1 00:00:00,840 --> 00:00:04,160 Speaker 1: And we begin with the news on former President Trump 2 00:00:04,240 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: saying his attorneys have told him that he's been indicted 3 00:00:07,760 --> 00:00:10,479 Speaker 1: indicted over the document's case. At Baxter, I know this 4 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:13,080 Speaker 1: is just breaking now you're in the Bloomberg newsroom in 5 00:00:13,119 --> 00:00:16,880 Speaker 1: San Francisco. Do we know anything more at this point? 6 00:00:17,040 --> 00:00:18,480 Speaker 2: Well, you know what we're going to get with an 7 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:21,319 Speaker 2: expert here in just a second. We know that it 8 00:00:21,400 --> 00:00:24,440 Speaker 2: was a post Doug that his attorneys told him he's 9 00:00:24,480 --> 00:00:28,440 Speaker 2: been indicted over the document's case. We know that it 10 00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:31,000 Speaker 2: was moved to Florida. Let's get more now Bloomberg's a 11 00:00:31,120 --> 00:00:34,120 Speaker 2: legal expert at a host of Bloomberg Law. June Grosso 12 00:00:34,280 --> 00:00:37,559 Speaker 2: is with US Life. All right, June, So we know 13 00:00:37,720 --> 00:00:40,600 Speaker 2: that they moved a couple of weeks ago the grand 14 00:00:40,640 --> 00:00:43,560 Speaker 2: jury proceedings down to Florida. What do we know about 15 00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:46,520 Speaker 2: this indictment at this point, Well. 16 00:00:46,360 --> 00:00:50,159 Speaker 3: I don't know what the indictment says. The indictment could 17 00:00:50,200 --> 00:00:53,200 Speaker 3: be on several different charges. There could be an obstruction 18 00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:56,120 Speaker 3: charge in there, there could be an espionage a charge 19 00:00:56,120 --> 00:00:59,040 Speaker 3: in there. It could just be mishandling of classified documents. 20 00:00:59,160 --> 00:01:02,920 Speaker 3: It's hard to tell at this point what they decided 21 00:01:02,960 --> 00:01:06,399 Speaker 3: to charge him with, so, you know, beyond him saying 22 00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:08,440 Speaker 3: he's indicted, we don't really know much. 23 00:01:09,120 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, and he said it now, just yesterday or the 24 00:01:12,880 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 2: day before, he had said that nobody had said anything 25 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:19,360 Speaker 2: to him about it, which may be true. He likes 26 00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:23,680 Speaker 2: to break the news himself, So this this came down. 27 00:01:23,760 --> 00:01:26,240 Speaker 2: I don't mean to be cynical there we left, but he. 28 00:01:26,280 --> 00:01:29,000 Speaker 3: Does you know, he said that nobody had told him 29 00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:30,800 Speaker 3: he was going to get indicted. That doesn't mean no 30 00:01:30,840 --> 00:01:33,440 Speaker 3: one told him he was the target of the investigation, 31 00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:35,760 Speaker 3: which is what the letter. You know, what the what 32 00:01:35,880 --> 00:01:38,399 Speaker 3: the prosecutors tell you. They tell you the target of 33 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:42,520 Speaker 3: the investigation, and everybody draws the conclusion that, okay, if 34 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:45,759 Speaker 3: they're telling us this, that's their requirement, and that means 35 00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:48,000 Speaker 3: that you're going to get indicted. So I think he 36 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:49,880 Speaker 3: was parsing words perhaps there. 37 00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:53,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, okay, yeah, thank you for making that distinction. 38 00:01:53,120 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 2: I didn't make it clear. Now we've just got another 39 00:01:55,600 --> 00:01:58,120 Speaker 2: headline June up saying he's been summoned to appear in 40 00:01:58,160 --> 00:02:02,680 Speaker 2: Miami court on two. What is a process do you 41 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 2: think from here? 42 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:07,440 Speaker 3: Well, you know, I think we'll learn more about this indictment. 43 00:02:07,480 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 3: I assume that the Special Counsel or perhaps even the 44 00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:15,040 Speaker 3: Attorney General is going to have a press conference. I mean, 45 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:19,320 Speaker 3: these indictments are sealed usually, so we find out about 46 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:22,400 Speaker 3: them when they decide to tell us. In this case, 47 00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:26,320 Speaker 3: Trump decided to tell us so, but normally we'd wait 48 00:02:26,360 --> 00:02:29,640 Speaker 3: for the prosecutors and he'll have to make an appearance 49 00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:33,080 Speaker 3: in court and you know, plead not guilty. Most likely 50 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:35,720 Speaker 3: it will be probably a very brief appearance, sort of 51 00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:39,560 Speaker 3: like we saw in New York. What's interesting here is 52 00:02:39,600 --> 00:02:43,400 Speaker 3: that after having a grand jury in Washington, d C. 53 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:48,280 Speaker 3: For so long investigating the classified documents, the Special Council 54 00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:52,760 Speaker 3: decided to open a grand jury investigation in Florida. And 55 00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:56,639 Speaker 3: the thought is that he wanted to be sure that 56 00:02:57,040 --> 00:02:59,560 Speaker 3: there would be you know, the venue would be met, 57 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:01,520 Speaker 3: that this was where. In other words, you have to 58 00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:04,919 Speaker 3: have the case in the place where the alleged crime 59 00:03:05,000 --> 00:03:09,040 Speaker 3: took place. So in this case, any obstruction or any hiding, 60 00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:12,320 Speaker 3: any thing like that would have been done in Florida. 61 00:03:12,440 --> 00:03:17,040 Speaker 3: And also this means that the Trump team loses a 62 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:20,000 Speaker 3: ground to try to stop the trial by saying, wait 63 00:03:20,000 --> 00:03:23,160 Speaker 3: a second, this shouldn't be in Washington, D C. This 64 00:03:23,200 --> 00:03:26,600 Speaker 3: should be in Florida. But I think that, you know, 65 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:30,600 Speaker 3: the prosecutors are going to have a harder time in Florida, 66 00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:32,680 Speaker 3: that the jury pool is not going to be as 67 00:03:32,680 --> 00:03:36,560 Speaker 3: sympathetic to the federal government as it might have been 68 00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:37,160 Speaker 3: in DC. 69 00:03:38,360 --> 00:03:42,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, but that does not stop mister Trump from trying 70 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,160 Speaker 2: to change the venue. But Florida is where he has 71 00:03:45,240 --> 00:03:47,040 Speaker 2: indicated that he would like it. Correct. 72 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:51,520 Speaker 3: I don't know exactly what he said about it, but 73 00:03:51,920 --> 00:03:55,040 Speaker 3: one assumes that he preferred Florida. As I said, it's, 74 00:03:55,080 --> 00:03:57,160 Speaker 3: you know, a venue where there would likely be a 75 00:03:57,280 --> 00:04:01,680 Speaker 3: jury pool that's friendlier to him and less likely to 76 00:04:02,320 --> 00:04:04,760 Speaker 3: you know, agree with the federal government on some things 77 00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:09,360 Speaker 3: as opposed to you know, DC or New York. So yeah, 78 00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:12,320 Speaker 3: I think that that would be the best, the preferred 79 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:15,080 Speaker 3: venue for him. And it's just I think it shows 80 00:04:15,080 --> 00:04:17,880 Speaker 3: that the prosecutors want to move this along very quickly. 81 00:04:17,920 --> 00:04:19,479 Speaker 3: They want to get this to trial, and they don't 82 00:04:19,480 --> 00:04:20,919 Speaker 3: want to be hung up in a lot of pre 83 00:04:21,080 --> 00:04:21,880 Speaker 3: trial motions. 84 00:04:22,480 --> 00:04:25,480 Speaker 2: Yeah. And so Tuesday you say would be short. Now, 85 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:29,080 Speaker 2: let's go through the as you say, it's sealed it 86 00:04:29,520 --> 00:04:32,800 Speaker 2: and it will will be opened most probably on Tuesday 87 00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:37,839 Speaker 2: by the by the court. But the potential charges could 88 00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:41,640 Speaker 2: be number one, that he took classified documents out of 89 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:47,159 Speaker 2: the White House. Number two that he that he obstructed 90 00:04:47,360 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 2: justice in trying to let the FBI or DJ do 91 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:54,719 Speaker 2: its job. That those are potential Are they not right? 92 00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:57,760 Speaker 3: And I think, you know, the obstruction of justice charge 93 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:01,760 Speaker 3: is very serious. And I something that you know, as 94 00:05:01,839 --> 00:05:05,640 Speaker 3: we analyze the evidence that they seemed to have, that 95 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:09,360 Speaker 3: they might have enough to make a case about obstruction 96 00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:12,400 Speaker 3: of justice. I mean, we discovered that they have all 97 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:15,919 Speaker 3: kinds of evidence. For example, they have a video tape 98 00:05:16,120 --> 00:05:20,320 Speaker 3: of someone moving the boxes fro in mar Lago to 99 00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:25,480 Speaker 3: a storage room the day before the federal prosecutors were 100 00:05:25,480 --> 00:05:29,799 Speaker 3: scheduled to appear to collect them. There apparently is a tape, 101 00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:34,000 Speaker 3: an audio tape of former President Trump bragging to a 102 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:37,599 Speaker 3: group of people that he had in his hand. No 103 00:05:37,640 --> 00:05:39,040 Speaker 3: one saw it was in his hand, but he had 104 00:05:39,080 --> 00:05:45,599 Speaker 3: in his hand some classified material about US intervention with Iraq, 105 00:05:45,760 --> 00:05:49,560 Speaker 3: with possible with Iran. And also that he said that 106 00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:52,240 Speaker 3: he knew that he shouldn't have. That's like a critical 107 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:56,200 Speaker 3: piece of information because he's admitting that he knew what 108 00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 3: was going on. And also something that I think sort 109 00:05:59,080 --> 00:06:01,919 Speaker 3: of when this happened, I thought, well, they have a 110 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:06,680 Speaker 3: case because one of his attorneys has had to go 111 00:06:06,920 --> 00:06:11,320 Speaker 3: before the grand jury and testify because the judge ruled 112 00:06:11,520 --> 00:06:14,640 Speaker 3: what's called a crime fraud exception, and that is that 113 00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:19,400 Speaker 3: if the judge believes that the defendant in this case, 114 00:06:19,400 --> 00:06:22,359 Speaker 3: so the potential defendant in this case is using the 115 00:06:22,440 --> 00:06:26,440 Speaker 3: lawyer as part of the crime, it's not the lawyer's crime, 116 00:06:26,600 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 3: it's the defendant's crime, then they allow them to pierce 117 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:34,520 Speaker 3: the lawyer client privilege. And that's very rare that it happens, 118 00:06:34,560 --> 00:06:37,520 Speaker 3: and very rare that it that it's granted. And in 119 00:06:37,560 --> 00:06:41,799 Speaker 3: this case, Evan Corkran ended up not only testifying before 120 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:45,719 Speaker 3: the grand jury, but also turning over written notes and 121 00:06:45,760 --> 00:06:48,679 Speaker 3: are written and an audio tape that he had about 122 00:06:48,720 --> 00:06:52,680 Speaker 3: his conversations with Trump. So there seems to be a 123 00:06:52,720 --> 00:06:56,960 Speaker 3: lot of evidence beyond just what we know about, you know, 124 00:06:57,040 --> 00:06:59,800 Speaker 3: people coming in and testifying as to what Trump's state 125 00:06:59,839 --> 00:07:01,760 Speaker 3: of mine was. So, you know, it would be really 126 00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:06,960 Speaker 3: interesting to see whether this indictment sort of walk through 127 00:07:07,360 --> 00:07:10,960 Speaker 3: the evidence that they have a talking indictment rather than 128 00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:13,480 Speaker 3: what happened in New York where we didn't know very 129 00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:14,920 Speaker 3: much when we saw the indictment. 130 00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:20,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, and June I I. And again I'm not trying 131 00:07:20,040 --> 00:07:22,880 Speaker 2: to be cynical here, but it would be very smart 132 00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:25,880 Speaker 2: for mister Trump at this point to not say too much. 133 00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:29,840 Speaker 2: And yet he's on truth social part of his posting 134 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:33,600 Speaker 2: blitz now is quote that corrupt Biden administration has informed 135 00:07:33,640 --> 00:07:36,120 Speaker 2: my attorneys that I have been indicted seemingly over the 136 00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:40,600 Speaker 2: Box's hoax. So he's not going to calm the heat 137 00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:43,040 Speaker 2: going into this. But could any of what he says 138 00:07:43,080 --> 00:07:45,640 Speaker 2: now be be held against him in the court of. 139 00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:49,560 Speaker 3: Law, Well, it depends on what he says. I mean, 140 00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 3: he said so much about these documents. He said that 141 00:07:52,840 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 3: he could, you know, wave his hand and all the 142 00:07:55,440 --> 00:08:00,720 Speaker 3: documents were declassified, and that just by asking for them. 143 00:08:01,080 --> 00:08:04,040 Speaker 3: I mean, he said so many things that really are 144 00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 3: not grounded in fact. But what I think he's trying 145 00:08:07,040 --> 00:08:09,600 Speaker 3: to do here to a certain extent is, you know, 146 00:08:09,840 --> 00:08:12,920 Speaker 3: mess with the jury pool, sort of get the jury 147 00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:16,440 Speaker 3: pool in his favor. And that's difficult to do. But 148 00:08:16,600 --> 00:08:19,160 Speaker 3: yet enough you hear enough of this over and over 149 00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:22,600 Speaker 3: and over again, and it starts to affect some people. 150 00:08:22,680 --> 00:08:25,720 Speaker 3: So I think in this case. If it's held in Florida, 151 00:08:25,760 --> 00:08:28,600 Speaker 3: as we suspect, there's going to have to be a 152 00:08:28,680 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 3: lot a really strenuous waddear of the jurors, the potential jurors, 153 00:08:33,880 --> 00:08:36,280 Speaker 3: to make sure that they've not been painted by any 154 00:08:36,320 --> 00:08:38,840 Speaker 3: of these things. But Trump is also running for public 155 00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 3: office for president, so he also wants to get the 156 00:08:42,280 --> 00:08:44,360 Speaker 3: electorate on his side. So he has a lot of 157 00:08:44,360 --> 00:08:48,280 Speaker 3: different reasons for getting out there and making these statements, 158 00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:51,360 Speaker 3: even though his attorneys may have advised him and probably 159 00:08:51,440 --> 00:08:53,680 Speaker 3: did advise him not to say anything. I mean, we 160 00:08:53,800 --> 00:08:57,400 Speaker 3: saw what happened with the New York case. Basically ignore them. 161 00:08:57,840 --> 00:09:01,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, absolutely, the pattern is there. June. You are 162 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:05,600 Speaker 2: absolutely awesome as usual, and I know you're prepping for 163 00:09:05,640 --> 00:09:07,960 Speaker 2: a Bloomberg law and this will be up on top 164 00:09:08,040 --> 00:09:11,600 Speaker 2: and that follows Daybreak Asia here on Bloomberg. June Grosso, 165 00:09:12,280 --> 00:09:15,600 Speaker 2: legal expert here, Thank you so much for your time, 166 00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 2: really appreciate it. Let's get some political impact now from 167 00:09:20,679 --> 00:09:24,640 Speaker 2: Bloomberg's Jenny Shanze, professor of Bloomberg Politics, contributor and author 168 00:09:24,679 --> 00:09:31,559 Speaker 2: of American Democracy and Crisis. Okay, Jeannie, The immediate political 169 00:09:31,880 --> 00:09:35,840 Speaker 2: impact will be a bit mixed. But it hasn't seemed 170 00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:39,600 Speaker 2: to affect any of the legal problems his overall stature 171 00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:41,040 Speaker 2: in the polls, does it? 172 00:09:41,040 --> 00:09:44,040 Speaker 4: It has not. I mean, he is still polling nationally 173 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:47,880 Speaker 4: in the double digits, although that is subject to change. 174 00:09:47,960 --> 00:09:50,680 Speaker 4: And you know, I think this week alone, as we've 175 00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:54,880 Speaker 4: seen at least three big entries into the race, it 176 00:09:55,000 --> 00:09:57,839 Speaker 4: is a sign that there are Republicans out there who 177 00:09:58,080 --> 00:10:01,920 Speaker 4: feel that this is an individual who may not be 178 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:04,960 Speaker 4: in this race for the long term or is going 179 00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:08,320 Speaker 4: to be vulnerable. So while he's still leading by double 180 00:10:08,360 --> 00:10:12,040 Speaker 4: digits facing the indictment out of New York, the indictment 181 00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:15,120 Speaker 4: at the federal level is something that really could be 182 00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:17,560 Speaker 4: a game changer. And can I just say the word 183 00:10:17,600 --> 00:10:22,079 Speaker 4: here is extraordinary. Never in American history have we seen 184 00:10:22,200 --> 00:10:25,480 Speaker 4: something like this happen to a former president, let alone 185 00:10:25,520 --> 00:10:29,160 Speaker 4: somebody who is the leading candidate for the nomination for 186 00:10:29,280 --> 00:10:33,040 Speaker 4: the major party for the next election. So extraordinary by 187 00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:35,160 Speaker 4: any measure, regardless of what happens. 188 00:10:35,280 --> 00:10:39,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, history after history after history. Hey, Doug is in 189 00:10:39,240 --> 00:10:40,719 Speaker 2: New York. I think, Doug, you'd like to ask a 190 00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:41,319 Speaker 2: couple of questions. 191 00:10:41,360 --> 00:10:44,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, Jeanie, So that the move here that Trump is 192 00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:48,120 Speaker 1: playing seems to be that he wants to delegitimize this investigation, 193 00:10:48,240 --> 00:10:52,599 Speaker 1: the handling of the classified material. Is that still resonating 194 00:10:52,760 --> 00:10:55,760 Speaker 1: within the base or within the Republican Party. Are people 195 00:10:55,840 --> 00:10:59,120 Speaker 1: beginning to break away now and say, you know, we've 196 00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:02,520 Speaker 1: had enough. There may have been a violation of the 197 00:11:02,600 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 1: law here, and you're going to have to own up 198 00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:04,520 Speaker 1: to that. 199 00:11:05,320 --> 00:11:08,600 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think you know which Hunt has been sort 200 00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:11,760 Speaker 4: of the way in which he has approached any criticism 201 00:11:11,840 --> 00:11:15,160 Speaker 4: and certainly any move towards the legal realm in this 202 00:11:15,280 --> 00:11:17,880 Speaker 4: kind of thing. And he's going to continue to make 203 00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:19,920 Speaker 4: that case as you were just talking about. He's been 204 00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:23,079 Speaker 4: doing that actively on truth social almost in real time. 205 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:27,079 Speaker 4: But I do think we are seeing Republicans in places 206 00:11:27,120 --> 00:11:30,000 Speaker 4: like Iowa, New Hampshire where the base is really paying 207 00:11:30,040 --> 00:11:33,880 Speaker 4: attention to the upcoming election and they are looking they 208 00:11:33,880 --> 00:11:37,920 Speaker 4: are open to an alternative to Trump. I don't think 209 00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:41,000 Speaker 4: he will lose that thirty percent regardless of what happens 210 00:11:41,040 --> 00:11:43,480 Speaker 4: who have been with him this whole time. But I 211 00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:47,920 Speaker 4: do think we see like fifty sixty percent potentially of 212 00:11:48,040 --> 00:11:51,040 Speaker 4: the base of the Republican Party who says we would 213 00:11:51,080 --> 00:11:53,800 Speaker 4: be open to an alternative to Trump. That doesn't mean 214 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:57,160 Speaker 4: an anti Trump candidate, but an alternative to Trump. And 215 00:11:57,160 --> 00:11:59,439 Speaker 4: that's why I think we see now about ten to 216 00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:02,640 Speaker 4: twelve can that it's in this race. So there is 217 00:12:02,840 --> 00:12:06,439 Speaker 4: a willingness to look at other people because many Republicans 218 00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:08,760 Speaker 4: you talk to, even if they like what Donald Trump 219 00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:12,239 Speaker 4: did as president and they feel like he has been victimized, 220 00:12:12,679 --> 00:12:15,600 Speaker 4: they do feel like this is a lot for them 221 00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:18,000 Speaker 4: to handle and will make his ability to win the 222 00:12:18,080 --> 00:12:19,560 Speaker 4: general very very tough. 223 00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:23,040 Speaker 2: Now, Jenny the even President Biden, I was asked today 224 00:12:23,160 --> 00:12:25,920 Speaker 2: a news conference with Rishi Sunnek at the White House 225 00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:28,720 Speaker 2: and asked as he was had he folded up his 226 00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:32,840 Speaker 2: book and he was starting to leave. You know, if 227 00:12:32,880 --> 00:12:35,880 Speaker 2: you influence the DOJ, would you respond to what Donald 228 00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:38,400 Speaker 2: Trump is saying, which is what you're talking about? And 229 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:41,800 Speaker 2: he had to respond to that does this. So this 230 00:12:41,840 --> 00:12:44,160 Speaker 2: is going to play politically back and forth like that 231 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:47,200 Speaker 2: with Joe Biden not saying anything in Trump all over 232 00:12:47,280 --> 00:12:48,040 Speaker 2: social media. 233 00:12:48,559 --> 00:12:51,679 Speaker 4: That's right, and Joe Biden and the White House are smart. 234 00:12:51,800 --> 00:12:54,960 Speaker 4: The campaign on the Biden side is smart to not 235 00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:57,840 Speaker 4: say a word about this. If they were to jump 236 00:12:57,880 --> 00:13:00,440 Speaker 4: into this tray, it would be a big mistake. Donald 237 00:13:00,440 --> 00:13:03,360 Speaker 4: Trump is trying to goad them into saying something they 238 00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:07,800 Speaker 4: should keep quiet. You know, when your opposition is faltering, 239 00:13:07,960 --> 00:13:10,880 Speaker 4: let them falter is the rule. Don't jump in. And 240 00:13:10,960 --> 00:13:13,559 Speaker 4: so I think he's going to continue to be quiet. 241 00:13:13,559 --> 00:13:16,040 Speaker 4: I hope he is. But I do think Donald Trump 242 00:13:16,120 --> 00:13:17,720 Speaker 4: is not going to let up. He is going to 243 00:13:17,760 --> 00:13:20,840 Speaker 4: continue to say that this is a witch hunt, This 244 00:13:21,040 --> 00:13:25,040 Speaker 4: is something that is politically motivated, and there is an 245 00:13:25,120 --> 00:13:28,240 Speaker 4: audience for that argument. But I also think there are 246 00:13:28,280 --> 00:13:32,040 Speaker 4: Republicans out there, a large percentage, who say, even if 247 00:13:32,040 --> 00:13:34,760 Speaker 4: he was victimized in this way, it's going to be 248 00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:37,360 Speaker 4: difficult for him to win the general And for our 249 00:13:37,920 --> 00:13:40,640 Speaker 4: own purposes, if we hope to beat Joe Biden, as 250 00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:42,959 Speaker 4: many of them, all of them do, we've got to 251 00:13:43,000 --> 00:13:45,839 Speaker 4: look elsewhere. So while this may help Donald Trump to 252 00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:48,440 Speaker 4: a certain extent, I don't think in the long term 253 00:13:48,480 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 4: it's going to be a winning strategy for him. 254 00:13:50,440 --> 00:13:53,760 Speaker 1: So at what point, if you're a Republican candidate running 255 00:13:53,760 --> 00:13:56,439 Speaker 1: for president, Jeanie, do you make the choice to kind 256 00:13:56,440 --> 00:13:59,480 Speaker 1: of cross the line to not defend the president, or 257 00:13:59,520 --> 00:14:02,600 Speaker 1: to remain silent and to be critical and to actually 258 00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:06,840 Speaker 1: say former President Trump you're carrying too much baggage around, 259 00:14:06,840 --> 00:14:09,920 Speaker 1: particularly on the legal front. You're not the ideal candidate 260 00:14:09,960 --> 00:14:11,439 Speaker 1: if we want to retake the White House. 261 00:14:11,840 --> 00:14:14,559 Speaker 4: I think we're already seeing that happen. We saw Vice 262 00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:17,679 Speaker 4: President Pence out in just the last couple of days, obviously, 263 00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:21,160 Speaker 4: governor former Governor Chris Christie out making that case. So 264 00:14:21,320 --> 00:14:26,440 Speaker 4: I do think we are hearing potential representatives and potential 265 00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:30,560 Speaker 4: candidates for the Republican nomination who are making that case. Already. 266 00:14:30,840 --> 00:14:33,680 Speaker 4: Ron DeSantis has made that case when he's been asked 267 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:36,920 Speaker 4: even things as basic as you need a two term 268 00:14:36,960 --> 00:14:39,720 Speaker 4: Republican he's saying, and not a one term. So I 269 00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:42,160 Speaker 4: do think we're hearing that, and I think if he 270 00:14:42,440 --> 00:14:46,040 Speaker 4: is in fact indicted, or when he is indicted, facing 271 00:14:46,080 --> 00:14:48,640 Speaker 4: the amount of charges that he's facing, as serious as 272 00:14:48,680 --> 00:14:51,440 Speaker 4: they are, we're going to hear that drum beat more 273 00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:54,960 Speaker 4: and more from these opposition candidates. A few have been 274 00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:57,280 Speaker 4: reticent to make that case, but I think more and 275 00:14:57,320 --> 00:14:59,120 Speaker 4: more the damn is going to be broken and we 276 00:14:59,160 --> 00:15:00,960 Speaker 4: are going to hear that argument made. 277 00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:04,600 Speaker 2: Timing this is going to be Jeannie going on. Now 278 00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:07,600 Speaker 2: the core case doesn't come be presented immediately This is 279 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:11,720 Speaker 2: probably going to run into primary season, and even it 280 00:15:11,760 --> 00:15:15,680 Speaker 2: could run toward the general. Can he be elected? Do 281 00:15:15,720 --> 00:15:17,520 Speaker 2: you believe? And I know I'm asking for your opinion. 282 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:18,280 Speaker 2: Can he be elected? 283 00:15:19,520 --> 00:15:23,120 Speaker 4: I think realistically, could he be elected in the general, 284 00:15:23,280 --> 00:15:26,440 Speaker 4: I do not believe. So I go with Governor Chris Sanunu, 285 00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:29,840 Speaker 4: who says, you know, a vote for Donald Trump in 286 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:33,000 Speaker 4: the Republican primary at this point is a vote for 287 00:15:33,120 --> 00:15:35,640 Speaker 4: Joe Biden. And that is the argument I think you're 288 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:40,120 Speaker 4: going to hear Republicans make increasingly. It's simply difficult, given 289 00:15:40,160 --> 00:15:42,960 Speaker 4: the math to imagine that he could win over the 290 00:15:43,000 --> 00:15:46,960 Speaker 4: Moderates and Independence and the Republicans. He needs to capture 291 00:15:46,960 --> 00:15:49,920 Speaker 4: the White House. Could he win the nomination? Yes, if 292 00:15:49,960 --> 00:15:53,200 Speaker 4: there are you know, a large number of Republicans vying 293 00:15:53,320 --> 00:15:55,680 Speaker 4: for this and they stay in a long time, he 294 00:15:55,720 --> 00:15:58,960 Speaker 4: can hold his thirty, but he fairly difficult to win 295 00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:01,320 Speaker 4: the general. But to your point about the timing, it's 296 00:16:01,440 --> 00:16:04,960 Speaker 4: utterly astounding. Already we see the New York case schedule 297 00:16:05,200 --> 00:16:09,080 Speaker 4: just after Super Tuesday. You couple a federal indictment with that, 298 00:16:09,560 --> 00:16:13,280 Speaker 4: whatever happens at Georgia, and this is going to be astounding. 299 00:16:13,360 --> 00:16:15,400 Speaker 4: This is a man who's going to be focused on 300 00:16:15,720 --> 00:16:21,120 Speaker 4: fighting for his life and yet also running for president again. Extraordinary, 301 00:16:21,240 --> 00:16:23,480 Speaker 4: like nothing we've ever seen in American history. 302 00:16:23,560 --> 00:16:24,040 Speaker 3: If you're just. 303 00:16:24,120 --> 00:16:28,080 Speaker 1: Joining us here on Bloomberger Daybreak Asia, that is Genie Shechianzeno, 304 00:16:28,240 --> 00:16:32,720 Speaker 1: Professor also Bloomberg Politics contributor, helping us unpack the story 305 00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:35,880 Speaker 1: that we've been talking about. Former President Trump saying today 306 00:16:35,960 --> 00:16:39,040 Speaker 1: a short while ago on truth Social that his attorneys 307 00:16:39,080 --> 00:16:43,240 Speaker 1: have been informed that he was indicted by the Special 308 00:16:43,280 --> 00:16:46,800 Speaker 1: Prosecutor Jack Smith's office, and The New York Times reporting 309 00:16:47,120 --> 00:16:49,960 Speaker 1: that mister Trump is set to surrender to authorities in 310 00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:51,960 Speaker 1: Miami next Tuesday.