WEBVTT - Outlook For Semiconductors, Domestic Chip Production 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Right now, let's get

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>over to Hans Albrished. He is a portfolio manager and

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>option strategist at Horizons E t F Management and UM,

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a great day to have you on, Hans, because we've

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>had some really kind of weird news in the E

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>t F space. I'm thinking of the short arc E

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 1>t F, which Matt Levine was writing about yesterday. I mean,

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like Cathy Woods strategy, you could just

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>find out what she's going along and short at yourself. Um,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>or you could just short the arc E t F.

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Why would someone feel compelled to build a short arc

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:02.319
<v Speaker 1>et F. Well, I think, uh, you know, I think

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit like shorting bitcoin. You know, there's a

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we have a product actually that allows you to take

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>part in a short bitcoin effectively. Uh, and I think

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a bit of a trading vehicle for people,

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the stocks that Kathy tends to invest in,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>or these exponential, these emerging technologies that often get uh,

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, stretched and overextended, and and I think this

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of gives people away to kind of play both

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>sides of the equation um because you know, some of

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>these companies are smaller, and uh, we know that Cathy's uh,

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, can have large a large percentage of the

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>holdings of some of these companies, and some people think

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.559
<v Speaker 1>that that's sort of something that can reverse over time,

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>So a bit of a mean reversion play from that perspective,

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think. But I say that's more of a trader's

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>trader's vehicle than something you want to hold for a

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>long time, because of course I'm I'm a true believer

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in these technologies over time, so Hans. Other news we

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>got today came from BMW kind of learning about the

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>impact of the chip shortage on its business. So maybe

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not a reason to want to be invested in

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>an automaker like that, but maybe it's a good investment

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>idea to invest in the company that makes the products

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that are seeing shortage. The chipmakers and you obviously at

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Horizon ETFs launched uh C HPS, the first Canadian semiconductor

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>e t F. What kind of interest are you seeing

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in that product. We're seeing some good interest. It's the

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>first one that really takes a very global perspective. So

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the products you see out there, the

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>socks and things like that, have very much a US focus.

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And what we'd like to talk about is that, you know,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>this is really a global movement, this exponential and emerging

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>movement where semiconductors are the new oil. Right we hear

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>about data being the new oil. Semis are really the

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>new oil. The oil. They make up the foundation for

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>almost everything in our new world, and and that goes

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>for everywhere in the world. And so you've got some

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>areas of the world. Asia is the biggest cloud growth

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>area in the world. You've got robotics and automation being very,

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>very big in that part of the world. So it's

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>better to have exposure to companies that are some of

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the very big and influential companies that exist outside of

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>outside of the US. Is there gonna be a time

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>in you know, the near to medium term future when

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we ramp up chip production by so much and demand

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>falls off that we have a glut. Well, it could

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>be you know, we oftentimes we kind of uh, we

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>overextend one way or another. I think it's going to

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be difficult in the in the chip space because it

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>is very very capex um extend, very capex intensive um

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and so it's not that easy to adjust. And we

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>saw that in the during the pandemic where some some

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>areas like automakers sort of it was very much uh,

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>an example of expectation versus an actual reality Jewels, where

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody sort of took their pedal, took their foot off

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the pedal, and then suddenly auto demand you know, went

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>through the roof because everybody started doing the good old

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>American day trip, uh, the good old American road trip. Um.

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And so when when things get out of balance in

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that to that perspective, you can have some problems. Some

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of that capacity went to other areas of chip demand,

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and then when the automakers needed that demand again, it

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.799
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there. And it's very difficult to kind of move

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to shift that capacity around. Uh. And it's going to

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>take a little while for for us to solve this

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>problem because it isn't as easy as flicking a switch.

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm a road trip fanatic, and when I go on

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>a road trip at all, I like to bring my iPhone,

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>my Apple Watch, my iPad. I need as many chips

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>as I basically can in the car to feel like

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm safe. Hans, thanks so much for joining us, Hans

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>alversh there is a VP and portfolio manager at Horizons

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>et F Management. Gotta get you back on and talk

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>more about chips in the future. Let's bring in Kara Murphy.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>She is cheap in vestment officer at Kestra Holdings. They

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 1>have a hundred twenty three billion dollars of assets under management.

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And Carrey, you are optimistic, right, I mean, at least

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the economy. You think we see uh

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>some good signs with foot traffic, air traffic, consumer spending,

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. How much longer does that continue or have

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we maybe peaked? So I am optimistic, and I think

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>part of it is because we still have a tremendous

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>amount of momentum in the system, both from fiscal and

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>monetary stimulus that started last year. But you know, we've

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>been looking very closely as COVID case counts go up,

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.799
<v Speaker 1>like how is the consumer actually reacting. So, while certainly

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a health concern, on a continuing basis, what we're seeing

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is that people aren't really changing their behavior very much. Um.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>We're continuing to see foot traffic even in COVID hotspots,

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>in places like restaurants, hotels, gems. Air traffic is holding

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>study at pre COVID levels. Consumer spending is now above

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>pre COVID levels. So what we're seeing is that the

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>economic impact of the increased case counts are pretty minimal. Okay,

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean you want to keep going towards

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the value, the cyclical, the reopening kind of place. Yeah, well,

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we are starting to see a rotation towards

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more quality UM in the market. But

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's a nice consumer theme out there

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. So areas like home builders, discount retailers, those

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>are areas that will continue to benefit from both the

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.799
<v Speaker 1>consumer kind of coming out of their pandemic shell low

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates being willing to actually walk stores again. Um.

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>And so I think there's some interesting opportunities there. What

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>about the growth stocks, what about those mega texts that

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 1>have powered this market higher? Are you done with those? Yeah?

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard to bet against those stocks, right, I mean,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like tremendous top line growth, free cash flow generation um

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>at a norm arisen out of momentum. So so I

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to bet against them, but I think their

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>attractiveness compared to let's say a year ago, is lower.

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about E s G. But we actually have

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a great live law going on on the terminal right now.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You can type T live T L I V go

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>into your terminal and it's with Steve Liberatory over at

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>nu Vene talking about E s G and the risk

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of green washing. How do you get around that green

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>washing risk when trying to make E s G oriented investments?

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think first of all, it's important to understand

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that that there is a growing demand for the ability

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to express your values in a portfolio. And so we

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly see this um with our clients who are asking

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to be able to have some consistency between what's important

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to them and the holdings that they have. So I

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's one very important trend to keep in mind.

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Another is that like the data that we have in

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>E s G is so much better, the analytical capability

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is so much better than what we had like ten

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So you know, I think this concern about

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>greenwashing is the idea that you know, suddenly everybody has

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>got an E. S. D. BEN and everybody's you know,

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>using these other factors to sort of determine investment. Um.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And that is a risk. But we're in so much

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>better place today than we were ten years ago. UM.

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's all a very good thing. Yeah.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And also, I mean, what are you gonna gonna do.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna drive up the cost of capital of bad

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>businesses or do you invest in good businesses hoping that

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>sometime regulation gets past. Um. It seems like an interesting

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>conundrum to me. I want to get to home builders because, um,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you have written about the pullback that we've seen. Um,

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>but there's still so much demand, as Kaylee and I

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>can attest to m for homes and so little inventory.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>What happens here? Well, and I think you can guess right,

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>tremendous demand, limited supply. You know, I think that's really

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to buoy prices, particularly at homes. And

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the home builders have been very deliberate and

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of holding back some of their inventory. UM. So

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll start to see that come online in the second

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>half of this year and then even into next year.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And then the meantime, we've seen a lot of input

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>costs really received. I mean, lumber has gotten a lot

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of attention and that's come back tremendously at the same

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>time that home builders shares have been receiving. So and

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>then even when we look at valuations, while they're you know,

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 1>towards the high end of their typical valuation range, as

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>earnings continue to increase, um, as these homes come back online,

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>as prices hold firm, um, I think you'll continue to

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>see these stocks do well. Maybe good news for the

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>home builders stocks, less so for Matt Miller who's trying

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy a house in Westchester potentially, I don't know

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>how much luck that's going to have. I've had some

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>listeners right in with some tips, so if anybody knows

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a place in Bronxville, Yeah, Matt is using his platform

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>to get tips. And we only have about thirty seconds left,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 1>but of course, earning seasons winding down, we still do.

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll hear from the retailers later on this month. How

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>strong a position are they in. I think the retailers

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.679
<v Speaker 1>are in a great position, so you know, We're particularly

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>focus on the discount ones who didn't benefit as much

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from the rush to online last year. But like I said,

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to see more foot traffic. We're also seeing um

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.439
<v Speaker 1>wage increases, particularly in low wage earners, which again should

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>really help those discount retailers. Kara, thanks so much for

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us today. Kara Murphy, their chief investment officer over

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>at Castro Holdings that said they had a hundred twenty

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars in assets under management, So um, some

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>real firepower there and some great insight on what to

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>do in this market you're not looking for. I thought

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you were looking for a house too. I would in

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>theory that would be great map, But after looking at

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>what prices has done over the last couple of months,

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm just gonna have to wait it out.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>See when it cools down, maybe I'll find my entry point. Yeah,

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I may try and wait it out as well.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully it'll cool down by like January or February. UM.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>But it's an amazing market right now. If you're a seller.

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I know a guy who sold a house. He put

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 1>his house on the market Friday and it was done cash,

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>no contingencies within like five minutes. Uh yeah, very very

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>hot marketly alright, Our big take today is on Gary Gensler,

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the head of the SEC, readying more crypto oversight. His

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>intention is to protect investors and he's made that pretty clear.

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.679
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is he's also um, I guess he's

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 1>said at least open or neutral on the technology, the

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>blockchain technology, and he even taught a class at m

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I T about it, so a lot of people have

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>speculated he might be a friend to the crypto world.

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Robert Schmidt joins us who wrote the big take story

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>today with Benjamin Bain and Robert. I guess you know.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>The issue is a lot of crypto investors, a lot

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of crypto believers are also very libertarian, and a lot

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of people take that to mean also anti regulation. Hey Matt, Yeah,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. And it is true. I mean

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a you know, a system that has developed

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of outside of the government, So there's kind of

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a real hesitancy on some of the people who are

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>real enthusiasts here, uh to have the government wagh in

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>uh and said rules for this market. Um. But as

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you saw with our Ginseler piece, Ginseler is um saying

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what the government has to have a role here.

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a one point six trillion dollar market and growing,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and so from an investor standpoint, he doesn't think that

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of protections. Talk a little bit about

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>his his background and how exactly that informs his opinion

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in his policy approach when it comes to crypto. Yeah,

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it is fascinating because the government, as you guys might imagine,

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is not full of crypto experts, replaced crypto with anything

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>well true, and especially you know talking to people say

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill, right, nobody knows exactly what any of

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is and it is confusing. Um. So Ginsler

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>has really put himself in an interesting place because he's, uh,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the few people who really understands this stuff.

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And he developed a very popular course at m I

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>T on blockchain and money. Um. He's long been interested

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in kind of these intersection of finance and technology. Uh,

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and he studied it for three years before he was

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>appointed SEC chairman. So he says, well, look, this is serendipity,

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm glad I'm here and I'm glad I understand

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this stuff well. And there are a lot of people, Um,

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there are people in the crypto space. I shouldn't say

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:37.959
<v Speaker 1>a lot, because I don't know how many, but I

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we talked to on a regular basis people who work

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with crypto in the investment world, and UM, people who

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>are pro regulation of in some form or another, who

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>say that we need to have some clear cut rules

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in order to get this really widely adopted and going. Um,

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe Gainsler is their friend. Yeah, he is. I think

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>although you know, it all comes down to um as

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>everything does in Washington, and the details of this stuff

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of regulation and oversight you want. But um,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that's true. Ginsler talked to us about, you know, the

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>early days of the auto industry, and he said, well,

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, people were driving around. There were barely roads,

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>there were no traffic lights, there were no speed limits,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>people were getting killed, you know, and once the government

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.239
<v Speaker 1>stepped in and said, hey, we've got to have some

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>some kind of rules here. Uh, the industry took off.

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And he sees, you know, UM, crypto as as similar,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that it really does need some guardrails there before it's

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>widely adopted. I should point out that I normally live

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in Berlin, and living in Germany, probably the number one

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>best thing about living in Germany actually by far in

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a way, is the fact that there's no speedle in

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it on the auto bun. I can't believe no other

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>developed Western countries have that, because it's such a great

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>part of life there. But to the story, back to

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Gary Gainsler, Robert, I guess once he forms an opinion

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>about this and kind of decides what direction he wants

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to go with this regulation, what kind of speed and

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>or lack thereof are we talking about? Was how some

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of these things could actually come to fruition. Yeah, well,

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that the government is never fast about anything. Um.

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And Ginsler also has a lot on his plate, a

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff that we've talked about over the over

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the months, you know about the game stop trading and

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Arcagos family office blow up. He's got a lot of

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>things that he needs to deal with, uh, stuff that's complex,

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>high profile. UM And he's just added this to his list.

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're not totally sure, but it will be a while.

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know he is, as we point out in

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>our article, he ran the Commodities Futures Trading Commission during

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration and put in a whole new set

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of rules for swaps, which you know, many people think

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>was a big cause of the financial crisis, and he

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>did it fast and he muscled it through, so people

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>are not discounting his ability to do this. You know,

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he's he's he's I guess he's kind of heroic almost

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in in that he came to the rescue there, and

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people on both sides of

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the aisle have a lot of respect for him. You

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>quote Hester Pierce, Republican commissioner on the sec UM who

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is also more of a libertarian. She says, I come

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.479
<v Speaker 1>from a perspective that people should have the maximum freedom

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.479
<v Speaker 1>to engage in transactions they want to engage in voluntarily.

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Sounds almost American of her um, but she is supportive

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>too of some regulations. She says society needs to have

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that discussion about what the right regulatory framework is. Yeah,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>she thinks that like, hey, we need to set rules,

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe what she sees as regulations might be different

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>than what Ginceler j'ss regulation. But she kind of agrees

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that in order for this all to take off and

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be beneficial to society and um, you know, maybe help

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>our economy grow, that you really do need to kind

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of tell everybody what the what the rules are, so

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't disagree on that. They probably do

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>disagree on on you know, what the actual policy might be.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.959
<v Speaker 1>But that's what these commissions do. They have five members,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>they get together, they talk about it, and they try

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to hash something out. And just to be clear, you know,

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the big problems that we have in crypto.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Anybody who reads Matt Levin's columns UM gets a lot

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of info about the defive space and the fact that

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there are these Ponzi schemish rug poll um scams that

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to get investors over and over again. Not that

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the investors don't expect it to happen. I think a

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of people going into this no that they're gonna

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>get ripped off half the time. But this is what

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they one of the main things they want to put

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a stop to, right, Yeah, they sure do. And the

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>SEC kind of since, uh you since crypto exploded, has

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>been kind of pursuing an aggressive enforcement approach on this

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and and Gaincler definitely says that, you know, the fraud

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>has got to stop. We've got to figure out how

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>to do this, uh, and he said he was going

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>to continue um the investigations into all of this stuff.

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about the influence gainst their wheels outside

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of just the sec you you talk about in the

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>article how he also sits on the Financial Stability Oversight Council. Yeah,

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>there's two kind of panels that that are important in

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>this area. One is the Financial Stability Oversight Council that's

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of an uber group of regulators that looks at, um,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, practices that are potentially dangerous to the financial system.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And then the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, which

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is a smaller group that advises the President on some

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of these same you know, market impacts of things. And uh,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he's really, um, the main person on both those panels

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that is, uh, you know, most experienced in crypto. So

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>people who've worked with him on this stuff say that

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.120
<v Speaker 1>his his views are taken pretty seriously. Robert. He didn't

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>give you any clue as to whether or not we're

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get a bitcoin ETF allowed in the U

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>S anytime soon. Yeah, unfortunately not. Um, but he is

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>giving a speech today at the Aspen Security Forum which

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>may touch on some of that, and UM he said that,

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's continuing to think about it. And he

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>understands that a lot of people are very interested in this.

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I feel like if he was going to tell Aspen,

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>he probably would have told you, Benjamin, I have a

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>feeling we're gonna be as well. Yeah, exactly. I think

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to be a little while, but for now,

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some Canadian ETFs that do pretty much

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Great Big Take story, Robert, thanks so

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Really appreciate your insight. Robert Schmidt

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>writing with Benjamin Bain about Gary Gensler getting ready for

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>more crypto over society wants to make rules, which makes

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>sense considering the fact that that's his job. He's a

0:19:55.040 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>rulemaker UM in the Securities and Exchange Commission, and he's

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be dealing with something that he knows fortunately

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot about, So maybe people will be less angry

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>about the rules that he makes. I think there are

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that just don't understand what goes

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>on in this space to begin with. But if you

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get a look at the story, decide n

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I big take go. This is Bloomberg. Let's get away

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>from politics and get back over to the markets, because

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of action in the markets, say,

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of direction in terms of equity indexes,

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>but um, we still see yields and incredible lows one

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>sixteen fifty six on the tenure right now, and we see, uh,

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the the real yields right now dropping and they and

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they have been down for a while, but right now

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>down at negative one hundred and eighteen basis points. So

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty incredible Uh, it's a pretty incredible environment

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to working in. Dan Genter joins us. He is the

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.400
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of r NC Genter Capital Management. They've

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.360
<v Speaker 1>got five billion dollars of assets under management, and Dan,

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what you make of this. It must be

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the most asked questions. Why are rates so

