1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,360 Speaker 1: Let's get to Shane Assistle, our guest for the half hour. 2 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:05,880 Speaker 1: Shana is founder and president at ben Ryon Capital Management, 3 00:00:05,880 --> 00:00:09,040 Speaker 1: on the line from Chicago. So, Shana, do you do 4 00:00:09,080 --> 00:00:11,880 Speaker 1: you buy into this rally today? Is this an important 5 00:00:11,880 --> 00:00:14,360 Speaker 1: inflection point or do you think it's a kind of 6 00:00:14,400 --> 00:00:19,000 Speaker 1: a bear market trap interest It's interesting. I don't know 7 00:00:19,040 --> 00:00:21,360 Speaker 1: if I have an opinion on this rally. I think 8 00:00:21,400 --> 00:00:26,799 Speaker 1: that there's a number of issues I personally see UM. Specifically, 9 00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:29,400 Speaker 1: I think earnings being as resilient as they have been 10 00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:33,000 Speaker 1: is actually not a good thing UM. So I'm concerned 11 00:00:33,240 --> 00:00:36,760 Speaker 1: that this type of rally kind of emboldens the Federal 12 00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:41,519 Speaker 1: Reserve to be more aggressive or continue this aggressive stance 13 00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:44,599 Speaker 1: on interest rates. We have midterms coming up, which can 14 00:00:44,640 --> 00:00:48,080 Speaker 1: be positive for UM markets, and markets do tend to 15 00:00:48,159 --> 00:00:51,919 Speaker 1: bottom in October, so you know, there's there's kind of 16 00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 1: things on both sides that I see, But I'm not 17 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 1: sure we're through the worst of it. I actually think 18 00:00:58,160 --> 00:01:01,840 Speaker 1: the market is going to be volatile for extended period 19 00:01:01,880 --> 00:01:05,280 Speaker 1: of time. Would weaker earnings that have really changed the 20 00:01:06,280 --> 00:01:08,080 Speaker 1: move the needle at all? For the Fed? They seem 21 00:01:08,200 --> 00:01:11,040 Speaker 1: very committed to getting inflation under control. And we've heard 22 00:01:11,080 --> 00:01:13,400 Speaker 1: from Marc Mobius today saying rates might need to hit 23 00:01:13,480 --> 00:01:16,480 Speaker 1: nine percent to achieve that goal. What are your thoughts. 24 00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:20,760 Speaker 1: I saw that. I think there is no chance the 25 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:25,119 Speaker 1: Fed goes to nine percent. They seem very uh fixated 26 00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:29,600 Speaker 1: on sort of four and a half to five UM. 27 00:01:29,720 --> 00:01:31,960 Speaker 1: But that said, he does have a point if if 28 00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:35,200 Speaker 1: inflation doesn't start coming down, they do have to be 29 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:39,600 Speaker 1: above the inflation rate. UM. I just think that the 30 00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:45,280 Speaker 1: Fed sees is following the economic conditions and as long 31 00:01:45,319 --> 00:01:50,840 Speaker 1: as employment stays where it is and earnings remain stable, 32 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:54,840 Speaker 1: they feel like they can continue to be aggressive because 33 00:01:54,840 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 1: it's not pushing the economy into recession, and they have 34 00:02:00,840 --> 00:02:03,000 Speaker 1: said that they're willing to do that. I think if 35 00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:07,280 Speaker 1: they start to see signs that there's real economic casualty here, 36 00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:10,680 Speaker 1: that that might give them reason to pause. Bloombrick economist 37 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:15,359 Speaker 1: or forecasting a recession hitting the American economy in October, 38 00:02:16,280 --> 00:02:19,919 Speaker 1: so a year from now with one percent probability, that's 39 00:02:19,960 --> 00:02:23,200 Speaker 1: a lot for the market to kind of digest very quickly. 40 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:27,440 Speaker 1: Is that feasible in your view? I actually agree with that. 41 00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:30,920 Speaker 1: But here's an interesting fact. Since there has never been 42 00:02:30,960 --> 00:02:32,720 Speaker 1: a recession that started in the third year of a 43 00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 1: presidential cycle in the US. So history says that that's 44 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:39,840 Speaker 1: not going to happen. But I think the probability is high. 45 00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:42,919 Speaker 1: It's just it's never happened before. And Shana, we've got 46 00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 1: to say, report today from Bloomberg Economics predicting a knee 47 00:02:46,320 --> 00:02:49,560 Speaker 1: one percent chance of recession now in the US. SO 48 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:53,280 Speaker 1: in this environment, I understand you're getting defensive. Where are 49 00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:56,680 Speaker 1: you putting money to work? Well, you know, I've been 50 00:02:56,680 --> 00:02:59,639 Speaker 1: on a few times. I would say that my my 51 00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:04,079 Speaker 1: usp and how I'm positioning portfolios hasn't changed at all. UH. 52 00:03:04,080 --> 00:03:08,919 Speaker 1: Continue to focus on quality UH factors UH specifically low 53 00:03:08,960 --> 00:03:15,120 Speaker 1: ball and the actual quality factor, looking at being defensive 54 00:03:15,200 --> 00:03:19,160 Speaker 1: through the use of liquid alternatives to help heads the 55 00:03:19,200 --> 00:03:24,160 Speaker 1: downside potential and portfolios sticking with large cap names. If 56 00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:26,760 Speaker 1: I am outside of the large cap space, I tend 57 00:03:26,840 --> 00:03:31,760 Speaker 1: to focus on defensive types of of names. And when 58 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:36,480 Speaker 1: I say defensive, I mean like in the devent defense space. UH. 59 00:03:36,480 --> 00:03:39,200 Speaker 1: And so you know that hasn't really changed at all. 60 00:03:39,240 --> 00:03:42,520 Speaker 1: The names I like remain the same as they have 61 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:46,320 Speaker 1: been for quite some time. Looking for some good entry 62 00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:49,200 Speaker 1: points into a couple of my more controversial sort of 63 00:03:49,240 --> 00:03:52,000 Speaker 1: tech names. There's some names in the reeds space that 64 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:56,480 Speaker 1: I'm interested in, haven't found the right entry point. Uh. 65 00:03:56,560 --> 00:03:59,600 Speaker 1: That's that's how I'm generally looking at portfolios. Nothing's really 66 00:03:59,680 --> 00:04:02,880 Speaker 1: changed in the way I'm positioning them now. I don't 67 00:04:03,440 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 1: um want to get more bullish at this point, because 68 00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:10,040 Speaker 1: to your point, I think that there's more downside than 69 00:04:10,040 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 1: the economy to come, and I do think the markets 70 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:15,440 Speaker 1: are going to remain volatile for some time, especially while 71 00:04:15,480 --> 00:04:17,920 Speaker 1: the FED continues to be aggressive. So what about being 72 00:04:17,960 --> 00:04:20,960 Speaker 1: diversified in such a way that would take you offshore? 73 00:04:21,000 --> 00:04:24,880 Speaker 1: I mean, maybe e M Asia. Are there markets there 74 00:04:24,920 --> 00:04:27,839 Speaker 1: that that look appealing. I know we've had the Party 75 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:30,520 Speaker 1: Congress underway and there's been a little bit of disappointment. 76 00:04:30,880 --> 00:04:33,840 Speaker 1: We know that the mainland Chinese economy is struggling, but 77 00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:37,039 Speaker 1: there are other markets to consider, wouldn't you agree? I 78 00:04:37,080 --> 00:04:39,719 Speaker 1: would agree. My My biggest problem with some of the 79 00:04:39,760 --> 00:04:42,279 Speaker 1: emerging market offerings out there is they do tend to 80 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:46,400 Speaker 1: be China heavy um and the zero COVID policy really 81 00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:48,800 Speaker 1: is concerning to me. I just don't know how you 82 00:04:48,839 --> 00:04:52,000 Speaker 1: improve your economy if you have that policy. So there's 83 00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:54,320 Speaker 1: like there's an e t F called f r d M, 84 00:04:54,360 --> 00:04:57,520 Speaker 1: which is an emerging market um uh e t F 85 00:04:57,600 --> 00:05:01,600 Speaker 1: that focuses on emerging market economy, but more on the 86 00:05:01,600 --> 00:05:05,159 Speaker 1: the openness of their their economy, which has actually done 87 00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:07,400 Speaker 1: quite well. That's something I would take a look at 88 00:05:07,560 --> 00:05:11,560 Speaker 1: UM in terms of taking advantage of of opportunities and 89 00:05:11,560 --> 00:05:14,159 Speaker 1: emerging markets. I'd like to see the dollar weekend a 90 00:05:14,200 --> 00:05:18,960 Speaker 1: bit before I'm ready to jump in to UM international names. 91 00:05:19,360 --> 00:05:21,600 Speaker 1: You need a bit of a weaker dollar for for 92 00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:23,880 Speaker 1: that to really pay off unless you're doing some sort 93 00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:29,039 Speaker 1: of hedging UM in in in the investment strategy UM. 94 00:05:29,080 --> 00:05:32,000 Speaker 1: And so this dollar has been a little strong, too 95 00:05:32,040 --> 00:05:35,120 Speaker 1: strong for me to to take the risk of some 96 00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:39,200 Speaker 1: of these economies that have larger gy of political issues 97 00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:42,039 Speaker 1: that I think are going to continue to affect them. Yeah, 98 00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:44,240 Speaker 1: a little strong might might be an understatement. Where one 99 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:47,400 Speaker 1: forty nine against the end. Now, when do you see 100 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:50,360 Speaker 1: this story ending? And I suppose this brings us full 101 00:05:50,360 --> 00:05:54,680 Speaker 1: circle back to the fit it does. And and quite frankly, 102 00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:57,560 Speaker 1: you look at something like the UK which can't get 103 00:05:57,560 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 1: out of its own way. It's not helping itself. And 104 00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:03,520 Speaker 1: as long as it keeps having issues, the dollar is 105 00:06:03,560 --> 00:06:05,760 Speaker 1: going to be strong against say the pound, and the 106 00:06:05,839 --> 00:06:09,400 Speaker 1: Euro has its own issues, and so it's hard for 107 00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:12,000 Speaker 1: me to see a scenario where even with what the 108 00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:15,480 Speaker 1: Feds doing, the dollar weakens in a significant way because 109 00:06:15,760 --> 00:06:19,000 Speaker 1: you have to look at it relative to the other options, 110 00:06:19,040 --> 00:06:22,240 Speaker 1: which don't look like they're going to get their act 111 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:26,600 Speaker 1: together anytime soon. In terms of some of these beaten 112 00:06:26,680 --> 00:06:29,560 Speaker 1: up markets. You'd mentioned China a moment ago. If you've 113 00:06:29,600 --> 00:06:32,080 Speaker 1: got a really long time horizon, let's say three to 114 00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:34,560 Speaker 1: five years, can you take the attitude that this two 115 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:37,320 Speaker 1: may pass. Do you look at opportunities with the intention 116 00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:43,280 Speaker 1: of getting long again. I'd like to see China those policies. 117 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:45,960 Speaker 1: I don't know how long they're going to keep a 118 00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:49,040 Speaker 1: zero COVID policy. They're one of the only countries still 119 00:06:49,080 --> 00:06:53,159 Speaker 1: doing that. They could hypothetically continue this process for five years. 120 00:06:53,440 --> 00:06:58,120 Speaker 1: And there's some you know, geopolitical aspects to it, with 121 00:06:58,800 --> 00:07:03,360 Speaker 1: sanctions and these weird policies that for example, the US 122 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:06,680 Speaker 1: have that are going to hurt the Chinese economy. So 123 00:07:07,160 --> 00:07:10,040 Speaker 1: it's really hard for me to look at that risk 124 00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:12,160 Speaker 1: and think, yeah, now it's the time to get in there. 125 00:07:12,640 --> 00:07:15,600 Speaker 1: I just I need to see some more progress there, 126 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:19,440 Speaker 1: all right, thanks so much. Shane Assisile, Founder and president 127 00:07:19,600 --> 00:07:21,560 Speaker 1: at Boundary and Capital Management,