Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. You know attention to
Speaker 1: detail is critical when you own your own business, So
Speaker 1: use legal zoom dot com for the legal details now.
Speaker 1: Their network of independent attorneys licensed in forty eight states. Well,
Speaker 1: they know local laws and can provide answers to your
Speaker 1: legal questions. Legal zoom dot com is not a law firm,
Speaker 1: so you won't pay by the hour. Just use Hannity
Speaker 1: one when you check out and save even more. Legal
Speaker 1: zoom dot com. Why would you, Linda even ask that question?
Speaker 1: Am I gonna run Hillary's stupid foreign policy speech? Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is dangerous, that he's frightening, and he's scary. You
Speaker 1: know the thing about her campaign that's so bad is
Speaker 1: it is so predictable. Oh my god, the world's gonna
Speaker 1: burn down if if Donald Trump is elected and has
Speaker 1: his finger in the nuclear button. Oh stop it, give
Speaker 1: me a break. No, I know, I don't even want
Speaker 1: to pot it up for a second. No, Okay, there's
Speaker 1: a speech going on. Trump ideas are dangerously incoherent. This
Speaker 1: is someone who has threatened to abandon our allies at NATO,
Speaker 1: the countries NATO is outdated, down down. I don't want
Speaker 1: to hear it. Nobody in this audience wants to hear it.
Speaker 1: My job is to keep an audience for as long
Speaker 1: as I can listening to this program. Now, with all
Speaker 1: the talk at Trump University, wait till you hear about
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton's university connections and the problems that they have.
Speaker 1: It is fascinating how everything the Clintons have tried against
Speaker 1: Trump boomerangs back against them. And I think it all
Speaker 1: started with with women, and he Trump goes right back
Speaker 1: about Hillary being an enabler and Bill Clinton abusing women
Speaker 1: at backfires. The New York Times tries it, that backfires.
Speaker 1: All the women defend Trump. Then, of course that's exposes
Speaker 1: the New York Times is bias. Then we see the
Speaker 1: choreographing by Telemundo the week. Then we've got the eight
Speaker 1: seconds inserted by by Katie Kirk. It's unbelievable what we're learning.
Speaker 1: All right, let's start though. Now. Obama wanted to criticize
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in a speech yesterday. This is priceless. I
Speaker 1: heared this on TV last night. Every time I aired
Speaker 1: it with a tease, I was laughing. This is so funny.
Speaker 1: Listen to this. If we turn against each other based
Speaker 1: on divisions of race or religion, if if, if, if
Speaker 1: we if we fall you know, a bunch of okay
Speaker 1: dope just because you know it, uh, you know it
Speaker 1: sounds funnier, the tweets are provocative. Then we're not gonna
Speaker 1: build on the progress that we started. Oh okay, the
Speaker 1: progress that we started. Now Here is Obama blaming Fox
Speaker 1: News and talk radio for angering white people. That's what
Speaker 1: he said about the economy, arguing that it's actually doing
Speaker 1: so well under his administration. Here's what he said. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm just being blunt with you by telling hard
Speaker 1: working middle class families that the reason they're getting squeezed
Speaker 1: is because of some moochers at the bottom of the
Speaker 1: income ladder, because of minorities, or because of immigrants, or
Speaker 1: because of public employees, or because of feminists, or because
Speaker 1: of because because poor folks who aren't willing to work,
Speaker 1: they've been able to promote policies to protect powerful special
Speaker 1: interests and those who are at the very top of
Speaker 1: the economic prement. That's just the truth. I hope, I
Speaker 1: hope you don't mind me being blunt about this, but
Speaker 1: I've been listening to this stuff for a while now,
Speaker 1: and I'm concerned when I watch the direction of our politics.
Speaker 1: I mean, we have been hearing this story for dec
Speaker 1: Tales about welfare queens, talking about takers, talking about It's
Speaker 1: the story that is broadcast every day on some cable
Speaker 1: news stations, on right wing radio. It's pumped into cars
Speaker 1: and bars and VFW halls all across America and right
Speaker 1: here in El Khurt. And if you're hearing that story
Speaker 1: all the time, you start believing it. There's no wonder
Speaker 1: people think big government is the problem. Let's go over
Speaker 1: the record, shall we, because I think this is a a
Speaker 1: smarty He claimed the US economy is so better off
Speaker 1: under his presidency by almost every measure. Really, you know,
Speaker 1: median household income is down nearly two thousand dollars from
Speaker 1: what it was in two thousand and eight. Did you
Speaker 1: know that middle income American families make substantially less money
Speaker 1: This was in the New York Times and inflation adjusted
Speaker 1: terms than than years ago, and there's no evidence of
Speaker 1: that reversing. Did you know that last year workers salaries
Speaker 1: and benefits, Oh, they rose a two. Labor Department said
Speaker 1: the Employment cost Index, which tracks. Wages and benefits rose
Speaker 1: point six percent from October to December that quarter, and
Speaker 1: that's the same as the previous three months and the
Speaker 1: past year salaries and benefits. Wow, that's just pathetic. You
Speaker 1: want to know what, um, Well, how many Americans now
Speaker 1: live in poverty? Nearly ten million more Americans are in
Speaker 1: poverty since this guy has become president. Oh boy, forty
Speaker 1: six point seven million Americans live in poverty. I keep
Speaker 1: telling you, fifty million Americans in poverty, nine million out
Speaker 1: of the out of the labor force. We'll get to
Speaker 1: that in a second. Number of people on food stamp
Speaker 1: sturring Obama's time in office, more than thirteen million people. Wow,
Speaker 1: that's forty four and a half million Americans on food stamps.
Speaker 1: You want to know what the number was when he
Speaker 1: became president, thirty one million. Now it's forty five million. Wow.
Speaker 1: I guess maybe the labor force participation rate is sixty
Speaker 1: two point eight percent. We haven't seen a number that
Speaker 1: bad since March of nineteen seventy eight. Since Obama has
Speaker 1: taken office, we have lost two sixty four thousand manufacturing jobs.
Speaker 1: Home ownership rate is dropped by nearly four percent from
Speaker 1: sixty seven point three to sixty three point five average families.
Speaker 1: Healthcare premiums under Obamacare have increased by nearly forty percent,
Speaker 1: according to the Kaiser Foundation and their twenty fifteen Employer
Speaker 1: Health Benefits survey of countries. I'm sorry counties in the
Speaker 1: United States have failed to fully recover under Obama's watch.
Speaker 1: He's had eight years to fix it. Oh, in the
Speaker 1: national debt. By the time he leaves office, he will
Speaker 1: accumulate more debt than every other president before him combined.
Speaker 1: The so called recovery has been the slowest since World
Speaker 1: War Two. Really, even Bill Clinton understands that Bill Clinton,
Speaker 1: you know, slammed Obama's time and all, you know, we're
Speaker 1: finally come at a point where we can you know,
Speaker 1: put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us. Loops, Sorry,
Speaker 1: a moment of truth slipping out of Bill Clinton's mouth.
Speaker 1: But don't no, it's talk reading the numbers, don't lie.
Speaker 1: The president does lie. The President saying that the economy
Speaker 1: is better is a lie by almost every measure. It's worse.
Speaker 1: Socialism has failed yet once again. And the idea, yeah
Speaker 1: that you know, with so little, people with so little,
Speaker 1: with so few jobs available. Yeah, illegal immigration is a problem.
Speaker 1: You want to know why, because those people can't get
Speaker 1: on food stamps. They've got to work. So guess what
Speaker 1: they're gonna get hired before an American because they'll work
Speaker 1: for less. So not only do Americans have jobs taken
Speaker 1: away from them, then they get wages driven down. Never
Speaker 1: mind the fact that illegal immigrants can cross the border,
Speaker 1: and that's a problem also. But don't you know then,
Speaker 1: of course Hillary is praising the president's policies. Hillary will
Speaker 1: double down on stupidity and the president's policies here. It's
Speaker 1: unbelievable to me. So the president lies again because well
Speaker 1: that's what this president does regularly. Um, I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: to this later in the program. I bet you didn't
Speaker 1: know the American thinker Ross story. I'm putting two stories
Speaker 1: together here. I bet you didn't know that the Clintons
Speaker 1: as they attacked Donald Trump University. And we've learned a
Speaker 1: few things about this in the last twenty four hours.
Speaker 1: Number one, we learned that the judge involved in the case. Oh,
Speaker 1: it turns out he is a the presiding judge as
Speaker 1: a uh over the university Trump University cases, a member
Speaker 1: of Larassa, you know Larossa meaning the Race Lawyers group.
Speaker 1: Oh maybe as a a conflict of interest here, maybe
Speaker 1: you should have recused himself. Maybe that's why it's being
Speaker 1: shed in the worst light. Then we found out, and
Speaker 1: our friend Jeff Lord broke this story over the American
Speaker 1: Spectator that the Robbins Geller law firm that appointed appointed
Speaker 1: by Judge Gonzala career to represent the plaintiff in the
Speaker 1: Trump University lawsuit has another connection to Hillary beyond the
Speaker 1: campaign contribution from the firm chairman Darren Robbins. Anyway, it
Speaker 1: turns out that Robin's Geller paid the Clintons nearly a
Speaker 1: half a million dollars in less than a year, and
Speaker 1: what for speeches of course, So during I guess the
Speaker 1: Obama years have been good for those rich people called
Speaker 1: the Clintons. Just in case you're interested in some facts. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get into this way. Do you hear how
Speaker 1: much Bill Clinton made and how corrupt this whole laureate
Speaker 1: educational system is. And it's fascinating to watch everything boomerang
Speaker 1: back against the Clintons. I mean, Hillary used the State
Speaker 1: Department even to boost bills for profit college scam, and
Speaker 1: some of the students at this college speak out as oh,
Speaker 1: except you don't know it. Because the same New York
Speaker 1: Times that tried to portray Donald Trump as a misogynist
Speaker 1: and that backfired, the same Katie curict that tried to
Speaker 1: with that inserted eight seconds and a piece, the same Telemundo.
Speaker 1: They're not gonna do it. It's amazing to read, you
Speaker 1: know today in USA Today, they're so angry at the treatment.
Speaker 1: Trump's alarming view of the press mustn't be tolerated, as
Speaker 1: the headline in USA Today today, I'm like, I'm cheering
Speaker 1: that the press is being exposed as a bunch of biased, phony, corrupt,
Speaker 1: morally a morally bankrupt industry that I work in. The
Speaker 1: only difference between me and them, I'm honest. I'm telling
Speaker 1: you I'm a conservative. I don't hate it. Now. Something
Speaker 1: very strange is going on. I want to spend some
Speaker 1: time on this today in the Democratic Party that I
Speaker 1: think is very important that you better pay attention to it.
Speaker 1: It's real simple. The closer that Hillary Clinton gets to
Speaker 1: securing the nomination, think about this, the weaker she's becoming.
Speaker 1: I've got a story here today. ABC News expert. A
Speaker 1: guy is out there predicting as Sanders upset in California.
Speaker 1: It's now a two point raised in California. And even
Speaker 1: Doug shown said, if if Sanders wins California, who would
Speaker 1: have thunk it? Seventeen Republicans they resolved this how long ago,
Speaker 1: and yet the Democratic Party she can't beat a seventy
Speaker 1: four year old, bitter, angry, curmudgeon socialist from Vermont. She's
Speaker 1: getting weaker every day. And the main reason for this is,
Speaker 1: you know, all the scandal, all the corruption, all the dishonesty.
Speaker 1: I mean, for example, you know, she's an ethical rack
Speaker 1: and an ethical mess, and it becomes more clear and
Speaker 1: more obvious every day. You know. Look, for example, you
Speaker 1: have this former information technology advisor. I kept telling you
Speaker 1: to pay attention to the name Brian Pagliano, and I'm
Speaker 1: telling you remember, Oh the guy Hannity, the dope on
Speaker 1: the radio, said, remember he exercises his fifth Amendment again.
Speaker 1: He had done it once, then he got immunity, and
Speaker 1: now he's doing it again because he wants to prevent
Speaker 1: any video recording from being made of the session. Probably
Speaker 1: doesn't want retribution from the Clintons. Doesn't want any evidence
Speaker 1: of it. Now, Pagliano won't answer questions he's asked by
Speaker 1: Judicial Watts, the same people that deposed Cheryl Mills and
Speaker 1: Uma Aberdeen and maybe soon even Hillary herself. But anyway,
Speaker 1: as they pursue their Freedom of Information Act lawsuit related
Speaker 1: to the Clinton private email server, they're gonna take Pagliano's
Speaker 1: deposition on Monday. Pagliano previously played the fifth and he
Speaker 1: called uh. He was called to appear before a closed
Speaker 1: session of the House Benghazi Committee. He reportedly spoke with
Speaker 1: FBI investigators looking into the Clinton email set up after
Speaker 1: receiving immunity from the government, and that means he's a
Speaker 1: cooperating witness. I mean he's got something our government wants
Speaker 1: in its investigation of Hillary Clinton. Pay attention to Brian Pagliano.
Speaker 1: He has provided information that will allow investigators probably to
Speaker 1: knit together the emails with other evidence, including images of
Speaker 1: Clinton on the road as Secretary of State and how
Speaker 1: she has put at risk operatives in the fields national security,
Speaker 1: and a bunch of other things. Now you have Cheryl
Speaker 1: Mills this week, State Department, you have Judicial Watch. They
Speaker 1: tangled last Friday as Mills testified in this deposition in
Speaker 1: a lawsuit related to Clinton's use of a private email
Speaker 1: server during her tenure of Secretary of State, and the
Speaker 1: strategy of Mills and her lawyers was to constantly and
Speaker 1: repeatedly and obsessively register objections to any line of inquiry
Speaker 1: and the explanations obvious. Cheryl Mills is exceedingly close like
Speaker 1: Uma Aberdeen to Mrs Clinton. They've been lawyered up, and
Speaker 1: they have a huge amount of criminating evidence against her,
Speaker 1: and she's gonna fight every effort to elicit that information.
Speaker 1: Katherine Harriage has done a great job over at the
Speaker 1: Fox News Channel, and they've got literally for lawyers, uh
Speaker 1: seven total for representing the Justice Department and State departments,
Speaker 1: along with Cheryl Mill's personal attorneys. Seven attorneys in there.
Speaker 1: They objected to more than two hundred times during a
Speaker 1: five hour deposition, effectively blocking Cheryl Mills's responses to questions
Speaker 1: about Brian Pagliano's role in all of this. What does
Speaker 1: she have to hide? What's what's Brian Pagliano know that
Speaker 1: they don't want you to know. But of course Hillary
Speaker 1: claims she's being so transparent, just like Obama we'll get
Speaker 1: into more of this and what a what a mess
Speaker 1: this whole thing is. We've got that coming up in
Speaker 1: the course of the program. You're gonna hear a story today.
Speaker 1: We're putting it together thanks to others Ross Story and
Speaker 1: American Thinker about oh, the Clintons University problem and the
Speaker 1: millions that they made from a corrupt system that many
Speaker 1: students have complained about. You need to take control of
Speaker 1: your family and assets. Now. It sounds like common sense,
Speaker 1: but too many people procrastinate instead of getting in a
Speaker 1: state plan before it's too late. Now, with legal zoom
Speaker 1: dot Com, there's no reason to put it off any longer.
Speaker 1: You don't have to figure out on your own whether
Speaker 1: you need a will or a living trust and what's
Speaker 1: best for you. Instead, you work with an independent attorney
Speaker 1: now available in forty eight states. Now they'll walk you
Speaker 1: through your options and recommend an a state plan that
Speaker 1: offers the best solution to fit your needs. And since
Speaker 1: legal Zoom is not a law firm, well you can
Speaker 1: count on efficiency and value. Everything is on your schedule,
Speaker 1: your terms, Plus you know what your state plan bundle
Speaker 1: costs upfront, instead of worrying about high hourly rates. Now,
Speaker 1: that's how legal zoom has become the leader in helping
Speaker 1: families with their legal needs. You get the legal help
Speaker 1: and you walk away feeling great about it. So don't
Speaker 1: leave the most important decisions that you can make in
Speaker 1: the hands of other people. Take control of your family's
Speaker 1: future with an a state plan. Bundle at legal zoom
Speaker 1: dot com today. Just use Hannity one when you check
Speaker 1: out and save even more. Legal zoom dot Com Some
Speaker 1: breaking news, and that is that Paul Ryan Donald Trump
Speaker 1: can help make reality of a bold House policy agenda.
Speaker 1: I don't mean to be disrespectful to the Speaker, but
Speaker 1: if you look at what Donald Trump's agenda is, well,
Speaker 1: they're gonna have to be pretty bold to outdo the
Speaker 1: boldness of what he's doing. Anyway, So Paul Ryan has said,
Speaker 1: six months ago I took the job as Speaker, my
Speaker 1: House colleagues and I were discussing an equally important question.
Speaker 1: What could House Republicans do to give Americans a clear
Speaker 1: choice about the future of the country. How on us
Speaker 1: among the majority of Americans upset with the direction of
Speaker 1: the country is headed. But that's not enough. Well, part
Speaker 1: of the problem is Mr Speaker and I say this respectfully.
Speaker 1: Republicans have been weak and timid and lacking courage in
Speaker 1: a backbone. And you basically have enabled the Obama agenda.
Speaker 1: And you didn't use the power of the purse. You
Speaker 1: didn't you didn't repeal and replace those aspects of Obamacare
Speaker 1: that you said you well, you had a lot of
Speaker 1: show votes when Baynter was Speaker, and I know you
Speaker 1: weren't speaker at the time. And he said he spent
Speaker 1: all of his adult life, Paul Ryan said, pursuing ways
Speaker 1: to help protect the American idea, a notion that the
Speaker 1: condition of one's birth does not determine the outcome of
Speaker 1: outcome of one's life. The first step is always putting
Speaker 1: it on paper and having a real debate. And with
Speaker 1: the Obama presidency nearing an end, we have a real
Speaker 1: opportunity to get big things done in the next four years.
Speaker 1: That's why next week my colleagues and I will start
Speaker 1: introducing a series of policy proposals that address the American
Speaker 1: people's top priorities. These plans are the result of months
Speaker 1: of work by House Republicans. The concept from the start
Speaker 1: was simple. If we had a Republican president ready to
Speaker 1: sign bills into law. What would we do this month?
Speaker 1: Will show the country what a better tax code looks like.
Speaker 1: I like that idea. Will outline of plan not just
Speaker 1: for repealing Obamacare, but replacing it with a better system
Speaker 1: more focused on patients and choices and lower costs well
Speaker 1: Obamacare's raised costs. Will offer a plan to restore the
Speaker 1: constitutional and separation of powers that decades of executive overreach
Speaker 1: ever roted. That's a good thing. Will present the ideal
Speaker 1: nationalist national security and foreign policy to keep Americans safe. Well,
Speaker 1: you have to rebuild the military first and foremost. UH,
Speaker 1: take care of our veterans should be part of this.
Speaker 1: Will show how we can reform rules and regulations so
Speaker 1: they spur the economy and create jobs, not destroy them.
Speaker 1: Will offer a better way to help people lift a
Speaker 1: lot of poverty and into the lives of self determination.
Speaker 1: It'll be a positive, optimistic vision. Well, he's not talking
Speaker 1: about building the wall. He's not talking about sending education
Speaker 1: back to the States and ending common Corey. He's not
Speaker 1: talking about energy independence. I didn't hear anything about the
Speaker 1: v A reform or building our military. I hope he's
Speaker 1: talking about health care savings accounts and I hope it
Speaker 1: balanced budget. Not in twenty five years, but four years anyway.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm hoping for anyway. So that with that said,
Speaker 1: he did say Donald Trump can help make it a reality,
Speaker 1: and he's now supporting him. Well, we'll see who's gonna
Speaker 1: be listening to who here? Why is Kogel running Hillary
Speaker 1: speech out in San Diego and streaming us? No, they're
Speaker 1: streaming her speech, but they're streaming and running the speech.
Speaker 1: Can you write the people over coogl what is wrong
Speaker 1: with these people? Who runs that station? I mean, that
Speaker 1: is the dumbest decision I think I've ever heard who's programming.
Speaker 1: The reason we have quadrupled your ratings, let me be
Speaker 1: honest here out in San Diego, is because you got
Speaker 1: rid of what you were doing. If you put Hillary
Speaker 1: on in my spot for a half hour, you are
Speaker 1: chasing my listeners away. As a matter of fact, they're
Speaker 1: running away scared. What difference makes a big difference to
Speaker 1: me because I'd like to keep the ratings up high
Speaker 1: where they are. So can somebody call Cogo Radio and
Speaker 1: tell them that running Hillary speech was a dumb IDEA?
Speaker 1: Good grief? Who makes the decisions for this company? That
Speaker 1: is so dumb. Anyway, Now now I have to get
Speaker 1: everybody up to speed. So this week has not been good.
Speaker 1: I started out by saying, the closer that Hillary gets
Speaker 1: to securing the nomination, the weaker she becomes. And the
Speaker 1: main reason are the many scandals, her being an ethical
Speaker 1: mess and an ethical wreck. And I talked about Brian
Speaker 1: Pagliano exercising his first Fifth Amendment rights to self incrimination
Speaker 1: against self incrimination at a deposition on Monday. Also, Pagliano
Speaker 1: took the Fifth once before, but he got immunity from
Speaker 1: the government. That means he's a cooperating witness, and by
Speaker 1: all accounts, he'll be a devastating witness, which is why
Speaker 1: Cheryl Mills, when questioned in a deposition last Friday, repeatedly
Speaker 1: refused to talk about Brian Pagliano, and seven lawyers in
Speaker 1: the room representing the Justice Department, the State Department, Cheryl
Speaker 1: Mills personal attornees objected more than two hundred times to
Speaker 1: the five hour deposition, blocking Cheryl Mills's responses to questions
Speaker 1: about Pagliano. I keep saying, Pagliano, pay attention. He's gonna
Speaker 1: end up being the John dean of the Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: email scandal as the guy who's set up the private
Speaker 1: email server for the Clintons in a mom and pop shop,
Speaker 1: in a bathroom closet. So he's invoking his Fifth Amendment
Speaker 1: rights against self and crimin nation when he's going to
Speaker 1: be deposed by judicial watch because he doesn't want to
Speaker 1: be videotaped. Now begs the question, why is Brian Pagliano
Speaker 1: worried about incriminating himself in a non criminal lawsuit, especially
Speaker 1: when he's cut a deal with the Justice Department which
Speaker 1: is granting him immunity from criminal prosecution. I'll leave that
Speaker 1: to the legal experts here, But in the meantime, we
Speaker 1: have a Clinton email gate kingpin desperately trying to keep
Speaker 1: you the American people, from finding out what he knows
Speaker 1: about Hillary's criminal misconduct, which means that probably he's a
Speaker 1: fearing some type of retaliation or intimidation that has come
Speaker 1: his way. So we'll find out over time. Add to
Speaker 1: Brian Pagliano and add to Cheryl Mills, you have the
Speaker 1: State Department Inspector General's report. It shows that Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: willfully failed to comply with the federal record keeping laws.
Speaker 1: Now those are laws, and when you break the law,
Speaker 1: there are consequences. And I guarantee you somebody that knows
Speaker 1: all about this as a guy by the name of
Speaker 1: General David Petraeus. Anyway, it was an eighty three page
Speaker 1: Inspector General report, and what they found is is that
Speaker 1: Clinton and her team consistently broke government rules for email
Speaker 1: and record keeping, and her decision to use a personal
Speaker 1: unsecured server exclusively for government business had the effect of
Speaker 1: moving classified information outside of secure government channels. That is
Speaker 1: against the law. That is a felony, that would prevent
Speaker 1: anybody from ever working in any government position. Again that
Speaker 1: had anything to do with clearance, that would mean president.
Speaker 1: And on top of that, we know that Hillary has
Speaker 1: repeatedly lied about her conduct. She has repeatedly said her
Speaker 1: private server and email account there was no permission to
Speaker 1: be asked for. It was done by my predecessors. It
Speaker 1: was permitted. Now that's a flat outlie. None of her predecessors,
Speaker 1: not one, had private, unsecured email servers. None of them
Speaker 1: conducted their State Department business on private email instead of
Speaker 1: a state dot gov email address. None of them set
Speaker 1: up an unsecure email server to escape Congressional oversight like
Speaker 1: she did, Mrs Clinton never sought approval, and when John
Speaker 1: Podesta wrote in an email to supporters claiming that had
Speaker 1: Hillary known of any concerns about her email set up
Speaker 1: at the time, she would have taken steps to address them,
Speaker 1: she believed she was following the practices of other secretaries
Speaker 1: and senior officials, that too, is a lie. There are
Speaker 1: so many. I can give you the list of lies here.
Speaker 1: Line number one in Podesta's letter. Podesta's a known hack liar,
Speaker 1: Clinton sycophan. He's got his head so far up their backsides.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm surprised he can even see anyway, so
Speaker 1: Podesta says, Well, Hillary Clinton's email was well known by
Speaker 1: many State Department officials throughout her tenure. Well the Inspector
Speaker 1: General said no senior department officials were not asked to
Speaker 1: approve of private email server and said they were unaware
Speaker 1: of the scope and extent of Secretary Clinton's use of
Speaker 1: personal email accounts and a server. Podesta said there's no
Speaker 1: evidence of a breach of her email server. Well the
Speaker 1: Inspector General contradicted that to the Clinton staff actually had
Speaker 1: to shut down her server temporarily because of hacking attempts
Speaker 1: and cyber attacks must be reported. Yet the i G
Speaker 1: found no evidence that the secretary or staff ever reported
Speaker 1: any of those incidents the computer security personnel, or anyone
Speaker 1: else within the department. Podesta, the liar, said she believed
Speaker 1: she was following practices of other secretaries and senior officials.
Speaker 1: I'll call him Powell. Oh, he did have a private email.
Speaker 1: He did not a private server. Huge difference. Technology guidelines
Speaker 1: by the time she got in office were more detailed
Speaker 1: and far more sophistic aided, according to the Inspector General,
Speaker 1: and specifically discussed quote the obligation to use the department
Speaker 1: systems and the most in most circumstances. So she lied
Speaker 1: there too. As Podesta lied, Podesta said she'd take an
Speaker 1: unprecedented steps to ensure public access to her emails, providing
Speaker 1: the department with all of her work related emails, totaling
Speaker 1: fifty pages, and calling for their release. Oh okay, here's
Speaker 1: the problem, the Inspector General pointed out. The production of
Speaker 1: emails was incomplete, and that doesn't even include the thirty
Speaker 1: emails she deleted that she told us were only about yoga,
Speaker 1: a wedding, a funeral, and conversations with Bill, who doesn't
Speaker 1: use email. That's not been a good week for her,
Speaker 1: you know, So all of these lies. You know that
Speaker 1: she was in a position of authority to get the
Speaker 1: full information of her emails out. That's not what the
Speaker 1: Inspector General contradicted, that she wouldn't and her aids wouldn't
Speaker 1: speak with investigators of the State Departman's Office of Inspector General.
Speaker 1: But Colin Powell did, and Condo Lisa Rice did, and
Speaker 1: everyone else participated, not Hillary while they were preparing their report,
Speaker 1: So she didn't participate at all. So you got this
Speaker 1: email server scandal. It's already being investigated by James Comen
Speaker 1: the FBI, and now it's impacting the race. Catherine Herridge,
Speaker 1: my colleague at Fox, and Pam Brown over at Fox
Speaker 1: report the State Department Inspector General report increases quote, the
Speaker 1: likelihood and the pressure for the Justice Department to pursue
Speaker 1: criminal charges. According to an intelligence source familiar with the
Speaker 1: FBI investigation, it's very harmful to her and increases the
Speaker 1: likelihood and the pressure the Department of Justice to indict.
Speaker 1: I'm pretty convinced the FBI is gonna find criminal wrongdoing
Speaker 1: I'm pretty convinced based on comments of people like Rudy
Speaker 1: Julianni and Chris Christie and people that know James Comey,
Speaker 1: and based on James Comey's conduct appointed by then President
Speaker 1: George W. Bush and threatened to resign over an issue involving,
Speaker 1: you know, information and stuff with with Senator Ashcroft. They
Speaker 1: actually he actually raced over to his hospital room when
Speaker 1: Alberto Gonzalez was going there to beat him. It's ridiculous,
Speaker 1: I mean, the level of detail. So anyway you know
Speaker 1: it says we know it now. The FBI probe is
Speaker 1: investigating the email practices. They're focused on weather. More than
Speaker 1: twenty classified emails discovered on our server constitute a violation
Speaker 1: of Federal code, especially and specifically the Espionage Act eighteen
Speaker 1: US Code seven nine three, known as gross negligence statute.
Speaker 1: In other words, was this treated with gross negligence course,
Speaker 1: it was because she was trying to do this to
Speaker 1: avoid an escape congressional oversight. It's beyond dispute that gross
Speaker 1: negligence Statute has been violated just on what we know publicly,
Speaker 1: what we learned from the other Inspector General about special
Speaker 1: access programs on her server. Do you know what that
Speaker 1: that's a higher classification, more sensitive classification than top secret,
Speaker 1: you know. So it's you know, based on just what
Speaker 1: has known publicly. We know the gross negligence Statute has
Speaker 1: been violated, to say nothing of what the FBI may
Speaker 1: be discovered an air investigation, which means that if James Comey,
Speaker 1: the director of the FBI overseeing the investigation, does what
Speaker 1: the law would apply to you and me, he's gonna
Speaker 1: recommend a criminal referral and indictment of the former first
Speaker 1: Lady Secretary of State. And I've got a wonder, and
Speaker 1: this is just speculation on my part. I wonder if
Speaker 1: that's why Doug shown he might have a contact and
Speaker 1: he's saying it may be very likely Hillary is not
Speaker 1: going to be the nominee anyway. If Comey does in
Speaker 1: fact recommend the indictment and the Justice Department refuses to
Speaker 1: act on it, I would predict to you that James
Speaker 1: Comey will design and that this scandal will now take
Speaker 1: over the entire campaign, even beyond what it has already done.
Speaker 1: You know, this is the FBI primary, and probably the
Speaker 1: most important primary of this political season anyway. So that's
Speaker 1: what we have on that pay attention to these things.
Speaker 1: But another poll shows California slipping away from Hillary. It's
Speaker 1: now twenty people have signed up for occupied d n
Speaker 1: C Anti Hillary protests for the d n C convention
Speaker 1: in Philly. Oh, this is gonna be a I don't
Speaker 1: know if I'm gonna make it to patso Geno's with
Speaker 1: all that going on, and Hillary is trying to distract
Speaker 1: and an obfee skate today. Oh, Donald Trump's foreign policy
Speaker 1: positions are dangerous. If you listen to Cogo Radio, you
Speaker 1: know all about it. You're forced to listen to that garbage.
Speaker 1: So I'm very fundamentally sorry for you know, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is the same old, same old. Have any of
Speaker 1: you heard of the name Jill Stein? Do you know
Speaker 1: Jill Stein is Linda You? We read news a lot, right,
Speaker 1: Does anybody in that room know who Jill Stein is? Anybody?
Speaker 1: And I'm not it's not a trick question. Do you
Speaker 1: know it's a Green Party presidential candidate that's running. You know,
Speaker 1: Gary Johnson announced? Is he not the dullest human being
Speaker 1: on the face of the earth? He wants to be president?
Speaker 1: What does Bill Well thinking? Bill Well's a smart guy?
Speaker 1: What does he think and joining forces with this idiot.
Speaker 1: Unlike him, I have some experience with the tough calls
Speaker 1: and the hard work of state craft. I wrestled with
Speaker 1: the Chinese over a climate deal in Copenhagen, broker to
Speaker 1: ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, negotiated the reduction of nuclear
Speaker 1: weapons with Russia, twisted arms to bring the world together
Speaker 1: in global sanctions against Iran, and stood up for the
Speaker 1: rights of women, religious minorities and LGBT people around the world.
Speaker 1: All right, So it's the quintessential democratic playbook. Republicans are racist, sexist,
Speaker 1: and dangers. Typical campaign boring speech Hillary Clinton. Not worth
Speaker 1: covering for those of you that were stuck to hear
Speaker 1: it in San Diego today on Cogo Radio. Sorry about that.
Speaker 1: Not my decision one, Shawn is our toll free telephone number.
Speaker 1: It's always an honor, privilege of pleasure to welcome back
Speaker 1: our friend and culture to the program. She wrote the
Speaker 1: book Addios America. And I was reading your column today.
Speaker 1: I really enjoy reading your columns. You're one of my
Speaker 1: favorite columnists because you're so kind of classically irreverent. And uh,
Speaker 1: I didn't know you were writing another book and you're
Speaker 1: writing a book about Trump. What is it? It's it's
Speaker 1: on our next president? Yes? Well what okay? Details? What
Speaker 1: is it about our next president? And technically, um, what
Speaker 1: I said in the column was true. It was due yesterday,
Speaker 1: it was not turned in yesterday, but I think it
Speaker 1: will be turned in. Um. Well, listen, this is how long.
Speaker 1: This is how long we've been friends. We've been friends.
Speaker 1: I remember way way back in the day, and this
Speaker 1: is over a decade ago where you used to talk about, oh,
Speaker 1: I can't write books anymore, because I sit there and
Speaker 1: I just changed most cigarettes as I as I write them,
Speaker 1: and you haven't done that in over a decade. Right, Well,
Speaker 1: I never said I couldn't write books. I've always loved
Speaker 1: the writing and research. It's my favorite thing to do.
Speaker 1: But it is true that, Um, after the first three
Speaker 1: there was high crimes and misdemeanors and slander, and then
Speaker 1: trees and and those were all things that had been
Speaker 1: you know, burbling up in me. For it seems like
Speaker 1: my whole life. I was a big I was writing
Speaker 1: about Joe McCarthy when I was in college and starting
Speaker 1: with my friend, so I thought I'd gotten everything out
Speaker 1: of my system. So starting with trees and um. And
Speaker 1: all of my friends will tell you this because every
Speaker 1: time I say it again, they remind me I've said
Speaker 1: it about the last eight books. I'll say, Okay, that's it.
Speaker 1: I got nothing else in me, nothing new to say.
Speaker 1: And I do always think that. I mean, I never
Speaker 1: I never go about writing a book by saying I
Speaker 1: need to write a book. Let me think of a subject. UM.
Speaker 1: It's always that something is just presented to me, thrown
Speaker 1: in my lap, something important I needed to research and
Speaker 1: point out. UM. And I think that's true with with
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. As as you know, I was an early adopter.
Speaker 1: From the moment he gave that Mexican rapist speech. He
Speaker 1: had my heart and I and I never turned away. UM.
Speaker 1: And you know, slowly the rest of the world is
Speaker 1: catching up, and I think I think they will have
Speaker 1: caught up by November. I gotta tell you, like when
Speaker 1: he took on the media this week, I find his
Speaker 1: strength inspiring. And I'll tell you what you can compare
Speaker 1: it to. You can compare it to McCain, who wouldn't
Speaker 1: bring up Reverend Right. You can compare it to McCain
Speaker 1: who who agonized over bringing up Airs and Dorn. You
Speaker 1: can compare it to Bob Dole's campaign. I am tired
Speaker 1: of Republicans being slandered and besmirched and attacked for things
Speaker 1: that are absolutely false, that they're racist and sexist, and
Speaker 1: poor Mitt Romney carried around women's resumes and he wanted
Speaker 1: to hire them. What an awful human being he was.
Speaker 1: We've never seen anything like Trump before, and it came
Speaker 1: not a moment too soon. I think, as he said
Speaker 1: in his opening speech, the country is getting very close
Speaker 1: to the tipping point where it will be unsalvageable. One
Speaker 1: of the things I really admire about Trump that I
Speaker 1: also admired about Reagan. And I will say this, um
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney. Most people who run for president, you know,
Speaker 1: it's just the next step. It's like running for student counsel.
Speaker 1: This is what they've done their whole lives. Reagan and Trump,
Speaker 1: we're making their lives immeasurably works by running for presidents.
Speaker 1: They didn't have to do it, and far more in
Speaker 1: the case of Donald Trump than than the other two,
Speaker 1: either Reagan or Mitt Romney. In that first week, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump lost hundreds of millions of dollars by talking saying
Speaker 1: true and important things about illegal immigration, for speaking the truth,
Speaker 1: he lost deals with Macy's, with Univision, um with NBC,
Speaker 1: and what did he do this week? By the way,
Speaker 1: I hear the p G A tour pulled out on
Speaker 1: one of it. I just sat back and thought, wait,
Speaker 1: what did he do? Did I missed some other great
Speaker 1: statements of his It's just I mean, it's never ending.
Speaker 1: But but this has been part, from what I can tell,
Speaker 1: part of his personality, his whole life. I never realized
Speaker 1: it until that announcement speech. I never really thought much
Speaker 1: about him until that announcement speech. Um. But he is
Speaker 1: a problem solver. And people I know who have known
Speaker 1: him and been in meetings with him, they say, you know,
Speaker 1: throughout these meetings of reports, so let's just gonna look
Speaker 1: bored to be throwing, you know, spitballs, um as everything
Speaker 1: you know, the good news is being reported on. And
Speaker 1: as soon as someone will say something like, oh and
Speaker 1: this other issue, well this is a big problem, suddenly
Speaker 1: he'll you know, come alive and he's like robocopy loves
Speaker 1: solving stuff. Um. And I think that's what what what
Speaker 1: he looked at our country and said, we need someone
Speaker 1: to speak the truth. And oh my gosh, you are
Speaker 1: right about him not backing down to the media. This
Speaker 1: is not an incidental point. No one has ever done
Speaker 1: this before. You know, political correctness is kind of recent. Um.
Speaker 1: I mean, I think Reagan probably would have, but it didn't.
Speaker 1: Really political correctness has really taken off in the last
Speaker 1: ten years. And the bossy, irrogant media not only sneering
Speaker 1: and humiliating Republicans, but but sneering and mocking the American people.
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't let them do that with his supporters. He stands,
Speaker 1: he stands for truth, and he stands with his supporters.
Speaker 1: I like the strength. You know, it's actually hilarious to
Speaker 1: watch Trump's alarming view of the press must not be tolerated.
Speaker 1: Some guy named rem writer writing for USA Today and
Speaker 1: I'm like, no, it's got Not only is it tolerated,
Speaker 1: he called them at do you see that scum in
Speaker 1: the back of the room, just because it's true And
Speaker 1: we learned a lot about but of my saves a
Speaker 1: sleeze Lamas was the last time I was on a show.
Speaker 1: I was talking about Tom Lamas on ABC World News tonight.
Speaker 1: Described you know why need to BROADWCKT your listener surely
Speaker 1: know all about that story and said that her claim
Speaker 1: to have been raised by Bill Clinton Quinton was I
Speaker 1: quote discredited. I've been trolling him on on on on
Speaker 1: Twitter to ask him, what what's your evidence? Do you
Speaker 1: have some new new evidence in this case that none
Speaker 1: of us have heard about. Um, no word back from
Speaker 1: him yet. And I'm pretty sure it was Tom Lamas
Speaker 1: whom Jump said, Oh my gosh, that pres commerce was
Speaker 1: so magnificent. Anyone who hasn't seen it, you want to
Speaker 1: go online and watch it. It's linked about a dozen
Speaker 1: times on my Twitter feed. But he was reading from
Speaker 1: all of the veterans organizations he's given to. He was
Speaker 1: responding to lies from the media UM to say where
Speaker 1: the five million, six hundred thousand dollars had been distributed
Speaker 1: to these various veterans groups. And he would um period
Speaker 1: odically interrupt his listing of where the money had gone,
Speaker 1: just to take a shot at the press. Let me
Speaker 1: let me give you a lift here, because as you know,
Speaker 1: I have interviewed him as much as anybody, and I
Speaker 1: have really in spite of criticism against me, I have
Speaker 1: asked him every question that I could possibly think of,
Speaker 1: and I have pinned him down a number of times
Speaker 1: on what he would where he stands on the issues.
Speaker 1: He explained his position, how he converted to being pro life,
Speaker 1: and he's very pro Second Amendment. Debate bemautic. He really did,
Speaker 1: and and he he gave the list of justices that
Speaker 1: he put on the Supreme Court. He's promised he here's
Speaker 1: his agenda. He's pro life, pro Second Amendment. He gave
Speaker 1: us a list of justices, a pool of justices. His
Speaker 1: names he pulled from if he when making Supreme Court appointments.
Speaker 1: He promises to rebuild the military. He's identified radical extremists
Speaker 1: as an enemy that we need to bomb the out of.
Speaker 1: He said he fixed the v A, build the wall
Speaker 1: and secure the border, Repeal and replace OBAMACAREY. He's leaning
Speaker 1: in his website says health care savings accounts. He says
Speaker 1: he wants to expand called drilling, fracking, nuclear, and all
Speaker 1: other technology. He said he'd end common core and send
Speaker 1: education back to the States. He said he'd negotiate free
Speaker 1: and fair trade deals, better trade deals. And if I
Speaker 1: could in the last thing, that's one lap, one more.
Speaker 1: And he pledged the balance of the budget. What is
Speaker 1: that conservative could be said by any other candidate running
Speaker 1: for president as a Republican, accept the trade deals. I
Speaker 1: noticed you didn't mention anything about immigration. I think be
Speaker 1: summarized in a single sentence. He will put America first, last,
Speaker 1: and always, and he will do it and he doesn't
Speaker 1: care that the press and the entire media will scream
Speaker 1: bloody murder about it. He cares about Americans first, not
Speaker 1: foreigners first. I mean that that that if your listeners
Speaker 1: heard the beginning of my segment here, you had that
Speaker 1: speech from Hillary going on and on about how she's
Speaker 1: done this, she's done that. I couldn't even listen. I
Speaker 1: was falling asleep. And a peace deal here, and I
Speaker 1: pushed for the rights of women in this country in
Speaker 1: that country. No, this is the typical politician listing these
Speaker 1: these these tiny little specifics. We don't want, but him
Speaker 1: what we want is the core central organizing philosophy. And
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is the first person since Ronald Reagan to
Speaker 1: come along and say he's putting our interest first, whether
Speaker 1: it's on trade or immigration, or flinging troops around the
Speaker 1: world for pointless wars um that get that end up
Speaker 1: turning out worse than than they were when we went in.
Speaker 1: Although I do blame the failure of the Rock War
Speaker 1: not on the war but on Obama's withdrawal, and I
Speaker 1: hate him for that. But what can you do? I
Speaker 1: mean going forward? Having seen that Obama could destroy a
Speaker 1: victorious war by coming, by being elected and pulling out
Speaker 1: every last troop, does that encourage you to do it again?
Speaker 1: Just the opposite, you know? But I think you missed.
Speaker 1: My point is like he's saying specific things, and you're right.
Speaker 1: I the idea of America first, you know, I went
Speaker 1: through a series of statistics. So Obama yesterday attacked Fox
Speaker 1: News and attack talk radio and and then he made
Speaker 1: this idiotic comment that we're better off economically by almost
Speaker 1: every economic measure. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Speaker 1: And then you've got a dishonest media and everything boomerangs
Speaker 1: back when they attack Trump. The New York Times a
Speaker 1: boomerang back. The women supported him, and then it exposed
Speaker 1: that they don't interview Broderick and Willie and and wanted
Speaker 1: to and uh, Paula Jones. Then you've got you know,
Speaker 1: ABC and NBC, and you've been tweeting about this, how
Speaker 1: we need to Broderick rape claim was discredited. It was
Speaker 1: never discredited ever by anybody. Ever. Trump is pointing it
Speaker 1: out and that the American people have seen this, even
Speaker 1: whether you are liberal or conservative. The wise from the media,
Speaker 1: they always putting Americans last, the blaming Americans for everything,
Speaker 1: not caring for for Obama to come out. Look, I'm
Speaker 1: sorry for any listeners. If you're a Democrat and you're
Speaker 1: voted voted for Obama, okay, fine, But unless you live
Speaker 1: in Washington or New York City and happen to work
Speaker 1: on Wall Street, that isn't true in your life. Your
Speaker 1: life has gotten worse and that president, that party, and
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, most of my party do not
Speaker 1: care about you. This is the first man who's come
Speaker 1: along who cares about ordinary Americans and doesn't care what
Speaker 1: the press says, doesn't care what his neighbors say, doesn't
Speaker 1: care that he is being attacked from absolutely every media outlet.
Speaker 1: What do you say to the David Frenches of the world.
Speaker 1: What do you say to these other people that want
Speaker 1: to run third party and help Hillary because Bill Crystal
Speaker 1: is pissing me off. Well, I think it shows that
Speaker 1: they were never really serious about the stuff you and
Speaker 1: I care about. In the first place, Sean, I mean,
Speaker 1: just to take one example. I'm sure you've talked about it,
Speaker 1: but it's a pretty darn important example. There is absolutely
Speaker 1: no question that if Hillary Clinton is elected, Um, she
Speaker 1: will the point probably two up to three or four
Speaker 1: Supreme Court justices. And you know damn well what the
Speaker 1: first thing is they're going to do. She has said it,
Speaker 1: liberals have said it. They will call up District of
Speaker 1: Columbia versus Heller, the first time in the Supreme Court
Speaker 1: acknowledged the meaning of the Second Amendment. Um. I don't
Speaker 1: think gun groups even supported that case going to the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court because we were getting along fine. Um, don't
Speaker 1: want to risk it. Supreme Court may say you have
Speaker 1: to be in a militia, and there're no militia, so
Speaker 1: there's no Second Amendment. If they overturn Heller, and they
Speaker 1: are absolutely dead set determined too, that is the end
Speaker 1: of the Second Amendments in America. There's no question about that.
Speaker 1: To risk allowing Hillary to get into the White House,
Speaker 1: I would also add at this point, you even know
Speaker 1: quite well I was adamantly ferociously opposed to John McCain,
Speaker 1: and when it was down to Obama, Hillary and McCain.
Speaker 1: I was for Hillary over McCain because we McCain would
Speaker 1: have given us amnesty, and that would have been want
Speaker 1: to hear something funny, but because I've been too late
Speaker 1: even for for for Trump to save if McCain had
Speaker 1: gotten in and pushed through amnesty in any event, when
Speaker 1: the time came to it, when it was Obama versus McCain. Okay, okay,
Speaker 1: I started a website, get drunk and Vote for McCain
Speaker 1: dot com. But I did it. I voted for McCaine.
Speaker 1: My friend John Phillips on radio, got drunk, used a
Speaker 1: breathalyzer and filled out his absentee ballot for McCain. We
Speaker 1: did it, and we weren't happy about it. And these
Speaker 1: little brats they accuse US conservatives of principle of being
Speaker 1: upset when they run ex president and we vote for
Speaker 1: their guys. Now they're taking their ball and going home. No,
Speaker 1: it's outrageous. It shows they never really cared about the
Speaker 1: Second Amendment. They never really cared about abortion. They never
Speaker 1: really cared about this country. Nuke king Rich had a
Speaker 1: great line, and I gotta let you go after this.
Speaker 1: He said, Donald Trump is the first genuine outsider in
Speaker 1: my lifetime. Nudes been around a while to take on
Speaker 1: the higher national establishment in both the Republican and Democratic parties.
Speaker 1: And what's beginning to be obvious is it's a huge establishment.
Speaker 1: And I've said this, I didn't realize how deep it was.
Speaker 1: And by the way, it's a corrupt establishment, and it's
Speaker 1: an establishment that pays off each other, and it's an
Speaker 1: establishment that does all types of inside the deals, and
Speaker 1: you see the incestuous nature between the media, etcetera. But
Speaker 1: I gotta go, Yeah, by the way you're making it,
Speaker 1: you're making it impossible for me to um to fulfill
Speaker 1: your mother's wishes. I got, yes, she did, she did,
Speaker 1: so you went to the bathroom we were going. I
Speaker 1: went out and culled, there's a pisser. He's like the
Speaker 1: sister that I never had. You know a lot of
Speaker 1: people that's come up Dane in Arkansas, and I've had
Speaker 1: a lot of people ask mat you scared for your laugh?
Speaker 1: And actually I have been. We will destroy you, is
Speaker 1: what they said to me. Who said my brother said
Speaker 1: it on behalf of Billy when he was campaigning for
Speaker 1: him in danger and this by people any more. I
Speaker 1: used to Yeah, I was. I was very scared. I
Speaker 1: was horribly, horribly threatened, and people don't know that story.
Speaker 1: Why did you originally deny it considering this was a
Speaker 1: legal matter. Did you see what happened to Gennifer Flowers?
Speaker 1: Did you see what was happening to Paula Jones my alegant, Yes, No,
Speaker 1: not afraid. I just I just knew what would happen.
Speaker 1: Now the New York's Times their story on Donald Trump
Speaker 1: was debunked, But I don't see the major expose s
Speaker 1: on the numerous women that claim not only consensual relationships
Speaker 1: but also that were either exposed to in the case
Speaker 1: of Paula Jones or Kathleen Willie groped and grabbed and
Speaker 1: fondled and touched and kissed against her will, or in
Speaker 1: the case of one need to Broderick uh saying that
Speaker 1: she was raped by Bill Clinton. I've interviewed these women.
Speaker 1: A lot of people in the mainstream media just, oh, well,
Speaker 1: that's ben debunk You ask them where it's been debunked,
Speaker 1: and it's never been debunked. It's just their narrative and
Speaker 1: their support of the Clintons. And we've learned an awful
Speaker 1: lot in the last week about the media Katie Kuric
Speaker 1: inserting eight seconds to make a gun group look terrible,
Speaker 1: and in fact, they answered immediately, we have the case
Speaker 1: of Telemundo and on a cameraman choreographing protesters that were
Speaker 1: actually in the process of leaving the protest, how to sit,
Speaker 1: where to sit, how to hold the flag so that
Speaker 1: this guy can get a shot at that was exposed. Then,
Speaker 1: of course, the New York Times hippiece was exposed. All
Speaker 1: the women that supposedly were abused by Donald Trump came
Speaker 1: out in his defense, and the women stated that the
Speaker 1: New York Times purposefully manipulated what they said and took
Speaker 1: out of context what they said. Amazing turn of events
Speaker 1: in every way. Now, there are other women over the
Speaker 1: course of the years that I have interviewed. Now we
Speaker 1: had Juanita and Kathleen and Paula Jones on last week.
Speaker 1: Uh Allie Kyle and as somebody I have known him
Speaker 1: for a number of years, it's been a while since
Speaker 1: we've talked. She's come out with a brand new book,
Speaker 1: Hilary The Other Woman, which is a political memoir. And
Speaker 1: Dolly Kyle, welcome back to the program. Thank you for
Speaker 1: being with us. Thank you, Sean. You know you I
Speaker 1: never knew this, and all the times that I interviewed you,
Speaker 1: you start early in the book that you were raped
Speaker 1: by a friend of Bill Clinton's when you was sixteen
Speaker 1: years old, that you had drugged and raped. Yes, I
Speaker 1: was a virgin. I was drugged and I was raped,
Speaker 1: and I didn't tell anyone until about thirteen years later
Speaker 1: when I told Billy. And it was actually the day
Speaker 1: Elvis died. I told him I had been drugged and raped,
Speaker 1: and he said, I'm sorry that happened to you. When
Speaker 1: you when you say Billy for those that don't know
Speaker 1: you refer to Bill Clinton as Billy. Oh, did I
Speaker 1: say that, I'm sorry? Yeah? Yeah, Okay, So I don't
Speaker 1: think most people referred to Bill Clinton as Billy. So,
Speaker 1: but but then you've always had that I guess name
Speaker 1: with him. Anyway, thirteen years when I was eleven, I
Speaker 1: was introduced to him as Billy. And that's what I've
Speaker 1: alway calling my whole family, causing Billy and a lot
Speaker 1: of people in Hot Springs calling Billy. Right now, you finally,
Speaker 1: thirteen years later, told somebody you told him about what
Speaker 1: had happened, explained the terrible thing is about. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Ten years after that, I told a friend of mine.
Speaker 1: She asked me, who did it? I told her she
Speaker 1: knew two other women who had been raped by that
Speaker 1: same guy who raped me. So then I felt really
Speaker 1: terrible because, oh my god, do you suppose she knew
Speaker 1: the only three women he had raped? I don't think.
Speaker 1: So what is your What was your relationship with Bill Clinton?
Speaker 1: We met when I was eleven, he was twelve going
Speaker 1: on thirteen. We were friends in high school. We got
Speaker 1: to be friendlier over time. We at later had an
Speaker 1: adulterous affair for which I have repented. I am sorry.
Speaker 1: I was wrong. I did a lot of wrong things.
Speaker 1: So you had a consensual relationship with Bill Clinton when
Speaker 1: he was married to Hillary? What was the the attorney
Speaker 1: general at the time? Was he? Uh, the governor at
Speaker 1: the time? What was he? All of the above, So
Speaker 1: you had a long standing sexual relationship with him while
Speaker 1: he was married? How many years? Good nas Sean, don't
Speaker 1: make me do the math um before he was married,
Speaker 1: and then during his marriage and up until he was
Speaker 1: running for president. When the same guy who had Jennifer
Speaker 1: Flower story called me, I called Billy to say, whoa,
Speaker 1: this is about to be exposed, and he three. My
Speaker 1: brother said to me, if you cooperate with the media,
Speaker 1: we will destroy you. That was pretty much the end
Speaker 1: of it. Yeah, so that intimidated you, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: is very consistent with a pattern. If you listen to Juanita,
Speaker 1: if you listen to Kathleen, and you listen to Paula.
Speaker 1: Those are names that are well known. But again, there's
Speaker 1: a whole other generation of people out there, millennials that
Speaker 1: are supporting Bernie Sanders seemingly in large numbers over Hillary,
Speaker 1: that don't know all of this. Well, that's true, Seawan.
Speaker 1: And the other thing is this, you can list a
Speaker 1: half a dozen, a dozen, twenty women whose names are
Speaker 1: somewhat familiar, but don't forget. Did Billy Clinton admitted to
Speaker 1: me when we were talking about Wilt Chamberlain, who said
Speaker 1: he'd had sex with twenty thousand women, Billy said, that's
Speaker 1: ten times more than I've had, So do the math
Speaker 1: A thousand women? He said, he think did he think
Speaker 1: that he mean it literally? Do you think you think
Speaker 1: he he meant it literally? I think there were Okay,
Speaker 1: maybe not two thousand. Maybe he didn't keep count maybe
Speaker 1: it's only hundreds. But here's what I'm saying. All of
Speaker 1: those hundreds of women whose names you don't know, and
Speaker 1: some of most of whose names I don't know, those
Speaker 1: women are still terrified because Hillary is the terrorist. She
Speaker 1: is the person who uses threats of violence and intimidation
Speaker 1: for a political aim. That is the definition of terrorism.
Speaker 1: You have a whole chapter about meeting Hillary Clinton. Tell
Speaker 1: us about that, and how long into the affair did
Speaker 1: this happen? Oh, Sean, that's not fair for people who
Speaker 1: are going to read the book. That's the best description ever.
Speaker 1: But it was nineteen seventy four. Billy and I and Hillary,
Speaker 1: all of us were single at the time. He was
Speaker 1: teaching the law in Fayetteville and running for Congress. He
Speaker 1: asked me to pick him up at the airport um,
Speaker 1: which I did, and he had this woman with him.
Speaker 1: He introduced her as Hillary, and I promise you I
Speaker 1: thought it was a joke. So did you know at
Speaker 1: that point that was his wife? No? No, no, she
Speaker 1: wasn't his wife at Okay, So this is before all
Speaker 1: of this happened. But you had been friends with Bill.
Speaker 1: You didn't start an affair with him until after they
Speaker 1: were married. You didn't have any No, no no, I have.
Speaker 1: We We had an affair in that spring of nineteen
Speaker 1: seventy four. I was single, he was single, She was single.
Speaker 1: He was having a relationship with Marla Krider at the
Speaker 1: university and Hillary came down and found about out about
Speaker 1: Marla and it's threatened her. So yeah, it's Hillary has
Speaker 1: been inserting herself with threats from the beginning. You describe
Speaker 1: it another point in the book, Hillary, you um as
Speaker 1: somebody that was known in the I guess areas anti social, narcissistic, Uh,
Speaker 1: disregard for comfort needs, schedules, and the convenience of other people.
Speaker 1: And you've learned about later her arrogance towards state troopers
Speaker 1: in Arkansas and staff serving them in the White House.
Speaker 1: And then you said, watch the impervious way Hillary treats
Speaker 1: anyone beneath her, especially young black women. Are you suggesting
Speaker 1: she's racist? Oh, I'm absolutely suggesting she's racist. And I say,
Speaker 1: talk in the book about the racial discrimination lawsuits that
Speaker 1: were filed against Billy when he was governor by blacks
Speaker 1: and by Hispanics. Do you know that at one point
Speaker 1: he told the Arkansas State police to stop and search
Speaker 1: every car and truck driven by an Hispanic in the
Speaker 1: state of Arkansas, and they sued him, took him the
Speaker 1: federal court. He was reprimanded by a federal judge, and
Speaker 1: he got so mad about that. Then he told the
Speaker 1: state troopers they could just stop and search any car
Speaker 1: they wanted to search. Here. Let me put put some
Speaker 1: of this, uh in terms of a timeline together for people,
Speaker 1: because when Bill Clinton's decided He's going to run for president,
Speaker 1: and Jennifer Flowers had that big press conference and it
Speaker 1: was the National Enquirer at the time, and she had
Speaker 1: the tapes of Bill Clinton, and then there was a
Speaker 1: big push to say that those tapes were severely edited,
Speaker 1: and then Hillary and Bill go on sixty minutes and
Speaker 1: claimed that nothing had ever happened. Years later, during impeachment
Speaker 1: and people forget this, he did admit that he had
Speaker 1: a relationship sexual relationship with Jennifer Flowers, but only one time,
Speaker 1: which you know was not true. I mean, at that point,
Speaker 1: he was admitting to a lie from years ago to
Speaker 1: get into the White House. If people knew at the time,
Speaker 1: I don't think he would have been elected. Well, sure,
Speaker 1: I think that he admitted to the one time, because
Speaker 1: word on the street in Arkansas is that she got
Speaker 1: pregnant by Billy and had an abortion, So he would
Speaker 1: have to admit to that one time. I think, I
Speaker 1: don't know if it's because she had records of that.
Speaker 1: I don't know. That's just the word on the street
Speaker 1: and sounds reasonable to me. I never I never heard that,
Speaker 1: and I don't wanna. I don't wanna. Look, Jennifer Flowers
Speaker 1: has been through a lot. I've known her over the years.
Speaker 1: I don't want to I don't want to say anything
Speaker 1: like that if we don't know for sure. Let me
Speaker 1: ask this because you you you talk at length about,
Speaker 1: you know, all the women that were lied about you
Speaker 1: being one of them. When this whole now, Monica Lewinsky
Speaker 1: was a consensual relationship, Jennifer Flowers was a consensual relationship.
Speaker 1: Yours was a consensual relationship, very different than what Paula,
Speaker 1: Anita and Kathleen Willie are describing. But you say, even
Speaker 1: in that lawsuit that Paula Jones brought that you were
Speaker 1: lied about there. Oh, absolutely. In fact, this was the
Speaker 1: basis for Dave Shippers, who was the chief investigative counsel
Speaker 1: for the Clinton impeachment. They had incontrovertible proof of Billy's
Speaker 1: lying about me. He actually turned in handwritten notes to
Speaker 1: federal judge and they interviewed people in Hot Springs to
Speaker 1: find out that it was absolutely completely wrong on what
Speaker 1: he said. And that's what that was the perjury, the
Speaker 1: suborting of perjury. He got his aid to do the
Speaker 1: same thing, to lie under oaths. Maybe she wrote the
Speaker 1: same kind of notes backing up what he said. Um,
Speaker 1: it was witness tampering, it was obstruction of justice, and
Speaker 1: all of those things were the reasons that Dave Shippers
Speaker 1: was going to call me to be the chief witness
Speaker 1: for the Clinton impeachment. Except you know what happened to that.
Speaker 1: Well then, so he lied under oath about you and
Speaker 1: you you had really what was decades long affair. I
Speaker 1: mean this went on for like twenty years, right, And
Speaker 1: and how would he see you when he was married
Speaker 1: to Hillary? How would those liaisons happen? I'm sure, And
Speaker 1: that is the easiest thing in the world. I mean,
Speaker 1: I know you're a good guy and you wouldn't do this,
Speaker 1: But trust me, everyone always has the time for an affair,
Speaker 1: and they have an easy way to figure it out.
Speaker 1: It's one of the things that happens to people who
Speaker 1: are all right. So so in other words, now do
Speaker 1: you know of other women? I mean there are how
Speaker 1: many women do you know of that you believe he
Speaker 1: has had sex with while he was married to Hillary?
Speaker 1: There are probably only another twenty that I know about.
Speaker 1: And did did Hillary Clinton know about you? When did
Speaker 1: she learn about what was going on with you and him?
Speaker 1: She knew about me when they were at Yale because
Speaker 1: Billy moved in with her in the fall of I
Speaker 1: think it was nineteen seventy two, and he told her
Speaker 1: about me then, or at least he told me that
Speaker 1: he told her. But you know, Billy is such a
Speaker 1: liar as she is, you can't ever be sure what
Speaker 1: he really did. Yeah, and you were intimidated as well.
Speaker 1: You're afraid to tell your story because you watched what
Speaker 1: was unfolding with Jennifer Flowers while he was running for president. No, Sean,
Speaker 1: that's not exactly true. I was threatened, but I have
Speaker 1: never been afraid. I testified. I never recanted my story.
Speaker 1: I was available to testify. And the reason that I
Speaker 1: wrote my first novel as a novel was that I
Speaker 1: want to be a novelist, and it was loosely based
Speaker 1: on our true story, and they started attacking me and
Speaker 1: planting false story worries in national publications about me so
Speaker 1: that my book wouldn't get published. And that's why I
Speaker 1: saw the lawsuit against Billy and some of his co
Speaker 1: conspirators there in the White House. You have a whole chapter. Now.
Speaker 1: I've interviewed all these other women that I mentioned Wa Needed, Kathleen,
Speaker 1: and Paula, and people have asked me over the years
Speaker 1: if I believe them, And the answer is, I do
Speaker 1: believe them. And you talk in the book, how you
Speaker 1: believe wa Needa? Why do you believe her? I found
Speaker 1: her extraordinarily sadly, the whole thing credible. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, the first time I interviewed her, I had
Speaker 1: a very hard time conducting that interview. Oh yeah, that
Speaker 1: was tough. Well, I saw the interview on UM the
Speaker 1: the interview with Lisa Meyers at NBC. I talked to
Speaker 1: Lisa Myers about this because Lisa Myers wanted to interview
Speaker 1: me on the steps of the federal courthouse in Washington
Speaker 1: when I filed the lawsuit and we had that set
Speaker 1: for the next morning. She called me that night and
Speaker 1: she said, I'm sorry, Dolly, we can't do the interview.
Speaker 1: And I said why. She said, the NBC higher up
Speaker 1: have mixed it. How do you know that Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: is a sex addict because you said that in the
Speaker 1: book to me. Here's the thing. I got into therapy
Speaker 1: after a second divorce. I thought, Okay, what's the common
Speaker 1: denominator here, Well, it has to be me. I have
Speaker 1: to have a problem. So I got into therapy. I
Speaker 1: found out I was a codependent. I started reading about
Speaker 1: sex addiction, and I saw that not only was Billy
Speaker 1: is sex addict, but I was as well. And this
Speaker 1: is very typical for people who have been raped. They
Speaker 1: either go toward the promiscuous or they go toward the frigid.
Speaker 1: And that's what I did. And I had to work
Speaker 1: through all that in order to get myself back to
Speaker 1: some kind of state of normalcy, because it is a
Speaker 1: horrible thing to be raped. It is horrible and it's
Speaker 1: the most out of control feeling. I mean, I woke
Speaker 1: up to this horrid pain because I had been drugged
Speaker 1: and I wasn't even aware of the first part of it. Uh,
Speaker 1: we'll talk to you more in the future, because I
Speaker 1: think there's still more to say. But I think as
Speaker 1: this issue comes forward, and I have no doubt Hillary
Speaker 1: is going to play the gender card a lot in
Speaker 1: this campaign. We will be getting back to you, Dolly kol.
Speaker 1: Thank you for being with us, and I'm sorry for
Speaker 1: all the pain that you went through and thank you
Speaker 1: for telling your story. The book is called Hillary the
Speaker 1: Other Women Woman. It's a political memoir. Dolly Kole wrote it.
Speaker 1: Thank you for being with us. You're welcome, Sean, always
Speaker 1: great to talk to you. And it's on Hannity dot
Speaker 1: com right now if you want to take a look
Speaker 1: at it. Hillary is not a talented person. In fact,
Speaker 1: she's a person with absolutely no natural talent. All you
Speaker 1: have to do is watch your speak and you ever notice,
Speaker 1: even from minor's speech, she has telepropters. Do I have
Speaker 1: telepropters here? But she's got like these minor's speeches and
Speaker 1: she's going and I saw this a couple of times,
Speaker 1: seeing the fowards we're going to win in the north, south, East,
Speaker 1: and West Papa Papa Pah boy. So instance here Hillary Clinton,
Speaker 1: and this is Hillary Clinton, who lies? I mean, she lies?
Speaker 1: You remember that I started that she lies she lies.
Speaker 1: He made his speech and she's making another one tomorrow.
Speaker 1: And they sent me a copy of the speech, and
Speaker 1: it was such lies about my foreign policy that they said,
Speaker 1: I want Japan to nuke, I want Japan to get
Speaker 1: nuclear weapons. Give me a break. Just yesterday we learned
Speaker 1: the truth about Donald Trump's big talk about helping veterans.
Speaker 1: It turns out it wasn't until the press shamed him
Speaker 1: that he actually made the donations he had promised for months.
Speaker 1: It was all just a publicity stunt. Well, today we're
Speaker 1: learning about another scam, the so called Trump University. Trump
Speaker 1: Trump and his employees took advantage of vulnerable Americans, encouraging
Speaker 1: them to max out their credit cards, empty their retirement savings,
Speaker 1: destroy their financial futures, all while making promises they knew
Speaker 1: were false from the beginning. This is just more evidence
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump himself is a fraud. He is trying
Speaker 1: to scam America the way he scammed all those people
Speaker 1: at Trump You all right, that was Hillary Clinton attacking
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, as she's been doing all day. Oh, he
Speaker 1: can't be trusted on foreign policy, etcetera, etcetera. Well, there's
Speaker 1: a story that I want to share with you that
Speaker 1: very few people know about. Well, the American thinker deserves
Speaker 1: a lot of credit for this. Few people know about
Speaker 1: how Bill Clinton actually was hired in two I bet
Speaker 1: you didn't know this, Linda to be the chancellor of
Speaker 1: the Laureate Network, the world's largest for profit university network.
Speaker 1: Did you know that? No, you didn't. How Clinton has
Speaker 1: personally been paid to make appearances promote in this university
Speaker 1: in countries like Malaysia and Peru and Spain. And by januaryeen,
Speaker 1: Laureate University at eight hundred thousand students worldwide. Its annual
Speaker 1: revenue was four billion dollars, far larger than revenues to
Speaker 1: quote Trump University, which was basically like a seminar course,
Speaker 1: except that you know, just a few people signed up
Speaker 1: for the extended course. But it was a seminar course,
Speaker 1: like in real estate or other other ways to make money. Now,
Speaker 1: um Clinton was paid for all of this. Laureette has
Speaker 1: now taken over struggling colleges using high pressure marketing tactics
Speaker 1: like turbo charging enrollment using students as telemarketers, and they
Speaker 1: were investigated by the Real State Legislatures Investigative Commission on
Speaker 1: Private Universities in Brazil. Uh Robson Late, who was a
Speaker 1: real state legislator, led the probe, concluded the following they
Speaker 1: have turned education into a commodity that focuses more on
Speaker 1: profit than on knowledge. Neither Laureate nor Bill Clinton will
Speaker 1: disclose how my money that Bill Clinton has been paid
Speaker 1: to promote the for profit international university set up, which
Speaker 1: features both classroom and online instruction. One student named Larissa
Speaker 1: d Silva UH complained that when she enrolled in the
Speaker 1: Brazilian branch of Laureette, the admissions officer promised her thirty
Speaker 1: percent discount on tuition. Two years later, the deal evaporated
Speaker 1: and her monthly tuition costs jumped through the roof. She
Speaker 1: summarized the change in policy by stating, quote, I feel
Speaker 1: completely deceived and apparently the fine print states that grants
Speaker 1: in tuition discounts may be temporary, so it's not it's
Speaker 1: her fault for not lawyering up before she enrolled in
Speaker 1: the Clinton promoted college. They also have a habit at
Speaker 1: Laurette of allowing students with low admissions tests test scores
Speaker 1: to enroll as well. One such person named Phelippe lhas
Speaker 1: aged twenty four stated he was surprised when he was
Speaker 1: accepted as a student. I knew I had done horribly
Speaker 1: on the test, he recalled, but the salespeople called me
Speaker 1: three times saying I did great and asking when I
Speaker 1: would come down to enroll these international universities, unlike Trump
Speaker 1: University is still in existence and they're going strong in
Speaker 1: the news media attacking Trump. Well, maybe they could look
Speaker 1: at this connection as well. How much did Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: get paid? And was this a scam? And we're people
Speaker 1: scammed in this Now, if I had to guess, I'd
Speaker 1: say that Clinton is gonna rue the day they ever
Speaker 1: brought up Trump University because the stuff we're gathering today
Speaker 1: about the Clinton's very own shady third world college scam here,
Speaker 1: you know, makes Trump University look like Harvard in comparison.
Speaker 1: Especially the report has passed March on how Hillary used
Speaker 1: her State Department and her cloud from the State Department
Speaker 1: to help the same for profit, shady college that was
Speaker 1: paying her husband millions of dollars. Ross Story reported this.
Speaker 1: It was recently revealed through Hillary's emails that during the
Speaker 1: first year Secretary of State, she insisted that laureate education
Speaker 1: be included in the guest list for an education policy
Speaker 1: dinner hosted by the U S Department of State. It
Speaker 1: is a for profit model that should be represented, she
Speaker 1: wrote in August to two thousand and nine in an
Speaker 1: email that she thought we'd never see on her private
Speaker 1: email server anyway. As a result, the senior vice president
Speaker 1: at this college was added to the guest list. Several
Speaker 1: months later, Former President Bill Clinton became an honorary chancellor
Speaker 1: and which turned out to be incredibly lucrative. He was
Speaker 1: paid a cool sixteen point five million between twenty ten
Speaker 1: and twenty fourteen for his role in the for profit college.
Speaker 1: There are five schools in the US that operate under
Speaker 1: Laureate's umbrella, Walden University in Minneapolis. Even though the parent
Speaker 1: company had enough money to pay our former president four
Speaker 1: million a year, Walden charges students nearly sixty thousand dollars
Speaker 1: in tuition and fees for most undergraduate degrees. Wow. According
Speaker 1: to CNBC, Critics of Laureate's Walden University and Minnesota claimed
Speaker 1: professors were inaccessible and that continual delay stretched out the
Speaker 1: time and thus the money the students needed to pay
Speaker 1: to earn an advanced degree. Three students filed the lawsuit
Speaker 1: against Walden, hoping to make it a class action suit,
Speaker 1: alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of state
Speaker 1: consumer protection and unfair competition laws. Another Laureate school, the
Speaker 1: New School of Architecture, Design and Design in San Diego,
Speaker 1: charges undergraduate students they are eight thousand, six hundred and
Speaker 1: forty six dollars per quarter intuition alone. That's quarter of quarterly,
Speaker 1: four times a year, and Kendall's college tuition is just
Speaker 1: as outrageous. Lore of its revenue from outside the US,
Speaker 1: mostly from Latin American countries. The company faced a great
Speaker 1: deal of backlash in Chile and Brazil, leading to the
Speaker 1: loss of accreditation for one of its Chilean schools in
Speaker 1: and Chile's National Accreditation Commission cited low graduation rates, a
Speaker 1: sharp increase in student enrollment without faculty numbers, keeping pace
Speaker 1: with low faculty salaries. And it's a classic behavior of
Speaker 1: these schools to cut costs increase revenue, and again those
Speaker 1: institutions will run like businesses looking for profit and according
Speaker 1: to The Washington Post, critics also argue that Laureate spends
Speaker 1: too much money on marketing, executive salaries and Rubin of
Speaker 1: students rather than on quality education. Wow. Jointing us now
Speaker 1: to weigh in on this double standard is Brian Finch
Speaker 1: is the co chair of the cybersecurity practice at Pillsbury
Speaker 1: Winthrop Shaw Pittman. Jessica Tarlove senior strategists at Shown Consulting. Now,
Speaker 1: why do I think that the Clintons are gonna now
Speaker 1: regret Trump University? Jessica? Um, I don't think that they're
Speaker 1: going to regret it. Um. But certainly this is in
Speaker 1: fabulous news and we're gonna need to know more. I
Speaker 1: see the American Sinker articles that you read, and I
Speaker 1: think Bloomberg looked into this too, actually a few years ago. Um.
Speaker 1: This is going to add to the murkiness surrounding the Clinton's.
Speaker 1: But I don't think they're going to rue the day
Speaker 1: that they went after Donald Trump for anything sixty million dollar,
Speaker 1: sixteen million dollars. Poor people from poor countries that are
Speaker 1: saying that they were bamboozled and ripped off by this company,
Speaker 1: and even the affiliates in America they are saying, you know,
Speaker 1: they lost accreditation, accreditation, so on and so forth, So
Speaker 1: how can they possibly I'm not saying that it's a
Speaker 1: good thing. We need more details. I've see this is
Speaker 1: just the beginning of it, and we're going to get
Speaker 1: more information if it goes on. And I'm sure that
Speaker 1: the press is going to look into it. What I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not so sure. I'm not so sure the press
Speaker 1: will look into this. You'll do it, for sure, And
Speaker 1: I know that there are other journalists who will be
Speaker 1: interested in this, and you know, Peter Schweitzer, there are
Speaker 1: people out there hot on the heels of the Clinton's
Speaker 1: about this stuff. But I would just say that Trump's
Speaker 1: issues exist and they're going to keep going after them,
Speaker 1: and Clinton's issues exist, and they're going to keep going
Speaker 1: after them. And that's just why it's going to be
Speaker 1: the messiest battle we've seen. And I don't think that
Speaker 1: they're going to regret going after him about Trump University.
Speaker 1: I just don't. What do you think? If I can
Speaker 1: ask Brian your thoughts. Pretty interesting that every time the
Speaker 1: Clinton's hit Trump, it boomerangs back, doesn't it? It does?
Speaker 1: And I think they've never really faced a candidate like
Speaker 1: Trump before, being a New Yorker, at least technically I'm
Speaker 1: from upstate New York. I'm not sure they've ever really
Speaker 1: faced a New Yorker like Donald Trump before, who's from
Speaker 1: the city and is very hard nosed and really, you know,
Speaker 1: the investigations from the New York Times and the Washington Post,
Speaker 1: et cetera. That's old hat for Trump. He's the battling
Speaker 1: the Daily News and other New York City newspapers for
Speaker 1: decades at this point, So a bit of an investigative
Speaker 1: journalism that has probably warmed over leftovers from previous uh
Speaker 1: in the newspaper accounts and investigations really aren't going to
Speaker 1: phase him and maybe news for the rest of the country.
Speaker 1: But ultimately, I think from a from a Trump perspective,
Speaker 1: it's it's something that he's not going to be too
Speaker 1: concerned about and he's not going to be afraid to
Speaker 1: fire back on issues like you've identified. And I'm sure
Speaker 1: each side will have its own story. Uh Clinton's will
Speaker 1: have their story, the Trump will have his own side
Speaker 1: of the story as well. But the one thing that
Speaker 1: they can be sure about on the Clinton camp is
Speaker 1: that every time they fire, they're going to face return
Speaker 1: fire from Trump and it's gonna be a pretty heavy broadside.
Speaker 1: I think that's absolutely true. Now the judge presiding over
Speaker 1: the University case, and the Trump University case is a
Speaker 1: member of Larassa, which is the race lawyers group. We
Speaker 1: also came to light in and Jeff Lord broke this
Speaker 1: the American Spectator that the law firm Robin's Geller, appointed
Speaker 1: by Judge Gonzalo Corriel to represent a plain of in
Speaker 1: the Trump University class action lawsuit apparently has yet another
Speaker 1: connection to Hillary Clinton. Beyond the hundred dollar campaign contribution
Speaker 1: from firm chairman Darren Robbins, it seems that Robin's Geller
Speaker 1: paid the Clinton's nearly half a million dollars in speeches.
Speaker 1: So doesn't that seem like the deck is stacked against
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and that that judge should have recused himself. Well,
Speaker 1: there's certainly uh methods in place for a judge, particularly
Speaker 1: a federal judge, to be vetted and to be removed
Speaker 1: or have their decision overturned if there is an appearance
Speaker 1: of lack of impartiality when it comes to these types
Speaker 1: of these matters, and having litigated somewhat in my career,
Speaker 1: these are always issues that come up, and certainly if
Speaker 1: you're on the losing side of things, there there are many,
Speaker 1: many colorful adjectives that come across the lips of lawyers
Speaker 1: out of earshot of the judge in the UH in
Speaker 1: the U. S. Marshals in a federal case, to talk
Speaker 1: about their their lack of impartiality. Uh. Now, you know
Speaker 1: with respective membership Laurazzo or other those types of groups. Uh.
Speaker 1: You know, that doesn't surprise me that there's criticism. You
Speaker 1: would hear the same thing about conservative judges regarding the
Speaker 1: Federalist society. But at the end of the day, our
Speaker 1: voters really gonna care about that. Now. I think we're
Speaker 1: just in a mood seawan where people are just so
Speaker 1: upset and so angry about Washington and everything that's been
Speaker 1: going on in the political class and the way the
Speaker 1: economy is being run, our position in the world, etcetera.
Speaker 1: That a lawsuit over a business venture run by Donald
Speaker 1: Trump isn't really going to be what is going to
Speaker 1: be at the deciding factor, much like no one's really
Speaker 1: gonna say I'm not going to vote for Donald Trump
Speaker 1: because the Donald J. Trump tie I bought it a
Speaker 1: retail store wasn't as nice as another brand. I think
Speaker 1: ultimately they're going to carry about the same weight. Uh.
Speaker 1: In the general election, but by a two to one margin, Jessica,
Speaker 1: the American people find Donald Trump more trustworthy than Hillary Clinton. Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: I don't think that's I don't think that's remarkable because
Speaker 1: we know that Hillary Clinton. You know, well, I can
Speaker 1: give you a series of lies that Hillary Clinton has told.
Speaker 1: I mean, just on this week alone, we learned on
Speaker 1: her email scandal that she's told numerous lies. For example,
Speaker 1: with the i G report that came out in spite
Speaker 1: of what Hillary is saying, we found out that UH
Speaker 1: senior Department officials were not asked to approve her private
Speaker 1: email server. They weren't aware of the scope or extent
Speaker 1: of the use. We also learned that Clinton staff shut
Speaker 1: down her server temporarily because of hacking attempts. When you know,
Speaker 1: Hillary and company said there was no evidence of a
Speaker 1: breach of her server. They also claimed that she believed
Speaker 1: she was following the practices of other secretaries. But Colin
Speaker 1: Powell didn't used personal email. I did use personal email,
Speaker 1: but he didn't have a private server and technology guidelines
Speaker 1: by the time Clinton took over with more detail, the
Speaker 1: more sophisticated. In spite of her claim, she told numerous
Speaker 1: lines this week alone oh no. I I think the
Speaker 1: report is a very large problem. And I thought, you know,
Speaker 1: before that came out, that she was going to get
Speaker 1: through this kind of you know, it would continue to
Speaker 1: float around, but she wasn't gonna have big problems from it.
Speaker 1: And I think it's very serious. I do you think
Speaker 1: also that you know, Trump had trustworthiness issues and we
Speaker 1: know about you know, the Ve's donation money, that he
Speaker 1: wrote those checks once the media started looking into it,
Speaker 1: or I think half the check. But either way, with
Speaker 1: and these are two untrustworthy candidates, and I know that
Speaker 1: rasmusin Pole have found that he was more trusted. It
Speaker 1: was surprising to me not disagreeing with you. Yeah, so
Speaker 1: so that means you're voting for Trump? Oh no, no,
Speaker 1: no, no no, no, it doesn't mean anything. Well, your your
Speaker 1: boss said she may not even be the work to
Speaker 1: your boss, dog said he may she may not even
Speaker 1: be the candidate if she loses California. I know you
Speaker 1: agree with them. Talk to Doug extent extensively about that.
Speaker 1: Um No, I don't. I think not only an indictments
Speaker 1: hands in her way. But I saw another poll that
Speaker 1: fifty percent think that she should keep running even if
Speaker 1: she's indicted. Um, I've said that if we caught her
Speaker 1: on videotape shooting somebody in the back of the head,
Speaker 1: they'd still vote for us. So what can I tell you?
Speaker 1: I mean, didn't Donald Trump say that he could stand
Speaker 1: on Fifth Avenue and shoot someone in his voters would
Speaker 1: still back him. So he said that, But I don't
Speaker 1: think that's as true as in the case of Hillary.
Speaker 1: But that's a good point, too, too shape to you, Jessica,
Speaker 1: all right, thank you all. I know right, I see,
Speaker 1: I'm growing as a host. I'm growing as a human being. Well,
Speaker 1: illegal immigration is up fifty seven percent just over the
Speaker 1: last two years. Now, imagine for a minute, you're one
Speaker 1: of those Americans out of the labor force, one of
Speaker 1: those Americans millions more in poverty, millions more in food
Speaker 1: stamps under Obama, and what do you find out? Yeah,
Speaker 1: legal immigration is up fift You know what I'm thinking,
Speaker 1: I'm thinking my government doesn't care about me getting back
Speaker 1: to work out of poverty and off of food stamps. Sad,
Speaker 1: because they're the you know who are the people that
Speaker 1: are now competing for the jobs that Americans can't get
Speaker 1: it ready, those are illegal immigrants. They want to survive,
Speaker 1: they want a job. It's not like they have access
Speaker 1: immediately to government benefits, so they'll work cheaper. Well, that
Speaker 1: takes jobs away from Americans and the people disproportionately impacted
Speaker 1: by this over the Obama years have been minorities. And
Speaker 1: you have to wonder why of Black America voted for Obama.
Speaker 1: Such a large percentage of the Hispanic community votes for
Speaker 1: Democrats every election. Here, a a c l U top
Speaker 1: state official has resigned because she is opposed to transgender bathrooms.
Speaker 1: By the way, I only thought it was weak conservatives
Speaker 1: that were Neanderthals that didn't want biological men in the
Speaker 1: same bathrooms as little teenage girls. It's ridiculous anyway. Life
Speaker 1: site News points out that the African American woman who
Speaker 1: leads a state chapter of the a c l U
Speaker 1: has resigned, citing her own daughter's frightened reaction to biological
Speaker 1: males using the woman's rest room. I gotta give her credit.
Speaker 1: I hate these lawsuits anyway. There's a guy, a blind
Speaker 1: Louisiana man. I often hate these lawsuits, I should say,
Speaker 1: suing McDonald's in an attempt to force the burger chain
Speaker 1: to serve customers who walk up to the drive through
Speaker 1: window to place in order. Now, now let me tell
Speaker 1: you this is I don't know what McDonald's policies are.
Speaker 1: I've actually walked up to drive in windows and they've
Speaker 1: taken care of me. Yeah. No, I have you never
Speaker 1: done that? I don't know, because I saw it was empty.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm always looking for you know me, why
Speaker 1: you look at it? Put your mike on. I can't
Speaker 1: people can't see the reaction. I just don't understand. Why
Speaker 1: would you Why wouldn't you walk into the If I
Speaker 1: parked and I see the ladies in the window, I've
Speaker 1: walked up to the window and said, can I have
Speaker 1: you know? Why would you park? Because I don't know?
Speaker 1: Because that's because it's no. No. I remember, no. I
Speaker 1: remember we were in a city. We were being driven
Speaker 1: and I remember the guy pulled over and I just
Speaker 1: walked up and the lady served me. The only point,
Speaker 1: my only point was is that because I just did
Speaker 1: he parked, I was going in, I saw the lady
Speaker 1: and I just walked up. I'm just telling you what happened.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't usually, as a regular measure walk
Speaker 1: up to the drive through window I would normally go in,
Speaker 1: but in this particular I remember, but the lady. My
Speaker 1: point is, the lady served me that day. It was
Speaker 1: a Wendy's. And you know, my question is this is
Speaker 1: so stupid, This is so dumb. It's like people that
Speaker 1: sue over hot coffee and they spell hot coffee on
Speaker 1: themselves and it burns them and it's terrible. But now
Speaker 1: we all have to drink warm coffee as a result
Speaker 1: of these frivolous lawsuits. And by the way, you know,
Speaker 1: I want this this guy. Look, he has every right
Speaker 1: to get whatever he wants. I don't understand if I
Speaker 1: owned a business and a guy walked up and he
Speaker 1: was blind, and he was at the drive through window,
Speaker 1: why don't you just serve the guy? You know? Maybe
Speaker 1: they're thinking, all right, well, then we have to worry
Speaker 1: about the lawsuit that says, well, the car that follows
Speaker 1: the guy that walked up to the drive through window
Speaker 1: gets hit by a car and we'll get sued there. Okay,
Speaker 1: just a quick question, because I don't know this story.
Speaker 1: Didn't did he walk up there by accident because he's
Speaker 1: blind and he wasn't he didn't know that he was there?
Speaker 1: Or was thirty five year old guy. He filed this
Speaker 1: lawsuit in Chicago federal court. He's arguing the restaurant's policy
Speaker 1: of refusing to serve driverless customers as a direct violation
Speaker 1: of the Americans with Disability Act. Now, every one of
Speaker 1: these stores has to be a d A compliant, don't they.
Speaker 1: They have to have wheelchair rams. For example, I had
Speaker 1: a story today. So I had a meeting this morning,
Speaker 1: and uh, I went out to Friendly Is with my
Speaker 1: wife and she sees this guy in a wheelchair that's
Speaker 1: trying to go uphill to go to the hospital, which
Speaker 1: is about you know, through two and a half lights down,
Speaker 1: And she looks at me and she goes, she points,
Speaker 1: she goes, go take go help the guy. And I
Speaker 1: went to help him. It turns out that the guy
Speaker 1: was a vet of the first go for and uh,
Speaker 1: he was in town and he thought he'd be able
Speaker 1: to make it on his own. He wasn't gonna make
Speaker 1: it to the hospital. He had to pick up some
Speaker 1: medicine or something. So I dropped him off in the
Speaker 1: emergency room. I said, you all right, and you know,
Speaker 1: we we took care of him, but you know, that's
Speaker 1: what people do. I mean, if I owned a business,
Speaker 1: I would make it wheelchair accessible, and you follow the law.
Speaker 1: But this is where, this is where we all pay
Speaker 1: more because some people sue over the silliest of things,
Speaker 1: and I think the policy is stupid too. If somebody
Speaker 1: comes up walked up to the drive through window and
Speaker 1: it was Hannity's Hamburgers, I would serve them because I'd
Speaker 1: be glad that a customer came to my store. And
Speaker 1: if that's how they want to be a servedide server.
Speaker 1: And then when you got sued because they were hit
Speaker 1: by a motorcycle or a vehicle because they were walking
Speaker 1: in a drive through area and the person behind them
Speaker 1: didn't see them for one reason or another because they
Speaker 1: were standing as opposed to being in a vehicle, then
Speaker 1: you would you change your policy because now you were sued.
Speaker 1: Now this is a good nose. Speaking of food on Wednesday.
Speaker 1: On Wednesday, the Food and Drug Administration they're gonna they're
Speaker 1: now moving to cut the average salt consumption by a
Speaker 1: third in an effort to reduce heart attacks and strokes.
Speaker 1: As if I'm a big salt user, Yeah, I know
Speaker 1: it's massive. I you put it on everything. My daughter
Speaker 1: puts it on ice for crazy. You got that for me?
Speaker 1: That's not good. Do we really need the government telling
Speaker 1: us to put salt on where when we can use salt?
Speaker 1: How much salt? For example, I love French fries. When
Speaker 1: I have French fries a few times, i'll eat him
Speaker 1: because I'm too fat, I put a ton of sault
Speaker 1: on him so I can really enjoy it, because that's
Speaker 1: how I like them. I need a government official moderating
Speaker 1: how much salt cloes in the French fries. Now, oh,
Speaker 1: Philadelphia schools, you're from Philly. They added to Muslim holidays.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you still saw that. And of course,
Speaker 1: you know, with all the talk about the guerrilla, we
Speaker 1: had sixty four people shot over the holiday weekend. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: sixty six shot and five dead in Chicago over the
Speaker 1: holiday weekend. Unbelievable. Um. And and we did have a teacher.
Speaker 1: This was in Houston, Texas. A twenty four year old
Speaker 1: middle school English teacher got impregnated by a thirteen year
Speaker 1: old student. She turned herself in today. You know, Bob Grant,
Speaker 1: you still you know something. It's sick, and it's getting sicker.
Speaker 1: It's sick, all right, it's twisted sick. All right, let's
Speaker 1: get to our billy busy telephones. We got Michael Is
Speaker 1: in Connecticut on the Sean Hannity Show. Michael, how are
Speaker 1: you glad you called? Hey? Sean, how are you? I'm good?
Speaker 1: What's going on? Not much? First, I just want to
Speaker 1: say you've been doing great work this election season. I
Speaker 1: really want to thank you for that. Listen, I thank
Speaker 1: you for for this is what we do. We try.
Speaker 1: I had to do it fairly and and thoroughly, and
Speaker 1: I know we didn't satisfy everybody, but we tried as
Speaker 1: hard as we could. We really did. Thank you for
Speaker 1: saying that. Yeah. So the reason I called today is
Speaker 1: because you have been talking about commencements and graduation speeches,
Speaker 1: different college student reactions. And something funny happened that at
Speaker 1: mine on May eighth, I graduated from the Yukon School Business,
Speaker 1: and we had a man speaking by the name of
Speaker 1: John Kim. He's the chief investment officer for New York
Speaker 1: Life Insurance, I believe, and he was talking about the
Speaker 1: nineties and how Bill Clinton was president, and then he
Speaker 1: made a comment that said, perhaps we will have a
Speaker 1: Mrs Clinton as president this year and the whole place,
Speaker 1: student section, the parents, watching, the family and friends. The
Speaker 1: place has erupted and boot. It was crazy. The amount
Speaker 1: of hatred for that woman insane. Like I have no
Speaker 1: doubt Donald Trump will win the millennial vote. Look, I'm
Speaker 1: not making I'm not in the prediction business for politics,
Speaker 1: and particular, I think that the electoral map is I
Speaker 1: don't care who the candidate is. I am convinced though,
Speaker 1: and I'm you know, people, I vacillated back and forth
Speaker 1: during this primary who was the most electable, But I
Speaker 1: do think that Donald Trump, of all the sixth seventeen candidates,
Speaker 1: probably is the most electable. I think this country has
Speaker 1: moved from center right to more center center left. I think,
Speaker 1: especially the younger generation, wants too much for free um
Speaker 1: and I think that our educational system is destroyed an
Speaker 1: entire generation of kids and indoctrinated them into socialism. And
Speaker 1: it's scary because if we don't apply conservative principles. From
Speaker 1: my perspective, I don't think we're gonna be able to
Speaker 1: change the country and will deteriorate. It is predictable as
Speaker 1: one plus one equals to America in decline. Now is predictable.
Speaker 1: I went through the numbers earlier. Today, it is in
Speaker 1: a rapid, precipitous, dangerous decline. Hillary Clinton represents a continuation
Speaker 1: of policies that will keep America in decline scary. Karen
Speaker 1: is in Miami news radio six w y O D.
Speaker 1: How are you, Karen? Hi Sean, I just want to say,
Speaker 1: you spoke of someone praised Tom Joyner yesterday, and I
Speaker 1: just want to say, as an African American down in
Speaker 1: South Florida healthcare business owner who's been slaughtered by the president,
Speaker 1: I stopped listening to Tom Joyner. He does not speak
Speaker 1: for Black America, but I stopped listening to him at
Speaker 1: the campaigning of Block because of the promotion of ignorant
Speaker 1: and very one sided, narrow minded thinking. So I just
Speaker 1: wanted to input that my life. Well, I mean, I
Speaker 1: was having this argument that the mainstream media did not
Speaker 1: vet Obama, and I was having that argument with Austin Gulsby,
Speaker 1: and we made a bet that besides George Stephanopolos asking
Speaker 1: about Bill Airs, that nobody else in the mainstream media
Speaker 1: asked the question. And so he came back with, well,
Speaker 1: Tom Joyner did and some other obscure hosts that I
Speaker 1: had never heard of did and I said, well, you
Speaker 1: mean this, Tom Joyner, when when this took place in Hawaii?
Speaker 1: This talking about a story. What's the girl's name? The
Speaker 1: little girl's name again, Bethany Hamilton's. I interviewed her, lovely girl,
Speaker 1: and from what I heard, she got married to doing well.
Speaker 1: But a shark bit off her arm. And she was
Speaker 1: a surfer. And this is how the mainstream media, according
Speaker 1: to Austin Goulsby, treated that story. Listen, just listen to
Speaker 1: the best friend and her friend's father. But she was
Speaker 1: lying on the board off the Kawai's north shore. A
Speaker 1: shark bid once and then disappeared, taking her left arm
Speaker 1: just below the shoulder. She said, nobody saw it happen,
Speaker 1: but everybody heard her. Yea, A shark just bit me. Wow,
Speaker 1: the building, stay out the water, White people shop, won't
Speaker 1: bite you. That's why he keeps on, keeps on biting white.
Speaker 1: Oh the sharp bite he bites quite right. He keeps
Speaker 1: on biting white. That shunk bites, he bites quite right,
Speaker 1: and he keeps on biden and it goes on mac
Speaker 1: then it's you know, that's pretty horrible. Young what was
Speaker 1: she eleven, twelve, thirteen years old at the time, lost
Speaker 1: her arm, thirteen years old. For everyone, Sean, they do
Speaker 1: that for everyone. Everything's a joke. I don't think that's
Speaker 1: a joke. I don't care any child, young child loses
Speaker 1: their arm. What's funny about it. It's not funny to me.
Speaker 1: It's a it's tragic, and you know, and the girl's
Speaker 1: a lovely girl. I met her. All right, Thank you, Karen,
Speaker 1: God bless you. Eight nine f one Seawan Steve in Arizona.
Speaker 1: What's up, Steve? Oh? How are you glad you called? Sir? Yes, sir, Yeah,
Speaker 1: thank you for taking my call. I'm even nervous talking
Speaker 1: to you. It's like talking you're talking to a friend.
Speaker 1: There's no knee to be nervous. Let not your heart
Speaker 1: be troubled. Okay, well, I'll make it quick. Is I
Speaker 1: have a Trump flag and Navy flag next to when
Speaker 1: I have an American flag in my yard. And when
Speaker 1: I put my Trump flag up, I got my yard
Speaker 1: egg and that wasn't a big deal. They used the
Speaker 1: brown eggs, so they're more expensive, so they wasted their
Speaker 1: own money. But my daughters were scared twenty and seventeen,
Speaker 1: and they said, Dad, what happens if they try and
Speaker 1: do something worse to us, and I'm like, they're not
Speaker 1: gonna So I was kind of hoping you could say
Speaker 1: something to help me out. Well, look, um, you know,
Speaker 1: I lived my life in a world where I am
Speaker 1: constantly criticized. There was an article. Did you see the
Speaker 1: article today? Living in the Washington Post. You know that
Speaker 1: I I interviewed Donald Trump about all the charities that
Speaker 1: he was the military charities and the Washington There were
Speaker 1: fifty of them at sixty. I didn't read the whole list.
Speaker 1: One of them happened to be the Freedom Alliance, which
Speaker 1: I'm associated with. But by the way, proudly I gave
Speaker 1: them hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars
Speaker 1: in donations from my own pocket. And I'm proud that
Speaker 1: I was able to do that and proud to work
Speaker 1: with them because they give scholarships to the children of
Speaker 1: of slain soldiers and uh, you know, and I didn't
Speaker 1: disclose it. I'm like, so what and what's the what's
Speaker 1: the problem. I didn't even know they're on the list,
Speaker 1: to be honest, so stupid. And you know why they
Speaker 1: did it because they were caught red handed because Donald
Speaker 1: Trump did the right thing by those charities. He vetted
Speaker 1: the charities. If he didn't vet the charities then and
Speaker 1: he gave them money, then everyone would criticize where he
Speaker 1: gave the money to, which is what the Washington Post
Speaker 1: is trying to do. So what I have my advice
Speaker 1: to you is let not your heart be troubled. You
Speaker 1: go fight for what you believe in. Somebody eggs your house,
Speaker 1: you find out who it is, you egg their house.
Speaker 1: I did that once to a bully in my neighborhood
Speaker 1: put eggs on my house that morning, and uh on
Speaker 1: Halloween the next night, I trashed his house with dozens.
Speaker 1: But I'm not pro retaliation. Why I actually am Why
Speaker 1: why are you making me lie? I you know somebody
Speaker 1: eggs my house, I'm gonna there's somebody punches me. I'm
Speaker 1: punching them back harder. What what is? What? Why you?
Speaker 1: Why did you make me say something I don't believe?
Speaker 1: Because the problem is is that we live in a
Speaker 1: society where even though you might believe that you know
Speaker 1: it's right to fight back, then someone's gonna say, oh,
Speaker 1: I did this because Sean Hannity said I have a
Speaker 1: right to fight back, and Suddenly I said, if somebody
Speaker 1: eggs your house, and yeah, all right, if they let
Speaker 1: me speak for is an eye for an eye kind
Speaker 1: of thing. If somebody puts eggs on my house and
Speaker 1: I know who they are, all like, there's back twice
Speaker 1: as bad. Okay, that's what I would do. Not that
Speaker 1: we're encouraging anyone to do that, we're telling anybody what
Speaker 1: to do. I'm just saying what I would do. You
Speaker 1: should lead your lives the way you feel, you show
Speaker 1: and personal responsibility is our motto. Make your own decisions,
Speaker 1: all right, we do. We sit safe and secure now.
Speaker 1: I feel good now