WEBVTT - The Cycle: Pitching Streamers and Two-Start Pitcher Competition (Ep. 1025)

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle, Part three of the week.

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ryan Warmley, joined as always by Mike Mayer. Be

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out parts one and two if you

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>miss them Part one if you want to see me

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>do a shot at Tequila Live at ten am on

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the air as I celebrated the Orioles firing Brandon Hyde.

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting that in. So Mayor can't make a joke

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about me needing to do another shot here on part

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>three as you already did on part two, because I

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>already did that on part one. By the way, I

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>do want to remind everybody that if you're struggling with

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>lineup decisions, our lineup assistant recommends optimal lineup suggestions to

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>maximize your team's performance each day or week. Just sink

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 1>your league for Taylor guidance based on your roster in

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>league settings. Download the Fantasy Baseball My Playbook app or

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>visit fantasypros dot com slash MLB My Playbook to set

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>your winning lineup today. All right, Mayor, we're diving into

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>our streamers. What do you got for us?

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>All right? So using the Fantasy Pro Streamer tool, and

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 2>also I will say for the Tequila shot. It was

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 2>tenning mirror of time, but it was after twelve pm

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>my time, so it is socially acceptable where I am

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 2>just not worthy.

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Hey it's it's five o'clock somewhere right.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not in America though, So using the Pitching Streaming tool,

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I kind of I try to filter this by I

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 2>put in one of because you can like sink your

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>teams and kind of look at how this all works

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>and see who's available. I put in one of my

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 2>shower alert shallow where that's hard word to say, leagues

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>in here, just to kind of really hone in on

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 2>players who should be available for you to stream on Monday.

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 2>The really the only name I'm interested in it. It's

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 2>when I brought up a few times already and so

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 2>far it's gone well. Is Nick Martinez at the Royals.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 2>If you listen to the daily juice around the vetting

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>pro side, Matt Parral has just been hammering the Royals

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>team total under just over and over and over again.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 2>It just keeps winning. I think it just was. I

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>think it just lost yesterday after like a pretty incredible

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>streak of like hitting so many games, and according to

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 2>our tool, that's a good offensive target. And Matt Parral

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>has proven that, so you can win some money too

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>if you want to just tell the under team total

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 2>for the Royals. There's no other names. I'm really excited

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 2>about Zach Lettel against the Twins. I don't really know

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 2>about that, and no one else. I'm really very excited

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 2>about Tuesday. I had as a stay away day question

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>mark because I kind of looked at this day and

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't see.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>A whole lot this week's Friday is what you're saying.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Pretty much. The top name available is Bowden Francis, but

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 2>he has not had a good year and also like

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 2>might still be roster in ther league. He has the

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>best matchup according to this tool with VBR versus opponent.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 2>He's at the Texas Rangers. You know, offense is not

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>very good right now, but still when it comes to streaming,

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I trust Bowden Francis, And like

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 2>similar story for Lucas Gilito, like he's been like good bed,

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>good bed, good bet, and so not exactly someone I

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 2>want to trust in his seven point zero eight ear right,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 2>even though it is a decent matchup against the Brewers

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and then the only other one Chris Paddock at Tampa

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Bay is you know, probably the best option here. But

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>the Tampa Bay lineup is not scary, but that ballpark

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 2>is scary, so you know that's probably the best. You know,

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 2>someone he's been pitching better and you know, decent matchup,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 2>So probably Chris Baddock. But I would also just lean

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 2>stay away. On Tuesday, Wednesday, I had It's another pretty

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 2>light day in terms of like filtering by names available,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 2>This might just not be a great streaming week kind

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 2>of looking at this, the top name is at least

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Severino at Houston. I don't hate that, especially with your

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and on Alvarez. I assume we'll still be out. I

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 2>don't think I'll be back by then, so I don't

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>hate that, especially outside of that A's ballpark. But other

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 2>than that, not a whole lot I like on that day.

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Thursday is a funny one because, like I said before,

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>I filter this by like one of my shallower leagues,

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 2>not like super shallow, but on the shallow side, and

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 2>so it removes players who are rostered in that league.

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 2>And so because Thursday is a small slate and I

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>have my league sainct, there is one name available. Normally

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 2>there is like fifteen or you know, like that I'm

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 2>looking at and some of them are just started to

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 2>mention because they're bad. A Thursday, small slate is one name,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>so it's Jeffrey Springs or bust. So it's do you

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 2>want to stream Jeffrey Springs at Toronto? And there are

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>no other options that day. But also he's been pitching

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot better, so I don't know that I hate

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>that one. It's not that bad.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't hate that one. I will say I would

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I would do Springs if he's available.

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Friday, I managed to find a name this week,

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Colin Reya again against the Reds, not on the road.

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 2>He's at home against the Reds. You could also do

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Justin Berlander at the Marlins. Jose Siriano at the Guardians

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>is probably my third choice there, but I don't think

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I want to get in bed with anything else there

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 2>unless you want to do Dean Kramer against the White Sox,

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>but I assume you probably don't.

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean against the White Sox maybe, but.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not really. On Saturday, the top name of album

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 2>was when we just mentioned Ben Brown, but we don't

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 2>know if he's one hundred pcent going to make that start,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see Charlie Morton against the White Sox. Probably

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 2>not gonna do that. I don't think I want to

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>get into anything Charlie Morton's up to these days. How

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 2>about this?

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You you very literally could not pay me to start

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Morton.

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 2>Would you do Zebbie Matthews against Seattle at Seattle?

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it depends on how much of a need

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it was, but I'd consider it.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean his first start wasn't that great, but yeah,

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>that's probably well. I will warrant, Oh, will warrant if

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 2>it's at the Dodgers. Now, I'm not streaming Will Warren

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>against the Dodgers.

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 2>I saw Will Warren. I got excited and then I

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.679
<v Speaker 2>saw the matchup, so I'm not doing him against the Dodgers.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I actually have him, like I mentioned, in a deeper league,

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 2>but I didn't start him this week even though it

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 2>was a two star week because the second start was

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 2>against the Daughters. But his first start was really good.

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 2>And then to close out the week, there's Nick Martinez again,

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>but he's at the Cubs. I'm probably not going to

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 2>do that. Here's a question for you, though, Nick Martinez,

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 2>if you have to do him in a for a

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>two start week and you have to lock him in

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>your lineup? Are you doing it with the starts Monday

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 2>is at Kansas City and then Sunday would be at

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the Cubs. Are you running that risk or are you

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>just staying away from that.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 1>M That's a tough one. I think I would not

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>run that risk. I think I would only start him

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>if I could just do Monday as a streamer. I

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>would not lock in the two star week.

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it depends on how desperate I am in

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 2>a league. I have a couple of these.

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty scared of at the Cubs.

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that makes me nervous. Yeah, I think that's fair.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.559
<v Speaker 2>And then other than that, there's bound in Francis again

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.679
<v Speaker 2>at home against the Athletics. So again, if you streamed

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 2>him on Monday, you'd be streaming him in it's a

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 2>weekly league, you'd be streaming.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, I would prefer Francis locking in

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a two start week over Martinez given the matchups.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>What was his first matchup, Okay, at Texas and then

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 2>against the Athletics, but at home. I don't hate that.

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I would I'm not saying it's like the perfect no matchup,

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but like that's better to me than having one of

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the starts to be at the Cubs.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there aren't many other good options here. They're

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 2>either really bad pitchers or have really bad matchups. So

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, not a great streaming week, but

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>those are the options.

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's go to our two start picture competition. You

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 1>do have the lead four to two, although I still

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>maintain that one of those weeks was blatantly unfair that

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you got the win, so it really should be three

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to three, but it is currently four to two. So

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see see how our current week goes, where I

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have Schooble and you have Framber. You won the most

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>recent week with Michael King. I did have to go

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>as Shane Boz obviously because Hunter Green was hurt, which

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I knew it was a risk, and you know Boz

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>was not good, particularly in the second start, so that

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was an easy win for you. Like I said, we'll

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>see how week seven wraps up. Of For week eight,

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>we actually had some good names. I feel like this

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is the first week in like a month where there

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>were multiple options and it was guys that we hadn't

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>used already, Like we really had a number of good choices.

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I ultimately went with Jacob de Gram, and the main

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>reason I went with him was because I think it

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>was Yamamoto had at least one start that I didn't love,

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and I figured, I'm gonna like him again later in

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the season. I'll just save him. But the other real

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>main thought was I don't I have been really on

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the train of I do not want to Gram. I

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>do not trust him to stay healthy. He's pitching awesome

0:08:58.000 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I mean I expected him to be

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>good when he was on the mound. I just didn't

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>think we'd get the innings out of him. So I

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.599
<v Speaker 1>want to use him before you've already used him. I

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>also want to use him early, before the inevitable injury

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>comes that I keep predicting. Plus, he gets Toronto and

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Saint Louis, like, you know, I'm comfortable with those matchups obviously,

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So he's on a heater. He's actually healthy. I'm sure,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, knock on wood jinxing it, but I'll

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>take to ground while I can.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing something similar on the other side. I'm going

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>with Garrett Crochet, you know, similar injury concerns, just because

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>you know we've only ever seen this last year and

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 2>before that pretty lengthy injury history. But right now, Garrett

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Crochet has been incredible. You know, despite what Welsh says,

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm leading off, he's been really, really good. He's got

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 2>a sub two era looks incredible. His matchups are at

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the Brewers and at the Brave, so don't necessarily love

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>that I'm streaming two road starts, but also not the

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>worst matchups. Although the unfortunate thing is I could be

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>playing with fire with that second start because it's at

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the Braves. But Acuna is going to be back, so

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 2>that could be interesting.

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was one reason why I went away from

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Crochet because I got to the sheet first. I considered

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>taking him though, because you couldn't take de Graham and

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>then forcing you to use a different player. But I

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just figured I want to take de Grom and I

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>like the matchup.

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Some gamesmanship for me. There there were some other names,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>think about it.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of good options.

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Yamamoto, but one of those starts against the.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Yankees, Yes, that's what it was, the Yankees.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Joe Ryan is not I don't know if I've used

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Joe Ryan, but Joe Ryan's another.

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Really, this was not a week where like, if your

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>first choice was gone, you were gonna have to fall

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>back on Shane Boz or Shane's Smith. I went Shane

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>back to back weeks thanks to Kelly. That's brutal shock

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>are They both lost? All right? So we'll see how

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that goes, and then our weekend excitement. We'll go quickly

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>here because I got to get out of here. Hunter

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Green returns on Friday, the aforementioned Hunter Green to face

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cubs. So I mean, that's a really fun matchup

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>if he's back in healthy that I'm really excited to

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>watch that one. Green versus the Cubs, Freddy Praultzo versus

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Paul Skins, fun matchup, a couple of pictures. And then

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Zach wheel Or versus your beloved Jeffrey Springs. I don't

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>highlight that one as well, but really, like the big

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>one for me is Green on Friday against the Cubs

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the big highlight of the weekend for me.

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 2>What about you, I gotta say, you write verse vs.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Without the period? I don't care for that. I don't

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>really like.

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually definitely do both. Like sometimes I write with

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>the period and sometimes I don't it. There is literally

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>no rhyme or reason to my logic. There.

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 2>For my weekend excitement, I have the battle of the

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Cell Highs, Nick Pivetta versus Chris Sale, Nick Pavetta being

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>more of a sell higher than Chris Sale, but two

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>people I've talked about on the show as Cell Highs

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 2>in the past. Also Ronald Lacunya returning. The great irony

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>being I can't I'm in Georgia, but I can't watch

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 2>the Braves because of wonderful MLB blackout rules. They are

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>not on the cable provider that I have, so that's awesome.

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 2>But you know I'll see highlights of ron Lalguni returning.

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>And then the last one is, like I mentioned, I

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 2>recently traded for san Diel Contre because I'm interested in

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 2>buying low on him and he has a pretty rupe

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 2>will start against Angels, and I want to see if

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 2>this is the beginning of him turning things around.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll go ahead and wrap things up there.

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everybody for tuning in to our pitching focused episode.

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>We of course did Routing the Bases is part one

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>where we went through Brandon Hide and we did some

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>grade the trade, we talked some rules changes we'd like

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to see. We did a whole bunch of stuff in

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Part one and super fun. I also did it tequila

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>shots to go watch that if you want to see

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that on YouTube. And then part two we did our

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>usual buys and sales and waiver stuff. So a great

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>bunch of episodes this week. Hope everybody enjoyed them this weekend.

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>For Mayor, I'm Ryan Warmley. Thanks for tuning in. We'll

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>see you again next time. And by the way, next

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>week we'll be Kelly Kirby instead of Mayor. You get

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>a fun, rare worm and Kelly episodes, so that'll be

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>fun to chat with her and see. I told her

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>already I want to do a segment on some lessons

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>she's learned in the first few months of this season,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see. We'll see what Kelly has to say.

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.839
<v Speaker 1>But for Mayor, I'm Ryan, thanks for tuning in. We'll

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>see you next week. Thanks for listening to the Fantasy

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast. If you love the show, the

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>best freeway to support us is by leaving a positive

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, Follow us on x, Instagram,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok at Fantasy Pros and subscribe to our YouTube

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>channel at YouTube dot com Slash Fantasy Pros MLB