WEBVTT - Drive Time: 2023 Miami Dolphins Assessment

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>To remove going deep speedways past. From the Baptist Health

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Studios inside the Baptist Health Training Complex, this is Drivetime

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>with Travis Wingfield. He's got my advands in the playoffs.

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>What is up, Dolphans And welcome to the Drive Time Podcast.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I am your host, Travis Wingfield. And on today's show,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to this one. We're gonna do a

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>comprehensive where can it get better internal assessment of the

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>roster of the team, where things are, the salary cap,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the flexibility they might have. We're gonna hear more from

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Chris Greer. We're gonna talk about some league leaders on

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this roster and break down more about the quarterback position.

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Plus pick the divisional round weekend games. We have a

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>lot to get to on this one. From the Baptist

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Health Studios inside the Baptist Health Training Complex. This is

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Drive Time Podcast. Maggie Gaffe. Did I get you

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>guys with that longer pause? This time? I think I

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>might have. So I wrote down here that I want

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to do a quick Friday show. But every time I

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>say it's gonna be quick, I wind up getting my

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>rundown into three or four more points that winds up

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>turning into three or four more three minute monologues, which

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>adds on another twelve to fifteen minutes of the show.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's why the show became a forty five minute

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>program compared to a thirty minute program that it was

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>three years ago. So I'm gonna try to keep it short,

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>but wasting time right here already will not do that.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>But I just want to kind of take a look

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>at where we are six days after elimination. And again

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this is off script, to be quite frank, I really

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>struggle this time of year, just the absence of football,

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on the absence of rooting against other teams, and you're

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>just kind of playing out the string. I love playoffootball

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the best, but now that we've arrived as one of

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>these teams that can compete at this level, it's a

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>lot harder for me to watch. And then, you know

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole I understand this time of year, people in

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>their content wants and desires, look forward to speculation and

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>here's what I would do, and here's my projected offseason,

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna do a lot of that here. But

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a little more challenging for me because there are

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>certain things we can and cannot do in that regard,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but I like to push it up against the line

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and get ourselves into a position where I can tell

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you my thoughts in a way that is appropriate. So

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back and just look at the

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>team and what we saw this year and just do

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>some overall thoughts, because you know, it's been a tough

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>week for fans of the finn and I'm still very

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>much struggling to reconcile with this fun ass year being

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>over right, it sucks, But just you wait in seven months,

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>because we always say it, we're not coming back. This

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>team has to prove something to me that's not how

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it is. In seven months, you're gonna be back in

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>those bleachers with me absolutely charged up, watching Tu throw

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>July dimes, Tyreek Hill for touchdowns, getting ready for another

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>run of the playoffs, and maybe this can be the

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>year we break through that playoff at victory door. We'll see.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of playoffs, the worst performer on wild Card weekend

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't actually anybody in a uniform. It was actually me.

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I went two to four in the wild Card round,

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>my worst week of the year by far. Those were

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>tough games and obviously the Miami pick boned me in

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a big spot. I thought the Rams could come back

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and win that game and get that victory. Nope, the Cowboys. Wow,

0:03:26.720 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that was not what I expected in that game at all.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the ones I got right was Pittsburgh and Houston.

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>The rest we got wrong Tampa and in Philly Common

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the Lions getting the Bucks in

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the second round. Damn it, that was supposed to be

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>our path. I keep thinking about the four minutes against

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. If that would have gone our way, you

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>would have hosted Pittsburgh and then probably hosted Houston. If

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you just would have won that Titans game. You're that

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 1>close away from all of this, a trip to the

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>AFC Championship game essentially, and all of this talk being

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>completely void. That's why I like this whole podcast is

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be toping about using longer timelines to extrapolay

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>expectations and forecasting opposed to one and a half games.

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>That's when you make bad decisions. We'll talk about that

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>here as we go along. Let's go ahead, though, and

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>pick these divisional round games real quickly. I'm taking all Chalk, Okay,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore over Houston Buffalo over Casey. Is Casey favored in

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that game? They shouldn't be. Buffalo is gonna, I think,

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna roll them. I'm rooting for the Chiefs, not like

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Elliott, Go Chiefs in that one, big time. Would

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>never root for the Buffalo Bills. In fact, the one

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>thing that's gonna make this offseason even worse than it's

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>already gonna be is if the Bills win the freaking

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. I don't think they will. If I think

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna go to the AFC Championship Game against the Ravens,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and then I have the Niners over the Packers, which

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm really pulling for the Packers in that one too,

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Lions over the Bucks in the other NFC contest.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's go ahead and assess the Dolphins offense here. You know,

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I've thought about this for a week. I've watched the

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs tape. You guys heard the podcast. I've watched a

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>little more of film. I've gone back over some more numbers.

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Just tricky, a tricky spot the Dolphins find themselves in,

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>because I think that they're gonna be just as good

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>that next year as they were this year. But they're

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to find the small margins to get the victories,

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to get more competitive in bigger spots against the better competition.

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It is what it is. All year, I told you guys,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna be okay, and I was wrong. I

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was wrong that they would be able to find victories

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>against those teams. Now, I will argue every single one

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 1>of those games, besides the Buffalo one was on the

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 1>road in tough conditions. No less in Kansas City. We

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>did beat Dallas at home, but one in one at

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>home in big games. It's not terrible. I mean, you're

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>damn close to making it too. And no, if you

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>would have gone to and Oh again, you would have

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>reset this entire narrative because I believe you would have

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>steamrolled Pittsburgh. I believe you're a better team than Houston, which,

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>by the way, real quick, the Texans winning a playoff game,

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>can we just not say that they had a better rebuild.

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>We've won eighteen more games than the Texans in the

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>last three years, and they got a better draw in

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the first round in the Cleveland Browns because they were

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a fourth down conversion from the Colts on a walk

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in throw on the sideline from Minshew to Tyler Goodson

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>away from going nine to eight and losing the division, mission,

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs altogether. So please don't tell me the Texans

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>did a better job in the rebuild. They had a

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>better couple of weeks than Miami. That's that's it. That's

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>all it is, So shush on that. So when I

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>assessed this offense, here's here's what I came away with.

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we would really benefit from more versatility to

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.720
<v Speaker 1>beat more defensive looks. Tyreek Hill said as much in

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the postgame press conference, saying they're gonna have to find

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>ways to beat two man and too high cover two structures, right,

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and that that's I mean, I think it's pretty obvious

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>how you do that. You get more physical inside with

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a better interior running game. We have so much we

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>can do to put you in peril. But developing a

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>change up off of that, whether that's you know, that

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>physical downhill running game, which I think is a big

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>way to get teams out of those two high looks,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.239
<v Speaker 1>or expanding the progression, which requires more time for sure

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to be able to touch more blades of grass in your

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>route concepts, and that requires what better protection and the quarterback.

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>He plays a big role in it two. He has

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to I think I think te needs to step back

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this offseason and kind of recalibrate the mindset. You need

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the offense to have more rooted basic concepts that they

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>do well, like it's power, like it's duo. You know, hey,

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>here's a five play, Here's a five word play that

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we can communicate and get out of the huddle of

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty seconds and just go run the damn thing and

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>convert and be successful and out execute you. Because Mike

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>McDaniel said in his first year here that if someone

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>knows the offense, that's not that big of a deal

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>because the best offense is out there, the best units

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in this sport can execute when the opposition knows what's coming.

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>He has said that in the past, and that's why

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>he talked about like training camp videos, it's not that

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal. The entire Shanahan playbook and the

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>wrinkles and the trees that have existed for decades. Now

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's all available online. You can look it up. Opposing

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>coaches can look it up. But that's not gonna matter

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>because the way you tailor your offense to specific players

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to specific years, to specific ski E personnel groupings, I

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>should say the rules within those changes. So it's the

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins need to kind of practically preach in that regard

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and just get better at things that teams can know

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>what's coming, whether it's the stuff that's confusing in their offense,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>but more rooted basic concepts that just gets you simpler

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>execution where you don't have to be this out smarting

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>three motions on a given snap that you know you

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>have to get communicated on the road in a tough

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>environment and allowed crowd. Just things that you can get

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>too much more simple. That's kind of my thought process there.

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We also need better size inside. Even with Connor Williams,

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we struggled against the Biggins, and we saw in training

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>camp like Raykwon Davis kind of could give Connor Williams

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>some issues because of the size and length. I think

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you need press and seam beaters. You know a Jake

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson from the Cowboys was a really good example of that.

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, Derham Smith is a nice player, a really

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>good blocker. Julian Hill as well, just not really that

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>top tier, like I know he can get on top

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of a linebacker and go make a tough catch in traffic.

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>We just I think that's something the Dolphins probably need

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>this offseason. Although it's not like some miracle like you know,

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>grow that you're just going to pop in there and

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to change things. You have to kind of

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>be intentional about it. My assessment of Tua here. So

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>I want to go through just kind of the progression

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of what I've put together the last week of thinking

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about this, And I saw a quarterback again in the

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>last one and a half games, two and a half

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.719
<v Speaker 1>games because Buffalo, well, the first half, because Buffalo is

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>actually really damn good. I thought those two long touchdown

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>drives were a thing of beauty. The pick was terrible,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but man, he hit some big time throws in that

0:09:19.480 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>first half, and then the second half fell off after

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a bad second half against the Ravens and a horrible

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 1>performance against the Chiefs. But what I saw was a

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>quarterback that I think lost faith and trust in what

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>he was doing, which was compounded in an elements game,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>an element that I'm not sure that he's suited for. Like,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's tough. I get it, especially when you have three

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>special talents within the conference who all play in cold

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>weather cities. We'll do the quarterback rankings on the Monday podcast.

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you right now the top three quarterbacks in

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the league for me, not in order, our Josh Allen,

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, and Lamar Jackson. So that's the kind of

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the gauntlet you have to go through in the AFC

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>if you don't win your division and get home playoff games.

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>And Tua certainly takes his blunt of the blame for that.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think he needs recalibrated. He needs a

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>happy medium between protect yourself and being aggressive or patient

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>if it comes to hanging in the pocket to let

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>something develop. They're just finding ways to make plays last

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer from his perspective, and I trust

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that he will do that. But there are two things

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:18.079
<v Speaker 1>that I think most attribute to those incredulous habits, right

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>unsatisfactory habits, in case we didn't have a dictionary or

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the source nearby. First, the circumstances, the combination of different lineups.

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, four players on this offense exceeded seven hundred

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>snaps one to a seventy three Austin Jackson, seventy four

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Leam Miikeenberg and eighty one Durham Smith Lester Cotton played

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the sixth most snaps on your offense this year and

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Waddle was out only out snapped Cedric Wilson by

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty reps. If I told you that going into the year,

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you say we're gonna have some problems offensively, Travis. These

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 1>are just from game participation numbers from a camp injury

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>before Game one for Jalen Waddle all the way through

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the ankle spray on Christmas Eve. He barely practice all

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>year long. He was in the concussion protocol early in

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the year after the Patriots hit in Week two that

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>strained oblique in training camp wiped out all of camp

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and then pretty much all of the preseason, and then

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.439
<v Speaker 1>into Week one he was limited in the game against

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, and then a twisted knee where he gets

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>rolled up on the second play in Germany against the

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs and takes some time to come back from. Then

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the ankle sprain was after he got removed from the

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>game for getting an eye poked against Dallas. It is

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>just almost comical what this team went through, and Waddle

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>is a perfect example of that. Like his production was

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>way down and still had a thousand yards, but the

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>production that he is used to experiencing last year that

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw, that's the kind of player that he is,

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about on the tape all year how

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>there was options to get the football to him, but

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>really I think his limited capacity from injuries was what

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>really kind of derailed his year from a production standpoint

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>from what we're used to, and that's what the entire

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>roster went through. First, before we talk more about this,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and hear from Chris Career on how

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the injuries impacted the season for the Miami.

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Doll Sometimes, as football, injuries happen, but those guys do

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic job of getting our guy prepared. And I

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>think you would have some players who have come here

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 2>from other teams well that have talked about injuries they've

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 2>had at previous places, and they've had no issues here.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>So it's been it's just one of those years where

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 2>it was our turn, unfortunately, to have injuries, and it's

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 2>part of football.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I've alluded to this so many times that the last

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>two years, the Ravens like left training camp the most

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>banged up football team and then wind up having the

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>most injuries at the course of the season as well.

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And now this year they've been pretty healthy and look

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>at them, they're thriving in the best way possible. So

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>hopefully Mimi can get that luck next year. We don't

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have to go through two years of this like the

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Ravens did. But I think back to when the best

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in the NFL talking about practice time and

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>wild not being available and where he most start missing

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>practice late in the year and the offensive line combinations.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Remember when the best wide receiver in the league dropped

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>two critical passes the same week that he had to

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>leave practice because his house was set on fire, or

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the ankle injury he had that directly led to the

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>loss that prevented that You know, that could have prevented

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>that semblance of a collapse, because you would have put

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 1>Miami at home versus Pittsburgh in the first game of

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, an easy win, and then the Texans in

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the second round, a team that were better than by far.

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>What about a left tackle who never practices. What about

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>switching centers several times throughout the year Connor and Connor

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>out Liam in Liam out Lester. How about signing Jonathan

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Harrison in the middle of the season and thirteen different

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>offensive line combinations in eighteen games. Speaking of that line,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the variation is the second point. The starters were very good,

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but the depth in this league at that spot, it's

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>just so tough to be good seven, eight, nine, ten

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>guys deep, and you can find ways to mitigate the

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>issues that presents. And that's what this team did all

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 1>year long. They mask some of the issues they had

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>with the injuries on defensively and offensively. Because think about this,

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>there's five linemen that play every snap on thirty two teams,

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>which means they're one hundred and sixty offensive lineman. I

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's one hundred and sixty good offensive lineman

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. I don't think that there's one hundred

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and twenty. So you have several guys that are relied

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>upon to play as opening days starters who just aren't,

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, capable of competing with the many athletic pass

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>rushers and defensive tackles and guys up front that are

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just freaks these days. So to expect to have your

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>ninth and tenth guy be on the field dominating, it's

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>not realistic. And that's why I always say Dolphins fans

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>use a standard for the Dolphins that's not held to

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>any and it's not tethered to anything in reality. Just

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>go look at go watch other games like one time,

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll always see quarterbacks missopen throw as offensive line issues

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>have leaks like it happens across the league. Now, I

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>do think they did a fantastic job scheming around it.

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>The quarterback did a great job navigating it, and there

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>were plenty of wins as well. But when you step

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>back and assess, you can see how damaging that is

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to an offense over the course of a long, long

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>football season. And yes, a lot of the production is

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a product of offensive philosophy, but the real loss was

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>in the running game. The interior movement regression became way

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>too much and then long third and downs that come

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>from that with disruptive timing, it just didn't work. These

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>things snowball and get into other areas like can you

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You can often ug on a weed and trace it

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>back to the route right, and the route was that

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we just didn't have enough time on the grass together,

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>especially late in the year, for this timing rhythm based

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>offense in a road environment to compete in bad conditions

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like it was the perfect storm in that KC game,

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and I will agree the entire year was lost on

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo game it was, or the Titans game. However

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to shake that out. Miami had to find

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a way to get that division championship and play home

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>games and avoid that perfect storm. But the injuries you

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>couldn't avoid that, And then the conditions you could have

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>avoided that, but you didn't because of injuries and poor play,

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And then that's part of the offensive operation thing. Like

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could tell you I have a concerted

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>effort or a concerted point on the podcast here that

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you just fix it this way. But

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it goes back to just having more simpler

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>concepts that you can go to and execute in road

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>environments to make sure you're not having those situations. Because

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Tua talked about the communication issues, lack of time on

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the grass with the guys, and how that can make

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this timing offense really kind of skip a beat and

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>wind up getting production like you saw in the wild

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>card playoffs. So let's go ahead and pin it right there,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>take a break, come back and pick it up on

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the exact same topic. We have a lot more to

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Colm talking about this football team where to go in

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the off season. That's all next Draft Time podcast to

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>your host Travis Wingfield, brought to you by Auto Nation,

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to recap the first segment and where I think things

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>went wrong and where they could get better. Let's just

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and start here. Better Health, right, isn't that

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a website? Better health is first adding a physical interior presence,

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>developing counter punches. You know, maybe it is Derek Henry

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>full seam ahead downhill into your two high looks, have

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>fun tackling this guy with a light box. And then

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of course the recalibrated quarterback. Those are some things that

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I an amateur, right, that I think we can do

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>better and where I'm pouring my resources this offseason. I

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't mind seeing swings at filling the third receiver with

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a rookie hit as well. That happens all the time,

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>because damn it, when you needed Braxon Barrios or Cedric

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Wilson to separate inside with three week gos when there

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>were double coverage on either side on the perimeter, they

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do it. And that's a big deal. You got

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to find someone that can do it. And we seed

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>all the time in the National Football League. Late round

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>draft picks, Puka Nakua, Tank Dell. These guys coming to

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the league and they have big impacts. Miami needs a

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>player like that. We'll talk about that more in just

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a second. The other good news is we still do

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have really, really, really good players. I saw someone complaining

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>about the players that might leave. Two is not going anywhere.

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek's not going anywhere. Wattle's not going anywhere. Devon a

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Chan's not going anywhere, Zach Seedeler's not going anywhere. Jalen Phillips,

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Chubb, Jalen Ramsey, Javon Holland there's a lot of

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>good football players on this team. You just are gonna

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>have to find a way because I think we can

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>mow through the bad teams once again, but just learn

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>how to have that CounterPunch against good teams. Win one

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>or two more of those, and you're gonna get multiple

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>home playoff games our schedule next year. Speaking of that,

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>speaking of having all the best games or all the

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:52.919
<v Speaker 1>best teams be on the road, it ain't like that

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>next year. It's probably gonna be a lot easier next year.

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention we're gonna play more than just two

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of the six at home where you went one and

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>one and zero four. Right, That's why I probably in fact,

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and just take a look at this

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>real quick and look, this stuff changes annually. Here's the disclaimer.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Even during the course of the season, schedules will change.

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Week two Patriots were anything close

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Week seventeen Patriots, which makes me think the

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>road game in prime time in Week two was actually

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of an impressive win back against the Patriots in

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Week two, whereas when they played the Bills in Week

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>seventeen with Bailey Zappi and like a team that just

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get the heck to their U hauls and

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to vacation. It's a different type of football game. And

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we won that shootout with the Chargers in Week one.

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>How many people picked the Chargers to go to the

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl? I know Greg Rosenthal did, NFL dot Com guy.

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>There was plenty of others as well. And they were

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>sub five hundred with their quarterback and didn't win a

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>game without him, And they just changed their perception change

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>entirely from who they were in August to who they

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>were in December. That's the point, Like, wouldn't have been

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>nice to have gotten the Eagles in Week sixteen instead

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of Week seven when they were in the midst of

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a ten to one stretch compared to a stretch where

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>they finished one and six to end it. So there

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't a ton to glean from this, But I think

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you can assess these teams with what it might look

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.439
<v Speaker 1>like this offseason and which directions they can go, and

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>who is in position to be a threat this year

0:19:12.640 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and who is not. And when I look at the

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>schedule this year compared to what it was a season ago,

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can very much assess how the

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>schedule is easier in this regard. Let's go ahead and

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>start here. Home games. Buffalo, right, a good team with

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>an elite quarterback that we have to find a way

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>to beat. You have to beat Buffalo at home. Lose

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in Buffalo for all I care, but you have to

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>beat them at home. And doing that would to me

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>guarantee seven and one at home, maybe even eight to

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>oh beat the nine ers. But would I just the

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>home schedule is going to be faarable for the Dolphins

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, which obviously puts you in great shape to

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>go on the road and try to win six of

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the nine games you have on the road. All of

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, you're talking about twelve thirteen wins. So Buffalo

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>at home, biggest game you'll have in the entire calendar

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>all year long. The Jets at home. I just can't

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>take them seriously, even with their forty year old quarterback

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>returning from an achilles, sociopathic, libelist loser loaner. I just

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>expect to sweep them and do it by a combined

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>score of sixty four to thirteen. Again, I'll worry about

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the Jets when they prove we should worry about the Jets.

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Patriots brand new coach, and I like Gerardmeo. I think

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's probably going to work out for him. But to

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of go to a coach off the same tree

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>that was already aging himself out of the league and

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>now you have a total rebuild with an offense that

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has zero talent on that offense and probably your rookie quarterback,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we can not really worry about that team

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years. The Titans new coach they

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>fired a great one. Is the next one going to

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>be as good? Most likely not total rebuild. The quarterback

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>as will love us the guy. The only evantage they

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>had at us in that game, I thought was Mike

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Rabel and that coaching staff that out coached us in

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that game. So I like that as a potential rebuild

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>team that we can destroy in our house. The Jaguars,

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, the most overrated quarterback in the NFL right now,

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a dreadful defense that wiped the staff clean on that

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>side in our house. In a rebuild, get him early too.

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I think that's a game that you should probably win.

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders total rebuild. Are they going to bring back Pierce?

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't know yet. Probably no DeVante Adams stuck in

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that Jimmy g contract. Is it going to be Aidan O'Connell.

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be a new coach there, most likely. Don't

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>like their chances. The Cardinals potentially dangerous, but they're in

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>year two of a gut down rebuild. The quarterback changes.

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Thinks Kyler Murray is a great player, but we should

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 1>be by far the superior team in this one. Who's

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>coming all the way across the coast to play a

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>different level of heat right dry heat in Arizona humid

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.479
<v Speaker 1>down here in South Florida. And then the last one

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine Ers. They're a better team than us.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Tough game, but have to imagine it goes in primetime

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>most likely. But yeah, we have three games on our

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>schedule that I think are above the rest. The first

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>two are against the Bills on the road in a

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>home and this one. Because these road games, even though

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a couple of teams here and there show

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.679
<v Speaker 1>some bite, I don't think any of them are going

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to be better teams than us, besides maybe Buffalo. But

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the Niners game, that one stands out. But that's home schedule.

