WEBVTT - Is the Tech Boom Coming to an End?

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to start this episode with a bit of

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>ancient history. On August two, Apple crossed a trillion dollars

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in market value. Paid off big time yesterday when Apple

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>became the first publicly traded company in US history to

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>hit one trillion bucks in value. That's one with twelve

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>zeros after it. To put things in Perspei, Apple held

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>onto its stratospheric valuation for all of three months. On

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>November two, it closed the trading day at a value

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of nine eight six point six billion dollars. For part

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of a single trading day. In September, Amazon also preached

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the threshold we start with. Amazing Amazon somewhere CEO Jeff

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Bezos is smiling, maybe even laughing, as the company becomes

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a second one ever to hit a trillion dollar valuation,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>coming in right behind Apple a month ago. It's a

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sign of just how much the tech industry has come

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to dominate the economy, but perhaps also represented some kind

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>of high water mark for tech. Apple is lost about

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of its market value since the peak. Amazon is down

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>around twenty and Wall Street is punishing other tech stocks.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet's down about from its peak, Facebook's down twice that much.

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>What had been a simmering problem for tech stocks seemed

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>to reach a boil just before Thanksgiving, as the tech

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>inferno rages on. How much worse can they get? What

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>do you do with tech? The closing bell ending one

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of the worst days on Wall Street, a drop of

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>over six hundred points on the Dow, bringing financial markets

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to the lowest levels since March two thousand nine. For

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the last decade, Americans have been very enthusiastic about the

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies, but that mood is shifting. Social media

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>undermining democracy. How scared should we be about our loss

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of privacy? And should the government break up the big

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:57.279
<v Speaker 1>tech companies like Amazon? This market turmoil comes after months

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of these mounting concerns. Now seems like a good time

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to ask if there are leaner times ahead, what does

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it mean for big tech and how does that affect

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the rest of US? I am brab Stone and I'm

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Brewsting, and this week on Decrypted, we'll take a

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>look at what's driving investors on Wall Streets to start

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>jumping tech stocks and masks, and if the market continues

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>to punish Silicon Valley, what unintended copquence is gonna play out? Elsewhere. Now,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it is worth noting that predicting a tech shakeout has

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>been a pretty sure fire way to be dead wrong

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. Back in smart people

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>warned that Facebook would be laid low by its inability

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>to adapt the smartphone. Others at the time said Apple's

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>growth would soon hit some basic limits of economics. The

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>debate over the bubble in the tech industry continued on

0:02:55.000 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>through last year and straight onto today. So we'll see

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>if this time is different. Stay with us, So, Josh,

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we're keeping this on the Tuesday before the Thanksgiving holiday

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>here in the US, and uh, the last few weeks

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have been pretty brutal for tik stocks, right. There have

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>been some recent events that have caused a real directional shift.

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>There were some reports from suppliers to Apple that a

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>large customer was reducing its orders, and this really forwarded

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the same narrative that's coming out from Apple itself that

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>iPhone sales are probably not going to be what they

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>have been in the past. For Facebook. At the same time,

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 1>there have been increasing reports about the way that it's

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>really mishandled its response to some of the criticism regarding

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>disinformation um and election issues, and those two companies have

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>really been hit hard. You've seen the other companies go

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with them. These tech companies, by any tangible standard, have

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>been phenomenally successful and continue to be successful. You know,

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is not going out of business, but at the

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>same time, they are entering a period where growth seems

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to be harder to come by. And

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that's partially just because they are so big and they've

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>infiltrated so deeply into our lives that how can they

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>really get much deeper? Right, Well, let's take these companies

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>one at a time. You mentioned Apple. Obviously, you know

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that the company seems to have cut its own expectations

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>for the iPhone. Certainly suppliers have been more public about that.

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>A Golden Sacks lowered its rating on Apple recently, and

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing reports of week iPhone demand in China and

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>other emerging markets not a great reception for that kind

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>of top of the line iPhone X Are Is Apple

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a victim of its own success here? Yeah? I think

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that sounds right. One thing about Apple um is that

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it started making smartphones that people really wanted to buy

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I every two years if they already had one, or

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe by their first smartphone, and both of those trends

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have kind of reached, um, you know, they're really reaching

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>their limit. People are buying new smartphones much less, and

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>people who wanted smartphones pretty much already have one at

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. Apple has acknowledged this. In its most recent

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>earnings report. It said it was just gonna stop saying

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.119
<v Speaker 1>how many smartphones it selled, and UM, you don't stop

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>saying how many smartphones you sell if you think you're

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to sell more and more and more. Um.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>It also said that it was going to look to

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>make more money from services. So Apple's acknowledging that, you know,

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it's reached a point where it's going to be a

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>slightly different company going forward. Josh, let's talk about Amazon. Now, certainly,

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the companies that has performed the

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>best in in in the markets over the last five years,

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and yet since it hit that intra day high of

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars a few weeks ago, it's been really

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing but down since. Um. One big component of the

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>market pessimism seems to be is that core retail business,

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>which grew at just eleven percent in the third quarter.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, things like AWS the cloud business, advertising continue

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to grow so quickly, but you know, maybe they hit

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a saturation point. I mean in the US, I think

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>it's like sixty percent of all households are already Amazon

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Prime members, So what room do they have to grow? Yeah,

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I think the story here is that you'd rather be

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Amazon than any other e commerce company, but that eventually

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is going to reach the limits of its own

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>growth in the same way that Apple does. Really, yeah,

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Amazon kind of foresaw this moment, and yet

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that it was relying on to to save

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it and continue the fast pace of retail growth were

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:48.799
<v Speaker 1>were businesses like their business in India, the grocery business

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and the acquisition the Whole Foods, and those just haven't

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>paid the immediate dividends that Amazon is needed to keep

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>growing at in the retail business. And when we talk

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>about the kind of hail Mary passes to continue growth,

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it also kind of reminds me of Google, because you know,

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Google sort of the same slowdown as the other tech companies,

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's those businesses like um self driving cars with

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Waymo division, and and and maybe like a revived

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>business in China that haven't come in and rescued the

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>slowdown in the in the core business. Yeah, I think

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Google has a real disconnect. There are the things that

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>people like to talk about that Google is doing, as

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, the self driving cars, sort of the moon

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>shots as they've been called, and then there's the way

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that Google makes money, and that's selling digital advertising. It's

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a great business for Google, it continues to be, but

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>there are is a limited amount of advertising that the

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>businesses of the world are willing to buy. And Google

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is such a large proportion of the digital ad sales

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>at this point that it's going to have trouble continuing

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to grow at the rates it has in the past.

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Um And that's a similar dynamic with Facebook because it's

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the other kind of big player in the digital ad market.

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But Brad uh, Facebook's also had some other problems which

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think are kind of the leading edge of sort

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of broader concerns about tech and and those are the

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>social problems. What do you think about those? Well, I

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>mean I think they're existential for Facebook. I mean people

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>spend so much other lives on on the service, on

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, ancillary services like Instagram and WhatsApp, and you know,

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>part part of the like The contract I think Facebook

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>has with its users is that you know that the

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>service like improves their lives. It helps them connect to

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>uh to friends and family and and there it's a

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>productive use of their time. And I think all the criticism,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>criticism and scandals around the company has made people feel

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot more ambivalent about about the service, you know,

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I think Facebook faces some real challenges and

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing the impact of these controversies in its quarterly numbers.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, the membership growth has slowed, the revenue growth

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is now slower than investors expected. So I think we're

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:56.960
<v Speaker 1>beginning to see the impact from what has really been

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a year of NonStop conflict and controversy. Yeah. Think Facebook

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of represents the extreme view of a number of

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>dynamics that are sort of broadly within the tech company.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, people don't necessarily feel good about using Facebook. Um,

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>there have been Facebook has been sort of front and

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>center and the questions about its role in democracy and

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the political debate, and then also its response to these

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>problems has been kind of the most tenured, uh the

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>most bungled of of any company really, and so you

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have all of the things that are bothering people about

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>tech in general seem to be happening at Facebook to

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the greatest extent. But Facebook doesn't have a monopoly on

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>those concerns. And and speaking of monopoly, I think it's

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>another thing that it's maybe worrying investors and kind of

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>challenging some of the expectations of growth around these companies

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>that you know, they're now being thought of as kind

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of monolithic companies who whose impacts on communities might not

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be great. The appetite for new regulation is rising to

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent in Washington, in d C. But certainly

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>in in Europe, where you know, Google is appealing a

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollar fine. Uh, it's not. The discussion hasn't

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>completely connected to the stock price issue, but I mean,

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the weight in the worry of

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>regulation is beginning to kind of impact the growth prospects

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of these companies. Okay, Josh, So calls for regulation of

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>big tech are getting louder, But people are calling for

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>different things, right, and they fall into a couple of

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>different buckets. Yeah. I think the first one's antitrust, and

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just the idea that a company that is the

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>size of a Google or an Amazon is just going

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to use its market power to um

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to disadvantages competitors in one way or another. One typical

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>remedy is breaking up the company's I personally find that

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a kind of wildly impractical solution. You know,

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it took it took like two decades for the Microsoft

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>antitrust case to wing its way through the courts. I

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think it also took a couple of decades for the

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>IBM anti trust case before then, tech moves so quickly

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. And I don't know about you, but I

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have not heard a coherent plan for what breaking up

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>any of these companies would look like. You know, Donald

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump has made some comments about how he thinks that

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is too big, are Google is too powerful, But

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party is generally not one that will take

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>such actions. So it would really be Congress or regulators

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that would step in here. And it's hard to see

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the GOP really taking that on as a crusade. So

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the other avenue of antitrust enforcement is merger approval, and

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult for me to see um, you know, an

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazon buying another company like Whole Foods, or or Google

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>buying a YouTube or Facebook buying and Instagram without you know,

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>some serious scrutiny and maybe even even the federal government

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>blocking such an acquisition. Yeah. And I think this could

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting area because when I talk to people

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>about what might be the impacts of a slower market

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for tech, a lot of them said, look, these companies

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of cash, their current forms of growth

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>are slowing, and so on. Logical thing for them to

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>do is to try to buy new companies. But as

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they go to do that, as you said, the next

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>acquisition that looks kind of like the Instagram acquisition, it

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>probably won't sail through quite so easily. So that's the

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>potential for antitrust enforcement against the big tech companies. But

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the other big bucket of regulatory enforcement is likely to

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>come around privacy, um and data protection. We saw a

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>few months ago a major data protection law take effect

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in Europe called g DPR. Tell us a little bit

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. Yeah, g DPR tries to come in and

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>address the concern that the way that the technology companies

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>use private data, mostly to target ads, has just gone

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>too far. You saw California actually pass its own privacy

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>law in the wake of g DPR passage, and there's

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the general idea that there's going to be more of

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this going ahead in the future. UM. The big tech

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>lobby in Washington is actually really prepping up to try

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to pass a national privacy law under the idea that

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>UM what it's going to get if it doesn't work

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>on this law will be worse. And I think there's

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.680
<v Speaker 1>more tension ahead here. Basically, when you have more privacy,

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>these tech companies are going to become less profitable because

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they use your personal data to target ads. And as

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>these companies are squeezed, they're really going to find more

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>urgency into not allowing some of the more rigorous privacy

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>protections to take place. Although Josh, there is an argument,

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and you often hear it from the tech companies themselves,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>that regulation could actually be good for them because it

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>would harm smaller players. It would hurt it would hurt competition, UM,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it would strengthen perhaps even their monopolistic positions. Do you

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>buy that. I think that there's something intellectually satisfying about that.

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It does make sense generally that smaller competitors UM would

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>face uh more challenge nges and trying to deal with regulations.

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, it's just so transparently self serving

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that it's hard to think that that's really their concern here. So, Josh,

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the salves for you know,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the regulatory pressure that might slow growth for

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>these companies is pushing in the new businesses. So where

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>do you see say, Google and Facebook, you know, trying

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to grow their business and make up some of the

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the shortfalls in their core areas. Yeah. I

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>think the one thing for Google and Facebook that's probably

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a commonality between them is that they've both taken a

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>large part of the digital ad market, but there's this

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>huge bucket of television advertising that both of them would

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>love to get into UM, and that's money that's already

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>being spent that they could take away from other advertisers.

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think you'll see them look there. For Google,

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously the moon shots. It really is moving ahead

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>on autonomous vehicles, and hopefully we'll be able to do

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>UM more with that in the next year or so

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and also move into other markets. As you mentioned, China

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is a problematic one, but clearly it wants to get

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in there. UM. Google CEO soon Dar Pachai, has not

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>backed away from UM from China very much, even after

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some pushback from employees. With Facebook, most of its growth

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is already coming from these acquisitions like Instagram and What's

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>App that looked like pretty rich at the time but

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>have really paid off for the company. Um. Instagram is

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a big place that it's focusing on, and it's looking

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to develop new kinds of ad products that it can

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>use not in the timeline but in other places. And

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's really where it's going to go.

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And Brad, you're the Amazon expert, So why don't you

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>tell us about where Amazon might go from here? Yeah,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think, uh, they're all already planning for

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of slowing growth in that core business, particularly in

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the US, you know, which is kind of quite saturated.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Amazon already accounts for I think sixt of online sales

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in the in the US. Um, I think, you know,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the future is overseas. It's in countries like India and

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Australia and Brazil. Uh, you know, where they have just

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>started new businesses and they're really kind of struggling. You know,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>we've heard a lot about Amazon's entrance into the healthcare market.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's very new and very long term and

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think physical stores, you know, the bookstores and the

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Go grocery stores, the four Star gift stores are

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>popping up all over the country. That could be another

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>major avenue for growth. And then you know Apple, I

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>think we talked a little bit already about the service

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>business making up for the shortfall of iPhones. But you know,

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just as like Waymo is the great hope for Google,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for Alphabet in the long term. I think, you know,

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't discount Apple's ambitions and cars. You know, they

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>hired an engineer from Tesla named Doug Field, and there

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>has long been a rumor that Apple is working on

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of autonomous vehicle software who knows, maybe even an

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>actual Apple automobile. And so as these companies prepare for

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>slowing growth and more regulatory scrutiny, I think they're probably

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>pinning at least some of their hopes on some of

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>these future, more futuristic businesses. What about kind of their

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>role in society. I think one of the big one

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of the big draws to work at these companies, aside

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>from the money obviously, in the past, has been that,

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've really been kind of mission driven companies

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that felt like they were changing the world. Everybody loved them,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and now they're kind of getting it from all sides.

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>How do you think that Silicon Valley is going to

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with not being sort of the darling of American

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>business going forward. I don't know that Silicon Valley is

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ready to accept that, to be honest. You know, I

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>think it's why Amazon works on things like drones, and

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's working on VR and the apples, you know, building

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a car, and and Google, you know, is trying to

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>help people live longer. I mean, they thank the solution

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for all these challenges, these perceptual challenges, is to go

0:17:47.680 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and like start inventing again. And that's it for this week. Decrypted,

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening. We always want to know what you

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>think of the show. You can email us at Decrypted

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net or I'm a Twitter at Joshua

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Broosting and I'm at brad Stone. If you're a fan

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>of the show, please take a moment to rate and

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>review us. It helps new listeners find the show. This

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>episode was produced by Pio Gudkari and Magnus Hendrickson. Our

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 1>story editor was Aka Eto. Thanks also to Ann Vandermay,

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Emily Buso, and Liz Smith, Francesco Levi is ahead of

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Podcasts. We'll see you next week.