WEBVTT - Episode Four: A Weight-Loss Mecca’s Secrets

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the first things I noticed when I walk

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>into Pennington Biomedical Research Center is a giant stained glass window.

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>It's filled with images of healthy living cast in rainbow colors.

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>You see there are two wheels here, and there is

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a cyclist on on the top, and then there is

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of fruits and vegetable. I mean, it's it's

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>quite a nice piece of art. The stained glass window

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>towers above a Pennington entryway. Brightly colored shards of glass

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>depict asparagus, bananas, peace, and a pineapple. The outline of

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a runner cuts through the background, painted in shades of

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>orange and purple. And then there's a DNA DNA on

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the right. There are blue and pink fish at the bottom,

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>canteloupe on the side. The longer I stare, the more

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.119
<v Speaker 1>bowls of healthy living reveal themselves. But it's all about

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>what we do. I mean, you know health, genetics and biology,

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and you have you have all the elements of nutrition,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you have the exercise, you have the d n A.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing makes the place feel like a temple

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to nutrition, because it kind of is. Pennington is a

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>sprawling research center working to study obesity. Our tour guide

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>today is Eric Ravasan, a prominent scientist in the space

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>who is Associate executive director for Clinical Science at Pennington.

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>He's the one talking me through all of the stuff

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in this very large stained glass window. Stained glass is

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously more a feature of churches, but the religious symbolism

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is sort of fitting. Really, this is a place that

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>treats weight loss as a sort of gospel. Pennington has

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>two acres of campus, including labs and research facilities, around

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>two hundred scientists and state of the art equipment, much

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of it dedicated to unlocking the secrets to shedding pounds.

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It's in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, and it feels like a

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>college campus minus the students. I've been on a journey

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>to get to the bottom of the science of weight loss,

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and as our stained glass windows shows, weight loss is

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>something we all have lots of ideas about. Some of

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>those ideas are actually true, but they're all too often

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>not the whole truth. If anyone could help us sort

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>one from the other, I figured it would be the

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>people here. First, though, We're going to take a look around.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the way you test. Participants are like,

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>we're walking up to the fourth floor. Yeah, we got.

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Our first stop is to check out some fairly innoxious

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>looking medical machinery. It's big and gray and looks almost

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like a bed. And is this the machine beginning now?

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It started already. Radiation is on right now because you

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>can see the lagser on saying in a radiation is

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that this equipment can actually tell you how much of

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>your body is fat, and how much of it is muscle,

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and how much is bone. I want to call it

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a nightmare machine. It's the scan no one wants to

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>see of themselves. But what this equipment really measures is

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>body composition. And the total of this person here is

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty points six of the body is fat. We often

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about the number on the scale like it's the

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>only thing that matters, but this is a good reminder

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:03.119
<v Speaker 1>that wheat isn't every thing. That's why weight loss researchers

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>use tools like these body composition machines. And a big

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>finding they've had is that people vary a lot. People's

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>bodies are different, really really different, and that's actually at

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the root of a lot of the findings they've made

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>here at Pennington. But first, back to the tour, We

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>check out a big area known as a metabolic kitchen,

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>where calorically precise foods are prepared for studies, and we

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>walk by spaces that look like hospital rooms. They're also

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>used for research. Eventually we get to the craziest stop

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>on the tour. We step into a hall that looks

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>into small furnished rooms to seek a curtain and the

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.239
<v Speaker 1>bed and you have everything could be happy, and there's Stevie.

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>They look like really sad studio apartments. Even though there's furniture,

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the rooms are sterile looking. There aren't exactly many homey touches.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>That's because they're actually rooms where scientific research happens. They're

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>called metabolic chambers, and they measure metabolism. Like the name suggests,

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>these sad little rooms are designed to measure how many

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>calories the person inside is burning. People stay in them

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>for a good chunk of time, thus all the furniture.

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Eric also points out that they have windows. We fast

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>the food and uh and you know through here outside

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 1>of the metabolic chambers, in the hallway where we're standing,

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of pipes and scientific instruments line the walls.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It kind of looks like a boiler room or something.

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>This equipment track everything going on in the little rooms.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Cool right, Maybe a little creepy too. Eric tells me

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that there are only about thirty metabolic chambers in the

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>world thirty, and Pennington is home to four of them.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>When we arrive, there's actually a woman in one of

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the rooms already. She's sitting on the bed. It looks

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:29.119
<v Speaker 1>like she's scrolling on her phone. Maybe in a little

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 1>while she'll go use the adjoining toilet. Watching the stranger

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>live her life in a little box while equipment measures

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going on inside her body is pretty weird, Even

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>if it is for science. The whole thing feels a

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>bit dystopian. It makes me think of like a lab

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.559
<v Speaker 1>rate in a maze or something. Now she probably can't

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>see this, but a computer screen right behind Eric and

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I actually shows how many calories she's burning on a

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>minute by minute basis. A chart shows us how that

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>rate is changing over time. Eric tells me that while

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the woman slept, she burned just under a calorie a minute.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Then I would say she got up here. He's saying

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that because we can see on the screen that at

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>this point her metabolism jumps. People tend to burn more

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>calories as they become more active. She went to brush

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>your teeth, you know, metabolious me here goes to three

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>calories a minute. Then you can see and at the

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>end of the day we summarize how many calories she

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>has doing. The real work of the metabolic chamber is

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>happening silently in the air, because the chamber is actually

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>tracking how much oxygen the woman in the room is

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>taking in and how much carbon dioxide she's breathing out.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I Well, both oxygen and carbon dioxide are involved in

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the process of converting food into usable energy. A little

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>math and toda, you have calories burned. This is all

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>part of metabolism, something we usually think about only in

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of how fast we gain or lose weight, and

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely part of it, but metabolism is also what

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>keeps us alive and kicking, something that we should celebrate

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>not blame. You know how people are always talking about

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>calories in calories out. A metabolic chamber is a very

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>precise way of calculating the calories out. Part. Technology like

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this is really important at places like Pennington where researchers

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>are digging into the secrets of weight loss. And by

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the way, some of what they've learned, is that calories in,

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>calories out is not the whole story, not by a

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>long shot. I asked Eric what to make of the

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>numbers the metabolic chamber is spitting out? Would another person

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>burn three calories a minute doing the same things as

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the woman in the room just now? Like? Did I

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>burn that much getting ready this morning? That seems like

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>really interesting and even important data to have about yourself.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>If any given way, sex page, and body composition, you

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>have large variability in between people. Metabolism differs a lot

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>by person. In other words, Eric couldn't really say if

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I or another person would burn as many calories a

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>minute as the woman in the room. But he tells

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>me about some research he did way back in the eighties.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>We measured people like in the chambers, re measured them

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>five years later and looked at the relationship between the

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>metabolism and the weight gain. They gain a lot of weight,

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>and we found that a low metabolity create is a

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>risk factor for weight game, otherwise known as I have

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a slow metabolism. People love to say I'm gaining weight

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>just because I have a slow metabolism. But when we

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>say that, do we really know it for sure. No, no,

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that you have to measure it. You have to get

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>into one of the sad little rooms. Metabolism isn't a

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>straight line. It can change over your lifetime, including as

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you age and when you lose weight. Researchers have learned

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>more about that in recent years, and it may help

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>explain why dieters overwhelmingly regain weight over time. We'll get

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>more into this later. We walk by another suite of

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>rooms with a tread mill and stationary bike. Researchers use

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>these to push people to their exercise limits. It's kind

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of like a stress test done by a cardiologist, except

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>even more intense. Nearby, a person is actually getting biopsies

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>taken of her fat and muscle. I watched the lab

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:26.719
<v Speaker 1>tech sitting at her microscope work on a sample. There

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>are actual fat and muscle cells in front of her.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything you can't measure here? When it comes

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to UM two, obesti, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. I think

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>we have it all. One of my co league used

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to say, it's like toys are us for a kid? Uh,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's toys are us for a scientist? So yeah,

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you're probably realizing by now that this is a place

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>with incredible resources fort etting weight loss. And the thing

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 1>about weight loss is that we all kind of think

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we know the basics. Losing weight is about eating fewer

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>calories than you burn calories in calories out right. In

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this episode, I'm going to get to the bottom of

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>what we actually know the science of weight loss. How

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:26.479
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a lot more complicated than that simple formula.

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to try to figure out why, why

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it's so complicated, and why despite that the simple formula

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of calories in calories out keeps getting repeated anyway, not

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>just by your neighbor or uncle, but by doctors and scientists.

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>To do that, we'll start this mecca of weight loss,

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:57.959
<v Speaker 1>but we'll go beyond its walls too. I'm Bloomberg News

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>health reporter Emma Court and from the Prognosis podcast. This

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is Losing It. Imagine that you're at the doctor's office

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and they tell you to step onto the scale, which

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they invariably do visit after visit. That number is measuring

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>not just your bone, muscle, and fat, but also possibly

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>your lunch from earlier, your shirt and pants, maybe some

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>p You can't talk about weight loss without first, making

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>sense of weight itself. And what doctors and scientists are

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>concerned about is not your clothing or undigested chopped salad,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>or even your bone and muscle. They're worried about fat,

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and specifically a person having too much. So how does

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a person get more body fat? That comes back to calories,

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>which we went deep on in our first episode. Remember,

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>calories aren't just align on a nutrition label. They are

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>source of energy for your body. Calories are the gas

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in your cars fuel tank. Every day we're taking from

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that tank because we gotta um, we gotta move. This

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is Leanne Redman. She's an expert in physiology or how

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>human bodies function, and she works for Pennington. We've got

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a digest food we think we just function to every day,

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we've got energy going out of the tank. So every

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>day we have to replenish the energy going into the

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>tank to keep your weight the same. Ideally, you'd be

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>eating around the same number of calories that you burn.

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Lean says, there's a little wiggle room here of about

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred calories a day. But eat too many

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>calories for too long and that energy has to go somewhere.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It gets stored in the adipose tissue in the body fat,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and then we gain weight gain atiposity of a time,

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and that eventually leads to obesity. In other words, fat

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is another store of energy. We've demonized it the same

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>way we've demonized metabolism, but it actually serves this and

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>other really important functions. Still, extra fat can put a

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of stress on your body. That's why doctors and

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>scientists worry about people having too much fat. A quick

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>note about language here. We will be talking a lot

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>about weight in this episode, in particular because of the

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>stigma and bias about this subject. There are different schools

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of thought about how to talk about it. The fat

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Acceptance movement embraces the term fat. Some doctors and scientists

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>favor saying person with obesity. I will talk about it

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>as much as possible the way people do themselves. I

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have tried to avoid the terms overweight and obese, though

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I have had to use them at times for clarity's sake,

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>times like now. Obesity is usually defined as when a

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>person's body mass index is over thirty. As a refresher

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>b M I equals weight divided by height squared. The

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>number is supposed to be a proxy for body fat.

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>But as the formula I just rattled off makes clear,

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>b M I doesn't actually rely on your body's measured

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>fat composition, just weight and height, and b M I

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is what's overwhelmingly used to talk about weight, like when

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>rates of obesity in the US began increasing in the eighties.

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Around this time, government stats show that nearly six of

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>American adults were considered too heavy increase from an earlier period.

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That judgment was made using b M I, and it

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>keeps being made using b M I, and it tells

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>us that Americans keep getting heavier. Today, nearly three quarters

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>of adults are considered by the government to have higher

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>than normal weights. So again, calories matter because extra calories

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>can turn into fat. It's that saying that you've heard

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>so many times before, calories in calories out. This is

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>also something we've known for a long time. When you

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>eat just enough food to supply the energy you need,

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>your white stays the same. But when you eat more

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>than you burn up an energy, the rest is starred

0:17:55.400 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>as fact. So is it really just that simple calories

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>in calories out. The answer is yes, sort of ish,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>not exactly. Calories in calories out is true, but it's

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>also not true. If you're lost right now, that's okay.

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I promise it will all make sense by the end

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of the episode. Remember, we came here to Pennington for

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a reason. We wanted to sort out when it comes

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to wait, what's fact, what's fiction, and what's still a mystery?

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So how do we know that calories in calories out works?

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>When you walked through this thing that looked like a

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 1>medical ward to get to the metabolic chambers. This is

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Owen Carmichael. He runs the Biomedical Imaging Center at Pennington.

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So basically some of the fancy machines we've been looking at,

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we've actually had studies where people live there and they

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>sleep in the hospital like beds. They're living in a

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 1>what looks like a hospital where they're interacting with a

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of nurses and um that they do not have

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a refrigerator that they have free access to. They cannot

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>order up snacks. They're in a controlled environment. They're being

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>given calorically precise meals. The sprawling Pennington Gym is nearby.

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>For some people, this might sound like the ideal conditions

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to diet, the v I P diet life, and that's

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly what the scientists intended for other people. Of course,

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this might sound more like torture, but anyway, Pennington researchers

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>have found that they really, honest to goodness, lose weight,

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and they lose fat, not muscle, So it's good weight loss.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>People lose weight, at least they do when they spend

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that whole time at Pennington. But you can't do that

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time. Study participants have lives to

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>get back to, and it's exactly when they do that

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>step outside the boundaries of Pennington out into the real world,

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that the trouble begins. I think it's very difficult to

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>really wrap your head around how seven this thing we

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>call the obesogenic environment is that scientists speak for the

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>kinds of unhealthy environments that surround us every day. The

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Danish cart on the corner by your office, not having

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a grocery store in your neighborhood, living somewhere with lots

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of cars but no sidewalks. If you're lucky enough to

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>have enough to eat, the world can sometimes seem like

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's shoving a plate of fries down your throat. Seven.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>And while you have some limited ability to decline, that

