WEBVTT - The 2023 All-Bust Team (Ep. 624)

0:00:00.520 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 1>The best of the busts. Welcome in everybody, the Fantasy Pros.

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Fantasy Baseball Podcast. It is Meet Joey

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>p joe Piece Apa, and today it's about the bus.

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right, it's the Monday we're recording this.

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's grouchy, and everybody's always got problems on Mondays, and

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 2>we've got problems with some players. And to help break

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>down the all bust team for twenty twenty three is

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 2>of course my podcast partner, The Wels. You can follow

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>him on the Twitter machine at is it the Welsh

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>and we brought in a big gun today from Rodo

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Wire and of course from Fangrafts, the one, the Only

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Jason Collett. Follow him on Twitter at Jason Collett and

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Jason Collette. I saw you not that long ago and

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 2>we had some fun talk. We were buying back into

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Lux. It was a simpler time about a week ago.

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>And now I gotta tell you, I love you. You're

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>one of my favorite people, but I hate your list.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>A lot of your players are some of my favorite

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 2>guys going into twenty twenty three. So one of us

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 2>is either going to be really right or really wrong.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 2>And somebody's gonna be depressed.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I figured it was gonna create some controversy. Look

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>at that. I wanted to make sure I picked different

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>names than what Welch has as I didn't want to

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 3>be like, oh, that was my guy. So I wanted

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>to go through some things and I was like, you know,

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>some of these are going to be like what are

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 3>you thinking? Jay, So we'll see. I hope I give

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>you at least something to think about with a completely

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 3>pissing yap.

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, Jason, I kind of wish we could have, like,

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 4>had you get to this first, so we could have

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 4>seen what those names look like on here, because there

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 4>are two on here that make me very upset, very

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 4>very upset. It also maybe means that you would have

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 4>had some of my guys, which I'm kind of excited

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 4>to see.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 5>And for everybody.

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 4>I also attempted to pick like a few different names.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 4>We've talked a lot about Bus recently. You may know

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 4>some of them that I may have taken. I went

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 4>in a little bit of a different direction for some

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 4>different bus. But Joe, sometimes I can't help myself with

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 4>a few of these guys. I just have to continuously

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 4>keep calling them bus and when they're amazing this year,

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 4>everyone will remind.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Me, well, let's she's what I have a huge problem

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 3>with because he's on two of my rosters already. So

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm my god, I've got to hear what you have

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 3>to say there.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, well, why's what we get out of the way.

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, because you have basically every chance you've had,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 2>you've taken shots.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>At Dalton var Show. So let's just get that out

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the way.

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Clean slate for those who might not have ever heard

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>a podcast here between the two of us, give them

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 2>why Dalton var Show is going to be a bust

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>at twenty twenty three.

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>A catcher.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to be like level about it, like Dalton

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Varshow is still going to be a very fine player.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 4>My biggest issue has been where he's going. NFBC drafts

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 4>lead a lot of this, and you know, pointing out

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 4>like if you go to Fantasy pros ADP is manipulated

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 4>by all of the places.

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 5>It's an aggregate system.

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 4>NFBC plays a big role in that, and NFBC pushes

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 4>up catchers, and I think that generally pushes these guys

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 4>up to a level that I just don't think I'm

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 4>super comfortable with because I think the position is kind

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 4>of deep, obviously pull heavy. I think he's going to

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 4>struggle versus lefties. There's the potential that I'm not going

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 4>to say there's going to be any platoons or anything

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 4>like that, but you never know if he's going to

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 4>get out versus lefties. I don't know if he's going

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 4>to run as much. And I've exhaustingly said that. You know,

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 4>Toronto was in the bottom third of the league and

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 4>stolen attempts, while the Diamondbacks were like the top five

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 4>overall teams in stolen base attempt They're gonna go up

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 4>in general, but those stolen bases come down. The average

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:05.399
<v Speaker 4>kind of stinks a little bit, and the homers pop

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 4>down a little bit. Why would that be more valuable

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 4>by twenty rounds in Adlie Rutchman. Why would that be

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 4>more valuable than fifty rounds on Salvador Perez or going

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 4>even further. I could just keep listening catcher names. I'd

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 4>rather not make the investment early on, even though he

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 4>does qualify at another position. So I think, like top

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 4>fifty five is just bust material for me. It's gonna

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 4>be really hard I think for him to return that value.

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 4>I say all of that, and then he's gonna be

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, thirty twenty and I'll just eat pro.

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's funny you should mention Adlie Rutchman in that

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>conversation because that's the guy that collect chos at A

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 2>good friend, Ryan Warmley, the worm, mister Oriole himself is

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 2>not gonna be happy about this. But Adley Rushman's certainly

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a name that's been you know, highly towed the last

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>few years. You know, got some time in last year,

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>looked pretty good doing it.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's always the difficulty.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Of young catchers, I feel like, who have to manage

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>a pitching staff and really learn all that, where sometimes

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 2>their offense takes a second fiddle or the back seat

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 2>to that. So is that you're concern with Rushman or

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 2>is something else he saw last year in his performance

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 2>that worries you about twenty twenty three?

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Really, no more what you just talked about there?

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 3>And if so, there was an excellent interview a couple

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>of weeks ago, our buddy you know, Sarah's interviewed Stephen

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 3>Vote on the podcast and Steve and you know he

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>now Vote is now working with the Seattle organization. But

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 3>he talked about the amount of work that went into

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>every game and all the prep of what he had

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 3>to do every single game, and Joe, as you said,

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 3>a lot of these rookie catchers, they have to do

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 3>all of that stuff and hitting is almost like a

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 3>secondary thing. And this is no slight against Adlee Rudchman.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I love him as a real baseball player. I just

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.799
<v Speaker 3>think there's a gap between the real and the fantasy

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 3>that's not being addressed in the current marketplace right now.

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's only so when you look at his ADP

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 3>it's high and Welch you said it with I'd rather

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 3>have Perez all day long, and Perez is going that

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 3>is going lower than Rutchman is. And I would say

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>another point to your point about the catchers being inflated.

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's not forget between between varshow between Lendes, between Langoliers,

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 3>and between Garver. We potentially have four catchers that are

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 3>either being drafted because we know they're not going to

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 3>play catcher or in hopes that they're going to play catch.

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 3>So it's like Langoliers is a projected CE one, but

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 3>you can't draft him as a C one in most

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 3>in most formats right now, and so you're seeing that

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>value get pushed up. You're seeing Mitch Garver because he's

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 3>already caught as of yesterday two games in spring just

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 3>need you know, need to get the ten game in NFBC,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 3>need to get into five in some leagues, some leagues

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 3>even one, and so you're like, let's do this. So

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 3>some of that catchup value is coming up. But for Retchman,

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 3>I see a lot of I see a lot of

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.039
<v Speaker 3>that gap where it's like he's a great real player

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 3>and I saw him play a number of times coming

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 3>here through Charlotte last year before he got promoted with that,

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 3>but I'm not where the marketplace is on him. And

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>that's why I have zero I have zero shares and

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 3>all the drafts I've done.

