WEBVTT - Tech News: You Got AI On My Google Search

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey therein

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>an executive producer with iHeartRadio. And how the tech are you?

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It's time for the tech news for May eleventh, twenty

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, a Thursday. Bye, I'm doing my math correctly.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Google is currently holding its Io event. This is where

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Google invites app developers to attend various keynotes and workshops

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to learn about new Google features that the developers can

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>integrate into their own work. So yesterday Google held the

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>opening keynote, which is traditionally when the company makes the

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>bulk of its announcements and sometimes includes like impressive displays

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of technology to get folks excited about Watson development. So

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>here's a quick rundown of some of the things Google

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>announced yesterday. They unveiled several new devices. One of them

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>is called the Pixel Fold, which, as you might imagine,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is a foldable mobile device, essentially a smartphone that can

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>unfold into kind of a tablet. It has an o

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>led screen when it's folded, that screen measures five point

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>eight inches on the diagonal, but if you unfold it

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a seven point six inch display. That doesn't

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>sound like it gets much bigger, but it's actually kind

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of like a almost like a square tablet rather than

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the rectangular kind you're you're probably used to. It is

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>more square in shape. I have to admit I've never

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>been the target market for a device like this, like

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a hybrid device that can be a smartphone or a tablet.

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But for those who do want that sort of thing,

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>they will need to save up about one thousand and

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred and ninety nine bucks to get one when

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>they become available. Google also showed off a new smartphone model,

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the Pixel seven A, so the A series of phones,

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>like the five A and the seven A. Those tend

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of a budget model, a slight update

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but a budget model of the previous year's newest phone.

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So the seven A will cost five hundred bucks for

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the basic version. There's also a version that will support

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>millimeter wave transmissions, but only certain carriers support that. But

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>if your carrier does, then you can get that one

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for five hundred and fifty bucks when they go on

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sale and then. Google also introduced a tablet called the

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>wait for it, Pixel Tablet. It's an eleven inch tablet.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>That one will cost five hundred bucks when it hits shelves.

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>These have Google's latest processor in them, and lots of

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>other bells and whistles, but you know, I'm not going

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to dive into all of that because it would take

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>up the whole episode. Beyond the hardware, Google also talked

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>about some changes to Google products and services, and a

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>huge one is Google Search. You know, it used to

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be that that search was the only thing we really

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>associated with Google. These days, I don't know what most

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 1>people think of when they think of Google. I still

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>think of search, but then I was around before Google

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Search really became a thing, when I was using web Crawler,

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't know if everyone still thinks of

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Google Search. But that's where the big change is coming.

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Google Search has remained relatively unchanged for ages,

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>although you could argue the incorporation of ads has switched

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>things up a few times. But this new feature, which

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>will be an opt in experience, meaning it's not just

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the standard experience you do have to elect to be

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>part of it, is called Search Generative Experience, and as

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that name suggests, if you click into that mean that

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>your search query could include an AI generated answer at

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the top of your search results, and that might mean

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't even need to go any further to find

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>out more about whatever it is you're searching for. Like

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're searching for a fairly simple or you know,

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>not to in depth topic, then you'll get a little

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>summary and you might not have to click through to

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a different web page. Or maybe you use the answer

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that's provided by AI to ask follow up questions and

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>get more in depth answers and still not click through.

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the kind of stuff that makes web page

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.919
<v Speaker 1>administrators really nervous because if no one's clicking through, then

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>there's no traffic. If there's no traffic, then there's no revenue.

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And unless you're, you know, a subscription based website, and

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>people just don't bother to cancel their subscriptions. But otherwise, yeah,

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a scary kind of thing. In fact, this is

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>something that a lot of websites have been concerned about

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for all while, but it could potentially be helpful to

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>users as long as the answers are reliable. You know,

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as we have seen that's not always the case. The

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>company also has opened up google Bard before it was

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in a beta test and you had to be invited

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to be part of it. But now you can just

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>use it if you want to and maybe see if

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it's improved. Since Google developers expressed concerns about its dependability

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and accuracy, I would recommend that if you do use

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Google Bard, don't you know, rely on it to give

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you safe instructions on how to go scuba diving, because

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>developers pointed out that an earlier build of Google Bard

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>gave instructions that could be harmful or even fatal if

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you followed them. So yeah, I would not depend entirely

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>upon AI responses right now. Google also announced that it

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>is updating its operating system for wearable devices. This is

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>fittingly called where a Swear where OS, so the fourth

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>generation is what is currently in development, just so you know,

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>where OS three hasn't yet fully deployed. So it's interesting

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that they were talking about the next generation when the

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>current one hasn't really fully rolled out yet. There's lots

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>more too. Google also showed off an AI tool that

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pixel users the smartphone and maybe the tablet as well.

