WEBVTT - Tesla’s Sales Fall Most in a Decade, Alphabet Boosts Guidance for 2025 Spending

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Tesla said it's moving forward with its robotaxiing affordable vehicle

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 3>plans while reporting second quarter earnings that fell short of

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street's estimates of justin earnings forty cents per share

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 3>that was just below the average analyst estimate. Revenue fell

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 3>twelve percent to twenty two and a half billion dollars

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>that was also lower than expectations and the sharpest decline

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 3>in at least a decade. Gross margin, which is a

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 3>measure of profitability, was higher than anticipated. Right Now shares

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>down about six tenths of one percent, and Tesla did

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>say many of its key in issaiess remain on track.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 3>Quote despite a sustained uncertain macroeconomic environment resulting from shifting tariffs,

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 3>unclear impacts and changes to fiscal policy, and a political sentiment.

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.199
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in a Bloomberg Intelligence Global Autos and Industrials

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 3>research manager Steve Mann joining us once again from New Jersey.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>You gave us a great preview earlier in the afternoon.

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Now we have the numbers. Anything surprise you, Yeah.

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 4>I think if you look at the stocks down after

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 4>hours a bit, I think I think the most important

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 4>thing there is they haven't given us enough visibility into

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 4>the future what their outlook is going to be. I mean,

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 4>the numbers they miss consensus. But if you kind of

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 4>dig into a little bit more and look under the cover,

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 4>it's actually not bad. If you look at automotive gross

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 4>margin excluding credits, it's actually fifteen percent better than the

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 4>last quarter of twelve and a half and better than

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 4>consensus estimates. And then if you look at free cash flow,

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the reason why it's down versus the first quarter is

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 4>because they spend an extra nine hundred million on capex,

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 4>which is not a bad thing given that there's they're

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 4>launching the cheaper model and the cyber cap So if

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>you exclude that nine million of additional cap backs, their

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 4>free cash flow is actually over a billion, more than

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 4>six hundred and sixty million. In the first quarter.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 5>So that's good.

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 4>That's good. I mean spending cap bacs given you know

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 4>what their product launches are is not a bad thing.

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 4>They're investing into the future. And look, they're also expanding internationally,

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 4>right they have. You know, we've seen over the quarter

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 4>improvement higher sales in South Korea, they announced entry into

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 4>into India, and then they're launching the extended version of

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 4>the Model Y in China. So it's a good thing.

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 4>But look, we do want to hear what you on

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 4>US has to say, uh, in terms of not just

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 4>the robotaxi, but you know, how how are they going

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 4>to face ahead when the challenges we were seeing the

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 4>US market, which is critical. It's it's their one of

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 4>the largest market uh in in their portfolio. So we'll

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 4>we'll have to hear more, uh on the on the call.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>How do you think Tesla's robotaxi stands up to the

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>other autonomous vehicle solutions that are out there right now,

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 3>namely Wemo.

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the market can be very big, especially

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 4>in the US if we're not talking internationally, Uh, there's

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>definitely room for multiple players. Uh. You know, my perspective

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 4>is that you know, Tesla is using an all camera

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 4>system that actually is gives them a greater flexibility and

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 4>greater scalability with with that system.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 4>Weimo and others use a combination of radars lied on

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 4>and camera system. Cameras just are just cheaper right to build,

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 4>and uh, you know, and and so it's a lot

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 4>easier to scale, cheaper to scale for Tesla. So but

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 4>then again, I think the market's big enough. I think

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be users that want in all camera system.

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 4>I think there's going to be users that don't feel

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 4>comfortable with that and want the redundancy redundancy of lie doars.

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 4>So you know, for example, Uber is partnering with Weimo.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 7>So I kind of go back to wait, all right,

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 7>So I'm looking at the FA function on the Bloomberg

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 7>and we just talked about free cash flow, and so

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 7>it's one hundred and forty six million dollars versus six

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 7>hundred and sixty four million in the first quarter of

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty five, as our live blog says, dropping eighty

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 7>nine percent. And I know what you're saying about, it's

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 7>good that they're spending for the future, right because you said.

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 5>To us earlier that the best way to get to.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 7>That one point fifty six million unit delivery for the year, right,

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 7>that's the concessus estimate is that they've got to launch

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 7>that cheaper vehicle, right, so they've got to bring stuff out.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 7>Do we have to be worried though about that low

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 7>number or they're they're going to be fine.

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's uh, I mean, it's it's technical, right, It's

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 4>that if free cash flow is overbuilain obviously the more

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 4>the better it is. Down Yeah, it's you know, compared

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 4>to a year ago, two years ago. But look like

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 4>if you look at the model Y, if you look

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 4>at the gross margin, you know, excluding credits, it is

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 4>up right, that actually tells you that, uh, you know,

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 4>the new vehicle is likely the model new model why

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 4>is likely built. They're able to build at lower cost.

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 4>The issue is, like I said in the preview, is

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 4>they just don't have enough volume.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 4>So so if if they can expand volume with the

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 4>with the existing model Y, not just in the US

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 4>but in the international markets and as well as introduced

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 4>to cheaper model which is supposed to build to be

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 4>built within the existing capacity, you know, there could be

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot upside, right in terms of margin in terms

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 4>of free cash flow. So uh, you know, it's really

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 4>execution at the moment, and that's what we want to

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 4>hear from Elon Musk. You know, how where where is

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 4>the second Where is the cheaper model? They said, it's

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.840
<v Speaker 4>actually they said the production has started. Initial production has

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 4>started in June, but you know it could take some

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>time right before they launch and I have to get

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 4>all the kinks out. But you know, you want to

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 4>hear about India. India is a huge market, right and

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 4>where they taking India? Uh, you know, definitely Robotaxi is

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 4>an important and then the cyber cap. You know, we

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 4>need a little bit.

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 5>More details, all right, details is certainly near.

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 4>Term details, near term details.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 5>All right, great setup, Steve Man, thank you so much.

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 7>We're going to look forward to reading your research in

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 7>the after hours and certainly into tomorrow's trade. Deeman Bloomberg

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 7>Intelligence Global Auto an Industrials research manager, joining us from

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 7>BI headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 3>I want to go right now and bring in Ross Gerber.

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 3>He's president's CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management.

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 3>As at the end of last year, had about three

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 3>point four billion dollars in assets under management. Long time

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 3>outspoken Tesla bull more recently expressing concerns about the company,

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 3>as he did three months ago after the last quarter

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 3>report earnings report. According to the Bloomberg terminal, gerber Kawasaki

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 3>still owns about seventy eight million dollars worth of Tesla stock. Ross,

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 3>good to have you with us this afternoon. What have

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 3>you been doing to your Tesla position over the last quarter?

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Just before we get your take on the numbers.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've been selling for years and I continue

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to sell. I you know, we have so much stock,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and we have a lot of clients that really believe

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Tesla story, and we've kept some stock obviously

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>in our portfolios, but in my ETF, I'm out of Tesla,

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>completely out of my GK. And it's mostly because the

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>business is declining, and these earning results continue to show

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that the business continues to decline and in some kind

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of troubling ways. So as much as the previous guest

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is bullish on many of these things that Elon talks about,

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to talk about the truth that nobody wants

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to buy Elon's products, like until that gets addressed there's

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge elephant in the room that nobody seems to

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>want to point at because it's Elon. So he's the

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>innovator behind all of the things that are great about Tesla,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>but he's also the sort of villain that's created so

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>much animosity around him that nobody wants to buy his products.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 7>We've had a great cover story by the team of

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 7>Max Chafkin and Ed Ludlow in Bloomberg business Week the

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 7>new issue coming out, the August issue. It'll soon be

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 7>on newstands, it's already on the Bloomberg But you know,

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 7>the whole idea ross as you know, since you understand

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 7>this guy, this company so well, you never kind of

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 7>count Elon out, And so I wonder, you know, if

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 7>he does get it right, if he maybe, I don't know,

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 7>We'll see what happens in terms of his involvement in politics,

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 7>because it does seem like he still wants to stay

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 7>according to the SpaceX filing. But I mean there is

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 7>always that caveat when it comes to Elon right that

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 7>he sometimes pulls it out, or he often pulls it out.

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think that's been true in the past,

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very grateful that he pulled it out five

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago when it really mattered and Tesla was almost

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>on the verge of bankruptcy, and it has become a

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>very successful company. But it doesn't mean he's going to

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>do it again. And this idea that you know, these

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of entrepreneur rock star people don't fall is actually

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is not true. In fact, it's very common to what

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we call the rise in fall story. That's all the

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>stories you see on Netflix and the documentaries, So you know,

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>this might be a rise in fall story, and things

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>don't rise forever, per se. And I always remind people.

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't think most people even know who invented the television,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>but the television was invented in the United States by

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a company called RCA, which was like the hottest stock

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of the fifties. Well, how many TVs are made in

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the United States today And the answer is zero. So

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the very same thing could happen in the ev business.

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But that said, Elon can fix the company. It's solely

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>broken because of him. He can certainly fix the company

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>if he wants to do what's necessary to improve his image.

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And in a year people forget and Tesla might be back.

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>But he just doesn't seem to care about fixing his image,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't seem to be an understanding the responsibility

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>goes to him on why sales are down so.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Much, So why even have any Tesla stock right now?

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason I hold personally still some Tesla

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>stock is for the same hope that we all have

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that they are definitely focused on a future, and especially

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for me a climate activist, you know, it's a green

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>future that I'm pushing and Tesla still is the leader

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in green you know, transportation and energy, and I think

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's an incredibly important company to succeed. Hence why I'm

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>out here banging on elon all the time. It's not

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, for any other reason than wanting to see

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Tesla succeed because it's crucially important to climate change. But

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>this robotaxi business is not crucially important to anybody. So,

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Tesla's main business is selling evs

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that and energy storage, and they should be focused on

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>repairing that main business. And I think there are other

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>future end of ours are interesting and that's why it's

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a reason to hold the stock. But it also trades

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>at one hundred and fifty times earnings that are going down, okay,

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and so you know you have to weigh that too.

