WEBVTT - Bicameralism, Part 2: The Silent Pantheon

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you a Stuff to Blow Your Mind fan? Are

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you a New Yorker? Do you plan to attend this

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>year's New York Comic Con. If so, then you've got

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to check out our exclusive live show NYCC presents Stuff

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind Live Stranger Science. Join all three

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of us as we record a live podcast about the

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>exciting science and tantalizing pseudo science underlying the hit Netflix

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>show Stranger Things. It all goes down Friday, October six

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>from seven pm to eight thirty pm at the Hudson

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Mercantile in Manhattan. Stuff You missed in History class has

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a show right before us, so you can really double down,

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>learn more and buy your tickets today at New York

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Comic Con dot com slash NYCC hyphen presents Welcome to

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind from How Stuff Works dot com. Hey,

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name is

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Into Day. This is

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be part two of our two part series

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>on Julian Jaynes and the bicameral mind and the origin

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness in the Breakdown of the bi cameral Mind.

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So as this is part two of a two part episode.

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>If you haven't heard part one yet, you should go

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>back and listen to that one first. Sometimes we say,

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you feel like jumping right in and

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>go for it, This is one where I feel like

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you're really going to have a hard time following us

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't heard part one yet, because that's gonna

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>be where we explain what Julian james main hypothesis is

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>and how he arrived at it, and then in the

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>second episode we're gonna be talking about evidence for it

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>from the ancient world and from the modern world. Yeah,

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>this episode is going to be full of like falling

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>kingdoms and whispering statues and other great stuff, but you

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>need that first episode to understand it. Now, as with

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the first episode, we want to make clear that we're

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily endorsing this hypothesis. This is a very controversial hypothesis.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not something that is at all considered proven or

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>even necessarily very well attested by evidence. It's something that

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is controversial but very fascinating and I think worth exploring

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as a hypothetical. Yeah, it is a it is a

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>radical hypothesis, and if nothing else, it is just a

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>fascinating thought. Experiment. So as we discuss it again, you're

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>going to hear us Uh discussing it as if it

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>was fact, as if this is actually how ancient people thought.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But that is just a part of our exploration of

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the hypothesis. Now to briefly recap the core of Julian

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>James theory, and we should say Julian James, when did

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>he live? Nine? Yeah? So seven. Julian James was an

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>American psychologist. He's primarily known for this book that was

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>published in nineteen seventy six called The Origin of Consciousness

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind. And the thrust

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of that book is, until about three thousand years ago,

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>human beings were not conscious. They did not possess consciousness

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the way we do today. And around that time,

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>roughly three thousand years ago, modern human consciousness be and

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>as a cultural invention, probably in Mesopotamia that's spread around

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the world over time. And before that time, for thousands

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>of years, almost all humans were not conscious in the

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>way we are, but instead we're unconscious beings commanded in

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>all novel behaviors by hallucinated voices that they called gods

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or another way of putting it and uh, and James

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>himself put it this way, everybody was schizophrenic sort of. Yeah.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so schizophrenia, as James imagines, it is one

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>form or a modified version of a regression to this

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>bicameral mind state that used to be the norm for

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>how humans and ancient civilizations lived. And so this norm

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>would be that most of the time you would be

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>going around unconsciously behaving out of habit you know, you

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>have a stimulus response behaviors, and you would have habitual

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>behaviors that you would enact, and this would serve to

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>do most things that would be you know, recurrent repetitive

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>behaviors over the day. Whenever something new happened, whenever you

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>needed to make a decision and there was a stress

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>point induced by that decision, you would be told what

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to do by a hallucinated auditory voice that you would

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>perceive as a god, and that you would enact that. Now,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this is, as you said, a radical hypothesis. Yeah, because

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>again the idea here is that everybody heard these voices,

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that this was the universal human experience, this was the norm, right,

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And so obviously I mean that that sounds kind of

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy to us now, like, what really could could that

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be true? So, if there is any truth to Jane's theory,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and as we said before, we're not necessarily endorsing it

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>is true, just entertaining it as an interesting hypothesis, we

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>should be able to find some evidence of that theory.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And so we can look at psychiatry, and we can

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>look at neuroscience, and we can look at evidence from

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the ancient world. And today we're gonna start by looking

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>at evidence from the ancient world, from history, from archaeology,

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>from ancient literature. If there was a bicam moral mind state,

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.559
<v Speaker 1>this divided mind state, where one half of the brain

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>spoke to the other as the voice of a god

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and commanded the unconscious other half, we should be able

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to see that in the behaviors of ancient people's and

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the traces left of those behaviors. Right, So a lot

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of this episode is going to be UH, Joe and

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I discussing some of the examples that James brings up

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in the book. We can't possibly touch on all of

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the examples because much of the book, and much of

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the real joy of the book is UH is him

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>bringing up these various examples from from historical accounts, from archaeology,

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>from literature, and using that to support the idea of

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the by bicameral mind. Yeah. And one of the pleasures

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of the book is even if Jane's hypothesis does turn

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>out to be entirely incorrect, you know, if there never

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>was any bicameral mind, if consciousness is not a recent invention,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>if he's wrong about all that, it's still a fascinating

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>book just because of the way he pulls in so

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>many different disciplines and ranges throughout history, incorporating evidence in

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>such an amazing and fascinating way. All right, well, let's

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>jump into it a bit here and start discussing some

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence that James brought up in the book. Okay, Well,

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we probably should be able

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to think about is if ancient people's perceived auditory hallucinations

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that they regarded as gods, and these gods told them

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what to do, there should be some evidence of this

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in what traces they left of their relationship to the

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>gods they believed in, right, Yeah, And one of those examples,

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>James argues, is the positioning of the houses of the gods.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is the basic idea. Well, today, you travel

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to a big city. Let's say you go to Washington,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>d C. Okay, this is our example, not James. So

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Washington, all right, and you seek out the grandest,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>most centralized home, the one that just really stands out

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 1>from the rest, is the most protected. It has them,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you know that, the most central status of any other

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>um habitat. Okay, so I'm imagining it is the home

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of an extremely tall, thin person that stands looking out

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>over the water. Yeah, that's that's one one interpretation. No way,

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that thing isn't a home, is it. No, well, it's

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>not a home, But I mean that is an example

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of a of a building of prominence with a with

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a statue in it, which kind of gets into some

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>additional arguments that we're going to make here. But no,

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, you'd expect to find the home of a king, right, Yeah, yeah,

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>you would. That's the thing, right, you would want to

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you would expect a right, this is the center of

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the town. The whole town is built around this. It

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>occupies a spatial center as well as just the center

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of meaning and purpose. Or maybe sorry that that was

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>probably my sexism talking to a king or a queen.

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>In any case, you would expect the ruling person to

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>live there. But what have you entered into this grand

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>building at the center of the city and you found

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that it was home only to a quote hallucinated presence,

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the statue of that presence in the case of

0:07:56.240 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Abraham Lincoln, if you will, but still you for our

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>purposes here an unreal entity, a god, a goddess. Um.

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>You can also look to to cities in which a

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>church still occupies the central ground, and James argues that

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this is an perhaps an echo of the bicameral past.

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>So why would that why would that be evidence of

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a bicameral past, to find churches or temples at the

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>center of a city as opposed to the house of

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>a king. Well, the idea here is that the voice

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>occupied the center of our thoughts, and so to it

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>occupied the center of the town or the city, and

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that the house of the God or the house of

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the gods was quite literally the house of the gods. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this is true. So if I remember hearing when I

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>was a kid people saying, you know, be be respectful

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>when you're in church because it's God's house. But the

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>churches I was going to didn't literally believe that the

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>God they worshiped lived in the church. That was just

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>where humans congregated to worship. That's not so much the

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>case in ancient religions. It really does seem like in

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>many ancient religions, the place of worship or the the

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sacred building was literally where the God inhabited. Yeah,

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>where the God inhabited, and then his things sort of

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>go on the place where God may visit, the place

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>where God may be contacted. So he draws on examples

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>from the God houses at Jericho, uh the ziggarat of

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>r which we discussed in our Tower of Babel episode,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>as well as the city of Hatasus, the Bronze Age

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>capital of the Hittite Empire, and in the Ladder this

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>was actually a mountain shrine with images of the overwatching

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>gods rather than a city center, but he said it's

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of an exception that that also lines up with

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the argument. He also looks to the Old mec and

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Mayan empires as Bicameral Mesoamerican empires due to the presence

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of quote huge, otherwise useless, centrally located buildings in chief

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>among these the pyramid of TiO Tiwakan in modern Mexico.

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>And I love how he mentioned, you know, otherwise useless buildings,

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>because is this touches on on our discussions in the

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Tower of Battle episode regarding the ziggurats. A lot of

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>our our study of the past has been us trying

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what was this for what purpose? And

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times we try and figure out a

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.239
<v Speaker 1>practical purpose. You know, what purpose did this structure have? Absolutely?

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean these building projects consumed vast resources. I mean

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to build the most prominent and highest and well defended

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>building in the middle of of an inhabited space. That

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>just seems like, why would you waste that on being

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>there for a being that is not that does not

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>physically need a house. Yeah, unless you are a people

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>for whom the voice of God is real. Again, this

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is just the wonder of this theory is that it

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>turns so much of ancient history on its head. Uh.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>And and then also you know, more recent history, as

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this is all an echo of the past. Now, in

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the previous episode, we pointed out that you know, the

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>by the voice of the bicameral mind, it is it's

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>coming in to help you deal with novel experiences that

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>pop up, and how it might be helpful but it

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>might also be destructive. Well, in the same way that

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a conscious person can make good decisions or can make

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>bad decisions, the god guiding the behaviors of the unconscious

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>bicameral person, if this person ever existed, could be giving

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>good advice or bad advice. I mean, it's based on

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the integrated powers of the brain. In both cases, it's

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>just that is it consciously happening or is it being

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>delivered to you as a command that must be obeyed? Yeah.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And and along these lines, he attributes the construction of

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>ancient meso American cities that are located in inhospitable areas,

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>such as you on top of a mountain or uh,

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a swamp on the you know,

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on the side of a cliff. He says that, uh,

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>these are areas that again we're inhospitable, and they may

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have been abandoned at some point later on. Uh. And

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.599
<v Speaker 1>this is because they were linked to the commands of

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>quote hallucinations, which in certain periods could be not only

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>irrational but downright punishing. Now that's possible, but it's also

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>possible that we in the modern world are just not

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing correctly what the benefits of these spaces were. That's right,

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're always working with imperfect data. Um. He

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>does not reference this, but I couldn't help but think

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of Montezuma Castle in modern Arizona. These were cliff side

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>dwellings of the Senegua culture that were abandoned around four

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>s after centuries of occupation. Now now, various explanations for

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the abandonment of Montezuma Castle include a drought, resource depletion,

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>tribal conflict, and interestingly enough, just religious inclination to move. Now,

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you can get into a discussion of of how that

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>would possibly line up with james timeline for the bicameral mind.

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>But he does uh point out that by the time

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>the Incans encountered Europeans in the fifteenth century. Uh, there

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>was perhaps a combination of things bicameral and things protosubjective, subjective. Yeah,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is one feature of his theory that for

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time it wasn't just like everyone

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>was bicameral and then everyone was conscious. You had a

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>long period of the slow death of bicameral society turning

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>into being taken over by conscious people. You know, this

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>makes me think of shows like Game of Thrones and

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>other fantasy worlds where magic slowly bleeds out of the world,

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>because that's essentially the argument here is that over time,

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>fewer and fewer people are hearing the voice voices of

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the gods, Fewer people are hearing the voices of the

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>spirits of the departed loved ones, etcetera. And yet they're

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by the cultural memory of people who did hear

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the voices of the gods, or people who still hear

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the voices of the gods today even though they can't.

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So you have this society in which there are conscious

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are are constantly being reminded that they could

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>be in contact with the gods, but they're not, and this,

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I imagine is very distressing and frustrating to these people.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this is also interesting in that you

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually have this clash between the Inca Empire and the

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Spanish Empire. And he says that this was as close,

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>too close to anything in our history as to a

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>meeting of these two different minds, of the bicameral mind

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and the conscious mind, like two different cultures, uh, encountering

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>each other. Um. And and yet he points to a

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>number of different arguments for and against the Inca Empire

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at being a bicameral empire. Well, it could have been

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>an empire in transition, as many of these others were

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for so long. Yeah, I think Basically, he says that

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he believes that if there was a transition from a

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>bicameral society to a conscious society, that it began in

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Mesopotamia about you know, roughly one thousand BC. Uh, you know,

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred years on each side. It was a

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>slow transition and spread around the world from there. Yes.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So with the Inca in particularly, he um he points

0:14:56.360 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>out that on one hand, uh, the administrative demands and politics,

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we're probably beyond something that a purely bicameral culture could handle.

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Yet they had a god king who was the Inca

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>among them, and there were you know, other aspects of

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>bi cameral culture as well. Uh. And then these may

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have been again to your point, mere traditional echoes of

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the past. But he points out that, uh that you

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you had these gold and jeweled spools that members of

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the top of Inca hierarchy they wore in their ears,

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes with images of the sun on them that

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>these may have indicated that those same ears we're hearing

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the voice of the sun, since the Sun was a god. Yeah. Yeah,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So he spends a lot of time with various examples

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>discussing the importance of eye symbolism, ear symbolism, as uh

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>as showing that that the individual or the statue is

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow involved in speech or hearing. Now, one of the

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>things I wanted to revisit from our last episode is

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just the idea that James is not necessarily saying that,

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, the bicameral mind is not as good as

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the conscious mind. I know, we our conscious bias, uh,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, would naturally kind of feel that way, But

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily that conscious minds are better or more

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>valuable or even smarter. I mean, that's not just that's

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>just not necessarily the case. It's that they have different

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>adaptive strengths, and so having different strengths a a sudden

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>clash of a conscious culture against a bicameral culture could

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be very disastrous for one or the other. Yeah, I mean,

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this is this is basically the the the key example

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of an outside context problem in our world and Uh,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and James has a just a beautiful little description of

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>how this would have gone down. Assuming that this is

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a meeting of a bicameral or partially bicameral culture in

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the Inca and a conscious culture and that of the Spaniards,

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he says, quote, it is possible that it was one

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of the few confrontations between subjective and bicameral minds, that

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>for things as unfamiliar as Inca at a Wappa was

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>confronted with these rough, milk skinned men with hair drooling

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>from their chins instead of from their scalps, so that

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>their heads looked upside down, clothed in metal, with avertive

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>eyes writing strange lama like creatures with silver hoofs having

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 1>arrived like gods in gigantic quampas uh teared like mockagan

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>temples over the sea, which to the Inca was unsailable

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that for all this there were no bicameral voices coming

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>from the sun or from the golden statues of Cuzco

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in their dazzling towers. Not subjectively conscious, unable to deceive

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 1>or to nar narrat a rise out the deception of others,

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the Inca and his lords were captured like helpless automatons.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a horrible thing to imagine, as I mean, reading

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>anything about the European conquest Americans is always like a

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>horrible thing to Yeah, you don't have told have to

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine a separate state of mind for it to be

0:17:55.840 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a rather horrific, uh encounter. But yeah, that is of

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the features of his hypothesis. Is so one of the

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>things that consciousness gives us is a capability for treachery. Yes,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that really, the bicameral person is not very much capable

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of treachery. I mean, they can't prolong a deceptive behavior,

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 1>right because they can't run this internal narrative of how

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they should behave if they were to believe one thing

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>versus how they you know, really what goal they'll be

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>working towards secretly, It just doesn't seem like that works

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 1>out very well. But these conscious people are capable of

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>extreme deception and treachery and the ability to just be

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>jerks all right. Now. Another area that that he brings

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>up is that of essentially the loved dead. He points

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to the burial of the dead as if they were

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>still alive as being a key evidence for by the

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>bicameral mind. So we've covered a number of different momification

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>practices on the show over the year. So I think

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone here knows the drill the corpse as an astronaut

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>on a cosmic journey to the other side. You know,

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of an elaborate tomb. Maybe you fill

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that tomb with items that that individual loved in life

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and therefore might continue to need on a trip. And

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>then beyond that, you may even supply them, as we

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>see in the case of Egyptian tombs, with food stuffs,

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>with with perishable goods to uh to aid them in

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the journey. And the idea here is that if this

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.239
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond the mere idea that oh, well, they like

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to cheeseburger, so let's put a cheeseburger in there as

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a you know, a token is some sort of uh,

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>just at tribute to them. It's the idea that that no,

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I still hear their voice, they are still speaking to me,

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>even though the body has stopped moving, I will put

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a cheeseburger in there for them to eat, exactly. Yeah,

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So we think of tokens to the dead today primarily

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>as uh it's something representing the way the living feel Yeah,

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>but no, the belief here was that the dead person

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>still need at that. Yeah. And he says that this

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>spills over to the treatment of ordinary dead as well

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>as royal dead and many of these ancient cultures. But

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the concept of bearing the dead and massive tombs preserving

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>their bodies, providing them with physical luxuries and even food, uh,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>this is key. And and and and in cases where there

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>was no food, such as the graves at Larsa and

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Mesopotamia from around the uh. He says there these areas

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>were foodless because the tombs were beneath human habitation, so

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 1>that the dead essentially still lived among the living, so

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that they would wander up into the house and you

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>would literally hallucinate them doing so and telling you what

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>to do. Yeah. Now, James admits that grief could have

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>been the core motivation and most of these rights. And certainly,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the way we think about it when

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to put ourselves in the shoes of ancient people, right.

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, another very plausible and perhaps the more probable

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>answer is just that people wished their loved ones were

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>still alive and wanted to behave as if they could now. Yeah, now,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>he argues that grief alone wouldn't be able to account

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>for all of these practices. I mean, I think it

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>depends on your example and uh and you know what

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>your experience with bereavement is. I think that a lot

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>of this can a test that. Yeah, that that the

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>loss of a loved one, or even the loss of

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>just a you know, I loved celebrity in many cases

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>can can have a big impact, a huge impact on

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>your life. So uh, yeah, I don't know to what

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>extent I completely agree with that assessment, but I still

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a it's an interesting case to be Yeah,

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in a bicameral culture, you could imagine that

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 1>when Prince died, everybody would still be hearing him sing

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.719
<v Speaker 1>into their ear. Yeah, because what is prince but a

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, royal of the modern age. All Right, we're

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, and when we come back,

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we will keep looking at evidence from the ancient world

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that may indicate a bicameral past. Okay, we're back. You know, Joe,

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned uh uh Statue of Lincoln to the top

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of this step said, I know, oh you know what

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I was talking about. What's it

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>called the Obelisk the Washington I thought you meant when

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about a statue of a tall, slender figure,

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought you meant Lincoln slender dude. There's a miscommunication

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>that so easily comes with our conscious inability to communicate. Well,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you've been you've seen Lincoln his statue in Washington. Yeah,

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>he's just sitting in that chair. But he probably has

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not spoken to you. And I mean I don't mean

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that in a in a metaphorical sense or anything. I

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that statue has not literally spoke. You have not

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>heard the voice of that statue. No, But if I

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>were a bicameral person, apparently I might, like I could

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>go to pay reverence to that statue. But I wouldn't

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>just be paying reverence. I'd be getting advice on what

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to do exactly. So that's the next point that the

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>James made, is that we have these idols of the

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking stone that that that play into all these different cultures.

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So we've already mentioned that, all right, your your father's

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>voice is still in your head, like literally in your head,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you're still hearing it after they have died. Because of

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>this confusion to take place about about the nature of death.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>So your your parents did die, yet you still hear

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>their admonitions, right, and then the king dies, you still

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>hear the voice of the king. So one of the

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>first humans just raised up the corpses and skulls of

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>their dead loved ones and their dead leaders. Uh. After that,

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>we would turn more and more to two various artificial

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>likenesses of those individuals in varying degrees of detail. So

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>we we can find crude humanoid figurings dating back to

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a roughly UM fifty six hundred BC in what's modern

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>day Turkey and uh and relatively, these are relics that

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>were already ancient when the pyramids were built. Now, Frasier

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>would have classified such carvings as just fertility figures, but

0:23:57.160 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>James points out that that was the horse He was right,

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and he was trying to cram everything into those process. Yeah.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>But but James points out that you you can find

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.239
<v Speaker 1>them in very fertile parts of the world, such as

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Old Metal civilization, and he points to some

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of the various um attributes of these likenesses open mouths,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:19.439
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated ears, as if the statue is going to listen

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to you and speak to you, and in the case

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of the old mix, the creation of such idle skyrocketed

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>about seven hundred see. But James's questions whether this was

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>due to the cease of the voices. So did the

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>voices stop so that you you were crafting more and

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>more of these details to try and bring them back,

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>or was it due to a multiplication of them, so

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're having to deal with the chaos of

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>all these voices now. He argues that many artifacts might

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>have been quote semi hallucinatory uh mnemonic aids for the

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>non conscious people. So they're all it's also about remembering things,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ings and um, you know, adding order to life. But

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>he argues that quote some of these small objects, we

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 1>may be confident we're capable of assisting with the production

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of bicameral voices, and he points to Mesopotamian ie idols

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 1>from around three thousand BS. He and the eyes of

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>these and numerous others were figures were important to focus

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>because of our involved dependency on eye contact for communication. Yeah,

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>and then it's only left for the statute to speak

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to us and speak they did. Uh. Not only according

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to bicameral mind theory here, but also just according to

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>various accounts. Um uniform literature he writes provides examples of

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>speaking statues. If you turn in your Old Testament to

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Ezekiel one, there's an example of a Babylonian king who

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>said to speak to idols, which were known as a terrup. Yeah,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they're there are all kinds of accounts of this throughout

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the ancient world of us. I mean, this is another

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>case of like we were talking about in the live episode,

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with ancient literature. You know, you read it and you

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.159
<v Speaker 1>feel you send something alien about the characters, and you're like,

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is that something I'm just not getting that's getting lost

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in translation or were they truly alien to my mentality?

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>A similar thing is going on with when it describes

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the practices of hearing God speak. You could think like, okay,

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>well I don't usually hear God speak. Um, so maybe

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 1>there's just something this, you know, this like a literary

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>device or something that's getting lost in translation. Or you

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>could just say, no, I'll just take this literally. I'll

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>take it at face value. Something was speaking to them

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and it was the other hemisphere of their brain. Yeah,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So we get into this point where these statutes, these

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>artifacts become kind of focus points for the voice, like

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way too, in a way summon the voice

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>even when it's not, you know, directly called up by

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>stressful circumstance. H. He has numerous tidbits to support this.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Some of the really fun ones I found was he

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>adds that to quote, the conquered Aztecs told the Spanish

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>invaders how their history began when a statue from a

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>ruined temple belonging to a previous culture spoke to their leaders.

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>So I just love the mental image of you know,

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>these tribal individuals coming across the statue built by someone else,

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and it it summons the voices just to look at it.

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>You can also imagine, though, how if this model is correct,

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>conscious people would react very negatively to encountering b cameral

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>people and and the voices of their gods. Right, Oh yeah,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's another example he makes is that you

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>have the Spaniards, who again are conscious individuals steeped in Catholicism,

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and they come in and uh, they encounter the native

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 1>peoples and they actually reported that the people of of

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Peru were a quote commanded by the devil. In that quote,

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the devil himself actually spoke to the incas out of

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the mouths of their statues. So that could just be

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, historic goal cultural slander, or it could be

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>them trying to make sense of practices they saw. Yeah,

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, before really getting into the bicameral mind theory,

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I would have easily just said, well, that's just obviously

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>just a bunch of xenophobic foreigners from another continent coming

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in and saying, oh, they have statues. They probably stand

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>around listening to their voices and they obey the statues.

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, either way, they are putting their their dominant

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>racist spin on it. But it could be that they

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>were actually observing a practice. Yes. Now again we always

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 1>get into the same situation though, where they was this

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a practice that was based on on an existing bicameral

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>experience or is it an echo of a bicameral past. Yeah,

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it could be either one. If there's anything to this theory.

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that I think is one of the most

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>important takeaways of this whole theory is that if James

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>is correct, it's not that people used to be more

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>religious and now they're less religious. That's not the progression.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>It's that ancient bicameral religion and modern conscious religion are

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>completely different types of things. Conscious religion requires an emphasis

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>on things like faith and belief and organized systems of dogma.

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, they say, here's what we believe, and here's

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>why you should believe it, and so it's like regulated

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>by ecclesiastical authorities. It's addressed to an object that is

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>not immediately apparent. Not so for bicameral religion. Right, So

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>bicameral religion would have had no need for the concept

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of faith, because what's the point in telling people to

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>believe in the gods that literally talked to them and

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>appear before them all the time? That's right, I mean,

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the gods are speaking to you household, God's household spirits

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are speaking to you. Uh so you really there's not

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>really any room to doubt there if doubt was even

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a thing that your mind can do. Yeah, I mean,

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>our modern concept of religion you could look at as

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>something that came to exist at through the disappearance of

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the direct experience of the gods. Likewise, I mean, could

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>could heresy even exist in such a world like everybody is?

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly you're you're still gonna have, you know,

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a structure to society but everyone is hearing voices of

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the God. Everyone has has their their their radio set

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to the other world. Yeah, I mean this is a

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>world where the voices are speaking to everyone. Okay, I

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think we should look at one more thing about features

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we see of the organization of ancient societies before we

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>start to look at some ancient literature. So how about

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the theocratic organization of ancient society? What what does that

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>tell us about whether or not a bicameral mind ever existed.

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>According to Julian James, well, in this we're getting into

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a topic that we've discussed before, the idea of divine kings.

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean that the king is either the

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the right hand man of God, works for God,

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>or in some cases is God. That's an important distinction,

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and James makes that this stinction. You know, there are

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>two main types of kings for him, the steward king

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and the God king. Right, that's right, the steward king.

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>This is where the king is a stand in for

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>God and then the God king. The king is God

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and James believe that both tides developed out of the

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>more primitive bicameral situation where a new king ruled by

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>obeying the hallucinated voice of a dead king, which sort

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of that gives you like the you know, the succession order, right. Yeah,

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you're never really obeying you're never really obeying

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the new king. You're always obeying the old king through

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a sort of intermediary. And in this he I mean,

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>he even argues that the ziggurat centered civilizations of ancient

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Mesopotamia that in these cases it's not you can't even

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>really look at it, like the human beings were the

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>ones that were ruling, Like the ruling powers were the

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>hallucinated voices of the various gods. Right, So it was

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>not the left brain or the dominant side of the

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>brain of the actual king, but it was the other

0:31:57.000 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere of their brain ruling, the dominant side ruling the people. Right.

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And he also gets into how, you know, we've talked about, Okay,

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you're reacting to statues, humanoid figures, but on top of

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this we also end up with all with additional uh,

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>religious imageries, symbology. That's that's this used even written language. Uh.

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 1>He points out that quote reading in the third millennium

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>b c. May therefore have been a matter of hearing

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the cuneiform, that is hallucinating the speech from looking at

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>its picture symbols rather than visual reading of syllables in

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>our sense. Woh, that's that's fascinating. So you think about

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>how reading takes place for us today, it is largely

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>an unconscious thing if you're an adult that's been reading,

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>not if you're a kid who's learning to read, or

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:45.479
<v Speaker 1>if you know, at any point in your life. If

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you're learning to read, you do have to think about

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the constituent parts of words and sentences, like you have

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to sound them out and put them together in your mind,

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>using your conscious mind. Eventually reading becomes unconscious. I mean,

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if in this, in this bicameral framework, you

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>would learn to read in an entirely unconscious way, the

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>same way that maybe you get better at shooting basketballs

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>or something in an unconscious way. Yeah. Yeah, that's so. Now.

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Now another thing that another point that he makes about

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>language is that in reference to ancient Egyptians, uh, much

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>like the language of the ancient Sumerians. He says that

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>these languages were concrete from first to last, and that

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>interpretations involving abstract thought, uh, these are that these are modern,

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>modern intrusions, and that basically the gods commanded rather than created. Yeah,

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see that more we look in literature in

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the next section. Now, I think I made reference already

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to household gods and household spirits. You encounter these in

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different cultures. If it's not household gods,

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>then maybe it's a you know, just a memorial of

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>various members of the family, right, And a lot of

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 1>those traditions still carry on to this day. But the

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>idea here is that not everyone can hear the voice

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the ruling god, right, that would seem to be kind

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of chaotic if the even if it's just a simple

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>model of the previous dead king speaking to the current king.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it wouldn't make sense for everyone to hear

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that king's voice and have their authority. But everyone in

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this scenario, in the bicameral scenario, is hearing voices. So

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.240
<v Speaker 1>who are those voices? Well, there's a hierarchy of God's

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't exactly like because we there are different types of

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>stressful situations. Imagine a scenario where one is cooking, preparing

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>a meal in one's hut, and um, let's say you've

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>only got one piece of meat and then you accidentally

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 1>drop it onto the ground. There's a moment of panic,

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>what do I do? Well, the household cooking god chimes

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in and says, take it and wash it in the

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>river or something to that effect, you know, and the

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's salts. Second. Yeah, so this would be the

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>case of a of a lesser deity coming in and

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>calling the shot. Yeah. You know. One of the things

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>about ancient religion he mentions in the book that is

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very interesting is his discussion of the evil ocean, of

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the concepts of the car and the ba in uh

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>in Egyptian theology, where it's hard to I guess we

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 1>can't summarize it here, but if you get a chance

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to read the book yourself, look out for that section.

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting. It's it's about the way we're you know,

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>words for theological concepts sort of transition into other into

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>having other meanings. Now, part of the whole timeline, of course,

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is that as we've already stressed, that the gods cease

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking to everyone after a while and then cease all

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>together for the most part. We'll get into the details

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 1>of that as we we go. But but then when

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that happens, there's uh, there's order collapses. Uh, cultures end

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 1>up retreating into the jungles, and for many people everything

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>has to be built up again. Basically, the idea here

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>is that the bicameral mind, this, this whole system of

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>hearing voices, this hold society together. This is it's it's

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>an instrument of social control. Yeah, and so it's it's

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>like playing jinga with gravity, and then gravity goes away,

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and then how do you hold the blocks together? Well,

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly have to come with new novel ways to

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>do it, such as gluing them all together. I guess.

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Is so the political organization equivalent of that would be

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what it would be brutal dictatorship. Yeah, things like brutal

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>dictatorship have to step in. Uh. Suddenly, you know, you

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have all these wars and just total bloodshed occurring because

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the voices that organized society have have stopped speaking, or

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 1>have certainly stopped speaking with enough regularity to hold everything together. So,

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in closing on this, he argues quote that man in

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>his early civilizations had a profoundly different mentality from our own,

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that in fact, men and women were not conscious as

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we are. We're not responsible for their actions and therefore

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>cannot be given the credit or blame for anything that

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>was done over these vast millennia of time. That instead,

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>each person had a part of his nervous system, which

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>was divine, by which he was ordered about like any

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>slow ave a voice or voices, which indeed were what

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we call volition and empowered what they commanded, and were

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 1>related to the hallucinated voices of others in a carefully

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>established hierarchy. And this mindset would have again developed over

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the over the ninth century BC to the second millennium BC,

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>a gradual procession progression. Right, So that's the hypothesized era

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of the bicameral mind, which around the first millennium BC

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.080
<v Speaker 1>starts to decompose and fall apart. All right, we're gonna

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break, and when we come back, we

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>will look at signs of the bicameral mind in ancient literature.

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Than all right, we're back, all right, So obviously it

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>would make sense that we'd see examples or the examples

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>could be made in literature, because after all, the bicameral

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>mind is uh is according to the theory, according to

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the hypothes here and offshoot of the acquisition of language, right,

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Jane says language makes it exist, So could you could

0:37:56.719 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at ancient uses of language to find evidens

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>of it? Now, another thing that complicates this is that

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:06.760
<v Speaker 1>James thinks that one of the causes of the decomposition

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of the bicameral mind into the conscious mind is the

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 1>widespread introduction of written language. So this also writing ends

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 1>up undermining the bicameral mind. But can we see signs

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of the bi cameral mind in ancient literature? I think

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>he's got some interesting stuff to talk about here. Yet again,

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to be clear that I'm not endorsing his

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>theory as correct, but I do think some of his claims,

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>especially about what we see in Greek literature, are fascinating

0:38:33.120 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and a little terrifying. I have to admit, when I

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was reading you know, it kind of kind of gave

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>me the willies at various points to try to imagine

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ancient people ruled by bicameral mind. But when you started

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Iliad in particular, it kind of gave

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>me chill bumps. Oh totally. So the Iliot is one

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of Jane's chief examples of bicameral literature. So, of course

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the Iliad if you're if you never read it, it's

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>an epic war poem that tells the story of an

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 1>alliance of Greek kings and warriors, primarily the warrior Achilles,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>laying siege to the city of Troy. This is the

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>historical event now known as the Trojan War. And Jane's

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>claims that the Iliad was developed by a group of

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>oral storytellers or bards known as the ao E d

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's in contrast to sort of the traditional received

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:21.280
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that they were composed by an individual named Homer.

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably more widely believed now that these

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are the works of many people of time. But anyway,

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that that war took place about twelve thirty b C.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Or sorry, it was first composed around the time the

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>war took place around twelve thirty BC, and it was

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:42.359
<v Speaker 1>first transcribed into written form around nine hundred or eight

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty b C. And scholars may believe some

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 1>different dates now, but that's what Janes is working with.

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at the thoughts and behaviors of

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>characters in the Iliad, it should tell us something about

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the mental life of people who composed and wrote the

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>story about three thousand years ago. And when we examine

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the what do we find? Well, James makes a really

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>striking claim about the Iliad. It is a work of

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>literature in which the characters are almost entirely devoid of

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 1>anything recognizable as consciousness. You do not really see introspection

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Iliad. There are a few passages which serve

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as exceptions to this. Generally, James thinks that they look

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like late additions to the text or signed or they

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:30.479
<v Speaker 1>could possibly be signs of early protoconscious thoughts seeping through.

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But primarily, the characters of the Iliad do not introspect,

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>They do not narrotize, they do not seem to have

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 1>conscious consideration. Instead, when they're faced with the need for

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>novel behavior, what happens. They're told what to do by

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a god. A god makes them do it. Now, it's

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it's generally when we look back on pieces of literature

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like this, we think, well, this is just this was

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a primitive form of literature, This was a this is

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a more archaic um in a form of storytelling. Yeah,

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you see it as a literary device very well, could be.

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:03.879
<v Speaker 1>It makes me think, you know, all these various bad

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 1>films that you and I enjoy. Uh, sometimes they're enjoyably

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>bad because the craftsmanship isn't there at various levels. Um,

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>if bicameral, If the bicameral mind hypothesis is true, could

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it be possible that that sometimes we love bad movies

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.359
<v Speaker 1>because they seem to have been created by a bicameral mind.

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I was with you every step of the way there, Robert.

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I can believe that there are movies that feel quite bicameral. Yeah,

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>they feel as if they were like dictated by a

0:41:35.320 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>divine presence rather than consciously thought through. All right, but

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but but back to the discussion here. So, yeah, we

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>have this this war going on. There's no introspection, there's

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>nothing that resembles consciousness, and at all the pivotal plot

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>points are punctuated by a God stepping in and saying

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>do this or do that. So there might be like

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a scene where Achilles is going to reach out and

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:57.720
<v Speaker 1>kill his king Agamemnon, but instead it says a God

0:41:57.840 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>grabs him and tell and makes him not do it. Yeah. Interesting.

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see more of that in our films, though,

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>where they just have God's pop up than direct the

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>course of action, you know. Even in the words of

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>the Greek, Jane says, uh, we can see something of

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:18.479
<v Speaker 1>bicamerality here, because there are Greek words that later come

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to be used to refer to consciousness, and they appear

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 1>throughout the Iliad, but through contextual clues we can tell

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that they mean something entirely different in the Iliad than

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>what they mean when they later come to mean consciousness.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 1>For example, the word see he it's spelt psyche, you know,

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in the English pronunciation see he. In later centuries, this

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>clearly comes to mean consciousness or mind or soul. That's

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>how it is used in Greek, but in the Iliad

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>phase it appears to refer to something more like physical

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>life substances. Jane says it means something more like blood

0:42:54.120 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>or breath, like if a soldier gets killed on the battlefield,

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 1>his see he bleeds out onto the round or the

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>word thumos. In later writings, Jane says this means something

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>more like emotional mind or soul. In the Iliad, once again,

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it seems to have this base level animal meaning. It's

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>something more like animation or motion. So when a soldier

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>stops moving the thumos goes out of his limbs, but

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it also seems to mean this weird kind of organ

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the body that can be filled with the impetus

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for motion or activity. Next is noose. In later Greek

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it certainly comes to mean consciousness, it's like a conscious mind.

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But in the Iliad it appears to mean something much plainer.

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It means like sight or field division. So when you

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>see something, the thing is in your noose. Now, this

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>next point, this is the exact place where he really

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 1>gave me the creeps, and I got actual chill bumps.

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>He points out that the Iliad, as well as Greek

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 1>art at the time, quote shows man as an assembly

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of strange the articulated limbs, the joints under drawn, and

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the torso almost separated from the hips. It is graphically

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>what we find again and again in Homer, who speaks

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of hands, lower arms, upper arms, feet, calves, and thighs

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:18.879
<v Speaker 1>as being fleet, sinewy in speedy motion, etcetera, with no

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>mention of the body as a whole. Yeah, so it's

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just this idea of just these automatons waging war, uh,

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, killing each other, uh, with without this concrete

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:36.439
<v Speaker 1>sense of self guiding. It so alien to comprehend. Oh,

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it really is. And so if you buy into Jane's theory,

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 1>or if you just want to entertain it as we

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are doing, these characters simply do not seem to introspect.

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>They argue, they rage, they desire, they act out on desires,

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>but they don't seem to have access to a mind

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>space where they can perform introspective metaphor based activities like

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we described in the previous episode. They don't have access

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 1>either to the conscious aspect of decision making. Instead, when

0:45:03.280 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>they got to make a novel decision, the iliot is

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 1>very clear about what happens. The God tells him what

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to do, and they do it. Hm. Maybe this is

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we like like a very classic

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>action hero, you know, because it's like they don't think,

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>they just do. They are a man of action. They

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>are a bicameral hero. I mean, you sometimes do get

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:27.959
<v Speaker 1>that sense, right that there is a kind of there's

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a kind of unthinking charisma to the action hero in

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 1>most action movies. I guess that is what you'd call

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that that man of action cliche. I mean, I guess

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it technically usually is a man in these movies. And

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 1>he's got this kind of macho swagger that does not

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>seem to involve thinking, it doesn't seem to involve self reflection.

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 1>They've just got this, uh this like violent intuition, can't

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 1>be bargained with, can't be reasoned with, and absolutely will

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>not stop. I mean this, that's the terminator in a nutshell.

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>The by the terminator is is a is a machine.

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Everybody was the terminator in the Iliad. That's the scary part.

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, So what I what I'm thirsting for now?

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:14.239
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like this theory is too interesting and I'm

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>too tempted to want it to be true. So what

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I want now is for a great classic scholar to say, like, no, no, no,

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 1>he's got it all wrong. Here's why, here's how. You

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 1>can definitely find lots of signs of consciousness in the Iliad.

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And they're not later editions. They are part of the

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>original text. I want that, or I don't want that.

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I need that. Yeah, Otherwise I feel

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>like I'm just buying into the idea that Stanley Kubrick

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 1>faith them in landing or something. Right. Yeah, it is

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just such a radical hypothesis. Okay, well, let's leave the

0:46:45.080 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Iliad and look at some other literature from the ancient world.

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>How about Jewish literature. This is interesting. I'd not run

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>across this before either. This is ah So this deals

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with Yeah, the Elohim, one of the names of God

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>used in the the Hebrew Bible, very often just translated

0:47:02.800 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>as God, a singular right, but he argues that it

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:09.200
<v Speaker 1>translated as merely God is to miss the plural nature

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 1>of the word in Hebrew. Uh, which is something I've

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>independently read, like Melohem is essentially a plural word, but

0:47:16.040 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it's rendered in the modern sense and as a singular word. Yeah.

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 1>It says that it comes from the root of to

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be powerful. But better translations of of ela him might

0:47:26.560 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be the great ones, the prominent ones, the Majesty's, the judges,

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the mighty ones, etcetera. And so these, he argues, are

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the vote could be the voice visions of the bicameral mind.

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 1>And he also argues that one can really see the

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 1>decline of the bicameral vision in the Bible. Now, this

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:47.839
<v Speaker 1>is I really love this because he's basically talking about

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:49.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, if you pick up the Old Testament and

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you read it front to back, you can see this transition.

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So in the he says quote. In the true bicameral period,

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 1>there was usually a visual component to the holluciated holy

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>sinated voice, either it's self hallucinated or as the statue

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in front of in front of which one listened. So

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.360
<v Speaker 1>even as a modern reader of the Bible will find this,

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you go from a physical God who physically does stuff

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:15.720
<v Speaker 1>like kick people out of the garden or shut the

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:19.720
<v Speaker 1>door on the arc, to a God that merely speaks

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to everyone, and a purely auditory God that we account

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that we encounter with Moses, you know, with additional visual

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:29.959
<v Speaker 1>flares here and there, and crucially after that, a God

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of law and religion rather than of direct experience. So

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:37.919
<v Speaker 1>you go from this robustly imagined God who physically does

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff to a God who is a voice, to a

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>God who is not experienced directly and rather as experience

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 1>through his tradition of teachings and law and so um

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so yeah. James argues that the Hebrew Bible is essentially

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a long narrative of the transition from myth to bicameral

0:48:56.640 --> 0:49:00.319
<v Speaker 1>humankind too conscious humankind, and you can see the whole thing. There,

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got the older prophets like Amos, who Janes identifies

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:08.400
<v Speaker 1>as clearly b cameral, to Ecclesiastes, who uh. James thinks

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the author shows all the markers of consciousness, and he

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>claims you can also see this painful transition from bicameral

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>society to conscious society in many aspects of the canon.

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>A couple of examples, he says people are constantly begging

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:26.320
<v Speaker 1>for contact with a God or God's that no longer

0:49:26.440 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>speak to them in the literature that he believes comes

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>from the conscious period of this history. So one quote

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 1>he gives from Psalm forty two, and this is with

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the name of God rendered directly to the plural rather

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:41.279
<v Speaker 1>than the singular as it would usually be rendered as

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the stag pants after the water Brooks, So pants my

0:49:44.560 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>mind after you, Oh Gods, my mind thirsts for God's,

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for living gods. When shall I come face to face

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 1>with God's. Yeah, it's almost like a like a gradual

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:57.439
<v Speaker 1>breakup story, like oh, he used he used to see

0:49:57.440 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>God all the time we hung out, and now, yeah,

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:01.879
<v Speaker 1>we talk on the phone sometime, but it's not quite

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the same. And now it's like he won't even call.

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 1>We just keep exchanging texts, and suddenly you know, that's

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>all I have to go on. It's just the the

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 1>not even new text but the old texts. But then again,

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>there are there are definitely, in Jane's vision, partisans of

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the conscious version of the religion that don't want anything

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to do with the direct experience version of the religion.

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Like he says that there are many signs throughout the

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:28.319
<v Speaker 1>books of the Hebrew Bible that the Bicameral people may

0:50:28.320 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>have been actively persecuted by conscious people for religious reasons.

0:50:33.400 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll just read one quote, he says. Quote. A further

0:50:35.840 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 1>vestige from the Bicameral era is the word obe, often

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>translated as a familiar spirit. A man also or a

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 1>woman that have an obe shall surely be put to death,

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:52.040
<v Speaker 1>says Leviticus. And similarly, Saul drives out from Israel all

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 1>those that had an obe. In First Samuel, even though

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 1>an obe is something that one consults with, according to

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Deuteronomy eighteen eleven, it probably had no physical embodiment. It

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>is always bracketed with wizards and witches, and thus probably

0:51:07.280 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>refers to some Bicameral voice that was not recognized by

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the Old Testament writers as religious Yeah, I mean, you

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:18.000
<v Speaker 1>get into this scenario where you know, obviously the individuals

0:51:18.000 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 1>who don't hear the voices, they've built up all this

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this law and order based on the old texts and

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the old stories. It it becomes dangerous if other individuals

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are attempting to to add new material to it. No,

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing God's right now, and they're telling me something different. Yeah,

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it reminds me of the fact that the

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.520
<v Speaker 1>church that I attend they have this saying God is

0:51:38.560 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>still speaking, which, as it's intended, the idea is God

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is still real and a part of everyone's lives, and

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is not just a story. But on

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, there's it's kind of scary to think, well,

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 1>God is still speaking, what's he going to say? You know,

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:58.359
<v Speaker 1>um comes it could provide license for some very uh,

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for some very disturbing content or some great stuff. Yeah, indeed. Yeah,

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:05.719
<v Speaker 1>it's just sort of like it provides you with a

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>blanket authorization for action that is not so there if

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you have a written and codified law. So again, all

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:15.839
<v Speaker 1>of this just ends up playing into the conflict of

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the downfall of the bicameral mind as the voices blink out,

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and this a new system of of order and social

0:52:23.800 --> 0:52:27.000
<v Speaker 1>stability has to take hold. So let's try to summarize

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>real quick what James is saying is the basic contours

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the transition through the bicameral period to the conscious period.

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's see Robert tell me what you think of this.

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>As I've tried to summarize his view, I think James

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 1>argues that bicameral society emerged with language and the increasing

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>size of tribal groups. So when one could encode mental

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:52.680
<v Speaker 1>content into grammatical sentences, it was possible to code action

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:56.320
<v Speaker 1>motivation efficiently through language. So you'd have a big group

0:52:56.560 --> 0:53:00.759
<v Speaker 1>where your authority figure can't be around instantly tell you

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:03.319
<v Speaker 1>what to do because the group's too big. So a

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>command heard from one's parents or one's tribal chieftain is

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 1>hallucinated to recur over and over again, providing continuous motivation

0:53:12.520 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for action. And this is the non dominant hemisphere commanding

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the dominant hemisphere. This is the first version of bi camerality.

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So when you've got words and sentences that can be hallucinated,

0:53:24.280 --> 0:53:29.160
<v Speaker 1>then over time, these admonitory voices Eventually they become not

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:32.959
<v Speaker 1>just repetitive but synthetic. So they're not just telling you

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what these authority figures have told you in the past,

0:53:35.880 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're telling you what these authority figures would command

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:42.840
<v Speaker 1>if they were present now. And of course we know

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the mind has the power to synthesize information and imagine

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>what somebody else would command. We do that consciously now,

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but here it's saying, what if the right hemisphere, and

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in most people, or the non dominant hemisphere generally did

0:53:56.719 --> 0:54:02.960
<v Speaker 1>that automatically, nonconsciously. Uh So, over time, parents and chieftains

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:06.920
<v Speaker 1>die and their voices are still heard instead of internal

0:54:06.960 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 1>copies of authority figures to become imbued with disembodied authority,

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the voice itself provides inherent authorization, magical authority, as from

0:54:17.600 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a god. Then for a long time, bicameral society grows

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and develops, and bicameral people build technologies and kingdoms and

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.800
<v Speaker 1>begin to write works of ancient literature. But what happens

0:54:28.840 --> 0:54:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to make it all disappear? Essentially, his answer is a

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:38.839
<v Speaker 1>combination of catastrophe and literature. Would you agree with that, Robert, Yeah,

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>that seems to be the basic idea of catastrophe and literature. Yeah,

0:54:43.040 --> 0:54:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the story of the story of our lives. Yeah, that

0:54:45.600 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that that is the roof collapsing on the bicameral mind.

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So the catastrophe he singles out is the widespread failure

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of civilization throughout the Eastern Mediterranean close to the end

0:54:55.719 --> 0:54:59.399
<v Speaker 1>of the second millennium BC. This is a period that's

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 1>coming off of what's now referred to as the Late

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Bronze Age collapse, where ancient empires fell apart and dispersed

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and people were displaced, and there was a lot of

0:55:08.040 --> 0:55:12.840
<v Speaker 1>war and raiding and uh and collapse of infrastructure, trade

0:55:12.920 --> 0:55:16.040
<v Speaker 1>was interrupted, education stifled, and it led to what some

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:19.279
<v Speaker 1>would consider a dark age of the ancient world. And

0:55:19.320 --> 0:55:22.279
<v Speaker 1>he also argues that a certain a small amount of

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 1>natural selection may have come into play as well, because

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:27.840
<v Speaker 1>as all this is going on and the enormous, enormous

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:30.360
<v Speaker 1>bloodshed that's playing out here at the end of the

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>second century BC, those who had the best chance to

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 1>survive were those who could resist the commandments of the

0:55:37.000 --> 0:55:40.319
<v Speaker 1>gods and the literal you know, the voice of compulsion, right,

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:44.640
<v Speaker 1>who were more adaptable and could narrotize out solutions to problems,

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and who had the ability to practice prolonged deception and treachery. Yes,

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that's another huge idea here. So yeah, So he's got

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a summary of of the several factors he thinks led

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to in this period around the Eastern Mediterranean and Mesopotamia,

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the collapse of the bikeamera all mine, and in the

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 1>beginnings of widespread consciousness in culture. So what are what

0:56:04.960 --> 0:56:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are these main things he offers? He's talking about, first

0:56:08.680 --> 0:56:12.279
<v Speaker 1>of all, one, the weakening of the auditory by the

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:14.560
<v Speaker 1>advent of writing. Okay, A good example would be the

0:56:14.600 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>invention of written law, right, clearly distinguishing acceptable from non

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:20.960
<v Speaker 1>acceptable behavior in a way that does not require the

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:24.040
<v Speaker 1>intervention of an internal God. Yeah, we got these tablets here.

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:25.480
<v Speaker 1>He didn't have to speak to you all the time.

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Just refer to the tablets. Yeah, this is how I

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:30.920
<v Speaker 1>feel about any kind of power point presentation. Just give

0:56:30.960 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>me the power point. I don't need the voice of

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:36.800
<v Speaker 1>God telling me the things. Just give me a list. Yeah, okay, Okay,

0:56:36.800 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 1>what's the next thing? Number two? The inherent fragility of

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:42.799
<v Speaker 1>hallucinatory control. Okay, Yeah, we can see that there's some

0:56:42.840 --> 0:56:46.919
<v Speaker 1>instability in the system there. Number three, the unworkable nous

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of God's in the chaos of historical upheaval. Okay, so

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the gods prevented problems that they caused problems when when

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:57.120
<v Speaker 1>society and hierarchy was falling apart. Yeah, and again the

0:56:57.200 --> 0:56:59.840
<v Speaker 1>voice of the gods was just there was not actually

0:56:59.880 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the voice of a divine being with superior knowledge. It

0:57:03.760 --> 0:57:07.360
<v Speaker 1>was still originating from within the individual, right. Okay. The

0:57:07.360 --> 0:57:10.280
<v Speaker 1>fourth one, the fourth one is depositing of internal cause

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and the observation of difference in others. Okay, so you

0:57:13.600 --> 0:57:16.640
<v Speaker 1>see other people are behaving differently, and you begin to

0:57:16.760 --> 0:57:20.480
<v Speaker 1>wonder if maybe they're just behaving on their own and

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 1>not being commanded by God's maybe undermining your own authorization

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of god belief. Yeah, I can see where it would be. Um,

0:57:27.480 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it would, it would It would be contagious

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in that in that respect. Uh. Number five, the acquisition

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:39.000
<v Speaker 1>of a narratization from epics, the introduction of stories. Number six,

0:57:39.040 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the survival value of deceit, which we already touched on,

0:57:42.480 --> 0:57:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and number seven a modicum of natural selection, which we

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:48.200
<v Speaker 1>also discussed here. But to be clear, I think James

0:57:48.280 --> 0:57:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is primarily thinking about these transitions in mindset, not as

0:57:52.320 --> 0:57:55.360
<v Speaker 1>changes in the physical brain brought about by you know,

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>mutation and natural selection, though there might be a little

0:57:58.520 --> 0:58:02.200
<v Speaker 1>bit of selection towards levels of predisposition for it. But

0:58:02.240 --> 0:58:05.280
<v Speaker 1>he's primarily thinking about this as cultural change, right, that

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>there there are cultures of bicamerality and cultures of consciousness. Yes,

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, we're gonna take one more break and when

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:16.720
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we're going to jump into modern traces

0:58:16.760 --> 0:58:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of the bicameral mind. All right, we're back. So we've

0:58:21.560 --> 0:58:24.600
<v Speaker 1>examined the evidence that James claims to offer for the

0:58:24.640 --> 0:58:27.480
<v Speaker 1>existence of a bicameral mind and history and his conception

0:58:27.560 --> 0:58:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of how the bicameral mind arose and then collapsed into

0:58:31.400 --> 0:58:36.120
<v Speaker 1>society's based on conscious mentality. So, if there truly was

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:38.959
<v Speaker 1>a bicamerality in the past, if our brains are still

0:58:39.040 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 1>so wired as to be perhaps capable of bicameral culture

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the present, if we just practiced it, what would

0:58:46.200 --> 0:58:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of that be. Well, you would think that

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:51.440
<v Speaker 1>there'd be some practices in human behavior that would give

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you evidence that we used to be bi cameral, and

0:58:53.720 --> 0:58:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that we could still be bicameral if we tried. That's right,

0:58:57.440 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And he first of all, he makes uh he makes

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 1>some examples out of religion. So at this point I

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>think everyone can pretty well imagine the sorts of religious

0:59:06.400 --> 0:59:09.360
<v Speaker 1>examples that James is going to make. After all, we've

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:13.200
<v Speaker 1>been discussing the trans like nature of biocameral existence uh

0:59:13.200 --> 0:59:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in the commanding words of corpses and statues, you know, all,

0:59:17.720 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, very magical and scenarios that we can imagine

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:24.120
<v Speaker 1>lining up with both religious stories and religious right. So

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>expectantly he points to spirit possession. There's a topic we

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:30.600
<v Speaker 1>come back to on a few different episodes of Stuff

0:59:30.600 --> 0:59:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind, and it ranges from demonic possession

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:37.400
<v Speaker 1>across various cultures to you know, tribal African beats that

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:41.360
<v Speaker 1>threatened Carl Young's sanity, and more positive forms of spirit

0:59:41.520 --> 0:59:44.880
<v Speaker 1>possessions such as oracles, which which Jane spends a lot

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of time with. UM. We have a recent episode of

0:59:47.600 --> 0:59:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind that covers the the Thaie

0:59:49.840 --> 0:59:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Tattoo festival, in which uh, the animal tattoo ends up

0:59:54.760 --> 0:59:58.000
<v Speaker 1>overtaking the individual individual. So we have examples of this

0:59:58.000 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this throughout different cultures. H Speaking of tongues, UH and

1:00:01.920 --> 1:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>similar religious experiences may also play into this, and of

1:00:05.560 --> 1:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>course we have examples of this in ancient writings as well.

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So as early as a fourth century BC, Socrates wrote

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of God possessed men, so and clearly like, that's not

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing you would necessarily speak about if

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>if you were immerged within a bicameral UH world anymore. Right, Um, yeah,

1:00:25.680 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>these might be more vestiges of the bicameral culture, right.

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And James points to a number of different examples, mainly

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>those dealing with Greek oracles UH, with the idea being

1:00:37.560 --> 1:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that the oracle the individual here would have would have

1:00:40.320 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>ramped themselves up, but they basically ramped up right hemisphere

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>activity in relation to the left as a result, as

1:00:47.240 --> 1:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a response to complex ritual stimuli, you know, the use

1:00:50.960 --> 1:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of all these various and we've talked about statues and

1:00:53.240 --> 1:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>language and and all of all of these aspects playing

1:00:56.760 --> 1:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>into passed by cameral experiences. And therefore the idea here

1:01:01.520 --> 1:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is that even as we're shifting out of the bicameral age,

1:01:05.520 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>even as the bicameral ages behind us, you have conscious

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>individuals who are able to sort of resurrect the bicameral

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>experience enter into trance like states, etcetera. By engaging in

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>these rituals. Yeah, and these would be rituals where they

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>channel the output of what Jans identifies as in most

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>people the right hemisphere speech associated sections of course, right

1:01:28.200 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a speech usually coming from the left hemisphere. So it

1:01:30.840 --> 1:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>would be like the voices of the gods that spoke

1:01:33.640 --> 1:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the bicameral minds of the ancients, but speaking out

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>through the mouths of these oracles and prophets. And you

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>know what, uh, those oracles and prophets, they didn't necessarily

1:01:44.120 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>speak in a even in a commanding tone. In many

1:01:47.440 --> 1:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>cases they may have they may have sung yes. And

1:01:51.160 --> 1:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so this is a really interesting section James gets into

1:01:53.920 --> 1:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the in the third book of his book where

1:01:56.400 --> 1:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>he talks about the evidence of passed by camera reality

1:02:00.520 --> 1:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in poetry and music. So remember that james neurological hypothesis, uh,

1:02:05.840 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is that the bi cameral mind consisted of the non

1:02:08.120 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dominant hemisphere, which is the right brain in most people,

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>speaking directly as an auditory hallucination to the dominant hemisphere,

1:02:14.800 --> 1:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>which is the left brain in most people. Keep that

1:02:17.240 --> 1:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in mind here, that's right now. His his his thesis

1:02:20.280 --> 1:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>here is quote, the first poets were God's poetry began

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with the bicameral mind, the God's side of our ancient mentality,

1:02:28.080 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>at least in a certain period of history, usually or

1:02:30.920 --> 1:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps always spoke in verse. This means that most men

1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at one time throughout the day, we're hearing poetry of

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a sort composed and spoken within their own minds. That's

1:02:42.080 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>terrifying and beautiful. Yeah, that that kind of sums up

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the bicameral hypothesis in general. So evidence

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is scanned for this, but he argues that quote individuals

1:02:51.520 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>who remained bicameral into the conscious age, that these individuals

1:02:55.920 --> 1:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to express the voice of God or God's in poetry.

1:02:59.800 --> 1:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh the so you know, the Indian Vada dictated by

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the gods, the oracle at Delphi, early Arabic poets, etcetera.

1:03:08.560 --> 1:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And this concerns music too, because early poetry was musical

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>in nature. Jane's says absolutely. I mean, you could still

1:03:15.920 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>say that poetry is musical and nature, especially insofar as

1:03:18.960 --> 1:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it invokes any kind of scanning or rhythm. That's right.

1:03:21.720 --> 1:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And speech is a function again primarily of the left

1:03:24.760 --> 1:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>cerebral hemisphere, but song is primarily a function of the

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>right hemisphere. Poetry begins as the divine speech of the

1:03:32.560 --> 1:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>bicameral mind. That's an interesting hypothesis in itself. Now there's

1:03:38.120 --> 1:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a he presents a fair amount of of evidence for this,

1:03:42.440 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>which I'm gonna I'm gonna roll through here. Joe, jump

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>in as we go. Hit me man, all right. So,

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>first of all, many elderly patients who have suffered cerebral

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>hemorrhages on the left hemisphere such that they cannot speak,

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they can still sing. We also have the Wada test

1:03:59.520 --> 1:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to determine in a person's cerebral dominance. This is when

1:04:02.400 --> 1:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>sodium amatal is injected into the karatid artery on one side,

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>putting the corresponding hemisphere under heavy sedation, and the other

1:04:10.320 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>side remains awake. So in this case case, if the

1:04:13.440 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>left hemisphere is sedated, the patient can't speak, but they

1:04:16.640 --> 1:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>can sing. If the right hemisphere sedated, the patient can't sing,

1:04:19.880 --> 1:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but they can speak. So like, the centers for speech

1:04:23.240 --> 1:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and singing are lateralized and the situation is more pronounced.

1:04:28.200 --> 1:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>In cases where there's actual physical damage to one hemisphere

1:04:32.160 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or the other, or you know, it's it's completely removed. Also,

1:04:35.120 --> 1:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>electrical stimulation of the right hemisphere in regions adjacent to

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the posterior temporal lobe often produces hallucinations of singing and music.

1:04:44.040 --> 1:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh and he also he presents an experiment that you

1:04:46.760 --> 1:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>can try. He says, says that you can prove the

1:04:49.680 --> 1:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Latin though the laterality of music yourself. Try hearing different

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>musics on two earphones at the same intensity. You will

1:04:58.000 --> 1:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>perceive and remember the music on of the left ear

1:05:00.840 --> 1:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>phone better. This is because the left ear has greater

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>neuro representation on the right hemisphere. Now it points out

1:05:08.320 --> 1:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that Plato spoke of poetry as possession. Yeah, I said,

1:05:12.160 --> 1:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>poets then around four b C. Were comparable in mentality

1:05:16.680 --> 1:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to the oracles of the same period and went through

1:05:18.720 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>similar uh psychological transformation when they performed. And then there's

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>this idea. We've all heard talk of the muses, right right,

1:05:26.920 --> 1:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so ancient epics might start saying like sing

1:05:30.000 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>muse blah blah blah. So the authors telling their personal

1:05:36.000 --> 1:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>composition God to start going. Yeah, Now, when we talk

1:05:40.160 --> 1:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>about the muses, where you know, we're just talking about

1:05:42.440 --> 1:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>inspiration or you know, or attention even or just you know,

1:05:45.760 --> 1:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the will to get a project done. It's a literary device.

1:05:48.400 --> 1:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We think of. Yeah, but but back back then, the

1:05:51.200 --> 1:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>argument is that the bicameral human would literally need to

1:05:55.520 --> 1:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>hear the voice of the Muse. Yeah, the muse was

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>literally real, so it wasn't just something to imagine, It

1:06:01.560 --> 1:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was something they experienced, though it all was in the brain. Now,

1:06:06.400 --> 1:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he points out that by the sixth century BC, the

1:06:08.760 --> 1:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>poet is no longer in just naturally imbued with their song.

1:06:12.600 --> 1:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>They have to learn the gift of the muse in

1:06:14.880 --> 1:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>order to hear it. So the society that the voice

1:06:18.080 --> 1:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is becoming harder and harder for everyone to hear. So

1:06:20.720 --> 1:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>this might be kind of like how the oracles of

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>these later periods, living in conscious societies have to go

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>through elaborate rituals to get into the altered state of

1:06:28.960 --> 1:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>consciousness where they channel their non dominant hemisphere and let

1:06:33.160 --> 1:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the voice of God speak. That's right, And he says

1:06:35.920 --> 1:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that in the fifth century b C, we hear the

1:06:39.600 --> 1:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>very first hints of poets being peculiar with poetic ecstasy.

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:47.240
<v Speaker 1>That's this is quote there, So I want to use

1:06:47.280 --> 1:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that from now on. If I'm like trying to get

1:06:49.040 --> 1:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>some writing done and somebody interrupts me, I'm like, hang on,

1:06:51.720 --> 1:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm being peculiar. Yeah, so it basically just gets harder

1:06:55.200 --> 1:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and harder to hear the voices of the gods until

1:06:57.280 --> 1:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you're having to essentially make up the words yourself. It

1:07:01.000 --> 1:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a lot of of how magic works in

1:07:03.640 --> 1:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Dungeons and Dragons because Dungeons Dragons you basically have three

1:07:07.600 --> 1:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>different types of magic users. You have the warlock who

1:07:10.920 --> 1:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>works their magic via enslavement to a god or god

1:07:14.080 --> 1:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like being. So that's a bicamera being. Yeah, yeah, that

1:07:16.640 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>would be the bicamera experience. A sorcerer learns to better

1:07:21.320 --> 1:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>channel magic that naturally emerges from their being. So this

1:07:25.520 --> 1:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>is like a transitional being. This is like one of

1:07:28.480 --> 1:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the oracles in the late antiquity. Yeah, like it still

1:07:31.360 --> 1:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>flows through them, it still can flow through them, but

1:07:33.880 --> 1:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>they have to manage it. And then finally you have

1:07:36.680 --> 1:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the arcane wizard, who has to master the workings of

1:07:39.440 --> 1:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>magic through study and academic effort alone. So these are

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the pathetic poets of the modern era who have to

1:07:46.160 --> 1:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>consciously compose their works exactly. Yeah, and uh, you know,

1:07:50.560 --> 1:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that within Dungeons and Dragons you

1:07:53.320 --> 1:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>can you can have that, you can have sort of

1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the attitudes of what the wizard is. And this is

1:07:57.880 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>also kind of based on attitudes involving chews and wizards

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and in the real world in earlier periods. But there's

1:08:05.000 --> 1:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the the arcane wizard is a master

1:08:07.960 --> 1:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of of these forces, where lesser models are um you know,

1:08:12.960 --> 1:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the magic is a master of them, which is, you know,

1:08:15.960 --> 1:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>not unlike the comparison between the bicamera and the conscious

1:08:19.320 --> 1:08:22.639
<v Speaker 1>human right, And of course the idea is as uh

1:08:22.840 --> 1:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>conscious society exists for longer and longer, and the bicameral

1:08:26.760 --> 1:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>society goes farther and farther into the past. Our ability

1:08:30.040 --> 1:08:32.519
<v Speaker 1>to access these states of consciousness, to be an oracle,

1:08:32.680 --> 1:08:35.479
<v Speaker 1>or to be a muse possessed poet gets further and

1:08:35.520 --> 1:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>further from our grasp. Exactly he writes, And then the

1:08:39.640 --> 1:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>muses hush and freeze into myths, nymphs and shepherds dance

1:08:43.520 --> 1:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>no more. Consciousness is a witch beneath whose charms pure

1:08:47.240 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>inspiration gasps and dies into invention. The oral becomes written

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>by the poet himself, and written it should be added

1:08:54.479 --> 1:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>by his right hand, worked by his left hemisphere. The

1:08:57.800 --> 1:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>muses have become imaginary and in in their silence as

1:09:01.479 --> 1:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a part of man's nostalgia for the bicameral mind. That

1:09:05.560 --> 1:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is gorgeous. Yeah, And the whole book is filled with

1:09:08.760 --> 1:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>passages like that that're just beautifully written and uh and

1:09:11.920 --> 1:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and and just really drive home, often emotionally, the subject matter.

1:09:15.920 --> 1:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>That's another reason I guess I got to be skeptical

1:09:18.160 --> 1:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and suspicious of this hypothesis is that it's so well written.

1:09:22.240 --> 1:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I need to be especially cautious about it.

1:09:25.040 --> 1:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Like he he communicates it so well and it's so

1:09:27.760 --> 1:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>beautiful in the book that that it's like getting an

1:09:30.920 --> 1:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>unfair advantage as a scientific hypothesis. Yeah, yeah, I I

1:09:34.880 --> 1:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>can definitely get that argument. Maybe that's why most scientific

1:09:38.280 --> 1:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>papers are so horrible to read, Like why you know,

1:09:41.360 --> 1:09:43.479
<v Speaker 1>it's really rare you come across the one that's really

1:09:43.520 --> 1:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>well well written, And it's because, well, maybe maybe you

1:09:46.960 --> 1:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't let your writing skills make it stand out more

1:09:50.320 --> 1:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>than the theory itself deserves in terms of content. All right, Well,

1:09:55.400 --> 1:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>what's another lingering example of of the bicameral mind. Hey,

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>can you think of a state in which people have

1:10:02.160 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>altered consciousness or reduced consciousness and a tendency to obey

1:10:06.320 --> 1:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>verbal commands. Who sounds a lot like hypnosis to me.

1:10:09.920 --> 1:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Ding ding ding. There you go. Now, we've talked about

1:10:12.080 --> 1:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>hypnosis on the podcast before, but just to reiterate what's

1:10:15.600 --> 1:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>going on with hypnosis is people seem to have wildly

1:10:18.160 --> 1:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>differing levels of susceptibility to hypnosis. Some people just can't

1:10:22.040 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>be hypnotized, but for those that can, hypnosis does seem

1:10:25.640 --> 1:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>to be a genuine altered state of consciousness at some

1:10:28.680 --> 1:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>level in which the body is relaxed, focus is narrowed,

1:10:32.080 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>inhibition is lowered, consciousness is reduced, and verbal obedience is increased.

1:10:37.520 --> 1:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Sounds kind of like the model of bicamerality. With a

1:10:41.280 --> 1:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of these public demonstrations of hypnosis that you see

1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, or that you're on a cruise ship and

1:10:45.360 --> 1:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody's doing a show. I think people following the hypnotist

1:10:48.080 --> 1:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>commands is not necessarily always a highly altered state of consciousness.

1:10:52.120 --> 1:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It could be partially just a performance brought on by

1:10:55.200 --> 1:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>social pressure. But this is actually part of Jane's theory.

1:10:58.439 --> 1:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>He talks about the idea of collect of cognitive imperative.

1:11:01.800 --> 1:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Group pressure enables different states of mind, and this is

1:11:05.760 --> 1:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>why you can have, uh, basically a culture dictating which

1:11:11.200 --> 1:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>mindset you adopt, the bicameral mindset or the conscious mindset.

1:11:15.320 --> 1:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's also the reason that you can, through these

1:11:17.320 --> 1:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>elaborate rituals, say like the Oracle at Delphi, produce these

1:11:21.240 --> 1:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>these amazing uh you know, metered prophecies out of your

1:11:26.520 --> 1:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>right brain because group cognitive pressure is putting you into

1:11:30.000 --> 1:11:33.479
<v Speaker 1>that mindset. And so he's saying hypnosis maybe maybe in

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>fact a modern reapproximation of the left brain operation of

1:11:37.360 --> 1:11:40.599
<v Speaker 1>a bicameral person. But instead of having the right brain talk,

1:11:40.680 --> 1:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you're having the hypnotists talk. And again this makes me

1:11:44.360 --> 1:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think of yoga classes where I just let the individual

1:11:47.600 --> 1:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>tell me what to do for an hour and a

1:11:49.800 --> 1:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>half and it it feels so liberating. Now, another big

1:11:53.880 --> 1:11:56.439
<v Speaker 1>area that the Jane spends a lot of time with

1:11:56.800 --> 1:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is the condition of schizophrenia. Now, this is obviously going

1:12:00.800 --> 1:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to be very relevant because it's one of the features

1:12:03.240 --> 1:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of schizophrenia is hallucinations, especially auditory hallucinations. Yeah, it is

1:12:07.840 --> 1:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a condition defined by voices, by auditory hallucination, voices that criticize,

1:12:12.600 --> 1:12:16.479
<v Speaker 1>voices that tell us what to do it with under

1:12:16.479 --> 1:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the tent of the bicameral mind hypothesis. It would seem

1:12:19.360 --> 1:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to line up pretty well. And uh, and so James

1:12:23.479 --> 1:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>argues that schizophrenia is essentially a relapse into the bicameral mind. Now,

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he argues that in the sculptures, literature, murals, and other

1:12:32.000 --> 1:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>artifacts of the great bare bicameral civilizations, we do not

1:12:36.040 --> 1:12:39.559
<v Speaker 1>see instances of individuals who suffer madness in a way

1:12:39.600 --> 1:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>that differentiates them from their fellow humans. There's idiocy, but

1:12:44.560 --> 1:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but he says, there's no madness. Uh. They're like, there's

1:12:47.800 --> 1:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>no insanity in the Iliad, for instance. Yeah. Now by

1:12:50.280 --> 1:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the time we get to Plato, Plato speaks of madness,

1:12:52.960 --> 1:12:56.519
<v Speaker 1>but in these ancient civilizations, Jane says, you don't see it. Yeah.

1:12:56.520 --> 1:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>He says that the first instance of insanity discussed in

1:12:59.080 --> 1:13:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the conscious period, uh is in Phaedrus or Plato calls

1:13:03.040 --> 1:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>insanity quote a divine gift and the source of the

1:13:06.680 --> 1:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>chiefest blessings granted two men. And then he goes on

1:13:11.120 --> 1:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to a Plato ends up identifying four types of madness.

1:13:14.360 --> 1:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>And you'll and just again think of the bicameral mind

1:13:16.640 --> 1:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and reference to all of these prophetic madness ritual madness,

1:13:20.600 --> 1:13:24.719
<v Speaker 1>poetic madness, and of course the erotic madness. Huh okay,

1:13:24.760 --> 1:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so these kind of line up with some of the

1:13:26.080 --> 1:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>categories we've just been talking about. The Greeks wrote on paranoia, uh,

1:13:31.360 --> 1:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>he argues, which is literally having of two minds. Over time, however,

1:13:36.360 --> 1:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>madness is no longer and no longer has these sort

1:13:38.760 --> 1:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of divine categories that Plato identified, But it becomes a

1:13:43.240 --> 1:13:45.639
<v Speaker 1>part of an ill, a part of a disease. There's something,

1:13:45.680 --> 1:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>there's an ailment at work with the human being. Now

1:13:48.040 --> 1:13:51.879
<v Speaker 1>this maybe James thinks, as there is more conscious takeover

1:13:51.960 --> 1:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of society by the conscious culture, that it becomes untenable

1:13:55.920 --> 1:14:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for for bicameral society to exist and work within itself.

1:14:01.320 --> 1:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>So people who experience the bicameral mindset within a conscious

1:14:04.560 --> 1:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>culture have they essentially have no cover, They have no

1:14:08.680 --> 1:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>nobody to like be part of their culture right now.

1:14:12.880 --> 1:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>He also points out that the voices of schizophrenia these

1:14:15.439 --> 1:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>tend to be when I say the voices of schizophrenia,

1:14:18.000 --> 1:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the voice is heard by individuals with schizophrenia, Uh, they

1:14:21.760 --> 1:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>tend to be authority figures created out of cultural expectation.

1:14:25.640 --> 1:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And the hallucinations also seem to have access to more

1:14:28.040 --> 1:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>memories in the patient. There in many cases and in

1:14:31.080 --> 1:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>many cases they replace thought. The they frequently take on

1:14:34.920 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>religious overtones because he says the condition emerges from the

1:14:38.840 --> 1:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>neurological structures bound to the birth of religious thought to

1:14:41.920 --> 1:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>begin with right, and he says that the there's also

1:14:45.920 --> 1:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a frequency of religious experience overall in the waking state

1:14:50.280 --> 1:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for human consciousness, the the hypnopompic state that is often

1:14:54.760 --> 1:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>accompanied by vivid, lingering imagery. We've discussed this in terms

1:14:58.080 --> 1:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of sleep paralysis and supernatural experience before. James writes that

1:15:03.439 --> 1:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>these parts of the brain are quote released from their

1:15:06.240 --> 1:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>normal inhibition by abnormal biochemistry in many cases of schizophrenia

1:15:10.760 --> 1:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and particularized into experience. This is also telling. He points

1:15:15.040 --> 1:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to the relative inability of schizophrenics to draw a person.

1:15:18.600 --> 1:15:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Think again to our discussions of eye and me. There's

1:15:21.760 --> 1:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this draw a person test or adapt test, and it's

1:15:25.320 --> 1:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>used to help identify schizophrenia and other conditions by asking

1:15:29.360 --> 1:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the individual to draw a person. Now, if you have

1:15:31.920 --> 1:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>trouble drawing a whole person, that kind of makes me

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think about those disembodied body parts you talked about With

1:15:39.120 --> 1:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>reference to the iliad and UH. And I have to

1:15:42.120 --> 1:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>point out this is another thing I see my son

1:15:44.200 --> 1:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>having to do on kindergarten tests and UH in evaluations

1:15:47.880 --> 1:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>draw a person and and see I mean they're also

1:15:50.920 --> 1:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>looking to see with what degree of accuracy you can

1:15:52.800 --> 1:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>pull them together. But but yeah, in this case, are

1:15:56.800 --> 1:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you able to draw a complete person at all? Now,

1:16:00.280 --> 1:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>not all people who have schizophrenia are going to have

1:16:02.439 --> 1:16:05.559
<v Speaker 1>trouble drawing a person, right, but when they do it

1:16:05.800 --> 1:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is UH is extremely diagnostic. Also with schizophrenia, narratization can

1:16:11.439 --> 1:16:15.839
<v Speaker 1>also become impossible. You see these like fractured self stories rtues.

1:16:16.760 --> 1:16:20.679
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also body image boundary disturbance or boundary loss.

1:16:20.920 --> 1:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>And this again this ties into this UH, this lost

1:16:24.320 --> 1:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>sense of I or me. And remember too that schizophrenia

1:16:29.640 --> 1:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>has a genetic inherited basis to the underlying biochemistry. Natural

1:16:34.160 --> 1:16:37.559
<v Speaker 1>selection James Argue would have favored it for a while.

1:16:37.760 --> 1:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a certain tirelessness in schizophrenic individuals. They seem to

1:16:41.200 --> 1:16:44.519
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of energy, and in the bicameral individual

1:16:44.600 --> 1:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this would have become this would have become very important

1:16:47.200 --> 1:16:50.559
<v Speaker 1>if you were say building pyramids or are there great works? Yeah,

1:16:50.600 --> 1:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean we were talking about one of the advantages,

1:16:52.320 --> 1:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>or one of the possible advantages of a bi cameral

1:16:54.439 --> 1:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>mind would be mental endurance, much more so than a

1:16:57.080 --> 1:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>conscious person could muster. So James basically says that the

1:17:00.160 --> 1:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>modern schizophrenic is an individual that's essentially in search of

1:17:03.720 --> 1:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a bicameral culture quote, but he retains usually some part

1:17:08.240 --> 1:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of the subjective consciousness that struggles against this more primitive

1:17:12.240 --> 1:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>mental organization, that tries to establish some kind of control

1:17:15.760 --> 1:17:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a mental organization in which the

1:17:18.479 --> 1:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>hallucination ought to do the controlling. In effect, he is

1:17:22.120 --> 1:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a mind barred to his environment, waiting on God's in

1:17:25.360 --> 1:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>a godless world. Okay, So you convinced yet, Joe. I mean,

1:17:30.760 --> 1:17:33.959
<v Speaker 1>it's tough because I do find his argument very compelling,

1:17:34.720 --> 1:17:37.439
<v Speaker 1>but it just may be the case that he was

1:17:37.479 --> 1:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>wrong about how about some of the evidence that he claims,

1:17:40.760 --> 1:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>or about how he interprets some of that evidence. So

1:17:44.400 --> 1:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I find the bicameral mind thesis very

1:17:47.920 --> 1:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting and very compelling, but I do not consider myself

1:17:51.280 --> 1:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>convinced that it is correct true and with like with

1:17:54.439 --> 1:17:57.559
<v Speaker 1>the schizophrenia evidence, for instance, is this is this truly

1:17:58.240 --> 1:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>more evidence in supported by cameral mind theory, or is

1:18:02.439 --> 1:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this schizophrenia as explained with bicameral mind. Yeah. I mean

1:18:07.240 --> 1:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>one way you could look at the bicameral mind is

1:18:09.400 --> 1:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you could say it's a theory that explains a lot,

1:18:12.240 --> 1:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>or you could say that it is a very interesting,

1:18:15.560 --> 1:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>carefully conducted story that's overlaid on lots of evidence that

1:18:20.000 --> 1:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we already knew about. So what would be really interesting

1:18:23.280 --> 1:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>about it would be can it predict new discoveries like,

1:18:27.360 --> 1:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>based on the assumption of the bicameral mind hypothesis, would

1:18:31.120 --> 1:18:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you be able to predict will find X, Y and

1:18:33.439 --> 1:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>z about the ancient world and about neuroscientific discoveries in

1:18:37.520 --> 1:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the future, say with you know, uh a neuroimaging, And

1:18:41.040 --> 1:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be a real good way of testing whether

1:18:43.320 --> 1:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it has any predictive power and thus whether we can

1:18:45.760 --> 1:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>have any confidence that it will continue to have predictive

1:18:48.240 --> 1:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>power in the future, which is pretty much synonymous with

1:18:50.680 --> 1:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>saying there's something to it that it might be true.

1:18:53.920 --> 1:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So I tried to look up you know what

1:18:55.960 --> 1:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>if people said about it and the theory. It's had

1:18:58.360 --> 1:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of critics, It has lots of people, you know,

1:19:00.960 --> 1:19:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it's always been controversial ever since it was first introduced.

1:19:04.240 --> 1:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>It's had supporters. Some people think that it's uh, it's

1:19:07.200 --> 1:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, there's something to it. Some people think it

1:19:10.160 --> 1:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>might shed some light on some issues, even if it's wrong. Overall,

1:19:14.120 --> 1:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it's had a lot of people who think it's just bunk.

1:19:16.320 --> 1:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there's opinions all over the place. One

1:19:20.439 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>paper I found that I thought summarized well some of

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the neuro scientific evidence and implications is a paper by

1:19:27.280 --> 1:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Leo Share published in the Journal of Psychology or Psychiatry

1:19:30.640 --> 1:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and Neuroscience in two thousand. UH. Leo Share is a

1:19:33.640 --> 1:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>professor of psychiatry at Mount Sinai and New York, and

1:19:36.320 --> 1:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in the short piece he collects some relevant reactions to

1:19:38.960 --> 1:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Jane's hypothesis and argument. Uh. Some reactions to Jane's include

1:19:43.360 --> 1:19:46.839
<v Speaker 1>He finds that in nine seven, Assade and Shapiro published

1:19:46.840 --> 1:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a criticism of Jane's work in the American Journal of Psychiatry,

1:19:50.840 --> 1:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and they write, quote, the difficulty which we find with

1:19:53.760 --> 1:19:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Jane's hypothesis is that the conclusions he draws have a

1:19:56.600 --> 1:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>questionable basis in neuropsychiatric fact and quote. If Jane's hypothesis

1:20:01.600 --> 1:20:05.519
<v Speaker 1>were to coincide more accurately with anatomic fact facts about

1:20:05.560 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>what we find in the body. The right temporal area

1:20:08.520 --> 1:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in question would more likely coincide with Broca's expressive area,

1:20:12.560 --> 1:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a notion that does not conveniently fit Jane's theoretical constructs.

1:20:17.040 --> 1:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Assad and Shapiro. Shapiro also claim, according to Share that

1:20:20.400 --> 1:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>quote lesions of the right sided areas corresponding to Broca's

1:20:24.720 --> 1:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and Wernicke's areas seem more related to the negative symptoms

1:20:28.120 --> 1:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of schizophrenia, like restricted affect than to the positive hallucinatory

1:20:32.800 --> 1:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>symptoms unquote, and they also claim that Jane's oversimplified the

1:20:37.200 --> 1:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>phenomenology of hallucinatory experience to make them fit his hypothesis better. Um.

1:20:43.280 --> 1:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Also in ninet, the International Journal of Psychophysiology published a

1:20:47.800 --> 1:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>letter that wrote, quote, after many years of psychophysiological studies

1:20:51.479 --> 1:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>mainly carried out in the field, if evoked to neurocognitive

1:20:54.240 --> 1:20:57.519
<v Speaker 1>bioelectrical events, I feel I can safely state that the

1:20:57.560 --> 1:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>concepts of the mind slash brain and brain slash behavior dualisms,

1:21:01.880 --> 1:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>with their ancient, widespread and persistent philosophy, are now all outdated,

1:21:06.400 --> 1:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>as are those of the bicameral mind or the double brain.

1:21:10.200 --> 1:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Then again, however, Share says in nineteen a paper published

1:21:13.640 --> 1:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>in The Lancet by Olan claimed that research in neuroimaging

1:21:17.360 --> 1:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>has quote illuminated and confirmed the importance of Jane's hypothesis.

1:21:21.800 --> 1:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And this research includes a paper in The Lancet nine

1:21:25.800 --> 1:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>by Lennox at All in which a right handed person

1:21:28.400 --> 1:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>with schizophrenia underwent neuroimaging during hallucinations and the authors found

1:21:33.439 --> 1:21:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that the auditory hallucinations occurred in the right hemisphere but

1:21:36.760 --> 1:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>not the left hemisphere, which would match up with Jane's predictions,

1:21:40.479 --> 1:21:44.559
<v Speaker 1>the predictions made by the bicameral mind hypothesis. So I'd

1:21:44.600 --> 1:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>say it's still in the realm of something that is

1:21:47.000 --> 1:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting but definitely not proven. But just imagine how fascinating

1:21:51.680 --> 1:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be if more and more studies start lining

1:21:54.240 --> 1:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>up with stuff that could be predicted directly by the

1:21:57.280 --> 1:22:01.479
<v Speaker 1>bicameral mind hypothesis. Indeed, Yeah, I mean, that's that's the

1:22:01.680 --> 1:22:04.559
<v Speaker 1>great thing about the about this particular hypothesis is that

1:22:04.800 --> 1:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we can continue to study it. We can continue to

1:22:07.080 --> 1:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>see how how it potentially lines up with their modern

1:22:11.439 --> 1:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>scientific understanding of consciousness and the brain. So yeah, I

1:22:15.040 --> 1:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>guess we can start wrapping up here. But I want

1:22:17.000 --> 1:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to say in the end, though I'm not convinced by it,

1:22:19.400 --> 1:22:23.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not advocating it as true. It's fascinating, very well argued,

1:22:24.160 --> 1:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say, arguably quite brilliant in the way it

1:22:26.600 --> 1:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>pulls from so many disciplines into a coherent picture of

1:22:30.040 --> 1:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a cross disciplinary hypothesis. But can't yet endorse it. Yeah, yeah,

1:22:34.800 --> 1:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I would, I would agree, But it is it is

1:22:37.360 --> 1:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to use it as a thought exercise for looking

1:22:40.000 --> 1:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>back on past cultures. And uh, you know, after I

1:22:42.760 --> 1:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>was reading it, I kept I was wondering, well, why

1:22:45.200 --> 1:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>don't we see this reference to more works of fiction. Well,

1:22:48.439 --> 1:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it turns out it was apparently one of the key

1:22:50.920 --> 1:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>influences on Neil stephen snow Crash, which we mentioned in

1:22:54.479 --> 1:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>our Tower of Babble episode. It's a cyberpunk classic of

1:22:57.560 --> 1:23:02.519
<v Speaker 1>that involves a linguistic momentic weapons um which you know,

1:23:02.520 --> 1:23:04.479
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to that episode of certainly reads

1:23:04.520 --> 1:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>snow Crash if you want more than that. But I

1:23:06.840 --> 1:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>was not familiar with this book. There is a two

1:23:09.960 --> 1:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine novel by Terence Hawkins titled The Rage of Achilles,

1:23:14.760 --> 1:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and get this it's a novel of the Trojan War

1:23:17.640 --> 1:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>told within the confines of the bicameral mind hypothesis. So

1:23:23.000 --> 1:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Odysseus is a conscious modern man in this and Achilles

1:23:27.680 --> 1:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is a bicameral killing machine. That is a brilliant concept

1:23:31.520 --> 1:23:34.559
<v Speaker 1>for a novel. And if there's any truth to Jane's vision,

1:23:34.600 --> 1:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this might have actually been possible. Like during the long

1:23:37.280 --> 1:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>slow breakdown to the bicameral mind, conscious people and bicameral

1:23:41.000 --> 1:23:43.719
<v Speaker 1>people would have had to encounter and deal with one another.

1:23:44.280 --> 1:23:48.479
<v Speaker 1>And can you just imagine all the difficulty that would create. Yeah,

1:23:48.720 --> 1:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but for both sides, because on one hand, the conscious

1:23:52.160 --> 1:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>human is capable of deception that the bicameral human has

1:23:55.760 --> 1:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>no ability to. Like basically comes down to that that

1:23:58.479 --> 1:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>duel in a game of throwing owns between the Mountain

1:24:02.680 --> 1:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh, what's his name? The Ober and Martel. Yeah,

1:24:06.280 --> 1:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>where one is one is crafty and deceptive and the

1:24:09.080 --> 1:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>other one is just pure brute strength and NonStop killing action. Yeah.

1:24:13.400 --> 1:24:16.519
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying the Mountain is bicameral and the Red

1:24:16.600 --> 1:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Viper of Dorn is conscious. I think so, And really,

1:24:19.200 --> 1:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean he only becomes more bicameral. Story progresses. All right,

1:24:24.560 --> 1:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So there you have it. Do you have an anything else, Joe, No,

1:24:28.400 --> 1:24:30.519
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's it for now. I I found this

1:24:30.560 --> 1:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>a really fascinating topic to explore. It's one of those

1:24:33.640 --> 1:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that I've said this a few times now, but I

1:24:35.680 --> 1:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>just want to stress again. It's like I feel this

1:24:37.880 --> 1:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>conflict within me about ideas that are so cool. I

1:24:42.360 --> 1:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like I have to be especially suspicious of them,

1:24:45.920 --> 1:24:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Like the more interesting they are, the more I feel

1:24:48.560 --> 1:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like I have to really check my desire for it

1:24:50.960 --> 1:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to be true. Yeah, especially an idea that's this expansive.

1:24:55.800 --> 1:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The concerns the history of our species and our civilizations

1:24:59.560 --> 1:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and the very nature of consciousness. So it's not like

1:25:02.640 --> 1:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>buying into a single idea like, oh, well, actually I

1:25:05.280 --> 1:25:08.559
<v Speaker 1>think the Chinese discovered North America, you know, before the

1:25:08.680 --> 1:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Vikings something like that, which I'm not saying that doesn't

1:25:11.320 --> 1:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have large historical ramifications, but it's not something that just

1:25:16.120 --> 1:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>affects the absolute understanding of our species in our way

1:25:20.200 --> 1:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of thinking. All right, well, of course we'd love to

1:25:23.840 --> 1:25:25.559
<v Speaker 1>hear from all of you out there. What are your

1:25:25.640 --> 1:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the bicameral mind. Do you buy into it?

1:25:29.560 --> 1:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you think it's complete bunk. Do you

1:25:31.880 --> 1:25:34.559
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of middle ground there? And what are

1:25:34.600 --> 1:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>some really cool examples of its utilization in various sorts

1:25:38.120 --> 1:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of fiction that you've encountered. Here's something I would like

1:25:40.520 --> 1:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to employ your imagination on. If this could happen, if

1:25:44.720 --> 1:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you could go from a bi cameral mind to a

1:25:46.360 --> 1:25:50.479
<v Speaker 1>conscious mind, how much more could human mentality change? Oh? Yeah,

1:25:50.600 --> 1:25:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Like if you go three thousand years into the future

1:25:53.200 --> 1:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>from now, could our mindsets be as different from from

1:25:56.960 --> 1:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>hours now as the conscious mind is from the hypothetic

1:26:00.040 --> 1:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>call bicameral mind? Yeah? I mean, am I engaging in

1:26:03.320 --> 1:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a bicameral experience when I let my GPS device tell

1:26:06.800 --> 1:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>me where to drive? I don't know, you totally relinquished

1:26:10.280 --> 1:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>conscious control? Yeah? Almost, It's almost to that level. Uh

1:26:14.720 --> 1:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that I was hanging out with my family over the

1:26:17.000 --> 1:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>weekend and my sisters were like asking me, like, why

1:26:19.960 --> 1:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>did you make this turn in that it's said of

1:26:21.360 --> 1:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this turn? And I'm like, I just do what the

1:26:23.120 --> 1:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>machine tells me to told me to drive into the ocean. Yeah,

1:26:25.920 --> 1:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I put my trust in the machine. It's by and

1:26:29.160 --> 1:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>large there's a less uh, there's less of a chance

1:26:32.120 --> 1:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that it will drive me in the ocean. That I

1:26:33.840 --> 1:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>will drive me into the ocean. So uh, that's how

1:26:36.920 --> 1:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it shakes out, all right. Well, you can find is

1:26:39.040 --> 1:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>It's Stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. That's where

1:26:40.960 --> 1:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll find all the episodes that you will find, blog

1:26:44.000 --> 1:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>post videos, you will find links out to our verious

1:26:46.120 --> 1:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, Instagram, and more. Hey,

1:26:50.439 --> 1:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has that great uh discussion module group where you

1:26:54.400 --> 1:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>can join up and you can uh interact with us,

1:26:57.080 --> 1:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but also other listeners to the show and you can

1:27:00.640 --> 1:27:04.519
<v Speaker 1>discuss episodes such as these with those individuals. And if

1:27:04.520 --> 1:27:06.559
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with us directly, as always,

1:27:06.560 --> 1:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at blow the Mind at how

1:27:08.960 --> 1:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com for more on this and thousands

1:27:21.960 --> 1:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Does it how stuff works dot com