WEBVTT - Alphabet To Raise $80B in Equity, Anthropic Files For IPO

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. AI's money race. Alphabet

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>will raise eighty billion dollars while Mthropic makes its IPI move.

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>The confidential filing is in at the SEC.

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Thus Elo Musk SpaceX is negotiating to pay raiser thin

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 4>fees to Wall Street firms handling its IPO, and.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>HPE sows after its annual sales outlook beat estimates on

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 2>the back of massive demand for AI infrastructure. Will be

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>joined by CEO Antonio Neri.

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 5>But there is so.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 4>Much going on in the meantime, and we start the

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>show off with today's big number, ed it's eighty billion dollars. Look,

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Alphabet sees that seventy five billion dollars being raised SpaceX

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 4>in its IPO and just says, poll ho, my beer,

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to do eighty billion. We're seeing it being

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 4>distributed in really novel ways, maybe trying to limit some

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 4>of that dilution and more broadly, but eighty billion dollars

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 4>in future equity raise to finance AI infrastructure does have

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 4>an impact on the stock. Now, we're going to have

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 4>a little look at how we're currently are seeing shares

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 4>of Alphabet slightly under pressure on the day, but only slightly.

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 5>We're down by nineteen percent.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 4>We've actually come off of our lows amid what has

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.559
<v Speaker 4>been some anxiety in the market more broadly, but dig

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 4>into what this equity issuance really is.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, here's what we need to know about the package.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 2>It includes a ten billion dollar Berkshire half away investment,

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty billion in public offerings, and then a forty billion

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>so called at the market program ATM to sell shares

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 2>from time to time beginning in the third quarter. That

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 2>means starting on July first. Together, the transactions represent one

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>of the largest equity deals of all time, and basically

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>it's just a cap to expendit this story. We know

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>from Alphabet this is how much CAPEX will be this year,

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 2>and we know that it's going to go up and

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>BI has an even bigger number.

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's get into what BI is all about. Bloomberg Intelligence

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 4>analyst Roma Schiffman is joining us who have analysis out

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 4>on this today, saying this raise marks an important funding

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 4>signal for Hyperscalers as infrastructure spending moves along a.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 5>Multi trillion dollar path.

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 4>They're already raised eighty five billion dollars Robert in the

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 4>credit market, and now they turn to the equity market.

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.399
<v Speaker 4>What does it mean more broadly for the size of

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 4>the money that is needed by Hyperscalers.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, put the beer away. Technology companies are popping

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 6>champagne bottles right now.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Listen.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 6>I've come on this show time and time again said

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 6>I've never been more bullish on the tech sector, and

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 6>I think this move is wildly bullish. To get such

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 6>a boost of confidence from arguably the world's greatest investor

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 6>in Berkshire Hathaway, to go against all everything I've learned

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 6>in math camp, where the weighted average cost of capital

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 6>suggest you're supposed to be issuing more debt and instead

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 6>obviously alphabet is so confident in Rois on their investments

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 6>to be able to raise this much money, To have

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 6>this big of a kiddy certainly suggest that spending this

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 6>year they said was going to go up significantly. Now

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 6>our friends that our an equity team are saying they

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 6>might spend as much as three hundred billion next year

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 6>in capex.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Robert, stay with us.

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 2>We have some breaking news crossing the Bloomberg terminal red headline.

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Trump to get audit immunity even as one point eight

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>billion fund in doubt. Basically, US officials are continuing with

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>this agreement that bars the government from probing past tax

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 2>filings of President Trump and his businesses. This is Bloomberg reporting.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 2>According to a source, there is a plan to set

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 2>up an anti weaponization fund that's now on hold. We're

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>going to bring you more details of that story as

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 2>we get it. But coming from Bloomberg virus source, Trump

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>to get audit immunity even as a one point eight

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>billion fund is now in doubt.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's get back to our top story.

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet raising eight hundred billion dollars in equity to raise

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>in different structures. Just said it is so important because

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Alphabet has held our hand on this a little bit.

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>So capital expenditure one hundred and ninety billion dollars in

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.839
<v Speaker 2>the current period of the year. They said it would

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 2>be higher, you know, going into twenty seven. You just

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>reference the BI number, which is like capex could be

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 2>three hundred billion dollars for a year.

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Am I right? Am I misspeaking? Yeah? I think that

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 3>sounds the numbers are noise.

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 6>Listen, the biggest hyperscalers are spending close to eight hundred

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars cumulatively this year. I think it's going to

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.799
<v Speaker 6>be well over a trillion next year and five trillion

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 6>over the next five years. So they're sort of searching

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 6>the globe for all different sources of capital. It's summertime.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 6>The pool is open for raising capital, whether it's equity,

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.559
<v Speaker 6>public debt, private debt, currencies across the globe. Everyone wants

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 6>to have a little bit a piece of AI and

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 6>this is the way to get it. Again. I think

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 6>it's it's so bullish because there's so much capital on

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 6>the sidelines that's willing to fund this. The beauty of

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 6>issuing equity here. It's actually not the first time somebody's

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 6>done it. Oracle did this earlier in the year. I'm

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 6>saying they were going to issue twenty five billion dollars

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 6>of equity. It's super positive obviously from a credit perspective.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 6>It helps create and protect healthy balance sheets. I think

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 6>going forward, what it also means our stock buybacks are

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 6>going to be lower. You're not going to be issuing

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 6>eighty billion dollars of stock and then start buying stockback anytime.

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 6>We've actually already start to see slowdowns in stock buybacks,

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 6>and I think over the next year you're going to

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 6>see more of that, and you might see more equity issuance.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 6>And part of that is because spending is going so

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 6>much higher. And I think it's because the confidence level

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 6>in monetization of AI is finally coming to fruition, and

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 6>we saw that in first quarter results.

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I misspoke a second ago and said eight

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion, but they will raise eighty eight zero billion,

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 2>still big numbers. Robert Schiffman, a Bloomberg Intelligence Thank you.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>This is about a race for capital. Our other top story,

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Anthropic has confidentially filed to go public, pulling ahead of

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>rival Open AI in the IPO race. More, let's speak

0:05:55.560 --> 0:06:00.119
<v Speaker 2>with Bloomberg's AI reporter, Sharing Gafari. Yeah, yesterday was wild, right,

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 2>and the confidential filing, the Anthropic blog post announcing it.

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing in there, no price range, no terms of

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the offering, so there's a lot we don't know.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.119
<v Speaker 3>Try and tell us what we do know at this point.

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 7>That's right, So it's short on details because it is

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 7>a confidential filing. And the financials are not public. However,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 7>Anthropic has as of yesterday submitted a draft s one

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 7>to go public, pulling ahead of Open an Eye, which

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 7>is also expected to be filing as soon as in

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 7>the coming weeks. CEO Sam Altman reacted to that in

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 7>an interview yesterday, saying that the company will go public

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 7>when it more or less when it feels like it

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 7>or one wants to, and not not sort of before

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 7>it's ready. So still some uncertainty about one exactly Anthropic

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 7>competitor will and Anthropic has now pulled ahead to be

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 7>the first to pull that trigger with the filing. That

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 7>being said, what do we know about Anthropic, Well, its

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 7>revenue has been growing at rapid pace. It's now reached

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.799
<v Speaker 7>an annualized run rate revenue projection of forty seven billion

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 7>in annual revenue. You know, there's been The CEO has

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 7>said that they had an eighty x increase in that

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 7>kind of projection in the first quarter compared to the

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.559
<v Speaker 7>on an annual basis, So extreme revenue growth but also

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 7>still high cost.

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 4>It does feel that the momentum the wind is behind

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Anthropic at this point, showing shouldn't we be the thinking

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 4>of it as some sort of race to go public.

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 5>That seems to be a lot of the narrative.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 7>I think there's no denying that you have three major

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 7>AI firms SpaceX which now is an AI company because

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 7>of Xai, and then open A and Anthropic, all going

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 7>public or all talking about going public or planning to

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 7>in the span of several months, and some of the

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 7>filings here happening within weeks. So I think it's undeniable

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 7>that there is this race dynamic, much like there is

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 7>with their technical products, and of course going first could

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 7>help set the narrative there. You know, some are questioning

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 7>how much money Wall Street has to devote to these

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.239
<v Speaker 7>AI stocks and will the firms who go earlier absorb

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 7>more of that. That being said, there's also a lot

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 7>of pent up demand for getting in on the AI boom.

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 7>These companies that the core AI only companies and Jennai

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 7>have not been public until now. So it remains to

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 7>be seen how much of an advantage there is to

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 7>going first, but there certainly is this competitive dynamic in

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 7>the IPO discussion right now.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg, stre and Gafari, great to have your analysis, Thanks

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 4>so much. Coming on now, some news crossing the terminal

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 4>that Guy Rosen, he's met as chief information security Officer,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 4>was previously oversaw the company's election integrity work. He's departing

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 4>in the coming months now, it's all according to an

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 4>internal post review by Bloomberg. Meta has begun a search

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 4>for his replacement, the post said, and Rosen will stay

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 4>at the company in the meantime. But let's get back

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 4>to those IPOs, to the so called race the frenzy.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 5>Emily's Agnes with us.

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 4>She is the senior venture capital research analyst at pitch

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 4>pick Emany is there a risk that oxygen is being.

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 5>Sucked out of the room. The fact that we've got.

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 4>All of these mega IPOs just tell us the numbers

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 4>that you've crunched of just how significant the wall of

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 4>a new equity coming to this market is.

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 8>Yes, we're really in uncharted territory. Just for a context,

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 8>looking at the past ten years, it's one point five

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 8>trillion dollars in terms of all of the USVC backed

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 8>public listings, and SpaceX alone would be greater than that

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 8>decade long figure. And in terms of the number of

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 8>IPO proceeds that are being raised. SpaceX is looking at

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 8>seventy five billion, opening eye Anthropic or looking at a

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 8>combined one hundred billion dollars, and that is again greater

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 8>than all the IPO proceeds that have been raised in

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 8>the past decade. So really we're in uncharted territory in

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 8>terms of how gargantium and these mega IPOs are.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>What I find interesting about this is it it could

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>all happen at the same time. So what Sharene did

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>was recap what we know. The s one is in

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 2>confidentially from Enthropic. SpaceX will price June eleventh, trade soon

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>after maybe open AI goes in September. Is it possible

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 2>for all of that to happen in the balance of

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty six.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 8>No, that's a really good question, and I think, like

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 8>Shrey mentioned, like there is a lot of pent up demand,

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 8>but it's also such a big number, and I think

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 8>all eyes will really be on the SpaceX ipo to

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 8>see how the demand actually plays out and if it's

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 8>actually sustain has substance, because if the SpaceX ipo flops,

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 8>then potentially Anthropic might wait until later to go public

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 8>until the volatility evens out. So a confidential filing is

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 8>one necessary step to go in public, but it's not

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 8>necessarily a guarantee that it'll happen in the next few

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 8>months or even the next year.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 4>What so interesting is we're almost coming back to this

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 4>circularity issue.

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 4>You think about how Anthropic is paying one point two

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 4>five billion dollars per month to SpaceX for compute, then

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 4>we really get the documented files that are currently just

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 4>private to us and to the SEC at the moment,

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 4>the SEC has got its hands on the filing coming

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 4>from Anthropic. Eventually, when we understanding them look at them,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 4>we'll see how much they're reliant on Google or on Amazon.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 4>How much is this a worry for investors? How much

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 4>could this be an impact for those VC investors are

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 4>also invested in many of the same names.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 8>Yes, the AI cycle is so like interconnected and also

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 8>like on top of their like thirty percent of US

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 8>VC bat starrups are AI native for AI adjacent, So

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 8>all eyes are really emphasizing trying to see if this

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 8>AI valuations and these pricings are able to be uphelm

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 8>because so much of the market is interdependent and also

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 8>depending on this technology to move forward and eventually become profitable.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 8>So I think this is really the big question for

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 8>VC right now, and that's why there's so much emphasis

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 8>on these big names and these upcoming listings.

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Emily, it's more than that.

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not just the commonalities on the cap tables, SpaceX, Anthropic,

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 2>open AI. They're all pitching the same thing. Is there

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 2>any precedent in history that gives us a warning signal

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.559
<v Speaker 2>about that three companies trying to occupy the same lane.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 8>Oh, that's a really interesting question. And I feel like

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 8>in terms of something like such a transformative technology that

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 8>hasn't seen something in the public markets, I don't think

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 8>we've had such a similar precedent, and that's why I

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 8>think this day and age is really really interesting to

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 8>see how these megal listenings will play out.

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 2>Pitchbox, SEMy Jane. Great to have you on the program.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.479
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. Now coming up elon Musk SpaceX

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 2>is shooting for the moon with the biggest IPO. But

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to the banks must keeping their fees

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 2>in lower fourbit We're gonna have the details next.

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 4>You know Musks SpaceX Well, it's negotiating to pay one

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 4>of the lowest of underwriting fees.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 5>I was expected to be the largest ever IPO.

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 4>So also say the company is amy in a rate

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 4>less than zero point seventy five percent for the seventy five.

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 5>Billion dollars it aims to raise.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's get more Bloomberg Finance report to CASN doher Dy.

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 4>That is the idea here that look er, point seventy

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 4>five percent of seventy five billion is still quite a

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of money.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean, split among twenty plus banks, it's five hundred millions.

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 9>So if you're really gonna think about Morgan Stanley and

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 9>Goldman Sachs, who are leading this IPO, they're the ones

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 9>that are going to see the biggest benefit. But across

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 9>the board, it's not a bad payday for the bank,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 9>so they're.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Really happy to be there.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 9>And you're seeing that the negotiation power is really for SpaceX.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 9>They are working with all of these banks, but again

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 9>they're the ones that are saying, we want to show

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 9>up and we want to help you come to the

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 9>market in this historical moment across Wall Street.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 3>That's a really great point.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when I've been speaking to people on the

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX side, you know their answer on this as well.

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Elon mus is a very good negotiator.

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 3>But even if the.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Bank fees are like you know, I don't know what

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 2>we're talking fifty to sixty basis points. Whenever it ends

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>up being of an IPO where they raise seventy five billion,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>they go to a two trillion valuation, whatever ends up being,

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 2>they'll do fine, right, Catherine, They'll be okay, They'll.

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 5>Do absolutely fine.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 9>This is something that they can also tout in quarters

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 9>moving forward, and we have other IPOs that are coming

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 9>down the pipeline. So really, this is again this moment

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 9>in history that all of the banks want to have

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 9>their names tied to. It's going to lead to future

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 9>IPOs that they can work on. It's going to lead

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 9>to more fees that they can end up paying their bankers.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 9>And they're hoping that this is just the start, but

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 9>it is supposed to be a very strong start.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we've just been talking about how strong it

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 5>could be.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 4>If we've got Anthropic already fighting with the SEC, if

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 4>we've got open AI hot on the heels. How important

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 4>is it for these bank becers. How much anxiety is

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 4>there that this has got to go really well?

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 9>I think that they've all been preparing for this moment.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 9>It's all of the talking points that the bank CEOs

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 9>and all of the heads of investment banking, they've all

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 9>been saying, we've seen green shoots, we are expecting based

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 9>on our strong pipeline. Think about how many times the

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 9>word pipeline has been talked about, but no one has

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 9>talked about, I mean, moving beyond the pipeline.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 5>Let's talk about the deals.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 9>Let's talk about the billions of dollars that could come

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 9>to the public markets. They're hoping that this sets a

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 9>precedent that is going to lead to future fees that

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 9>is going to keep the ball rolling.

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Belus Caerine Doherty on one of the most read stories

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 2>so far today, Thank you. We're going to get more

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 2>in the impact of the SpaceX IPO from SpaceX employee

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 2>number one and now CEO of Impulse Space, which itself

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 2>raised five hundred million in a new funding round. We

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 2>speak with Tom Muller next. This is Bloomberg Tech. Impulse Space,

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 2>led by SpaceX alumni SpaceX veteran Tom Muller, has just

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 2>hit a massive four billion dollar valuation. The company raised

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 2>five hundred million dollars to scale its space tugs or

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 2>spacecraft that can hold satellites across different orbits. Joining us

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>now is Impulse Space founder and CEO Tom Mulla. Tom,

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 2>it's great to have you on Bloomberg Tech. I've been

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 2>able to spend some time with you in SOCO right.

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Look at the facility, see what you're building. And you've

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>always been super honest, like space is hard, difficult to

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 2>get there five hundred million in one go. Just explain

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 2>how that gets you to this world where you are

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 2>like the traffic conductor in lower for a bit, moving

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 2>different orbital planes for different satellites.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, well, you know there's a lot happening in space

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 10>right now, and we're here. We basically take over where

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 10>launch leaves off. So you know, Larne vehicles like you know,

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 10>like spacexfil can get you to lower th Robit and

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 10>we take you everywhere else. We move you around within orbits,

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 10>and we have vehicles, very high energy vehicles that can

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 10>take you out to very high energy orbits or out

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 10>to the moon, tomors and beyond.

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 3>The very high energy bit. Is that I find super fascinating.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 2>You were demoing for me the propulsion technology you've worked on,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>so to explain how it works.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 3>But I think also like for a lot of the audience.

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Why is it necessary to move whatever the satellite is

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 2>from one position in orbit to another?

0:17:58.600 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 3>What would cause that?

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 10>So in the in if you're talking about, helios are

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 10>a very high, high energy product. You know, most satellites

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 10>that want to get to geosynchronous orbit, like the very

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 10>high or twenty two thousand miles out typically get typically

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 10>get dropped off in the lower orbit and then and

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 10>then they end up in a transfer orbit, and it

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 10>can take months to get there. With Helios, we can

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 10>get you there in one day.

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 11>We just we have it.

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 12>You know.

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 10>It's basically a rocket on our rockets. It's got a

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 10>big tank full of propellant and a very high energy

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.960
<v Speaker 10>pump fed engine on it, and it does a couple

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 10>of burns and gets you to a high energy orbit.

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 10>It can also take you, like a way more payload

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 10>to the Moon, or to Mars, or to the outer planets.

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Helios, the larger is meant to be flying what in

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty seven, you've already had the mirrocraft flying three

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 4>missions and that was the first launch in November twenty

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty five. Al most recently in twenty twenty five. I'm

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 4>interested what one hundred million dollars buys you because, as

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 4>Ed says, space is hard, but it's it's also expensive.

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 10>Yes, So we've more than double the size of the

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 10>company in the last year, and we're continuing to hire.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 10>We've got a new facility here that we're building out.

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 10>We've just got a lot of work in all sectors,

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 10>you know, commercial, NASA, and government. So we're addressing all

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 10>that work and we're building the highways to the space economy.

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 4>You were, of course integral to the propulsion over at SpaceX,

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 4>and we think now of the SpaceX mafia that's about

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 4>to be created by the end of this month, and

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 4>how much money that might infuse new space technologists, new founders.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 4>What does that moment mean to you for SpaceX to

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 4>go public.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 10>I mean, this is this is great for building a

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 10>space economy. And what I say now often is that

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 10>I think the true space age is starting now. I

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 10>think we're going to start building megastructures in space, which

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing with you know, a million days. ATA Servers

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 10>was already talked about using the resources of the Moon,

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 10>which is something I've been talking about since before I

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 10>started this company. H this is this is the things

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 10>that we're super excited for. This is this is the

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 10>reason I started this company. This is the reason that

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 10>employees joined to do really cool things. We're super excited

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 10>about this permanent uh Moon base that's been announced by

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 10>by NASA. This this is exactly what.

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 3>We want to do.

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, Tom, part of visiting with you in SOCOW

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 2>is like there's a ripple effect. There are there are

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>companies born out of SpaceX's growth. There is a network

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 2>of people that are SpaceX alumni. When this biggest ip

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 2>of all time happens, what do you think the economic

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 2>effect will be for your industry?

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 10>Gig atic? I think, you know, I grew up in

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 10>the Star Trek area the original series, and I felt

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 10>like some you know, by the time in this age

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 10>there would we be living in a Star Trek world.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 10>And I still think we're going to get there. And

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 10>you've got to imagine that in a Star Trek world,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 10>the space economy is a big the biggest part of

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 10>the economy right now, the space economy single digit of

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 10>the global economy. And I think we're going to get

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 10>there where space, by that measure, will grow faster than

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 10>any other sector.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 4>It's space, It's also defense tech, and we think about

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 4>the billions that the administration wants to put to work

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 4>in a so called Golden dome, and I'm interested as

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 4>to how that is going at the moment, how the

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 4>intercept to work that we understand you've been doing with

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 4>andrel how that progresses at this moment.

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 13>Tom.

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, we're here to just provide advanced solutions. You know,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 10>the government needs to move around, they need to protect

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 10>their assets, and we're here to help out however we can.

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Tom, do you think we'll be in a place where,

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 2>like this year or next you'll have a demo for

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 2>the tech or the work vendoral we're talking about space

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 2>based in incepts technically, is that a realistic timeline for

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 2>the next twelve to eighteen months.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 10>I can't talk about the specifics of these programs.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you this one final question on the

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX IPO. Yeah, reflect on how hard it was those

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 2>early years for you and now how you got to

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>this point. I know you're no longer with the company,

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>but it's a part of the story real quick.

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 10>You know, we always said we knew what it would

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 10>be hard, and it was harder than we thought. That

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 10>I'm super proud of what we achieved. It's I mean

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 10>amazing that this company that I was employee number one

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 10>is now a trillion dollar company. It's just, you know, amazing.

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 5>And now we wonder where Impulse Space goes.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Now worth four billion dollars and a five hundred million

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 4>dollar rais fascinating. Thank you the found the CEO, Tom

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 4>Mulla there coming up. Perplexity makes a big bet on

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 4>the future of how AI workloads get done. We're speaking

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.200
<v Speaker 4>with a CEO out of in strinav Strinavus.

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 5>Next, this is bluebo Tech.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloombo Tech. There is so much going

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 2>on around the world. We're looking at the US listed

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>shares of ten Cent, which follow the Asia listed shares

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 2>in absolutely storing up eleven percent a report that they

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 2>are bringing out an AI agent version of we Chat,

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 2>and right now in this AI story, it's so in

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 2>line with everything that's happening that trading has really come

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 2>over into the US session and the stock up eleven percent.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 2>We're going to keep an eye on that one. And

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 2>then the power of a few words from probably the

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 2>world's most important figure in AI. I would play you

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the SoundBite, but by the time we hit play it

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 2>be over. Jensen One walked on stage at Computext in

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan and said the next trillion dollar company about Marvel.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 3>That's it.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 2>That's the story, and the stock is up almost thirty

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.400
<v Speaker 2>percent as a consequence, and copy text in Taiwan has

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 2>put the spotlight on the companies that are building the

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 2>hardware behind the AI boom. For more on the latest developments,

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's in king who leads our semiconductive coverages with us.

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 2>Probably I was going to say the most substance. We

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 2>can debate that, but for the industry, one of the

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 2>most important stories was sk Heinex coming out and saying

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 2>pledging we are going to double our capacity over a

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 2>certain timeline.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Could you just take that.

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Explain why sk Heinex is important and why that commitment

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of was a big deal for the chip industry.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 14>S Knix is the second largest maker of computer memory chips.

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 14>There's a massive memory shortage right now because of the

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 14>massive amount of memory required for data centers. So Heinix

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 14>coming out and indicating, hey, we're going to step on

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 14>it in terms of putting more capacity in place in

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 14>general helps it means okay, well, we'll get enough memory chips,

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 14>maybe this growth story can continue. But the big caveat

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 14>here is Cheteun, the chairman of this company. He said

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 14>previously we could be losing money tomorrow. He's been very

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 14>careful in the outlook for this market and he hasn't

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 14>given a specific timeline here, and that would be really important.

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 14>That would tell you exactly what's going on.

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 4>It's really fascinating some of the details we do get

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 4>out of com and I think that's really still on

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 4>the thunder. Yesterday it was all about in Videa's announcements

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 4>and then the negative impact I had on the likes

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 4>of Intel AMD and we're waiting on Qualcom. What have

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 4>you heard from some of the other companies throughout the

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 4>couple of days.

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 14>Well, I mean you mentioned Qualcom, you mentioned Intel, and

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 14>obviously in video. One thing they all agree on is

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 14>robots ain't happening as fast as we'd like. And they've

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 14>all come out with essentially the same story, which is,

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 14>we're going to give you hardware, We're going to give

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 14>you software, We're going to give you all of the

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 14>tools to bring humanoid robots to market faster. And all

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 14>of these companies and others too have said that this

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 14>is one of the next big markets.

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 11>This is going to.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 14>Be something that really changes the economy and brings AI

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 14>into the home, the office, the factory, and really makes

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 14>it that pervasive story that it has to become to

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 14>support this spending.

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Zy and King with the download from computext, thank

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you very much. It's not just chip makers pitching the

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 2>furniture of computing. It computexts Perplexity took the stage with

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Intel to unveil what it calls the world's first hybrid

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 2>local server AGENTIC inference orchestrator, a phrase that sounds like

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 2>it was generated by AI itself. Here with more Perplexity,

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Ceo Arab and Shrinibas Aravin is great to have you

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>back on the show. I spent all morning thinking about

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 2>how do I explain this, and basically, the.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Orchestrator is there.

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a piece of software to decide whether a or

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 2>a part of an AI workload is best done locally

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 2>on device at the edge, or if it needs the

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 2>superior computing of cloud server.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Is that right?

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Have I kind of nailed what you're trying to solve

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 2>for here?

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 3>That's correct?

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 13>So yeah, thank you for having me again, And that

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 13>is exactly correct. You don't want all your compute centralized

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 13>in gigantic servers and everything running through the largest frontier models.

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.959
<v Speaker 13>You're already reading reports of how people are freaking out

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 13>about their token costs. Some people are spending half a

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 13>billion dollars per month per engineer. What you actually want

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 13>is efficient token value per w per user. And that

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 13>requires orchestrating privacy, accuracy, intelligence, and costs all together in

0:27:16.640 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 13>one single, unified system. And that orchestration capability requires hybrid

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 13>model between server side and the local and that's what

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 13>we demoed today with Intel. And we're actually chip agnostics,

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 13>so our solution works with Intel, it works with NVIDRTX.

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 13>So just like how we've been model agnostic, we've planned

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 13>to be chip agnostic here.

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. So my next question was going to be

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 2>why Intel? You know, what is it about Intel's role

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 2>in the AIPC market and on the service side that

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 2>makes it work. But if you're agnostic, what's the breakthrough

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 2>that you've cracked, Like, if you've written the software, what

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 2>is it you've managed to achieve in how those spaceloads

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 2>are diverted. Okay, go go a bit further.

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 13>So, like I said, you want one single system to

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 13>route across models, files, tools, chips, servers and decide when

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 13>to use which model, or when to use your local

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 13>file system, your local Subasian model, your local LM, or

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 13>when to use a frontier model for depending on tasks

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 13>and the prompt or depending on the confidentiality and sensitivity

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 13>if your files or apps. That requires you to make

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 13>clever orchestration decisions balance trade offs between accuracy and costs.

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 13>And that's what we're doing in our software and that

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 13>computer essentially an operating system that balances all these different

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 13>objectives simultaneously.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you sit in such an interesting place as

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 4>an orchestrator, whether it be letting people use your own

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 4>hind house models, whether it's using a mix of third party.

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 5>Models, and the third party models are up to or

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 5>not right now, I don't haven.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 4>I just want to get your take on how you

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 4>feel about competitive modes or competitive threats. If these big

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 4>companies Anthropic, Open AI, SpaceX all go public in the

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 4>next few months.

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 13>We actually love and Thropic, Open Ai, Xai, all these

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 13>frontier labs. Every time any of their AI gets better.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 13>Our unified system also gets better because we route across

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 13>all of them. We basically think of Perplexity computer as

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 13>taking the best of all AI and putting it together

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 13>in one single unified interface and system. So all of

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 13>you know how much Anthropics models have improved since the

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 13>beginning of the year. What has it led to for us?

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 13>Our revenue actually tripled since the beginning of the year.

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 13>It's just been five months in the year and our

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 13>revenue is already tripled to what that's So we're actually

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 13>like very happy with all these companies's progress, and they

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 13>completely deserve their I pos, so we're very excited for them.

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Can I follow up to you able to discuss what

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 4>that revenues jumped to. There were reports in the that

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 4>you're up about four hundred and fifty million dollars just.

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 5>In the March.

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we crossed that. I think I publicly tweeted that

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 13>we cross five hundred million about some somewhere around mid April.

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 13>We are announcing new numbers yet, but we're doing really well.

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Irvin.

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I've been thinking a lot about where Perplexity sits in

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the suite of available tools and technologies. Right research seems

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 2>to be a really interesting place with Perplexity, And I'm

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 2>wondering how you measure the engagement on the platform, so

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 2>like it's not just like one query and done, but

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.719
<v Speaker 2>do you kind of track the time that an individual

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 2>desk or user would stick with one query as sort

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 2>of indication of success, you know, how the platform is

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 2>being used, the behaviors of the userbase.

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 13>So we're actually not trying to maximize engagement per user

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 13>in the sense we're not actually trying to keep them

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 13>longer on the platform or something. In fact, like accuracy

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 13>is somewhat like towards the opposite end of that, Like

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 13>if you give the user an accurate answer in the

0:31:04.280 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 13>first turn, it's likely that they're not going to continue

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 13>in the same chat. What we actually look at is

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 13>like retentive uses, like if the same user is using

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 13>Perplexity for a lot more research tasks, not just like

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 13>that one single task that came with And that's that's

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 13>always been the case. For example, we introduce a max

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 13>plan and that's already like you know, at the beginning

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 13>of the year in terms of subscriptions split between the

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 13>max plan that is a two hundred dollars month plan

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 13>versus the pro plan was someone like nine is to

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 13>ninety one.

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 11>Today it's more like thirties to seventy. So I think

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 11>that that already.

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 13>Shows that there are these power users who are willing

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 13>to pay like two thousand dollars a year out of pocket.

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 13>This is not even a enterprise because they love these

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 13>superior research and orchestration and accuracy that we bring in

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 13>our product.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 5>Interesting, so we're seeing the growth.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 4>You're talking about your revenue run rate right tripling, going

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 4>up to almost five million dollars. I'm interested as to

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 4>where the combative nature does come in because it looks

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 4>like you're playing well with all the other players out there.

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 5>But there are some issues in the courts.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 4>In particular, CNN, for example, has just the latest to

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 4>hit you with a lawsuit alledging that you violated federal

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 4>copyright laws. How are you dealing with how people get

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 4>paid and what you train upon and what you feed

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 4>and source to us as a user.

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 13>I mean, the fact of the matter is that like,

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 13>nobody has any copyright over truth and facts. Like I

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 13>think we've been consistent with our position. We're very confident

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 13>in our position, and we will let the legal process,

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 13>you know, decide what the right thing is in that.

0:32:41.880 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 11>Pretty close situation.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 13>I don't want to comment further on that, but nobody

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 13>has any copyright over truth.

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 4>In facts, perplexity CEO staying up late. It is like

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 4>eleven thirty pm with you. We so appreciate you coming

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 4>back after your Yeah, jet lag works worldwide out of

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 4>industry in ourse safe flight back from Taiwan.

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 5>We appreciate it.

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Now. Look, the AI build out maybe bigger and longer

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 4>than investors actually expect. Our CEO Rene Haas has been

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 4>telling Bloombog that demand from memory and compute could keep

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 4>growing for years, and says the industry's biggest customers may

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 4>need to share more of the cost.

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 5>He's worked exclusively with Bloomog. Stephen engel Over at computext too.

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 5>You take a listen.

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 15>I would say one thing that's different about what we're

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 15>seeing right now is the amount of compute that artificial

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 15>intelligence requires is quite significant to anything before it, and

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 15>it touches every single industry. It touches everything around humanity.

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 15>Everyone on the planet will have some interaction with AI,

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 15>whether it's AI indirectly or directly, but it affects everyone.

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 15>If you think about world GDP one hundred and thirty

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 15>trillion dollars, knowledge work white collar work being maybe a

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 15>thirty trillion dollar market. That is a large market which

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 15>today is largely under tapped. So is memory going to

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 15>be short till twenty thirty? I don't know not. But

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 15>could I see this demand continuing much longer than people

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 15>have ever seen historically? That I do believe.

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 16>So do you maybe look back at twenty twenty three

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 16>and there wasn't enough investment because a lot of memory

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.720
<v Speaker 16>chip makers were having trouble. Absolutely, they just didn't build

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 16>in that capacity or foresee the demand that was going

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 16>to shoot through the roof like it is now.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 15>If the folks at Micron, Samsung, s K Hunts, they

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 15>have tough jobs, and in twenty twenty two, twenty twenty three,

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 15>they're all losing money and.

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 16>Now they're in the trillion dollar valuations.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 15>The trillion dollar club. But cautious, right because they look

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 15>at that and say, if I overbuild, where will I

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 15>be when the supply crunch eases up? But I do

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.439
<v Speaker 15>think you may see some more innovative business models. Would

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 15>hyperscalers be investing in fabs? Would there be more equity

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 15>partnerships around that, so it's a secure supply. I think

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 15>that's quite possible.

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 16>Well yeah, so what kind of resiliency needs to be

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.240
<v Speaker 16>built into the system so you don't have such peaks

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 16>and troughs.

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 15>There needs to be a shared system, right, shared shared risk,

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 15>shared investment, shared risk. I think asking public companies like

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 15>a Micron to all of that risk themselves with no

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 15>shared risk from the people who are the large consumers,

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 15>that's very, very hard to sustain. The governments have been helping,

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 15>I mean US government has helped in terms of the

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 15>work they've been doing with Micron and also encouraging Samsung

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 15>and Heinis to expand the US, But I think it's

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 15>more than just government.

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 3>That was on CEO Reneha speaking with Steven Engel and

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.399
<v Speaker 3>are coming up on the show.

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 2>HPE's annual sales outlook crushed estimates fueled by AI demand,

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and its president CEO Antarionerr's joining us.

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Next, this is Bloomberg.

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Tech HPE stock.

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Can we just look at it skyrocketing this morning as

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 4>we see its surge after second quarter results beat expectations.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 4>It raised it's fully of forecast where sales could jump

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 4>by an entire one third after thirty three percent.

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 5>That growth is being fueled.

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 4>You know why, by massive demand for AI infrastructure joining

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 4>us now HPU presidency, Antonio and Ery, you're up twenty

0:36:04.520 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 4>one percent.

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 5>You have let to a record high on the stock.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 4>It is a record move for the stock and you've

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 4>added thirteen billion dollars in market cap. Just reflect for

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 4>a moment on what people are calling a blowout quarter.

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, well, good morning, Caroline. Was an exceptional quarter. As

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 17>you said, right, we achieve a record break results a

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 17>number of key metrics. We have tremendous demand across our

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 17>portfolio or portfolio is an intersectional networking, cloud and AI

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 17>and that demand is durable. And therefore, you know, thanks

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 17>to the results of the first half, the tremendous record

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 17>breaking backlog that we have the pipeline which remains multiples

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 17>of that backlog allow us to raise their twenty six

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.439
<v Speaker 17>guide and to provide twenty twenty seven guide six months

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 17>ahead because of that durability.

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 11>So we're very, very proud.

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Of this moment, Antonio.

0:36:56.120 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 2>This is a story about demand, right an outlook, it's

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 2>through HPES lens a revenue figure, but I think there's

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of value if you could talk us through

0:37:06.640 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 2>whether that outlook for twenty six and then the twenty

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 2>seven outlook, which you say is evidence of durability, is

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 2>a volume story or it's a pricing story.

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 3>In other words, no great.

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Volume of servers more than you normally do, you can

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 2>just charge a lot more for them.

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 17>Well, first of all, when we talk about the outlook,

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.720
<v Speaker 17>we are actually pulling by two years the twenty twenty

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:37.360
<v Speaker 17>eight outlook that we provided last October and the security.

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 11>Anitsts meet in Intra twenty twenty six.

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 17>And to give us sense, you saw that our armies

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 17>per share at the midpoint will be three dollars and

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 17>forty cents, which is a dollar higher than the previous guidance.

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 17>And at the core of that is our networking story

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 17>and the improvements we have made across the entire portfolio,

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 17>a combination of course, of volume in the key products sements,

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 17>whether it's campus and branch, which is up almost thirty percent,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 17>in orders so the routing business, so the data center

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 17>switching business orders which is a close to twenty percent,

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 17>and then on the server side of the equation, we

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 17>are up triple digits in demand storage for the six

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 17>consecutive quarter triple digits in our private cloud portfolio, which

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 17>obviously has the AI factory for enterprise continues to growth.

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 17>So it is a volume story with very disciplined pricy

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 17>and execution.

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 4>I mean talking about discipline the fact that operating profit

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 4>you see going to eighty to eighty five percent.

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 5>Growth for the fiscal full year.

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 4>And this in the context of memory prices, just going

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 4>through the roof, how are you able to navigate what

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 4>could be a significant pricing pressure bottlenecks. Still there's a

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 4>lot still to be a little bit anxious about Antonio.

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 5>What could disrupt this?

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 17>Well, we need to go underneath the portfolio and look

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:02.760
<v Speaker 17>at the mixed caroline because now with an eleven billion

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 17>dollar business in networking clearly drives a different mix in

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 17>a gross margin which was record thirty six point nine percent.

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 17>Let's not forget that we are ahead of plan in

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 17>the Juniper and Catalyst initiatives. Both Milestone says synergy that

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 17>fuels costal sales improvements and topics improvements, and then you have,

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 17>of course you have the cost increases in d RAM

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 17>and A nand but fundamentally there is all about the demand.

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 17>I have to tell you and I comment this yesterday.

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 17>Customers need access to this technology. You guys have covered

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 17>extremely well the AI momentum both in the buildout, but

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 17>we were very pleased to see the acceleration and enterprise

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 17>which is driven by that option, especially in AI infancy.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 2>There are lots of things happening on premise back hybrid cloud,

0:39:54.920 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 2>as we just discussed with Perplexity, is becoming increasingly important

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>in your outlook or even in the court of gone.

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Was this a story about one big customer that changed

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 2>the trajectory for you or are you seeing new types

0:40:08.840 --> 0:40:11.720
<v Speaker 2>of customer? It's not just a hyperscale a story anymore.

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 17>We have been very selectively playing in the AI scale

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 17>in terms of profitability as well as working capital. Because

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 17>we need a lot of working capital. We have prioritized

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 17>paying down the debt and making sure we drive the

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 17>profitable growth tour networking, cloud, NAI need enterprise and sovereign

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 17>and inferencing. So this is not one customer. This is

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 17>a number of many, many customers. I spoke yesterday about

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 17>some of the customers that we are winning, that they

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:49.760
<v Speaker 17>are bringing that infrastructure on premise because for compliance reasons,

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 17>governance reasons, data privacy, reasons, security reasons, they need to

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 17>be on premise. And I give an example of my

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 17>own use case. We inside HP we have twelve hundred

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.879
<v Speaker 17>AI use cases, of which two hundred and fifty are

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 17>in production.

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 11>We actually use a combination.

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 17>Of proprietary or close models and open models, and we

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 17>have very stringent governance and we do it on premise.

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 17>And we see that trend happening across the enterprise more

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 17>and more.

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be very dry and very specific with you, Antonio.

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Is this an enterprise super cycle or is this something

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 2>different where agentic ai leads to a complete structural shift

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 2>on how all kinds of companies change their spending habits.

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:39.919
<v Speaker 17>What do you see is the ladder And I think,

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 17>you know AI enterprise will accelerate. But the reality is

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 17>that agentic AI is transforming the way we do business,

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:54.280
<v Speaker 17>is transforming business processes, workflows, and is making companies more

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 17>agile and efficient.

0:41:56.480 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 11>So that's what we see today.

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 17>And I think we are early in the enterprise adoption

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 17>and I think you know, customers now want to make

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 17>sure they are not left behind. We have a say

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 17>inside the company and the future belongs to the fast

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:09.760
<v Speaker 17>and so.

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 11>You got to move really fast.

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 17>And we learn a lot through the COVID right through

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 17>the own ramp to digital, so is the ladder. And

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 17>I'm enthusiastic about this because it really helped customers to

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 17>be more competitive in the market, which ultimately is the

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 17>teas is about the eye productivity.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 4>It's about productivity, and many worry that means few jobs.

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 4>That means change in labor. Have you seen any changes

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:36.879
<v Speaker 4>the way in which you're hiring, Maybe you don't need

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.280
<v Speaker 4>as many employees. What do you think about the narrative?

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 17>Well, definitely, the type of roles you're hiring is different.

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 17>But inside the company, we have a very aggressive talent

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 17>development succession plan. In fact, this afternoon I'm going to

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 17>have a session with my entire team about that.

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 11>But the skill sets of the future have to.

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:01.440
<v Speaker 17>Evolve, and you know how we to remind our sixty

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 17>five thousand employees to use this technology in their fabled

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 17>to become more productive. And I believe everyone, everyone, including yourselves,

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:12.400
<v Speaker 17>as an incurs you got to be you have to

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 17>have a minor in AI, have to use the technology

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 17>is going to be a competitive advantage in every role

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 17>across the enterprise.

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 2>We're using the Technology HPE president and CEO Antony and

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 2>Area back on Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. Some news.

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 2>The White House just released an AI executive Order and

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 2>it says it will select trusted AI partners within sixty days.

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Been bosing a tech headism.

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Mike Shephard joins us with the details, go into the details.

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:42.879
<v Speaker 2>What is this, What is the government trying to do?

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 3>What is it saying?

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 12>Well ed, We're still reading through it right now. This

0:43:47.760 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 12>is the director that President Donald Trump was set to

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 12>sign about two weeks ago, but then abruptly put the

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 12>whole thing on pause, expressing some concerns about elements of

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.360
<v Speaker 12>the plan that he didn't like and that he thought

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 12>could impede innovation. In essence, this directive calls for the

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:11.280
<v Speaker 12>government to work with AI developers on a voluntary basis

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 12>and gain access to cutting edge frontier models to determine

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:20.239
<v Speaker 12>whether they could pose a cybersecurity risk. The whole idea here, ed,

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 12>is really to try to ensure that security risks posed

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 12>by artificial intelligence are somehow rained in and nipped in

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 12>the bud ahead of time by the government and the

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 12>companies working together. Voluntary is a word that appears several

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 12>times in the order, and the idea is that the

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 12>government will be cooperating with the companies rather than dictating

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 12>to them.

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it really is a voluntary framework.

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 4>With AI developers, they talk about collaborating, but they also

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 4>talk about benchmarking. Mike, who are the people in the

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 4>room who are able to do that benchmark how a benchmarking?

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 4>How are we going to get that expertise driven through?

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 12>Well, that's a great question, because to make the determined

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 12>about whether a model should even be covered by this order,

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:07.319
<v Speaker 12>whether it's events enough, say Mythos, for example, you would

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 12>have to have a room full of experts, and the

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 12>ideas that you would have people from various departments within

0:45:12.880 --> 0:45:16.560
<v Speaker 12>the government, people who have classified clearances, and they would

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 12>be working in a classified setting, in a top secret

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:24.520
<v Speaker 12>process to determine whether a model would even qualify under

0:45:24.560 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 12>the terms of this order, whether it has the kinds

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:33.320
<v Speaker 12>of cybersecurity capabilities that we've seen identified in Mythos such

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 12>to be a worry of the government and of industries

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 12>more broadly. Now, what we have seen the order also

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 12>lay out is a process now through which federal agencies,

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:49.359
<v Speaker 12>state and local authorities, and operators of critical infrastructure would

0:45:49.400 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 12>also gain access, again on a voluntary basis from the

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 12>companies to these models that are determined to be so

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 12>cutting ash that they could post some sort of cyber

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 12>risk and could also be used to test networks for vulnerabilities,

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 12>much in the same way that Mythos has been described

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 12>to us.

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, what we've seen, Caro, is.

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 12>That this is coming the very same day that Anthropic

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 12>is releasing Mythos on a much wider basis.

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, to another one hundred and fifty additional organizations around

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the world. My Bloomberg's Mike Shepherd, thank you very much. Indeed,

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 4>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech Ed.

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a lot of.

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 2>News in today's show. Check out the podcast to recap.

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find it online, Apple, Spotify, iHeart

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:34.320
<v Speaker 2>and on all the Bloomberg platforms.

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:35.520
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech