WEBVTT - Elon Musk, Tech, Retail Sales, and Subway (Podcast)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>We want to talk tech podcast Countery Business Day, we

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>bring you interview with market Rose and Bloomberg experts. We

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the Center podcast or wherever you listen

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to podcast, and that Bloomberg big cricket fin out Dan

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Ives as much of a cricket you don't think, Fan,

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just well, he wasn't. He went to State College Pennsylvania,

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>which is no mean feat by the way, from New

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>York to watch wrestling and State Wrestling. Now, granted they're

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the best in the country, but Dan Ives

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>he covers technology, uh for wet Bush Securities and mandep

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>siting here from Bloomberg and in Tellvision they're in our

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and act the broker studio. Dan, let's start with you, Tesla.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I follow you on Twitter, and by the way, folks

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>follow Dan Ives on Twitter. He's got a good Twitter

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>game there, um, and you're not too happy with him

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>sticking around at Twitter. El So Tesla. So the problem

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>is Elon Musk is supposed to run Tesla, right, but

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>he's obsessed with Twitter to the point where he like

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>changes the algorithms that we all have to read all

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of his tweets. He said, he was gonna pick someone

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>else stand down before Christmas, and now it's like the

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>end of this year, maybe beginning of four. Dan, what

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is the deal with your dog? Yeah? I mean look

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the goal post from Musk because we've seen four continue

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to get pushed out. And I think when it comes

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter, you know clearly that's been less of an

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>overhanging the last few months. But I think investors want

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to see Musts Weezer focused on Tesla, on SpaceX and

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>some of them. Any kind of focus doesn't have to

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>be a laser, just a little bit of focus on Tesla.

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Right it was, And I think what we've seen the

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>last few months like part of why Tesla stockstone where

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it has it. They meet strategic decision in terms of

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the price cuts, which have been massive home run successes.

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think when you will get the Twitter cut

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>prices and they raise prices, what are they doing over there? Look,

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they're trying to find the equilibrium unsupplied the man.

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think in China throwing spaghetti at the wall.

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, come on, man, it's Tesla. Why don't you

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>just make a decision and stick to it? Because there's

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>so many questions I have. I'm so glad you came

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in here. Dan, It's great, it's great. I was listening

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to Ross Gerber last night. He was on Bloomberg Business

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Master, and I think he made a

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>ton of great points without being a jerk, you know.

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he doesn't want to offend Elon, but he

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is a big shareholder who's trying to get a board

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>seat right now, and he was saying, we gotta rain

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>this guy in, we gotta get him back to Tesla,

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and we need a succession plan, right because if anything

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>happens to Elon. Musk talk about key man risk, he

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>has nobody in place. Kimball is not gonna come and

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>run it. Right. Look, I think the bigger thing, as

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Ross has talked about, is really more as competition grows,

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the U S and globally, you just

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that strategically they're both defensive and

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>offensively positioned. And I think from Musk, you know, his investors,

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge part of the premium. We saw what

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>happened with the Twitter situation, you know, call it from

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>October to December. Big part that was the Twitter overhang.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's why you need sure that strategy and it

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 1>must is going to talk. We'll be there in austin

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>March first the big plan. So I think investors are

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to see what is that? What does that mean

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>about production in the future? All right, so good. I

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a ton of tech news out there. We

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>could just spend all day on this stuff. The one

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that got my attentionous Airbnb. I've used it once and

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>it was because it was a Bloomberg sponsored Airbnb. I'm

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>still in the hotel mode, man, Dave, talk to me

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>about Airbnb, their business. I mean, I mean the stock

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at great number, stock up twelve point four percent today, well,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and talking about raising prices. This is a company that

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>has benefited from you know, pent up travel demand price increases.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>They don't have to take down prices to drive demand.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And look, it's a very robust business model. Out of

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>all the marketplace companies you you don't include Ruber, Lift, Door, Dash,

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>this is the model that generates over even dumb margins

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and and that is what investors like it can convert

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, free cash flow. On our ten billion dollar

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>run rate, you've got two billion in free cash flow

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>every year. Now, granted, they're going to run into tougher

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>comps because they did very well during the pandemic. Well

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>guess what, coming out of the pandemic, they did even better.

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And so now they are running into tougher comps even

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>though they have the category leadership in alternative accommodations and

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they are adding users like you and they will continue

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to do. No, no, they're not adding Paul's money. Is

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>not an alternative accommodation. I'm a four seasons guy, but

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>I did stay at a Verbo condo out in Veil

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>last week. But that's only because I didn't make the reservation. Somebody, well,

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>how was it awesome? Fantastic? But that's just because Veil

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>was amazing. Yeah, but I mean, are you guys like

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Airbnb people? Are you? I have gone both ways in

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of accommodation, and um, yeah, I don't really. I'm

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like you, though I would prefer to stay at like

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the bierssha half. I don't need I don't need to

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>stay in somebody else's apartment. But there are a lot

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of shitsu wations where people have some sit condos that

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they're they're only investing in to do. Airbnb or Verbo

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>is Airbnb who owns verbo. Verbo is owned by Expedia.

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And look, they have competition, but the repeat rates in

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that eighteen to thirty four year old cohors that's what

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>my kids. That is where Airbnb is really hitting off,

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and and they continue to do very well the repeat transactions.

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>That too, they don't have to spend much on sales

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and marketing. The Google marketing span for Airbnb is the

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>least out of all the O t A. So it's

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that's why you see that high leverage in the business model.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>That's it. My daughter travels the world nothing but Airbnb.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know actually does it Anyway? Dan, what's your

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>best idea out there? Credit card? No, they are off

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the doll They're off the doll. I was very good

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>for the first X number of years. Alright, So Dan,

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:51.919
<v Speaker 1>what's your best idea that you're talking to clients about

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>these days? And well, I mean, look, Tack, as we've

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about, it's is under own is either going to

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the year since two thousand nine? Is that right? Yeah?

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean look to sell off. Right. The New York

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>City cab driver was barrassed on tech coming into this year,

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's why in my opinion, I still look at

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>names like Microsoft. I look at names like Salesforce, which

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is one where I think activism puts a floor in

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a huge some of the parts

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>that you could see significant movement there. And our top

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>pick continues to be Apple. I think it will again

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>regain that three trillion mark cap. Are you ever gonna

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>get an Apple car? Is this ever gonna happen? Look,

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the big thing now as you're talking about

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this AI arms race, Game of Thrones, Chat, GPT, Microsoft, Google,

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the disaster last week with bard Apple, They're gonna come

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>out we believe this summer, you know, with significant AI functionality.

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But it all is leading and Germans talked about this,

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we believe the car. It's a matter of

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>when not if that comes out. Two thous What are

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.279
<v Speaker 1>they gonna do with their AI product? We've had Siri

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>for more than a decade, right, and she's not very smart? Um,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>not nice? Well, I don't know if she's intended to

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>be as smart as like an AI chat bot. Um,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean series gonna be able to do

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff beyond you know, say, shall I google that for you? Well?

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Look, they've been spending. We've eight to ten

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>billion on AI and they have something that no other

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>company in the world has. It's two billion, and that's

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the installed base. So I think when you comes to AI,

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this is something I think Cooper Tino is extremely focused on.

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And it just goes back to many of the innovations

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in rear view mirror. Yet again, Cook and Apple, you know,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>proved the naysayer is wrong. Man, Deep One are the

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest AI bets right now. I mean, it's been so

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>huge in the news. Dan talks about the cab driver

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>negative on tech, but has got to be positive on

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT, right, I mean, everybody's tried this thing. I

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>think there is that hype aspect around chat GPT. But

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, you can't take Google or Alphabet

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the equation. I mean, I know their disaster,

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it was a disaster, the bar demo, but look, this

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>company still is the leader when it comes to the data.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>The number of apps that have over a billion dollars

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>billion users, you know, so they have almost five or

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>six of their apps that have over a billion users,

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of proprietary data. I mean, how can

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you be negative on Alphabet if you're positive on chat GPT.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>They have a monopoly of search, so I mean, who

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want a monopoly? And and look I I think

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean it talks about incremental you know, negative in

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of being taking some share. But I still think

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Google is the powerhouse when it comes today. I learned

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>from their Cardshact moment last week that ultimately to improve

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on the AI functionality. But it just shows that's why

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and Jassy Apple they're not rushing anything out, but

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>no doubt in the della popping the champagne. In terms

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of Chat GPT, Hey mendep just real quickly, um, Meta, Google,

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Digital advertising? What's the call for this year? I think

0:08:57.000 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment is too negative talking about you know, tech

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>under owned. I had the pocket that has done the

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>worst is digital ad companies and Meta has been a

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>cost cutting story so far. But I think there will

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>be a cyclical rebound at some point with digital ads,

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's more likely given what we are seeing, you know,

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the overall sentiment that these companies have

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>hit trough valuations and now it's about just you know,

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>sequential increase in top one well Meta just picking that stock.

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of the poster child for digital advertising. Still

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>down to a trial and twelve month basis. That's a

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>bad news. The good news is it's up forty seven

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>percent this year in so maybe some of the buyers

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>coming into this name on a longer term basis. Sorry,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. Tech round Table kicking off this two hours

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>segment with Dan I've senior equity analysts at wed Bush Securities,

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>wearing the casual wear very well today in the Bloomberg

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in an Actor broker studio, plus Mandy of Saint Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>senior tech anles. We're like getting these guys together, they

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>know what they're talking about. I'll be like the round

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>table off things tech. We're gonna more coming up. This

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. Good Morning. We had some pretty strong retail

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>sales number the consumers still out there, so maybe the

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Fed can uh, you know, maybe keep rates higher for longer.

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of seems to be a little bit of

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a bet out there. Robert Teeter, head of Investment Policy

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and Strategy Group at Silver Crust Asset Management Joints us

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. So Robert, busy

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>time for you professionals out there, We've got lots of

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings to deal with. We've got lots of ECO data,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>CPI yesterday, retail sales today. When you put it all together,

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>what are you telling your clients these days? I think

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we're sort of sorting through a matrix here of on

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy side, are are things getting better or worse?

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And things seem to be getting a little bit better.

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>And on the inflation side, which is a critical influence

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for evaluation, uh, things seem to be slowing a bit

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their improvement, but also getting better. And

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 1>so I think that the back and forth here is

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>largely between the interaction between those two and assessing whether

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>this this good news that you get on the economy side,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>how bad is that for inflation right now? I don't

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's too bad. But you see some of the

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 1>reaction that we had yesterday to the CPI data, the

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>reaction today to strong retail sales. I think that tells

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>me we're going to be in a bit of a

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>tug of war here as we continue to fight through

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>these two issues. Well, doesn't the Fed have to raise

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>rates further? I mean, I got a great message um yesterday,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>who what NEIL data sent me a message saying, like,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>what does the FED have to show for four or

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy five basis points of break takes? I mean stocks

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>are down what fifercent from their highs, So that's that's

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing, I guess. But um unemployments at three point

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>four percent, right, we're all spending like crazy. Airbnb has

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>after the last month they were up. I mean, that's

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just a sign of what's going on out there. It

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>sure is, and I do think it indicates that the

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>FED will will certainly continue to increase. I think in

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis point increments, maybe another fifty or seventy

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>five in total, and stay there for a long time.

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a little bit of a contrarian take on

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the economic side of things, and that I feel that

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.719
<v Speaker 1>that each month that the economy UH stays robust, it's

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>more time for inflation to come down. So well, all

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>those things that you stated are true. The FED hasn't

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>made progress in financial conditions, hasn't made progress in uh,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, softening the labor market, but there has been

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>progress in inflation, and I think so long as that

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>continues without the economy falling apart, we have a chance

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>for a pretty good outcome. All right, we're about I

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know away through this earning season. Um, what are

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you takeaways? Yeah, I think there's been a lot of

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>strong signals from earning seasons. So while earnings haven't been

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that exciting, under the surface, there have been some pockets

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of strength, and I think the strength is coincided with

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the message we're hearing from the economy. So consumer discretionary

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>has clearly been a strong source of earnings. You've heard

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>from the banks in terms of the consumer remaining resilient.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's encouraging. And we've seen some strength in

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the industrial space as well, and I think that plays

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>into a couple of themes that are unfolding right now.

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, first and foremost among those reshoring, and so

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.599
<v Speaker 1>I think there are some pockets of remaining strength in

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy. I think you have to be very careful

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of earnings. That top line number might not

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be too exciting, but there are some areas to find

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a good earning scrop. It's intu. I'm just looking at

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the a function that hooked me up with a while. Uh.

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And for the SP five hundred, again we're about companies

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in SP FID of reported five point three sales growth

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>your year, but earnings declined by two point four percent.

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's that margin pressure. Certainly is some margin pressure,

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think coming back a bit to normal. So

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, my mapping of it is to say margins

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>get back to where they were in twenty nineteen, which

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>says there's still a little bit of downside pressure on margins.

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 1>I think revenues will continue to remain strong in those

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>areas that I mentioned, and so it does playing a

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>picture of you know, basically flat earnings growth in terms

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of outlook for this year, but with some opportunities below

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the surface. Flat. So SMP earnings flat from two. That's

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>better than a stick in the eye, right, I think

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it is, I really do. I think there's there are

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of transformations going on. And so whether it's

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this theme of a you know, a rolling recession or

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I prefer to think of it as different parts of

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy, in different parts of the economic cycle. There

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>are these areas that are continuing to produce strong earnings growth.

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just not enough to boost the overall level. Consumer

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>discretionary industrials are pretty small relative to tech and financials. Yeah,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at energy just again on this e A function, earnings,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a revenue of fifteen percent year over year, earnings up

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven percent year of a year or so. You know,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of goes the question, boy, energy has been

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>good for the first time in a long time over

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. Have I missed it totally?

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Just go back into my you know, two year treasury

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>yield at four points six. It's it's an interesting question

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to ponder. I mean, I don't think that the upside

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to be what it was in the past.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you look through all those all

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>those sectors on there, and I love the e A

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>function as well, Uh, the areas that have had strength,

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>all indications are that they will continue to have strength.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So the key question is just valuation. And in my view,

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the overall valuation on the market will be influenced a

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>lot more by the interest rate and inflation picture, which

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I see improving. So to answer your question, I do

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's still some opportunity in energy as well as

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>those other areas that are showing learnings growth. What do

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you think about other regions? I mean, we focus on

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the US obviously because we're here, but um, there could

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>be you know, something we're missing out on. Overseas. E

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>M was very popular at the beginning of the year.

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Everyone said, Oh, Europe's gonna avoid this recession. How does

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>it look to you now? I think all of those

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>have been an an interesting sort of one time time

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>trade that maybe has a little bit of of of

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>legs left to it in terms of evaluation disparity against

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the U S and that recovery in Europe, the reopening

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of China playing into e M. So I do think

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>there's still a bit of opportunity there, but longer term,

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>when we step back and look at the demographic picture,

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>when we look at the productivity picture, where we look

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at where companies are locating that are producing growth, most

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of those opportunities are in the U S. Yeah, I

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>mean we're talking to e A function. So I noticed

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously there's a yellow drop down box you can choose

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>your index. I put in the stock six D instead

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of the S and P five and it's dramatically different. Um,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and well, look it's the same trend but stronger. So

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>sales growth is like super boosted up twelve percent, and

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>earnings the declines are only one and a half percent,

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that's really kind of a reopening story

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for Europe as well. I think it is. I think

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>both Europe and Asia a little bit behind the US

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the reopening cycle, the reopening cycle from

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>from the economy, So again, there may be a little

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more opportunity there, but longer term, the demographic picture

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and productivity in the US just looks a lot. By

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, are you worried coming back home, um about

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the housing situation here, because we really haven't had, um uh,

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>any serious injuries from raised rates so far. Right, six

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>percent seven percent Mortgage rates make affordability kind of off

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the charge, so anybody who wanted to sell is gonna

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe rent instead, and anybody who wanted to buy, um

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the same goes for them. But if we start to

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>see job losses, we could start to see four sales

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and then big price drops. That's that's a great area

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of focus for US. I think we're not in the

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>danger zone yet, but we could be if these rates

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to remain high towards the end of the year

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and if we don't see progress on inflation by the

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. For now, you have a situation

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of people who bought homes are are

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>still in very good shape. They bought them, you know,

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to three years ago, before the move higher in prices,

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and you have a slowdown and activity. Of course, we

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>saw a few green shoots in housing earlier in the

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>year when rates cooled a bit, so we think there's

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the potential for that to happen again as we get

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>later into the year, more progress on inflation. Well, look,

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I about to close on a property. Uh, and I'm

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>paying a much higher mortgage rate than I would like

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>or I would have paid a year ago, but I

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>fully expect to refinance in twelve months, so hopefully that

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>still works up. I look, you know, I'm trying to

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>get Tom Keene out of the triple leverage all cash

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>fun and now I'm saying, hey, you can go buy

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.239
<v Speaker 1>a two year note and get four point six. How

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.239
<v Speaker 1>are you guys thinking about fixed income ine after just

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a brutal Yeah, I think there are some good opportunities

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in fixed income, and you don't have to be too

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>aggressive on the duration or credit front to pick up

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty good returns. So that's an area where we've been

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>constructive and encouraging clients to to not go into all cash,

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>but rather to go out a little bit. Uh, not

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be long duration. You don't have to be to get

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>good returns and not take a lot of excessive credit risk.

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>There's no reason to. And it plays a much more

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>constructive role into portfolio than it did three years ago. See. Yeah, no,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I've this is what we've been hearing U and it

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me for sure. Um, I just wonder

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really help financial conditions if I'm getting four

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>point six percent of my two year right, So the

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>fed I inc Is going to be the variable that

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>could blow down this house of cards because they either

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>have to keep raising or we have to all wait

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>through what another year of another two years of inflation

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that's just unacceptably high. I mean, we have the smartest

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>people in the world coming out and now suggesting they

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>raise the target, and I'm thinking, wait, this is not good.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Two percent is already too much inflation, so three percent

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is worse. Yes, I think that's right. I don't think

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense to raise the target.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you hit on the key theme, though we

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 1>do have to be patient. I don't think inflation is

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>coming down quickly, but as long as it's heading in

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the right direction, I think it gives people a lot

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of encouragement in terms of planning for businesses or planning

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>its consumers. While the problem is is getting better, that's

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>much more important at the pace. I agree with you,

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>it may take a while, and so we may be

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at a situation where we're getting out towards the

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>end of the year and we're still not uh near

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the two percent target that the FED is set, although

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 1>there are pockets within the CPI construction where you do

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 1>see those numbers coming down a bit, and I think

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you've seen share pal starting to refer to some of

0:18:57.840 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the progress that's been made, and I think that's a

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>good thing. I think out will continue through the year,

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>but it will take some patience to get there. Just

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds. How much more earnings risk do you

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think is still out there in terms of estimates, Yeah,

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's another area of focus for us as well.

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think the pressure is there on the margins side.

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been a little bit less focused on that top

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>line number and willing to accept the sort of flat

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>outcome with the recognition that there will be some big

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>positive and negative numbers beneath the surface. There. One theme

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that we heard throughout the earning season was companies really

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on efficiency. So whether that's being careful with regard

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to labor costs, are continuing to deploy technology, efficiencies are there,

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>so companies might manage a bit better than expected on margins. Alright,

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>good stuff as always Robert Teeter, head of Investment Policy

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>and Strategy Group at Silver Crest Asset Management, and I

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think you can see him on Bloomberg Television at one

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm today with Cretty Guptas. So if you want

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>more Robert Teeter and his good thoughts on the markets,

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find it. Lots of earnings already

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>under the belt. We've got some more to go here.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But this market, as we've seen over the last couple

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>of days, still focus pretty intently on the federal Reserve,

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>on lation. We've got the CPI print yesterday, we got

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>some really strong retail sales today. Let's check in with

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the professional kind of looks at this stuff for a living,

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>trying to Pence, chief Investment officer for Pence Capital Management. Uh.

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>He is an Army veteran, so we think driving for

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>his army service there driving thanks so much for joining

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>us here. Lots of ECO data, lots of earnings. When

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you sift through it all, what are some of your

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>takeaways here as you look towards Well, I think there's

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>two There's there's two big things. The first one is

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>no one told the consumer don't fight the FED. When

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at retail sales and coming up, and we

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>had just a good report today and with employment strong, uh,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>with with basically balance sheets in good shape, you know,

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>consumers not necessarily slowing down. And I think that that's

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that's beginning to put some pressure on the FED of

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what they're thinking about going forward with it with interest rates.

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a that's a big issue. Consumers

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>still see to be strong and they still can still

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 1>have their buying. So how high do you think the

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>FED has to go to get real traction on financial conditions? Well,

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>I think you're probably looking at you. For the longest

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of time they're saying terminal rates was you know, maybe

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>between five five. We think that that now may move

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit to five fifty. But uh, one

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>of the things that people aren't quite paying attention to

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>his lag effects uh. And and where you know company

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the market. You know, FED does something in two days,

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>market adjust in two hours, but consumers and businesses it

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>takes them weeks and months sometimes to adjust to they're

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>changing capital cost. And so I think that we're under

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>appreciating the fact that this last hundred fifty basis points

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of hikes, uh, really haven't worked their way into the

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>market yet. Uh. And I think this is why at

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>some point the FED does need to pause, and the

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>pause is going to be long because the consumers and

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>businesses kind of have to catch up with the decisions

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of wants them to make. Give us a sense of dryden?

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Does you think here we see rates moving higher for

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks. That makes fixed income much more

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>attractive relative to the last you know, decade and certainly

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>relative to last year and performance was so terrible. Um,

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about fixed income? What's your kind

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of your strategy there? Well, you know, absolutely, I think

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>that this is quite significant. You know, we went for

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>decades where the market was the Tina market. There was

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there is no alternative, and now I think

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we're in what I call the baby market. Uh. And

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that stands for bonds or back, y'all. Uh And and

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's true when you can get when you

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 1>can get a two year north of four percent and trasury,

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that changes that gives It gives really invest

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or something that they really haven't had in over a decade.

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.719
<v Speaker 1>And so it makes a much better alternative to you know,

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the market. And they have, you know,

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>for a retail and ester to be able to get

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a two year treasury north of four it changes how

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they think about risk, It changes how they think about

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>long term investing. And I think that that's exceedingly important

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for advisors and people pay attention. We're getting back, like said,

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>bonds are back, y'all, and we need to pay close

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>attention to that. And we have a cross asset reporter,

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Katie Greifeld, she's coming on and about ten minutes to

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the fact that investors can earn

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>more in cash than they can in the S and

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>P right now and and and everyone hates this rally um.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, even people who are in it are saying,

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this is just a bear market rally. It's gonna falter um.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>What what signs do you look for for that, you know,

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>market pivot to happen. Well, so there's a difference in

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the market pivot and true true, true. I'm talking about

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the market like what signs do we we're up fiftcent

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>from the October lows, you know, does that hold or

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>do we come back down? I think we're ahead of ourselves.

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think one of the big things is you

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>cannot discount human emotion. Everybody was so happy to see

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of it. Basically was a sea change. You

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of took off that jacket and put on the

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>new one. So I think we saw this early rally uh,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>more like a relief rally if anything else. Uh. And

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>so now we're going to have to look through the

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>rest of this quarter for validation of that and also

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the realization that we made. You know that I think

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 1>that the idea that a bad recession is coming uh

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe coming off the table, and that it looks like

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a little small recession or no recession. And we're kind

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 1>of in that camp. But I think it's important to

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to we haven't seen the last hundred fifty

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>basis points of hikes really work its way through the

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>business decisions yet. So I think that that's why we

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have to be a little cautious. So I don't mind

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the rally, but I think that we have to make

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sure that we're being cautious to have this first and

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>second quarter. But I don't see I don't see a

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>technical recession occurring first or second quarter. You know, we

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have positive GDP grow, so you're not gonna see if

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it happens. It's not having a third quarter, so's pushed out, tried.

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>And what are you doing with new capital coming into

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>your firm here? How cautious are you being? How are

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you allocating it at this time? Well, first, the first

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>thing we're doing is allocating the fixed income piece because

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we think that that's almost a no brainer, right uh.

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>And that we are looking at putting the fixed income

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to work in the in the two year uh, and

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>things with short of that, because if we get a pivot,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>you know you're gonna get it based on clipping a

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 1>good coupon and some and some capital gains out here,

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty four or six months. But then what

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we're really paying close attention to is the fact that

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the consumer side, you have a Barbell consumer,

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so you have the luxury goods doing fine, you have

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the low into the retail doing pretty good. Uh. It's

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>in the middle we're staying away from so your barbell consumer.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But then also we take a good close look at payments. Uh.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, as inflation rises, ticket you tickets go up, right,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>but payments are being able to maintain their margins. So

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>companies that are involved in payments uh and travel in

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>luxury spence. And we think also, I think defense is

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be a good segment. I don't

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't see the war in the Ukraine uh ending.

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:29.959
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be changes. But even if it does,

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>even if it ended tomorrow, you have a tremendous amount

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>of money that's got to go into defense. Because the

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>NATO countries have learned their lesson and they're all committing

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to this two percent. Um you're gonna have nineteen countries

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>instead of nine, and so they've got to replantis arsenals.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So we think defense is a good play. Uh for

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years, solid earnings. Geo politics at all

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a worry. I mean especially with um, you know Chinese

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>relations U S. China relations m getting more and more

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:06.360
<v Speaker 1>sour every day. Yeah, it creates moments of volatility. Um.

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know, a bad thing hurts China more than

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>it hurts anything else anybody else. They they need a

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>strong economy to keep their people uh in place. Uh.

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I think there's there's risks that people aren't

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>fully appreciating on the China thing. But the geop political situation,

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the whole world's watching Russia uh, and they're

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna watch what happens over the next several weeks if

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Russia tries to have a offensive uh to break out

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of their defensive perimeter. But you know when I think

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of what the world is learning is that uh, you

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>know uh Ukrainian you know this old cost you know

0:27:44.680 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you I gotta thank for a hundred and seventy three

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>point two to build it? All right, Frank, stuff all right, right?

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And try to pen CEO of Pence Capital Management Riding

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is a army veterans, So we thank him for his service.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Just getting some thoughts on these markets. We're gonna have

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>more coming up this this bloomberg. I want to move

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to another sector that I really love, UM because I

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like to eat out, and that's restaurants. And you want

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk restaurants and all that kind of stuff. Um,

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like Cracker Bowl is one of my faves. And and

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're you should say that publicly.

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I love crackerbout the country get canceled, I could get

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>cancel I love it. Mike Haylen, he does this stuff

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for a living. He's a senior restaurant's analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>So my gradiet to the broader call on restaurants coming up.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>But first I want to start off with Subway. I

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>always thought this was public, but it's a private company

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's rumored that it might be sold. Here talk

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to us about what's going on with Subway. What do

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you know? Yeah, Unfortunately, like you said, uh, it's private.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So uh you know, I've been digging for information the

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days and some of the some of

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the data points like same starce sales and it's hard

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to find any bad ones, right, and so only

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they only report the good ones. Um. But yeah, from

0:28:57.120 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what I understand, Um, you know they're looking to sell.

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the timing is so great with

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 1>with the rising interest rates over the last year. Um,

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know from what we're here and they're looking

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to sell and they think they can get about ten

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>billion for it, So who picks them up? I think

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's gotta be p I think it's got to be

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>private equity. So UM, there's two big multi unit operators

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>in our space, UM, you know, UM Restaurant Brands and YUM.

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't see either one of those making a play

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for it. UM Restaurant Brands. UH is really focused on

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>UM turning around Tim Horton's UH in Canada, which which

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they've made some progress there, and also Burger King in

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States, which is gonna be a pretty heavy lift.

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>They're investing for million over the next two years in

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there alongside their franchisees to help boost results there. Uh.

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think they have their hands full. Young Brands.

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>The other one, UM uh you know Young Brands right

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>now is doing really well right UM, and so that's

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the name that comes up. But they're they're trading at

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>five times leverage, that's the long term target, you know.

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Tacking on ten billions to that bound she is is

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>going to shoot their their leverage ratio up pretty significantly. Uh.

0:30:26.160 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I think it's just kind of

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a too big of a pill to swallow for them, right, Um,

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so PE takes it up, and then, by the way,

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not as interesting to us anymore. Right, what if

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>PE takes it, I'd like to see what they pay

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for it. Evaluation. That kind of stuff isn't actual. You

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>want to see kind of valuation. That's a good point.

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But mar but Mike, what are the publicly traded UH

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>companies that you like? Paul and I went to Chipotle

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the other day and the line was, I think it

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>may have gone out the door at one point when

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we were in there. Um, and it's a long store,

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of they just don't have enough employees. Yeah,

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they're still they're still cranking. Um, yeah, they're still cranking.

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know it's a market by market thing. You know,

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>they reported earnings recently and I think their stores or

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>so are are are fully staffed. So so it kind

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of depends on the market. Um, it just goes up

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>into the right. I mean, it's pretty impressive. Yeah, it's

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>been a good run. Fourth quarter though, was you know,

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw some chinks in the armor, right, Um, you

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>know they're they're garlic garlic Guahios steak limited time offer

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>did not do as well as Brisket the year prior,

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>traffic dropped about four percent year over year. Uh. You know,

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Same Star sales came in lighter than expected. So you know,

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not really you know, the jury is not out yet,

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but there could be some minor pushback here with some

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of the low and middle income consumers over there with

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the with the aggressive price increases we've seen there. So

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>they increased prices probably more than any of the other

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>chains that we covered over the last two years. Um,

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and their three years sames ourselves. Even though

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the trend accelerated by five fifty basis points in the quarter. Uh,

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's still one of the strongest performers post pandemic um

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in our coverage universe, if not the the strongest. Will

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>see how the rest of earnings pans out. So listen,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of really good things going on over there.

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we're really curious as opposed to the

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>cracker barrel Old Country, that stock chart is a disaster.

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 1>As much as Paul loves the Country Boy Breakfast, Um,

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not making any money on this one. Well, so,

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's been tough. Um. You know, they have a

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>high percentage of of older customers right, people that are

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>repired and they're pulling back on their spending. People that

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>might be a little more afraid of COVID over the

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, so less likely to go into

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant family. Dining in general has been pressured more

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>than pretty much any of of the you know, subcategories

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in the restaurant industry. So yeah, it's been that's been

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a particularly difficult place to play, for sure. Most of

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>their customers aren't taking the PJ from a rubit of Veil.

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Probably not so anyway, But Mike, I was out of

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Veil last week and a lot of the restaurants they

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>were only seating maybe two thirds or three quarters at

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the table because they still don't have staff. So that

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>still seems to be an issue. But I'd love to

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>get your call here. What are you telling clients about

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the restaurants space here? How do we play it? Sure? So,

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>uh well, it looks like, you know, Veil needs an

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>influx of ski bums. Yes, it sounds like to me

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe the lift ticket has just gotten Yeah it's

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money. I just bought one for Park City.

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, it's definitely not cheap. Um So yeah, you know,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>January December was pretty bad, which they're surprising. December sales

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>were bad, which is a surprising because we were laughing

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>some O Macron impact and they've had a nice rebound

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>here in January. But we think it's gonna be short lived,

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>right because we're laughed in that O Macron outbreak last year,

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and so in mid February or so well that that

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tail winds gonna start to go away, you know. And

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we just think that all of the aggressive um price

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>increases right to combat inflation and all the other inflationary

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>aspects um that that are hurting consumer wallets, we think

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it's eventually going to take their toll in the restaurant space,

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>so um. You know, we think quick service franchise, heavily

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>franchise chains changed with scale, so think you know McDonald's,

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 1>think of Dominoes. We think those chains will will outperform

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>uh this year. And it's the casual dining chains that

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>own a lot of the restaurants have a lot of

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>operating leverage in their model. You know, if they see

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>some pressure on the sales line, it's gonna, all right,

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to squeeze their margins. All right, My great stuff

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as always my Kevin, senior restaurant analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg lots of earnings data, after lots of

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ECO data out there, CPI yesterday, retail sales jobs. I

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>need a professional to give me some perspective here, and

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that's what we call on Gina Martin Adams. She's the

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>chief equity strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. So, Gina, you do

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this for a living, You've been doing it for decades.

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>How do you put it all together and make a

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>coherent call for Yeah, I think that's a great question,

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>because we are in very unique times, you know. I

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.919
<v Speaker 1>think we first need to acknowledge the fact that even

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 1>though people such as myself and and you guys there

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>have been in this market for decades, we've been in

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the market in the decades of experience of decelerating CPI,

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we've never experienced inflation to the green we experienced inflation

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in two and that inflation spike has serious consequences for

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>investment strategies going forward. I do think it's really important,

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>most important, though, to keep your eye on the earning

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>stream and what's happening in earnings and the expectations for

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 1>earnings over the course of this year will most likely

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>drive stock prices. It's no coincidence that stock prices struggled

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.959
<v Speaker 1>last year as earnings came off of their peak. We've

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>now discovered, you know, over the course of the last

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>several months, that earnings didn't the peak at the end

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of one which does help explain the market's weakness throughout,

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>even though the economy appears to be rather stable. Inflation

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest reason for that earnings peak. We saw

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation pike last year. It created a crunch in margins.

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:02.479
<v Speaker 1>The inflation deceleration absolutely essential in in order to create

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a margin bottom. So what do you expect in terms

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:09.479
<v Speaker 1>of SMP earnings this year, Gina? We had Robert teter

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>On from Silver Crest Asset Management who said he thinks

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>earnings are going to be flat. Yeah. The first question

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I have to ask back is which version of earnings?

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Because I think this is incredibly important right now and

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.919
<v Speaker 1>it's really missing from the discussion. Operating earnings or sort

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of adjusted consensus comparable earnings are what most strategists and

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 1>most analysts forecast, and on a on an adjusted basis,

0:37:34.280 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we too expect a very modest decline, we expect something

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>close to two to five percent ultimately um A lot

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of thats so on how much energy drops. If you

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.240
<v Speaker 1>look at adjusted EPs, adjusted EPs is already down seven

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 1>from its peak and likely falls another closer to seven percent.

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>So which EPs is also very important because when you're

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>only looking at consensus comparable EPs numbers over the last year,

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you would have thought earnings were still rising. Well, what

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 1>do I have on E A. Wh When I pull

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>up E A and I look at sales growth at

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>five point three percent, earnings growth negative two point four percent,

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what are we looking at just as numbers now an

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 1>adjusted number. So what we're doing, and I think this

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 1>is really important, is you've you've got to keep track

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of which version of earnings you're looking at, because if

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at adjusted versus unadjusted earnings, you also get

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>a very different perspective on where valuations are. And I

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>think this is the struggle right now is and it

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 1>is always the struggle. At major cyclical turning points in

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the market, companies do have major write off Let's think

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about just one example, Ribbyan and Amazon. You get a

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>completely different perspective of Amazon's earnings when you think about

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the Ribban write offs. Then when you look at a

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>consensus comparable operating learnings number for Amazon, the result is

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>really incredible distortions and valuations as well, which makes this

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.839
<v Speaker 1>point in the in the market cycle really difficult for investors.

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Really adds as the complexity. So where do we go here, Gina?

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how should I think about these markets? I

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>got the markets are still done double digits from the high,

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>but boy, they're up off the lows at October low.

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where to go here? What do you

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>tell an investors? Yeah, and our view was at the

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 1>October low, we had priced a pretty significant earning surcession.

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>We've done in our fair value models at that point

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in time, we wrote that the market was already anticipating

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere between a five and fifteen percent contraction and earnings

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>depending upon where you're boging for fet funds. Right is,

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so we had already gone through a process of pricing

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a fairly significant downdraft coming. We're now experiencing that downdraft

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in the earning stream on an adjusted basis um, and

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue to experience that in the early part of

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that said, the rally that we've we've had in the

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>market since the October lows does look to be a

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>bit overdone in our view. In particular, the leadership and

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the rally is very suspicious. If we're moving into a

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>climate where economic growth is somewhat stable, inflation is decelerating

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 1>but nonetheless a little too sticky, and the Fed has

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep policy rates higher. Leadership in large cap growth

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>is very suspicious and subject to correction. So I think

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got a lot of potential movement beneath that top line.

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>As the market looks a little bit overbought in the

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:32.280
<v Speaker 1>short run, some of the excess inflation of the October

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to January period probably needs to blow off. So we

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>look at UH the SMP broken down into eleven industry

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 1>groups here to day, the leaders, to your point, Gina,

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>are consumer discretionary stocks and then I t so tech stocks.

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean to you that, um, you know, investors

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>are just so thrilled that two is over and they're

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 1>just buying the worst performers of this year. Or are

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>they did they do tax loss harvesting at the end

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of last year, Now they're getting back into those since

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they got the right off. Are they were they shorting

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 1>these stocks, and this is now a short covering rally. Yeah,

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a combination of all three of those.

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Those are all excellent points and certainly all part of

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the explanation for why stocks of rallies since October, but

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>not all of it, right, I mean, some of the

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 1>rallies since October is probably going to continue to stick

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>because consumer discretionary, as an example, not all of consumer

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>discretionaries large cap growth. Sure, you've got the Amazon and

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Testless of the world, but then on the other end

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:37.359
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum, you've got some pretty tremendous value opportunities

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that emerged in consumer discretionary and some hyper cyclical industries

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>that tend to perform very well in an environment where

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy is moving into recovery from recession. So I

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>think there's some opportunities there. Very similarly, with tech, you've

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:55.320
<v Speaker 1>got a combination of big cap, defensive growth and value

0:41:55.360 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>segments like the semiconductor space, where you know, I expectations

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>were completely obliterated and are now starting to recover a

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit in intercipation of a cycle emerging. So you know,

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you've really even got to go beneath the

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>sector level, right down to the industry level and even

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the stock level at this point in the cycle, to

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>look for where you see those deeper values, where you

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>see sort of less exposure to interest rate risk going forward,

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>where recession in the earning stream has largely been priced.

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those are the opportunities that we're looking for

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to um emerge as winners over the course of Gina.

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Not that you don't have enough on your play right now,

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going to ask you to help us book

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:39.320
<v Speaker 1>our show over the next couple of days. Should we

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>book a small cap portfolio manager? Small caps something to

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.879
<v Speaker 1>take a look at? Yeah, I we absolutely think small

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>caps are something to take a look at. You know,

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the small cap bear market is much longer in duration

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>than the large cap bear market, so deep value has

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>emerged in the small cap space. You're looking at a

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>group that's trades roughly one and a half nearly two

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>standard deviation below large caps valuation multiples and has been

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in a bear market since March of small caps also

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>have been in a bottoming process for longer. Remember the

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>October lower lows in the SMP five hundred were not

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>confirmed by small caps, which made their lowest low in

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>June UM and have been sort of waffling around and

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a little bit of a lift, but

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>not a tremendous amount of love, and underloved spaces are

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>always the spaces where we want to dig for for

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.320
<v Speaker 1>some diamonds UM in the rough. I think that small

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 1>caps do present a really strong opportunity provided we all

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we have indeed price that recession and we're moving into

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>some form of recovery here in the short term. It's

0:43:41.440 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 1>so confusing to me UM, probably because we don't focus

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>on it as much. But you've also got choices to

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>make in small caps. Do you go with the Russell

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, do you go with the SMP six hundred.

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:55.720
<v Speaker 1>There's Jeff Menton has a story on all these crazy

0:43:56.040 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>technical indicators like the momentum indicate you're moving average convergent divergence,

0:44:02.680 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like it's just made up UM, and I

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>just don't know UM where to go when I look

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at small caps. Yeah, I think that's a good point.

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:16.200
<v Speaker 1>But even the small cap benchmark manager really looks at

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:19.600
<v Speaker 1>only the top segment of small cap, the small cap

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Russell two thousand index, So for the most part, you're

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at the S and P six hundred as your

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>most investable opportunities within small caps. Maybe you extend that

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to uh, you know, the top the thousands of fifteen

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred of the Russell two thousand. There are some signals

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the small cap index, you know, just works closely

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:42.479
<v Speaker 1>with our small cap strategist, might Casper to derive those

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>comments to drive that commentary on the MACDI and the

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:50.040
<v Speaker 1>mac D has given us a signal that small caps

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe running out of steam with a negative crossover in

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>positive territory. That's a lot of gobbledegod, but it basically

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:01.319
<v Speaker 1>means is we probably have all right, reach some sort

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of short term top and small cast. That doesn't mean

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that opportunities are still there. Paul the stuff, Paul the

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 1>moving average, convergence, divergence. So's a negative aspect and positive

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>territory for sure. Cross am I'm buying that or my

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>selling it? Gina Martin Adams. She covers all things on

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the strategy side for Bloomberg Intelligence. Thanks for listening to

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:28.280
<v Speaker 1>interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>put on false Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio