Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us. Right
Speaker 1: down are toll free telephone number if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program at eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four one Shawn if you want to join us.
Speaker 1: We do have good news on the Save Act. Susan Collins,
Speaker 1: Senator Maine as signed on. We now have fifty Republicans.
Speaker 1: We had Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee on the
Speaker 1: program last week. That would mean proof of citizenship and
Speaker 1: voter ID for elections moving forward. Now it's going to
Speaker 1: take all fifty Republicans and JD Vance to insist that
Speaker 1: the Democrats have a real filibuster. The way that the
Speaker 1: filibuster has evolved over the years is in the old days,
Speaker 1: you would have to stand and talk for as long
Speaker 1: as you could possibly stand and talk. Ted Cruz once
Speaker 1: did it for twenty one hours. As it relates to
Speaker 1: trying to filibuster Obamacare, obviously didn't win, but he made
Speaker 1: a statement. There have been others that have done this
Speaker 1: over the years. But it's like mister Smith goes to
Speaker 1: Washington and it's just the right thing to do. Uh.
Speaker 1: And then at that point then we can have more
Speaker 1: integrity in our elections. And more confidence in election results.
Speaker 1: It should be a prerequisite one way or the other.
Speaker 1: President Trump said he's going to make sure that these
Speaker 1: integrity measures are put in place, but the best way
Speaker 1: to do it would be for the Senate to do
Speaker 1: their job and sign it into law. The real star,
Speaker 1: I mean, you've got this Munich Security conference that has
Speaker 1: emerged out of this by far. I mean, you have stars,
Speaker 1: and you have just absolute embarrassing flops. You know, maybe
Speaker 1: one of my favorite statements. I don't know if you've
Speaker 1: noticed this or if you picked up on those. Lind
Speaker 1: I didn't say it on the cut sheet. If it's there,
Speaker 1: let me know. Oh no, it's here's AOC now. She
Speaker 1: stumbled over a question. I'll play it later. She couldn't,
Speaker 1: you know, answer a question about committing troops to defend
Speaker 1: Taiwan against China. It's almost as if she knew nothing
Speaker 1: about the topic at all. But my favorite line is
Speaker 1: when she said that Venezuela is below the equator. Is
Speaker 1: just pay close attention to this, you know, we look at.
Speaker 2: What happened in Venezuela for example.
Speaker 1: It is not a.
Speaker 2: Is It is not a remark on who Maduro was
Speaker 2: as a leader, he canceled elections, he was an anti
Speaker 2: democratic leader. That doesn't mean that we can kidnap ahead
Speaker 2: of state and engage in acts of war just because
Speaker 2: the nation is below the equator.
Speaker 1: No, he was indicted as a narco terrorist who was
Speaker 1: killing Americans and profiting off it. The funny part is
Speaker 1: she goes the US should not engage in actions like
Speaker 1: the one against Maduro just because Venezuela is below the equator.
Speaker 1: One little problem. Venezuela is not below the equator. Why
Speaker 1: they led facts? Now this is this is the leader
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party. Now she is, I mean Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer is not the leader of the Senate. He's the
Speaker 1: minority leader in name only. Came Jefferies, minority leader in
Speaker 1: name only. The real brain trust is the radical left AOC.
Speaker 1: By the way, she wants to implement a wealth tax
Speaker 1: all across the US. Now, like, immediately, President, are you
Speaker 1: going to impose a wealth tax or a Billionnais tax?
Speaker 3: I don't think that.
Speaker 2: I don't think that anyone and that we don't have
Speaker 2: to wait for any one president to impose a wealth tax.
Speaker 2: I think that it needs to be done expeditiously.
