WEBVTT - The Pound Could Drop 5 to 10 Percent If May Loses Vote (Podcast)

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. If

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>you thought the Brexit was over, you were wrong. We

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>actually got that vote yesterday against Theresa May, prime Minister

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of the United Kingdom, against her plan for Brexit. Not surprising, however,

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it was surprising the magnitude of her loss. Today she

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>faces a no confidence vote. The pound up against the

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>euro and the dollar. Go figure on that one. Joining

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>us now to explain what we should look for and

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>whether we're going to soon come out of this Brexit malaise.

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Dr Sam nap President of em Are Global Ventures, joining

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>us here in our BLOOMBERGNNA Active Brokers Studios. So, Dr

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>and natapoff, what do you think will happen today? Well,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>remember what happened yesterday, Prime Minister Theresa May suffered an

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>historic political defeat. Today she in about four hours she's

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>going to have a vote of no confidence and these

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>don't happen very often. The last one happened twenty four

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and the last time someone lost one was

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>forty years ago. If she loses the vote today, which

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is very unlikely, she'll probably win it by about ten votes.

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>If she loses it today, the pound could drop by

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>between five and ten percent. This is a totally unpredictable,

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>unpredicted event, and the capital and financial markets would go

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and say, so, let's say that she does win, as

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you say, by ten or twelve votes. Boy, where do

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we go next here? Well, now there are only three

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>there's only three options for Britain right now. There's a

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>modified deal Brexit, a no deal Brexit, or no Brexit. Now,

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem is in Britain is that each one of

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>these groups thinks that they have victory within their grasp.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>There reason may think that, you know, as we get

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>closer to March twenty nine, the day that Britain actually

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>formally leaves the EU, recalcitrant MPs will come back to

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>her side and vote her deal through in some form.

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.679
<v Speaker 1>The Brexiteers who want Britain to go back to their

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>pre lapse arian form they are are desperate for this,

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, purifying no deal Brexit until they can go

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>back and be Britain of the nineteenth century. And the

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>remainders are desperate to redo the referendum, and they're thinking

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge step forward towards a second referendum.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's going to happen. I actually think

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that Britain will stay in the European Union in some form,

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a Norway Plus which is a lesser version

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of membership, or there'll be a second referendum. But that

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>brings us back to the vote of no confidence today again.

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>The Labor Party in Jeremy Corbyn, it's leader, brought this

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>brought this vote today, which is the first one in

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty four years. It's very rare. His party said they're

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 1>open to bringing more of them in the near future.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>What that means is that the Labor Party has committed

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>more towards trying to get a new general election than

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>pushing for a second referendum. For some reason, I've always

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>felt a second referendum is kind of where the country

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>should go, given the greater knowledge of what is really entails.

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't that may may not happen what side

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think of? This argument will move first towards accommodation.

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem with Brexit is that it has only two constants.

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It's totally irrational and totally unpredictable. Uh. A lot of

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the opponents of a second referendum UM have an argument

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that Trump supporters here would would would support, which is,

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we had to vote, the country spoke, we got an outcome,

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and now you want to revisit it. Donald Trump is president,

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>get used to it. Well, hold on, if you if

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they did hold another referendum, do you think that most

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>people in the United Kingdom would vote against Brexit? Now

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be in in polling and people have

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 1>pulled this extensively, about a fifty one percentage in favor

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of remain. Now now that the the the facts are

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out. The amazing thing about the Brexit referendum was

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>that the Leave folks campaigned on things that weren't true

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>and rubbish the things that were. Now we are in

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly the reverse situation. So what is your sense of

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 1>timing here? I see discussions about delays and delays? Is

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that the mode written now? Or do you expect something

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 1>quickly to happen? One way or the other. Theresa May

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is required on Monday to provide her Plan B for

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what comes next. Uh. In many ways, Theresa May is

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>no longer in charge of this process because she's Prime

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Minister in name only, with enormously diminished powers of executive office,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>much the same way that Donald Trump is as president

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>after the election. Now he's balanced by the House of

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Representatives led by nance Dallassandro Pelosi. So we're not going

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to explain all that right now, but there's a backstory.

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But um on Monday, Theresa May will put out a

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>new plan and it won't be terribly relevant because she's

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>already so damaged and in a normal year she would

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have been she would have resigned yesterday. But we're not

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in a normal year. This isn't in a normal situation,

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and no one can predict what comes next. Here's my question,

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>at what point will the European Unions say we want

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to be negotiating with Prime Minister May. She has shown

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>her grit, she has shown stomach through all of the

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>jeers and the and the rowdy meetings in Parliament. We

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>want to deal with them, so so let's throw her

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a bone. We don't want to be dealing with Corbin.

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that likely? No, it's not, You're like, no, that

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>not because the European Union doesn't want to get involved

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in internal British politics, because not even Britain's understand internal

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>British politics. And I'll just remind you that back in

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>when Margaret Thatcher went under a leadership challenge, she won

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>the first vote, the first out, but not by that

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>much and she said, I fight on, I fight to win.

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Twenty four hours she resigned. Theresa May's on very thin nice.

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there any scenario where the EU would accommodate anything

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point just to get a deal done? Are

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they just gonna let the Britain's figure it out? They

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>probably want this to fail, right as sort of an

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>example to the rest of the Nation's Well, yeah, you

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>have to remember what Britain brings to the table for

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the EU, which is considerable. One is Britain as a

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>net contributor to the EU budget. They give more money

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to Brussels than they take and that's not true of

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the members of the European Union. Secondly,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Britain is the second largest economy and an important economic

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>part and home to the europe to the European capital Um,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the European financial capital. But also important, let's just say

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>still is and is moving. But the final thing is

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there are social and legal issues within the European Union.

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Their Eastern European members are becoming a little bit more authoritarian.

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>And Britain has long been a pillar of the rule

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of law and and it's importance that EU wants to

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>keep Britain in. If Britain wants to stay in. It's

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>just Brussels has no idea what Britain wants right now. Wow,

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this is something. Uh, you know we're gonna be talking

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>about this, We've been talking about for over two and

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a half years. It's just it's not gonna go away.

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And here we go. All I know is I think

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be having Sam uh Not in our studios

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>more often going forward, just because it's never gonna end. Uh.

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Dr Sam not a president Empire Global Ventures. Uh

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>here with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little Netflix. Netflix is reporting earnings tomorrow

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>after the close. Stocks had a phenomenal run. What else

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is new? It's up? Uh, I guess you know, thirty

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>percent year to date, up about six over the last

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, so stock continues to perform extremely well. The

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>company announced yesterday a significant price increase, the four one

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen recently. Uh and stock traded up on that news.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's get some more color on Netflix with Mark

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Douglas Marcus the CEO of Steelhouse. It's based in Los Angeles, California,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>but Marcus with us is here at the Bloomberg eleven

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>three oh Studios. Mark, welcome. What do you make of

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the price increase? That was an aggressive price increase yesterday.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>What does it tell you about the company and its future? Yeah, so,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think in the immediate literally tomorrow, I think it's

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>an indicator, a pretty strong indicator that they're gonna report

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.839
<v Speaker 1>really good numbers. I don't think. I don't think most

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>people would basically report something that could make people think

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they might the growth might slow, and then

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>report slower numbers. So I'm betting that they report really

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.719
<v Speaker 1>good earnings. I think. The other thing is is that

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no place else for you to go

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>as a consumer. Netflix is the for everyone I know,

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Netflix and in their numbers, the first place to go. Second,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to because I want to push back Disney

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.559
<v Speaker 1>coming out with their own streaming service, supposedly the Netflix

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.599
<v Speaker 1>killer right this year, and they're gonna take some of

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>their movies off of Netflix rotation. Is that going to

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>matter or you think no, it doesn't matter that Disney

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is now irrelevant. I think that basically the consumers have

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a short list and starts with Netflix. That's where the

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>money goes first. A monthly subscription is less than the

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>cost of a single movie. It's increasingly all new, all

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>original content. They crushed it with bird Box at the

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. Another reason why I think they're

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>going to report really good numbers and then everything after

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that is where do I go next? Do I go

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 1>to Hulu? Do I go to Disney? You don't have

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>kids to you? I actually do. But they're not Disney age,

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the Netflix age. So from the computer, from the competitive

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>lent landscape perspective, You're right. Netflix has been it. They've

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>been first to market. They've got the market share a

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty seven million subscribers globally. Everybody else is playing catchup.

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'll come back to what I heard from some

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Redstone thirty years ago, where content is king

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the big media companies are pulling their content off of Netflix. Uh,

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Disney doubles down the twenty one century Fox acquisition, so

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it loads up it's it's content. It does feel like

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the competitive landscape in ten is going to be materially

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for Netflix, and it's been in the past. Yeah,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think they look, you know, Toyota and Ferrari

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>don't compete right the the you can it's where money

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>goes to a number of these companies. Where does it

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>go from consumers? Where does it go first? Where's it

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>go second? Where does it go third? Until you see

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>people saying I'm going to cancel my Netflix subscription to

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>get a Disney subscription, then not really competing. So you

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>think there's a the marketplace can support two or three

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>or four. Yeah. I would be concerned about NBC Universal,

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>like I wouldn't be concerned about Hulu. I wouldn't be

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>concerned about Disney. I wouldn't be concerned about Netflix. So

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about, um my fixed expenses. How much can

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Netflix raise prices before people push back? In other words,

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a year from now, could they say, you know what,

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you love our stuff so much? A month? I think

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that their next price increase is very quiet. There was

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a meme, so bird Box spawned all these memes on

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and other social media. One of the funniest ones

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>was how those forty five million people watch bird Box

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>with twelve Netflix accounts? Right, so everyone knows is sharing accounts.

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Netflix's next price increases to start locking down

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the ability to share the accounts starting to drive consumers

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>who are borrowing accounts to buy. How do they do

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>that and why haven't they done it already? Well, because

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a form of free trial to to basically allow

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>accounts to be as easily shared. There's a little bit

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of control on it, but for the most part, every

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you can easily get access to Netflix account without paying

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>for it. The locking it down technically is is pretty easy.

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Hulu does it. So I think their next price increases

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>not announced. It's just it's harder to share, which creates

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>more subscribers. I would I'm bullish on Netflix. I would

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>be that that that's a whole another increase in revenue

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>that's not accounted for. They still have so many levels

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to push. They're basically the biggest production company in the world.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to that point. That you know, on the

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>other side of the income statement, where it's not just

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a revenue story, it's a call story. And they're spending

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like drunken sailors in Hollywood. The Ted Serrando's checkbook is open,

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>nobody spends more money. Nobody's got a bigger check book

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>is there, and they have no free cash flow. By

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, they can't pay for it, so they're going

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to the bond market. Is there a point where you

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>get concerned that they're spending too much? Um, Well, they

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>just generated another billion dollars in cash annually with the

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>price increase they announced yesterday. I mean, that's the that's

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the that is the long term concern they I think

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they have twelve billion dollars in debt um they're negative

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.239
<v Speaker 1>cash flow three billion dollars a year. But they're expanding

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>their user bay rapidly. And you know that they added

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars in cash all jess with Essay's announcement,

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>assuming that there's no consumers don't leave, so you know

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they're managing it for now. Two or three years from now,

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I might be a little more concerned. I think for

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future, they have a lot of levers to

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to generate subscriptions and generate cash in literally ten seconds.

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Who's their biggest competitor. I think Disney is the biggest competitors,

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>so they're not they can't really compete, but they can compete.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>They can compete, but I don't think they take subscriptions

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>away yet. But they are the number two. They become

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the number two choice. Mark Douglas, thank you so much

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Always a pleasure. Mark Douglas is

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>chief executive of Steelhouse based in Los Angeles, but he

0:13:40.840 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studios. You know,

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the fastest growing segments of the consumer products

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>business has been the cannabis sector. UH. We have thirty

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>eight states approximately in the US right now that have

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>legalized cannabis. There's companies coming public, much greater awareness and

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>acceptance of legal cannabis. UH. Joining us today is Kevin Hart,

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>founder and CEO of green Check Verified out of New Haven, Connecticut.

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>He joins us in the Bloomberg eleven three oh studios

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk to us a little bit about what how

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>his company is playing in the food chain, if you will,

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the legal cannabis business. So, Kevin, thanks for being

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>here with us real quick, you give us our listeners

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of the thirty second elevator pitch for what your

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>company doesn't, how you fit into the ecosystem. Sure, we

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>recognize three years ago that you know, the banking for

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the cannabis industry was believed to be illegal, and that's

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>simply not true. It's it's legal within the states where

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>those programs are compliant and they're recognized to the number

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that you said. The challenges, it's just very complex and

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>very expensive for state charter banks and financial institutions, which

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>means it's impossible for a cannabis business to actually be

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>able to do this. So you have these two independent,

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>highly regulated industries that really don't know much about each

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>other but would love to work together. That screams the

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for technology. So we developed the technology framework of

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>platform and web AP that integrates all the rules and

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>regulations at the local level that the cannabis business operates on.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:23.359
<v Speaker 1>We monitor their them for compliance. We monitor every individual

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>transaction at the dollar level, and therefore that information has

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>passed along to the financial institutions so they can review

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the money bring it into deposit accounts and financial institutions,

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>state charter banks and credit unions are dying for new

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>deposit dollars. It's a challenged industry because of the bigger banks.

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>They can bring that money in and they can pass

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>their rules and their risk profile internally, and then they

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>can pass that information back all the way through to

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the exam cycle on the back end. So it is

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a holistic, integrated, horizontal approach to attacking the banking challenge.

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And we work within the banking system, not around it. Okay,

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So rather than just saying we'll use bitcoin, right, you're saying, actually,

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>here is an ecosystem that can that can perhaps be

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>sustainable within the existing financial world. What I'm trying to

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>understand is first of all, how you make money, who

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>pays you? And then second of all, is it just

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>state and local UH financial firms that adhere to this

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of local guidance from the rules or can it

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>be the JP Morgan to Bank America On the back

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>end here, the larger financial institutions aren't going to get

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>involved in this industry yet, it's not worth the reputational risk.

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know candidly, they just don't have the monitoring

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>ability of those individual transactions and the rules and regulations

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>at that local level. Um. You know, at some point

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in time is laws change and regulations evolve. I think

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll see the bigger banks getting involved. You can't deny

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the size of the industry and the growth, but not today.

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And so this is a ripe opportunity for those state

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>charter banks, great unions that are looking for new deposit dollars. Um.

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You know there are the reason why Bitcoin and the

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>others don't participate is, you know, it's it's complex enough.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You take non regulated currencies and you add that to

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the mix, and that's just gonna push people farther and

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>farther away. So you know, this is about monitoring cash.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's eight plus percent of the transactions are

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>still done in cash. This is an essentially cash intensive business.

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Where do you get your cash? Our fee structure is

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 1>based upon the dispensary. They pay a nominal fee structure.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>It's cheaper than the cost of a debit or credit

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>card transaction fee. And we also have a tiered pricing

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>structure with the financial institutions, so we do collective fee

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>on both ends, but it's still cheaper than the cost

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of cash. So how are the local financial institutions viewing

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the cannabis business. Are they receptive to it? Are they

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>still resistant to it? Does your presence and your regulatory

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>framework help ease that? Where are they in the general? Okay,

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll do business with the local cannabist company. It's a

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>fascinating process that we've been involved with so far. We

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>knew we had to not convince, but we knew we

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>had to be able to position our value to the

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>financial institution. And to date, the street will end. And

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a sports person. I believe in hot streaks.

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>The street will end. Every financial institution that we've had

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>conversations with and demo this platform too, has asked us

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>for an exclusive on the product and the geography there.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And I've been selling enterprise software for forty years and

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>been involved. Nobody's ever done that before. So this is

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>compliance software, but it's compliance that comes with new business.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>It actually comes with the deposit dollars attached to it,

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and they see those opportunities, so they're very excited about it.

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So what's the longer term plan for green check Verified.

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering, do you see this is eventually being

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>acquired by a major bank when the reputational risk goes away,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or will there be an I p o UM. We

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.239
<v Speaker 1>look at all those options. I'm a big believer to

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>begin with the end of mind and you always have

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep your options open as to what you might

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>do from a company perspective. But our goal right now

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.719
<v Speaker 1>is to continue our growth trajectory. We started our national

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>launch that's rolling out. We're in fifteen states right now,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and for levels of conversation and implementation, we'll see where

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the market goes. There will be some changes as things

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>involve in Washington, but legalization and State's Right Act actually

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to become an accelerant for us because the

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Treasury is never going to turn a green line onto

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>banking and all the black market money that's out there.

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if actually federal law legalizing marijuana fight

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>her no, and it will actually help Okay, it will

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>actually help us. All right, Well, we'll have to continue

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly how that would help you at another time. Unfortunately

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>out of time. But Kevin Hart, really interesting having you on.

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for being with us. It's important to kind

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of look at the infrastructure of the cannabis industry. I

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>speak to so many people on Wall Street who say, Gosh,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I coul should have gotten into cannabis, not training play

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and consumer. Kevin Hart is a founder and chief executive

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>officer of green Check Verified, which is based in New Haven,

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Connecticuty choices here in our New York City headquarters of

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg LP. Lisa, I think we're on day if I'm

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>not mistaken of this partial government shutdown. And obviously, in

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>addition to the question of how long will it last? Uh?

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>And is there any end in sight? The question is

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>can it get any worse than what we're seeing right now?

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It looks like President Trump has ordered thousands of federal

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>employees back to work, most notably without pay. But let's

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>bring in Chris Flavel, Bloomberg policy reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>He's at studio in Washington, d C. And he's out

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>with a story on this topic. So, Chris, thanks so

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. You know, where do you think, uh,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this shutdown goes maybe over the near term, the next

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>week or so. Yeah. So we've got a story where

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.719
<v Speaker 1>we put that to people who follow this stuff and

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to people inside and around government. And there's a list

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and I would, you know, I'd be folly to try

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and say here are the scariest things. But one that

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>certainly is alarming is what happens to government workers who

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>decide they just no longer want to be working for free.

