WEBVTT - Inside Flashpoint

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Flashpoint is released weekly and brought to you absolutely free,

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:09.119
<v Speaker 1>but for ad free listening, early access and exclusive bonuses,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Tenderfoot Plus at tenderfootplus dot com or on

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts.

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome everyone to Inside Tenderfoot TV. Today we're

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>going inside Flashpoint, our latest show that takes an investigative

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 2>look at the narratives of the nineteen ninety six Olympic

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:33.319
<v Speaker 2>bombing and the subsequent bombings in Atlanta, Georgia. There are

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of themes in this story that are still

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 2>very precient. Today I'm Laura from the Tenderfoot team, and

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 2>today I'm talking to host and co creator Cole Lakassio

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and executive producer and co creator Doug Mattica to hear

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>about their experiences digging into such an intense story with

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 2>some seriously personal strings attached. Let's get into it.

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Today.

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting down with col A Cassio and Doug Matica,

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the producers and hosts of Flashpoint, and I'm really excited

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to get into it. Welcome Cole and Doug. Thank you

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 2>for being here.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Dor, thanks for having us.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this show just wrapped up, which means that

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 2>everything is very fresh, and I kind of wanted to

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>start a little bit at the beginning of things before

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>getting into some of the more kind of hard hitting

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 2>topics of the show and your experience with it. Can

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>both of you just give a little bit of an

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 2>overview to our listeners of how you got involved in

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 2>podcasting in the first place, a little bit of your

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 2>history within this medium, and why you chose it for storytelling.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I got into it through Doug. Actually, I was in

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>college and I was working on in indie film over

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the summer, is like an internship in between my junior

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and senior year of college. I met Doug that way.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He was a pretty around a film when I was

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>wrapping up college. I did radio all during school and

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I loved it, but I was trying to figure out

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a way to not have a typical journalism job after

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I got out of college, and I'm glad I worked

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on that film. I never considered film or storytelling like

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that in any capacity until I met Doug, and so

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I hit him up after college, and you know, I

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>went the typical like applying for jobs at like you know,

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>local papers and like ESPN and that sort of thing,

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but they were all very entry level and not very

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>creatively rewarding. I hit up Doug and asked him what

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>he was doing, and he had just started a podcast company,

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>so naturally it was a good fit. So I moved

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>out to LA.

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, at first I told him, don't do it, just

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 3>like my mentor told me, don't get in film. It's

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the worst thing you can do. Kid, don't do it.

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 2>I was told that when I was studying film too.

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 3>But you know, when you got it in your head

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 3>and you need to creative stuff, you just do it. Yeah.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 2>And when was do you mind have asked? When? This was?

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Just for a sense of kind of what the world

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.399
<v Speaker 2>of podcasting was at that time, since it's this was grown.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I hit him up first in May of twenty nineteen.

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>That's where I graduated.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so established industry, but it's grown, right.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And I moved out to Los Angeles in July of

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. And you know, honestly, i'd never really listened

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to a long form narrative podcast of any kind. My

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>first introduction to it, as I'm sure is the case

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>for many people, was Cereal Doug. And Doug gave me

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>basically a homework listening list and it included Cereal and

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>included Shitdown. I can't there were a few more, but

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I started with Cereal and s Town Yeah, and kind

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of just took off from there. It's such an awesome

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>medium to be able to craft the story you want

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell without having to worry about visuals, which was

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>always actually my least favorite part of film. Were the

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>visuals important, but being able to really tap into and

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>take hold of the storytelling aspect of it was very

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>intriguing to me. So I'd moved out to La. The

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>very first thing I got to LA, I went to

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the office and met up with him. We caught up

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and he brought me inside and on his computer he

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>had an article about Eric Rudolf from Outside magazine and

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, why are you reading that? And he said,

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>do you know about this? Like you're from Atlanta, Like

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you know about Eric Rudolf. And the article

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>was talking about how it was mostly focused on the

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>man hunt and how he was able to sleep in

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the woods. I think the title of it was Eric

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Rudolf Slept Here. And he was blown away by it.

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>And Doug can talk about this more on what fascinated

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>him about it, but when I saw that article, I said, well,

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a connection Eric Rudolf, and I told him

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>my story in my birth story, and the kind took

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>off from there. He actually came up with our original

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>title for the show on the spot right after I

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>told him that story.

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Doug, were you looking were you looking into building a

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 2>podcast around his story kind of in your head already

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 2>before you talked to Cole about his connection to it?

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Totally? I thought his story was and I think Cole

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 3>mentions this very briefly in one of the apps, but

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 3>like Eric's story, his timeline is kind of like very

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 3>synchronous with the timeline of the rise of the far right,

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the religious right domestically. And I thought that was interesting

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 3>because he, you know, spoused a lot of those views

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.359
<v Speaker 3>quite publicly, and he's been pretty prolific from prison. I

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 3>don't recommend you read his work, but he he's got

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 3>time on his hands, for sure, but he's also got

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 3>clarity of vision. But I was really interested in that

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 3>the sort of cultural historical piece, but also I was

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 3>amazed that somebody could hide for five years, How do

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>you do that? And so you know, this outside magazine

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 3>piece was fascinating. It really just got into the topography

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 3>of the region, and so I was what I was

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 3>doing is poking on trying to find an angle, like

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 3>what's the angle? How do I tell this terrorist story

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 3>and use it to give a broader cultural overview? But

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 3>what's the angle? Like anybody can tell the story? And

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Jimmy Shoeshine here walks into my office. I mean, shit,

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 3>you not within an hour of And we had worked

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 3>together for two months NonStop in production, like we were

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 3>on set every day, so like this never came up.

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 3>Why would it? But yeah, he walks into my office

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 3>sees this, and he's like, oh, I have a story,

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 3>and I think he actually stepped outside.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>For a second.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 3>He's like, I want to confirm a couple of things.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Hold on, And he went outside and he made a

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 3>call and talked to Leah, his mom, and confirmed a

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 3>couple of things before he dropped the bomb. And then

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 3>he dropped it, and I was like, whoa. And it

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>just so happened that I was in the process of

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 3>setting up my first podcast, Whistleblower, with Tenderfoot. At the time,

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't set up yet, but we were getting close,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 3>and it was in production on Whistleblower that at a

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 3>certain point we were I think, you know, midway through

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and in Atlanta, Cole's helping on that, he's editing on that,

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and I Donald just at lunch one day, I was like,

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 3>what else you got? What are you working on? And

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I gave him like a two sentence pitch on this

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 3>and he was like, I'll take that.

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's an incredibly compelling You have an incredibly

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>compelling position within I guess the broader narrative of Eric

0:07:56.960 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Rudolph and the extremism that is growing. Cole, when did

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 2>you first find out about your birth story and your

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.239
<v Speaker 2>relationship to Eric Rudolf? Because you talk in the show

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 2>about always being fascinated with this bombing And forgive me

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 2>because I don't remember if you had actually already been

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 2>interested in that as a young person and then found

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 2>out because you mentioned I think it was high school

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>or college that she told you. So were you interested

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>in this before you actually knew your connection to it

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and then it grew or was it something that grew

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 2>out of finding out your birth story.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 1>I knew about Eric Rudolf pretty early on in my life,

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think when you grow up in Atlanta, you

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>know about that story, right, you know more than most would.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I think most people only know typically when you tell

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>them about the Olympic Park bombing, they know Richard Jewell,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't really know the name Eric Rudolf. But I

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>think for most people who have lived in Atlanta, you

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>know through the nineties, they're going to know about the

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>man hunt, They're going to know about the additional bombings.

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of grew up with that story in

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>the back of my mind, just knowing like this is

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a crazy story. I knew about my birth story parts

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. I knew about my biological father. I knew

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that he just wasn't part of our

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>lives past the age of like two. For me, it

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was not a good situation. Thankfully, my mom got out

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of it. She had a lot of support from her

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>parents and my grandparents. But I did not know about

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the Eric Rudolf part of it until high school. It

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was something that I mean, my mom's a very open person.

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>She's an open book, but you have to ask her

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>certain things to get those pieces of her life, and

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something that she wasn't trying to keep

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>from me. She told me everything else. It's just something

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that she put away, and I don't think it was

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>really important to her after she made the decision to

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>keep me. I think trauma is a very powerful thing.

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it does a lot to memories. I think

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that played into that. So when I heard that part

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of the story and I was interested in going this

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>route of journalism, I kind of always kept it up here,

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, to hopefully one day be able to tell

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.119
<v Speaker 1>that story. But in a way that doesn't come across

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>as supportive of his actions, right, because I've always been

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a pro choice person as long as I've been able

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand what that means. So I certainly didn't want

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>people to get the wrong idea about it. But it

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was always there and I always wanted to tell that story.

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I just need to find the right way to tell it.

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And thankfully linking up a Doug and then Tenderfoot, we

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>were able to do that. Right.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Do you mean to run with the old title a

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 3>little bit here?

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? That I think? Is it?

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 3>So? Yeah? Cool was talking about trying to find the

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 3>right way to tell the story, and originally we had

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 3>intended to and just for like two years in our

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 3>mind and our conceptualization of an ideation process. This podcast

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 3>was called Eric Rudolf Saved My life, not mine his,

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>but but and on the one hand, we wanted to

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 3>embrace everything about the paradoxical nature of this story. Yes,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Eric Wrudo was a monster. Yes, Cole doesn't exist unless

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 3>his monstrous actions save his life. But to start off

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 3>on that, the first foot forward being he saved me.

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 3>And there was always something that felt off about that.

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 3>But it was also cool because, well, but we want

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 3>to we don't want people to be able to avoid

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the paradoxical moment here. We really want people to have

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 3>to hold these you know, contradictory truths. Yet it was

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 3>a bit it was a bridge too far at the

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 3>end of the day. I mean, Alex was a was

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 3>a really strong and sound voice in figuring that out

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 3>with us, with the whole process for us.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and just for contact, Alex Bespa said, is one

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>of the other executive producers on the show.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I didn't want to change it. I didn't want

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that didn't either, And we after we had that initial

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Donald and Alex about it, we kind of

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>digging our feet in a little bit, like being a

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>little stubborn, and we started talking about other potential titles,

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and nothing was coming up even close to that title

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in our minds, and how strong that title was. When

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I told people about the story prior to its release

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and I used that title, they said, Wow, that is

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>such an amazing title. Do not change that title to

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>get you attention. But those were very specific types of

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>people that were telling me that too. Those were people

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>that were more in line with our thinking and understanding

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>the type of story we wanted to tell. Those were

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>not people who were coming into it cold or seeing

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the title come up on their podcast feed for the

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>first time. You know, so, I think it needs context,

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and when you're making a podcast, you don't always have

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity to vibe context before people listen to it.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Right, I think from my perspective this hearing this, this

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 2>is the first time I've heard the other titles, and

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 2>option I do kind of get that there's this The

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 2>whole show is a paradox. The whole subject is a paradox.

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Your relation to it is so paradoxical. And knowing, like

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 2>you said, Doug, that Eric's continued to publish from prison,

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 2>he is this kind of champion within this specific community,

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>you may have ended up with a lot of people

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 2>very non paradoxically clicking through right and listening to the

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>show with very different like it'd be great to get

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 2>people of different viewpoints listening to it, but I could

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 2>see how that might have been one of the concerns, right,

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 2>is that the sort of I don't want to say ironic,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 2>but like slightly ironic nature that that title has, Like

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you're saying, you can't give any context around it for

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 2>that first introduction.

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think we have a lot of people listening

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that are at the end of the day, when they

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 3>get to the end, they're pissed off because a lot

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 3>of maybe assumptions or beliefs or values that they think

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 3>they need to hold on to are challenged maybe in

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 3>a way they're not comfortable with. We're getting some of

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 3>that anyways, which is fine. Another challenge, just on the

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>creative side, was if that's the title, are we giving

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 3>up the ghost here? Are we like teasing the listener

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 3>into figuring out what the reveal is right from the drop,

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 3>you know? And at the end of the day, I

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 3>don't think the reveal was really that. It was cool.

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it was I like the way we handled it,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 3>but like that's not what it's about. Getting to that

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 3>and owning the what you learned from the reveal and

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 3>then taking that with you through the story is much

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 3>more important.

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>And I do want to give Alex a lot of

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>credit too, because he is the only person that came

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>up with the title where I was willing to let

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>go of the old title because I think Flashpoint is

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>such a st title and it speaks to the show

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in so many ways. Yeah, and where we are today

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in this climate, can you talk.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 2>A little bit about where you maybe once you decided, okay,

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 2>we're doing the show, how you started that process of

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 2>research and crafting the narrative arc and whether that shifted

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 2>over time. Like, I'd love to hear about that whole

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 2>process because of all that nuance. And yeah, where it

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>begins versus where it ends up.

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, it all starts during COVID, like the peak

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of COVID. And I think it was that summer in

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty I had my first It all started with

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>an interview with my mom. It was in our basement.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I was living with my parents at the time. I

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>had just moved back from Los Angeles and was living

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at home all through COVID and we sat down and

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just I put a mic in front of her and

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked for two hours. And the bulk of what

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you hear in episode two is from that first interview

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that we did. Doug and I hadn't talked to anyone else.

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>We talked to ourselves about the type of story we

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to tell, but we hadn't talked to experts at

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this point. We hadn't talked to anyone related to the

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>story except my mom. So we started with that interview

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and we took it from there.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 2>That's amazing. Wow, all right, so she shared her story

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>with you, And then how did you go about deciding

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 2>who to interview who else? What other voices you were

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 2>going to bring into the show, because there's a lot

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 2>of them.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Doug was very good at helping me understand the Christian identity,

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the religious component to the story, and he was very

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>good at pointing me to experts that could talk about that,

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>people he's followed on Twitter for years, Substack wherever I

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>was very much focused on the crime story and finding

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>those people people connected Eric Rudoff family members.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 3>The Tenderfoot team was also really good at helping us find.

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah Eye contacts and police.

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but also one person always inevitably led to another. Yeah,

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Like we would talk to one FBI guy, they would

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 3>teach us with a GBI guy, so on and so forth.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Weird anecdote is that for a while there in twenty

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, everyone I reached out to or top to

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>died or had someone close to them pass away.

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 3>It was quite a wrong.

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I talked to GBI agent Charles Stone, who comes

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>up many times in the podcast, and I found out

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a month and a half later,

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>he passed away.

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 3>WHOA.

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I went to his house, we sat down for about

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>two and a half hours. He just had surgery, and

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I found out about six weeks later he passed away.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very fortunate to have been able to sit

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>down with him. Wow.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So was the narrative arc then sort of developed

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 2>organically or did you have a really specific from the

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 2>get go? We want to you know, start here reveal

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Cole's relationship to every like, you know, focus on the

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Olympic bombing first and then shift to the clinic and

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 2>then reveal Cole and then like, how did you actually

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 2>draft out where the show was going to go? Or

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 2>was that something that really was kind of an organic

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 2>result of all these conversations, one leading to the other.

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>When we first started the show, we wanted to save

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:31.199
<v Speaker 1>the reveal until the last act of the whole series,

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>so it would have been around episode six, and of

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>course we revealed that in episode two, and I think

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the right move because I think once people

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>understand my connection to the story, they're able to hold

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>onto my words a little harder and maybe listen a

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>little closer than they would otherwise given my connection. But

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the original outline we had certainly is not what we

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>up with. We wanted to dig into the connections, the

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff that made people angry. We wanted to dig into

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that in episode two. Of course we didn't. I think

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that was the right move because, regardless of people's viewpoints

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>or where they stand on abortion, I think most people

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>listen to all eight episodes, and that is the most

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>valuable tool we could have had in making this show.

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we initially were scripting episodes where each each episode

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 3>had sort of a tangential history piece, and little by

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 3>little it was taking you up through and it was

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 3>going through the timeline of Rudolph's life. Also, the timeline

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 3>of Leah's life and also the timeline of America's sort

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 3>of cultural maturity from you know, the sixties when he

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 3>was born, when we start our story with Goldwater, et cetera,

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 3>and jumping back and forth in time was just proved

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 3>really way too challenging. Donald and he's just he's so

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 3>he's so savvy about this stuff without having to try.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 3>He's just like, no, simplify, tell the crime story, and

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:12.159
<v Speaker 3>then break it down. So we resisted that for a minute,

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 3>and then we were like, yeah, okay, cool.

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk a little bit about this whole process

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 2>of crafting the narrative because there were so many people

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 2>that you also talked to and connected with directly, Cole.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember the name of the gentleman who you

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>talked to on the phone, but you called for the question. Yeah, yeah,

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 2>So you called him right and you told him your connection,

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 2>Derek Rudolph, and then he made all these assumptions about

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 2>your viewpoint, which is just how people are. But can

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 2>you talk a little bit about just that experience that

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>you had, maybe your internal experience around reaching out to

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 2>people who you maybe disagree with, who might have been

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 2>making assumptions based on your relationship it indirectly to Eric's actions.

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Was that experience like for you conducting interviews and how

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 2>did you kind of maintain emotional clarity and try to

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>stay a little I guess neutral and objective in those conversations.

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a great question. I think when I first

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>started reaching out to people, I wasn't getting the response

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that I would have liked because I wasn't explaining my

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>connection to this story. I was coming into it from

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a journalist doing a story on Eric Rudolf in

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>his other bombings and the subsequent manhunt. I would love

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you in silence. I quickly realized if

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I followed up and didn't bury the lead on my connection,

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>people were much more willing to talk to me because

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>they were interested. They were interested in the story. And yeah,

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think there were instances too where people came into

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it with their own set of views and they projected

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that onto me. And surely I must think this because

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of X, Y and Z, but that just wasn't the case.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>When I talked to Tom Brandham, he immediately assumed I

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>thought Eric Rudolf was, in his words, a hero that

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be further from the truth. Now, did I correct

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>him when I talked to him, No, because I was

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>looking to get an interview, and I did. I ran

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:27.679
<v Speaker 1>into that a few times. But I think that on

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the flip side of that, when I talked to certain people,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>they understood where I was coming from. And in the

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>case of talking to some of these victims, they certainly

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>would not have talked to me if they thought I

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>thought Eric Rudolf was some type of hero. For example,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Emily Lyons, we sat down for

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>three hours in Birmingham, and she gave me her entire

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>powerful story and she did ask me where I stood

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 1>on things, and I was very upfront with her from

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the start, and I think that giving her that context

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>was very important to having a very good, fruitful interview

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>with her, because otherwise I don't think she would have

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>been comfortable telling me her story if she didn't know

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>where I was coming from.

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not in the same way. I'll also add that

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 3>you said it right there. Emily asked you. Tom didn't

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 3>ask you if people. If people come into it and

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>they're curious about oh wow, that's a wild story, I

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 3>want to understand what you actually think. It's not like

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 3>Cole was cagy and didn't tell them he told him.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 3>But in the case of somebody like Tom Branham or

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Dan Gamon, just so happened with those guys that they

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 3>didn't ask. It's not like we were being coy and

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 3>hiding this stuff. But we're there to listen for the

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 3>most part. If someone asks us, we're there to answer.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 3>Certainly Cole is, but somebody doesn't ask if they're not

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 3>expressing curiosity in you, if they just want to talk

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>about themselves, that's okay.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, That is a very good point. I loved. And

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:04.879
<v Speaker 2>it's Emily's voice is the last voice that we hear

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 2>in the podcast, right. I love that. It made me

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 2>cry so good. I actually I think that I actually

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>exclaimed out loud, like yes, that's such a strong ending

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 2>hearing her. I really thought it was powerful to hear

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 2>so much of her and to bring her back in

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 2>at the end. And I'm not entirely sure how to

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 2>ask this question, but you know, she makes this point

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 2>of this being about men exerting control over women, and

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I would love to know what your perspective is on this.

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.399
<v Speaker 2>Having interviewed so many people you talk about being a

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 2>male voice telling the story, but yeah, what's your perspective

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 2>on this and how did that narrative show up in

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 2>this whole process?

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Early on, Doug and I were very aware of the

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that it was two men, three men, four men

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>telling the story, the story about women, the story about choice,

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think early on we really shied away from

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>my perspective and more we're trying to make it about

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>my mom's story. And thankfully episode two does have a

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>large part of her story. So we were always being

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>very delicate with it until one day Doug told me, no,

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this is your story. You're telling it. It's time you

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>take some authority and tell it the way you want

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell it and from your perspective. And I think

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that once we establish that, it sort of clicked for me.

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 1>But that is to say, every single part of this

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>story is about that narrative of men controlling women. Let's

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>take my mom's story. For example, my biological father, as

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>you hear in episode two, throughout that entire process, was

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>very controlling of her. He's the one who went to prison,

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>yet he expected my mother to wait around a high

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>school student, wait around until he got out of prison, right,

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and then when she did get out of prison. He

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>expected her to spend house arrest with him. That, as

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>my mom says, isn't love. That's not a relationship. That's

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not healthy. And ultimately, I do think that if it's

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a large reason of why I'm here today is because

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 1>of his control over her. I don't know if we

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>want to say it like that, but I think my

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>point came across there.

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 3>No, I think that's fair. I think that you Again,

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 3>it fits into the paradoxical nature of this story, where

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 3>the critique of patriarchal control is something that is essential

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 3>and it's baked into this, but it doesn't change the

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 3>fact that the person who's telling the story exists because

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 3>of patriarchal control. Patriot like an approach to inflicting your views,

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Eric Rudolf inflicting his views of the world on everyone else,

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 3>and they are very misogynistic and male and racist and

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 3>white supremacist, et cetera. Again, I think it's it's a

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 3>tricky wicket, but it's nonetheless it fits with the rest

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 3>of the story we're telling. And so yeah, we were

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 3>extremely deferential to whether it was Leah or any of

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 3>the other women whose stories we were trying to tell

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.239
<v Speaker 3>until it got to the point where it was it

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 3>became clear that there had to be a framing device

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 3>for all of that, and it had to be our host,

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 3>and it is his story. Like be clear that that

0:27:53.560 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 3>men controlling women is straight fuckery. Yet own the fact

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 3>that you're here telling your story.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 2>You all had a very challenging task ahead of you

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 2>to You're not remaining neutral, right, but like you're poking,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 2>like you said, the things that make people upset, but

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 2>you're also attempting not to alienate everybody, you know, And

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 2>that's a really important thing to try to do. And

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I appreciate that that's what you're you know.

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 1>The good news is, I think both Doug and I

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>both have experience in not alienating people. I mean, whether

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>it's our families, our friends, We are around and interact

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with people who don't hold our set of beliefs right

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and so constantly, and those people are also listening to

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>our show. And I think and I hope the fact

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that we were able to hold listeners for so long

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and to have them hear what we have to say. Sure,

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to make people upset. We understood that coming in.

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But I do hope that people take something from the

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 1>show that they didn't expect, and that's where the paradox

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>comes in.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 2>So who do you think really needs to listen to

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 2>this podcast?

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm I'm sure there's a preaching to the

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 3>choir component of this that isn't who needs to listen,

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 3>But I think that's I'd like to think that those

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 3>people listen and recognize that maybe we got some things right.

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 3>But I also think there's a component of people that

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 3>they maybe aren't quite keen to some of the undercurrents.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Like we talk about the murmurations and how movements happen,

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 3>and movements always have like a fringe, and a murmuration

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 3>has outliers and fringes that are pulling it. That's what

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 3>gives the thing shape, right, is that the outliers are

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 3>pulling out, sometimes even separating and coming back in those

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 3>sorts of fringes, and a movement are and I'm not

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 3>saying it's they're created with Machavelian and tent, but they are.

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 3>They exist in a way that makes it a whole

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 3>lot easier to ignore some of the ify stuff because

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 3>while there's a really extreme person over there that's doing

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 3>stuff that I would never subscribe to that. I would

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 3>never recommend bombing an abortion clinic. No, no, right, but

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 3>some of the stuff you are doing, if that person

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 3>weren't there, it might be a little on the edge.

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think that that in political speak, it's called

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 3>moving the Overton window. That also is kind of that

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 3>drama being beat so loudly it's become boring. But I

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 3>think there's a lot of people that consider themselves very

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 3>moderate that maybe don't realize how things are being nudged around,

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 3>like maybe the ground they're standing on. I'd like those

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 3>people to potentially hear this and at least say it's

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 3>food for thought.

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I will chime in and say since episode one,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>two three four, the first part of this release, I've

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>had people reach out to me who I know where

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they stand politically, belief set, and they just thought it

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was amazing, you know, is the word they would use.

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't wait to hear more. They thought my perspective

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>was so interesting and unique. But I do think that

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they thought I was going a certain way with it,

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's been the case with a lot of people

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in my life. Is like, who I know lean or

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>are fully blown on that end of the spectrum. They'll

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to the first few, take one thing from it,

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and then we go a different direction, and they feel,

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess, a bit isolated by that when they shouldn't.

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think naturally that's just where we are today.

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's possible for people to hear certain

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>words in a sequence and not take that as the

0:31:58.600 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the world.

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 3>It's hard not to be defensive. That's again something that

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 3>we're trying to do here. Is like, even if somebody

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 3>may listen to this and feel like there's a lot

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 3>of finger wagging, there's some I guess, but I hope

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 3>that's not the point. But it's really hard not to

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 3>be defensive. It's really hard to hear criticism. That just

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 3>is always the case. It doesn't matter who you are,

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 3>how righteous or humble you may be. It's just it's

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 3>a difficult thing to take. And so even if you're

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 3>not even being criticized, if you feel like you're being criticized,

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 3>it's just hard. Right, nobody said being human was easy.

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Let'st I check.

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 2>So what do you hope people will gain from this show?

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's what we've been talking about. I think

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it's more than anything. Perspective that my story in my

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>mom's story is not the rule is not should not

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>be taken at face value. My mother had a lot

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of help. She had a lot of support financially, emotionally.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>If it were any other situation, I would not have

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>turned out the way I am. And with that comes privilege,

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and I recognized that privilege, and I think for that

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>for that reason, that is why choice must exist. And

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>also I think we're giving too much power sometimes to

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Eric Rudolph because my mom could have gone to a

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>different abortion clinic, right, she could have still carried out

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the procedure, but she didn't. But that was a choice.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, that was still a

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>choice that she made.

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 3>The world your mom grew up in afforded her a

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 3>choice and we say this and allowed her to get

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 3>her arms around her moment. Without that choice, who knows

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 3>what she would have done. Honestly, who knows what she

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 3>would have done. People do crazy stuff when they're in

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 3>situations like that. But it's like that idea of arguing

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 3>with someone whose argument is to take your argument is

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 3>to take the ability or the platform to argue away

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.760
<v Speaker 3>from you, Like you have to just afford that much.

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think my takeaway that I would hope for

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 3>is probably I came into this different from Cole. Cole

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 3>really wanted to have a conversation about abortion and I

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 3>wanted to have a conversation about the culture. They're not unrelated.

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 3>But that's what I'd like to see, is just a

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 3>more serious conversation about the culture instead of just like

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 3>this tribal screaming match.

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 2>When you say the culture, can you just expand clarifying?

0:34:48.719 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, about so the political dynamics in play and how

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of seeped into every every decision of our lives,

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the way in which we present ourselves to the world,

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 3>Like it's all gotten a little bit infected by that,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 3>and I think that that's inevitable.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Yet the way that we deal with it isn't.

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to think that there can be a conversation

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 3>that's not pedantic or like trying to prove each other wrong,

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 3>but rather if I may get really sacaraing and go

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 3>ted lasso, just being curious, there's something to that that

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I can appreciate.

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, there's a different I don't remember when you're

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 2>engaged in curiosity, Like there's a different part of your

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 2>brain that's activated than when you're engaged in a debate. Right, Like,

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 2>being able to actually be in that space allows you

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 2>to kind of depersonalize a little bit. I think it's

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 2>like the science mind. You know, if you're researching and

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 2>you're looking for a specific answer, you're going to find

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 2>that specific answer to fit your hypothesis. If you're just

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 2>openly exploring something and you're listening in a more neutral place,

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 2>there's an infinite number of possibilities that can come out

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of that, right that probably aren't going to match that

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 2>hypothesis that you may have set up for yourself.

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Right. Cole's story is a good example of that. The

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 3>example of people hearing his story and making certain assumptions

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 3>about him is perfectly fine, But the fact of the

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 3>matter is he, in order to end up where he

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 3>ended up, necessarily had to not personalize it.

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I think being able for me, being able to talk

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to everyone on every end of the spectrum in this

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>entire show was incredibly valuable. And also to be able

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to sit in a room with someone like Emily Lyons

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>where the actions of one man in a way saved

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>my life but destroyed hers. That's pretty powerful. And to

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to talk to her about that and for

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 1>her to love me and for me to love her

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>is what mys And to be able to have a

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation about that and to be able to hold our

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>contradictory truths at the same time, that's powerful.

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think sharing that is the best we can do.

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 3>I'd like you, I can't I can't expect or even

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.400
<v Speaker 3>attempt to have someone else in habit Cole's experience of that,

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 3>but sharing it, you'd hope that people would open up

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 3>about the possibility of having a real conversation without you know,

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 3>blowing shit up.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:39.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you for the conversation. It was really great

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to connect and I again really appreciate the work you

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 2>did on the show and the conversation that it's hopefully

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 2>will open up just one on one with people, if

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 2>we get folks talking about some of these things in

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>a more interpersonal, nuanced way, like great, amazing and I

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate you taking the time today. So thank you, Yeah,

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 2>thank you.

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Thanks for listening to this episode of Flashpoint.

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>This series is released weekly absolutely free, but for ad

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 1>free listening, early access and exclusive bonuses, you can subscribe

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to tenderfoot Plus on Apple Podcasts, or at tenderfootplus dot

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>com