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>low if we're looking at economic growth that's so strong. Well,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I think the only thing you can really look at, Matt,

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is that just a fairly typical flight to quality and

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the and the real concern here is what's happening with

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the delta variant of COVID nineteen. I mean, you we've

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>had a number of false starts with regards to you know,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>people trying to come come out of the closet and

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>get back and reintegrate into society and and now I

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>think when companies literally were setting guidelines and dates for

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>people to return to the office and setting in those parameters,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, now they don't know what to do again.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think that you're you're in a situation where

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you're combining two factors, which is the market has just

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>had a tremendous run of what we've seen so far

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 1>this year, both on the back of earnings and some

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>multiple expansion. You know, it's it's trying to take a

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>deep breath anyway, and now when you put the new

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID fears on top up of it, you're just again

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing some concern, You're seeing some flight to quality.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing or you're going to be able to continue

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to push these earnings forward at this pace, which is

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>what we really need to support the market. Are you

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>one of those people fleeing to quality, Dan, or where

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>are you positioning now? We were really in a situation

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>where right now we're we're just looking for values. So

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess too some degree you could say that we're

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>going to quality, but but for us, it's belling more

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>with that we've been really focusing on since the fourth

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>quarter of last year. I mean, we we feel that

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the overall market itself is it's look, it's earnings are

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>really the game right now. We think the concerns about

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>inflation are really have kind of faded into the background

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>at least for the time being, and earnings is really

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>what is going to drive this market. The ability to

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>expand multiples beyond here we think is very very limited.

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So being focused on earnings and then in line with that,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>being focused on valuations to us we think is key,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that we feel will continue with a

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>resurgence of some rotation back to value that we saw

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>in the first half. It's great to have somebody on

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the program UM who actually in a sense puts his

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>money where his mouth is with stock picks. And you've

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>got a couple that I think are pretty popular. UM,

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>b m Y and CVX are are a couple that

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we've had UM guys and and and gals on in

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the past. Who are really behind these these stocks? Why? Well,

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I think again it's value. I mean, when you look

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>at what you're getting for Bristol Myers. The biggest issue

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>with Bristol Myers is that people are very concerned about

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>the back end of the pipeline. As certain drugs are

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>coming off a pattern, we don't have as much concern

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and we think the current flows are very strong. I mean,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>they're going to continue to be a leader in oncology

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and cardio vasco disease. I mean they have some of

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest drugs that are in that area. You look

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>at where their cash flow is right now, they have

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>eight percent free cash flow as you have a company

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>that's trading at at a you know, an eight point

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>three pe right now based upon our estimates. So I

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>think that the real issue is is that we like

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the healthcare space. We think this is really undervalued and

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the and the big thing becomes, as I mentioned, is

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the back end, because we feel that when you look

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>at the new drugs that are coming online, I mean,

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 1>these have revenue capability that's twenty billion, and the street

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>very cautiously is putting roughly a ten billion dollar number

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>on that. So so we see that potential being significantly higher.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>And then when you look at the current valuation at

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>roughly eight times and you get a two point eight

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>percent yield while you wait, you know, we find that

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>very attractive. And when you look at cv X, it's

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a similar thing in the oil space. Uh. And

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>if you want to make a pure play on the

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>commodity price, this is one of the best places to

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>do it. And we think at roughly seventy dollars a

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>barrel now we think will continue to creep up near

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>closer to eighty. Uh. You're in a situation where you

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 1>look at forward you know, earnings of what we think

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is quite reasonable here. You know, you're trading about fourteen

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>times and a big kicker is you're getting five and

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a quarter percent while you wait in dividend yield and

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they only need fifty dollars a barrow to cover it.

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's to us once again, very strong value. Dan

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>just quickly, we only have about thirty seconds left. But

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>what would you be staying far away from here? What

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of sector? Well, I don't want to paint it

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with a total brush, but I think would be taking

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>some money off the table and some of the technologies.

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're you know, once again, we think they've

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>had a good run again. They've come back, you know,

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>after a value took over in the fourth quarter, in

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the year, and so you know,

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.239
<v Speaker 1>looking at that to maybe lighten up a little bit

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and get back into some of the cyclicals. Dan, thanks

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>very much for your time. Really appreciate getting your insight today.

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Dan Genter is the chief executive officer at r n

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>C Genter Capital Management, and as I said, he's got

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars in assets under management and talk talks

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to us about stocks that he likes, about actual picks,

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>which is great to have. You like Lincoln National, he

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>likes b m, Y, like CVX, and he likes Altrea.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.