WEBVTT - The Fed, Big Tech Earnings, Apple, and Barbie (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn to economics because we've got a lot of

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>eco data this week. We've got a lot of central

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>banks meeting around the globe. I think the Bank of Japan,

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the ECB coming this week, along with the US Bank

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of England next week. So a lot to chew on

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>there from the central bank perspective. Let's break it down

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>with Liz McCormick, chief correspondent of Global macro Markets at

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, and Michael McKee, international Economics and Policy correspondent

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg News, who joins us here in studio. Mike,

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>just want to start with you. We had the the

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>PMIS come out. I don't they didn't look that good

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what do you.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Know, I'm manufacturing service. The composite PMI slowed from last month.

0:00:57.600 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>What do you reading to these types of numbers.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, the economy is slowing, which we expected. The question

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 4>is how fast does it slow. The Bloomberg most recent

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Economic survey that just came out last Friday, suggests

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 4>that economists think that the US economy is going to

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 4>fall off cliff starting in this quarter, but that includes July,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 4>and that's not kind of what the story the data

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 4>are telling at this point. Now you look at a

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 4>number that's forty nine for manufacturing, the PMI is not

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 4>a great number. It's below the level in theory that

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 4>is break even. But we still see services above healthily

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 4>above fifty, and composite above fifty. So things have slowed down,

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 4>but they don't seem to match up with what people

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 4>are expecting to happen.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you're a glass half full type of person.

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm wait until the waitress comes around.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 5>Fill it up again.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>We got GDP numbers on Thursday, and we get the

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 4>latest spending numbers on Friday, so we'll have a much

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 4>better view by Friday of where the economy is. Unfortunately,

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 4>for the Fed, they're meeting Wednesday.

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 6>Well, speaking of that optimism, I wonder Liz, if you

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 6>can talk us through this Nirvana scenario that we're hearing about, and.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 7>Is that what we're gonna see?

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know I love ed Yar Denny, but Nirvana

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.119
<v Speaker 8>we all wanted show.

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 3>That's great.

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, well, I mean clearly there is some like

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 8>Mike just said, some of the dire predictions many thought

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 8>we might be in a recession already haven't panned out.

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 8>So the market is kind of kind of more so

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 8>saying hey, there's a possibility we could get through this.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 8>I mean, we've got five hundred basis points of tightening already.

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 8>FED says they're going to do some more markets pricing

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 8>in a little that could we have this you know,

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 8>I call it the nebulous soft landing on that possibly

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 8>the market is pricing in some easy next year, but

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 8>the FED could ease a bit even if we're not

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 8>in a recession, just to get things better in line

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.079
<v Speaker 8>to normalize policy. So I would say there's still kind

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 8>of a camps out there hard landing policy mistake from

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 8>the FED is coming. They should have stopped to the

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 8>h Maybe they'll pull this off kind of thing, and

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, we'll have to talk in maybe six months

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 8>in a year.

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 3>See it was right right.

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>All right, So Michael, you're the international guy here. Bank

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of Japan this week, ECB this week, Bank of England

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>next week. How does a market look at some of

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>these other international national banks visa v what kind of

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what the FED does?

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Don't forget the Bank of Ghana which raised rates today.

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh good to know to thirty percent.

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Inflation is running at forty two and a half percent

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 4>a year there, so they're a little bit above that

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 4>two percent target. Yeah, But the FED is driving everything

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 4>in the sense that we are the by far biggest economy,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 4>and it's the most influential central bank, and it is

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 4>where the US rate settles, is what drives currency trading.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 4>So everybody's watching that, and then they'll be perhaps more

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 4>eyes on. At this point the ECB, they're in the

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 4>sort of same situation as the Fed. Christine and the

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Guard has to and company have to decide whether they're

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 4>one and done. They're going to do one more and

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 4>then they will hold and wait and see what happens,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 4>or do they promise to do a series of rate

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 4>hikes still because they're still concerned about where inflation is

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 4>the Bank of Japan, the consensus is that a huge

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 4>change is coming the end of yield curve control, but

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>not now, so it's a question of when do they

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 4>get there. What'll be interesting with the Bank of Japan

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 4>is to see what their economic forecasts are, because the

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 4>reporting from Bloomberg is that what we're going to see

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 4>is a big increase in the Bank of Japan's inflation outlook.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 4>They're going to raise their inflation view, which is kind

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 4>of the opposite of what the other central banks want

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 4>to do, but it's what the Bank of Japan wants

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>to see happen.

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 6>So as we head into this kind of triple header

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 6>of central banks, which do you think we'll learn the

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.679
<v Speaker 6>most from in terms of where we're heading.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, it depends, And this is a good question for

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>Liz because it's a it's a matter of interpretation. What

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 4>everybody wants to know from the FED and the ECB

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 4>is what next and how specific are they going to

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 4>be about what next? Whereas the Bank of Japan is

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 4>not going to really do anything and probably won't say

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 4>a whole lot, but if they do raise their inflation

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 4>forecasts a lot, that's going to set up a lot

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 4>to talk about what do they do next, how much closer.

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Are we to the end of your curve control?

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So, Liz, again, what's kind of the market. Does the

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>market feel like this Federal Reserve is still behind the curve?

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean when you look at the trading week, the week, month,

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>the month here, it's felt like for a long time

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the market wasn't listening to the Fed.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think, well, I think the market has kind

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 8>of thought the Fed was behind a curve on both ends.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 8>Obviously late to the party to realize inflation wasn't transitory,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 8>so they were slow to tight and slow to stop

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 8>their quantitative easing. And then there are some who feel

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 8>like Fed is going too far, like the market is

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 8>only priced for one more quarter point hike. We know

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.840
<v Speaker 8>the Fed's dots have said two. It'd be interesting to

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 8>see if Chairman Powell, which he's been really you know,

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 8>kind of doubling down and saying to whoever he talks

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 8>to Congress, whomever, there's two more hikes coming. That's what

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 8>a lot of our officials are signaling.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.119
<v Speaker 7>Does he tone that down a little.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 8>I think he clearly doesn't want to, just like Christine Legard,

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 8>like Mike was saying, they don't want to kind of

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 8>gin up animal spirits too much to say we were done,

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 8>we've won the battle, because they're pivotal, you know, at

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 8>not a key inflection point, but getting there.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 5>But inflation is above both.

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 8>Their targets, right, So maybe somebody called it endgame communication, like,

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 8>you know, how far are we How do we kind

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 8>of gingerly get us into even if it's higher for

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 8>longer that they get to wherever and they stay there

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 8>for a while. That's the next thing. But I think

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 8>that's what they're trying to say. We're getting closer, maybe

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 8>more work to do, but we're not for sure done.

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 8>They don't want to signal that, and I think that's

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 8>why the market is in price for two hikes.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 4>When you said does the market think the FED is

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 4>still behind the curve? I was thinking, well, it depends

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 4>on what day of the week it.

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 6>Is, right exactly. Well, and it's such a great point

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 6>that they were too late to the party and now

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 6>people think they're too late to leave. It sounds like, Liz,

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 6>based on what we were saying with Mike earlier about

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 6>this triple header this week, what are you going to

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 6>be looking at the most?

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, I probably since I live here, have to say

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 8>the Fed, because I mean like they do move all boats.

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean for a while, like Edna Current and I

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 8>were talking the other day, for a while we all

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 8>thought maybe boj is right the most exciting this week,

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 8>and then we had that great reporting from our folks

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 8>saying not this time. Like Mike said, that's like a

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 8>waiting on GOODO. We keep thinking that you'll curve control, change,

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 8>tweak whatever is coming. So I really think it's the Fed.

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 8>You know, how do they signal? Does is there a

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 8>way they can you know, get the market to price

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.559
<v Speaker 8>up a little bit? I think, you know, Pow wants

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 8>as much optionality, but this bond market really kind of

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 8>wants to rally.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 3>So we'll see how.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 7>He does with that.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And Michael, just for our friends who maybe don't have

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a good understanding of kind of inflation in Europe, why

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is it so much worse there? It seems like even

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>though everybody's over there traveling, you know, that's.

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's based on a few different things.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Especially energy has been an issue there, and their indexes

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 4>are constructed a little bit differently from ours, so they're

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 4>not directly comparable, but they do show the problems that

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 4>we've had and they have had much bigger rate increases

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 4>with some of the pattern barketing they have that people

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 4>are worried about. But can it come down fast? Well,

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 4>inflation's coming, I mean energy prices are coming down. So

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 4>as long as that happens, inflation should come down. And

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 4>when you look at the PMI to take us back

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 4>to where we started for Germany thirty eighty for manufacturing,

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 4>that suggests you're going to see some price pressures.

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 9>Ease.

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, great stuff, great having you both in here. I

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>looked up and Liz was right there. I was expecting zoom,

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but Liz was right there. LIZI McCormick, chief correspondent of

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Global macro Markets with Bloomberg News, and Michael McKee, International

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Economics and Policy correspondent, both the Bloomberg News, joining us

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>both here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. And on Monday,

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I mean usual on a Monday, you

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>get the Bloomberg salespeople because they have their big morning

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>media on Monday, so all the kids are and you

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>get us and we get some of the economists.

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 3>And that's how it works.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Like Liz is doing an incredible Q and A session.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 6>I think tomorrow today I'm.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Going to be front row.

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:53.359
<v Speaker 6>I can't wait for all internally, ask me anything.

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Liz McCormick and the benefit of her experience.

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 10>You're listening to the team.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 9>Ken's are lying Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 9>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 9>Business App, or listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Madison Mills, Paul Sweeney here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Big big earnings week, technology coming in to focus. I'm

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>talking Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, a bunch of others, and I

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you what these com be is better delivered. Nastac

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is up about thirty four percent just a year to date.

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So anticipation in the market for really strong performance. It's

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>see if they can deliver. Dan Ives.

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 3>He always delivers.

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Dan Ives as managing director and senior equities analysts for

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>web Bush Security.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 3>So Dan, a big week for tech. What do you expect.

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 11>I think it's get out the popcorn. I mean, in

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 11>my opinion, we're going to see an uptick and it spend.

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 11>I think Cloud's going to be strong from the likes

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 11>of the behemoths Microsoft as well as Alphabet and I

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 11>think it's all about AI spend. We're starting to see

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 11>monizations sooner arrive than later. I mean, Paul in my opinion,

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 11>Bright green Light, Dome and Tech I think up twelve

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 11>to fifteen percent second half of the year.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 6>Wow, Dan, how much are you going to be looking

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 6>at capital allocation when it comes to overall it spend

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 6>companies that are portioning off a larger chunk of that pie,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 6>specifically to AI. And are there any companies that could

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 6>be hurt or dinged because of that allocation?

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's a great question. That's why right now the

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 11>trophy case at the top of the mountain is in Redmond.

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 11>I mean, if you look with Nadella and the team

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 11>have done, I mean they are in pole position to

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 11>gain more and more share budget. We believe next year

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.439
<v Speaker 11>we're hearing eight to ten percent a budget to AI

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 11>driven this year less than one percent. And that's that's

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 11>the drum roll, that's the super Bowl what everyone's waiting for.

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 11>The actual quarters are almost the backstory to really the

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 11>forecast and the outlook going into next year.

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>How about the companies that rely upon digital advertising, Dan,

0:11:56.720 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of been, you know, a wobbly business even

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, even amongst all the other key growth drivers

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in technology. So we're talking about Meta and you know

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Alphabet that really rely up on digital advertising.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 3>How is that's looking right now?

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 11>I mean we're seeing upticks. I think stabilization is going

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 11>to be the sort of word that we hear from Meta,

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 11>from Alphabet, and you combine it all, we're starting to

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 11>now see a less cautious spending environment. They'll be you know,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 11>probably toned in terms of how they talk about things

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 11>over the coming quarters. But I think digital advertising we're

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 11>seeing stabilization, cloud and uptick and overall it spint I

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 11>think you saw that from Arvin and IBM. I view

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 11>this as sort of a table pounder of view into

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 11>tech this week. I do not view the reactions of

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 11>Netflix and Tassa as a brahma for what we're going

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 11>to see this week. That's why, in my opinion, getting

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 11>the popcorn ready, and I believe it will be a

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 11>strong week for tech.

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so if it's not Netflix and Tesla, Dan, what

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 6>is the bell weather that you've looked into to indicate

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 6>how happy you're gonna be able to be this week.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 11>It's tomorrow night. When you look at Alphabet, you look

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 11>at Microsoft. That's that's the key. That's that's the messy

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 11>moment for earnings for tech because of what we ultimately

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 11>see in cloud, in digital advertising, and if you look

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 11>going back to the Nvidio guidance heard around the world

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 11>the last quarter, Now we start to see the optics

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 11>in spend in terms of the forecast, no better. Everyone

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 11>will be listening to Nadella and Microsoft's called that is

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 11>going to be the one that they not just tech,

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 11>but all the street's going to be focused on to

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 11>see what we're seeing monization of cloud. We think a

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 11>trillion dollars incremental spend next decade.

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Dan, you know the Nvidia results.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the last quarter that just really

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>shook the market, reset the market, woke up people like

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>me who really wasn't paying attention to this AI thing.

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>How much of the AI budget over the next several

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>years do you think it's going to be incremental tech

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>spending or maybe just taken it from all the parts

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of the stack.

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 11>Why we think about thirty to forty percent incremental. The

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 11>rest will be taking from the stack. That's why the ciscos.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 11>You could argue the intels, maybe the hp is obviously

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 11>will back in so on the hardware side. But I

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 11>think it's incremental because in our opinion, it's a nineteen

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 11>ninety five moment. It's an Internet moment. Companies are actually

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 11>changing their view of spend and two letters have all

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 11>changed in terms of AI and that's why, unless you

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 11>have a telescope, you're not seeing a recession out there.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 11>And I think that's gonna be innarratable here in the

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 11>next week or two.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 6>So if it is ninety five all over again, how

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 6>are you not worried about a bubble?

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 12>Dan?

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, first off, I think if you look at the

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 11>actual evaluations, it's we're not talking pets dot com movement.

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 11>In other words, these are now the star wards that

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 11>ultimately I view. When I look at Microsoft, I could

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 11>argue this is a three and a half four trillion

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 11>dollar company in next two to three years. I think

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 11>the difference when you go back to the bubble ninety

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 11>nine two thousand, I mean a lot of that was hype.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 11>This is different because the fundamental and the real business

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 11>cases are there. I'm not saying, oh, there's not gonna

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 11>be fraud from losers that fall by the wayside. But

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 11>I believe this is an AI gold rush. It's real.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 11>And then's why this week I think the Bears go

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 11>back into their hibernation mode after how little win last

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 11>week to what's been a brutal six months for him.

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey Dan, in the context of this AI discussion, it's

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>going to accelerate once again this week with these earnings.

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>How does Apple fit into an AI discussion.

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 11>I mean, they're not gonna be on the outside looking in,

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 11>and we've talked about them. I mean, they're spending almost

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 11>the equivalent of what Microsoft did with Open Ai in

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 11>turn on on AI. This is all the drum all

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 11>to what I believe. I'm in German's hand, had a

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 11>bit to their They're gonna roll out AI within their ecosystem.

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 11>I ultimately believe it's an AI app store for Apple,

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 11>which I believe could add thirty to forty dollars per share.

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 11>And again Cook continues to play chess while others are

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 11>at the kids table playing checkers.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 6>Wait, say more about the AI app store.

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 11>What are you anticipating a separate app store that's gonna

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 11>be AI driven developers? I believe it started off with

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 11>Vision pro in terms of, you know, actually building a

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 11>separate almost app store. It's gonna be AI driven health, fitness,

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 11>AI apps will be in that app store, and that

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 11>for Apple, that's just gonna be a whole nother opportunity

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 11>to further penetrate the base that has an unparalleled install base.

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 11>And I believe right now the valuation is not reflecting

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 11>what I'll call AI multiple and that's why I believe

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 11>this is a four trillion dollars markap by twenty twenty five.

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 6>Dan, you mentioned the headset, and this earnings call is

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 6>gonna be the first time folks have the opportunity to

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 6>ask Apple about that headset. Do you think they're gonna

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 6>get killed for invent staying in a headset when people

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 6>have moved on to focusing on AI.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 11>Because ultimately is not about the headset. Because my view

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 11>is that this is really just the start ar v

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 11>R to what ultimately is going to be the next

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 11>vision around AI, and that's going to be integrated more

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 11>and more within that ecosystem for Apple, and I think

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 11>ultimately investors who are focused more on iPhone fifteen, we

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 11>think ultimately units are going to be higher and this

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 11>is a mini super cycle. That's the long game right now.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 11>It's all about developers build out for what I view

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 11>is sort of the next evolution of the Coupertino ecosystem.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Dan, I just want to talk Tesla for just

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a moment because Bloomberg News Stephan and Nicola is out

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>with a great story saying Tesla is lapping Germany's automakers

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in the global ev race. And so you know, we

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>heard from all the big German manufacturers over the last

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 1>several years how they're going all in on EI. But

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Tesla delivered almost eight hundred and ninety thousand cars in

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the year. That's more electric vehicles

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes or Porsche combined.

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 3>So how do you think.

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>About Tesla and just kind of their competitive position as

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody else tries to ramp up.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's Tesla's world, everyone else paying rent. If

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 11>you look at electric vehicles and from a scaling scope perspective,

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 11>battery technology, super charger, and I ultimately believe the FSDAI.

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 11>That's why I think last week you got the knee

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 11>jerk sell off after just a parabolic move this year.

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 11>I think this is still early to middle innings of

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 11>the broader Tesla story build out and this ev green title,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 11>the five trillion dollars green title. There's been many winners.

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 11>The three win three are Code GM four, the European

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 11>players at the China players. But ultimately, if you look

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 11>the biggest beneficiary is gonna be muscling us really quickly.

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 6>Dan, are you team Twitter formerly or now x formerly

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 6>to Twitter? Or team threads?

0:18:58.600 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 10>Oh?

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 11>I stayed Twitter, and again I go back to thread?

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.840
<v Speaker 11>Did rathery broccoli from the full data the trench?

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Very good?

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Dan, conviction of nothing else. Dan I

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>was managing director and senior equity analyst at Webbush Securities.

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate getting that roundup on Tech is again a big,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>big earnings week here for a lot of industries and

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>most notably tech and is the biggest sector in the SMP.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the tape cats are live program Bloomberg

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 9>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 9>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 10>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 9>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 9>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 13>Let's talk about some of the industrial companies and because

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 13>they're reporting numbers today, but you know, I looked at

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 13>the PMIS today for the manufacturing PMI came in at

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 13>forty six point two.

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not good on the number fronts. A. It's below fifty,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>suggesting contraction, and it was blowed the concent of forty

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>nine and it was below just kind of in line

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>with last.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Month forty six point three.

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But I want to start there and then we'll branch

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>out to some of the manufacturing companies that are reporting

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>later this week. Brook Sutherland joins us. She covers all

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of that industrial stuff for Bloomberg Opinion, and she joins

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>us here on our Bloomberg.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Interactive Broker Studio. So, Brooke, what did you think when you.

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Saw the manufacturing PMI today. I mean, it's a it's

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a manufacturing recession. Is that kind of what we're dealing with?

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 12>I mean, this is a continuation of a trend where

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 12>we have seen numbers from the PMI that have been

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 12>indicating a contraction in manufacturing activity. I think the question

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 12>is there's a bit of a diversience between those numbers

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 12>and what we're hearing from the industrial companies which are

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 12>still very bullish on the demand that they're seeing. They,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 12>you know, are talking a lot about sort of structural

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 12>tailwinds that will keep people buying industrial equipment for the

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 12>foreseeable future. Those include electrification of everything, the sort of

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 12>wave of factory investments that we've seen in semiconductors, electric

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 12>vehicle and other types of manufacturing. And I think the

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 12>question for investors is, you know, whether this slowdown that

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 12>we're seeing just reflects a normalization of supply chains because

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 12>you had a lot of people that were over ordering

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 12>just to get their place in line and to make

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 12>sure that they could get some kind of components coming

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 12>in the door, and whether we may be just seeing

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 12>the other end of that or if we're seeing a

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 12>real demand slow down. And I don't think investors have

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.199
<v Speaker 12>made up their minds, And I think it depends on

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 12>which company is reporting. Honestly, the way in which people

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 12>view their order numbers.

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 6>It feels like three M is the name to watch

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 6>this week. Is that what you would say?

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 9>Sure?

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 12>I mean, it depends on what you're looking for. We've

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 12>got just about every industrial company reporting earnings this week,

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 12>so three m is interesting. You know, I don't really

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 12>view them that they used to be an industrial bell Weather.

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 12>I don't really think of them as that anymore, just

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 12>because they have so many idiosyncratic problems, including pfast liabilities.

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 12>They have an ongoing legal issue with combat earplugs that

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 12>they sold to the US military that veterans are claiming

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 12>we're defective, and so, you know, they have a variety

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 12>of issues that you know, investors will be looking for

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 12>updates on. But they do still have their industrial businesses

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 12>and it will be interesting to see what's happening there.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 12>These tend to be early cycle businesses and so they

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 12>tend to be on the front lines of economic swing.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 12>So if we are seeing a slowdown, you would see

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 12>it hit there first before some of the longer cycle

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 12>businesses like aircraft engines or wind turbines or things like that.

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 3>This is a Tom Keane kind of trivia question. What

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 3>does three AM stand for? You know, I don't know

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 3>that Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing. John Tucker knows that.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, it used to be.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 5>They officially changed the name the three AM two to

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 5>three AM.

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but based in Saint Paul, Minnesota. Saint Paul is

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a great Town by the way. I love Saint Paul,

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a great hotel that I can't think of the name.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>But the stock has been brutal trailing, you know, over

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the last five years, compounded annual decline of about nine

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>percent versus the S and P five rounded up up

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>almost twelve percent.

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 3>So that's just a brutal name.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And what's just I mean, it's a fifty eight billion

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar market cap company.

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.119
<v Speaker 3>What's the problem with those guys? What's the story?

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 12>You know? And it's you have to somewhat feel bad

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 12>for the current management team because the issues largely do

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 12>not have to do with decisions that they made. They

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 12>have to do with the way in which three M

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 12>was managed, you know, decades ago. So the company is

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 12>a legacy manufacturer of p fasts, which are known as

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 12>forever chemicals because they linger in the environment and in

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 12>the body. They've faced numerous legal challenges over p fast

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 12>and the uncertainty of what happens there has been a

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 12>big drag on the stock. And then, as I mentioned,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 12>there's also the military plugs issue, which was the last

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 12>thing that the company needed but remains unresolved. And you know,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 12>we're talking about estimates in the range of several billion

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 12>dollars to try to settle that alone, before you even

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 12>start talking about p fasts.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>All right, three m Minnesota Mining Manufacturing went public. Just

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>some trivia and get on the Bloomberg terminal with the

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>dees function October first, nineteen seventy eight.

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Who took them public?

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Kid Or Peabody, which was an awesome firm back in

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the day, some of the best bankers, best analyst, great

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>m and a practice, really good stuff. All right, ge,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of still consider them a belt, whether I don't.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not the belt, whether they used to be.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 3>What are you looking for here? From ge? What's the

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 3>What are investors going to be looking for?

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 12>Sure? I mean, well, they're a significantly simpler company they

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 12>used to be from back in the Kidder Peabody days.

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 12>But they so they've already spent off their healthcare business,

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 12>and then they are speeding toward eventually spinning off their

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 12>energy businesses, and so that includes their gas turbines but

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 12>also their wind turbine business and some other myriad assets

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 12>that get kind of grouped with that. And once they're

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 12>done with that, they will essentially be an aviation company,

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 12>and investors are already treating the stock as if you

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 12>know that spin off is a good done deal, and

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 12>I think it's just a simpler story and people are

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 12>better able to focus on that core aerospace business and

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 12>the growth opportunities there.

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 3>Broke.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 6>One of the fantastic stories that you have for us

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 6>on Bloomberger Opinion recently is about ties to China for

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 6>some of these names, and you specifically talk about Chinese

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 6>ownership of Sirrus Aircraft. I believe can you talk to

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 6>me about how the China story is impacting some of

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 6>the names that you cover.

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 12>Sure, I mean, I think it is a big issue,

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 12>and I think the current environment is a minefield for CEOs,

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 12>even those who have had long standing relationships with Chinese entities.

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 12>And so Sirus makes private planes. These are more like

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 12>hobby aircraft or used for charter flights, that sort of thing.

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 12>And they were acquired by a subsidiary of a Chinese

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 12>company in twenty eleven. Before that, they were owned by

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 12>a Bahrain investment arm of a bank there, and so

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 12>they've been under foreign control for a very long time.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 12>But the company is getting more scrutiny. I filed to

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 12>go public in Hong Kong in June, and that's just

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 12>drawing attention to the fact that it is in fact

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 12>owned by a subsidiary of a Chinese entity that is

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 12>subject to sanctions. And you're seeing this happen in all

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 12>types of industrial businesses where long standing relationships are coming

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 12>under fresh scrutiny. There was also a report in the

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 12>Wall Street Journal earlier this year about a Rockwell Automation

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 12>software development center in China and whether that might pose

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 12>some sort of national security risk. And I really think

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.719
<v Speaker 12>to operate in China, if you are an industrial company,

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 12>you need to have a siloed enterprise there, and a

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 12>number of companies have already taken efforts to set this up.

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 12>Emerson sources ninety six percent but its components for its

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 12>Chinese products within that region that with the rest coming

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 12>from other East Asian countries. It doesn't run that business

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 12>with expaths. It uses all local employees primarily, and I

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 12>think you're just going to see more and more of that.

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So when we talk to the industrial companies that you

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>do all the time about China, is it central to

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>their future as either a source of raw materials or

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>an end market for consumers? How do they view China

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>over the next five to ten years.

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 12>Sure, I mean I think they're carefully Yeah, that's given

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 12>what a political issue it is. But it's a very

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 12>important market for these companies. It's the reason why they're

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 12>there in the first place. And so, you know, one

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 12>of the interesting things about Cyrus, the private aircraft maker,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 12>is that, you know, the entity that owns it has

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 12>joint ventures with just about every aerospace company under the sun,

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.959
<v Speaker 12>and most of them are focused on the development of

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 12>the C nine one nine, which is the Comac challenger

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 12>to the Boeing seven thirty seven max in the Airbus

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 12>A three twenty. And the reason why those US companies

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 12>have those ventures is because they want to compete for

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 12>this business that you know, if this is sort of

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 12>the future of China aviation, it's an important place for

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 12>these companies to be.

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brooke great stuff has always Brooke Suther then

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>she's a columnist covering industrials and deals for Bloomberg Opinion.

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Appreciate gatting a few minutes of your time.

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the Team Can't Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 9>weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 10>On Bloomberg dot Com.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:55.120
<v Speaker 9>The iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app or listen

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 9>on demand wherever you get your podcast.

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's check in with somebody who really does

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>this stock stuff for a living. She's been doing it

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>for a while now, she's got some experience. And Maletti,

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>head of Active Equity at all Spring Global Investments in

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>what town here and thanks so much for joining us here.

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>We're getting into the teeth of the earning cycle here.

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>What have you seen and heard so far and what

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are you looking forward to going forward to a big

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>tech week of earnings.

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 14>It has been a big tech week. Nice and nice

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 14>to talk to you again, Paul. Look, so far, earning

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 14>for the most part have been pretty strong. But I

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 14>think what our teams are looking at is what does

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 14>the tail and the burning season look like? And I

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 14>think we'll see some volatility this earning season. I think

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 14>that was somewhat expected by most investors. You do generally

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 14>see some softness this quarter, and that's what we're expecting

0:28:55.720 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 14>to see. But you know, from what we expect it

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 14>all year. There will be differences from the bottom up

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 14>company by company, and that's why we think it's a

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 14>great environment to look at companies specifically and not just

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 14>you know, pick a sector, pick an industry, pick growth,

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 14>pick value. It's time for individual company selection right now.

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 6>So and what is the market going to move on

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 6>more this week? The FED decision or some of these

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 6>check earnings.

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 14>That is a great that's a great question. I do

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 14>think it's not going to be on the side decision itself.

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.239
<v Speaker 14>I think we all really do believe. And there's kind

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 14>of because Hass's opinion that we're going to get that

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 14>twenty five basis point increase. But I do think what,

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 14>you know, what we don't know is if we're going

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 14>to get the interpretation of a hawkish tone or a

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 14>dubvish tone from Chairman Powell. And that is the million

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 14>dollar question out there. You know, I guess I'm in

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 14>the camp that he's still going to continue to be

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 14>a little bit more hawkish. And you know, even though

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 14>we have seen some signs of weakness in the economy,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 14>the jobs data and the employment data continues to be

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 14>pretty strong. And that's going to continue to make can

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 14>fairly cautious and want to give them optionality that we

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 14>may not be done or that the FED may not

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 14>be done raising rates. And so I think the market's

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 14>going to move a little bit more on that than

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 14>on tech.

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Brames, he and you and I have known each other

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for a while, so will not surprise you to know

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that I missed out on owning those big seven magnificent

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>seven names. So now I got some work to do

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for the remainder of the year.

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Do I look it?

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe some smaller MidCap names. I mean that acquires a

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit more homework on my part. But is that

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>where you think some opportunities might be.

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 14>I'm Paul, you know probably put me in the same camp.

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 14>I do think there is a really good opportunity for

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 14>investors out there, and you know, I think this is

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 14>this is something that we've been focused on a lot,

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 14>because for investors who want to invest more broadly, who

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 14>want to stay in the market regardless of what the

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 14>economy is doing, and by the way, history would suggest

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 14>that is the right thing to do. If the market

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 14>broadens out, and it should, there are real opportunities downcaps.

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 14>And if you just look at the fundamentals, what Paul,

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 14>you spent a lot of time doing, and I spent

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 14>a lot of my career doing. Free cash flow is

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 14>a really good metric of qualities. And if you look

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 14>at the free cash flow margins and the highest quintile

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 14>of free cash Dolow margins in those smaller cap names,

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 14>they're trading at a twenty percent discount to the counter

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 14>parties and large caps, and that's a historic discount by

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 14>any measure. And you know, if you can buy quality

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 14>at that big of a discount, and even at a

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 14>discount relative to their smaller cap piers, that's the area

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 14>of the market that our investment teams are finding some

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 14>real value in today. And I think where investors can

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 14>be rewarded. There's strong balance sheets there. You know that

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 14>pre cast slow will give them protection even if things

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 14>get a little bit more challenging in the economy, even

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 14>if we head into a recession.

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 6>So and how much of the boat needs to be

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 6>filled with small caps at this point given what you're

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 6>saying about some of the opportunities there.

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 14>You know, the allocation decision is really a personal one,

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 14>and that's where it's a little bit more challenging for

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 14>me to have a personal opinion. I certainly do have

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 14>an opinion on my own, but I think for investors

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 14>it's you know, small cap can be a little bit riskier.

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 14>But again, it's the area. It's just where you want

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 14>to invest within small cap. I don't think it's an

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 14>area that should be ignored. Growth can continue to be

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 14>really good block cap companies even when growth pulls back

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 14>within the economy. So it's it's an area that investors

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 14>should not ignore. The lead the allocation decision up to

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 14>investors themselves. The tactical decision is I would just say,

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 14>don't ignore the area at all.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and do you folks at all Spring have you

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>are you still talking recession? Is that still in your

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>outlook or have you kind of tabled that a little bit?

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, you know, I think we're still in the camp

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 14>that the recession risks still do linger. And you know

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 14>the reason for it is six months ago, you know,

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 14>we were only at three percent interest rate, and there's

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 14>a lot of great increases that have happened since then,

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 14>and there's a big like effect to the impact of

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 14>increasing rates. We have yet to see the full impact,

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 14>whether that takes six or nine months to fully feel that,

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 14>you know, we haven't seen it, and so we're still

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 14>cautious about how bad the total impact will be. We

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 14>already know we saw some breakage in the system with

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 14>what happened with the regional banks earlier. I don't completely

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 14>think that is over. And again we're not done with

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 14>rate increases. We have one coming this week and then

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 14>still a question about what happens after that. So it's

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 14>not off the table for us. That being said, you

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 14>don't want to be out of the market completely. We

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 14>already saw the ramifications of what could happen with that,

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 14>and so you know, the economy and the market are

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 14>two different things, and investors just have to keep that

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 14>in mind.

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, and thanks once again for joining us and

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the Letty, head of active equity at all Spring Global Investments.

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 10>You're listening to the tape.

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 9>Can to our live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 9>am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, Tune it up, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 9>and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 9>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 9>say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Mattel here. This is a beneficiary.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>They own the whole Barbie thing. Mittel stock is up

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>one point six percent today.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Nice move. It's up twenty percent year to date. That's nice.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's got a market cap is seven point six billion.

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's break it down with the analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>who covers Mattel, the company, the stock, Lindsay Dutch. She

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. So, Lindsay, give us

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense of kind of what this means for Mattel. Here,

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it's obviously a great day, a great weekend for the

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>movie and what it means.

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 3>For but what's it really mean for the company.

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, thanks Paul for having me. So this movie is

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 15>a big deal for Mattel. Barbie is one of their

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 15>biggest brands. It peaked at one point seven billion and

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 15>twenty twenty one, it was off about eleven percent last year.

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.760
<v Speaker 15>There was sort of weak demand for Arbi, so coming

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 15>into this movie, there was a lot of uncertainty, you know,

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 15>and concerns about demand for the dolls. But I think

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 15>Mattel did a really great job in terms of hyping

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 15>up the movie, and I think that could be a

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 15>catalyst for the second half and really a rebound for

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 15>the company in terms of toy sales, but also the

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 15>royalties that they're going to get from the movie and

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 15>related merchandise and things like that. So there's a real

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 15>possibility of strength in the second half, you know, with

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 15>this big movie debut.

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 6>Lindsay I'm curious about and I know you haven't seen

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 6>the movie, but there's definitely a sense of Mattel calling

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 6>themselves out a little bit when it comes to some

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 6>of the potential what someone view as mistakes they've made

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 6>in terms of Barbie's impact on how young women and

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 6>girls are viewing themselves, et cetera. I wonder is there

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 6>any potential negative impact for Mattel because of some of

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 6>those messages, or is the extra dream success of the

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 6>Barbie movie just going to be a boom for them?

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 7>So I agree.

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:06.919
<v Speaker 15>I mean, I think that the brand has had ups

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.760
<v Speaker 15>and downs, you know, throughout its sort of life and

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 15>and creation. I think Mattel was going into this movie

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 15>they knew it was critical to you know, reinvent the

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 15>brand a little bit and and sort of ease some

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 15>of those concerns that we've had.

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 7>So I think that was you know, it.

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 15>Is a pivotalle, a pivotal moment for the company and

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:36.280
<v Speaker 15>whether they can really you know, change the attitude around Barbie.

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 15>But there are also so many people who are nostalgic

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 15>about the toy, about the brand, and that adult collector's

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 15>market is huge and it's growing.

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 7>It's a big piece of the toy market.

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 15>And so I think that there's a lot more opportunity

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 15>than than risk, especially like seeing the numbers coming out

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.799
<v Speaker 15>of this weekend and this debut to.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 3>In general, how big is it the toy market in general?

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 3>How big is it?

0:38:04.960 --> 0:38:07.280
<v Speaker 1>What's the growth characteristics of kind of the toy business,

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.399
<v Speaker 1>because now it seems like every kid's got a phone

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in their hand.

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 7>I know.

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 15>So, you know, the toy market in terms of dolls,

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 15>if you think about dolls, that's more like a three

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 15>to four billion dollar category.

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 7>Mattel is a clear leader.

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:25.760
<v Speaker 15>They've always been a dominator in that doll category because

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 15>of Barbie.

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 7>They also own American Girl.

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 15>When we think about dolls, you know, growth was astronomical,

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 15>astronomical in the pandemic, and it really started to come

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:39.959
<v Speaker 15>off in twenty twenty two.

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 7>You know, there was weak demand.

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 15>We had over inventory issues, you know for a lot

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 15>of their key suppliers if you think about Target and Walmart.

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 15>So there was a huge pullback in the fourth quarter

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 15>last year. Really hurt results for Mattel and as well

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 15>as other peers, and the beginning of this year, you

0:38:57.920 --> 0:38:59.240
<v Speaker 15>know it is going to be challenging.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 7>Their sales were in the first quarter.

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 15>I'm expecting sales to be down again when they report

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 15>their results for.

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:06.080
<v Speaker 7>The second quarter.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 15>But like I said, this is really a second half

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 15>story for the company, and really what can happen with

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.399
<v Speaker 15>this growth going into the back half. So in terms

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.359
<v Speaker 15>of the category as a whole, you're talking about sort

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 15>of like low to mid single digits growth. You know

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 15>in this next couple of years, Mattel is typically a

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 15>market share gainer, so you know, we would typically expect

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 15>a little bit faster growth coming out of Mattel.

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:35.439
<v Speaker 6>Well, and you mentioned American Girl. They've also got Hot

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:39.200
<v Speaker 6>Wheels under the Mattel brand, which has increasingly been taken

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:41.880
<v Speaker 6>up a bigger piece of the revenue pie. Do you

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 6>anticipate that allocation changing this coming earning season or earnings

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 6>results because of the Barbie movie?

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 15>So I think so Barbie has always dominated in terms

0:39:55.920 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 15>of Mattel's revenue mix. You're right, hot Wheels is gaining.

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 15>They were about a one point two five billion dollar

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:06.919
<v Speaker 15>business last year compared to Barbie's one point five. I

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 15>think that, you know, heading into second half, you know,

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 15>success of the movie could really put Barbie.

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 7>Back, you know, sort of on top.

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.240
<v Speaker 15>I think Hot Wheels is sort of closing that gap

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 15>here in the first half.

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 12>There.

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 15>I think Mattel's history does sort of, you know, skew

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 15>towards that doll category. But the vehicles has just had

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 15>a couple of really great years and when we saw

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 15>growth slow in dolls, vehicles picked up. Also, action figures

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 15>has been a really big growth driver for them. It's

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 15>much a smaller business, but where we are seeing growth

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 15>in that category. But I do think coming into the

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 15>end of this year, you know, we'll see Barbie be

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 15>still be a bigger business for matel than Hot Wheels,

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 15>but that gap is definitely a lot tighter than it

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 15>was historically.

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Lindsaya, as a former media analyst myself, I

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have to ask this question, is there going to be

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a bar Be Seql?

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:04.760
<v Speaker 3>What have we heard from the company? Have they said anything?

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 15>They have not said anything, but you know, their CEO

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 15>has a background in TV and entertainment, and I think,

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 15>you know, he truly believes in sort of that halo effect,

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 15>you know, linking entertainment and movies and everything that we

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 15>stream today, you know, to physical toys.

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 7>So I wouldn't be shocked.

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 6>And the return on the investment in the Barbie movie

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 6>is going to be considered a positive for them when

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 6>history looks back on this moment, right.

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:36.359
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 15>So I think there's you know, some element of the

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:43.840
<v Speaker 15>movie baked into guidance which is pretty bleak for the

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 15>year when we think about Mattel, But I think a

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 15>lot of it is not baked in. I think, you know,

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 15>the profitability, the margin on you know, when they license

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 15>out that.

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 7>Barbie brand, the Bee, the Pink Bee.

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 15>You know they had, you know, a partnership with Gap

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 15>that they did, you know, all that merchandise sales, all

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 15>the licensing out of things like that. It is huge

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 15>on the margin and I think that a lot of

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 15>that stuff can come in better than expected this year.

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 15>But again sort of just rebuilding that love of Barbie

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 15>and the brand going forward.

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lindsay, thanks so much for joining us. Lindsay Dutch.

0:42:21.880 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>She's an analyst Bloomberg Intelligence. She covers some of the

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer space, retail as well as the reachs.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 3>But today it is all.

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 1>About her coverage of the company. Mattel again is stock

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>up nice today on the news up twenty percent year

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to date. See if they can monetize this Barbie mania

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>going forward.

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:42.280
<v Speaker 9>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 9>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:42:46.000 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 9>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 10>The Bloomberg Business app.

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 9>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 9>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 1>One of the names that's actually driving performance this year,

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>as it typically does, is our good friends Adding Cooper

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Tino Apple. Mark German joins us, I don't know why,

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>because he's a chief technology off and corresponding something like that,

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I liked CTO.

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 7>He's basically the CTO.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we'll go with yeah, and he covers all the

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff out there in Silicon Valley. Mark, I haven't

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>replaced my phone and I don't know how long man,

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:25.839
<v Speaker 1>How does Apple think about me? I've had this phone

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for I don't know, three or four years. What do

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they have to do to get me to kind of

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>buy a new phone?

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? So I think your first question is what do

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 5>they think of you?

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 16>They okay, so they like you a little bit because

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:42.600
<v Speaker 16>you have an iPhone. They like you a little bit

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 16>more if you're buying apps and subscribing to things. But

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 16>they're not in love with you because you don't have

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 16>a new one and you haven't bought for the last three.

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Or four years.

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 16>What they would prefer is if you were upgrading annually.

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 5>What do they have to get you? What do they

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:55.280
<v Speaker 5>have to do to get you upgrade?

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 16>Well, I'll just be completely honest with you because I've

0:43:57.239 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 16>had similar thoughts as well. So the iPhone ten came

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 16>out in twenty seventeen, that's six years ago. So this

0:44:04.719 --> 0:44:06.400
<v Speaker 16>is going to be the iPhone fifteen is going to

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 16>be the sixth generation phone since the iPhone ten. God, honestly,

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:15.359
<v Speaker 16>it's not too different. The phone doesn't operate that differently, right.

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 16>The big difference would be the overall performance in the speed.

0:44:18.760 --> 0:44:20.359
<v Speaker 16>And the reason you would want to upgrade at this

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 16>point is because the phone at this point, if you

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 16>have an iPhone tent, probably feels really sluggish and it

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:28.760
<v Speaker 16>feels really behind, particularly on the camera, or you've dropped

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 16>the phone enough times or you have dents in the

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 16>steel band around the phone, you have a crack in

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 16>your screen, or maybe you have a big glass crack

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 16>or shattering on.

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 5>The back of the phone. Right, So that's really.

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 16>How they get you to upgrade over time as the

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 16>phone feels sluggish and damaged and such. This year is

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 16>going to be an interesting year. This is going to

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 16>be the first time in maybe three years where they're

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:50.879
<v Speaker 16>doing anything of significance.

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 5>Okay, right in my opinion.

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 16>So the iPhone fifteen Pro is going to be quite

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 16>an upgrade this year. It's going to have a titanium

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 16>case around the edges instead of stayingless steel on the

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:04.879
<v Speaker 16>biggest and most expensive phone, the fifteen Pro Macs. It's

0:45:04.920 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 16>going to have something called a periscope camera that allows

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 16>for much deeper zoom using hardware. That means the camera

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 16>lens can actually move within the phone to get closer

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 16>to the image in order to provide better zoom versus

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 16>the digital zoom we have today, which you can zoom

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 16>in but you get a bit of a blurry picture.

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.240
<v Speaker 16>They're also changing the charger to more of an industry standard,

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 16>going from the current lightning charger to what's called USBC,

0:45:30.400 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 16>And there's also going to be a much faster process

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.360
<v Speaker 16>or in better battery life on the top end phones.

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 16>The low end phones will get some of the iPhone

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.959
<v Speaker 16>fourteen pro features like the dynamic island, that new area

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 16>at the top of the phone, as well as a

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 16>better camera on the back.

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.239
<v Speaker 6>So how much of everything you're talking about played into

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:51.239
<v Speaker 6>Apple's decision to ask suppliers to keep the production of

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 6>iPhone units in line with last year at eighty five

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:57.720
<v Speaker 6>million units, which I found just a little bit confusing

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 6>because phone sales have been declining over the past eight quarters.

0:46:01.640 --> 0:46:03.280
<v Speaker 6>So what did you make of that decision?

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:07.120
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, so eighty five million would mean flat for the

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 16>thirty year in a row. The thirteen was a very

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 16>small upgrade. The fourteen was a small modus upgrade. I

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:18.720
<v Speaker 16>would say the fifteen is not a generational upgrade, right,

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 16>but it is significant, And so I think if let's

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 16>look at it this way, right, if it was a

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 16>minor update this year, I think units would actually be

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 16>declining given the overall economy and the overall smartphone market

0:46:29.880 --> 0:46:32.880
<v Speaker 16>and the tech market in terms of sales and buying

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 16>power and such, not the stock market. I think the

0:46:36.920 --> 0:46:39.319
<v Speaker 16>fact that it is a significant upgrade across the four

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 16>models this year is why they're.

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 5>Able to keep it flat.

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 16>You know how sometimes Apple says that, you know, the

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 16>revenue has gone down, but in a all things current environment,

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 16>it actually would have been up. Right, So something similar

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 16>to that, where given everything going on, they're able to

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 16>stay flat because the upgrade is so significant.

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Mark Toktos, I guess the latest thinking coming out of

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Kopertino on China. I can't think of a company that

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>has any more ties both in the supply chain and

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>source of raw materials as well as an en market

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>than Apple does with China. What's their latest thinking about

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:18.480
<v Speaker 1>how they're approaching this over the next several years.

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 16>Well, I'll tell you one thing and that'll answer your question.

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 16>It feels like the rhetoric around China and Apple working

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:28.200
<v Speaker 16>with China and the US China relations, while that's still there,

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 16>it feels like it's an idea or a reality.

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 5>I guess that has.

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 16>Calmed down in recent months. Right, things were really teetering

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 16>a year ago, six months ago even, and people were

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.799
<v Speaker 16>really pushing for Apple to get out of there. That

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 16>is no longer the case now. To answer your question,

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 16>nothing has changed.

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:47.759
<v Speaker 5>Over the last year or so.

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 16>The idea or the plan is still to diversify production

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:56.440
<v Speaker 16>as much as possible outside of China. They're building up

0:47:56.480 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 16>more lines for the iPhone in places like India. They're

0:48:00.320 --> 0:48:04.319
<v Speaker 16>expanding the iPad to places like Vietnam. A lot of

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 16>Mac production has moved to Vietnam and Malaysia, right, So

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.720
<v Speaker 16>they're doing what they can to move out of China

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 16>except for one product. It's the iPhone, the one we

0:48:14.719 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 16>were just talking about. And in order to get the

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 16>iPhones in those eighty five million quantity that you need

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 16>to ramp up and be built in two months time

0:48:25.400 --> 0:48:28.800
<v Speaker 16>and to be deployed globally over a three month period,

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 16>you just can't and by the way, at the quality

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 16>they need to do so, you just can't do that

0:48:32.920 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 16>outside of Fox Coon in China at this point. So

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:37.439
<v Speaker 16>that's really what's keeping them there.

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 6>So Mark, we don't get Apple earnings until next week,

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 6>but slew of tech names reporting this week, making up

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 6>about forty percent of the market cap of the S ANDP.

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 6>In terms of the names we're going to hear from

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 6>which name are you going to be listening into to

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:57.040
<v Speaker 6>indicate how the Apple story may evolve or are the

0:48:57.080 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 6>tech names we're hearing from this week completely separate from

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 6>the Apple story.

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 16>I mean, I know this week we have Meta, we

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 16>have Alphabet, we have Microsoft, right, any other big ones

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 16>that I'm missing, some of.

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 6>The social ones like we've got to snap this week,

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:11.480
<v Speaker 6>some of that stuff, but not necessarily about weather for

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:12.280
<v Speaker 6>no Apple.

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:16.359
<v Speaker 16>I would definitely not include Apple in that group. They

0:49:16.400 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 16>have a way of either outperforming or underperforming that group, right,

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 16>So I think they're a bit of an outlier there

0:49:22.200 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 16>in terms of, you know, earning calls that I'll be

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 16>paying attention to definitely will be meta, right. I would

0:49:28.520 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 16>like to see how their you know, metaverse play as

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 16>they call it, is continuing to go. I want to

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 16>see what the losses are like. I want to see

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:37.840
<v Speaker 16>what they have to say about the Apple product. I

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:41.279
<v Speaker 16>want to see if they have any more commentary on that.

0:49:41.560 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 16>I want to see what's coming out of Alphabet in

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 16>terms of their hardware sales. I want to see anything

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 16>they have to say so far on their new pixel fold.

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 16>That thing is eighteen hundred dollars. I have had one

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 16>for several weeks. I don't think it's particularly great. I

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:57.400
<v Speaker 16>also don't think people are particularly buying them up, so

0:49:57.440 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 16>I want to pay attention to see what's going on there.

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 16>One other interesting news item for this week is going

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 16>to be Samsung Unpacked. That's going to be their new

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 16>phone launch event that's happening in Korea and they're going

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 16>to be announcing their latest phones there, which obviously we'll

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 16>be going up against Apple's new devices in the fall,

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 16>so I'll be interested to see how those all compare.

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:17.239
<v Speaker 16>So it's actually going to be quite a busy week

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 16>and a lot to pay attention to.

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey Mark, just real quick twenty seconds. Apple recently completed

0:50:22.920 --> 0:50:26.320
<v Speaker 1>their just amazing new headquarters in Koopertino. What percentage of

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 1>their employees show up there on a given day?

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:29.520
<v Speaker 12>Ooh?

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 5>What percentage show up on a given day? You know?

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 16>The headquarters seats about twelve thousand to fifteen thousand people,

0:50:36.000 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 16>and then there was a bunch of peripheral buildings around

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:41.640
<v Speaker 16>there in the Coopertino Sunny Vale its larger Santa Claire

0:50:41.719 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 16>Valley Silicon Valley area. I would say the majority of

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:48.240
<v Speaker 16>employees are coming in three times a week, that's typical.

0:50:48.239 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 16>Most employees are there.

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 3>Two They better be happy employees.

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:53.280
<v Speaker 1>The stocks of fifty percent this year on a compound

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of basis, up over thirty percent over the last five years.

0:50:56.560 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 3>They got to be happy. I mean, I say, get

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 3>your wealthy keister back. That's just me, all right.

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Mark German, Chief correspondent Technology for Bloomberg News. He's based

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 1>out there in Silicon Valley. He's drinking the cool lad

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Why not? I mean, Applestock has just been a just

0:51:10.480 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a tank, just been amazing and it continues.

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:28.959
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Faull Sweeney.

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.