WEBVTT - Tech News: I Never Metamate I Didn't Like

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio. And

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you Today? Is Thursday, February twenty two.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Let us get to the tech news. Should be a

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>nice quake episode today. And by now, I'm sure you've

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>all heard how Mark Zuckerberg has gifted his underlings I'm sorry, peons,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry employees with a new designation. Yes, they are

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>called meta mats. Now thanks, I hate it. He also

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>said that a new corporate value for the company goes

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>something like this meta meta mates me, which means that

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>employees should think about what's important in that order, namely,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>first comes the company, then come the co workers, then

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>comes yourself. And I just want to say, that's kind

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of messed up. All right, It's it's Jonathan soapbox time.

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You all get out the popcorn. We're gonna go early today.

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So you have likely heard the phrase the show must

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>go on, which is an old theater phrase and it's

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>toxic as all get out. So let me explain. The

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>phrase suggests that the most important element here is the

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>show that the show is more important than the people

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>who are involved in making the show happen. So if

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you are a performer and you're sick or you're hurt,

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you gotta suck it up because the show must go on.

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>The show is way more important than your personal health

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and well being. And if you happen to have the

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>temerity to think that your own welfare is at least

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>as important as the show, then you are an egomaniacal diva.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Well I've got news for you. All actors are egomaniacal divas.

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>We just are. It's just the ones who value their

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>own welfare can often be portrayed as being the real jerks. Now,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, some of them are real jerks. Some

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of them go beyond valuing their welfare and they think

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that the world revolves around them. But that's beside the

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>point anyway. I feel this show must go on. Mentality

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>has kind of benefited organizations at the cost of their

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>own employees health and wellness for like ever, and I

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's a good mindset. And that doesn't even

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>take into account the fact that meta mates is an

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>awful thing to call here employees that seems dehumanizing to me,

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe because I'm still reeling from Meta's commercial during the

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, and I guess I shouldn't be surprised. So

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we could say that the spirit of the

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>message is that an organization really only succeeds if the

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are working in that organization are working together

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>toward a common goal, and that if everyone had a

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>more kind of self centered approach, then nothing would get accomplished.

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And I can get behind that. I can understand that

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea that, hey, this enterprise only works if we

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>all work together. I get that. It's just that this

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>particular phrasing doesn't read that way to me. It almost

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>sounds more like this is what's important, and you are

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>like third on the list. Yuck. Earlier this week, I

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about how research shows a significant percentage of hacker

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>activity originates out of Russia. No big surprise there. Well, yesterday,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the US intelligence community published an alert saying that Russian

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>hackers have been compromising defense contractors and subcontractors in an

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>effort to steal information regarding US defenses. The alert said

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that a pattern of regular targeting of these companies dates

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>back to at least January twenty twenty, and according to

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the alert, the data in question relates to quote US

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>weapons platforms, development and deployment timelines, vehicle specifications, and plans

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>for communications, infrastructure, and information technology end quote. That is

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.679
<v Speaker 1>really bad news for the United States. And I'm definitely

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>not surprised at this thing, at the fact that Russia

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>has been targeting those systems. Cyber warfare is just a

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>fact of life right now. Also, I can guarantee you

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that the United States is trying and potentially succeeding at

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>doing the exact same thing to Russia. We just don't

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hear about that typically, But I I would be shocked

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 1>to learn that we don't have anything related to those

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of activities going on here in the States. The

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>upsetting thing is hearing how these attacks have actually been effective,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of them apparently are using bay sick

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>tactics that could easily be defeated with just the bare

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>minimum amount of attention and care. Stuff that folks should

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be aware of by now, Like spear phishing attempts. You

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>know what phishing attempts are. That's when someone's trying to

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>trick you into giving up information. Spear Fishing is a

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more targeted, right, You are using what you

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>know about your target to improve the chances of fooling

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>them into giving you information. And you would think that

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>defense contractors would have a pretty good process to identify

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>and prevent that kind of thing from happening. But I

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>guess it just proves that people continue to be the

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>weakest link in any security system. Uh So we won't

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have a perfect information security system until we get rid

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of people, I guess, is what I'm saying, Not that

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to get rid of people. That kind of

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>ends up making the whole thing moot. If you live

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in an apartment in the United States, well, the fc

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>CE just gave you more options when it comes to

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Internet service providers. And here's the sitch. Sometimes landlords someone

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>who owns a multi tenant building of some sort, they

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>will make a sweetheart deal with a specific Internet service

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>provider and that makes that I s P the only

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>provider for that building. So anyone living inside the building

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>has no choice when it comes to an I s P.

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>They either pay for service from that one provider that

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the landlord made an agreement with, or they have to

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>go without internet service. Now, technically this was already against

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the rules in the United States, but there were various

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>loopholes that landlords and I s p s could use

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to assentially ignore the rules. Now the f c C,

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the Federal Communications Commission, has passed a four

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to zero vote to close those loopholes. That is awesome,

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly since the CC currently has an equal split of

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Democrat and Republican reps sitting at it. So it's very

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>rare to find a topic where both of those parties

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>will actually align and support it in an a unanimous vote.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That like never happens, So that's nice. And uh, you know,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>there's still one empty seat on the f c C.

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>That's something that a lot of people are kind of

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>irritated about because they would love to see the FCC

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>at full operation, particularly because that would mean you would

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>have a tie breaking vote, a three to two vote,

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh, because we're talking about a democratic administration, it

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>would mean a Democrat sitting at that extra seat, but

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that has not been filled as of yet. Anyway, the

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>hope is that now these loopholes have been closed and

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>competing I s p s will be able to get

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>access to those buildings that previously had been off limits.

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>To them and tenants or choices when it comes to

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>choosing an internet service provider, and here in America, a

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of places have very limited options when it comes

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to internet service. For example, at my home in the

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>city of Atlanta, I essentially have two broadband options for

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>cable based internet, and then one other one if I

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted satellite and to have the slowest internet ever, Folks

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>who live in apartments typically don't even get that limited

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>amount of choice. So here's hoping this means we're going

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to see a big change for people who are living

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in apartment buildings and such, though there are several consumer

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>advocacy groups that are saying we're likely to see more

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>loopholes pop up, and what we really need is a

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>full FCC that is capable of taking larger steps towards

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>preventing that practice from continuing. Well, we all know that

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>meta slash Facebook has been hurt pretty badly by Apple's

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>changed to iOS. That is that Apple gave iOS users

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to opt out of app tracking or app

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>based tracking, and that meant that iPhone owners and alike

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>could decide to not feed into Facebook's tried and true

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>method of gobbling up user data to aid in its

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>business of targeted advertising. So the company reportedly lost out

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on like ten billion dollars of revenue last year because

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>of this change to iOS. Well, now Alphabet slash Google

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is following suit. The company announced yesterday that it is

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 1>updating its own policies that would restrict how apps can

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>share user data with third parties. But Alphabet's approach is

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be a little bit different. In fact, in

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the announcement, there is a passage that reads, quote, other

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>platforms have taken a different approach to ads privacy, bluntly

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>restricting existing technologies used by developers and advertisers. End quote.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I put the sas in that, But no, there's sass there.

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>It looks like it's targeting Apple, saying Apples using a

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>hammer instead of say, a scalpel. So Google's approach will

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>allow for some sort of wiggle room, it seems. And

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the company has also said it's not going to implement

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>these changes for another two years, and that will give

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>developers and advertisers time to prepare for that and to

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>create new plans and strategies. So it doesn't sound like

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be quite as severe a change as

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple's approach, but it can still pose a threat to

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>revenue for companies like Meta down the line. Okay, we've

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>got some more news stories to cover before we get

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to those, Let's take a quick break. Hi. Are you

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Canadian or do you use a Canadian bank? No, this

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't an ad this is this is a news story.

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>If you are a Canadian or use a Canadian bank,

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you might have been experiencing some pretty rough issues with

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>your bank recently. Uh So, yesterday on Wednesday, online services

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>went down for five major banks in Canada, including the

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Royal Bank of Canada. Customers found it impossible to perform

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>by sick tasks like e transfers and mobile banking, and

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>there were reports of people being unable to pay for

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 1>purchases at the point of sale due to this outage.

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It happened yesterday evening, and as of this recording, there

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>has not yet been an explanation as to what happened.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh and in some cases it sounds like services are

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>continuing to be disrupted. Uh. There is some speculation about

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>what happened, but since that speculation lacks any evidence as

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>of the time I'm recording this, I'm not going to

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about it until we learn more. We have seen

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>big outages and services father online stuff before, but it's

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 1>is unusual to see something that's specifically affecting a single

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>sector banking in this case, and stretching across multiple institutions,

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty freaky. I'll be sure to follow up

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>on this once we know more about what is going on.

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>In the state of California, lawmakers are working on legislation

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that would put tighter restrictions on how big tech companies

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in the state can collect and use children's personal information.

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh It's modeled after a similar code in the UK,

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and the California proposal would mean that big tech companies

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>like Meta and Alphabet would have to limit how much

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>data they collect from young users and restrict their use

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of targeted advertising to kids and prevent them from using

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>various tricks to tempt kids, to sidestep privacy protections, and

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>also to knockoff location tracking for children within the state.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen kind of a general move towards raining

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in big text influence over the last couple of years,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it comes to how tech can impact children.

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's the surface level reason the earn It

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Act is going through the U. S. Senate. I talked

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about earn it earlier this week and how that legislation,

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>if passed into law, could be a death sentence for

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>end to end encrypted communication here in the United States.

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say earn it is a bad approach to

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to protect kids. But these restrictions, you know, limiting

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>how companies can collect information and what they can do

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>with it, that seems like a pretty good step to me.

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>On a national In the United States, senators have introduced

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the Kids Online Safety Act. This legislation is meant to

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>counteract the harmful effects certain online platforms seem to have

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on children. You might remember the big story of the

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook leak last year, and that internal documents from Facebook

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>indicated that folks at Meta you know, the parent company,

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are aware of the harmful effects that platforms like Instagram

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>can have on some users, particularly young girls and young women.

