WEBVTT - Congress Has to Change Its 19th-Century Structure, Harman Says

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene with

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, and of course

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg David Gura and Tom Keene here in

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>New York in our Bloomberg eleven for studios. This is

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance on Bloomberg Radio. As you've mentioned, it's you

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and General Assembly week here in New York and making

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>fun of the traffic, but a big deal here is

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred heads of state, world leaders descend

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on New York for meetings and dinners and the like,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and of course President Trump in town schedule to address

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>the UN General Assembly tomorrow for the first time. Converressman

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>j Flober, Congressman Jan Harmon with us here now in

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg studios. Former Congressman now at President of the

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington and DC. Great to have

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you with us. What are you gonna be listening for tomorrow?

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a big deal, suffice to say, to have

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>this audience to be in that space. What are you

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be listening for from the President tomorrow? Well, this

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>is a chance for him to recalibrate his foreign policy.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I uh, I think his inaugural speech was disappointing, and

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>here's a chance on a world stage with world leaders

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for him to sound much more visionary and hopeful, and

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>he should take a chance to take the opportunity. In

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>my view, he's also having side meetings with all kinds

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>of folks Europeans, Africans, and he's having lunch with the

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>heads of South Korea and Japan on Thursday. North Korea

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>will be the top of his agenda. And again, North

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Korea is an international problem, It's not just an American problem,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and he needs to make the sale to the whole

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>world about why we should work together to contain North

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Korea's missiles and nukes. What's your your sense of how

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he regards the United Nations at this point? Important it

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is to him and his foreign policy portfolio. I do

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>note that NICKI Haley u s ambassador to the U

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>n Front and center, perhaps even more so than than

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>his secretary stay talking about global issues, including the North

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Korea crisis as well. Have you seen an evolution in

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>his thinking about this multi, multi ladder institution. At least well,

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>he made a terrific choice in Nicki Haley. Um. Who

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>knew that the governor of South Carolina would be such

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a star on the U N stage? But she is. However, Um,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>my understanding is he's cutting her staff in half and

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this will be a place where he announces rolling back

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>US foreign aid. As a member of Congress, I always

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>was amazed when my constituents would say fifty percent of

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the budget goes to foreign aid. Well, excuse me, it's

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>less than one percent of the budget, and it is

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>probably our best foreign policy tool. You were on the

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Committee, the Homeland Security Committee, the Armed Services Committee.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I really have a great sense of the way that

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>security apparatus works in Washington, d C. You talk about

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 1>staffing being cut back, security aid funding being cut back

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. How problematic is that to your mind? Um?

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This president talks about reform of the UN, talks about

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>reform of all of these institutions, has even joked about

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to Russia sending back a bunch of diplomats that's helping

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line. From from from a perspective of actionable policy,

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>how affected. Are these institutions as a result of the

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 1>cuts that we've seen thus far or the positions that

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have gone unfilmed. Well, let's understand that I don't think

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress will stand for this, and I think many in

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Congress Lindsey Graham comes to mind, many in the President's

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>party will restore the funding. So let's go there. But

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>if the seventh floor, which is the main UH floor

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of senior people at the State Department, is empty, how

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>can Rex to listen succeed. So that's the beginning of

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the of the problem. But in addition to that, UM

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Jim Mattis are are very capable. Secretary Defense says that

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>UH military policy has to be lashed up to diplomatic

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>policy or whatever you want to call it for UH

0:03:54.880 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>non non non military policy, and without people, you can't

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>do it. Madam arro Space, that's what my father called you.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You you were the congresswoman of the aerospace industry. Anyone

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>would always say that you had a wonderful understanding of aerospace.

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Are you taken back by the merger frenzy among defense

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>contractors and in this highly technological expertise that we have

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>U t X. Rockwell Collins of cedar rapids, and now

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got Orbital Sciences being crow bought out by north Room.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Come on, it's all gonna be one big company, isn't it.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you want? Not so much. Perry, who

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>was an extraordinarily good Secretary of Defense back and you

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>know another century when Bill Clinton was president, had what

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>was famously called the Last Supper, and that was with

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>heads of defense firms. This is not a yes. And

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>his point was that the UH defense procurement budget is

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>getting smaller. We all thought there would be a piece

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>dividend after the end of the Cold War, but at

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>any rate, UH, and that these firms should consider merging UH.

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>And they also did consider. This was something I'm proud

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of going into UH many non military activities, dual use

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>activities which made them stronger. So I'm not surprised to

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>see continued mergers. The advantages that many of these very

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>good firms, and Northrop is one of them, UH will

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>be UH good stewards of this new acquisition. The disadvantages

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you lose the nimbleness and the flexibility of the smaller firms.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's a mixed bag. I'm strongly for

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a strong defense, as you know, and Madam Mary's space

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>ain't bad. I used to call myself Boeing's mother was

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>out of Boulder, Colorado. They played dead like nobody. Jane

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>harmon with us the thirty six district, of course, at

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the Woodrow Wilson Center. Now we continue, Jane, there was

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that couch scene the other day, speak your Pelosi majority

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>leader Schumer and some other guy from the other party.

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Can the Democratic Party migrate over to Jane Harman's Democratic

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Party or is it going to be Clinton Pelosi forever? Well?

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>How's this? What's the What are the young kids gonna do?

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to refine you in Scoop Jackson? Yeah? Well,

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I yes, I have called myself a Scoop Jackson Democrat

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>for years. I actually knew him when I was a

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Senate aid in the early seventies and he was he

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>was Boeing Senator. So from from Washington State. But yesterday

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in this town there was a meeting of something called

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the New Center. The New Center is an idea factory

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>co chaired by Bill Crystal and Bill Galston. Uh, imagine that.

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And it has produced a set of ideas and I

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>think are very attractive to both parties. So that's out there.

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it'll get traction, Maybe people will move to the

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>center in both parties. Okay, Secretary Clinton's out in a

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>book tour taking a victory lap. I guess, And we

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>had all the uproar last week. David gurg covered it

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:02.239
<v Speaker 1>really well in politics. Congresswoman Harman, how do you win minute?

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you win Michigan? How do you win Wisconsin?

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you win the rectangle that looks like Tennessee?

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>That was your district east of l A. Well, I

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>won in a lean Republican district. Now, how did I

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in my first story terms? How did I do that?

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I had a vision of where we were going that

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>uh people bought. You got to have a vision. It's

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>not just that the other guy's bad. It's why you're

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>good when you left it. When you left the Congress,

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>things were i'll say, getting bad in terms of partisanship,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the ability for Congress to get things.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Then we saw another continuing resolution here kicking the can

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>for three months. Now, what do you say to those

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>who are just completely skeptical of Congress's ability to get anything?

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And what's it gonna? What's it gonna bring what's gonna

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>bring you back to regular order in the US Congress?

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think, well, I believe in Congress. I did

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>leave because of the toxic partisanship, and I got a

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>better offer to be in a bipartisan, nonpartisan intellect fund. Yeah,

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>but not for me. It's not invest in me. It's

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>invested in in amazing, brilliant ideas. So which is an

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>easier sell, got to say. But at any rate, I

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.679
<v Speaker 1>still think Congress can work. There's so many people there

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>who want to do the right thing in both parties

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>as they define it. What's wrong is the is the

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>business models broken U. The game is to blame the

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>other side for not solving the problem. If you work

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>with the other side, you get primaried. California has figured

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>out a better answer. We have UH citizen commissions to

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>draw lines. We have what's called a jungle primary where

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone runs against everyone, and that way you have to

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to other people and be open to other ideas.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>There's been a tendency to fix Congress by trying to

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>blow it up. UH, And I wonder what you make

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the way that many elected representatives have pursued that

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>who has the institutional knowledge the memory, uh, to figure

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>out the way that the Congress works, and to to

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>find solutions that will actually improve the way things working. Right. Actually,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I like the last part of that question about improve

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Congress has a nineteen entry committee structure. I mean, why

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>do we need an agriculture committee when we don't really

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.599
<v Speaker 1>have a Homeland Security committee with with ample jurisdiction, uh, etcetera.

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So I do think Congress has to change, and being

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>disruptive is not a bad thing, but being disruptive with

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>respect for the institution is the way it needs to happen.

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>We do a huge thing on STEM here. Thank you,

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey Institute Technology. You're Smithy, that's the ultimate liberal

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>arts Massachusetts school. Tell me how if it's science in

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the new curriculum, A woman of the liberal arts, how

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>do you fit science and math into the new liberal

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>arts curriculum? Boy? Was that a softball? First of all,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I applied early decision to Smith having never seen it

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>from public school in Los Angeles. So very cool. Uh,

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it was very cool. And Smith was the first women's

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>college to have an engineering program and it's had it

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for years, So just so you know, so it's not so,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>how do we get quickly here. How do we get

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>women to stay in math, stay in science and do

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it like the women that made Cassini I by making

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>it more easily available and making it cool. And you

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>ask about it on your program every single day, and

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>more women will tune in and and put mentors on

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>your program and they'll do it. We try to do it.

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I know you're still congresswomen keep funding jp L Jane

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Harmon Madam Merrow Space from California has something to do

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with the school in New Jersey now as well. This

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Ratter joining us now in our Bloomic eleventh

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>three US too is the chairman of will It Advisors.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>UH great to have you with us here. Let me

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>start just by asking you about the week ahead. Yes,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>we have the FED. We also have a lot of

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:45.959
<v Speaker 1>traffic here on the upper east side of Manhattan's the

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>UN General As simply gets underway. The President scheduled to

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>speak tomorrow before that that international body. What are you

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be listening for? We had a list of what

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this administration is prioritizing from UH, the U S Ambassador

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to the U N and from the National City. Your

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>advisor on Friday reform high up on the list. The

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>President attending a meeting about UN reform today in particularly,

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna be listening for tomorrow? Well, as

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are really two Trumps. There's the there's

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the more congenial, more broad, broad looking Trump, and then

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>there's the more of the the ugly Trump. And it

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting, especially with Steve Batton gone from the

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>White House, to see if we get more of the

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>good Trump. Now, even some of of Trump's more experienced

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>people do favor reforming the UN, cutting what we pay

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to the U and things like that. So I think

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in the speech is obviously going to be presumably a

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>hunk about North Korea, UH, and there's going to be

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a piece about how he sees the UN going forward.

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>He does not like multilateral institutions. I think we've learned

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that about his personality, So it'll it'll be interesting. It

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>could be a pretty tough speech. It could be a

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough speech, but I suspect he'll stay within the fairway.

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you assess the efficacy of sanctions? We saw

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the U. N Security Council apply another round of them

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>last week on North Korea. There's talk perhaps of Moore.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>We've had them in North Korea, on Venezuela, on Russia,

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on a number of other countries. How do you know

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>if they're working? They I think sanctions at best take

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a long time to work. You can go further back

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in history and you look at Rhodija, you can look

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>at Cuba, you can look at Iran. Uh You're talking

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>about things that take decades and may then even have

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>no effect, and then at some point you just decide

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>unwind them. But look, we have a limited toolbox of

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>things we can do about North Korea short of military activity,

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>which I don't think anybody thinks is a good idea,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>And sanctions are simply are simply one part of it.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think I would give the President and Nicky

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Heilly in particular high marks for getting a fifteen to

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing vote on a set of sanctions. And I think

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I think if you take out Trump or Trump has said,

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>somewhat Trump has said and most of his tweets, the

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>actual things that are being said by Rex Tillison and

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Nikki Hilly yesterday on the Sunday shows the way. It's

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the way the professionals are handling this is actually I

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>think about as good as it gets. But there is

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the green marble of the u N. There is something

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about walking into that time warp of middle sixties architecture

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and walking into that Assembly hall. I'm assuming he's never

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>done that. He's going to go up there against that

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>green marble and act at what ecumenical? Is that the

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>right word? I mean, what if somebody pops off and

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>says something, What if like somebody who's kind of somebody

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>puts some you know, do you think he's gonna stay

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on message? I think he is going to stay on message.

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know what the message is, right. And

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary Tillison's showing up, I assume. So every Secretary

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of State in history has been at the UN General

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Assembly week as far as I know, I assume. So Look,

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>my my guess is that you will get. My guess

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is that he will get a measure Trump who will

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be tough about the u N and say that there

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>should be changes and it's not as effective as it

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>should be, etcetera, etcetera. And I think he'll be tough

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on North Korea, but I think he will stay inside

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the fairway in terms of talk. And I'm not even

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a Golfer. But I think it will stay in the

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>fairway in terms of the kinds of things. He says,

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I believe President She's not going to be here play

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>President Putin is not going to be here as well.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>How much a vacuum does that leave? I mean, I

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>think of of of the two countries on this globe

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that have the largest impact on a number of these

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>big issues, be that North Korea or Syria. Uh, is

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it going to be a hindrance to actual things getting

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>done by them not being here in New York? Yes?

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And no. I think obviously in the modern world there's

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly communications back and forth with their people that will

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>allow things to happen. But but I think it does.

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we do lose something because I think I

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>think having our president have a chance to bilaterals with

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Putin with g is an important part of trying to

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>diplomatically move the world forward. God, twelve seconds left left?

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Long time? Can you own an Apple? Here? We've had

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>really different a different set of opinions over the list,

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what. Yeah. I have never owned Apple, not because

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the company and obviously been wrong. I

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think I think they've done a great job I think

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that I think the existential question for Apple is what

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is the next act? And as Tim Cook able to

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>produce it? You know, Steve Jobs, if you just think

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>back to when Steve when this thing made, When when

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple made some computers and that was kind of it,

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and Steve Jobs said well, We're gonna make a phone,

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and every said what And the phone is now over

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>half the business, as you know, and the iPad and

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the Apple TV and the I Watch and all of

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the others now and now all the media stuff. The

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>question really is, can Tim Cook produced an innovation on

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the scale of the kinds of things Steve Jobs did

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that really transform the company? Steve Wrotner, thank you so

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>much for you in perspective. How do you get around town?

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I do a lot of walking guy a helicopter. I

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I try not to go a little sixtieth Street and

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I do a lot of walking. You would be at

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve Wrenner, thank you so much. As Willow Advisors should

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>point out an investment advisor to Michael Bloomberg, the principal

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>owner of the company and also of course owner of

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio as well, Alan Krueger here in Bloomberg eleven

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>three US to the professor of Economics and Public Policy

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at Princeton, former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>under President Obama. This this week, the President has proclaimed

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this week to be Prescription Opioid and Heroin Epidemic Awareness Week.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>He's talked about opio addiction the problem of it in

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this country a few times. I don't think he's gone

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>so for US to declared a national emergency yet, but

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it is certainly indicated that might be that might be coming.

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>We talked about it in a social context, help us

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>frame it in an economic context. How big an issue

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is this for the US at this point? Well, I

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>give the President credit for talking about the issue. I

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's important that we also take some concrete actions,

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and I was hoping that the commission that he set

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>up would make proposals to try to reduce the crisis.

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing research on how the spread of opioid

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>use has been affecting labor force participation, and as you know, David,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a problem of low labor force participation in

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the US that's run into the opioid crisis. And I

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>think those two problems are now intertwined. When I look

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>at prime age men, UM, I find that almost half

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>for taking pain medication every day. Two thirds of those

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>people are taking prescription medication. And a new study I

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>have that I just presented at the Brookings Institution last week,

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I found that areas of the country where more opioid

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>medication is being prescribed have seen bigger decline in labor

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>force participation. Of course, there could be other factors behind that,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but from what I can tell, this is possibly depressed

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>UM the participation rate by more than half a percentage

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>point for prime age men. Again, we're talking about the

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>through the economic factors here. When you look at the

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation about this issue in particular, how much dialogue has

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>there been among economists and social scientists and addiction specialists

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>and medical doctors. You mentioned the commission that the President established.

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that there was a medical doctor on

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that committee of four or five individuals. Are you satisfied

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>as you look into this that the kind of dialogue

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we need to have is taking place, incorporating your economics

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with the medical side of this issue as well. There's

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fascinating research that's being done. UM. Some

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of the results quite depressing. I'll tell you an example.

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I have a colleague, Janet Curry, who has a study

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which finds that doctors who attended lower ranked medical schools

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to prescribe opioid medication, looking within the

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>same county, looking within the same field as specialty. Um.

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.239
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's fascinating research that's being done. I

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.640
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen much interest from policymakers yet. Alan Krueger were

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this folks, And again, as we like to do from

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>time to time, particularly with someone with a reach of professor,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Krueger has moved away from the usual, which is jobs

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, to his important work of Brooking's paper

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Run Opioid and and such. Um, there's some wonderful first

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>order difference equations within your report, and maybe even so

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>an oiler function because we're not quite sure. There's lambda's

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and other Greek letters. What the public wants to know

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is Horse and Kurt, which is almost economics one oh one.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Do the drugs cause the unemployment or does the unemployment

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>cause the drugs? Well, that's an excellent question. And I

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>appreciate Ton that you have a copy of my study

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>right next to you. I really appreciate that. And you

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 1>cut right to the heart of the matter. So I

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. You know, I think the arrows point in

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>both directions, and in certain level, the initial causality is

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>less important than the reality that this is a problem

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be addressed. This is so important. You nailed,

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You go right. It goes in both directions, But political

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>discourse is no, it goes in this direction, and the

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>other side says no, it goes in that direction. Can

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>we get compromise on the couch in the Oval Office

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>on opioids and drug addiction? This heroin epidemic that we

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>have no I think there is widespread agreement that this

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is a significant problem, and I think that came out

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in the presidential election. Um, there's been very little discussion

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>about what to do it about it. I mean, let

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>me give you another example time. And one of the

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>findings in that in that Brooking study is that three

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>quarters of the prescription pain medication that man a rather

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the labor force are taking is being paid for by Medicaid,

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Medicare or Veterans Administration program. So the government does have

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>levers to try to influence the initial prescription, and that

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>does seem to be a source of a lot of

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the addiction. Even if people move to illegal drugs, it

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>seems that they're addiction is starting with prescription medication. That's

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>such a good point. And on the subject of a

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>legal us, I mean there's another economics issue here as well,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which is just the relative cheapness of a lot of

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 1>these drugs. They're easier to get, and they're they're less

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>expensive as well. Well. That's part of the problem. The

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>New York Times had an article today about insurance companies

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>being reluctant to prescribe more expensive but less addictive pain medication. Uh.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>And that comes down to economics, and I don't think

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the insurance companies are taking full account of the cost

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of the externalities of having over thirty thousand people a

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>year or die from opioid abuse. We are our parents

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>lectured us on heroin. It's what they were afraid of,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was all you know within the culture and

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the music. This is completely removed from the drug culture

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of twenty or fifty or a hundred years ago. And

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's almost an economic discussion, isn't it about fenl or

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. It's they're cheap and it's am I right,

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>It's just there, it's they're cheap, it's highly addictive, and

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it's very powerful, and it's there and it's available. It's available.

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that fixable? You know, this problem is almost unique

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to the US. You look at the rest of the world,

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>They're not going through this type of how do you

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>fix it? Give me the gimme after the first order

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>difference equations. What's the Kruger solution? Well, I think there's

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>some obvious solutions. In some states have started with this

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>limit the number of pills that compete, that people get

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the initial prescription, make them come back and see medical profession,

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>professional doctors. I think the medical profession bears a lot

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of responsibility. And you go to Manchester, New Hampshire, which

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I guess its ground zero in New Hampshire. Do you

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>blame the doctors? Do you blame the hospital? Do you

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>blame Raytheon for pulling their business out forty years ago?

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where's the Kruger blame here? Well, you know, Tom,

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm focused on solutions, not on blames. So I think

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>what we should do is say, how do we solve

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this problem? Figuring out an assigning blame when there's plenty

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of blame to go around is not terribly helpful. Is

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this something? When you were cheering the Council of Economic Advisor,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you would have these the access to somebody at DHS.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>In other words, how hard is it to get all

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of the parties within public policy to the table, to

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>get folks heading up different agencies to meet with the

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>White House to to work on these kinds of solutions.

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not hard at all. What the government is great

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.120
<v Speaker 1>at his meetings? Uh? What I found when I worked

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for President Obama at the Treasury Department at the White House.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Government is great at meetings, good at talking, good at listening.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Action is more difficult, and particularly the action requires Congress.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking around this a little bit here, but

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.640
<v Speaker 1>tell us just what data you looked at. How difficult

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is it to come by data on this subject of

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>opioid addiction in particular? I started using a survey called

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the American Time Youth Survey, which is a real gem.

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>It's collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and it

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>had a supplement which I helped frankly to design, which

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>asked people about their experience with pain and whether they

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>took pain medication on the previous day, and when I

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>started the study, I didn't expect to find what I found.

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, that survey found that in two thousand and third,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>teen of prime age men to fifty four who were

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>not working, not looking for a job, took pain medication

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.399
<v Speaker 1>on the day of the survey. And I didn't know

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was aspirin. You know, you feel differently if

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it's aspirin. So I did a survey myself where we

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>identified about six men who were not in the labor force,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>same age group. We found that of them had taken

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>pain medication. Two thirds of that group took prescription pain medication.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>And then I dug deeper in that survey. The c

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>d C does a survey on people's experience with pain

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>over time. It's a very big sample, uh Amazingly. One

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the things that data shows is that pain has

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>not been declining. In spite of the fact that we've

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>almost quadrupled the amount of opioids that are being prescribed.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.239
<v Speaker 1>Pain for men or out of the labor force has

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>actually been gradually rising over time. And I think there's

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other evidence that suggests that this treatment

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>is not working. Um. So I used a variety of

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>data but those are the main sources. I ask you

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>just about the role economics can play in solving or

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>leading to a solution for social crises like these. As

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Tom was saying before we went to break um, this

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is something I think more people are talking about. Unfortunately,

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I think more people have experience with looking back at

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the history of of of economics and the way that

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it can influence discourse and conversation about issues like these.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.719
<v Speaker 1>What's the role of economics in a conversation about hope

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we had addiction in this country? Well, I think economics

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.479
<v Speaker 1>has an important role to playing, frankly, in all policy issues.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it should be the only voice at

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the table, but I think it's an important vote, important voice.

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And in economics, we tend to think about incentives. You know,

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we we were pretty good at at at calculating costs,

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're pretty good at considering incentives. People don't always

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>respond the way we think they should respond, but we

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.479
<v Speaker 1>can think about what the economic incentives are. And I

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think this crisis is in part a result of economic incentives.

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>It's in part a result of uh economic weakness and

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 1>for three decades having a hollowing out of the middle class,

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's in part a result of incentives

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the health field. Tom mentioned Manchester, New Hampshire is

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>certently affecting some local communities more acutely than others. Although

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say with it with a broad brush, it's

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's happening across the country. When you look at this

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>on a regional basis, are there places who have it

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>worse than others? Absolutely? You know, if you look at

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>prescription UH opioid medication and you compare the top temper

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>cent and the bottom temper cent across America, it's a

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>factor of thirty to one. So uh, I don't think

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>there's any way that pain varies by thirty to one

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>across counties. Um as best I could tell, it doesn't

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>vary by anything like that. So I think the medical

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>profession practices, and we find this across medicine in many

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>different fields. If you look at herne operations, if you

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>look at cines arian sections, they're big variability. There's very

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>big variability across regions. The Krueger style is rigid, rigorous

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>economics and Matthew nous and then you will have a

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>paragraph that you parachute in with and here you quote

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Hillbilly elogy all the rage right now. J D. Vance,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>you quote Rick and Jackson, Kentucky, and you Crow's case.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You quote Case Dton Angustaton the laureate. Uh and in

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>case doing better than good on the depth of the

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>deaths of despair. Okay, So there's a medical community and

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a fancy pants medical community. Is this about second

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>rate doctors are the doctor's victim of the incentives? How

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>do you blame the physicians um prescribing the medicines for

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the deaths of despair? Well, I think some of it's

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>seen scentives for the doctors think they don't have enough

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>time to properly treat many of their patients. Sometimes there

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and so come on there and it's like sixty minutes

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>last night. Basically it's a drug commercial with Steve Croft

0:27:57.400 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>wrapped around it. Come on, these guys are are incentivized

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to move drugs, right am? I right? That was gonna

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>be my next sentence. Uh, they're incentives pushed them in

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>this direction. Um. So I don't think they're necessarily bad people,

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think many are responding to the incentives. They

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>phase pivot here and just ask a few questions about

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and leading up to this meeting, that's FED meeting this week.

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Earlier in the show, I was saying, real economics, we

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>could just to close things up. But uh, we were

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>talking earlier in the show just about the focus that

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we've had on inflation in this country in particular, it

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>seems like we've talked less about the labor market as

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a result of that. Certainly the FED is grappling with

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>with both, although it seems like increasingly the part we're

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>focused on on its inflation. How does the labor market

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>look to you at this point? How concerned are you

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>about slack? How concerned do you think this feed is

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about where the labor market is at this point? Well,

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>what I say is there's a lot of slack, but

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not effective slack. So eleven and a half percent

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of prime age men are not in the labor force.

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>That's certainly slack. It's not effective in the sense that

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>they're not all that likely to come back to the

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>labor force even if the economy picks up. And I

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>think it is related to the opioid crisis that we've

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>been discussing. Um So I think the problems are connected. Obviously,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>given that the surprise on the low side and inflation

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the last six months has taken a lot of people

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>by surprise. UM. I think that does deserve a trend,

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this amount of attention. The last cp I picked up

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit. I think that will give give analysts a

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 1>lot to chew over um and there'll be more a

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more information coming in December on the opioid issue.

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And and that percent of the workforce, that second of

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the workforce you're talking about. This FED must be as

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>flummixed as everyone from a policy perspective about this issue.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>How tighter its hands, how tighter FED policy makers hands

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to dealing with this, this crisis in particular. Well,

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is beyond the FEDS, UM, But it's

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a crisis that they're focused on. Janet Yellenside in the

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>opioid crisis and testimony a couple of months. Have they

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>acknowledged it enough? Do you think? Um? I think it's

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>something they're aware of. I haven't seen research from the

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>FED staff on the issue yet, but maybe that's something

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they happen the works in time. We got left two ideas.

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>The first one is my long read of the weekend

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>was Allen blind to the former vice chairman of the FED,

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>writing about his magnificent co author of a classic economics textbook,

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>William Baubo. How does that process go if Princeton, where

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you honor a giant as you did with the death

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of William Boma. Well, Bomble, as I've said on your show,

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 1>was a real giant in economics, and in many different ways,

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>unaccountable contributions were extraordinary. I mean in his eighties and

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, he was more productive than most economists are

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout their career. Uh. Bombl's cost disease is something I

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>teach to my my freshman class. Uh. We we have

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a process when we have a university wide faculty meeting

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>early in the fall to recognize colleagues who have passed

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>away in the past year. Uh. The factory member rights

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a statement. It's supposed to be a joint statement, but

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Alan blinders such a beautiful writer. Alan Alan roaded himself

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and Bert Malkill and I signed onto it asked him

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>not to change a word. It was such a beautiful

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>statement about Will's contributions. And the final thing is it

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is a travel Monday here at Bloomberg Surveillance where we

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>ask all our guests about how tough was a trip.

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>To tell us about traveling to last talk to Dr

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Krueger from from the Canals. First of all, I'm obliged

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to point out that I was in Europe because I

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>went to an economic conference that was in Croatia, and

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the easiest way to get there was to fly. Then

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it's rent a car and drive a King's landing and

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>abrupt that was further north. It was umag beautiful, beautiful

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>part of Europe. I had never been to Croatia before

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and it was a very very fine conference that I attended.

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You didn't answer the question. Venni Venice was lovely as

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as I've I've only been to Venice a few times.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>It's lovely as it's been each time I visited. Very good.

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Alan Krueger will have him a joint interview with Luigi's

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>The Constance. Yes, trips to like come O in the like,

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>but yes, well I'm not I don't read o Keeper

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the MX as No. Thanks for listening to the

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keene David Gura, Is that David Gura before the podcast?

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.