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 4>And the only edition I want to make to this

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 4>is I am generally any top one hundred catcher is

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 4>just not going to be my thing. So I'm just

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 4>not going to have interested and interested in catcher one. Yeah,

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 4>So don't like I pick on bar Show a little bit,

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 4>but that's just kind of like all of them.

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Give me Wilson Contreras, give me William Contreras. Give me

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 5>a contraris.

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 3>Highest ketcher I've taken so far this whole draft season.

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>With Sean Murphy in an auction, I paid sixteen and

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 3>I was a keeper league. It's I'm with you, guys.

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 3>I tend I'm not if you if somebody, if you

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 3>see my draft board, I took a catcher on the

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 3>top one hundred. It was either because JT. Real Mutle

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 3>fell quite a bit or somebody's kidnapped me.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Right, got to do a wellness check on Collette. Let's

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>go to the first basement here collect long did you

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 2>start with this one? Who is your twenty twenty three

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 2>bust at that position?

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Potentially?

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 3>So I went with Nathaniel low here with Texas, and

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 3>when you look at him last year he hit over

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 3>three hundred, kind of out of nowhere, and what you

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 3>look at you have to take a look at the

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 3>spray chart, and this is one of those things where

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 3>I look at the law of unintended consequences with the

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 3>new defensive rules. If you look at the way he

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 3>hit last year, he had a lot of soft contact

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the other direction because the defense was giving it to him,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 3>and he's like, fine, I'll take it. But there you

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 3>see a lot of infield hits going that direction where

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 3>there's going to be a fielder this year. And you

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 3>look at the aggregate projections for him, most people have

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 3>him down in the two sixties. And that's that's quite

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 3>a drop from a guy to hit over three hundred

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>last year and the aggregates have them down where they

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 3>have them with that and one of the weaknesses that's

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 3>been in his profile. And I would say this applies

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 3>to his brother too. I would assume they have the

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 3>same hitting coach because they have the exact same swing.

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's like they have struggled with velocity up

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>And so when I saw Nathaniel Lowe breaking out last year,

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, okay, it has to be he closed his hole. Well,

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>you go look at the data. He hasn't the league

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 3>just for whatever reason, it wasn't pitching him there as much,

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 3>and he was deciding, okay, I'm just gonna slap it

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the other way and give me what the defense gives me.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 3>So somebody who took that kind of stuff forward in

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 3>one year, I'm concerned about taking that kind of step back.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't really see it playing out in the marketplace

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 3>right now. But that's somebody that I've been avoiding myself.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Look, it's a player that in first pase is not

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 2>super deep. This year, you know, there's certainly a drop

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 2>off and looking at last year's status.

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You hope that it holds.

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 2>But you make a good point, like there's a lot

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 2>of reason to believe that maybe the batting average of

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>very least does not now Welsh.

0:07:58.440 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>When we look at the first basement on.

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Your all Bus team, it's another player who might be

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 2>moving up in his lineup too, which could affect potentially

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>his RBI totals. He saw him hidden in the two

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 2>spot this weekend over there for the Philadelphia Phillies. Let's

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>talk about Reee Hoskins.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I picked on Reese simply because well, obviously a

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 4>couple of reasons, but like one of the biggest ones

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 4>is this injury that he had the knee surgery in December.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 4>I believe he's getting in a game where he got

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 4>in Sunday or it's today, it's like right around right now,

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 4>he's just getting into spring, which is a little bit

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 4>of a setback, which I don't love. Lineup potentially moving up,

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 4>you could look at RBI opportunities come down. Also, XBA

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 4>we expected batting average is lower than his batting averages

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 4>past year. He's had an increase in his k percentage

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 4>for three straight years, hard hit percentage kind of gone down,

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 4>exit average, exit velocity kind of leveling down about a

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 4>mile per hour. So you take all those into consideration,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 4>and you look at where he's being drafted, you say,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 4>first base is in deep.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't want to call it.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to make it like, oh, you could

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 4>just wait forever. But I think it's like you're shopping

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 4>in different pools. So it's like, if you know you're

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 4>shopping in, you know, a high end department store, you're

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 4>getting in the top end, middle end, You're gonna start

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 4>shopping at Target. But if, like, if you're comfortable shopping

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 4>at Walmart, I think you can just be comfortable shopping

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 4>at Walmart with these first Basement and I think there's

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 4>like six or seven of them, and Ree Hoskins isn't one.

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 4>His cost comes at nine as far as first baseman,

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 4>and he's kind of the upper tier of Walmart first Basement.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 4>I think you've got Christian Walker C J.

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Kron. I really like my Ryan Mount Castle and Rowdy Telez.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 4>I just would rather move away from Reese Cott Hoskins

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 4>with some of those decreases, with the injury stuff that's

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 4>going on, and pay a much cheaper price, potentially three

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 4>or four or five first basement lower for what I

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 4>think would be relatively the same production. I mean, he

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 4>hadn't expected batting average it was under two forty. He

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:47.679
<v Speaker 4>hit two forty. I believe it was two thirty six.

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 4>I can probably get that out of Rowdy Teles with

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 4>a bigger home run potential and probably pretty close to

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 4>run in RBI totals, and it'll probably fifty or sixty

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 4>picks later. So I'm gonna pass on Reee Hoskins and

0:09:58.360 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 4>he's going to be my all bus first base.

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, you can also play Devil's advocate and said maybe

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 3>he performed like that with some of his expected stats

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 3>last year because of that injury. He was trying to

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 3>play through that, so you know what happens there. I

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 3>would also not rule out you know, as you were

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.439
<v Speaker 3>talking about the different tiers of shopping for first base.

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You know this.

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 3>We're also in the season where daily news events move things.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 3>It's like a week ago, Oh no, Jose Miranda. The

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 3>shoulder is problematic, and then he hits two home runs

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the other day, so okay, now we're all back in

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Jose Miranda. So and oh he plays first and third,

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 3>so that's all fun too. So daily events move the

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 3>needle on something. So as we alarm McGavin lux's acl.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, sometimes they move them in a very very negative direction.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 5>Room down.

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to second base, gentlemen, and let's talk about

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>a guy who actually had a bounce back year last year,

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 2>but apparently the Welsh isn't buying it. Who's the second

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 2>basement on your bus team?

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 4>So I actually really struggle with this one because of

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 4>what we've talked about before. The position is not great.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 4>It really kind of stinks towards the middle end. So

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 4>it's like, do I want to pick on the top guys.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 4>I kind of thought about Ozzie Albi's because Jason is

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 4>about to just ruin my day and ruin everybody's with

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 4>all the positive things we talked about with the guy

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 4>I love more than anybody, So can you really have

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.599
<v Speaker 4>post one hundred and second basemen that are going to

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of flop? So my point was picking on with

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Labor Torres is. You know, he's got a lot of competition.

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 4>That team seems like they are really opening up the

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 4>possibility of Anthony Volpi and Oswald Perrazza being there sooner

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 4>rather than later. There's a lot of trade rumors that

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 4>were going on. I don't know if they fully fully

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 4>believe in what he did last year. Again, you have

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 4>another instance of like an expected batting average, it is

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 4>quite a bit lower. He hit the ball a ton harder,

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 4>but where he's going as far as second basement is

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 4>the eighth overall second basement. So really the bus side

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 4>of this is like feeling comfortable and not taking one

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 4>of those guys to get Glabor Torres. I think it's

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be a big disappointment. So when I'm looking

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 4>at these guys, what I want.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 5>Because there's a big tear drop here.

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 4>By the way, seven and up is inside the top

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 4>one hundred eighty fifth according to Fantasy pros overall is

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Andre Simenez, and that's a seventh second basement. Then you

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 4>drop like twenty spots and you go into the next guy,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 4>which is Glabor Torres. Would I rather pay a close

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 4>to one hundred price with that type of gap for Torres,

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 4>or take Monsey later, or take a bounce back on

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 4>Brandon Lowe. At the end of the day, I'd rather

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 4>take any of the top seven. And he is the

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 4>representative of the first bit where I hate second base,

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 4>so he is kind of the culprit here. Plus I

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 4>do think the team is really opening up that opportunity

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 4>to get him out of here sooner rather than later.

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>You know what's funny.

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at Tho the opportunities or where he might

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 2>land in such a speculative trade, and the only one

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>that really came to mind for me was the Dodgers

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 2>now because they've got some open season issues now in

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 2>the middle infield, he could play shortstop, he could play second,

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 2>depending on how you want to.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Move those things around. So there's not a lot of

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>suitors out there.

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Were like everything matches up for the New York Yankees

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>and for Labor Torres. But you're right if they think

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 2>that last year was hey, let's get out before the

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, the bottom drops out again, Torres, that could

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 2>certainly be something to keep an eye on later in

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the year. Let's take a quick break in the action

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to tell you about animal I love live events, but

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 2>I hate buying tickets, the hidden fees they suck. It's

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 2>like paying for a whole other person who's not even

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>there to be there with you at the event, and

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 2>customer service is terrible and coordinating with friends is a nightmare.

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>But then I discovered fanimal and fannamal has tickets to

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 2>everything concerts, festivals, football, basketball, you name it, and Major

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>League Baseball. And plus there's no fees. The price you

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>see is actually the price you pay.

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>What a concept. You heard it here first.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Fanimal is the cheapest place on the internet to get

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>MLB tickets. And we've all experienced how painful it is

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>to coordinate going to events with friends, and I always

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 2>end up fronting a bunch of money and then chasing

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 2>down the friends to get reimbursed, and if.

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>They flake, I'm stuck with the whole bill.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 2>But f Animal's patentent group purchase makes it easy to

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 2>split payments with your friends, so nobody's left holding the

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 2>bag and you don't have to commit until your friends do.

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:52.959
<v Speaker 1>So just pick the seats, pick.

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 2>How many tickets you want to pay for yourself, and

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 2>then send the link to your friends. And when you

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 2>join your group, everyone gets stared separately, and your tickets

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 2>are secured so you can stack cash by inviting friends

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 2>ten bucks every time someone joins your group catching baby.

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 2>So fanomal it has amazing customer service to don't take

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 2>my word for it. Check out their hundreds and hundreds

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 2>of five star reviews.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The next time you need.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Tickets, go to fanimal dot com or download the fnimal

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 2>app and use the promo code fanimal MLB.

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>That's fanimal MLB for twenty.

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Dollars off your first purchase. Check out animal and experience more.

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 2>And now back to the act. Let's get to your

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 2>second base bust Jason Collett, who is it?

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's break hearts chism? And I will say this, I love,

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 3>I love.

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That you're a liar.

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 3>You do not actually.

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Hate him, you hate him him being a ust you.

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Know, I love. I love that he's on the cover

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 3>of the video gay. I love the last year, you know,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 3>James Anderson and I were like on the front end

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 3>of this is this is a guy, Let's let's stay in.

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 3>People were trying to fade them out, and I remember

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 3>James and I have been very aggressive with him. But

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 3>my big concern is he's had trouble staying on the field.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 3>He's moving from second base to center field, which is

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 3>a position that puts them at more risk from injury.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 3>So you have that position switch in a big part

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 3>for him to cover some ground with help, with not

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 3>as much help on either side of him that he

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 3>should have. That's really where my concern is. It's not

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 3>his abilities, it's all the other factors that play into it.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 3>And when you see when you see him inside the

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 3>top fifty, that's where my concern is with him. I

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>struggle to see how he's going to achieve that return

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 3>on investment with those factors playing against him. It's nothing

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 3>about anything else that I see in his profile outside

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 3>of that health grade, which is is tough to ignore,

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that he's moving to a tougher physical

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 3>position than second base.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It's tough to nore.

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think you make a great point there about

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>everything which isn't It is also sometimes we get wrapped

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 2>up in the excitement of a player, you know, and

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 2>that happens quite a bit.

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>But last year, the guy.

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Who played sixty games, I mean it was a fun

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>sixty games, fourteen homers, twelve still on bases. You know

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot of things and a flashy, entertaining something that's

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, fun to watch. That fun to watch factor

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>sometimes gets you in trouble in fantasy. You want guys

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 2>that are fun to play every day. And certainly there's

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 2>some tenuous situations there potentially for Jassism and the ADP range.

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>He's going in. Let's go to third.

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Base, and you've got another young player that people are

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 2>excited about that you are not Jason Colletz.

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about all right.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 3>So this is Jordan Walker and I was in Florida

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 3>this weekend. I was at the game that he hit

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the four hundred and fifty and the four hundit seventy

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 3>foot home runs. I will also add that wind was

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 3>blowing out about two hundred miles an hour that it

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 3>would not have stopped either one of those. I mean,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 3>they were both well hit. But that said, we talked

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>about this a little bit on the First Pitch Florida

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>panel this weekend, done in West Palm Beach. You know,

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I have to wonder how much of Jordan Walker's current

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 3>market price is being influenced by what Rodriguez and Bobby

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 3>wit just did last year. Because we saw these two

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 3>guys and the great thing about Julio Rodriguez and maybe

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 3>you can make the same type of care comps because

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 3>everybody says both these guys have an eighty grade character.

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 3>And you saw how Julio Rodriguez made the end season

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 3>adjustment once the Empire started giving him a giant zone

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>and it's like, okay here, He's like, okay, fine, if

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 3>you're going to call that a strike, I now know

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 3>what to do. And then he went off and just

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 3>tore the cover off the baseball, and Jordan Walker could

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 3>very well do the same thing. It's just to me

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 3>when I look at Walker, we also cannot forget Jared

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Kelnick is on that possibility a range of outcomes too,

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 3>and that was very recent as well. And Jared Kelnick

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 3>was a can't miss guy and he's missed a lot

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 3>of baseballs. I know he's having a great spring at all,

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 3>but your range of outcomes could vary there. And the

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>other thing I have about Walker concern wise, is we

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen how he's going to handle experienced pitchers that

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>can command the baseball. He's only hit double A and

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing him do some things in spring this year

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 3>and small stints. But I want to see how he

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 3>handles those crafty veterans in trip La. I want to

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 3>see what he can do against a major leagueers, because

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 3>they will quickly find flaws. They found it, and they

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 3>found it in Kellnick and they just pounded on him

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 3>and he's been forced to adjust. And I want to

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 3>see what they do when they find Walker, because everybody

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 3>has one. Once these experienced guys find out, how is

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 3>he going to adjust? We know the regression's already begun

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 3>because he was old for four or two strikeasts yesterday.

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 5>So Jason can something? Can she something? Jason? Do you

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 5>want to be a bad guy? Are you trying to

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 5>be a villain?

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 3>Is this from the office? I am the thief of joy.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 5>I'm just making sure just right.

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you're picking on everybody's favorite players and lovel

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 4>I get that.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 5>I Actually the only thing I would question.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 4>Is like where are we at with Walker where he

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 4>becomes a bus because he was post I think when

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 4>he was post two fifty and Joe and I have

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 4>been talking about him and he push up and if

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 4>he truly does get a roster spot and jumps inside

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 4>the top one hundred, then you're kind of like lopping

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 4>some of that off and you're taking off the value

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 4>and stuff like that. But I do think you have

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 4>to kind of consider, like what rookies have done, where

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 4>the talent is, and where he's going to really being

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 4>about a bus But to your point, there might not

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 4>be a buzzier play that is on everyone's target list

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 4>for this coming week or the next couple of weeks

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 4>because of what he's doing and the likelihood he is

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 4>to make that roster. But he still is coming at

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 4>a cheaper cost unless it has pushed that top one hundred's.

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Right now, he's still overall two twenty.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 3>F its like he's jumping around every at bat. But

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, honestly, I would say this weekend, this weekend

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 3>at Labor, he went seventeen in NL only he went

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 3>twelve and the twelve team mixed, and that was a

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 3>better price I thought for your twelve dollars. If I'm

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 3>going to twelve teen mixed league, that's a risk I'm

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 3>willing to take. I saw some people speculating that there's

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 3>a potential he could go in the first six rounds

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 3>of main event week and that wouldn't ye know, it

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of wouldn't spread the trajectory if he keeps doing

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 3>what he's doing, we're going to see that rot just

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 3>keep it's going to go number one with the bullet.

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's not going to get up there. I

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>would be stunned if he got inside the top seventy five.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 3>But the way he's hitting right now, somebody's gonna take

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 3>that chance.

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 4>Next up on Jason's list, he hates Julio Rodriguez and

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 4>then Ronald all buy him.

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 5>Just letting everybody know, well, she.

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Was the third basement on your All Bus team for

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 2>twenty three.

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Kind of just like the other position. I'm staying in

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 4>this same kind of pool of talking about tiers of players,

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 4>and Johanneo Suarez just continuously doesn't jump out to me. Matt,

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, I would have also said Matt Chapman. Matt Chapman, though,

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 4>hits the ball really hard, kind of across the board, obviously,

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Johanneo Swarez can hit the ball hard, but struggles with

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.679
<v Speaker 4>batting average, really really bad whiffs. He was in the

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 4>bottom five percent tile of K percentage this past year.

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Projections hate him this year, I mean two thirty six.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Last year was an anomaly. The previous two years he'd

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 4>barely hit over two hundred. He had a three hundred

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 4>Babbitt this past year hit two thirty six. Even the

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 4>bat x is at two oh nine. I don't get

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 4>down with guys that are going to hit sub two twenty.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 5>I just can't do it.

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 4>I can't talk myself into it under any circumstance. And

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 4>I just think that this is a guy that, as

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 4>far as ADP is going, has him as a starting

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 4>third baseman in any format you play in except for

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.479
<v Speaker 4>eight man leagues. That is a starting third baseman. And

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 4>that's a recipe for disaster if you really believe it's

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 4>going to work out. Plus, I think there are better options,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 4>safer options. Jason talked about Jose Miranda, who I have

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 4>been talking about since November.

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 5>I love him. I think the contact skills are there,

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 5>I think the powers there.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 4>I think he's an exponentially better fantasy player than Johannio Suarez.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 4>If I wanted floor, I could go Ty France stolen

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 4>bases to keep Brian Hayes. Not that I want to

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 4>do all this. Third base, like second base stinks more

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 4>so than anything else. I don't want a sub two

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty batting average guy and it's a recipe for a bust.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a good one there. I'm with you on Suarez.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to the shortstops, Welsh, who makes the list

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 2>for you?

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 4>On the shortstops, there are some to pick from, and

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 4>I've actually been picking on the bottom end of a

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 4>lot of them.

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 3>This time.

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 4>It might surprise a lot of people, even Joe, because

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 4>I've always been just had like a little soft spot

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 4>in my heart for him.

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 5>But I'm gonna go with Carlos Korea.

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 4>And I think Carlos Korea is a safety net for

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 4>all these people that go. Okay, guess what shortstop is

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 4>really safe this year? It's a safe position I can

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 4>if I don't take them. I don't need to take Trade.

0:21:57.040 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean they would take Trait Turn, but I don't

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 4>need to take Boba Schett. I don't need to take

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 4>Lynn Door because I can just keep going back and back.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 4>I actually think the position once you get out of

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.360
<v Speaker 4>that top eight is just crazy scary. I think there

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 4>are questions with danzby Swanson. I think Tim Anderson's injury

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 4>injury history, everybody is just giving a pass for when

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 4>they don't give it for anybody else. He's the Byron

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.879
<v Speaker 4>Buxton of shortstops, and then you come back to Carlos Korea.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Carlos Korea couldn't pass the physical I don't even need

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 4>to do the same stuff. We all know he didn't

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 4>pass the physicals and everything like that, but as well,

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 4>he just doesn't live up. He's had one season where

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 4>we've had the run RBI totals that have been there,

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 4>hasn't stolen a base in three plus years, doesn't hit

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 4>over twenty five homers, perpetually injured, and he's the guy

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:41.959
<v Speaker 4>that every gun goes, Okay, well, I can draft him

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 4>if I don't get anybody to be fair because of

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 4>the position eligibility. He's like seventeenth on Fantasy pros list.

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 4>But he's a guy that I am pretty firmly avoiding overall,

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 4>and I think he's going.

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.120
<v Speaker 1>To be a bust. Hey, look, you know what I've

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>already said about Korea.

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, when two teams pass on your medicals, you know,

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's a long term.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Issue, but maybe it's more of a short term issue too.

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 2>And let's not pretend like career has been the picture

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:04.959
<v Speaker 2>of health in his career period leading up to that,

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 2>So at a deeper position.

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some shots that I'd rather take.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Who are you taking a shot at at shortstop here

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 2>and putting them on the all Bus team.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 3>Collett Wilson mentioned it, we talked about. He mentioned Dansby Swanson.

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 3>Dan Sby Swanson, I felt he was very very well

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 3>insulated last year in Atlanta and took advantage of a

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 3>very good surrounding cast to put up his numbers. He

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 3>does not have that same insulation with the Cubs, so

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 3>that to me, it's like when you look at where

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 3>his market prices now, I haven't seen that much of

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 3>an adjustment. It's like, Okay, he's just taking those talents

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 3>north to Chicago and things should be just fine. I'm

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 3>not there because the surrounding cast is big change for him,

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 3>and so I expect about a fifteen percent reduction in

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 3>his overall production. That's not playing out in his current

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 3>market value. So that's somebody I have stayed away from.

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm stay away from the Cubs period for the most part.

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Collette, I'm just.

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Not buying this whole half ass sort of We're gonna

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 2>throw some money at some shoes and take some players

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and see what happens.

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's weird build.

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 4>Theoretically, It'szki's already hurt too, Sazuki's hurt.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 5>I Actually I just high highlighted this.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 4>If anyone listened to the microcast and Fantasy pros, Dansby

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Swanson was in a top ten bus we were talking about.

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 4>He was one of the ones I put in there

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 4>because I agree. And it's back to that same Carlos

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 4>Korea thing that it's just like there's all these guys

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 4>that people are like comfortably sitting all this will be

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 4>my starting short step. I really don't want it. I

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 4>want one of the elite, top tier guys. Dansby Swanson

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 4>does feel like one of those guys that you're paying

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 4>this year for last year's stats.

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Good point.

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the outfielders that made the team for

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Jason Kleett, Michael Harrow's the second Jake McCarthy and Masataka Yoshida.

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Those are three outfielders. Let's talk about him in a cluster.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 2>What are your concerns about these guys here?

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Rittle them off for me?

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Collect sure. With Harris it's you know, people, he's he's

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 3>in the back of the second round. Now that's where

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 3>he's going. And when I try to look for historical comps.

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:53.439
<v Speaker 3>So when I'm I'm looking at players, and when I

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 3>look at young players that have such a gap between

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 3>their walk rate and their strikeout rate. When I when

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 3>I went back and looked at rec examples, guys that

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 3>popped on that were Dylan Carlson, Ian happ and these aren't.

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 3>These weren't great sophomore seasons Cody bell But you know,

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Bellinger had a season when he was twenty three. It

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 3>wasn't his sophomore year, but he had he was coming

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 3>back from their hurt shoulder. But when you look at

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 3>young players that have a big gap between their walk

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 3>and strikeout rate, they tend to either tread water or

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 3>declined a little bit rather than take another step forward.

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 3>And Harris, his defense is going to keep him in

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 3>the lineup. I've seen some people say, oh, you know

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 3>against lefties, still sit, No, he'll stay. He's just probably

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 3>going to go down the ninth because they have options.

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>They don't have to hit him second all year like

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 3>they like they did once they called him up, and

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 3>so against those lefties, him coming down and some of

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the historical concerns that have happened with sophomores that have

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 3>had that type of plate disciplined type of issues. I

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 3>am not paying that second round value. I believe by

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 3>season's end his value is going to be closer to

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 3>fifth sixth round. And you know, if you draft him

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 3>as the second round, you're getting fifth six return to me.

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 3>That hits the bus area. When I look at McCarthy again,

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 3>when something comes out of nowhere, you got to look

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 3>at look at where did it? Where can it go

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 3>from there? And a lot of his stuff you look at,

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, I heard somebody this week and call it

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 3>the lollipop screen on statcast, and the speed stands out.

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Everything else is blue blue, blue, blue blue, as Wels's

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 3>shirt right, and everything else is red on the speed.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 3>And so everything that's built on speed, anything happens what

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 3>it happens to the rest of the game. So I

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 3>have concerns about the market and if Arizona, if they

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 3>keep running like they did last year, maybe they do,

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe I'm wrong. And then with Yoshida, I just personally

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 3>have had a terrible, terrible track record with everybody coming

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 3>over from me to the Korean Baseball League or the

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Japanese league. Every year, I like I'll buy in. It's

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna be this guy. It's gonna be this guy. Every

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 3>year it's been disappointment. Last year I was all in

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 3>on Suzuki, and when he was healthy, it worked out.

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 3>But he had trouble. He had trouble adjusting to certain things.

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 3>And we still don't know where Yoshet is gonna hit.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 3>And it's not the same. This isn't your your Boston

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.479
<v Speaker 3>lineup that's gonna put up a ton of runs, and

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 3>so you know they're still trying to figure out. I

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 3>guess Devers is gonna hit second type of thing, but

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 3>this is not the loaded I'm gonna score six runs

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 3>again Boston lineup anymore. So I see these are three

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 3>names that I look at the chart and I'm like,

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm not paying those prices.

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you make great cases for all three of them.

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Yoshida's one definitely sticks out to me in points leagues.

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I can understand, you know, maybe he'll you'll get on

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 2>base and off, it'll do enough things there. I understand that,

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 2>But you don't know what the power is gonna be.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 2>And Harris as graz as he was, you don't know

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 2>what the adjustments are in year two, the great point.

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>There for you Welsh your outfielders.

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Where Louis Robert, which again, this one hurts my soul,

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Cody Bellinger, which I totally get and at least gotta

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 2>see another guy that that's the one to hurt my soul.

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, and let's talk about these three outfitters.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Give me, I want to the most compelling case for him.

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I would want to point out by the way, I

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 4>love the McCarthy one. That's when I've really been hitting

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 4>on with a lot of people. I felt like a

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of the early stuff was like, oh, death charts,

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 4>he's gonna hit three, He's not. Corman Carroll's gonna lead

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 4>off to tell Martes hit to and Lord of Scuriel

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 4>has hit three in almost every single game this spring,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 4>including today. He's gonna move further back in the lineup,

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>maybe five or six, which could lose some opportunities.

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:11.360
<v Speaker 5>I think he runs less.

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 4>So I really like that one, all right, So mine,

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Luis Robert, I love this is kind of like the

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Tim Anderson. This is the Byron Buckson thing. He's great

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 4>when he's out there, but he's not out there. He's

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 4>never played a career one hundred games in one season.

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 4>That doesn't work for me. Two eighty four batting average

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 4>is solid, twelve homers, eleven stolen bases in around one

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 4>hundred games. Your best case scenario would be a twenty

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty season. But even in the bottom line of projections,

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 4>this is the baseline. This is like you know they're

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 4>giving you the baseline. Best case scenario is twenty homers,

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 4>twelve stolen bases on the bat X. That's not worth

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 4>his price. That's not worth where you're getting Louise Robert

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 4>with the inherent risk, with the injury as well. So

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 4>I love him, but I don't think he's worth the risk.

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 4>And there's so many other players like we make excuses for,

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 4>like why would we take him inside the top fifty

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 4>when he doesn't play those games? And really the return

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to say it's Carlos Kraa esque because

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 4>he steals bases, but like, are we even going to

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 4>be happy on one hundred and fifty game on Luise Robert?

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 5>I think that's in question. My other guys, who the

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 5>hell do I have? I've got.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.479
<v Speaker 4>So adulas Cursia. Here's my big thing with him. I

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 4>feel like we all got to this place now where

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 4>we're comfortable. Last year, everyone's like, he can't do it,

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 4>he can't do it again. Then he did do it.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Xba's up to two forty four, and everyone's like thumbs up. Okay,

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 4>here's what I'm worried about a little bit bigger this offseason.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 4>I've seen him in camp breaking balls last year kind

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 4>of around thirty percent of his pitches, and he really

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 4>regressed the year before. In twenty twenty one, he hit

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 4>two fifty six, which is the highest batting average against

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 4>any This past year, he started to really hit up

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 4>fastballs and the breaking balls tanked his fifth percentage forty

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 4>one percent on them, and he only hit one ninety nine.

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 4>I think pitchers are going to adjust to him. I

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 4>think that comfort level we have in aduls is going

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 4>to do us wrong because the same thing.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 5>The crazy price. It is crazy crazy.

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 4>Price right now, and he makes bad contact, he swings

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 4>through everything, and he's really just barely stabilizing that two

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 4>forty four to keep going. I don't think it's going

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 4>to be there. I think he's going to get attacked

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot more with breaking pitches, and I just don't

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 4>think he has the like floor to maintain a top

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 4>fifty five overall player. I think he could still be good,

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 4>but I think this is a matter of you paid

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 4>top fifty. Let's say what is his ADP right now?

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 4>In the dullest Garcia, I want to say, it's like

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 4>forty eight. Yeah, if he returns top eighty or ninety,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 4>maybe you're going to be okay with it. But like,

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 4>what does he have to do? He has to do

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 4>everything he did last year to return that.

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 5>So I don't like it. And Cody Villain's pretty.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 2>He's seven in the consensus over on Fantasy Pros and

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 2>I who want to check this, you go to fancypros

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 2>dot com. You can check it out there at the

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 2>rankings page and he is the fifteenth outfielder as well.

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 2>And look at all these guys that you're talking about too.

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Make sure that as you're looking through these names and

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 2>you're hearing these names here too, don't forget that you

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 2>can also put the guys to work here, guys like collect,

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 2>guys like Welsh myself. Well, if you make the cheat

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 2>sheets with the cheat sheet creator and you can go

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 2>use that on the draft Wizard Fancy rose dot com

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 2>slash draft Wizard, you can avoid some of these pitfalls

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 2>are some of these players, which is really useful, so

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:10.920
<v Speaker 2>make sure you check that out again. Fancy Rose dot

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Com slash Draft Wizard. You could always download the app

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>as well, and the chie Chet Career is great because

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 2>you could do a composite of the different analysts you like,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.440
<v Speaker 2>or you could just stick to one like Jason Collett.

0:31:21.040 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Jason glet's my guy. That's my dude.

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 5>I hate, he just hates.

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Give me a quick take on Bellinger before we get

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to the pictures here.

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm just not gonna do it. I'm not going

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 5>to buy back into it.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there's any reason he's changed his swing

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 4>like seven hundred times in the last three years. I

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 4>don't see any reason why we should buy it that

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 4>he's going into Chicago. He's still crazy free swinging. Strikeout

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 4>percentage went up this past year, he walked less, he

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 4>hit for a worse batting average than I mean, it's

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 4>just continuous and his XBA was zero point two one three.

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I don't see why we would.

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Buy Everybody has the same thing Welsh right where they go, Oh,

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, it's a new situation. Let's give another chance.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the worst thing you can do. What

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I like actually want to win.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 5>I like Cody Bellinger. I want him to succeed.

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 4>I think he's a crazy three hundred home run potential guy,

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 4>but he just doesn't make contact. And like this year,

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to make more of a concerted effort than

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 4>anything else to really focus in on guys that make

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 4>consistent contact. And I know that's like, oh, it's such

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 4>a stupid whatever, but like Doulos Garcia, I don't think

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 4>it's consistent. Has really big whif issues. Cody Bellinger. Obviously,

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of those players who do I like.

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 4>I like the Jose Miranda's my craziest one of all

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 4>of this is probably like O'Neil Cruz and Jazz Chisholm.

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 4>Those are huge swings I want to take because of

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 4>the home run, the power, speed potential. But for the

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 4>most part, if I do take those guys, those are

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 4>my risks. I want to have a lot of balance

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 4>around those teams, and I want guys with really good

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 4>contact skills and these floors, because these dudes, Cody Bellinger

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 4>could be a Fantasy winner, but he also could be

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 4>cut by May.

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 3>He'd also be Joey Gallo this year.

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, great, completely agree.

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say about that. I'm speechless.

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go to the starting pitchers on the

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 2>list for you, Jason Collett, so further Streider.

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Hold on away. I'm going to name them all.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to let them hang in the ether like

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 2>one of those two bubbles for everybody to take it in.

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Spencer Stryder, who I am so excited about, Shane Bieber,

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:15.680
<v Speaker 2>who Welsh doesn't like so and you and him are

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>going to see why d eye on that one? And

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Hunter Green, which I think we can all understand where

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 2>you're coming from them. So Strider Bieber Green dissect them

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 2>for us. Why are those guys people who have big

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 2>potential bust?

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 3>So for me, I've seen Strider go is sp two

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 3>and to me it's it's when I look at a

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 3>guy who is just turning. He turned twenty four during

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the off season. He went from pitching, you know, pitched

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 3>into twenty nineteen. Twenty twenty was a wash twelve innings

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 3>before the college season was shut down. Uh, you know.

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Twenty one. He had a thirty nine percent jump in

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 3>his workload from twenty twenty one to twenty twenty two.

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 3>If we were to project that type of workload on

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 3>him this year, that means we're taking Strider to one

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 3>hundred and eighty plus innings this year. And that's exactly

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 3>how he's being drafted. And when I you know, Joe,

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 3>you were, you were in New York, you came up

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 3>with the Mets and Generation K. You kind of know

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 3>where I'm hinting at with some of this, But that's

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 3>what I was in high school.

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 2>And you're also hinting at a team that has aspirations

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 2>for the playoffs. So if you're going to push him

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 2>to one aiding in the regular season, that's not even

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about what's gonna happen in the playoffs. Socicly, I

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>look as SB two, you're one hundred percent.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>That's nuts, But man, I just need I want them.

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 3>I see the risk reward And you can have the

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 3>same conversation with the Grom. It's like the innings that

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 3>he does pitch. I've heard, you know, make this point.

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 3>He was even talking about it this weekend. It's like,

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 3>if the Gram comes out and gets one hundred and

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 3>forty innings, he could be the best pitcher in baseball

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 3>because of the quality of that. And we saw what

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 3>Strider was able to do last year, but again we

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 3>haven't seen how he comes back from a big workload,

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 3>jump and go in thirty eight increase is a big one,

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 3>and that's why I'm like, I've been out on him.

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 3>That said, I do have him for one dollar in

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 3>one of my leagues because I traded what about this

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 3>year when I was dumping so yay. And when I

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 3>look at Shane Bieber, love the pitching style, love to

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 3>watch him pitch, but my biggest concern with him is

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 3>the imbalanced schedule's gone. He had a like a two

0:35:09.120 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 3>thirteen era against Al Central last year, a three fifty

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 3>two against everybody else, and so he had a lot

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.400
<v Speaker 3>of a lot of sweetness came out of facing the

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Tigers and the Royals and the depleted Twins lineup and

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.439
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox mess repeatedly, and so that big gap.

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Now he's got to play some of those other teams.

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 3>I want to see how that softens up. And then

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 3>with Green, it's nothing about the pitcher, it's the surrounding cast.

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Getting back to the Dansby Swanson thing. That's not a

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 3>great bullpen that's not a great defense, and that's not

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 3>inconsistent run support, and he can go out and strike

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 3>out twelve guys and lose a game, and so I

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 3>without the wins like I can't legitimately. I've seen some

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 3>projections saying Green's a ten twelve game winner. I don't

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 3>see it because I don't know how the Reds are

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 3>going to get there. They're not Oakland bad, but they're

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 3>not good and it's good. There's gonna be times where

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:56.840
<v Speaker 3>he gets pulled out of a game and that bullpen

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 3>blows that lead. So that's that's why I'm out on

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Green as Kurt market price, because he is inside

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 3>the top one hundred right now.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 2>Wels, you've got Dylan Cees, Robbie Ray Kyle right now.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 2>You've talked a lot about Dylan ce So give everybody

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 2>the ten seconds on that, because we already know your

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 2>feelings on him.

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But Robbie Ray Kyle Wright or two other guys you

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 1>think could be potential.

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Bust, Why yeah, I mean Cease has just been big,

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 4>high walk rates, like the strikeout rates. I don't know

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 4>how good this team is going to be, and I

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 4>just think he's super volatile.

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 5>I just don't like the cost.

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of being Nick Pollock agreed, I

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of people agree. Just the cost of

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 4>where Dylan Cees goes overall just doesn't quite add up.

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 4>And again this is there's actually a balance. It'sunny we were

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 4>talking about Strider. I keep thinking and Jacob deGrom where

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 4>it's like, how do you balance out your teams?

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, would you almost sometimes.

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 4>Rather take these players that have, you know, this volatility,

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 4>but to be like the number one overall player and

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 4>then just take a bunch of players around them for

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 4>protection or do you want safety across the board? And

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 4>I just actually don't think Dylan Ceese qualifies as either

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 4>one of those. I don't think he's got that the highest.

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 4>I would rather Strider than Cease all day long. I

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 4>just don't like those walk rates. Robbie Ray specifically is

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 4>one that I'm just not in love with. He had

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 4>a decrease on his fastball, which was around a mile

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 4>and a half overall.

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 5>And I think it just went away for me. But

0:37:12.960 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 5>I think this was an.

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Overall pitch mix that his velocity went down. Yeah, his

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 4>slider went down about a full mile and a full

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 4>mile per hour, his change up went down, his fastball

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 4>went down. I don't overall like Robbie Ray and the costs.

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 4>He's still pretty pretty heavy up there. So Robbie Ray's

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 4>just a guy that i'm strikeouts also went down, like

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 4>from eleven to ten k per nine and the three

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 4>and a half year I just think doesn't fit. So

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.359
<v Speaker 4>he's just, you know, a little too crazy. And Kyle Wright,

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, I don't. I think we're paying so much

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Kyle Wright for what he did last year. And I

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 4>said this on the microcast, There's one thing I can

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 4>guarantee you Kyle Wright will not win twenty one games

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 4>this year. So what does that ultimately do his overall value?

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't.

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 4>The strikeouts are not elite. He has great team contact.

0:37:57.640 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 4>It's actually funny because I agree with what Jason said

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 4>about Hunter Green, like I like Hunter Green stuff a lot,

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 4>and I love the k's and I like the strikeouts,

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 4>but the team in general doesn't give you a lot

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 4>of safety. Kyle Ray does have the safety because of

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:12.919
<v Speaker 4>the braves. I mean, the guy won twenty one games.

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 4>There's a reason behind it. But you've got still a

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 4>two and a half walk per nine under nine k

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 4>per nine is not what I love, and he had

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 4>a little bit higher his expected The Ray was almost

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 4>four compared to a low three. So take all that

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 4>in consideration, I think he's gonna regress. There's no chance

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 4>that wins come remotely close, and we're paying for him

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 4>right around right around top thirty overall. Sp So, Dylan Cee,

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 4>Robbie Ray, and Kyle Raight are all my bust pitchers

0:38:37.680 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 4>for this year.

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's close it out with the closers, then, Welsh, who

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 2>is your potential bus closer in twenty three?

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, on the microcast, I told you, guys, Joe Barlow,

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 4>because Joe Barlow is being drafted inside the top one

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.320
<v Speaker 4>fifty and uh or no Scott Barlow.

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 5>The Barlow's confused me.

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 4>I actually saw Scott Barlow today, Scott Parlow with the Kansas

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 4>City Royals, because he was going inside the top one fifty.

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's silly that you're taking closers that

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 4>don't have defined roles because rold As Chapman is there,

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 4>and that there's no way that a role as Chapman

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 4>is there to just sit and be an eighth inning guy.

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 4>He had a lot of opportunity to go in other places,

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.920
<v Speaker 4>so staying with it and giving a different name these

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 4>guys that are in these questionable closing spots. Clay Holmes

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 4>is somebody that is in one of the best you

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.479
<v Speaker 4>know cities, New York. He's a Yankees closer. It seems great,

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 4>lots of opportunity. The team has already talked about moving

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 4>him in and out of that position.

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 5>I hate that.

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 4>I hate the idea of paying at any top high

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:32.720
<v Speaker 4>end closer.

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 5>And he comes after like the big guys.

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 4>He's not like he's going at a crazy cost, but

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 4>he's inside the top fifteen of closers. I think you

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 4>have to reach ahead because every guy, almost every guy

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 4>after him, has really big questions unless you want a

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 4>Rockies closer and a Pirate's closer and Bednar and Burt,

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think you do want bart and Bednar.

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 4>So Clay Holmes, I feel like people are like, Okay,

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 4>I can snag this guy. I just don't think. And

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 4>the Yankees have already told us that he's guaranteed to

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 4>get those spots. So I think that's going to be

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:58.839
<v Speaker 4>a bust for a lot of people that are like, oh,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 4>I can wait on closers, and I'll get you know,

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 4>a guy that's going to be put in a great

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 4>situation with the Yankees, Clay Homes is pretty easy for me.

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Collect you've got another high profile reliever on yours as well,

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 2>it's Devin Williams.

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Why yeah, I do so another point I would say, there,

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 3>why why people are kind of doing what they are

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 3>with closers. Let's not forget that there were only eleven

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 3>pitchers that had twenty five plus saves last year, So

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.479
<v Speaker 3>I think that's kind of been boldened people to say, fine,

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 3>I'll punt. You know. Conversely, I saw something earlier today.

0:40:26.640 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Somebody in a in a in a twelveth t o

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 3>C fifteen OC opened up with Aaron Judge, then took

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:35.520
<v Speaker 3>Emanuel class A, Josh Hater, and Edmund dis as his

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 3>first four picks, all three, all three. So I want

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 3>to see what the rest of that build looks like.

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh So, But I think people are more in boiler

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 3>to say, hey, I'm going to try the Tampa Bay

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Rays approach and just you know, find all these stream

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 3>relievers and try to build all these saves all year

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 3>because they want to they want to take advantage of

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 3>hitting or whatever early on. But I put Devin Williams

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 3>because he's going it's fun to watch him pitch. Love

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 3>the airbender, love the strikeouts. But let's not pretend that

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 3>he's been a model of health. Uh. You know, he's

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 3>had some knee issues. That airbender requires him to severely

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 3>pronate his arm to throw that pitch. That puts him

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 3>at some risk. You know, severe pronator will be got

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 3>like Brent Honeywell, I wish that could have happened, but

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 3>it never did. But so Williams, he's.

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 5>Still happen.

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that is not where you know he was.

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 3>He was our ten staff. You know, there's no such

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 3>thing as a pitching prospect, just a reminder trade your

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 3>pitching prospects every time you can.

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 3>But with so, that's my thing with Williams is I'm

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 3>concerned that he can stay healthy over the course of

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 3>a full season. If I am drafting Williams, I'm trying

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 3>to make sure I get Matt Bush somewhere deep down

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 3>the draft as some insurance policy with that. But Matt

0:41:44.040 --> 0:41:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Devin Williams, I want to said, Matt Devin Williams has

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 3>cost you to acquire the skills because the upside's definitely there,

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 3>but the risk is there and you should look to

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 3>mitigate the risk as well. But I'm I ended up

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:56.279
<v Speaker 3>with Williams in one. I think I took him to

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:59.439
<v Speaker 3>teach FBI as my first closer, but he definitely wasn't

0:41:59.440 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 3>my target.

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, just to recap everybody's bust teams for twenty twenty three,

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the Welsh at catcher, Dalton v Oar Show, then Reese

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Hoskins at first, Labor Tours at second, Ueno Suarez at

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 2>third base, Carls Korey at short, Luis Robert Etais Garcia,

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Cody Bellinger in the outfield, and then the rotation is Cease,

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Robbie Ray, Kyle Wright with Clay Holmes. You know, it's

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 2>funny you look at this roster Welsh, it's pretty competitive roster.

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, it's funny.

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 5>It's so funny you said that.

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 3>I was about to say.

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 4>I could totally see someone doing the all fade Welsh

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:32.879
<v Speaker 4>team and putting this team together, and.

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I want somebody to do that. In fact, go out

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there and do it and let us know if you are.

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 5>I mean you didn't have a first round pick if

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 5>you did, but yeah.

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:40.840
<v Speaker 2>No, you didn't have a first round pick, but you know,

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 2>it's just kind of funny. Adlie Rutchman at catcher, Nathaniel

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Lowe at first, Gestism at second, Jordan Walker third danceby

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Swanson Short, Michael Harris, Jake McCarthy and Yoshida in the outfield,

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:55.760
<v Speaker 2>and Spencer Strider, Bieber, Hunter Green and Devin Williams.

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Certain name I might go to war with. I'm not

0:42:58.080 --> 0:42:59.359
<v Speaker 5>gonna lie here, I might go to war with.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Hey. Well, the boy I tried to say is every

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 3>year we have surprises, so everybody steps up. In order

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 3>for somebody's up, somebody's got to step down.

0:43:05.560 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 2>And you guys have definitely hit on some big names,

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's worth everybody paying attention to because

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 2>just because a big name, big investment doesn't.

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Mean it's a sure thing all the time.

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 2>So you rethink and at least understand where the guys

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 2>are coming from a little food for thought here from

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 2>the Welsh and Jason Collett. Follow him on the Twitter

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 2>machine at Jason Collette. He's a great follow He does

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 2>great stuff in the baseball world. Check out his work

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 2>at Rodewi and Fangrafts as well. I want to think

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the sponsor of today's show, and that is Fanimal. Head

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 2>over to fanimal dot com or download the Fnimal app

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:40.319
<v Speaker 2>and use that promo code fanimal MLB that's fa n

0:43:40.400 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 2>im al mlb phanomal mlb to get twenty dollars off

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 2>your first purchase. Check out the Fnimal experience and experience more.

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 2>That'll do it for us, But the story of the

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 2>game goes on for Jason and Welsh.

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time kids.

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 2>That the then