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You kidding me, Like that's at least six and two,

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 1>is it? Not? On the road? Bills? Yeah, if you

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>win this, I think you go a direct path to

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the division championship. Don't even stop by, Go collector two

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred bucks and go to the division championship. Because winning

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>m Buffalo is just it's hard to do. We have

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Sometimes we don't have to. But if

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>you go five and one in the division with the

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>road loss at Buffalo, it is what it is. Jets

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>see above, Patriots cea above in the road. I don't

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>need to explain those again. The Texans, yes, stroud balled

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>against Cleveland, but they also again talked about it earlier.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Shouldn't even be in the playoffs if Tyler Goodson catches

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a routine swing pass. They missed the playoffs all together,

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>plus the games indoors. They still have a long way

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>to go before that roster is complete. Go back and

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>watch some of their games earlier this year. There are

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>some roster holes for the Texans, and they're gonna have

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to really spend big and kind of have a new

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>piece of that football team. But their quarterback is great,

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's always a tough battle, especially on the road.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>The Colts, who plays quarterback for them, Anthony Richardson gonna

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be the starter when the year begins, but he got

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hurt like five times this year, so depending on when

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the game is, who the heck knows? Who the hell

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you get? Heck and hell, But it's another cold weather

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>game that's wiped out by a dome, right so that's

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of nice. And I just don't like these These

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 1>teams are not better than Miami, man, Like you might

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>say so because you're mad in emotional right now, but

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they weren't all year long. The Browns pretty good roster,

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 1>but their cap situation, like we'll talk about Miami's cap

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>situation in a minute, this is a truly bad one

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 1>because they owe a quarterback next year sixty three million

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars who is not very good. Disaster, and they were

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a quarterback position that was a disaster

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>all year long outside of the four week magic carpet,

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>right Joe Flacco, even with a two hundred and eighty

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>million dollar guy like I don't worry about that offense.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Their defense is pretty good this last year, but that's

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>hard to sustain. So we'll see. I think Miami's a

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>better football team, but that could be a cold weather

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>game that you look at down the line, one of

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the kind of in between games there. How about the Seahawks,

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 1>another total rebuild team which is like six on this

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins schedule this year. Gonna have a new coach who

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>probably gets a new quarterback, and that defense has to

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>be rebuilt because the structure of it under Pete Carroll,

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to run that antique defense anymore. The

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>rams second year of a near total rebuild Stafford was

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the difference. I think if he plays in that game,

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>down the road, then that's a tough one. If he doesn't,

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna win. You're gonna win it going away, even

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on the road. But warm Weather City in a dome

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams, whose roster is not anywhere near as

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>good as ours. Their quarterback is great, but if he

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>misses a game, they can't go with him. And he

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>misses a lot of game or without him, I should say,

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and he does miss a lot of games. And the Packers,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>who suddenly look like world beaters, but they actually scored

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen points against the Bears in a must win game.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Two weeks ago, they scored what was it was it?

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen points against the Panthers in a must win game. Like,

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>don't let one game make you think that's who a

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 1>team is forever. It's just not how it works. The

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Packers were two and five at one point. They couldn't

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>move the football save their lives. And Jordan Love was

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 1>out of town. Right, he can't play, Travis, You were

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 1>wrong about that guy. Plus they're a mess on defense.

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Now I like that their offense to grow from here

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're built around first and second year players. But

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:44.679
<v Speaker 1>my whole point here, guys, that could be a cool

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>weather game. My whole point here is this schedule, based

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>upon where these teams are, with their offseason resources, with

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the coaching structures, the quarterback, it's going to be a

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>lot more favorable than what this year was, which was

0:24:57.400 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the defending champs on the road, the defending NFC champs

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road, the best team in the NFL on

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the road in eight. In Week seven team Buffalo and

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>there literally they're two hottest points of the season. If

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you get Buffalo like in Week twelve when they were terrible,

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you probably beat them, right, But that's not how it goes.

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So the schedule this year was really tough. It played

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>out that way this year. I don't think it's gonna

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be that same way. So potentially six cold weather games,

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you always have three in division, so it's probably gonna

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be more like two, three, four in that range. Packers

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>will be cold if it's a certain time year, Browns two,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Seattle if it's before Thanksgiving. It's never too cold. Probably

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>wet though, But then you also have to say, well,

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the three division opponents could also get early season dates

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>down here in South Florida, and that evens that out

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But then weirdly, most of our home

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>games are a team from a desert, a team from California,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the colder part of California, but still another Florida team,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and then a Nashville team, which isn't without its own humidity.

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>If there's one good thing about losing the division, it's

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have a Roady in Baltimore, which you

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>would have had. It's no trip to Detroit, although Lambo's

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>not any better, but Detroit probably a better football team

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>right now. But yeah, and then it means the Raiders

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>are not the Chiefs. That's a pretty big win. But

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I look at that home schedule again, this isn't how

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the schedule works, but are there two games on there

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that stand out above the rest? Like I just think

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Miami's in a good shape and a good spot there.

