WEBVTT - Surveillance: China Is Overconfident, Carr Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ye. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Leie. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. So

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>let's begin with our top story. China state media signals

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a lack of interest in resuming talks with the United States.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Without new moves that show the US is sincere, it

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is meaningless for its officials to come to China and

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>have trade talks. This according to a commentary carried by

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>state runs Shinhwa News Agency and The People's Daily otherwise

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>known as the Communist Party mouthpiece. In the FX market,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it means dollar strength and it means to Chinese currency

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>heading towards the seven mark. Really pleased to say. To

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>weigh in on the efex market, Shahab Jala knows joining

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>us now credit sweets head of FX and macro Trading Strategy.

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Good morning to Shahab. It's the question we always ask,

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>is China tolerating you and weakness or is it engineering it.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's at the moment accepting your weakness rather

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>than necessarily engineering it. UM, you're seeing a widening gap

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>between the offshore remembi um and the on shore level,

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the fixing on shore, which generally points to the market

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to push the currency weaker as opposed to the authorities. UM.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're getting too important levels now. The offshore remmby

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>at six against the dollar is a level the market

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>expects to be protected. UM. If that's not the case

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and we rapidly go to seven, there could be a

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>backlash to that in emerging markets generally. Actually, I would say, so,

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the Chinese currency and the tolerance of officials.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the line of the sand for officials

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is six on the offshore rates up. That's what the

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>markets has felt. The market has felt that that level

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is important because what they wouldn't want to see is

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>actual tests of seven, because that's too risky in a sense, UM,

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because once you go through that level, there's always the

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a major spike. So this six level has

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>been for the market key level and has been an

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>expectation that, given that talks are still continuing, UM, the

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese would not want to see a big push for

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the dollar above the seven level and go against their currency. Uh,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>simply in order to not antagonize the US. So if

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we now see that happen, perhaps the market will interpret

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that as a green light for authorities. UM. So this

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is this is a potentially big problem because this wasn't

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the case, for example, back in Q four when problem

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>when when we had a similar test of these levels

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>thrilled you with us this morning, I can't say, now, folks,

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>how wrong I was. I thought, you know, Friday, I

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I had the surveillance nap and looking snews of a Friday.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.839
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you, folks, to start with John

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>News on a Friday works right now, we can talk

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to him for an hour. Muhammad Hillarian rights for Bloomer Opinion,

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Ambrose Evans Pritchard rights for the Telegraph, and the summary

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of these two brilliant essays. And I remember John Llarion

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>talking to uh Ambrose at the thing in Lake Como. Um,

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>what they're talking about is a dollar shortage, and that

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>China is constrained because they and everybody else out there

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>has a dollar shortage. Explained to our global Wall Street audience,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>what guys like you think or say or mean when

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you talk about a global dollar shortage, well, to be honest,

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>it can mean many different things. But I think at

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the most critical level for the market, what it means

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is that there is a need to refinance dollar loans,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, by the quote its sector in countries like China,

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and a sense that they may find that difficult to

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>do under certain circumstances. And when that's the case, that

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>tends to put upward pressure on the dollar itself as well. Um.

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's one form of dollar shortage. But frankly, when

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you look at the country like China, the market also

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is concerned, tends to be worried about the possibility of

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>capital flights. Um. You could argue that given the lack

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of global financial diversification in China, there is a permanent

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar shortage there um. And clearly when the currency starts

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>to fall, the odds rise that investors and others locally

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>tried to find new ways to exactly and put further

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the currency. So so I think, you know,

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>this idea of a dollar shortage is definitely in the

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>market's consciousness and it takes many different forms. But talk

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>about the fame of capital flight dominated the story back

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>in extain how close are we to that? Do you

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>still consider a situation that we are nowhere near six?

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I think what's happened since then is that the Chinese

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>authorities have ramped up the number of measures they they

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>can use to try to keep the pressure on locally

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to stop money leaving China. But that's a different story though.

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Um if uh you get to a point where there's

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>such a dramatic loss of confidence in China where locals

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>fun new ways and take bigger and I think that's

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>something that could come through that. What's so important here

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>away from the drama of our two or three standard

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>deviation move is the grind of we can't sell our

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>US security is fine, We've got to, you know, get

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>their yielding and there's no place else to go besides

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>US securities. We all know that, but shop what's the

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>outcome for their adjacent nations e m. The Pacific rim

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>If we yet a grind in rand Mimbi weaker, well,

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's still puts pressure on the currencies regionally,

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if that's what you receive, because what that would probably

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>mean is that the Chinese government believes that it needs

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a week to remember longer term because of the higher

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>odds of weaker economic growth, and that is trying its

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>best to control that um. But once the market perceives

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 1>that that's the way the Chinese government is looking at things,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it will quickly look at the other Asian emerging markets

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and Asia Pacific currencies and see them as a fair game.

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think either way, whether it's a slow grind

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>lower or more dramatic collapse in the currency, there's going

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.799
<v Speaker 1>to be a little pressure on on the age of Pacific.

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, good morning, Michael Purvis, John Ferrell a d X.

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Why the Asian basket occurrencies extrapan is down almost three

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 1>since mark. It's been really tough. And what was interesting

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>about the session yesterday's we had a running in usquities.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>We did not get any pick up in emerging market

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>equities whatsoever. Just didn't participate. This morning, China looks weak

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>shahab from a market perspective. The equity market down two

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent, the Chinese currency is weaker. Is

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>we digest the commentary coming out of China? The government

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>keeps saying the following it will work to counteract the

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>effects of more US tariffs and keep the economy in

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable range. This is according to the National Development

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and Reform Commission studying the impact of US tariffs, and

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>will roll out responsive measures when necessary. Shahab The hope

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is always that we get stimulus. Kitchukes of sock Gen,

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>writing this morning, evidence of a global economic slowdown continues

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to build. Bond markets have been beneficiaries. Equities are torn

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>between the negative impact of slower growth and the feel

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>good of accommodative central banks. What kind of accommodation do

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we get from Chinese authorities? I think the expectation from

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>China is more monastoriesing, for example in the form of

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>UM again reducing a reserve requirements on the banking system

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, something we've seen recently, but potentially even raid

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>cuts as well. But there's also great hopes on the

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>fiscal side UM and we've seen, for example, measures to

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>cut the tax burden on consumers. The problem is that

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a sense that China has already used these

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>levers in the past it's a great effect, and that

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a big credit overhanging China already which might make

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>constrained the government so and that this could be exactly

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what the US believes as well. In thinking that it

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>can push China to make big concession. And so the

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>fact is we don't really know UM. No one can

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>really tell the extent to which China's paint thresholds can

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>sustain over the next few months. The U S appears

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>willing to to test that UM. But the problem for

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the global economy and stock markets is that if both

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>sides dig in UM, then the problems can get much worse.

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now, there is a sense of a kind of

0:08:57.920 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a G twenty put you could argue in the sense

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a meeting Trump, you know, in June,

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>which which some hope will lead to a resolution a

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>few months UM. If that was to fail to come through,

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I think then that's when things get much worse. Shocks.

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much. Terrific briefing as well. We got

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>eight minutes in this black which is way too short.

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Cruel and unusual punishment with Miranda car she's with high

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>tongue international. This truly could be a one hour briefing

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Let's try to get it going. Miranda. I'm

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you an open question before John goes to

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the dynamics over a mimby, and that You've got to

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>get to the weekend, get to the Sunday talk shows

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and see where the trade talks are Monday morning. What

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>will you focus on, Well, it depends what the US

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>note does in um, whether it tries to ratch it

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>up the tensions in terms of right right, let me interrupt,

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this is really important. The Secretary Commerce disagrees with you,

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilbert Ross said yesterday, I'm Bloomberg. He feels that Chinese

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>have to respond. You're going against the secretary and saying

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's what the US does well. From China's point of view,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they regard the Huawei um accusations and as the action

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 1>taken against Huawei this week as further ratcheting up of

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>tensions after the after the the tariffs increased, and there

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting comment from Wang Yang, who's um Um

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Politburo member um SO. He was giving a briefing and

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that the maximum hit that the China sees from

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the trade tariffs is only one percent. So if you're

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about one percent hit on six to six point

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>five percent target UM, this means that basically they're gearing

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>up to, you know, to take quite a quite a

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>tough stance because they're saying it's not going to affect

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>us that badly. We we can copeus this UM so

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 1>expecting China to then um take measures to offset the

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>tensions when it's seeing that actually we can cope. Is

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that maybe the US is expecting too much, Miranda.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about what the Chinese can do to offset

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the tensions. Domestically. A lot of people have

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>taken to trying to translate Chinese media and the message

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in Chinese media it's a little bit more explicit today

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>whereby a piece of commentary was carried by state run

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>media including Shinwa News agency and the People's Daily too,

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and essentially it said without new moves that show the

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>US is sincere, it is meaningless for officials to come

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to China. Miranda, translate that for us. How important is

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that statement, that piece of cometary carried by state run media, Well,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is interesting that they do feel that

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they can take a take a much tough restance UM.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, because the economy and q world wasn't quite

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>as bad as expected, um and because the tariffs don't

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>seem to be how thing quite the catastrophic economic impact

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>that everyone thought this time this time last year, then

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>then it's saying no, we can stand up. And it's

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>particularly because if you think some of the measures that

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>were put forward, China sees as undermining the very essence

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>of its UM state run system UM and and also

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of been the entire Chinese system, which is it's

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 1>now sort of promoting both in China and throughout the world.

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>And so if it sees a threat to that UM

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but without too bad the economic consequence. I mean, they

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>may be a little bit too confident about how um

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>how little an impact it's going to have, and obviously

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the negotiating stands UM but but but

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, they feel they feel, whether rightly or wrongly,

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they can take they can afford take a tougher stand.

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>There was a piece carried by the Nikaation Review in

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours that I thought was absolutely

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to read, and I encourage all of our listeners

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to try and find it. You can get it under

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the headline how J J Ping's colleagues rejected an unequal

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>trade deal? How much power does the president currently have

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 1>in China right now? We typically usually and I think

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>it's a mistake to frame this as a president of

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the United States that faces re election in twenty and

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a president in China that faces no election whatsoever and

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>no political pressure. But at home it seems that he

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>is under increasingly, relatively speaking, more pressure. Miranda, how do

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you frame that for customers clients at the moment? Well, yes,

0:13:27.040 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>because there's not um universal agreement that that everyone should

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be taking a soft stance um and and the U

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>S trade war is the right way to go. But

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the the I mean there is there is much more

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of a idea that China should be standing up to UM,

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>standing up to the US, but the idea of of

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>of threatening the relationship and also the sort of long

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>term cooperation that that generates a lot more obviously the

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.839
<v Speaker 1>debate um and so you're going to have to match off,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and particularly when the risk is that some of the

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>economic um performance has actually is going to come to

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>an end because some of the trade was actually front loaded.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>So you've already seen some benefits. Now we're getting to

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a stage where sort of you know, the the economy

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is slowing, the trade impact is actually coming home to

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>roost at the very time that the trade tensions are

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>just like ratcheting up another stage. And this is a

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>time where actually you could see you know, sort of

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the economic consequences being much more negative um and then

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>see much more disagreement coming through. Well, let's get real,

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and anybody that spending China knows real means park prices.

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I showed. I showed pork inflation in China a couple

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of days ago. Miranda Karm looking at US hog prices,

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lean hogs. They've been negative one standard deviation price for

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a good three years, and all of a sudden, even

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>US park prices are up on trend about one standard deviation.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>What synthesized for us the tension of the base food

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of China? For the Communist Party in Beijing, what does

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it mean if they see elevated pork prices and pork

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>inflation in China, Well, that that is I mean, food

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation is a is a key issue. But I mean

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the pork price inflation was caused by

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the by the by the swine, thee yes, and and

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and and so it's uh, it's a consequence of that.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not part of the part of the trade war.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Although offerusly if you can't then import us pork, then

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the private the domestic prices rise. Um. But but it's

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>more I think the question is not so much on

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the on the food prices so much. That's not so

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>much of a tipping point, but the um if you

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>get there was also expectations. If you did see the

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>trade war, economic growth was cut by one percent, and

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>then you see unemployment rise to maybe sort of from

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>five five to six percent, and it's it's the employment issue,

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>which is arguably a bigger, a bigger cause of consult

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but that tends that tends to shift policy. Um. And

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we've we you know, it's always even though everyone focuses

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>on the GDP target, focus is always really on it. Okay,

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I got to get this question. We're indo, this is

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what your best at That labor policy? Is it different

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>than ten years ago or thirty years ago the cultural revolution?

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Is the Beijing labor policy? Is it a new policy?

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>The employment has always been I mean that that's I mean,

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>no one's providing a pcent employment anymore. And it's not

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the sort of the if you like the iron rice

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>bull that that you would expect. But but but but

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows that you still have to keep them and

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you have fewer graduates coming in now, you know the

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>demographics are slowing down. Um, but you do still need

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to keep a good, healthy employment right um. And and

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's always um. You know there isn't the state support,

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but people need that employment to keep up. And it's

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>still it's still very valuable. Miranda Carr, thank you so much.

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>With High Tongue International in London, briefing there in China.

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the interview of the day. If you have

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>any kind of a pulse for American politics, why do

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I say that, because this is not going to be

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a homogenied, sanitized candidate interview. We're gonna actually talk to

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody who speaks English. Kate Benningfield works for the former

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Vice President Biden of Delaware, but far more importantly has

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>experience with Christopher Dodd, John Edwards, and Jean Shaheen, among

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the others along the way. Kate thrilled to have you

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>with us as you do the operational bit for Joe Biden.

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to take you act of the Democratic campaign

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand four in your youth, where John Edwards

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>got up and changed the American dialogue. Speaking of two

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:16.919
<v Speaker 1>America's what are the Two Americas of your candidate, Joe Biden. Hi, Well,

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. I appreciate it. UM. So you know,

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden is running for president for three reasons. He's

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>been out for the last three weeks making the case

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to voters in all the early states and in Pennsylvania

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about um, uh, the need to reclaim the soul of

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>this nation. Uh. You know, he truly believes that I see,

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we are we are at a place of moral reckoning

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for this country, um, and that this is a moment

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for us to get past this, you know, broken government

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that isn't working for people. UM. And to your point

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about two America's, I mean, he's going to be talking

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>about this in Philly tomorrow. He's got a big his

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>first kind of kickoff rally, um, which is the informal book. John.

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 1>She's promoting, you know, the moment for the vice president.

0:18:58.480 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>She's about to do that. That's why she's on the

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>cut to the chase. Okay, it's it's two thousand twenty,

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's October. You haven't slept since June and Joe bideness

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to talk to to America's secretary. Clinton had a bigger

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>popular vote but didn't resonate with two America's, which to

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>America's is your candidate going to try to resonate with Well, you're,

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>first of all, you're putting the frame from the Edwards

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>campaign on our on our current campaigns. But but look,

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he uh, you know, he is somebody who comes from

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>from middle class roots himself. Uh. You know, working people

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>know that. Working people know that he is somebody who

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 1>understands them, who understands their concerns, who knows what it's

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>like to you know, lay in bed at night and

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>look at the ceiling and wonder how you're gonna be

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.479
<v Speaker 1>able to afford healthcare or what's going to happen if

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>you have a health crisis in your family, how are

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you going to take care of it, How you're gonna

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>afford to send your kid to college. Uh. People know

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's somebody who has lived that experience himself, and

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>so um, you know, Okay, So that's one of the

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Americas I get that is his other America Disaffected Republicans. Look,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>he's he's he believes that we have to come to consensus.

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You know something he said in New Hampshire, Uh yesterday,

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe two days ago, the days I'll run together. Um.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh that's what happens when you don't sleep right. Uh.

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>That you know, without consensus in our government, power accrues

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to the executive and to the president and and and

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he can abuse it. And so you know, he believes

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>that we're never going to be able to get anything

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>done for people if we can't come to some kind

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of consensus. Um. And you know he's had experience. Look,

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>nobody has has had more success, you know, staring Republicans

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>down and exacting concessions from them, uh than Vice President Biden.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You go back to like the fiscal cliff deal in

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the White House. Um. You know, he was able to

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>extract concessions from McConnell. So you know, nobody has uh.

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd put his his his chops up against

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>anybody's on that. Um. But he also understands, and I

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 1>think that the American people understand that right now government

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is not working um, and we need to change. And

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the kind of change he represents is getting back to

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 1>um a place where uh, you know, government is functional

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and things get done on behalf of the American people.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 1>That's always the pitch kite to be fair every time

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>there's an election, not just in the United States but

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else. We need to change. But I returned to

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the status quo. It's not really a change. It's not

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a return to the status quo. I mean the status

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>quo right now is is broken, right. I mean the

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>status quo we have right now is a government where um,

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, people's concerns are not uh taken seriously, where

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the you know, wealth is accruing to the top of

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>our economy, where you know, people aren't feeling the benefits

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of economic policies. Where we have a president who um

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is trying to divide us along lines of race and gender, uh,

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>sexual orientation. That's the status quo right now, and that

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.879
<v Speaker 1>is not that is general. Joe Biden represents the polar

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>opposite of that, um and that's that to what he

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the you know, kind of leadership that he would

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>bring to the White House. Okay, let's wrap things up

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>with how much daylight there is between Joe Biden and

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the President United States on China right now? How much

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>daylight is that? Well, look, what Joe Biden has said,

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 1>in a point he's made for for many years, is

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that he uh he thinks there's always a mistake to

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>bet against American workers. UM. And he believes that this

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>president has made some real mistakes by uh not bringing

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>our allies along to these discussions with China, not bringing

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the full weight of our negotiating allies to the table, UM,

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and not having labor at the table. I mean that's

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, as as president UM. You know, he believes

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is important to too and that in order to force

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 1>China's hand, that we have to be able to bring

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the full negotiating weight of our allies along with us.

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that he would do UM as president. Okay,

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a free pass. I mean, we got through

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 1>this without talking about those those pesky socialist Democrats are

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>democratic socialists. Run out of time. There's other candidates that

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>we've We've got a lot to do. We'd love to

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>have you again, Kate Benningfield, working with Joe Biden is

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>UH on the campaign of Churs centered out of Philadelphia.

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The Announcementate, I believe it was yesterday, Kate, and I'll

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>make a serious pitch. We would love to speak to

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the Vice president as the campaign goes forward. Clearly an

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>important voice across the American political landscape. Kate bending Field

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>with thanks Joe Biden, Financial Mark Financial Markets is just

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>rallied Sharply and Tom and we said we look at

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>each other and we say, you know, what do we

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>do from here? Fortunately, our next guest can be very

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>helpful in answering that question. Bob michael Is Global c

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I O of JP Morgan Asset Management, Head of the

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan's Global Fixing Income. Bob, thanks so much for

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>joining us. You know, I guess the you know, the

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>real question is what do investors do from here? How

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>are you approaching the markets? What a great time to

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>be a bond. You've got central banks on hold, you've

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>got the global economy slow, and you don't see a

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of inflation. The Fed raised rates for three years.

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>We would have liked to have seen rates higher. But

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to buy in here. You're looking at a

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 1>ten year treasury that's just below two point four. You

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>could pick up maybe a percent or so by buying

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>investment grade credit. You don't fight this. You go and

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>buy bonds before they continue to drop lower and yield.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, am I going where am I going?

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 1>On the credit spectrum? Am I going a little bit

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>further out on the credit quality spectrum. Well, I think

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this is where you have to get a bit choose here.

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I think for for credit um go certainly a little

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>bit longer duration. I'd say the intermediate part of the

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>curve five to ten year um You can go into

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the high yield space. Right now. In high yield, your

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>actually getting a yield that's about six and a half

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>percent with a credit spread that's just over four percent,

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's compensating you for default rates that are still

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>under one percent. So you're okay, still holding some high

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>yield in here. But Michael, it's Friday. I'm waiting for

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 1>interest rates to move higher. It's been a long wait.

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>It's about a decade. There's a third edition of Inside

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the Yield Book. Sydney Homer, Martin Leebowitz. I'm very proud

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that I had something to do with the reissuance of

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that a lifetime ago. Bob Michael. If I read Inside

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the Yield Book today, would it help me in this

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>bond market? No, it would confuse you. You would miss

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.880
<v Speaker 1>everything that's that's old. This is why we love Hivan,

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Bob Michael, and folks correct, go this this is outdated thinking.

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>The central banks have an entire new arsenal of tools

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're deploying their sucking life out of the bond market.

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You can sit there and look at historic metrics and say,

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I know the FED should be at four and the

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>dominure should be at five. Tom. You will get there

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in and you can see that they always frazzled. Michael

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>is even fired up. He sounds almost like Jamie Diamond

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. He's so fired up, Bob Michael. If that's

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the case, the bond pro seriously are going to say

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the vector from where we are now back to normal,

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be some form of jump condition. Do

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to set ourselves up for sharp price decline

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>in fixed income assets somewhere down the road. Absolutely not.

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>The problem is everyone is already set up for that.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the flow in fixed income over

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, it's gone into money market funds

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and short duration funds. Everyone expected they would buy bonds.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>At the end of this year or the start of

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>next year. When we look at the amount of money

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and money market funds, it's up to three point two

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. That's the highest it's been since the financial crisis.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>So I mean only only money coming into the bond

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>market right now is coming in from overseas. Domestic investors

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.959
<v Speaker 1>are still waiting, not going to get Okay, we've been

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>making jokes, folks. This is serious and this is the

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>theme of the day off Muhammad al Arian and Ambrose

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Evans Pritchard that there's a dollar shortage out there abroad.

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a certain sweat and desperation which you see every

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:44.200
<v Speaker 1>day worldwide. At JP Morgan explain to our audience the

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>desperation of foreign big money institutions that they must own

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>full faith and credit America. We complain about short money

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at around two and a half percent and having to

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 1>buy the ten or at two point four percent. If

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you're in Switzerland, it's minus three quarters of a percent.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>If you're in Japan or Europe, you still have negative rates.

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>That money is looking to find yields somewhere, and that

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>money has been coming into the US market and has

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>been hedged back to the base currency of whatever the

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>country is. That money is now starting to come in unhedged,

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>so so money coming out of Asia and out of

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Europe is now coming into the bond market and bond

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>bonds and not hedging the dollar out because they want

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the safe haven status of the US dollar. But we

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta leave it there. But Michael, thank you so much.

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>That's a real clinic from JP Morgan. This is a

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>joy because when the oil industry turns upside down, every

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>buddy dials one. Don't they dial Daniel Jurgen, you know,

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>all the usual victims. And Amy Myers Jeffee, who has

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a shingle out at the Council on Foreign Relations. What

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you need to know is she's interesting when oil blows up,

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and Amy Myers Jeffee is really interesting when it's quiet

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in oil, which has been the strangeness of the last

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. She is the founder of the Baker Effort

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>at Rice University on energy. She owns Rice University Energy

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Oil Economics and has worked with many other institutions. Now

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>writing at the CFR, Amy, wonderful to have you with

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>us today. Everybody would say with the news flow brand

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in West Texas should be gyrating around. They're not. Why,

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the traders are wrong. I mean

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there's this tug of war between the negative China news

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and all these sort of quote unquote sabotage acts, and

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I tell people we're using the word sabotage to make

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it so and small um. But it's not small um.

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a sign of escalating conflict. And the

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>targets have been very strategic. What's the elasticity of that

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>nexus of supply and demand right now? How tight is

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the market? And you know, not to get Matthew on

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a Friday, we don't do that. Particular weathers is gorgeous,

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>but but what's the responsiveness we will see given an

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>event in supply and demand? You know, the US has

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>this upside potential, but it's not instantaneous. So you know,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if we got to a seventy dollar w t I price,

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have analysts like Cornerstone, Macro and City

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.719
<v Speaker 1>saying that you know, you could have you know, up

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to twice as much oil coming out of the United

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>States production over the next two years. But you know

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that's over the next two years. We have to get

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>through the summer and OPEC capacity is really constrained. It's falling.

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>The reports out of Venezuela is that production is down

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred thousand barrows a day. You know, before

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a month or two ago, we were saying a million. Right,

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you've got constraints now with Saudi Arabia because their pipeline

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is down. You have the contaminated oil from Russia that's

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>clogging pipelines and inventory in Eastern Europe, so that's a constraint. Um.

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you have these pockets and then and

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>then we have to worry about escalating conflict in the

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Middle East. UM. Energy Intelligence Group is reporting that Saudi

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Arabia is beefing up security and it's offshore oil fields

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that border Iran's waters. So there's a lot of risk

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in the market, and I think the market is just

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to relax. What do you think the market? What do

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you think the market is missing here? Is that the

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>supply issues that you just outlined, or does that have

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a or does the market maybe have a more doubbish

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>view or bearish view of demand? Well, I think they

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>have a very devish view of demand. Um. No one

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is talking about a recession starting right away this summer

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Gasoline demand is on track to

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>be higher this year. Um. You know, I've heard different

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>analysts talking about China. One has to figure that the

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Chinese will at least put a temporary stimulus into the market.

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess some people are judging because they haven't intervened

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to stop the slide in the Chinese stock market. Um.

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, well, demand might be a slow responder

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in China to the stock market decline. So I do

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think that the market is anticipating the lower demand and

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>meat as being immediate and the supply outages as being

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>temporary and um. And maybe that's not right. Maybe the

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>supply outages might become worse or more lasting, um. And

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe the demand fall off will definitely come, but maybe

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the timeline for it is farther away. So Amy, let's

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>pick a scenario where you know, over the next several

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks or a month or so, sometime over the summer,

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the situations with Iran does go sideways. Where do you

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>think w T I could go in that scenario? Well,

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>let's what do you mean by sideways? Well, I just

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>meant that we could have a problem with Iran and

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there would be a supply disruption. Okay, My feeling is,

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, at a minimum, you know, we

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>could have another five to ten dollars in the price

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>just from a from the conflict worsening UM and and

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>having there be a problem with perceptions about how much

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>oil is available. To remember, right now, there's oil and

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>inventory out in the Middle East and other places, and

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they're using that inventory, you know, to supply people. The

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Europeans are drawing down inventory to replace the lost Russian barrels.

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a big financial dispute over the contaminated oil.

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, once that inventory is used, it's gone.

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Where's the Strategic Petroleum Reserve? Is it? Like underneath CFR

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>up on Park Avenue? Where where is it? Actually? Where

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>is the thing? It's located in Louisiana and Texas. And indeed, um,

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that the administration is looking carefully at whether

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it needs to release the strategic prawing. Remember the Congress

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sell it anyway. I mean, but Amy, to

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>be honest, you're too young to remember this, but I

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>remember the hysteria over the Strategic Petroleum Reserve? Is that?

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that? What's next? Here? I think the the strategic

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>pro poem reserve is on the table. Let's remember we're

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.839
<v Speaker 1>also going into the US hurricane season. Let's hope there's

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>no hurricanes that disrupt US production this year. Um, But

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you know it's just stuns me. Um. That the oil

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>trading community, they're either so dependent on their algorithms on

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy, it's just hard to believe that that makes sense.

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>She's been waiting too too much time in the Did

0:34:57.280 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>you see how she just went after our audience so amy,

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the things I've heard about is

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I talked to energy people really over the last several years.

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just this extraordinary amount of oil in the US

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>now with the shale oil. Just give us a sense

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of why it's not we can't just simply turn on

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the pickets and get that oil into the marketplace. You

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>know we can, but there's a time lag. Companies have

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 1>their drilling schedules, and we know what those are. Those

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to produce a another eight hundred or a

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>million barrels a day over this year. For companies to

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 1>suddenly have the money and run out and put on

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more rigs, you know that's not going to happen in

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.720
<v Speaker 1>one day. I gotta get the stand there, I gotta

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 1>get the rigs there. We have to have a board

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>meeting and decide to increase our spending. When I've got

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, my investors telling me I need to have

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>capital discipline right, so you know it can happen, and

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it could be a big boost, and and that could

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>happen in three months, six months, eight months, UM, but

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not something that's going to happen in the month

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of June July one refinery runs go up to supply gasoline.

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Amy Mayer's jeffe one final question. I don't need to

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>buy hold sell. I understand it's not your game. What

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think of Ana Darko, Chevron, Occidental Total, that

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>whole dance that we saw two weeks ago. Well, you know,

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I like Vicky Haloub. I think she made the boldest

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.240
<v Speaker 1>move since the eighties when t Boon Pickens was bald

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>and honestly, uh, if she were a man, everybody would saying, oh,

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>she's a risk taker. How bold Because if we have

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a conflict in the Middle East or justice sabotage makes

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the market worse, She's gonna look like a genius, having

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 1>consolidated more property and being able to get those economies

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>of scale together for the Permian. Now, I don't like

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Total's purchase of UM of Mozambique. I think that between

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, these long term risk to the Chinese economy

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and UM and the overall, we have so much natural

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>gas in the United States and other places. You know,

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so optimistic about you know, African natural gas

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 1>leaving his LG is total. But you know, power to

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>them if they think they can make a business out

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of that. UM and uh, you know, people. The thing

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that I've heard that I think is a serious challenge

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for Oxy is that companies always have difficulty emerging two

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>companies when there's cultural differences. UM and the you know,

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of management style of the Anadarko and the management

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>style of Occidental are very different. So that's going to

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>be a challenge. Amy, thank you so much for joining us.

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 1>She's a classic Amy Myers Jeffee with the constant foreign

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>relations of Rubenstein senior fellow there, and I really want

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>to point out her founding abilities for James Baker at

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Race University where they really jump started Texas scholarship on energy.

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>She is just wonderful. Paul, what she just said there.

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't have an opinion on this, but boy,

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that zeitgeist is really out there on Oxy Forward. Thanks

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple podcasts. SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast.

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.959
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio