WEBVTT - Jenny Johnson Talks Disruption, Navigating Change

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Jenny, wonderful to see

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you again.

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's a lot going on in the market,

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 2>just a couple of things here and there, I think, Yeah, So,

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>how do you see the role of traditional money actually

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 2>changing with alternatives and how do you see it evolving

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 2>in the next couple of years.

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, I think there's some trends that are obviously

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 3>going to just continue right. One is alternatives, and you know,

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 3>you look at I think a lot of this the

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 3>growth and alternatives actually comes from kind of the two

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 3>thousand and eight financial crisis. So one, you know, with

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 3>banks not changing the capital requirements around banks. Banks really

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 3>want to preserve their capital for their biggest and best clients,

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>and so it created this opportunity for private credit to

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 3>step in. I think that honestly, low interest rates were

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>probably one of the things that fueled private equity, but

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 3>also a bit of the environment where I think less

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 3>and less people will less and less companies want to

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>go public. And I don't think that trend changes. I

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>don't think I don't think there's a lot of people

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:05.639
<v Speaker 3>going Boy, I'd really like to be a public company

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 3>CEO these days, and I think in a time where

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 3>you have all these great technological advances like AI, where

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 3>companies need to invest in the technology that may not

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 3>pay off for years, it's really hard with the pressure

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>of cordingly earnings, and so in some cases transforming a

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.639
<v Speaker 3>company ends up being better in the structure of private equity.

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think like that trend is here. I think

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm a big fan of blockchain. I think that's going

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 3>to open up new investment opportunities and kind of interesting things.

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>I always say that eventually your financial advisor is going

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 3>to report your portfolio in three ways.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They're going to say, here's your investment.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Return, here's the impact you have, and by the way,

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 3>here the loyalty programs that you've gotten from your tokenized

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>equity ownership that have now tied loyalty programs to it.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 3>So that's where I think things ultimately evolve.

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 2>So on blockchain and bitcoin does change significantly under a

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>trumpet restoration.

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh for sure.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 3>And again I always make sure you separate bitcoin from blockchain.

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, bitcoin different deal.

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I was a skeptic of it initially,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 3>but a couple of things people said to me. One

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 3>somebody who lived in Israel, said, my parents and grandparents

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 3>had their money taken away by the government. They will

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>always keep a portion of their savings in bitcoin. And

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 3>then I had actually an employee who lived in the

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 3>Middle East and said, if I say the wrong thing,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 3>I can have my accounts frozen. So I always keep

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 3>a percentage of my earnings in bitcoin, and obviously in

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 3>the kind of key because they can keep it protected.

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 3>So if you grow up in a society where you

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 3>feel your money safe, you think that doesn't make any

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 3>sense and why should this external currency come in. But

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 3>if you actually think that there's a lot of the

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 3>world that would like that safety and control, you can

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 3>see where bitcoin has a lot of opportunities. And then

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 3>blockchain is again, it's a technology. It's a technology. It's

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>going to do a lot of really good things in

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>financial services. A lot of toll takers take a piece

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 3>of a transaction that can eliminate it and so it's

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 3>going to create more efficiencies.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>It's going to open up investment opportunities.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Jenny, do you think that there'll be a catalyst for

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>companies to want to go public again or is it

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 2>just private all the way? Is this, you know, the

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 2>trend for the next five ten years.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 3>So I actually think it used to be you go venture,

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>private equity, IPO, public markets, I actually think so I

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 3>think that stays, and we see it where people are

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 3>just waiting a lot longer going to go public. But

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>at some point people want that liquidity and monetize it,

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 3>and the private markets aren't yet that liquid there's some amount,

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 3>But I actually think what you're starting to see is

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 3>public companies being taken private because they we invest in

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 3>a company, invest in it and they have three trillion

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 3>dollars in assets by financial advisor platform.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, they need to invest in it.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>It is hard as a public company to make those

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>kind of investments and stay of the street. Hey, by

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the way, this is going to impact earnings for the

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 3>next eighteen months. So they become private, right, And so

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 3>they were taken private by bank capital, and then they'll

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 3>go public, I think again, So I think there's going

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>to be this new cycle of pulling people off, doing

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the investment that needs to happen, whether it's AI investments

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 3>or whatever, and then going public again.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 2>But do you have a concern on valuations in private markets?

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this comes over and over again, but we

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>haven't really seen anything. Maybe real estate wan a bit ugly,

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>but there's nothing huge.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I actually one of the concerns, you know,

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>investment grade and even some non investment grade of private

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 3>credit is trading at the same spreads as traditional fixed income,

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 3>Like you get no premium for ill liquidity. That worries me,

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.160
<v Speaker 3>that kind of thing I think. I mean, fixed income

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 3>markets are priced for perfection at the moment, so you know,

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 3>you always have to pick your spots. There's we have

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 3>a huge secondaries business. I think that they've deployed this

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>current fund with about twenty six percent average discount. There's

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>been seventy percent deployed. And you know what I say

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 3>is it's not that the valuations are wrong of the

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 3>private equity. It's that there's not a lot of supply

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to create liquidity in that market because there's not a

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of secondaries. But that gives you a little bit

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 3>of a pricing element.

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.559
<v Speaker 2>So what does that mean that you'll do for actually

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Franklin Templeton in terms of risk taking and to take

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 2>advantage of these new trends, do you change the company

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>at the margins?

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, we had to, right, so we've done ten acquisitions

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 3>in the last five years, and those acquisitions have been

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 3>focused on really capabilities that we didn't have. I mean,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 3>our job is to provide our clients with choice across

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the full risk spectrum and then deliver it in different

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 3>vehicles which are appropriate to whatever the client's looking for.

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 3>And so we recognize that, Look, this alternatives trend isn't

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 3>going away. You see more and more institutions and right

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>now we're really nascent as far as the wealth channel

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 3>the average person's access to that, but you could see

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 3>that trend and you could see the excess returns in

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 3>there by the better players. I mean, there's a big

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 3>dispersion in the top performer and the bottom performers the alternatives,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>and so we recognize. So today we're a top ten

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 3>alternatives manager. So that was most people think of us

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>as really just traditional equity and fixed income, but we're

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 3>actually quite large in the alternatives.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>So it's again about being creating choice.

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 3>We also filled in some other product gaps that we had,

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and then now it's going to be about delivering those

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 3>capabilities appropriately to clients. And so if you look at

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 3>today with the wealth channel only having about five percent

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>allocation alternatives, that number you talk to big distributors.

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that number is probably.

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Closer than fifteen percent, which will mean some clients will

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 3>be zero and some will be thirty. But as it's

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 3>fifteen percent, what's the best way to deliver it? Well,

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 3>if you have a lot of money, if you're a

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 3>high at worth, that might be in direct investments in

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 3>those alternatives, but it also might be a managed to

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 3>count with a sleeve or a portion of that mutual

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 3>fund or use its fund that has an allocation of

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the alternatives, right, And that way it creates a certain

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.280
<v Speaker 3>amount of liquidity that's important for a lot of people.

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, do all these changes change the fee structure?

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 3>So look, the biggest probably pressure on the fee structure

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>on the traditional markets.

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Was of course passive, right.

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I think in the alternatives, it's really important to understand

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 3>the best top performing private equity manager's top quartel outperform

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 3>bottom quartile by twenty percent a year. Okay, top quartile

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 3>versus bottom in real estate was ten percent a year

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 3>about and private credit was five percent a year. The

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>top quartel performers are over subscribed and so they are

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 3>not feeling any feed pressure. Right, It's about people continuing

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 3>to make sure they can come up with liquidity. It's

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 3>why there's a secondary business because if there's a call

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 3>for that top manager to start a new fund, you

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>don't want to be left out. My worry is who's

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 3>on sale. It's the bottom who's going to have the

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 3>feed pressure. It's the bottom quartile performing. And we have

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 3>trained so many people to think only about fees that

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 3>as we start to introduce alternatives and things like into

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 3>retirement programs, and if it's just fees, the lower performing

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 3>guys are going to be ones who cut their fees.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 3>And you're better off being in the public markets than

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 3>you are to be in a poor performing alternative manager.

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>And I also want to ask about outflows. So you

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 2>have been a tough spot because of LEMCO.

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>What happened, Well, it's there's never much upside to talking

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 3>about government investigation publicly. So you know, look, you know

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 3>it's a difficult situation.

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It's it's was.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, one one person, uh, and you know we're

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 3>cooperating with the government on it. I think the most

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 3>important thing is we still have a lot of clients

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 3>invested in Western asset management, and so we have been

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 3>made sure that we insulated the investment team from a

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of what's going on with the investigation, so that

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 3>we can ensure that they're managing clients money and staying

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>focused on that. And so that's been you know what

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 3>has been important for us to do.

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Will you fold it closer into the business.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So our model has always been and it's and I

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 3>think all the way back to when Franklin acquired Templeton

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 3>was look at, if you're in the asset management business,

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 3>what are you buying when you acquire a company. You're

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 3>buying people in their investment process. So don't destroy value

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>by suddenly going in and messing with it. So we

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 3>leave the investment team to be very much independent, and

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 3>then we take things like the fund administration, some of

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the client service and we tend to bring those things

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 3>in technology and those things. In the case of Western

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the other thing you can't do in the asset management

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 3>business is do a hostile takeover because people can walk

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 3>out the door, right, It's not like a lot of

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 3>other types of businesses. And so in that they negotiated

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.119
<v Speaker 3>a five year standalone so they really have run independently

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 3>as a company. And so we are now in the

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 3>process of looking what does it make sense to bring

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 3>in We've hired compliance folks to take a look at

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 3>and obviously continue to enhance the policies and procedures within there.

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 3>We also, of course took a look more broadly at

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 3>all the rest of the Franklin's investment teams to ensure

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 3>that we're confident with all the policies and procedures. And

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, well, the answer is, we do what makes

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 3>good common sense with each So they're all slightly different.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>We usually let the CIO define.

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 3>A bit of what that is, and I go back

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to Mutual Series today has the traders sitting on the desk,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Templeton says, I prefer to use the global trading platform.

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's what makes sense for that investment team.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 2>How do you find the right acquisition? Was it a

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 2>tough I mean, you know, have been one of the

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 2>most inquisitive.

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, So I always say it's kind of the

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>three season look at investment. Bankers will tell you why

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 3>it's a great price and a great strategic fit, but

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 3>they'll never talk about the culture and the paper, and

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 3>that is what determines whether a deal makes it or not.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 3>And so the thing that we look for culture I

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 3>say it's the three seas. How quickly when you're talking

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 3>to the team, do they talk about clients right? Pretty

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 3>important clients, you know? Do they collaborate with each other?

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 3>Do they actually seem to like each other? And you

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 3>can see a lot of dynamics on that. And then

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 3>the third do they have a mindset of continuous improvement?

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 3>And especially a time like now with all theechnological innovation

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 3>that's going on, if you don't have a mindset of saying,

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 3>how should we be thinking?

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how should investment team think about AI?

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that nobody knew it has the answer,

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 3>but if you are not thinking about it, you're going

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 3>to be left behind.

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And so did they have that mindset?

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 2>How are you thinking about AI? So?

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>I the type and I love perplexity and all the

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 3>all the media guys hate it because it's Look, I

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 3>can't remember last time I googled something. I go to

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 3>to you know, the either Chatchipete claud or perplexity. I

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 3>forced myself to use it because you have to use it.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Usually.

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 3>What happens with technological innovation is the first thing that

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 3>people do is they make more efficient what they do

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 3>today because that's all we can imagine is what we

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 3>do today.

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But as you start to get better.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 3>At the tool, and so we rolled out Microsoft Copilot

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 3>very broadly in the firm because we want people to

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 3>use the tool, then they will start to come up

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 3>with the next idea. You know, when when the iPhone

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 3>came out, we said, oh, this is cool to it's

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 3>a you know, a a phone, a media flashlight, a camera.

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>But what Apple was doing was they were unleashing the

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 3>innovation of people.

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 1>That is what AI is going to do, and we

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>won't see it and you know for a little while.

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Today from an investment standpoint, it's all the picks and shovels.

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 3>It's the you know, the navidis and the cloud services.

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>But the real investment opportunity is understanding which firms in

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 3>each sector actually start to make it be a differentiator

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 3>and it'll be very hard for the others in that

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 3>sector to catch up. And so I think, you know,

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 3>part of an investment process is asked, what are you

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 3>doing now.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>We have a strategic.

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 3>Partnership with Microsoft that we announced where Microsoft's actually made

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 3>us a strategic partner because some of the things that

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 3>we had laid out they said, are really challenging from

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>a technical standpoint, and they wanted to be involved. They're

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 3>actually providing US resources to build it.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about trade and tariffs? So Donald

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Trump will be inaugurated January twentieth, I mean, are you

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 2>expecting more deregulation? What does it mean for asset managers?

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 2>Or is it inflationary because of the specter of terriffs.

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, so on the tariff front, I always say, you know,

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 3>like remember Trump is a he's a deal maker, right,

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 3>So if you're the deal maker, the first thing you

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 3>want to do is express your position of power. So

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the greatest way to express how to say, I'm going

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 3>to do all these trade tariffs on all these you

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 3>know countries, and then you start there and then you

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 3>negotiate what you want. So you think about it and say,

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 3>what does he want? You know, in the case of Mexico,

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 3>he'd like help on immigration. Actually, he probably really does

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 3>want to reduce the amount of FDI investment.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>From China that's increased.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 3>I think in twenty eighteen it was like two hundred

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>and seventy million. Now it's just under six billion. So

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, he'll probably want some help there. As they're

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 3>re shuffling their supply chain Europe. You know, he'd probably

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 3>like some help from a military investment on he'd probably

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 3>like some help on you know, the attacks on some

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 3>of the big tech companies.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 1>So he'll use that as his negotiation.

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Now, there are going to be tariffs, and with China,

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 3>I think China's it's just going to be tough. But

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 3>remember China has just responded with now saying they're not

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 3>going to export a bunch of minerals that are critical

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 3>to the US. We have to remember the US needs

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>China and China needs the US. So there has to

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 3>be a reasonable approach on both sides, and I think

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 3>that will happen over time. But tariffs tend to be inflationary.

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you worry about emerging markets? You're very embedded in

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the emerging markets that could be the

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 2>biggest losers in this.

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they can't. I mean they've been pretty savvy.

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>You figure out places where there's growth opportunity one either

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, China plus one supply chain. I know that

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump has said that he's going to go after and

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 3>try to reduce some of that, but that's very real

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's helping different markets. You can look at some

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, take in India, look at India's going to

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 3>grow just from domestic They could just get their domestic

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 3>economy continue to go.

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a great opportunity.

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Fifty six percent of the population under the age of

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. So you know, you have to pick your markets.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 3>We like Korea, Thailand in certain sectors the consumer or

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 3>in Thailand we think is a good opportunity. So you know,

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>it just depends and you have to figure those out.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 3>That's why I like active investing.

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>There you go always a pitch. There's what about deregulation.

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to be good for.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think well, I think he's expressed.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, here's you know, it's only the last time

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 3>we saw president that was already in power was Grover Cleveland.

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 3>So Trump's been in power, We've seen what he's done.

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 3>He has said that he wants less regulation. He did

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 3>that his first term, so I think we would expect

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>to see that and I think that tends to be

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 3>good for businesses, good for equities.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>You have a lot of fixed income.

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't you know, there's talk about independence

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 2>of the FED, which he's now walked back on.

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's interesting because if you actually do a bottoms

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 3>up earnings projection for next year on the SMB five hundred,

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 3>it's like fourteen and a half. It's slightly higher than that,

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 3>so that these are companies who are projecting their earnings

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 3>being up right. So they're looking at a lot of

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 3>the tailwinds that are going on in the US economy.

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, whether they're over zealous about what interest rates

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 3>ultimately do, who knows, But you know, I think there

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 3>that it seems to be very positive for equities, and

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>I think the good story in twenty twenty four is

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 3>that the equity markets broadened out as far as the returns.

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 2>So what's the best way if I gave you like

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>a three million, how do you deploy those three millions?

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you could afford the illiquidity risk. Okay, So

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm just gonna tell you two that I love right now.

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 3>One is secondaries. Just again, because you had six trillion

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 3>deployed in private equity, and you've had about one hundred

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>and fifty billion deployed secondaries and maybe another one hundred

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and fifty billion raised.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And we thought that it would dry up once the

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>equity markets came.

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>But the reality is, you know, when the IPO market

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 3>has slowed down, people need liquidity, and so they're going

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to secondary managers and the returns we're seeing some of

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 3>the best discounts that we've seen in the history of it.

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 3>And the second one is actually real estate debt. And

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 3>here's why most of the regional banks were the big

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 3>lenders in the real estate market. And the reality is

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 3>the office. If you're not a great a office. I

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of the real estate people would say,

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 3>we're still not sure we've seen the bottom yet. But

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 3>what you see a lot of the bankers saying is, hey,

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 3>don't hand me the keys back. I'll give you a

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 3>good term rolling it forward. But that means that they're

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 3>not lending to the new developers out there, and so

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing that there is a real opportunity so Benefits.

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Street Partners are a private credit manager actually has about

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 3>nine billion in real estate debt that we're having conversations

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 3>with Clarion Partners, our real estate team real estate manager saying, hey,

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 3>if we end up taking over any of these properties,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 3>we'd love to talk to you about how to think

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 3>about monetizing it and maximizing return, and in it they

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 3>identified that there's this real opportunity because as these regional

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 3>banks have stepped back, you can't just be a private

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 3>credit manager and say, oh today I'm a real estate expert.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 3>You actually have to have that expertise. So we think

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 3>that's another really interesting So those are two i'd say.

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Go for and Jenny. In terms of interest rates, are

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 2>we higher for longer given all of the uncertainty out there?

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 3>I'd say with the US deficit, I don't see how

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 3>in the debt, I don't see how.

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>That you you can't.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 3>You obviously have you know, a pretty robust economy, all

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 3>those things. I mean, But I think most people think

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the federal cut in December, I think it's something like

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 3>the eighty seven percent likelihood or something, But afterwards it's

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe two more. But then I don't think I think

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 3>it's higher for longer. And again I think people are

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 3>underestimating the risk of or not the risk because the

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 3>US is still going to be the reserve currency and

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 3>you're still going to be able to always finance it

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 3>because there doesn't seem to be another, you know, option,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 3>But at what price does it crowd out other investments.

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's a twenty twenty.

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Five problem, maybe not even a twenty twenty six problem.

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But at some point this becomes an issue.

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 2>But this is what a diversification away from US dollar reserves.

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, like I said, I don't think it's a twenty

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty five or twenty twenty six problems. So I think

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 3>it's it's somewhere further down the road, but I do

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 3>think it.

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Keeps the rates up a little bit.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Final question, you're what's your priority for twenty five.

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, for you know, we we.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 3>Did these ten acquisitions and now it's about digesting and

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 3>finding opportunities. Like this real estate credit example, you know,

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 3>came because two CIOs we're having a conversation just to

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 3>try to gain some insights from each other, and they're like,

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 3>we see this dislocation in the market. Like one of

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the key things that we do is twice a year

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 3>we bring all our CIOs together, both from public and

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 3>private side, to just get to know each other. I

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 3>always say the dinner is more important than any topic

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 3>because as they get to know each other and they

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 3>get curious and they're comfortable asking questions. I mean, it

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 3>was really fun to be sitting there watching the value

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Guy and the Growth Guide debate the valuation of Navidia,

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 3>both in their in their core. I always think one's

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 3>a pessimist and one's an optimist, but in their core,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 3>their view and what that is. That makes for healthier

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 3>investment teams to have that kind of access and we

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 3>can provide that three sixty view of capital markets to

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 3>all our investment teams, which I don't think you get

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 3>in most other firms.