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 3>In the past, you've talked about how nice it is

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 3>to drive a Rivian, for example. Are you willing to

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 3>now invest in any other EV company that you've turned

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 3>on Tesla?

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 8>No.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've lost a lot of money and EV

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>businesses over the last five years that I've hoped would

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>succeed in, including Rivian and many others, And unfortunately, many

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the EV operators are now having all the incentives

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>taken away from them as well as traditional car companies

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>along with tariffs and everything else. It's just really a

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>horrible setup to be a car company. The car company

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>we own is Ferrari actually, which has no problem selling

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>their cars at forty percent margins that make Tesla look

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like chump change. So you know, truthfully, it's just a

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>tough to be in a global auto business on a

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>great day, let alone with Trump as president. So it's

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a very tough time for the businesses, and I'm just

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not recommending that right now. Versus a stock like train

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>technology that makes you know, clean energy air conditioning units,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>where the demand for air conditioning is off the charts,

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's been a wonderful green energy investment along with

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>ge Vernova, which we also own. That's been a wonderful

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>green energy investment. But it's not EV's.

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 7>Hey, listen, I do want to go back to We've

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 7>got the Tesla live blog going on and just tracking

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 7>everything that's coming out of the earnings. Are down a

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 7>Hull who covers Tesla and Elon, says Page twelve of

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 7>the shareholder deck shows the Tesla ecosystem, which includes optimists.

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 7>We know, the robot pushing a baby stroller, you know,

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 7>you know ross When it comes to Tesla and the

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 7>world of Elon, there are so many different moving parts.

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 7>There's you know, the shining beacon of SpaceX right that

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.199
<v Speaker 7>that's a really great business. There's all the AI stuff

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 7>that's going on. There's so many different moving pieces. What

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 7>else do you want to know maybe on the call

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 7>today about you know, from the Elon universe.

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the most important thing in my mind

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 1>that has the biggest opportunity to help Tesla is this

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>low cost vehicle they keep talking about. They have so

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>much excess capacity in their factories now because they're not

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>selling more cars that they need a new vehicle. And

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>also for addressing other markets, whether it be India, China

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and Europe. You need a small vehicle that's inexpensive to

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>compete against the other EV players and regular traditional car companies.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>And they need to do this now, and the sooner

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 1>they do this, the better, And that's the most important thing.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I know. We like to talk about the day a

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>robot is pushing my kid around in a stroller. That

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>day is long in the tooth from coming. Nor does

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody in the world would trust some big robot made

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>by Elon Musk. Yeah, when I get out of that fantasy,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Well, I was.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Just going to say when I'm on my deathbed, I

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 3>know I'm not going to say, wish I spent less

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 3>time pushing my kid's stroller and had robots do it instead.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 3>The dishes I want done, not less.

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Time with my kids. Laundry done.

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the dishes, But I don't know my wife actually

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>likes doing the dishes, so I don't know.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 5>Tell her to ask her what her secret is. I

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 5>would love to know. Hey, Rob, I don't know she

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 5>likes it.

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 7>Rus Gerber always appreciate you finding time for us.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 5>We got to run right now. Shares of Tesla just

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 5>down about six tens of a percent.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 7>We do want to bring in to the conversation Brett Thill,

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 7>he's senior technology research out and said Jeffries, he's got

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 7>a buy rating on Alphabet. He's got a hold rating

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 7>on IBM, which also is that with their results and

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 7>we are seeing that that stock. Let me just bring

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 7>it up real quickly on the Bloomberg shares of IBM

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 7>or down about four point four percent, so we're both

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 7>seeing some movement there and right now Alphabet down one.

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Point two percent.

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 7>Hey Brent, good to have you here to the conversation

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 7>with Tim Mandeep and myself. Your take on what we

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 7>got from Alphabet, Yeah, I.

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 8>Mean it was pretty in line. I don't think there

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 8>was any big fireworks. You know, you had a bigger

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 8>capex number was about four and app billion higher, which

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 8>is a sign of investing in AI. They raised capex

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 8>by ten bill which again everyone knows it's going to

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 8>AI and so I think everyone likes that that they're

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 8>spending to keep pace, but obviously it's having a drag

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 8>on the margin. So the margin last course about forty percent,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 8>they're at thirty eight point three percent, so a little

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 8>bit of a drag on the margin on the downside,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 8>and then you know, just magnitude of upside just you know,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 8>not a lot, and they don't give you a lot

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 8>of color what they're doing. So I think, you know, look,

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 8>this has been the worst sentiment of any name I

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 8>cover an internet. Our investors are not bought in everyone

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 8>starting their search, which actually BT and perplexity first be

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 8>stelling up in Google, and so the big question is

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 8>ultimately where are they going to end up in this

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 8>in this AI race, And many of the advertisers are

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 8>talking about the transition with AI overview and what they're

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 8>going through that it's more expensive and they're getting a

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 8>better impact from it. But it's still early. So you know, overall,

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 8>Cloud you know was did well. YouTube was thirteen percent growth,

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 8>it was ten last course, accelerated a bit off an

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 8>easy comp and so yeah, I think it's just basic

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 8>kind of quarter, nothing really exciting that The challenge right

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 8>now is investors just don't believe. You know, any investor

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 8>I talked to is like, I need to be underweight

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 8>Google because I just don't believe they're going to make

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 8>this transition.

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 3>We'll make the case for us, make the case for

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>us that you think they will make the transition.

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, the case for the transition is that you need

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 8>three things for AI. You need data, users, and capital.

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 8>And they have more data and more users than anyone

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 8>in the world. So if like I've always said this,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 8>like I think this is like pulling up to a

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 8>stoplight and you look right and it's like a tiny

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 8>little car and you might be in a car that

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 8>you think is faster, and then the car on the

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 8>right just takes off and you're like, wow, I didn't

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 8>realize that was underneath the hood or where the muscle

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 8>come from.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 5>There.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 8>They have a lot more AI muscle under the hood

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 8>than they're showing. They're terrible communicators, they're not good with investors.

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 8>They don't give you guidance, they don't go on the road,

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 8>they don't spend time with investors, like Nvidia, like Microsoft,

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 8>like the Rust, and so investors are just like, look,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 8>they gave me the earnings call, four times a year,

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 8>and that's about it, and then the filing and that

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 8>there's nothing in it, and then I'm left to guess.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 8>So every investor has to do their own work, and

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 8>we're all doing our own work. Your day starts in

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 8>chat abt and Perplexiti. It's not and it was starting

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 8>in Google maybe a year ago. There's alternatives. So I

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 8>think this is the same thing we're seeing with Adobe,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.239
<v Speaker 8>with Salesforce, other names we cover in tech. Is a

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 8>new crop of AI stories going to effectively, not necessarily replace,

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 8>but become the central spot where you start your your

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 8>your your search. And I don't think that you know

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 8>that that that boogeyman is going to go away for

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 8>a while. So you know again, I think you know

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 8>stocks underperformed has done nothing. You look at the IGV

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 8>the software next, It's up twelve percent. Google's flat.

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:55.360
<v Speaker 6>You look at the.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 8>Other index, the SMH, the Internet of Index, it's You're

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 8>up eighteen percent year.

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Date, Google's flat.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean, there's literally been way better ways to make money,

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 8>whether it's DoorDash. When you look at what's going on

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 8>in meta, and we hear this from advertisers. Advertisers are

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 8>obsessed with what Meta is doing in AI, and so

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 8>again I'm not super super bearish or on Google, but

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 8>I think what we're seeing are the facts of the facts,

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 8>which is it's really hard to change the narrative and

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 8>they're going to have to make a change in their

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 8>own behavior, and the numbers and then the adoption rate,

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 8>and so that again we're never going to rule them out.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 8>I think the stock's super cheap, so that's why I

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 8>still have a buy in it. But I would say

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 8>of all the large cap Internet names, they have the

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 8>most work to do.

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 5>All right, So Man Deep, come on back in are

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 5>a Man Deep?

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 7>Saying, globalhead of Technology research at our in house Bloomberg

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 7>Intelligence Team.

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 5>I mean, do you think they could do better in

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 5>terms of messaging? I'm curious about your thinking.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 9>I agree with Brent on that that they are the

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 9>ones who give you the least when it comes through

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 9>the product pipeline and how it's going to change their business,

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 9>especially given they are getting disrupted, so they could do more.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 9>But at the same time, like I said, you know,

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 9>a search business that is their cash cow growing double

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 9>digit is a very impressive performance. And to my mind,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, given all the competitive threat that we talk about,

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 9>they're still able to execute. And unless the search business

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 9>really starts to decelerate sharply, I don't see anything in

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 9>the fundamentals that has changed for Google.

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 5>Is meta threat to Alphabet.

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 9>No, because they're struggling with their own large anglid model.

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.199
<v Speaker 9>That's why they're making all the aqua hiers, so they

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 9>don't have the talent. It's really Google and open Ais

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 9>that are going neck and neck when it comes to

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 9>the consumer side, and then you have Gottenthropic on the

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 9>enterprise side. But these three dominate the large angred model

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 9>race right now.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 8>Let me add that the advertisers are not saying that

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 8>our advertisers are saying they're shifteen dollars from too Mata

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 8>away from Google's. So I think when you look at

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 8>actually advertising dollars, they are shifting and that's coming from

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 8>our checks. So I think that there is a shift

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 8>that's been happening. I don't think Google goes to zero,

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 8>but I do think there's a shift in advertisers.

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 9>Why did Google Search then grow double digits this quarter?

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:22.159
<v Speaker 8>It's starting to fade and we think that ultimately that

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 8>is results are much stronger.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 9>Okay, I mean that's where we have to wait for meta.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 9>Maybe it grows high teens or over twenty percent, and

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 9>then probably the meta.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 8>Stocks are twenty two percent. You're to date for a

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 8>reason because the advertiser checks that. We all do are

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 8>saying that. Secondarily, the framework of what they can do

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 8>with AI is so much more powerful from what we're

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 8>seeing in the experiences. So I'm not again, I'm not

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 8>a Google hater. I just think that we're starting to

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 8>see a sudden they are behind it.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 9>It comes to LLLM. So it's not because of their

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 9>LLLM lead that their ad revenue is shifting. So it's

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 9>just better at surface and how meta is monetizing. It's

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 9>not Bella Lamps, right.

