WEBVTT - Scott Bok Explains What Investment Bankers Actually Do All Day

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Jill Wisenthal, and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Racy, how good at Excel?

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Are you.

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Not good? Compared to a lot of people who listen

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 3>to this podcast? I would imagine, I mean, I can

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 3>do some basic stuff like auto some and you know

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 3>so some.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 5>No, it's not.

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 3>That's like literally clicking a button. I can write like

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 3>a couple formulas in the little command prompt. But I

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 3>think everyone can.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I could write some really rudimentary formasts, but I never

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>really I got to the degree that some people are.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 2>But the good news is I saw that I have

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>to learn it. We don't have to learn I saw

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>that Claude code they have or Claude they have some

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>extension where you just talk to Excel and and you say, like,

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, build this kind of formula and make these

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>changes and import this. I haven't played around with it,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 2>so not one hundred percent sure would work. And to

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 2>be honest, because by limited Excel skills, I wouldn't even

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 2>be able to verify if it worked in the first place.

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>But my sense is, you know that maybe that seems

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 2>like a maybe that's changing.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I would guess that it works pretty well. And imagine

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 3>if you're someone who's been working probably in finance for

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 3>like twenty years, and you became known as not and

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to say Excel spreadsheet monkey, Excel spreadsheet gorilla,

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 3>like you know, someone really admired for their Excel skills

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>and suddenly you've been disrupted totally.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Wellst Sometimes you see these things online where like they

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>show this stuff like oh, the investment bank investment analysts

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 2>or junior analysts just got put out of a job,

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 2>and like there's a go I'm pretty sure there's more

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>to the job. So I do know that, like building

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 2>models and so forth, there's an important thing in finance

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and Wall Street in various capacities. I'm pretty sure that's

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 2>not the entire job. I'm pretty sure automating Excel was

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 2>only part of it. But nonetheless, technical skills are technical skills,

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and if that changes, who knows, maybe the job could change.

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 3>The question I've always had about Wall Street is how

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 3>much of it is driven by your own personality and

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of client facing skills versus I am a brilliant

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>analysis who is not only able to come up with

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 3>amazing ideas for mergers and acquisitions, sort of you know,

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>working girls style, where like Melanie Griffith is in an

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 3>elevator and is like, I know your company needs to

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 3>start with whatever, versus like I'm just really good at

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>hopnobbing with executives.

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>It's probably a mix, right, That would be my guess

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>that there's someone is really good at this company that

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 2>is parking lot, so this the city could buy another

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 2>parking lot company and so forth, and then another person

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 2>who's really good at staying out and taking the class

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 2>to a nice dinner. I don't think you could really

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>or I don't really want to have a conversation, but

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 2>the degree to which AI is going to disrupt all

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 2>of these white jobs until I have a better handle

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 2>what the white color jobs are in the first place,

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we are.

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 3>How important are excel skills actually in this business?

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 2>What is the sort of distribution of skills that it

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>takes to thrive in some of these capacities. Anyway, very

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 2>excited to say, we really do have the perfect guest

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>to talk about some of this. Someone we talked to

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 2>last year and that was about sort of the history

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 2>of investment banking over the last several decades and the

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 2>sort of connection between global capitalism investment banking. We wanted

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to have them back on the show because as an

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 2>investment banking veteran, someone who can maybe talk about the

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 2>inside and how people work and how the culture change

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 2>and how technology changes. So we're going to be speaking

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>with return guests. Scott Baki is the former longtime CEO

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>of the investment bank Greenhill, the author of the recent

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>book Surviving Wall Street and it comes back on odd Lot.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>So Scott, thank you so much for coming back with us.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 2>It's great to be back.

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 2>What are you for listeners who, in case they didn't

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>listen to the previous one, which they should. What did

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>your career span on Wall Street? When did you first

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>get into it? And you know how well give us

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the sort of the thirty second Scott book career bio. Well,

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 2>I feel like.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>I started at the very beginning of really the explosion

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 4>of the investment banking business. You know, as I said

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 4>in my book, when I graduated from Wharton, I did

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 4>not know what an investment banker was. I knew exactly

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 4>one person from our entire class who got a job

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 4>on Wall Street. So it was a very small place.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Back then, M and A was very rare. Here were

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 4>we talking about nineteen eighty one. Okay, you know, it's

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>your interest rates peaked. It's the you know, stock market

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 4>was had been flat for more than a decade. You know,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 4>private equity is a phrase didn't even exist. Hedge fund

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 4>didn't exist. I mean, it was a very very different role.

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 4>By the way, it wasn't even legal to buy back

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 4>your own stock back then. That that happened a year later.

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 4>It was viewed as market manipulation to do that. So

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:49.559
<v Speaker 4>the whole thing of sort of playing with balance sheets,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 4>putting companies together and so on. I mean, there had

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 4>been a bit of that in the nineteen sixties, mostly

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 4>around building conglomerates, which I think in part was because

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 4>they couldn't buy back stock. Because if you're generating cash

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 4>to do with it, you could be it t a

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 4>big industrial company, and so I think I'll buy the Hartford,

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 4>a big insurance company. You know, today people would think

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 4>that's a crazy idea, but that was kind of the

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 4>predecessor to what became, you know, the M and A

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 4>and transaction business around you know, maximizing shareholder value. That

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 4>that really began, I would say, right at the beginning

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 4>of my career.

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 3>Perfect, this is already a fascinating conversation, I have to say,

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 3>so I imagine this dynamic would have changed throughout your career.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 3>But how much of the investment banking business is the

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 3>bankers approaching clients and saying we have an idea for you,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 3>versus the clients coming to the bankers and saying we

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 3>have a problem, such as we have all this cash

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 3>and we can't you know, buy back our shares or

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 3>we want to do something with it to reduce our

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 3>cost of capital or whatever.

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, that changed an awful lot of our time

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 4>because it's the beginning. There were lots of companies and

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 4>very few investment bankers, and so they didn't get a

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 4>visit all that often, and so when they did, the

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 4>bank would try to bring, you know, ideas and maybe

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 4>they hadn't heard before. You know, Now there's thousands and

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 4>thousands of investment bankers, many many different firms of many

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 4>different types, and they're all maintaining relationships. So it really

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 4>turns into more of a dialogue where you don't you

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>don't just you know, you never met the client before

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 4>your show up say hey, I think you should buy

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 4>this company down the street and wow, that's a great idea.

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 4>I hadn't heard that before, and they do it. It's

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.799
<v Speaker 4>more like you have an ongoing dialogue with a client.

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 4>You figure out what they want to do, what they're

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 4>you know, kind of what their appetite to their board is,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 4>what their balance sheets like, how their business is going,

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 4>how they feel about their share price, you know, what

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 4>what they think is kind of the next big thing

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 4>for them, And over time you come to an idea.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Almost mutually.

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 2>I would say, what were you good at in the

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>early eighties or the people that you went to work

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 2>with very early on, what would you say you had

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 2>in common? Why? Why did uh you know? Why was

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it a fit for you?

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 4>For me, I was probably a little bit different since

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 4>it came from a legal background than some. I mean,

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 4>there were some people who were you know, the ex

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 4>and by the way, Excel wasn't even around then. It

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 4>was Lotus one, two three. Who are the you know

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 4>Excel jockeys who built these you know, enormous models and

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 4>so one and I did a bit of that myself.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 4>I think my strength was more in sort of structuring, conceptualizing, negotiating,

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, marketing, talking to CEOs and boards. It was

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 4>more of that kind of uh in many ways, the

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 4>qualitative skills, the math. You can pick up what you

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 4>need fairly quickly. And you know, I sometimes tell, you know,

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 4>people of like my my son's generation, he's he's thirty

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 4>years old. I tell his people at his pure level,

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 4>I see, you know, the great rubicon a cross in

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 4>the world of you know, Wall Street and related fields

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 4>is when you get to the point where there's somebody

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 4>smart working for you. You're you're You're no longer yeah,

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 4>you're You're no longer the one, you know, training some

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 4>complete newbie. You're no longer the one doing it all yourself.

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 4>You're the one who's doing a bit of conceptualizing and

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 4>giving into a very smart person who's going to stay

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 4>late at night and build you a beautiful model.

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 3>I want to ask you what it was actually like

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 3>working a sort of junior banker in the eighties. But

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 3>before I do, what's with all the people with legal

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 3>degrees going into banking in the nineteen eighties, Because you

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>weren't the only one. I think there were a few

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 3>other famous compatriots at the time. Lloyd blank Find for instance,

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 3>stands out. But what was it about having done a

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 3>law degree that translated into banking?

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Back then, there were many who made the move, And

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 4>as a matter of fact, while I was interviewing the

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 4>New York Times, Sunday magazine had a cover story called

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 4>lawyers Becoming Bankers. I mean, it really was a big phenomenon,

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 4>and I think literally the reason was the business exploded suddenly.

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 4>There's just massive amounts of transaction activity. There aren't that

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 4>many investment bankers. You're not just going to hire more

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 4>people who are twenty two years old and train them.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 4>You need someone who's twenty six or twenty eight or

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 4>thirty years old who actually has kind of been around

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 4>the business. They may have some skills to learn, but

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 4>they bring other skills to the table, and so they

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 4>brought into bank the lawyers, including myself, is kind of

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 4>a way of sort of ramping up the scale of

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.599
<v Speaker 4>the team rather than just saying we're going to just

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 4>hire more twenty two year olds and train them. But

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 4>you didn't have a time for that, you know, there's

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 4>so much such a growth in transaction activity. That's why

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of lawyers made that move.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Well you mentioned just now you're like, okay, it's nice

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 2>to be in the position where you can conceptualize something.

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 2>And then the really you know, the smart wiz kids

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 2>stays up all night building the model? Are they staying

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 2>up all night?

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the This is sort of one of the

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 2>big questions that people have is like, what is it

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>about the business that demands these sort of in some

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 2>case extreme hours laid into the night. Why can't they

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 2>just do it during the day? I clock out at five?

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Very good question, you know, I think one in this

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 4>this kind of relates to, you know, the future of

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 4>AI and efficiency and investment banking and so on as well.

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 4>I think maybe the dirty little secret of the industry

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 4>in terms of how the sausage is actually made, is

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 4>that the actual building of the model, the creation of

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 4>the math that says why it makes sense or doesn't

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 4>make sense to buy something that certain share price, that

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 4>that takes a limited amount of time, the fiddling with

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the PowerPoint pages that expressed that information so it makes

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 4>just the right points and just the right way and

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.439
<v Speaker 4>just the right color seam, and you know, just the

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 4>right things in italics and other things in bold and

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 4>things like that. You know, bankers tend to be perfectionists,

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 4>and so they will fiddle with that for a very

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 4>long time and a lot of times. I mean, if

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 4>you ask people who are in the early part of

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 4>their careers, like, what are you really doing when you're

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 4>there late at night, it's very often it's fine tuning

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 4>math that was done long ago.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 3>There's also a schedule misalignment, I guess, because you get

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the feedback from your boss at like five or six pm,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 3>right and like at the end of their day, and

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 3>then you have to stay up really late to make

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>all the changes and get them on their desk in

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 3>the morning. But okay, perfectionism long hours. Was that the

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 3>case when you were initially entering the industry in the eighties,

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 3>very much so, But not with PowerPoint, with something else?

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's true. I mean it literally was. I don't know,

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure it was called anything. I think it

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 4>was like a typed page, you know, of numbers.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 4>It was kind of the early, the early version where

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 4>there wasn't all the software that put it in pretty

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 4>pictures and so Matia look that that came along with

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 4>the you know, pie charts, and bar charts and things

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 4>like that. You know fairly early, but it wasn't nearly

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 4>as kind of beautiful, is it. And I mean now

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 4>it almost looks like you know what Vanity Fair magazine

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 4>used to look like, right you open up's got beautiful

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 4>color and pictures and charts and and all that sort

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 4>of thing. But people always worked very long hours. That

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 4>was always the sort of ethos of the industry that

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of work to be done. We wanted

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 4>to be perfect, and hey, if you can make it

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 4>a little bit better by staying another half hour, you

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 4>stay another half hour.

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 3>So how much of that do you think was driven

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 3>by genuine client demand in the sense that you know,

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 3>a client presumably would be not very impressed if you

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 3>saw that a bullet point was slightly misaligned in a

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 3>PowerPoint presentation or something like that, versus driven by the

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 3>institution itself and a soret. I don't want to say

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 3>hazing culture, but there is a sense that, you know,

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 3>we all have to work long hours. I worked long

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 3>hours at the beginning of my career. It's expected that

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 3>now you are going to work long hours yourself.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 4>I think if you go back to the beginning really

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 4>the nineteen eighties. I think it grew initially out of

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 4>neither of those things. I think it grew out of

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 4>the fact that business was growing so fast and you

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 4>had a limited sized team, and you had twice as

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 4>many deals to work on as last year, and next

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 4>year you had fifty percent more than that, and I

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 4>mean it was a really extraordinary growth, and so there

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 4>just like weren't enough hands on deck that you could,

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, go home at seven o'clock at night. Now,

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 4>over time, that generation of bankers, including myself, you know,

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 4>they bore the scars of those years throughout their careers,

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 4>and so yes, there probably was in the industry some

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 4>element of hey I worked like this, You're going to

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 4>work like this. But initially it was just a genuine

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 4>business issue of hey, there's so much business to do,

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 4>so a few of us here to do it. We

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 4>have to work very lately get it done.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 2>What about the element of essentially banking, Like many other fields,

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 2>including academia but also law, you know, there's like a

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>pyramid element where there's like a very small number or

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 2>relatively small number of extraordinarily good slash remunerative jobs at

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the top at a large base of junior analysts and

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.599
<v Speaker 2>so forth, and how much is it a sort of

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>emergent competition amongst the junior bankers or whatever such that

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not even necessarily some directive to put it in

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 2>crazy hours. But there's a big field of people and

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>they want to get up to the next rung, and

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 2>there's fewer spots to the next rung, and that creates

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>that mechanism of intense competition, the desire to sort.

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Of over please, you know, to just go over the top.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, that's that certainly is there as well. I

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 4>remember back I don't know why I remember this, but

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 4>back you know, kind of in the late eighties. I

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 4>was probably in late twenties at that time, not even

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 4>a vice president yet at Morgan Stanley. I remember we

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 4>had this meeting once with the head of investment banking

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 4>at Morgan Stanley, the guy named Joe Fog very very

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 4>sort of, very sort of tough guy of that era,

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 4>and we're sitting around the table. I don't know, there

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 4>must have been twenty some associates in New York at

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 4>that time something like that, and people are asking them

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 4>the question, hey, you know, we have someone you know

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 4>who covers the retail industry, someone who covers the industrials,

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 4>someone who covers you know, insurance companies, Like, what what

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 4>are we going to grow up into? You know, what

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 4>are the roles going to be for us? And so

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 4>people did try very hard to differentiate themselves. Now, of course,

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 4>what none of us around that table knew is this

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 4>business was going to be like a hundred times bigger.

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 4>So it wasn't like, oh, we have somebody to cover

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 4>the retail industry, So I guess that's not an opportunity

0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 4>for me. No, there was going to come a day

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 4>when you would have twenty five people covering the retail industry.

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 4>But there's always been that sense of, you know, few

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 4>opportunities at the top, even when it wasn't true, you know,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 4>even when there was going to be more opportunity.

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 3>So I imagine quite a bit of the work you

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 3>were doing in the nineteen eighties is what we would

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 3>now characterize as pretty rote work in the sense that,

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, we didn't have computers, we didn't have Bloomberg

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 3>terminals that would show the share price or a bond quote.

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 3>You would have to like actually call someone up and

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 3>get that.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Inn which that's right now. Who owned that company, but

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg put it out of business a long time ago.

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Shout out to the Bloomberg terminal. I guess, but you know,

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>you went through a wave of disruption, basically, And yet

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 3>it seems that the work of physically going somewhere to

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 3>find corporate papers or physically calling someone up to get

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 3>a share price quote, that was replaced with work of

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 3>a different kind. Can you explain how that substitution kind

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 3>of happened.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 4>I think it was replaced with going from the sort

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 4>of very intermittent meetings with a limited number of clients

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 4>to talk about ideas to a place the industry is

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 4>today where you go very very regularly to almost every

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 4>company on the planet of any real size. Right You're

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 4>someone is there, and you're there with analysis of their industry,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 4>their performance, their stock price, their competitors, what's for sale,

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 4>what might be for sale, and so it's more like

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 4>a saturation coverage. It's you know, it's a little bit.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 4>I think investment making is very very different from consulting,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 4>but you know, but where it has some similarity is

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 4>this kind of try, this attempt and desire to sort

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 4>of almost get inside the business and really know your

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 4>client's business, and that was not something that was even

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 4>attempted back in the nineteen eighties. But that's what all

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 4>those people are doing with all those extra hours.

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Now you mentioned you in the early eighties, you couldn't

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 2>have anticipated that the industry was going to grow one

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred folder whatever it was. And this is one of

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 2>those things where perhaps from any indo people, many in

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the public like wise, finance so big? Why why is

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>there so much money in this area? Finance doesn't produce anything?

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Why why is this? Why has this grown so much?

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>How would you articulate that to someone? Why fundamentally, there

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>is just so much demand for financial services at the

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 2>corporate level, and so much more than there was, say

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>forty years ago or forty five years ago.

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think there there are literally it's no exaggeration

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 4>to say that there really was an ethical change that

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 4>the world of sort of post World War two. You know,

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 4>big companies building conglomerates, you know, work at the same

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 4>place for thirty five years like my father did. And

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, not a massive amount of intense competition, not

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 4>a lot of mergers, kind of stable, stable companies and

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 4>and and you know, maybe that meant slow growth at

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 4>some point, and maybe that was part of a problem.

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 4>But in the early eighties you had really a lot

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 4>of things change. I think corporate culture changed a lot.

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 4>You know, Jack Els took over from a guy named

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Greg Jones who was very involved at pen where I went,

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 4>you know, a very very different kind of character. You know,

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 4>the the tax law changed. You know, capital gains got

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 4>started getting taxed differently from ordinary income. The tax rates

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 4>got cut quite a lot. Deregulation increase, the kind of

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 4>pressure on unions, you know, Reagan breaking the Air Traffic

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Controllers union, the ability to buy back stock, even the

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 4>sort of theoretical notion of you know, what is a

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 4>company for, right, Milton Friedman said, the company's sole purposes

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 4>to make money. You know. Professor at Harvard Business School

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 4>named Michael Jensen wrote all these these stories or analysis

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 4>about why, you know, you had to maxim my shareholder

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 4>value and you can't serve two masters, so that has

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 4>to be the only thing you're you're trying to do.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 4>And you know, and he had this long running debate

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 4>with my first boss, Marty Lipton, founder of Walked Out

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 4>Lipton about you know, should a company serve you know,

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 4>the community its employees, it's customers, et cetera. And that

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 4>all those things mixed together really made for a tremendous

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 4>focus on transactions. How do you maximize values with more

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 4>shares outstanding or less outstanding? Is it combining with this

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 4>other company? Is it spinning off a business you've already got.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Maybe this year it's spinning it off, maybe four years

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 4>later it's buying it back. You know, this this game

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 4>really in a way, and hedge funds grew up to

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of play that game, to bet on that game,

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 4>and investment bankers grew up to really you know, drive

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 4>the transaction activity from that. So the industry that you

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 4>know again was very very small back in the in

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.239
<v Speaker 4>the seventies, and you know, as you turned into that

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 4>sort of Reagan era when all those rules changed, just

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 4>really exploded it. And you know, the number of transactions

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 4>to you know, has been very very high and growing

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 4>for a long time. I think the interesting question is

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 4>does that go on forever? But it's not like it

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 4>was there forever. If you're if you're you know the

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 4>age I am, and you started what I did, you

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 4>sort of feel like it did. But if you look

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 4>just a tiny bit further back in history you realize, no,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 4>this is all new.

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 3>This might be a dumb question. But in terms of

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the urge to do something as a corporate manager or executive,

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 3>did you notice a difference between public and private companies.

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Was that urgency or pressure more apparent at publicly traded ones.

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 4>Yes, because they had you know, there was this thing

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 4>that became known as the market for corporate control. Right

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 4>if you if you don't buy into my mantra of

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 4>maximizing shareholder value, and therefore you don't, I will bid

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 4>for your company, and I will maximize shareholder value, and

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 4>the difference between the value today and the value later

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 4>is going to be mine. And so there was pressure

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 4>on public companies. Of course, private companies, you know, there

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 4>were a lot of sort of family owned companies that

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 4>had a longer term point of view and some that

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 4>are still there, you know, the Mars family, you know,

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 4>some companies like that are huge Cargill, some really big

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 4>ones that have remained you know, kind of steadfastly private.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 4>But today, of course, private company really means private equity

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 4>owned company, you know, and that has grown you know what,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 4>thirty thousand plus companies owned by that sector of a

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 4>bit of a log jam right now, and they really

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 4>are the masters of that universe. They're the masters of

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 4>trying to maximize shareholder value.

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Actually we should talk about that because this is the

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 3>other thing that's happened in investment banking is you have

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 3>had the rise of private equity and also hedge funds,

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 3>which are in some ways, you know, competing directly with bankers.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 3>One of the things you sometimes hear, actually when it

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 3>comes to the junior bankers actually working really long hours,

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 3>is this idea that well, we all know they're going

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 3>to go join Blackstone in like two years anyway, so

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 3>we have to squeeze out as much as we can

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 3>from them before that actually happens. How did that actually

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 3>change the business? And I guess, like how much pressure

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>did that generate on the banks to respond and I

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 3>guess retool their own offerings and response.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, private equity really became the biggest client base for

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 4>the whole industry, right and that also was a very

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 4>very small, nascent industry. You go back to the you know,

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 4>the early days, like Morgan Stanley had to its first

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 4>private equity fund. It was I can't remember exactly. I

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 4>think it was like a forty four zero million dollar

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 4>fund and you go back to KKR's initial fund. I

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 4>mean people used to do leverage buyouts with like you know,

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 4>buy a ten million dollar company with one hundred thousand

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 4>dollars down and by and by by the rest with debt,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 4>right we put together, I think you may have missed

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 4>the opportunity. Unfortunately, prices went up from there. But you know,

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 4>these things kind of fed fed on themselves, had some

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 4>early success, and so really in the nineteen eighties beginning

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 4>then you had the rise of the private equity industry.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, these huge players that for a long time,

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, did very very well taking companies private, you know,

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of doing a number of things to boost their

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 4>returns and then putting them back out into the public.

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 4>That that has also changed quite a lot where the

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 4>industry is looking at, you know, all kinds of private capital, right.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, Blackstone really pioneered this model of oh,

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 4>let's do real estate, let's do hedge funds, let's do

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 4>private credit, and so you expanded to so many different fields.

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 4>But that that really fundamentally changed Wall Street because the

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 4>rise of the private equity to created a client that

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 4>was kind of in the kind of permanently in the

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 4>transaction business, right, not like a public fortune one hundred

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 4>five hundred company that might do a deal every year

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 4>or two or three. You know, these were firms that

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 4>did you know, ten or twenty deals a year, and

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 4>so they were became the most important clients.

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:27.479
<v Speaker 3>They're raising Dutch is raising money. I got thank you.

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 3>I stole that from Lloyd Fling. Fine. Actually, oh I

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 3>feel bad. I've been reading his book, which is why

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 3>I keep mentioning him that good one.

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you get a little bit further into your career

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 2>and you get a sort of role where perhaps you

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>get to think a little big picture and you have

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to more junior people are the ones staying up late,

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. Talk to us a little bit about recruiting,

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 2>and I met this is an area of course today

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 2>that there's probably a lot of anxiety for people going

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 2>into the biz. But talk to us a little bit

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 2>about like, Okay, some things obviously can be taught. Math

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:03.239
<v Speaker 2>can probably generally be taught. Put aligning bullet points on

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 2>a PowerPoint. I think that could probably be taught. Though

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:10.479
<v Speaker 2>fastidiousness and attention to detail maybe inherently, maybe not how

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>would you talk to us a little bit about how

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 2>how you found people at the writ fit, how you

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 2>what that process was like.

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, that also, of course has changed dramatically as the

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 4>industry has grown. If you go back to early days,

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 4>we recruited a very few schools. I mean it really

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 4>was sort of the Ivy League and maybe a few others,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 4>and it was for a small number of jobs, so

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.239
<v Speaker 4>there were plenty of students there for that. Now, when

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 4>the industry really exploded, those schools weren't producing enough people.

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 4>And I can say in the early days of Greenhill

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 4>we had in terms of like what knowledge these these

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 4>young people had, we had a little bit of a

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 4>strategy of you know, let's take half of the class

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 4>just kids who are really smart. You know, but they

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 4>can do math, they can speak, they can write, they

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 4>just got great grades all the way through. They're really

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 4>really smart. And let's take the other half as people

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 4>who actually have some substance of knowledge that's useful. You know,

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 4>they went to Wharton. There are other great business schools

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 4>about University Gina had one. We recruited a lot from

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 4>a University of Texas, Indiana, University, University of Michigan, and

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 4>so we'd kind of do half and half in figure.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 4>You know, the kid who majored in finance at Wharton

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 4>can teach the kid who majored in English at Yale.

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Now today, what's changed is that the typical student wherever

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 4>he or she sits, as they're in their senior year

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 4>of college. I mean, they've had like four internships by now,

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 4>they've taken various online courses. They come in so ready

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 4>to roll, even if they majored in something that's completely

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 4>unrelated to what Wall Street actually does. So you're getting

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 4>someone who's almost trained before they even arrived. Now you

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 4>give them a lot more training, of course, but it's

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 4>not the kind of thing where you bring in an

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 4>English major, you know, as we did in the early

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 4>days and teach them like here, here's what a stock

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 4>is and here's what a bond is. You know, these

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 4>students have been working on that since they were in

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.719
<v Speaker 4>high school. I'm maybe I'm sorry to say I think

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 4>they should probably doing other things in high school. But

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's become a very very competitive world, right

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 4>even though there's many, many more opportunities for students to

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 4>get a job on Wall Street today as they come

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 4>out of college at the same time, it's very very competitive.

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Was there like a point where you started noticing that

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 2>or like around when that change, because it certainly tracks

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 2>that you like meet young people and they're like, oh

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 2>my god, like, how do they know all this stuff

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 2>and about things that maybe it's the Internet or something,

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 2>the things that I certainly didn't know about when I

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 2>was in high school really even college in many instances.

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 2>But I'm curious when you started when you started noticing that.

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 4>I think maybe in the sort of the post dot

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 4>com bubble bursting kind of in the early two thousands,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 4>when business really started to pick up again and you

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 4>had those several great years leading into what, of course

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 4>became the financial crisis, But there was such an increase

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 4>in opportunity then, and there was and now everyone was

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 4>in on the secret, right, I mean, they could read

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 4>about the industry, they could understand the you know, compensation

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 4>structures and the potential for themselves to get ahead in life.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 4>And and so these students started kind of working backwards like, Okay,

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I wanted to get a first year analyst job.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:26:59.719
<v Speaker 2>How do I do that?

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 4>What internship should I get after you know, freshman year? Well,

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 4>you can't get a very good one then, but maybe

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 4>you can get something tangentially, you know, do you know

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 4>somebody works as a stockbroker, Can you be a you know,

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 4>work in the mail room there or something after software,

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:14.959
<v Speaker 4>or maybe you can do a little better than that.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 4>After junior year, maybe you can get you know, something

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 4>better than that. And by time you show up, you know,

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 4>as a college junior looking for that first year analyst

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 4>job at Goldman Sachs, you know, you've got like five

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 4>names on your resume that look like, wow, this this

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 4>person's been around the industry a long time, even though

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 4>they're twenty one years old at the point, at that

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 4>point scary.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you think as many people are going to want

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.199
<v Speaker 3>to go in finance given that, I mean, we've already

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 3>been through shifts in the popularity of finance as a career.

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 3>So at one point it was the place that you

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 3>wanted to go to if you were like a Harvard

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 3>grad or whatever, and then it became tech for a

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 3>little while, and now there's all this anxiety over AI

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 3>disrupting particularly analytical jobs. Do you think it's going to

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 3>be as popular a choice.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it will. It will evolve and fluctuate and

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 4>probably decline over time. Just the industry is all about cycles, right,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Markets are all about cycles. I mean, we've had an

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 4>incredible run, incredible run. Okay, the you know, COVID was

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of a hiccup right where markets sort

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 4>of plummeted and things slowed down, but then you know,

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 4>it exploded in activity in just a matter of months later.

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 4>So it's been a long run really since the financial

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 4>crisis of you know, really wonderful times largely on Wall Street.

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 4>And you know at some point there's going to be

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, a retrenchment from that. There's going to be

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.719
<v Speaker 4>some kind of decline. Who you know, who knows. Maybe

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 4>maybe maybe a war set you know, turns things around,

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 4>maybe a private credit problem turns things around. But something

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 4>will happen, I think can sort of dampen the interest again,

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 4>just as happened, you know, with the dot com crash

0:28:47.400 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 4>or the financial crisis.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little bit more about technology and the

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 2>technological changes that you saw in your career. So okay,

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 2>mentioned like you're using Lotus one two three in the beginning,

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 2>which I have some memory of Lotus one two three

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and ease of data retrieval is so much is so

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 2>much different now. But talk to us about okay, twenty

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty four, but in recent years and some of the

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 2>other ways, like what what other technological innovations came out,

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 2>What time consuming activities did they shrink to your zero?

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And then what new things did people do on top

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Once Okay, the technology is here, you don't have to

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 2>allocate your time to this. You're now going to allocate

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 2>your time to that. Talk to us what else you saw?

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean look in the early days, like even

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 4>if companies weren't even that of their own share price, right,

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, not everybody had a Bloomberg terminal or CNBC

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 4>you know screen on their on their desk. If you're

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 4>sitting in Dayton, Ohio. Uh so you didn't know. As bankers,

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, you could bring very little information and it

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 4>was new to the client. It was interesting to the client.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 4>Over time, we used to do a lot of laborious

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 4>work to create sort of a comparable companies analysis. Here

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 4>are the ten companies in your business segment. You know,

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 4>you trade at this pe multiple or this ebit don multiple,

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 4>and here's where the other guys trade, and here's how

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 4>their leverage is different than yours, and here's how their

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 4>stock is performed. And that used to be a tremendous

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 4>amount of work. You know, Now really a machine can

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 4>largely do that, and a lot of the other kind

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 4>of creation of sort of standard charts on you know,

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 4>on what's going on in the industry, even what's going

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 4>on in your company can be done very very quickly.

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 4>So I think, you know, the pyramid I have to

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 4>think is going to get less fat at the bottom

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 4>because you're going to be really leveraging technology to do

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 4>a lot of things that used to be somebody sitting

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 4>up all up all night trying to find out, you know,

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 4>what pe multiple Coca Cola was trading at, and now

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 4>you know it's that you can get it at the

0:30:57.080 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 4>touch of a finger.

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Does the edge in that scenario? You know, if it's

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 3>not about how much knowledge you're accumulating and can share

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 3>with your client, is the edge more on the execution

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 3>side of things, just the knowledge or the client's belief

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 3>that you, out of everyone else in the IB business,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 3>is going to be able to execute like a smooth deal.

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that's true to some degree, And you know,

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 4>particularly amongst sort of the so called independent firms like

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 4>green Hill was for a long time and many others

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 4>are today. But I think among the larger you know

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 4>group of competitors, I think a lot it's going to

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 4>come down to what else is in the relationship. You know,

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 4>are you are you and their revolving credit facility? To

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 4>do you do their bond offering? Are you doing equity

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 4>research for them?

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Are you know, are you touching them and just every

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 4>are you doing their hedging? Are you, you know, talking

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 4>them about currency, talking them about commodity prices? And so

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 4>I do think it it may That's why I think

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 4>sort of the one stop shopping is kind of a

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 4>little more appealing again because if if nobody, if nobody

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 4>really has the magic anymore, right of the magic is

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 4>now a fingertips uh, and you know me even a

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of things like you can you can you don't

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 4>even need to do the Excel model. I mean, you

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 4>can say into a in the AI, if you have

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 4>this stream of cash flows to this period of time,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 4>this discount, right, what's the number? I mean, it will

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 4>give it to you without you typing a single number

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 4>under the page. But I think that with everyone having

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 4>access equal access to that information. I think it will

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 4>come down to, yeah, maybe are you smarter than the

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 4>other guys? Can you execute better? But probably in most cases,

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, what else are you doing for me? And hey,

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I could give this to anyone, but I'm gonna give

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:34.959
<v Speaker 4>it to you.

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 2>How much Tracy alluded to this at the very beginning,

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 2>But you know how much of the job is being

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 2>a good hang, being a good hang at the golf course,

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 2>knowing being able to get a good dinner reservation. It's seriously, no,

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 2>for real, like this is like I don't think you know,

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>this is where I when I think about if I

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>were this, I don't think i'd be very good at that.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I like start looking at my watch or you on anger,

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 2>so mostly I start looking at my phone's looking board,

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. The endurance, that's true.

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 3>It's very obvious when Joe is bored talking to you,

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I speak from a.

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Gast So this is not this should not be my field.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 2>But talk to us about that element and just the

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of people skills and all there.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Now, of course that's at quite the high level, right,

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't matter how you know, how fun you are

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 4>to be with as a senior associate at JP Morgan.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 4>That's not necessarily going to win the business. But maybe

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 4>your boss's boss, you know, whether he's in the right

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 4>golf clubs and inviting clients and you know, getting to

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 4>know them on a personal level. Look, there's always going

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 4>to be that element to the business, but that that's

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 4>a pretty small piece. And of course everyone has that too, right,

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you can one up others. You can bring

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 4>somebody to the Masters, you can, you know, rather than

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 4>to a you know, a country club on Long Island.

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 4>You know, you can. There's there's different levels of sort

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 4>of client entertainment, but you know that that's Look, it's

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 4>important to build relationships.

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 2>It always is.

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 4>I think what you know, whether you're talking about sort

0:33:59.920 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 4>of personal wealth management or corporate financial management, what the

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 4>what the advisors have to realize is like everyone in

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the world is calling on this guy and trying to

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 4>get you know, either his personal money to manage or

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 4>trying to manage his corporate affairs and help him do

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 4>acquisitions and so on. I mean, it's not That's another

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 4>thing really that changed a lot in the industry. Used

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 4>to be that people, you know, firms had clients like

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 4>like you, No, that's my client and this one is

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 4>your client. Now they're just all clients and everyone's clients everyone, right,

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 4>And it's kind of a free for all where you've

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 4>got a lot of parties out there, you know, in

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 4>you being special because you invite somebody to you know

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 4>something and get to know them butt, I mean everyone

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 4>else is doing that too, And as a matter of fact,

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 4>if you don't have the relationship, you're probably more prone

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 4>to do that because you're trying to break in, you know,

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 4>get to know them.

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned this word earlier in the conversation, but can

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 3>you explain culture to us? Explain all culture to us? No,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 3>the investment banking culture, because this is one thing that

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 3>we hear all the time time from you know, especially executives,

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 3>former executives at investment banks, this idea that well, we

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 3>have a culture that is different to someone else's culture.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 3>And whenever you hear them summarize the culture, it's almost

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 3>always like we're client facing and it's all. I've never

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 3>heard a bank say it's not about the client. Actually,

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.399
<v Speaker 3>our culture is about something else. What does culture mean

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 3>in investment banking?

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 4>I think it's probably fair to say every firm aspires

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 4>to the same culture. Right, you aspire to be driven

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 4>by excellence and attention to detail and client service, and

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 4>and you produce that great coverage through team work and

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 4>training and mentorship. I mean, every everyone aspires to all that.

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 4>There are though different cultures. There are some places I

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 4>think are much harder to work than others, although I

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 4>think the industry has become a little more in common.

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think there was there was a day

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 4>when you know, the difference inture between like a Morgan

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Stanley and a bear Stearns was was vast.

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I would say more about that, like what would have

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 2>been the d.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 4>You know, there were some firms that sort of you know,

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 4>the word scrappy sometimes gets thrown around on Wall Street, right,

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 4>and if you're if you're the elite firm, like say,

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 4>you know back in the day, Morgan Stanley and Golden

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 4>Sacks were. Of course there's still elite firms in any

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 4>ways today, but you know, as opposed to someone who's

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 4>kind of scrappy trying to get business that maybe you

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't do. I mean, there were there was a day

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 4>One of the interesting things not to bring up the

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Epstein files, but but you know, there was a day

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 4>when when there firms had a lot of rigor over

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 4>who they would do business with, you know, and I

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 4>know that you know, Morgan Stanley, that was the case.

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 4>I think at Gold and Sacks that was the case.

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look, they were in the law firm business.

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 4>There were there were firms that didn't like hostile takeovers.

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, they thought that, oh, that that's kind of

0:36:50.640 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 4>unseemly for us to be trying to buy somebody else's

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 4>business on a hostile basis. And so these firms that

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, you could put in the category of scrappy

0:36:57.840 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 4>were the ones that were trying to be a little

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 4>more like, hey, if the client wants that help, I'm

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 4>going to give the client that help. Or if the

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 4>client has a little bit of a that's right and

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 4>and well, and also by you know, maybe doing a

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 4>transaction for someone as a client that maybe of you know,

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 4>back in the day, I'm Morgan stand there, gomal Sex

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't have worked for now you've got a credential that industry. Now,

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 4>now you've done a media deal. Now maybe you can

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 4>do the next media deal. Maybe you can swim upstream

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 4>toward the more prestigious clients. So so, I think at

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 4>one point the cultures were a lot more different than

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 4>they are today.

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's kind of flattened.

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, look, this is probably a function

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 4>of scale of activity, and of things like technology, and

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 4>of things like you know, just so much open information

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 4>on everything. You know, everyone can sort of copy everyone else, right,

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 4>It's pretty obvious what a good culture is higher smart

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 4>young people. Train them well, treat them decently, and they'll

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 4>grow up to be you know, good good bankers. You know,

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:55.800
<v Speaker 4>pay attention to your clients, have integrity, you know, et cetera.

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 4>You'll build a good business. But that those aren't secrets, right,

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 4>everybody knows those.

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 2>I have a question. It's sort of this on long

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 2>standing puzzle within finance. It might be relevant this year

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 2>because there's some very big companies that might come public.

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Why does the IPO process as we know it exist

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 2>and persist? Because this is one of the long standing

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 2>academic things. Why is there frequently a pop Why did

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the companies have to pay large fees to underwriters, particularly

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.799
<v Speaker 2>given you'd think the Internet could just just have an auction, right,

0:38:27.840 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 2>an auction out the allocation of shares you want and

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 2>then get the market price instantly and so forth. And

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 2>yet this has been tried for a very long time,

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 2>and going back to the dot com here or there

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 2>have been attempts to disintermediate the traditional IPO process with

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 2>almost no success backs tried. That seems to be sort

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 2>of not a particularly counter signal. Perhaps, How would you

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 2>describe the persistence of the IPO.

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, first of all, the public start with

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 4>public companies, right, that's what you have after you do

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 4>on IPO. You know, that market really has shrunk. I

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 4>mean it fell in half. The number of public companies

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 4>in America fell in half the in the twenty five

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.319
<v Speaker 4>years or so that our firm was an independent firm.

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 4>So that I don't think that's a good thing. I

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 4>think it's a good positive thing to have more companies

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 4>in the public realm, where there's more information and more

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 4>under you know, transparency to what they do and so on.

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 4>But I think to go from the world of private

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 4>where nobody really knows much about your company to public,

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.399
<v Speaker 4>I think having a lot of you know, a lot

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 4>of sort of activity around that, you know, a big

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 4>almost like pr campaign, you know, lots.

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Kind of video and stand up there on the thing

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and like, yeah, yeah, exactly. It is a bit like that.

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I remember for our own IPO back in

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and four, we had like sixty something one

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 4>on one meetings as well as big group meetings and

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 4>places like New York and Boston and so on. But

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.319
<v Speaker 4>if you're trying to get known by a lot of

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 4>investors in a real hurry, you kind of need to

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 4>go through something like that. And you know, and that's

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 4>not like the industry has been some sort of a

0:40:00.520 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, uh, fees are fixed and there's nothing you

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:04.919
<v Speaker 4>can do about it. I mean, for a long long time,

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 4>an IPO was I remember it was seven percent. That

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 4>was an underwriting commission, you know. I remember we worked

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 4>and advised a Visa when it did what was then

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 4>the biggest IPO in two thousand and probably seven or

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 4>something like that, and that was like a fraction of

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 4>a percent, you know. So the end of it is

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 4>it sort of succumbs to competition, right, And somebody says, Okay, yeah,

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 4>if I'm doing a classic early year Silicon Valley IPO

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 4>and we're raising one hundred million dollars, yes, I think

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 4>a seven million dollar fee is fair for that, And

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 4>probably your competitors feel that way too. It's a lot

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 4>of work, it's a little bit risky. But when you're doing,

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, an ip that's in the hundreds of millions,

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 4>the billions, and maybe today the tens or hundreds of billions,

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, the fees will be very, very small and

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 4>driven by pretty ferocious competition.

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure did you say Greenhill iPod in two thousand

0:40:52.080 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 3>and four. Yes, So that's kind of late, right for well,

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 3>certainly in the context of like some of the larger

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 3>investment banks, because I think by then even Goldman had

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 3>had gone from.

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 4>A vestorship in nineteen ninety nine.

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So what was the sort of push pull process

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 3>of actually going public for you? What were the considerations?

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, for us, it was that there had been a

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 4>long I mean, obviously some bigger firms like Morgan Stanley

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 4>went public in nineteen eighty six, and I think Goldman

0:41:17.000 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 4>in ninety nine or something like that. But you know,

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 4>for a firm like Hours that was kind of a smaller,

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 4>more focused firm, the long history of that was that

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 4>you normally sold the firm, and even in its fairly

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 4>early days, you'd kind of build something, you know, prove

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 4>you had a team, Priva, had a brand, prove, you

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 4>had some clients, and you'd go out and sell the firm.

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 4>There were many, many cases that happened, and you know,

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 4>we viewed the IPO as an alternative, and IPO is

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 4>a way to realize the value you had created, but

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 4>also keep what you thought of the special culture. To

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 4>go back to that word, you didn't want to change things,

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 4>You don't want to give up control, et cetera. And

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 4>so that that was really what drove us to go

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 4>public and I think many others as well.

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 3>So when but also in an IPO process, you're raising capital, right,

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 3>what what does capital actually mean for a boutique advisory

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 3>firm Light Green Hill?

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 4>You know, you're you're often that used to be the case.

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 4>That was the original idea that you go public to

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 4>raise capital, and to some extent that's still true. But

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 4>you look at even take these mega you know technology companies,

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 4>stay do they do they need capital? They can raise

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 4>all the capital they want the private markets. So it

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 4>really has evolved from that to wanting liquidity. I would say,

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 4>you want to have a you want to have a

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 4>marker that says here's what my company is worth. Uh,

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:33.919
<v Speaker 4>and you want to have the liquidity to be able

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 4>to transact at that price in any given day. So

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that has driven more I pos in recent

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 4>years than the kind of the earlier notion of wow,

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.399
<v Speaker 4>we need to build a new factory, or we need

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 4>to you know, invest a lot to build an overseas

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 4>business or launch a new brand, so we need to

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 4>do an IPO to raise money.

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Has something changed in the IPO front? Now? I'm just

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 2>maybe I missed it, But I feel like several years ago,

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe the mid twenty tens, I still used to hear

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 2>read a lot of stories about so and so won

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 2>the Uber deal, right, or so and so and this

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 2>would be a big thing and they like their flush

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 2>left on the swan or the perspectives.

0:43:12.840 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Whatever getting or something yeah, and stuff like.

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 2>That used to and how I feel like, I don't

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.359
<v Speaker 2>has something changed there or that's still a thing. Okay,

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that's still that's still a thing.

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 4>You still want to be on the left and but

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 4>you know what, what also, again, the industry became very

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 4>very big, very very competitive, and so you know, it

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 4>used to be like there was one lead underwriter and

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 4>then you got into well, you're the global lead. You're

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 4>the co global lead.

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 2>You're the lead laugh, massive lead. Like everyone everyone gets

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 2>to be a lead.

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.320
<v Speaker 4>It's it's like getting an A at Harvard. I understand

0:43:43.320 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 4>the pipation for.

0:43:45.600 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Trophies for the Uber one, like there wasn't There was

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a banker who became an Uber driver. There was remember

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that because he wanted to show that he and like,

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I get it. It's like that's cool. He like really

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 2>like got it. He really took the job seriously and

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 2>he Joe for Uber and stuff like that. But still

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 2>in my mind, I was like, does this really make

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a difference from ubers. They're just selling some shares that

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 2>they're moving on, like it's cute. People used to do

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 2>that sort of thing.

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.359
<v Speaker 4>I think. By the way, I can't remember his name.

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 4>He was kind of slightly after my time, I think,

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:19.440
<v Speaker 4>but he is. That banker is still at Morgan Stanley

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 4>and is I'm sure going to be the one driving

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 4>the pursuit of Elon Musk's large IPOs to come we should.

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he became. He was also he became the Uber

0:44:30.880 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 2>He became an Uber driver for a while. Yeah, he was.

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 3>He was a big deal.

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 2>And that definitely in the mix today with some of

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 2>these big potential IPOs.

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 3>We should actually talk about league tables, though, because I

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:44.320
<v Speaker 3>feel like this is sort of perhaps an inordinate amount

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 3>of what an investment banker's life is actually about. And

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 3>back when I was covering the banks, the league tables

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 3>were the things I probably got called up about the most.

0:44:53.719 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, lots of banks explaining to me why the

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 3>league table rankings were not, in fact an accurate reflection

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.280
<v Speaker 3>of their business. How much do those actually matter?

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 4>I think whether you're frankly, if you're number one or

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 4>number four, number seven, you know, we're number nine or

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 4>eleven even, you probably have a pretty equal chance at

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 4>pursuing something. But look, the bankers, do you know, do

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 4>aggressively fight to try to be number one in some

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:23.759
<v Speaker 4>in something? Right? And but but again with the with

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 4>the increase in just availability of information and transparency, I mean,

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 4>it used to be that, you know, there was a

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 4>lot of gamesmanship around the league tables. You know, you'd say, well,

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 4>we're number one in in uh you know, and I

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 4>pos and you'd look into the footnotes and it would say,

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, this includes all deals for you know, radio

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 4>stations with a market cap more than a two hundred

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:46.919
<v Speaker 4>and fifty million dollars. And you know, if you're trying

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:49.240
<v Speaker 4>to pitch some media deal or something, and you always

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:51.200
<v Speaker 4>have some way to slice and dice, like us I

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:55.399
<v Speaker 4>pos uk, I pos this industry, this deal size. Now

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of all out there and it's uh, you know,

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 4>but there's there's ten or a dozens that are very,

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 4>very competitive, and the fact that one ranks number one

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:05.879
<v Speaker 4>versus four is not a big deal.

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 2>It's hilarious. Michael Grimes, he not only drove for Uber,

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 2>he mastered the online game Farmville before Facebook's IPO. They

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 2>spent hours playing that and hey, if that paid off

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:19.359
<v Speaker 2>for him, good for him. And now he is bad

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 2>because it looks like he'll probably be a.

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 3>Lot of people master Farmville for free with right, he.

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Turned it into something, and I guess it's likely to

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 2>be involved or perhaps positioning himself for a potential role

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 2>into SpaceX IPO. Final question for me, But I'm just curious,

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 2>So like, Okay, we don't know what the future is

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 2>going to look like, but I'm curious, like people you're

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 2>talking to or things you're seeing the AI question, and

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 2>there's some obvious things today anyone knows that you can

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:51.200
<v Speaker 2>do a very good comp analysis already with almost no knowledge,

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 2>like what are some comps here? And well, maybe that's

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 2>not the kind of output that you would show to

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 2>a client, but it might get your ninety five percent

0:46:57.200 --> 0:47:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of the way there. And so that's that's extraordinary about

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 2>excel files and stuff like that. What else, like, what

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 2>does it feel like AI is going to do to

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:09.360
<v Speaker 2>this space or what would be your guess or where

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 2>today would you imagine we're already seeing AI change the

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:13.760
<v Speaker 2>nature of the job.

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 4>No one really knows the answer to that question. Of course,

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 4>is such a fast moving technology. But look, I do

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:23.320
<v Speaker 4>think it will change a lot about how bankers interact

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 4>with clients because the information now is going to go

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 4>from you know, from kind of available, but you have

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:31.280
<v Speaker 4>to sort of work to dig it out to available

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 4>just literally your fingertips, and by the way, not just

0:47:33.680 --> 0:47:36.200
<v Speaker 4>to you the banker, but also to your client. So

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 4>I think differentiating yourself as a banker inside one of

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:43.320
<v Speaker 4>these firms or as one of these firms relative to

0:47:43.360 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 4>your peers trying to win the IPO, trying to win

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 4>the M and A deal, trying to win the bond

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 4>offering is going to be more complicated. You'll you'll have

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 4>you'll be more efficient in preparing your materials, You'll be

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 4>more efficient in communicating with that client and delivering you know, interesting,

0:47:57.200 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 4>insightful information to them. But a lot of that information

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 4>is going to look it's going to be commodity like.

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 4>And so the real challenge is going to be, you know,

0:48:06.400 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 4>if a client has access to all the information you do,

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:11.720
<v Speaker 4>when they're getting all the feeds of you know, various

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 4>data they like and so on, and you have a

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 4>one hour meeting with that client, how are you going

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 4>to use that meeting? That one hour meeting. You know

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 4>that they already know a lot as you're walking in there,

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 4>So how do you use that? It's got to be

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 4>more about you know, the human dimension, the tactics, why

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 4>this company may be more amenable to a deal now

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:31.799
<v Speaker 4>than they were in the past. You know, things like

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 4>that that are more about psychology really than about math.

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I feel like the trend is towards extroverts with large

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:39.120
<v Speaker 3>balance sheets.

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I suppose yes. All right, Scott bo, thank you so

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 2>much for coming back on the podcast. We love catching

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 2>up with you, and now we got to do it again.

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 4>I would love to it's a great probably.

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:48:50.280 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 5>That's great, Tracy.

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I love talking to Scott.

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 3>I yeah, that's great.

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad. I'm glad we met Scott. I think just

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.160
<v Speaker 2>this idea and it came up at the very end

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 2>about the information asymmetry just being gone, and it feels like,

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's not something that is just true with

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 2>AI now, right, but it feels like there is a

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 2>version of this story that you could say, going back

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 2>for the last forty five years, in which decline degradation

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 2>of the information edge that a bank would have had

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:34.400
<v Speaker 2>over its clients for all kinds of different largely you know,

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:36.439
<v Speaker 2>technological changes since then.

0:49:36.840 --> 0:49:39.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I found that conversation fascinating. I guess

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:44.280
<v Speaker 3>the two takeaways for me are the first technological revolution

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:46.799
<v Speaker 3>in investment banking and the idea that, well, we don't

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 3>have to spend as many hours like actually pulling physical

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 3>sec filings or something like that, or looking up quotes

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:58.320
<v Speaker 3>on a quotron or whatever, and what replaced that work

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 3>was more meetings. Right. I feel like humans can always.

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Find a reason to meet with each other exactly.

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:08.759
<v Speaker 3>I know, it's crazy, isn't it ridiculous?

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Humans just love touching base and any am I maybe

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm revealing my own your own biases, my own biases.

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I think it's very good that we

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 3>have an extrovert and an introvert on the show. We

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 3>got both sides, both sides of the story. But the

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:27.760
<v Speaker 3>other thing I was thinking is the trend towards bigger,

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:32.320
<v Speaker 3>bigger balance sheets, more services, the one stop shop idea.

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 3>And it feels to me like, Okay, if you can't

0:50:36.120 --> 0:50:39.239
<v Speaker 3>have an informational edge anymore, and if you do have

0:50:39.320 --> 0:50:42.399
<v Speaker 3>this sort of flattening of culture for various reasons, because

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:45.440
<v Speaker 3>everyone's getting smarter and smarter about what a good culture

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 3>actually looks like and they're able to sort of execute

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:52.080
<v Speaker 3>on it in various ways, then it is it feels

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:53.960
<v Speaker 3>to me like it's very much going to be fought

0:50:54.040 --> 0:50:55.840
<v Speaker 3>just on size and scale.

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:59.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't think share buybacks are evil to

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people do, but it is interesting. We

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 2>could just go back back. So interesting fact, like I

0:51:04.520 --> 0:51:06.960
<v Speaker 2>always forget that that they haven't been around that long,

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that they were seeing as market manipulation at one point,

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 2>we could just ban them. I mean, the fact that

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 2>capitalism worked fine for a very long time without share back.

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 2>Share buybacks would probably be probably wouldn't be the end

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:20.720
<v Speaker 2>of the world.

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:22.920
<v Speaker 3>We should do another episode on this, but that reminds me.

0:51:23.320 --> 0:51:26.360
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I was thinking was this idea that like, well,

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 3>we had an entire I mean multiple industries really that

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 3>grew up whose entire sense of purpose was about doing transactions. Right,

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.400
<v Speaker 3>So you have the traditional Wall Street banks, but then

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 3>you had private equity and private credit, and so you

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 3>just have this explosion in deals.

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, if Michael Grimes is going to ride on

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 2>a rocket to get the lot to space, he's gonna

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna do a little space joy ride. So to

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 2>get that.

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:53.920
<v Speaker 5>It was one thing.

0:51:53.960 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh you know what I thought was also very interesting,

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think this says a lot about culture in

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 2>general on just banking. The idea that at one point,

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 2>for better or worse, and maybe for better, and that

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:09.799
<v Speaker 2>there were like clients that the banks wouldn't touch, but

0:52:09.880 --> 0:52:12.799
<v Speaker 2>they end that they're like, no, we're above this, this

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 2>is not what we do here.

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, some of them had investigators, like on staff to

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 3>go out and investigate potential clients.

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 2>I think that's really interesting and a certain level of

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:24.759
<v Speaker 2>you know what we're going to leave some money off

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the table because this is not what we do here.

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 2>We have standards and so forth. And I do feel

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 2>like these days it's just money. It's just across the board,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.839
<v Speaker 2>it's just accumulating more and more money, and so the

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 2>idea of some money isn't good enough for here, Like

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 2>it does not feel like that's a thing anymore. Maybe. Well,

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:49.879
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people would say in retrospect,

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 2>people they should have had better standards about who they

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 2>do business with.

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it feels much more a moral now. And I

0:52:55.960 --> 0:52:58.080
<v Speaker 3>mean that in the sense that like there's a possibility

0:52:58.080 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that people hide behind that say, like, well, we shouldn't

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:05.279
<v Speaker 3>be making qualitative decisions about our clients. We're just here to,

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:09.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, share the good gospel of capitalism. Yeah, all right,

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 3>shall we leave it there.

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Jill Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand desh Ol

0:53:22.480 --> 0:53:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Bennett at Dashbot and Kilbrooks at Kilbrooks more odd Laws content.

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots with the

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 2>daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and you can

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:32.919
<v Speaker 2>chat about all of these topics twenty four to seven

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:36.240
<v Speaker 2>in our discord Discord dot gg slash odlines.

0:53:36.600 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:53:38.760 --> 0:53:41.640
<v Speaker 3>when we talk about the business and culture of investment banking,

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 3>then please leave us a positive review on your favorite

0:53:44.200 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 3>podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber,

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:50.399
<v Speaker 3>you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free.

0:53:50.719 --> 0:53:52.880
<v Speaker 3>All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel

0:53:52.920 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 3>on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for

0:53:56.239 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 3>listening in in