WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 16 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man Down Man Thursday Morning Debt, then

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Eating the Book podcast and Megapod. It's Gill Alexander. It

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>is week sixteen and we got another esteemed guest. He's

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>back for another appearance this week, second time on the

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>show this year. First Mike Palm could not make the

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>show today. Mike had a full day of nothing but meetings,

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so he can't be with us. We are efforting to

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>get his picks though, by the end of the show. Yes, Todd,

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that is what we're doing. I texted him, and you

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>texted him, and we need his ps Okay. Jeff Parls

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>produced number five from a numbers game on Visa Series

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 1>X channel two O four, kind enough to step in

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in Mike's stead. Thank you, Jeffrey appreciate it. Of course, Gil.

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I will try to get my numbers right before the

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>before I make my picks today. By the way, Jeff,

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you something funny about Jeff Parls. Yes,

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>last week on Sunday, we're watching the games and he

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.279
<v Speaker 1>has the over in the Tennessee Houston game, right, and

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>so he's he's sitting next to me. You know, we

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>all cheer when something happens and so Tennessee's driving the

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>ball down the field, are like the twenty and Tannehill Sorry,

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they're at the five yard line, and he thinks he's

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>about to get seven points, which would help his over

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, and he the an tanne Hill throws an

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>interception to some linebacker who's not like the speediest guy

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of all time. He starts is that who was more

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>than Okay, So Whitney Mercer is running the other way,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and and of course Jeff is yelling go, go go.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>And remember it's a long way from the five to

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the other goal line, that's yards, right, So he's yelling

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>go in the middle of the go when the guys

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 1>are about like the forty five, Jeff's like, go go.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't care which way we get the points. Go

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>go go. It was the funniest thing I ever heard.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I was go and doing his own color commentary inside

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the go. It was fantastic. He was explaining, explaining is

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>bet while Merciless was going down the field. Yeah, exactly,

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's perfect. It doesn't matter how we get the points.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I still have to get over a certain number. But

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>then he continues Gil. Then he goes right back to

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the go. It's like go, we don't get out. We

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>got the points go Jeff Parlan Todd Wishnev can be

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>seen in their full glory at the South Point Hotel,

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Casito each and every Sunday in the Wishnevs section by

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the door. By the way, if they've videoed my reactions

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>watching the Sunday games, it would be literally television gold,

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>television gold. I don't doubt it. I don't doubt it.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>Our guest who has been waiting patiently listening to this, Michigas,

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is back on the show once again. He is a

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>pioneer in the use of predictive algorithms in sports betting.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>He has my dear friend, ladies and gentlemen from Dr

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Bob Sports. It's Bob Still Hello, Bobby, Hello, Gilly. How's

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>it going well? How are you? I'm doing very well. Man.

0:02:57.080 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>You were saying all fair before the show started, that

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you're two year old is a Petrie dish of germs.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>It is this true? Yeah, that's true. He is in

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.359
<v Speaker 1>daycare now and he brings that stuff home to me.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And I never get sick, and all of a sudden

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm under the weather and making it tougher to work.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>My sixteen hours a day, so um, I'm doing my best.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell him to stop being so selfish. And he's

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>two to sect though, so he gets we'll keep him alive. Well,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I miss you, guys, gets along with his little sister.

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I've yet to meet his little sister, so hopefully one

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>day soon. Thank you for doing this. I appreciate Go

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to the room for you, come on out to Colorado.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Okay, let's do this. Usually we start

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Circuit Sports million update, but since Mike he's

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>not here, we go right into the best Bets, so

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's Best Bets Teaser of the week, and then of

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>course the final two questions because there's no Thursday games

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. Your right, that is correct, Thank you, Toddy.

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>There are three Saturday games though, there are three Saturday games,

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>but those will just throw into the general pool of games.

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Houston at Tampa, Buffalo at New England, and the Rams

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>at San Francisco. Bob, you are the guests. Your first

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>best bet, sir, side or total? Where are you going? Well,

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go with the New York Jets.

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>They e t s Jets Jets Jets. Um, you know

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing is the Jets are underrated now on both

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>sides of all. You know, first of all, they had

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a few games to see, three games I believe, in

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which the offense did not have Donald and the average

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>about three yards per play. And I still think that

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Jets are a little underrated offensively because of that. Also,

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last two weeks now, everybody thinks all the

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Jets have given up they're terrible. Yeah, but they had

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>three starters out in the secondary each of the last

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Everyone's back this week, including all Pro Jamal Adams. Uh.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>They allowed to eight point eight yards per past play

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>in those in those last two weeks, but in the

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>first thirteen weeks of the season, the Jets only allowed

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>six point two yards per past play, which is better

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>than average. They match up pretty well here, I think. Uh.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Hispurgs best receiver is Juju Smith Schuster,

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>who runs most of his h routes from the slot,

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Jets have one of the best nicke slot

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks in the in the league and Brian Pool you

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>ran second in the league in in yards per cover

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.679
<v Speaker 1>snap aloud in the slot. So it's a really good

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>matchup for the Jets having their best cover corner against

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's best receiver. UM, so I think the defense will

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>do a good Jeff here. Also, the Jets rank ninth

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in the league in our run defense metrics UM, which

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, on success rates and stuff like that. So

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Pittsburgh's gonna do a lot on the ground,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and that just leaves you know, Duck Hodges, you know,

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>doing it on his own basically without you know, having

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>his best receiver open as much as usual, without a

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>running game. So I think Pittsburgh's gonna struggle offensively. That's

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>probably the other side of the ball. UM. You know,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Donald has had trouble versus the blizz in his career,

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and Pittsburgh bliitzes a lot. There's seventh in the league

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and blitz rate, so that could be a problem. But

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 1>then again, it also leads some more checkdowns and getting

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball out to your running back, and that actually

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>helps the Jets here. As Levian Bell is a good

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver out of the backfield, I'm sure he would love

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.119
<v Speaker 1>too to have a great perform against his former team,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and he's matched up in this particular matchup, he's matched

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>up against one of the worst covering linebackers in the league.

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Mark Baron is the second worst in the league amongst

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>qualifying linebackers in yards per cover snap allowed. So Lebann

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Bell is gonna have a good matchup in the Blitzing

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>may backfire because he may get more balls out the

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Bell out of the backfield. Uh And also Blissing tends

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to lead the quicker passes to slot receivers and Jamison

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Crowder happens to be Donald's favorite receiver and he runs

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>most of his routes out of the slot and still

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is nickelback Mike Hilton his fourth worst in the league

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and yards per cover snap allowed in the slot. So

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>there's some good match ups here for the Jets offense, UM,

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I think they'll be able to move the

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>ball relatively well. Um and the Jets are tough at home.

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Donald's played much better at home in his

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>career and in the game that Donald has played this

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>year at home, the Jets are four and two straight up.

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the losses was by one point to Buffalo.

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>They've had wins over Dallas in Oakland and then the Giants,

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>all his underdogs uh um and the only the only

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>game they've lost at home by more than one point

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>with Donald the quarterback was to New England, which you

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 1>know that's gonna happen. So I I like the UH.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I like the like the Jets, plus the point I

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>could get straight up to be honest, what do we do?

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We sprinkle something, We sprinkle all the money line, Bob,

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know how this works. Spreckle spreckley um. And you

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>know it should be mentioned that the Jets against the

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Ravens on Thursday night, by the way, very thorough analysis, Bob.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>As we know and expect from you, as always, you

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>always come through. The Jets should have been pretty much

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>tied with the Ravens at halftime this past Thursday night.

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Jets on extra rest here. But you know they did

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Jets things, couldn't convert a fourth and one, missed the

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>field goal. There were some other things that they did

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in that game that just shot themselves in the foot.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Should have been much more competitive. You like the Jets.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>You're sprinkling on the money line. By the way. Steelers

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they're in the sixth A shin right now, currently in

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the a f C, but really no room for error.

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Currently hold the tiebreaker over the Titans because of one

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of excuse me, because of one fewer conference loss, but

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>two games left, So that doesn't mean anything because the

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>playoffs don't start right now. But Bob, you always have

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a statement when the teams in a must win situation, Well,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>if they were good enough to win when they wanted

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to win, they wouldn't be in a must win situation.

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>That's right, And here's and here's the stat. Here's the stat.

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And I was gonna throw this out at some point

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>mine as we'll do it here. This is not an

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>absolute must win for Pittsburgh because they can lose and

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>still be in the playoffs. But I do have an

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 1>angle that that's that's sort of the same. The concept

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>applies that Pittsburg getting money because they're in the must

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>win and people are looking for excuses the better game. Well,

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh needs to win, so I'm gonna bet on them

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>because they need to win. Like I said, needing to

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>win doesn't mean you're going to win. Um. But anyway,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>teams that absolutely need to win or else they're eliminated

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>from the playoffs. When facing teams that are out of

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>playoff contention, they must win. Team are sixty two and

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred against the spread over the years against teams

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>that are out of the playoffs. This is what I

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>said the other day. Oh sorry, yeah, no worse. People

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>overreact to this must win. They're grasping for some reason

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>to better game and must win as it seems like

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a good reason, and it's just it's just doesn't work,

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and there's usually value playing against these must win teams.

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:25.599
<v Speaker 1>UH in the fifth and week fifteen and six and

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and seven win an angle of five UM. So

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't officially apply here because Pittsburgh can still lose

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and still make the playoffs. But in in concept that

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of does apply here because I think we're getting

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>line guy on the Jets because Pittsburgh gonna must win

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and people are betting Pittsburgh because of it. It's all

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>my years spent with you, Bob. I knew to bring

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this up because again, and if you're in a must

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>win situation, you must not be that good sixty two

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>one against the spread, UH in an absolute must win situation.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>As Bob has pointed out, this is not exactly qualified

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>because there is a scenario where Pittsburgh could lose and

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>still get in. But these do apply in many situations

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>weeks seen in particularly Week seventeen, will have these. Um yeah,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Oakland this week, Oakland obviously you know they're still hanging on,

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>but nonetheless they already must win against the Chargers, who

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>are out. I believe Indie, Uh well, Indie Laws, so

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>they're out Cleveland. Cleveland might be the other one. Uh

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 1>or didn't or yeah, I think Cleveland's the other one.

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is in the playoff. The Baltimore is oisle of

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, right right right? The other the other side

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't apply, That's right. It has to be against Oakland,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I think is the only one this week. I'm dug

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>into all of it, but next week there should be bunched. Todd,

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you were saying that you had brought this up on

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a numbers game yesterday to right, not even knowing that

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>on a numbers game on on Visa and uh it's

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a the sports betting network. Um that network. Um, I

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>was talking about this yesterday. I always think the must

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>win thing is overblown, And now Bob comes and throws

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>some stats on top of it, telling you there's sixty

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>one and a hundred. So I am vindicated, Thank you, Bob.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>O problem and I've been tracked he missed by hand.

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's really hard to look this up.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm tracking missed by hand just years ago. I

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>just noticed it years ago, and I just tracked it

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>by hand. I probably tracked this for for twenty years now.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't tracked it, but I used to notice it

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>all the time because these idiots would get on the

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>TV and be like, Wow, this team needs to win.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is it's a football game. Is the

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>guy the defensive back not gonna run as hard because

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't need it for the playoffs? The professionals too,

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>They agree, and then there's pride and then people people,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, team players want to win. That's why I

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>said when when everybody's talking about Miami tanking, I was like, no,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>players don't tank organizations tank. Players want to play well.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Players want to win, you know. And then Miami started

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>winning some games. Yeah, exactly the same thing here. You

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>guys should just hug it out. That was beautiful, Todd.

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I love you, Todd, love you. I mean. Dr Bob

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>knows his stuff. As I've told you before, we have

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>similar systems. He uses a model. I used the Losh model.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>The goolash model. That's right. But you're right also, Bob.

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The one quirk about that, what you're saying is there's

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>no database that's gonna be able to pick up teams

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that absolutely need to win versus teams that don't because

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they're so specific, right, like yeah, because because like we

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>said about Pittsburgh, they kind of do need to win,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's not absolute, so it's a very specific specific

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Once it reminds me of this exactly, Gil is when

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>they go, it's very tough to beat the team three

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>times in one year, you know, which is ridiculu, ridiculous, ridiculous.

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It's another one that, like cousin, we must win. It's bullshit.

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Come come conference tournament time in college basketball, you know

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the double revenge team. People love to play the double

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>revenge team in the conference tournament. Well, double revenge. Playing

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>double revenge teams will get you to the poorhouse quicker

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>than anything else, because if they were good, they would

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>have won one of the first two games, right, Bob,

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>They would have got revenge the first time because they

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>had a chance in the second game and they didn't. Um. Yeah,

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>double revenge were events teams in conference tournaments in basketball,

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>or like I think blind or like against this press.

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with that, and Bob Kills conference week in basketball,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a bread and butter for him. Todd, what's your

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>first best bet? We'll go to you next. Okay, well

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I was. You know, we all know what I usually

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>like to bet here, and that is my best bet.

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I always take Tampa over, and I like to stick

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it up the ass of the Sharps. The Sharps last week,

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in an unbelievable situation, they kept betting the Tampa Bay

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>over down all the way until it got to forty five,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>even at the South Point on Sunday morning, and I

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, Okay, this is just getting ridiculous. Give me over.

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And I guess it was because they thought David Blow

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>was the quarterback for Detroit or something. I don't know

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>what they were thinking. But again, Tampa Bay came in

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for us, so you know, Tampa Bay over straight Textica.

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go with Tampa Bay over just

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this second. I'm still mulling it over because that all

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the receivers are hurt now and stuff, and they're playing

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>more of a quality team. Um, so I'm gonna pass

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on that right at this moment, I'm gonna go with

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>your buffalo bills plus? What do I get? Six? Or

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>six and a half? You get? Let me see here.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>It's an excellent question, Todd. You get because that's going

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to be one of mine too. You've been you've been listening. Uh,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's right in the middle. It's split, yeah, split, alright?

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So what do I get? Um, it's six? Is there's

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>as many six as a there? Or six and a half?

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>What should be the ruling book of choice? We've never

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>had this situation come up yet this year, and I

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>think it since it came from six and a half.

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>It was six and a half, you know, and he

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was going over his bed and probably was six and

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a half. And it's really split down the middle here.

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So we'll give him six and a half. Is that

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a half minus fifteen? There you go, six and a

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>half minus fifteen. I will take the bills plus six

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half. If you notice, I don't do it

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the way Mike Palm does it, where he takes the seven.

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 1>In this situation, you'll be like, I'll take buffalo plus seven.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And then when we have to remind non buffalo plus seven,

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it's buffalo plus okay, Anyways, I'll take the Buffalo Bills.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I'll take the Buffalo Bills is because

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots. And here's here's a narrative that

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna hear a lot late in the season. Well,

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots do this all the time, and then of

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>course it comes playoff time and they turn it on

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and Belichick win to the Super Bowl. Yes, that is

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the narrative, but folks, it doesn't usually work in this pattern.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The pattern usually is the Patriots suck early and then

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Belichick cleans it up, coaches them up, and by the

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the year they win the Super Bowl. Not

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>happening this year. They are not a talented football team

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>at the wide out position. There's no one for Tommy

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Terrific to throw the ball to who is open. In

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the first game between these teams, New England had to

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>hold on with all their dear life to barely squeak

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>out a sixteen to ten win. They had to hold

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bills at the three yard line. The Bills played

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>them straight up, nice and tight. The Bill's defense is outstanding.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It's definitely only in the top five or six in

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the league. The Patriots have no one to throw the

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>ball too, and Joshua Allen can run the football when

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>all else fault fails through No. Granted, the Bills offense

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't good. I'm not here telling you the Builds offense

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is good. But it's good enough to stay within six

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half against the team that is offensively challenged

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>as the Patriots are this year. They will not win

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl this year. You heard it here first,

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I think I think we might have heard

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it before else heard too. Um, I'm gonna I'm gonna

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>jump in, Jeff, because I too. On guessing lines on

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Monday with Chris Andrews, this was the first game I

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>immediately gravitated towards. I guessed that New England would be

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a four and a half point favorite in this game.

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Instead it was six and a half. I'm own Buffalo

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to Buffalo clinch to playoff Berth With that win against

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers on Sunday night, New England clinched to playoff

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Berth for the eleventh straight season, which extends an NFL

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>record against in Seneta, Patriots win the a f C

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>East for the eleventh straight season, also by the way,

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>with a win in either of their final two games,

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Bills would have to win out, Patriots would have to

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>lose out for the Bills to win the A f

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>C East. But all the reasons that Todd stated, uh,

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this is too many points. The New England defense, I

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>get it, they're great and the Buffalo offense not that great.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But the other side of the ball, you can say

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the exact same thing, the Buffalo defense versus the New

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>England offense. You're giving me six and a half points

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>here does not make any sense to me. A am reminded,

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>since Bob is on the phone with us here, Bob

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>once had a football guy. I won't mention any names,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and Bobby will remember who I'm talking about who. His

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers always showed value against the New England Patriots, and

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots and the heyday of Belichick would constantly destroy

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>anybody who felt that way from week to week. And

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you just had to throw out the numbers when it

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>came to the Patriots because they were a different animal.

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you, though, Todd. I think this is a

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>different Patriots animal then those Patriots teams. So give me

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the six and a half points. I'll take the Buffalo Bills. Bob,

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you remember the episode I was talking about, right, yeah, Yeah.

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>The thing is they they years they outplayed the Patriots

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>outplayed my my math model by two and a half

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the three points every single year. So I would just

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>I would just add two and a half point to

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>New England every week and well and that would take.

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That would keep me off on them most of the time. Oh,

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why you have to You have to go to

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Google Losh model system, which you take. You take

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>your model, then you throw in the Google losh of

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>what you've seen, and you get yourself a mixture of

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>a nice Google Losh of a system. Very interesting, very interesting. Jeff. Sorry,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to you sooner next round. But what's your

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>first best bet? You know, Gil, I'm going with with

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you and Todd just said each have the best bet

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of the week is the Buffalo Bills plus six and

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a half. Look, I I think everyone said said it

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the right way here. The Bill's defense is phenomenal. New

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>England's offense isn't very good. New England's defense is phenomenal.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo's offenses is the erratic. We'll put it that way,

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>since uh Josh Allen might be the most erratic quarterback

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, you could get a great jot shallon

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>game and Buffalo actually wins this game out right, where

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>you can get bad Josh Allen and Buffalo's defense is

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>going to have to hold New England's offense down to

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 1>really stay in the game. But I don't know how

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.239
<v Speaker 1>New England scoring in this game. The last time they

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>scored sixteen points and sit and and a touchdown of

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that sixtheam was a block punt, so and the Bill

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:23.479
<v Speaker 1>should be able to keep this thing tight. I'm with

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you and Todd. I'm going Buffalo plus six and a half,

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>which which means with all three of us having that

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>as our best bets, look out everyone New England. The

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>other way New England that didn't work out and said

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that happened to us last week. We all had Miami

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>right and then that did not work out nicely at all.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be a different result with Buffalo this week.

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I really do Bob pick number two, sir, well, I

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>am going to play a total. I'm gonna play Denver

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and Detroit under under thirty eight. I believe it is

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>right now, We'll give you the thirty. Yeah, there's a

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of places at thirty seven and a half and

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>mostly thirty eight. Um. Yeah, it's a situation where we

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>both offensive lines are banged up. First off, David blow Um.

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>You might remember he came out on fire in his

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>first game on Thanksgiving through a couple of touchdowns in

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter. Since then, not so much's He's down

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to five point two yards per past play um through

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>his three starts. And this is a this is a

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>tough situation down two key receivers. Um with Marvin Jones,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe you know historically been one of the

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>better wide receivers on you know, maybe Galada is the

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>best wide receiver now, but Jones is a solid receiver,

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>and the and the rookie Titan Hockinson's out. Also, that

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>leaves in with Galladay and Amndolah. Well, Gallada fine because

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Harris is on on the other side. So Chris

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Harris doesn't have to worry about two great wide receivers.

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>He could just shadow Galada around and and and limit

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>limit him. And then you've got Avendola in the flot

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and that slot receivers have a really tough time against

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Vic Sangio's defenses. Last year when he was with the Bears,

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 1>they were one of the best in the league covering

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>slot receivers, and this year, same thing with the Broncos,

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the best in the league and limiting slot receivers.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Avendola is probably gonna struggle against this defense,

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>and Galaday is gonna be shadowed by Harris, who's an

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>All Pro who's done great against other other number one

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>receivers UH for years. So I just I think I

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>was gonna have a tough time finding open receivers in

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this game. Um So, that's one problem. Also, the offensive

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Linealgas has banged up. The left guard Jodals had a

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>great season, He's fifth in the league and pass block

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>win rate. He's now on injury reserve. The Factups also

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>injured and out for the season. Um So, I think

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Shelby Harris UH that Denver's interior defensive lineman should be

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>able to supply some pressure up the middle. And then

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got Von Miller coming from the outside against you know,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, below average right tackle UH for for Troy

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Rick Wagner was terrible and he's also nursing a knee injury.

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think Denver is gonna have guys in the backfield,

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the middle, around the edge, and you know, and and

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and but I was not going to have his receivers

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>opened like he normally would. Um So, I think they're

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna struggle offensively. In Denver, you had Drew Lock his

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>staffs overall is pretty darned good completion six and a

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>half yards per past play, but all that was in

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>one game against Houston, had a magical, ridiculous game in

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one game. Um but the only average four point yards

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>per past play against the Charters, and last week the

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>average four point seven yards per past play against the Chiefs.

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And in general, rookie quarterbacks, the first two or three

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 1>starts tend to play relatively better than they will going

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>forward once the league has some tape on them. Then

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they get started to get shut down. That that might

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>have started last week with with the Chiefs really locking

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>down on Lock as as as I. As I just said,

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>um so, I think Rock's gonna struggle as well. I

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just don't see. I mean, Courtland Sutton is the best

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver obviously, and the choice got a Pro Bowl

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cornerback as well, Darius Slay. So that's gonna be a

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>neutral thing. And I think the only option is gonna

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.239
<v Speaker 1>be gonna have as Noah Fans has had. It's been

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>great as a rook yet at the tight end position,

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and the lines don't defend tight ends well. So if

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you're in fantasy, pick up Noah Fans this week because

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna have a big game because I think, yeah,

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I think something's gonna be shut down and Fan's gonna

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be open most of the time. But that's one option,

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna have pressure in his face most of

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the day. So I think it's both teams are gonna

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>struggle offensively. And I come up with thirty four point

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>eight points based on the based on the map model,

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>even with Denverse safety cream Jackson out, I still on

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty four point eight points as a predicted total. F

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going under going under a thirty four point eight

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>your projection. Thirty eight is the number you get it at. Yeah,

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>people are in their Fantasy Super Bowls, people still playing DFS.

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Detroit's owner we were talking about this on a numbers

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>game this morning, Martha firestone Ford. She said, uh, they're

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>keeping Matt Patricia next year, and her quote was, we

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>expect to win. Those are our expectations, which I was

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>telling Jeff this morning is the equivalent of me saying

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I like candy. Those are my likes. So interesting sentence construction.

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But they're going with Matt Patricia seven game losing streak

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>for Matt Patricia and the Detroit Lines. They've lost ten

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of eleven. They started the year two oh and one.

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Matt Patricia earning apparently another year or at least the

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>start of another year with the Detroit Lions. Todd your

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>second pick, Well, I expect to win like a famous

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>attire and carpet manufacturing magnates. Um, but I will take um.

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It's Arizona getting ten? Is that what you're you're seeing

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>out there? Arizona is not getting ten, They're getting nine

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Nine and a half. Interesting, okay, Um,

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you know what? Screw give me Arizona anyways, Arizona. I

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>like the discipline. You know, I'm showing tremendous discipline here, folks,

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and in in buying off of a key number in

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>its back them getting I'm getting what we call chin stof.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right, I'll get sins off the key number just

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I love I love this Kyler Murray

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>kid I really do. I I was a big skeptic

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:11.680
<v Speaker 1>at first. I thought he was gonna be a bust

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>too short. Uh maybe he was just overrated because Oklahoma

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>has so much talent that you know, he could just

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>throw with impunity. You know what. I'm a believer now

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 1>this kid is good. He maybe you know, uh Lamar

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Jackson light, but he can definitely do things with his legs,

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and he can throw the football. And I think he's

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a pretty He's a much more cerebral quarterback, I think

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>than people are giving him credit for. And um, you know,

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I've just been impressed with him all the way around. Uh.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 1>They had a real nice win against Cleveland last week. Um,

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that Seattle whooped him up real bad the

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>first game, and that's one thing that does concern me

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But since then, I think, you know,

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this Arizona team is getting more and more familiar with

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the Klingsbury offense, and and uh, you know, they just

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>become in my opinion, they've they've improved a lot as

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the year has gone by. They played San Francisco um

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>real tight in that game, despite the fact that Fats

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>So through the ball in the end zone and it

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>looked like the game, but I think Arizona is much

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>better and Seattle. You know, Seattle is a good team,

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>but there's a little bit of smoke and mirrors in

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle stuff. I feel like Seattle is a is

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a good team. I don't know if they're a very

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>good team, and I think they're being considered a very

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>good team here as opposed to just a good team. Um,

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half points is not as many as ten.

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh my math model says nine and a half is

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a little less than ten. But nonetheless, I'll be undisciplined

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>here and take Kyler Murray. I think I think my

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>favorite part of that analysis was when you said the

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Klingsbury offense Cliff Klingsbury. Um, uh Cliff Kingsbury of course

0:26:56.119 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>ingy um, sorry uh, Todd, Im I just would like

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to call a little bullshit here. Here's what I think

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is happening. You are clinging to what a one game

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>lead over me and our full season a t S

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>standings is that the correct lead. You believe correct standings

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are gilly Ice one to Champ one. So one game lead.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>You have a one game lead where neither one of

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>us are killing it. Let's be clear, but you have

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a one game lead over me. Todd has managed to

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>mimic my first two picks that I made on guessing lines.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even I didn't even hear guessing. Uh yeah,

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're doing playing out the string. Arizona

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is my second pick. So I'm gonna step in. And

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>if I were you, i'd be very careful because I

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>really didn't listen to it. And the fact that we're

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>both coming on the same things without hearing each other

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is a bad sign. Yes, yes, worse for me than

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.479
<v Speaker 1>for you. I have a feeling, Toddy. Nine and a

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>half is what I'm taking on the Cardinals for all

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>the reasons Todd stated, I don't want to be labor it.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on Seattle. Look, a lot of these

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>teams in the NFC. This is a really aberrational year.

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Four teams are eleven and three in the NFC, and

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in a fifth team Minnesota could make This could be

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs as a sixth seed at twelve and

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>four if they win out, and then of course there's

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East leader. But like, I don't think Green

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Bay's any is that great At eleven and three, Seattle,

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and I love Russell Wilson. I don't think they're that great.

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that honestly. I get the Lamar Jackson m

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>v P thing, But Russell Wilson every year does it

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with nothing. By the way, That's why I love when

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 1>people are killing Tom Brady or or making excuses for

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady this year, Well, he doesn't have any wide receivers.

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't have any offensive line. Russell Wilson never has

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that any year. But I like Arizona. Kyler Murray is

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>really scary to bet against, and nine and a half

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is a lot here. And it's also one of those

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>scenarios that Todd likes to point out with you know, hey,

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>even if Seattle goes up, the back door should be

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 1>wide open as well. So Arizona for me plus nine

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half or excuse me, yes, plus nine and

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a half Jeff number two. It's on Monday night. I'm

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to take the Packers getting five and a half from Minnesota.

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook's regular season seems to be over, as that

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>shoulder injury finally caught up to him in Los Angeles.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't look like Madison status is great either. It

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>looks like Mike Boone is gonna get the bulkload of

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the carries from Minnesota, and that that frightens me because

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Cook is so electric and Madison has showing the ability

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to actually fill in very well when he's been called

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>upon this year. And it's still Kirk Cousins in a

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>prime time game, in a game where you in Minnesota's

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the playoffs locked up. It's very It's it's

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>basically impossible for them to hop green Bay even with

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a win, because the Packers would have to throw a

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>game to the Terrible Lions the following week. But at

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>some point Aaron Rodgers is going to have a big

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 1>game again. It We're waiting. It has been. It has

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>been stagnant for Rogers for a few weeks going now.

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know Minnesota should have won the first meeting,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>even though they fill down in three touchdowns the Green

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Bay and Lamba all the way back in Week two.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>But I like green Bay in this spot getting five

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half points. This feels like a field goal

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>game in the end, and I wouldn't be shocked if

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>green Bay wins the game out right. So I'll take

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the Packers plus the five and a half Uh, it's

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>solely on the quarterbacks, even though I know Cousins statistically

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>has been every bit as good or even better than

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Rogers since the early season struggles for Cousins. But I'm

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>going Green Bay plus the five and a half Monday Night.

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Are we sprinkling on the money line as well? Jeff?

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we very well may when this is all

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>said and done, Gil, I want to see if this

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>thing gets uh, gets even further up as we go along.

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need a yes or no on that. We'll

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>go yes, sprinkle trickle, sprinkle me mine, all right? Best

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>be going to answer. I'm going to need an answer.

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Best bet number three? Bob, what he got? I don't

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>really have one, but I'm gonna give you one anyway.

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just looking over all these games like maybe you know,

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the first two I really like, but this one, I'm like,

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm gonna go completely contrary here, and

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>normally my analysis is very uh. I think it's um

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, leads you in the direction that I'm going

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>most of the time, and I have a really good

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>fact to back up my pick, and this one I

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have none. I'm gonna take Tampa Bay. Um. There without

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans, there without Chris Godwin, didn't matter last week.

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Papistic is making everyone look good at the wide receiver position.

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:27.160
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't throw interceptions, very dangerous to of course,

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>he's probably gonna throw a one or two interceptions. But

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>even with that being cooked into the model, I still

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>think this line is a little too high. And Houston

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>come up the big win last week as an underdog

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>even division game. It's a little bit of a let

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>down spot going on the road against the team that

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they may not respect. And you know, more contrary stuff,

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Texas Will Fuller's back on the field, They're looking good.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>There's no real reason for a fundamental standpoint here to

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>take Tampa Bay. Yet my model likes Tampa Bay even

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>with all the injury adjustments, and you know a bunch

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of contrary situations that I follow that also favorite Tampa Bay.

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm probably not going to make this the best

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>best for my clients, but I like Tampa Bay um

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as as a third best be here on the show.

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me just explain to you what happened.

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>That was the doctor Bob football picks equivalent of Bob

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>streaking through a mall. Like that is as naked as

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he gets with a pick without any sort of real

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing to back it up, nothing to back nothing to

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 1>back it up, not even underwear. Todd, my model model

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like it. I'm really, let's let's adjust for Waffall. Okay,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>let's adjust to that. Let's adjust down for this, let's

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 1>adjust to that. My model still likes Tampa. I'm like, Okay,

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>do I trust it? I guess my model has been good.

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I gotta trust it. So I'm taking Tampa. Jamis Winston

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>first quarterback in the history of the NFL two straight

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks over four d fifty yards passing. Jamis what Tampa Bay.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>We were talking with Lombardi. I was talking with Lombardi

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this week on a numbers game at Visa in about

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>how Tampa now is in this situation with Jamie is like, now,

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? Do you keep him? Do you

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sign him to this massive contract? Do you draft somebody?

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Is the person you draft gonna be better than Jamis? Like?

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you do there? In that Jared Goff, Kirk

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Cousins no man's land of Oh God, do we push

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>all our chips in the middle of the table or

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do we cut ties? What the heck do we do

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>with this guy? Yeah, you know what, Gil, You're better

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>off with the guy that throws that many interceptions been

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>so inconsistent. You can't pay him huge, huge salary because

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>then you're just gonna make the rest of the team worse.

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're better off getting a journeyman quarterback for

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a low salary and spending money on the rest of

0:33:42.280 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the team. That's more efficient way of making your team

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>better than paying a mediocre to possibly you know, better

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>than average quarterback a ton of money and then not

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>having money to to build around him. So no doubt,

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But I say that about I said that about Kirk

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Cousins and about Jared at golf, and you know that

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't stop the Vikings and rams, respectively, because you only

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>win Super Bowls with a Hall of Fame quarterback, and

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of the ones we mentioned are

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>or are going to be. Of course, time will tell,

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And the only other way is a quarterback on a

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>rookie deal where he overperforms and you can pay everybody else,

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>just like you were talking about Allah Russell Wilson with

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle Seahawks. So what about Trent dilfor Trent Dilfor.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Trent Dilford and Brad Johnson are the last two examples

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of quarterbacks who buck what I just said that is

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>now seventeen and nineteen years ago. So you can what

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>about Trent Dilfor and what about Brad Johnson all you want,

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>but it just doesn't happen anymore. Toddy number three. I

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.319
<v Speaker 1>think the word Bob was looking for when he was

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about how he usually has a lot to back

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>up his pick is he has a voluminous data. Voluminous

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is the word I believe. But we didn't see is Bucks.

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 1>Is Bucks getting plus three? Um? Yes, Bucks plus three,

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>plus three and extra yeah with limited with smaller juice, Yeah, yes, Okay,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:07.280
<v Speaker 1>So I just wanted to get that down to the

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>erect there. Okay, So I'm I'm much like Bob. My

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>googlesh model does not have anything delicious for the third pick.

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna go with

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the over in the New York Giants against the Washington

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Climb Haskins at forty one, and I'll tell you why. UM,

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>forty one is not a big number to me. I

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of low on the low side. For

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. I notice when you've got teams in the

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>NFL late in the season that are just kind of

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>playing out the string, that the defensive intensity seems to

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>wane a little bit. Um, you know. I think it's

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 1>probably because defense is much harder to play, you know,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of course, and see that late in games when games

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>are decided, a lot of times you get touchdowns just

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>because you know they don't care whether to give them

0:35:58.400 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the backdoor touch on. The feel is a little less

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>intensity in games that are you know, between absolute you know,

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>also rans. So that's one thing going for me. The

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>other thing is Clem Hapkins has started to move the

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>ball a little bit more than than he did early on,

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and um, he's been halfway decent. I call him Clem.

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that's not his real name, but um climb

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not as as as you know early and Giants defense

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>has never impressed me. I think they're just absolutely putrid.

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>So I don't see why at home Clem can't get

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you some points. And for the Giants, they're going against

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins defense. It's halfway okay, But sometimes the Giants

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>can score like they did against the mediocre Miami defense

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>last week. So, uh, you know, forty one, it's not

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that high in number. Give me, if you ever have

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a child a son, I demand that you name him Clem.

0:36:53.920 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I think what we'll probably Clem Shlomo wishnem Ton, of course,

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>referring to Dwayne Haskins, but he likes to call Dwayne

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Haskins Clem Haskins. Former Washington bullet In Minnesota Golden Gophers

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>head coach. You know that game is very important. You

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>know that why that game is very important? Todd wish

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Now Giants, Redskins. Um, No, it is the Chase Young Bowl. Now.

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Dolphins will have something to say

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>about this as well. But currently you've got those three

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>teams at three and eleven. Bengal is gonna draft first.

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Bengals are gonna probably pick Joe Burrow, Ohio kid. After all,

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they benched Andy Dalton just to see what they had

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>behind them all year. This is for Chase Young. To me,

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>whoever loses this game is it a better position than

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the winner? And Chase Young might be the only sure

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>thing in this coming NFL draft. So big game with

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that implication, But Todd is going over forty one Giants

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Redskins Jeffrey. Wait wait, something was gonna say something to

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>back me up? Please? Yeah? Can I? Well, I'm not sure.

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:56.959
<v Speaker 1>So I have a database. And as you were talking

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>about this and too bad, she was like, that's interesting.

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to look this up. So I set the parameters.

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I decided, what are bad teams less than less than

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>a four percentage at this point of the season, would

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that be considered bad? That's why I putty, but both

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>teams less than four percentage, so less than six and nine.

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 1>So and I did the final two weeks of the

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>season sixteen seventeen, and I decided to look that up,

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and as it turns out, two interesting trends revealed themselves.

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:26.879
<v Speaker 1>So I just randomly put this in to to sub

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>four teams in the final two weeks of the season,

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>since the home team in such games is forty nine

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and nineteen against the spread go figures. So maybe it's

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the road team that doesn't care and their home the

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>bad home team, maybe like let me have home fans here,

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that's here us on and the road teams like let's

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 1>just play out the spring and get out of here anyway.

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But also looking at the total because that's what you're interested.

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 1>These games are also forty seven and twenty one under really,

0:38:53.880 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's sort of sort of bucks your it doesn't sum. Yeah,

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>so they have it two stub four teams in the

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>final two weeks of the season. The home team is

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>two against the spread and the under forty seven one

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and two. Wow, those are random and pretty pretty ran. Yeah.

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I just plugged it in just out of curiosity and boom,

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's there's no backfitting in that. Just plug it in

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's what you get. So interesting. So I guess

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in that case, maybe you do the Giants team total under.

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when you can buy those two things.

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's what you get, the road road team

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.399
<v Speaker 1>not scoring a long um. But nonetheless, I just thought

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>i'd throw that in because I do have the power

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of the database here on behalf of Redskins fans everywhere.

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope that that home team thing doesn't happen. Give

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>me Chase Young, Jeff, what's number three? I'm gonna go

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>over in Baltimore and Cleveland at fort nine. The first

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>time these teams met, Cleveland scored forty on Baltimore. I

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>know what it feels like. It was about forty five

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago, not just a week four of this year. Uh. Look,

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore's offense is completely different than what it was back

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in Week four. Jackson obviously after the first four weeks

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of the year where he struggled, especially weeks two, three,

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and four after a ridiculous game against the Miami Dolphins

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>freshman team week one. But look, I could Baltimore is

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>coming off of a weird performance where they had the

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>worst special teams game of the entire NFL season by

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>d v O A uh Aaron Shotson company that tweeted

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that out earlier in the week. It actually dropped Baltimore

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>special teams ranking all the way to number twelve, which

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. Uh if we're just one game out of

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the top five. But this feels like Baltimore, Baltimore is

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to name their score. Cleveland I think

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be Cleveland's gonna score a little bit in

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this game. Offensively, I'm gonna go over to forty nine.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>This feels like it's something like we saw on Thursday

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>night with Jets in Baltimore. Like, uh, and I'll go

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>over to forty nine and a half. How can I

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>inter stude in forty nine and a half, Jeff over, tho,

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I have I pulled the Mike palm. I'm sorry, guys. Yes,

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll go over forty nine and a half. I like

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that too, I I I this feels like Baltimore is

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna score in the forties and Cleveland's going to score.

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I just don't want to like ten with a with

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.439
<v Speaker 1>a road team in the NFL. Yeah, forty nine app

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>school would make go about those Baltimore special teams. That

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>was part of the problem against the Jets too. They

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>gave up all kinds of kick and punt returns. They

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>had a punt blocked if I'm not mistaken by thinking

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>about the right game. Um, yes, a touchdown. Yeah, so

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you know that was a big deal Thursday night too,

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:42.879
<v Speaker 1>where you know here they are crushing teams and yet

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>their special teams are abysmal at times. Um, my final

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pick is going to be something also with thin analysis,

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>just to keep with the theme of our final picks

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>here in Week sixteen, slim pickens. But it's the de

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>facto NFC EAS Championship and I'm taking the Dallas Cowboys,

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys are now just giving one and a

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>half now the reason part of the reason for this drop.

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Although it did open at one, then it ticked upwards

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and then it's back down to one and a half.

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott limited in practice yesterday, so there was some

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>controversy as to, you know, the extent of Dax injuries.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett says he's not doing whatever he wants to

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:22.440
<v Speaker 1>do at this point. But I don't think anybody really

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>thinks Cooper Rush is gonna show up for this game.

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys win, they're in the playoffs, they win the nfcas

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Eagles win, they still need to win their final game

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in week seventeen. This is nothing more for me than

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>sheer talent versus talent. Philly is a bare bones, skeletal

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 1>version of the Philadelphia Eagles, with players like Word and Boston,

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 1>names that no one had really counted on as recently

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 1>as two three weeks ago participating. And then you've got

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys, who have all the talent in the world.

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And really, and this is a big if if only

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Jason Garrett and Kellen Moore we get their acts together

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and actually coach them up, I think they're clearly the

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 1>better football team. I think if the Cowboys are ever

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>going to show themselves. It's in a game like this.

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no excuse for them to lose a football game

0:43:13.160 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>like this. It is in Philly, It's gonna be a

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 1>tough atmosphere, but I think the Cowboys bunch them in

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the mouth. They could win this quite handling. Give me

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys giving the point and a half against the Eagles.

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Both teams seven and seven, and again Cowboys win there

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in Eagles win, they gotta win Week seventeen. So Cowboys

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>are my final pick before before we do the teasers.

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Mike just texted me his picks, so you want me

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell him quick kill, We've got real bad news

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 1>here because he likes the Bills plus six and a

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>half as well guaranteed loser. Um Broncos. Uh, he likes

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. What are the Broncos minus what seven? Minus seven? Yeah? Okay,

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>minus seven. I'm sure he'd like it at six and

0:43:54.120 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a half. And the Chiefs he likes at okay, the

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs at minus six at Chicago. And then his teaser,

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>he said, is the Eagles, which would be the Eagles

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:12.360
<v Speaker 1>at plus uh seven and a half Eagles plus seven

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half and he wants to take. Also the

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>what's the other side of the teaser? Here? The other

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>side of the teasers Eagles and Jets, which would be

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Jets plus nine right, yes, okay makes sense? Nine is

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Stanford long esk teasers. We know how those will going

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>this year. Sport for today's beating the book podcast comes

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>as always from our friends at Bookmaker dot EU. I

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 1>have been saying it all season long, I will continue

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to say it. The Bookmaker dot you is an industry

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 1>later for close to thirty years. You should know that

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:47.120
<v Speaker 1>by now pro players consider them a must because their

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>first to post dots, they take the highest limits, and

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, pride themselves on never having kicked out a

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>winning player. That is huge in this day and age.

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Bookmakers a highvolume sports book best suited for not only

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the sophisticated player who understands sports, but also the large

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>recreational players as well. And their motto is where the

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>lines originate, because chances are the sports book at which

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you've been betting all along follows their lines. And right now,

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>if you visit Bookmaker dot E slash gill, that's Bookmaker

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>dot U slash g I l L you can claim

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>an exclusive welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars.

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Once again, that's bookmaker dot eu slash gill g I

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>l L to join and claim you're welcome bonus of

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>up to three hundred dollars right now. Don't miss out,

0:45:31.239 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, Bob, what's your two teams six pointer of

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:37.399
<v Speaker 1>the week. I'm gonna go with Tennessee and I'm gonna

0:45:37.400 --> 0:45:42.280
<v Speaker 1>go with the Giant on that trend that goes against

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, I think I think with the Giants getting

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:47.319
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half, I think both are getting eight

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half, is that it's not about right Tennessee

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 1>and the Giants. Giants will get eight and a half

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee gets a half. Yes, that is correct for both

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Todd teaser. Bob, you got me real nervous now because

0:45:57.600 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the part of the reason I kind of like that

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 1>over was because I thought Clem Haskins would be able

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to score, and he's decided that. I was worried about

0:46:04.960 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the scoring. But now you're telling me that that road

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>teams are crappy when they stink on, you know, late

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:12.759
<v Speaker 1>in the season. It's got me a little nervous that

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 1>old Eli is only going to give us like ten points,

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna stick with my over forty one. But

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I am much more nervous than I was before. Um,

0:46:21.280 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 1>So the teaser I'm gonna go with is um give

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>me the g men as well. Um, I just you know,

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:33.839
<v Speaker 1>can the can the can the Redskins win one by

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>more than than eight and a half of them or

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, that's not usually what they do.

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>So let me let me have the g Men plus

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the eight and a half, and then let me have

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, this is not the correct thing to do,

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 1>but give me the Buffalo Bills plus the twelve and

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a half, because you know what, I just don't see

0:46:53.640 --> 0:46:56.320
<v Speaker 1>him getting blown out in a low scoring game. It's amazing, almost,

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:58.879
<v Speaker 1>step in, Jeff, because we just round robins the three

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of us. Because my teas or was Tennessee and Buffalo,

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>so bob led Tennessee and the Giants. Todd goes Giants

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and Buffalo, and I go Tennessee and Buffalo. So just

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:13.520
<v Speaker 1>really round robin those three teams in teasers. What's yours?

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>It's wonderful. I have not none of the teams in

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>mine that have been mentioned so far. Give me the

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Niners down to two a half from six and a

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>half and give me the Denver Broncos minus one. I'll

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:28.600
<v Speaker 1>go with that. Where Broncos Okay, you know what is

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what is yours? Before we get Jeff's what

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>was yours? I grete it down. Mine was Tennessee and Buffalo. Okay,

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So Bill's plus twelve and a half and Tennessee plus

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half? Correct? And Jeff, Jeff, Jeff's what

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners and the Broncos San Francisco minus a half

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and Denver he gets at minus one? So Niners minus

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a half and Denver minus one? Well done, Jeff? Alright,

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>final two questions, gentlemen, We've asked them for years. First

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, the big favorites on the board, which do

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you believe is the most likely to lose? Outright? Now,

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>this is one of these weeks where the pickings, well, no,

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>there's enough. Actually, I was gonna say, if I do

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>seven or more, we got we got four choices. If

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I drop it down to six and a half. If

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I drop it down to six and a half, that

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 1>adds like three more games. Do we vote on six

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and a half? Decide? All right, we'll do six. We'll

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>do six and a half. Make it easier here will

0:48:29.800 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>include New England as a six and a half point

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite over Buffalo, San Francisco six and a half point

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>favorite over the Rams. Both of those games are on Saturday.

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Then on Sunday, Baltimore ten point favorites at Cleveland, Indianapolis

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:45.600
<v Speaker 1>six and a half point favorites at home against Carolina

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta seven and a half point favorites. Call it, uh yeah,

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>barely seven and a half point favorites at home against

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Chargers six and a half or seven. I think

0:48:57.320 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's seven now. Consensus home favorites again in Oakland, Denver

0:49:02.840 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>seven point favorites at home against Detroit. Seattle nine and

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites against Arizona. A lot of choices.

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Which of those big favorites is most likely to lose? Outright?

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>In your opinion, Bob, I think the Colts. I am

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just not big on the Colts, and I don't mind

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Greer at quarterback for Carolina. You know, Greer had the

0:49:23.560 --> 0:49:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the highest catchable long ball rate in college and college

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:31.400
<v Speaker 1>football last year, so he was an accurate long ball thrower,

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe he catches one of those long, Maybe get

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>one of those long balls, get McCaffrey doing his thing.

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think the Colts offense is much to

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>speak of, and I just think they're most prone to

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 1>get upset. I like that choice. I loved Will Greer

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>at West Virginia and that Colt's performance against the Saints

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>on Monday night. I think I said this on the

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>show the next day. I don't care if you take

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a Dolphins team, Redskins, Giants, Bengals, pick your horrible team

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, Lions, whatever. That Colt's performance against the

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Saints was maybe the most list single game performance I've

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ever seen this year in the NFL. They were terrible.

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 1>It's like they didn't get off the plane. I do

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not hate that play at all. Todd, same question. I'm

0:50:10.560 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a little worried about Will Greer because he reminds me

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of Drew Lock a lot of armed talent,

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>not exactly cerebral lee enhanced. But anyways, Hey, he could

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 1>have a good game, right Bob, So I'm gonna go

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:27.799
<v Speaker 1>with the uh. I think the Anthony Lennards could could

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:31.080
<v Speaker 1>lose this week, um only because they're the Anthony Lennards.

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 1>They've got the gelical quarterback and um, you know him,

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>he loves to you know, a guy helps him up

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and then he still screams in the guy's face. Very spiritual, feel,

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 1>very spiritual. So um, I'm really getting sick and tired

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of his act and the Anthony Lynn act. And why

0:50:49.080 --> 0:50:51.680
<v Speaker 1>not they could lose, you know, they're a joke team.

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just tired of the Chargers, so I could see

0:50:53.640 --> 0:50:57.239
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders beat him. Jeffrey, I'm going with Jacksonville. And

0:50:57.320 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I know I've said first game Gil that that the

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars have given up, but don't underestimate how much all

0:51:04.560 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>those players hate Tom Coughlin. And Tom Coughlin obviously got caned. Now.

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course he doesn't coach the team, but his ridiculous,

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:17.480
<v Speaker 1>old school, ridiculous cloud has been seeped over that team

0:51:17.520 --> 0:51:21.320
<v Speaker 1>this whole year. He's gone. Atlanta has been so bizarro

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:24.640
<v Speaker 1>this year, with winning at San Francisco and winning at

0:51:24.680 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans this year and then stinking the rest of

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the year, it would make total sense to me of Jacksonville. Uh,

0:51:31.440 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 1>somehow pulled one out of their behinds and managed to

0:51:33.960 --> 0:51:36.760
<v Speaker 1>win that game. So I'll go Jacksonville. What that. Wow.

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I did not see that one coming, especially from you, Jeff,

0:51:39.040 --> 0:51:41.759
<v Speaker 1>who who again had pronounced Jacksonville dead a couple of

0:51:41.800 --> 0:51:44.719
<v Speaker 1>weeks back. But I get the reasoning. I am going

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:50.560
<v Speaker 1>with everybody, the New England Patriots. I am going with

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the New England Patriots. I know, I know it's Bill

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Belichick and the Patriots. Patriots six and a half point

0:51:55.760 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 1>favorites total thirty six and a half just by that conflation,

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that might be the answer, But I really believe that

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are vulnerable here. I don't think Tom Brady

0:52:07.800 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is any good anymore. I really don't whether that's because

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:13.359
<v Speaker 1>of the wide receivers and the offensive line. He's part

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of it as well. It's probably all three things. I

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:19.360
<v Speaker 1>think the Buffalo defense reeks havoc in this game. I

0:52:19.360 --> 0:52:21.799
<v Speaker 1>think New England is the answer to that question. Indianapolis

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>would be a close second, but I think New England

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is a is the choice for me, which is probably

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>my boldest answer to that question of all time on

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the megapod. But I really do think they're the answer

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 1>given those choices. Final one. We live in a bizarro world.

0:52:36.320 --> 0:52:39.120
<v Speaker 1>We are forced to bet fifteen of these games on

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:42.239
<v Speaker 1>the side, but we're allowed one free pass one game.

0:52:42.280 --> 0:52:44.520
<v Speaker 1>We're on the side. You're like, I want no part

0:52:44.600 --> 0:52:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of that whatsoever. Maybe you don't use that word. I

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:49.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but you get the idea, Bob, what would

0:52:49.840 --> 0:52:54.839
<v Speaker 1>be the game? I think Cincinnati Miami. I mean, that's

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>probably the easy choice. I make it. I make it pick.

0:52:58.040 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Who knows what the motivation is free there these teams. Uh,

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I probably stay with him that one. You make it

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.560
<v Speaker 1>pick in the market, makes it pick todd I'm gonna

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:09.799
<v Speaker 1>go with um Carolina, Indy. I just don't have a

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:12.879
<v Speaker 1>good feel for what is Carolina. You know, sometimes they're good,

0:53:12.960 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they're bad. Indianapolis. Sometimes they're good, sometimes they're bad.

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just too much. I don't know what's going on, Jeffrey.

0:53:20.200 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 1>The Los Angeles Raiders and the San Diego Chargers in

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the game. I'm staying away from. No idea what either

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>those teams can possible. They're capable of anything in each direction,

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:33.360
<v Speaker 1>both teams, So I'll stay away from Raiders Chargers. Todds

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and Chef made the error of calling them the San

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Diego Chargers. Do you have your Charger song ready to

0:53:37.239 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>go today? Are you ready? I've tried to do this

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 1>many times. But I'll be honest with you. When I

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do a song, I have to be a tremendously good performance.

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't do heck. I feel that the San Diego

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Charger song, if any of you have heard it, is

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult song to sing. It has a lot

0:53:58.200 --> 0:54:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of the song to it. It has a cadelic nous.

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So instead of that, in lieu of that, I will

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>sing Keep It Coming Love by Casey and the Sunshine Band.

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Keep It Come and Love, keep it come and Love.

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Don't stop it now, stop no, no, stop it now.

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Just a complete random substitution that was outstanding. Todd, you

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>saved yourself. By the way. When I was a little boy,

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Casey and the Sunshine Band was my favorite group of

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:36.400
<v Speaker 1>all time. I was if you watch something great, go

0:54:36.480 --> 0:54:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube and put in keep It Coming Love Casey

0:54:39.360 --> 0:54:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Sunshine And there is a video of Casey

0:54:44.160 --> 0:54:47.319
<v Speaker 1>looking as coked out as a human being could possibly

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:53.359
<v Speaker 1>be phenomenal, dancing dancing in green aqua pants that don't fit,

0:54:53.960 --> 0:54:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and two and two ladies behind him dancing with it

0:54:57.640 --> 0:55:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is just absolutely man. H w you Casey. When I

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:02.439
<v Speaker 1>was a little kid, first of all, No one told

0:55:02.440 --> 0:55:04.239
<v Speaker 1>me that all these songs were about sex, right, I

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 1>had no idea, But that's the way. Get down tonight,

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:13.280
<v Speaker 1>boogie shoes come on. Oh, by the way, there's another

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:16.319
<v Speaker 1>one where Casey and Sunshine. He is the entire band.

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It's him and a whole bunch of black guys and

0:55:18.480 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 1>girls and one other white guy. And they they're wearing tuxedos,

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:27.319
<v Speaker 1>white tuxedos that are bedazzled with no shirts. I'm wearing.

0:55:28.200 --> 0:55:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing that right now. A matter of fact, who'd

0:55:32.320 --> 0:55:34.839
<v Speaker 1>I love that? Look? So todd? Is that? What you do?

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:37.440
<v Speaker 1>You just YouTube get watch Casey and the Sunshine videos,

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Like how did you get on that? Well? Something like

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:41.839
<v Speaker 1>I like to go on YouTube sometimes and start just

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:44.720
<v Speaker 1>either I'll be like watching like old clips of Letterman

0:55:44.880 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or something, and then sometimes I'll start going over into

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:50.319
<v Speaker 1>like old songs, and I found that one, and then

0:55:50.360 --> 0:55:52.319
<v Speaker 1>of course it always like suggests a whole bunch of

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>other songs for you. And so then I'm off and

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Casey and the Sunshine band because I love Casey and Sunshine.

0:55:59.239 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>There's so many good good So me and my brother

0:56:02.239 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 1>had a cassette tape. Bob by the way, aren't you

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 1>glad you did? You agree to do this podcast? And

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:08.800
<v Speaker 1>me and my me and my brother had a cassette

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:10.399
<v Speaker 1>tape where I must have been like five years old

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and he was nine years old and we were singing

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Casey in the Sunshine Band songs and it got when

0:56:14.680 --> 0:56:16.960
<v Speaker 1>my car got stolen in San Francisco. I think we

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:19.400
<v Speaker 1>lost that cassette. But I will say this about their

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 1>music catalog. Laugh all you will about their songs. But

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm your Boogeyman is a jam. How about the shoes

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the shoes song, Boogie Shoes. Yeah, Boogie Shoes is another one.

0:56:31.760 --> 0:56:33.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, I saw Casey in the Sunshine Band in

0:56:33.960 --> 0:56:36.080
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. You know they have the city you know,

0:56:36.200 --> 0:56:39.640
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Eve gala every year in downtown. Yes. Uh,

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they played in the same tent. Now they had lots

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of different acts all around all around the area. They

0:56:44.680 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>play in the same tent with Shaka Khan. Now that

0:56:47.120 --> 0:56:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was a fun night. Well what this is like old

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Casey in the Sunshine Man, Like, how old were they

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:54.759
<v Speaker 1>at the time? This was years ago alright, so not

0:56:54.840 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 1>crazy old but still old. Yeah, thank you for that, Todd.

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Where were we? Where did we answer? All? The questions,

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, we didn't answer this. Oh I need to

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 1>answer it, that's right. My choice would be Todd's choice

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Indianapolis. I have zero feel for either football team.

0:57:08.840 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is about as middle of the road as against.

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Their defense is abysmal in Indianapolis didn't show up at

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:17.880
<v Speaker 1>all last week, so who knows with a game like that,

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So Caroline Indianapolis my choice as well. Gentlemen, thank you

0:57:21.720 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 1>as always, appreciate the time, Todd as always, jeff thank

0:57:24.880 --> 0:57:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you for filling in for Mikey. Thank you, Jeffrey, appreciate it.

0:57:27.880 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank thank you for having me Gil. That's always a

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:31.920
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to do. That's always a pleasure to have you

0:57:31.960 --> 0:57:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and Bob man Uh, you are the best man. I

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>so appreciate you doing this, and thanks for playing along

0:57:37.880 --> 0:57:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with our Casey in the Sunshine band aside and actually

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 1>throw it in that you saw them in a tent. Todd,

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:49.400
<v Speaker 1>take us out with keep it coming love, keep it

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:54.400
<v Speaker 1>coming low, keep it coming low, don't stop it stop, no,

0:57:54.680 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>no stop it. Todd, just give me the intro of

0:57:57.040 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the musical intro that you were doing at the binning

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 1>so I could take us out you when you went that.

0:58:01.480 --> 0:58:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Just give me that and do it. Thanks everybody for listening.

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with all your bets this week. Week sixty

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in the National Football League,