WEBVTT - Equities Enter Correction as Tariffs Weigh Down Markets

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Joining us right now, and this is a timely conversation

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>because we're like the stock market, We're all gonna die.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>And maybe we look at gold mac Dasic joins us.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>How to fixed income strategy from Maryland for Bank of

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 2>America private bank? What's the level of sweat among your clients?

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>And don't give me the Brian Mooyn and answer blah

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 2>blah blah. Okay, what's the level of panic out there

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 2>on a Friday? Not that bad, Not that bad at all.

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>That's what we're here.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Retail has been surprisingly resilient, looking to put capital to work.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Week.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>You are not seeing panic, specially they're going to the

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 3>equity markets from most of the two legged Vidiuser clients

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 3>that they're directing very maturely to this market environment.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Ran listens every morning, So don't sweat. But is it

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 2>just because they think things and systems will adjust? The

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump message from the White House and we'll move forward.

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>I think they have a very good ability and they

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 3>have out of the past couple of years to sort

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 3>of look through the noise. And at the end of

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 3>the day, there is that's obviously economic uncertainty here, and

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I know outside a certain sectors, certain geographies, there are

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 3>not a lot of massive layoffs. Right the corporate sector

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>is still not laying people off.

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 2>So even if there's a.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 3>Slight uptaket unemployment from the lows, until you actually start

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 3>to let people go into you're afraid of your own job,

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 3>your brother in law loses his job, your wife loses

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 3>their job. Until that happens, people are still relatively sanguine.

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 3>And again we're not seeing any sentiment, significant sentiment changes

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 3>from retail with regards to the equity markets, which is impressive.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 4>All right, Well, how about in fixed income space here?

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you can sit there at a two your

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 4>treasure and get darn your four percentiest. Do you do

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 4>that that's not a bad living or do you take

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 4>some credit risk?

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 3>So we don't think you need to take a lot

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 3>of credit risk, but we would like people to certainly

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>be longer duration than a sort of two to three

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 3>or on average, right the radio clients should be around

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>probably think five to six years. It depends individual client,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 3>But end of the day, the bomb market average duration

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 3>is just over six. We really don't want clients to

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 3>be too short to whatever their strategic duration target is

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>without a good reason. Again, a lot of clients are

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 3>actually still where you do have some concerns from retail

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 3>clients is actually the fixed income side. They get more

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 3>worried about that, having seen that bond bear market, the

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 3>eighteen percent drop twenty twenty one, twenty two from the highs,

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>that's concerned, though that's obviously a lot more likely from

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 3>a yield of negative two percent real rates than it

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 3>is at a roughly plus two percent real yields across the.

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Current It's interesting, I mean, over the last couple of years,

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 4>when I look at the Bloomberg fixed income total return screen,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 4>where I've seen the best returns has been with risk

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 4>high yield leverage loans actually, and those two are actually

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 4>underperforming this year. That's kind of a change, at least

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 4>definitely underperforming.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Again, not surprising to see credit both high and IG

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 3>underperform the index. With equities, they have a higher correlation

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 3>to equities, But again for the retail client, depends on

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 3>your time frame where you might see some market value

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>changing in your corporate bounds relative to treasuries spread widening.

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>If you're strategically long credit year in and year out,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>you're getting that extra yel over credit losses, you'll get

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 3>a better portfolio performance. So right now we're actually just

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of pulling our horns in on our sector tilts

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>neutral across sectors and fixed income.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Are you throwing a brick? It's some you know advisor

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>at Bank of America who goes back to road sixty

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 2>forty strategy. Is it like a dinosaur or is it

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>germane today?

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, we do not think it's a dinosaur

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 3>at all. Maybe I'm the dinosaur, but we don't think

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 3>it's a dinosaur at all. We had a lot of

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 3>concerns obviously that bonds were no longer doing their jobs.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 3>You needed something else to replace. Equid to replace bonds

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>as diverse for equities, commodities was given as a particularly

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 3>good one. We were never buyers of that at those valuations.

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 3>We had a couple of years back again negative real yields. Yeah,

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 3>it's probably hard for bonds to work the way I've

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 3>described it for a retail client, as you're in a

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 3>former meter race. If you're two percent behind inflation, well

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 3>you're fifty meters behind the starting line versus commodities. Combody

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 3>are gonna track inflation. The bonds are below inflation, you're

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>not starting in a good place. You're having fifty yards back.

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 3>You're sitting in the stands. Now, we've got bonds that

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 3>are two percent on average real above inflation. So they're

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 3>already beating inflation, and so they're ahead in the race.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 3>That's why they're diverse fied. That's why they diverse filed

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 3>in August. That's why they're diversifying. Now they have the

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>evaluations where they can come down with any uncertainty.

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>What's the biggest mistake high networth retail makes and fixed income.

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Historically?

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Blog? Is it just that simple?

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 3>It's been the opposite. It's been the opposite again for

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 3>the past seven years. The issue has not been yield hoggy,

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>it's been afraid of duration. So scarred, so scarred by

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 3>those double digit losses in terms of high quality fixed income.

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 2>That's one of the.

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Rough I mean historically rough. In twenty twenty two.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 2>It was very rough.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Again, when you're in when you're negative two percent real yields,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 3>there are not a lot of good things that can happen, right,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>but that that negative two to two percent move, that

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 3>four hundred basis point move and real rates. Our opinion,

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 3>generally speaking, that was the bond fair market.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 4>How about I mean mortgage backed securities. I'm seeing some

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 4>of the best returns in fixed income and mortgage backed securities.

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 4>What's going on in that market?

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 3>We like mortage backed securities generally speaking. Again, we're neutral

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 3>cross sectors, but within sectors we do like mortgage backs

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 3>because what's the rest of the mortgage back. You're always

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 3>going to get your principle and your interest payment back.

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 3>You just don't know when. If people prepay, you get

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>more cash using your rates are lower. You don't want

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 3>it rates go up. The bonds extend, you get less

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 3>cash flow, and you'd like to reinvest in higher yields.

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 3>The bonds have already extended, hopefully some of you have

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 3>two percent mortgages on whatever properties you have. The bonds

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 3>have extended already, you're still getting a cash flow, so

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 3>you're almost basically a flat yield on mortgage backs to

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 3>investigreate corporate right now, that makes mortgage backs look relatively attractive,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 3>especially at a alta equity environment.

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 2>With all the politics that's going on, folks, we're waiting

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 2>for a conversation or rehoarded in conversation with a gentleman

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 2>from the Netherlands, mister Routie now at NATO, the new

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 2>leader of NATO, and we're looking forward to that here

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 2>in about four minutes. We hope we're lining up the

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>antennae in the satellites starlink Matt Disick with US with

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Bank of America. I look at this and the number

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>one thing has been the gift of cash. If you

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 2>believe disinflation's in order, not the fear of deflation. But

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 2>after the sticky inflation, there's a settlement of GDP, we

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 2>get a disinflationary trend. Can you model cash back under

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>four percent? I believe you can.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 3>And if you maintain the idea that the FED is

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 3>focused on getting back to two percent inflation or very

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 3>close to it, well then you know, no matter how

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 3>aggressive fiscal policy is, it can't really change demographics. It's

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 3>very tough to change the population dynamics, and so real

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 3>rates again that they have to be you know, fifty

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 3>base points above inflation. Probably not in that range of

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 3>fifty to one hundred and fifty one percent on average,

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 3>one percent over inflation, right, So then a three percent

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 3>fit of funds right, two percent inflation plus one percent reel.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Sounds like a reasonable place.

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 2>To be really valuable on a Friday. Thank you so much.

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Mentisic for this will be with us here again. Next

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 2>time we'll talk rugby at University of Pennsylvania.

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on Applecar,

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>playing Android otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or what

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Us Live on YouTube.

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>This is a joy, as we had Sam Stova earlier.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Now we're really gonna dive into the adjustments of someone

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>who's got in the market so right. John Stolfiz in correction,

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>half correction, partial correction, has said be comfortable on equities.

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>He's chief investment strategists at Oppenheimer. This morning, are you

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>still a bull? Yes?

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 5>I am Tom still a bull? Why very much? Because

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 5>when we look at the way business is navigating these waters,

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 5>the earning season that just ended Q four earning season.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 5>You've got double digit gains and seven out of nine

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 5>sectors only two sectors negative. One was double digit earnings negative.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 5>That was energy. We're figures because we're a wash in

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 5>oil right now. But the seven sectors that were double

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 5>digit gains, it wasn't just and communications services. It was

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 5>you had good, strong value stocks in there and values

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 5>out performing growth right now. And we think it's you

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 5>know the market is dynamic.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, let's be dynamic. Let's pretend we're on a

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 2>couch forty years ago. I'll do my lur Rukaiser imitation

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>and you do your John Stolfi's imitation. It's seven eight

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty at night, the world's turned upside down, and Uncle

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Lou's they're having us calm down. How will corporations adapt

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 2>to this Maelstrom? What does securities research at Oppenheimer's say, Well.

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 5>I think what what is generally the thought here is

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 5>that corporations have been under due rest now for over

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 5>sixteen years. In many points we had the great financial writing.

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 2>It has been under duress. Now come out.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 5>You don't know them recently, but if you look at

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 5>it over the last few years. I mean, it had

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 5>tough times, and some of the other texts did. But

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 5>when you look at the markets and managements, how they've

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 5>operated across the sectors, it's great financial crisis, the pandemic,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 5>the disruption of the global supply chain, the levels of

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 5>inflation that were hit, the FED policy tightening, no recession.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 5>The consumer is still spending. It's the resilience Tom, That's

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 5>what gives us the courage of our convictions. At this point.

