1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,360
Speaker 1: Welcome to today's edition of the Clay Travis and Buck

2
00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:04,720
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast.

3
00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:08,639
Speaker 2: Welcome everybody. Tuesday edition of Clay and Buck kicks off

4
00:00:08,920 --> 00:00:15,040
Speaker 2: right now. We had the Senate all night working hard

5
00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:19,600
Speaker 2: to pass a bill that the Republican base does not

6
00:00:19,680 --> 00:00:23,760
Speaker 2: want pass. Ninety five billion dollars in foreign aid for Ukraine, Israel,

7
00:00:23,840 --> 00:00:28,840
Speaker 2: and Taiwan, nothing for the southern border. We shall discuss that.

8
00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:36,400
Speaker 2: We also have the immunity claim making its way through

9
00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:40,879
Speaker 2: the courts. The Trump legal team put forward an application

10
00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:44,839
Speaker 2: for a stay, and wow, I don't know if we're

11
00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:48,400
Speaker 2: going to get too deep into it today because it's intricate,

12
00:00:49,000 --> 00:00:53,960
Speaker 2: but basically, they're asking the Supreme Court to tell the

13
00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:58,480
Speaker 2: circuit court to hold on a second, you can't tell

14
00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:02,680
Speaker 2: the district court to go forward with the trial until

15
00:01:02,840 --> 00:01:06,199
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court rules on whether or not the stay

16
00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:11,000
Speaker 2: goes into place. And also they're looking they're looking to

17
00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:13,560
Speaker 2: get down the line cirt. I mean, the whole thing

18
00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:16,600
Speaker 2: is a giant mess, but a stay and a stay.

19
00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:20,880
Speaker 2: They're trying to play time games here with the Trump trial,

20
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:23,440
Speaker 2: so we might get into some of that a little

21
00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:26,600
Speaker 2: bit later. They asked for you're actually brought this, the

22
00:01:26,640 --> 00:01:29,679
Speaker 2: Court should stay the d C Circuits mandate pending resolution

23
00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:34,880
Speaker 2: of President Trump's petition for cercii in this court. As

24
00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:37,959
Speaker 2: an additional relief, President Trump requests this court stay the

25
00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,240
Speaker 2: d C Circuits mandate pending the resolution for a petition

26
00:01:41,319 --> 00:01:46,320
Speaker 2: for en bunk consideration. Whoop clay, they are, They're getting

27
00:01:46,319 --> 00:01:49,480
Speaker 2: deep into legal weeds. But basically the Trump team is like, hey,

28
00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:53,200
Speaker 2: what's the rush. Supreme Court, we need more time for this,

29
00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:56,560
Speaker 2: And the DC Circuit and District Court are saying, it's

30
00:01:56,640 --> 00:01:58,560
Speaker 2: go time. We got to get this Trump trial going

31
00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:00,200
Speaker 2: as fast as possible.

32
00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:04,920
Speaker 1: Which is why I've been saying for some time. I've

33
00:02:05,000 --> 00:02:08,000
Speaker 1: got the law degree. And so when you read all that,

34
00:02:08,120 --> 00:02:10,239
Speaker 1: which I bet a lot of people is like their

35
00:02:10,280 --> 00:02:14,760
Speaker 1: eyes are rolling back into their head. It is so hard,

36
00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:18,280
Speaker 1: even for someone who is a lawyer to be keeping

37
00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:22,440
Speaker 1: tabs on all of the different moving parts of the

38
00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 1: Trump legal process. And I think, Buck, maybe I'm gonna

39
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:30,400
Speaker 1: end up being wrong, but I think all of this

40
00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:35,320
Speaker 1: is so much. They threw so much at him that

41
00:02:35,440 --> 00:02:39,560
Speaker 1: it's going to be hard for the average voter to

42
00:02:39,639 --> 00:02:44,840
Speaker 1: be focused that much on the criminal and civil prosecutions

43
00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:48,080
Speaker 1: that are taking place of Trump, and so I question

44
00:02:48,360 --> 00:02:51,880
Speaker 1: what the overall value is going to be because I think.

45
00:02:51,760 --> 00:02:54,399
Speaker 2: It's that they they've thrown so much at him. Buck.

46
00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:56,760
Speaker 1: I really feel like if they had said, Hey, we're

47
00:02:56,760 --> 00:02:59,440
Speaker 1: going to put all of our eggs in this one basket.

48
00:02:59,520 --> 00:03:02,080
Speaker 1: This is the tr trial we think is the most important.

49
00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:05,360
Speaker 1: This is the one we're going to bring. It's either

50
00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:09,600
Speaker 1: you know, win or lose on this one. I think

51
00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,720
Speaker 1: people would have been able to follow it. But right now,

52
00:03:12,840 --> 00:03:16,120
Speaker 1: I think he's got three different hearings today. Buck, and

53
00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:18,600
Speaker 1: you just reference the fact of what the Supreme Court's

54
00:03:18,639 --> 00:03:21,160
Speaker 1: got to do, and really the essence of what you

55
00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:26,200
Speaker 1: referenced is not guilt or innocence, it's timeliness. Yes, they

56
00:03:26,200 --> 00:03:29,360
Speaker 1: are trying to do everything they can to get that

57
00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:33,720
Speaker 1: Jack Smith trial decided before November because it's their hell

58
00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:36,440
Speaker 1: Mary that they think will win them the election.

59
00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:40,080
Speaker 2: Here's what's a few things here. One, Clay, I think

60
00:03:40,120 --> 00:03:42,120
Speaker 2: that they probably are going to manage to get this

61
00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:45,440
Speaker 2: to trial. And here's why I think so. When you

62
00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:49,800
Speaker 2: look at the way that they have responded to motions

63
00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:52,880
Speaker 2: up to this point. None of this is normal process.

64
00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:56,000
Speaker 2: None of this is the way that it's supposed to go. Right,

65
00:03:56,400 --> 00:04:01,360
Speaker 2: Immunity issues are special. So immunity issues, when you raise them,

66
00:04:01,720 --> 00:04:04,160
Speaker 2: you can appeal it before you go to trial, because

67
00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:06,080
Speaker 2: the whole point if you're Trump or somebody else who

68
00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:08,520
Speaker 2: has immunity, is you shouldn't have to face a trial

69
00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:11,760
Speaker 2: at all. Right, that's the whole point. If you go

70
00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:14,880
Speaker 2: through the trial but you had immunity, you've already been punished.

71
00:04:14,920 --> 00:04:18,479
Speaker 2: So there's a different process for this because usually you

72
00:04:18,480 --> 00:04:20,440
Speaker 2: could only appeal a verdict, right, you don't get to

73
00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:22,960
Speaker 2: appeal that they're bringing a case against you. Well, with

74
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:28,240
Speaker 2: immunity you can, Clayvy, I think you know, initially the

75
00:04:28,240 --> 00:04:31,559
Speaker 2: circuit they're giving them, you know, five days for this,

76
00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:34,159
Speaker 2: two weeks for that. I was talking to a lawyer

77
00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:37,760
Speaker 2: buddy of mine. He says, this stuff takes months. Usually

78
00:04:38,400 --> 00:04:43,920
Speaker 2: this stuff would routinely take ninety days extended extended. That

79
00:04:44,040 --> 00:04:47,040
Speaker 2: this process that they are ramming Trump through right now,

80
00:04:47,600 --> 00:04:52,200
Speaker 2: by normal order, meaning everything DC District, DC Circuit, Supreme

81
00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:57,120
Speaker 2: Court motions should take at least two years, and they

82
00:04:57,120 --> 00:05:01,640
Speaker 2: have already condensed year one into a few months basically, right,

83
00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:04,279
Speaker 2: that's what's actually good. So they are throwing out and

84
00:05:04,320 --> 00:05:09,400
Speaker 2: it's all based on this principle that Jack Smith is fording.

85
00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:11,200
Speaker 2: And Andy McCarthy talked to us about this. I think

86
00:05:11,200 --> 00:05:13,800
Speaker 2: it last week that the public has a right to

87
00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,560
Speaker 2: a speedy trial. In this case, there's no such thing

88
00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:19,000
Speaker 2: as a public right to a speedy trial. There's a

89
00:05:19,040 --> 00:05:22,520
Speaker 2: defendant right to a speedy trial. So they are wildly

90
00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:26,440
Speaker 2: abusing the system already. Now there's no to your point

91
00:05:26,480 --> 00:05:30,039
Speaker 2: about process, their discretion about Okay, you've got ten days

92
00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:32,160
Speaker 2: for this motion or five days to come back on this,

93
00:05:32,279 --> 00:05:34,680
Speaker 2: or three days to come back on that. That's not

94
00:05:34,720 --> 00:05:36,960
Speaker 2: really reviewable. I mean, the Supreme Court can come in

95
00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:39,960
Speaker 2: and say no, but they're probably not going to do that.

