WEBVTT - Let's Talk About Slack, Baby

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to game Plan, this show about our lives at work.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Francesca Leavie, editor of the game Plan section at Bloomberg,

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Rebecca Greenfield, a reporter at Bloomberg, where I

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>cover workplace culture. This week, how group chat platforms like

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Slack are changing the way we communicate at work. Coming

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>up in a little bit, we'll talk to Dana Evans,

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a reporter at New York Magazine who has a complicated

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>relationship with Slack and group chat that she's written about extensively.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>She's going to explain to us how it is that

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>an enterprise workplace software affected her life so much she

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>wrote a personal essay about it. But first of all,

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get out of the way what group chat is, Becca,

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to give the basic description. Slack is group chat,

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>and just from now on. There are lots of different

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>group chats, but I think we're just going to use

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Slack a shorthand for all of them, because it's a

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>really popular, notable one. But yeah, there are others like

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>hip chat and campfire, and all of them basically are

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>just chat rooms where you hang out with your coworkers

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>all day and it's kind of a primary way of

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>communicating with coworkers, and it's work sanctioned, so it's kind

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of like your work email, but chat right and you

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>can email people one on one, or message people one

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on one through this app, or talk to them in

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>special rooms that are divided by department or by team,

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>or by project you're working on, or by anything you

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>make up right, Like you can make a slack room

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for I don't know, talking about the Real Housewives of Atlanta,

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that a one of those? Yeah, that's that is

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the housewives and probably a really popular slack room. Yeah,

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>i'd say, I don't know what. I don't know how

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it rates against the other Real Housewives. I mean, it

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>depends on your taste. But you know, a girl, I know,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like an O C. I don't watch the Real Housewives. Sure, yeah,

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean either um so. But anyway, so what we're

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about here, on its face, doesn't sound that unusual

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>or new, right, Like it's chat rooms have been around

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>since basically the dawn of the consumer Internet, Like when

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Internet was sort of commercialized in the mid early

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>mid nineties, that's how people communicated on like a O

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>L chat rooms. Yeah, I think the only thing I

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>did online as a young young kid online was check

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>my email for I don't know what and then go

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>to A O L chat rooms and pretend to be

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>eighteen years old, which is really, how old were you really?

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I was probably I don't know what. What year do

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>you think this was? Like? So yeah, I was really

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I was like six to eight. Wow, you're pretending to Yeah,

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I don't know what that says about,

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like society, But so yeah, these chat rooms are similar

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>in form to the A O L chat rooms, different

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and function I would say, So nobody's asking a s

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>L because you know everybody and age, sex location, right

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a popular query on a L chat rooms. So yeah,

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they are different than AMIL chat rooms because it's very

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>work related. I mean, it was made specifically for offices

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for work, so a lot of the conversations are about work.

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But then there are also a lot of conversations that

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>aren't about work, which is kind of why it's gotten

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so popular and my people like using it so much. Right, So,

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>like all of these companies came into this space kind

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of at a time when the modern office was ripe

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>for a new way of communicating. Would you say, I

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>think the word you're looking for is disruption. No, I

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't looking for it, but it found found you. Yeah,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like everyone hates email. It's like a thing

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people love to hate. H Let's talk about that a

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit, because I feel like the idea of an

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>enterprise workplace chat room feels new or had such room

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to take off. The way it has is because we've

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>reached a tipping point with how much seem to hate email,

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>which once was supposed to be the solution to all

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>our problems. Right before email, We don't before email. We

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>just grunted at each other before email. Obviously that we're

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>plugged into walls. Yeah, people spend more and more of

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>their time at work at email. One stat I found

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>was that people spent thirteen hours a week out of

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>their forty hour work week answering emails. It's like, not

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>very fun. That's a shocking number of hours to spend.

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>That's like all of the waking hours in one day.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you spend five days at work a week,

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those is consumed by email. Maybe if we

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>had no email at work, we could argue for a

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>four day work week, since we spend a whole day

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>answering email. Maybe, but then how would we communicate with

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>all of our colleagues who work from home or in

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>office is abroad Slack No, But yeah, so email is

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>just I don't think that I have a troubled relationship

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with email. I again, have that I am not. You're

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not troubled by not responding to email, right, I guess

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm rude. I just don't answer emails. I just I

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>use it kind of like how you know, I use

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it for what I want to use it for. I

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have a troubled relationship with email, and I also don't

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>answer emails. But then I'm plagued with guilt about it,

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and that must be hard. Yeah, Slack kind of came

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>along and was like, here's a much more casual way

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to communicate with your coworkers. The conversations tend to be

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>way more casual. It's a lot easier. There's some fun

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>integrated into slack. There's like a very simple command for

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>putting in gifts or gifts whatever you prefer is correct,

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and so that kind of makes the conversations very informal.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>It replaces a lot of annoying type of email. I

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>think like it doesn't replace email completely, but kind of

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the annoying like just checking in on something email, which

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is can be like an annoyance and turn into a

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>monster very quickly. And then also because it's way more

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>fun than an email, which has kind of become a

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>very formalized form of communication, people really gravitated, right, Like

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about it being fun compared to email,

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I think if you've never never worked on a chat

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>platform at work or on Slack, you might not know

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what we mean. But it it's sort of like designed

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>in the language of the Internet, Like it's just kind

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of easier to communicate in the way that you might

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>normally like send somebody a text or tweet something. In

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the interfering, it's more like talking. And that's another thing

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>about Slack. It has also in addition to being a

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of email replacement, it's a kind of a meeting replacement,

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>another like much hated part of office life, Like people

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>hate going to pointless meetings where everybody is just kind

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of performing. So now you have a lot of these

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>conversations on Slack, So give me a sense of the growth,

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>because we're not now talking about something that's really even

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that niche anymore. Yeah, no, it It grew from a

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty thousand years years two years ago to like

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 1>millions of people logging in today. I see tons of

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>people on their phones using slack out and about in

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>New York City all the time. And it isn't just

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a couple of industries using it. Now

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it's spreading so mainstream right tech media startups. NASA's jet

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>propulsion laboratory is on slack that it's been reported slack

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>slack chapters. Yeah, no slack, I mean slack loves championing

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this great get for them because it shows like like,

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just something for like a bunch of young

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>tech bros. This is something that's useful for office life

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of any kind. So it's a real phenomenon. And it

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>came about as a way of solving a lot of

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the efficients, a lot of the efficiency and communication problems

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that everybody was having at work. And has it done that?

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So obviously not. There is a slack lash that has started.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Slacklash being a term that you coined, I believe, so

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe I coined it, and I wrote a piece

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>back in January that was titled You're about to hate

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Slack as much as you hate email, and just kind

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of made the point that this communication at work is

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fraught and stressful and and it's starting to stress people out.

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I find it very stressful posting in these group platforms

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Like I have a lot of like

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>social anxiety about what I post inside a Slack chat

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>room and like who's responding and who's not, and like

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want to have to think about that

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>at work when I have a million other things going on,

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Like that is a productivity suck. My anxiety is sucking

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>up my productivity. And there's another downside, which is that

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you can forget because it's so easy to type in

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a Slack message or a stupid joke that you might

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>not make in a more polished context. It's easy to

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>forget that everything that you write is on the record

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and your employer knows about it, and it's going to

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>live forever, even if it feels really temporal. And actually,

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you don't believe me, let's listen to an example

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of kind of the worst case scenario of that, and

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>what is a campfire? Transferred campfire is a chat tool,

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And then if we go down just giving the middle

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sections and entry. I can't be it, says you, guys

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>don't even know how good this whole Cogan shape is

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>f Megan Fox. And then Max Are replies, whole Cogan

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>fuc k is Megan Fox. Sorry, I don't really like

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to say that. The works on the record, um, and

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:43.079
<v Speaker 1>then k WSAs she wishes. He gets really tender at

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the end, a really tender like drop. Do you know

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what that's a reference to. It's the extension of a

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>joke about um. The joke is I can manager. Okay.

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So what you just heard was the an editor at

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the website Gawker explaining to a lawyer who appears to

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>have very little sense of humor what he meant and

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>his colleagues meant months or even years earlier, when they

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>were discussing on Campfire, one of these group chat platforms,

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a sex tape that they were about to release featuring

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a former professional wrestler, Hulk Hogan. Um. And this is

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a court case, highly publicized court case, where the Hulk

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>was suing Gawker for releasing the sex tape. And I

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of the people who were making these

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>blue jokes in Campfire ever expected to hear them mentioned again,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>let alone read aloud in open court by their editor. Yeah,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>when you I saw. I've read the transcripts of their

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>chats because they're part of evidence, and it's just like

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all jokes left and right, jokes. Everybody is just joking

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about Hulk Coogan's penis and the tender leg drop joke,

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, using a lot of slang, and it's very

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>clear that, I mean, for most people, this wouldn't even

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>look like an appropriate workplace conversation, right. I think Gawker

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is kind of known for an edgy or style, and

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I think probably even in the newsroom it's employees speak

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a little more freely than some others, and this is

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like obviously like the most casual form of their communications.