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>The pixel users will get to use this AI tool

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that will help them edit photos. So let's say you

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to change the brightness of just one part of

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the photo without affecting the rest. You could do that

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>or and this was really cool. They showed off an

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>example of this. Let's say that you took a picture

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of your friend. Say your friend is standing near a

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>cruise ship, and it's a good picture, but you just

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>wish that you had had your friend's step like six

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>inches to the right. Well, with this tool, you could

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>shift your friends six inches to the right, and AI

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>would effectively paint the background so that it wouldn't look

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>as if you had moved the person in the first place,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like it should seem as if you could move your

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>friend to wherever in the frame you want, and the

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>AI will just take care of the background so that

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like you messed with it at all,

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>which is really cool. Also kind of scary because when

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you get into that real time photo manipulation stuff where

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>AI is kind of covering for you, it can raise

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of potential misuse scenarios further down the line,

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>but still kind of neat if you're just using it

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>casually for the purpose for which it was intended. There

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>was a neat privacy announcement. Android devices will be able

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to detect Bluetooth devices that were intended to track stuff,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>so like Apple's air tags, right, the purpose of air

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>tags is such you can slip one into, say your luggage,

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you can use the air tag to find

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that piece of luggage if you get your destination and

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>your luggage doesn't that kind of thing right, Well, some

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>people obviously have been using air tags to tag other stuff,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>not just like luggage or whatever, but sometimes, like I

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, a person that they wanted to follow, like

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a stalker would use it to slip the air tag

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>into say a car and end up stalking someone that way. Well,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>now Android will be able to detect these sorts of devices.

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So if it sees that there's some Bluetooth device that

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 1>is traveling with you, like it's detected, and it's still

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>detected even as you move through your environment, like if

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you're driving down the street, it will give you an

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>alert so that way you can check to make sure

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that someone hasn't bugged your car or whatever. I assume

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's only going to do this when it does

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>detect that stuff is moving around with you, so that

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't get crazy numbers of notifications. When say you

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>go to the gym and everyone's using Bluetooth earbuds or something.

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Google also made some other announcements, but I think that

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that's enough for right now, and we could probably dive

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>into more in future episodes of tech stuff. Over in Russia,

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the Russian government has fined Google's parent company, Alphabet, the

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 1>staggering sum of three million rubles, which is, let me

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just convert this into dollars. Oh, it's about forty thousand bucks. Okay,

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not a lot. But then you might say, okay, well,

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>why did they find Alphabet in the first place. What

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was the infraction. Well, the Russian government says Alphabet failed

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to remove videos on YouTube that the government has determined

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>contain misinformation, primarily about Russia's war against Ukraine, which has

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>not been going well for Putin, but the Russian government

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>would prefer that not be publicized within Russia itself, and

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>also any videos that contained what the government has referred

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to as LGBT propaganda. The government classifies any content that

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote promotes homosexuality as propaganda and that whomever is

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 1>responsible for publishing it can face fines. Now, I would

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>make some very judgmental comments about this about how Russia

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>has targeted these folks. But I feel like before I

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>can start casting stones at Russia, I gotta aim a

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>whole lot closer to home, because currently we're seeing an

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>increased movement against the LGBTQ plus community in various states

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.679
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, including some that border my state,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine my state, which has perhaps some sympathetic

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>politicians in charge, could follow suits. So I can't get

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>two up in arms about Russia doing this. Although avi

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Russia has gone to extremes to suppress anyone in the

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>LGBTQ community there, I can't, you know, We're seeing similar

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>things happen here in the States, so I can't really

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just single out Russia anyway. I don't know if Google

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>will bother paying this fine. I mean, maybe they will.

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>It's only forty thousand dollars. I'm sure executives could just

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>root around in their couches and come up with that.

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>But Google, like a lot of tech companies, has already

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 1>pulled out of Russia. They closed down their offices based

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in the country, and while Google services are still available

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>in Russia, the company doesn't operate there like on a

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>like a corporate scale. Speaking of YouTube, there's apparently a

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>new anti ad blocker feature on the service, at least

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for some users. According to Reddit, a few folks having

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>counter messages saying that ad blockers are not allowed on YouTube,

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and if you want to watch YouTube without ads, you

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>need to become a YouTube Premium subscriber, or your other

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>option is just to disable your ad blocker and then

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you get ads supported YouTube access. Google has seen a

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>lot more people subscribe to YouTube Premium over the past

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, so it is possible that this is

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>really meant to push more folks toward that. In fact,

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the redditors said that the pop up message included a

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>button to make it super simple to subscribe to YouTube Premium,

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>so you could just click there in the pop up

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>window and do it. So far, this message has been

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>part of a limited rolled out experiment. It's not going

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to everyone. It's just going to a subset of YouTube users.

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>It is possible that YouTube will not expand this to

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the general user base. But as I've said before, if

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a company sees that a tactic is effective and is

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>generating revenue, then they're more likely than not going to

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>adopt it wholesale. It's hard to back off of that,

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and as full disclosure, I've actually been a YouTube Premium

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>subscriber for ages. Although to be fair, I was actually

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>a Google Music subscriber, but then Google sunset that service,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and when they did, they ported my subscription over to

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube Premium because there's YouTube music as well, and I

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>just kept it because I like watching YouTube without ads.

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But I also understand that, you know, you can't get

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 1>something for nothing or else. No one can make some

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>things anymore. Speaking of that, this is perfect timing. We're

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>going to take a quick break so that we can

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>listen to a few messages from our sponsors and then

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll be right back. Okay, here we go back with

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the news. Sam Altman, the CEO of Open AI, is

0:13:55.640 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>about to appear before the US Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Technology and the Law. This happens next Tuesday. Senators want

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a conversation with Altman about his perspective on

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>how governments should approach AI. You know what sorts of

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>laws might need to be updated or even new laws

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially proposed in order to allow for the safe and

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>responsible development and deployment of AI while minimizing risks and

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>threats and other types of problems. Now, in the past,

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Altman has been pretty candid about his opinions, and they

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't always what you would expect from a guy who

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>runs a company that is known for perhaps the most

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>high profile implementation of AI that's out there right now,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at least among the general public. He has said more

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>than once that chat GPT is not as miraculous as

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>some people made it out to be. And remember, he's

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy running the company that made chat GPT. He

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has already met with political leaders about AI safeguards recently.

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is a really good step. I

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's just going to become political theater where

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Altman's being grilled for all this stuff. I feel like

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>this there's the potential of actual collaboration here. Now. I

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>have never met Altman, I don't know him personally. I

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>get the sense that I mean he is trying to

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>walk the line between running an AI company and also

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to manage expectations in a field where the hype

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>cycle can take off without warning. We've seen that recently

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with reports about how investors are pouring billions of dollars

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>into different companies that are centered around AI, even if

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>those companies don't have you know, a business plan or something.

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So I hope that this meeting next week is informative

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and productive and that perhaps lawmakers can start looking into

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>things that need tweaking, like you know, right to publicity

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and right to personality laws as an example. Meanwhile, over

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in the European Union, lawmakers there are also nearing the

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>final step toward regular AI. So the EU has a

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>big set of rules about AI that's nearing the point

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of adoption. And these rules cover a lot of ground,

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>including stuff like the rules around facial recognition, for example,

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that it should not be used in public spaces, that

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement should not be relying upon it, because, as

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen here in the United States, facial recognition technology

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is far from perfect. There's a tendency for this tech

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a bias that makes it difficult for facial

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>recognition systems to differentiate people of color, for example, and

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>this leads to disproportionate harassment when law enforcement relies on

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>such technology to identify and track suspects. So the EU

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to perpetuate that, and these rules would forbid

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement from relying on facial recognition technology for those purposes.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>The EU's approach has been to categorize AI not in

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of the AI's capability, but rather in terms of

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>its perceived risk, which is interesting, Like, it's interesting to

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think about classifying AI as the perceived risk it has

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>on people. So if an implementation of AI is perceived

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to be dangerous, well, then it'll likely get the unwanted

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>label of unacceptable, Like the level of risk is unacceptable,

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so we cannot allow it. It would be against the

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>law to implement AI for that specific purpose. If the

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>AI is meant to I don't know, just like automatically

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>tally up calculations in a spreadsheet, it would probably get

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>a much lower risk assessment assigned to it, although you

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>could argue that even that application of technology can potentially

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>have really nasty consequences. It all depends upon what that

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheet is all about. Right now, I have yet to

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>actually read the law. The law itself has been in

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the making for a couple of years. This has been

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a long process, with lots of different parties having input

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>as the EU lawmakers have tried to structure this proposed bill.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So I am not able to give my full opinion

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>about this because I haven't read it. I do think

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's encouraging to see lawmakers get to this stage. However,

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it took a long time to get there, but at

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>least we got there. So often when I'm talking about

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>AI and the law, I'm just talking about this nebulous

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>era that we're in right now where very little appears

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to be happening. Well, things are happening in the EU.

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>This is, by the way, very super complicated stuff. You

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that you protect citizens and all that,

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>but you also you don't want to enter into a

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>situation where you're outright preventing research and development on tools

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially create enormous public good. It is not

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>an easy thing to do. I think we often get frustrated,

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>including myself, get frustrated at our leaders for taking so

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>long to adopt rules and regulations meant to protect people.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Often we feel like whatever regulations are out there aren't

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to protect people, but are there to protect other things

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>like corporations, which in here in the US are treated

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>as people. But you know, it's refreshing to see some

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>progress on that front, at least in the EU. We

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>also have a few stories about other places that are

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>adopting rules that relate to AI. For example, lawmakers here

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, specifically in the state of Minnesota,

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>are closing in on passing a bill that would make

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it a crime to create a deep fake image or

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>video that shows someone appearing to have sex without that

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>person's consent. So, in other words, it's a law that

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>would make deep fake pornography illegal if the person being

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>depicted in the video or image didn't agree to it

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Likewise, it would be illegal to

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>use deep fakes in an effort to spread election disinformation. Now,

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the state's House of Representatives had already voted on a

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>version of that bill, and yesterday the state's Senate. Because

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the lawmakers are in two houses, the House of Representatives

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and the Senate, both at the state level, and then

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we have a federal level here in the US as well,

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>this is just for the state of Minnesota. So the

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Senate unanimously voted in favor of its version of the bill. However,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the Senates version is technically more strict than the House version.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>The House version had an exception built in with regard

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to things like free speech and satire and parody, but

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to get further into that would get far more complicated. Now,

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the Senates version of the bill will go back to

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the House of Representatives. They will then discuss the changes

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>made and vote on whether or not to adopt it.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>If they do vote to adopt it, which seems like

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong bet, there's a lot of support for

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.199
<v Speaker 1>this bill, it would then move to the governor to

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>be signed into law. Minnesota is not the first state

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>to do this. They would follow states like Texas and

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>California that have already put laws on the books that

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>make certain uses of deep fake technology outright illegal. You

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>might remember a story earlier this month about how IBM's

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>CEO speculated that as many as seven eight hundred open positions,

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>which is just a small group of a much larger

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 1>section of open positions that are all under a hiring

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 1>freeze right now, those seven eight hundred jobs could ultimately

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 1>go to AI rather than being filled with human beings.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Well now, IBM's chief Commercial Officer, Rob Thomas has said

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that managers who refused to use AI or who failed

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to learn how to use AI in the context of

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>their jobs will find themselves replaced with managers who do

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>use AI. Now that at first, when you hear it

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>makes it sound a little sinister, but honestly, I think

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this is more in line with how most AI experts

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have framed the best use of this technology for the

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>last several years, that AI is not meant to outright

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>replace people, but rather to augment employee's abilities so that

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they can do their jobs more effectively, and also to

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>focus on the parts of the job that are more

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>rewarding and are less suitable for automation. Right so, someone

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>who is willing to use AI in order to do

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that will be seen as a more valuable leader than

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who isn't. While the CEO's revelation about potentially automating

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>thousands of jobs outright is I think a controversial one,

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think mister Thomas's point is much less controversial. It

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>makes sense as long as you're talking about using AI

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to augment your ability to do your job. If he,

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in fact is talking about managers using AI to eliminate

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>entire divisions of actual employees, then no, I can't. I

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 1>can't sign on for that. I think that's a bad idea.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's quest to acquire Activision Blizzard continues to hit more roadblocks.

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>The competition regulator of the UK has now passed an

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>interim order that forbids the two companies from purchasing an

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>interest in one another, so they can't like Microsoft would

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>not be allowed to purchase any ownership of Activision or

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.959
<v Speaker 1>vice versa. While the UK is standing firm against this acquisition,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the European Union is expected to actually approve the deal

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>sometime this month, So if you're keeping score, Japan has

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>already approved this deal, the EU is on the way

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>to approving the deal, the UK has voted against the deal,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and the US is teetering toward opposing the deal but

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>has not yet firmly come down, So it's really still

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a coin flip situation. And I honestly don't

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>know how things go if every one other than the

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 1>UK approves this deal, Like, I don't know how that

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>ends up working, because global company structures and the rules

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>regarding them confuse the heck out of me. So maybe

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>some people out there probably know exactly how this would unfold.

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I am not one of them, so I'm not going

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to try and guess. Disney Plus saw a drop in

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>subscribers for the second quarter in a row, with four

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>million people deciding they would let it go. Let it go. However,

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, the company reduced the losses that

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it has experienced running the streaming service. So while more

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>people have left, the actual financial losses have decreased. They're

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>still operating at a loss. They're not profitable, but they're

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>not losing as much money per quarter as they had been.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>So producing content for streaming is expensive, as you might imagine.

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now in the US, it's impossible at least four

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>US base operations. It's impossible because the Writer's Guild of

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>America is on strike. But on an earnings call CEO

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>for the second time now, Bob Eiger said that the

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>company will unite the Disney Plus and the Hulu streaming

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>services into a single service. And for someone like me

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>who subscribes to one of those, that being Disney Plus,

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>but not the other, that being Hulu, that sounds pretty great.

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>One thing that's less great is that the plan is

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>also to increase the monthly subscription fee for those who

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>want an ad free experience. So yes, you will have

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>access to more content, but you'll also be paying more

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to get that content if you don't want ads. I

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know about the ads supported one that may remain

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the same. The price hike could get here before the

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>unified streaming platform does. That also raises the possibility that

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the price could go up again a second time once

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Hulu and Disney Plus have tied the knot. I don't know.

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Iiger said, this unified platform should launch before the end

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year, and I may have to find someone

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>who is an expert in streaming strategies to come on

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the show so we can really talk about the challenges

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that streaming companies face when they're running these services. We've

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>seen it a time and again, from Netflix to Warner Brothers,

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Discovery to Paramount Plus and beyond. There have been a

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of examples of services trying new approaches to generate

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>revenue and to reduce costs, and in some cases to

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>merge with other services. You know, war Brothers Discovery and

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Paramount Plus have both gone through that and now discuss

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Disney is doing it too. So as someone who just

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>can't bring himself to subscribe to everything that's out there,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually in favor of a little consolidation in the field.

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't want it to go out of control, but

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the different number of streaming platforms so that

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not having to, you know, manage eight different subscriptions

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>or something that sounds good to me. I just don't

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>want to see streaming subscriptions reach the same height as cable, right,

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>because then we're just back to the model that was disrupted. Now,

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.959
<v Speaker 1>it may be that it's necessary to do that in

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>order to fund the platforms so that they can actually

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>create the content that we want to see in the

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>first place. But yeah, this is that complicated nature about streaming.

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>That's why I need to get an expert on the

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>show so we can kind of talk it out and

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>really understand all the different factors that go into the

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>streaming platform business. All right, I've got three more news

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>stories I want to talk about that are pretty interesting.

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But before we do that, let's take another quick break

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for our sponsors. Okay, we're back, and this is potentially

0:27:55.040 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>really exciting news. So Heleon Energy, which is aiming to

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>bring fusion power not just into reality, but to make

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it a viable commercial service, has announced that it has

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>landed its first customer, which is Microsoft. Microsoft has agreed

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>to buy a certain amount of energy from Helion Energy

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>once its fusion reactor goes into commercial service. So fusion

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>power is what the sun runs on. Stars run on fusion.

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It is the opposite of fission, which is what traditional

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power plants rely on. So fission nuclear fission is

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>where you take a heavy atom and you expend some

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>energy that causes this atom to break apart. As the

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>atom breaks apart, it releases way more energy and you

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>harness that to generate electricity. Typically you do it by

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>superheating water into steam, which then turns turbines and generates

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>electricity that way. That's your typical way of creating electricity

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>through a nuclear power plant. It's not that different from

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>using other types of energy to heat water up and

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>turn it into steam so that you can turn a turbine.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's on nuclear now. Fission power plants have

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>some real perception problems. Some would argue that that's all

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they have, that those are the only problems. It's perception,

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and that everything else is totally you know, cromulent. I'm

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>not quite at that level, but I do think that

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the opposition to nuclear power is perhaps predicated more on

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>outdated concerns. Not all of them are moot, but some

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of them are. Anyway, a lot of people associate nuclear

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>fission power plants with nuclear waste, which is understandable. It's

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>scary stuff because it can remain dangerous for tens of

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years, and thus nuclear power plants are also

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>often seen as a potential threat to safety, also understandable

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>because we've had some high profile examples of that happening.

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Even if you could argue that, and you can, you

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>can argue that our reliance on things like fossil fuels

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>have led to far more deaths and medical complications over

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the course of its history than all the nuclear mishaps

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and disasters added up together. Right, So nuclear fusion doesn't

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have these perception problems because what it does is you

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>take very light atoms, stuff like hydrogen, and then you

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>use some energy to fuse them together. So classically we

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>would take hydrogen and then applying a lot of energy,

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>really focusing these atoms so that you can overcome the

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>nuclear forces that would otherwise resist fusion, you overcome that,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>they fuse together and then you get helium, and that

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>process also releases an enormous amount of energy. So there

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>have been several experimental fusion reactors around the world that

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>have achieved fusion. They have done it, but there are

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>still hurdles in the way of making that a viable

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>means of producing energy. So, for one thing, most of

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>these experiments actually required more energy to fuse the atoms

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>together than they got from the reaction. So if you're

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>expending more energy then you get out of the process,

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a net loss. That doesn't work right, Like, you

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>might as well be using that energy directly to produce

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>electricity as opposed to using this middleman where you've got

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a net energy loss. Even in the cases where you

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>could argue you got more energy out and there are

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple, but they very narrowly focus in on specific

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>parts of the process and ignore everything else. But even

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if you get past that, you still have the challenge

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of making this a persistent reaction so that you can

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to produce energy and not just have like a

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>spike of energy production. Then you have to essentially refuel

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and do it all over again. So there's that hurdle

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. So this is very very challenging to do.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to do. However, Helium says it's aiming for

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>commercial power generation by twenty twenty eight. That's crazy soon

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>way earlier than what most folks have predicted. Now, I

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>would love to see this happen. I have my reservations,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I have my doubts, but if Helium can actually pull

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>this off, well, it could serve as an incredible model

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to totally overhaul our energy infrastructure. Fusion could provide a

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>source of clean energy without stuff like carbon emissions or

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>nuclear waste. The actual fuel we'd be using would be well,

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, technically, it's the most plentiful stuff on the planet,

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>although you do have to spend a lot of energy

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to get it. But if we could do that without

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it taking a huge chunk out of the energy we're

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>producing through the process, it's worth it. So it would

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 1>mean that we could rapidly transition off of fossil fuels.

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>That would be like literally ancient technology in comparison. But

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to hope it all works out. We can't

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>assume it's going to work out. Hoping, I think is okay,

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>but assuming is not. And I should add there are

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>experts in the nuclear fusion field who remain skeptical of

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Helium in general, who have said that it's a company

0:33:35.240 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that has shown more on paper than in reality. So

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>whether this company can actually produce energy starting in twenty

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight on a commercial level. Remains to be seen.

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I hope it works out because if it does, that

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>would be transformational, absolutely transformational. But you know it's I

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know how how sure A bet that

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is up in Canada, specifically in a suburb of Montreal

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>called Brossard. That community is testing out a new traffic

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>light and it's a traffic light that's kind of like

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Santa Claus, except of knowing if you're sleeping or if

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you're awake, and knows if you're obeying the speed limit,

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and if you're not, no green light for you. So

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>this traffic light is meant to calm traffic and it

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>monitors a driver's speed as they go down the street

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're approaching the light, and if they're going above

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the speed limit, then the light turns red and then

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the driver has to slow down and come to a stop.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.800
<v Speaker 1>But if the driver is within the speed limit, the

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>light stays green and they can just pass right through.

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>So those of you all in Europe might be saying,

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>we've had traffic lights like this forever, but this is

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the first time it's been used in Canada and for

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 1>those who are in like Canada or the United States

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're having trouble imagining this. This is not a

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>traffic light that's at an inner because that would be crazy, right.

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>If it's a light that would just be green whenever

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>people are going the speed limit and red if they

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>were going too fast and it's at an intersection, then

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you just end up with a lot of you know,

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>low speed collisions that it would be the intersection everyone

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>would avoid. No, this light is just right smack dab

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.319
<v Speaker 1>in the middle along the side of a street. So

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I would love to actually see these kinds of things

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>rolled out in my neighborhood because I sometimes see people

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 1>zipping down our little side streets way too fast in

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>an effort to bypass traffic that's on the main streets.

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of kids who live in

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>my neighborhood and I worry about them because folks who

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>are frustrated with traffic on a big road are aggressively

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>driving down side streets where you're not meant to go

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>that fast in order to just get around it. So

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see this incorporated in other places.

0:35:56.719 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Then again, I also don't drive so maybe the drivers

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 1>out there screaming at me saying no, I don't want

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to have a light, tell me I can't speed. And finally,

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>an enterprising young woman who has already created a successful

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>career as an influencer is doing something a bit bold

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps controversial. So her name is is Karen or

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's Karenne, it's cr yn, So I'll say Karenn

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>karenn Marjorie, And my apologies if I just picked the

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong pronunciation. I am old and KARENN Marjorie's like twenty three,

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>so we are worlds apart. I don't I have never

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 1>heard of her before, but she has like two million

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:40.879
<v Speaker 1>followers on Snapchat, so lots of people do know who

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>she is. And she teamed up with some developers who used,

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, thousands of hours of her content to essentially

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>build an AI version of herself. And you might say, well,

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>why would she do that? So she does it so

0:36:56.840 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that she can rent out artificial Karennes to folks who

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>want to have her as a friend or maybe a girlfriend,

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a casual fling. So the AI version of

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Karen has a computer simulated version of her voice. It

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>is Telegram based so it's like a voice chat based

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:23.840
<v Speaker 1>AI version of her, and supposedly it has essentially a

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>copy of her personality, or at the very least some

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>version of her public personality. So interested customers can rent

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 1>time with Aikrinne for about a dollar a minute. And

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>she actually launched the service like a week back as

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a beta launch, but this week it became you know,

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it emerged from beta and it's called corinne AI so

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>c r y nai. Fortune reports that the beta test

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>netted more than seventy one point five thousand dollars in

0:37:54.920 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>one week. Yaoza. So users can connect to the on telegram,

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>they can talk about whatever they like. It may not

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>come as much of a surprise to most of you

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that the overwhelming majority of people who tested it out

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 1>happen to be male personally. I think it's a clever

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>business move. Karin is leveraging her influence as well as

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>leveraging technologies capabilities. She's kind of turning the turning the

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 1>tide on things like deep fakes, right because a lot

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of times when we look at deep fakes, they're being

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>used to mimic someone without their consent. She's saying, well,

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>I want to be in control of this. So I

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 1>am going to actually be the person creating this and

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>marketing it and benefiting from it. So instead of being

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a victim, I have agency. I am in charge of it.

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I should add, however, there are experts in ethics who

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>are really worried about this sort of thing, not Carinn specifically,

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but generally speaking, a trend toward these humanized AI agents

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>because they worry that interacting with them, especially interacting on

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a more frequent basis, could start to reshape how people

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>interact with other actual human beings. And based upon what

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we've seen with the web and how that has influenced

0:39:22.360 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>how people interact with one another, I think that is

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a realistic concern. It's something we should actually really

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think and talk about. So I feel conflicted about this.

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, I think that Karin is absolutely

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 1>right to take charge of her own identity and public persona,

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and on the other hand, I worry that people will

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>become too dependent upon this, that it will become a

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of crutch that will possibly warp the way that

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 1>they interact with other people, and that that in the

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>long term, can be harmful to themselves and the people

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>around them. So yeah, it's complicated, but it is interesting

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to see someone take charge like that. And she doesn't

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 1>need me to say it to say good luck to

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>her because she's doing just fine based upon making more

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:16.839
<v Speaker 1>than seventy grand in a week. She definitely doesn't need

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>any will which is for me to see success. As

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of you, I hope you are all well.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's it for the news for this week, so

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.