WEBVTT - APA, TikTok, and Regional Banks

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg is now on your dashboard with Apple CarPlay and

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto. It gives you access to every Bloomberg podcast,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>live audio feeds from Bloomberg Radio, print stories from Bloomberg

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>News in audio form, and the latest headlines of the

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>click of a button with Bloomberg News. Now it's free

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>with the latest version of the Bloomberg Business App. That's

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Get it on your phone in

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store or on Google Play. Just download

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the app, connect your phone to your car and get started.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's all presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market movin news.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast.

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 2>It's Thursday, so Sunday, you know, Merger Monday. But there's

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>a trade out there in the shale business and we've

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 2>seen a lot of consolidation in the patch out there

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>in really the last couple of years, and we have

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 2>another deal here APA to buy shale oil driller calland

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 2>Petroleum for four point five billion dollars. And we want

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 2>to talk shale. We talk with Vince Piazza. He is

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>our energy analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. Hey, Vince, I know

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>you've been busy recently kind of parsing through all these

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 2>M and A trades in the shale patch here in

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the US. Talk to us about what APA is. What

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 2>is APA doing here with this acquisition of Calent Petroleum.

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, look in the Permian, Paul, and by the way, Paul,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 3>happy new here to you and yours. What we have

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 3>here is a jump ball for acreage in the Permian.

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 3>And we've seen this across several years. It paused and

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>then kicked up again most recently. But this is really

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>about larger players looking to gain scale and smaller players

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 3>looking at the environment in front of them. With higher

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 3>rates and big guys getting bigger, there's really not a

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 3>lot of room for them. And you know, we cover roughly,

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>we follow roughly fourteen to fifteen names in the Permium

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 3>that are below five hundred thousand net acres and they

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 3>need to do something. They need to do something to

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 3>survive or to put themselves up for sale and callan did.

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 3>And we see this as a continuation of consolidation for

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 3>scale and asset concentration. These guys are selling a commodity.

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 3>There's very little differentiation. The way you gain efficiency, the

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 3>way you gain productivity is to be big, to have scale,

0:02:55.800 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 3>to have concentration across your region. And in case it's

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 3>the Permian, we've seen a lot of M and A

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 3>in the Permian on the oil side. We haven't seen

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot on the gas side. I think that's where

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>the real story will be in twenty twenty four. You know,

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 3>natural gas has likely bottomed. In twenty twenty two, we

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 3>should see better conditions, better balances. We should see more

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 3>consolidation in the gas side as well, especially with the

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 3>curve of the way it looks, and we'll probably see

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 3>that more in the Hainesville and also in the Marcellos.

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 3>But what this really tells us is there is scarcity value, right,

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 3>and so you are bidding up smaller operators, MidCap operators,

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 3>operators that were privately sponsored, and the pe shops need

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 3>to monetize these investments to recycle that capital as well.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 3>So you're seeing small, mid sized pe back names selling out,

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and you're seeing publicly traded names also selling out, especially

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>in an environment where you have higher rates. In the

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 3>case accoun, they were one of the higher levered names

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of the companies that we follow. So, you know, I

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>think it is reality coming to call on them and

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>other smaller operators.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I'm just you know, Bloomberg, it's got

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 2>some good reporting here, just summarizing what's happened so far.

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Just recently, in October, Excellon Mobile reaches sixty billion dollars

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.359
<v Speaker 2>deal to buy Pioneer Natural Resources. Chevron followed it up

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>with a fifty three billion dollar agreement for Hesse Corporation,

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and in December, Occidental Patrolling mcgreed to acquire Crown Rock

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>for a ten point eight billion So, Vince, as you say,

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 2>a lot of deals getting done here, talk to us

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>about just the natural gas market in general, you know,

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 2>because when we talk about energy, we tend to talk

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 2>about oil more than that gas. Here, talk to about

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 2>where we are in that market today. What's the outlook.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, the outlook right now, just given the backdrop for

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 3>weather and the rather mild temperatures that we've had here

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>early on in the winter season, it's been it's been

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 3>a tough go for natural gas. You know, we would

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 3>have thought we would have seen a better bid into

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the winter, but with a very mild December and a

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit turning here in January as of cooler at

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 3>tempts settle in. But it's been a pretty tough go.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>But then again, it's better than where we were last year,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 3>where we saw NAT gas go below two dollars very briefly,

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 3>but we think we're past that point. We think twenty

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 3>twenty four bounces will likely tighten. You know, right now

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 3>we're in this mix of this two sixty two fifty spot,

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 3>but we think that things will improve. There is a

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 3>structural secular trend, and that is toward LNG exports. The

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>US has grown its export capacity, it will continue to

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 3>grow this export capacity through twenty twenty through twenty thirty,

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 3>and we think this is a net positive to pull

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the excess capacity that we have in the US into

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 3>the European corridor and in the Asia corridor. You know,

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 3>last year we had a lot of flows go into

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 3>the European corridor, just given the fact of Russia and

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>the Ukraine War and what that meant for energy security.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 3>So the US was a buffer for that. We will

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>continue to be a buffer for that. LNG export capacity

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 3>gains will be a structural story that we'll hear more

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 3>of and that will tighten balances for US. In the US.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 3>You also have gas in the power stack that has

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 3>gain share and that will continue to be stable over

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>the next year or so. We will continue to gain

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 3>share there as well on the industrial side. So you

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 3>have both a cyclical story, which is the weather component

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 3>that we can control, but there is also a structural

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 3>component to it that does provide longer term growth for

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 3>natural gas, not just as a transition fuel, not just

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 3>as a bridge fuel, but as a key component within

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 3>the energy complex, the energy portfolio.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Vince, you know, it's interesting that the US has

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 2>become a net exporter of oil here and a lot

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 2>of probably a lot of our listeners probably aren't aware

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>of that, particularly the ones I kind of remember back

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 2>in the seventies when we had those oil emergencies and

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.559
<v Speaker 2>shocks here, and a lot of that's due to the shale.

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Can you you're the expert on shale, You're the expert

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 2>on fracking. Can you explain to us, when these fractors

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 2>blast in a bunch of this water into the rock,

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>what comes out in terms of oil versus natural gas?

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>How does that typically work?

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, in a place like the Permium where most

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 3>of the M and A activity is occurring, not only

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>do you have your crude oil, but you also have

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 3>what's called associated natural gas or associated gas. You know,

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>typically you will have something to the effect of two

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 3>thirds liquids, you know, one third gas. That gas has

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:07.679
<v Speaker 3>to go someplace, and it has been a big boon

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 3>to a place like the Permian, which is the third

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 3>largest producer of natural gas as a standalone basin, which

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 3>is really incredible when you think about we're really drilling

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 3>for crude oil in that basin. But what we have

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 3>here is a plethora of natural gas, and the export

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>market is the most likely area for it to move

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 3>through in order to balance. In order to balance these

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>markets in general, no matter where you drill, you're going

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 3>to drill some natural gas if you're drilling for crude

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 3>oil as well. So when we do talk about natural gas,

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 3>it is a default to talk about crude oil as well,

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 3>since that is the driver of what we come up

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 3>with when we also drill for natural gas and oil,

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 3>so it is the thing that stirs the drink for

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 3>the natural gas market as well.

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I guess we all kind of got

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more smarter on liquified natural gas when

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Russia did invade Ukraine and that really cut off the

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 2>supply of Russian gas to Europe. And we've got a

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 2>lot of it, but it's not easy to transport. Is

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 2>you got to do this whole liquification process. How is

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 2>that whole part of the industry developing.

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 3>It's developing very rapidly. We're growing capacity. We have become

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 3>a key exporter to only Europe, but also to Asia.

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>One thing that is quite key for us here in

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the US. And we saw this last year as well,

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 3>our ability to adapt quickly and move those move those

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>molecules into the market that needed it the most. We

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 3>were saved by a relatively warm winter in Asia, were

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 3>able to move those molecules into Europe to help them

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 3>restock their storage. We have here in Europe relatively stout

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 3>storage at well over eighty three percent fulfilled, and so

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 3>for this winter at least, natural gas storage is not

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 3>going to be an issue and We've done an exceptional

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 3>job in the European Union has done an exceptional job

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 3>refilling its capacity to deal with any uncertainty that would occur,

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 3>not only on the warfront, but also in terms of

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 3>weather as well. So natural gas in the US being

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 3>exported to other countries has been a key contributor to

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 3>how we are looking to balance our market here in

0:10:55.160 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 3>the US. And you know right now, with your being filled,

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the Asia market is looking quite quite attractive, and it

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 3>is more profitable to move those molecules into Asia relative

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 3>to the European market.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Vince, great stuff, great tortois force there on the energy

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 2>space that guests Vince Piazza, senior industry analyst covering the

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>energy space. We've got a great energy team, a global

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 2>energy teams. You have to look at energy on a

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>global basis, and that's what Bloomberg Intelligence does. We appreciate

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>getting some time from Vince Piazza here again some more

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>m and A in the natural gas spase here in

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the US in some of those shale basins, as Vince

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 2>was saying, there's a lot of demand there and there's

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>a need for scale, particularly from some of these smaller companies.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>So again saw another deal today APA to Bai shale

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 2>oil driller calend Petroleum for four point five billion dollars.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>So good stuff there.

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to the team Ken's our line program Bloomberg

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 4>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 4>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Here's something that I don't do. I don't TikTok.

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 2>It is just a monster of a social media platform,

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 2>particularly with the younger demos, and really a competitive threat

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 2>to a lot of the existing social media platforms out

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>there from certainly an advertising perspective and maybe even a

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>e commerce perspective. And we've done some research in Bloomberg

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence on this, Man Deep Singh, he's our senior tech

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 2>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligency. Man's our global tech team, which

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you is one of the best tech research

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 2>teams on the street.

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 4>B I go.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>I know I just said that about our energy team,

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 2>but that's also true with our tech team as well.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 2>We have folks Europe, North America, Asia, pretty much everywhere

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 2>you need to be, So Man Deep, talk to us

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 2>about TikTok here. I mean, my basic knowledge of these

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 2>social media platforms is just get as many people as

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you can on your platform and then to try to

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 2>monetize them by selling advertising, trying to get them to

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 2>buy stuff. What's TikTok strategy here?

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 5>Well, so they've done exactly that in terms of, you know,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 5>getting to one hundred million daily plus daily active users,

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 5>monetizing the ads a fifteen billion dollar rund rate. And

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 5>there is a real risk the fact that we're going

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 5>into an election year, this company could be banned. We've

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 5>been talking about it forever.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 2>They ban could be banned in the US, Yes, because

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>of its Chinese ownership.

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 5>Big yeah, Okay, yeah, And that's been the case, you know,

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 5>in terms of a risk for the last couple of years.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 5>Hasn't happened, but we know this is an election year

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 5>and so there will be more focus on that. And

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 5>the fact that they announced this e commerce play, to me,

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 5>it suggests they want to be out there for the

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 5>small businesses because these are the companies that will advertise,

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 5>that will create their storefront on TikTok. And once you

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 5>have merchants on your platform, it gets all the more

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 5>hard to ban such a platform because people are actually

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 5>generating revenues. Strategy that seems to be the play here.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 5>But we know social commerce hasn't been successful in the US.

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 5>Take a look at Facebook. They tried Facebook shops, Instagram

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 5>shops never really took off. And so the play here

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 5>is something that hasn't worked out in the US because

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 5>the buying behavior of US consumers is very different from

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 5>the Asia consumers where social commerce has been successful. Do

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 5>you in which is the TikTok eqaluent is a two

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 5>hundred billion dollar GMV business in China.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>So social commerce that's a kind of kind of a

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 2>new term for me. But that's basically just taking social

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>media users Facebook, whatever in this case TikTok and having

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 2>them and drive I guess e commerce off of that platform,

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>getting them to start buying stuff, and then TikTok will make.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 5>It, yeah, finishing the transaction within your social media app.

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 5>So right now they show you an AD and that

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 5>takes the user traffic to the e commerce website. In

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 5>this case, the experience is in app.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>It makes a ton of sense.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, it makes for a good buying experience if

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 5>I can do things within the app as opposed to

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 5>going to another app.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 2>So why hasn't it worked here in the US, do

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>you think?

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 5>Because think of how an e commerce website works. You

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 5>need logistics, you need payments, you need sourcing, you need inventory.

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Social media companies aren't doing that, okay, and Amazon is

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 5>doing that. They've built so many warehouses just for doing that.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 5>They have their own delivery. So e commerce requires all

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 5>these things. And for TikTok they're likely going to partner.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 5>So they have already partnered with Shopify and Walmart. They're

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 5>gonna look for more partners. Obviously Amazon has done the

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 5>same with other social media companies. Who would have never

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 5>imagined Amazon partnering with Meta and Snapchat.

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 2>They've done that. So what's the we need talk to

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the folks in the e commerce world. What's the feeling

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>about the ability of bite Dance slash TikTok to actually

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 2>has some success here in the US?

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 5>Very unlikely at least from my lens, given you know,

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 5>you need to match that Amazon experience that people have

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 5>in the US right two day prime shipping, one day

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 5>prime shipping, and so for them to do it, one

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 5>they need the merchants on the platform. They need to

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 5>offer a lot of stuff. But look, they appeal to

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 5>the younger demographic. We know TikTok appeals to that ten

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 5>to twenty five year olds and they can adopt a

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 5>new platform much more quickly than other consumers. So I

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't be surprised if they use incentives to drive that

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 5>e commerce shift. But in the end, there is a

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 5>political bend to it, and the reason why they're doing

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 5>it is just to make sure they have a lot

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 5>of small merchants on the platform, which increases their odds

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 5>that they won't be banned in the US.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, So for those folks that aren't really that

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 2>familiar with the business of TikTok, bike Dance, which owns TikTok,

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>aims to grow the size of its US e commerce

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 2>business tenfold to as much as seventeen point five billion

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 2>dollars this year, according to people familiar with the matter,

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>posing a bigger threat to Amazon Dot So that's laying

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 2>it out there.

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, it's an ambitious goal, but we know

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 5>the US e commerce market is huge, so it's still,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, less than five percent of the overall e

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 5>commerce market that's out there.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 2>And TikTok was last year on track to a master

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 2>around twenty billion in global gross merchandise value, with Southeast

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Asia contributing the bulk of the sales through its platform,

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News reported. So now they're saying, okay, so they

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>have a success, Yeah, some success in other parts of

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 2>the world. Now the question is can they do it

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.360
<v Speaker 2>here in the US. Yeah, and you talk to Amazon,

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 2>They're like, they're a fly. We're not even worried about it.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>It's that's the case.

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 5>I think Amazon did pre empt that. So in December

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 5>they announced this partnership with Meta, with Snapchat, with Pinterest.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 5>That didn't happen so far. So Amazon and the other

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 5>social media platforms want to partner with these e commerce

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 5>platforms because in the end, this is the next leg

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 5>off the offline to online shift, the video shopping, the

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 5>live stream shopping, which you have seen play out in

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 5>China and the Asian regions where TikTok has had some success.

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I can't let you out of here without

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 2>talking about AI whatever that is generative AI market. This

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 2>is your research, dude. Generative AI market appears set to

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 2>reach one point three trillion by twenty thirty two. What

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 2>are you talking about?

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, so what we saw last year was a bumper

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 5>year in terms of what Nvidia showed us, you know,

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 5>their data center sales. So I don't think anyone can

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 5>write off such forecasts now after what we saw with

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 5>video last year. But look, it's going to happen in phases.

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 5>Right now, we are still in that infrastructure phase where

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 5>chip companies are seeing that demand, and more so around

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, the accelerator chips, the GPUs. Not every type

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 5>of chip is in demand. Now you're seeing memory companies

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 5>see that AI demand, and gradually you are going to

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 5>see other types of infrastructure really get replaced. Within data centers,

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 5>we are going through a massive data center refresh cycle,

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 5>and then it will trickle through applications. The real disruption

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.679
<v Speaker 5>will be in how we use our application software because

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 5>AI is going to redefine the way we use software.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 2>And that's the.

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 5>One point three trillion component over ten years.

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Here's some more numbers, because you guys have a lot

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 2>of numbers in your research generative. AI may expand to

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 2>about ten to twelve percent of the total IT hardware,

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 2>software services, AD spending and gaming markets by twenty thirty

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>two from less than one percent. Based upon the bi calculations.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 2>That gives you some sense of kind of the growth here.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and that's the disruptive element. We're not talking about

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 5>companies finding new dollars to put in generative AI. You

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 5>are going to see some existing spend being migrated to

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 5>generative AI for good reasons because of productivity. Copilots make

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 5>you more productive, the workers more productive, and that is

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 5>why companies are going to move some of their existing

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 5>spend towards these any eye tools.

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 2>You guys wrote a research report on this, right, Yeah,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>where can you? I can get a Bloomberg terminal users?

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean basically, this report tells you everything you need

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 2>to know about AI. Yeah, get it onto the report,

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>sixty page report. BI go gets you to Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 2>That's where you can find it. Yeah, anywhere else for

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 2>like the non subscriber, the non Bloomberg people, Oh, they.

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 5>Could reach out to the media folks, and I'm sure

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 5>they can share something.

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Because I'm telling you, folks, a lot of people, as

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 2>we all know, in twenty twenty three, AI was not

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 2>just the tech story. It was a US global marketplace

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:37.679
<v Speaker 2>story that you have a lot of the gains we

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 2>saw in the equity markets in twenty twenty three, that

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 2>weight loss drug. So and I know we've got a

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 2>weight loss report out there. The GLP stuff from Sam Fizzelli.

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>So again some great stuff coming out of Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Check it out on the Bloomberg terminal, big Man Deep

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>saying thank you so much for joining us. He's a

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>senior analyst for technology Bloomberg Intelligence. He's in the studio.

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 2>He's in the office on like of some management level

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 2>folks at BI. But take note of that who comes

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 2>in and who doesn't, Man Deep sing. He is our

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>senior guy on technology, along with anorog Rana, doing our

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 2>global coverage.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Here you're listening to the tape. Can's our live program

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 4>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 4>from our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's check in with Ed Harrison. Why do

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 2>we do that? Because he's a senior editor Bloomberg News.

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 2>He's a smart person, has a ton of experience here

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 2>covering the markets, and he's got a great column that

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people feel like is they must read

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 2>the Everything Risk, a column for Bloomberg News. His latest

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>one is this twenty twenty four is risk is a

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 2>hot US economy? What do you mean by that? Ed,

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Senior Editor, Bloomberg News, joins us Ed, what do you

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 2>mean by the twenty twenty four risk is a hot

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 2>US economy?

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 6>Hey? Happy new year to you, by the way.

0:21:57.880 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Cheers.

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 6>I think the risk is that everyone really is expecting

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 6>soft landing, Yes, but really they're expecting that soft landing

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 6>to be associated with enough softness to get rate cuts.

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 6>In fact, in the bond market, we have one hundred

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 6>and forty basis points of cuts that are being priced in,

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 6>and we're already saying that as soon as March we

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 6>could have a rate cut. That's what the pricing for

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 6>the market is. If the economy is too hot, and

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 6>right now we have GDP now at two point five percent,

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 6>that's too much for those kind of rate cuts to

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 6>come through. And so if you have to look at

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 6>where the path of least resistance is right now, it's

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 6>towards lower yields generally. But this is going to be

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 6>a huge headwind against that, and therefore that's going to

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 6>be the pain trade yet again this year.

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 2>So is there a reasonable call here that the Fed

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of knows all that and therefore they may hold

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 2>back a little bit and push the rate cuts to

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 2>mid or later in the year to try to, you know,

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 2>kind of avoid some of that.

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I think that that's what the teta

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 6>tet that you're gonna have in the beginning of the

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 6>year is the Fed versus the markets saying, yes, we're

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 6>gonna cut rates, but how much are we gonna cut

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 6>them by? With the with the market really you know,

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 6>front running these these rates very aggressively. But you know,

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 6>to a person, I think that the Fed officials have

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 6>been saying over the last several weeks that yes, that's right,

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 6>we're gonna do it in Q three, We're gonna do

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 6>it in Q four, not in Q one. Maybe at

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 6>the end of the second quarter. It all depends on, obviously,

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 6>what the data say. And I think that this has

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 6>all been spurred on by that December dot plot that

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 6>we got, which so seventy five basis points have cuts

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 6>more than we'd seen in the September dot plot, and

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 6>then a very h you know, some people would say

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 6>dubvish pow in the press conference after that.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we saw that. And as you've called out before,

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 2>in the bond market, we had a you know, the

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 2>ten year treasure, which, as Tom Keane likes to say, was,

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, fifty a cup of coffee ago was five percent.

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 2>We traded it all the way down to like three

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and a quarter percent on the tenure. We packed it

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 2>up a little bit here now at three point ninety

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 2>seven percent, So you know, maybe the market's trying to

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.199
<v Speaker 2>adjust here. I guess the next big data point is

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 2>can be the non farm payrolls tomorrow.

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 6>I mean I'm with the FX raids team, and we're

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 6>anticipating that hotly, you know, especially because we had the

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 6>ADP data that came out today that was higher than expected.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 6>We also had the jobless claims data, both continuing and

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 6>initial claims were lower than expected. So there's a lot

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 6>of angst, if you will, about where we're positioned in

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 6>the bond market visa VI that that job support, Because

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 6>if the job support is hotter than expected, exactly as

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 6>I'm saying, that's the pain trade. Yep, then you could

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 6>see the a big reaction to that.

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 2>So what are your sources saying out there in terms

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 2>of the positioning in the marketplace. I guess in twenty

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty three, a lot of the quote unquote smart money,

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the hedge funds, you know, had a net short position

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 2>out there on the treasury market. You know, on the

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>other side of that trade was long term investors like

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>mutual funds like Warren Buffett saying, you know, I'm going

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to show up at every auction and keep buying US treasuries.

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Where do you think kind of the smart faster money

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 2>may be with treasury positioning right now?

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, that's that's an interesting question because ultimately, Matt,

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 6>I think that we've seen such a big move that

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 6>you would think that the shorts would move in. But

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 6>I think people are now they're unwinding their lungs and

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 6>we're moving to sort of a more neutral position. We

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 6>haven't gotten to the point where there are a lot

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 6>of people who are starting to reanimate the shorts yet.

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 6>I think that's when we would see a bigger move

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 6>to the upside for ye deals if we got that,

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 6>But we weren't seeing that yet.

0:25:59.359 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 6>As a result, I'm thinking that you know, we're sort

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 6>of in a range bound mode at this point, with

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 6>four percent sort of the sweet spot within that mode.

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 6>You know, BED funds at five to five sort of

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 6>limits how much upside you can have because you curve

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 6>would be too inverted. But then at the same time,

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 6>how much higher can you go from here? I don't

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 6>think that you're gonna get more than up to four

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 6>twenty five, four thirty five at the max. So we're

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 6>kind of in this this this this range where four

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 6>percent is really kind of a sweet spot for the

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 6>market at this point in time.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 2>W IRP GO World Interest Rate Probability Function on the

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg terminal kind of tries to forecast where the Fed

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>will go with a rates based upon FED funds futures.