96
00:05:41,200 --> 00:05:43,400
Speaker 2: So they're able to speed this whole thing up because

97
00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:46,320
Speaker 2: they're trying to get it to a trial irrespective of

98
00:05:46,360 --> 00:05:50,600
Speaker 2: what would be normal. So Scott's crazy. Yeah, it is crazy.

99
00:05:50,680 --> 00:05:53,600
Speaker 1: So my thought in general is as soon as the

100
00:05:53,640 --> 00:05:59,120
Speaker 1: Supreme Court took one half of the charges that Jack

101
00:05:59,160 --> 00:06:02,920
Speaker 1: Smith is used and said we're going to hear this case,

102
00:06:03,640 --> 00:06:08,160
Speaker 1: to me, it became almost I don't know how you

103
00:06:08,279 --> 00:06:12,760
Speaker 1: start a trial with four charges if the Supreme Court

104
00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:16,000
Speaker 1: is going to potentially say two of those charges are

105
00:06:16,080 --> 00:06:19,719
Speaker 1: not prosecutable under the statute of which you're using, which

106
00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:22,640
Speaker 1: is why them taking that case was so significant. In

107
00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:27,479
Speaker 1: other words, if they started a trial and halfway through

108
00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:31,200
Speaker 1: the trial suddenly the Supreme Court comes down with a ruling,

109
00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:34,240
Speaker 1: then they would have to basically drop half of the

110
00:06:34,320 --> 00:06:37,440
Speaker 1: charges against Trump. So I still think that the way

111
00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:39,919
Speaker 1: this is going to play out, Buck is there's no

112
00:06:40,000 --> 00:06:43,640
Speaker 1: way they're going to start before July, and then the

113
00:06:43,720 --> 00:06:48,279
Speaker 1: question becomes what day does the what day officially does

114
00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:51,760
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court come down with a ruling, And then

115
00:06:51,839 --> 00:06:54,320
Speaker 1: are they going to try to do the case the

116
00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:59,240
Speaker 1: Jack Smith case in mid to late July, August, September

117
00:06:59,360 --> 00:07:04,960
Speaker 1: of an election. I think that becomes challenging to justify

118
00:07:05,440 --> 00:07:08,040
Speaker 1: as anything other than a political prosecution.

119
00:07:08,279 --> 00:07:11,600
Speaker 2: So, but the courts have gone along with this at

120
00:07:11,640 --> 00:07:13,360
Speaker 2: every step of the way. They've moved this as fast

121
00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:16,440
Speaker 2: as they absolutely possibly can, beyond anything that anyone has

122
00:07:16,440 --> 00:07:19,320
Speaker 2: ever seen before in the DC circuit. Right they're they're

123
00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:20,800
Speaker 2: truncating all the schedules.

124
00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:23,040
Speaker 1: Well, they were trying to start on March fourth, so

125
00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:26,120
Speaker 1: that's finally out the window. So I think they're going

126
00:07:26,200 --> 00:07:28,480
Speaker 1: to miss that by several months. But yes, you're right,

127
00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:32,280
Speaker 1: they've moved more in a more rapid fashion than ever before.

128
00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:36,560
Speaker 2: And and we'll see what the Supreme Court does. And

129
00:07:36,600 --> 00:07:38,000
Speaker 2: to give everyone a sense of this, I mean, this

130
00:07:38,080 --> 00:07:41,120
Speaker 2: is a really fascinating point as well. I think Jack

131
00:07:41,240 --> 00:07:46,200
Speaker 2: Smith could have gone through normal process and allowed the

132
00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:50,840
Speaker 2: DC Circuit, the appeals court to hear the immunity challenge

133
00:07:50,840 --> 00:07:53,080
Speaker 2: and there's also community challenges. Right in two parts, there's

134
00:07:53,080 --> 00:07:55,600
Speaker 2: immunity and then there's the double jeopardy point. The double

135
00:07:55,680 --> 00:07:58,000
Speaker 2: jeopardy point, I think that gets slapped down very easily.

136
00:07:58,080 --> 00:08:00,680
Speaker 2: Congress is not a criminal court. Sorry, that's not gonna work.

137
00:08:01,680 --> 00:08:04,280
Speaker 2: But the first one on immunity, that's actually a big issue.

138
00:08:04,280 --> 00:08:07,160
Speaker 2: That's a big constitutional question that has to that hasn't

139
00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:08,880
Speaker 2: been resolved by the Supreme Court. That needs to be

140
00:08:08,920 --> 00:08:12,640
Speaker 2: resolved by the Supreme Court. But Jack Smith went around

141
00:08:13,240 --> 00:08:18,160
Speaker 2: the Circuit court directly to the Supreme Court. Even though Clay,

142
00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:20,840
Speaker 2: you and I both know Circuit Court's gonna crush Trump

143
00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:22,960
Speaker 2: on this one. He doesn't even want it to go

144
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:24,840
Speaker 2: to the mbunk. He wanted to go right to the

145
00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:27,520
Speaker 2: Supreme Court. Why because he's trying to rush this thing

146
00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:30,000
Speaker 2: as fast as he can, and the Supreme Court. If

147
00:08:30,040 --> 00:08:32,480
Speaker 2: they take it now that they're looking at this, they're

148
00:08:32,520 --> 00:08:34,800
Speaker 2: probably gonna move very fast too, right, because what's the point.

149
00:08:34,920 --> 00:08:36,439
Speaker 2: They can't be the ones to move slowly?

150
00:08:37,000 --> 00:08:40,640
Speaker 1: And I actually, I actually think if if they came

151
00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:44,720
Speaker 1: to me, and this would be a crazy upset, right,

152
00:08:44,760 --> 00:08:47,240
Speaker 1: if I'm having a conversation with some Supreme Court justice

153
00:08:47,240 --> 00:08:49,000
Speaker 1: and he's like or she's like, hey, Clay, what do

154
00:08:49,040 --> 00:08:51,000
Speaker 1: you think we should do here? I actually think the

155
00:08:51,040 --> 00:08:53,560
Speaker 1: way the Supreme Court should handle this is to delay it,

156
00:08:54,280 --> 00:08:58,480
Speaker 1: because what this really is buck to me, is the

157
00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:01,440
Speaker 1: question you have to ask yourself. And I go for

158
00:09:01,520 --> 00:09:03,360
Speaker 1: everybody out there, and I would say, if you're a

159
00:09:03,360 --> 00:09:05,559
Speaker 1: Republican operative, if you're listening to this, if you're on

160
00:09:05,600 --> 00:09:07,840
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign and you're listening to this, to me,

161
00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:11,480
Speaker 1: you distill all of this down and say, do you

162
00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:14,120
Speaker 1: want a jury in New York City? Do you want

163
00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:16,920
Speaker 1: a jury in Washington, DC? Do you want a jury

164
00:09:16,920 --> 00:09:20,080
Speaker 1: in South Florida? Do you want a jury in Atlanta, Georgia?

165
00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:20,440
Speaker 2: Right?

166
00:09:20,640 --> 00:09:24,360
Speaker 1: What is that forty eight people roughly? Or do you

167
00:09:24,400 --> 00:09:26,760
Speaker 1: want a Supreme Court in the United States nine people?

168
00:09:27,440 --> 00:09:29,200
Speaker 1: That's fifty six to fifty seven people?

169
00:09:29,280 --> 00:09:31,240
Speaker 2: Whatever? The math is there fifty seven.

170
00:09:31,320 --> 00:09:36,440
Speaker 1: I think, do you want fifty seven people to make

171
00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:40,680
Speaker 1: a decision about whether Trump should or should not be

172
00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:43,200
Speaker 1: the president of the United States, or do you want

173
00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:46,160
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty million people to make a decision

174
00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:47,280
Speaker 1: about whether Trump should be.

175
00:09:47,520 --> 00:09:49,760
Speaker 2: To agree with you, there is almost no chance that

176
00:09:49,840 --> 00:09:51,959
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court sits on this and just says, yeah,

177
00:09:52,000 --> 00:09:53,880
Speaker 2: it's on our docket. We're not gonna We're not gonna

178
00:09:53,920 --> 00:09:55,520
Speaker 2: touch this until after the election.

179
00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:56,199
Speaker 3: No.

180
00:09:56,200 --> 00:09:57,760
Speaker 2: No, I'm not saying until after the election.

181
00:09:57,840 --> 00:09:59,800
Speaker 1: But I'm saying if you take it and delay it

182
00:10:00,000 --> 00:10:02,240
Speaker 1: as long as you can, If you take this case

183
00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:04,839
Speaker 1: and you rely, first of all, they can knock half

184
00:10:04,920 --> 00:10:07,440
Speaker 1: of the jack Smith charges out. And if they knock

185
00:10:07,520 --> 00:10:10,559
Speaker 1: half the jack Smith charges out, I do think that

186
00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:14,000
Speaker 1: would be seen as a fairly substantial win. If you

187
00:10:14,040 --> 00:10:16,240
Speaker 1: don't release your opinion, I'm not sure what the last

188
00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:19,800
Speaker 1: day to release opinions are, but let's say it's early July.

189
00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:21,960
Speaker 1: Let's say it's July fourth weekend. They're going to come

190
00:10:21,960 --> 00:10:24,640
Speaker 1: out with the ruling, and then you have to go

191
00:10:24,679 --> 00:10:27,319
Speaker 1: get a jury seated. That would mean you can't start

192
00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:32,199
Speaker 1: until August. I think it becomes very difficult to start

193
00:10:32,240 --> 00:10:36,240
Speaker 1: a trial in August wise of the election. Well, because

194
00:10:36,280 --> 00:10:41,120
Speaker 1: in general you have the Department of Justice position, I.

195
00:10:41,080 --> 00:10:43,480
Speaker 2: Know that they're forgetting what the triage, what the courts

196
00:10:43,520 --> 00:10:47,400
Speaker 2: have done up to this point is entirely unprecedented in scheduling.

197
00:10:47,520 --> 00:10:50,360
Speaker 2: I get in as fast as humanly possible. So the

198
00:10:50,440 --> 00:10:53,520
Speaker 2: notion that they're going to rely on precedent to stop

199
00:10:53,559 --> 00:10:55,960
Speaker 2: it at that phase to me, when I'm saying Clay,

200
00:10:55,960 --> 00:10:57,320
Speaker 2: is when I was looking over this last night when

201
00:10:57,320 --> 00:11:00,920
Speaker 2: the application went through, this freight train has been quietly

202
00:11:01,040 --> 00:11:04,199
Speaker 2: moving in the background that you know was in Chuckkin's hand.

203
00:11:04,200 --> 00:11:05,960
Speaker 2: The District Court then it went to the Circuit Court

204
00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:08,840
Speaker 2: and then back to chuck In and the District Court

205
00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:12,200
Speaker 2: did I'm sorry. The Circuit Court did something that completely

206
00:11:12,240 --> 00:11:15,760
Speaker 2: shows their hand in this. They said, look, you either

207
00:11:15,840 --> 00:11:18,040
Speaker 2: take it to the Supreme Court or the clock starts

208
00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:21,079
Speaker 2: running and Chuckkin can put this back on the calendar.

209
00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:23,199
Speaker 2: That's what they want, right, They want to get to

210
00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:26,120
Speaker 2: the trials as possible. So now Supreme Court's probably going

211
00:11:26,200 --> 00:11:27,880
Speaker 2: to come down, I don't know, in the next day

212
00:11:27,960 --> 00:11:30,760
Speaker 2: or two and say okay, okay, there's a stay, right,

213
00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:33,280
Speaker 2: I think they're going to have to do that, and

214
00:11:33,320 --> 00:11:36,280
Speaker 2: then they may even I think they can say we

215
00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:41,360
Speaker 2: take your application for this stay as effectively that they

216
00:11:41,400 --> 00:11:44,120
Speaker 2: can do this a grant of sert. They can say

217
00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:46,719
Speaker 2: we'll look at the immunity claim now too, or they

218
00:11:46,720 --> 00:11:49,200
Speaker 2: can say hold on, brief us in a few weeks,

219
00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:51,720
Speaker 2: brief us on why you know, and go through a

220
00:11:51,720 --> 00:11:54,960
Speaker 2: more standard process. But I can't see a way in

221
00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:57,520
Speaker 2: which they're not looking at this thing and coming down

222
00:11:57,600 --> 00:12:00,760
Speaker 2: with a decision about whether the true trial can go

223
00:12:00,840 --> 00:12:03,600
Speaker 2: forward on the immunity claim within the next few months,

224
00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:06,000
Speaker 2: based on the timeline that they've done everything so far,

225
00:12:06,120 --> 00:12:08,160
Speaker 2: unless the Supreme Court is going to say all the

226
00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:10,280
Speaker 2: other courts are moving super fast, We're going to move

227
00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:13,800
Speaker 2: at normal speed, which is quite slow. Yeah, that's that's

228
00:12:13,800 --> 00:12:15,800
Speaker 2: what I'm saying. I would move at normal speed, and

229
00:12:15,800 --> 00:12:16,679
Speaker 2: that would put it.

230
00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:20,000
Speaker 1: Then I think it becomes difficult to start before August

231
00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:22,880
Speaker 1: the Jack Smith case, which is then you know, we'll

232
00:12:22,920 --> 00:12:25,080
Speaker 1: also see we still got to figure out what's going

233
00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:27,400
Speaker 1: to happen in New York City. Is the Alvin Bragg

234
00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:29,560
Speaker 1: case going to go forward first? Because I think that

235
00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:30,720
Speaker 1: can wrong foot things.

236
00:12:31,840 --> 00:12:33,520
Speaker 2: But then you kind.

237
00:12:33,320 --> 00:12:36,480
Speaker 1: Of get into, I think, a very difficult proposition where

238
00:12:36,880 --> 00:12:39,360
Speaker 1: if the case is not starting till August, and if

239
00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:42,560
Speaker 1: we presume that the case is going to Remember I

240
00:12:42,600 --> 00:12:44,319
Speaker 1: was looking at this book. Do you know the first

241
00:12:44,400 --> 00:12:48,120
Speaker 1: votes start getting cast in September? I mean, I know,

242
00:12:48,160 --> 00:12:51,800
Speaker 1: it's crazy, Like I think the first vote gets cast

243
00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:54,280
Speaker 1: in on September twentieth is the first day that anybody

244
00:12:54,320 --> 00:12:57,559
Speaker 1: can vote the presidential election. Given how much early voting

245
00:12:57,600 --> 00:13:00,520
Speaker 1: and everything else there already is, I think it's going

246
00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:02,640
Speaker 1: to be hard to get any verdict in the Jack

247
00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:06,600
Speaker 1: Smith case before many voters are already going out and casting.

248
00:13:06,840 --> 00:13:08,920
Speaker 2: I think they view it as just the trial might

249
00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:11,880
Speaker 2: be enough, and that's why it's all about just getting

250
00:13:11,920 --> 00:13:14,720
Speaker 2: it to the trial. So if they get guard the

251
00:13:14,800 --> 00:13:17,480
Speaker 2: outcome that yeah. Regardless of the outcome, they just feel

252
00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:19,400
Speaker 2: like if they can get Trump in a courtroom at

253
00:13:19,440 --> 00:13:21,360
Speaker 2: the height of the election, you got a guy who's

254
00:13:21,360 --> 00:13:23,920
Speaker 2: an accused criminal runn against whoever the Democrats are running.

255
00:13:23,920 --> 00:13:25,800
Speaker 2: We talk about that in a few minutes. I think

256
00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:27,439
Speaker 2: that's I think that's the whole game. And I don't

257
00:13:27,480 --> 00:13:29,880
Speaker 2: know how the Supreme Court, given how the other courts

258
00:13:29,920 --> 00:13:32,840
Speaker 2: have operated, now it will look like they're doing Trump's

259
00:13:32,880 --> 00:13:35,680
Speaker 2: bidding if they don't move fast. And there is a

260
00:13:35,679 --> 00:13:37,880
Speaker 2: pretty strong case to sit when I say that, that's

261
00:13:37,880 --> 00:13:40,599
Speaker 2: what the Democrats will obviously say, and there is a

262
00:13:40,640 --> 00:13:43,440
Speaker 2: pretty strong case for you know, you got to let

263
00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:45,960
Speaker 2: this thing move through and be finished. I mean, one

264
00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:48,840
Speaker 2: of the problems here is why shouldn't the whole process

265
00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:50,760
Speaker 2: be finished, because even if Trump is found guilty, he

266
00:13:50,760 --> 00:13:52,720
Speaker 2: should be able to appeal it. And what if he

267
00:13:52,800 --> 00:13:55,760
Speaker 2: was appealed. What if his appeal is upheld of the

268
00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:58,040
Speaker 2: conviction that Jack Smith gets, but that appeal doesn't come

269
00:13:58,080 --> 00:13:59,520
Speaker 2: till after the election, you know what I mean.

270
00:14:00,600 --> 00:14:02,840
Speaker 1: I don't think there's any way the Supreme Court will

271
00:14:02,920 --> 00:14:06,080
Speaker 1: rule on a Trump appeal before the election.

272
00:14:06,160 --> 00:14:07,719
Speaker 2: No, that's but that's what I'm saying is that the

273
00:14:07,760 --> 00:14:10,920
Speaker 2: appeal could come after the election, and so you don't

274
00:14:10,920 --> 00:14:13,160
Speaker 2: even get fair process even if you get a verdict

275
00:14:13,200 --> 00:14:16,200
Speaker 2: the first time around. I mean, imagine, imagine this scenario.

276
00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:20,320
Speaker 2: Trump goes to trial, Trump gets convicted. Let's say it's September,

277
00:14:20,520 --> 00:14:24,600
Speaker 2: right theoretically, yeah, and then there's an election, whatever the

278
00:14:24,640 --> 00:14:28,160
Speaker 2: outcome is, and then Trump on appeal in January or

279
00:14:28,160 --> 00:14:30,480
Speaker 2: you know, appeal says, uh, you know what, actually he's

280
00:14:30,520 --> 00:14:34,080
Speaker 2: not guilty. I mean, how does that? I don't think that.

281
00:14:34,120 --> 00:14:35,840
Speaker 1: I don't think that's a crazy I don't think that

282
00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:39,400
Speaker 1: timeline is crazy at all. Which is why I remember,

283
00:14:39,920 --> 00:14:43,760
Speaker 1: if there are five justices who really think this is

284
00:14:43,840 --> 00:14:47,720
Speaker 1: an affront to American democracy, they can say that he

285
00:14:47,840 --> 00:14:52,440
Speaker 1: has immunity and this case is done. I don't know

286
00:14:52,440 --> 00:14:56,200
Speaker 1: if Amy, Cody, Barrett, and Cavani, Yeah, right, that's not

287
00:14:56,360 --> 00:15:00,840
Speaker 1: being talked about a lot. They could theoretically say this

288
00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:03,560
Speaker 1: case is you know, this case is within the bounds

289
00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:07,400
Speaker 1: of presidential authority and just toss it in July.

290
00:15:09,440 --> 00:15:10,760
Speaker 2: Would you you want to play you want to play

291
00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:11,440
Speaker 2: a bet on that one?

292
00:15:11,480 --> 00:15:15,640
Speaker 1: I I think it's unlikely, but I do think they're

293
00:15:15,640 --> 00:15:18,000
Speaker 1: gonna cut jack Smith's charges in half.

294
00:15:18,120 --> 00:15:21,640
Speaker 2: I think they're going to toss the half of the

295
00:15:21,920 --> 00:15:23,520
Speaker 2: ie is. And I think if they can get one,

296
00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:26,760
Speaker 2: if they can bring one felony indictment to trial against Trump,

297
00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:29,400
Speaker 2: that that's that's the whole that's the whole game, that's

298
00:15:29,400 --> 00:15:31,040
Speaker 2: the whole goal. I don't know. I mean, all I

299
00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:32,640
Speaker 2: know is the application when you because you know the

300
00:15:32,680 --> 00:15:36,640
Speaker 2: application amended to it, this was so appended appended to it,

301
00:15:36,680 --> 00:15:41,360
Speaker 2: sorry was the the district court and the Circuit Court's

302
00:15:41,480 --> 00:15:43,880
Speaker 2: previous actions. When you look through it, you're like, this

303
00:15:43,960 --> 00:15:46,040
Speaker 2: is a sham. This is a total sham.

304
00:15:46,280 --> 00:15:49,800
Speaker 1: It's appeals all, it's all completely and I have to

305
00:15:49,840 --> 00:15:51,920
Speaker 1: be careful not to curse because I'm so far made

306
00:15:52,200 --> 00:15:53,280
Speaker 1: almost three years with you.

307
00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:58,960
Speaker 2: It's all bs. An appeal decision should take six months usually,

308
00:15:58,960 --> 00:16:01,640
Speaker 2: I know, I know, six months. They're doing this stuff

309
00:16:01,680 --> 00:16:05,200
Speaker 2: in ten days, five days, folks. It the fixes in

310
00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:07,880
Speaker 2: times ten. I was pulling my hair out last night

311
00:16:07,920 --> 00:16:09,360
Speaker 2: reading this. All right, well I got a lot of hairs.

312
00:16:09,360 --> 00:16:12,880
Speaker 2: We'll be okay. Puretalk believes in American values. This is

313
00:16:12,880 --> 00:16:15,400
Speaker 2: the cell phone company I use every day, the same

314
00:16:15,400 --> 00:16:18,360
Speaker 2: one that claims Clays family relies on two. Pure Talk

315
00:16:18,440 --> 00:16:21,280
Speaker 2: also believes the word free should mean exactly that. Free.

316
00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:24,040
Speaker 2: Switch to pure Talk and get a free Samsung five

317
00:16:24,120 --> 00:16:27,800
Speaker 2: G smartphone. No four line requirement, no activation fee, nonsense,

318
00:16:27,840 --> 00:16:30,400
Speaker 2: Just a Samsung that's built to last with a rugged

319
00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:33,840
Speaker 2: screen and a quick charging battery. Qualifying plants started just

320
00:16:33,880 --> 00:16:36,720
Speaker 2: thirty five dollars a month for unlimited talk, text, fifteen

321
00:16:36,800 --> 00:16:40,200
Speaker 2: gigs of data, and a mobile hotspot pure talk services

322
00:16:40,200 --> 00:16:42,600
Speaker 2: on the most dependable five G network in America for

323
00:16:42,720 --> 00:16:45,280
Speaker 2: half the price of Verizon AT and T or T Mobile.

324
00:16:45,520 --> 00:16:48,120
Speaker 2: The average sized family saves almost one thousand dollars a

325
00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:50,200
Speaker 2: year on a pure talk plant. I love pure Talk

326
00:16:50,360 --> 00:16:52,680
Speaker 2: work for me in Scotland, It'll work for you all

327
00:16:52,720 --> 00:16:55,360
Speaker 2: over this country. It actually has overseas plants too. Dial

328
00:16:55,440 --> 00:16:58,400
Speaker 2: pound two five zero, say keywords Clay and claim your

329
00:16:58,400 --> 00:17:02,120
Speaker 2: eligibility for a free brand new Samsung five G smartphone.

330
00:17:02,240 --> 00:17:07,360
Speaker 2: That's pound two five zero say Clay and Buck, inspiring

331
00:17:07,440 --> 00:17:11,200
Speaker 2: you to seek out the truth. The Clay Travis and

332
00:17:11,359 --> 00:17:12,359
Speaker 2: Buck Sexton Show.

333
00:17:12,560 --> 00:17:17,600
Speaker 1: Welcome back in Clay Travis Buck Sexton Show. Okay, grab

334
00:17:17,680 --> 00:17:22,520
Speaker 1: the transcript Ali flag this. I'm giving you my prediction

335
00:17:23,040 --> 00:17:25,359
Speaker 1: for what the Supreme Court is going to do because

336
00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:29,520
Speaker 1: we're talking about this rushed idea to try to get

337
00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:32,919
Speaker 1: the Jack Smith case to trial. Buck, I think you

338
00:17:33,000 --> 00:17:36,119
Speaker 1: have to think about all three of these cases not

339
00:17:36,280 --> 00:17:41,879
Speaker 1: as individual decisions, because they'll be seen as a collective whole,

340
00:17:42,400 --> 00:17:45,639
Speaker 1: as sort of the Trump docket on the Supreme Court.

341
00:17:46,160 --> 00:17:49,159
Speaker 1: I think the Supreme Court, by at least seven to two,

342
00:17:49,400 --> 00:17:53,280
Speaker 1: maybe nine to zero, is going to say Trump can't

343
00:17:53,320 --> 00:17:55,760
Speaker 1: be taken off the ballot in Colorado, that will be

344
00:17:55,880 --> 00:17:59,160
Speaker 1: considered a Trump win. I think Buck, they are going

345
00:17:59,240 --> 00:18:03,000
Speaker 1: to say five to four that half of the jack

346
00:18:03,040 --> 00:18:06,960
Speaker 1: Smith cases cannot be tried, that they are misusing the

347
00:18:07,040 --> 00:18:10,240
Speaker 1: statute on the jan sixth cases, and.

348
00:18:10,160 --> 00:18:11,960
Speaker 2: Then I think six ' three.

349
00:18:13,560 --> 00:18:16,639
Speaker 1: Maybe five to four, but six ' three more likely

350
00:18:17,119 --> 00:18:20,800
Speaker 1: they will say Trump does not have broad immunity. So

351
00:18:20,880 --> 00:18:23,800
Speaker 1: Trump will win two of the cases, lose one, and

352
00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:25,000
Speaker 1: then we come back.

353
00:18:25,080 --> 00:18:26,879
Speaker 2: This is the big question that you've been asking.

354
00:18:27,760 --> 00:18:31,200
Speaker 1: I think they will issue all of those opinions other

355
00:18:31,240 --> 00:18:33,439
Speaker 1: than the Colorado case, which I think will come sooner

356
00:18:33,960 --> 00:18:36,720
Speaker 1: on the last day of the court, which will be

357
00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:38,720
Speaker 1: sometime in late June early Joe.

358
00:18:39,000 --> 00:18:40,919
Speaker 2: So does Jack Smith get to trial?

359
00:18:41,840 --> 00:18:44,480
Speaker 1: I say the question, you say yes, I'll tell you

360
00:18:44,520 --> 00:18:46,360
Speaker 1: what I think when we come back back.

361
00:18:46,400 --> 00:18:48,760
Speaker 2: That's called the teas, all right. So I was gonna

362
00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:52,080
Speaker 2: lay out a whole range of topics today for the show,

363
00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:54,800
Speaker 2: but we got a little side because there's many things.

364
00:18:54,840 --> 00:18:58,960
Speaker 2: Many of the things have happened, Biden's decline in state

365
00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:02,560
Speaker 2: of mind, also Clay. At some point I'm going to

366
00:19:02,600 --> 00:19:05,679
Speaker 2: ask you, uh, there's a chart the wall Street journals

367
00:19:05,680 --> 00:19:09,000
Speaker 2: shared of the American jobs that skew heavily to one gender.

368
00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:12,439
Speaker 2: I actually, yes, yes, we'll hold this for the end.

369
00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:14,960
Speaker 2: We're not gonna do it right now, but I want

370
00:19:15,040 --> 00:19:17,160
Speaker 2: I want to I want to everyone to think about

371
00:19:17,160 --> 00:19:19,080
Speaker 2: this one. I want you to think about this one.

372
00:19:20,119 --> 00:19:23,120
Speaker 2: The general you, uh, if you had to pick one

373
00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:25,399
Speaker 2: that skewed heavily female and had to pick one that

374
00:19:25,480 --> 00:19:28,960
Speaker 2: skewed incredibly heavily male, which ones from the list would

375
00:19:28,960 --> 00:19:30,240
Speaker 2: it be? But we'll get to that in a little

376
00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:33,680
Speaker 2: bit first up here. So it just struck me last night.

377
00:19:33,720 --> 00:19:36,520
Speaker 2: I had this because I wanted to read the just

378
00:19:36,560 --> 00:19:40,320
Speaker 2: to update everybody. There's an application from Trump's team to

379
00:19:40,440 --> 00:19:43,680
Speaker 2: the Supreme Court for a stay of the Circuit Court

380
00:19:43,680 --> 00:19:46,199
Speaker 2: in d C. Circuit Court in d C gave a

381
00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:50,480
Speaker 2: deadline for Trump's team to put in this application and

382
00:19:50,560 --> 00:19:53,400
Speaker 2: if they don't put it in, the Circuit Court said,

383
00:19:53,440 --> 00:19:55,600
Speaker 2: we're sending it back to Chuck kitt in the district court.

384
00:19:55,880 --> 00:19:58,240
Speaker 2: She can put a new trial date on the calendar

385
00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:01,000
Speaker 2: and it's all systems go. Team put in the State

386
00:20:01,040 --> 00:20:02,639
Speaker 2: of Supreme Court or we need to hear from the

387
00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:05,359
Speaker 2: Supreme Court. But I went through the whole the whole

388
00:20:05,400 --> 00:20:08,960
Speaker 2: document YEP last night and added to it. You can

389
00:20:09,000 --> 00:20:12,760
Speaker 2: see the arguments, but also you can see the other

390
00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:16,160
Speaker 2: decisions that have been handed down and the timeline, and

391
00:20:16,200 --> 00:20:19,920
Speaker 2: they are at warp speed, or if you're a spaceballs fan,

392
00:20:20,400 --> 00:20:24,200
Speaker 2: ludicrous speed. They are leaving this thing. What should take

393
00:20:24,280 --> 00:20:26,880
Speaker 2: six months in the appeals process, they're doing in ten

394
00:20:26,960 --> 00:20:30,280
Speaker 2: days or or you know, or five days. And this

395
00:20:30,359 --> 00:20:32,800
Speaker 2: is so clear what's going on with that in mind?

396
00:20:32,840 --> 00:20:35,520
Speaker 2: It does go to the Supreme Court. I already said,

397
00:20:35,640 --> 00:20:38,000
Speaker 2: I think that Jack Smith is going to squeeze in

398
00:20:38,040 --> 00:20:41,080
Speaker 2: this trial before the election. That is that is where

399
00:20:41,200 --> 00:20:43,439
Speaker 2: my head is at right now. Do you think he

400
00:20:43,480 --> 00:20:46,760
Speaker 2: gets Does he get to a trial before we cast

401
00:20:46,800 --> 00:20:50,439
Speaker 2: our votes? Yes? Or no? I I don't think so.

402
00:20:51,440 --> 00:20:55,080
Speaker 2: All right, I've got a couple. Put it on the board.

403
00:20:55,520 --> 00:20:56,359
Speaker 2: I've got a couple.

404
00:20:56,640 --> 00:20:58,840
Speaker 1: First of all, I think he'd only have two charges left,

405
00:20:59,800 --> 00:21:02,320
Speaker 1: and I think the Supreme Court is not going to

406
00:21:02,359 --> 00:21:04,120
Speaker 1: be a part of the rocket docket.

407
00:21:04,600 --> 00:21:05,679
Speaker 2: I think there's a chance.

408
00:21:05,720 --> 00:21:07,360
Speaker 1: Again, I don't think it's likely, but I think there's

409
00:21:07,359 --> 00:21:10,720
Speaker 1: a chance they say that Trump has immunity. Here again

410
00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:12,760
Speaker 1: I said, I think that they will not say that

411
00:21:13,280 --> 00:21:15,639
Speaker 1: I'm gonna throw out a couple of crazy things for

412
00:21:15,680 --> 00:21:21,800
Speaker 1: everybody to think about. One one, I think, uh, there's

413
00:21:21,880 --> 00:21:25,439
Speaker 1: possibility that Merrick Garland, and I know some of you

414
00:21:25,480 --> 00:21:27,800
Speaker 1: out there are gonna say this never happened, that Merrick Garland,

415
00:21:27,840 --> 00:21:29,680
Speaker 1: who I think is feuding a little bit with Joe

416
00:21:29,720 --> 00:21:34,080
Speaker 1: Biden right now, steps in and says, we're not because

417
00:21:34,119 --> 00:21:37,439
Speaker 1: the General Department of Justice policy that you do not

418
00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:43,359
Speaker 1: have political trials during a during a political season, and

419
00:21:43,400 --> 00:21:45,560
Speaker 1: that would clearly be the case here because it would

420
00:21:45,600 --> 00:21:49,720
Speaker 1: have to go on in August September October. I think

421
00:21:49,760 --> 00:21:53,760
Speaker 1: that's possible. Second part here, Buck, and I don't know.

422
00:21:54,840 --> 00:21:56,920
Speaker 1: You guess it's time out for say anything is possible.

423
00:21:56,960 --> 00:21:58,719
Speaker 1: Mister Clay, all right, you got to tell us what

424
00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:01,440
Speaker 1: if you're making predictions, can't be a possible prediction.

425
00:22:01,600 --> 00:22:03,160
Speaker 2: Okay, Well, I'm not.

426
00:22:03,160 --> 00:22:08,119
Speaker 1: In Merrick Garland's head, right. But Merrick Garland made Robert

427
00:22:08,160 --> 00:22:13,240
Speaker 1: her a special counsel. Robert Her again gave Biden a

428
00:22:13,320 --> 00:22:16,600
Speaker 1: pass on a willful criminal violation, which I disagree with.

429
00:22:17,200 --> 00:22:20,160
Speaker 1: But he also really and we're going to talk about

430
00:22:20,160 --> 00:22:23,840
Speaker 1: the cognition issues may have may have cut the legs

431
00:22:23,840 --> 00:22:26,879
Speaker 1: out from underneath the Biden presidency to.

432
00:22:26,840 --> 00:22:27,440
Speaker 2: Get into that.

433
00:22:28,200 --> 00:22:31,800
Speaker 1: And I think the rig job that they tried to

434
00:22:31,920 --> 00:22:35,600
Speaker 1: push through, remember the Hunter Biden no charges everything else,

435
00:22:36,119 --> 00:22:39,199
Speaker 1: the Politico story where Biden went off and said he

436
00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:41,800
Speaker 1: doesn't like Merrick Garland and he's not going to bring

437
00:22:41,880 --> 00:22:45,879
Speaker 1: him back. I think there's a possibility that Merrick Garland

438
00:22:46,480 --> 00:22:52,359
Speaker 1: has a uh better betterment of the country moment where

439
00:22:52,400 --> 00:22:54,800
Speaker 1: he says, I'm not going to allow this trial to

440
00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:57,359
Speaker 1: go forward and it doesn't happen.

441
00:22:57,880 --> 00:23:00,280
Speaker 2: And I understand that I would give you a undred

442
00:23:00,320 --> 00:23:01,959
Speaker 2: to one odds on this product. I mean, this prediction

443
00:23:02,119 --> 00:23:04,920
Speaker 2: is Bunkersville. You have way too much faith in Merrick Garland,

444
00:23:04,920 --> 00:23:06,399
Speaker 2: way too much faith in it. I have it.

445
00:23:06,920 --> 00:23:10,800
Speaker 1: I have faith as a warrior in the same way

446
00:23:10,840 --> 00:23:16,600
Speaker 1: that Judge Mary Ellen Noriyaika Trump appointee said no to

447
00:23:16,680 --> 00:23:19,600
Speaker 1: the Sweetheart Deal. Remember I was like the only person

448
00:23:19,680 --> 00:23:22,720
Speaker 1: saying Garland is a Biden appointee. There's a big difference here.

449
00:23:23,040 --> 00:23:29,920
Speaker 1: I get it. But ultimately, Merrick Garland is judged by history,

450
00:23:30,040 --> 00:23:33,199
Speaker 1: not by Joe Biden. And if you are over seventy

451
00:23:33,280 --> 00:23:35,680
Speaker 1: years old, do you want to be the guy who

452
00:23:35,760 --> 00:23:40,119
Speaker 1: is ramming through a conviction that to your point years

453
00:23:40,160 --> 00:23:43,119
Speaker 1: from now, in the moment, you can make choices that

454
00:23:43,160 --> 00:23:45,720
Speaker 1: seem like good choices when you sit back. That's what

455
00:23:45,800 --> 00:23:50,240
Speaker 1: the law does. Warriors sit back and they think ideally.

456
00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:54,840
Speaker 1: Judges in particular, you have zero faith.

457
00:23:55,119 --> 00:23:58,480
Speaker 2: I still are in the midst of all out law

458
00:23:58,560 --> 00:24:03,040
Speaker 2: fair against leading republic the Republican nominee. Ye. They have

459
00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:06,920
Speaker 2: broken all the taboos, they have crossed all the rubicons.

460
00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:11,440
Speaker 2: They get a crap about precedent, about prior practice, about

461
00:24:11,480 --> 00:24:14,920
Speaker 2: DOJ guidance. And you think Merrick Garland is going to

462
00:24:14,960 --> 00:24:17,760
Speaker 2: be the man standing the thwart the madness and allowing

463
00:24:17,800 --> 00:24:21,520
Speaker 2: people to vote on Trump. I don't know, I do.

464
00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:26,159
Speaker 1: I do have still I'm like, if this were a movie,

465
00:24:26,800 --> 00:24:30,959
Speaker 1: I would be like Luke Skywalker, who still believes that

466
00:24:31,080 --> 00:24:32,560
Speaker 1: Darth Vader even Vader, But do you.

467
00:24:32,560 --> 00:24:35,400
Speaker 2: Remember what happened to Vader? Wasn't good? Wasn't good.

468
00:24:35,520 --> 00:24:37,960
Speaker 1: I'm just saying Vader went down, but he had a

469
00:24:37,960 --> 00:24:40,960
Speaker 1: moment of redemption. Buck, I still believe in the possibility

470
00:24:40,960 --> 00:24:43,240
Speaker 1: of redemption. Spoiler alert. By the way, if you haven't

471
00:24:43,280 --> 00:24:46,880
Speaker 1: seen Return of the Jedi, I believe Merrick Garland could

472
00:24:46,960 --> 00:24:49,840
Speaker 1: be like Darth Vader there at the end, getting his

473
00:24:49,920 --> 00:24:55,479
Speaker 1: helmet pulled off, breathing slowly as the empire crumbles around him,

474
00:24:55,800 --> 00:24:59,159
Speaker 1: recognizing that he still went to law school and he

475
00:24:59,320 --> 00:25:01,919
Speaker 1: still became a lawyer, and he held his hand up

476
00:25:01,960 --> 00:25:05,840
Speaker 1: and he swore an oath to the law to preserve

477
00:25:05,920 --> 00:25:06,560
Speaker 1: the country.

478
00:25:06,840 --> 00:25:10,520
Speaker 2: Okay, this is the craziest most Outlantis theory. I think

479
00:25:10,560 --> 00:25:12,320
Speaker 2: you've ever leveled on the show. And if you happen

480
00:25:12,359 --> 00:25:14,359
Speaker 2: to end up being right, we'll have to come up

481
00:25:14,400 --> 00:25:17,000
Speaker 2: with I don't know, I'll have to bow down liability.

482
00:25:16,600 --> 00:25:19,399
Speaker 1: Buck and I don't even know what the law would happen.

483
00:25:19,880 --> 00:25:22,199
Speaker 1: I think there's some possibility that if they try so

484
00:25:22,240 --> 00:25:24,680
Speaker 1: this is if Merrick Garland doesn't have his Darth Vader

485
00:25:24,720 --> 00:25:29,000
Speaker 1: redemption moment. Second part here, I think there's some possibility

486
00:25:29,480 --> 00:25:33,639
Speaker 1: that Trump refuses to show up for the trial. And

487
00:25:33,800 --> 00:25:37,879
Speaker 1: if he refuses to show up for the trial, I

488
00:25:37,960 --> 00:25:41,040
Speaker 1: don't know what the what the process of the courts

489
00:25:41,119 --> 00:25:41,520
Speaker 1: would be.

490
00:25:42,560 --> 00:25:45,680
Speaker 2: Are they going to arrest president? What do you mean?

491
00:25:45,800 --> 00:25:47,840
Speaker 2: They would have to hold them in contempt and threaten

492
00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:49,320
Speaker 2: to incarcerat him? Right?

493
00:25:49,400 --> 00:25:51,720
Speaker 1: I know, but I don't know what the process under

494
00:25:51,760 --> 00:25:54,359
Speaker 1: which that would occur, they would put him in prison,

495
00:25:54,400 --> 00:25:57,120
Speaker 1: and they would put him in handcuffs and lead him

496
00:25:57,119 --> 00:26:00,239
Speaker 1: into court. Like I think that this could blow up

497
00:26:00,280 --> 00:26:03,399
Speaker 1: in their faces and there could be all sorts of

498
00:26:03,480 --> 00:26:08,000
Speaker 1: procedural machinations associated with If Trump just says, screw you, guys,

499
00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:09,520
Speaker 1: I'm campaigning for president.

500
00:26:09,840 --> 00:26:13,439
Speaker 2: I'm not showing up for your sham trial. That theory

501
00:26:13,760 --> 00:26:17,320
Speaker 2: is that's hardcore but not crazy. You're Merrick Garland theory.

502
00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:19,600
Speaker 2: I'm just I can't even be I can't co sign it.

503
00:26:19,600 --> 00:26:21,919
Speaker 2: I don't even know what's happened. Someone's kidnapped play today.

504
00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:26,119
Speaker 2: But you're Trump's defying the court. That's certainly within the

505
00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:29,760
Speaker 2: realm of Trump's attitude, as we've seen in the civil trials.

506
00:26:30,080 --> 00:26:32,560
Speaker 2: And I do think it raises an interesting question of

507
00:26:33,800 --> 00:26:36,239
Speaker 2: do they really have that? You know once to do

508
00:26:36,280 --> 00:26:38,800
Speaker 2: you have the stress stops to put these months to

509
00:26:38,880 --> 00:26:43,359
Speaker 2: Donald Trump day in prison or jail in Washington DC?

510
00:26:43,800 --> 00:26:45,640
Speaker 1: Are you going to go down to mar A Lago

511
00:26:46,280 --> 00:26:50,280
Speaker 1: and arrest him? I mean to me, how does that

512
00:26:50,320 --> 00:26:53,280
Speaker 1: play politically? I don't know the answer, but I think

513
00:26:53,280 --> 00:26:56,040
Speaker 1: it's a pretty crazy look for Joe. Think about this

514
00:26:56,080 --> 00:27:00,520
Speaker 1: buck for Joe Biden's Department of Justice to travel to

515
00:27:00,600 --> 00:27:04,639
Speaker 1: ma A Lago, storm mar A Lago, take his chief

516
00:27:04,680 --> 00:27:08,440
Speaker 1: political rival, put him in cuffs, and sit him in prison.

517
00:27:08,640 --> 00:27:12,800
Speaker 1: I think that is potentially a play we could have

518
00:27:12,880 --> 00:27:14,600
Speaker 1: if they try to put this in on court.

519
00:27:14,720 --> 00:27:16,720
Speaker 2: If I think we don't have the Darth Vader redemption,

520
00:27:17,000 --> 00:27:20,920
Speaker 2: I think you underestimate the viciousness and the go it

521
00:27:21,359 --> 00:27:23,960
Speaker 2: all the way, at all costs nature of the Democrat

522
00:27:23,960 --> 00:27:27,280
Speaker 2: opposition against Trump. I think they will do whatever they would.

523
00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:31,680
Speaker 1: You advise Trump to refuse to show up and make

524
00:27:31,720 --> 00:27:35,720
Speaker 1: them come to Marrow Lago and put him in cuffs. Politically,

525
00:27:36,119 --> 00:27:39,200
Speaker 1: not a legal analysis, but a political analysis.

526
00:27:39,880 --> 00:27:43,520
Speaker 2: Uh, I don't know how. I don't know how. People,

527
00:27:44,000 --> 00:27:46,320
Speaker 2: because look, if the Supreme Court, let's just let's just

528
00:27:46,400 --> 00:27:48,840
Speaker 2: we're leaving something out here and we've gotten way down.

529
00:27:49,000 --> 00:27:51,359
Speaker 2: There's news today that we have to get this.

530
00:27:52,000 --> 00:27:55,239
Speaker 1: This is the election, okay, which is crazy to think

531
00:27:55,280 --> 00:27:55,800
Speaker 1: about it.

532
00:27:55,600 --> 00:27:57,959
Speaker 2: It's a ways out there. If the Supreme Court allows

533
00:27:58,000 --> 00:28:00,840
Speaker 2: the trial to go forward effectively, I think then that

534
00:28:00,880 --> 00:28:04,040
Speaker 2: puts a stamp of Look, he's not immune and they

535
00:28:04,040 --> 00:28:08,959
Speaker 2: brought charges and he's facing trial and a majority conservative

536
00:28:09,000 --> 00:28:11,680
Speaker 2: or at least you know theoretically conservative court allowed the trust.

537
00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:13,520
Speaker 2: The Spreme Court could we didn't even talk about this.

538
00:28:13,520 --> 00:28:15,280
Speaker 2: They could just say, nah, sorry, this whole thing is

539
00:28:15,680 --> 00:28:18,360
Speaker 2: you know, he's got immunity to sham basically shut it down,

540
00:28:18,359 --> 00:28:20,480
Speaker 2: shut it all down. That could happen. I don't think

541
00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:22,360
Speaker 2: that's going to happen. I give that like a ten

542
00:28:22,400 --> 00:28:25,919
Speaker 2: percent five percent chance something in that neighborhood. But if

543
00:28:25,960 --> 00:28:27,919
Speaker 2: they allow it to go forward and there is this trial,

544
00:28:27,920 --> 00:28:30,480
Speaker 2: I mean everything this is, this is sort of what

545
00:28:30,480 --> 00:28:32,440
Speaker 2: what I was thinking about last night. And then and

546
00:28:32,480 --> 00:28:34,000
Speaker 2: then we have to we have to do a reading,

547
00:28:34,040 --> 00:28:35,480
Speaker 2: We have to come back and talk about Decline and

548
00:28:35,480 --> 00:28:37,320
Speaker 2: Biden apparently hour two and even get back to it.

549
00:28:37,440 --> 00:28:40,840
Speaker 2: Here's my underlying thesis for so much of this, Clay

550
00:28:41,080 --> 00:28:44,760
Speaker 2: or maybe just thought process for this. Everything that we've

551
00:28:44,760 --> 00:28:47,080
Speaker 2: said they wouldn't do, not we but you know, everything

552
00:28:47,120 --> 00:28:50,400
Speaker 2: that the consensus opinion had been, how they would never

553
00:28:50,600 --> 00:28:54,880
Speaker 2: dare they would never dare do that against Trump they

554
00:28:54,920 --> 00:28:57,800
Speaker 2: have done at every step of the way. There has

555
00:28:57,840 --> 00:29:01,080
Speaker 2: been no impeach them once, Yes, impeachm. Twe Yes, Special

556
00:29:01,080 --> 00:29:04,240
Speaker 2: Council Russia collusion, yes, trying to get charged against him, Yes,

557
00:29:04,280 --> 00:29:06,960
Speaker 2: trying to use you monument's clause. Yes, and now this

558
00:29:07,840 --> 00:29:10,480
Speaker 2: four criminal indictments. I mean, the whole thing is nuts.

559
00:29:10,880 --> 00:29:15,040
Speaker 2: They have broken down the barriers, the bulwarks of sanity

560
00:29:15,360 --> 00:29:18,600
Speaker 2: at every stage. So we think at the last moment

561
00:29:18,640 --> 00:29:21,479
Speaker 2: that we think it's going to hold, I don't know.

562
00:29:21,840 --> 00:29:23,680
Speaker 2: I don't I don't think. I don't see it. That's

563
00:29:23,760 --> 00:29:25,080
Speaker 2: that's my problem.

564
00:29:25,560 --> 00:29:30,000
Speaker 1: We I mean, we're truly in uncharted waters, unprecedented era,

565
00:29:30,800 --> 00:29:33,400
Speaker 1: and it may well decide the election. By the way,

566
00:29:33,480 --> 00:29:36,200
Speaker 1: I would advise Trump if he were asking me, I

567
00:29:36,240 --> 00:29:38,440
Speaker 1: would say, don't show up for trial. If they try

568
00:29:38,480 --> 00:29:41,200
Speaker 1: to do trial, make them come to mar A Lago,

569
00:29:42,040 --> 00:29:46,440
Speaker 1: storm mar A Lago and take you out in cuffs

570
00:29:46,960 --> 00:29:51,600
Speaker 1: in the middle of a fall presidential campaign. That's what

571
00:29:51,680 --> 00:29:55,200
Speaker 1: I would suggest. Now Trump may prefer buck that the

572
00:29:55,240 --> 00:29:56,560
Speaker 1: whole charade.

573
00:29:56,120 --> 00:29:56,680
Speaker 2: Of the trial.

574
00:29:56,720 --> 00:29:59,200
Speaker 1: He may want to stand on the steps and make

575
00:29:59,240 --> 00:30:03,160
Speaker 1: the argument. But I think forcing Joe Biden's Department of

576
00:30:03,400 --> 00:30:06,880
Speaker 1: Justice to arrest you when we are all voting may

577
00:30:06,880 --> 00:30:10,880
Speaker 1: have started, I think would blow up in Joe Biden's

578
00:30:10,880 --> 00:30:12,160
Speaker 1: face in a massive way.

579
00:30:12,360 --> 00:30:13,800
Speaker 2: I really really do.

580
00:30:13,960 --> 00:30:18,080
Speaker 1: Regardless of what the trial was at that point, we'll

581
00:30:18,080 --> 00:30:21,200
Speaker 1: talk about that also Joe Biden's declining cognition.

582
00:30:21,240 --> 00:30:23,120
Speaker 2: Will it even be Joe Biden in charge?

583
00:30:23,760 --> 00:30:26,840
Speaker 1: And you know what you need, right maybe some testosterone,

584
00:30:27,040 --> 00:30:31,120
Speaker 1: maybe them bigger vitality for certainly what they could use

585
00:30:31,240 --> 00:30:35,000
Speaker 1: in the Biden White House where they have noster probably

586
00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:42,360
Speaker 1: the least sosterone administration of American political history. And right now, look,

587
00:30:42,680 --> 00:30:46,120
Speaker 1: I just got back late last world five day trip

588
00:30:46,160 --> 00:30:47,120
Speaker 1: to Vegas.

589
00:30:47,120 --> 00:30:49,040
Speaker 2: Not gonna lot or zapped.

590
00:30:49,040 --> 00:30:51,280
Speaker 1: You may hear my voice a little bit a lot

591
00:30:51,320 --> 00:30:55,240
Speaker 1: of late nights that talks scentensily help you out for

592
00:30:55,320 --> 00:30:59,320
Speaker 1: the guys once we contend as we age over lower

593
00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:04,120
Speaker 1: testos levels. You can boost your testosterone by subscribing to

594
00:31:04,200 --> 00:31:08,600
Speaker 1: Chalk's Mail Vitality Stack formulated with natural ingredients. Chalk's Mail

595
00:31:08,680 --> 00:31:12,400
Speaker 1: Vitality Stack supplements will help naturally restore your body with

596
00:31:12,480 --> 00:31:14,720
Speaker 1: the energy and focus you need to get it all done.

597
00:31:14,800 --> 00:31:18,000
Speaker 1: No more reaching for a sugary energy drink that will

598
00:31:18,040 --> 00:31:22,040
Speaker 1: eventually you know this crash. Now through the end of February,

599
00:31:22,160 --> 00:31:25,800
Speaker 1: Chalk's offering a massive discount on any subscription for life.

600
00:31:25,960 --> 00:31:28,720
Speaker 1: They also have a female Vitality Stack for all the

601
00:31:28,800 --> 00:31:31,960
Speaker 1: ladies out there. Learn more about their products online at

602
00:31:32,040 --> 00:31:36,720
Speaker 1: chalk dot com spelled cchoq dot com. My name Clay

603
00:31:36,880 --> 00:31:41,280
Speaker 1: as your promo code to unlock the exclusive February only

604
00:31:41,440 --> 00:31:46,560
Speaker 1: offer cchoq dot com your promo code, my name Clay.

605
00:31:47,640 --> 00:31:51,240
Speaker 3: Need a break from politics, a little comedy to counter

606
00:31:51,320 --> 00:31:56,520
Speaker 3: the craziness, So the Sunday Hang a weekend podcast to

607
00:31:56,840 --> 00:31:58,960
Speaker 3: lighten things up a bit. Find it in the Clay

608
00:31:58,960 --> 00:32:02,280
Speaker 3: and Buck podcast beat on the iHeartRadio Annual, or wherever

609
00:32:02,360 --> 00:32:03,680
Speaker 3: you get your podcasts.

610
00:32:03,920 --> 00:32:07,160
Speaker 1: Welcome back in Clay Travis Buck Sexton Show. Appreciate all

611
00:32:07,200 --> 00:32:09,520
Speaker 1: of you hanging out with us. We'll take some of

612
00:32:09,560 --> 00:32:12,160
Speaker 1: your calls, by the way, as we roll into the

613
00:32:12,240 --> 00:32:15,040
Speaker 1: second hour here in a bit. Just got a VIP email.

614
00:32:15,320 --> 00:32:19,520
Speaker 1: I love the way it starts, albeit rare. Clay is right,

615
00:32:20,560 --> 00:32:24,280
Speaker 1: albeit rare is a very good They have covered Biden's

616
00:32:24,360 --> 00:32:28,080
Speaker 1: ass and now they release info about Biden which could

617
00:32:28,200 --> 00:32:31,640
Speaker 1: end him. Either Merrick Garland has seen the Warrior Light

618
00:32:31,920 --> 00:32:33,160
Speaker 1: or something.

619
00:32:32,720 --> 00:32:35,800
Speaker 2: Else is afoot. I'm just letting all of our beloved

620
00:32:35,880 --> 00:32:38,280
Speaker 2: VIPs know. I'm keeping all of these. Ah. I do

621
00:32:38,400 --> 00:32:41,680
Speaker 2: like this guy in particular, if he apparently is keeping score.

622
00:32:42,760 --> 00:32:46,040
Speaker 2: I do keep in mind all the people that say

623
00:32:46,080 --> 00:32:48,200
Speaker 2: that it's not going to be Biden. I'm going to

624
00:32:48,240 --> 00:32:50,280
Speaker 2: send you all a mass email when it is Biden

625
00:32:50,400 --> 00:32:52,520
Speaker 2: and just ask where are you taking me out for steak?

626
00:32:52,560 --> 00:32:55,600
Speaker 2: All across America in your hometown? Where am I getting

627
00:32:55,640 --> 00:32:58,720
Speaker 2: the best steak? Because you're going to owe me, folks.

628
00:32:58,960 --> 00:33:01,480
Speaker 1: You've got receipts, all right? You also mentioned this the

629
00:33:01,520 --> 00:33:03,360
Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal. What have you got in front of you?

630
00:33:03,680 --> 00:33:06,080
Speaker 2: All right? The American jobs that skew most heavily to

631
00:33:06,120 --> 00:33:08,320
Speaker 2: one gender. I'm gonna have Clay pick once I tell

632
00:33:08,360 --> 00:33:10,080
Speaker 2: them what the jobs are. But we first wanted to

633
00:33:10,080 --> 00:33:17,400
Speaker 2: see the highest proportion profession in this country of female workers.

634
00:33:17,920 --> 00:33:21,880
Speaker 1: Is what I would guess. I'm gonna give you three guesses.

635
00:33:21,920 --> 00:33:23,160
Speaker 1: There's five on this list.

636
00:33:23,200 --> 00:33:23,600
Speaker 2: You told me.

637
00:33:23,640 --> 00:33:26,080
Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you three jobs that I think would

638
00:33:26,120 --> 00:33:31,600
Speaker 1: overwhelmingly skew female. One would be like preschool kindergarten teacher.

639
00:33:31,680 --> 00:33:34,160
Speaker 1: There's almost is that on the list. Yes, do we

640
00:33:34,200 --> 00:33:39,960
Speaker 1: have a ding bell? Another would be like I don't

641
00:33:40,000 --> 00:33:45,560
Speaker 1: know if it's too specific, but like I would say

642
00:33:45,640 --> 00:33:52,240
Speaker 1: like some sort of like cosmetic skin, like you know,

643
00:33:52,360 --> 00:33:54,240
Speaker 1: like care ish thing like.

644
00:33:54,200 --> 00:33:56,400
Speaker 2: I've never knowld it again, you didn't see this list. No,

645
00:33:56,600 --> 00:33:59,200
Speaker 2: I've not seen the list. Okay, those are number one

646
00:33:59,200 --> 00:34:01,239
Speaker 2: and number two, just you know you said them at two.

647
00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:04,120
Speaker 2: First and number one it's a skincare specialist.

648
00:34:04,560 --> 00:34:09,080
Speaker 1: Skincare I've never heard or seen of skincare specialists or

649
00:34:09,120 --> 00:34:12,279
Speaker 1: female Yeah, like I'm thinking like Rodan and Fields like

650
00:34:12,360 --> 00:34:14,200
Speaker 1: all that stuff, like they never, they never.

651
00:34:14,320 --> 00:34:16,239
Speaker 2: There's never a man you nailed too.

652
00:34:17,520 --> 00:34:19,920
Speaker 1: And the third, what would I say is the third

653
00:34:20,160 --> 00:34:25,920
Speaker 1: most female centric job? I'm thinking already I think, think

654
00:34:26,360 --> 00:34:30,640
Speaker 1: like a sexist Clay, Yeah, think yeah, think like a sexist.

655
00:34:34,160 --> 00:34:36,640
Speaker 1: Oh man, I'm thinking of the men. I'm thinking of

656
00:34:36,719 --> 00:34:40,480
Speaker 1: the men's secretary as the h that's super Yeah, that's

657
00:34:40,520 --> 00:34:41,000
Speaker 1: a good point.

658
00:34:41,040 --> 00:34:42,400
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was trying to help you with that. I

659
00:34:42,480 --> 00:34:44,560
Speaker 2: threw you a clue. You had phone a friend on

660
00:34:44,719 --> 00:34:47,360
Speaker 2: live radio right there. And then the next two so

661
00:34:47,480 --> 00:34:51,480
Speaker 2: it's skincare specialist, preschool kindergarten teacher number two, number three

662
00:34:51,600 --> 00:34:56,640
Speaker 2: legals or just secretaries, administrative assistants for dental hygienis. Oh,

663
00:34:57,440 --> 00:34:59,600
Speaker 2: I should have gotten that one. And then five is

664
00:34:59,680 --> 00:35:01,400
Speaker 2: speed Wich language pathologist.

665
00:35:01,960 --> 00:35:03,840
Speaker 1: Okay, men, let me give you some men that I

666
00:35:03,920 --> 00:35:09,120
Speaker 1: immediately think of, like a mechanic, mechanics. Mechanics got to

667
00:35:09,160 --> 00:35:13,840
Speaker 1: be on the list, like construction worker, yes, A like

668
00:35:14,040 --> 00:35:15,400
Speaker 1: plumber or something like that.

669
00:35:15,600 --> 00:35:21,919
Speaker 2: Like is there any player, yes, a like. That's three.

670
00:35:22,000 --> 00:35:24,239
Speaker 2: I just nailed three. One of the other three all right,

671
00:35:24,360 --> 00:35:27,440
Speaker 2: logging workers and by a mason or stonemason. Those are

672
00:35:27,440 --> 00:35:31,040
Speaker 2: the top five. If you have to pick one of

673
00:35:31,200 --> 00:35:39,239
Speaker 2: the female centric jobs, which one is it to do yourself? Second? Man,

674
00:35:42,120 --> 00:35:47,759
Speaker 2: those all sell like awful jobs. I was gonna look

675
00:35:47,760 --> 00:35:49,360
Speaker 2: at Travis.

676
00:35:49,480 --> 00:35:51,799
Speaker 1: I was gonna say secretary, but I would just feel

677
00:35:51,840 --> 00:35:52,759
Speaker 1: like such a little bit.

678
00:35:54,239 --> 00:35:56,800
Speaker 2: I would say, of the of the male worker jobs,

679
00:35:56,840 --> 00:35:59,719
Speaker 2: you can tell me which one I'd go Logging just

680
00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:02,200
Speaker 2: be at least you're outdoors. But I don't know if

681
00:36:02,239 --> 00:36:05,520
Speaker 2: we have any loggers listening, please call in and tell

682
00:36:05,560 --> 00:36:06,520
Speaker 2: me what it's like to be and.

683
00:36:06,880 --> 00:36:09,719
Speaker 1: Being totally afraid of getting hit by a tree. That's

684
00:36:09,760 --> 00:36:10,520
Speaker 1: a tough job.

685
00:36:10,680 --> 00:36:10,839
Speaker 2: Man.

686
00:36:11,120 --> 00:36:13,640
Speaker 1: I would probably be a plumber. I don't think a plumber.

687
00:36:13,719 --> 00:36:16,080
Speaker 1: That's kind of a gross job. But at least you're indoors,

688
00:36:16,120 --> 00:36:19,239
Speaker 1: the weather's not that bad. Plumbers fix problems and are

689
00:36:19,320 --> 00:36:23,040
Speaker 1: super necessary plumbers. I prop people with a smile. I

690
00:36:23,400 --> 00:36:27,960
Speaker 1: probably go with the kindergarten teacher. I think if I

691
00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:30,400
Speaker 1: had to pick one of those people, might I know

692
00:36:30,480 --> 00:36:31,320
Speaker 1: they'd ask questions,