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 8>I don't believe it's I don't believe it's because of

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 8>l arm Stone.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, Brent, if if indeed there is this shift happening,

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 3>and I certainly see it in in my behavior, and

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I do end up going back to Google, but there

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 3>is there are other options out there now, whether whereas

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 3>there used to not be other options. Uh, if that happens,

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 3>how does Google end up leveraging it's sor it's a

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.440
<v Speaker 3>iproduct for actual ad revenue, What does that what does

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 3>that look like?

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think the challenge is when you go back

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 8>to Gemini, that if you've gone into perplexity, into the

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.719
<v Speaker 8>app or chet Ebt where we all started in Gemini

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 8>was late, how do you how do you transition out

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 8>of those apps when you're when they're already front and center,

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 8>and so they've got to get people to kind of

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 8>get out of that. And then secondarily, like I go

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 8>back to like I plan a family vacation in Europe

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 8>on chet Ebt, and to your point, I had to

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 8>go back to Google to find the boat, rent all

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 8>the restaurants, all the things we want to do as

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 8>a family. So I do think that you ultimately end

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 8>up back. I think that the challenge right now is

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 8>it's unclear exactly how they're going to navigate through this

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 8>and are they going to end up in a better

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 8>or worse position? And right now Wall Street's betting a

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 8>worse position. Right stocks down on this print, which wasn't

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 8>that bad. Why is it down? Why is the sentiment

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 8>so bad? There's just better alternatives that people see, and

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 8>you hear these advertisers, these big advertisers are spending billions

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 8>of dollars a year on behalf of their clients, and

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 8>they're saying, well, this is what I'm doing with my

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 8>ad budget.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 5>So I think they need to do a better.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 8>Job of you know, you've got to get AIO review

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 8>in the market and get usage. You have to effectively

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 8>show a better ROI. You have to get Gemini usage up.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 8>I think you know from a Wall Street A lot

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 8>of this is just actually management too, which is giving conviction.

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 8>We covered Microsoft when Bomber was there and stock did

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.199
<v Speaker 8>nothing and people just didn't have a conviction. They had

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:03.479
<v Speaker 8>conviction when the Dela came in the stock one thirty

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 8>and now it's five hundred and so a lot.

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 5>Of this too is optical.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 8>You got to optically hold hands and help people. Because

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 8>investors get the help from a lot of the other companies,

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 8>they don't get the help from Google. So if you

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 8>can drive a car, you're probably more likely to buy it.

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 8>But if you can't drive it, then you know, like

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 8>maybe I'll just go buy another car I know I

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 8>can drive. So they need to do a better job

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 8>on that side.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 9>And to Brent's point about Gemini usage, I think on

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 9>the call, if they shared the token count, so last

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 9>quarter they mentioned four hundred and eighty trillion was a

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 9>token count and it grew almost you know, five x

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 9>month over a month. Microsoft shared a similar metric, and

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 9>to my mind, in the case of Alphabet, you'd not

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 9>only have the cloud lift, so cloud consumption is driving

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 9>token count, but also the surface area they have with

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 9>their family of apps. So they have six apps with

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 9>over two billion monthly active users. All the AI Gemini

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 9>AI that they are deploying on those apps, including Search,

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 9>that will show up in the token count. And that's

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 9>why Google is almost ten times that of Microsoft. So

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 9>Microsoft process fifty trillion tokens, right, Google process four hundred

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 9>and eighty trillion tokens. That's because of the surface area

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 9>they have to you know, show Gemini and deploy that,

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.159
<v Speaker 9>and that for me is the key metric on the

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 9>earning score.

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 5>So that's what you're going to be looking for.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 7>All right, We're gonna let you go because you, I know,

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 7>have lots to do, man deep seeing you are such

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 7>a gem Bloomberg Intelligence. Hey, bred before you go, just

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 7>a quick thought on IBM because they also report and

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 7>they're down almost five percent in the aftermarket.

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 5>What do we need to know just quickly.

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 8>Yes, software that did better consultings kind of like blah,

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 8>and I think the CEO and mentioned they'd like to

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 8>do better in consulting, but that that seems to be

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 8>the biggest concern across consulting overall. So you know, tell

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 8>two cities software business growing high single digit consulting not

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 8>massive grower and flat on a constanqurency basis, And so

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 8>you know you they're shifting to become a software company.

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 8>Arvind has done a great job, the CEO. The stock's

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 8>up almost thirty percent year today. The multiples almost at Microsoft.

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 8>Like I'm much rather own Microsoft. I'm much rather on Google.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 8>There's other names I'd rather personally own. I can own

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 8>any these names, but we're advising ARC clients to own on.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Over over IBM.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 8>We just we just see, you know, the stock pretty

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 8>full at the multiple it's at all.

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 7>Right, just real quickly, what would be your top number

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 7>one question on alphabet on the call here?

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 5>And the stock's down one still one point six percent lower?

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 8>Just quickly, you know, the continued adoption of AI overview

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 8>and what's happening with Gemini?

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 5>All right, gon I leave it there. This was fun, Brent,

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 7>Brent Delle, you see your technology research analyst over at

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 7>Jeffries joining us on zoom on this Wednesday.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting to two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Play and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 7>So we've seen initial public offerings definitely picking up some

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 7>momentum this year. As a group, IPOs are up about

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 7>five percent year to date as measured by the Renaissance

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 7>IPO Index, but up forty one percent from a low

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 7>back on April eighth.

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 5>We've got a couple of.

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 7>IPOs today, both are trading lower in their first day

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 7>of trading. We've got Niq Global Intelligence share slumping after

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 7>the company raised more than a billion in its IPO,

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 7>giving it tim.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 5>Just about a market cap of just under six billion dollars.

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Another a small cap Carls Med. It's a medtech company,

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 3>slipping in its first day of trading after raise one

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred point five million dollars in its IPO. The company

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 3>with it approximately three hundred and eighty seven million dollar

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 3>market cap. Carlsmed uses AI to personalized spine surgery. It

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 3>sold six point seven million shares after offering them for

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 3>fourteen two sixteen dollars each. Here was more in the

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 3>company in the first day of trading as a public company.

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Mike Cordonier, co founder and CEO and president of Carl's

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Med from the Nasdaq. Also joining us a Bloomberg News

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 3>activities reporter and Tallya Kenny Javitch. She's here in the

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 3>studio with us, Mike. The stock is down on the

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 3>first day. How are you feeling on a day such

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 3>as today? Stock not necessarily moving in the direction you

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 3>want to see.

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, we're feeling really good about you know, how we're

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 10>doing today. You know, continue to focus on our mission

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 10>and building awareness about you know, really what we do

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 10>that ultimately we know has transformed spine surgery, and so,

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 10>you know, continue to focus on the fundamentals, and you know,

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 10>it's it's ultimately going to be a really strong day

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 10>for us.

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 7>For those who mind, have I familiar Mike, just fill

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 7>us in on exactly what you do. From what we

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 7>understand you guys do personalized surgery, which got one of

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 7>our producers c see a little word, because we thought

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 7>all surgery was personalized elis. We hope that's the case

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 7>when we go under the knife. So they say, so,

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 7>what exactly do you guys do?

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you know, we've really taken a very different approach

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 10>to what really a medical device company is. And so

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 10>we are a medical technology company, and we work with

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 10>surgeons and patients, and we take digital imaging of the

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 10>patients as well as surgical inputs from the surgeon, create

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 10>a virtual plan of that patient surgery, and then we

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 10>three D print personalized devices for their spine surgery, build

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 10>those on demand, delivered directly to the operating room. And

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 10>ultimately what this does is this gives a surgeon really

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 10>power to be able to perform very precisely what can

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 10>be a really complex spinal surgery.

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 11>Mike Hi, congratulations on trading debut. I'm curious about your

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 11>path to profitability because companies like yours typically require a

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 11>lot of capecs. Do you guys have any timeline in

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 11>mind on when you become profitable?

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, we haven't provided direct guidance to that. However,

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 10>we have built our company very differently than a traditional

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 10>medical technology company because we don't carry any inventory. Everything

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 10>that we create is three D printed directly on demand.

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 10>And so as we think about this public offering the

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 10>use of capital to reinvest towards really our growth in

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 10>being able to provide this technology to a lot more.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 5>Patients, what's proprietary?

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Ultimately, you know, we have a broad technology platform

0:30:55.920 --> 0:31:01.160
<v Speaker 10>that we built, and so as we think about rolling

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 10>this out much more broadly, we've been able to create

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 10>an end to end technology platform that is proprietary to

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 10>us that we've called our Digital Production System, and this

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 10>is a all in one system that allows us to

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 10>take digital data about the patient, about the surgeon, create

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 10>personalized plans and the devices to achieve those plans. And ultimately,

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 10>when we started down this journey just.

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 5>A few years ago.

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 10>This whole end to end process took us a little

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 10>bit longer than eight weeks. And now we've really reinvested

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 10>in our proprietary system that allows us to do this

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 10>in two weeks or less, which really allows these scheduled

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 10>surgeries to be able to be done in the time

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 10>that the surgeon and patient needs them.

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Mike, why was an IPO the right move here? If

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 3>the broad adoption by doctors around the US and around

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the world. Is your goal here? Why not look to

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 3>be acquired by let's say, a Medtronic or a Johnson

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 3>and Johnson or a striker that already has these relationships

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 3>with doctors and can these roll this out more broadly.

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we really, you know, think about this much more

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 10>than a product line and really much more as a

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 10>new way to run a business, because, you know, very

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 10>different than what the large players in this space do,

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 10>which tends to be a very capital intensive business model.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 10>You know, we've built this new business model which is

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 10>really digital first, allows us, in conjunction with the surgeon

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 10>to do the procedure digitally first and then make one

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 10>demand everything that's needed. And so because of this, because

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 10>of ultimately our ability to do this on demand, we've

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 10>built a very nimble, agile company that we can deeply

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:07.719
<v Speaker 10>target those key institutions and the patient population to directly

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 10>deliver exactly what's needed. And we see this really as

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 10>a platform technology that has a lot more applications, much

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 10>beyond our current indications that we have for spinal fusion.

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 7>So can I just ask you, so, does that mean

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 7>you ultimately see yourself maybe for every complicated surgery figuring

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 7>out how to.

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 9>Do this just quick.

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, yeah, absolutely. You know, we see this as a

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 10>continued innovation partnership with you know, surgeons as well as

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 10>us on the technology side to be able to profinde

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 10>a very novel personalized solution to patients.

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 10>That ultimately drives better outcomes because as we've looked at

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 10>our early data for spine fusion surgery, we've been able

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 10>to materially improve outcomes for patients because we can directly

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 10>personalize the devices needed for their surgery.

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 11>Mike, what is your tariff exposure?

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so we are one hundred percent supply chain in

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 10>the US, and so we're very well insulated from you know,

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 10>the news that's coming out around tariffs.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 9>Hey.

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 5>One thing I want to ask you though, in terms

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 5>of the growth of the business.

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 7>I know there's you're not going to give us anything

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 7>on profitability or when you get there, but what's the

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 7>growth that you are seeing in usage, growth in revenues?

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 7>Can you give us some numbers? We are Bloomberg and

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 7>you are a public now and ultimately you're going to

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 7>be sharing this stuff.

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 5>Just got about forty seconds.

0:34:42.160 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, you know, we've we've grown phenomenally since we started,

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 10>and we can we can report that, you know, in

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 10>the first quarter of this year, you know, we grew

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 10>one hundred percent year over year, and so you know,

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 10>we see this adoption very apid, with new surgeons, new

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 10>accounts coming on board, and you know, we anticipate, you know,

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 10>continued wide adoption of this new standard of care.

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 5>All right, I think we have to leave it there.

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 7>Hey, listen, stay in touch, love to know as you

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 7>continue along, and maybe on that first joarning you can

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 7>come join us after that. Mike Coordinair he is co

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 7>founder Cordon you or excuse me, co founder CEO president

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.439
<v Speaker 7>of carlsmed joining us from the Nasdaq on their first

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 7>day of trading. And our own Natalia Kitty Javich, she's

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 7>here in studio. She's our Bloomberg News Equities Reports.

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.760
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 7>Those latest trade agreements still waiting to be done, including

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 7>one with the EU and then another that's already been

0:35:55.400 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 7>hammered out with Japan.

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Tip weigh in both US Treasury Secretary Scott Besson follow

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 3>by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik.

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 6>Fifteen percent for Japan for reciprocal terroriffts for autos. That

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 6>is a different kind of deal. But because the Japanese

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 6>proposed a very innovative solution, has it Russell's.

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Come up with anything innovative?

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 6>Not yet. The EU has a collective action problem twenty

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 6>seven countries.

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 5>That's up to them to negotiate.

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 10>Right, are they willing to open their market?

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 5>I don't think.

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 11>I don't think anybody.

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 10>Europe's not going to go and give us a trillion

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 10>dollars too.

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, can they get below fifteen percent? Or is fifteen

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 5>percent now the floor for autos? I would I would

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 5>know for a recip goal tariff the European.

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 7>Union don't willing to accept.

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 5>I don't think the countries can get low like that,

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 5>all right?

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 7>That, of course is US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnik, proceeded

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 7>there by US Treasury Secretary Scott Best. They were earlier

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 7>on Bloomberg Surveillance on TV and radio. Hey, check out

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 7>those full interviews. You can find them on the Bloomberg

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 7>and at Bloomberg dot com. Hey for the town though

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 7>on these trade agreements and what impact it may have

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 7>on global trade and for investments in the US. We

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 7>start in the Nation's Capital with a senior advisor in Japan,

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 7>Cheer at CSIS. It's the set of for Strategic and

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 7>International Studies, Christy Gavella, joining Tim and myself from the

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 7>Nation's Capital. Christy, it does seem like things are moving

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 7>along on trade deals according to what's kind of coming out.

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 7>Are these good trade deals for the United States? Are

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 7>they good for the economy? Are they good for the

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 7>global economy?

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:32.440
<v Speaker 5>And why or why not?

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 12>Well, it certainly seems that the Trump administration is gaining

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 12>momentum in its quest to negotiate trade deals before the

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 12>August one deadline. If we look at the deal that

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 12>was announced with Japan yesterday, it's clear that these are

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 12>good deals for the US in the sense that the

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 12>US is raising tariffs by significant amounts and their horror

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 12>administration also by getting increased investment that addresses the trade deficit.

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 12>You know, some could argue that the concessions being offered

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 12>are perhaps not as significant as they might have wanted,

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 12>but they are getting, for example, Japan five hundred and

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 12>fifty billion dollars in investments, as well as concessions on

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 12>rice imports and also on auto safety standards. So these

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 12>are meaningful deals in a sense, and the deal with

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 12>Japan was the most substantial negotiated yet in terms of

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 12>trade volume.

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 3>In your view, does it seem like the deal with

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Japan is better for Japan or better for the United States?