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, there's no way they thought they'd

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>ever see those again. I think in these chat platforms,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>you feel like it's like disappears once you type it,

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like because it's like literally a feed that like scrolls up,

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gone, but it's obviously not. Yes, you are supposed

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to never I've been told by lawyers, never type in anything,

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>type or write anything you wouldn't want on the front

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>page of the New York Times, which I feel like

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit of a dated like guidelines, like maybe

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>it's on the front page of Gawker or like a

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>viral tweet, like, but that's the thing, Like it seems

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like we have to relearn this with every new technology.

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Like most people are pretty savvy about incorporating that advice

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to sending an email. You wouldn't. If

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a conversation that's kind of sensitive,

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you should probably have it over the phone

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>or in person and not over email. But for some reason,

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>because lack is new, because it feels kind of off

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the grid or fun or social, people just don't have

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the same relationship to it that they do with email. Yeah,

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>email used to be fun when it first entered offices,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>people gossipped and made jokes. And then when I think

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>people started getting in trouble for these things and it

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>became more like formalized in the workplace, it became this

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>more formal, boring, strictly work related tool. Part of why

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we hate it so much. And but slack is so

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>new and that behaviors seems so casual. It's like something

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>has to have been publicly subpoenaed in a hundred court

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>cases before, Like we've all heard of court cases that

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>feature email transcripts, and our presidential campaign, one of the

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 1>main issues swirling around that is Hillary Clinton's emails and

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>what they say and to whom they were sent. And

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you know the idea that I mean, yes, of course

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>people keep making mistakes on emails, but it's like, this

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is the first example of the sort of clinical examination

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of a group chat, of the campfire transcript that we're

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of used to seeing. This is the first high

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>profile example of that kind of treatment of a group

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>chat transcript. Then, you know, with government agencies now starting

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to use slack like their stuff can be foiad this

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is it's work, it's work chat. But all of us

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>are so guilty. You know, it's like we're talking to

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>our friends, right, And that kind of confusion between how

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.599
<v Speaker 1>to treat slack, whether it's a work thing or a

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>personal thing, is something that is very much on the

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>mind of our guest. So I think it's a great

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>time to introduce her. Dana Evans. She's a writer for

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>New York Magazine, and back in January she wrote an

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>article called are my Coworkers slacking off without me, Dana,

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>We're very happy to have you here. What do you

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>think of how we described slack? Did we basically get

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it right? Yeah? I mean I think that that really

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>covers it. That's the basis of the article is like

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it makes work seem fun, which I think is good

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and bad. What is your current relationship status with slack?

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd say it's complicated. I try now, I think for

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a while. You know, I started New York Magazine almost

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a year ago now, and I think that when you

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>first start, it's sort of a process of like getting

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to know how a company uses it and feeling comfortable

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's I think it varies at every place that

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you work, so it's kind of like knowing what the

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>company politics are. And I think now our slack channel,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>especially at the Cut, which is where I work at

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>New York Magazine, we have kind of two separate channels,

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>one specifically for like very straightforward work stuff, and then

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a second one that is only fun. So it's kind

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of like knowing where to balance, Like you know how

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>much time you spend in the fund slack and how

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>much time you spend in the work slack, and also

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>how much time you spend completely away from it, which

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I think is really valuable. Do you feel like group

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>chat reveals kind of the people who are having a

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit too m fun Like just like there's a

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>person who like spends too much time hanging out talking

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to people, there's like probably the person who spends way

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>too much time in the fun cut. Yeah. Absolutely, I

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>think that that's that's like what's funny about it though,

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think it also varies like over you know,

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it changes over time. There's definitely always going to be

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the person who like is really good at multitasking and

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>can be slacking all day and also working or that's

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>what you think is going on anyway. But and then

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>there's the people who never come into the conversation at all.

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>But there's always the one person who's just like does

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this person do anything oday at all? Or they just

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>like constantly talking, So how how are you splitting your time? Like?

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>What how are you using slack for me? I think,

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>especially my old job, I was really adamant about having

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>one day where I didn't go into slack at all

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like, especially in writing, it's so distracting

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to constantly having notifications coming up and now I kind

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of I'm a little bit more like self monitoring. So

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I try to have you know, mornings off from it

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>if I can possibly, like if I can you know,

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>focus on writing stuff. But in general, I keep it minimized,

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and my notifications aren't like you know, they don't pop up.

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It's so it's like I have to actually go in

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and check it to see if something is you know, happening.

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of like the fun stuff, it's hard

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, like some days you just wake up and

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you really don't feel like being a productive person, I guess,

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's so easy to just kind of give into

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the the available fun chat, I guess, And so on

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>those days, I try to like remember it, this is

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>also a job, and I have to actually do things

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>for my job. So yeah, it's interesting that you bring

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>up that you have to monitor your slack behavior because

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about how much people love slack, but

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>those obviously this darker side. And again it's almost as

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if Slack has made our work lives a little bit

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>more complicated, like there's now just like another way to

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>communicate with people. And before we get into some of

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>those more complicated feelings on Slack. We're going to hear

0:16:54.360 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>from some other office workers about their feelings with office chat.

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Slack sucks. I love slack, but I also hate slack.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm distracted a lot by it. I enjoy using Slack,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it might actually encourage negative vices for me, So it

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>can be a little bit distracting at times because you

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to be able to catch up on

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>every single channel, but you generally can't if you're busy

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>working on projects. Like when you're in a Slack group,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>everything is very instant, which I feel like I'm part

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of a conversation as opposed to an email thread that

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of will come out of order or it will

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.479
<v Speaker 1>not reply to the most recent one, but are applied

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to four behind. So you're kind of pulling together threads

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of information from different threads of emails when there was

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>just too many notifications and being part of too many

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>channels and setting those notications to like always notified me

0:17:55.160 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>no matter what a So let's talk a little bit

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>more about what slack fomo is exactly. Can you define

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it a bit for us, Dana, Yeah, I think because

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>like I said, like slack makes work seem fun on

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>days off, or like like I said, I have these

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>days where I tried to really bunker down and focus

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>on one piece and not being slack at all. You

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of miss the goofy conversations you're having with your coworkers.

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're not particularly close with your coworkers. It's

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>just fun to like be talking about personal stuff that

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you probably would never actually broached with a lot of

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>people that you work with. So it's kind of like

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the fomo aspect comes in when you realize, oh, like

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 1>I took the afternoon off and maybe Beyonce's record came

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.400
<v Speaker 1>out or whatever it is like that you would normally

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>be talking about, and it's like you weren't there for

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>any of that conversation, and you feel kind of like, oh,

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 1>my friends had a really fun day. I wasn't there

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>for it, even though it's literally work and that's essentibly

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>what the product is for. Do you think you're kind

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of upset about missing out because part of having fun

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>at work is part of my job. Job? Yeah, I

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>think slack makes you a little bit delusional about what

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>work is. And I think that inevitably, you know you're

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be using this tool for productivity, but Oftentimes

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I find myself in these conversations where it's like we're

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>having so much fun talking about this thing that like

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>no work happens for like an hour. And I think

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that that is the thing that you end up missing

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because you're maybe you're gone to do actual work. You're

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 1>right in your piece. Slack, on the other hand, makes

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a simple d M from your boss at nine pm

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and others to seem less threatening. Oh I'll just answer

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>her question now, you think so she believes I'm still

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 1>at this party though I left a long time ago

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for a different, better one. The different better party is

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>subsequently your real life exactly. I mean, I've just it's

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so hard for me to imagine any other context where

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>we would talk about work, where we would use a

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>party as a metaphor for work. Right, yeah, absolutely, But

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that even that, like the sort of the

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>d M aspect of it, and hearing from your editors

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and your bosses all the time, I think is like

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it really it makes everything seems so normalized, like, oh, yeah,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of course I would respond to this thing, and like

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know, nine pm or whatever, But you

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>forget that this is an actual work transaction that's happening,

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and and sometimes that like, you know, when I do

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>get dms like that, maybe I'm at a bar, maybe

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>i'm you know, I'm doing something that like probably I

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>should take some time to think about responding before I

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just shoot something off. But I think it's it makes

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>everything so casual that it seems like, oh, it's not

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:22.159
<v Speaker 1>a big deal to respond to how I wanted, So

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you'd be less likely to send an email to your

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>boss from a bar thing, Yeah, exactly right, because it

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>just seems so impersonal just to be like, oh, this

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is you know, chat, I'm just talking to her as

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if I'm talking to in person. But it seems like

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you you, even though you know it's wrong, at that

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>d M at nine pm, you seem to be okay

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>with it in some ways. But there are some people

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>who I think are a little bit angry about that,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's been a little bit of a slack lash

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>building In the last six months. There have been a

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>bunch of articles people talking about notification overload that actually

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>it's worse than email because you can send these messages

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>all the time, all day. But you seem to have

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good relationship, a good balance, I would say

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>I try. I don't know if I definitely adhere to

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the things that I'm saying that I actually take time

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>away from it. But I think, you know, especially with

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like all day aspect, it really makes

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you work twenty four hours a day

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're sort of available twenty four hours a day.

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think actually remembering because I think I'm self

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>limiting because I know I have terrible a d D.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>And like, if I actually pay attention to those notifications

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>all day, I will get nothing done. So it's I

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>think the way I manage it is being able to

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have a block of time where I know that I'm

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>not allowed even to say anything in slack work or

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>not work. Yeah, that's really impressive. Thank you. So to

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom of all this, Dana slack, is

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it the end of productivity at work? Or is it

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the answer to all our problems? That's I feel like

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>we're not there yet. I think that what will happen

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>at least in the next year or so, as as

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know it grows astronomically as it had is people

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>will really start to figure are out how do you

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>slack to their advantage? Whereas right now it's stick total

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>free for all I feel, and I think that companies

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to start doing, you know, with the Gawker

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Hogan trial, it was like, oh, this is actually we

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>need to be thinking about how we're using this this platform,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will start to get to a

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>point where there's going to be a lot more slimming

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>down of how we use it. We'll still use it

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>as a chat platform, and it will allow us to

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to speak more freely with our coworkers, but I think

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is a little bit more professional.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess if that's the right word to use. I

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if you can use that word with Slack,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but feeling like it's a place where it's actually aiding

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 1>us as opposed to setting us back, that's that's a

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>good point. We tend to blame technology for all of

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>our work problems and productivity issues, but like, we really

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out how to use these things to

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>our advantage. And you know, even Slack recognizes that it

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>has a long way to go and released this winter.

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I do not disturb feature so that when people shouldn't

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be on Slack, or when they don't really want to

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>be on slack. They can just kind of turn it

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>off and not get the notifications, which is just like

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>one tiny step towards like not being connected all the time.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So slack is recognizing human nature. We're basically always going

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to goof off if there is one. Amen,

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for talking to us about slack, Dana. Before we go,

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna dig into the archives. Here's an excerpt from

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>an article. The manager is hunched over his terminal, squinting

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>at the screen. Then comes a little chuckle, a rapid

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>fire series of key strokes. He hits the sent button

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and the scene is repeated by another manager across the room.

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The exchange is quick and utterly invisible. It is part

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of a system that is quietly damaging many corporate enterprises

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>from within. Well, that is clearly an article about group

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>chat within the past year or so, right, So those

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>articles from the Washington Post, and the writer is talking

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>about the problem he talks about is instantaneous email. It's

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a great time waster, after all, he says, it is

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>fun to share secrets, tell jokes, flirt, complain about fellow

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>workers Peckett Dillows, especially if you can't get caught, which

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is just exactly what people do on grip chat now.

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's really great to see how people thought about

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>email when it first came out. People obviously workers thought

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it was fun. Probably the biggest difference is that that

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>last bit, especially if you can't get caught, the lack

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of awareness of people probably had about how easy it

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was to, you know, or would become for your employer

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to peek in at what you're doing, or for you know,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>opposing counsel to depose the records of what you said.

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what kind of crazy things were said if

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>there really were an atmosphere where people thought, like, no

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>one has any way of knowing what I said in

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this email, where even now, like there's some voice in

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the back of our head when we're typing some totally

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>not work appropriate thing into slack that's telling us someone

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>could probably read this. But even it's kind of like

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>this guy says, emails ruining the office, but none of

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 1>us could live our work lives at every right. Well,

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I wonder maybe this is naive, But what what was

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it like before email then? Like what would you do

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just talk in person the entire time? And I mean

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 1>I think work got done within a much smaller sphere.

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that. I mean, it's a conversation about globalization

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and everything else, but you just worked with a smaller

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>group of people. You work with the people who are

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>around you, you either talk to them in person or

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you you know, made a long distance phone call. Yeah.

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And some of the other old articles I was looking

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>at they talk about phones the way we now talk

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>about email, where like the phone was work life but

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>now you know we rarely pick up the phone and

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>hate email, and slack is the future. Why can't you

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>just slack me the answer to my simple question? Yeah? Great, Well,

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today on game Plan. Dana,

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you for and you guys can read more of

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>our work life coverage over at Bloomberg dot com and

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>check us out on Twitter. I'm at rs Greenfield, I'm

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at Francesca today and Dana is at Dana d A

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>y n A Evans Underscore. See you next week. Oh okay,

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>g fun times USA. Ready, Okay,