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>And then just a personal note here, I have to

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think the Seattle, LA Swing is a one west coast

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>trip thing and might be one that I try to

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:25.679
<v Speaker 1>get on myself because I want to go home and

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>see some family back home in Seattle. But uh, just

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>please have the second leg of the NFL be in

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Seattle and make it in September so I can go

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to Seattle for a week in September. That's my that's

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>my only request. I don't ask much. Let's go ahead

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and take our last break right there, come back and

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>do the defensive assessment. That's going to be a real

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>quick and then I'll also finish up with some league

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 1>leader numbers. I have for you guys, some more stuff

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on TUA I think you're gonna want to hear, plus

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>my most important players who need to step up in

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. All that next Draft Time podcast, your

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 1>host Travis Wingfield, brought to you by AutoNation. Let's go

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead and continue here with our end of year assessment.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Continue on defense and another sidebar. I see that you're

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>being led to believe by some that Fangio is potentially

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>considering dipping. I hate this time of year, man, like,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't even get the information game. And when it

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to this stuff, so like so and so reports,

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>then everyone gets in a tizzy. And then the actual

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>thing happens, you know, a month later or two weeks later,

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's different, and then it's like everybody freaked out

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>because of something that could have happened that didn't happen.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd never understand that everybody freaked out that they hadn't

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>signed an offensive tackle two years ago. And then Lyell

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Collins signed to the Bengals, and everyone started calling for

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Chris careers head doesn't prioritize the offensive line, he's not

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>good enough. And then like two days later, they signed

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the best left tackle on the market and a potential

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>future Hall of Famer. And then Collins completely busted to

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the point that he didn't see the second year of

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that contract of a huge free agent contract, and Toront's

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>had his injury issues for sure, but you've gotten what

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is it, twenty one games of elite left tackle play,

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>which is twenty one games more than what Collins gave

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals. My point is this, I wish the loudest,

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the local minority of Twitter and social fans and reporters alike,

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I wish they held themselves to the same standard they

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>hold other decision makers like Chris Queer two. Because where

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Greer Bat's a proven you know, fifty percent whatever it is,

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>your mythological preten GM batting average of one fifty six

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>just ain't holding up, brother, trust me. And if I

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>can needle that point a little bit further and I'll

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>do this. Don't think I'm not petty enough to do this.

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I did it. Somebody on Twitter who said after the

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Titans loss, we would not win another game because you're emotional.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I get it. And you said that Connor williams absence

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was the reason for that they were not gonna win

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:34.400
<v Speaker 1>another game. And all I had to do was search

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that person's at and the terms Connor Williams, and sure

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>enough that back in September when the missnaps were happening,

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that person wanted Connor Williams bench. In fact, I said,

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I saw a tweet he said, cut Connor Williams and

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>put Liam in. So you all aren't as swift as

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>y'all think you are, and you just know, you just

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>know when an account will have takes, Like at some

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of the most predictive stuff you can see in the

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>entire world. You can usually tie someone's political stance of

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>their football takes on team like go back, try it,

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you'll see what I mean. So all of that is

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to say, can we chill on vic is unhappy? Just

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>chill He's here, he's the DC, and with that we

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>can build off of it. Now, I do think there

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>are some chances. It's maybe, you know, maybe to let

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>him get some of the guys that he thinks run

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>his system best. Like clearly he didn't have an affinity

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>for camp Smith and for Chaining Tendall. And we'll find

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>out about those guys next year. But I think there's

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity here to let Vic maybe have a little

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more say on who gets pt and who comes

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>into the lineup, because all camp he told us like,

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>now we're getting there, we've got some pieces. We gotta

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>find some others. Okay, let Vic cook, because he's clearly

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good at this. But quite frankly, I don't have

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot on defense. I think getting guys back, some

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>small tweaks here and there, the potential next step if

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we cannot keep Christian is the big one. But let's

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>say that ninety four is back, and what real changes

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think need to happen, Because despite the Ravens game,

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>which was a one off down the stretch, this is

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a defense that played really well down the stretch. Back

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to my point about Twitter, once again, I saw an

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>actual tweet the other day. Let me pull it up. Actually,

0:29:58.000 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>let me pull this up on my phone real quick.

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the tweet is an image of Ryan Tannehill's

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>career numbers for the Miami Dolphins, and he just quotes

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that and says Tua is coming back next year. The

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>sooner you accept that, the better end quote, and like, okay,

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>there's like twelve things wrong with that tweet. First, none

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of those numbers are ever as good as what Tua

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>has done the last two years, not even close. Right,

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Remind me when we were first in offense and second

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in scoring under Tannehill. Go ahead and remind me. Remind

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>me when we led the league in yard at passing guard.

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember that, or or leand league and passerrating as

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a twenty four year old for the first time in

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the NFL since Dana Marino nineteen eighty five. Like, damn man,

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing? But wait, there's more. What did

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill do when he left here? Oh? He just

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 1>became a top five quarterback by every statistical metric, wins

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and losses, yards per attempt, passer rating QBR, vertical passing game,

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>every metric top five for two and a half years.

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>He also led the Titans to the AFC Championship game,

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the playoffs and then back into the playoffs

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>as a one seed in his three years there. So

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought you guys didn't like Tannehill, But now he's

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 1>some measure of proof. Pick a damn lane, that's my thing.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>But hold on, there's one last one. I reply to

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 1>him says, we will lose more games than this year.

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Just watch and yeah, winning eleven games is tough, but

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we were not gonna lose more than that. I promise

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you that. And the reply to that, that bad reply

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is gotta hope and pray the defense can all return

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and be as dominant as they were this season. What

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what you mean the defense that ranked twenty first and

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>scoring that one with the offense that was second, What

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the hell? What are we doing? Jesus man? So I'm

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure there's a lot that needs to happen. I

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>think the numbers became the numbers because of a slow start,

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>as they kind of found out who they were, learned

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the rules the defense, how the defense orchestrates as one

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>instead of eleven individual pieces. You'll have decisions to make

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 1>on guys like Deshaun Elliott. I don't think Brandon Jones'

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>raeq one it was is a tough decision Andrew Van Ginkle.

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.040
<v Speaker 1>But the majority of the corps is locked in and

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>ready to roll. But if there's things you saw throughout

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the year and thought we can get better there, well,

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>first you can be healthier, but sometimes it comes down

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to luck like that. But I would say better pass

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>defense in the middle of the field. I thought we

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>caught we got beat by those deep crossers from tight alignments,

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>by tight ends. Just the general construction. I think the

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>rules in the back end when you didn't have certain

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>guys available was an issue. So finding way to get

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that connective tissue put back together. I just felt like

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>there was an area we can improve in in the

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>passing defense in the middle of the field. But then again,

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that's something that can also come from another year in

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the system. It would also help to not have your

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>two primary signal callers miss essentially the final seven games

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Javon played in two but he was limited,

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and Baker played in one and a half games the

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>game that he was hurt and Buffalo in the finale.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>That's tough, but I do think you can get better

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in your middle of the field coverage. It's the slot

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>position wasn't good enough this year, your safety coverage was

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>not good enough, and your linebacker coverage was not good enough.

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Finding ways to get better in all three of those

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>areas are kind of my big keys here. The biggest

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>thing is probably the Edges coming back from their injuries.

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I trust Chubb and Phillips will be even better. But

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>how long that process takes, that's probably just the biggest

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>question that I would have. All right, let's go ahead

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and close up with some numbers here. We'll do more

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in depth numbers on the position by position exit interview

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>pieces next week and into the end of January, but

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>real quick before that, let's go ahead and put a

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>bow on the mini overall assessment and just run this

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>audio here from Chris Career. Yeah.

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, at the end of the day, we have

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 2>good players here and everyone will have a market. We're

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 2>not really right now concerned about where we'll be in

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 2>March and salary cap wise. I think, you know, Brandon Shore,

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Max Topolitano, We've had a lot of conversations. They've given

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 2>us a lot of flexibility with multiple options of ways

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 2>we can you know, be creative, and so hats off

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 2>to them, just you know, through their work and grind

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>on things, And so Mike Brandon and I will have

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of discussions, and we'll talk with Steve as

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 2>we get through here, and we'll try and keep as

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 2>many of the players here that we can.

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Look whoever's telling you about cap opolypse doesn't get salary cap. Okay,

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>trust me, Go ask Kyle Crabs about the cap. What

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Miami can do that comra right there, like he just

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>told you we're gonna be What do we want to do? Okay?

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Just please just trust me, Please trust me. Let's go

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 1>ahead and look at some numbers here, some end of

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>season leader board positions. And I wound up doing this

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and then put myself back into a two argument. So

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>forgive me for that. But our quarterback this year, among

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>QB's with at least three hundred and fifty passing attempts,

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>which means you played more than half the games, he

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>was third in completion percentage first in yards ninth, most

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in attempts by the way fifth, and touchdown passes fourth,

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and success rate second, and yards per attempt fifth, and

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:36.399
<v Speaker 1>passer rating fourth, and sack percentage second, in net yards

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>per attempt fourth, and EPA per play fourth, in completion

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>percentage over expected and that obviously leads to fourth and

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>EPA plus cpoe composite. That's a stat that a lot

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of folks love to measure their quarterbacks by, unless you're two,

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because apparently tu and party don't count for their stats.

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>So how about that? How about that man? But how

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>about this for the playmaker crowd, because Tuoa has got

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a bigger playmaker, right He finished fourth in

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Big time throws. This is measured by distance of the

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 1>throw plus receiver separation. He had thirty six Big time

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 1>throws and you know who had more? Dak, Josh Allen,

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>and Matthew Stafford. That's it. Literally all guys that have

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 1>been attached to the MVP Award at one point or another.

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>This past month before Lamar Jackson kind of took it over,

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:21.479
<v Speaker 1>and this got me thinking, who are the annual top

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 1>five Big time throw contenders? How many did they have?

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And what can we glean from that crop of players?

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So this year it was Dak forty one, Allen thirty nine,

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Stafford thirty seven, two thirty six, Jordan Love thirty five.

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Last year it was Allen fifty two, My god, Mahomes

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight, Burrow thirty seven Brady thirty six, Gino thirty five.

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty one it was Stafford forty seven, Alan

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and Brady both had forty four, Murray had forty three,

0:35:46.760 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and Burrow had forty one. It sure seems like the

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>guys that land in that company are dare we say,

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>elite quarterbacks? I don't know. I have a lot more

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>on that. Let's go ahead and say it for the

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Quarterback Exit Interview podcast on Monday. But the last point here,

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because I cannot help myself. I think the natural reaction

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to this is I don't care about these numbers, Travis.

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>When playoff games, I test b ba ba ba, and like,

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 1>there are some of those takes out there from people

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that I will take time to have a conversation with

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know who you are. There are also some of

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>those takes from people out there who, let's just say,

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>like I always say this, pick a front. Do you

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>know what a front even means? Not four three three four?

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Pick a front a grouping five to zero and draw

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>how you would fit a run from that front against

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>an offensive personal grouping. Because if you can't do that,

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess our nature to argue, especially since

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the advent of social media. But like, let's just say,

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I wish that people would replace their takes with questions.

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>If you don't know something, ask about it. Don't ignorantly

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 1>spew about it. Ask questions. I like to provide this

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>context because A I don't think anything in sports is

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.720
<v Speaker 1>black and white, and B it informs you for future

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>projections and gives you an idea of what to expect.

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So because of this context and that big time throw stat,

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>there's far more to extrapolate from that than there is

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 1>from one and a half really really really really bad

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>football games from your quarterback with the roster that had

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>just withered away with no practice time cohesion together on

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>top of conditions that don't suit what you do. And

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that that can be the big takeaway from

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>your eye tests whatever, Like this team is not suited

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 1>to play in the cold, for sure, But I also

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think that one and a half games and using that

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>purely as your extrapolation, well, that's why fans are bad gms.

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:25.200
<v Speaker 1>That's operating on recency bias and emotion. Decision makers in

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this league or any capitalist industry, they don't think that way.

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>They operate on larger timelines and trajectory right, because for

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five year old quarterback whose superpower is something

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.439
<v Speaker 1>he gets better with age at opposed to Josh Allen,

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>who's going to decrease in that. Like physical skills. We

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>saw Russell Wilson fall off a cliff. It's going to

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>happen to all those guys. But Tua has the skills

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>to play into his thirties at a high, higher, higher,

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.440
<v Speaker 1>higher level. Because Drew brees best quarterback play of his

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>career was in the thirties. All the guys that play

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>like that, that's what happens. It's just something to hold

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.439
<v Speaker 1>on to. Raheem Moster was first in rushing touchdowns six

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>and success rate, tenth in rushing yards and he was

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>sick among backs and yards per carry and fifth and

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>first downs eight. Chan was twenty six and rushing on

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just one hundred and three carries. The next lowest number

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>of carries in the top twenty five was one forty eight,

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:11.760
<v Speaker 1>so forty five more carries and that was Lamar Jackson

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback. None of the other backs had less than

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundred who were in the top twenty five and

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>rushing he's a special talent. He led the NFL with

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:20.280
<v Speaker 1>seven point eight yards per carry and was just behind

0:38:20.320 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Raheem and success rate at sixth in the NFL. Tyreek

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>was first in receiving yards, second in receptions he tied

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the league lead and receiving touchdowns with thirteen. He was

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 1>first in yards per route ran fifth and yards per

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>target among receivers who had one hundred targets. I think

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really cool that Wilkins, Sealer Chubb were all in

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>the top thirty in the league in sacks. Nobody else

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL can say that Christian trailed just Matdabuike,

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald and Chris Jones and QB hits. Among defensive tackles,

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Chubb tied the league lead with six forced fumbles. He

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>was thirteenth in edge pressures. That's seventy and sixteen games,

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>a little over four per game, So give him five

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>more for the seventeenth game and suddenly he would have

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>been ninth. In QB pressures. He was also eighth and stops,

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>which just tackles For defensive wins. Wilkins and Seiler both

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 1>top ten among dts and pressures. They were eight to ninth.

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>David Long was six among linebackers and QB pressures, and

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey was targeted forty two times this year and had

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a passer rating allowed of forty eight point nine. Jalen

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Johnson for the Bears saw more targets with a pr

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>allowed of thirty three point three. That was it in

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.959
<v Speaker 1>terms of better passer ratings allowed than Jialen Ramsey. All right,

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.399
<v Speaker 1>last segment here twenty twenty four players that I think

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>need to step up in a big way because they

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>could be massive ripple effects on your roster. Cam Smith,

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and I also added Ethan Bonner. Miami needs a cornerback

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on a rookie contract to assert themselves. It's an expensive position.

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>We can't really afford to go back into the draft

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>class at it. I don't think we can afford to

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>get another big contract on the books Beside Jileen Ramsey,

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Miami needs a young player at cornerback to step up.

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It starts with Cam Smith. I think he has all

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the tools in the world, and I think there's something

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>there with Ethan Bonner. Cater Kohu go back to your

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>rookie season production as well is off also an option.

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:01.399
<v Speaker 1>Two really important players, Cam Smith and Ethan Bonner. Eric Azukama,

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:03.880
<v Speaker 1>he had a pretty fun role carved out early in

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the year, and we learned it wasn't gonna be a

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>season or a career ending injury that he suffered, and

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>he's looking forward to getting back to playing football. I

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:12.239
<v Speaker 1>do think receiver is very high on my offseason board,

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a free agent or a mid round draft pick.

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Miami needs a better separator outside of what they had

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>outside of Waddle and Tyreek Hill, So Eric Azukama is

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 1>on the list. Maybe brilliant Sanders two, but I would

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I probably would go different route. Julian Hill rook the

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 1>young players right, young tight end who can block his

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>butt off. If he can take the step in the

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>passing game and become a real big threat that way,

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be huge for this Dolphins offense to have

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years of cheap production from that position.

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And then last one is Keon Smith, Liam Mikenberg and

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Brian Hayes, the middle guy. We've seen a lot of him,

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 1>so we kind of know to expect there. But Keon

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Smith showed some real bite this year. If you can

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>wind up getting him to be a starting tackle for you,

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it's you're probably gonna draft that spot or try to

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>go big a left tackle if toront doesn't come back.

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>But between Keon Smith, Leam Miikenberg and Brian Hayes, if

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you can get some young production from those three guys

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>next year on your offensive line, would go a long

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>way towards this roster rounding out in a very good way.

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>That's my time long podcast, over forty five minutes. I

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thought it was gonna be under thirty. Didn't happen that way.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Please subscribe, rate, review the podcast on Apple Spotify, where

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcast from. Go ahead and follow me

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>on social at Winkle NFL. Check out the fish Tank

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Seth and Juice to Brian Walker. Episode I

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think is out next week. Also the YouTube channel for

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.359
<v Speaker 1>media Availabilities, Dolphins Today and so much more. And last button,

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>not least Miami Dolphins dot Com Until next time. Fins Up,

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>callin and Cameron Daddy, He's coming home.