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>metaphorical plate of fries. Not everything is under your control.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>We've all experienced this. I even saw it when I

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>was visiting Pennington for this episode. Here I was speaking

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>with scientists all day long, talking about the importance of

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>healthy eating and portion control and cooking food at home.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 1>And meanwhile, I'm staying in a hotel and eating literally

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>all of my meals out. And did I mention that

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Pennington is based in Louisiana A fantastic lace into like

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a little peopood. This is a place essentially a full boy.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I like my overflowing with brad shrimp. That thing is

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>as big as you. Everywhere I went, I kept ordering

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>food without realizing that it was all deep fried. I

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.719
<v Speaker 1>was at lunch one day with a bariatric surgeon who

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>works at Pennington, and the waiter rattled off a long

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>list of very fried recommendations. Again, my dining companion here

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>does weight loss surgery for a living. It was kind

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of surreal. When we finished up, they actually brought us

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a plate of cotton candy, which we had not ordered

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for free. And it's not just the environment around us

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that's making things difficult. It can be us too. Here's

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>leanne again, So it is definitely ultimately about this imbalancing calories.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's very, very complicated, right because there are so

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>many factors that determine what we eat when we you know,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.479
<v Speaker 1>where we're craving something, whether we're full, whether we're hungry

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>or not. And then on the other side, when you

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>reduce people's calories, they're like, oh, I'm eating less, so

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna like, I can, you know, move less? Right,

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>So they start conserving calories and maybe not as physically active.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>The same is true when people are exercising more, they

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>need more calories, and when people start eating less, our

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bodies respond to that. Remember that calories aren't some inconvenient

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>aspect of oreos their energy. When you have less energy

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:25.719
<v Speaker 1>coming in, your metabolism slows down. That actually makes sense

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it. Your body is now smaller,

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 1>so running it moving it around that takes less energy,

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how smaller cars can be more fuel efficient.

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But studies of contestants on the TV show The Biggest

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Loser have found that metabolism can drop even more than

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you would expect. Pennington researchers were actually involved in those studies,

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>including Eric Ravesson, who took us on the tour earlier,

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but we we measured all the people from this season eleven.

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>He was quite a riot to go to the ranch

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>outside in California. There's a name for this phenomenon of

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>metabolism slowing more than expected after weight loss. It's called

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>metabolic adaptation. Scientists have also found that after weight loss,

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:24.719
<v Speaker 1>hormones that regulate hunger and weight can get disrupted for

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>long periods of time. These hormonal disruptions and metabolic adaptation

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>could help explain why so many people regain weight after dieting.

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>In other words, a person goes on a diet, they

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>regain the weight later, and people assume it's the dieter's fault. Right,

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>It seems pretty logical. After all, they say, oh, she

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>stopped eating as many salads, or that he stopped going

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to the gym as much, and maybe they say even

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>more unkind things than that. But here's the thing. Scientific

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>research tells us that there may actually be a biological

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>reason for those things happening. That a dieter could be

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>getting really hungry because of hormonal disruptions, that their body

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>might actually be burning way fewer calories after weight loss.

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>When I first learned about this, It kind of blew

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>my mind because there seems to be a scientific explanation

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>for why so many dieters regain weight over time. Your

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>body is actively fighting back, and that actually makes sense

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 1>if you think about evolution, because bodies need energy to live.

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>An energy used to be a lot harder to come by,

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>so at the end of the day, it does come

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>down to the energy imbalance, the intake, and the expenditure.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>You have to be out of balance in order to

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>change weight. But it's all of these other physiological signals

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that are driving the intake and the expenditure that we

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>need to understand better in order to be able to

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>achieve weight loss for everyone. We're simplifying the science here,

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>but needless to say, these are complicated things to study,

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and it helps to have a dedicated research facility like

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Pennington with all its bells and whistles focused on it.

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Remember how earlier I said that Pennington feels like a

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>college campus. It's actually officially part of Louisiana State University,

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>which is also in Baton Rouge a few miles away.

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Back in the nineteen eighties, the head of l s

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>U got the billionaire oilman Claude Bernard Pennington to commit

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five million dollars to start a nutrition

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>research center. Over the decades since, the center has been

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 1>involved in some of the most cordant research done about

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>weight and weight related conditions at the Pennington Biomedical Research

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 1>Center Biomedical Research Center. Researchers from the Pennington Biomedical Research

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Center in Louisiana found Pennington Biomedical Pennington Biomedical Research Center

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, So to summarize, studies,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>including ones done at Pennington, have shown that when people

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>eat less, they lose weight. Calories matter pretty self explanatory,

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>but as we just talked about, calories also aren't the

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>full story. There's this big gulf between what happens in

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>research studies at places like Pennington with its gadgets and gizmos,

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and the real world. And scientists are also still learning

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>more about how your body seems to fend off long

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>term weight loss. So what is all this add up to.

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>It means that weight loss is more complicated than advertised,

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot more complicated. It also means that losing weight

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't fully in a person's control, even though that's how

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we tend to talk about it. Reasons like this are

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>why scientists and doctors have started to call obesity a

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>disease the same way that diabetes and cancer are diseases.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And if obesity is a disease, dieting takes on even

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.080
<v Speaker 1>more importance. It's not just a way to lose weight,

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but also a form of medical treatment. And if diets

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are medicine, surely we know what the best diet is

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for a person. Right the Great diet debate, low carb

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or low fat, high fat diets actually may be superior

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to low fat diet. In the low carbohydrate groups, they

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>lost about two and a half to five pounds more

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>than those in the low fat diet crew. Carbohydrates are

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the single most important thing you can eat for health

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and weight loss. And you're thinking, right now, Dr Hyman,

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>have you gotten nuts? Practically each decade has had a

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>new dietary villain. First fat was bad, and then carbs

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>were bad. Now I think maybe they're both still bad,

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>but so is sugar too. Right where did we land

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on all that? I'll answer that in a minute. First though,

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>back to Pennington. As I spoke with scientists at the Center,

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I kept feeling like I was going in circles. They

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 1>would tell me how complicated weight loss turns out to be.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Now there's so much variability between people, and not just

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>with burning calories, but in terms of how easily people

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>lose or gain weight. Now there's still so much scientists

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are learning. And then I would ask them, well, what

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>should people do if they want lose weight? And they

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>would say, diet, eat fewer calories. And so I'm going

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to get the person to write down everything that they

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>eat and drink for the next five days, and we're

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>going to look at where the excess calories are coming from,

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to start there. I told Leanne how

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>confused I was by this. How can it be more

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>complicated than calories in calories out? But also that calories

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in calories out is the answer. And then leon tells

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>me something that just might haunt me forever. Remember our

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>metabolic chamber from earlier, the sad little rooms. She and

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>her colleagues at Pennington did a study where they put

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>people in there, and the scientists actually over fed these

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>people on purpose. They gave them more calories than needed.

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>They were trying to make them gain weight, and this

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is what they learned. Some people will burn majority of

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the excess calories that they've eaten, and they're the people

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that will retaine their weight. Some people will burn, will

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>burn those extras, some people will burn none. And Leanne

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>says they've also found that the opposite is true. When

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you give people less to eat, some people lose weight

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>immediately and others just don't. In other words, it's calories in,

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>calories out, but only for some people. So what I'm

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>taking away from all this is, if you are a

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>person who wants to lose weight, we don't have great

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>information for you dieting calories in, calories out best. We

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>have another way of putting all this is other people

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>get to eat as many honey buns from the vending

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>machine as they want and just burn it all off.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>But you don't. By the way, there are other options

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for weight loss besides diet, like medication and surgery, but

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>they're used a lot less. I was struck by what

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Leanne said. Though, for all the new fingled machinery and

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fancy gadgets we toured earlier, the answer is that we

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>still don't have an answer. Even though dieting doesn't work

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.959
<v Speaker 1>in a long term way for many people, dieting is

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>still the best we've got, and yet the dogma is

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>still why don't you just diet? No uncertainty, no caveats,

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>none of the nuance we uncovered here at Pennington. I

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>asked Leanne about the uncertainty about the lack of sufficient

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>answers a couple of times, until finally she said this.

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've spent billions of dollars trying to understand

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>obesity and white management and how it a fixed people

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and how we can help people, and it just seems

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like it's all going to a black hole because you know,

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>even with that huge investment, we have no answers. You

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just heard Leanne Redman, an expert in physiology at Pennington,

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that despite all the money that's been invested in

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>weight loss, not to mention all the fancy equipment and

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>scientists who have spent their careers working on the subject,

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we have no answers. We have no answers. In fact,

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly why we keep coming back to diets. They're

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 1>not the answer, but they are the closest we've gotten

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to an answer. Then again, there are a lot of

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>diets out there. The South Beach diet low fat whole thirty,

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So so many diets, which ones actually work the best?

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I put the question to Christopher Gardner, a nutrition scientist

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at Stanford. This is a super depressing answer that nothing

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>works because we haven't resolved the obesity epidemic. I know,

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this is getting really frustrating, right. One of the things

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that we do know is that there isn't one diet

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. So people who claim that it's my diet

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>or it's the Paleo or the Kido or the something else,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I just it's not true. Let's say I invented a diet,

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it's named after me, obviously, and I go around telling everyone, look,

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 1>this is the diet that's going to finally make you

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lose weight. Basically, what I'm saying is I tried Emma's

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>diet and it was awesome, and everybody should try Emma's diet.

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>And what I do as a scientist is I get

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.959
<v Speaker 1>a hundred people and I signed fifty two Emma's diet

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifty to the other diet. And I have to

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>see that, yeah, way more people on diet A work

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>than DIETETE and you really doesn't happen. And so what

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we found is that there isn't one diet for everyone.

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>The big problem is keeping it up. I don't eat

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>carbs until I'm craving them so much that I give in.

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't eat out until it starts crushing my social life.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>All diets have at least this in common. What's the

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 1>best diet to be on? It's the one you can maintain.

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if you can keep up a low

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>carb diet, power to you, same for a low fat diet.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>But how do you know at the outset which one

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to work for you. That's where lots of

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>scientists across this field are now channeling their efforts. The

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>consensus now is that diets should be individually matched a

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>person based on different factors about them, kind of like dating.

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>My diet biography might say I'm a court journalist, sits

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>at a desk all day, works out a few days

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a week, loves her kale salads, sweet tooth. But there's

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>still a lot missing from that description, things that I

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 1>couldn't tell you, and even Pennington scientists can't use right

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>now to match me to a diet, Like what's going

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 1>on in my gut microbiome that's the collection of bacteria

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>involved in digestion and metabolism. What about my genetics? Those

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>are factors that could help you match a person better

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to specific diet or what's known as precision health. But

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to find the genetics or the metabolism

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so far that would point you to one diet or another.

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>We're not there yet, not by a long shot. Scientists

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>are trying to figure it out though. In fact, the

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>National Institutes of Health is just starting to fund a

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>study about this. So again, low fat diets aren't the

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>best diet it for everyone. Neither is low carb diets

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>may have to be tailored to the individual. All the

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>research on dieting and weight loss over the years has

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>brought scientists to this conclusion. I know, I know. But

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, for all we don't know about weight loss,

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>there are some things we do know. We actually know

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount about the people who lose weight and

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>keep it off, what they do, and what it takes.

0:37:33.080 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>There was a sense of it's pretty hopeless, uh and nobody,

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody really succeeds in weight management. If you're a based

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just out of luck because you know there's not

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>much you can do about it. People try to diet

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't work. That was James Hill, who is

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Chair of Nutrition Sciences at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.399
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about how in the late nineteen eighties rates

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of obesity began rising very suddenly. Remember we talked about

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this earlier, how those rates had been stable beforehand, but

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:13.759
<v Speaker 1>they've risen and risen until today. And again, as all

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>this is happening, people are feeling pretty hopeless about losing weight.

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So James and his colleague Rena Wayne, who is a

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>professor at Brown University's Medical School, decided to start tracking

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>successful dieters. They created the National Weight Control Registry, which

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>people can join if they have lost at least thirty

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>pounds and kept it off for at least a year.

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>There are more than ten thousand members today. James says

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Registry was supposed to answer a key question,

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what does it take to lose weight long term? And

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the Registry has actually provided some answers, as evidenced by

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty scientific papers James and his colleague have written about it.

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:06.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we know what it takes to lose weight

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 1>long term. You just have to diet and exercise and

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>prioritize it every single day and worked really hard forever.

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.879
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things I always tell people that

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:28.720
<v Speaker 1>we've learned from the National Wake Control registreet it takes

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conscious effort for these people to stay successful.

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's not the case that they lost weight and

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>then they went back to living your lives and didn't

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think about it. You might remember from our last episode

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is a diet myth the South Beach Diet

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>helped spread in the two thousands. They prioritize their weight

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>very very highly. Of all the people who diet, and

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>there are many, very few of them actually end up

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>joining the Red Distry. We'll talk about that more in

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit. First, though, here's what we know about people

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in the National Weight Control Registry. Most of them eat

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a relatively low fat diet, but some people do the

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>low carb thing too. Again, the specific diet doesn't seem

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to matter that these folks. Diet seems to matter more

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>than what kind of diet. Most of them spend probably

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>more time than the average person thinking about their diet

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>during the dash, thinking about what they eat, keeping track.

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them keep diet diaries, so they pay

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>attention to the food they eat. National Weight Control Registry

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 1>members weigh themselves every day. They track what they eat

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and how much physical activity they get. They're also all

0:40:53.640 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>exercising about an hour a day. Jane Fonda and eighties

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>exercise icon wanted everyone to feel the burdens, not just

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>National Weight Control Registry participants. If you're thinking that an

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:16.319
<v Speaker 1>hour a day is a lot of exercise, you're right.

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>The US government recommends a few hours of exercise a week,

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and most adults aren't even doing that. I spoke with

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.879
<v Speaker 1>five members of the National Weight Control Registry for this

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 1>episode and heard similar things for starters. Nearly all of

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>them exercise intensely most days, and a lot have adopted

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 1>some pretty extreme habits to keep their weight off over time.

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>One guy I spoke with, his name is Marcos Goodman,

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>told me that he had lost sixty five pounds eight

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago. To keep it off, he eats the same

0:41:56.520 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>five or six meals every day so he doesn't have

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:05.440
<v Speaker 1>attract different foods, like for breakfast, oatmeal with flax seed

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and sesame seeds, a banana and some non fat milk,

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a stew for lunch made of either sardines or chicken,

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>and then an evening meal of soybeans. Another woman I

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>spoke to, Susan Pierced Thompson, lost sixty pounds eighteen years

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>ago and then since then maintained her weight by cutting

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>out flour and sugar completely. Susan ended up starting her

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:36.880
<v Speaker 1>own weight loss program based on those ideas. But the

0:42:36.920 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 1>thing that struck me the most was the mental and

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>emotional energy all these people spent on simply maintaining the

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:48.240
<v Speaker 1>weight that they had lost. It just became this big

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:52.040
<v Speaker 1>part of their lives. For some of them, their lives

0:42:52.080 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>even sort of seemed to revolve around this one thing.

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>No one ever says, this is going to be really painful.

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>You better get ready because you are going to suffer.

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>No one ever says that, and I did suffer tremendously.

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>This is Desha Gill, a fifty six year old stay

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>at home mom who lives in Dallas, Texas. She's talking

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>about the process of losing weight what it was like

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 1>for her. I don't know if you've ever tried to

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:27.279
<v Speaker 1>sleep when you're really really hungry, not just wanting to eat,

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but truly feeling like you're starved. That's how I had

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to feel every night. Disia says she has struggled her

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 1>weight since she was eleven years old. She told me

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>that she started off binging on candy bars at summer camp.

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I was always very interested in health and longevity, and

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to be active and athletic, and but who

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I felt like and what I looked like could not

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have been anymore opposite. And I found it humiliating and

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing to look at myself and for people to see

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>how I would. I was repulsed and so ashamed all

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the time, all the time. Desha says she has probably

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>read hundreds of weight lost books. She has tried weight watchers,

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Jenny Craig over eaters anonymous, she got a lap band,

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a surgical procedure that constricts the stomach. She even tried hypnosis,

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>none of it worked. She also says she experienced health

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>issues that seemed related to her weight, like fatty liver disease,

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and asthma. Desha knew she needed to make a major change.

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 1>She begins shifting how she eats and ends up losing

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and ten pounds, But she's also raising suns,

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>which means lots of tempting foods in the house. I

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>did research and found these food safe that have timers

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>on them, and so I bought some food safe so

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that I could put the food that I had trouble

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>controlling myself with those food staves, so that my son

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and this could get them, or if I wanted to

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 1>treat at some point, I could time it so that

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't get into the food safe until I said

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:32.959
<v Speaker 1>that I could. Disha still uses those food saves. They're

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>made of plastic and have a dial at the top.

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>She sets them to unlock over periods of hours or days,

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 1>so she can't eat, say, candy or chocolate whenever she wants.

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>She also keeps a fridge near her bedroom in case

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>she gets the urge to eat late at night. There

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are protein bars in there, as well as apples and

0:45:56.280 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 1>bottles of water. It keeps me from going downstairs and

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>eating four thousand calories because I can't sleep and I'm

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:10.360
<v Speaker 1>upset about something that happened that day. Disha also spends

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.960
<v Speaker 1>about five days a week exercising for ninety minutes. She

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>has a special playlist of upbeat music that she listens

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to when she exercises, and only when she exercises, like

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's say she gets a craving to listen to those

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 1>songs at another time. It happens a lot, in fact,

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 1>but Disha doesn't do it. She won't let herself. So

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.319
<v Speaker 1>anything I can do to spice it up and make

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:43.879
<v Speaker 1>it different. And because it is easy to stop feeling motivated,

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>especially when you're basically at your goal, but I do

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>find new ways to constantly motivate myself and make it fun.

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>It has to be fun. The measures that successful dieters take,

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>other words, can take over their lives. This is the

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:09.280
<v Speaker 1>part that's usually missed about the National Weight Control Registry. Sure,

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.920
<v Speaker 1>these people have all lost large amounts of weight and

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:16.400
<v Speaker 1>kept it off for many years, but what it has

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:21.200
<v Speaker 1>taken to get them there is totally unreasonable. It just

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem possible for most people or even worth it.

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And you always find a few people who are able

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to lose a lot of weight. This is Glenn Geeser,

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a professor at Arizona State University who's criticized the National

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Weight Control Registry. Most people are unwilling to do what

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>it takes to get the weight loss that they would like,

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:47.680
<v Speaker 1>things like lock your favorite snacks in a safe so

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a huge gap between what people would like to

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>weigh and what is feasible. Glenn has actually done some

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 1>math to figure out how many dieters make it to

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the National Weight Control Registry. In other words, lots of

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>people diet, how many lose at least thirty pounds and

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>keep it off for a year or more. About a

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five million Americans try to lose weight

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 1>each year, So the ten thousand people that are in

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the National Weight Control Registry represent about one out of

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:31.439
<v Speaker 1>every twelve thousand five US adults trying to lose weight.

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>As in, for every person in it, there are probably

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>twelve thousand, four hundred and people who didn't lose that

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of weight or didn't keep the weight loss off.

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:49.279
<v Speaker 1>That means registry participants aren't even the one percent, they

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 1>are the point zero zero eight. But the point is

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is that the people who are in the National Weight

0:48:55.960 --> 0:49:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Control Registry are just a very very small drop in

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in a big, big bucket of people. James Hill, the

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>registry is co founder who we talked to earlier, actually

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of agrees with some of the criticism. This is

0:49:11.239 --> 0:49:14.080
<v Speaker 1>not for the faint of heart. If you're going to succeed,

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>You're going to have to put time and effort into

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>it for the foreseeable future. This idea, you know, it's

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>short of the American ideas go out and go on

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a diet and then everything will be fine. Right, It

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:30.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen. Most people who lose weight regain it. The

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:34.960
<v Speaker 1>hardest part, James says, is keeping it off. He has

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>responded to some of these critiques by starting a whole

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 1>new project. It's called the International Weight Control Registry, and

0:49:42.040 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it launched last year. This new registry is tracking a

0:49:45.960 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>much wider group of people, including those who have not

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>been able to lose weight. The team is also trying

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to reach a more diverse group of members. The National

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Week Control Registry's typical member is four. You're fifty years

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 1>old and generally a white woman. I kept thinking about

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>how much people in the registry who have kept weight

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:16.360
<v Speaker 1>loss off have had to diet and exercise. For some

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of them, it became so all encompassing that they turned

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it into a profession. They became dietitians or personal trainers,

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed like it was worth it for them.

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Many of the things they did probably did help make

0:50:32.239 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>them healthier, and they probably started thinking of themselves differently too,

0:50:37.800 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as someone really fit with a lot of willpower and determination.

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Like Dasha, I basically did something that I have been

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>able to do according to science, according to everything that

0:50:56.320 --> 0:51:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I've ever read, And in a way, Desha and the

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 1>others have new lives now, but that number on the

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:10.799
<v Speaker 1>scale still rules their time, their energy, their interests, and

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>their identities. They're afraid of what will happen if they

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>stop dieting and exercising, because they might gain the weight back.

0:51:21.160 --> 0:51:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Even though they've gotten what they wanted, they still live

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:29.759
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of fear. So maybe you're wondering why

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 1>diet anyway, The backlash against dieting is very much at

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:37.800
<v Speaker 1>our doorstep. So I really don't like the word diet.

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>That word, to me is just so negative and it's just,

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:42.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, the thoughts that come with that word are

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:49.280
<v Speaker 1>like deprivations, starving and just not getting to have anything good.

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And in our next episode will look at how diet

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>has become sort of a four letter word but hasn't

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:02.719
<v Speaker 1>really gone away a some of the people in the

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest rush away from dieting, they actually run weight loss companies.

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 1>It's different it's something that I can actually live with.

0:52:11.480 --> 0:52:14.879
<v Speaker 1>It's I wouldn't even call it a diet losing. It

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is written and reported by me Ema Court and edited

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:22.840
<v Speaker 1>by Kristin B. Brown. Magnus Hendrickson is our senior producer,

0:52:23.280 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Wong our associate producer, and Blake Maples is our

0:52:26.920 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 1>audio engineer. Our theme was composed and performed by Hannis Brown.

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Francesco Leavie and Tim Annette. Be sure to

0:52:35.680 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Prognosis if you haven't already, and if you

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like our show, please leave us a review that helps

0:52:42.560 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>others find out about it. Thanks for listening, See you

0:52:46.400 --> 0:53:00.279
<v Speaker 1>next time. Two