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 12>It represents a compromise on both sides. Japan's initial position

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 12>was that it wanted the removal of all US triffs,

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 12>which of course it did not receive. But a key

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.319
<v Speaker 12>issue for Japan was the tariffs on automobiles, which were

0:38:37.360 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 12>at twenty five percent from earlier in the year. So

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 12>Japan received a reduction to fifteen percent on autos. It

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 12>also received an overall reduction from the proposed twenty five

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 12>percent reciprocal terifts to fifteen percent, so that is a

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 12>substantial improvement over the initial conditions Japan was facing. It's

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 12>also the lowest reciprocal teriff rate that's been negotiated to

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 12>date with a country that's running a trade surplus with

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 12>the US. Make no mistake of fifteen percent tariffs are

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.799
<v Speaker 12>still a significant blow for the Japanese economy. So you know,

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.280
<v Speaker 12>things were given and things were gained on both sides.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 7>Hey, you know, there was a Bloomberg story Christie out

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 7>this morning and included a quote from trin you and

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 7>senior economists for Emerging Asia at New Texas, and she said,

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 7>we live in a new normal where ten percent is

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 7>the new zero, and so fifteen percent and twenty percent

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 7>doesn't seem so bad if everyone else got it.

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.080
<v Speaker 5>And she's talking, of course, about teriff levels.

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 7>She went on to say that at fifteen to twenty

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 7>percent tariff level, it's still profitable for US companies to

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 7>import from abroad rather than produce similar goods at home.

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 7>So wait a minute, I thought these trade deals were

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 7>about bringing back manufacturing and supply chains to the US

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 7>and investment back to the US.

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 5>Is that going to really happen?

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 12>Well, on your initial point, it is true that the

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 12>Trump administration has managed to reset people's perspectives on what

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 12>constitutes reasonable tariffs. So you know, what we see with Japan,

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 12>for example, would have been considered horrific. And the minimum

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 12>one percent that seems to be on the table is

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.359
<v Speaker 12>also shocking. By previous standards, But it is true that

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 12>in the longer term, it's still up in the air

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 12>whether these tariffs will really achieve the goal of bringing

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.439
<v Speaker 12>investment and jobs back to the US in a substantial way.

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 12>These tariffs are not necessarily the best tools to do that,

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:22.720
<v Speaker 12>and it also is very difficult to predict how companies

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 12>and others will react to them, So we can only

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 12>really see the short term consequences in terms of rising

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 12>prices for consumers and also the revenue that it will

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 12>generate in the short term, But companies and others will

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 12>adjust in unpredictable ways, and it won't necessarily mean that

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 12>they will come back to the US.

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 3>The President has talked about trade deals and economies opening

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 3>up to the United States, and in your view, was

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 3>the Japanese economy closed to the United States? I mean,

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 3>certainly from an automaker perspective. It's been a few years

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 3>since I've been in Japan, but I didn't see any

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 3>American cars on the roads of Japan. They were all

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Andanese cars there. But has the market been closed to

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the US?

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 5>In general?

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 12>Tariff barriers in Japan are not significant. Japan has had

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 12>open trade with the US for a long time. But

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 12>you're correct that on sensitive products like agriculture, there have

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 12>always been high tariffs. That's not unique to Japan. So

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 12>rice did become a significant issue in the negotiations. On

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 12>auto's the main issue there is more complicated. So the

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.879
<v Speaker 12>concession that was given in the agreement related to auto

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 12>safety standards, which have long been perceived to be a

0:41:34.160 --> 0:41:37.439
<v Speaker 12>non tariff barrier that have made it more difficult for

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 12>US automakers to sell in Japan because they have to

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:42.839
<v Speaker 12>meet different safety standards. But there are a host of

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 12>market factors that make US cars less competitive in Japan

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 12>that won't necessarily be addressed by these changes. So you know,

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 12>there are areas, in short where Japan's market has been

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:57.439
<v Speaker 12>rather closed. But on the whole, you know, companies face

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 12>relatively open conditions on a relatively free and fair playing field.

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 7>We've seen some reports about the EU seem to be

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 7>maybe working getting closer to a deal with the United States.

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 5>We've got China next week.

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 7>Just to wrap up, just remind everyone why having trade

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 7>deals with these big trading partners is important for the

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 7>US economy and the US overall.

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 11>Well.

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 12>From the perspective of the Trump administration. The issue is

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 12>that these countries are running trade surpluses, so they are

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 12>seen as a negotiating a tool in that sense. Overall,

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 12>these are our major trading partners in the US, and

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 12>so the trade volumes that are going through are significant

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 12>to the economy. It's important that these relationships are maintained.

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 12>It's important that, from the administration's perspective, they be rebalanced

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:48.879
<v Speaker 12>in various ways. So, you know, getting these deals ahead

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 12>of the August one deadline minimizes disruptions to markets and

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 12>to companies' activities, so it's important that they move forward.

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 7>Yep, we can cross a big, big uncertainty off our

0:42:57.520 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 7>list here, no doubt about it.

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much. Christie Senior Advisor in Japan.

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 7>Chair at CSIS, the Center for Strategic and International Studies,

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:07.320
<v Speaker 7>joining us from the nation's capital.

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal