WEBVTT - Good vibes only for the White Sox | Episode 112

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Socks on thirty fifth is next doors open on the left?

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>What is going on? White Sox fans. I think we're live.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to a live midweek kind of preview, pope pre

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 2>show or pregame episode, hopefully pregame episode of the Socks

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 2>on thirty fifth podcast. Duke is out today. I am

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>your host Jordan Zowski for the day. Nick Gower as

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 2>always good to see you and filling in for Duke

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Brett Hafner. Gentlemen, this is a Good Vibes Only podcast,

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 2>and I want to make sure of that from the

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>start to hammer that home. I know both of you

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>were at the game on Tuesday, Brad Montgomery's debut. That

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of sparked the idea for this pregame show before

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the series finale. Good Vibes Only, you guys talk about

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 2>your experience that day. I know that kind of helps

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>in the question of how you're doing, which I assume

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>is pretty good.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean for sure, And that's like you said,

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of what inspired this idea. I just want

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 3>to talk about this team right now. And I know

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 3>we do a podcast every Sunday, or we recorded every Sunday,

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I should say, but it's like, when the vibes are

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>this good, I want to talk about them more than

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 3>just once a week. So that's very, very different from

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the last few years. But yeah, the game Tuesday was awesome.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean one of those games where and I never

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 3>really felt like we were going to win until the

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 3>game ended, honestly, kind of similar not in terms of

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 3>the score or anything, kind of similar vibes to the

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Edgar Carroll walk off against the Cubs and another game

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 3>that I was at this year where it's like two

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, walk off home Rouns in the bottom of

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 3>the tenth after you lost the lead. So yeah, I

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 3>just can't say enough about how energetic the fan base

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is right now and just how into the games people are.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Like one of one of my complaints going to games

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 3>from the more you know down years is that everyone's

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>like scrolling through Instagram rules or whatever, and I no

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>one's really paying attention. That's not at all the case anymore,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 3>at least where I'm sitting, like everyone just locked in

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 3>all the time. And yeah, it just feels really good

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 3>to have a winning, a first place team. But Brett,

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I know you were there as well obviously, so what

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 3>were your takeaways.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, we're a good Vibeses only podcast today, but

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 4>for the first seven or eight innings of that game,

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 4>I was just how are we in this game? I

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>was so frustrated, just because, as long talked about on Twitter,

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.119
<v Speaker 4>you know, there were some questionable decisions blah blah blah

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 4>blah blah. But it was just so cool to see

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 4>the fan response to Brade Montgomery. Honestly, every time he

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 4>came up to the plate, like it was one of

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 4>those things where again there is energy that has not

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 4>been felt in many years, and hey, like fans were

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 4>energetic for him just beyond the first at bat. I've

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 4>seen many debuts over the last few years where they

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 4>get a nice little clap for the first at bat

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 4>and then the rest of the game they're just a

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 4>normal White Sox player. But no, it was a special night.

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 4>And from my vantage point, Nick, you can tell me

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 4>how you were from yours mine. I was sitting in

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the upper deck kind of behind home plate. I thought

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 4>his home run was a line out the entire way.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I did not. It just totally got me off guard.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Me too, I thought it was best case scenario, would

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>double off the wall, But I agree.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 3>I thought it wasn't hit hard enough honesty to be

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 3>a home run. I don't know if you've noticed this,

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>but they used to up until this season, they would

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 3>have EXE will say a launch angle instantaneously when contact

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 3>is made in center field. Now they don't put it

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>up until after the play is over, which is annoying

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 3>because I would use that as a crutch, like I

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 3>would know immediately if it was going to be a

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.799
<v Speaker 3>home run or like a Warden Trive fly ball. Now

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 3>I had I've lost that superpower and I'm just guessing

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 3>with everyone else.

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 5>But no, I was surprised.

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, me and some others up in the section that

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 4>I was sitting in, we were like, that couldn't have

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 4>been that hard off the bat, right, And that's something

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 4>that I actually ran into our fellow coworker Tim Moran

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 4>on the red line afterwards, and we were like, there's

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 4>no way that was above like ninety five and I

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 4>think it was ninety eight, let alone.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I thought it was.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>I thought it was a line drive the whole time.

0:03:57.840 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Thought it was just gonna be okay, nice piece of hitting,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 4>but it gets caught for an out, but left Fielder

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 4>kept running. I'm like, no way, And it didn't really

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of grasp me the reality of what had happened

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 4>until kind of looking at Twitter afterwards and seeing how

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 4>historic that game was, and so Nick, myself and Tim

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 4>we were all there. This guy Jordan, he didn't find

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 4>himself there, but you know what, that's fine.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>He was gabbing about it on Twitter. Though.

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I will always talk about everything.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 2>What people don't understand is I am doing this on purpose.

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I am doing you all a favor when it comes

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 2>to player debuts because I was at every single one

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 2>of the ones for the last rebuild. Monkata sees Copek.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 2>We see how that worked out. So I am doing

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>everybody a favor. I'm staying far away from the debuts.

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>That might change depending on one thing we will talk

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 2>about when it comes to this weekend's rotation, because I

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 2>will be there Friday Saturday, so that might change. But

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 2>I have been staying far away from all of these

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>debut for a good reason. I am doing you all

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 2>a favor. So you're welcome, is what I'm trying to

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 2>get at.

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I guess all all that, but I don't

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:12.559
<v Speaker 3>know if I buy it if we're being honest. But whatever,

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 3>here's what I will say.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Now, go ahead, you can pile on Brett. Go ahead.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 4>If we get a certain picture who gets called up

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 4>and you're there and he stinks it all up.

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we know where to point our fingers to.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like at a certain point I tried to tell you, guys,

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess maybe let's start there before we get too

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 2>far in, though, I want to make sure I do

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>the host duties. Be sure to subscribe to the Sacks

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 2>on thirty fifth podcast Apple, Spotify, YouTube, subscribe to us

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube. We're really trying to grow it there, so

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>please continue to look out for stuff there anywhere you

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts. Also following us on social media Twitter, Facebook, Instagram,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>at socks on thirty fifth and socks on thirty fifth

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>dot Com is the website, so make sure to follow

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 2>our stuff there as well. I see people in the

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 2>chat who are saying they were season ticket holders during

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the Moncata era two. So much heartbreak, you see, I'm

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>trying to save you from that. Let's start with the

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 2>series that is coming after today, since we still don't

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 2>know if they're actually going to play tonight's game.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Against Braves the Dodgers.

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Based on how things are shaping up, Sean Berk Eric

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Fetti should probably be the first two that we expect

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>to pitch during the series. There is an open spot

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>on Saturday. Will Benable was very transparent before today's game.

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 2>We don't know who is going to be there. A

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>bunch of internal option. Might be a bullpen date, it

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 2>might be the aforementioned Hagen Smith. I don't know how

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 2>you guys feel about that. I know Hagen Smith has

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>become a very divisive topic on White Sox Twitter. We

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 2>know there have been some recent armslat changes. Again, I

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 2>guess I'll start with that. I think we all kind

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of feel generally good about him. But do the armslat

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>changes do the results kind of do anything for you?

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 5>There?

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Are you just kind of like, I just want to

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 2>see him at this point and then we can make

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 2>those judgments.

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I will say that I really enjoy that

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 4>I've seen the strikeout numbers kind of tick up a

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 4>little bit recently. You know, we're still seeing lack of

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 4>getting deep into games. Some of that, you know, with

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 4>pitch counts are by design, but ultimately we're not seeing

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, six or seven inning outings at this point.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 4>I will say, though, like my kind of thing when

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 4>it comes to Hagen Smith is that like kind of

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 4>when is the right time. They've been aggressive in promoting

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 4>all these other prospects throughout the entire year, and it's cool.

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 4>We've had twelve guys come already. Hagan Smith is probably

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 4>gonna end up being the thirteenth. I don't know what

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 4>at this point.

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>What what do you plan on saving him for?

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I know that we're starting to get health

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 4>back of guys like Shane Smith and Tanner McDougal, but

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, it kind of seems like there's an opportunity

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 4>with a guy like Noah Schultz on the IL.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think that I saw someone tweet about this earlier.

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 4>You're really throwing him to the wolves here against the Dodgers,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 4>if that's what they decide to do. But it's a

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 4>great test to see if he can still be putting

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 4>hitters away at the end of the day.

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree that There are really two thoughts I

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 3>have on this. The first one is that in a

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>recent I Think with MLB Network interview, Chris Ketz shared

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 3>some thoughts on the strategy behind when he promotes guys

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 3>like Riku Neshida being promoted on that Monday Memorial Day

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Day game against the Twins after a long road trip

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>that was intentional to try to inject energy in the team.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Brandon Montgomery one kind of similar, you know, coming into

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 3>a really tough stretch. So I wouldn't be surprised if

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Hagen Smith gets promoted for the Dodgers series, just because

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 3>it is a really tough stretch and you know, having

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>someone that's that, you know, electric when he's right on

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the mound to watch, could you know, inject more energy

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 3>into the team. So I like it from that point

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 3>of view, and also like, yeah, it would be throwing

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 3>him to the Wolves in terms of the Dodgers being

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 3>a great lineup, But Hagen Smith is the kind of

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 3>picture of where you could debut him against the Dodgers,

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 3>or you could debut him against like, you know, an

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 3>al Central team out the Twins or Royals or somebody.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not sure if the stat line would be

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 3>that different, solely because I feel like his problem, if

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 3>he has an any problem in his debut, it is

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 3>going to be that he'll walk like six batters, and

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that would happen no matter who he's facing.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 3>But he's the kind of picture whose stuff is good enough.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 3>And even if he walks six batters, he could be

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>like Blake Snell and you know, only a lot one

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 3>or one or two runs still strike out seven plus.

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 3>So I kind of feel like he's a little bit

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 3>insulated from the opponent just because of the type of

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 3>picture he is and his his command issues in a

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 3>way kind of neutralize the fact that it's a tough lineup.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 3>But that being said, now that I'm saying that, so

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.560
<v Speaker 3>we get called up against the Daughters and give up

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>like four home runs.

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>So, Jordan, what do you think.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 5>My thing is too?

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 2>With always the armslots and lowering it. You know where

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of going to go with this. I hate

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 2>that the lower armslot kind of leads to an east

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>west profile more, meaning it's like, hey, you're working on

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 2>one plane consistently. I haven't seen enough pitch metric data

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 2>on it. Baseball Savon kind of has some, but not

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 2>a ton. I'd like to see it at the big

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 2>league level before I start making any judgments on that.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 2>It's something I at least think about from that standpoint.

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 2>That being said, I do agree, like at a certain point,

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and it does kind of get into a question that

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 2>a fan has that we'll talk through later. At a

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 2>certain point, you kind of have to see what guy's got, right, Like,

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 2>you can only protect him for so long. We talked

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 2>about the need to continue to churn through this roster

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 2>because you don't have complete studs on either in your

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>rotation or in your bullpen that are just mainstays outside

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 2>of a few so you have to continue to churn

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 2>and move it and try different things. And my opinion

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>on it is Hagen Smith becomes that next iteration of it,

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know if it sticks. I don't know

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>if maybe he's a three inning guy and it's a

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 2>piggyback type situation. I don't know, I think. I mean,

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how you guys feel about this way.

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I feel like they should be open to a variety

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 2>of different things and maybe they don't have to dead

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 2>set him on a starter right away if they feel like,

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's maybe still a gap between where they

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 2>want him to be and where he is.

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, and they've shown the flexibility with other

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 4>pitchers you know, on the staff to give him a

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 4>variety of different roles, and I think that kind of

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 4>applying that philosophy towards Hagan Smith might not.

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Be a bad idea. So I feel like at this point,

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>why not.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now I'm on the same page. I mean, they

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 3>called up a Joe Rock the other day. He hasn't pitched,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't think, but he's another guy. I mean, I

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 3>know they're both lefties, so it might negate it a

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 3>little bit, but he's another guy who can give you,

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, two to four innings if you want to,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 3>So they could be creative about it. They could even

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean probably not Sandling because they just sent him down,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 3>but they could even bring up somebody else from TRIPAA

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>if they wanted to. You have a couple pretty fungible

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 3>relievers in the Major League bullpen right now. I Chris

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Murphy for example, where you could probably send him down

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 3>and don't have to worry about it too much. So yeah,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 3>they can be creative for sure. I mean, I think

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 3>it would be kind of cool a month or two

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 3>from now if Hagen Smith and Tanner McDougal would piggyback

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 3>off each other in the Majors throughly three or four

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>innings each that kind of thing. But we're obviously he's

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 3>not healthy right now. Doogal so well to wait for that,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 3>But I totally agree being open to different kinds of

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 3>roles with the picture like Smith, you almost kind of

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 3>have to be because if you plan on him going

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 3>six innings and he has control issues in the second

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>inning and can't get out of it, you need to

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 3>have that time be either way.

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 2>So let me ask this because I think it's a

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 2>good natural transition to where I maybe want to go

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>with kind of continuing our conversation today. You mentioned a

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 2>McDougal and kind of the injury idea behind it and

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 2>trying to still ease guys back in but also get

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>value out of all of them. Another big reason we're

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>doing this podcast today is because the White Socks are

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 2>in sole possession of first place and at the June eleventh,

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think any of us expected that. So

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>take a moment to really think about what I just said.

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 2>From there, though, yes, what sixty seven games or so

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 2>win of the season. League's taking notice. There's a lot

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 2>of talk about trade deadline stuff. Again, we'll get into

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>that with some of the fan comments. If you're just

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 2>joining throw your comments in the chat or your questions

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 2>in the chat, and we'll try to get to as

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 2>many of those as we can at the end of

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 2>the show. Regardless, Fangrafts is currently having the White Sox

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>sit at a twenty five percent chance to.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Make the playoffs. How do you feel about that number?

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 5>Too high?

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Too low?

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's the obvious impact of Mooney, Teal Schultz, McDougall,

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe Hagen Smith, maybe Shane Smith. I don't know, Like

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of unknown still and again we're kind

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 2>of in the middle of the gauntlet of Hey, you're

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 2>at least taking two of three from the Braves.

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Then you've got the Dodgers and the Yankees. Like where

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 5>does that number feel to you? Too high? Too low?

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 5>Just right?

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 2>Like where where let's check the vibes at a certain

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 2>point here?

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean to me, it feels too low. Like

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 3>if you put a gun to my head right now,

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I would probably say they were going to make the

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>playoffs if I'm just being honest.

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Really, I've talked about this.

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 5>That is kind of wild. I don't time, I don't

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 5>mean to catch off. I don't mean to cutch off.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, No, I mean other I read lot. I've

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>said this before. I read a lot of what other.

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Teams say about us just because I'm curious, and they

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 3>all think, well, look at that rotation, like Davis Martin

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 3>seems like he might be fine, but the wheels are

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 3>about to fall off there. And that might be true.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 3>But you kind of just said in Jordan, there are

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 3>so many options coming up soon between Smith, McDougall, maybe

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Shane Smith even becomes an option later in the second half.

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 3>And then you have guys like Mason Adams Drew Thorpe

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>that are currently working back from injury that could also

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 3>play a factors. So, and then there's the trade market, right.

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 3>So my opinion is that the offense is good enough

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 3>that it can withstand, you know, less than average part

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 3>in starting pitching, and the bullpen I think is underrated

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 3>because Grant Taylor, Sean Newcombe, Ryan Hudson, and st Anthony

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Domanga is less so Domanga's but those first three guys

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 3>especially are all very dependable guys out of the bullpen,

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and I don't really think there's that much floopy stuff

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 3>going on with their numbers that would lead me to

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 3>believe that they're going to fall off a cliff or

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 3>anything like that. So the Fangrafts thing, I've looked into

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 3>their projections and they basically are projecting that every single

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 3>hitter on the White Sox is going to vast regress

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 3>and have like a WRC plus below one hundred, even

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Vargas and Montgomery like like between now and the rest

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 3>of the season. They're basically saying they're all going to

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 3>be blow outrig hitters. I just don't think that's going

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 3>to happen. I mean, maybe I'm drinking too much kool Aid,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 3>but I'm not saying this team's going to win the

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 3>division and get a first run buy or whatever they're

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>in line to do right now. But I think it

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 3>very well could be a playoff team, especially with Tila

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 3>Murakami back. Ideally within the next you know, three to

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 3>four weeks. The LINEU wouldn't really have a single hole

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 3>in it at that point. So I'm, yeah, I'm drinking

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 3>the kolid. I think twenty five is too low. I'd

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 3>probably say like fifty to sixty if I had to

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 3>put a number on it.

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 2>It's so hard to write with the projections piece of it,

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>because it's like, yes, these projections are built off of, Hey,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 2>what is fan refs think these players are going to do?

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 2>And like, I get it, there's been some inconsistency with Vargas' career.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 2>You don't know what Murakami is going to be long term,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Like you had a couple good months of data, but

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 2>you don't have long term data to base it off of.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's why it's so hard to to take that

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>number and feel any certain way about it, because you're

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 2>you've got a team that has twelve guys making their

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 2>major league debuts. There's not a lot of data debase

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 2>it all off of. And that's whereas like I don't

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 2>know what to say, Brett, what say you?

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I happen to.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Be looking at Baseball Reference earlier and they have some

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 4>really interesting odds for us. They have sixty one percent

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 4>to have stocks to make the playoffs. And here's the

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 4>deeper one that kind of blew my mind.

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>A little bit.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 4>They're given the Socks a thirteen percent chance to make

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 4>the league championship series.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 5>That feels high.

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>That feels that feels hid high.

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay, But honestly, I think between where fangrafts and kind

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 4>of where like Nick and Baseball Reference, it I feel

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 4>like I'm kind of in the middle of those two,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 4>so but kind of like in like the thirty five

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 4>forty percent. You know, it's just I find myself really

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 4>going back and forth here between the fact that we're

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 4>performing without probably our two two better hitters on the

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 4>team in Kyle Teal and Murakami. Right now, like we

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 4>are finding ways to win ball games. We're scoring, We're

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 4>scoring at were you know, we're I think we were

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 4>scoring like four point something runs before Murakami got hurt,

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 4>and now we're scoring five and a half per game

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:16.959
<v Speaker 4>since Murakami's been hurt.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously smaller sample.

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Size, but the team is continuing to show that we

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 4>are not just We're not just the Bash Brothers at

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 4>this point.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>We can do that.

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 4>We can be the Bash Brothers, but we can be

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 4>you know, a line to line, pole to pole kind

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 4>of team, which is being able to showcase all those

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 4>different kinds of hitting has been super cool. But I

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 4>would say that, you know, it's getting likely er by

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 4>the day, and that is what is making this really

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 4>stupidly fun, because it feels like with every win, with

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 4>every kind of successful game of baseball they play, it's

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 4>like this is this is still real. This is not

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 4>some fever dream, you know, fake insanity run because they're

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 4>playing competent baseball in many different ways.

0:17:58.960 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 5>And that's the hard part of.

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Being like an unbiased fan who's trying to like objectively

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>think about the game.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Because we entered this season, I think all of us

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 2>were kind of like, you know what, we'll evaluate as

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 2>we go. We're trying to be objective. We know this

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to suck. It just hopefully it's going to

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>suck less than last year. Now we're getting into games

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 2>where you think about like Tuesday Night, where just berating

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>the bunting strategy behind it, and you're like, well, what

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel this way if this team was ten games

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 2>fifteen games below five hundred and no, probably not.

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 5>I probably wouldn't say a thing about it.

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, it's like, Okay, you have

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 2>those thoughts about a baseball game, right, you get frustrated

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 2>when those things happen. But at the same time, here's

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 2>me on the other end, Like I don't know if

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I can say, like with fifty to sixty percent confidence

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 2>that the Socks are making the playoffs. So it's really

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>hard to kind of balance those two ideas of, Hey,

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 2>there is some objectivity I have to place on evaluating

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the team, But how much do I about I agree

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty five is probably low. I'm not at fifty percent yet.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably closer to Brett in the thirty forty. And

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 2>I think Sean Anderson, when we talked with him a

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 2>couple weeks ago, kind of said it, well, we kind

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 2>of have this discussion a little bit. Play Cleveland first.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Getting this far Without playing Cleveland, I want to see

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>how the White Sex match up against who, for all

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 2>intents and purposes, is probably the only team that is

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 2>really going to make a run at the division other

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 2>than the White Sox. If you can go in that

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>first series look really good, maybe take two of three

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 2>and really set the tone for how you're going to play,

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 2>then maybe I feel better about Hey, now we're forty

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent. If they're keeping toe to toe, I personally

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>don't view this nine game stretch against this Gauntlet to

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 2>be anything more than Hey, a nine game stretch against

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 2>the Gauntlet. Tell me how they do against Cleveland, and

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 2>then I'll start having more of those discussions. But Brett,

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 2>to your point, it's fun to be where this team

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 2>is at I just I don't know if I'm ready

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 2>yet to flip the switch for this is fun too.

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Now I have expectations to where even the bad moments

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 2>hurt way more. I have to be ready to flip

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>that switch. I don't think I am yet.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna hurt. I'm just like I feel like I'm waiting.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm waiting for just like you know, and I guess

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of the Murkcammie injury that kind of felt that way,

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of just like ooh, something happened, like

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 4>the magic kind of disappeared for only like two seconds,

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 4>which was great, but in the moment, it hurt real bad.

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 4>You know. It feels like because we're coming off of

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 4>so many hundred lost seasons in a row, we're waiting

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 4>for it. But I don't know, man, it's fun to

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 4>relish in the fun.

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>It is.

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I really like the point you made bright

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 3>about how they can beat you in so many different ways.

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Like earlier in the season it was home runs after

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 3>home runs. Now it's like they can win these two

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>to one games against you. They can get on base.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, one of the reasons I feel so strongly

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 3>that they're actually a good team is because I spend

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of time looking at you know, like the

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 3>underlying metrics more for offense than pitching of the offense

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 3>is what's more impressive to me, And pretty much every

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 3>player on this team that's that's hitting well is doing

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 3>so one way that I think is sustainable. Like Sure

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Vargas and Coolson Montgomery might end up playing worse than

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 3>they are right now, but their current profiles don't have

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 3>any big red flags from them. The only player on

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 3>the White Slacks where I look at his underlying metrics

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 3>and he's probably going to fall off unfortunately, as Tristan Peters,

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 3>and I do still think he's a good player. Even

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 3>if he falls off, like he's a great defender, he

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 3>still has value. I don't think he's like a three

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred hitter with the one twenty WRC quels. I hope

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 3>he personally wrong, but there's just so much to like

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 3>about the offense that everyone wants to focus so much

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 3>on the lack of pitching depth, which I hear you on,

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>but it's also like I could see this team in

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 3>July August when the weather's hot at home games, like

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 3>you know, comfortably hitting two home runs a game and

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 3>just outscoring in these high scoring games.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm optimistic personally.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 2>I do like you're point to about just the sustainability

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 2>of how they're playing.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 5>It comes back to, you, know, how.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Backed in your results are, like retainable. I guess habits

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a better way to say that. But like, hey,

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>if you're got a three hundred batting average and you're

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 2>running a four hundred babbit, okay, now we got to

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 2>talk about that. But hey, if you're being really disciplined

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 2>in the zone, making good swing decisions, taking your walks,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and hitting the ball out of the ballpark, Okay, now

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 2>that starts to look a bit better. And that's where

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 2>I feel good about it. I continue, maybe just how

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 2>my mind works to focus on the pitching staff, Like

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 2>at a certain point you have to make sure you're

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>either consistently churning that or adding a little bit to it.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think this current iteration is going to

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 2>keep the wheels turning forever. Like you're gonna have to

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 2>continue to be active, continue to be smart. Doesn't mean

0:22:55.119 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 2>you need to add somebody every single time, but it

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 2>means you have to continue to churn through things. One

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 2>way they're doing that on the offense though, is ever

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>since Pereira is back, he's in the lineup tonight, assuming

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 2>they get the game in. For those of you who

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>are wondering about the weather, I don't know. It's sunny

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 2>here and I'm in the suburbs, but it gets nasty fast.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 2>They bring back Everson Pereira, trade Derek Hill to the

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Phillies for a couple of prospects.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 5>I don't know how you guys feel about that.

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not a flashy move, right, but number one, it

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of helps ease against Hey, is there any Tristan

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Peter's regression that comes? And number two gives you a

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>true power bat off the bench or for tonight in

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the lineup. But gentlemen, how do we feel about the

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Derek Hill trade that brought back a couple of prospects.

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 4>I am gonna tip my cap to Derek Hill and

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 4>say thank you for your service. You know, he was

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.479
<v Speaker 4>fun to have around. There were some cool pinch hit

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 4>like moments the Derek Hill game where he hit the

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 4>go ahead home run and made the diving catch in

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 4>the ninth That was awesome. And I think that you

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 4>know now we got him from waivers last year. He

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 4>was probably gonna get deffaide if no one wanted him,

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 4>and now we get two prospects out of it. So

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Derek Hill, thanks for your service.

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>It was great, haven't you. Yeah?

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I think Brett put it well. That was one of

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 3>the moves because we got him and it was pretty

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 3>late in the season. It was like August or September

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 3>last year. And when I saw the mortification of every

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 3>thinking like just why, like why are you wasting a

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 3>forty man spot on this guy? And then why are

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 3>you keeping him on the forty man the full winch,

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I was actually annoyed, and then he won me over

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 3>this season. He wasn't that flashy like you guys said,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>but he played his role well. He played good defense,

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 3>he's fast, he could get hits off of lefties like

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 3>he fulfilled his purpose. And it's unfortunate because we could

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 3>have used players like Derek Hill a lot over the

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 3>last decade and now we have this weird problem where well,

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Gritchik is hitting too well to get rid of him,

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 3>so obviously you'll keep him. And we had to send

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 3>down Nishida. I know know Sheiet's numbers weren't great, but

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I still would have liked him to get a bit

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 3>more of a shot. We just can't afford it. The

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 3>team is too good. So yeah, I don't have the

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 3>highest of hopes for the prospects we got, but it's

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 3>better to get something than nothing, like you said, And

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Perera obviously was quite impressive early on in the season.

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 3>So I'm excited to have him back out in center

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 3>field tonight, like you said, assuming the game happens, because

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 3>he's one of those guys too, where we were talking

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.679
<v Speaker 3>before he got hurt. I mean we tumultively. We were

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>all talking about whether this was like going to be

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>like a masterpiece gets move like that Everson Pereira just

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 3>show up and become like a long term outfield solution.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 3>And I mean, maybe it's way too early to say,

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>but I want to. I want to see him play

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 3>all summer and make that discrimination. So he definitely adds

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 3>needed power against left handed pitching, because we saw that

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 3>lineup against Chris Sale last night. They scratched across a

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>couple of runs. But Matt, that was not a very

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:40.879
<v Speaker 3>good looking lineup on paper.

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I know, you get to some of these games where

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 2>it's like, cool, we got all these left handed prospects

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>and cool, awesome, can't wait, and they're like, oh shit,

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 2>there are major league left handed starting pitchers that will

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 2>absolutely carve you because they're pretty good.

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the Pereira the Hill move is interesting from

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 2>the prayer standpoint. I think it was nice to be

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 2>able to get anything for a guy you were going

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 2>to be fa like that. That was the alternative. You

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 2>found a desperate Phillies team who needed a Adolas Garcia replacement.

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes things just go your way if you're in baseball,

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 2>if you're a GM whatever. That's one of those things

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 2>that just went Chris gets his way, probably saved to

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Cunya a little bit, though. I know he has been

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 2>hitting a little bit better recently and just naturally opened

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>up a spot. But to your point, Nick, like there

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 2>wasn't going to be an easy there's I think they're

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 2>out of easy moves right like at this point because

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 2>bringing Moone back well, I guess one last easy move

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 2>is probably moving Drew Romo back down for Kyle Teal.

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 2>That's probably your last easy move what they do when

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Mooney comes back. If Gonzalez continues to hit well, I

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know. Acunya isn't exactly a foregone conclusion if he

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>continues to do smart things on the base paths, right Like,

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 2>so it's becomes a little bit more challenging with each

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 2>move moving forward for this team, which is a great

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 2>problem to have. And tip your cap to Derek Hill, though,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 2>and tip your cap to Chris Getz for capitalizing on

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the situation because at the end of the day, Nick,

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 2>like you, they made that move. I remember doing like

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 2>our preseason prediction like I don't need to see Derek

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 2>Hill on this roster, and I'm like, all right, you

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 2>know what, Derek Hill did a pretty good job for

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 2>the role he he was asked to play. So I

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 2>have one more question for you guys before we get

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 2>into fan questions. So those of you who are listening,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 2>if you have not submitted a question you would like

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 2>us to get to, please do so. Now between the

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 2>end of the Brave series the start of the Dodgers series,

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 2>these next let's just say, these next four games, right, like,

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 2>what is the measure of success to you guys? Maybe

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that goes along with your feelings of how this team

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 2>should be performing going like, think about postseason expectations right, Like,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 2>or is it still good enough for you to say, Hey,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>as long as you're competitive in these games, that's still

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 2>good enough for me. Like where does that fall in

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 2>terms of, you know, you've taken two of three from

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the best teams in baseball at the very least,

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and now you have another one of the best teams

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 2>in baseball coming in right after that. What is success

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 2>over this next four game period to you?

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean for me, it's kind of what you

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 3>were saying about just be competitive. Because I know it

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 3>sounds ironic. I'm the guys saying I think to make

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.159
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. But at the same time, I think the

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 3>team that makes the playoffs has Murakami and Teal in

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 3>the lineup, and also Colson missed the last couple of games,

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think that Eric Cofetti or Anthony k

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 3>will be part of the rotation by then. So just

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 3>be competitive, don't get swept. That's my goal for both

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 3>the Dodgers and the Yankees series. That being said, it

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 3>was also my goal for the Brave series, and we

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 3>might even be the ones doing the sweeping. Hopefully we'll see.

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 3>So this team continues to you know, blow past my expectations,

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, I just look competitive. I mean, I'm sure

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 3>there'll be one of these games against the Dodger Yankees

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 3>that the Socks lose like ten to nothing and everyone's

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 3>going to start losing their minds. But as long as

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 3>that's not a theme, as long as it's a one off,

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it'll be okay.

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>One blowout.

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 4>I can live with anything more than one blowout. I

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 4>think I'd be pretty upset. Yeah, but yeah, like really

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 4>just like you know, with these four games, if we're

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 4>two and two, I think I'm pretty pleased at the

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 4>end of the day because you know, we still have

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 4>another Yank we still have another big series coming up too,

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 4>and then by the time we're done with the Yankees,

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 4>then it's pretty much we're getting to Cleveland.

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, this kind of this little gauntlet, it

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>really continues.

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Like I kind of view it as just a tough

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 4>month of baseball, including Cleveland, you know, but I think

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 4>that they're continuing to play good baseball, and that's kind

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 4>of my minimum mask here, just keep playing good baseball.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm in the same boat again, But that

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 2>comes from someone who is just like still at the

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 2>place of I don't know what to think about this

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 2>team yet. I'm having a crap ton of fun though,

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 2>and that's where I'll continue me as long as we

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 2>keep having fun, I guess it doesn't.

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Matter to me that much.

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Just yet again sweep the Braves win two of three

0:29:57.680 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 2>from the Dodgers. Now we now we start having different

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 2>conversations at a certain point, but cool, I do want

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 2>to save some time for some fan question. Thanks to

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 2>all of you who have already submitted some. I see

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>some continue to come through the YouTube chat. Still continue

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>to send them along. We'll get to as many as

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 2>we can. I will start with one I've seen both

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube and on Twitter previously. This one comes from

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:24.959
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter Sir Stony Island, at Antonio Belile and at

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 2>alex W three six eight on YouTube. Starting pitching at

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the trade deadline, it continues to be a topic of conversation.

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 2>We've kind of had a little bit of it. It's

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 2>been on social media. Consistently. Give me some names, just

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 2>as realistic as you think it might be. Doesn't have

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 2>to be the perfect trade. But who are you thinking

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 2>in terms of how realistic would you go here?

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, one name that I like is Sonny Gray. I

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 3>think the Red Sox are more likely not to sell

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 3>at this point. That's actually the problem with this exercise, honestly,

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 3>is so many teams are around five hundred right now

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 3>that is difficult to say who's gonna sell, who's gonna buy,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 3>so obviously that limits the options. But I like Gray

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 3>because he still eats innings. He's still an above average

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 3>pitcher or two. He wouldn't blow your socks off as

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 3>like an ace of the staff running that, but he'd

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 3>be a solid third guy. You can trust him to

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 3>start a playoff again if you have to. And most importantly,

0:31:17.960 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 3>the acquisition costs I don't think would be as high

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 3>as like a read det Mers that I've seen floating around,

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 3>just because he doesn't have as long as team control

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and I don't think but I think det Mers, you

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 3>could reasonably at this point ask for like a real

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 3>top thirty to fifty profits in baseball for him to headline,

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 3>given how how good he's been this year. I don't

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 3>think you can make that same kind of ask with

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 3>the you know, thirty five ish year old rental in Gray.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've seen some really interesting answers to this one.

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Just on Twitter seeing a lot of I've seen like

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, like Ken Rosenthal talk about you know, just

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 4>acquiring kind of like a just an inning, like another

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 4>innings eater.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen like some names like even like Seth

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Lugo get thrown around like some of the Royal starters.

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know a team that I'm really interested to

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 4>see kind of maybe where their season is going to

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 4>go in this regard.

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>What about the San Francisco Giants.

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 4>They've got some interesting pictures that I'm like, hmmm, if

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 4>their season continues to be awful, I could be I

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 4>could be interested in a couple of these guys.

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 2>I think of all the names I've heard so far,

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Sunny Gray is probably my favorite.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Nick.

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 5>I think that fits the.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Bill of a guy who just will go out there

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 2>eat innings, but does so in relatively good fashion, like

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 2>there there are there are still ace outings out of him,

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 2>even as he's a little bit older at this point

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 2>of his year. I actually really like Sunny Gray here.

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Carmen low Dinski or something like that with Pittsburgh is

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 2>another one, just because he's been frustrated there that he

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been starting and very vocal about it. To be clear,

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe a little too vocal about it. You worry about

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 2>some the clubhouse concerns, but at the same time I

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 2>get the frustration that would be another name I'd go with.

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Sunny Gray is definitely my favorite one so far, and

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I do think it makes plenty of sense. Next question

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 2>we'll go to is from at Chi Sacks Ryan on Twitter.

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 2>With all the questions or with all the issues we

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 2>have had with the bullpen, why are they so reluctant

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 2>to bring up ben people's The only reason I can

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.719
<v Speaker 2>think of would be that they are saving the arm

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 2>for trade bait. So I think we've had this conversation

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 2>a lot on this show, and I think we've all

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of fallen in the camp of just bring them up,

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.719
<v Speaker 2>see what happens, right, But we've also said, like, hey,

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 2>we said that before about the Peyton Pillettes of the

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>world and stuff like that. So maybe the Socks knows something.

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 2>What I will dig into and I will say is

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 2>this looked at him a little bit, seems like a

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 2>very fastball, slider heavy combination fastball is just okay, right,

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna get a little nerd specific here, so for

0:33:58.640 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 2>those who.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Hate this, I apologize.

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Fastball has some okay rise to It's sixteen inches of

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 2>horizontal movement or excuse me, vertical movement, and it's very

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 2>little vertical so it's a very straight fastball and a

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:14.959
<v Speaker 2>gyro slider, so it's a lot of just north south

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 2>like kind of right on top of it.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 5>He struggles mightily to lefties.

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>As well, though.

0:34:22.080 --> 0:34:24.359
<v Speaker 2>He has a sixteen percent walk rate in total, which

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:25.839
<v Speaker 2>is way too high in the first place, but it's

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 2>eighteen percent to lefties and it's thirty percent strike I

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:33.800
<v Speaker 2>rate looks awesome. It's forty four percent against righty's twelve

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 2>percent against lefties. He has walked more lefty batters than

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 2>he struck out. Maybe that profile of rising fastball that

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't rise that much, and then gyro slider isn't what

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 2>he needs right now. Maybe they need to continue to

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 2>make adjustments.

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 5>I go from there.

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>But if the question is why might they be reluctant,

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 2>that's a reason I could get. I don't know if

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 2>it's the reason I think the pitch shapes maybe aren't

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 2>great yet, I'd be curious to see what Peyton Pollett's

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 2>pitch shapes kind of look like too in kind of

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 2>diving into it. But again I cautioned about getting as

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 2>much as I'm like, churn, churn, churn, churn. I'm like,

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 2>at a certain point, if we keep calling for a

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 2>name and they don't bring him up, like there's got

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 2>to be a reason at a certain point is kind

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 2>of how I view it. I don't know if you

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 2>guys feel differently, but that's my two cents on Bend Peoples.

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 4>Especially if he's sorry, go ahead, Brett, No, I was

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 4>gonna say, I don't really got much more on that one.

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we're just seeing kind of certain things, like

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 4>you know, really work in a sense, and I feel

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 4>like the way that we end up seeing Pollette or

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 4>People's is probably an injury at this point.

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that's probably fair. And if he's struggling against

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the lefties, that's obviously not a good sign. I didn't

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 3>realize that the extent of the you know, the more

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 3>more walks and strikeouts aince lefty, that's obviously a red flag.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 3>So the guy I was really I did to see

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 3>from Charlotte as a reliever was Wicklham and Gonzalez. I

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 3>know he got injured, but before he got injured. He

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 3>was looking pretty good. I thought he looked good in

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 3>the majors last year's who I was surprised he didn't

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 3>really get another chance in April with the big, big

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 3>legue club. But I hope he's help these to him

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 3>because that's a guy that I think will have more

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 3>of an immediate impact. I mean people might obviously, I

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 3>just don't know, like you said, Jordan, if it'll transfer

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 3>as well as someone like Gonzales, who I think has

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more upside.

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 2>And again, here's the last thing I'll say on this too,

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 2>is like, Okay, why does the struggles against lefties matter? Well,

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 2>because with the three batter minimum, you can't really hide

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 2>that at a certain point, so you have to be

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:41.359
<v Speaker 2>able to be competitive lefties and righties. So all right,

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to take this question as quickly as possible.

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 2>The only reason I'm taking this question is because it's

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 2>semi draft related for those who may be listening for

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 2>the first time. I am a high school coach in

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the Chicogland area. We faced Land and Tony and Nazareth

0:36:55.560 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Academy in the playoffs this year. Tomey obviously getting a

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 2>lot of hype as a potential name for the White

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Sox in the second round of this year's draft. This

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 2>question came from Josh Nelson over Its Socks Machine. He

0:37:08.840 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 2>was there, he saw Land and Tony crushed a homer

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 2>against us, and you want to know what pitch was on.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 2>It was on a fastball. I will say, a very

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 2>impressive baseball player. Like there is some great talent in

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 2>the Schogland area. We've been fortunate to play quite a

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 2>few really really top to your talents. We played Tyler

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Bell back in the day for those who really followed

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 2>the draft before. He ended up at Kentucky and now

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 2>he's a clear first round pick. So very very talented

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 2>baseball player in Land and Tony. I thought we had

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 2>a great strategy going in. He was one for three

0:37:41.960 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 2>that day with a K. But you know, when you

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 2>have that much talent and you're getting that much talk

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 2>and helium in your draft status, you can't miss your

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 2>spots with fastballs.

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:53.879
<v Speaker 5>And we learned that the hard way.

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 2>So Josh, for your reporting purposes, there is the answer

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 2>to the Land and Tony question. A couple more I

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.800
<v Speaker 2>saw on YouTube as we're closing out here. One is

0:38:04.840 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 2>about Cleveland from Jake Richard Myers, I'm curious about your

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 2>take on Cleveland. You mentioned it's what you're looking at

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 2>to decide when to get excited. What do you see

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 2>is the biggest challenge from them. I know that question

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 2>is probably directed at me, and I have some thoughts,

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 2>but I'm curious if either of you have any thoughts

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 2>on Cleveland just in general.

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, some of their their pitching is you know, I

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like they do this almost every year in a

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>very annoying way.

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 4>But they have some scary pitchers right now, some of

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 4>their young guys that have kind of come around, like

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 4>the Parker Mestics of the world and the Kate Smiths

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 4>of the world. It is it's very interesting to see

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 4>what they've got going on.

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. They do this crap every year.

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 4>They somehow get a team that they don't decide to

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 4>spend in free agency. They find themselves at the top

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 4>of the division every year. But ultimately, like they their

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 4>style of baseball is generally pretty good.

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I know how to do it. They have a system

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that they've been going. They find ways to win ball

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>games every year. Yeah.

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, to me, it's just how do you pitch against

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Jose Ramirez. It's not really a good way to do that,

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 3>but he's the guy that kills you pretty much every year,

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 3>and I would like to see. I'm not even a

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 3>different approach because, like I said, it's not a good

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 3>answer to the question, but I just want to see

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:23.839
<v Speaker 3>what they do. The only other thing I'll say about

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland is I have enjoyed seeing the respect slash fear

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 3>out of their fan base over the last couple of

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:32.600
<v Speaker 3>weeks of like this White Sox Sea reminds me of

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 3>like a more fun version of us. One of the

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 3>comments I saw, or like a version of like more

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 3>aura than us, Like he's always just trying their absolute

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 3>hardest and it loves playing for each other.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And I can't help but agree.

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:44.920
<v Speaker 3>So I'm looking forward to those series.

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 2>One thing I will say, kind of on top of this,

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I've I've never had any data to back this up.

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I've always felt like the White Sox druggle within in

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 2>division scouting, and I've never feel like they have entered

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 2>games and series the best plan possible for Hey, which

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 2>guys do you can't let or which guys can't beat you?

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 2>And how do you approach those guys? How do you

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.240
<v Speaker 2>pitch those guys. Nick, to your point on Jose Ramirez,

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 2>this year has been way better. Maybe the talent of

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:16.800
<v Speaker 2>the other teams has been worse that that might be

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 2>part of it. But at the same time, I feel

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 2>like these past couple of years under Venerable have been

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. Cleveland is that hurtle though. Cleveland is that

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 2>team that you know when you talk about churning rosters

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 2>and finding value out of nowhere and just extracting every

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 2>ounce of talent out of a player and then churning

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:36.680
<v Speaker 2>and finding someone else. Cleveland does that as well as anyone. Cleveland, Milwaukee,

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Tampa Bay, those are the types of teams that do

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 2>it better than anyone. So you're always going to have

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 2>for me, You're always gonna have that fear going to Cleveland.

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I know people hate the Twins and like, oh those guys,

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Like the biggest rivals are the Twins. I will forever

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 2>say it's Cleveland because they know how to find value

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 2>on the margins better than anyone else in the division.

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's why that will continue to be the biggest

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 2>one for me, just because yeah, even these great teams

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 2>like Atlanta are going to have off days.

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:04.279
<v Speaker 5>Cleveland.

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 2>You're going to have a hard time every single game

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.879
<v Speaker 2>you're walking into that building and just always been that way,

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's a credit to that organization more than anything else.

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking through here. I think there was one.

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Other question about a trade target. I think it was

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Yordan Alvarez. I will say I don't think that one

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 2>is particularly reasonable. I think the White Sox are going

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 2>to play very close to the vest and really not

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 2>change anything. I think the last or change anything big,

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I will say, I think the last question I'll ask

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 2>here is we're wrapping it up. Also from Alex w

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 2>three six eight. I think this is a good question.

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Do you honestly think Will Venable can take this team

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 2>to a World series based on what you've seen so far?

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 2>That's a tough question. Yeah, And I like that there

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.240
<v Speaker 2>was the pause there. That is a tough question.

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I don't know.

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 3>I need to see more. I mean the way that

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 3>they like, they play so hard and they seemed to

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 3>such a good time playing, and that's I think a

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 3>big ingredient. But I can't get past some of the

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 3>in game stuff. Like Brett talked about it, I was

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 3>also like raging in the crowd on Tuesday with all

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the bunts that weren't working, Like, why do you keep

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.479
<v Speaker 3>doing this? So I don't know, it's too early.

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Here's what I'll say, And this is definitely a bold statement,

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 4>I think for sure, but I think this offense can

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 4>find a way to get deep in the postseason, a

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 4>fully healthy offense. I think they can find a lot

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 4>of ways. Now we'll keep managerial decisions potentially out of that,

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 4>but hey, it's going to play a factor. Like I

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 4>was just looking up the stat because I had to

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 4>figure out how often you know, Will Venable was doing

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 4>sacrifice bunts and fun fact, he actually leads the league

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 4>in it. Shocker, no slim surprise. He has a I

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 4>don't know what the stat was exactly called, but it

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 4>was under It was all under the managers. I'm gonna

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.800
<v Speaker 4>call it like bunt plus essentially, and it was like

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 4>he had a bunt plus of two oh nine, so

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:11.879
<v Speaker 4>standardized as all.

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:14.240
<v Speaker 5>Other you know, plus stats are arch metrics.

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Not surprising, but I think this offense can potentially make

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 4>a really deep run. Obviously, did you not hear me

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 4>talk about the pitching.

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 2>I did not.

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 1>That would be a concern.

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.399
<v Speaker 5>I just I I'm in the same boat as Nick.

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 2>I think there are certain things and you mentioned like

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the sack bunting piece of it, that that's not how

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:41.640
<v Speaker 2>successful playoff teams have won baseball games, so and the

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 2>stats back that up a ton, so that that's a

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 2>concern for me. That being said, like I know there's

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 2>some hesitation maybe from some to like really be super

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 2>critical of him, but at the same time, like he

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 2>has done a great job, like the fact that this

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 2>team is competing the way that it is and you

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 2>see a day in and day out the guys they

0:44:03.960 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 2>bring up and it partially gets but it's also very

0:44:06.200 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 2>much on ventable in the culture he has set some

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 2>of the guys he's pushed forward to make the roster

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 2>that we've all sat here and been like, what the

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 2>hell are they doing? I think from a culture standpoint,

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 2>and how he can rally a team to come through

0:44:19.719 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and be a leader of men. Yes, Will Venable can

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:24.359
<v Speaker 2>take the White Sox for a World Series and then

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 2>some how he manages in game on the daily still

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 2>to be seen, but you're not gonna know that, Like

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:34.839
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to know that until you're in these

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.400
<v Speaker 2>sorts of games, right, Like you don't come in as

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:39.399
<v Speaker 2>a manager just be perfect right away.

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 5>So that's why it's hard for me to balance.

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 2>There's definitely some seasoning that needs to be done, But

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:47.799
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, I feel really good about him

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 2>as a manager. I feel like this is the type

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of guy that the White Sox needed to really shift

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 2>what had been a sinking ship in terms of leaders

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 2>of men that had been there or over the past

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 2>several managers, campaign seasons, whatever. He has absolutely righted that ship,

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and he seems smart enough, objective enough, and self aware

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 2>enough to be able to be like, hey, on Tuesday,

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I messed up in that situation. Probably shouldn't have done that,

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 2>saw the first baseman crashing. Definitely shouldn't have kept the

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 2>bunt on.

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>That's on me.

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 5>A lesser man just defends himself in that situation.

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:23.919
<v Speaker 2>Those are the types of things that make me feel

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 2>good about He can probably learn from it and grow

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 2>in the role.

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 5>So we'll see that.

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 2>That's where I land out, and I think we're kind

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 2>of all in the same place. But culture wise, absolutely,

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if the White Sox are still playing tonight.

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I haven't been checking, but we're gonna wrap here for

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 2>our hopeful pregame show. Thank you everyone who was joining,

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for everyone who submitted questions. It was absolutely awesome.

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>We will hopefully continue to do things like this. So

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 2>that's all we have for this episode of the Socks

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 2>on thirty fifth podcast. Be sure to suscri the podcast

0:46:00.719 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 2>on Apple, Spotify, especially YouTube. We're really trying to grow

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 2>that community. Wherever you get your podcast. We are there though,

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.319
<v Speaker 2>at Socks on thirty fifth, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, make sure

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 2>to follow us there. Socks on thirty fifth dot com

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 2>is the website. We've got a lot of great stuff.

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:18.960
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna a lot of great stuff coming out of

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 2>this week weekend no judge, wink wink, so make sure

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:25.799
<v Speaker 2>to follow along with us this weekend. So for Nick

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Gower and Brett Haffner, Brett, thank you for filling in.

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Jordanzewski sending off. Take care everyone. We will

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 2>talk sometime soon, whether it's this weekend or early next week,

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 2>We're going to be back soon to talk more fun

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 2>White Sox baseball though, that is for sure.

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Go White Sox, Go Socks get a win,