WEBVTT - More Startups that Died in 2023

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Tech are You. So we're continuing our episodes about tech

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>startups that met their end in twenty twenty three. Last

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>episode we covered a cloud services company, a cybersecurity firm,

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>an organization that provided telemedicine services to pet owners, as

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 1>well as a music streaming service, all of which had

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to close up shop in twenty twenty four for various reasons.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Though I should add that cybersecurity firm did later emerge

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>out of bankruptcy earlier this year and has a new

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>lease on life. So it was only, in the words

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of Miracle Max, mostly dead. But what other startups had

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>their end downs in twenty twenty three? See what I

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>did their startups and downs? Well, how about a real

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>estate company that went on to embrace technology. You can

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>think of it as kind of like a cyborg real

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>estate company if you will. It didn't start off as

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a tech company, but it would embrace tech as part

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of its DNA. I think of a lot of tech

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>companies when you boil it down, or at least a

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of tech startups end up not really being that

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>much about tech. Tech tends to get tacked on or

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, sloppily incorporated into the company identity, but in

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>reality you're really just talking about some other business. We Work,

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, is the perfect example. Right. We Work is

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>treated as a tech company. You find articles about we

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Work in like websites that cover tech news, But we

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Work is really just a real estate company. You know,

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a company that ends up purchasing or leasing office

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>space and then sub leases it to tenants. That's it.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>The tech thing is kind of superfluous, but we still

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>treat it like that because it's part of this startup culture.

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 1>So please forgive me that some of these intrigues are

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>tech light, But I think, if anything, they really illustrate

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>problems that exist in the venture capital community. And I

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>would argue venture capital has caused so many problems by

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>elevating ideas that weren't ready like, ideas that just could

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not be viable, and then pushing them to the moon,

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and then ultimately these ideas failed. The example that well,

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>besides we Work, the example that leaps to mind is Therhanose, Right,

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Theharrannose was a company that was based on a critically

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>flawed premise, one that could not possibly have worked, and

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of sunken cost fallacy going on

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>around Thearrahnose. I've done an episode or two or three

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>about Pharahnose in the past, so we won't go over that. Plus,

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we're focusing on stuff that died in twenty twenty three.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Therhos's old news. So we are turning to this real

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>estate company, and its story is a doozy because this

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>particular company had raised hundreds of millions of dollars just

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>one year prior to having to liquidate everything. So I'm

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about a company called viv v EEV, and Viv

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is a special case for us, partly because the tech

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>part of tech startup is debatable, but the other big

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>reason is that Viv was a unicorn. That's a startup

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that reaches a valuation of at least one billion with

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a B dollars. So for a company to hit Unicorn

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks and still fizzle out just one year after achieving

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>unicorn status, in fact, that's noteworthy. I mean, that's a

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.119
<v Speaker 1>that's a precipitous fall. So Viv's origins are rooted back

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight, when a'm A Holler and

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Ami Avrahami founded an asset management and real estate development

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>company in Israel. So Holler and Avrahami had met in

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands back in Israel. Holler had founded

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a mobile handset company called IXI Mobile and Avrahami had

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>served as the product manager for that company, and then

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they continued to go into business with one another, and

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they would co found a different real estate startup called

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Really r Eali that launched in twenty fifteen, so that

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>came after VIV, but it would shut down in twenty

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty two after interest rates and inflation hit the real

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>estate market really hard and it just became an unsustainable business.

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And as it would turn out, Really would be kind

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of a preview of what would happen to VIV. Like

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>VIV predated Really and it lasted longer than Really, Like

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it closed after Really did, but like Really, it would

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>not be able to stick around. So VIV originally started

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>off with a different name. The one that it was

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>known for for the first few years of its existence

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was the Dragonfly Group, but it switched to VIV in

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen. By then, VIV was also changing its focus,

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>like it had been kind of a more classic real

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>estate company, but it would describe itself as quote a

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>vertically integrated developer focused on building innovation end quote. And man,

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 1>you gotta love buzzwords that don't actually tell you anything.

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, you got to keep it vague, y'all. Anyway,

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>VIV was emphasizing homes made out of prefabricated elements. So

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>think of like modular homes made up of various cubes,

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>or a homemade of prefabricated walls that essentially click into place.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That kind of thing. It's meant to drastically reduce the

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>time and money it takes to construct a building. But

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff hit around the same time, and

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it made it very challenging to maintain a

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>home building business posing as some sort of tech company.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess the prefabricated part was largely seen as the

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>tech element, but the pandemic and inflation and interest rates,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>all of these things contributed to runaway real estate costs.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>While potential home buyers were holding back because I mean,

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>who could afford to buy a house in that market

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>In March twenty twenty two, Viv secured a four hundred

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in funding. That is when VIV officially hit

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Unicorn status in its valuation. But by November of twenty

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, just a few months later, the company had

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>had to downsize by around thirty percent, which meant they

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>laid off about one hundred employees. The following year, VIV

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>would be forced to go into liquidation after the company

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>could no longer deliver upon financial obligations they had to

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>their various partners and their employees, meaning they couldn't afford

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay anyone. All US based employees were let go.

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>At that point, VIV ownership transferred to the real estate

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>company Lenard. That's a that's an enormous real estate company,

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and according to an Israeli tech journal, the transaction was

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for quote several dozen million dollars end quote now several

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>dozen million dollars. That's a big junk of change. I

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't mind finding several dozen million dollars in my couch.

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>That would be awesome. But we also have to remember

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that just a year earlier, VIV had hit a billion

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar valuation, so being sold for a few dozen million

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars was a heck of a markdown. Avrahami was let go,

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as was another co founder named Dafna Akiva, who had

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>served as the chief revenue officer for the company. And

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.239
<v Speaker 1>hitting a billion dollars of value only to go bust

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a year later is really rough. Like it's hard to

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>put into perspective how something like that happens. Now. Obviously

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about an incredibly expensive business. Anything that's involved

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with home construction. We all know that those costs went

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>up around the pandemic era. I mean, there were supply

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>chain issues. Raw material costs were through the roof, Like

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to build a house around twenty twenty

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.839
<v Speaker 1>to like twenty twenty two, it was suddenly way more expensive.

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Then you also had things like labor shortages, which made

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it even more complicated. You had shortages in skilled labor,

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so if you needed someone like a skilled electrician or plumber,

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that was really hard to come by. There were just

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not that many out there that you could get access to.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So there were a lot of factors that all happened

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, and it's possible that VIV would

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>have stuck around had it been just a little bit

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>more established. I don't necessarily know that it was mismanaged

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>or anything, but there were a lot of external factors

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that were stacked against it. But you know, hitting a

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of value only to go bust a year

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>later is tough. What if instead you hit two billion

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>dollars in value and still went bust. And what if

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the company was known for pizza making robots. That's right,

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we have pizza making robots coming up next with our

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>story of a company called Zoom. Zu me. I will

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>tell you that sad tale after we come back from

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>this quick break to think our sponsors. Okay, so the

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>super easy but not entirely accurate description of Zoom is

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that it was a startup that used a kind of

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>food truck delivery service for pizza, but it had other

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>tech elements to it. For example, a robot back at

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Zoom headquarters would do some early prep on a pizza,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>so you would have this pizza dough, it would already

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>be formed into the shape of a pizza, and a

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>robotic arm would apply pizza sauce, the idea being that

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it would be a consistent amount of sauce and consistently

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>distributed because you've got a robot, it's just going to

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing over and over and over again.

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>You never have to worry about having repetitive stress injury.

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>You just might have to do some maintenance every now

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and then. That was the first part. You might say, huh,

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that seems like a pretty high tech solution to something

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not really a problem. That's a key early indicator.

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>After that, you would actually have a human staff member

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>who would add toppings according to the order that were

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>coming in to Zoom. So customers would order a pizza

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>with certain stuff. The robot would put some sauce on

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a pizza, a human would put toppings on the pizza,

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and then they would load this uncooked pizza into the

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>back of a delivery truck. Now, the delivery trucks had

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ovens with GPS trackers in them, so the oven would

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:24.599
<v Speaker 1>know quote unquote where it was, and it was programmed

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so that it would bake the pizza at a rate that,

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>in theory, would mean the pizza would be fully cooked

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>shortly before the truck would actually arrive at the customer's location.

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is that this pizza is hot and ready.

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Little Caesars, eat your heart out hot and ready as

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the truck is pulling up to deliver this pizza, and

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>then there was another robot in the trucks that could

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>cut the pizza, slice it into the proper slices, and

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>then boom, the customer would have themselves a really, really

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>fresh pizza delivered to their home or play of business. However,

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just saying that zoom was this, that's doing a disservice

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to the company, which was more than just pizza. They

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>had larger ambitions. When they actually formed those ambitions, that's

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to say. A lot of the accounts suggest that

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 1>at least after the pizza business failed spoiler alert, that

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>they were like, oh, well, that was just kind of

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>a use case, a test case for what we want

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 1>to do, which is a much larger idea. Some people

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>have suggested that maybe they said that only after the

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>pizza thing failed, when they said, how can we take

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>these ideas we had and turned them into something viable.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the truth of the matter, but the

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>story goes that they had these larger ambitions. Unfortunately, just

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>delivering on the promise of a well made pizza would

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be a lot harder than they anticipated.

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Let alone, the more lofty goals of doing stuff like

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>using data to predict consumer behavior so that you can

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>maximize your fleet of delivery vehicles and thus, you know,

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>deliver more than just pizza, and to do so really efficiently,

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>not to mention, you know, be able to anticipate things

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>within the supply chain so that you're able to cut

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>costs that way. Those were sort of the big ideas

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that would form when they formed. I don't know if

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it was actually part of the plan all along to

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>make this a larger business, or if it was just

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>something that kind of came up after the pizza delivery

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>business started to falter. I can't say for sure. Now

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>for this particular entry in our list of startups that

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>failed in twenty twenty three, I am relying heavily on

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>an amazing piece, truly. It's a great article and it's

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>written by Jared Herman. It's a ja ryd Jared Herman

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and Herman wrote an article titled Why Zoom Died, How

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Melting Cheese Burnt a two point three billion pizza delivery

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>startup run by robots. It's a great title. You can

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>find that piece on how they grow. That's the website

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a thorough explanation of the mistakes that led to

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Zoom's demise by someone who really understands business far better

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>than I do. So if you want insights as to

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>what went wrong that go well beyond my capabilities, I

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>recommend checking out that article, all right. So co founders

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Julia Collins and Alex Garden got the initial idea for

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Zoom sometime around twenty fifteen, and the goal was to

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of the labor costs out of making pizza.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You would automate as much of the process as possible,

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and this would be disrupting the pizza market Silicon Valley style. Now,

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the plan included a big data element as well, not

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>just consumer behavior, but everything up and down the supply chain.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So the thought was, if you can be nimble, then

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you can take advantage of the market. You can buy

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>from different suppliers to minimize costs while you are guaranteeing

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the best quality ingredients for your pizza, and you can

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>measure the convenience of buying from one place that might

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>charge more, but that place might be closer to your operations. Therefore,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it would reduce transportation costs and minimize food waste through

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff like spoilage, so like, there are all these different

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>factors that usually are very difficult to account for, and

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea was that with data you could start to

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>anticipate these things more effectively and thus run at a

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>level of efficiency that's never been seen before and that

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>would really save you money in the operation side. So

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this was an audacious plan from the get go. Just

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit about preparing pizzas in the back of a

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>moving vehicle would prove to be really tricky. Zooms soon

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>discovered that cooking pizzas in a moving vehicle isn't the

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>best if you want predictable, consistent outcomes, because there are

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of forces at play, Like there are bumps

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the road, their stops, their starts, you know, acceleration, deceleration,

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>all of that can have an effect on the construction

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and cooking of a pizza. So while the pizzas would cook,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Zoom discover that cheese would slide around and burn, and

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>topping's distribution would be inconsistent due to this, and it

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't a very smooth production as was first envisioned,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and it meant that consumers were disappointed, like they would

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>get pizzas, and they would look terrible because it wasn't

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like a pizza that had been cooked in a stationary

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>kitchen and then shipped over to the customer. It was

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>cooked in an oven that was moving all over the place.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And sure, you might say that the founders should have

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>anticipated this. That anyone who has ever ridden in a vehicle,

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>especially if you've had to stand up in a moving

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicle like on a bus or a subway train or something,

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know that even a boring, uneventful trip can cause

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>some lurching and such. And perhaps that bit of the

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>plan was just a little too unrealistic. But as Jared

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Herrmann points out in the article I mentioned, a bigger

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>problem might have been that the team was looking at

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>multiple challenges all at the same time, rather than focusing

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>on just one before incorporating or attacking another challenge. Herman

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>argues that Zoom was quote trying to be three things

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>all at once, a technology company, a pizza shop, and

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a sustainability play end quote. However, the pizza delivery service

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>was just part of this puzzle, right. The real goal

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>of Zoom, according to the co founders, was to figure

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>out how to leverage all these individual pieces, right, a

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>fleet of delivery vehicles. Now the logistics of operating those vehicles,

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this message of sustainability, how to take all of that

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and to apply all the data that was being gathered

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>for various purposes. The pizza delivery business was therefore just

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a use case, sort of prototype test run. Now, the

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>pizza delivery business did not go smoothly, it was not

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a success. But then the whole thought, or least is

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>how it was communicated, was that the team would learn

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>from their mistakes and their failures. They would correct those issues,

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>try again, and keep going down that route toward a

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:07.159
<v Speaker 1>sustainable business that could run on proven technologies, and that

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this business could then be ported for all sorts of

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>different use cases, not just pizza delivery. That's not exactly

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>what Zoom actually did, though, So while they might have

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>communicated that this was their plan, their actions spoke differently.

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So first they tried to stick with the pizza delivery thing.

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>They switched gears so to speak, not to use a pun,

0:18:29.920 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>but rather than driving an oven around town, they would

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>park the truck's food truck style. They would cook the

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>pizzas in their food trucks, and they would rely on

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>delivery drivers to pick up finished pizzas at the trucks

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and then deliver them to customers. I assume they also

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>depended on delivery drivers to bring the uncooked pizzas to

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the food trucks in the first place, unless the food

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>trucks were just stocked with all the ingredients, because remember,

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>originally the idea was that the initial assembly of the

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>pizzas happened in a stationary kitchen. Anyway, it was just

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that then the uncooked pizzas would be sent to the

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>delivery trucks. So I don't know if that step still

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>existed at this point where they went to the stationary

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>food truck model. If it did, that adds unnecessary steps,

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>right like why are you preparing a raw of pizza

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>in one place, shipping the raw of pizza to a

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>second location for cooking, and then shipping from that location

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to the customer. That seems unnecessary. So I don't know

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for sure that that's what they were doing, but if

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it was, they definitely were not making it more efficient,

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and no surprise, this still did not work out. It

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>did not make a successful business, so the company did

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a pivot to a more farm to table food truck approach,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>so again not just pizza but other stuff. This involved

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>licensing the technology to other companies, but none of that

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>seemed to really click right. It certainly wasn't becoming a

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>sustainable business. In twenty nineteen, zoo Zom shifted to something

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>entirely different. So instead of preparing and delivering food, the

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>company got into the business of producing food packaging. Not

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>food itself, but the packaging that food goes into, which

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is wild like. That is a heck of a pivot.

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>The boxes that Zoom produced were made from plant based material,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so once again the goal of promoting sustainability was emphasized

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as part of Zoom's mission statement. So rather than using

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>single use plastic, you could have food packaged in plant

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>based boxes. But there was one teeny tiny little problem.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>These boxes contained polyfluoroalkyl substances or pfas. So these are

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>chemicals that have a long shelf life. They can be

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>found in various organisms that have absorbed these chemicals, and

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>they have potential links to quote harmful health effects in

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>humans and animals end quote. That's according to the Environmental

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Protection Agent here in the United States. As such, some

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>places do not allow food to be packaged in boxes

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that have pfas in them. One of those places happens

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to be San Francisco, which is obviously where most tech

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 1>companies in the United States incubate and grow. So that

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>was a huge setback for Zoom, and it turned out

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that all that data that Zoom was touting as being

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like the key to their business strategy could not make

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>this business work despite more than two billion dollars raised

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in various funding cycles over the lifespan of Zoom. So

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>in June twenty twenty three, Zoom shut down. If you

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>want to dive deeper into the various factors that led

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to this sad end I recommend you check out that

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>article on how they grow, the one that's written by

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>Jared Herman. But way up among those reasons is an

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>argument that ultimately Zoom was a hammer in search of

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a nail. It was a solution to a problem that

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't really seem to exist. So just because an idea

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is interesting doesn't mean it's going to be a practical

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 1>business in the real world. That is a pretty tough

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>lesson to learn, particularly if you're an investor who has

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>sunk millions of dollars into that idea. Okay, we've got

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a few more stories to get through. There's two in one,

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>and there's also a story I found incredibly unsettling. But

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>before we get into all that, let's take another quick

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsors. We're back with startups that

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>failed in twenty twenty three, and this is a two

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for two different companies offering very similar services. And both

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.479
<v Speaker 1>of these companies would fail in twenty twenty three, and

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>both are located or we're located in Europe. So first up.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty one, a group of German entrepreneurs founded

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a same day grocery delivery service that catered primarily to Berlin,

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Germany's population of Turkish and Arabic residents. This business was

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>called Yababa and secured more than fifteen million dollars in

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>seed funding. Initially, things seemed to be going pretty well,

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and the co founders had aggressive plans to scale up

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the company and launch services in other European cities, including

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>ones outside of Germany. Now that sounds to me like

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>those plans were perhaps a bit too aggressive. It actually

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of reminds me of stories I would hear during

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the dot com rush here in the United States. In

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties, you had these companies that pushed to

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>scale super fast and rapidly reached a point where the

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>cost of operation was so great that it was outpacing

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the amount of investment coming into the company, or the

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 1>investment plus revenue. Usually if the company had a way

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of generating revenue in the first place. In the dot

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>com days, that was never a guarantee. There were companies

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that had no business plan to speak of that still

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>got huge amounts of investment in those dot com gold

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>rush days. So providing same day grocery delivery services in

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a single city is already a huge undertaking. There are

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.239
<v Speaker 1>so many operations you have to take care of for

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that to work, laying the groundwork to do the same

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>in other cities, and scaling up operations to support that

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of work. That's a gargantuan task. It's hard to

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>stress how difficult that is, particularly for a startup. It's

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 1>not something that I think you should rush into. Yubaba, however,

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>embraced the challenge and in early twenty twenty three, despite

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>burning through investor cash at a heck of a rate,

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the company launched a pr campaign to raise awareness of

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the service in Berlin, and the hope was this would

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>help encourage another round of investors who, again, due to

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 1>global economics, we're being a little more conservative with their

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>cash than they might have been previously. Like, it's hard

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to get excited and think you're going to get rich

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>quick if you're taking out a loan to invest in

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a company and the interest rates are out of control.

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>When interest rates are low, It's amazing how willing people

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>are to spend money that isn't technically their own. I mean,

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's generally true, right, It's amazing how how

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>quick some people are to spend other people's money. This is,

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 1>by the way, something I genuinely do not grow on

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a personal level because I find it. I find myself

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>growing anxious if I am in charge of handling anything

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that involves other people's money, like that includes using a

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>corporate credit card. I'm like, like, I have to be

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>one thousand percent certain that what I'm using it for

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is in fact totally appropriate and approved before I use it,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>because I have this sense of responsibility. It's not fear,

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it's accountability. But some people they're really cool with using

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>things like corporate credit cards to buy all sorts of

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff and then maybe they deal with the consequences later,

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and that just blows my mind. Anyway, for whatever reason,

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>these investors were discouraged from putting more money into Yebaba,

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>and so this funding round failed to coalesce in early

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, and unfortunately Yebaba was at a point

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.960
<v Speaker 1>where they needed that influx of investment money because buying

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the stuff so that they could then sell it to

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>their customers, and it reached a point where they couldn't

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>afford to pay partners anymore, they couldn't purchase the stuff

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they would need in order to meet their customer and demands,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and they had no real option other than to file

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>for insolvency. Now that being said, I did find that

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the website still appears to work, or at least the

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>website still exists. I didn't make an account. I don't

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>live in Berlin, Germany, so I'm not sure that I

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>could make an account. I couldn't find any official reports

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>about whether ya Baba sold its assets to some other

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>entity which is then continuing its operations, or if the

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>website is just a holdover from before filing for insolvency,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the website is still active but doesn't actually work.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Maybe ya Baba itself even rose from

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the ashes, maybe it's operating as its own business again.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>But again I'm not seeing any news articles that actually

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>say that. All the news articles reference ya Baba shutting down,

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>not a new ya Baba rising up, and sites like

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Pitchbook list Yobaba as being officially out of business. So

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in lack of any other information, that's what I'm going

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>with anyway. Over in the United Kingdom, there was a

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>similar company called Ojah Oja. It was founded in twenty twenty,

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>so it actually pre dates Yababa by a year. It

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>was founded by a woman named Mariam Jamo, a British

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Nigerian citizen and a former banker. Like Yababa, Oja focused

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.239
<v Speaker 1>on grocery delivery services in the UK, catering to a

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>niche market. In Oja's case, it was African and Caribbean

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>grocery items. Oja received a little modest two point nine

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>million pounds in initial seed funding. You know, ya Baba

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>had fifteen point five million, so it got much more

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at its origin and later on Oja got an investment

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>from a noteworthy individual Raheem Sterling, a soccer or football

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>player of some renown. I don't know who Sterling is,

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>but I don't follow football, so that's that's on me.

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Jamo was really boasting about Sterling's investment in twenty twenty three.

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>In May of twenty twenty three, and that's pretty brazen

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>because it was literally just weeks before for Oja, the

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>company that Sterling invested in, got shut down. In fact,

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>according to the Standard, Jimo was boasting about Sterling's involvement

0:29:10.560 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in an interview with the Sun while simultaneously her company

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was facing the second of what would become several legal

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>claims regarding unpaid bills. And it turned out that Oja

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>had run through its investment funds and had failed to

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>pay produce suppliers and other partners. So there were these

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>bills that were just not getting paid by Oja. Some

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>said it even looked that like Oja was selling produce

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for less than what it cost the company to buy

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that produce. That's clearly unsustainable, right, So maybe the idea

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>was to try and attract a customer base that this

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a lost leader. But if you're

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon investment to keep you afloat. Then you need

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a pretty big cushion there for this to work.

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.479
<v Speaker 1>And maybe the idea was that gradually OJA would increase

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>prices so that it would become a more realistic business.

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if you're buying stuff for five pounds

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're selling that same stuff for three pounds, you're

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly only in the business of losing money. That's what

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>your business is. On top of all that, employees were

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in a tight spot because the company had failed to

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>pay them as well. Some said it felt almost like

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>they were unemployed, but they still had to come in

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to work a job, which is a big ol' yikes.

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>The standard also cited an internal Slack communication thread in

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>which Jimo responded to employees asking about their pay with quote,

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>there is nothing to pay you with Stop talking to

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>me about this end quote. Further complaints would result in

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Jamo telling employees to take it up with HR. Here's

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the rub with that. The head of HR was Jimo's

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>own mother, which I mean, come on, like nepotism right there.

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That's that's rough. Customers felt the effects as well the cump,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and he began to miss deliveries, so customers found themselves

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in a stalemate while seeking refunds for goods that were

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>never delivered to them. By the end of July twenty

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, the company was done for and it stopped

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>delivering on July thirtieth and was handed off to administrators

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>for liquidations. That these two businesses failed isn't really that

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>big of a shock. While they provided services that their

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>customers likely really wanted. The margins for grocery delivery services

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they're razor thin. They're so thin, and in the early

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>years of these businesses, a regular flow of investor cash

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is often necessary to keep things going while you build

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>scale that ends up being sustainable. But both Yababa and

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Oja launched just when factors were discouraging investors in general,

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>let alone people who might invest in a delivery service

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that isn't likely to make them tons of money like

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it might be a good return on investment down the line,

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's not the sort of business that typically gets

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you rich unless some other massive company acquires it for

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous amount of money. So the fact Ya Baba

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and Oja both shut down in twenty twenty three isn't

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>so much a comment on how well they handled things,

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>because even if economic factors had been more favorable, it

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>still would have been a really challenging business to run,

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>just because of the nature of that business. So I

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to suggest that either Yobaba or Oja were

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:35.239
<v Speaker 1>run poorly. Other people might have more insight into that,

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>but even if they had been run perfectly, there was

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>no guarantee of success in that climate. Okay, our final

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>entry is in my opinion, a real bummer, So apologies

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead of time. This is also a story that has

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>allegations about the CEO that makes that CEO seem like

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially one of the worst bus is to work for

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in the tech space. And y'all know my opinions about

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. That is, this is not Elon Musk I'm

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about. So it's saying something if I think this

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>guy merit's mention in that space, if the allegations are true,

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I need to say that because it could be that

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the allegations aren't true. It's also very sad to talk

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 1>about this next one during Pride Month because we're going

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to dive into the strange story of Daylight. So Daylight

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was a neo bank platform with a focus on the

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>LGBTQ plus communities, and it sounds to me like this

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>startup had the terrible burden of a CEO who was,

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at best the wrong person for the job. At worst,

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he was allegedly a toxic influence who was very good

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>at making his staff feel incredibly unwelcome and uncomfortable. All right,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So a ton of the information I'm relying upon here

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>comes from an amazing article in New York Magazine by

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Jen Weissner and Jen, if I am butchering your name,

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and undoubtedly I am, I apologize, could be Weisner, but

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the article is titled the Meltdown of a Gay Bank

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and then what went wrong with an LGBTQ plus startup

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 1>set out to disrupt finance. So in that piece, Jen

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and I apologize for the familiarity, but I feel like

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I can pronounce your first name. Jen reveals that Daylight

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>was initially the idea of a Slovak entrepreneur named Mattege Fatacnik.

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Talk about butchering names, I'm just going to keep doing this,

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but it was Ftacnic who brought in Rob Curtis. Rob

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Curtis is an Australian entrepreneur whose CV has so many

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>different companies listed. Then it begins to beggar belief. Although

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you would later find out, or at least if you

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>read this article, you would find out that Rob Curtis

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>allegedly has been shown the door in more than one

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of his experiences as an employed person. That's a polite

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>way to say he's been fired a lot. But Curtis

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>had worked at various companies and organizations with mission statements

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that related to the LGBTQ plus communities over his career.

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Not all of them do, but a lot of them do,

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>especially toward the more recent career choices he made, and

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>so he was very much in that world and had

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:30.840
<v Speaker 1>made various connections. Curtis was brought in to this venture,

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and he then brought in two other UK based business partners,

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Billy Simmons and Paul Barnes Hoget. So these three, Curtis,

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Simmons and Barnes Hoget would become known as the co founders.

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:47.479
<v Speaker 1>As to what happened to Mattege, he would serve as

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of the board. Some said that this was

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>essentially his project and then Curtis ran away with it.

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the truth of that. I just know

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's mentioned in the various articles, so that with

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>a grain of salt, but the concept of Daylight was

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that this new bank would be a welcoming service for

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>folks who were in the LGBTQ plus space. People would

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>be treated fairly, They would not be discriminated against. People

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>would be able to secure credit and bank cards that

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>had their chosen name on them, not whatever legal name

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>had been assigned to them, but their chosen name, so

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have to be dead named every single time

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they used a card. Presumably, queer customers would encounter fewer

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>roadblocks for major transactions such as securing a mortgage or

0:36:35.840 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>other loan. The company hired extensively from the LGBTQ plus communities,

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:44.280
<v Speaker 1>many of the staff identifying as queer or trans et cetera.

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>The New York magazine piece paints a rather unflattering portrait

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>of CEO Rob Curtis, which is to put it lightly so.

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>According to the article, Curtis had said that he had

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>been fired from jobs before due to being something of

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a troublemaker, and the implication appeared to be that Curtis

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>was kind of saying he spoke his mind and he

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 1>stood up for his community, like he would stand up

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for LGBTQ plus folks, and that this kind of behavior

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>where he was unapologetically standing up for his community was

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>seen as unacceptable in the very stuffy established English banking industry.

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>That appeared to be the implication. However, Staff told New

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>York Magazine that upon interacting with him on a professional level,

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like Curtis wasn't so much a punk rock

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:36.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of leader. He was more of just a punk

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>like someone who behaved poorly and showed little regard for

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>other people in his organization. There's a description of a

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.760
<v Speaker 1>huge party that Curtis threw in his home that sounds

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like something that came out of an over the top

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:52.919
<v Speaker 1>nineties comedy, mixed in with a bit of the cluelessly

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.760
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate behavior you would expect from Michael Scott in episodes

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of The Office The US Office. I'm not going to

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 1>repeat the stories about that party here because I think

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone should actually go read the article for themselves in

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Magazine. It's free to read, there's no paywall.

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend it. But the party definitely doesn't come

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>across as remotely appropriate or at all respectful of employees.

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And their feelings. You know, there's being disruptive, which is

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a bad thing, but then there's also being

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>downright disrespectful and in my opinion, cruel, and I feel

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the descriptions of that event fall more in the second

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>category than the first. But that's my opinion. Curtis would

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>actually deny a lot of the allegations that various employees

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 1>brought against him in a federal lawsuit where they made

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 1>these claims and others, And I certainly don't have any

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 1>firsthand information as to what was going on behind the

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:48.240
<v Speaker 1>scenes at Daylight. I do not know if the numerous

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>allegations against Curtis actually have merit. There are a lot

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of them, and there seem to be a lot of

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people corroborating them, but I don't have direct knowledge. If

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they are true allegations, then I do think he'd be

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in the running for worst boss to work for in

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>my book. But maybe those allegations aren't true. I try

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and maintain a level of objective fairness, but boy howdy,

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it sounds bad. The New York magazine piece also mentioned

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 1>some questionable and shady stuff on the business side, including

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>manipulating numbers to make Daylight look better to investors, like

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>inflating the number of customers that the company had. In

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:32.640
<v Speaker 1>some cases, it just means making stuff up. For example,

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there are allegations that management invented a fake study to

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 1>make it seem like Daylight had a much broader reach

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>than it really did. And I guess really it's more

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>than allegations, because apparently the company owned up to fabricating

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 1>the study, and that's crazy. Fast company actually wrote a

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 1>piece that was based off the findings of this study,

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and the study ended up being bogus. The day after

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the piece came out, Curtis allegedly revealed that Daylight had

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>managed a revenue of just one dollar forty seven cents,

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>not one point four to seven million dollars, but a

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar forty seven at least, assuming I'm reading the article correctly,

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that is abysmal. Daylight launched new features, including tools meant

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to help customers with family planning, including tools meant to

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 1>help secure financing for fertility treatments or to help queer

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:29.240
<v Speaker 1>couples pursue an adoption. But it was either too little,

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>too late, or it was the nail that sealed the coffin.

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>In May twenty twenty three, Rob Curtis posted on Medium

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>that quote, I'm incredibly sad to announce that today we

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are closing Daylight, the first and only LGBTQ plus banking

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>platform in the USA end quote. He would also write

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.880
<v Speaker 1>quote I feel now is the right time to exit

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this market end quote, which I bet is true. I

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>bet he felt that that was the time to exit.

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he probably felt it was a little late.

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 1>He laid much of the blame for the company's failure

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on larger economic factors, things like interest rates, primarily which

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>admittedly that is a huge issue. He claimed the company

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>had quote opened thousands of trans inclusive debit accounts, supported

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>thousands of prospective LGBTQ plus parents' plans for their families

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 1>end quote, which might be true, But the various articles

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I've read have suggested that the customer base was much

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:28.759
<v Speaker 1>smaller than that. However, again, those are from articles. They're

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>not from like internal documents from the company itself, so

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:35.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe the articles got it wrong. As for that federal

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit that was filed against Daylight and its co founders

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>that ended up getting settled out of court in the

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>summer of twenty twenty three, the settlement was filed like

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in late July. I do not know the details of

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>that settlement. I don't have access to that document. But

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the settlement would mean that the matter would be dismissed.

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So you could say that the court case was dismissed.

0:41:57.480 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 1>But to me, that sounds like the court found that

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>there were no merits brought to the court, like that

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the plaintiffs had no real basis for the lawsuit. The

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that it was a settlement changes that narrative, right.

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>But Rob Curtis would go on to found a tequila company,

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>so that's why he went to next I think that's

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>interesting because one of his earlier jobs was working for

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 1>a company or an organization called drink Aware, which is

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to helping customers quote develop a personal strategy to

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>reduce harmful drinking end quote. So now Curtis runs a

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>company that pairs influencers with booze. The mind boggles, right,

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Like to go from a company that's meant to help

0:42:38.160 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>people manage their drinking in a way that's responsible to

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>promoting a tequila brand by bringing influencers in. It's just wild,

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Like it's given me whiplash, y'all. And this particular story

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>stings a lot for me. I get particularly upset when

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>people who are coming from disadvantaged or vulnerable communities encounters

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>setbacks like this. I have no doubt that many of

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the people who worked for Daylight truly believed in the

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>company's mission and to know that they found themselves out

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of work in the spring of twenty twenty three, as

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>well as the company supposedly dedicated to supporting these communities

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>had failed so spectacularly that must have been really hard.

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I hope they all found gainful employment with organizations that

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>value and respect them. Because dang, y'all. Okay, that's a

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 1>look at some more startups that failed in twenty twenty three.

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>There are more than just those, Unfortunately, you know. I

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>wish that I could say, like we covered them all,

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>but no. Lots of other startups also met their untimely

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>end last year. Maybe I'll do another episode to kind

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 1>of wrangle up some of the stragglers, because there's some

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>good stories in there too, some good lessons to be learned.

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think. In the meantime, I hope all of you

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>are well. We're coming to the end of it. But

0:43:57.480 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>happy Pride Month, everybody. I really hope you take care

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of each other, show compassion toward one another. It's the

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 1>only life we have. Let's make it a good one

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>if we can. And I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.