Speaker 1: Ah, we should, We should do this expeditiously. That would
Speaker 1: be stealing and that of course they would love to have.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 1: By the way, the Netherlands House of Representatives just approved
Speaker 1: a thirty six percent tax on unrealized capital gains in
Speaker 1: crypto and on bonds. California now is watching a billionaire
Speaker 1: mass exodus the likes of which we've never seen in
Speaker 1: our lifetime before. And what there's no way because it
Speaker 1: would be retroactive if they passed this in November, and
Speaker 1: it's California, so I'd say the odds are probably high
Speaker 1: that it could pass. If they passed this in California,
Speaker 1: it would go back to January. If, in other words,
Speaker 1: in you're a billionaire and you have your company in
Speaker 1: California and they're just going to come in after you've
Speaker 1: paid taxes, assuming otherwise you'd be in jail, and then
Speaker 1: just confiscate five percent of your wealth. This is insane
Speaker 1: and this is what we're now. You know, we're just
Speaker 1: watching a decline the likes of which we've never seen before.
Speaker 1: I'm going to spend time probably in the second hour
Speaker 1: of the program today if I think time we put
Speaker 1: a CID enough of the speech of Marco Rubio it
Speaker 1: was Marco Rubio's finest moment. I think he's If you
Speaker 1: want to talk about a star that has emerged out
Speaker 1: of the administration by far, I don't think it's even close.
Speaker 1: Is Marco Rubio. I don't know about you, Linda, but
Speaker 1: where whenever I'm asked about the administration, obviously President Trump
Speaker 1: gets asked about the most people ask me questions, and
Speaker 1: then they all want to talk about Marco. That is
Speaker 1: the name that is mentioned by far more than any other.
Speaker 1: But he gave an unbelievable speech at this Munich security conference,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to play a lot of it later
Speaker 1: in the program, and laying out the deep ties that
Speaker 1: entwine the US with Western Europe while also firmly laying
Speaker 1: down America's concerns about how they have abandoned our shared
Speaker 1: heritage and we're not going to go along with him.
Speaker 1: And what was really spectacular about it. He was saying
Speaker 1: this right to Europe's face, and you would think that
Speaker 1: maybe the reaction would be bad. No, just the opposite.
Speaker 1: He won huge applause with the assurance that in a
Speaker 1: time of headlines heralding the end of, you know, the
Speaker 1: the Transatlantic era, let it be known and clear to
Speaker 1: all that this is neither our goal nor our wish
Speaker 1: because for US Americans, our home may be the Western
Speaker 1: maybe the Western hemisphere, but we will always be a
Speaker 1: child of Europe. And then he talked about the Alliance's
Speaker 1: divisions and this delusion that with the fall of the
Speaker 1: former Soviet Union, every nation would now be a liberal
Speaker 1: democracy and what he's what he is really pointing out here,
Speaker 1: and he said, we're not We're not being polite about this.
Speaker 1: He called on Europe to unshackle itself from guilt and
Speaker 1: shame and forge new global paradigms built on respectful borders,
Speaker 1: re industrialization, and peace through strength. Basically, he laid out
Speaker 1: the Trump doctrine, and he's telling them that they should
Speaker 1: follow our lead if they want to remain independent countries.
Speaker 1: I mean, at one point it was pretty spectacular because
Speaker 1: he won over this, this roomful of European leaders on
Speaker 1: their own territory, and he was taken on all of
Speaker 1: their sacred cows. I have been saying this for some time,
Speaker 1: and I may be of a different mindset in this way.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure it's possible to save Europe as a
Speaker 1: continent at this point. Because of the horrible leadership and
Speaker 1: decisions that they have made, both independently and collectively. They
Speaker 1: have had unfettered, wide open borders and what I call
Speaker 1: immigration without assimilation, Like, you know, the best answer on
Speaker 1: immigration I ever heard was Arnold Schwartz on The View
Speaker 1: when asked about you know, having the chance at twenty
Speaker 1: one to come to this country, and he said, I
Speaker 1: look at it like if I'm a guest at somebody's house,
Speaker 1: you clean up after yourself, you obey their laws, you
Speaker 1: be respectful. You know you have to do it legally.
Speaker 1: And he goes, not one person on that show like
Speaker 1: his answer. And he goes, and if you're an immigrant
Speaker 1: in America is kind enough to open up its country
Speaker 1: to you, you owe it to this country to obey
Speaker 1: its laws and to give back as a way of
Speaker 1: saying thank you for the opportunity to live I think
Speaker 1: in the greatest country God gave men. And what Rubio
Speaker 1: was saying in this speech, we have no interest in
Speaker 1: being polite as Americans and orderly caretakers. If the West,
Speaker 1: meaning Western Europe, wants to participate in this managed decline,
Speaker 1: and when you have immigration without assimilation, what is the
Speaker 1: net result? Of that, how does it manifest itself? It manifests.
Speaker 1: It's so with eighty five Sharia courts in Great Britain
Speaker 1: and no go zones and other parts of Europe, and
Speaker 1: it has not worked out. Well. You can't have a
Speaker 1: separate society within a society, and that's not the way
Speaker 1: immigration historically has worked. I think it was Prime Minister
Speaker 1: Howard back in the day. If you come to Australia,
Speaker 1: you will be an Australian and adopt our ways. We're
Speaker 1: letting you into our country. You don't get to come
Speaker 1: here and try and change our country to your system
Speaker 1: of beliefs. Otherwise you can stay where the hell you
Speaker 1: came from. And at the time it was controversial. It's
Speaker 1: not controversial. But if you look at immigration without assimilation,
Speaker 1: if you look at the adherents throughout Europe to climate alarmism.
Speaker 1: I mean remember German Chancellor at the time, Angela Merkel.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump gave her a white flag. She goes, what's this.
Speaker 1: He goes, it's the surrender flag and she goes, what for, Well,
Speaker 1: you just surrendered your sovereignty. She had done a multi, multi,
Speaker 1: multi billion dollar deal because they had given into climate alarmism,
Speaker 1: to import the lifeblood of their economy from Vladimir Putin
Speaker 1: and Russia to make them rich. And meanwhile, what is
Speaker 1: the main purpose, the main geopolitical foe as it relates
Speaker 1: to to NATO would be Russia and Putin. I mean,
Speaker 1: it was insane, But all across the board, they have
Speaker 1: embraced this climate alarmism. They have embraced socialism, and socialism,
Speaker 1: as we've discussed often on this program, always ends the
Speaker 1: same way. Whatever socialism, collectivism, statism, communism, whatever manifestation it
Speaker 1: takes on, it always ends the same way, unfulfilled promises,
Speaker 1: more poverty and a loss of freedom every time. And
Speaker 1: the last thing is, and Rubio pointed this out in
Speaker 1: his speech, is they have not in any way kept
Speaker 1: up with their national security obligations, and they've let their
Speaker 1: guard down. And Donald Trump has challenged them on all
Speaker 1: of these issues. And this is what made this speech
Speaker 1: so dynamic and so impactful. And he said, we have
Speaker 1: no interest in America and being polite and caretakers of
Speaker 1: the West managed decline. And he said, arguing that the
Speaker 1: West has drifted, that it wasn't inevitable this drift, but
Speaker 1: the result of policy choices and that America intends to
Speaker 1: go in a different direction. He said, we don't seek
Speaker 1: to separate. We seek to revitalize an old friendship, to
Speaker 1: renew the greatest civilization in human history, urging the alliance
Speaker 1: that boldly races towards the future. He's giving them the
Speaker 1: opportunity and by doing so. Then he laid out the specifics,
Speaker 1: and the specifics would be to reclaim supply chain independence.
Speaker 1: In other words, we don't need to be dependent on
Speaker 1: countries that hey, you know, we shouldn't be dependent on
Speaker 1: China for anything, because they are a geopolitical foe, he said,
Speaker 1: enforcing immigration limits. And I'll add to that assimilation, rebuilding,
Speaker 1: defense capabilities, all the things that I'm saying that Europe
Speaker 1: has gotten away from. You know, if you look at
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's issues with Europe, what did Donald Trump do?
Speaker 1: Donald Trump demanded that they double their commitment, more than
Speaker 1: double their commitment to NATO because they have let their
Speaker 1: guard down. And that was fully on display as Vladimir
Speaker 1: Putin was building up in amassing troops and military equipment
Speaker 1: on the border with Ukraine. And they didn't do a thing,
Speaker 1: and they let it happen. And Joe Biden talked about, well,
Speaker 1: it depends if it's a minor incursion based on what
Speaker 1: we're going to do about this. Okay, a minor incursion.
Speaker 1: Four years later, here we are and no end in sight.
Speaker 1: And the only hope we have is the fact that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is investing a lot of political capital to
Speaker 1: try to get Europe back on track. But that threat remains.
Speaker 1: You know, what would stop Vladimir Putin from invading any
Speaker 1: other European country? And he just blasted this concept of
Speaker 1: a world without borders as a fantasy and wanting mass
Speaker 1: migration has threatened Western civilization. It is especially true as
Speaker 1: evidenced by the no go zones and Sharia courts, etc.
Speaker 1: And there are people that have no Not only do
Speaker 1: they not want to assimilate, they want to impose their
Speaker 1: value system on Europe and make Europe change to their
Speaker 1: way of thinking. If that was the case, why didn't
Speaker 1: they stay in the country they came from, you know,
Speaker 1: and Rubio pointed this out. We've got to gain control
Speaker 1: of our national borders, controlling who and how many people
Speaker 1: are we allowed to enter our countries. It's not an
Speaker 1: expression of xenophobia. It is a fundamental act of national sovereignty.
Speaker 1: And Donald Trump challenged them on defense, and he's challenging
Speaker 1: them on immigration. He's challenged them on their unfair trade
Speaker 1: practices with the United States, He's traveled, he's now you know,
Speaker 1: challenge them on Greenland. And meanwhile, the biggest beneficiaries of
Speaker 1: the Golden Dome that Donald Trump wants to build out
Speaker 1: and I believe he successfully will to be very honest,
Speaker 1: based on what I know sources I have, I can
Speaker 1: tell you we've made great progress. But Europe has to
Speaker 1: get there their act together, and now is like a
Speaker 1: moment of truth for them. And the only person that
Speaker 1: has challenged all of this and what has basically gone
Speaker 1: unchallenged up to now is Donald Trump and now Mark Rubio,
Speaker 1: and he did it spectacularly. We do have an update
Speaker 1: as it relates to the Save Act that we have
Speaker 1: spent a lot of time on this program discussing. Now.
Speaker 1: The President did say on Friday that he will issue
Speaker 1: an executive order after laying out the legal reasons for
Speaker 1: national voter identification requirements. All this is is proof of
Speaker 1: citizenship and a valid ID that you can't get like,
Speaker 1: for example, in certain sanctuary citizen states, you can get
Speaker 1: a license. I mean, we've seen this happen again and again.
Speaker 1: The case in Florida with this guy couldn't It turns
Speaker 1: out he couldn't read English and he couldn't read road signs,
Speaker 1: kills three Floridians. There's been many examples of this, and
Speaker 1: so you have to have a valid driver's license, a
Speaker 1: voter ID. And now we did get the fiftieth Republican,
Speaker 1: which was critical, and that was Susan Collins of Maine.
Speaker 1: And this campaign now is very very important. Now there's
Speaker 1: going to be a Democratic filibuster, and we discussed this
Speaker 1: with Senators Cruz and Senator Mike Lee last week, and
Speaker 1: what they are demanding is that Republicans stand together and
Speaker 1: insist that the Democrats do an old fashioned real filibuster
Speaker 1: where they have to go to the Senate floor and
Speaker 1: stay there and talk and talk and talk as long
Speaker 1: as they can possibly talk until we get to the
Speaker 1: point where we actually get a vote on this and
Speaker 1: then the President can sign it into law. Now, with
Speaker 1: all that said, the President's going to lay out the
Speaker 1: legal reasons for national voter ID requirements, and he said
Speaker 1: he wants voter ID implemented for the twenty twenty six
Speaker 1: mid term elections. Why would any Democrat be against this? Now?
Speaker 1: I can only think of one reason, and it's nefarious.
Speaker 1: They do they want illegals that are that don't have
Speaker 1: the legal right to Why would they be against that?
Speaker 1: Why would they be against voter integrity? Chuck Schumer is
Speaker 1: doubled down over the weekend, once again claiming it's Jim
Speaker 1: Crow two point zero. But you got to understand, Chuck
Speaker 1: Schumer is minority leader in name only. He is scared
Speaker 1: to death of the real power base within the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party that's AOC anyway, So we'll see. Now there is
Speaker 1: a Jerry Manderin fight going on in Virginia, for example,
Speaker 1: they just proposed an electoral map that would potentially give
Speaker 1: Democrats ten of the state's eleven congressional representatives in the House. Now,
Speaker 1: forty six percent of the Commonwealth of Virginia voted for
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. I mean, it's pretty outrageous they'd give Republicans
Speaker 1: nine percent of the state's representation. But that's what they're
Speaker 1: trying to work through. You know, none of these things
Speaker 1: that Abigail Spanberger is implementing. Remember, in Virginia, you only
Speaker 1: get one term and then you can run again, but
Speaker 1: you can't do it consecutively. So she did not run
Speaker 1: on any of the things she's doing. However, there might
Speaker 1: be a loophole. This was on Foxnews dot Com. A
Speaker 1: little bit in the weeds, but worth knowing and one
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy nine years ago. Arlington was once part
Speaker 1: of the District of Columbia, and it was given to
Speaker 1: Virginia for the express purpose of continuing slavery in northern Virginia.
Speaker 1: Now Arlington one's part of d C is home to
Speaker 1: nearly two hundred thousand Virginians, a great many of whom
Speaker 1: are DC bureaucrats that now enjoy the benefits of living
Speaker 1: in the states while also exerting disproportion and influence over
Speaker 1: the federal government. They receive essentially double representation of Arlington
Speaker 1: residents want to influence Washington. The argument that I read
Speaker 1: and I thought it was just interesting in the weeds
Speaker 1: again but interesting. But in seventeen ninety d C was created.
Speaker 1: Its location was seated directly in between Maryland and Virginia,
Speaker 1: but in eighteen forty seven, after the district pressed for
Speaker 1: abolition of slavery, Alexandria now Arlington County was officially retro
Speaker 1: seeded after President then President James Polk issued a proclamation
Speaker 1: and then the Virginia legislation legislature accepted it. Now, the
Speaker 1: Civil War that followed again from eighteen sixty eighteen sixty
Speaker 1: to eighteen sixty four, so this is eighteen forty seven
Speaker 1: I'm talking about. There were financial, strategic, voting interest at
Speaker 1: stake at the time, and it's hard to argue that
Speaker 1: slavery was not the primary motivator Virginia. Virginians were afraid
Speaker 1: that slaves would simply walk across the boundary into d
Speaker 1: C and become free, and with that barrier of the
Speaker 1: Potomac River parting Virginia from the district, they'd be unable
Speaker 1: to gain their freedom. And indeed, anyway, the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: has never weighed in on whether this maneuver was ever constitutional.
Speaker 1: There might be a way, might be a way to
Speaker 1: challenge whatever nefarious gerrymandering plans that they have in Virginia's
Speaker 1: that's two in the weeds. Linda's a little two in
Speaker 1: the weeds, right, Yeah, I think it's interesting. It might
Speaker 1: I might be go ahead.
Speaker 5: So Mike Lee did something today that I really liked
Speaker 5: a lot. Senator Mike Lee he he's obviously been crushing
Speaker 5: this entire issue of things that are going on, and
Speaker 5: he put this video out today that did something nobody
Speaker 5: else has done yet. Instead of just listing all of
Speaker 5: the things that you do every day and in everyday
Speaker 5: life that you need an id for, he did the opposite.
Speaker 5: He goes, how about I go into the bank and
Speaker 5: I just say, I don't have idea, I don't have
Speaker 5: anything to prove who I am, but I just I
Speaker 5: want that money out of that account because it sounds crazy, right,
Speaker 5: He goes, you have to go pick your kid up
Speaker 5: from school. I'm not going to show you a idea.
Speaker 5: I'm not going to tell you who I am. I
Speaker 5: just I want that child. Could you bring him out please?
Speaker 5: I'm we'll take him with me. And he's like, when
Speaker 5: you start to say it like that, you realize how
Speaker 5: insane it sounds, and then you realize.
Speaker 1: It's and get on a plane without identification. Good luck
Speaker 1: to you, plee.
Speaker 5: And now they even worse with the real Linda drinks
Speaker 5: a lot, like I mean, she's a heavy drinker, and
Speaker 5: of course.
Speaker 1: A heavy heavy drink. All right, play along, right, right,
Speaker 1: so she's buying like remember when we were kids, he
Speaker 1: had Boonze Farm, Strawberry Hill and grape. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: terrible that it was just absolute garbage. You can't buy
Speaker 1: a beer without an ID, you can't buy a bottle
Speaker 1: of wine without ID, you can't buy any liquor without ID.
Speaker 1: But people that smoke cigarettes not a good idea. By
Speaker 1: the way, you can't buy a pack of cigarettes without
Speaker 1: an ID. You can't even get a jewel pod without
Speaker 1: an ID. Everything in life you need an ID if
Speaker 1: you want to if you go into the White House,
Speaker 1: good luck getting into the White House without an ID.
Speaker 1: Even even if you work there. It's not happening. You're
Speaker 1: not getting through.
Speaker 5: Well, look at last week they were showing you how
Speaker 5: they voted. They had to put the ID into.
Speaker 1: This hilarious and then vote. I'm like you people aren't.
Speaker 5: That was hilarious and asso off with his campaign fundraiser.
Speaker 5: You had to show ID to get in. I'm like, okay,
Speaker 5: So clearly you have issues. You hate everyone. You're asking
Speaker 5: for ID.
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom is the world. This is Gavin's life now,
Speaker 1: he's a world traveler. He's in Davos now, he's at
Speaker 1: the security conference in Germany. And then he's a full
Speaker 1: time tweety bird, full time trump stalker, full time podcaster,
Speaker 1: full time author, and people in the Pacific Palisades cannot
Speaker 1: get permits to rebuild their homes. You know, like a
Speaker 1: year and three four months later. It's insane, absolutely insane,
Speaker 1: and he's over there now comparing law enforcement to Nazis
Speaker 1: in German.
Speaker 3: Remember all those images of masked men, the secret police,
Speaker 3: something familiar in Germany. Those first images came out of
Speaker 3: my state, the second largest city in the United States
Speaker 3: of America. We saw four thousand National Guard federalized first time.
Speaker 3: We'd never say anything like that, and seven hundred active
Speaker 3: duty Marines sent not overseas, but to the second largest
Speaker 3: city in the United States of America, militarizing the streets
Speaker 3: of my city. Masked men, masked men showing up unaccountable.
Speaker 3: No idea, ideas.
Speaker 1: Is he's just lost the plot. He really hasn't. I
Speaker 1: don't even know if the people of California would vote
Speaker 1: for him for president. He's been such a horrible governor.
Speaker 1: Highest income taxes, sales taxes, highest gas taxes. Now they
Speaker 1: got this referendum. Every billionaire is now leaving, and with it,
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley will cease to exist. Mark my words. He
Speaker 1: won't be able to the fourth largest economy well based
Speaker 1: on his population size, but he's done everything to destroy
Speaker 1: that state. The Spokane, Washington mayor, woman by the name
Speaker 1: Elisa Brown, proposed redirecting one hundred grand from the Spokane
Speaker 1: Police Department and their public outreach budget to fund assistance
Speaker 1: programs for illegal and refugee families when a member is arrested, detained,
Speaker 1: or deported by federal immigration agencies. So she wants to
Speaker 1: defund the police give the money to illegals. You want
Speaker 1: to talk about losing the plot? Now, Minneapolis Democrats, you
Speaker 1: got tampon tim and mayor smallfry, you know, describing the
Speaker 1: damage caused by I, excuse me, ice protected this state.
Speaker 1: Let me give you numbers. CBS News even admits CBS
Speaker 1: that over twenty one hundred illegal aliens were arrested for
Speaker 1: murdering Americans in just the last year alone. In twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five and five four hundred illegals were arrested last
Speaker 1: year for raping and sexually assaulting Americans. Now, I defy
Speaker 1: any of these politicians to name three people that were
Speaker 1: part of the twenty one hundred arrested that were murdered
Speaker 1: by these illegals, or the five four hundred illegals arrested
Speaker 1: for raping or sexually assaulting Americans. Interesting because they can't
Speaker 1: Obama's now comparing Ice and their rogue behavior to dictatorships
Speaker 1: rogue behavior. We've seen this in authoritarian countries. Let's take
Speaker 1: a trip down memory lane, shall we, because Obama sounded
Speaker 1: very different in twenty ten making the case for deportations
Speaker 1: and controlling our borders.
Speaker 4: There are those in the immigrants rights community who have
Speaker 4: argued passionately that we should simply provide those who are
Speaker 4: illegally with legal status, or at least ignore the laws
Speaker 4: on the books, and put an end to deportation until
Speaker 4: we have better laws. Ultimately, our nation, like all nations,
Speaker 4: has the right and obligation to control its borders and
Speaker 4: set laws for residency, citizenship, and no matter how decent
Speaker 4: they are, no matter their reasons, the eleven million who
Speaker 4: broke these laws should be held accountable.
Speaker 1: And then he talks about deporting them, and then he
Speaker 1: went about deporting them. By the way, Tom Homan had
Speaker 1: a great answer for tampon tim and mayor Smallfry. He said,
Speaker 1: you should be thanking us instead of demanding reimbursement. We
Speaker 1: have scrolled the names of all the people that committed
Speaker 1: the most heinous crimes in Minneapolis that ICE was able
Speaker 1: to deport. The only reason they pulled back is because
Speaker 1: they got all the local sheriffs and in the all
Speaker 1: eighty seven districts to agree that they would cooperate with
Speaker 1: ICE moving forward, which they had, which is a massive
Speaker 1: wind for Tom Homan, for ICE and Department of Homeland Security.
Speaker 1: By the way, Jasmine Crockett back in the news issuing
Speaker 1: a dire warning during a podcast on Friday, if I
Speaker 1: go to sleep, democracy may very well die. He said,
Speaker 1: But you know what, democracy can't wait. I can't go
Speaker 1: to sleep, may die. AOC is just being slammed. She
Speaker 1: and we'll play this late. I don't have time now.
Speaker 1: She probably sounded the dumbest I've ever heard her in Munich.
Speaker 1: It was so bad. By the way, the only Democrats
Speaker 1: shown common sense is John Fetterman slamming Democrats and their
Speaker 1: Jim Crow two point zero voter id rhetoric. I mean
Speaker 1: he's doing a great job. Really. The biggest surprise out
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party in a long long time. So
Speaker 1: you have newso show voting in Davos and Munich. California
Speaker 1: gas prices going through the roof last two weeks alone,
Speaker 1: gas prices in California a forty cents a gallon. It's upstatewide.
Speaker 1: Their average is four point fifty eight a gallon O way,
Speaker 1: It's about twoint fifty in the Free State of Florida.
Speaker 1: And we don't have an income tax here. We don't.
Speaker 1: We don't have all these times access that they have.
Speaker 1: You know, lrda's budget is literally less than half of
Speaker 1: New York and we have a greater population, much better
Speaker 1: infrastructure number one or number two every year in schools,
Speaker 1: and real policing that works. I mean, it's incredible. It's
Speaker 1: not the amount of money, it's how you spend it.