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Some are concerned about the consumer there, John. We had

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 4>some of the airlines earlier this week take their earnings down.

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 4>We had some retailers like Coals take their guidance down

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 4>here maybe suggesting that all this uncertainty out there in

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 4>the marketplace.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 5>The news, the noise.

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Maybe impacting the consumer. How do you think about that.

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, Paul, without a doubt. You know, we had the

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 5>FED raise eleven times and then on pause at nine

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 5>at the higher end and just started to cut last September.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 5>Just what fifty bip September, a pair of twenty five

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 5>BIPs in November and December. So very much. It's no

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 5>doubt you're going to feel the slowing because people are

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 5>feeling a pinch but American consumers tend to move towards

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 5>discount stores, private labels. We tend to keep shopping. The

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 5>world criticizes for all life of consuming.

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 2>But what if whatever the percentage is fortif the fancy

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 2>people in America are keeping American consumption going, does Oppenheimer

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>think that is dented and that will push into a

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 2>diminished revenue growth. No?

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 5>Not at this point, We're still looking where we.

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 2>Get into, say such a negative error. Come on, I mean,

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>I need some negativity from Stolfus.

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, to me, it looks like guitar prices are up.

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Actually, you know, you know, hold on, let's stop the show,

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 2>folks right now. We go to Paul Sweeney disciplinarian. Should

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 2>we have a joint guitar purchase this weekend where Stulfus

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 2>and I both purchase separate crutches?

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 4>I think you jump right in there.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 2>There we go. Okay, continue with John.

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 5>There's a child oil.

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:02.239
<v Speaker 2>Now there's a challenge.

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 5>But we have seen and what happens if the tariffs

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 5>affect Sitku spruce, you know, coming in from Canada. There's

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 5>all kinds of issues there the one thinks of. But

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 5>the realistic thing is we think that we're moving towards

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 5>a new globalization. We think probably a point where with

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 5>all this pressure that's been put on by the tariffs,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 5>the fact that we are the consumer of the world

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 5>in size, the rest of the world has over capacity

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 5>because over the last forty years they've been building capacity.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 5>We think we'll come out of this. Okay, I think

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.319
<v Speaker 5>that you know, Schumer, for all I've heard, there's plenty

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 5>of criticism today, I think he recognizes the fact that

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 5>we need to move together to try to avoid a

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 5>shutdown and come to some kind of negotiation. We're looking

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 5>for cooler heads to prevail, and you know, in this case,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 5>I think Schuber's showed you a cooler head.

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Paul, the sophistication of YouTube live chat is

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 2>killing me. Tanner, Good morning epiphones for everyone.

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, there you go here, Hey, John, I know

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 4>at one point you had an SMP target of around

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 4>seventy one hundred, I think the highest on the street.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 5>You sure know how to hurt a guy.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 4>So what are we doing here with this call?

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 5>Oh that's a great one, Paul. What we're going to

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 5>do with that is that it's under review at this time,

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 5>but we've got to figure. It's very early in the year. Yep,

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 5>this has been a very the dark pitch book. The

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 5>negative thought really has over been overly projected. Likely, so

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 5>let's take a look. But we'll probably look at it

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 5>and see how we go. And we got into the

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 5>second quarter.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 2>John Sulfas for this Lapko were thrillies with us. We're

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 2>going to continue with mister Solphus, a lengthy conversation this morning.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Good morning on your commute. I know it's a Friday.

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 2>People are starting to look at March madness, and Sweeney's

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>totally unfocused. What's his name sprained his ankle, Cooper Flag,

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Cooper Flag sprained his ankles. Sweeney had to be medicated

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 2>with a double tang mimosa this morning just to get

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to the show. Oh, there's lots of distractions with John Stolfus.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>There's no distraction, John, I'm going to cut to the

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 2>chase and we're gona do. This is a global Wall

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Street right now. So you got a fan distribution and

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>a bull like you extend your X axis. We come down.

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 2>You're going to get back to s and P seventy

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>one hundred. I get it. You extend your x axis

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>out Everybody in the game understands this. David Costin and

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Goldman Sachs did a fan distribution of outcomes where they

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 2>got down to a low single digit probability a center

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 2>tendency out there. You pushed against that. Do you still

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 2>push against a single digit equity world?

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 5>I do. I'd still push against it. And I think

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 5>that the reason why is where we are today is

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 5>we are at a watershed period of innovation that is

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 5>driving that can drive all sectors here. And it's not

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 5>just about tech. It's about what tech can do for

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 5>the utes. It's what it can do for healthcare. It's

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 5>what it can do for repurposing buildings and real estate,

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 5>for finding resources in consumer staples, designing products for consumer

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 5>discretionary This is a very this is you know, it's

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 5>what is it the Chinese curses. May you live in

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 5>interesting times, but the other side of it, for the optimists,

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 5>interesting times can produce not just risks, but can also

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 5>produce opportunities. And we you know, when we look in hindsight,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 5>because as you know, I've been in this business for

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 5>over forty years. It's going to be forty two. Sometime

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 5>between Maine and May and July.

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh you're a new kid.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 5>God bless me on that way. The thing is, I've

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 5>been through every boombust and recovery cycle, and generally, when

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 5>we look back hindsight, I perfection says, gosh, if only

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 5>we bought more, if only we backed up the truck.

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 5>When people get so negative.

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Crash of eighty seven, which was, we don't need to

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 2>go into it now, folks, there's too much valuable time here.

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 2>With John Stolfiz Crash of eighty seven. I walked in

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>the door and she handed me a triple my.

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 5>There you go.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 2>She took it, She took it off of a normal

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Martini class and put it in a Rocks class. Yeah.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 4>October nineteenth, we walked out of ne York Stock Exchange.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 4>I went to the pig and poke or something.

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's what we did. And guess what, life went on?

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Life went on exactly three months later? Where were we

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 4>exactly back on?

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 5>My aunt had turned eighty that year in August, and

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 5>I learned a lot about investing from her. Her first

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 5>phone call to me was the first words were, Johnny,

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 5>what should we be buying today? So that's that's where

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 5>I come, folks.

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Bronze it what you just heard there. What was her name?

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Mary Stolfer's aunt Mary, Aunt Mary. Okay, in the cannon

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg surveillance bronze it to the memory of Aunt Mary.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 2>What did she say?

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 5>She said, Johnny, what should we be buying today? That

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 5>was our exact words.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I'll go to Aunt Mary again, what should we be

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 4>buying here? If? If you feel like the world's not

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 4>coming to an end here?

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 5>Great question was you know ap and I doesn't let

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 5>me talk individual stocks because I managed my the Friday.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 5>I can give you. I can give you the sectors,

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 5>the worst performance, sectors the worst performance I want to

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 5>own consumer discretionary, infotech, communications services, financials, industrials, those look

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 5>good to me. You know, they are at the bottom

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 5>of performance from the peak coming down there. And you know,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 5>when it comes to healthcare, the utes, real estate, and staples,

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 5>I think they've had the run. Now they've had it.

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.959
<v Speaker 5>I think it's a little late to get defensive, right.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, a lot of folks are feeling like this

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 4>pullback in the market is kind of a self inflicted

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 4>problem here with all the talks about tariffs and what

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 4>that means for potentially growth and inflation. But that talk

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 4>in that environment. I don't see that changing anytime soon.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, I think it incrementally it can begin

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 5>to change. I think the first thing is hopefully fingers

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 5>crossed today we don't see a government shutdown when they

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 5>take that vote, that gets taken off the table. Then

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.479
<v Speaker 5>beyond that, you've got to figure that. You know, it

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 5>was Bloomber intelligence that I think about a month ago

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 5>said that if twenty five percent tariffs were put in

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 5>against Mexico and Canada, both of those countries would go

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 5>into recession pretty quickly. And the thing is, the pressure

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 5>of the constituencies here, whether it's from business or the

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 5>consumers in all countries around the world to different effects

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 5>with these tariffs will likely, we think, once again, bring

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 5>cooler heads to the table, some kind of a deal

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 5>to come out of it. And it's it's it's just

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.239
<v Speaker 5>that it's time for it. You know, it's not at

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 5>this moment, but it looks like there's too much at

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 5>stake to let things go to hell?

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Right Valuation? Did this pullback here hasn't made valuation attractive

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 4>or maybe just less egregious for some people?

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think for those who were thinking it was egregious,

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 5>it's less egregious. And for those who thought that it

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 5>was primarily because demand for stocks had gone up so

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 5>broadly and people, you know, it's no longer bucktail party

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 5>stocks that people that the private investor is doing. They're

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 5>looking to replace what used to come from social security

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 5>and corporate pension plans. Yeah, and with you know, with

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 5>a four oh one K, you just get x amount

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 5>in terms of that contribution that goes into the things.

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 5>So people have to invest like institutions, and that gives

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot of support to the market.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Question. Didn't we have Sam Stovall a couple of times

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>this week? John, It's just simple if with things beaten down,

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 2>do you buy things that have gone down less or

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>do you buy things that have been beaten up?

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 5>I think it depends upon the quality more than anything else.

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 5>So if it's something that has been really battered, happens

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 5>to be good quality, good management, good prospects for the balance.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Otherwise one thing you want to really emphasize quality here.

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 5>It's so overused these days, but we do believe that

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 5>quality of leadership and a corporation and ideas, and you

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 5>can find those across market capitalizations, whether it's large, mid

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 5>or small, with the large likely favored by the largest

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 5>investor community.

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>I got to get this in. We've got a huge

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 2>response on YouTube this Thank you so much. I mean,

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 2>come on the epiphone for thirty five hundred bucks with

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 2>the P ninety pickups. Explain to Joe Pass what the

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>great jazz guitars. Joe Pass explained what P nineties do

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 2>because all these kids out there, they're like Seymour Duncan Rocker, rocker,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 2>What a P nineties do that give you that sound?

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 5>The P nineties is a single coil a type pickup

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 5>instead of a dual coil, so it'll be more prone

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 5>to buzzing and hum. But that said, it has a

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 5>really good fat tone when he's rolled around us. There's

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 5>a roundness and a very rich sound that you get.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 5>But I prefer a PAF type pickup, you know, whether

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 5>it was built by DiMarzio or Seymour Duncan.

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 2>John Stoles, thank you so much.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa. Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna squeeze a two hour discussion in here with

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:24.200
<v Speaker 2>America's giant and Treid Douglas Erwin, his professor at Dartmouth.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 2>He's absolutely definitive. We mentioned Adam posing yesterday and Sad

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Bone of the Peterson Institute. It's real simple, folks. The

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 2>must read this weekend The Incoherent Case for tariffs Doug Erwin.

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 2>In what way is the White House incoherent?

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, in several ways, unfortunately. First is just trying to

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 6>justify what it is they're trying to do. What is

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 6>the mission? What is the goal? What is the end

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 6>game that they want to accomplish. Is it revenue? Is

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 6>it bringing back manufacturing jobs? Is it reducing the traid down?

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 6>Is it national security? It's all the above. And the

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 6>problem is is we just draw on an insight by

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 6>Jon Tinbergen, an old Dutch economist who won the Nobel

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 6>Prize many years ago. We're just saying, if you have

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 6>a policy target that you want to hit, you need

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 6>an instrument that will do that. And the problem is

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 6>terriffs can't achieve multiple objectives in this way without a

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 6>lot of collateral damage, and so it's not clear what

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 6>the administration wants to achieve.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 2>First and foremost, the Bible on this, folks, this is

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>when Blancheflower was younger, Slaughter was younger, Doug Irwin was.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I got a graduate school against the tide and intellectual

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 2>history of free trade. Here's my book review. Shut up

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and read it, Doug Irwin. This morning, I go to

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 2>John Stuart Mill nineteenth century early and he's arguing about

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>infant industries. It is if President Trump wants to bring

0:22:55.760 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 2>infant manufacturing back to America, can he do that? Is

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 2>because there any tip? Is there a policy's success template

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 2>to work off to bring infant manufacturing industry back to America.

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's interesting you bring u John Stuart Mill, because

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 6>we're talking about the nineteenth century, and of course he

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 6>refers to William McKinley quite a bit, another nineteenth century

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 6>president who imposed tariffs to try to keep industries here

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 6>in the United States. You know, you can do it sometimes,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 6>but the cost can be very high. You know, many

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 6>countries around the world try to reshore industries. So Argentina

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 6>has a little bastion of manufacturing in Tierra del Fuego

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 6>of all places that they've inculcated with tax subsidies and

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 6>important tariff tariffs. So you can reshore some industries, but

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 6>the question is at what price, at what cost to

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 6>other sectors of the economy, and is it really worth it?

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 4>So, Professor, depending upon the day, the administration has different

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 4>reasons for imposing terrffs, whether it's to you know, choke

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 4>off drugs come into the country, or immigration or the other.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Some days it's trade deficits. I'm just not sure. But

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.239
<v Speaker 4>for trade deficits, let's just stick to the economics. If

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.479
<v Speaker 4>the US one is a trade deficit with a particular country,

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 4>is that inherently a problem? And if it is, do

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 4>tariffs address that?

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 6>Generally, I mean, we can have a debate about whether

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 6>reducing the trade deficit overall not a particular bilateral balance,

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 6>but the trade deficit overall is a good policy or not,

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 6>or whether we should make that an objective.

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 2>But let's say it is.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 6>Then the question is you raise, is you know, our

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 6>terraces and a way of achieving that, and generally not,

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 6>because when you impose tariffs, the dollar is going to

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 6>appreciate and imports may go down, but exports are going

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 6>to be hit as well because of the appreciation of

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 6>the dollar. In addition, there's foreign retaliation. So yes, import

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 6>teriffs will reduce imports, but then foreign terff retaliation is

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 6>going to reduce US exports. So what we try to

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 6>point out is that, yes, there are policies that we

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 6>can do as Americans to reduce the trade deficit. First

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 6>and foremost, cut the fiscal deficit, because that is a

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 6>big source of dissaving in the US. It's a big

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 6>source of excess spending. And you might recall Marty Feldstein

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 6>way back in the nineteen eighties had the twin deficit

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 6>hypothesis that the current account deficit is being driven in

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 6>part by the fiscal deficit. And so that's one concrete

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 6>thing we could do to end our alliance on foreign

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 6>capital inflows and help balance our books on both sides

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 6>in terms of the trade accounts and the fiscal accounts.

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Do tariffs raise revenue for the US government for is

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 4>that efficient way to do that?

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 6>It can, yes, So we get about two percent of

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 6>the federal government's revenue today has raised through the tariff.

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 6>But The idea that you could balance the budget or

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 6>pay for tax cuts with a big increase in tariffs

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 6>is really not going to work. And one of the

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 6>problems is that imports are very sensitive to tariffs, so

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 6>as you raise tariffs, the volume of imports is going

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 6>to shrink. It's a tax base that's going to shrink

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 6>and disappear the more you tax, so that revenue is

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 6>going to disappear. Once again, there's no alternative really to

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 6>income and corporate taxes as a revenue raising device for

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 6>the US.

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>We are honor that Douglas Irwin is with us. I'll

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 2>put out on social his Foreign Affairs article. I'm not

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 2>going to mince words, folks. A subscription to the print

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 2>Foreign Affairs magazine is literally the price of a fancy

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 2>martini in Manhattan, Okay. And it is the bible you

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 2>throw to your kids and say, shut up and read

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Douglas Irwin, shut up and read outam imposing and on

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>we go. There's a lot of people out there, Professor

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 2>Irwin that think fancy ivy League professors are talking about

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 2>a rigged system. And one way to start it is

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 2>all the American corporations boosting up real estate in Dublin.

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>So even Bono can't afford to live in Dublin anymore.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Doug Irwin comment on the free launch of tax avoidance

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>in Ireland by American corporations.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 6>This is a really big issue, and you put your

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 6>finger on something. When we try to put use tariffs

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 6>to adjust these things, we're sort of missing the boat.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 6>I'd recommend to you. Kimberly Clousing of UCLA Law School,

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 6>also affiliated with the Peterson Institute, who has pointed out,

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 6>as many others have as well, that the tax code

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 6>sort of pushes American manufacturers overseas, and so we have

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 6>to resolve our tax system, our tax code problems to

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 6>bring back that economic activity and stop the offshoring of

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 6>intellectual property, receipts, corporate income and things of that sort.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 6>So just putting on tariffs isn't going to solve that problem,

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 6>but the domestic, the US tax code can.

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Please comment and then the leadership on this, folks, came

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 2>home William Klein, who was hugely influential for me, Douger.

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 2>When the President loves to talk about a bilateral approach

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>or even some would say a unilateral approach, William Klein

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 2>would say we live in a multilateral world. Is the

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>dreams and hopes of sixteen under Pennsylvania Avenue going to

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 2>discombobulate because we refuse to look at this multilaterally.

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 6>I think it's a shortcoming of their approach. And first

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 6>of all, I mean it has to start with sort

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 6>of foreign passing, recognizing that we have allies and people

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 6>that are democratic, market oriented economies, and we're all sort

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 6>of trying to achieve the same thing. They're not our enemies.

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 2>There's a wonderful.

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 6>YouTube video of Ronald Reagan giving one of his Saturday

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 6>radio addresses which is almost speaking to Trump from the grave.

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 6>It's talking about how our allies are and our trading

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 6>partners are our friends, not our enemies, and we really

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 6>have to work with them if we're going to confront

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 6>the China threat and other threats around the world. So

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 6>you can't alienate everyone and think that everyone's sort of

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 6>taking advantage of you. There are countries with goodwill that

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 6>we could work with cooperatively and improve the trade situation.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Professor, thank you so much. I'm not going to mince words.

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Just buy against the tide. Just put it on a

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 2>coffee table. You don't have to read it. Just put

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it there at school. It's got a beautiful light blue

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 2>cover and all that. Dougerwin, thank you so much it

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 2>dart Min's this morning.

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 1>us live every weekday on YouTube and always on the

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal.

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Guess what, folks, this is really the most important discussion

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>of the day. Sheila Cagilos with Jeffreys, and she brings

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 2>in bulletproof engineering cred along with their economics. It's on

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the airline industry. We're going to talk about the state

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of the industry now. But Sheila, I'm just going to

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 2>cut to the chase. Every house on the East Coast

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 2>is looking at the Try State area on my place.

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I've got a lovely place, folks. I counted twelve airplanes

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 2>in the sky like a couple of weeks ago, a

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>record amount airline safety in Denver the other day. Here

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the other day, the horror of what we saw in Washington.

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 2>People are really falling a part of this. You've got

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>engineering cred. Do you believe in the system.

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:25.959
<v Speaker 7>I do, but I also think this is where our

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 7>airline and defense coverage come into play exactly.

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>That's why we're here.

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I met with that.

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you it's a four hour conversation.

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 7>I think it's very important, you know, with the DOGE

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 7>cuts which have impacted defense, whether it's the manufacturers or

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 7>the service names, to realize how important government employees are actually.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 4>To the system.

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 7>Within the system of the US. I understand a five

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 7>percent headcunt cut that exists at banks all the time,

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 7>but to do it within government employees where we tend

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 7>to be understaffed. The FAA, as an example, air traffic

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 7>controllers in Newark are understaffed and we're flying forty percent

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.960
<v Speaker 7>more passengers through that airport as an example, So to

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 7>fire five percent of them in a blanket, you know,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 7>layoff does not seem to make sense. And a lot

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.719
<v Speaker 7>of the companies that have been hit, SAI C, Parsons,

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 7>Raytheon Technologies, Litos actually provides systems for the FAA.

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Do those people Paul's got the Gulf Stream, Scott's still here.

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 7>In a couple of days, he'll be fine.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Out of EWR. Do the flight controllers have the power

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 2>to say we don't have enough people, we can't do

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 2>our job.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, I know both the former administrator Mike Whittaker

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 7>FAA administrator, as well as Dan Elwell under Trump administration

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 7>number one. I do think there's areas where we could

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 7>cut administrator, cut air traffic controllers. Perhaps we don't need

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 7>them from twelve am to six pm when there aren't

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 7>twelve planes in the sky above your backyard. But you know,

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 7>we might have to fulfill more funding and also technology,

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 7>the data. There's a lot of data that the FAA

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 7>as we just need the technology to mine it, and

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 7>so cutting these service contracts don't necessarily make sense.

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Chill.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 4>Earlier this week, we had a number of the major

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 4>airlines cut their earnings, forecast their guidance Outlook what happened,

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 4>because it seems like I'm thinking back to the earnings

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 4>last season. I didn't hear much talk about that. What happened.

0:32:19.520 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 7>The drastic change is what's scaring folks, so, you know,

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 7>and it wasn't one thing. That's what I think everybody

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 7>is concerning for folks. So first it was the safety issues.

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 7>So let's close up on that. Whether it was Delta

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 7>or American put these airlines on a marketing hiatus where

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't make sense to put out a fly for

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 7>free tomorrow. Second, corporate travel, we've seen that tightening, whether

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 7>it's our clients as well, paralyzed by what's going on

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 7>in the markets. They can't leave their desk, so it

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 7>maybe prohibits a work travel trip. So corporates are tightening

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 7>their budget and seeing a pull back. And then third leisure,

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 7>everybody sees what's going on with the stock market, maybe

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 7>pulls back on that last trip. And then fourth federal

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 7>employees as well, traveling less.

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Paul, I just looked at the flight. I always look

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 2>at here and it's down one thousand bucks. Sure, road

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 2>trip over to Paris.

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but your the the Euros, you know, not where

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 4>it was a couple.

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 2>That's okay. But I can get tear I can get

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 2>tear free. Moet shunned down.

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 4>There, very good Chila talk. It is about the the

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 4>the airlines. Where are we in terms of capacity? Are

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 4>they at? Are they where they need to be? Where

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 4>they want to be, Because it still feels like every

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 4>plane I get on is full.

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 7>So yeah, I think we're watching the data really closely

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 7>over the next two three weeks, so forty percent of

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 7>airline earnings are in Q two, so it's go time

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 7>for them. Let's see what happens from March fifteenth through

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 7>April fifteenth. April ninth is one delta reports. But capacity,

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 7>to answer your question, TSA, volumes are up about one percent.

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 7>Capacity splatsh. So we've seen capacity tighten. That's been the

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 7>story of the last eight months. But we're seeing capacity

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 7>come in in Q two. Obviously, prices are down, so

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 7>airlines are trying to keep their profit levels adding more capacity.

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 7>That just exasperates the issue.

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 4>What what do airlines typically do if they do see

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 4>a shift down and demand, whether it's just consumer uncertainty

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 4>around tariffs or whatever. What do they do on the

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 4>cost side to adjust for that?

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 7>Typically very difficult. Yeah, you know, you don't have many

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 7>variable costs. A lot of it is fixed. Your planes fix,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 7>your pilot's fixed, your schedules, your gates, so very little

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 7>you could do. You could maybe add red eye find

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 7>to add incremental opportunities. That's what Southwest is doing. But

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 7>that's what makes airlines trade up five to seven times PE.

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 7>You know, seventy percent discounts to the market. Airlines have

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 7>not been seen as the best investment vehicles because they

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 7>have very little maneuvers.

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 4>They could pull Blue.

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Button Detroit Lions button. Then let's start there. How trothy

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 2>is the business right now? I mean, is it going

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 2>into one of those ugly periods where it's tough to

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>maintain free cash flow or even revenue pop?

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 7>I think depends on the carrier.

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 2>Really yeah, it's not an industry thing.

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 7>I think some will be better off. So Atlantic is

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 7>still holding in well, Tom still checking out his flight

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 7>to Paris. I think Atlantic is strong, but how long

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 7>does that last?

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 5>If all of Europe Pacific?

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:06.439
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 7>Pacific is okay as well the very limited capacity. Luckily

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.439
<v Speaker 7>Boeing is not delivering many seven eight sevens. Airbus isn't

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 7>delivering many eight three.

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Fifties single best idea right now.

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 7>I actually think Boeing, despite tariffs, despite Macro, despite everything,

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 7>folks were, you know, the equity offering was oversubscribe when

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 7>Boeing had fifty five billion a debt. Now they're down

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 7>to twenty five billion a net debt stocks at the

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 7>same exact price. Folks have waited six years for planes.

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 7>Air airlines are not going to cancel yet, and then

0:35:36.400 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 7>the aftermarket put in a ge or an F TI

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 7>F ties a smidcap name I cover it's it's been

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 7>you know, hurt by a short report out there. So

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 7>that's the other one I throw in.

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm Boeing. Do American companies, says United, Delta, the

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 2>others you know better than I do. Do they want

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 2>to buy Airbus or is it just like we can't

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 2>buy to lose its un American?

0:35:58.840 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 5>No, they do.

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, but the US is only twenty to twenty

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 7>five percent of the sky skyline, you know, it's not

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 7>as it's not fifty percent.

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Boeing selling to who? Then who's their dominant? Who's there?

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Is interesting?

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 7>Because this is why I think Boeing's quite interesting as

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 7>well as Airbus. We have one hundred and seventy five

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 7>operators buying planes in twenty twenty five. That is very

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 7>well diverse across the globe.

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 4>Where is Boeing in terms of you know, I've been

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 4>told by a lot of folks what drives this name

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 4>is can be the number of deliverables on the seven

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 4>three seven.

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 7>That's all that matters.

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So where is the company now and where would

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 4>they like to get to?

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:36.359
<v Speaker 7>And you have confidence they can get to that seven

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 7>three seven is about fifty to sixty percent of their

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 7>free cash flow. You have to assume Defense holds its

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 7>own and stops losing money. But three seven they were

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 7>at twenty to end the year. We're now in the thirties.

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 7>In terms of production, they're still in the twenty five range.

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 7>They're getting out of inventory, but we have three hundred

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 7>and eighty four deliveries for this year on the max

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 7>for contexts they did six hundred at the peaks that I.

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Got a squeeze, is said, is there financial integrity improved?

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Is the systems analysis of Boeing? I got free cash

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 2>flow negative fourteen gazillion, another year negative fourteen gazillion, now

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 2>negative five kazillion forward and then finally they flipped positive

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty six. What's the integrity of that?

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:27.399
<v Speaker 7>Guess it's Defense. Defense has lost three billion triple seven

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 7>X has lost four billion development programs. And then of

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 7>course you add the strike, you add DeLay's given you

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 7>gave away free aircraft.

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.360
<v Speaker 2>How's it turned around? How they fix the damn rivets

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 2>that fell out of the airplane?

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 7>It's interesting because I was in Charleston three weeks ago.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 7>That's where they manufactured eight epens. They do the three

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 7>sevens up in Seattle and rent In got reported by

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 7>a Boeing employee for my shoes not being suitable for

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 7>the factory floor. And I was like, this is a

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 7>very stark change to how it's been. You know, they're

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 7>very the fays integrated into the way.

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.760
<v Speaker 2>We were wearing Christian No I was wearing. I was wearing.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 7>I was wearing. I won't give the brand, but I

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 7>was wearing. Yeah, No, it was it was it was

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 7>ballet flats.

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 2>And so they wouldn't let you on the floor with.

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 7>Ballet They gave me an exception, but I was, I was, do.

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 2>You buy them? Yeah, okay, do you buy the ballet

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 2>flats on Madison Avenue the store. If you go in

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the store, you can only come out with three boxes.

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 2>I've learned that.

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 7>But they they.

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't let you on the floor in ballet flats.

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 7>Nope, they they they I had a solid talk about

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 7>appropriate you want to see right, So that that comes

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 7>back to my engineering. I gotta gotta step it.

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 5>Up, not Boeing.

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 2>So I could say Shila, Thank you so much. Shia

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 2>with this was Jeffreys. They're managing and I love it.

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.280
<v Speaker 2>The real engineering integrity there on the aviation position.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:15.640
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal