WEBVTT - Is Coronavirus the End of Cities?

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.116
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:22.156 --> 0:00:25.236
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:25.716 --> 0:00:29.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Felton. When the coronavirus hit New York City,

0:00:29.796 --> 0:00:33.676
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers left, mostly from the

0:00:33.716 --> 0:00:37.836
<v Speaker 1>city's wealthier neighborhoods. In San Francisco, rent for a one

0:00:37.876 --> 0:00:41.036
<v Speaker 1>bedroom apartment is down at historic eleven point eight percent.

0:00:41.836 --> 0:00:44.676
<v Speaker 1>There's no question that the coronavirus is changing what our

0:00:44.676 --> 0:00:49.116
<v Speaker 1>cities look like now. But will these changes last? Will

0:00:49.156 --> 0:00:52.636
<v Speaker 1>the people who left come back? How will we figure

0:00:52.636 --> 0:00:54.716
<v Speaker 1>out what it means to live in a denser or

0:00:54.796 --> 0:00:58.916
<v Speaker 1>less denser environment in an age of pandemic. Here to

0:00:58.996 --> 0:01:02.596
<v Speaker 1>talk with me about the pandemic, about cities, and about

0:01:02.636 --> 0:01:06.396
<v Speaker 1>protests is Jennifer Bradley. She is the founding director of

0:01:06.476 --> 0:01:10.356
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Urban Innovation at the Aspen Institute. She

0:01:10.436 --> 0:01:14.236
<v Speaker 1>has spent her entire career thinking about cities, how they function,

0:01:14.396 --> 0:01:17.236
<v Speaker 1>and how we can make them better. Recently, she's been

0:01:17.236 --> 0:01:24.476
<v Speaker 1>thinking a lot about the impact of Corona on city life. Jennifer,

0:01:24.556 --> 0:01:27.316
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being here. You spent your

0:01:27.436 --> 0:01:32.316
<v Speaker 1>entire career thinking about and analyzing and making recommendations for

0:01:32.396 --> 0:01:36.436
<v Speaker 1>how cities should operate and operate better. And now we're

0:01:36.436 --> 0:01:40.596
<v Speaker 1>facing what feels to me like the biggest crisis for

0:01:40.716 --> 0:01:46.276
<v Speaker 1>cities in our lifetimes. What has been your experience over

0:01:46.316 --> 0:01:51.156
<v Speaker 1>the last few mad months in thinking through and rethinking

0:01:51.196 --> 0:01:54.156
<v Speaker 1>the issues you've been working on your whole career. I

0:01:54.276 --> 0:01:57.516
<v Speaker 1>think that the thing that strikes me over both the

0:01:57.636 --> 0:02:00.716
<v Speaker 1>arc of my career and then particularly within the last

0:02:00.836 --> 0:02:06.716
<v Speaker 1>three months, is that cities are resilient. You remember it

0:02:06.836 --> 0:02:09.316
<v Speaker 1>in the early days of the pandemic, there were these

0:02:09.476 --> 0:02:14.876
<v Speaker 1>kind of prefervid, hysterical articles. Our cities over density seems

0:02:14.916 --> 0:02:16.756
<v Speaker 1>to be the key to the spread. So will we

0:02:16.796 --> 0:02:18.956
<v Speaker 1>ever go back to cities? Will we ever go back

0:02:19.076 --> 0:02:22.756
<v Speaker 1>on the subway? And what you realize now when restrictions

0:02:22.796 --> 0:02:26.356
<v Speaker 1>are starting to lift is it's very hard, it's almost

0:02:26.356 --> 0:02:30.036
<v Speaker 1>impossible to keep people apart from each other. So there

0:02:30.156 --> 0:02:33.476
<v Speaker 1>is this there is something in us as social creatures

0:02:33.476 --> 0:02:38.716
<v Speaker 1>and social animals that brings us towards the congregation, the connection,

0:02:39.036 --> 0:02:42.156
<v Speaker 1>and particularly now the novelty and variety of cities since

0:02:42.196 --> 0:02:44.756
<v Speaker 1>we've been stuck in our houses for so long. So

0:02:45.196 --> 0:02:49.076
<v Speaker 1>I think that resiliency is going to be what will

0:02:49.116 --> 0:02:52.956
<v Speaker 1>help cities move into whatever it is we're going to

0:02:53.076 --> 0:02:57.956
<v Speaker 1>encounter next. I think you're also seeing an understanding that

0:02:57.956 --> 0:03:01.916
<v Speaker 1>the city is many things. The city is both a government,

0:03:02.356 --> 0:03:08.316
<v Speaker 1>but it's also these formal and informal networks of support,

0:03:08.516 --> 0:03:14.356
<v Speaker 1>protection and organization and practices. And I think the fact

0:03:14.396 --> 0:03:20.956
<v Speaker 1>that cities are networked and distributed will help them moving forward,

0:03:21.276 --> 0:03:24.116
<v Speaker 1>because what they have to deal with moving forward is

0:03:25.116 --> 0:03:29.636
<v Speaker 1>radical shifts and declines in their budgets. Right when tax

0:03:29.716 --> 0:03:33.876
<v Speaker 1>revenues go down, city budgets are decimated. So I think

0:03:33.876 --> 0:03:35.916
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to see is our understanding of what

0:03:36.076 --> 0:03:39.396
<v Speaker 1>is a city evolved from something that's more top down

0:03:39.396 --> 0:03:46.596
<v Speaker 1>in government centric to something that's more distributed, flexible, a

0:03:46.756 --> 0:03:52.796
<v Speaker 1>kind of diy urbanism, and that will be bumpy and unpredictable,

0:03:53.796 --> 0:03:57.236
<v Speaker 1>but also truer to the spirit of cities, I think,

0:03:57.276 --> 0:03:59.716
<v Speaker 1>and so that gives me some hope for the future.

0:04:00.556 --> 0:04:02.716
<v Speaker 1>There are so many rich things in what you just said,

0:04:02.796 --> 0:04:04.796
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to try to tease out a few

0:04:04.836 --> 0:04:07.116
<v Speaker 1>of them from you. Let me start with where you

0:04:07.156 --> 0:04:10.596
<v Speaker 1>began about the city as a place of connections. One

0:04:10.596 --> 0:04:13.076
<v Speaker 1>of the amazing things about cities is that, of course

0:04:13.116 --> 0:04:15.436
<v Speaker 1>people have all kinds of connections in small towns and

0:04:15.516 --> 0:04:19.036
<v Speaker 1>in suburbs, but they're a little more predictable. That is

0:04:19.076 --> 0:04:21.396
<v Speaker 1>to say, we know a large percentage of the people

0:04:21.676 --> 0:04:23.716
<v Speaker 1>in the place where we are, or we know how

0:04:23.756 --> 0:04:25.356
<v Speaker 1>to think about those people. But in a city, we

0:04:25.356 --> 0:04:28.436
<v Speaker 1>have all these surprising juxtapositions. And that's one of the

0:04:28.476 --> 0:04:30.716
<v Speaker 1>things that we love about cities, and that makes city

0:04:30.756 --> 0:04:34.756
<v Speaker 1>life distinctive and unique. How does that change when it's

0:04:34.836 --> 0:04:38.556
<v Speaker 1>precisely the idea of the random juxtaposition that is frightening

0:04:38.636 --> 0:04:41.156
<v Speaker 1>us by making us wonder if it's going to lead

0:04:41.196 --> 0:04:44.556
<v Speaker 1>to our being infected. I mean, is there some danger

0:04:44.636 --> 0:04:47.316
<v Speaker 1>that the most distinctive thing about city life, or one

0:04:47.356 --> 0:04:49.916
<v Speaker 1>of the most distinctive things about city life, becomes a

0:04:49.956 --> 0:04:53.036
<v Speaker 1>source of fear rather than a source of joy. I

0:04:53.076 --> 0:04:55.876
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. I think if you look at the

0:04:55.916 --> 0:05:00.556
<v Speaker 1>way that the pandemic trends have unfolded or played out

0:05:00.596 --> 0:05:04.036
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of weeks, you see that there

0:05:04.076 --> 0:05:08.996
<v Speaker 1>are super spread or events within intimate families, within funeral

0:05:09.356 --> 0:05:13.796
<v Speaker 1>within birthday parties. So we are not necessarily safer with

0:05:13.916 --> 0:05:17.956
<v Speaker 1>the people we know than with people that we don't know,

0:05:18.436 --> 0:05:22.076
<v Speaker 1>and cities have always been about how to behave in

0:05:22.196 --> 0:05:27.996
<v Speaker 1>public and how to behave civilly with strangers. And I

0:05:28.036 --> 0:05:31.276
<v Speaker 1>think in some ways it might actually be easier to

0:05:31.396 --> 0:05:36.276
<v Speaker 1>behave civilly with strangers to understand. I hope we get

0:05:36.316 --> 0:05:39.316
<v Speaker 1>to the point where we understand that going outside during

0:05:39.316 --> 0:05:42.516
<v Speaker 1>this period without a mask should be as unthinkable as

0:05:42.556 --> 0:05:46.476
<v Speaker 1>going outside without pants. We begin to understand that we

0:05:46.516 --> 0:05:49.876
<v Speaker 1>need to wash our hands. It can be easier to

0:05:49.956 --> 0:05:53.996
<v Speaker 1>do that in the kind of semi anonymous public spaces

0:05:54.116 --> 0:05:57.476
<v Speaker 1>than it can be with those who are close to us.

0:05:57.596 --> 0:06:00.236
<v Speaker 1>Right when we wouldn't necessarily want to say, oh, Dad,

0:06:00.356 --> 0:06:03.196
<v Speaker 1>you know I can't hug you. You really do need

0:06:03.236 --> 0:06:05.116
<v Speaker 1>to wear a mask to keep you safe, to keep

0:06:05.156 --> 0:06:09.196
<v Speaker 1>me safe. So I think that being in public with

0:06:09.356 --> 0:06:13.516
<v Speaker 1>strangers is actually going to feel kind of invigorating, and

0:06:13.516 --> 0:06:17.676
<v Speaker 1>we will find new ways and protocols, right the nod

0:06:17.916 --> 0:06:20.956
<v Speaker 1>over the mask rather than the full smile, different ways

0:06:20.956 --> 0:06:23.276
<v Speaker 1>of greeting people, and this feeling that we're all going

0:06:23.396 --> 0:06:26.716
<v Speaker 1>through something on our streets together. I think we will

0:06:26.756 --> 0:06:32.116
<v Speaker 1>want more public having been so radically private and privatized

0:06:32.156 --> 0:06:35.836
<v Speaker 1>in all of our dealings. That's actually very inspiring, and

0:06:36.356 --> 0:06:40.196
<v Speaker 1>I love what you said. Another word you used was resilience,

0:06:40.236 --> 0:06:44.276
<v Speaker 1>that cities are places of resilience. What if people start leaving.

0:06:44.556 --> 0:06:46.676
<v Speaker 1>My parents live on the Upper East Side of Manhattan,

0:06:46.756 --> 0:06:48.156
<v Speaker 1>which I like to refer to as the city that

0:06:48.236 --> 0:06:52.036
<v Speaker 1>frequently sleeps, and the New York Times reported using cell

0:06:52.036 --> 0:06:56.596
<v Speaker 1>phone data that something like two thirds of the census

0:06:56.596 --> 0:07:00.316
<v Speaker 1>tract in which they live left the city. Now, that's

0:07:00.316 --> 0:07:03.196
<v Speaker 1>an extreme neighborhood. Obviously in many way as a high

0:07:03.196 --> 0:07:04.796
<v Speaker 1>percentage of that people they are can afford to go

0:07:04.876 --> 0:07:08.676
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. But one wonders if that is the harbinger

0:07:08.716 --> 0:07:11.116
<v Speaker 1>of something to come. Do you have the sense that

0:07:11.156 --> 0:07:13.596
<v Speaker 1>there will be a decline in the population of major

0:07:13.596 --> 0:07:17.436
<v Speaker 1>cities over time? You rescue that question with the caveat

0:07:17.476 --> 0:07:20.676
<v Speaker 1>of adding the word major cities. Cities are not all

0:07:20.716 --> 0:07:27.036
<v Speaker 1>one thing. I think there may be less attraction in

0:07:27.076 --> 0:07:31.876
<v Speaker 1>the near term for incredibly high cost, incredibly dense cities

0:07:32.436 --> 0:07:35.996
<v Speaker 1>like certain parts of New York. People are talking about

0:07:35.996 --> 0:07:40.476
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Whether engineers want to pay the extraordinarily high

0:07:40.476 --> 0:07:44.156
<v Speaker 1>housing costs when if they're working from home, they might

0:07:44.196 --> 0:07:47.756
<v Speaker 1>just as well live happily in Denver or Portland or Austin.

0:07:47.956 --> 0:07:52.556
<v Speaker 1>Or Boise. I don't think though, that this spells a

0:07:52.676 --> 0:07:56.476
<v Speaker 1>kind of end of cities or even end of big cities,

0:07:56.636 --> 0:08:00.916
<v Speaker 1>for several reasons. One, cities are incredibly hard to kill.

0:08:01.556 --> 0:08:04.316
<v Speaker 1>You look at a city like Detroit. Detroit's lost more

0:08:04.356 --> 0:08:08.796
<v Speaker 1>than a million people, but it's still actually a viable city.

0:08:08.836 --> 0:08:12.036
<v Speaker 1>It is still actually one of the larger cities in

0:08:12.036 --> 0:08:16.476
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And what people are forgetting right now

0:08:16.716 --> 0:08:20.196
<v Speaker 1>when people are able to work from homework from anywhere,

0:08:20.796 --> 0:08:25.036
<v Speaker 1>is that that's essentially the interest off of the accumulated

0:08:25.116 --> 0:08:30.196
<v Speaker 1>social capital that was built up through face to face interactions,

0:08:30.556 --> 0:08:33.956
<v Speaker 1>through the random meetings, through running into a colleague in

0:08:33.956 --> 0:08:40.276
<v Speaker 1>the hall. That's not going to be sustainable over the

0:08:40.356 --> 0:08:45.036
<v Speaker 1>course of decades. Also, cities are important labor markets, and

0:08:45.276 --> 0:08:48.676
<v Speaker 1>you'll need a wide number of opportunities for people who

0:08:48.876 --> 0:08:52.516
<v Speaker 1>are in two career households. So it's fine if one

0:08:52.556 --> 0:08:54.956
<v Speaker 1>person in the family is a Facebook engineer and can

0:08:54.996 --> 0:08:59.516
<v Speaker 1>work from anywhere, but her partner may not have the

0:08:59.596 --> 0:09:02.076
<v Speaker 1>same privilege and may need to be back in that

0:09:02.116 --> 0:09:04.996
<v Speaker 1>dense labor market of a San Francisco or a Los

0:09:04.996 --> 0:09:07.876
<v Speaker 1>Angeles or even a Denver or an Austin. So I

0:09:07.956 --> 0:09:12.116
<v Speaker 1>just don't see this trend reversing and turning on its

0:09:12.116 --> 0:09:15.036
<v Speaker 1>head and again, because there are other aspects of cities too.

0:09:15.076 --> 0:09:19.636
<v Speaker 1>They're not just places to work, they're places for discovery, delight,

0:09:20.236 --> 0:09:24.476
<v Speaker 1>for culture. I'm stunned. You can't keep people out of restaurants.

0:09:25.276 --> 0:09:27.996
<v Speaker 1>I'm blown away by this. Right, people are risking their

0:09:27.996 --> 0:09:30.876
<v Speaker 1>health for brunch. So that says to me that there

0:09:30.956 --> 0:09:35.716
<v Speaker 1>is something about cities urbanity, And I don't make a

0:09:35.716 --> 0:09:38.116
<v Speaker 1>strong distinction between city and suburb when I say this.

0:09:38.996 --> 0:09:41.636
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's meets so deep a need in

0:09:41.676 --> 0:09:45.596
<v Speaker 1>the human spirit that we will keep finding ways to

0:09:45.836 --> 0:09:49.796
<v Speaker 1>gather like this. I completely share your instinct that it's

0:09:50.236 --> 0:09:53.556
<v Speaker 1>kind of an inspiring fact about the human need for

0:09:53.596 --> 0:09:56.116
<v Speaker 1>social contact that people, as you put it, are risking

0:09:56.116 --> 0:09:58.596
<v Speaker 1>their lives for brunch, which is a great phase. But

0:09:58.716 --> 0:10:01.596
<v Speaker 1>to say that is also to realize that all of

0:10:01.636 --> 0:10:04.316
<v Speaker 1>my public health professional friends, you know, many of whom

0:10:04.356 --> 0:10:07.956
<v Speaker 1>have been on the show, their responses, it's crazy to

0:10:08.036 --> 0:10:10.756
<v Speaker 1>risk your life for brunch. It's a mistake. What we

0:10:10.836 --> 0:10:14.556
<v Speaker 1>need our firmer regulations and maybe firmer social norms that

0:10:14.716 --> 0:10:16.716
<v Speaker 1>make it clear that we shouldn't be doing this. They

0:10:16.756 --> 0:10:20.076
<v Speaker 1>do not think, for the most part that restaurants should

0:10:20.076 --> 0:10:22.276
<v Speaker 1>be open for brunch if people will risk their lives

0:10:22.276 --> 0:10:25.156
<v Speaker 1>to go there, and I add it oar, but we

0:10:25.196 --> 0:10:30.836
<v Speaker 1>will not be in pandemic forever. I recognize that that's

0:10:30.876 --> 0:10:33.156
<v Speaker 1>part of the question, and maybe I should cash out

0:10:33.156 --> 0:10:37.556
<v Speaker 1>that question. It's of course possible that this winter will

0:10:37.596 --> 0:10:40.036
<v Speaker 1>know that there is a vaccine that will work, and

0:10:40.116 --> 0:10:43.956
<v Speaker 1>that's the wonderful best case scenario, you know, Dao SX Machina,

0:10:44.036 --> 0:10:46.356
<v Speaker 1>and we all get back to life. And in that scenario,

0:10:46.396 --> 0:10:49.476
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree with you more. But there's also a possibility,

0:10:49.716 --> 0:10:51.716
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the experts seem to think it's

0:10:51.796 --> 0:10:54.636
<v Speaker 1>a probability that what we'll find then is actually that

0:10:54.676 --> 0:10:58.596
<v Speaker 1>we can't do that, that none of the vaccines really works,

0:10:58.716 --> 0:11:00.516
<v Speaker 1>or that they work somewhat, or that they work for

0:11:00.636 --> 0:11:03.556
<v Speaker 1>younger and healthier people, and that in that scenario, we're

0:11:03.596 --> 0:11:06.756
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start accepting the long term presence

0:11:07.516 --> 0:11:10.436
<v Speaker 1>of pandemic, not of the that kills everybody all the time,

0:11:10.476 --> 0:11:12.716
<v Speaker 1>but that kills some of the people some of the time.

0:11:13.276 --> 0:11:16.356
<v Speaker 1>And under those circumstances, you can already feel any here.

0:11:16.476 --> 0:11:19.316
<v Speaker 1>The public health professionals saying we're gonna have to maintain

0:11:19.396 --> 0:11:23.756
<v Speaker 1>social distancing for the foreseeable future. What about in that situation,

0:11:23.796 --> 0:11:27.916
<v Speaker 1>I mean, doesn't that pose more fundamental threats to the

0:11:27.996 --> 0:11:31.476
<v Speaker 1>aspiration to social life that we associate with cities. Yes,

0:11:32.516 --> 0:11:37.996
<v Speaker 1>and there are very dense cities that seem to be

0:11:38.756 --> 0:11:43.876
<v Speaker 1>managing and figuring this out. I think we will change cities,

0:11:44.476 --> 0:11:51.036
<v Speaker 1>but plagues haven't killed cities. The times that we have

0:11:52.036 --> 0:11:58.116
<v Speaker 1>dramatically reduced our density and shifted our gradient has been

0:11:58.916 --> 0:12:03.156
<v Speaker 1>because of enormous public campaigns and massive amounts of subsidies.

0:12:03.516 --> 0:12:07.596
<v Speaker 1>That's when we change the American landscape in the middle

0:12:07.596 --> 0:12:14.516
<v Speaker 1>of the century through the nineties. Absent that combination of

0:12:14.556 --> 0:12:19.916
<v Speaker 1>both significant campaign and massive subsidies, I don't see how

0:12:19.916 --> 0:12:22.436
<v Speaker 1>it will work and where it will come from. And

0:12:22.516 --> 0:12:24.716
<v Speaker 1>this just tells you basically that I'm an urbanist and

0:12:24.756 --> 0:12:27.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm committed to cities, and I will endeavor to keep

0:12:27.876 --> 0:12:30.916
<v Speaker 1>them strong and safe. But I don't know that my

0:12:30.996 --> 0:12:35.476
<v Speaker 1>life would be necessarily better in a more suburban environment

0:12:35.516 --> 0:12:38.036
<v Speaker 1>than it is living in an apartment building in Washington,

0:12:38.116 --> 0:12:40.116
<v Speaker 1>d C. I very much wish I had in unit

0:12:40.156 --> 0:12:42.956
<v Speaker 1>washer dryer, But other than that, I don't see how

0:12:42.996 --> 0:12:48.436
<v Speaker 1>it's better if I'm out in only Maryland. It's a

0:12:48.516 --> 0:12:52.076
<v Speaker 1>hugely important insight that you've written about that the movement

0:12:52.076 --> 0:12:53.916
<v Speaker 1>to the suburbs that we associate with the post World

0:12:53.956 --> 0:12:56.436
<v Speaker 1>War two period wasn't just some accident, and wasn't just

0:12:56.476 --> 0:12:58.676
<v Speaker 1>the result of market forces, but was also the result

0:12:58.716 --> 0:13:02.716
<v Speaker 1>of government policies and subsidies. What I'm wondering is if

0:13:02.716 --> 0:13:04.996
<v Speaker 1>we might not see over the next three to five

0:13:05.076 --> 0:13:11.236
<v Speaker 1>years a kind of less explicit, but nevertheless present reorientation

0:13:11.796 --> 0:13:16.356
<v Speaker 1>of how government officials think about cities, because I think

0:13:16.356 --> 0:13:18.996
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the urbanist picture that you've been describing

0:13:18.996 --> 0:13:22.116
<v Speaker 1>has been embraced by lots and lots of public officials

0:13:22.276 --> 0:13:24.756
<v Speaker 1>in the last decade or two. But that seems to

0:13:24.756 --> 0:13:27.876
<v Speaker 1>me shapeable and malleable. And if you're a government official

0:13:27.916 --> 0:13:30.116
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to be elected or voted out of

0:13:30.116 --> 0:13:33.636
<v Speaker 1>office based on your COVID numbers, and if you're consistently

0:13:33.676 --> 0:13:35.956
<v Speaker 1>seeing which I'm not saying will be, but imagine consistently

0:13:35.956 --> 0:13:38.196
<v Speaker 1>seeing that it's in your urban areas that you have

0:13:38.236 --> 0:13:41.956
<v Speaker 1>the largest amount of COVID cases, it is possible to

0:13:41.956 --> 0:13:44.956
<v Speaker 1>imagine government officials, I think, saying you know what, let's

0:13:45.116 --> 0:13:48.716
<v Speaker 1>de emphasize density. Let's not invest in the infrastructure that

0:13:48.716 --> 0:13:50.876
<v Speaker 1>makes density work. Let's not invest more in our public

0:13:50.876 --> 0:13:54.276
<v Speaker 1>transit systems, let's not invest more in bike lanes. I'm

0:13:54.276 --> 0:13:55.956
<v Speaker 1>not saying this will happen, but it does seem like

0:13:55.996 --> 0:13:58.236
<v Speaker 1>there could be that kind of a reorientation of a

0:13:58.316 --> 0:14:02.396
<v Speaker 1>historical type if we get this perception that cities are

0:14:02.436 --> 0:14:07.236
<v Speaker 1>where the virus is fair. That said, if you look

0:14:07.276 --> 0:14:12.796
<v Speaker 1>at the data from the most recent case surges, you're

0:14:12.836 --> 0:14:20.476
<v Speaker 1>not seeing a tight correlation with density. So you're seeing Arizona, Florida,

0:14:20.676 --> 0:14:24.676
<v Speaker 1>my home state of Texas. These are not exceptionally dense

0:14:24.756 --> 0:14:28.396
<v Speaker 1>places as the American landscape goes. But aren't we seeing

0:14:28.436 --> 0:14:31.236
<v Speaker 1>in those places that the spikes when you break it

0:14:31.276 --> 0:14:34.876
<v Speaker 1>down within those states, are happening in relatively denser parts

0:14:34.876 --> 0:14:38.476
<v Speaker 1>of those states as opposed to the more rural areas. Yeah, exactly,

0:14:38.596 --> 0:14:41.156
<v Speaker 1>or ex urban areas. Yes and no, right, I mean

0:14:41.196 --> 0:14:42.756
<v Speaker 1>there can be You know, you also look at the

0:14:42.796 --> 0:14:47.356
<v Speaker 1>meatpacking plants, which are dense within the walls but played

0:14:47.396 --> 0:14:52.236
<v Speaker 1>out in a less dense, larger landscape. So the density

0:14:52.276 --> 0:14:54.556
<v Speaker 1>I think that we have to be most worried about

0:14:55.116 --> 0:15:00.876
<v Speaker 1>is essentially household and workplace density as opposed to neighborhood

0:15:01.476 --> 0:15:06.436
<v Speaker 1>or city level density. What I would love to see

0:15:06.956 --> 0:15:12.396
<v Speaker 1>is policy focusing on housing and overcrowding so that people

0:15:12.796 --> 0:15:18.316
<v Speaker 1>were not living in dangerous individual unit conditions, that people

0:15:18.436 --> 0:15:22.756
<v Speaker 1>who need housing can get housing. Where I would like

0:15:22.916 --> 0:15:26.836
<v Speaker 1>all of this energy to go is in figuring out

0:15:27.116 --> 0:15:29.756
<v Speaker 1>from an epidemiological point of view, from a social point

0:15:29.756 --> 0:15:32.636
<v Speaker 1>of view, from an economic point of view, what do

0:15:32.676 --> 0:15:37.436
<v Speaker 1>we need to do to make density safe. We'll be

0:15:37.476 --> 0:15:48.876
<v Speaker 1>back in a moment, Jennifer. One of the things that

0:15:48.916 --> 0:15:54.556
<v Speaker 1>you spoke about was how cities are networks of support,

0:15:54.956 --> 0:15:58.436
<v Speaker 1>networks of connection, and that in some way they're in

0:15:58.476 --> 0:16:03.116
<v Speaker 1>that sense decentralized. That's a fascinating idea and it's counterintuitive

0:16:03.156 --> 0:16:04.876
<v Speaker 1>to me. So would you say more about that. When

0:16:04.916 --> 0:16:07.556
<v Speaker 1>I think of the city, I think of concentration rather

0:16:07.596 --> 0:16:11.956
<v Speaker 1>than of diffusing of authority or responsibility. So please explain.

0:16:12.636 --> 0:16:18.316
<v Speaker 1>You see this anecdotally in stories about people caring for

0:16:18.356 --> 0:16:22.116
<v Speaker 1>their neighbors, right, looking out for somebody down the street

0:16:22.196 --> 0:16:25.556
<v Speaker 1>who may be immunocompromised or who may be elderly, and

0:16:25.956 --> 0:16:30.436
<v Speaker 1>bringing them groceries. Right. Those are informal, mutual networks of support.

0:16:30.996 --> 0:16:33.196
<v Speaker 1>You see it in the way that different neighborhoods have

0:16:33.356 --> 0:16:38.676
<v Speaker 1>responded to well intentioned but poorly thought out policy initiatives

0:16:38.716 --> 0:16:43.676
<v Speaker 1>during this time. So, for example, Oakland decided to pedestrianize

0:16:43.716 --> 0:16:47.156
<v Speaker 1>a large amount of streets without thinking about who might

0:16:47.316 --> 0:16:50.916
<v Speaker 1>need those streets for car parking and commuting. So that

0:16:50.996 --> 0:16:55.156
<v Speaker 1>was frontline workers in neighborhoods that were predominantly populated by

0:16:55.156 --> 0:16:58.156
<v Speaker 1>people of color, and this notion of safe streets kind

0:16:58.156 --> 0:17:02.876
<v Speaker 1>of imposed was not an appropriate policy response. So neighborhoods

0:17:02.996 --> 0:17:06.716
<v Speaker 1>are organizing to get the kinds of things that they

0:17:06.796 --> 0:17:11.956
<v Speaker 1>need during the pandemic and show that they are differentiated

0:17:12.316 --> 0:17:14.716
<v Speaker 1>in a kind of self determining way. And we all

0:17:14.756 --> 0:17:18.236
<v Speaker 1>know that power across the city and power across neighborhoods

0:17:18.356 --> 0:17:22.276
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily evenly distributed, and organizational capacity and interest

0:17:22.356 --> 0:17:26.236
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily evenly distributed. And I think we're seeing

0:17:27.316 --> 0:17:32.396
<v Speaker 1>those differences in capacity play out and places that have

0:17:32.436 --> 0:17:37.436
<v Speaker 1>not previously been organized organizing more forcefully. Right because your home,

0:17:37.596 --> 0:17:40.116
<v Speaker 1>you're nearer your neighbors, you can kind of engage with them.

0:17:40.196 --> 0:17:43.436
<v Speaker 1>You are now better able to organize and identify yourself

0:17:43.436 --> 0:17:45.556
<v Speaker 1>and to speak up for yourself. Then I think this

0:17:45.596 --> 0:17:48.476
<v Speaker 1>will come up more and more as cities have to

0:17:48.516 --> 0:17:52.276
<v Speaker 1>make difficult choices about the distribution of resources during the

0:17:52.356 --> 0:17:56.956
<v Speaker 1>next phase, once there is more economic activity. You use

0:17:57.036 --> 0:18:00.996
<v Speaker 1>the phrase DIY urbanism, which is also really fascinating, and

0:18:01.036 --> 0:18:03.636
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear more about that, because it seems

0:18:03.676 --> 0:18:05.716
<v Speaker 1>to me that a lot of what we've seen during

0:18:05.716 --> 0:18:09.956
<v Speaker 1>this Corona period is municipal governments how us what to do.

0:18:10.556 --> 0:18:12.916
<v Speaker 1>Where I live Cambridge, Massachusetts, which is a weird city,

0:18:12.956 --> 0:18:14.836
<v Speaker 1>but it is my city, is the one I grew

0:18:14.876 --> 0:18:17.116
<v Speaker 1>up in and I love it. You know, long before

0:18:17.196 --> 0:18:19.796
<v Speaker 1>the state had a mass coordinance, the city had a

0:18:19.796 --> 0:18:22.916
<v Speaker 1>mass coordinance that it was enforcing I think practically not

0:18:22.956 --> 0:18:25.876
<v Speaker 1>at all. But Cambridge being Cambridge, there was lots of

0:18:26.396 --> 0:18:29.116
<v Speaker 1>moral enforcement from people on the streets. But that was

0:18:29.156 --> 0:18:32.036
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of do it yourself. It was the government

0:18:32.076 --> 0:18:35.076
<v Speaker 1>does it. When I hear DIY, I imagine sort of

0:18:35.116 --> 0:18:39.796
<v Speaker 1>spontaneously organizing individuals rather than the institutions of the city.

0:18:39.796 --> 0:18:41.676
<v Speaker 1>But maybe that's not what you meant by do it yourself.

0:18:42.316 --> 0:18:43.956
<v Speaker 1>I think you can look at right, so you could

0:18:43.996 --> 0:18:48.716
<v Speaker 1>say that Cambridge decided on its own that it was

0:18:48.796 --> 0:18:50.596
<v Speaker 1>not going to wait for the lead of the state

0:18:50.636 --> 0:18:53.516
<v Speaker 1>of Massachusetts that it had a better understanding of what

0:18:53.556 --> 0:18:57.276
<v Speaker 1>residents needed. The other DIY urbanism I'm seeing is people

0:18:57.316 --> 0:19:01.476
<v Speaker 1>reclaiming the streets in particular ways, shifting more street space

0:19:01.596 --> 0:19:04.916
<v Speaker 1>to pedestrians as opposed to cars without waiting for an

0:19:04.916 --> 0:19:11.156
<v Speaker 1>official city designation, spontaneous but socially stons gatherings. One could

0:19:11.356 --> 0:19:15.356
<v Speaker 1>argue that these protests that have been rolling through the

0:19:15.436 --> 0:19:18.236
<v Speaker 1>month of June and continuing in some cities are also

0:19:18.276 --> 0:19:23.396
<v Speaker 1>a kind of reclaiming of public space in a powerful

0:19:23.476 --> 0:19:28.396
<v Speaker 1>way that bespeaks a desire to use and shape space,

0:19:28.476 --> 0:19:30.756
<v Speaker 1>even in a pandemic, in a way that responds to

0:19:30.956 --> 0:19:35.316
<v Speaker 1>particular needs. So I think people will continue to use

0:19:35.356 --> 0:19:39.276
<v Speaker 1>the city space to get what they want. People make

0:19:39.396 --> 0:19:41.636
<v Speaker 1>the city as they live in it, I guess is

0:19:41.676 --> 0:19:45.236
<v Speaker 1>the point that I'm trying to get at, and I

0:19:45.396 --> 0:19:50.116
<v Speaker 1>call that DIY urbanism for short. But that's what makes

0:19:50.116 --> 0:19:55.156
<v Speaker 1>cities so fascinating is they're not top down enterprises. So, yes,

0:19:55.196 --> 0:19:58.156
<v Speaker 1>you have the government setting basic rules, you need to

0:19:58.156 --> 0:20:01.556
<v Speaker 1>wear a mask, these businesses will and will not open.

0:20:01.996 --> 0:20:04.116
<v Speaker 1>This is how commerce is being dictated, and then it's

0:20:04.116 --> 0:20:07.836
<v Speaker 1>how people use in shape and play with and interrogate

0:20:07.916 --> 0:20:11.556
<v Speaker 1>and even subvert those rules that I find interesting and

0:20:11.596 --> 0:20:17.316
<v Speaker 1>compelling and profoundly urban. The Black Lives Matter protests, spurred

0:20:17.356 --> 0:20:21.276
<v Speaker 1>most recently by the killing of George Floyd, are themselves,

0:20:21.316 --> 0:20:24.276
<v Speaker 1>as you were saying, a phenomenon with great implication for urbanism,

0:20:24.996 --> 0:20:27.396
<v Speaker 1>and I'd love to hear your thoughts on that, both

0:20:27.436 --> 0:20:32.236
<v Speaker 1>about the spontaneous, self organizing, kind of inspiring aspects of

0:20:32.236 --> 0:20:35.756
<v Speaker 1>the protests, and also about at the periphery of the

0:20:35.836 --> 0:20:40.236
<v Speaker 1>protests the occasional looting and violence, which has also been

0:20:40.276 --> 0:20:42.956
<v Speaker 1>a recurrent feature of urban life in the United States,

0:20:43.276 --> 0:20:45.716
<v Speaker 1>not just since nineteen sixty eight, but going back even

0:20:45.836 --> 0:20:49.756
<v Speaker 1>before them. I look at the Black Lives Matter protests

0:20:50.316 --> 0:20:55.516
<v Speaker 1>as a commentarian, even an indictment about how racialized space

0:20:55.876 --> 0:21:02.716
<v Speaker 1>is in cities. All spaces Cambridge versus Somerville, DC versus

0:21:02.716 --> 0:21:08.236
<v Speaker 1>Prince George's County have been designated and racialized. And one

0:21:08.236 --> 0:21:10.116
<v Speaker 1>of the things of the interesting to me about the

0:21:10.116 --> 0:21:13.756
<v Speaker 1>Black Lives Matter protest is they seem to be places

0:21:13.836 --> 0:21:19.236
<v Speaker 1>of emerging integration in cities. That's interesting to me. What

0:21:19.436 --> 0:21:25.036
<v Speaker 1>will as we play out the Black Lives Matter social

0:21:25.316 --> 0:21:32.036
<v Speaker 1>and political changes what will that mean for city space integration,

0:21:32.236 --> 0:21:35.956
<v Speaker 1>Who is welcome on what kinds of streets? Who we

0:21:35.996 --> 0:21:39.636
<v Speaker 1>think of as our neighbors. To me, cities are like,

0:21:39.676 --> 0:21:42.756
<v Speaker 1>it's two thousand years of political philosophy in your zoning code,

0:21:42.796 --> 0:21:45.556
<v Speaker 1>right Like. The cities are where we play out our

0:21:45.716 --> 0:21:49.596
<v Speaker 1>public and private philosophies, including a systemic racism which has

0:21:49.716 --> 0:21:52.996
<v Speaker 1>been an important part of America's political philosophy, which is

0:21:53.036 --> 0:21:56.356
<v Speaker 1>literally encoded in city streets and who gets to use

0:21:56.356 --> 0:21:59.436
<v Speaker 1>them and who feels safe where? So, how is that

0:21:59.956 --> 0:22:04.916
<v Speaker 1>going to change as far as looting and protests goes?

0:22:05.276 --> 0:22:07.356
<v Speaker 1>When you say that, all I can think of is

0:22:07.396 --> 0:22:11.916
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenty one Tulsa race massacre. That was looting, right,

0:22:12.036 --> 0:22:14.796
<v Speaker 1>That was looting, and that was violence, and it was

0:22:14.916 --> 0:22:20.956
<v Speaker 1>state sanctioned violence against a rising middle class black population.

0:22:21.596 --> 0:22:24.676
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the disruptions that we're seeing now

0:22:25.316 --> 0:22:31.356
<v Speaker 1>are a inexcusable and be nothing as compared to the

0:22:31.476 --> 0:22:38.756
<v Speaker 1>kinds of state sanctioned violence, looting, economic disruption, property disruption

0:22:39.356 --> 0:22:43.956
<v Speaker 1>that white people have perpetuated in neighborhoods of color for decades.

0:22:44.356 --> 0:22:47.676
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that heartened me is that

0:22:47.796 --> 0:22:52.436
<v Speaker 1>many DC white shopkeepers you know whose businesses were vandalized, said,

0:22:52.436 --> 0:22:56.476
<v Speaker 1>it's property, and I can replace property. And I think

0:22:56.516 --> 0:23:03.036
<v Speaker 1>there is a appropriate understanding that the violence of some

0:23:03.676 --> 0:23:08.396
<v Speaker 1>people who are using the protests as an opportunity doesn't

0:23:08.476 --> 0:23:14.556
<v Speaker 1>invalid the larger undertaking. One last question. Your approach is

0:23:15.236 --> 0:23:19.956
<v Speaker 1>I think measured, thoughtful, and on the whole optimistic. Do

0:23:20.476 --> 0:23:22.996
<v Speaker 1>you have any dark thoughts? I mean, I think the

0:23:22.996 --> 0:23:26.196
<v Speaker 1>structure of our conversation has been my asking dark questions.

0:23:26.196 --> 0:23:28.316
<v Speaker 1>And you're telling me, you know, don't overstate at Feldman.

0:23:28.356 --> 0:23:30.116
<v Speaker 1>You know you're taking it too far, and in fact

0:23:30.156 --> 0:23:31.636
<v Speaker 1>that all these good things and they're coming back. And

0:23:31.636 --> 0:23:34.916
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good and a heartening set of responses.

0:23:35.396 --> 0:23:37.316
<v Speaker 1>But do you have any worries? Maybe different ones than

0:23:37.356 --> 0:23:41.636
<v Speaker 1>I've thought about. I do worry about public transit. New

0:23:41.676 --> 0:23:45.236
<v Speaker 1>York does not work without public transit. There's no way

0:23:45.476 --> 0:23:48.316
<v Speaker 1>that people are going to be able to move about

0:23:48.356 --> 0:23:52.076
<v Speaker 1>in private vehicles at a volume that a place like

0:23:52.196 --> 0:23:54.636
<v Speaker 1>New York once. And I do worry a little bit

0:23:54.676 --> 0:23:58.876
<v Speaker 1>about temporarily defunding public transit. That I was worried about

0:23:58.876 --> 0:24:01.636
<v Speaker 1>that before. I've been worried about that since people started

0:24:01.676 --> 0:24:05.236
<v Speaker 1>making this argument with autonomous vehicles. I think public transit

0:24:05.436 --> 0:24:08.876
<v Speaker 1>is hugely important. My hope is that there is a

0:24:09.116 --> 0:24:11.236
<v Speaker 1>lip and that people say no. Public transit is actually

0:24:11.276 --> 0:24:13.996
<v Speaker 1>a public good and it's what frontline workers are using,

0:24:14.556 --> 0:24:17.676
<v Speaker 1>and we need to figure out again how to take

0:24:17.716 --> 0:24:20.356
<v Speaker 1>what we have and make it safe. So that's that's

0:24:20.436 --> 0:24:27.436
<v Speaker 1>one fear. I fear younger people remembering this and having

0:24:27.436 --> 0:24:33.116
<v Speaker 1>a fear associated with being outside. I worry during this

0:24:33.236 --> 0:24:37.836
<v Speaker 1>period about loneliness. I have a lot of love in

0:24:37.916 --> 0:24:41.036
<v Speaker 1>my life, but I am going out of my mind.

0:24:41.476 --> 0:24:44.236
<v Speaker 1>I'm desperate to see people, and I worry about As

0:24:44.236 --> 0:24:46.116
<v Speaker 1>I said at the beginning, I do worry about the

0:24:46.196 --> 0:24:49.556
<v Speaker 1>loss of social capital. We're living off the interest of

0:24:49.636 --> 0:24:52.476
<v Speaker 1>all the relationships that we built up face to face.

0:24:53.276 --> 0:24:57.636
<v Speaker 1>How long before we start diving into the principle and

0:24:57.676 --> 0:25:04.836
<v Speaker 1>eroding important nonfamilial relationships because we haven't been able to

0:25:04.876 --> 0:25:08.956
<v Speaker 1>tend them face to face. There are just their cues

0:25:09.196 --> 0:25:12.596
<v Speaker 1>that we miss. I worry that this might go on

0:25:13.596 --> 0:25:18.276
<v Speaker 1>long enough that will forget a little bit. Mostly I

0:25:18.316 --> 0:25:21.876
<v Speaker 1>worry about public transportation. Public transporation out of loneliness. Both

0:25:21.876 --> 0:25:25.436
<v Speaker 1>are existential, though inside the different ways. Yeah, But despair

0:25:25.516 --> 0:25:28.796
<v Speaker 1>and optimism and they're so closely braided. Right. So I

0:25:28.916 --> 0:25:32.436
<v Speaker 1>live on the edge of Rock Creek Park and there's

0:25:32.436 --> 0:25:36.076
<v Speaker 1>a little like Parker exercise zone just underneath my apartment,

0:25:36.356 --> 0:25:39.596
<v Speaker 1>and people are just Wow, they're using it. You can't

0:25:39.636 --> 0:25:42.076
<v Speaker 1>keep them away from it. It's just body after body

0:25:42.076 --> 0:25:44.116
<v Speaker 1>after body on those things. And I'm like, guys, that's

0:25:44.156 --> 0:25:47.876
<v Speaker 1>really a bad idea. But the upside is, Wow, people

0:25:47.916 --> 0:25:50.836
<v Speaker 1>have come to depend on public space and public trails

0:25:50.876 --> 0:25:53.996
<v Speaker 1>and nature and cities more than ever, and much better

0:25:53.996 --> 0:25:55.636
<v Speaker 1>to work out outdoors than to work out in an

0:25:55.716 --> 0:25:59.476
<v Speaker 1>indoor gym. So is this an opportunity for people to say, Wow,

0:25:59.636 --> 0:26:03.156
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know how much we needed the public realm

0:26:03.276 --> 0:26:07.676
<v Speaker 1>until the private realm shrunk and all these third spaces,

0:26:07.756 --> 0:26:11.716
<v Speaker 1>these spaces that are neither home norfully public, shutdown. So wow,

0:26:12.156 --> 0:26:16.396
<v Speaker 1>let's invest in them. Can we make that connection? Can

0:26:16.436 --> 0:26:18.796
<v Speaker 1>we say we loved these things and we needed them,

0:26:18.836 --> 0:26:21.636
<v Speaker 1>so we want to protect them and continue to love

0:26:21.676 --> 0:26:26.636
<v Speaker 1>them when Washington Sports Club or whatever is open again. Jennifer,

0:26:26.716 --> 0:26:29.196
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for your thoughtful analysis and for

0:26:29.276 --> 0:26:31.356
<v Speaker 1>your time, and for the amazing work that you've always

0:26:31.356 --> 0:26:33.596
<v Speaker 1>been doing that you're continuing to do. It's more important

0:26:33.596 --> 0:26:42.836
<v Speaker 1>than ever now. Thank you, Thank you. Listening to Jennifer's

0:26:42.876 --> 0:26:45.756
<v Speaker 1>analysis actually made me feel a little bit better about

0:26:45.796 --> 0:26:48.076
<v Speaker 1>the future of urban life in the United States that

0:26:48.236 --> 0:26:51.516
<v Speaker 1>I was feeling going into the conversation. Sure, there will

0:26:51.516 --> 0:26:54.516
<v Speaker 1>be aspects of cities that will change, but as Jennifer

0:26:54.556 --> 0:26:58.796
<v Speaker 1>points out, the human need to connect socially, which cities serve,

0:26:59.516 --> 0:27:03.756
<v Speaker 1>continues even in a pandemic and can evolve and change.

0:27:04.396 --> 0:27:08.156
<v Speaker 1>Humans are resilient. Cities are resilient, They're hard to kill,

0:27:08.516 --> 0:27:11.516
<v Speaker 1>their spaces of creativity, and they give opportunities for us

0:27:11.716 --> 0:27:14.876
<v Speaker 1>to come back. What's more, Jennifer points us to what

0:27:14.916 --> 0:27:18.036
<v Speaker 1>she calls a diy urbanism, where cities are taking the

0:27:18.156 --> 0:27:21.716
<v Speaker 1>lead and trying to construct space and experience in ways

0:27:21.756 --> 0:27:26.516
<v Speaker 1>that will facilitate making us safer and better off. There's

0:27:26.516 --> 0:27:28.836
<v Speaker 1>no question that they're going to be challenges to cities

0:27:28.876 --> 0:27:31.796
<v Speaker 1>in the years ahead, but as Jennifer points out, there

0:27:31.796 --> 0:27:34.516
<v Speaker 1>have been challenges to cities almost since there have been

0:27:34.596 --> 0:27:37.996
<v Speaker 1>cities at all. Every so often, I let the dark

0:27:37.996 --> 0:27:40.036
<v Speaker 1>side of my fears begin to affect the questions that

0:27:40.076 --> 0:27:41.956
<v Speaker 1>I ask on this show. And that's why it's so

0:27:41.996 --> 0:27:44.436
<v Speaker 1>good to have a guest like Jennifer who turns me

0:27:44.556 --> 0:27:47.396
<v Speaker 1>right around and points to the optimism that we ought

0:27:47.436 --> 0:27:49.596
<v Speaker 1>to have when we think about the capacity of the

0:27:49.676 --> 0:27:53.636
<v Speaker 1>human spirit and a human social interaction to overcome even

0:27:53.676 --> 0:27:57.196
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that we're facing. Right now. We'll be back

0:27:57.196 --> 0:28:08.476
<v Speaker 1>in a moment and now for our segment that we

0:28:08.556 --> 0:28:10.916
<v Speaker 1>call play back, where I choose a recent moment from

0:28:10.956 --> 0:28:13.356
<v Speaker 1>the news, play it back to you and analyze it.

0:28:13.916 --> 0:28:18.796
<v Speaker 1>So here we are. The Supreme Court, including the President's appointees,

0:28:19.356 --> 0:28:23.036
<v Speaker 1>have declared that he is not above the law. That

0:28:23.156 --> 0:28:26.716
<v Speaker 1>was the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi speaking last Thursday about

0:28:26.716 --> 0:28:29.956
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court's ruling that the New York District Attorney

0:28:30.316 --> 0:28:33.676
<v Speaker 1>may have access to the president's financial records as part

0:28:33.756 --> 0:28:37.196
<v Speaker 1>of a grand jury investigation. At the same time, the

0:28:37.276 --> 0:28:41.276
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court also held that Congress could not necessarily have

0:28:41.356 --> 0:28:44.436
<v Speaker 1>access to the president's tax returns, but potentially would be

0:28:44.516 --> 0:28:47.356
<v Speaker 1>able to get it if it satisfied a new legal standard,

0:28:47.556 --> 0:28:51.036
<v Speaker 1>a test that the Supreme Court laid out. The central

0:28:51.076 --> 0:28:54.396
<v Speaker 1>message of these cases is one the Chief Justice John Roberts,

0:28:54.436 --> 0:28:57.356
<v Speaker 1>who wrote the opinions in both cases, quoted from the

0:28:57.356 --> 0:28:59.716
<v Speaker 1>most influential Chief Justice in the history of the United

0:28:59.756 --> 0:29:04.396
<v Speaker 1>States until him, that is John Marshall. The president is

0:29:04.436 --> 0:29:07.676
<v Speaker 1>not a king, and therefore the president is not above

0:29:07.796 --> 0:29:11.916
<v Speaker 1>the law. In practical terms, we probably aren't going to

0:29:11.956 --> 0:29:15.796
<v Speaker 1>see Donald Trump's tax returns any time soon, but the

0:29:15.836 --> 0:29:20.316
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, per Chief Justice Roberts, vindicated the principle that

0:29:20.356 --> 0:29:23.756
<v Speaker 1>no person, including the president, is above the law and

0:29:23.876 --> 0:29:26.716
<v Speaker 1>open the door for lots of different kinds of investigations

0:29:26.716 --> 0:29:30.516
<v Speaker 1>of a sitting president, including even criminal investigations at the

0:29:30.556 --> 0:29:34.996
<v Speaker 1>state level. This result is gratifying, but it's important to

0:29:35.076 --> 0:29:38.636
<v Speaker 1>understand that it reflects a process whereby Chief Justice John

0:29:38.716 --> 0:29:44.596
<v Speaker 1>Roberts has truly been transformed. The transformation isn't in Roberts's

0:29:44.636 --> 0:29:47.956
<v Speaker 1>political ideology. Rather, it has to do with the way

0:29:47.996 --> 0:29:51.596
<v Speaker 1>his respect for judicial precedent is interacting with his very

0:29:51.756 --> 0:29:55.076
<v Speaker 1>very strong sense that he must vindicate the rule of

0:29:55.156 --> 0:29:58.996
<v Speaker 1>law in his job of Chief Justice of the United States.

0:30:00.076 --> 0:30:02.996
<v Speaker 1>Roberts started his time as Chief Justice being prepared to

0:30:03.036 --> 0:30:06.476
<v Speaker 1>defer to Donald Trump, including in the Trump vy. Hawaii case.

0:30:07.116 --> 0:30:10.516
<v Speaker 1>Since then, little by little, it has increasingly taken on

0:30:10.596 --> 0:30:14.756
<v Speaker 1>the role of holding Trump to account. Robert said he

0:30:14.796 --> 0:30:18.396
<v Speaker 1>was deeply influenced by the President of Chief Justice John Marshall,

0:30:18.716 --> 0:30:21.316
<v Speaker 1>a precedent laid down in a case involving, believe it

0:30:21.396 --> 0:30:24.716
<v Speaker 1>or not, the treason trial of Aaron Burr, the same

0:30:24.716 --> 0:30:28.636
<v Speaker 1>man who shot and killed Alexander Hamilton and subsequently led

0:30:28.636 --> 0:30:31.196
<v Speaker 1>a conspiracy to try to start a new country carved

0:30:31.196 --> 0:30:33.116
<v Speaker 1>out of part of the western part of the United States.

0:30:33.636 --> 0:30:37.596
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Jefferson was the president, and he wanted to prosecute Burr. Marshall,

0:30:37.596 --> 0:30:40.876
<v Speaker 1>who didn't like Jefferson, stood up to Jefferson. He demanded

0:30:40.916 --> 0:30:43.556
<v Speaker 1>that Jefferson satisfy the terms of a subpoena that Burr

0:30:43.596 --> 0:30:46.596
<v Speaker 1>sought in his own defense, namely that the President of

0:30:46.596 --> 0:30:50.276
<v Speaker 1>the United States provide documents to the court that Jefferson

0:30:50.356 --> 0:30:54.516
<v Speaker 1>had quoted in his message to Congress condemning Burr. The

0:30:54.556 --> 0:30:57.796
<v Speaker 1>takeaway of this precedent for Roberts was that the courts

0:30:58.196 --> 0:31:01.756
<v Speaker 1>must be able to stand up to the president. Without that,

0:31:02.076 --> 0:31:04.756
<v Speaker 1>the president would not be subject to the rule of law.

0:31:05.716 --> 0:31:07.996
<v Speaker 1>That same principle of standing up for the rule of

0:31:08.076 --> 0:31:10.636
<v Speaker 1>law and the power of the courts was also present

0:31:10.676 --> 0:31:14.556
<v Speaker 1>in Roberts's decision earlier this term to preserve Dhaka and

0:31:14.676 --> 0:31:17.596
<v Speaker 1>not to allow Donald Trump to rescind it without meeting

0:31:17.596 --> 0:31:21.276
<v Speaker 1>the necessary procedures. The upshot of this is that although

0:31:21.316 --> 0:31:23.716
<v Speaker 1>John Roberts has not been reborn as a liberal, he

0:31:23.796 --> 0:31:26.916
<v Speaker 1>has been reborn as a Chief Justice, fully willing to

0:31:26.916 --> 0:31:31.196
<v Speaker 1>provide the deciding vote alongside liberals on the Court to

0:31:31.196 --> 0:31:34.556
<v Speaker 1>hold Donald Trump accountable to the rule of law and

0:31:34.636 --> 0:31:37.436
<v Speaker 1>to assure the principle that the President is no different

0:31:37.436 --> 0:31:40.236
<v Speaker 1>than anybody else when it comes to confronting the rule

0:31:40.316 --> 0:31:43.516
<v Speaker 1>of law. At the same time, Roberts is demonstrating his

0:31:43.596 --> 0:31:46.276
<v Speaker 1>long standing concern that the Supreme Court not be seen

0:31:46.476 --> 0:31:51.436
<v Speaker 1>as partisan political and indeed, by crossing party lines, Roberts

0:31:51.476 --> 0:31:55.796
<v Speaker 1>has demonstrated that in his own case definitively and for

0:31:55.836 --> 0:32:00.916
<v Speaker 1>the historical record, Robert's transformation has been little short of extraordinary,

0:32:01.116 --> 0:32:03.676
<v Speaker 1>and I promise to return to it in a future episode.

0:32:04.236 --> 0:32:06.516
<v Speaker 1>Until the next time I speak to you, be careful,

0:32:06.796 --> 0:32:10.676
<v Speaker 1>be safe, and be well. Deep background is brought to

0:32:10.716 --> 0:32:14.156
<v Speaker 1>you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer is Lydia Jane Cott,

0:32:14.276 --> 0:32:18.436
<v Speaker 1>with mastering by Jason Gambrell and Martin Gonzalez. Our showrunner

0:32:18.476 --> 0:32:21.596
<v Speaker 1>is Sophie mckibbon. Our theme music is composed by Luis

0:32:21.676 --> 0:32:25.996
<v Speaker 1>Gera special thanks to the Pushkin Brass, Malcolm Gladwell, Jacob Weisberg,

0:32:26.036 --> 0:32:29.556
<v Speaker 1>and Mia Loebell. I'm Noah Feldman. I also write a

0:32:29.596 --> 0:32:32.356
<v Speaker 1>regular column for Bloomberg Opinion, which you can find at

0:32:32.396 --> 0:32:37.236
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash Feldman. To discover Bloomberg's original slate

0:32:37.276 --> 0:32:41.956
<v Speaker 1>of podcasts, go to Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. And

0:32:42.076 --> 0:32:44.356
<v Speaker 1>one last thing. I just wrote a book called The

0:32:44.396 --> 0:32:47.596
<v Speaker 1>Arab Winter Patragedy. I would be delighted if you checked

0:32:47.596 --> 0:32:50.876
<v Speaker 1>it out. If you liked what you heard today, please

0:32:50.876 --> 0:32:53.876
<v Speaker 1>write a review or tell a friend. You can always

0:32:53.916 --> 0:32:55.956
<v Speaker 1>let me know what you think on Twitter. My handle

0:32:56.116 --> 0:32:59.556
<v Speaker 1>is Noah R. Feldman. This is deep background