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the sort of thing this Act is meant to

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>target the risk that platforms could contribute to serious mental

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>health issues like eating disorders, substance abuse, and even suicide.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The Act calls for platforms that could be quote reasonably

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to be used in quote by people under the

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>age of sixteen to institute more protections so that those

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>users aren't presented with images and posts that promote things

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>that can be harmful to mental health. The Act calls

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>for platforms to institute limits that would prevent people from

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>specifically seeking out younger users, and it would also restrict

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>how much data the platforms could collect from younger users,

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>similar to the California proposal we just talked about. Also,

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Act would require platforms to make restricted settings the default,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and that is a big deal. I think a lot

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of platforms try to skirt issues with having their data

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>tracking abilities restricted by making those opt out choices rather

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>than opt in choices, like you opt out of having

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>your data tracked, and some go a step further and

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they bury in the opt out settings deep in the menu,

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>so they make it really unlikely that the majority of

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>people are actually going to go hunting for the setting

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to turn off data tracking, so the access you can't

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>do that there. The opt out has to be the default.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You have to opt into having things tracked. And uh.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>The Act also doesn't have a size requirement as far

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as the companies go. That doesn't matter how big or

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>small the platform is. If it is reasonably likely to

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>be used by children, the law will apply to that platform.

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of other laws tend to have like

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a restriction that say you have to have a certain

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>number of users for you to be held accountable to

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that law. That's not the case here. And of course

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this is not a law yet. It will have to

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>pass a vote in both the Senate and the House

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and get approved by the President before that happens, and

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it is quite possible that it could be changed significantly

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>before it gets to that point, or it could just

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>die on the floor. A lot of legislation does. The

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>website Motherboard recently received a recording said to be from

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a mandatory anti union meeting held in Amazon's JFK eight

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>warehouse up in New York. That's the warehouse that initially

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>failed to get enough signatures to force a union vote

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>last year, but now is back on track and got

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the signatures and now it's going to hold a vote.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>So at this mandatory meeting, a representative laid out the

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>supposed risks involved if workers were to sign to join

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a union. You might remember that Amazon employees at a

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>warehouse in Alabama held a union vote that failed, but

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>then the National Labor Relations Board or in l r B,

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>gave them a do over after the n l RB

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>concluded that Amazon the company had interfered with the union

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>election process in an effort to prevent a union from forming,

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>well actively discouraging employees by threatening them, in this case,

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>by suggesting that they could see a reduction in wages

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>if they joined a union and implying that there could

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>be no limit to how high union dues would be.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>That kind of falls into that category too. And if

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>this recording is in fact legitimate, and I have no

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>reason to believe otherwise, it could really be a massive

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>blow against Amazon. The vote on whether or not to

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>unionize should happen late next month, so we'll keep an

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>eye on this story to see where it goes. And finally,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a really cool article and Wired titled deep mind

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>has trained an AI to control nuclear your fusion that

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I recommend you check out if you're interested in stuff

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>like fusion, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. I'll give the highlights,

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but seriously, you should read the article if you can. So. First,

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>nuclear fusion is the process by which you release energy

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>by fusing two atoms together to make a heavier atom.

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>This is the nuclear process that takes place in stars

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>like the Sun. If we could create a nuclear reactor

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>capable of holding sustained fusion reactions, we could revolutionize how

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>we generate an access energy. Uh, build a few of

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>those working fusion reactors, and you would solve energy crises

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Plus you wouldn't have to worry about

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>dangerous radioactive waste the way you have to do with

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>nuclear fission reactors. Fission is the type of nuclear power

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>we rely on now. That's when you take a heavy

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>atom and you split it up and you release energy

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the process. But I don't know if you've noticed,

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>things are a little different here on Earth than they

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are on the Sun. We don't have the intense heat

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have the incredible gravitational forces that you

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>would find on the Sun. So it is very challenging

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to push tiny atoms together with enough energy to get

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>them to fuse. So a lot of our fusion work

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.720
<v Speaker 1>has been a net loss, where we're pouring more energy

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>into making the reaction happen, then we're getting out of

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the reaction itself. So the way we push atoms together,

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>since we don't have that incredible gravitational force of the

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sun is we use powerful magnetic fields, and if we

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>could control these magnetic fields more precisely and efficiently, we

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>could potentially make massive improvements towards sustained fusion reactions. This

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is where deep mind is coming in. Deep Mind emerged

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>from Google's secret R and D division years ago, and

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it focuses primarily on machine learning. So the task at

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hand was teaching an AI computer system how to control

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a complicated series of magnets to manipulate a magnetic field

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>in such a way to get the optimal result in

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a plasma that contains fusing atoms. Like I said, this

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>is just a highlight of what is covered in the article.

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>It is fascinating stuff and it could end up being

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a significant step toward making fusion go from science fiction

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to reality eventually. So check out that article. And that's

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>it for the news for Thursday, February two. If you

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have any suggestions for topics I should cover in future

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, reach out to me on Twitter.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Handle is text stuff hs W I'll talk to you again,

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>really sick. Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the i

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 1>heart radio, app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.