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that the president has ordered more federal employees

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.360
<v Speaker 1>back to work, even though they're not paid. That's certainly

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>one way of addressing this. But the problem that we're

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 1>told is really concerning people at senior levels of government

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is what if people in vital functions like T s

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>A just stop showing up. They can call in sick,

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>they can quit, they can do anything else, but if

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not they're doing their job, really vital functions start

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to stop, whether that is food inspection, whether it's people

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>getting on planes, whether it's prison guards. And we've never

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>been here before, so we're not really sure if it

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>goes on weeks or even months, how they'll respond. Well,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And Chris, I mean, we haven't we seen that to

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>some accent already with the lines at uh it sort

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of security checkouts at airports, T S agents showing up. Yeah,

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a great example. So the latest figures I heard

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>yesterday where I think somewhere in the neighborhood of seven

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>percent of workers calling in sick. That's almost three times

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the typical number. Look at the chaos we've seen with

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>just seven percent of workers not showing up imagines ten fifty. Uh,

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it's really I don't want to suggest we're predicting it.

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>No one knows. I think the concern is there's nothing

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>really stopping that from happening, and if it does, I

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know what, if anything, the government can do to

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>deal with it. What are some of the areas and

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>your reporting that you found that you know might be

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the most problematic for Americans. Um, you know

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned T s A. What are some of the

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>other parts of government that could be impacted? Certainly if

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the sort of the wide spread impacts,

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>food stamps are a huge issue. The administration has found

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a way to keep on sending food stamps for now,

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>it's made clear that that can't continue forever, perhaps through February.

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>There's an enormous share of American families that rely on

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>food stamps, thirty eight million people. They account for ten

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of all food people buy in stores and take them

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to eat. If those food stands stopped it would be

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic for a significant share American families housing support. There's

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a huge number of housing families that need help getting housing.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>If that couldn't be processed anymore because HUD the anecy

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in charge could no longer work, that be very traumatic.

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>And then company and batch. This is a big deal

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>because we don't really know what happens when, for example,

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I p O stop, when the patent office closes. These

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>are things that we haven't really experienced, so we're, in

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a sense we're speculating, but based on pretty good information.

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The core of it is a lot of these agencies

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>have sort of clever workarounds that will keep them performing

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>vital functions for a certain amount of time, but not forever,

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're approaching that limit. So I should give you

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a sense of some of the numbers behind this. Ian Bremer,

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>who is the president of your Asia group, just tweeting

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>out this data from the New York Times. The typical

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>federal worker has five thousand dollars in pay since the

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>shutdown began. That's a total of two hundred million dollars

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and unpaid wages each work day. I'm just wondering what

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's power actually is to order people to go

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to work even though they're not being paid. So this

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is before the courts. Yesterday here in d see a

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>federal judge dismissed for now a request by a union

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of federal employees to insist that they be paid. So

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>that is still winding its way through the courts. But

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>look at a legitimate question, right what is the limit

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of the government's legal ability to order people to work

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>without pay and for how long? Even if that gets

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>worked out, you still have the issue of funding right now.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>One thing that we looked at in our story is

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the federal government is an enormous landlord. They pay out

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>almost half a billion dollars in rent every month to

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>landlords around the country. That could stop as the g

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>s A either runs out of workers to process those

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>checks or money to pay that rent. So again, sort

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of a cascading effect in ways that we can guess

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>at but won't really know until it happens. So, Chris,

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're reporting just real quickly. Did you get any

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>sense anywhere that these mounting, exponentially mounting problems are weighing

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>on Congress at all one one way or the other

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to get a deal done. You know. It's it's so

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it strikes me as a black box. It's hard to

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>see a link between how bad things are in the

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>real world and what's happening in Congress. Uh, And and

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it would seem just impossible to meaningfully predict what's going

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to happen. The one thing we can say from our

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>reporting is these effects are real. Uh, They're bigger than before,

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and they affect really almost every facet of the economy

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>and the country. So certainly, Uh, they are painful for

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people and extremely so for many and

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they will again just get worse. Chris, I'm shocked that

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:46.719
<v Speaker 1>you didn't want to go out there and speculate what

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Congress is going to do. Next time you come on,

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we expect you to have a full eight ball prediction

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of what's going to happen in Washington. Thank you. I

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Chris Flavell is policy reporter for Bloomberg News

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>down in the nation's capital, Washington, d C. Where at

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 1>One Studios are Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio