WEBVTT - Tesla's Disappointing Deliveries and Apple's Quarterly Dip

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>From Marhard where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed lud Love.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline heind A Bloomberg's Weld headquarters in New York,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>and I'm d Ludlow side by side this week.

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Coming up full ev coverage ahead. Tesla drops after deliveries

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 3>fell way short of expectations. Meanwhile, Rivian beats production estimates.

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 3>We'll discuss.

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 4>Plus we'll get the outlook for technology stocks after Apple

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 4>posted one of its worst quarters relative to the S

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 4>and P in over a decade.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 3>And we'll take the pulse of the IPO market. That's

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 3>is Microsoft bat Rubrics IPO filing shows growing revenue, still losses.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Details to come, but first that's checking on these public markets.

0:00:58.360 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>And we're having the worst day in about a month

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>the moment on the key benchmarks. We're seeing tech in

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 3>particular under pressure, off by one and a half percent

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 3>on the NASDAC. This as we see once again a

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 3>fear of the fact that US economy is just too strong.

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>The Federal Reserve is not going to be cutting rates

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 3>at the market anticipated rate, and Therefore, we're likely to

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>see just a pullback and some of these more frothier

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 3>names Tenure Yield though also pushing higher on the back

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>of the fact that we're going to see rates staying

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 3>higher for longer potentially. And Bitcoin of course riscassett under

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 3>pressure as we see the rest sell off we're of

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 3>by more than five percent. Also we see the inflows

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>perhaps style back from those crucial spot bitcoin ets. But ed,

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 3>there is one stock that you.

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Are watching, yeah, and that is Tesla and Tesla deliveries

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 4>missed expectations. In fact, that's an understatement. Tesla's deliveries three

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 4>hundred and eighty eight thousand or so in the core

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 4>to gone was the biggest miss against Bloomberg consensus on record.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Where did we get this analysis wrong? The stock is

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 4>down around five percent in the session in pre marketed

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 4>fallen as much as seven percent. What are the factors

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 4>that are happening here? I want to bring in Stephanie

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Bauder's Streaty, director of industry Insights at Coxa Automotive and

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>Stephanie Tesla said this is supply side related. Three factors.

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 4>They diverted shipments because of the situation in the red Sea.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 4>They pause production in Berlin because of what they call

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 4>an arson attack, and they relaunched a refresh Model three

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 4>in Fremont, which impacted the production rum ramp. Why has

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 4>that impacted deliveries to this extent?

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, good afftering you, thank you so much. Yeah, Tesla's

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 5>definitely the news today. We had forecasted that we're going

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 5>to see decline in Q one for Tesla, And if

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 5>you look at just as you mentioned, you know, they

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 5>have the two models, the why you know and the

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 5>US that are really like carrying them forward, but they

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 5>don't have any new product recently, and hopefully with the

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 5>Roadster two coming in twenty twenty six, that's going to

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 5>help them. But if you look like any automotive, new

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 5>product really drives sales, and so I think for Tesla

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 5>they're in that in between waves. If they've mentioned on

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 5>their last call of where they had, you know, high

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 5>volume products and now they're waiting to launch this new

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 5>one that's going to be more affordable, which the industry

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 5>really needs. So I think Tesla has a lot of

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 5>word ahead of it, and I think when they have

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 5>their earnings car, I think it's going to be important

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 5>for them to really lay out what that plan is

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 5>to execute on that.

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Stephanie Love, how you're going there on the demand side

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 3>of the equation, I know you focus predominantly on the

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 3>United States, and interesting we talk a lot about well

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 3>some of the competition coming from Chinese makers BID in particular,

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>and you see also show me, for example, launching a

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 3>new EV where on the first day of sales online

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 3>it looks as though bookings a northern ninety thousand. When

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at the US demand side, how much is

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>the competition an issue for it or is it really

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the supply side a lack of a new product that's

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 3>the driver here.

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 5>I think it's the competition. You know, if you look

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 5>at last year, it was a record year one point

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 5>two pure battery electric vehicles. This year this quarter, we're

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 5>expecting fifteen percent year of year. But with that, you know,

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.119
<v Speaker 5>Tesla as you saw is you know, we are expecting

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 5>like a three point two percent year over year growth. Meanwhile,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 5>there's some other brands are going to see significant increase

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 5>Q one. The results are going to come in the

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 5>next week or so, will happen or even report. But

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 5>some of the other products that are going to become popular.

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 5>I think are really creating more competition for Tesla, and

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 5>I think that's going to continue. You know, Tesla's finally

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 5>having to compete with these other brands are offering different

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 5>styling product range that are competing with the Tesla models.

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think definitely that's going to be a driving

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 5>factor for Tesla going forward.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 4>Caroline, I'm just going to recap the numbers because I

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 4>slightly misspoke at the top. So Tesla's first quarter deliveries

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 4>were three hundred eighty six thousand, eight hundred and ten.

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 4>The estimate was for four hundred and forty nine thousand.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 4>As Caroline knows, Stephanie, I was one of the people

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 4>that leased a model. Why in the penultimate day of

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 4>the quarter. I did so because the incentives on offer,

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 4>both those from the federal tax credit and those that

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 4>Tesla did of its own accord, were just too good

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.679
<v Speaker 4>to pass up. Then on April the first Tesla raised

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 4>prices again and they said they were going to do that.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 4>And what it's got me thinking about now that we

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 4>have the first quarter number print, is there a market anymore,

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 4>particularly in this country, for a forty thousand dollars to

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 4>fifty thousand dollars EV. It seems like that's gone and

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 4>everyone is waiting for the twenty five thousand dollars EV

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 4>to finally materialize.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you hit on it. If you think about EV adoption,

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 5>like our research consistently shows that price is one of

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 5>the major barriers, along with infrastructure. And at the end

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 5>of February, the average EV was fifty two thousand. If

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 5>you look back two years ago, the price premium and

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 5>EV was about seventeen thousand, So in February that gap

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 5>narrative about fifty five hundred. But still it's expensive, right,

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 5>And so I think portability is key to adoption, and

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 5>I think we're going to need some more of those

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 5>vehicles that are that different price point. And I think

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 5>as we start to see more used evs enter the market,

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 5>that might be able to compate some of that price

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 5>point barriers.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 4>Rivian is another interesting one. They beat expectations on both

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 4>production and deliveries, though they'd kind of set the bar low,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 4>which is being kind for the quarter. What you make

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 4>of a name like Rivian where they offer the big,

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 4>BOXYEV that Americans love. They like light truck category, they

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 4>like big cars, but they seem still like a niche player.

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, any of these new entry entrants into

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 5>the EV market, you know, they'struggling with you know, cash,

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 5>trying to build up their brand. They don't have any

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 5>ice vehicle revenue to support that. But with Rivian, I

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 5>think the unveiling of the R two created a lot

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 5>of energy for that brand, and I think it's going

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 5>to be key if they're able to execute on that.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 5>But that R two is going to be critical in

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 5>terms of giving them entry into this high volume segment

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 5>and more affordable volumes and hopefully being able to turn

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 5>a profit over long term. So I think Rivian's on

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 5>a good path and I think definitely that R two

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 5>and veiling helped ignite some of that excitement about the brand.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Stephanie, we talk about the incentives offered from a federal

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>perspective at the moment, is the biggest competition to an

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 3>EV A hybrid, just because we're still so worried about

0:06:57.880 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 3>infrastruct great question.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think we're going to continue to see gas

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 5>hybrids increase in sale because if you think about a

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 5>gas hybrid, there's nothing different. Like you said, it's the

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 5>same experience as driving an ice vehicle, you don't have

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 5>to worry about charging infrastructure any of that. So I

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 5>think we're going to see that because it's a good

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 5>gateway as we try to navigate to full electrification. Hybrid's

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 5>definitely a good option, and we'll probably start to see

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 5>more plug in hybrids as well since that's a good

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 5>gateway as well.

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Stephanie, is policy support working in this country.

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 5>I definitely think it is. If you think about the incentives,

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 5>I think that seventy five hundred dollars, as we know,

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 5>with the changes in the regulation, some of them become uneligible.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 5>But I think that definitely has helped with adoption. And

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 5>I think one of the things that change with the

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 5>point of purchase. Now that you get that seventy five

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred a point of purchase, I think that is also attractive.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 5>But I will say that I think the incentives are

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 5>very confusing and consumers some consumers aren't aware of them

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 5>and confusing what is eligible what isn't. So I think

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 5>there needs to be more education around just EV's in general,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 5>around the incentives, the value of an EV, what's it

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 5>like to drive an EV? That total cost of operation

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 5>is going to be important as well, So I think

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 5>we have a lot of work ahead. In January, one

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 5>of our key messages was for EV it's going to

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 5>be the year and more so, We're going to see

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 5>more sales, but we're going to see more bumps. We're

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 5>going to see more incentives or price cuts. But also

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 5>I think we're going to see the industry build more

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 5>sales muscle and really selling these evs to that next

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 5>wave of adoption.

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 3>More transparency, please, Stephanie valdezstri we thank you so much

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 3>of Cox Automotive. Mean, while coming up, Erka KLA's going

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 3>to be joining us PA Jim Jennison Technology FUM portfolio manager.

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 3>We've got a deep dive on what's happening in the

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 3>broader markets today with a big chip sell off, and

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 3>she's got a keen eye on some of those names.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 4>Ed, what are you watching, Well, let's go back to

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 4>Shaomi for a second. You mentioned it. By close of

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 4>play Friday, having unveiled this new EV a surprise entrance

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 4>to the EV market, they had eighty nine thousand orders

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 4>ninety thousan I'm sure bigger. Now see the reaction when

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Asia markets opened after the holiday weekend, Really curiously there's

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot of evidence that in the Chinese market, consumers

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 4>were putting down the refundable deposit and then canceling just

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 4>for the prestige of saying I ordered a Gaomi and

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 4>then didn't follow through with it. Interesting if it actually

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 4>haven't materializes. This is bluebog technology. We took another bite

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 4>out of the Apple in the first quarter. Shares are

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 4>coming off the worst quarterly performance relative to the S

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 4>and P five hundred index in over a decade, with

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 4>the company raising more than three hundred billion dollars of

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 4>market value in twenty twenty four. The twelve percent dropped

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 4>since the start of the year's paying off for short sellers,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 4>giving them an incentive to unwind their bets. Now it

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 4>could be the time to buy. That's according to technical

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 4>analysts who argue Apple's flirting with levels where bottom feeding

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 4>could come soon. Apple looking cheap to some of the

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 4>ever megacap tech names on a relative term. The key

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 4>support level to watch for one hundred and sixty five

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 4>dollars a share. Will that be enough to entice you

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 4>dip buyers? If you're one of them, hit me up

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 4>on X, LinkedIn, Instagram, wherever social media you know where

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 4>to find me, Caroline.

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, let's just go a little bit broader than Apple

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and see what's been helping me the charge on the

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 3>border benchmarks, and what's pulling away a little bit. P

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Jim Jennison, Technology Fun Portfolio Manager Erica Klaas with us.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 3>We're so pleased to welcome you back to the show.

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 3>And while Apple's been having a few tough times, as

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 3>has Tesla, let's just focus on where it still dines

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 3>out and super microcomputer up more than two and forty

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 3>eight percent, Video is still up seventy nine percent. You're

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 3>a holder of chip names. People are questioned how far

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 3>they've run? Do they still have further to go?

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, at Jennison, we always take a longer term view,

0:10:56.679 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 6>and our view remains very constructive. When we look out

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 6>over three five years, we still see extraordinary opportunities for

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 6>penetration of AI and that is really broadening out in

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 6>its applicability in industries. So we still are very constructive.

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 3>When you say broadening out, does that mean you take

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 3>money off the table from the winners that we've seen

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the in videos that I mentioned and put it into

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>industry groups that now benefit from AI. Or do you

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 3>have to do both, our viewers, you have to do both.

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 6>There are the core experts in compute, led of course

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 6>by Nvidia, which I believe is a core holding to

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 6>own for a long, long period of time, and also

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 6>advanced micro devices. But the very existence of parallel computer

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 6>or accelerated compute is creating opportunities throughout various industries, whether

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 6>it be energy, whether it be for other semiconductor companies,

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 6>whether it be for healthcare. So we're really looking at

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 6>a broad base of opportunities for these companies to address.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 4>It's been really interesting in the show for probably almost

0:11:55.520 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 4>two years speaking with investors who are basically ripping off

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 4>the paneling of a server design and learning what's going

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 4>into it. Now a name like Micron is starting to

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 4>get credit at GtC, we can get into GCC and

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 4>all the fantastical things that Jensen said, But he was

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 4>slapping Michael Dell on the back and saying, Oh, if

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 4>you need a server, this is the guy. Is that

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 4>you'll kind of approach how the compute gets built in

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 4>its entirety and then work out the component providers and

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 4>invest in those.

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 6>So this is such a great question because on one hand,

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 6>the very essence of compute, how compute is done has

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 6>changed the demand for memory. As you talk about the

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 6>demand to be the demand created for distributing power, generating power,

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 6>dealing with power thermal envelopes for example, are all changing

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 6>and that's creating extraordinary opportunities on the infrastructure side of

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 6>the business that we're very interested in. On the other side,

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 6>the actual advent of accelerated compute has applicability to everyone

0:12:56.200 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 6>from smart cities to healthcare apptions. We're looking at things

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 6>like drug discovery, medical imaging sequencing as being enabled by

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 6>the event of accelerated compute.

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Here we are and we led you to it. But

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about markets and the tailwind that is AI that'

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 4>stop of mind. We're not talking about rates, we're not

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 4>talking about concerns of global economic strength, We're not talking

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 4>about geopolitical headwinds.

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 6>Why I think the interesting thing to think about is

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 6>that this technology is disruptive to literally every single industry.

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.599
<v Speaker 6>So while there are always going to be cyclical concerns,

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 6>whether it be one specific geographic region is slowing down,

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 6>or perhaps pressure of inflation or interest rates, at the

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 6>end of the day, what we're seeing right now is

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 6>literally every single industry being disrupted by the advent of AI,

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 6>and so I think that that discussion happens not in

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 6>a vacuum, but it probably drowns out to a certain

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 6>extent some of the more macro concerns I want to talk.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 3>We just mentioned that we're not talking about geopolitical tensions.

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I want to weave in the ongoing geopolitics that is

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 3>China and US because it does affect a lot of

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the chip names that you hold. We're actually just getting

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 3>breaking news that Hi Jinping, leader of China, and indeed

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 3>Biden and President Biden have whole held phone talks. Shinoa,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 3>which is a local news organization over in China, has

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 3>been reporting this. No real details on the phone talks,

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 3>and one indeed was discussed, but China's official news agency

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 3>reporting that President she has spoken with President Biden of late.

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Now we know within that context is the fact that

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 3>US has been limiting sales of US chips to China

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>worried about the application of such technology in China. Has

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>that worried or in any way changed your opinion on

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 3>how much to go into these some names that are

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 3>exposed to China and video being one of them.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 6>So from a semiconductor equipment perspective, those US companies that

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 6>sell equipment to make chips, they've also been banned from

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 6>selling their most advanced equipment into China. I think that

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 6>the end of the day, what that does is it

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 6>forces semiconductor companies to look for locations outside of Taiwan,

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 6>outside of China to build. And what we've seen is

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 6>an unprecedented amount of government support around the world to

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 6>build more semiconductor plants. That's a great tailwind for semiconductor

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 6>equipment for years and years to come. Later, on top

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 6>of that that these semiconductor chips themselves are becoming more

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 6>semiconductor equipment intensive. This is a long time tailwind for

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 6>the industry going forward. On the semiconductor side, as you say,

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 6>what we're finding is that where there's a will, there's

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 6>a way people want to have the compute. So it

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 6>may take place in different geographic regions, but the ultimate

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 6>necessity is there and driving the demand for Nvidia beyond

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 6>even what we had thought three months ago.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Caroline and I have no problem talking about semi conductors

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 4>all day long, but there are other things out there.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we're going to talk about the rubric IPO

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 4>later in the program, how do you feel about software cybersecurity.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, there must be more opportunity out there in

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 4>the world than beyond a GPU or a combination of

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 4>CPU and GPE.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, right now, I think that there's extraordinary opportunity

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 6>for apps to be developed to take advantage of this compute.

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 6>And so basically what we're seeing is a scramble an

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 6>incredible innovation on the software side to be able to

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 6>analyze big data, being able to sort through huge amounts

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 6>of data and then make sense of it so that

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 6>companies can understand consumer patterns, the progression of certain of

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 6>certain diseases, even modeling out how drugs may behave as

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 6>they're developing them. So the software is very, very critical

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 6>in this process. Not to mention the cybersecurity is an

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 6>absolutely essential part of this too, because this is at

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 6>the core the companies. Whatever company is best assets, that

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 6>intellectual property must be protected, and that's why cybersecurity is

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 6>also seeing such a strong backdrop of demand.

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 4>Tech the data at all costs. PGM Jennison Technology Fund

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.239
<v Speaker 4>Portfolio Manager, Erica Cloud. It's great to have you back

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 4>on the program. Thank you.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Time now for talking tech first up email musks starlink

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 3>well it claims that it's rolled out of high speed

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 3>internet in Italy, is being obstructed by Telecometalia, is the

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>country's largest phone carry over There, it's possible repercussions for

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 3>its services across Southern Europe and North Africa. Meanwhile, while

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 3>the US is asking South Korea to adopt restrictions on

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 3>semiconductor technology exports to China similar to those that Washington

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 3>has already implemented. It's another sign, of course, that the

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration is stepping up its efforts to thwart Beijing's

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 3>chip ambitions. Meanwhile, Japan it's approved as much as three

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 3>point nine billion dollars in subsidies to chip venture Rapidness.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 3>It's committing more money to it's ambition to catch up

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 3>in semiconductive manufacturing and the economy. Mister quin Salto said

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 3>that the additional funding will help rapidus by chip making

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 3>equipment and also develop advanced back end chip making processes.

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 7>Ed.

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 4>What if you got what a name? Catching up in

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 4>chips and it's called Rapidness. Let's turn to the IPO

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 4>market with Rubric, the cloud and data security startup backed

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 4>by Microsoft, filing for an IPO, with size and price

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 4>of the company's plan share sale to be disclosed in

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 4>a later filing. But the person that broke the story

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 4>first time around, Bloomber's Katie Roof, joins us. Now, I

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 4>think this is an IPO in the technology space based

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 4>in Palo Alto, well known back by Microsoft. We care

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 4>about it to us, the banks tell us the size

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 4>and scope of this one.

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 8>Sure, yeah, no, we've been We've been looking into this

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 8>one for a while. They were supposed to go public

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 8>last fall and then they delayed it. And I broke

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 8>last week that the filing was coming any day now

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 8>and it came. So yeah, this is one that's backed

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 8>by light Speed in Greylock. They have both were the

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 8>top shareholders and the filing, as you mentioned, they're also

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 8>backed by Microsoft.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 9>There's a lot of interest in this one.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 8>It's only the second enterprise software company to go public

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 8>since twenty twenty one. We had Klavo last fall and

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 8>now we have Rubric. This one is of course very different.

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 8>This is data security, but they have you know, large

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 8>enterprise clients. They have clients like Goldman Sachs, and then

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 8>they also have you know, public sector clients like the

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 8>State of Utah, they have a pretty wide list of clients,

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 8>and you know, they're going to be testing the market

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 8>to see how things are.

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 3>And the market has to digest the fact that it's

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 3>still lost.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 9>Making right, it is losing money.

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 8>But as Jason Lempkin, a top software enterprise software venture

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 8>capitalists pointed out on Twitter, it's ARR is growing significantly

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 8>the annual recurring revenue. This is a metric that enterprise

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 8>software investors care a lot about because it suggests that

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 8>that the customers are, you know, renewing their contracts and

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 8>that they're going to continue to get more customers, that

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 8>they have a high retention rate.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 9>So you know, depending on what you look at.

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 8>You know, if you care about profitability, no, Rubric is

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 8>not profitable and their revenue overall revenue is actually growing

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 8>pretty slowly, but you know ARR is up significantly.

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Well okay too, We thank you for some of the

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 3>devil in the detail that got released last night. Welcome

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 3>back to me in my Technology.

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline High and I'm ed Lovelow. This week in

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 4>New York City, the story of the markets, at least

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 4>in this session is strong economic data around the world,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 4>pushing us to believe that central banks all around the

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 4>world will keep rates elevated for longer. That's kind of

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the story. You see Bitcoin participating in this risk off

0:20:56.800 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 4>mode alongside the Nasdaq one hundred. The kind of individual

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 4>story we've been talking about all day is Tesla. It's

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 4>down five point five percent. That will have a big

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 4>points drag on the major indices, including the S and

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred and Frankly, this was the worst deliveries

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 4>missed for Tesla on record relative to the consensus. You've

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 4>got to go all the way back to the end

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty two for the last time they delivered

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 4>vehicles at that kind of three hundred and fifty thousand mark.

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 4>It was three eight six this time. Rivian also lower,

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 4>even though it beat expectations. All in all, higher rates

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 4>seems to be the story around the world of technology

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, we would just want to return to some of

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>that breaking news we had earlier. Bloomberg has indeed confirmed

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 3>with the White House that President she of China and

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 3>President Biden of the United States had a phone call.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 3>It has indeed concluded, and indeed it's the first time

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 3>that they've been talking directly since November when they met

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 3>in California. Remember, now there's a whole laundry list of

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 3>things they could be talking about. We understand from our

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 3>perspective here on the Technology show, there's going to be

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 3>a lot about cyber a lot about AI. There's also

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be, of course, from what we understand's being

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 3>made on discussions around fentanyl and particular, yes, President was

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 3>expected to urge more efforts to combat fentanyl and of

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 3>course its approach here into the United States. China's corporation

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 3>is also being sought on a multitude of geopolitical concerns

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Ukrainian war, of course, Middle East thermol in particular. So

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 3>we understand after these particular communications, these are what are

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 3>being discussed and being in particular focused on. But we'll

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 3>have a lot more for you in a moment as

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 3>to what exactly was being discussed on the AI and

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>cyberfront as well, not to mention chips, But for now,

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 3>let's return to an interesting story for an investor perspective,

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 3>because Do Not Pay as an artificial intelligence company that

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 3>offers online legal services, to become one of the first

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>private venture backed companies to pay dividend to those shareholders.

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 3>It's all because basically it's profitable. What else is going

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 3>to be doing with its money. It's actually got more

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 3>money than it raised from these VC names. Let's talk

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 3>about it. Which Joshua Browder do not pay CEO and

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Joshua why give money back to investors? I feel that's

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 3>a very unknown thing to do in the world of

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 3>VC backed companies.

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 2>I think investors and employee is are tired of money

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 2>losing companies. And we're in a really interesting time right

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 2>now where AI means you can build big businesses with

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 2>very few staff. So in our case, we only have

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 2>seven employees and seven contractors, but hundreds of thousands of

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 2>paying customers, and so we want to build a big business.

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 2>But we also realize that the purpose of a company

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 2>is to do well by at stakeholders, and it's nice

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 2>to give some money back to our earliest believers.

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 4>What does that look like? Give me size and scope

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 4>on the divv and if you have more money in

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 4>the bank and profit then you raise from vcs, give

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 4>me those numbers as well.

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so the dividend, our Q one dividend was in

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the middle seven figure range. Do not pay as a

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 2>whole has raised twenty four million in total, so it's

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 2>quite a sizable portion of what we raised that we

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 2>have in profits every year, and we're not resting on

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 2>our laurels. We're thinking big. Sam Altman said that there

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 2>can be a billion dollar company with just one employee,

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 2>and we don't think we're close to being there yet.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 2>We as I mentioned, we have seven employees. But with AI,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 2>you see companies like Klana where they've replaced sixty percent

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 2>of their customer service workload with AI, companies like mid

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Journey where they have hundreds of millions of revenue and

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 2>only under twenty employees. So that's really what we're inspiring

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 2>to be too.

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's just talk about the models you mentioned sam Altman. There,

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 3>how is do not pay built ultimately? When you're using

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 3>AI to negotiate some of these contracts and money off

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 3>for users? Are you underpinned by open AI or you agnostic?

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>We use open AI. I started the company seven years

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 2>ago when I got a bunch of parking tickets and

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I realized, if you know the right things to say,

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you can use templates to get out of them. But

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 2>in the AI era, it feels like we can build

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 2>much more exciting products. One thing I'm really excited about

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>is AI build and gootiation, which we just launched right.

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 2>We have robots log into people's utility accounts and start

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 2>chatting with the big companies. And what's interesting is the

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 2>big companies that use AI. We use AI and the

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 2>two ais are chatting to negotiate.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Josh, you've been coming on the show for a

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:17.959
<v Speaker 4>little while now. As we always point out to our audience,

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.439
<v Speaker 4>you are not a lawyer. But basically the original premise

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 4>of Do Not Pay was to use an automated service

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 4>to challenge everything from sort of parking fines to build disputes.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 4>How is the business growing? Give me kind of volumes

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 4>numbers around bills that have been successfully negotiated on do

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 4>not Pay? How many of your proceedings have gone onwards

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 4>to court? For example?

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 2>So do not Pay us all about helping people jump

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 2>through hoops that they don't have time to jump through.

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 2>So no one has time to wait on hold for

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>four hours to save twelve dollars. So a lot of

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>these cases, the squeaky will gets the grease and they

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 2>don't go to court. We just send these letters to

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 2>these companies and you get the refund one over a

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 2>million tasks and cases for our customers over the past

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 2>seven years, do not pay CEO Joshua Browder, great to

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 2>catch up on the program. Let's get right back to

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 2>that breaking news. President g of China, President Biden of

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 2>the United States, we've had a phone call. The calls concluded,

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 2>according to the White House, they spoke Tuesday, the first

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 2>one on one communication since meeting in California last November.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's end of Current in Washington, DC with the details.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology, so there was an element of

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 2>this conversation about the technology sector. What is the must

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 2>know about the conversation between President Biden and President G.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, as you say, first of all, the first time

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they've had a one on one since November. The White

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>House briefing suggesting it's kind of a progress check in

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of where things have gone since then. The

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>main points coming from our colleagues at the White House

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is that they spoke about the counter and narcotics trade.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that's the topic of fentanyl, which is central

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to what both presidents have been discussing. And then there

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>was a broader discussion around China's role in playing for

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>stability in the Middle East using its leverage there, and

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of course Chinna's role when it comes to the war

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. Now, the whole broader point of this call

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the idea that both sides are continuing to

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>try and stabilize relations. There are areas of cooperation, for

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>example in AI as you mentioned there, but the focus

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of the call in terms of the details so far

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 1>seems to have been both on security and on the

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>counter narcotics trade.

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 3>And there's a whole list of things that they could

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 3>have talked about that perhaps would have more ramifications on

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 3>the economies as well. I mean, you say that they're

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 3>working to try and find at least well security and

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 3>guard rails around AI. But at the moment we were

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 3>just talking how at the moment that the US is leaning

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 3>on South Korea to stop them exporting so much of

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 3>their chip equipment and technology to China. How much is

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 3>technology at the heart of a conversation here or not.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's very much the elephant in the room. As

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you say, the coal is about stabilizing relations, but that

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>does not mean the competitive strategic ages has gone away.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course the point being there, export controls, investment controls,

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the race for the US to get back in the

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>game in terms of chip production and EV production and

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>everything else. None of that has been changed or will

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>be changed by this phone call or any other. This

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is about basic communications. Remember it was only a year ago. Actually,

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>there were no communications between the two governments after the

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>balloon incident. So it's just all about getting the basic

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>guard rails in place. Don't forget Treasure sector Yellen of

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>course among the officials going to Beijing. So no major

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>progress from this. The technology race story hasn't changed. It's

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 1>just about keeping things on an even keel.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Diplomacy at the heart of it. And to Karen, thank

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 3>you so much for bringing us the latest on that

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 3>She Biden conversation coming up. That we're going to go

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 3>back to the private sector world for a moment. Atomico

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 3>partner Laura Cannell's going to be joining us. What Atomico's

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 3>investment outlook is whether they've been pacing their bets. She's

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 3>got real expertise in artificial intelligence. This is bloomg technology.

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Tiger Global gathered about two point two billion for its

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 4>latest VC fund. But here's the thing. It was well

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 4>short of its six billion dollar target, and it's the

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 4>smallest fundraising hall in roughly a decade. That's according to

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg sources. Let's bring in Bloomberg Tamapalma, who broke that story.

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 4>When I think about the raises they've done, the affectionately

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 4>known pips, they've had no problem in the past, they

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 4>had a problem this time.

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 10>They had a problem this time. And admittedly it's a

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 10>very difficult fundraising environment. But this is certainly a pivot

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 10>from the way we think of Tiger Global and their

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 10>epic fundraisers in the past. Their last fundrais was thirteen billion,

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 10>nearly thirteen billion dollars big. Every fund has been essentially

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 10>bigger than the one before, So this is the first

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 10>time that a Tiger fund has not raised more than

0:29:58.480 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 10>its predecessor.

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 3>This comes in the context of some bets that went bad.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 10>Yes, a number of things. Some of the bets haven't

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 10>been working well. They've been marking stuff down the environment.

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 10>A lot of funds, venture funds have been feeling marked downs.

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 10>A lot you're seeing when it comes to allocators to

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 10>these funds, in some ways their hands are tied because

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 10>private equity has been slow to give back distributions, so

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 10>they have fewer dollars to put to work. And then

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 10>venture has been challenging, as you're well aware, so it's

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 10>been a tougher space.

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 4>You mean, the fundraising environment generally for all firms. I mean,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 4>this story was incredibly well read, and one reason it's

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 4>cool is you kind of get some insight into what's

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 4>happening at Tiger Global. There's insider money, there's the LPs

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 4>that are external, there's pressure from all sides. Just give

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 4>us the juicy gos.

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 10>Yes, so the juicy gos. So essentially, when we look

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 10>at the history the past few funds that Tiger has raised,

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 10>insiders have given about ten percent of the assets. We're

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 10>seeing with this fund is that insiders are actually forking

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 10>up about twenty percent of internal assets for this fund,

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 10>so twenty.

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 9>Percent of fund raised assets.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 10>So what that means is the money they've raised from

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 10>outside investors is less than two billion dollars and they're

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 10>putting up more of their own cash.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Typically.

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 10>I will say though, that Tiger insiders do make up

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 10>the biggest investors and traditionally most of their funds.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's about aligning in terms of your end goals.

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure Hamma Palmer is a brilliant scoop came out

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 3>late yesterday, Miss Police, she joins us today on it. Meanwhile,

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 3>let's just stick with well the venture funding environment, how

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 3>hard it is when the money's being allocated. If you've

0:31:37.360 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 3>already raised VC spotlight time with Laura Connells, she's partner

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 3>at Atomico, currently holds four point five billion dollars in

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 3>assets under management, and in fact you've been allocating some

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 3>of that money. You recently led a fifty eight million

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 3>dollars Series C funding for a telehealth company called Plago,

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 3>and this is about cognitive behavioral therapy to help treat addiction.

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 3>It's really interesting you come on this moment, Laura, where

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>we've just heard that there's a conversation at the highest

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 3>levels between President she and A and Biden about Fentanel

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 3>so emotive, so high on a political agenda, health agenda

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 3>for many, Why is telehealth the right thing to back? Absolutely?

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 7>Look, as you've said, it's a hugely emotive and hot

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 7>topic going into these US elections. Also, and quite rightly, unfortunately,

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 7>substance use management is an area that continues to be

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 7>poorly served and so one of the things that we

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 7>spent a lot of time figuring out was what the

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 7>right type of solution was, and we found it with

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 7>a Palago team. We were lucky enough to back an

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 7>exceptional team there of initially a clinician led team founded

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 7>in the UK that relocated to the US, which really

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 7>set out to address broad based substance use disorder management,

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 7>so anything from tobacco and alcohol to opioids. And what

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 7>we found is that the optimal solution, and what they

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 7>found was the optimal solution was this combination of CBT

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 7>and digital content together with medication assisted treatment. Now, the

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 7>most important thing about it is for it to be

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 7>clinically validated with clear ROI from an employer perspective, and

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 7>I think, just to throw a couple of stats out,

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 7>you know, it's estimated that at least one individual there's

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 7>one individual in every American family currently suffering from some

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 7>kind of addiction, which is a shocking number. Around seventy

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 7>percent of those individuals are still in the workforce. Around

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 7>ten percent of the total workforce self reports a substance

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 7>use disorder or addiction, and only one percent of the

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 7>total workforce currently has access to clinically validated treatment. So

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, the numbers are shocking. The total estimated direct

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 7>cost of substance use disorders is around thirty five billion

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 7>dollars in the US, and that's only the direct cost

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 7>in terms of healthcare incremental healthcare costs. So you know,

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 7>to say that we're in urgent need of better solutions

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 7>is an understatement.

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's interesting that you are finding this particular case

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 3>to want to back. I mean, you're someone who has

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of expertise in the field of allocating towards

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence, the hot topic, and at the moment, I'm

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 3>sure in many ways this is AI driven, But I'm

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 3>interested as to what the competitive landscape was to allocate

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 3>to a company like Peleego or any company right now.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Are you finding that there's a tougher time to be

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 3>writing checks? Is it is a too much competition?

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 7>Yes, it's a It's been really interesting to watch this market,

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 7>to be in the market, particularly over the last couple

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 7>of years. You know, what I think we can we

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 7>can say about it safely say is that there's been

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 7>a lot of later stage capital, be it corporate, corporate,

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 7>venture investors, or perhaps a non specialist venture investors, including

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 7>family officers, that were very active in the market in

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty one and early twenty twenty two and that

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 7>have cleared out of the market. Now that's not to

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 7>say that competition has decreased. In fact, you know that

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 7>reduction in capital supply has also been met by you know,

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 7>a smaller pool of very high quality companies coming to market.

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 7>You know a lot of companies that perhaps have struggled

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 7>more not coming out to market to avoid getting priced.

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 7>And so for the very high quality opportunities, it's still

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 7>it's still pretty competitive, you know, as it should be,

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 7>and I think it's no bad thing for for investors

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 7>also to be to be forced to kind of show

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 7>their wares and the kind of value aad they can provide.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 7>I think the last thing to say about that is that,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, given the cost of capital has increased to

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 7>the to which it has in the last couple of years,

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 7>you know firms that can actually help founders avoid mistakes

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.919
<v Speaker 7>and who understand the shortcuts. Eye you have a growth

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 7>acceleration teams or big operating platforms and expertise that has

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 7>very meaningful incremental cost saving or indeed revenue uplift that

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 7>we can provide with less of the burn. So I

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 7>think an all round more discriminating market in principle. Of course,

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 7>there are a few areas where hype is notable, as

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 7>you've already discussed several times in your show today.

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.719
<v Speaker 4>So how do you discern hype from real You know,

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 4>I've been going to a lot of these hackathons where

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 4>venture partners are getting hands on with, even at the

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 4>code level, a piece of software before they're investing. Did

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 4>you do that with play Goo as an example?

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 7>So, Look, I mean I think Pelago in particular is

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 7>an example of you know, having deep expertise and a

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 7>right to win in a given sector. So here in particular,

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 7>you know this team of ex clinicians who have the

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 7>medical knowledge and expertise and then can combine that with

0:35:55.480 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 7>commercial new and technical sophistication. But the more general point,

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.399
<v Speaker 7>the more general question you're asking around how we get

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.760
<v Speaker 7>comfortable in AI in a market that's moving this quickly,

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 7>is that we really have a deep pool of technical

0:36:08.200 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 7>talent and experts that we also lean on to help

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:12.439
<v Speaker 7>us stay up to date and so that we're moving

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 7>in our understanding at least as quickly, as are the

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 7>best founders. But you know, that's one of the one

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 7>of the tough challenges in this market, that there is

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 7>so much noise, and so I think the best defense

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 7>against this is really just to be you know, to

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 7>have the humility to know that often, you know, people

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 7>and investors can grossly overestimate near term performance and underestimate

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 7>a long term potential value creation. So in summary, I

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 7>would say, take, we're trying to take our time investing,

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 7>we lean on the experts, and we have a big

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 7>dose of humility here as we invest.

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Laura, what's the direction of travel right now? Are you

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 4>chasing after potential portfolio companies or is your desk just

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 4>piled high with pitch decks.

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. Look, I think the best part of the job

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 7>is speaking to fantastic, exceptional founders who are trying to

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 7>build incredible companies. So look, we still get a huge

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.919
<v Speaker 7>amount of inbound and that really is as I said,

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, the best part of my day. So look,

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 7>there are two parts to two parts of the job

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 7>that we stay focused on. One, of course, is staying

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 7>as close as we possibly can to the founders that

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 7>we've backed and to be true partners to them and

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 7>that does require a lot of time and commitment and effort,

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 7>of course, particularly in this trickier macro environment. But of course,

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, we're constantly sourcing, constantly speaking, two people we

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.280
<v Speaker 7>think are going to be the next leaders in whatever

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 7>market they're operating in.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 3>And Tomoko of course borne out of the wealth from

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Skype and a real pin up in the European area.

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested as to the companies you're backing. Are the

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 3>European based you just mentioned how well the one we're

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 3>just the telehealth company moved to the US.

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 7>You know, one of the things we do as a

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 7>firm is we release every year the State of European

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 7>Tech Report, which is the kind of the industry standard

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 7>report for all the activity in European tech. And what's

0:37:57.960 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 7>been really interesting is if you take something like AI

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 7>for example, you know that really is a paradigm shift

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 7>in technology. Around thirty three percent of total funding last

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 7>year in AIML went to European based companies, and so

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 7>we really believe in the European opportunity. I mean that

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 7>was really the genesis of our founding. When Nicholas Enstrob

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 7>founded Atomico, it was on the premise the best founders

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 7>can come from anywhere and if the leading indicase that

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 7>is in terms of funding or anything to go by

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 7>at the early stage. You know, we fully expect that

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 7>we're going to have an absolutely extraordinary generation of European

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 7>based founders. So we are focused on you know, Europe

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 7>as the home called advantage, but we also recognize that

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 7>we want to stay. We want to keep the optionality

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 7>to invest on a global basis as well.

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 4>Tom a co partner Laura Connor, is great to have

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 4>some time with you out of London. Appreciate it. Another

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 4>story we're going to bring you real quick. Social commerce

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:47.920
<v Speaker 4>startup Flip, an online marketplace featuring product review videos made

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 4>by shoppers, has raised one hundred and forty four million

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 4>dollars in fresh funding. Is It seeks to take on

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 4>the likes of Amazon and TikTok. Led by Streamline Ventures,

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 4>the funding round brings flips valuation to one point zero

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 4>five billion dollars, and it includes a fifty million dollar

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 4>investment from advertising software firm at Loving. That's according to

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 4>the companies.

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 3>It has been going viral. Google says it will delete

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 3>millions of records of users browsing activities and as part

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 3>of a settlement of a class action lawsuit. Now. The

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit alleged it tracked people without their knowledge was filed

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty twenty, and it says the company tracked

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 3>people using incognito browsing mode. That function basically let's users

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 3>turn off data collection when using the Chrome browser, but

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 3>other Google tools used, like websites, like advertising technologies scoop

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 3>still the data up. Anyhow, It's all according to the

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 3>suit now. A Google spokesperson said that we are pleased

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:49.280
<v Speaker 3>to settle this lawsuit, which we always believed was meritless

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 3>and some more.

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes. So the other story we're tracking is what's happening

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 4>with Disney. Disney looks set to conclude a showdown over

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 4>the composition of its board. The Wall Street Journal reporting

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 4>overnight that the company is leading in its proxy battle

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:06.399
<v Speaker 4>against billionaire activist investor Nelson Pelts. That's with around half

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 4>of the votes counted. An investor can change their vote

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:12.719
<v Speaker 4>at any time. But the latest name, having got the

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 4>backing of the force from George Lucas and Jamie Diamond,

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 4>is black Rock. We have a four point two percent

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 4>stake almost ten billion dollars of Disney stock.

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 3>Important, t WRO Price another key name. But look, there's

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 3>not without some key names that are currently betting on

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 3>the other side of things and wanting to see Pelts

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 3>come to the board or indeed the previous CFO. All

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 3>of this really could go to the wire. It feels

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 3>like yes, and ultimately what does that mean for the

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.959
<v Speaker 3>key concern is long term succession planning for Bob byger Well,

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 3>if he does lose this quote unquote battle and we

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 3>do see Pelts join the board, is he going to

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 3>stick around? That's a key question as to how quickly

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 3>they have to consider some succession.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Again, as I wrote about earlier this week, if Pelts

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 4>is successful, which looks unlikely at this stage, how does

0:40:56.920 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 4>he change anything. I don't see many proposals.

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 3>We'll see overall, how the votes still add up. And

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 3>if I get any more ads asking me to do so,

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to go completely stir crazy. But that does

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 3>it for this edition of Bloomog Technology.

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Recap the show on the podcast, it was a pretty

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 4>big show, heavy ev theme chips, global politics, on Apple, Spotify, iHeart,

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 4>and all of the Bloomberg platforms. From New York City,

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 4>this week, this is Bloomberg Technology