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, it's pricing it up to six rate

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 2>cuts this year, you know, starting I don't know what

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, how do you feel about that? As a

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 2>market just to ahead of itself and maybe not once again,

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll say, underlying once again not paying attention really or

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 2>listening to FED chairman Pale.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 6>Well, you know, it's it's a good question about what

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 6>the market's doing collectively. I mean, basically, you're you're trying to,

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:14.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, give your winners room to breathe. Uh. And

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, when the when the FED basically gave a

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 6>green light in December, the people who were bullish in

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 6>the market, they posted to the max. And there hasn't

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 6>been any push There hasn't been enough pushback, and we

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 6>haven't had enough data, we haven't any had any FED

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 6>meetings to dispel the notion that you could get those

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 6>six rate cuts, So people are putting those positions on.

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 6>I think that as the data come in, likely those

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 6>six rate cuts will get paired back to a more

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 6>manageable number. The only way that you're going to get them, unfortunately,

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 6>is if you have a recession. I think then you're

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 6>actually going to get more than one hundred and fifty

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 6>basis points of cuts. And I know that. I think

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 6>it's Wells Fargo is the one. No, No, it's it's TD.

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 6>They're the ones who are predicting two hundred based points

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 6>of CODs.

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Wow, Yeah, that would suggests something's askew with there

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>in the economy. Hey, thanks so much for joining us.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Ed Harrison, he's a senior editor for Bloomberg News. Got

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 2>tons of experience in the markets, He's also former diplomat

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 2>at the US State Department. How about that, So he's

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of got a varied experience, a great worldview looking

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>at these markets here as part of our Bloomberg News team.

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate geting a few minutes of his time.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to the tape Cansur live program Bloomberg Markets

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 4>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 4>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 4>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 4>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit of ECONOMICUS. We've got some

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>breaking news here. Michael McKee joins us. Michael, what's happening

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 2>with our friends and your Saint Louis Fed.

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 7>They are getting a new boss, really, Alberto Mussalam. He

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 7>is a PhD economist and has worked on Wall Street

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 7>for a significant amount of his career, also at the

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 7>IMF and also at the New York Fed. He was

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 7>most recently the non executive chair at the Man Group

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 7>and a member of the board at Feddie Mack. He

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 7>says he'll resign those two positions. He was the CEO

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 7>of Events Asset Management and he was a managing director

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.959
<v Speaker 7>and partner at Tutor Investment. So he has got a

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:34.959
<v Speaker 7>broad Wall Street background and it looks like some experience

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 7>at the FED. So he has straddled both worlds.

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 2>So when of a bank regional bank gets gets a

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 2>new head, how do how do you kind of view it?

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Is there a period of just kind of get to

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 2>know each other, figures thing things out, or and is

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 2>this new FED present given I guess authority over some

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 2>period of time or how's that work? The transition?

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, Jim Bullard has already gone. He left class August

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 7>and he's now at Purdue University. Now the first vice

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 7>president for the Saint Louis FED takes over and represents

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 7>the Saint Louis FED at all the FED meetings and

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 7>things like that. Kathy O'Neil. She is not voting this year,

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 7>so it's not an issue. She presents what information she

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 7>has to the FED and takes part in the discussions.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 7>He is going to take over starting in April April second,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 7>so he will miss the first two meetings of the

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 7>year and then begin to take part. He doesn't vote

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 7>until twenty twenty five.

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what's the historically, what's the role of the Saint

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Louis Fed ben They have a rep reputation.

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, it evolved. It was known as one of the

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 7>kind of monitorist banks where the money supply and that

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 7>sort of thing mattered a lot. But under Jim Bullard

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 7>that went away as monitorism sort of died out when

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 7>it became hard to tell exactly what was money these days.

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 7>And then the President Bullard rather sort of became one

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 7>of the think leaders leaders at the FED. He came

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 7>up with the idea of regimes where you didn't change

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 7>monetary policy unless the whole regime of the economy changed,

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 7>and he was one of the first to really get

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 7>dubvish going into the going into COVID and coming out

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 7>of the Great Financial Crisis. So that's kind of their reputation.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 7>We'll see what mister Musalem very goos to say.

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, sage news for this FED watcher. Saint Louis

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>FED names ex tutor and New York FED executive as President. St.

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Louis the Gateway to the West. Alberto Musalem is now

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 2>its new president.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 4>You're listening to the tape Cancer live program Bloomberg Markets

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 4>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 4>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 4>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 4>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I've been hearing a lot of people fund manager, strategist

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 2>when they talk about twenty twenty four and maybe some

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 2>of the sectors that we should be looking at. They

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 2>say banks. Now, I think they mean like JP Morgan,

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Bank of America, those types of things. I'm not sure

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 2>they're talking about the regional banks, the community banks that

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 2>really had some problems in the beginning of last year.

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:35.959
<v Speaker 2>So I wanted to flush that out. And there's only

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 2>one person to do. That's Emily. That's Herman Chan. He

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 2>covers all of the regional banks for Bloomberg Intelligency Joints

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>US here in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. So, Herman,

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 2>is it too early to go back into regional banks yet?

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Because I know you were very good at telling us

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>it's an earnings problem. It's an earnings challenge for these banks.

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not necessarily a credit risk problem, it's an earnings problem.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 2>So where are we right now?

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 8>The market's been pretty optimistic. You've seen a big rally

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 8>in regional banks over the past couple of months to

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 8>end the year, and that's really driven by interest rates,

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 8>right The markets now expecting you know, five six rate

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 8>cuts in twenty twenty four, which would help alleviate some

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 8>of the earnings issues, the revenue issues from higher funded costs.

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 8>So that's really what's driving the rally. It remains to

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 8>be seen if that will hold, but it's more optimism

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 8>on rates more than anything else.

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 2>So I see, I'm just kind of looking at my

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg chart, you know, just from the lows back and

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess late October the spider s and P Regional

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Banking ETF, which is kr E, is the ticker up

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>about a thirty three percent. So again that nice rally

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 2>you were talking about, where are we in terms of evaluation?

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Is there still room to grow here? Do we still

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 2>have earnings risk? How do you put it all together?

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 8>Sure, so evaluation is still fairly you know, attractive. We

0:33:56.400 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 8>were towards that that October timeframe. We're about one times

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 8>tangible book value on injusted basis, which is historically the

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 8>traf levels. So now we're a bit higher than that.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 8>The revenue picture and the oarnings picture is going to

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 8>be a wildcard with credit quality, right, So if the

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 8>market's correct that we see rate cuts, the NENDI just

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.959
<v Speaker 8>margins for the banks could improve in twenty twenty four.

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 8>But what's still in flux is really what's happening with

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 8>credit quality. Are banks going to see higher loan losses

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 8>from areas like commercial real estate, particularly office commercial real estate,

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 8>multifamily commercial real estate. So those are the questions that

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 8>still remain unanswered for twenty twenty four.

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of the commercial real estate exposure, is

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 2>it at the JP Morgans of the world or is

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 2>it at the M and T banks of the world.

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, sure, so it's more at the M and T

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 8>banks at the world and increasing and higher as you

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 8>go lower in scale and size for banks, right, So

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 8>the smaller community banks have more commercial real estates, and

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 8>it sort of grows as you become a large regional bank,

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 8>and then the banks like JP Morgan have more diversification.

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 8>So it really we parse the numbers looking at office

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 8>commercial real estate. It's about two percent on average for

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 8>the banks that I cover, the large regional banks, so

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 8>it's a fairly manageable exposure. It really does create a

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 8>lot of headline risk, and when you see a when

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 8>the bank's reported in the fourth quarter, for example, there

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 8>are a couple of flagged non performing loans in office

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 8>commercial real estate, so let's spook the market a little

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 8>bit for banks like ZIONCE and P ANDC for example.

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, all right, so where are we in terms of

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 2>the earnings recovery for these banks? Have we seen trough earnings?

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Do you think ors are still risks to the estimates

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 2>out there?

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think that's going to be a good question

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 8>for banks heading into earning season over the next couple

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 8>of weeks. The banks have talked about, even before the

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.319
<v Speaker 8>expectation and of rate cuts in twenty twenty four, that

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 8>Nandager's margins would stabilize because there hasn't been any rate

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 8>hikes in recent quarter. So that's something that's been beneficial

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 8>for banks to stabilize their margins and not have their

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 8>funding costs increased like they did in most of the

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty three So that's helpful. And if you do

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 8>get rate cuts that would even alleviate some of the

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 8>pressures of higher deposit costs and banks happening to pay

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 8>up to attract deposits into regional banks.

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, M and A. I bumped into my buddy

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 2>on the train today. He's an M and A banker

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 2>for an investment bank that specializes in banks. He has

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 2>deferred his retirement for a while, much to his wife's chagrin,

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 2>because he thinks he's going to print money over the

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>next couple three years putting these banks together on the

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 2>MNA front. I mean, I guess what I learned during

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the regional bank crisis from last year from reading your research,

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 2>is that there's four thousand regional banks around the country.

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:05.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that's a big number or small number.

