Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hug. The media turns the
Speaker 1: COVID panic up even higher. The Great Barringing Declaration on
Speaker 1: why lockdowns should end is signed by a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of scientists. Trump says, even more is going to be
Speaker 1: declassified around Russia collusion and a VP debate tonight that
Speaker 1: we'll bring up to speed on. This is the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexon Show, where the mission or mission is to decode
Speaker 1: what really matters with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American
Speaker 1: great here a great American again, the Buck Sexon Show begins.
Speaker 1: He's a great guy. No welcome, friends, family, countrymen, Americans,
Speaker 1: people from all over the world. Actually welcome to the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show. Great to have you here with me.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. It is an honor and a privilege.
Speaker 1: You've got a chance to speak with you all. Let's
Speaker 1: jump right into it. There was a bit of a
Speaker 1: recuperation process yesterday for the media. They had to dust
Speaker 1: themselves off a bit. They were still in a state
Speaker 1: of shock after President Trump had recovered so quickly from
Speaker 1: the COVID nineteen circumstance in the hospital. At least he's
Speaker 1: not better, He's not one hundred percent fine, but we
Speaker 1: know that there are a lot of people right now
Speaker 1: who are trying to figure out how they keep the
Speaker 1: narrative going of be terrified of COVID, even though President
Speaker 1: Trump is seventy four year old man who has some
Speaker 1: additional aggravating factors. Perhaps for COVID has been able to
Speaker 1: do quite well, and in a sense, he's now a
Speaker 1: big test case for a lot of people as to
Speaker 1: how much better the treatment has gotten. Everything that he
Speaker 1: has received is available to the general public. But no,
Speaker 1: it's feel so important for everyone to be terrified all
Speaker 1: the time. Don't look at the numbers, don't look at
Speaker 1: what's actually happened here. No, No, that would be that
Speaker 1: would be way too rational. You're supposed to be afraid,
Speaker 1: be very afraid, is what the media is telling you.
Speaker 1: That is what they believe, and they want to make
Speaker 1: sure you believe it too. You have no other means
Speaker 1: in this process. There's no other way for you to go.
Speaker 1: And that's why you've got people like Cuomo out there
Speaker 1: saying no, no, you got to be terrified all the time.
Speaker 1: Play three and from a public service point of view,
Speaker 1: two and ten thousand people died. More people die in
Speaker 1: this country than countries around the world. They were doing
Speaker 1: much worse than we were. From a public service point
Speaker 1: of view, don't be afraid of COVID. No, be afraid
Speaker 1: of COVID. It can can. You don't be cavalier. This
Speaker 1: is just more denial. This is where it started. And
Speaker 1: you know the president, God bless him, he tells you
Speaker 1: where he's going. We know that when COVID started, he
Speaker 1: knew how bad it was going to be, and he
Speaker 1: just lied about it. You know, if it wasn't for
Speaker 1: that guy, the governor of New York, the US overall
Speaker 1: per one hundred thousand death rate for COVID would be
Speaker 1: better than most, if not all, large European countries. The
Speaker 1: outlier in the United States of all of the different
Speaker 1: places that have had major waves of COVID is in fact,
Speaker 1: New York and New Jersey by far the worst outcome,
Speaker 1: by far, the highest death toll per capita. Nowhere else
Speaker 1: really even comes close. Even still with the waves that
Speaker 1: have hit over the summer and the Sun Belt and
Speaker 1: California's bikes and cases, New York was by far the worst.
Speaker 1: And he is lecturing the rest of the country, really
Speaker 1: just lecturing Trump supporters about how outrageous what the President
Speaker 1: said is. Remember he says, don't let it dominate your life.
Speaker 1: Trump says, don't let it dominate your life. Don't be
Speaker 1: afraid of it all the time. And they're saying, no,
Speaker 1: let it dominate your life. That is what we have
Speaker 1: set up for you. We insist that you are you
Speaker 1: living constant fear of this thing, that you not allow
Speaker 1: yourself a moment's reprieve from being in this state of panic.
Speaker 1: It's completely outrageous, but that is very important to them
Speaker 1: right now. It's very important to them because they understand
Speaker 1: a country that feels optimistic, a country that thinks things
Speaker 1: are actually going pretty well. You know, the economy is recovering,
Speaker 1: it's coming back. Biden will make it much worse, make
Speaker 1: it much slower. The whole thing will go in the
Speaker 1: other direction. I think we all know that because they
Speaker 1: never learn the lesson, They never learn any of the
Speaker 1: lessons of history about their policies. Otherwise they couldn't support
Speaker 1: them today. What do you think Biden's going to make
Speaker 1: the economy strong? This whole build back better thing. What
Speaker 1: does Joe Biden know about making things better for the
Speaker 1: American people who actually have to go to work and
Speaker 1: run a business. Do you think the Democrats care about
Speaker 1: all the service workers who are out of a job
Speaker 1: right now. No. If anything, they want to continue as
Speaker 1: soon as they're in charge, so they get the political
Speaker 1: credit for it. They want to continue with what's a
Speaker 1: day facto universal basic income, and you be I send
Speaker 1: people checks every month. That's fine. You don't want to work,
Speaker 1: We'll send you a check every month. This was an
Speaker 1: idea that was talked about the Democrat primary, most notably
Speaker 1: by Andrew Yang. It's actually one of the least annoying
Speaker 1: of the Democrat candidates, though that's not saying all that much.
Speaker 1: And now they see a pathway to it, increasing the
Speaker 1: welfare state, increasing dependency on the government, forcing people to
Speaker 1: be less autonomous, less self sufficient. They like this. That's
Speaker 1: all to the good as far as Democrats are concerned.
Speaker 1: You know, you'll have the elites, the people that write
Speaker 1: the checks, so that Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer keep
Speaker 1: getting elected. They're fine, they get to work remotely, nothing
Speaker 1: changes for them. But for people that are lower down
Speaker 1: on the economic ladder, people that are just trying to
Speaker 1: make a living hourly workers, Guess what too bad if
Speaker 1: they have to shut down again for another six months
Speaker 1: under Biden administration. But don't worry, they'll send them a check. Notice.
Speaker 1: How that's going to change the perception that all of
Speaker 1: us had about being dependent on government. It's not a choice.
Speaker 1: When the government says you can't open your bar, you
Speaker 1: can't operate your restaurant, it's not up to you. They're
Speaker 1: gonna shut you down. In fact, we just saw last
Speaker 1: night in Brooklyn de Blasio sending in the NYPD, the
Speaker 1: mayor of New York City sending the NYPD to break
Speaker 1: up a demonstration of Orthodox Jews who were like, we're
Speaker 1: done with all this lockdown stuff. So just harassing that
Speaker 1: community they're outside, doesn't matter, not allowed to do it.
Speaker 1: If there are a Black Lives Matter protest, the city
Speaker 1: would roll out the red car. Then it's all fine.
Speaker 1: Then then everyone can think that this is wonderful and
Speaker 1: of course no COVID risk, Black lives matter. You know,
Speaker 1: who needs social distancing? When you have social justice wokeness
Speaker 1: is a special protection from viruses. You may have just
Speaker 1: figured this out. So this is where we are. This
Speaker 1: is the situation in which we find ourselves. It's completely
Speaker 1: It's completely mind blowing that the Democrats are going to
Speaker 1: just cling to the most panic narrative possible until the election,
Speaker 1: irrespective of what it does to the country and what
Speaker 1: it means for the American people. They simply do not care.
Speaker 1: And they also don't mind however much they have to
Speaker 1: lie to you. They will. I mean, here's Biden, who's
Speaker 1: going to have his VEEP would be veep Kamala Harris tonight,
Speaker 1: spewing all kinds of nonsense on that stage, and the
Speaker 1: media is going to go over time trying to support her. Right,
Speaker 1: whatever they have to do, they'll do. They're in this,
Speaker 1: you know, they're in this to win this, folks, I
Speaker 1: mean the media, not the Democrat Party. They're making sure
Speaker 1: that there are preferred candidates going to get through this.
Speaker 1: But Biden will say things that I know no intelligence
Speaker 1: serious person can believe this at this point. Here he
Speaker 1: is telling you that wearing a mask is not is
Speaker 1: not political play. Five. It's estimated that nearly another two
Speaker 1: hundred and ten thousand Americans could lose their lives by
Speaker 1: the end of the year. Enough, no more, let's just
Speaker 1: said partisanship aside. Let's end the politics and follow the
Speaker 1: science wearing a mask. Wearing a mask is not a
Speaker 1: political statement, It's a scientific recommendation. Social distancing isn't a
Speaker 1: political statement. It's a scientific recommendation. Testing tracy, the development
Speaker 1: and all the approval and distribution of a vaccine isn't
Speaker 1: a political statement. It is a science based decision. We
Speaker 1: can undo what has been done. We can't go back,
Speaker 1: but we can do so oh much better. We can
Speaker 1: do better starting today. We can have a national strategy
Speaker 1: that puts politics aside and saves lives. We're gonna have
Speaker 1: a national strategy that will make it possible for our
Speaker 1: schools and business to open safely. We can have a
Speaker 1: national strategy that reflects the true values of this nation.
Speaker 1: I just this guy is full of so much bull
Speaker 1: it's amazing that he's actually even in contention to be
Speaker 1: the presid never Mind, I headed on a lot of
Speaker 1: the national polsier sailing seeing which I don't particularly believe,
Speaker 1: but that's where it is right now. He's the one
Speaker 1: that wants the lockdowns. Remember that, he's the one that
Speaker 1: wants the lockdowns. But he says we're gonna find a
Speaker 1: way to open up. No, the Democrats are the ones
Speaker 1: saying lock it down. They can't have it both ways.
Speaker 1: They're the ones that have been pushing for schools to
Speaker 1: be lockdown going into the election, which was a completely
Speaker 1: unjustified decision from a purely scientific standpoint, outrageous. But they
Speaker 1: don't care. I don't care about the suffering from all
Speaker 1: these people. They're just using the death toll of COVID
Speaker 1: for political purposes right now. Nobody wanted any of those
Speaker 1: people to die. It's been horrible. But we've been doing
Speaker 1: all the things that Biden says he's going to do.
Speaker 1: He speaks about this like it's some revolutionary new plan
Speaker 1: they've got. Oh, we're going to social distance and mask.
Speaker 1: We've been doing this crap for now, what seven eight months?
Speaker 1: How much longer are we supposed to do this? It
Speaker 1: hasn't worked. If you look at the data, it shows
Speaker 1: that there are places where after MASK mandates went into
Speaker 1: effect as a matter of law, things got even worse.
Speaker 1: So what is he even saying, Oh, we could be
Speaker 1: better trumped into a good enough job. He didn't protect
Speaker 1: you from this virus. Take a look at what's going
Speaker 1: on in Argentina right now, which has one of the
Speaker 1: highest COVID positivity rates in the entire world for all
Speaker 1: the tests that it's for the test that it's running,
Speaker 1: it's not testing as much as other places are, but
Speaker 1: it's got over twenty thousand deaths. Argentina has a much
Speaker 1: smaller population a lot of these countries. We're talking about
Speaker 1: twenty thousand deaths from COVID nineteen and those I'm assuming
Speaker 1: are actually directly from COVID as opposed to the with
Speaker 1: COVID deaths that absolutely have been calculated in this country.
Speaker 1: So we have an inflated COVID death figure. Look, I'm
Speaker 1: not saying it's I have no idea, by the way,
Speaker 1: how inflated it is. We do know that there are
Speaker 1: at least thousands, if not tens of thousands of cases
Speaker 1: of people based on the way that they're tabulating these things,
Speaker 1: that should not be considered COVID death. But look, if
Speaker 1: it's fifty thousand people dying from COVID one hundred thousand
Speaker 1: people dying from COVID, it's horrible, and that's clearly the case.
Speaker 1: We've lost a lot of people to this virus, there's
Speaker 1: no question. But ultimately it's about the country having an
Speaker 1: adult conversation with itself, all of us talking to each
Speaker 1: other saying, look, we're doing what we can. But this
Speaker 1: virus is spreading and has been spreading. And all the
Speaker 1: people who have been saying, just do this, just do that,
Speaker 1: it'll stop it, it'll fix it. We're wrong. They've just
Speaker 1: been wrong. It hasn't worked. You think if Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: in charge, all of a sudden, there's gonna know, there's
Speaker 1: just gonna be more mask shaming, More people who are
Speaker 1: outside going for a bike ride who are told, where's
Speaker 1: your mask? More people who are walking alone on a
Speaker 1: nature hike. This actually happened a friend of mine and
Speaker 1: somebody passed from twenty feet away out in the woods,
Speaker 1: where's your mask? Oh it's not political? Well then are
Speaker 1: people either have politicized this or they're too stupid to
Speaker 1: have a conversation about what's actually a safety measure versus
Speaker 1: what is just a waste of everybody's time. And it's annoying,
Speaker 1: it's harassment. I know. Look, I'm not giving up on
Speaker 1: this one because I think a lot of are a
Speaker 1: lot of people on our side were just going along, Oh,
Speaker 1: let's show some good faith. We don't want I don't
Speaker 1: want to have this fight right now. Come on, I
Speaker 1: don't want to be wearing a mask. It's it's annoying,
Speaker 1: but I'll go along with it. And look, I've been
Speaker 1: beaten down by it too. You want to be the
Speaker 1: one person in New York City? I mean, it's basically
Speaker 1: like walking around with a maga hat on. Now if
Speaker 1: where if you don't wear a mask outside, that's how
Speaker 1: people view it in this city. And I'm sure that's
Speaker 1: true in other places as well, which of course is insane.
Speaker 1: But whether they wanted it to become one or not,
Speaker 1: and I think they did, it is a political statement.
Speaker 1: So why lie about it? Why is Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: all these other Democrat politicians why do they have masks
Speaker 1: on their avatars on Twitter? Why are their social media
Speaker 1: accounts all changed out so their their official photo has
Speaker 1: a mask on? Oh? Because that's really that's inspiring people
Speaker 1: to mask up. I don't give a crap what these
Speaker 1: politicians do with their own medical decisions and safety. That's
Speaker 1: up to them. Like I say, oh, if Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: wearing a mask, I better wear one too. But it's
Speaker 1: all symbolic, friends, it's symbolic of control. They're trying to
Speaker 1: see how much they can make you do and what
Speaker 1: they can get away with, and unfortunately they've gotten away
Speaker 1: with far too much. Unfortunately, we're at a point now
Speaker 1: where we're just negotiating over how deep the tyranny will
Speaker 1: run instead of whether we're actually going to get our
Speaker 1: freedom back. Hoping this will start to change. I'll tell
Speaker 1: you in just a little bit about thousands of scientists, doctors,
Speaker 1: researchers who are saying these lockdowns are horrible, it is
Speaker 1: not scientific. It needs to stop. The Great Barrington Declaration.
Speaker 1: Why why aren't you hearing about this in other places?
Speaker 1: Why isn't this the number one story on every conservative
Speaker 1: side in the country. I can't tell you. No. Let's
Speaker 1: have a bunch of people do the same five things
Speaker 1: to look for, and tonight's vice presidential debate, and this
Speaker 1: is what everyone does. Okay, you know, I got it.
Speaker 1: We got to cover our bases. And there's a vice
Speaker 1: presidential debate tonight. But this declaration out of Great Barrington,
Speaker 1: Massachusetts is honestly, it should be the end of all
Speaker 1: of this stuff that we're seeing with the lockdowns. It
Speaker 1: should be all over done tomorrow, finished, and there's a scientist.
Speaker 1: That's what they're saying. But Nope, not going to happen.
Speaker 1: People don't want to admit that they're wrong, and they
Speaker 1: don't want to give up control, and they're pretending that
Speaker 1: this is about keeping you safe. Here's the truth. They
Speaker 1: can't keep you safe and they don't care. And that's
Speaker 1: why when Trump says, don't let this dominate your life,
Speaker 1: don't be afraid all the time, it enrages them so
Speaker 1: much because that's what they want and they've gotten used
Speaker 1: to it, and now just Trump saying that takes away
Speaker 1: some of the power that they've accumulated, and so they
Speaker 1: react with rage at this, particularly the journos who I
Speaker 1: don't know who the worst people are in America, journalists
Speaker 1: or mask shamers, although there's obviously a lot of cross
Speaker 1: over there. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast. And I you know, I
Speaker 1: hate saying this stuff. It's it's it's tough to believe
Speaker 1: and you know, didn't need to be this way and
Speaker 1: something that we talk about all the time. But yes,
Speaker 1: I mean four hundred and ten thousand was the projection
Speaker 1: for my hm ME. While at the same time, they
Speaker 1: you know, the projection jumps around, but they say one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand of those lives could be saved if if
Speaker 1: he had ninety five mask wearing. So it's it's it's
Speaker 1: hard to hear, but but it certain tracks with everything
Speaker 1: else we've been hearing. We're just back into the same
Speaker 1: loop we were before. The models say this, and if
Speaker 1: you do what I say, the models say that, so
Speaker 1: you have to do. Remember, they're not they're not recommending,
Speaker 1: they're mandating. The Biden campaign. They want to make you
Speaker 1: do these things. They're gonna find you, they're gonna lock
Speaker 1: you up if you don't do these things. Doctor Fauci said,
Speaker 1: who I really think is the worst? I mean, this
Speaker 1: guy is like a Democrat operative who has gotten away
Speaker 1: with more manipulation of public perception than anybody in recent memory.
Speaker 1: It's horrible. What has he ever said that You're like, Wow,
Speaker 1: that's really helpful, that's really good. Yeah. Does he calm
Speaker 1: you down? Does he make you feel like the country's
Speaker 1: gonna get through this? No, he shows up, he goes Wow.
Speaker 1: You know, I think maybe another four hundred thousand, maybe
Speaker 1: in a two million, maybe at the max, maybe five million.
Speaker 1: I know, we're all gonna die. This is our top
Speaker 1: public health official that we're supposed to be listening to
Speaker 1: all the time. What a disaster, an absolutely aster. This
Speaker 1: guy is the COMI of the health world, he says.
Speaker 1: The models tell us, quote, if we do not do
Speaker 1: the kind of things we're talking about in the cold
Speaker 1: of the fall, in the winter, we could have three
Speaker 1: hundred to four hundred thousand deaths. That would just be
Speaker 1: so tragic. So it's on us, you see, do everything
Speaker 1: they say, or else hundreds of thousands of people are
Speaker 1: going to die. Let me tell you something right now,
Speaker 1: no matter what happens here, there are going to be
Speaker 1: people who die, and they're going to say the reason
Speaker 1: they died is because we didn't listen enough, we weren't
Speaker 1: well behaved enough, we weren't good enough children. When Saint
Speaker 1: Fauci was trying to give us his blessing, is this
Speaker 1: the country you want to I don't want to live
Speaker 1: in this country where that's happening, where people are all
Speaker 1: of a sudden bowing and scraping and begging for the
Speaker 1: approval of bureaucrats who have earned nothing other than the
Speaker 1: right to be in a government position for a long
Speaker 1: time I'm not impressed by that. I used to work
Speaker 1: for the federal government full of clowns and morons. Not everybody,
Speaker 1: but a lot of them. Three or four hundred thous people.
Speaker 1: It's not even clear if he means three three to
Speaker 1: four hundred thousand more will die or we'll get to
Speaker 1: another one hundred to two hundred thousand. On top of this,
Speaker 1: why hasn't New York already seen the huge spiking cases.
Speaker 1: It's in a few communities. Why does he have an
Speaker 1: answer for this? Now? He has no idea. You know,
Speaker 1: notice they don't even try to tell you what's going
Speaker 1: to happen next week or next month, or they're just
Speaker 1: it's always a three month projection as to what's going
Speaker 1: to happen. Listen to us or else. Well, there's another
Speaker 1: point of view on this, folks, one from a whole
Speaker 1: lot of doctors that I want to tell you about
Speaker 1: right now. Thanks for listening to the Bus and Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. The Great Barrington Declaration.
Speaker 1: This should be for conservative outlets, for news outlets across
Speaker 1: the country, this should be a top news story and
Speaker 1: they're not telling you about this. Wall Street Journal had
Speaker 1: a piece in it today. I mean, it's it's starting
Speaker 1: to get out there. But why isn't every one pointing
Speaker 1: to this. We're always told listen to the scientists. That's
Speaker 1: what they say, all the scientists believe, and then they
Speaker 1: fill in something all the doctors tell you, and then
Speaker 1: they say they're preferred, you know, mask mania, lockdown talking points. Well,
Speaker 1: this is a declaration that you need to hear and
Speaker 1: is as of this show, have been signed by three thousand,
Speaker 1: two hundred and ninety eight medical and public health scientists
Speaker 1: and over five thousand mds. Doctors, not like Joe Biden doctors,
Speaker 1: I mean real doctors. She's a PhD in bureaucracy. Real doctors.
Speaker 1: So that's These are people that when you hear their credentials,
Speaker 1: I'll get to you'll say, are they crazy? Did Trump
Speaker 1: brainwash them? Did? Did they not understand something about where
Speaker 1: a mask? This is what they write the Great Barentine Declaration.
Speaker 1: As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists, we have
Speaker 1: great concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts
Speaker 1: of the prevailing COVID nineteen policies and recommend an approach
Speaker 1: we call focused protection, coming from both the left and
Speaker 1: the right, and around the world, we have devoted our
Speaker 1: careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating
Speaker 1: effects on short and long term public health. The results
Speaker 1: to him if you include lower childhood vaccination rates, we're
Speaker 1: sitting cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings, and deteriorating mental health,
Speaker 1: leading to greater excess mortality and years to come. With
Speaker 1: the working class and younger members of society carrying the
Speaker 1: heaviest burden, keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Speaker 1: Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available
Speaker 1: will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionally harmed. Fortunately,
Speaker 1: our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that
Speaker 1: vulnerability to death from COVID nineteen is more than a
Speaker 1: thousandfold higher in the old and affirmed than the young. Indeed,
Speaker 1: for children, COVID nineteen is less dangerous than many other harms,
Speaker 1: including influenza. As immunity builds in the population, the risk
Speaker 1: of infection to all, including the vulnerable, falls. We know
Speaker 1: that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity the point
Speaker 1: at which the rate of new infections is stable, and
Speaker 1: that this can be assisted but is not dependent upon
Speaker 1: a vaccine. Our goals should therefore be to minimize mortality
Speaker 1: and social harm until we reach herd immunity. The most
Speaker 1: compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching
Speaker 1: herd immunity is to allow those who are at minimal
Speaker 1: risk of death to live their lives normally, to build
Speaker 1: up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better
Speaker 1: protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this
Speaker 1: focused protection. Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be
Speaker 1: the central aim of public health responses to COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with
Speaker 1: acquired immunity and perform frequent pr testing of other staff
Speaker 1: and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people
Speaker 1: living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered
Speaker 1: to their home when possible. They should meet family members
Speaker 1: outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures,
Speaker 1: including approaches to multigenerational households, can be implemented and as
Speaker 1: well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Speaker 1: Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to
Speaker 1: resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures such as handwashing
Speaker 1: and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone
Speaker 1: to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should
Speaker 1: be opened for in person teaching. Extracurricular activities such as
Speaker 1: sports should be resumed. Young low risk adults should work
Speaker 1: normally rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open,
Speaker 1: and arts, music, sports, and other cultural activities should resume.
Speaker 1: People who are more at risk may participate if they wish,
Speaker 1: while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon
Speaker 1: the vulnerable by those who have built up heard immunity.
Speaker 1: Now you might be saying, okay, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: why why haven't I heard about this? Why haven't more
Speaker 1: people been told about this? This was just signed on
Speaker 1: October fourth, it's October seventh, but oh, you know it
Speaker 1: must be because these are you know what you always
Speaker 1: hear when people oppose the lockdown stuff. These are quacks,
Speaker 1: that's what they'll say. These are quacks. They'll tell you
Speaker 1: that they don't they don't know what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: They don't know what's going on in society, and they're
Speaker 1: just full of it. Right, Okay, Well, here are some
Speaker 1: of the people that are a part of this. Here
Speaker 1: are some of the people that have signed their names
Speaker 1: to it already. Doctor Martin Coldorff, Professor of Medicine at
Speaker 1: Harvard University, a biostatician, an epidemiologist with expertise in detecting
Speaker 1: and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
Speaker 1: Doctor Snetra Gupta, Professor at Oxford University and epidemiologists with
Speaker 1: expertise in immunology. Doctor j Bardacharia, Professor at Stanford University
Speaker 1: Medical School. A physician, epidemiologist, health economist. Doctor Suturitt Bakhti,
Speaker 1: Professor of Medical Microbiology, University of Man's, Germany. Doctor Rajiv Batia,
Speaker 1: physician with the Veterans Administration, Epidemiology. Professor Stephen Bremner, Professor
Speaker 1: of Medical Statistics, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, UK. It
Speaker 1: goes on and on and on. I mean more, You've
Speaker 1: got Massachusetts General Hospital on here. Department of Clinical Microbiology,
Speaker 1: tel Aviv University, Israel, Professor of mathematics, focusing on population
Speaker 1: and evolutionary theory, and infectious disease epidemiology in Glasgow. It
Speaker 1: just goes on and on and on. Top institutions in
Speaker 1: the world have some of their top people that are saying,
Speaker 1: stop this lockdown crap. Now, it's not working, it's damaging,
Speaker 1: it's wrong. Focused protection, protect those at risk. Everyone else
Speaker 1: go back to normal life, acceptable risk for them. Some
Speaker 1: of us have been saying to do this for six months,
Speaker 1: just because your rational have good judgment and wisdom understand
Speaker 1: what the heck's actually going on. Does anyone really believe
Speaker 1: that we're going to be We're gonna have a ninety
Speaker 1: five percent compliance rate for social distancing and mask wearing.
Speaker 1: That's insane and I think of the costs of this too,
Speaker 1: it's outrageous. Focused protection is the answer. The Trump administration
Speaker 1: should be all over this. I don't know what to
Speaker 1: say other than we've got to tell people, We've got
Speaker 1: to spread the word. This is what the scientists are saying.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hud. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. It's remarkable. You know, among the dumbest people
Speaker 1: in society now think that they have the most insight
Speaker 1: into the health of the president, that he is lying
Speaker 1: to us, his doctors must be lying to us. All
Speaker 1: of the above. Here's AOC trying to give everybody a
Speaker 1: bit of her medical advice when it comes or her
Speaker 1: medical assessment. I should say, when it comes to the
Speaker 1: presidents of the United States. Play sixteen. The president is
Speaker 1: not in a good condition. He just was diagnosed with COVID.
Speaker 1: His oxygen levels were in perilously low areas over the weekend.
Speaker 1: That we're extremely concerning. And then we're supposed to believe
Speaker 1: that everything is absolutely fine right now when we were
Speaker 1: receiving conflicting medical reports from both the White House Chief
Speaker 1: of Staff Mark Meadows and some of the positions that
Speaker 1: we were hearing at Walter reed, Now, I don't think
Speaker 1: that we should be making any large political decisions when
Speaker 1: the president is such it is in such a perilous
Speaker 1: in such a perilous medical state. He is still receiving
Speaker 1: interventions and treatments, and and we're in the middle of
Speaker 1: talking about and making dramatic decisions. Yeah, so he's just
Speaker 1: like not really even the president right now. He's just
Speaker 1: like not even the president. Like it's just like whatever,
Speaker 1: or like twenty fifth, you know, constitutional convention or something
Speaker 1: or whatever, or like, yeah, this is the leading light
Speaker 1: of the young Democrat left. Folks, the best they've got, Like,
Speaker 1: I don't want to be mean, but she wants to
Speaker 1: do things that will kind of ruin your life. So
Speaker 1: I think we have to be honest about this. And
Speaker 1: I wonder if they ever get tired of just being
Speaker 1: wrong all the time. But they don't ask yourself this,
Speaker 1: Do they ever get tired of saying things that in
Speaker 1: retrospect and I'm in retrospect of yesterday, are foolish that
Speaker 1: they figure out in a twenty four hour period. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: what I said about the president was nonsense all week,
Speaker 1: and we were hearing ohays, oxygen levels drop, he's very ill,
Speaker 1: everyone's very concerned. They ran with that. The panic narrative
Speaker 1: turned out not to be true. So now we get
Speaker 1: to a place where they're just coming up with crazy
Speaker 1: ideas why he's not really able to make decisions. The
Speaker 1: guy's taking you know, a decks of methismee, which is
Speaker 1: a steroid you could you inhale and I think it's
Speaker 1: an end. I think you inhale it. And Ramdessevier, which
Speaker 1: is an anti viral drug. It's kind of like tamiflu,
Speaker 1: but you have to take it through an intravenous But
Speaker 1: you know, tamiflu is something you take to deal with
Speaker 1: to deal with the flu. You have taken the early
Speaker 1: stages of it. So what exactly she's saying, nothing, garbage, nonsense,
Speaker 1: You don't have to really worry about, you don't have
Speaker 1: to think about it. But the point is they'll undermine
Speaker 1: the president and his ability to be the president in
Speaker 1: any way they can. And even if tomorrow it sounds
Speaker 1: what they say today sounds stupid, as long as it
Speaker 1: has the intended effect for a little while, they're fine
Speaker 1: with it. As long as it's able to serve the
Speaker 1: purpose of one news cycle, great, doesn't matter. And then
Speaker 1: there's Shifty Schiff, who is among the scummiest of all
Speaker 1: fellows in Congress, which is truly saying something. I mean,
Speaker 1: this guy is a liar, a shameless liar, almost in
Speaker 1: a category of his own. I mean, there are many
Speaker 1: in Congress, many Democrats, who will just lie to your
Speaker 1: face and don't care. But Adam Schiff, when you add
Speaker 1: Russia collusion to all the other stuff that he's pulled off,
Speaker 1: remember when he was doing his whole in a prosecutor
Speaker 1: routine for Pelosi and that House impeachment. What a sham
Speaker 1: that whole thing was. He really does have the cold,
Speaker 1: dead eyes of a bottom dwelling shark. You know, that's
Speaker 1: really what you get from Adam Schiff. And yet voters
Speaker 1: in California like this guy. They think they think that
Speaker 1: he's he's just great. Here's here's what he says. He's
Speaker 1: also trying to make the case that, you know, the president,
Speaker 1: he's not of sound mind. Right now, their candidate is
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, who goes, you know, it's naptime for him,
Speaker 1: got to call lid for the day. But they want
Speaker 1: to talk about Trump not being of sound mind. That's
Speaker 1: how shif for roles play ten on the best of days.
Speaker 1: The President's thinking isn't too sound, So if there's any impairment,
Speaker 1: it's a real problem to me. This hearkens back to
Speaker 1: the president of proudly boasting that he's going to take
Speaker 1: responsibility for shutting down the government. Well, he's now proudly
Speaker 1: taking responsibility for denying the American people help in their
Speaker 1: time of crisis. Basically, today, Donald Trump told the country
Speaker 1: if you're a small businessperson and you're going under. Too
Speaker 1: bad for you. I'm not going to bother with it
Speaker 1: until after the election. If you've lost your job and
Speaker 1: you're on unemployment compensation and your benefits have run out,
Speaker 1: that's too bad. That doesn't affect me. I don't care.
Speaker 1: I'll deal with that later. You know, this is so
Speaker 1: responsible when millions are suffering, and of course politically it
Speaker 1: makes no sense for him to do either. So it
Speaker 1: does call him the question his judgment, certainly, but whether
Speaker 1: he's being impaired by these drugs. This is slimy shifty
Speaker 1: shift saying it must be the meds. He's making such
Speaker 1: crazy decisions, it must be the meds. What What a scummy,
Speaker 1: scummy fellow, the shifty shift is. That's that's what he's
Speaker 1: telling you. And there's a couple layers. You're one. There
Speaker 1: is no reason to believe that anything. I mean, the
Speaker 1: president is not on heavy doses of morphine. There's nothing
Speaker 1: to make anyone believe that he can't make decisions or
Speaker 1: isn't of sound mind. Right now, we've seen him. He's
Speaker 1: been showing up, he's been talking, he's been doing he's
Speaker 1: much more lucid than Biden is mister calling it a
Speaker 1: lid at nine thirty in the morning every day. I
Speaker 1: want that. I want the Biden campaign. Most people call
Speaker 1: it a vacation when you wake up, do something for
Speaker 1: like thirty minutes, then you're like, I'm done. But no,
Speaker 1: with Trump, it has to all be different. They we'll
Speaker 1: say anything and then on this aid package, because this
Speaker 1: is getting a lot of attention the last twenty four hours.
Speaker 1: The President said he would not sign what Pelosi and
Speaker 1: her crew of little socialists wanted two point four trillion
Speaker 1: dollars two point four trillion dollars of not not spending
Speaker 1: for like the whole budget for next year, that's just
Speaker 1: for now, just to keep things afloat. And Trump said, no,
Speaker 1: we'll give you one point eight trillion. We will give
Speaker 1: money for people out of work and support to businesses
Speaker 1: that are COVID related. We're not going to just plug
Speaker 1: the holes of Democrat run cities. This is where the real,
Speaker 1: the real conflict is on this the real friction Democrat
Speaker 1: run cities. We're not going to just bail him out
Speaker 1: with taxpayer dollars at the federal level. Sorry, well, Pelosi
Speaker 1: and the rest they're they're combining things that are not related.
Speaker 1: They love to do this. Pelosi keeps doing this. Now,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say Trump has done a good enough job
Speaker 1: of explaining this to the American people. A lot of
Speaker 1: you're gonna say, bok, he's playing five D or whatever. No, No,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about to Trump voters. Okay, he needs
Speaker 1: to be explaining this to people who aren't yet sold
Speaker 1: on Trump. That's what this is all about. It should
Speaker 1: be absolutely clear, it should be glaringly obvious that Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker 1: once again, she's done this now three different cycles of
Speaker 1: the Pelosi games, you know, Marie Antoinette style, let them
Speaker 1: eat cake while Pelosi's inter mansion doesn't care about what's
Speaker 1: happening to any of these workers, but then goes on
Speaker 1: to MSNBC and CNN and pretends Trump should be clabbering
Speaker 1: the Democrats on this. He's saying, look, I wanted They
Speaker 1: wanted to get money to people that are out of
Speaker 1: work and extend the unemployment benefits in August. We're in October.
Speaker 1: Democrats have been delaying because they insist on bringing these things,
Speaker 1: using these things together, and that's not the way this
Speaker 1: should be done. Right, They're padding this. They're throwing in
Speaker 1: their little wish list on top of the actual money
Speaker 1: that would go to people, the stimulus payments that would
Speaker 1: go to people so that they can keep paying their
Speaker 1: bills while they're on lockdown. Trump has not made a
Speaker 1: good enough pitch on this one yet, and I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: We don't do the president in any favors that I
Speaker 1: know people from the White House listen to this show.
Speaker 1: We don't do the president in any favors by encouraging
Speaker 1: a losing strategy on this one. He should have owned
Speaker 1: the news cycle on this for the last twenty four hours,
Speaker 1: making sure everybody knows he says he will sign right
Speaker 1: now one point eight trillion dollars given to people for
Speaker 1: their paycheck, protection given to people who are unable to
Speaker 1: open their businesses because these lockdowns, get that money the economy,
Speaker 1: get it to the American worker right away. It's just
Speaker 1: malpractice not to be winning this argument right now. I
Speaker 1: know the President's sick and now he's dealing with a lot,
Speaker 1: but folks, we are now in the sprint phase of
Speaker 1: this contest. We are in the all out and we're
Speaker 1: about to add the ACB nomination next week onto this pile.
Speaker 1: So it's it's go bigger, go hometime for Trump, for
Speaker 1: the Republicans. This is the whole thing. This is the
Speaker 1: big show right now. We've got less than four weeks
Speaker 1: to go here. I'm a strap in Shields High. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Buses and Show podcast. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Listen to the scientists and obey the law,
Speaker 1: two things that you've been told a lot since the
Speaker 1: COVID pandemic hit by libs who want you to do something.
Speaker 1: They pick the scientists. You're supposed to listen to. It's
Speaker 1: always fouci. Hey, it is what the fouch says. Listen
Speaker 1: to me. We're all going to die. The truth is
Speaker 1: we are. We are all, in fact going to die.
Speaker 1: Some people don't really accept and understand that, I think,
Speaker 1: which is why they make the public policy decisions they do.
Speaker 1: But we're all on borrowed time. We're just not all
Speaker 1: going to die of COVID. Less than one percent of
Speaker 1: us actually or even at any risk of dying from COVID.
Speaker 1: But nonetheless we are in the process of ruining the
Speaker 1: economy and ruining large American cities because of all the
Speaker 1: fear and panic that the Democrats continue to spread, and
Speaker 1: they say that the law is the law, and they've
Speaker 1: taken emergency powers into their hands, which is really in
Speaker 1: abuse of the law. Right, this is essentially the break
Speaker 1: the glass. Okay, doesn't matter what we were saying before.
Speaker 1: We just got to get everybody out of the building
Speaker 1: because it's on fire. Except they've been doing that since March.
Speaker 1: So we've been in this emergency state in different places
Speaker 1: across the country for many, many months, which is you know,
Speaker 1: this is a little bit like, oh, everybody, you've got
Speaker 1: to empty out of this area. There's a hurricane coming.
Speaker 1: And then it's like, well, we're going to declare marshal
Speaker 1: law just for a week. Actually it's going to be
Speaker 1: until we say it stops. That's what's going on. They
Speaker 1: just keep extending it. And the greatest example of US
Speaker 1: I think you can point to, although Cuomo is probably
Speaker 1: number one and then Newsom number three is mission again
Speaker 1: Governor Whitmer, who at one point was being talked about
Speaker 1: by the Democrat media as a possible late stage presidential
Speaker 1: you know, who knows, maybe she'll be the VP. Right
Speaker 1: that was what was being discussed for a while. They say,
Speaker 1: they say the law is the law, right, So Cuomo,
Speaker 1: for example, says, you have to wear a mask. I
Speaker 1: don't even know in public now, which does that even
Speaker 1: mean outside? It's not clear to me, but I think
Speaker 1: it means yes, but I don't and I've already said
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm a team. I might get arrested over
Speaker 1: this at some point. I'm not going to be obviously
Speaker 1: rude the NYPD. It's not their fault that they're enforcing
Speaker 1: this stuff. But I'm not wearing a mask walking outside
Speaker 1: by myself. That there are lines, I am drawing a line,
Speaker 1: and you know this is this is where you start
Speaker 1: to say, well, nullification of the law is the next
Speaker 1: step here. But we're not supposed to have one person
Speaker 1: who's making decisions about everything, whether it's your ability to
Speaker 1: leave your house, your First Amendment rights, your freedom of worship,
Speaker 1: your freedom of speech based upon what they claim are
Speaker 1: the most important health determinations for us. But that's what's happening.
Speaker 1: And then they say, well, it's the law. You've got
Speaker 1: to obey the law, the laws of law, and as
Speaker 1: we all know from the history of this country, there
Speaker 1: are laws that are unjust. That does happen, and laws
Speaker 1: have to change. Sometimes just because something is the law
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that it's right. And now you get into
Speaker 1: some deeper philosophical discussions. But Governor Whitmer, who has been
Speaker 1: saying you have to do this because I say so,
Speaker 1: and therefore it is the law, has had to figure out.
Speaker 1: Oh wait a second, turns out the court, the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court for the State of Michigan, has said no, in fact,
Speaker 1: what she is doing is wrong. Play clip one. This
Speaker 1: is how she responds. As a result of this action,
Speaker 1: of the Court's action, the legislature's action, our COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: cases could likely go up. There will be uncertainty, there
Speaker 1: will be disruption, and possibly greater risk to our economy,
Speaker 1: to our loved ones, possibly more people quarantined, and more
Speaker 1: fatalities we've seen that happen else. I swear what this
Speaker 1: ruling does not mean is that the orders I issued
Speaker 1: violated the law. Although I disagree with the court's conclusion,
Speaker 1: they held the law, the nineteen forty five law unconstitutional,
Speaker 1: meaning that that legislature seventy five years ago didn't have
Speaker 1: the authority to extend these types of powers to a governor.
Speaker 1: The court made it clear that I had interpreted this
Speaker 1: law correctly and utilized my powers. Yeah, so she likes
Speaker 1: being a little dictator, and she found a statute that
Speaker 1: allowed her to be a dictator because she doesn't care
Speaker 1: about the freedom she's infringing upon. But the court came
Speaker 1: along and said, well, even if that is in fact
Speaker 1: the law, guess what, it's still wrong. And that's where
Speaker 1: we are. We need to start embracing that idea much
Speaker 1: more broadly here, because all you have from these Democrat
Speaker 1: governors is I make the law. I am the law. Well, sorry, actually,
Speaker 1: the Constitution is the law. The amendments to the Constitution,
Speaker 1: the Bill of Rights, that's also the law. Some little
Speaker 1: pissant state official doesn't get to decide that the Constitution
Speaker 1: doesn't count because in the case of Cuomo, he's desperate
Speaker 1: to cover up grotesque ineptitude that caused a lot of
Speaker 1: people to die who would not have died otherwise. So
Speaker 1: now we're started, we're finally seeing the pushback. It happened
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania where a judge said, this is unconstitutional, these
Speaker 1: lockdowns that you have in place here? Was it? Governor
Speaker 1: Wolf there? Right? And it's happened now in Michigan. It's
Speaker 1: taken a while. The courts don't work very quickly a
Speaker 1: lot of time unless it's a Trump thing. And then
Speaker 1: the Ninth Circuit it's like the Ninth Circuit just stays
Speaker 1: up late at night waiting for some Trump executive order
Speaker 1: that they can strike down, only to have the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court say Trump's allowed to do that. What are you
Speaker 1: lunatics doing? They don't mind because they're they're hashtag resistance.
Speaker 1: It's not about the law, it's about being hashtag resistant.
Speaker 1: So that's what they do. And Widmer in the kind
Speaker 1: of sanctimony that you continue to see from Democrats, who
Speaker 1: I keep telling you be prepared for this. They will
Speaker 1: never admit that they're wrong. They'll never admit that what
Speaker 1: they've done is unconstitutional, was counterproductive and incredibly destructive. They'll
Speaker 1: never admit it doesn't matter what the data says, doesn't
Speaker 1: matter if we find out, you know, in six months. Nope,
Speaker 1: they don't care. So this is oh yeah, Governor Witmer,
Speaker 1: Oh she, oh gosh, yeah, she's just like I'm never
Speaker 1: I'm gonna keep you healthy. Oh sure, play too. So
Speaker 1: while the Supreme Court has spoken, and while I vehemently
Speaker 1: disagree with the conclusion, now is the time for the
Speaker 1: Republicans and the legislature to come back to town and
Speaker 1: start showing that they take this crisis seriously too. I'm
Speaker 1: ready to work with the legislature, but I'm never going
Speaker 1: to negotiate when it comes to doing the right thing
Speaker 1: and protecting the people's health. This is a deadly virus
Speaker 1: that still poses a very real threat. Is still praise
Speaker 1: on our most vulnerable populations, And as you're governor, I
Speaker 1: will continue to use every tool at my disposal to
Speaker 1: combat COVID nineteen. Oh yeah, she's gonna combat COVID nineteen,
Speaker 1: Sure she is. Oh gosh, you know, she was the
Speaker 1: one that said that you couldn't go from one house
Speaker 1: you own to another house you owned. That was not allowed.
Speaker 1: That was a that was a Whitmer rule during this
Speaker 1: whole thing. Nope, not allowed. Sorry, oh oh really? And
Speaker 1: then her husband, remember this, her husband was the one
Speaker 1: that was trying to pressure or an official to let
Speaker 1: let her let him take their family boat out sooner
Speaker 1: than everybody else could, Like, don't you know who? My
Speaker 1: wife is? Kind of a thing. Wasn't that Whitmer. If
Speaker 1: I recall, I think it was so Yeah, more hypocrisy,
Speaker 1: more stupidity, but always going to take the position that
Speaker 1: they're doing they're doing what's right, they're doing what is
Speaker 1: keeping us all safe, speaking of gave it a safe.
Speaker 1: We'll be talking more about the debate later. Biden's trying
Speaker 1: to back out. Why would he want to back out?
Speaker 1: If he did such a good job and they thought
Speaker 1: their internal polling for the Biden campaign looked so strong
Speaker 1: after this, why wouldn't Joe Biden immediately want to jump
Speaker 1: into round two and get even more voters to get
Speaker 1: fire up about him? Right? No, Instead, what we have
Speaker 1: is Biden using Trump's COVID as an excuse play six.
Speaker 1: I think what they're doing, if you Harris debate is
Speaker 1: I'm told I don't know this for a fact. They're
Speaker 1: using plexiglass, and they're following what the Cleveland Clinic says
Speaker 1: people having to be tested like I was tested today
Speaker 1: again and is taking it. I don't know what exactly
Speaker 1: what the rules are going to be, and I'm not
Speaker 1: sure that what President Trump is all about now. I
Speaker 1: don't know what his status is. I'm looking forward to
Speaker 1: being able to debate him. But I just hope all
Speaker 1: the protocols are fouled. Was necessary at the time. I
Speaker 1: think if he still has COVID, we shouldn't have a debate.
Speaker 1: Why can't they social distance and off and where, you know,
Speaker 1: make him to separate them by forty feet on stage
Speaker 1: and have him wear a mask, right, shouldn't it? Shouldn't
Speaker 1: that be sufficient? We're always told that's all you have
Speaker 1: to do, and it's really six feet. They tell you
Speaker 1: wear a mask six feet, right, wouldn't that be enough? Now? Well,
Speaker 1: they wear a mask during the debate. That's interesting, isn't it.
Speaker 1: But then I have a virtual debate. That's another way
Speaker 1: you could do this. But we should hear from the
Speaker 1: president again, because here's what needs to happen. For sure,
Speaker 1: Trump has to force Biden to evade on packing the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court statehood for DC and Puerto Rico. And how
Speaker 1: about some immigration discussion too. I understand immigration has completely
Speaker 1: fallen off the policy radar for most folks right now
Speaker 1: because there's no travel between countries, really very little, if any,
Speaker 1: so we don't think about it. But that doesn't mean
Speaker 1: that it's not still a massive issue in the moment
Speaker 1: that we go back to any kind of normal world.
Speaker 1: There's not going to be the issue of amnesty, which
Speaker 1: is that if Biden and the Democrats push that through,
Speaker 1: it's all over, folks, that the Republican Party is finished.
Speaker 1: So that's all they really have to accomplish. Then every
Speaker 1: you lose. If you lose on Ambassy, you'll lose on
Speaker 1: every other issue after it. It won't matter, it won't
Speaker 1: make a difference. But that's why the President does need
Speaker 1: to have an opportunity, I think, to push Biden on
Speaker 1: these issues. And we'll have to see if he even
Speaker 1: gets that chance. He's going to be healthy enough for
Speaker 1: the debate. The issue is whether or not Biden just
Speaker 1: decides this is all their whole campaign is. Don't give
Speaker 1: it you, Biden, Harris, don't give any real answers on questions,
Speaker 1: stick to the talking points. Trump is hitler, They would
Speaker 1: save everybody from the virus. And you know there were
Speaker 1: no riots this summer. Vote for us. That's basically their
Speaker 1: campaign pitch, and the media lets them get away with it.
Speaker 1: It's appalling, but they do. You would think that journalists
Speaker 1: just to get more viewers and to build a little
Speaker 1: credibility for their make believe. Oh, we're just the real
Speaker 1: journals out there. You think that they would spend some time,
Speaker 1: but now, no, they don't care. They don't care. They're activists, folks.
Speaker 1: They want an outcome here, and the outcome is Biden
Speaker 1: and Harris winning. You're in this is the Bucks X
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. Let's take a look at our justice
Speaker 1: system right now, friends, some important updates for you. Of course,
Speaker 1: you've may be seen at this point that the President
Speaker 1: has said that he's going to declassify everything around the
Speaker 1: whole Russia collusion debacle, the fraud, the hoax that was
Speaker 1: perpetrated against the Trump administration, and seems increasingly absolutely certain.
Speaker 1: We've always thought this was the case, but now we
Speaker 1: have proof. Right. It's one thing to know or to
Speaker 1: believe based on the available evidence that something has happened.
Speaker 1: It's another thing to know beyond a reasonable doubt. And
Speaker 1: I think we are at the place with Russia collusion
Speaker 1: where we are beyond a reasonable doubt that the Clinton
Speaker 1: campaign was not only behind this, but actively fabricating, right,
Speaker 1: actively pushing an errator that it knew wasn't true, and
Speaker 1: that they knew they could co opt the FBI and
Speaker 1: immedia to go along with it, and this is this
Speaker 1: is a crazy story we think about it. It's campaign
Speaker 1: OPO that's then treated seriously by the security services. So
Speaker 1: it's just it's just a total smear job. It's just
Speaker 1: a rumor, this Russia collusion stuff. But well, I'll get
Speaker 1: into in a second one I think is going to
Speaker 1: happen here with further declassifications. I got something else for
Speaker 1: you though. This just filed today in the early afternoon
Speaker 1: in federal court in DC, that the General Flynn case,
Speaker 1: which is still going on. People are still waiting around
Speaker 1: to find out whether Judge Emmett Sullivan, who hates General Flynn,
Speaker 1: that's been made very clear, call them a traitor in
Speaker 1: court for no good reason whatsoever, that this federal judge
Speaker 1: has decided even though the DJ has told him this
Speaker 1: case never should have been brought, we are pulling all
Speaker 1: charges from our end. His response has been, I'm just
Speaker 1: going to keep this going. I'm going to effectively have
Speaker 1: a one person prosecution of the Trump I'm sorry, of
Speaker 1: the General Flynn case, or bring in i should say
Speaker 1: two person. He's brought in this Judge Gleason to be
Speaker 1: as effectively a shadow prosecutor, a guy who isn't really
Speaker 1: not part of the DOJ, isn't a prosecutor, but he's
Speaker 1: making the case as an amicist for the judge. The
Speaker 1: whole thing is nuts. It's making a mockery of the
Speaker 1: justice system. It's disgusting. But it just goes to show
Speaker 1: Trump's derangement syndrome is so powerful that federal judges will
Speaker 1: ruin any credibility they have and really destroy their careers.
Speaker 1: I mean, they don't see it that way yet, but
Speaker 1: in the long run, I think it'll be obvious what's
Speaker 1: gone on here because they hate anyone associated even with Trump. Well,
Speaker 1: just today, Flynn's team has filed the ocean to disqualify
Speaker 1: Judge Sullivan for false and defamatory comments that they claim,
Speaker 1: quote echoed those of Rachel Mattaw. He appointed a conflicted amicust.
Speaker 1: He has become shrill and prejudicial. The whole thing. I mean,
Speaker 1: here's here's from the actual the actual filing today. Again,
Speaker 1: this is all trying to get justice for General Flynn.
Speaker 1: This was the incoming national security advisor of the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: This guy is still being ground down by the federal
Speaker 1: criminal justice system. Didn't even do anything the whole thing
Speaker 1: is nuts in this filing, they write. Nonetheless, in a
Speaker 1: remarkable reflection of its bias, the Court announced early in
Speaker 1: the proceedings that General Flynn had refused to cooperate in
Speaker 1: the Eastern District of Virginia far a related case against
Speaker 1: Flynn's former business partner. After the Court postponed his sentencing.
Speaker 1: That was false, so the Court said things that were
Speaker 1: not true. Moreover, sorry, here we go. As the court knows,
Speaker 1: General Flynn filed a petition for rid of mandamis, which
Speaker 1: just means shut the whole thing down. Because inter alia,
Speaker 1: the Court exceeded the bounds of Article three and intruded
Speaker 1: into the core functions of the executive branch under Article
Speaker 1: two when and appointed mister Gleeson. Moreover, mister Gleeson and
Speaker 1: his partner, David O'Neill of Deba Boys in Plimpton, had
Speaker 1: a conflict of interest that should have foreclosed their participation
Speaker 1: in the case in any way, even if appointment on
Speaker 1: an animicus in a criminal case to pile on against
Speaker 1: a defendant were itself lawful. Mister O'Neill represented none other
Speaker 1: than Sally Yates, the Deputy Attorney General who oversaw the
Speaker 1: Corrupt Investigation and January twenty seventeen interview of General Flynn. Folks,
Speaker 1: there's all kinds of conflicts of interest here, all kinds
Speaker 1: of injustices that are going on, and they just don't care.
Speaker 1: This is like Sally Yates's buddy involved here, and somehow
Speaker 1: no one recuses themselves, no one steps aside and is
Speaker 1: considered to be tainted when it comes to this judicial proceeding.
Speaker 1: It's it's horrible what they're doing to General Flynn. Is.
Speaker 1: I don't know how this is described it other than
Speaker 1: cough gass, and it reminds me of reading about going
Speaker 1: through the system in Souls and Eatson's The Gulag Archipelago
Speaker 1: or Sultan. Eatson says that part of the problem you
Speaker 1: would deal with there they would arrest you for no reason. Right.
Speaker 1: The reason was just to process people and ruin them
Speaker 1: and crush them, to show the power of the Soviet
Speaker 1: Union that they were just that was the machinery, the
Speaker 1: machinery of destruction. And as you were moving through it,
Speaker 1: the bureaucrats who were supposed to get confessions from you,
Speaker 1: they were just annoyed because it wasn't about whether you
Speaker 1: did it or not, it was okay, you're next. You're
Speaker 1: the next target for destruction. And if you didn't give
Speaker 1: them what they wanted, then they would punish you for
Speaker 1: annoying them because you weren't confessing. So you know you're
Speaker 1: you're screwed no matter what. That's what Flynn is going
Speaker 1: through right now. That is the circumstances in which we
Speaker 1: find in which a former three star or yeah, i've
Speaker 1: retired now three star general who was accused of a
Speaker 1: felony for really the question all hinges on that ambush
Speaker 1: interview that we know is a set up to take
Speaker 1: down someone in Trump's arbert. This was all orchestrated. This
Speaker 1: was blocking the peaceful transfer of power of an incoming administration.
Speaker 1: And the Flynn team is saying, look, the bias is everywhere.
Speaker 1: This guy can't get a fair trial. The DJ has
Speaker 1: already said, I mean usually if the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: says we're not bringing any more charges, you get to
Speaker 1: breathe a huge sigh relief, go out celebrate because you're good.
Speaker 1: You're not in jeopardy anymore. Not now, not if you're
Speaker 1: General Flynn. All of this is so disheartening because it
Speaker 1: makes us all realize that you can't trust our own
Speaker 1: justice system. The Democrats have successfully managed to corrupt the
Speaker 1: federal criminal justice system in this country for political reason,
Speaker 1: and it's very hard to undo that. It's very hard
Speaker 1: to change that because whatever we do to try to
Speaker 1: address it, they'll say is political on our end. But
Speaker 1: they've been weaponizing prosecutors' offices for a long time for
Speaker 1: political lens, and this is just another example of that.
Speaker 1: I don't I don't think that this will manage to
Speaker 1: get that rid of mandamus, the legal term for the
Speaker 1: trials over shut the whole thing down. I don't think
Speaker 1: that they're gonna they're gonna get that. And I don't
Speaker 1: think the Judge Flynn will a Judge Sullivan will be disqualified,
Speaker 1: even though we should. And they're just gonna keep dragging
Speaker 1: this thing out. They're gonna keep making Flynn wait, pay lawyers, wait,
Speaker 1: pay lawyers for a case that the prosecutorial arm of
Speaker 1: the government has said, this was bad, We're done here.
Speaker 1: Oh no, Now a judge just decides that you're like
Speaker 1: his plaything and he's going to torture you for fun.
Speaker 1: That's what they're doing to General Flynn. It's a disgrace.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Buses and show podcast. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. All right, Team back in
Speaker 1: action with us now is the one only Denish to
Speaker 1: SUSA his best selling author commentator. I'm sure you know
Speaker 1: him from as many books, but his movie because he's
Speaker 1: also a filmmaker. The Trump Card is out this Friday.
Speaker 1: You can watch it at home on demand, so couldn't
Speaker 1: be any easier. I'm gonna watching it this weekend. Check
Speaker 1: it out yourself. Trump Card the movie dot com. Denish,
Speaker 1: So good to have you back, Hey, It's always a pleasure.
Speaker 1: Great to be back. So we have a vice presidential
Speaker 1: debate going on tonight. Are you are you hopeful this
Speaker 1: is going to be meaningful in any way? Denish? What
Speaker 1: is what's your mindset going into this? I mean, I'm
Speaker 1: assuming you're probably gonna watch, but what do you think? No,
Speaker 1: I'll watch for sure. You know, I'm always a little
Speaker 1: bit nervous when you have a sort of whitebread Republican
Speaker 1: going up against somebody who we know is going to
Speaker 1: play both the race card and the gender card. So
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris's best credentials for being vice president is she's
Speaker 1: or the vice presidential nominee. She's a woman of color,
Speaker 1: and so she's going to go I think hard against
Speaker 1: Mike Pence, and the typical Republican has never known how
Speaker 1: to handle this. Trump is about the only guy who
Speaker 1: takes it in stride. So I'm a little nervous that Pence.
Speaker 1: You know, we don't want him to go into the
Speaker 1: fetal position, and we don't have to go under the desk.
Speaker 1: We want him, in his calm, methodical way to strike
Speaker 1: back and to strike back effectively in the Trumpian mode,
Speaker 1: although obviously using Pence's kind of clinical style. So I'm
Speaker 1: very interested to see how he handles Kamala Harris. It
Speaker 1: could be he could, He could have a big win.
Speaker 1: But to do that he has to be a little
Speaker 1: bit fearless. If you were advising the vice president on
Speaker 1: what he should focus on, either areas where he should
Speaker 1: attack the Biden Harris message, or just places where you
Speaker 1: think that he should really hammer home the most positive
Speaker 1: aspects of what Trump. Trump has done that would really
Speaker 1: resonate right now, Where would you tell him to go? Well,
Speaker 1: I think in terms of the general argument. It could
Speaker 1: be that Pence has even Trump and laying out the
Speaker 1: counter narrative because Trump doesn't really do narrative. Trump is
Speaker 1: really good at the zinger. Trump has a sort of
Speaker 1: a fearlessness that is unmatched in the Republican Party. But
Speaker 1: what Pence can do is tell a story. So, for example,
Speaker 1: Trump said to Biden in the debate, you know, isn't
Speaker 1: it true that your son, Hunter Biden got three point
Speaker 1: five million dollars from a Russian oligarch. But what Pence
Speaker 1: can do is give the backstory, which is that the
Speaker 1: Biden family has been running this family racket now for
Speaker 1: a while. He's always takes a family member when he
Speaker 1: goes on foreign trips. While Biden is having official meetings,
Speaker 1: the family member is cutting side deals with government officials
Speaker 1: from foreign countries, resulting in large transfers of cash into
Speaker 1: the Biden coffers. So this is a systematic racket similar
Speaker 1: to the Clinton racket. Although they use the Clinton foundation,
Speaker 1: Biden kind of uses his extended family. So Pence can
Speaker 1: lay all this out. What I'm worried about is if
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris goes full racial on Pence, I would have
Speaker 1: I would advise Pence to say, hey, listen, Kamala, this
Speaker 1: is really strange because you are descended from the largest
Speaker 1: slave owner in Jamaica, a guy who owned five plantations
Speaker 1: and over two hundred slaves. So you're actually descended from
Speaker 1: the slave owners side. You really can't claim victim's status.
Speaker 1: Isn't it true that all the privileges you've enjoyed in life,
Speaker 1: private schools, expensive colleges, all the benefits, access to political power,
Speaker 1: isn't that all due to your slave owner privilege. If
Speaker 1: I think this is the way to fight with these people,
Speaker 1: that it'll shut them up right away. But if you
Speaker 1: don't go there, if you if like McCain, you keep
Speaker 1: all the stuff off the table. And I think it's
Speaker 1: going to be a long night, which begin in Danesh
Speaker 1: to SUSA author and filmmakers. Movie The Trump Card out
Speaker 1: this Friday. Trump Card themovie dot com to go check
Speaker 1: it out on demand, you watch it right at home.
Speaker 1: I'm going to do it this weekend. You all should too.
Speaker 1: Denish the Trump return to the White House. From Walter Read,
Speaker 1: I think it was, in real time, the biggest meltdown
Speaker 1: that I've seen the media have. Maybe, well, there was
Speaker 1: the RBG passing. But then before that it might be
Speaker 1: the election itself. I mean I saw people talking about
Speaker 1: how he looked like Mussolini. He should be major media figures,
Speaker 1: he should be charged with manslaughter. And there was a
Speaker 1: really clear point that was made because Trump said, don't
Speaker 1: live in fear and let this dominate your life. Isn't
Speaker 1: Isn't it clear to any American now is paying attention
Speaker 1: that the Democrat Party in the media response to this
Speaker 1: is no, you have to let it dominate your life.
Speaker 1: In fact, you have to let us dominate your life
Speaker 1: by doing exactly what we tell you to do. For sure,
Speaker 1: look these first of all, the position that we have
Speaker 1: to live with coronavirus. This was gonna be the Democratic
Speaker 1: position on November four that they win the election. So
Speaker 1: we know that that means that their current position is
Speaker 1: a fake. They're just putting it on, and they're putting
Speaker 1: it on for a political purpose. Now, with Trump, they
Speaker 1: were dying. They so much wanted to see him on
Speaker 1: a stretcher. They wanted to see him getting oxygen. They
Speaker 1: wanted him on a ventilator. They wanted him to look weak.
Speaker 1: They were hoping that like Boris Johnson in England, he
Speaker 1: would go into the ICU, you know, the guys in
Speaker 1: his seventies. He's supposedly in a vulnerable group. But unbelievably,
Speaker 1: forty eight hours later, he basically comes cart wheeling out
Speaker 1: of the hospital room. You know, he's taking a ride
Speaker 1: around the town, and he says nothing more than what
Speaker 1: FDR said in the depression. We have nothing to fear
Speaker 1: so much as fear itself. That is Trump's message, whereas
Speaker 1: the Democratic message a complete loser, be afraid, be very afraid.
Speaker 1: What do you think, honestly happens after November third? If
Speaker 1: Biden ends up winning this thing, what do the next
Speaker 1: six months for America look like? So it's customary for
Speaker 1: people to say this is the most consequential election, but
Speaker 1: we've heard that before. Here's I see it. If Trump
Speaker 1: loses and Biden wins, there will be a systematic, coordinated
Speaker 1: campaign to adicate not just Trump, but what you can
Speaker 1: call Trump is him from American public life. And that
Speaker 1: means going after all those of us who have been
Speaker 1: since seen as sympathetic to Trump, trying to discredit us,
Speaker 1: trying to make it look like we were some temporary,
Speaker 1: ugly stain on the American landscape that should never be
Speaker 1: allowed to happen again. Now if Trump wins, on the
Speaker 1: other hand, he has the chance to do what Reagan
Speaker 1: did in the second term, consolidate the gains of the
Speaker 1: first term. I mean, he's had three Supreme Court nominations
Speaker 1: in the first term. He could have one or two more.
Speaker 1: He could make the court single handedly by himself. So
Speaker 1: Trump can have an impact not just on public policy,
Speaker 1: not just on the Court, but I think even on
Speaker 1: the culture. America was a different place after two terms
Speaker 1: of Reagan than it had been before. And I would
Speaker 1: say the Reagan Revolution didn't end until two thousand and eight,
Speaker 1: so it was a twenty five year phenomenon. And Trump,
Speaker 1: who Trump is clearly a consequential president like Reagan, and
Speaker 1: he could have some of that same enduring impact. What
Speaker 1: do you think it's going to take for the American
Speaker 1: people to finally say or enough? I should say the
Speaker 1: American people, because I do believe that in places like
Speaker 1: Los Angeles and New York City, there are folks who
Speaker 1: if they were told you got a shelter in place,
Speaker 1: we need at least two or three more years before
Speaker 1: we really test out, they would do it. I mean
Speaker 1: I live next to them. I know there are people
Speaker 1: in my building Denish who wears. There's a couple that
Speaker 1: wears a full headed toe has matt suit every time
Speaker 1: they go outside. I've seen them. I don't want to
Speaker 1: be mean, so I don't take photos. But it's crazy.
Speaker 1: What is it going to take for enough of us
Speaker 1: to say that enough is enough? I mean, what do
Speaker 1: we do to get to that place? And do you
Speaker 1: think the president can pull us out of this panic
Speaker 1: induced national coma? I think he can, and I think
Speaker 1: the way to do it is you have to have
Speaker 1: You may call them pioneers. In this case, Florida as
Speaker 1: a pioneer, just like worldwide in the coronavirus battle, Sweden
Speaker 1: was a pioneer. Sweden said, We're not going to do that.
Speaker 1: We're gonna stay open. We're gonna be cautious, but we're
Speaker 1: not close anything. Cafes are open, banks are open, offices
Speaker 1: are open. And now let's see the same thing is
Speaker 1: going on right now with Florida. Florida has no restrictions,
Speaker 1: no mass requirements. Everything is open. And if Florida doesn't
Speaker 1: have a massive spike that frightens the state into going
Speaker 1: into shutdown. Then that shows the way for DeSantis becomes
Speaker 1: a scout who is showing the way for the rest
Speaker 1: of us. So that's the way you do it. You're
Speaker 1: braver than the next guy. You go out front and
Speaker 1: you prove it can be done. Look, there's a politics
Speaker 1: of fear works for the Democrats. FDR discovered that in
Speaker 1: the thirties against the backdrop of the depression. Now again,
Speaker 1: the depression was real. The fear wasn't contrived, it was real.
Speaker 1: But the Democrats realized, we can do things with this
Speaker 1: fear or politically that we couldn't do otherwise. And so really,
Speaker 1: since I came to America in the seventies, it's been
Speaker 1: one fear mongering tactic after another. You know, the Earth
Speaker 1: is running out of food, nuclear winter, the ozone layers,
Speaker 1: dissipating climate change, now aronavirus. So in every case a
Speaker 1: pretext for greater government control and greater centralized authority. Denish
Speaker 1: to sues everybody. Check out Trump Card themovie dot com
Speaker 1: coming out this Friday. You can watch it at home
Speaker 1: and denish. We're looking forward to hopefully get you back
Speaker 1: here when Trump, Oh, before let you go. Do you
Speaker 1: think do you think Trump and Biden are going to
Speaker 1: debate again. Is that going to happen? Because Biden's looking
Speaker 1: like he might try to bail. You know, that's really
Speaker 1: surprising because I thought that Trump and the debate at times,
Speaker 1: I thought he was too as Sarbigie interrupted too much.
Speaker 1: I'm like, I wonder how he did. And then I
Speaker 1: saw all the left, you know, shrieking and screaming, no
Speaker 1: more debates, no more debates, and that told me, well,
Speaker 1: you know, Trump right did pretty well and probably scored
Speaker 1: some points on Biden. I mean, Biden was supposed to
Speaker 1: be the healer of it. The best he could do
Speaker 1: to Trump is You're a clown, You're a racist, you're
Speaker 1: a liar. So this guy is unhinged, and I think
Speaker 1: that the Democrats may be rethinking the second debate, although
Speaker 1: I expect it to happen. I hope it does happen,
Speaker 1: but who knows. Trump Card the movie dot Com Everyone
Speaker 1: out this Friday, Danish. Thanks again, great to see you,
Speaker 1: Thank you, my pleasure you're in. This is the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. You know, I'm a conservative. I don't
Speaker 1: often talk about how depraved the cultural institutions of this
Speaker 1: country have become, not that I don't think they are.
Speaker 1: It's just I focus a lot more on politics, national security, fighting,
Speaker 1: the deep state, immigration, there are just some other issues
Speaker 1: that tend to spend I spend more time on, but
Speaker 1: not always. And I gotta tell you this one was.
Speaker 1: This one yesterday was pretty remarkable. This news story that
Speaker 1: just broke that the former Member of Congress Katie Hill
Speaker 1: of California is having a movie made about her. Now
Speaker 1: where I'm certain, I mean, they've got Elizabeth Moss playing
Speaker 1: girl Elizabeth's moth Is. Moss is a very beloved figure
Speaker 1: on the left because she's the primary actor in that
Speaker 1: Handmaid's Tail show, which I have not seen, but I
Speaker 1: know what it's about. So, and she's also in mad
Speaker 1: Men for those of you who like that. I kind
Speaker 1: of found Madmen boring, but some people love it. And
Speaker 1: she's playing her, so you know, you can always tell
Speaker 1: based on the actor playing a person and how they're
Speaker 1: gonna be depicted, whether they're going to be it's gonna
Speaker 1: be favorable. And it's based on the book that Katie
Speaker 1: Hill wrote here, Okay, what exactly is this movie got
Speaker 1: a show? Katie Hill has been held up by the
Speaker 1: left recently. This resigned member of Congress from California as
Speaker 1: some kind of a victim. And it's really never clear
Speaker 1: to anybody who actually looks at what happened here. Why
Speaker 1: is she a victim. She was a married member of
Speaker 1: Congress who by her own admission, was having threesomes that
Speaker 1: included people in her employee on her staff, which is
Speaker 1: a violation of House rules. You're not allowed to do
Speaker 1: that for very obvious reasons. And this is a good rule.
Speaker 1: You know, you don't want some sixty year old guy
Speaker 1: from Mississippi or California, or you name it, who is
Speaker 1: having his twenty two year old intern do his bidding,
Speaker 1: not just xeroxing and stuff like that, you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. It's a good rule. It's a good rule
Speaker 1: to have, and it's just an ethics consideration for members
Speaker 1: of Congress. She violated that. We all know she violated that.
Speaker 1: And yet she's a hero because she spoke her truth
Speaker 1: or something. And the the Left is deranged, and you really
Speaker 1: should juxtapose the way that they're going to make. They
Speaker 1: are making a hero out of Katie Hill, who is
Speaker 1: really somebody who acted in just a reckless and depraved fashion.
Speaker 1: And you know, She's now going to be a hero
Speaker 1: because of what exactly. Oh, they attacked her because she's
Speaker 1: a woman. It was because of her sexuality and because
Speaker 1: of all another woman. No, no one really cares that.
Speaker 1: It wasn't really what it was all about. Remember Congress.
Speaker 1: This was a staffer and she tweeted yesterday about how
Speaker 1: excited she was about this. And then it was very
Speaker 1: interesting because a former staffer who worked for Katie Hill,
Speaker 1: who still had access to her old Twitter account, came
Speaker 1: out and had a whole bunch of things to suggest
Speaker 1: to say about this, because you know Katie Hills, like, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm so excited about the movie that's being made about
Speaker 1: my life. And you know she's gonna get the Hollywood
Speaker 1: HBO treatment where she's just a fearless, tireless fighter for
Speaker 1: progressive causes who got caught up in you know, some nonsense.
Speaker 1: I mean, they'll make the worst people into into heroes
Speaker 1: as long as it serves the political narrative. But this
Speaker 1: former staffer of Katie Hills, this is really interesting. I
Speaker 1: took to her Twitter account. Now, again this has not
Speaker 1: been very but whoever it was had access to the
Speaker 1: official Twitter account, and it all seems to add up,
Speaker 1: Katie Hill Quote was never investigated by the How Ethics Committee,
Speaker 1: nor has she been held accountable by anyone other than herself.
Speaker 1: We encourage everyone to reflect deeply before taking her word
Speaker 1: at face value. And then this political piece says, at
Speaker 1: the time of resignation, Hill was under investigation by the
Speaker 1: House Ethics Panel for allegations of an improper sexual relationship
Speaker 1: with a male congressional staffer. She denied that accusation, but
Speaker 1: admitted to an inappropriate relationship with a female campaign staffer.
Speaker 1: Several nude photos of Hill were published by conservative media
Speaker 1: outlets amid the scandal, which she blamed on an abusive
Speaker 1: husband she was divorcing at the time. In their messages Wednesday,
Speaker 1: the anonymous posters wrote that Hill quote took advantage of
Speaker 1: her subordinates and caused immense harm to the people who
Speaker 1: worked for her, many of whom were young women just
Speaker 1: beginning their careers in politics. Believe us when we say
Speaker 1: it's not only about who starts it, it's also about
Speaker 1: who ends it. The posters wrote, and while Katie is
Speaker 1: certainly the survivor of abuse, we are not confident that
Speaker 1: she should a sufficily acted to end her own patterns
Speaker 1: of inappropriate and abusive behavior. Control of my account was
Speaker 1: handed back to the house clerk when I resigned. She wrote,
Speaker 1: God knows who hacked it from there, So she's saying
Speaker 1: that this is a hack. I think probably what happened,
Speaker 1: if I'm guessing here, is that she handed it her
Speaker 1: account back either if she did, but they didn't change
Speaker 1: the password on the account, because why would they. It's
Speaker 1: now an account that doesn't have any meaning, and she's
Speaker 1: not a congresswoman anymore. And one of her old staffers
Speaker 1: had a hacking or account. I don't know. It sounds
Speaker 1: a little bit like when Joy Reid was claiming they
Speaker 1: hacked her blog from ten years ago to write a
Speaker 1: bunch of homophobic stuff under her byline. Weird, right, how
Speaker 1: that happens. Yeah, they're going to turn herto a hero, though,
Speaker 1: And this is one of these areas where I know,
Speaker 1: for a lot of us we say, ah, but come on,
Speaker 1: how much does it really matter or what difference does
Speaker 1: it really make? So HBO is making another propaganda movie.
Speaker 1: They get to win in the culture, They get to
Speaker 1: keep winning, and the culture friends, and you know, that
Speaker 1: might not change the minds of people who remember this
Speaker 1: news story now, But in five years, what are people
Speaker 1: going to remember the HBO movie about Katie Hill. They
Speaker 1: say they did the same thing with Anita Hill, where
Speaker 1: they made her into a hero. Now, she you know,
Speaker 1: followed Clarence Thomas professionally around, wanted to work for him,
Speaker 1: and they act like she was some great hero because
Speaker 1: she says that he made a couple of inappropriate comments
Speaker 1: in the office. This was some great act of bravery.
Speaker 1: Uh No, But they made a movie about her. Kerrie Washington,
Speaker 1: a very very appealing actress, played her in the movie.
Speaker 1: So that's the thing. Who do you want, you know,
Speaker 1: do you want them to take some guy and you know,
Speaker 1: make him look as crazy and much of a you
Speaker 1: know that they give like the Gary Busey treatment to
Speaker 1: your character. Be a Republican if you want like a
Speaker 1: basically a model to play you and show what a
Speaker 1: hero you are for women's rights and program of ideas
Speaker 1: and everything else, you know what side of the eye
Speaker 1: you've got to be on. And this matters. Unfortunately, this,
Speaker 1: this pushes people in directions politically, both in office and
Speaker 1: the voters. It's a shame. We gotta start winning, we
Speaker 1: gotta start fighting back at least. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the bus sets in show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Imagine all the White housekeepers, Imagine the butlers, Imagine all
Speaker 1: the staff that work to keep the White House running
Speaker 1: that he has now put in harm's way. Imagine just
Speaker 1: the everyday people that want to serve the country and
Speaker 1: serve the first family he has putting He's putting them
Speaker 1: in harm's way. Two White House housekeepers have tested positive,
Speaker 1: and I think it was Chelsea Clinton that tweeted out
Speaker 1: yesterday that she's so close to many of those people
Speaker 1: and she fears for their lives. I mean, what kind
Speaker 1: of man, not just president, what kind of man would
Speaker 1: act in this way to endanger the lives of people
Speaker 1: that are supposed that are taking care of him and
Speaker 1: his family. It's despicable, despicable. I mean, The View is
Speaker 1: the dumbest show on television. I think that's for sure.
Speaker 1: But I wanted to play that for you just so
Speaker 1: you could hear how how much rage there really is here,
Speaker 1: how much they really despise Donald Trump on a personal level.
Speaker 1: They think that they believe this stuff I know they
Speaker 1: say it, and it's easy for us to say, come on,
Speaker 1: this is just hyperbolic rhetoric, and this is just you know,
Speaker 1: they're playing dirty politics here. They believe this stuff, they
Speaker 1: really do. They think the president's a racist, a rapist,
Speaker 1: a murderer, and a traitor. They believe all those things
Speaker 1: and now, and actually they not all of them. Some
Speaker 1: of them are obviously being cynical about all of this,
Speaker 1: but some of them are in fact so stupid that
Speaker 1: they'll buy in to this. They'll think that this is
Speaker 1: an accurate view of the leader of the free world.
Speaker 1: And you'll notice there's a huge difference between the way
Speaker 1: that conservatives opposed the Obama administration, which was largely based
Speaker 1: on not entirely, but largely based on not agreeing with
Speaker 1: and opposing Obama's policies his decisions as president, and the
Speaker 1: deeply personal vitriol, the deeply personal hatred that they have
Speaker 1: for this president and uh, and on the how stupid
Speaker 1: are they side of it. I mean, he's right bay harsh,
Speaker 1: he's back blait twelve. Well, you know, I have to say,
Speaker 1: when I saw him running up those stairs, I thought,
Speaker 1: this guy thinks he's Sylvesta stallone and Rocky. The only
Speaker 1: thing is Rocky was not loaded up with let's say,
Speaker 1: Ram Dezevie and Dexamethason. You know, he had just this one,
Speaker 1: just got out of the hospital with a million drugs
Speaker 1: in his system. And by the way he was, he
Speaker 1: was shaking a little bit, and and and he couldn't breathe.
Speaker 1: I don't think he looked very good. He didn't look good.
Speaker 1: I don't like the way he looked. It wasn't good.
Speaker 1: It wasn't good. I hate him. He's bad, bad man,
Speaker 1: orange Man bad. It's all just orange Man bad. Nothing
Speaker 1: else is allowed to really enter into the conversation. Nothing
Speaker 1: can change their minds. Everything Trump does is evil. I mean,
Speaker 1: if Trump did, in fact, personally cure cancer tomorrow, there
Speaker 1: would be Democrats with cancer, had some good stuff that
Speaker 1: we need to talk about. Now, look what Trump has done.
Speaker 1: He's so awful. I mean, they would find a way,
Speaker 1: they would find a way to take that positions as
Speaker 1: insane as it clearly is, but this is what we
Speaker 1: are up against in this election cycle. I think everybody
Speaker 1: needs to understand it. Oh, there was a moment of
Speaker 1: self awareness from Don Lemon mister Don Lemon over at CNN,
Speaker 1: who does occasionally because he's sometimes too dumb to say
Speaker 1: things quietly, he says them loudly, things that Democrats aren't
Speaker 1: supposed to say, so he can be unintentionally insightful. But
Speaker 1: here he is Play eight. Joe Biden is not Hillary Clinton. People,
Speaker 1: you know, this isn't This isn't me. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: that I don't like Hillary Clinton, but people, she did
Speaker 1: not have a high favorability rating. Joe Biden's favorability ratings
Speaker 1: are higher, as you so rightly pointed out. Now, Now
Speaker 1: this president is not just aspirational. He has a record
Speaker 1: right that he's run on and that he and most
Speaker 1: of the time continues to run into the ground. And
Speaker 1: I think that people talk about the silent majority you said,
Speaker 1: you know, you don't see the lawn signs or whatever.
Speaker 1: I think that people feel that they don't have to
Speaker 1: put up lawn signs and do all those things, because
Speaker 1: the lawn sign is Trump out every day giving misinformation.
Speaker 1: And when someone after someone annoys you for a while,
Speaker 1: you know you have your detractors, Chris, many of them
Speaker 1: on state television, like I do, what's the best way
Speaker 1: to to handle it. You just ignore it. They can choke.
Speaker 1: Just know, just agnach the cernem that people. When you
Speaker 1: ignore people, that is the worst thing that you can
Speaker 1: do to anyone. So I think that people are sick
Speaker 1: of quite frankly sick of us talking about Trump every
Speaker 1: single night leading with him. You know, it's a bulk
Speaker 1: of our show. People are tired of it, and they're
Speaker 1: tired of his antics. And I think there's a silent
Speaker 1: majority who are just going to say, you know what,
Speaker 1: I'm done. He's right about. People are just tired of
Speaker 1: the way that CNN is the anti Trump network every
Speaker 1: single night. That's it. Every night they're talking about how
Speaker 1: terrible Trump is. Everything they're doing is geared toward that
Speaker 1: one outcome of not just defeating Trump in the election,
Speaker 1: but turning as many people as possible into Orange Man bad.
Speaker 1: Trump is evil, and nothing else matters. There's no other
Speaker 1: discussion of politics or policy that we need to have,
Speaker 1: because as long as we all understand that Trump is
Speaker 1: literally the worst person in all of his three then
Speaker 1: that's that's all. They'll get to do. One thing tonight,
Speaker 1: in the one thing tonight in the debate that I'm
Speaker 1: sure will come up is about how the Democrats position themselves.
Speaker 1: Now this is Biden saying it, but Kamala Harris will
Speaker 1: do this too, as the side that opposes hate, and
Speaker 1: this is this is another narrative that we need to
Speaker 1: pull apart, deconstruct a bit the side that opposes hate.
Speaker 1: Here's Joe Biden saying just that at play seven. I
Speaker 1: made the decision to run for president after Charlottesville. Close
Speaker 1: your eyes and remember what you saw. Neo Nazis, white
Speaker 1: supremacist and the KKK coming out of the fields with torches,
Speaker 1: lighted veins, bulgie chanting, the same anti Semitic bile heard
Speaker 1: across Europe in the thirties. It was hate on the
Speaker 1: march in the open. In America, hate never goes away.
Speaker 1: It only hides. And when it's given oxygen, when it's
Speaker 1: given an opportunity to spread, when it's treated as normal,
Speaker 1: an acceptable behavior, We've opened a door in this country
Speaker 1: that we must move quickly to close. As president, That's
Speaker 1: just what I will do. I will send a clare
Speaker 1: on a critical message to the entire nation. There is
Speaker 1: no place for hate in America. I'll be given it,
Speaker 1: will be given no license. He'll be given no oxygen,
Speaker 1: it will be given no safe harbor. Interesting do we
Speaker 1: think it's fair to say that there's a good chunk
Speaker 1: of the Democrat party that hates law enforcement? I mean
Speaker 1: a lot. I mean a lot of Democrats when you
Speaker 1: add it all together, really hate the cops. Is that hate?
Speaker 1: Or what do we call that? When you describe someone
Speaker 1: as a racist murderer worthy of violent assault because of
Speaker 1: their job, isn't isn't it fair to say you hate them?
Speaker 1: Isn't it fair to say that Democrats are being trained
Speaker 1: by their media night after night to hate Trump supporters,
Speaker 1: to hate them, not to disagree with I'm not to
Speaker 1: try to win them over, just to view them with
Speaker 1: a viciousness and a disdain that Trump supporters are beneath contempt?
Speaker 1: Isn't that what we're seeing from I want to talk
Speaker 1: about state media. I mean, the Democrat Party runs the media.
Speaker 1: It so isn't that? Isn't that a hatred? I think
Speaker 1: it is? Why is it that when something happens that
Speaker 1: the Left doesn't approve of, there will be innocent people
Speaker 1: who are attacked, There'll be bloodshed in the streets, There'll
Speaker 1: be stores that are broken into, and we all know
Speaker 1: that that's the expectation, but we just accept that there
Speaker 1: is there hatred behind that. Oh what about what we
Speaker 1: have seen where Trump supporters have been attacked, have been
Speaker 1: violently assaulted for wearing MAGA hats, and is that that
Speaker 1: considered a hatred? I just want to know and to
Speaker 1: say that a group of people, whether it's law enforcement
Speaker 1: or Trump supporters, are all together are evil and that
Speaker 1: they believe in something that's destroying the country. I think
Speaker 1: it's interesting that they really believe that the H word
Speaker 1: hate is something that only the left gets to throw
Speaker 1: around and that the great crusaders against it when we
Speaker 1: all recognize that what they've been doing, what their Democrat
Speaker 1: shock troops have been up to all summer, is deeply hateful,
Speaker 1: hateful to small business owners, hateful to Republicans and to
Speaker 1: police and to anyone who believes in law and order.
Speaker 1: Never forget that video. It was really insightful, and I
Speaker 1: know it's just one little moment in time, but that
Speaker 1: video where you had a bunch of kids playing beer
Speaker 1: pong and BLM supporter BLM rioters were walking past their
Speaker 1: window and they wave to them, and they threw a
Speaker 1: rock through their window and the kids are all we're
Speaker 1: on your side. Oh, it's a hateful movement. Look at
Speaker 1: the spittle and the rage coming from the mouths of
Speaker 1: white female Biden voters in DC who get in the
Speaker 1: faces of law enforcement and call them traders, race traders.
Speaker 1: Even that actually happened too. I'm not forgetting that that
Speaker 1: happened to the NYPD cops who were themselves minorities are
Speaker 1: called betrayers of their race by these protesters. Is that hateful?
Speaker 1: I think that's I think that's very hateful. I think
Speaker 1: that's very destructive. But yet this term is to run
Speaker 1: as other Democrats are trying to promote a country full
Speaker 1: of unity and love and decency and kindness. They're the
Speaker 1: ones that have been rampaging through the streets for months.
Speaker 1: And that's why that Michelle Obama video that she put
Speaker 1: out there. Here's here's one piece of I played twenty
Speaker 1: the message we will send to our children about who
Speaker 1: we are and what we truly value. To think about
Speaker 1: what would possibly compel you to accept this level of chaos,
Speaker 1: violence and confusion under this president and be willing to
Speaker 1: watch our country continue to spiral out of control because
Speaker 1: we can no longer pretend that we don't know exactly
Speaker 1: who and what this president stands for. Search your hearts
Speaker 1: and your conscience, and then vote for Joe Biden like
Speaker 1: your lives depend on it, Like your lives depend on it,
Speaker 1: she says, because otherwise you're going to have all the
Speaker 1: hate and violence. Remember she mentioned violence destruction, And who's
Speaker 1: responsible for the violence and destruction that this country has
Speaker 1: been in the grip of for months now? The answer
Speaker 1: is Democrats, friends, the answer is the Joe Biden Party.
Speaker 1: The answer is former Obama voters. That's who has been
Speaker 1: doing this. Why can't we just all be honest about
Speaker 1: at least that fact, because to vote for Biden is
Speaker 1: to embrace the big lies. You're in the Freedom Mind.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Well you
Speaker 1: might have heard there is a debate tonight with the
Speaker 1: vice president of the United States and the would be
Speaker 1: vice president if she has her way, Kamala Harris. We
Speaker 1: are now joined by someone from a Trump campaign. Tell
Speaker 1: us what they're expecting from their side. We've got Ali
Speaker 1: Parto with us now. She's the deputy communications director for
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign. Ali, how you doing great? Thanks so
Speaker 1: much for having me out here in Salt Lake City
Speaker 1: VP is ready to go. I think we're going to
Speaker 1: see a clear contrast tonight, just like we did last week,
Speaker 1: of the agenda that the President's put out, this America
Speaker 1: First agenda that's really been delivering for the American people,
Speaker 1: and what you're seeing from the left, which is a
Speaker 1: socialist agenda take us backwards, a four trillion dollars tax hike.
Speaker 1: You're talking about the most liberal senator in the country
Speaker 1: on the stage tonight. She is to the left of
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders. I'm not saying that. The studies say that,
Speaker 1: and so I think the decision and the contract us
Speaker 1: could not be clear. So what are some of these
Speaker 1: special debate protection measures we're seeing. Are they're going to
Speaker 1: be separated by plexiglass at the debate? Are they going
Speaker 1: to be in bubbles? Well? What is? There? Still some
Speaker 1: negotiation going on over this? You know, it is an
Speaker 1: interesting process. Our debate negotiations are constantly ongoing, not only
Speaker 1: for this debate, but also for the following two debates.
Speaker 1: There have been some interesting demands and request from the
Speaker 1: Biden Harris campaign this time around. Obviously, we do everything
Speaker 1: that's recommended to us, and we agree everything that's recommended
Speaker 1: to us by the by the health professionals. It seems
Speaker 1: to me, honestly that they're just trying to purchase signal
Speaker 1: a little on the on the Biden Harris side, but
Speaker 1: obviously that's what we've come to expect that. Um. I
Speaker 1: think I hope that they have a really good opportunity
Speaker 1: to talk about this tonight, because the Biden Harris campaign
Speaker 1: wants to say one thing and then do another. When
Speaker 1: you've seen this vice president leading the task force of
Speaker 1: you know, the greatest public private partnership in history, really
Speaker 1: delivering the best testing capabilities in the world, delivering the
Speaker 1: you know, a vaccine, and what's going to be a
Speaker 1: record time. Those are the things that people are going
Speaker 1: to be listening to tonight, and I think the Vice
Speaker 1: President is going to be able to do a very
Speaker 1: good job explaining that to the American people and contrasting
Speaker 1: that with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, who say a
Speaker 1: lot and do very little. Now, what are some of
Speaker 1: the questions that you know that you expect the Vice
Speaker 1: president to try. I know he's not the moderators exactly,
Speaker 1: He's not the one to ask you the questions, but
Speaker 1: if he's going to try to push to get an
Speaker 1: answer and there will be some free form exchanges between
Speaker 1: these two, these two ideological combatants on that stage tonight.
Speaker 1: What is he going to push on Supreme Court packing?
Speaker 1: I mean, what's at the top of the agenda for
Speaker 1: Pens to show in terms of the contrast between the
Speaker 1: two Oh, I mean, I think that Supreme Court packing
Speaker 1: is definitely on the list. Why haven't we heard an
Speaker 1: answer from Joe Biden or come on in heres on
Speaker 1: that issue? Why will they not say yes or no?
Speaker 1: And if they're four quarterbacking and we know she is,
Speaker 1: but is he and is their ticket? So I think
Speaker 1: that that's an interesting question that's going to get asked. Additionally,
Speaker 1: you're talking about a four trillion dollar packs increase. How
Speaker 1: is she going to pay for that? And why does
Speaker 1: she think the American people are willing to have that
Speaker 1: burden put on them, especially when we're bouncing out of
Speaker 1: a pandemic. It just makes her sense. Additionally, she is
Speaker 1: one of the first sponsors of the Green New Deal.
Speaker 1: Does she stand by that? Joe Biden tries to say
Speaker 1: he doesn't, but it's still on their website. I think
Speaker 1: these are really important questions for the American people to hear.
Speaker 1: There's people all across this country. I know you're in
Speaker 1: states with all across the country. You're talking to Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Florida.
Speaker 1: When you ask these folks about Joe Biden and Kamala
Speaker 1: Harrison wanting to ban fracking, you're talking about wiping out
Speaker 1: complete industries in those states, wiping out not only industries,
Speaker 1: but industries that hold up their economy. So I think
Speaker 1: there's so much for us to hear tonight and to
Speaker 1: ask questions about. Unfortunately, she hasn't been known to answer
Speaker 1: any of these questions. But the Vice President is tough,
Speaker 1: and I expect him to push and hope to get
Speaker 1: some of those answers questions answered. There were questions, and
Speaker 1: we are speaking to Ali Parto, who's the deputy communications
Speaker 1: director for the Trump campaign. Ali, there were questions. Look,
Speaker 1: I had concerns about what happened in the last debate.
Speaker 1: In terms of the moderator, Chris Wallace, what can you
Speaker 1: tell us about the campaign's feelings tonight. Well, I mean,
Speaker 1: Susan Page hasn't been our biggest fan, but there's not
Speaker 1: a lot of people in the media that we know
Speaker 1: that are or that really give the President and the
Speaker 1: Vice president the respect and then the tension that they
Speaker 1: deserve on the issues that they're pushing. But I think
Speaker 1: what I can tell you is this, the Vice President's
Speaker 1: going to have his time, and he's going to make
Speaker 1: sure that our record and our agenda and what we
Speaker 1: want to do moving forward is talked about and displayed.
Speaker 1: We always expect it to be two to one, um,
Speaker 1: but we still like our odds. And so I'm pretty
Speaker 1: confident and the Vice president's glance tonight and to tonight
Speaker 1: very confident. And uh and i'd say stand stand that
Speaker 1: and get ready to for good night. And just before
Speaker 1: we let you go, what what is the the standing
Speaker 1: right now of follow up debates? Are they going to happen?
Speaker 1: The President absolutely intends to debate, obviously, following CDC guidelines
Speaker 1: and everything that's laid out right now, there's no reason
Speaker 1: why he wouldn't be able to based on on the
Speaker 1: guidelines and in our understanding of the process moving forward.
Speaker 1: So you know, we hope he stays in good health.
Speaker 1: And he's a fighter, and I think he's proven that
Speaker 1: there's no one better to have fighting for you. Than him,
Speaker 1: and he is going to to get out there and
Speaker 1: talk to people about how we can responsibly move forward.
Speaker 1: I think that's the biggest thing, is it's time to
Speaker 1: responsibly reopen and move forward. You're going to hear that
Speaker 1: from the Vice President tonight and also from the President
Speaker 1: debates to come. There is kids that need to get
Speaker 1: back to school. There is you know, child abuse case
Speaker 1: is not getting reported, Families not being able to get
Speaker 1: fed because of the jobs that are not reopening. So
Speaker 1: I think it's time for us to safely reopen, but
Speaker 1: also to reopen. Right, It's two things. Do it safely,
Speaker 1: but also make sure we're actually doing it. So that's
Speaker 1: what the President's going to talk about and we look
Speaker 1: forward to more of that. Ali Pardo, Deputy Communications director
Speaker 1: for the Trump Campaign. Ali, thank you so much. We
Speaker 1: appreciate it. Yeah, thanks so much for having me. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcast. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Hey, dem Buck, it's time for roll
Speaker 1: Call Roco Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton or Team
Speaker 1: Buck at iHeartMedia dot com. Yeah, that's that's the way
Speaker 1: to reach out to us or a Buck Sexton on Instagram,
Speaker 1: send us the gram. That's what we got going on
Speaker 1: Rouser Mark. You see the NBA's ratings are down fifty
Speaker 1: percent for the finals. I did. Yeah. Do you think
Speaker 1: that's just because people, you know, without the without crowds
Speaker 1: and everything, it's not as exciting. You think it's a
Speaker 1: political backlash. I think twenty to thirty percent of it
Speaker 1: is just because the NFL's around. There's playoff baseball, there
Speaker 1: was hockey, you know, a different time year, all that stuff.
Speaker 1: I think the rest very well could be political. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: fair enough, because I saw that. I mean that's I mean,
Speaker 1: if you have a let's say you were running a
Speaker 1: broadcast news station or something, and you had a fifty
Speaker 1: percent drop in ratings, like everyone's getting fired, that's a
Speaker 1: that's catastrophic. So fifty cent drop for the NBA Finals,
Speaker 1: I think is I think that happens to sports every
Speaker 1: year during an election year. I think that's the reason
Speaker 1: the NFL's down slightly is because people are watching the
Speaker 1: news and more or into politics nowadays. You know, every
Speaker 1: four years, the next you know, for the next few weeks,
Speaker 1: you know, I hope, I hope missus Mark knows that
Speaker 1: you know you're gonna be stretched to the limit, Producer Mark.
Speaker 1: Luckily she's never here. Oh well, there you go. That's
Speaker 1: that's that's easier to deal with. Let's get to it. Um. Really,
Speaker 1: and I was playing I played a little call I've
Speaker 1: played a little Call of Duty last Oh no, it
Speaker 1: wasn't Call of Duty. Was a FIFA the soccer game
Speaker 1: on PS four And someone actually took the time to
Speaker 1: write me very mean messages about how they had beaten
Speaker 1: me with a lot of curse words. And I just
Speaker 1: kind of was like, you know, producer Mark, why can't
Speaker 1: ever just be nice? Why are people such lunatics? Like
Speaker 1: it's a sports video, That's why I was thinking about sports.
Speaker 1: The sports video game? Is your name Buck Sex? No no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: no no no. It's like you know, French old Dog,
Speaker 1: you know, Fan twenty twenty five or something. I never
Speaker 1: understood why talking trash and video games people you don't know,
Speaker 1: like if you're playing friendly with a friend and you
Speaker 1: want to you know, but like talking trash to strangers
Speaker 1: of a video that people are insane, that they're insane.
Speaker 1: Oh this is what happens a lockdown. I mean, I
Speaker 1: tried to resist it as long as I could, but
Speaker 1: the PS four has made a comeback a little bit
Speaker 1: during lockdown after ten years of not touching video games.
Speaker 1: All right, here we go, Jim, all rights, heybucking Mark.
Speaker 1: I'm a medical laboratory scientist and work in a hospital.
Speaker 1: One thing that often gets left out of the discussion
Speaker 1: on the ACA is how people with employers sponsored healthcare
Speaker 1: have been screwed. Before the ACA, I could afford healthcare easily,
Speaker 1: not any longer. Between the deductible on Cope's, I have
Speaker 1: to spend over eight thousand dollars out of my pocket
Speaker 1: before I am fully covered. That's not to include the
Speaker 1: almost four hundred dollars a month I have to pay
Speaker 1: as a premium, and my hospital system owns the insurance
Speaker 1: company Shield's high fellow patriots. No, Jim, this is very
Speaker 1: important what you're saying, and I wish I wish the
Speaker 1: Trump administration had more powerful messaging on this point. I
Speaker 1: know they say Obamacare is bad, but people need to
Speaker 1: know why it's bad. It's expensive, crappy insurance, that's what
Speaker 1: it really gives people. Or it's Medicaid, which you know
Speaker 1: is better than nothing. People think, but not much better
Speaker 1: than nothing Medicaid. If you have a real problem, you
Speaker 1: end up having a very limited network. Long you know,
Speaker 1: Long waits a lot of specialists. You know, if you
Speaker 1: get cancer or something, a lot of hospitals aren't going
Speaker 1: to take it. And it's really it's just not good.
Speaker 1: But all along Obamacare was sold to us under false
Speaker 1: pretenses that they were going to cover more people for
Speaker 1: less money and get better care. That's just not true.
Speaker 1: And it's really not possible for the government to just
Speaker 1: mandate that. The only way that you can have that
Speaker 1: is by induce shortages, which will lead to rationing. Right,
Speaker 1: the shortages. We don't have enough stuff to give everybody
Speaker 1: what they want. The rationing is okay, because we don't
Speaker 1: have enough stuff. This is what you get. We tell
Speaker 1: you what you get. This is basic economics. But Democrats
Speaker 1: think that they can suspend the laws of basic economics
Speaker 1: whatever they want to. All right, here we go, Michelle.
Speaker 1: All right. So don't know if you mentioned already, but
Speaker 1: Turn is a great series about civilian spies for George
Speaker 1: Washington on Long Island during the Revolutionary War. Designated Survivor
Speaker 1: was good too. I think I watched a couple of
Speaker 1: episodes of Turn and I liked it years ago, but
Speaker 1: I didn't dig in and watch the whole thing. And
Speaker 1: Designated Survivor that one is. I think I saw the
Speaker 1: first two episodes of that as well. It's got a
Speaker 1: little liberal for me, I think if I remember, have
Speaker 1: you ever seen that one? Producer Mark, I like that one.
Speaker 1: Actually it's a key for Sutherland, which I mean him
Speaker 1: is Jack Bowers amazing? Yeah? Yeah, twenty four people loved
Speaker 1: so interesting. You never watched twenty four na I was
Speaker 1: working in the CIA when twenty four is going on.
Speaker 1: That's true. It's a little too close to home for
Speaker 1: you then, yeah, totally. But they also the problem is
Speaker 1: when you work in that it's very hard. I can
Speaker 1: do it now, but it's it's very hard to watch
Speaker 1: that stuff and not say, oh my god, that's so fake,
Speaker 1: or oh that would never happen or whatever. You know,
Speaker 1: it's tough to watch these things and not when when
Speaker 1: you work in counter terrorism at the CIA and then
Speaker 1: you're watching a show about CIA kind of terrorism, you're like,
Speaker 1: that's ridiculous. You know that that's tough not to do that.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, yeah, that's probably why they used a
Speaker 1: fake entity like they called it the CTU, which is
Speaker 1: not obviously real. Yeah, well I was working in CTC,
Speaker 1: which is the counter Terrorism Center when whenever one's watching
Speaker 1: CTU and keep yourself. All I can tell you is
Speaker 1: the shows are much more interesting than real life, that's
Speaker 1: for sure. But that's not a surprise to anybody. Uh yeah,
Speaker 1: So let's get to it now. Does the end it
Speaker 1: survivor I'll check that one out again at some point.
Speaker 1: But I got a pretty long list right now of
Speaker 1: shows that i'm I'm actually pretty well stocked. And the
Speaker 1: Snow Princess wanted me to insist that everybody knows that
Speaker 1: the only reason she had a problem with Pull Dark
Speaker 1: was that she didn't like that there were some socialist
Speaker 1: undertones for the lead character in the few episodes we watched,
Speaker 1: which is fair, Which is fair, So she's keeping her
Speaker 1: real Next up here we have Ryan buck Love the show.
Speaker 1: Been a regular listener and a fan for a long time.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for speaking truth about one of
Speaker 1: the sins where it hit so hard by COVID. We
Speaker 1: as a country aren't very healthy, and I hope this
Speaker 1: message hits home so we can be better prepared for
Speaker 1: this kind of thing the next time we are faced
Speaker 1: with a pandemic. Making better health and wellness choices through
Speaker 1: our lives is the best vaccine we can hope for.
Speaker 1: And that doesn't mean closing gyms and small food shops down.
Speaker 1: But I worry we as a country won't face hard
Speaker 1: realities or make tough decisions anymore that will really keep
Speaker 1: us great. Let us both hope I'm wrong. Shield time. Well, Ryan,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for your support of the show
Speaker 1: and for listening, and means a lot to me and
Speaker 1: Mark and the whole team here in the Hut. As
Speaker 1: for yeah, we are a country that need to have
Speaker 1: more of a focus on health. In fact, I'll just
Speaker 1: tell you I have this. I mean, maybe it's a
Speaker 1: dream or I don't know if it's a vision for
Speaker 1: the future of the country. But now that everyone's realizing
Speaker 1: that you can be you can work from and I
Speaker 1: shouldn't say everyone, but now that there's an understanding in
Speaker 1: corporate America at least that work from home is a
Speaker 1: much more viable solution and a much better day to
Speaker 1: day and the productivity is for many people up. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm doing more content now on a day to day
Speaker 1: basis than I've ever done before, and it's only possible,
Speaker 1: and it's already stretching me to the limit. But it's
Speaker 1: only possible because I can do it all without having
Speaker 1: to commute, not burn an hour and a half two
Speaker 1: hours a day in transit. I mean, that's that's crappy
Speaker 1: to have to deal with that every day. That burns
Speaker 1: a lot of your time. I'm hoping that there's also
Speaker 1: going to be a greater emphasis on work, you know,
Speaker 1: that people have greater work life balance, and that now
Speaker 1: everyone realized that this whole eight hour workday thing, you know,
Speaker 1: the eight hour workday for most people unless you're in
Speaker 1: a service job and it's hourly. But for a lot
Speaker 1: of people that work in more office culture, you know,
Speaker 1: it's a little bit like the movie Office Space, where
Speaker 1: you know, he says, in any given week, I do
Speaker 1: about thirty minutes of actual real work. It's more than that.
Speaker 1: But I think that most people probably spend four hours
Speaker 1: of their eight every day doing stuff they have to do,
Speaker 1: and then four hours and either unnecessary meetings, traveling to meetings,
Speaker 1: traveling to you know, whatever it is that they've got
Speaker 1: to do in the in the course of the day,
Speaker 1: just unnecessary nonsense, wasting time going online doing things. So
Speaker 1: now it's really all okay. You have it, you have tasks,
Speaker 1: you have expectations for your role. Maybe now when it's
Speaker 1: just based on your output and not based on your
Speaker 1: time in on an issue, you'll be able to get
Speaker 1: more done in less time effectively, which I also hope
Speaker 1: is the case with the more and more people homeschooling.
Speaker 1: You know, I think if you have individualized instruction, and
Speaker 1: I look, I know it's there's challenges to homeschoing too
Speaker 1: for people and you know a lot of two parents
Speaker 1: or income households out there. But if you can get
Speaker 1: somebody who has one on one instruction for four or
Speaker 1: five hours a day, then are they able to just
Speaker 1: do whatever they want, play sports, go do other activities
Speaker 1: with kids in the in the area, in the neighborhood
Speaker 1: for the rest of the day. I mean, I remember
Speaker 1: the school day when I was I remember when I
Speaker 1: was in high school. I think we started at eight
Speaker 1: thirty am, and I would start eight thirty am and
Speaker 1: finished at like three thirty or four pm in the afternoon.
Speaker 1: It's a long day for a lot of like and
Speaker 1: they jam things in there that really didn't need to
Speaker 1: be in there. I think it could be shorter and
Speaker 1: more efficients all I'm saying, and I think order and
Speaker 1: more efficient and therefore more freedom is a possibility for
Speaker 1: all of us in different ways in our in our
Speaker 1: jobs and in our roles. So that would be that
Speaker 1: would be great. There are some jobs to require physical presence,
Speaker 1: obviously manufacturing and people who are you know, work with
Speaker 1: their hands, and people who there's there's still still stuff
Speaker 1: where you can't just phone it in from the couch.
Speaker 1: But for a lot of service jobs that are internet
Speaker 1: based and you know, you're able to do this stuff.
Speaker 1: So I'm hoping that that means they'll be more opportunity
Speaker 1: for people to also be healthier. Health is important. Healthy
Speaker 1: to be a focus and everyone, and this is another thing.
Speaker 1: Everyone is in charge of their own health. No one's
Speaker 1: gonna make you healthy, no one's gonna make you take
Speaker 1: the time to learn. And everyone has different stuff. You know,
Speaker 1: I have different medical conditions that I have to manage
Speaker 1: and deal with, and it's all on me. I can
Speaker 1: go to a lot of doctors and get advice and stuff,
Speaker 1: but at the end of the day, what do I
Speaker 1: do with the information I have, how do I actually
Speaker 1: live my life? What a I prioritize? You know, as
Speaker 1: I've gotten a little bit older now deep into my thirties,
Speaker 1: I know, it's crazy. These bones are getting creaky. You think,
Speaker 1: getting enough sleep things that my parents told me when
Speaker 1: I was a little kid that I was like, that's dumb. Nope,
Speaker 1: they were right. They were right, getting enough sleep, limiting
Speaker 1: your alcohol intake. I know people don't like to hear that,
Speaker 1: but I'm not anti booze, but you know, you gotta
Speaker 1: think of think of booze like chocolate cake, and it
Speaker 1: all makes more sense. Right. You have a piece, maybe
Speaker 1: maybe two if you're really partying, but you know, you
Speaker 1: don't eat the whole cake. And when I was in college,
Speaker 1: we were eating whole cakes every night. I mean it
Speaker 1: was crazy. So that's that the impact that has in
Speaker 1: your health. I mean, look, you you know all this stuff,
Speaker 1: but as you get older, you just realize because you
Speaker 1: also see the results of it more. You know, you
Speaker 1: see the results. Do you wear sunscreen? Do you drink
Speaker 1: too much? Do you have reasonable eating habits? You don't.
Speaker 1: Look I'm a guy who likes bree and chocolate chip, cookies.
Speaker 1: So you know, I got to spend some time in
Speaker 1: the gym, and I gotta kind of limit that stuff
Speaker 1: because otherwise, you know, you end up looking like the
Speaker 1: stave puff marshmallow Man. So we've all got our challenges
Speaker 1: with this stuff. But whether it's avoiding a pandemic disease
Speaker 1: or it's just keeping yourself day to day functioning at
Speaker 1: your optimum level of personal health efficiency, which really does
Speaker 1: also translate into degree of happiness. It's it's on individuals,
Speaker 1: and there's more self education you can do on this
Speaker 1: stuff than ever before. And I think this should be
Speaker 1: a much bigger part of what kids are, you know,
Speaker 1: learn about and is really part of a wholesome life
Speaker 1: in existence in school, I think kids, I think people
Speaker 1: need to learn about health in school. Then you learn
Speaker 1: about personal finance in school, and it should be a
Speaker 1: you know, it's a curriculum thing, you know, and everyone's, oh,
Speaker 1: I I took Latin for like four years or something
Speaker 1: in grammar school. Look that's fine. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: it's helpful in some ways, I guess, but I would
Speaker 1: have really liked to understand at an early age things
Speaker 1: like compound interest and you know, high high dividends, stock investing,
Speaker 1: and these are things that you know the the younger
Speaker 1: you are and more proactive and strategic, or you don't
Speaker 1: need a lot of money to set up a comfortable retirement.
Speaker 1: If you start young, have discipline, understand what you're doing,
Speaker 1: you don't need a lot of money to do it
Speaker 1: at all. I'm pretty sure with compound interest at an
Speaker 1: eight percent a year and you realized return if you
Speaker 1: starting at age eighteen, I think if you amass close
Speaker 1: to thirty thousand dollars. Now I'm not saying that's not
Speaker 1: a lot, but that's you know, that's pretax. You put
Speaker 1: that in by the time you're I think it was
Speaker 1: twenty eight. So if you have ten years twenty eight
Speaker 1: thousand dollars and you let it sit there's a famous
Speaker 1: Tony Robbins clip where he talks about this, and you
Speaker 1: let it sit at eight percent and then compound interest,
Speaker 1: you will end up with one point eight million dollars
Speaker 1: to retire on by the time you're sixty five. You know,
Speaker 1: I wish I had known more about that kind of stuff.
Speaker 1: So I'm just saying there's a lot of things out there.
Speaker 1: I know, I got a little bit down the rabbit
Speaker 1: hole on this one. Let's get back into more roll call.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Bucks Exton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. All right back into the roll call here,
Speaker 1: Eric writes, with the shows of support outside Walter read
Speaker 1: and the Trump Tower, I don't see the equivalent of
Speaker 1: support for Biden. I live north of Dallas in a
Speaker 1: neighborhood filled with Betto supporters, and the enthusiasm that they
Speaker 1: had for Betto doesn't exist for Biden. I don't see
Speaker 1: the turning Texas blue and the Electoral College votes going
Speaker 1: for Biden. Well, Eric, I can tell you that Breathe
Speaker 1: Badou is like totally disagreeing with you, and producer Mark
Speaker 1: can you play We've got a bett clip. We're gonna
Speaker 1: flip Texas blue. It's gonna hop in play it from
Speaker 1: puers typically out performance of the polls by Democrats of
Speaker 1: three to four points, so I would say those races
Speaker 1: are much much closer. M J. Hagar can beat John
Speaker 1: Cornyn and Joe Biden can can win this state. In fact,
Speaker 1: on the eve of early voting on the twelfth of October,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have a million voter. I don't think it's
Speaker 1: bank our volunteers are gonna call a million voters to
Speaker 1: get them to commit to voting on the first day
Speaker 1: of early voting of the Texas Democratic Party. The candidates,
Speaker 1: everyone's doing their part. I think we can do this, Joy,
Speaker 1: and I think I think we can end this on
Speaker 1: the third. You know, Pennsylvania will take days or maybe
Speaker 1: even weeks to count those ballots. Texas will know on
Speaker 1: the third. And if we win Texas, it is over. Mathematically,
Speaker 1: it is over. Psychologically. We can turn the page on
Speaker 1: Trump and Trump is um and begin the next chapter
Speaker 1: for this country. Let's turn the page on Trump. No,
Speaker 1: it's not gonna happen. To worry about it. He's not
Speaker 1: gonna flip Texas. Read that's that's nonsense, UM, So don't
Speaker 1: worry about that. And Eric, Yeah. As for anecdotal stuff,
Speaker 1: Dallas Batto supporters Biden, I want to agree with you
Speaker 1: that Biden has no shot, but he does. You know,
Speaker 1: the Democrats have built in, built in votership. That's pretty substantial.
Speaker 1: So we gotta see Bruce Hey, Buck love the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: Listen to the podcast daily, Keep fighting on to dispel
Speaker 1: the myriad of liberal lies and hypocrisy, and keep that
Speaker 1: twenty something year old Kurm Mudgeon producer Mark in line
Speaker 1: just joking, Mark Shield's Hiebuckster. Uh, yeah, there we go,
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, you're supposed to be kept in line, mister Sexton,
Speaker 1: you're not allowed to write in like that. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: gonna sayil kept in line, producer Mark is Bruce Waltz
Speaker 1: to Dough. I'm definitely not kept all right, everybody work, Yeah,
Speaker 1: Mark markets to run wild in the Freedom Hut because
Speaker 1: otherwise I won't know what time to show up or
Speaker 1: do anything. So he's he's got he's got the keys.
Speaker 1: He's got to let me into the hut, and then
Speaker 1: I get to make all the noise on the radio. Mike.
Speaker 1: That's the show for today, folks. Great to have you here.
Speaker 1: As always, we'll talk more tomorrow. Let's dig in for
Speaker 1: this election or in this fight till the end, Shields
Speaker 1: Hie