1
00:00:04,440 --> 00:00:12,280
Speaker 1: Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

2
00:00:12,280 --> 00:00:15,520
Speaker 1: and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

3
00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:18,639
Speaker 1: I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and how the

4
00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:21,400
Speaker 1: tech are you. It's time for some tech news that

5
00:00:21,440 --> 00:00:24,880
Speaker 1: caught my eye this week. We are on February twenty third,

6
00:00:25,120 --> 00:00:29,400
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. Let's get to it now. Yesterday was

7
00:00:29,560 --> 00:00:32,360
Speaker 1: a bit of a doozy for cellular carriers here in

8
00:00:32,360 --> 00:00:36,520
Speaker 1: the United States. Disruptions and service plagued AT and T customers,

9
00:00:36,560 --> 00:00:40,839
Speaker 1: and reportedly some folks who patronize other carriers had similar problems.

10
00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:44,479
Speaker 1: It was a massive outage and it lasted for several hours.

11
00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:48,160
Speaker 1: Those with Wi Fi capable phones could still make calls

12
00:00:48,159 --> 00:00:51,560
Speaker 1: over Wi Fi networks, but once out of the electromagnetic

13
00:00:51,560 --> 00:00:55,280
Speaker 1: embrace of the router, they found themselves without servants. Speculation

14
00:00:55,480 --> 00:00:58,520
Speaker 1: range from a technical glitch to a possible cyber attack

15
00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:01,680
Speaker 1: as being the cause of the issue. That last possibility

16
00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,160
Speaker 1: got the authorities involved, as more than seventy thousand dollars

17
00:01:05,240 --> 00:01:09,720
Speaker 1: reports flooded in from cities like Houston and Dallas and Texas,

18
00:01:09,920 --> 00:01:13,480
Speaker 1: Los Angeles. Out in California, Chicago and Illinois and my

19
00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:17,040
Speaker 1: hometown of Atlanta, Georgia. As for those other carriers, T

20
00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:20,240
Speaker 1: Mobile and Cricket Wireless reported some of their customers had

21
00:01:20,280 --> 00:01:23,959
Speaker 1: also mentioned a loss of service, and curiously, it seemed

22
00:01:23,959 --> 00:01:26,480
Speaker 1: to happen after those customers had tried to call AT

23
00:01:26,560 --> 00:01:29,160
Speaker 1: and T customers. I should also add that Cricket Wireless

24
00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:32,479
Speaker 1: actually piggybacks off of AT and t's network, so maybe

25
00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:34,959
Speaker 1: it's not such a big surprise that they had some

26
00:01:35,160 --> 00:01:39,480
Speaker 1: issues with their customers. The Federal Communications Commission, or FCC,

27
00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:43,640
Speaker 1: has launched an investigation into the incident. The US Cybersecurity

28
00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:46,560
Speaker 1: and Infrastructure Security Agency also looked into it, plus the

29
00:01:46,760 --> 00:01:50,960
Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security started to investigate it. But this morning,

30
00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:53,600
Speaker 1: AT and T says the problem that came down to, quote,

31
00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:57,400
Speaker 1: the application and execution of an incorrect process used as

32
00:01:57,440 --> 00:02:00,880
Speaker 1: we were expanding our network end quote. That's according to

33
00:02:00,920 --> 00:02:03,560
Speaker 1: an actual AT and T release. This lines up with

34
00:02:03,760 --> 00:02:07,680
Speaker 1: an earlier analysis from the Cybersecurity Agency. They said that

35
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:10,600
Speaker 1: the most likely cause of the issue was a fault

36
00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:14,240
Speaker 1: in a cloud computing configuration error. While it took hours

37
00:02:14,280 --> 00:02:16,600
Speaker 1: to restore service to all customers, AT and T says

38
00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:19,880
Speaker 1: that process is now complete so hopefully if you have

39
00:02:19,919 --> 00:02:22,079
Speaker 1: AT and T you don't have any issues right now.

40
00:02:22,600 --> 00:02:25,920
Speaker 1: And now a quick update on Cruise. Not Tom Cruise,

41
00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:29,280
Speaker 1: but rather the autonomous taxi company that famously got in

42
00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:32,320
Speaker 1: trouble when one of its vehicles struck and then dragged

43
00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:35,320
Speaker 1: a pedestrian for twenty feet or so while the car

44
00:02:35,360 --> 00:02:40,040
Speaker 1: was pulling over, and then allegedly Cruz was attempting to

45
00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:43,400
Speaker 1: cover up the incident by not sharing their video of

46
00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:47,080
Speaker 1: the actual accident. Anyway, the state of California has revoked

47
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:50,920
Speaker 1: Cruise's license from operating within that state, but the company

48
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:54,160
Speaker 1: is looking at other cities and is reportedly preparing to

49
00:02:54,200 --> 00:02:58,200
Speaker 1: return to service with actual drivers in the seats as well.

50
00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:01,880
Speaker 1: Spokesman Pat Morrissey said, our goal is to relaunch in

51
00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:07,120
Speaker 1: one city with manually driven vehicles and supervised testing as

52
00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:10,040
Speaker 1: soon as possible, once we have taken steps to rebuild

53
00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:13,040
Speaker 1: trust with regulators and the public. End quote. Now. I

54
00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:15,800
Speaker 1: would like to think that our trust would require a

55
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,800
Speaker 1: lot of work to rebuild, but I just don't know,

56
00:03:18,919 --> 00:03:22,280
Speaker 1: because some folks just love them sell some technology. But

57
00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:24,880
Speaker 1: then again, Cruz has to turn things around if it

58
00:03:24,960 --> 00:03:27,720
Speaker 1: is to remain a viable business. Since that accident, the

59
00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:31,440
Speaker 1: company has had several top leaders jump ship, and it

60
00:03:31,480 --> 00:03:35,280
Speaker 1: has also downsized more than twenty percent. So they definitely

61
00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:37,560
Speaker 1: need to make things start to happen, or else there's

62
00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:40,560
Speaker 1: not going to be a company anymore. Google is back

63
00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:44,280
Speaker 1: in the hot seat because it's newly renamed AI, which

64
00:03:44,320 --> 00:03:47,000
Speaker 1: is now known as Gemini, has a tendency to go

65
00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:49,920
Speaker 1: a little overboard for the sake of diversity. Now, I

66
00:03:49,920 --> 00:03:53,760
Speaker 1: think most of us understand that in most contexts, diversity

67
00:03:54,120 --> 00:03:57,560
Speaker 1: is important. It brings fresh perspectives and methods to bear.

68
00:03:58,040 --> 00:04:02,200
Speaker 1: Generally speaking, we all benefit when we concentrate on making

69
00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:07,080
Speaker 1: sure we are championing diversity. But if you wanted to

70
00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:09,680
Speaker 1: create a historically accurate portrayal of a group of people,

71
00:04:09,760 --> 00:04:13,640
Speaker 1: such as, oh, I don't know Nazi soldiers, you might

72
00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:16,840
Speaker 1: be shocked if the AI generated image included people of

73
00:04:16,920 --> 00:04:22,680
Speaker 1: color dressed in Nazi uniforms. The Nazis famously were not inclusive.

74
00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:25,280
Speaker 1: This sounds a bit like Godwin's law, right, I mean,

75
00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:27,719
Speaker 1: that's the law that says any conversation on the Internet

76
00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:31,920
Speaker 1: will inevitably gravitate toward Hitler as folks disagree with one another.

77
00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:35,360
Speaker 1: But the genesis of the complaints gets a little bit

78
00:04:35,360 --> 00:04:39,120
Speaker 1: more murky because they start in the anti diversity crowd,

79
00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:43,360
Speaker 1: or folks who are kind of like white rights people,

80
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:46,760
Speaker 1: or they just are I guess they would position themselves

81
00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:49,679
Speaker 1: as anti woke. But these were people who are complaining

82
00:04:49,680 --> 00:04:52,279
Speaker 1: that if you asked Gemini to create images of like, say,

83
00:04:52,360 --> 00:04:55,359
Speaker 1: an American woman, that it would create some images that

84
00:04:55,400 --> 00:04:57,640
Speaker 1: included people of color, and maybe you'd end up with

85
00:04:57,680 --> 00:05:00,000
Speaker 1: more people of color than white people. Maybe you'd even

86
00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:02,080
Speaker 1: end up with a group of people and there's no

87
00:05:02,640 --> 00:05:06,440
Speaker 1: white person represented in that group. This has led to

88
00:05:06,839 --> 00:05:09,760
Speaker 1: some of these people arguing that Google is pushing anti

89
00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:13,560
Speaker 1: white propaganda on the public, which, you know, let's be serious.

90
00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:15,919
Speaker 1: I mean, the examples I've looked at at least have

91
00:05:16,440 --> 00:05:19,760
Speaker 1: had white folks in those examples. It's not like they were,

92
00:05:20,279 --> 00:05:23,440
Speaker 1: you know, completely left out. And goodness knows, America has

93
00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:26,880
Speaker 1: a very long history of producing media that studiously ignored

94
00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:29,400
Speaker 1: the fact that people who are not white also live

95
00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:33,120
Speaker 1: in America. See also the sitcom Friends. You would think

96
00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:37,600
Speaker 1: that New York was almost entirely white based on that show. Anyway,

97
00:05:38,120 --> 00:05:41,240
Speaker 1: the Nazi thing indicates that perhaps Google has been a

98
00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:46,000
Speaker 1: little heavy handed when trying to force diversity into image generation. Right, Like,

99
00:05:46,040 --> 00:05:49,560
Speaker 1: there are different ways to have diversity work its way

100
00:05:49,600 --> 00:05:53,760
Speaker 1: into your product, and brute force is not necessarily the

101
00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:57,200
Speaker 1: best way. You can almost imagine that the algorithm has

102
00:05:57,240 --> 00:05:59,640
Speaker 1: a little like switch at the end of the sequence,

103
00:05:59,760 --> 00:06:02,800
Speaker 1: as is the group of people that you've created diverse

104
00:06:02,920 --> 00:06:06,400
Speaker 1: if not insert people of color. Now, obviously that is

105
00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:09,960
Speaker 1: not appropriate in every context, and honestly it points out

106
00:06:10,080 --> 00:06:13,400
Speaker 1: that true diversity and fairness is really hard to achieve,

107
00:06:13,720 --> 00:06:17,160
Speaker 1: even if we're just talking virtually. That doesn't mean that

108
00:06:17,200 --> 00:06:19,800
Speaker 1: we shouldn't bust our butts to try and achieve it.

109
00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:23,240
Speaker 1: And I would recommend Adam Robertson's article on the Verge

110
00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:28,200
Speaker 1: titled Google apologizes for missing the mark after Gemini generated

111
00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:31,640
Speaker 1: racially diverse Nazis. If you'd like to read more, it's

112
00:06:31,680 --> 00:06:35,280
Speaker 1: a very good article. In other Google Gemini news, Google

113
00:06:35,320 --> 00:06:39,440
Speaker 1: incorporated an AI writing generator into Google Chrome this week.

114
00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:42,840
Speaker 1: Now to use this, you actually first must enable it.

115
00:06:43,080 --> 00:06:44,919
Speaker 1: You have to go into settings to do this, and

116
00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:47,400
Speaker 1: I did that this morning, but I haven't really had

117
00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:49,520
Speaker 1: a chance to take this out for a spin to

118
00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:51,800
Speaker 1: see what it's like. I'll be sure to report back

119
00:06:51,839 --> 00:06:54,240
Speaker 1: once I've had some time with it. I did try

120
00:06:54,600 --> 00:06:58,000
Speaker 1: the tab organizer option. There's an option that's supposed to

121
00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:01,719
Speaker 1: reorganize your tab so that they make sense, but I

122
00:07:01,760 --> 00:07:05,080
Speaker 1: had already kind of grouped my tabs into relevant research.

123
00:07:05,520 --> 00:07:08,479
Speaker 1: So I guess there just wasn't anything left for Gemini

124
00:07:08,520 --> 00:07:11,920
Speaker 1: to organize because nothing happened. But you know, it's either

125
00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:14,679
Speaker 1: that or it just didn't work anyway. You can also

126
00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:17,880
Speaker 1: do things like you can click within a text field online.

127
00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:21,200
Speaker 1: Let's say you found an online form, like maybe you're

128
00:07:21,280 --> 00:07:24,520
Speaker 1: leaving a review for a product, and you can choose

129
00:07:24,840 --> 00:07:28,960
Speaker 1: help me write by right clicking, you know, write write.

130
00:07:29,520 --> 00:07:33,239
Speaker 1: That will get Gemini to either write or rewrite your stuff.

131
00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:36,520
Speaker 1: So maybe you want to sound particularly educated while you're

132
00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:39,000
Speaker 1: writing your next review about a pair of sneakers or whatever,

133
00:07:39,240 --> 00:07:42,160
Speaker 1: you can use this option. I have not tried this yet,

134
00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:45,800
Speaker 1: so I don't know what it's like, but it's good

135
00:07:45,800 --> 00:07:47,760
Speaker 1: to note that if you do use this feature, Google

136
00:07:47,800 --> 00:07:51,480
Speaker 1: will collect some data about the whole process, like what

137
00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:55,160
Speaker 1: site you're on and what you wrote or had Gemini

138
00:07:55,280 --> 00:07:59,400
Speaker 1: write for you, and further this then could be reviewed

139
00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:02,800
Speaker 1: by human beings further along the chain, as a way

140
00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:04,680
Speaker 1: to make sure that Gemini is on track and is

141
00:08:04,720 --> 00:08:07,880
Speaker 1: improving over time, So there could be human review added

142
00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:11,040
Speaker 1: into this, So for the privacy minded, you might want

143
00:08:11,080 --> 00:08:14,600
Speaker 1: to think twice before you activate this feature, you know,

144
00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:18,800
Speaker 1: and otherwise the things you write are possibly going to

145
00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:21,559
Speaker 1: be reviewed by human beings, and if you're writing stuff

146
00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:24,360
Speaker 1: that you'd rather human beings not actually see, which I

147
00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:26,080
Speaker 1: don't know why you'd be writing on the internet if

148
00:08:26,080 --> 00:08:29,040
Speaker 1: that's the case, but maybe don't use this. The website

149
00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:31,120
Speaker 1: Reddit is about to go public, so it's about to

150
00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:34,240
Speaker 1: hold its initial public offering, as in, you know, become

151
00:08:34,400 --> 00:08:37,400
Speaker 1: a publicly traded company. This is a really big deal

152
00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:40,600
Speaker 1: for several reasons. Reddit the site that lets users create

153
00:08:40,640 --> 00:08:43,480
Speaker 1: and manage pages called subreddit. It's about pretty much any

154
00:08:43,520 --> 00:08:46,400
Speaker 1: topic you can imagine, and probably a few you can't.

155
00:08:47,000 --> 00:08:50,160
Speaker 1: It has served as a sort of gathering ground for

156
00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:52,920
Speaker 1: interesting links to all sorts of stuff online, and it's

157
00:08:52,920 --> 00:08:55,880
Speaker 1: been around for years, but it has never turned a profit.

158
00:08:56,360 --> 00:09:00,200
Speaker 1: In fact, it lost more than ninety million dollars last year. However,

159
00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:02,720
Speaker 1: it did post a twenty one percent growth in revenue

160
00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:05,800
Speaker 1: year over year, so it made more money, which meant

161
00:09:05,840 --> 00:09:11,120
Speaker 1: it lost less money overall. It also recently went through

162
00:09:11,120 --> 00:09:14,240
Speaker 1: a really rocky situation where the company changed its Application

163
00:09:14,320 --> 00:09:18,080
Speaker 1: Programmer Interface policy or API policy, and in the process

164
00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:21,719
Speaker 1: it alienated a whole bunch of its user base. You know,

165
00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:25,920
Speaker 1: Reddit saw users deliberately sabotaged several popular subreddits as a

166
00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:28,720
Speaker 1: result of that, and the experience left many Reddit users

167
00:09:28,840 --> 00:09:31,439
Speaker 1: sour on the site. Now that being said, Reddit has

168
00:09:31,520 --> 00:09:34,200
Speaker 1: offered something of an olive branch, at least to the

169
00:09:34,240 --> 00:09:37,120
Speaker 1: most prolific Reddit users. They will have the chance to

170
00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:39,680
Speaker 1: purchase shares and Reddit before it goes active on the

171
00:09:39,679 --> 00:09:43,400
Speaker 1: stock market. That means you can potentially buy shares at

172
00:09:43,440 --> 00:09:45,560
Speaker 1: a lower price than what it will be when it

173
00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:49,280
Speaker 1: is trading on the stock market, though that's not a guarantee.

174
00:09:49,480 --> 00:09:53,800
Speaker 1: They can be pretty exclusive, as you know insiders in

175
00:09:53,880 --> 00:09:57,280
Speaker 1: this case. So there might be some prolific redditors out

176
00:09:57,280 --> 00:09:59,480
Speaker 1: there who still hold a grudge against Reddit for those

177
00:09:59,559 --> 00:10:02,680
Speaker 1: changes the API. But I have seen people really fall

178
00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:04,480
Speaker 1: over themselves for the chance to be part of an

179
00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:07,440
Speaker 1: exclusive group, even if that group isn't really impressive. So

180
00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:09,840
Speaker 1: I'm guessing a lot of the folks who have the

181
00:10:09,920 --> 00:10:13,280
Speaker 1: opportunity to make those purchases will in the interest of

182
00:10:13,280 --> 00:10:16,840
Speaker 1: full disclosure, I'm definitively not one of those people. I

183
00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:19,480
Speaker 1: use Reddit for research, but I do so pretty much

184
00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:23,040
Speaker 1: only as a lurker. I think I may have posted

185
00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:26,520
Speaker 1: on Reddit perhaps half a dozen times total across my

186
00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:29,640
Speaker 1: entire history with the site, and it's almost always as

187
00:10:29,640 --> 00:10:32,800
Speaker 1: a comment to an existing thread. But in other interesting news,

188
00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:37,160
Speaker 1: Open Ai co founder and former CEO and then reinstated CEO,

189
00:10:37,559 --> 00:10:41,000
Speaker 1: Sam Altman is one of the top shareholders on Reddit.

190
00:10:41,240 --> 00:10:43,600
Speaker 1: He boasts an eight point seven percent share in the

191
00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:46,800
Speaker 1: company that's more than twice as much as CEO Steve

192
00:10:46,880 --> 00:10:50,840
Speaker 1: Huffman possesses of his own company. This means that Altman

193
00:10:50,920 --> 00:10:55,560
Speaker 1: can actually outvote the CEO on shareholder matters. Altman's shares

194
00:10:55,640 --> 00:11:00,400
Speaker 1: means he's the third largest shareholder overall. The company's Advance Publications,

195
00:11:00,440 --> 00:11:03,439
Speaker 1: which owns Conde Nast among other things, and the Chinese

196
00:11:03,440 --> 00:11:07,040
Speaker 1: company ten Cent, which owns pretty much everything, are ahead

197
00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:10,480
Speaker 1: of him. Also probably not related, but Reddit has started

198
00:11:10,520 --> 00:11:13,439
Speaker 1: to negotiate with AI companies to allow them to use

199
00:11:13,480 --> 00:11:16,680
Speaker 1: Reddit to help train AI in return for paying a

200
00:11:16,679 --> 00:11:19,520
Speaker 1: hefty amount of money. So Google recently forked over sixty

201
00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:22,840
Speaker 1: million dollars and have agreed to do that per year

202
00:11:23,240 --> 00:11:25,840
Speaker 1: for the privilege of using Reddit to train AI. Which

203
00:11:25,880 --> 00:11:29,040
Speaker 1: is interesting that Sam Altman has such a prominent place

204
00:11:29,080 --> 00:11:32,120
Speaker 1: in the shareholders and Reddit is taking money from Google,

205
00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:35,360
Speaker 1: a competitor to open Ai, for this training privilege. I

206
00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:37,440
Speaker 1: really wonder if open ai will have to cough up

207
00:11:37,480 --> 00:11:40,640
Speaker 1: money to do the same thing. I guess we'll find out. Okay,

208
00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:42,800
Speaker 1: we're going to take a quick break to thank our sponsors.

209
00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:55,320
Speaker 1: We'll be back with more news after this. Okay, we're back.

210
00:11:55,640 --> 00:11:58,240
Speaker 1: So Yahoo is shaking things up over at in gadget.

211
00:11:58,440 --> 00:11:59,920
Speaker 1: If you're not familiar with the inn gadget, that's a

212
00:11:59,920 --> 00:12:03,000
Speaker 1: site that reports on tech topics and offers up stuff

213
00:12:03,080 --> 00:12:06,640
Speaker 1: like product reviews. The company laid off ten people in

214
00:12:06,679 --> 00:12:10,920
Speaker 1: the editorial department, including top leadership positions like the editor

215
00:12:10,960 --> 00:12:14,120
Speaker 1: in chief, and it also split the editorial department into

216
00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:17,600
Speaker 1: two groups, so one group will focus exclusively on news

217
00:12:17,640 --> 00:12:21,040
Speaker 1: and features and the other one on reviews. Reportedly, this

218
00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:23,559
Speaker 1: is to realign the editorial staff in an effort to

219
00:12:23,679 --> 00:12:26,560
Speaker 1: drive more traffic to the site, because more traffic means

220
00:12:26,679 --> 00:12:29,920
Speaker 1: more advertising revenue. And Gadget's general manager issued a memo

221
00:12:29,960 --> 00:12:33,720
Speaker 1: that said the changes will quote increase our velocity in

222
00:12:33,760 --> 00:12:37,600
Speaker 1: the quote that raises huge red flags for me as

223
00:12:37,600 --> 00:12:40,760
Speaker 1: someone who used to write articles for a website. Increase

224
00:12:40,800 --> 00:12:44,400
Speaker 1: our velocity sounds a lot like making deadlines much tighter,

225
00:12:44,880 --> 00:12:49,439
Speaker 1: requiring writers to write far more pieces per given amount

226
00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:52,040
Speaker 1: of time, and giving writers less time to research and

227
00:12:52,120 --> 00:12:54,680
Speaker 1: understand a topic, which makes it harder to write something

228
00:12:54,720 --> 00:12:57,280
Speaker 1: that isn't just a regurgitated press release. And that doesn't

229
00:12:57,320 --> 00:13:01,400
Speaker 1: really help anybody. Now. I don't have any attachment to Engadget.

230
00:13:01,400 --> 00:13:03,320
Speaker 1: I don't know any people who work there or used

231
00:13:03,320 --> 00:13:06,079
Speaker 1: to work there, but I really hope everyone find it, finds,

232
00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:08,480
Speaker 1: you know, gainful employment. They end up in a good place,

233
00:13:08,520 --> 00:13:10,439
Speaker 1: because it's a rough time to be out of work

234
00:13:10,600 --> 00:13:13,199
Speaker 1: as a web based writer. Now I probably should have

235
00:13:13,240 --> 00:13:15,960
Speaker 1: put this next story after the cruise story, but here

236
00:13:15,960 --> 00:13:18,559
Speaker 1: we are. So. The State of California has put Alphabet's

237
00:13:18,559 --> 00:13:22,360
Speaker 1: application to expand Robotaxi services in the San Francisco and

238
00:13:22,400 --> 00:13:27,680
Speaker 1: Los Angeles areas until June nineteenth. The California Public Utilities

239
00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:32,280
Speaker 1: Commission states that the application is suspended for further staff review. Now,

240
00:13:32,320 --> 00:13:35,120
Speaker 1: this is a standard procedure if the agency does not

241
00:13:35,280 --> 00:13:38,439
Speaker 1: approve an application within thirty days of it having been submitted.

242
00:13:38,800 --> 00:13:41,840
Speaker 1: So it's not like this is totally unusual. It's not

243
00:13:41,920 --> 00:13:45,560
Speaker 1: like it. It's definitely an indication that California is pushing

244
00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:48,760
Speaker 1: back against alphabet and WEIMO. My guess is that the

245
00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:53,240
Speaker 1: state of California is reevaluating their stance on autonomous vehicle

246
00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:56,120
Speaker 1: operation in the wake of the cruise incident as well

247
00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:59,400
Speaker 1: as other accidents involving autonomous vehicles, and that it might

248
00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:02,000
Speaker 1: be a wild for it issues any approvals to expand

249
00:14:02,040 --> 00:14:06,319
Speaker 1: service until the state legislation decides upon suitable rules and regulations.

250
00:14:06,800 --> 00:14:08,400
Speaker 1: Go back just a couple of years, and a lot

251
00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:11,240
Speaker 1: of car manufacturers boasted of plans to switch over to

252
00:14:11,360 --> 00:14:14,520
Speaker 1: only making electric vehicles in the near future. Mercedes Benz,

253
00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:16,800
Speaker 1: for example, said the plan was to go all EV

254
00:14:17,000 --> 00:14:19,440
Speaker 1: by the year twenty thirty, but now the company is

255
00:14:19,520 --> 00:14:22,040
Speaker 1: backing out of that promise. So the problem you see

256
00:14:22,240 --> 00:14:24,760
Speaker 1: is that folks are not buying as many evs as

257
00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:27,840
Speaker 1: the companies thought they would, and so the companies are

258
00:14:27,880 --> 00:14:32,000
Speaker 1: scared that going all EV will just devastate their industry,

259
00:14:32,320 --> 00:14:34,520
Speaker 1: and so companies are starting to change their tune, saying

260
00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:37,440
Speaker 1: that they won't be quite as aggressive in pushing evs

261
00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:40,040
Speaker 1: to the market, and that they will continue to produce

262
00:14:40,160 --> 00:14:43,960
Speaker 1: gas and hybrid vehicles instead. That's a blow to environmentalists

263
00:14:44,000 --> 00:14:46,520
Speaker 1: who are really hoping to see consumer transportation make a

264
00:14:46,560 --> 00:14:49,800
Speaker 1: really big change. But the market dictates where these companies

265
00:14:49,800 --> 00:14:52,080
Speaker 1: are going to go, and it's hard to argue that

266
00:14:52,120 --> 00:14:55,320
Speaker 1: a company should produce itself out of business. That doesn't

267
00:14:55,360 --> 00:14:58,280
Speaker 1: do really anyone any good. Now, one could argue that

268
00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:01,880
Speaker 1: issues like vehicle costs and charging station availability are really

269
00:15:01,880 --> 00:15:04,880
Speaker 1: having an impact, but in fact it's a really complex

270
00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:07,480
Speaker 1: challenge and maybe it's just too complex to follow through

271
00:15:07,480 --> 00:15:09,800
Speaker 1: on promises that were made just a few years ago.

272
00:15:09,960 --> 00:15:13,400
Speaker 1: Blue Sky, one of the federated social platform alternatives to

273
00:15:13,640 --> 00:15:16,360
Speaker 1: x slash Twitter, made a really big move this week.

274
00:15:16,720 --> 00:15:19,400
Speaker 1: The company will now allow you to choose who hosts

275
00:15:19,440 --> 00:15:23,479
Speaker 1: your data. So by default, blue Sky hosts all your information,

276
00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:25,680
Speaker 1: but you can designate another party to host all of

277
00:15:25,760 --> 00:15:28,040
Speaker 1: your data, and that includes stuff like all the stuff

278
00:15:28,080 --> 00:15:30,560
Speaker 1: you post, all of your likes, all of your follows, etc.

279
00:15:31,160 --> 00:15:34,320
Speaker 1: And that even includes yourself. If you want to store

280
00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:37,040
Speaker 1: your data on your own server, you can do that

281
00:15:37,480 --> 00:15:39,800
Speaker 1: and it doesn't have to be forever. Blue Sky structure

282
00:15:39,800 --> 00:15:42,640
Speaker 1: allows you to port data from host to host, so

283
00:15:42,760 --> 00:15:44,960
Speaker 1: if you change your mind, you can move your stuff.

284
00:15:45,120 --> 00:15:47,840
Speaker 1: Now this is huge since most social platforms require you

285
00:15:47,920 --> 00:15:50,520
Speaker 1: to host all of your information on their own servers

286
00:15:50,640 --> 00:15:54,000
Speaker 1: because your data is valuable and the platform wants to

287
00:15:54,080 --> 00:15:56,720
Speaker 1: leverage it. Being able to choose where it all goes

288
00:15:56,800 --> 00:15:59,240
Speaker 1: gives more power to the user, and if the user

289
00:15:59,280 --> 00:16:02,080
Speaker 1: determines that they're the current host is doing something shady

290
00:16:02,360 --> 00:16:05,360
Speaker 1: or it's a poor steward of their information, they can

291
00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:07,560
Speaker 1: change where it's stored. If you want to read more,

292
00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:10,560
Speaker 1: there's a post on blue Sky. It is titled blue

293
00:16:10,560 --> 00:16:13,920
Speaker 1: Sky an Open Social Web and it has all the details.

294
00:16:14,240 --> 00:16:16,480
Speaker 1: Our next story is cool because it suggests we can

295
00:16:16,520 --> 00:16:20,480
Speaker 1: achieve incredible boosts and processing power without having to fight

296
00:16:20,600 --> 00:16:23,640
Speaker 1: against the laws of quantum mechanics to do it. A

297
00:16:23,720 --> 00:16:28,040
Speaker 1: UC Riverside Associate professor named Hungwai Seng has published a

298
00:16:28,120 --> 00:16:33,480
Speaker 1: paper titled Simultaneous and Heterogeneous multi Threading and it explains

299
00:16:33,520 --> 00:16:37,600
Speaker 1: this concept. So basically saying points out that modern computers

300
00:16:37,600 --> 00:16:41,280
Speaker 1: typically have multiple processors. You know, you might have a

301
00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:45,640
Speaker 1: CPU and a GPU, you might have hardware accelerators for

302
00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:48,560
Speaker 1: stuff like machine learning or AI, and all of these

303
00:16:48,600 --> 00:16:51,400
Speaker 1: handle information separately, kind of like as if they are

304
00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:54,560
Speaker 1: in a silo, and then information can travel from processor

305
00:16:54,600 --> 00:16:58,720
Speaker 1: to processor. But this means the overall process is inefficient.

306
00:16:59,120 --> 00:17:02,080
Speaker 1: So Saying In his team demonstrated that by multi threading

307
00:17:02,120 --> 00:17:05,520
Speaker 1: processes across all of these different types of units, he

308
00:17:05,560 --> 00:17:10,359
Speaker 1: could speed things up considerably. He nearly doubled processing speed

309
00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:13,000
Speaker 1: while at the same time almost cutting the amount of

310
00:17:13,080 --> 00:17:17,080
Speaker 1: energy needed to complete those processes by half. So not

311
00:17:17,160 --> 00:17:19,919
Speaker 1: only does it boost computational speeds, does so in a

312
00:17:20,040 --> 00:17:23,280
Speaker 1: really energy efficient way. It's pretty insane that he could

313
00:17:23,280 --> 00:17:26,240
Speaker 1: get nearly double the output just by using multi threading

314
00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:29,720
Speaker 1: across processors without having to do a single hardware upgrade.

315
00:17:29,920 --> 00:17:33,399
Speaker 1: And this has the potential to create enormous benefits. So

316
00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:37,000
Speaker 1: imagine that you were able to double the output and

317
00:17:37,200 --> 00:17:40,880
Speaker 1: half the energy requirements of a data server farm for example.

318
00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:43,200
Speaker 1: Like that would mean that you would need less water

319
00:17:43,320 --> 00:17:45,880
Speaker 1: to cool the data farm, you would be using less

320
00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:48,400
Speaker 1: energy to run it, so it'd be more cost efficient.

321
00:17:48,600 --> 00:17:51,359
Speaker 1: You'd be able to double the output. That's incredible. Of course,

322
00:17:51,760 --> 00:17:54,560
Speaker 1: we could probably just screw that up by doubling the

323
00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:57,520
Speaker 1: number of servers we're storing in that server farm, and

324
00:17:57,560 --> 00:17:59,879
Speaker 1: then we're right back to where we started. But you know,

325
00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:02,879
Speaker 1: you get the point. Satan himself is actually cautioned that

326
00:18:03,040 --> 00:18:04,639
Speaker 1: a lot more work has to be done to figure

327
00:18:04,640 --> 00:18:09,040
Speaker 1: out when this methodology will be practical and applicable, because

328
00:18:09,080 --> 00:18:12,119
Speaker 1: it might be that for some applications it's ideal, but

329
00:18:12,200 --> 00:18:15,199
Speaker 1: for others we might see far less impressive gains and

330
00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:18,199
Speaker 1: that it wouldn't make sense to implement it. So it

331
00:18:18,280 --> 00:18:20,200
Speaker 1: is good to keep that in mind. But still pretty

332
00:18:20,280 --> 00:18:22,760
Speaker 1: darn cool. Now, before I sign off, I do have

333
00:18:22,800 --> 00:18:24,720
Speaker 1: an article i'd like to recommend to y'all, and this

334
00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:27,520
Speaker 1: one is from Wired. It's by Lauren Good and it's

335
00:18:27,560 --> 00:18:31,119
Speaker 1: titled tech Job interviews are out of Control. So the

336
00:18:31,119 --> 00:18:33,600
Speaker 1: piece explores how the culture in the tech sector has

337
00:18:33,680 --> 00:18:36,280
Speaker 1: changed dramatically over the last couple of years. You know,

338
00:18:36,320 --> 00:18:39,960
Speaker 1: once upon a time, developers and engineers found themselves courted

339
00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:43,520
Speaker 1: by headhunters and they were constantly being lured to greener

340
00:18:43,560 --> 00:18:47,639
Speaker 1: pastures on a regular basis with bigger compensation packages and benefits.

341
00:18:47,880 --> 00:18:50,879
Speaker 1: But now an interview process might require proving your worth

342
00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:53,880
Speaker 1: by working on a project without you know, actually being

343
00:18:53,880 --> 00:18:57,600
Speaker 1: an employee. So there you are doing real work for

344
00:18:57,680 --> 00:19:00,359
Speaker 1: free in order to prove that you're worth high hiring,

345
00:19:00,480 --> 00:19:02,720
Speaker 1: and meanwhile you're taking up time and energy you could

346
00:19:02,800 --> 00:19:06,000
Speaker 1: be using to actually land a gig, which is pretty

347
00:19:06,040 --> 00:19:08,120
Speaker 1: crazy stuff. But the full article goes into way more

348
00:19:08,160 --> 00:19:11,199
Speaker 1: detailed it's well worth reading. As always, I have no

349
00:19:11,200 --> 00:19:13,879
Speaker 1: connection to Wired or to Lauren Good. It's just a

350
00:19:13,920 --> 00:19:15,920
Speaker 1: good article and I think you should check it out.

351
00:19:16,359 --> 00:19:20,040
Speaker 1: That's it for the tech News for February twenty third,

352
00:19:20,160 --> 00:19:22,760
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four. I hope you are all well. I'll

353
00:19:22,760 --> 00:19:32,080
Speaker 1: talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an

354
00:19:32,080 --> 00:19:37,600
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

355
00:19:37,760 --> 00:19:44,800
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.