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:07.919
<v Speaker 2>It seems like a lot. It seems like maybe there's

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 2>ripe for some consolidation. How do you think that plays out?

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we do think there's there's it's an industry that's

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 8>very ripe for consolidation. That will happen over time. Regional banks,

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 8>in particular the ones that I cover, are facing higher

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 8>regulatory scrutiny, tougher regulatory costs, so that all entails a

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:33.359
<v Speaker 8>need for scale, and the banks have talked about that collectively,

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 8>me saying that when costs are higher, especially on the

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 8>regulatory side, you need scale to really absorb some of

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 8>these costs. And so that's something that the banks are

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 8>open to. Really, it depends on a couple of factors. One,

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 8>the regulatory response for M and A. The Biden administration

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 8>has been pretty cautious on bank M and A and

0:37:56.040 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 8>and you've seen the FED be very slow in and

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 8>approving bank deals over the past several years, So that's

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 8>a factor. It creates a lot of uncertainty for the banks,

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 8>for the buyer and acquire to deal with an elongated

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 8>regulatory approval process. And number two, interest rates. When rates

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 8>were as high as they were, it does create a

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 8>bit of a challenge in putting the two banks together

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 8>when you mark to market the target's balance sheet. So

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 8>the merger math doesn't make sense right now. But if

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 8>rates do come down even more, I think you'll see

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 8>more and more conversations and potentially that's a twenty twenty

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 8>four event.

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm looking at this group here, do I

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 2>stick with what I consider to be the high quality ones?

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking again, an M and t A P and

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 2>C bank the names I know or maybemight go down

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 2>to some of the smaller cap names and maybe I

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 2>get some better valuation here. How do the clients you

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 2>talk to, how are they playing it?

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think at this point you're you're seeing some

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 8>more appetite for some of the banks that felt more

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 8>challenges in twenty twenty three. So banks like KeyCorp, like

0:39:05.239 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 8>Comerica just got an upgrade earlier today from an analyst

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 8>Western Alliance. Those are banks that were a bit more

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 8>challenged by the rate backdrop in the falloff from the

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 8>SVB and First Republic signature failures, and you've seen more

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 8>of a bid for those banks over the past few months.

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.879
<v Speaker 8>So that's something I would point to as something to

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 8>look at.

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 2>The good news is we haven't had to talk to

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 2>you much yet, and that means we haven't had much

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 2>or anything really any notable failure or stress in the

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 2>regional bank business. So with a little bit of hindsight,

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 2>can we say this was kind of a handful of

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 2>one off kind of issues or is there something that's

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 2>going to have to change in the industry level?

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 8>Right, I would point to the fact that the banks

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:56.879
<v Speaker 8>that did fail that I mentioned earlier, they had very

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 8>different business models. They were fast growing. So I think

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.359
<v Speaker 8>what we learned from the turmoil last year is that

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:07.919
<v Speaker 8>it's maybe an oxymoron to say you're a fast growing bank.

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 8>Maybe you don't want to be that because you're introducing

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 8>a lot of risks to your balance sheet when you

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:17.280
<v Speaker 8>do that, risk to potential deposit flight when things go awry,

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 8>and interest rate risk, especially when rates were lower and

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 8>you were, you know, burdening your balance sheet with with

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:29.760
<v Speaker 8>securities that then were underwater when rates rose. So that's something.

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 8>Those were the lessons learned, And the other regional banks

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:37.919
<v Speaker 8>in my coverage universe are much more stable in their

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 8>in their strategies and business management and balance sheet management practices.

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 8>So I think what happened was the the banks that

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 8>had tougher business models were flush out.

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Penn State, you're Penn State, Grab. How how did you

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:54.240
<v Speaker 2>grade the season?

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 8>I would say a bit of a disappointment going heading

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.399
<v Speaker 8>into the season, we wanted to win at least one

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 8>of the games against the big two Ohio State or Michigan.

0:41:04.320 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 8>That we failed that. Unfortunately, our offense let us down.

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.000
<v Speaker 8>Our defense was actually the number one defense from the

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 8>in the nation.

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we have a quarterback. I'm still

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 2>not convinced.

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:15.239
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, he's a.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 8>Five star guy, but he seems a big jitter.

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 2>Is Dan Ives, who's a huge supporter. He's been No,

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 2>he's our guy, He's guy. I'm like, I'm just not

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:25.439
<v Speaker 2>sure he's our guy. I don't know. I have to see,

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 2>but anyway, I mean, the good news is with the

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 2>new teams coming into the Big Ten, we only have

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 2>to play Ohio State Michigan only once, right, you know,

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 2>we don't have to play both each in the season,

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 2>so that'd be good news. Herman chen Bank, analyst Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg.

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.760
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.720
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Faull Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:41:58.520 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio.