WEBVTT - From the Vault: Black Stone of Mecca

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And it's Saturday.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:12.039
<v Speaker 1>Time to go into the vault for a good old

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>archival episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind. This one

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>about the black Stone of Mecca. Yeah, this was a

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>really fun episode because it allowed us to discuss uh

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Islam and Islamic culture, but also meteorites, yeah, impact heights.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>This one originally published February. We're gonna just launch right

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>into it now, go on the journey with us. Welcome

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff Works

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Today

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking a little bit about religion, a

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit about geology, a little bit about about space

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and science. But I wanted to start off thinking about

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of sacred places. For some reason, they're there

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>are always central places that people want to go to

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and experience personally and stand in. All I think about

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the in the secular version, they're like, you know, museums

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like this. Oh yeah, when I went to

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the American Museum of Natural History in New York. I

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>remember feeling a kind of church like sensation, even though

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>those bonkers of people running all over and making all

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>kinds of noise. Uh, I had this sense of like

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a special place. Oh yeah, this is a

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>different place. Yes, well, I think I think museums are

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a great example because I feel the same way about

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the MET And absolutely yeah, like it's it's so fils

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like just you just as a place. It's very much

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the place of pilgrimage for individuals are interested in history

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and art and religion. And and then you go in

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and you have all of these pieces that themselves are

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>from all of these distant sacred places and sacred times.

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh totally yeah, it's great. Like you get to go

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to the it's almost like the catch net for for

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sacred places throughout history. But when you go to a

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>sacred place like this the you know, these places that

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>have a history, I almost feel like you are you're

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>playing on the same kind of awe that you might

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>experience if you went to and believed in a haunted

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>house that like that that some somehow a kind of

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>energy has collected there over time and it it gives

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you this sense of the sense of being part of history.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>To be there. Yeah, I mean we we sort of

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>map out our worlds with these with these pin points, uh,

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that that all the energy seems to converge around. Uh.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>And then when we visit those places, we're we're taking

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>part in that energy. We have all these expectations, and

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>then we're engaging in sort of the collective expectations of

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that place. Now, this is certainly something we've covered on

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow of Mind in the past, that being

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a Stendahl syndrome or Jerusalem syndrome, the idea where when

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>someone finally visits one of these places that means a

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>lot to them personally. Be it Jerusalem, uh, be it,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in the case of today's episode, Mecca, or be it

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just a museum or to stand before a particular piece

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of art that that carries a lot of weight with you.

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You enter into it with all these expectations. Then you're

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 1>finally there, and it can be overwhelming. It can be

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>mentally overwhelming and physically overwhelming to actually be there at

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>at this lynch pin of your life. Yeah, despite having

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>lived in the world your whole life, suddenly you feel

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that you have connected with with again the sense of history,

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like here's a place that that will continue to be

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>visited and written about and now I'm here. Yeah. And

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it could be an historical cathedral, it could be Stonehenge,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it could be a restaurant that was used as a

0:03:56.040 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>filming location from movie you like, but whatever it is, like,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this is a place that that has value that seems

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to extend beyond your life. Now, of course we've been

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about you know, our our favorite secular examples, museums

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. But I'd say you probably have to amplify

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this feeling of importance connected to place, even more so

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for religious believers and the sites that are sacred to

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>their personal religious beliefs. And of course one of the

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>sites that is sacred to millions of people around the

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>world will be found in Mecca in Saudi Arabia. That's right.

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>As far as sacred places go, and the and the

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>collective capital of belief that goes into attributing them as such,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the Haram Mosque or the Grand Mosque in Mecca is

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>easily one of the most sacred places on earth. Uh

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is one of the five pillars of Islam. Every able

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>bodied Muslim has to embark on a pilgrimage to Mecca,

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is known as the Hodge. On the way,

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you conduct a series of rituals, including the stoning of

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the devil in Mina, and finally you conduct seven revolution

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>san's within the Haram Mosque circling the Holy Kabba building,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which is this essentially, this this dark cube. It's featured

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 1>in the art for this episode, and I'm sure everyone

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>out there seeing the images of it. Of course, if

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you haven't, you should go look it up because you

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>should have this in mind, this this dark stone building

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with with the tapestries draped on it versus from the Koran.

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And then at one corner of the building something very special. Yeah,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the eastern exterior corner includes something that is known as

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the black Stone or the al Hajar alha squad. Uh.

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>This uh, this, it's this is going to be the

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>object that we're talking about here. As you pass it,

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you touch, you touch it, if you can, you kiss

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it if you can. If you can't reach it, you

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you point at it. But to touch the stone, it

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>is said, is to enter into a contract with God.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen translations that indicate that the black Stone

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>itself is the right hand of God on Earth. Now,

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.719
<v Speaker 1>later in this episode, we're going to be exploring what

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>the black Stone might be from a geological standpoint, what

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>it's it's history and significance is within the religion. But

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess first maybe we should just take a look

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>at the site itself at large, the Kabba. Yeah, the

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Coba itself is a very holy place in Islamic tradition,

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's uh. We're gonna in all of this,

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>as we do with any religion, We're gonna we discuss,

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're gonna sort of divide between the mythic history,

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the religious ideas of what this is and where it

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>came from, as well as what we actually know from history.

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>But according to uh, to tradition, the Kaaba was constructed

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>by Abraham, and its four corners a line with the

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>four compass points. It's made of great blocks of granite.

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>But the the holy black stone itself burns with an

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>even greater mysticism. So this black stone here, that's uh,

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's set in this in cement and surrounded by

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>silver here and again the eastern corner of the Cabba stone.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not a single stone or at least, it's not

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>actually a single stone anymore. Rather, it consists of eight

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>pieces of various size, seemingly the same rock, seemingly the

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>same origin, and they're submitted together surrounded by a silver frame.

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And the largest fragment is said to be about the

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>size of a date. So that's not very big, right, Yeah,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it's these things go. So sometimes you just hear about

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the black stone eager to match something larger. I must

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>say that I always thought before reading about this for

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.679
<v Speaker 1>for the episode today, that it was a single stone,

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was sort of like one very

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>large jet black stone. And the reason for that is

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that there are not very good pictures of it out there,

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Uh, So you know, generally this is not

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>something that people photograph very much. The photographs of it

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that do exist or kind of sometimes grainy or low

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>quality or from a distance. Uh, there's just not ideal

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>documentation conditions. But which is crazy, considering this is probably

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of the most viewed objects on the planet. Yeah, it's amazing.

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's something that you know, millions and millions of

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 1>people have personally laid eyes on. But but it's very

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to find a good picture of it. Um. But yeah,

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>so what you see in most of these pictures is

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>there is this silver It almost looks like a like

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a like a basin turned sideways or something. It's this

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>silver collar that's built into the corner of the building.

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And then inside this silver bowl there is just this

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>dark abyss. Generally is all you can see from the outside.

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So if I had to guess before I started reading

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the research on it what this was, I would think

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it was like a large piece of obsidian or something

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>like that, just a large flat black surface that is

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is smooth and dark and people uh, and you know,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>people pass by and and touch it and kiss it.

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But no, it turns out that there's actually a good

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>bit more texture going on inside, which makes identifying the

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>geology of the of the black stone all the more interesting. Yeah.

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So the pieces that are set in the cement, they've

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>been touched so many times they have there's a smoothness

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to them. Um, and uh, it's all the worth worth noting,

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>like these are pieces of something that was once whole.

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And we'll get into that in a bit. Various authors

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>have commented on it and tried to you know, they're

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they're varying figures that have come out over the years,

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>over the centuries, really Westerners getting a glimpse of it,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at it, trying to figure out how how big

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it is the pieces are now and how big it

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>might have been when it was a one piece. Um.

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a paper by Elizabeth Thompson which we're gonna

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>refer to several times here. She was from the University

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of Copenhagen. She wrote a paper in in Meteoritics in

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty titled New Light on the Origin of the

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Holy Black Stone of the Kabba, and she did some

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>some figuring here, and she says that the the possible

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>original size of the stone would have been by twenty

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>or nine eight inches by seven point eight by seven

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>point eight, which would have made it what possibly about

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the size of a cantaloupe originally basically cannel And I

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>rough estimate estimate here. I've never measured a cantaloupe. Robert Well,

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I I did some I was at home when I

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>was doing this portion of the notes, and I was like,

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, how big is that? Let me think

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is that what fruit does that align with? And the

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>best I can tell, possibly candaloupe? Uh fruit or um

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Islamic history esque experts may have may differ on that. Now,

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as for the color, this is another interesting thing because

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>again you look at it, you just see darkness surrounded

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>called the black stone. So what color is it? That

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually kind of difficult to decide on as well,

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>because various accounts have described it as brownish black or

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>blackish brown, or reddish black or deep reddish brown, and

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>some accounts also speak to a coal like matrix to it.

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I've read that that was only one account

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>that actually said at least one account yeah, then said

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>coal like matrix, But most accounts point out that they're

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:13.319
<v Speaker 1>yellow spots pointed white crystals. There's also a possible interior

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that is described as gray, so it's not just this

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>obsidian or charcoal like stone, but rather something that has

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, flex of other color in them. Right there

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>there are these little pieces of yellow or white. And

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.559
<v Speaker 1>then there are also some reports that inside the stone

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>it is white, or that like covered parts of the

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>stone that are not exposed in the in the cemented,

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>cemented paved surface are white. Another claim we should probably

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with because it does figure big into scientists trying

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what type of rock or mineral this is,

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is that it allegedly, according to very old reports, floats

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in water. Yes, this is this is something that comes

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>up with time or two in the actual in the

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>historical record of the stone where supposedly this was used

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to authenticated after it has been stolen in return. And

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into that story in a bit that was

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in like the tenth century. Yes, yeah, So the idea

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that they could tell it's the stone by placing it

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in water and seeing it would float, well, not many

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>stones float, so that would be a unique identifier. But

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess that that does just depend on taking that

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>story as accurate, right, And that's one of the that's

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems, the challenges, the tantalizing aspects of

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>this whole exercise and discussing what this stone actually consists

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of from a scientific standpoint, because you're you're left to

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>draw on all these varying accounts and very limited uh

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, observational data about the stone. Yeah, I mean

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the features of the stone. So one of

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the things about observing the stone that you have to

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>understand is that it is sort of the mechanics of

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>how the ritual the Kaba works. People are constantly circling

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this and there. You know, there might be thousands of

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>people in there, all trying to get up to the

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>stone to kiss it, or to point at it, or

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to touch it. And so you are not in a

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>situation where you can sit there and look at it

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and take notes. Right. This is not a museum, right. Uh. No,

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it might be more like in the louver where you

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>try to get a good look at the Mona Lisa,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's just people cramming in from all sides and

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>pushing you. I mean, I've read reports about people trying

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a good look at the stone and and

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>they're they're always reports mentioning just the crowd pushing you along,

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>not being able to get up close to it. Or

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>they're also guards there, and sometimes guards will push you along,

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>move you out of the way. Uh. You can sort

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of understand why, I mean that they don't want to

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>have a case of crowd crush or something like that

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>with the people there. Yeah. I mean, so you have

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and on top of all of this, you have your

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of religious expectations. You have the whole Stendahl

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>syndrome coming into play here. As you're beholding it now, Robert,

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you had a couple of accounts you were

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>reading of people talking about visiting the Kabba, right, Yeah,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I just I tend to find the idea of early

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Westerners visiting Mecca and seeing the Kabba in the stone.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I find those really fascinating. And so I just had

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>had had mainly two here I wanted to to highlight.

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And there's a third one that that we end up

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>referencing later. So the first one that to reference here,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Swiss traveler and Arabic speaker Johann Ludwig Burkhardt, visited Mecca

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen fourteen, so he was very much an Arabic

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>speaker enthusiast. He was he converted to Islam. This is

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>also the guy who rediscovered the ruins of Petra, which

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're if you're still foggy on what

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Petra is, think to what Indiana Jones in the last

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>year said that is that the treasury building of Petra,

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that's the one set in the cliff fool. Yeah, the

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>tomb of the grail. There were not the tomb, the

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>resting place, the booby trap place, Yes, the booby trap

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>place with the with the with all the grail stuff.

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>In reality, of course, that is Petra and does not

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have booby trap, does not have boot traps. Now, one

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the most notable individuals, one of one of my

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>favorites to visit Mecca in early times as a Westerner

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is Captain Sir Richard Francis Burton. He visited in eighteen

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty three, and Burton was also allegedly a convert to

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Islam and earlier possible convert to Hinduism. He's a difficult

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>guy to pin down and it sounds like I'm being

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>vague here. So he spoke twenty five distinct languages, not

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>counting dialects. He was something of a bisexual, hedonist, a

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>spy and explore. He was endlessly fascinated with other cultures, languages,

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>modes of human sexuality. And he's probably some commentators classify

0:15:56.040 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>him more as an atheist, but his exploration into Hinduism

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and Islam are are often referred to his conversions. Like

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he didn't just study them, he became them. Yeah, like

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that that's kind of my my my read on him,

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Like here's a guy who learned all these languages, and

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in using these languages, you kind of have to change

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the way your brain operates, and even to fake, like

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>even just to if you were to assume, okay, someone

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>like Burton, um they just faked Islamic belief in order

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to go on the hodge like to fake that, you

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>would still have to be so versed in a deep

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the culture the rights entailed there, Like your

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>cover would be so deep. How would you keep it

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>from overcoming you? I mean, in one sense it almost

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you almost want to say that to fully understand someone

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>else's religion, you almost have to be able to mentally

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>convert to it, and kind of hypothetical sense to like

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to try to see what it looks like from the inside, right,

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And then at the same time, like Burton again as

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>fascinating character, we can't get to everything he did here,

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>but he wrote a lot about his his travels and

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>his ideas and his his observations, and at times too

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>he kind of waffles back and forth. Sometimes he sounds

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, very much uh, you know, at one with

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>his lam and and and intrigued by it. Other times

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>he still still see some of that English colonial um

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>mentality rising to the surface, and he sounds a bit dismissive,

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, very very fascinating guy. Difficult guy to

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to nail down. But here's a quick quote from his

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>writings about beholding the stone. He said, after thus reaching

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the stone, despite popular indignation, testified by impatient shouts, we

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>monopolize the use of it for at least ten minutes. Yeah,

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which is quite a lot. When you see the crowd

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>pictures right whilst kissing it and rubbing hands and forehead

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>upon it. I narrowly observed it and came away persuaded

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that it is an aerial light. Other travelers, including Burkhardt,

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>had thought it volcanic in origin. Right, So here we're

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>starting to get to the question of what the stone

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>is geologically. A lot of commentators throughout the years have

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>assumed that it was that it was lava of some

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of basalt, things like that. But here's the idea

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's an aero light, that it is a type

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of meteorite, a space rock. Right. And to understand why

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this idea is so appealing, we have to discuss the

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>mythic the religious history of the stone a little bit.

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you if you dive into Islamic tradition and

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Islamic belief. There's a basic kind of a Damic origin

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>story and play here. So depending on how you interpret

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this origin story, the black Stone dates back to either

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Abraham or Adam, the first created human. So one interpretation

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is that Adam built the first Kaba on earth, and

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>here he sat on a white stone okay, a stone

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that turned black with the all of man. And the

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 1>first Kaba was then destroyed in the Great Flood, and

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't until later that Abraham was tasked with rebuilding

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>it or building the first cabin, depending on the telling.

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>H Another idea here is that this was a meteorite

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>brought to Abraham by the archangel Gabriel from the mountain

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>side where it had fallen, or that it originally was

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the stars of Paradise. Yeah. Now, one of

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the reasons they're they're kind of varying takes on this

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>is because the black Stone, as I understand it, is

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>not actually mentioned in the Koran. It is uh. It

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>comes from additional Islamic sources and just sort of traditions.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's always some of the most interesting things

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you find in any religion is the stuff that's not

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>necessarily straight in the middle of the cannon, but but

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily out of the mainstream cannon either. It's sort

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of like it comes from additional traditional material the the

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the metadata of the religion, right. I think

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we've touched on this before, discussions of of heaven, hell,

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>and purgatory in Christian and Catholic traditions and where those

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas come from, because certainly, if you're looking for a

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>strict definition of those things within the older New Testament, uh,

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>those details are not really forthcoming. No, you get a

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>few hints, but you're not going to find Dante in

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bible right now. In terms of what the stone does.

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Already mentioned that it's it's it's considered the right hand

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of God. To touch it is to enter into a

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>contract with God, and there are additional powers that have

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>been attributed to it. Oh, and I believe this comes

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>from the writings of one Heinrich von Maltson Well visited

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this the Mecca as well in eighteen fifty eight, coming

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 1>after the two individuals we already mentioned. Yes, supposedly so

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>so von maltzon Um. I want to be careful about

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>citing him because he strikes me as perhaps unreliable and

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>definitely unsympathetic. Like he wrote this eighteen sixty five book

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>in German called Mina walfartnc Mecha, which means My Pilgrimage

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to Mecca. The books in German. I've not found an

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>official published translation, but using Google Translate, I did a

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>little uh looking through this book and he um, he

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as an sort of unsympathetic and perhaps uncomprehending outsider.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't use him as a as a very

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>reliable account of what the people on the Hajj in

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteenth century we're actually believing. But he at

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>least claims, possibly wrongly, that the Pilgrims at the time

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>believed that it was impossible to destroy the Kabba and

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the and impossible to destroy the black Stone itself. Uh

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>so he said that you know, they were attributing these

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>miraculous powers to it. Now I know, um, you know,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>within every religion there's always going to be plenty of

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>diversity of opinion and different ideas. But I know one

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>strong tradition, and it's mom probably not adhered to by

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>all Muslims, is the idea that you know that that

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>there aren't miraculous objects you know that that that essentially

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>people aren't going to do miracles for you. Objects aren't

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be miraculous. But if this account of is correct,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there are at least some slightly miraculous uh properties attributed

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to the stone at some points in history. But then again,

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>as I say, this guy kind seems like a jerk

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and like he's maybe not understanding things correctly, Like he

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>seems disgusted by the rituals. He doesn't at one point

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>he's like, I had to go and kiss the stone,

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and he calls it the monster, So he's he's perhaps

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not looking at the stone from the perspective of of

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>an outsider who has converted to it to Islam and

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is fully uh fully accepting any of the ideas and

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>traditions around it. Yeah, or even just trying for the

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>sake of understanding, to get into that headspace and what

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 1>what does this mean to the insider, to the believer.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>And then as far as the future is concerned, there

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.479
<v Speaker 1>are tales that are on the Day of Judgment, uh,

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>it is said that the stone will grow eyes, mouth,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and tongue, and that it will see and speak, and

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>it will witness in favor of all those who touched

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it with sincere hearts, which I think is wow, quite

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a visual that one kind of gives me a chill bumps.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>The idea of the stone sort of becoming this floating

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>face that then speaks on behalf to God of those

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>who actually touched it and entered into that contract with

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>with with it not just a mouth but a tongue.

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>That's good. Well, maybe we should take a break, yeah,

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and then when we do, we can discuss a little

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>bit more about the supposed history of this stone and

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>then get into some of the geological ideas about what

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it is and where it came from. Than alright, we're back.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So the stone, the black Stone here, it actually predates Islam.

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>So it was it was there when Mohammed the Prophet

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>came into Mecca. And this is the fact that's acknowledged

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>by Islamic tradition, not contrary to it. Right right, Yeah,

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>this is this is pretty settled as far as I

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>understand it. So in Persian legend it was supposedly a

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>symbol of the planet Saturn. That was a tip that

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I read in a Brewer's dictionary phrase and fable. Now,

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>according to Oliver C. Farrington's writings. In nineteen hundred, he

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>wrote an article that the worship and folklore of Meteorites.

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>He says that the worship of the stone by Arabian

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>tribes is first spoken spoken of by Greek writers of

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>early times, and that the Kabba definitely existed as a

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>as a shrine as early as two hundred CE, and

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the black Stone was part of it. So this would

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>have been, you know, a shrine that entailed venerated objects

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>div ooted to different deities and among them was the

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>black Stone. Yeah, and so like having idols there, like

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I know, part of the Islamic tradition is the idea

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of removing the idols from the Kaba, right right, And

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what happened in UH six thirty C. That's

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.640
<v Speaker 1>when when the prophet entered Mecca, purged the Kabba of idols,

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>reportedly destroying something like three three hundred sixty idols. But

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>as often is the case with holy places in history,

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the Kaaba and the stone retained their sacred aspects. We

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>see this in Islamic history all the time as well,

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>such as the function of the Greek Parthenon as a

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>mosque during Ottoman occupation. This was something I really didn't

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of a lot about until recently when

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I attended a talk at at Emory University. How they

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you had? They had it was converted into a mosque

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the Parthenon, and then when the Parthenon was put was

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>partially destroyed, you had sort of the gutted Parthenon, and

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in the at all they had this, uh, this this

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of cubicle mosque that actually reminds one a little

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of the Kabba. Wow. Yeah, that's fascinating. I've never

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>heard that before. Now, there was a lot of turmoil

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>even during Mohammed's life. Mohammed lived five seventies through six

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, and the Kabo was was burnt during this time,

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and this may have caused some of the fragmentation that

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we see. That's the thing. We don't know exactly when

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this fragmentation of the of the stone occurred. Yeah, this

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>history of the uh, the stone as an object becoming

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>many objects does seem kind of fuzzy. Like there's this

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.200
<v Speaker 1>general idea that it was once a single stone or

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>fewer number of stones, and then broke into smaller parts,

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and then now there are apparently fewer visible pebbles in

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the stone than there were, say in the nineteenth century, right.

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>And one of the ideas here is that that the

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>pieces could either have been removed or lost, or they

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>could still be there. We just can't see all that

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>well because a we can't really see the stone fragments

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>all that well anyway, where they might be partially obscured

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>by the by the cement and the silver and repeated

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>attempts to you know, hold everything together. So what were

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the circumstances under which it was burned? So this was

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>during the civil war between the caliph Abd al Malik

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and Iban Zubar, who controlled Mecca at the time the

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Kaba was set on fire. This would have been in

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 1>six eight three and report by some accounts, the black

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Stone broke into three pieces and then was reassembled with silver.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's a that's an opportunity, let's say, for the

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 1>stone to have been broken certainly. Um. Now, another opportunity

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that comes up is in nine thirty and that's when

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Mecca was sacked by the Carmathians led by Abu Terar

0:27:56.800 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>al Janabi, who apparently used the hag as an excuse

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>uh to demand entry into the city with his troops. Now,

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a number of you're probably wanting, well, who are the Karmathians. Uh.

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>They were an heretical sect of Islam that considered the

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Koran allegory. They refuted various rights and entailed a mix

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of uh of of of Islamic and Persian mysticism. They

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>sacked and looted Mecca, They desecrated holy sites. They mascuared

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>pilgrims around the Kaba, and removed the black Stone and

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>took it out of Mecca, apparently in hopes of moving

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the destination of the Hojj to Hajar in what we

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>now call Bahrain. So they were trying to get everybody

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to come to them from now on. That That is

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the that that is how I understand it. Yeah, based

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on the material I was reading, Um, this ended up

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>not working all that well. And uh, I mean it's

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>worth it's also worth noting here that of course history

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is written by the victors, so you know to what

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>extended some of this color by the fact that the

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that even though the Carmatheans were very powerful at the time,

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>they ended up fading into history. So they tried to

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>change the point of the hodge didn't work. The black

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Stone is a return to Mecca around or nine fifty two,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but for a hefty ransom fee. Well, now, hold on

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a second, how do you know it's really the stone

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>when you return it. Well, you've got to test its buoyancy, right,

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>You've got to see if it floats in water, and

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>apparently it did. So that's where this idea comes from,

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>right in the tenth century, that that this was returned,

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and one thing that was known about the stone somehow

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 1>was that it would float in water. Yes, and some

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>accounts indicate that it was returned and of shattered into pieces.

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So whether it was whether it was shattered during extraction

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>or during the return, that's kind of you know, up

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in the air. Now, there's a an additional account that

0:29:57.360 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes brought up as a as a possible incident

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in which it was shattered, and that's around ten fifty

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the caliph Al Hakim byam and Allah allegedly sent an

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>agent to smash the stone, but this only inflicted slight

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>damage and the agent was killed on the spot. Who's

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to say, I only found one account where someone was

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>speculating on the nature of the stone, who thought that

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this might have been an incident that could have resulted

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in serious damage, and the details on these accounts were

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>from Mecca, a Literary History of the Muslim Holy Land

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>by Francis E. Peters. So if any of these didn't

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>do the trick, though, there was also a six flood

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that toppled three of the Cabal walls, so that also

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>could have contributed to the fracturing of the black Stone. Right. So,

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have a you have an object that is

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to damage and it plays such a vital role

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>for such a long period of time, Um, it's it's

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it's there's there's a high possibility it's gonna result in damage.

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the other things we should mention

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is that this is a stone that you can quite

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>well expect to be undergoing a certain amount of wear

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and tear, with millions of people from around the world

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.239
<v Speaker 1>coming to this stone and trying to touch it and

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>kiss it. Um, I mean, there is there's all. There's

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>all manner of which, uh, you know, handling of things

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>leads to their deterioration over time, even if you think

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you're being gentle. I mean, there's a reason museums don't

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>let you touch stuff, right, Like, what if what if

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the statue of David. What if everyone got to touch David. Yeah,

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that would that would erode the statue over time.

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And certains and certainly accounts of the black stone indicate

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that there is a certain amount of erosion that has

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>taken place, a smoothing of the stones from all of that,

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>all of those human touches, all of those kisses, all

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of that, you know, the oil from from human skin. Yeah,

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but one can imagine that, I don't know, all manner

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of various handling, touching and stuff like that could also

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe have contributed to fracturing. I mean, it wouldn't have

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a highly destructive event. Uh, even gentle caresses

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>over the centuries can add up. Indeed. All right, and

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that basically brings us up to modern times. So we're

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, and when we come back,

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to discuss the possible scientific origins of the stone.

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Where did it come from? And how

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>how limited are we in our ability to answer that question?

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Than all right, we're back. So we're gonna be talking

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>about scientific inquiry into the geologic nature of the black

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Stone of the Kabba. What what kind of rock is it?

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Did it come from space, did it come from Earth?

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>What's it made of? And there's one thing we should

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>note at the outset here, which is that it is

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to know the answer to this question because the

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>rock has not been removed to a scientific lab where

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you can do tests on it. This is one of

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>these strange situations where people are trying to do science

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>from a distance, sort of through the intermediary of people's

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>subjective accounts. Right we have, scientists have not examined the

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>black Stone, and really scientists are probably not going to

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>get to analyze the black Stone at any point in

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the foreseeable future. Uh, Like I kind of have to

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>think of sci fi scenarios in which the black Stone

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>could possibly be analyzed. It's uh, it's it's They're simply like,

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>why would you do it? Why would you allow it? Uh?

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Why why would you submit it for scientific analysis? There?

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Because because there's really nothing quite like the black Stone

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in any other religious tradition that I can think of.

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, an object that is so central, like

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>literally central to the belief system. Like the closest thing

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I can think of in Christian and specifically Catholic traditions

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is the shroud of Turin. But even that, it's not

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would not say the shout of turn

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as an article of faith or or you know, in

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>any way associated with a pillar of Christianity. Yeah, there

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>are definitely in other religions holy objects, holy sites, but

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like nothing as central as this and as

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>as hard to get at, because because as hard to

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>get out in a in a scrutinizing way, obviously it's

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>not hard to get at just in general, and that,

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>like we said, millions of people go in touch and

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>look at this thing, but you can't remove it, you

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>can't take it away with you, and you can't spend

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>some time scrutinizing it. Right, So we end up with

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it was generally intellectuals geologists looking at a pictures such

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>as they are looking at sketches, analyzing descriptions of it,

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and then using their knowledge of material science is to

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>try and figure out what it can be, which can

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be very interesting. So one of the standard things this

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is probably not a very interesting hypothesis, but for you know,

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>years people have said, well, it's probably some kind of

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:10.280
<v Speaker 1>lava or basalt something like that. Uh, generally, now people

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's the answer. Uh So. Another one of

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the main theories that's been offered over the years is

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that the Blackstone is meteoritic in origin, that it came

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>from space. And you know, it makes sense, right because

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>this this aligns with the cosmic origins that are presented

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in a mythic history as a gift of a primordial God.

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>What better origin than outer space? Right, And there's also

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a long history of two important factors here, one the

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>worship or at least veneration of meteorites and to the

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 1>use of meteor media meteoric iron. Now, I think a

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of Muslims would probably want to emphasize the distinction

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that the Kabba Stone is not something that is worshiped,

0:35:56.600 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's a more like symbolic object that is, uh

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that is playing a role in what they would describe

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 1>as their relationship with God. But even if the object

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is not itself a point of worship, you can easily

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>see how objects that fall from space would take on

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>some kind of sacred or venerable dimension. Yeah. Like, one

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>cool example of this is that Native Americans from the

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ruined Community of Oregon continue

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>to make annual ceremonial visits to the famous Willamette meteorite

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 1>at the American Museum of Natural History. Yeah. So, while

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>scientists believe the rock is the the iron core of

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a shattered planet, uh, the Clackamas tribes people knew it

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>as tom and Owa's a representative of the sky people

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and a source of healing and cleansing. I mean, if

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you look at a picture of this meteorite, and you should, Yeah,

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it looks like something that was sent by the gods.

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course it does. This thing looks insanean it's got

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>these caverns in it. Robert, do you know what it

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>looks like. I've seen pictures. Yes, it looks like you

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of topography, like it's a maze, or

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 1>even like a little of former living thing. There are

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.719
<v Speaker 1>like coral aspects to it. Yes, it looks like a

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>large piece of iron. Uh, parts of which have come

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>alive and slithered away. Now the iron is interesting too,

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>because that comes back to this, this use of meteoric iron. So,

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>before mining technology allowed for the ready harvesting of iron ore,

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the few sources of this durable metal was

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the was bits of it that plummeted from the sky

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in the form of the meteorites. The ancient Egyptians knew

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>about it. They dubbed black copper. That's a cool name

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's very very very cool. Uh. And uh,

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's generally spread then across vast distances. You're

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna find little bits of fit here and there. So

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it was a rare commodity. You could not cannot arm

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 1>an army with it, correct, you could, Yeah, you couldn't

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>make enough swords for an army, but you could make

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:09.359
<v Speaker 1>if you scratch, scratch enough of it together, you could

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>make a single sword and it would have you know,

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously would have holier or at least um, you know,

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>ceremonial significance. Um. So this this relegated most meteoric iron

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>creations to the realm of decorative or significance or ceremony.

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in Islamic history, the seventh century Caliphs were

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>said to have brandish swords made from meteoric iron, while

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>such iconic figures as a Till of the Hun and

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>tamer Lane reportedly wielded other cosmic blades against their enemies.

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>And you know, also their bowls, plows and stirrups that

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have been observed to have been made from it as well.

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So maybe sometimes you just ended up making what you

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>needed out of the iron, But for the most part

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.800
<v Speaker 1>it tended to take on a sacred significance. Weapons from space, Yeah,

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that should be a whole episd so it on its

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:02.840
<v Speaker 1>own sometimes could be is there enough there? Could we

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>do it? Weapons from space? I mean, has anybody ever

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:08.239
<v Speaker 1>tried to make like a like a I don't know.

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh what do you call it? A morning star? I

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:13.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Why would you make a morning star out

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of it when you can make a sword? Terry Pratchett,

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, before he died, I believe had obtained

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a sword made from er o'kirn. Know what I meant

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 1>was make a morning star with a moon rock? Yeah?

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I like the idea. Yeah, who does that mean? If

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 1>you have to be brain to death with a medieval

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 1>blunt weapon, why not? Why not? Moon rock makes it

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a little special. So it's easy to fall into this thinking,

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, it's a meteorite. Maybe it's it's it's it's

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>meteoric iron, and that's why all this, uh this, uh,

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the significance is given to it. However, as Thompson points

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>out we mentioned her, We mentioned her earlier, Elizabeth Thompson. Yes,

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>as she points out, this isn't necessarily a slam dunk theory.

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And iron meteorite, she wrote, would not break into fragments,

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:06.439
<v Speaker 1>nor would it float in water because it is a

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>piece of iron and so, but that doesn't alule out

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.320
<v Speaker 1>all meteorites. There's also the idea that it's a stony

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 1>meteor rite. But it would a stony meteorite float in water?

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Would it be able to withstand centuries of human erosion? Um?

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. Yeah. So here I think we should actually

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 1>get into a few of the papers that have been

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>published on this subject. Uh. And the first big one

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>and that tried to get at the after after the

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>meteorite theory had been dominant for a long time in

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century. The first one that I think really

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>tried to dig in and and look at the descriptions

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>and figure out what it would what it could be

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>was in nineteen seventy four in the journal Meteoritics. And

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so they're looking at it and saying, okay, pretty much

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody thinks this thing is a meteorite. Are they onto

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>something or are they wrong, and this was by Robert

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Diaz and John McCoy own And in this paper, Dietz

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and McCone argued that the Kabba Stone, the black stone,

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is probably not a meteorite but an agate. So why

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>do they get to age it. Well, let's follow them

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>through their reasoning. So first of all, they say, the

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that it appears to have been cracked and fractured,

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned earlier, Robert sort of rules out the

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.319
<v Speaker 1>possibility that it's a nickel iron meteorite. You you've seen

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>these types of meteorites before that are that are essentially

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like a big metal sponge. You know, if you have

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 1>tripped to phobia, these things really should set you off

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>with these patterns of holes. But a nickel iron meteorite,

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 1>it's not brittle like most earth rocks. It's more like

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a piece of metal. Un Thus, we would not expect

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to see a meteorite like this with a crack or

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>cracked into multiple pieces. But they say, okay, well, maybe

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it could be a stony meteorite. There's a different kind

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of meteorite. It's more like earth rocks. And from description

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and the stone they say is quote hummocky and muscled

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>so what does this mean and why is it relevant? Well, hummocky,

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not just like a cute British word or something

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that does kind of sound like, you know, lord hummocky twizzled.

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking it sounds like a great description for

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for a wine. It's like, what do you what do

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you think of this particular Wine's? Okay, well it's it's

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's hummocky and and muscled, well muscled wine. Yeah, with

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>notes of elderberry. Uh yeah, So hummocky actually means something

0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in geology. It means highly uneven or irregular in surface.

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 1>So they say, you know, literally millions of people have

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>touched this thing over the centuries, and yet they haven't

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>worn away these apparent irregular features of the surface of

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the stone. So for that to be the case, the

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>authors suggests that the stone needs to have a pretty

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:57.400
<v Speaker 1>good Mose scale rating, which they estimate should be a

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>minimum of a seven. So you know about the mo

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>A scale, right, That's that's how you answer no mo

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 1>m o H. The most scale geological hardness scale. It's

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 1>how you rate how hard is it? You want to

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 1>know how hard it is? You give a most scale rating.

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Um and a ten on the most scale is a

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>diamond that's super hard. I think. I think talc is

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>like a one or two. A seven is quartz. So

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they think for this thing to have withstood all of

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the touching and kissing over the years and still have

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>this uneven, hummocky surface, it needs to be at least

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.359
<v Speaker 1>a seven on the most scale, So that gives them

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:41.839
<v Speaker 1>one clue to work with. Another conclusion from the descriptions

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>is that the black stone supposedly has this highly reflective

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>almost mirror like polish. You know, you can you can

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>put your makeup on in it. I would advise against

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>doing that now, I don't know. People probably would not

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have the patience for that. Uh no, and you probably

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>actually couldn't. It's uh it's but they say that it

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>is almost mirroral like, it's highly reflective. Um and they

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>claim that this indicates the stone must be a fanitic

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and monomineralic. Oh god, more terminology. So what does that mean?

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>A Ponitic is a geology term that means very fine

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>grained minerals, So a fanitic rocks are those where you

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 1>can't see the individual mineral crystals with the naked eye

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and This usually happens in igneous rocks, you know, fire

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>formed rocks that are formed from molten rock cooling and

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>solidifying pretty quickly. You know, that often happens near the surface.

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>One common example would be basalt. Uh. The other word

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was monomineralic. That means exactly what it sounds like, rocks

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that are made of just one type of mineral. If

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 1>the rock is a fanitic and monomineralic, they think it's

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>more likely that it could be polished down to this

0:44:54.719 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>reflective surface by people touching it over the years. Already, though,

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we should know this is something we we

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:05.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of warned about earlier, the awkwardness of doing science

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 1>this way because listen to what's going on. They're having

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to work from secondhand descriptions of the features of the

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>stone without examining it themselves. So there's just a lot

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of room for problems to creep into this kind of analysis.

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So we should definitely take their conclusions with a large grain,

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>large crystal grain of salt. Anyway, to continue, how about

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the color of the stone. Can that tell us anything

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>about it? Well, their description says, you know, it's called

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the black stone. The stones black, maybe even jet black.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Now they don't know whether black is the original color

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of the stone or whether it has turned black through handling,

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>because again, the mythic idea here is that it was

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 1>originally white and human sin has turned it black or

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:56.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly black. And this this on top of the differing

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 1>opinions of just how black it actually is now referenced earlier. Yeah,

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and so back when this article was first published, the

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:06.240
<v Speaker 1>author has managed to get in contact with the keeper

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Kaba, who in turn got a Muslim scholar

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>named Mohammed alui Uh to offer a sort of concurrently

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>published reply that gives some theological and historical context to

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:23.320
<v Speaker 1>their article. And Uh and this scholar had among his claims,

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess is the idea that the stone was originally white.

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>He goes with that idea, and he says, various descriptions

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have called it quote whiter than snow, as white as silver,

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>or charmingly as white as yogurt. And I guess they

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what they have in mind is not that gray purple

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 1>tricks yogurt that oh goodness, I forgot about tricks tricks

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>yogurt yogurt in name only, Why would you make gray yogurt?

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>That is a crime against nature. Yeah, yeah, I mean

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the fruit needs to stay on the bottom or is

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>added after the fact. It should It should not come

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:03.920
<v Speaker 1>pre mixed. Okay, tricks. Tricks are for kids, I guess. Anyway,

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one explanation for the change in color, if in fact

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what happened is that it was originally white and it

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>darkened over time, is that whenever the pieces of the

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 1>stone become loosened or dislodged from the inset over the years,

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they started to come out of the cement

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:24.240
<v Speaker 1>they were reattached with this kind of putty or cement

0:47:24.480 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>made by kneading together wax, musk and amber grease. Yeah,

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 1>and so exposure to this putty is said to have

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.439
<v Speaker 1>turned the stones black over the time over time, and

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>supposedly the historian Iban Nafi al Kazi, while writing a

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>history of the Kabba, got to see the stone inset

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 1>completely exposed while the Kabba was being rebuilt, so out

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>of the frame where it's usually kept, and he reported

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that the part of the stone usually kept covered by

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the wall, the part that's usually hidden is white. So

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if he's correct about that, um, then it's not just

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a jet black stone, but a white stone. That is

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>either black on one part that's exposed, or has turned

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>black over time due to possibly multiple factors. But in

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:15.919
<v Speaker 1>any case, if the stone were originally black, it could

0:48:15.960 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 1>be a type of stony meteorites, such as chondrite condrite

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as a stony meteorite. Um. And remember that the stony

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>meteorites different from that that solid metal sponge meteorite, the

0:48:26.400 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>iron nickel meteorite. But then again, a chondrite meteorite probably

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 1>would not have been able to maintain it's quote hummocky

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>character with all those years of rubbing. So you put

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a stony meteorite in there, people touch it for a

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand years, it would get ground down. And the authors

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:47.680
<v Speaker 1>also say that a chondrite meteorite probably would not be

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>described as having a mirror like reflective polish. Now here's

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 1>one other option. How about a howardite meteorite. Good name again, um,

0:48:57.440 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Howard It's the authors don't think it's going to be

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>because Howards are very rare. They think it's an unlikely candidate. Also,

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Howard it tends to be light colored, and this would

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:10.359
<v Speaker 1>not fit in with an originally black cobba stone. But

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 1>then it might fit if the original stories of original

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>whiteness are true. Uh so a little bit more, some

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>legends about the stone point to the possibility of it

0:49:19.560 --> 0:49:23.840
<v Speaker 1>being a sapphire or an amethyst, which is interesting, but

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the authors think neither of those minerals really fit. Sapphires

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>are not big enough to be you know, the date

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:34.560
<v Speaker 1>sized pebbles we see now, and uh and amethysts are

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:38.799
<v Speaker 1>they quote they say, quote too readily cleaved. I'm not

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>quite sure I understand why that would disqualify. Maybe they're

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that that doesn't meet the hardness characteristics that just

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>come apart. Yeah, because because again I have to have

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a sweet spot here between something that is hard enough

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to withstand all that human erosion but also traction. Yeah. Uh,

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>and so I I don't know. It sounds like what

0:49:59.360 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you would want is something that is readily cleaved but

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>is not ground down by touching. Yeah. Maybe they mean

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:08.399
<v Speaker 1>it would have just it's just just too fragile. Maybe yeah,

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it could be. So what do they conclude? While the

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>authors suggest the simplest explanation would be to think of

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>visually attractive stones that are somewhat unusual but also not

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>things that are considered precious, gems. So they say obsidian

0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>might fit, but they say it's too brittle and delicate

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to have survived the years of handling and abuse that

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cobba stone has. And in the end they settle

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>on age. They think agged is the most likely candidate,

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 1>especially black agg it. Why well, it's monomineralic. Uh, it's

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 1>hard a Mose scale seven, it's tough, and it's fine grained,

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>meeting a fanitic in that fun word from earlier. So age,

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>when polished by years of rubbing, should also show a

0:50:52.600 --> 0:50:56.919
<v Speaker 1>fairly reflective surface, you know, kind of mirror. Like one

0:50:57.000 --> 0:50:59.000
<v Speaker 1>last thing that they sawed in their favor. They sighted

0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>an anonymous Arab geologist who went to view the stone

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>for himself while he was on the Hajj, and the

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:09.879
<v Speaker 1>scholar said that he observed what's called diffusion banding within

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the Kabba stone. If you've ever looked inside a cross

0:51:13.680 --> 0:51:15.799
<v Speaker 1>section of an aggot, you see these things that are

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of like tree rings, you know what I'm talking about,

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And these are the band's diffusion banding. And the authors

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:25.919
<v Speaker 1>claimed that this would be consistent with the stone being

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:30.879
<v Speaker 1>an agot um. One note is they seem absolutely unconcerned

0:51:30.880 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>with or unaware of the idea that the stone maybe

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:38.160
<v Speaker 1>should float. Yes, and that's that's something that Elizabeth Thompson

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:42.040
<v Speaker 1>commented on when in her paper which came afterwards, she

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>argued that that this choice, uh, the agot wouldn't wouldn't float,

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and it also lacked a cosmic origin story. Now, now, personally,

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that last bit especially is short sighted, because

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I think human history shows us that an object or

0:51:56.760 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>place need not be verifiably heaven touched to reson aid

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:03.839
<v Speaker 1>with with cosmic potency. Yeah, I'm not very convinced by

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that either. I don't see why you couldn't conclude that

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a regular Earth rock was a supernatural gift from heaven,

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Like it doesn't literally have to come from space for

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:16.680
<v Speaker 1>people to venerate it as a gift from heaven. Yeah,

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Because I mean, essentially, you could boil it down to

0:52:18.719 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>two different ways of looking at this stone and it's

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in its origin. Either it was a really cool looking

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 1>stone that someone came across and and it kind of

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:30.760
<v Speaker 1>went from there, or it was a perfectly normal stone

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but there was enough capital belief that was put into it,

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:38.160
<v Speaker 1>be it's something situational or just the right people saying

0:52:38.680 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 1>this is this is it? This is tied to to

0:52:41.719 --> 0:52:45.120
<v Speaker 1>some something larger than ourselves. I mean, you can just

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:47.279
<v Speaker 1>look around your house and you can find examples of

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 1>two of those things in action. Right Um, I have.

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm on my desk right now, I have just a

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:56.719
<v Speaker 1>normal like gravel pete rock. I don't know, probably came

0:52:56.719 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>from from asphalt or something. But my son brought it

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to me one day and say and wanted me to

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 1>keep it because it was special. It's not special, it

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:06.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look special at all, but the fact that he

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>gave that No, No, I took it in. For the

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:12.239
<v Speaker 1>life of me, I can't quite get rid of it,

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:16.560
<v Speaker 1>because because I have this small attachment to it, and likewise,

0:53:16.680 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>we all have various do dads around where that we have,

0:53:20.160 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be it a stone or some minor decoration where we

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:27.799
<v Speaker 1>just it just looks too interesting to get rid of. Well,

0:53:27.840 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe now we should go to the next paper,

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the one we've been talking about several times already, that

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of Elizabeth Thompson, who has a different theory about where

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this stone comes from. And her theory is an interesting hybrid,

0:53:41.800 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, or I guess we should say it's a hypothesis.

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting hybrid of the meteoric uh or the

0:53:48.200 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 1>meteoritic origin story and UH and dealing with some of

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the problems with that. Right. So, as as you can

0:53:56.680 --> 0:53:59.920
<v Speaker 1>tell by that that earlier criticism she had, she put

0:54:00.000 --> 0:54:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stock in the cosmic origin aspect that

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:08.280
<v Speaker 1>this is somehow connected to to a meteorite. Uh. However,

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it need not be an actual meteorite. According to her theory,

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be uh what is known as impact tight glass.

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:20.319
<v Speaker 1>So I've attached for Robert for you to look at

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:26.720
<v Speaker 1>here a couple of pictures of of wabar impact type glass.

0:54:26.760 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So cool looking. Yeah, wish I had some of this.

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:31.879
<v Speaker 1>These look these look super cool. Yeah. And and there

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>are there are examples of what maybe we'll try to

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 1>include some links to these images on the landing page

0:54:36.640 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for this episode of Stuff to Build Your Mind dot

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 1>com um, because they are kind of how would you

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>describe them that I actually I was trying to think

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of the best way to put this. They don't look

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like normal rocks. That do look again sort of like

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the iron meteorite. They look like something that could plausibly

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:54.239
<v Speaker 1>have come from a supernatural realm. It looks sort of

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like a fistful of cottage cheese was wrapped up in

0:54:59.440 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of seaweed, in a wad of seaweed, and

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:08.800
<v Speaker 1>then turned into stone. Which that sounds about right, Yeah,

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>essentially the idea here. I'll get into it more. But

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine what happens when a meteorite uh impact occurs in

0:55:16.160 --> 0:55:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a sandy region. All right, Okay, so there's silica sand,

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and what happens when sand is heated up turns to glass? Yeah?

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So Thompson points to the meteorite impact craters of a

0:55:27.600 --> 0:55:31.840
<v Speaker 1>region known as Wabar. This is six eight four miles

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:35.840
<v Speaker 1>or kilometers from Mecca, so it's reasonably close. It's in

0:55:35.880 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the Ruble Collie Desert and here several iron meteorites have

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:45.360
<v Speaker 1>turned up. But the bedrock here is pure pale sandstone

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>composed mostly of quartz. Crater walls are composed of block

0:55:49.920 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>glass that are formed from fuse silica and infused with

0:55:53.640 --> 0:55:58.319
<v Speaker 1>billions of sphere ules of of nickel and iron. So

0:55:58.400 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this is impact tight glass us. Yeah. And it occurs

0:56:01.640 --> 0:56:05.719
<v Speaker 1>in in what they call porous bombs uh so, and

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:08.680
<v Speaker 1>often with a white interior and a glossy black shell,

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:13.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes as black droplets. So she theorizes that the observed

0:56:13.440 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 1>yellow white specks in the stone are remnants of glass

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and or sandstone, and that the hardness of the glass

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 1>would make it resistant to all that human erosion. Meanwhile,

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the poorous nature of the glass would make it would

0:56:25.160 --> 0:56:28.399
<v Speaker 1>would make it float, and that the black color would

0:56:28.400 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be due to the nicoliferous iron sphere rules captured from

0:56:31.960 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an explosion of nickel and iron. And she adds that

0:56:35.080 --> 0:56:38.320
<v Speaker 1>these qualities mash up with other examples of Wabbar glass,

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:41.960
<v Speaker 1>as well as reports of meteorites used as memorials to

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the prophet. Now, I think this is a really interesting theory.

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Uh may I might be sort of favoring it just

0:56:48.520 --> 0:56:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because I love the pictures of this impact type glass

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>so much. It looks really cool. It looks so cool.

0:56:54.920 --> 0:56:57.879
<v Speaker 1>I want this to be the answer. Yes, it it's

0:56:57.960 --> 0:57:00.239
<v Speaker 1>It very much matches up with that classification and of

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can imagine somebody coming across this stone

0:57:03.520 --> 0:57:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and realizing this looks really cool. What's the story of this.

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>It's also I'm I'm persuaded, but not persuaded. I shouldn't

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>say that I'm I'm unfairly biased by this being a

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:19.280
<v Speaker 1>very geologically cool origin story that an object from the

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>heavens came down and literally melted the earth to form

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 1>these these objects that later become objects of reverence. One

0:57:29.120 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that's probably not necessarily I don't know, an influence,

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:36.560
<v Speaker 1>but just a very interesting legendary parallel is the idea

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the destruction of the city of Iram of the

0:57:39.160 --> 0:57:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Pillars by fire from heaven. Yeah. I've seen this referred

0:57:43.720 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to as the Atlantis of the Sands. Yeah, because it's

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a lost city. And I think it's

0:57:50.400 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 1>also called is it Ubar? Is that right? I'm not

0:57:53.120 --> 0:57:55.720
<v Speaker 1>sure I've seen it referred to it either I I

0:57:55.880 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Ram with an eye or a Ram with an a

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>at least in the the copy of the Koran that

0:58:01.200 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at, because it is mentioned in the

0:58:03.000 --> 0:58:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Koran chapter eighty nine, verse six to fourteen. It reads,

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:12.000
<v Speaker 1>hast thou not considered how thy Lord dealt with ad

0:58:12.080 --> 0:58:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of Aram, having lofty buildings, the like of which are

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not created in the land, And of Famide, who hewed

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:21.120
<v Speaker 1>out rocks in the valley, and the Pharaoh, the Lord

0:58:21.160 --> 0:58:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of Hosts, who exceeded limits in the cities and made

0:58:24.000 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 1>great mischief therein so thy Lord poured on them a

0:58:27.440 --> 0:58:33.000
<v Speaker 1>portion of chastisement. Surely thy Lord is watchful. WHOA yeah, alright,

0:58:33.000 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So Thompson has made uh an interesting uh speculation here

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that that it could be this impact type glass. But

0:58:39.640 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there was another scientific paper on it by H. J.

0:58:42.920 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Asson published in the Journal of Material Science Letters in

0:58:46.640 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 1>nine two called the Blackstone of Kabba Suggestions as to

0:58:50.880 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>its constitution, And he looks at the research we've already

0:58:54.200 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about and tries to draw some conclusions from it,

0:58:57.800 --> 0:59:01.240
<v Speaker 1>critique it, and then offer some ideas of zone. So

0:59:01.600 --> 0:59:04.880
<v Speaker 1>he reacts to to that original discussion of Dietz and

0:59:04.960 --> 0:59:08.680
<v Speaker 1>McCone who said it was an agate, and so he says, okay,

0:59:08.880 --> 0:59:11.840
<v Speaker 1>their reasoning rests on some assumptions that the stone is

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>jet black, that it's mirror like in reflective power, uh,

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and that it's got these apparent banded regions that there

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that their friend the geologists saw when he went and

0:59:22.480 --> 0:59:26.240
<v Speaker 1>visited it, that they attribute to diffusion banding. So it

0:59:26.280 --> 0:59:30.840
<v Speaker 1>makes them think agat on this basis. They say that

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not a stony meteorite of the chondrite variety because

0:59:34.880 --> 0:59:37.880
<v Speaker 1>those crumble too easily and the word here is friable.

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:41.360
<v Speaker 1>They're too easily friable. Uh So they're looking for something

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a fanitic and monomineralic, you remember that, And they

0:59:45.120 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 1>conclude that it's ago. But Acton claims that even though

0:59:48.560 --> 0:59:51.919
<v Speaker 1>agat is readily available in the Middle East, he thinks

0:59:52.000 --> 0:59:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the authors overlooked the importance of the fact that the

0:59:54.880 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>stone is a collection of pebble like fragments cemented together

1:00:00.480 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than a single stone with a well preserved hummocky surface.

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>So he he thinks that they may be sort of

1:00:07.920 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>um mistaking the textured appearance of this cemented together piece

1:00:14.440 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of pavement essentially for the surface of what a stone

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:24.160
<v Speaker 1>itself should look like. And in defense of stony meteorites,

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he says, okay, chondrites, those are stony meteorites actually vary

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot and exactly how crumbly they are, you know,

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>some of them might be more crumbly than others. How

1:00:34.880 --> 1:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>friable they are also, Accon says, you know, cond rites

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that have been subjected to what he calls extraterrestrial shock,

1:00:43.280 --> 1:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which is also the medical condition induced by watching the

1:00:46.640 --> 1:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>movie Mac and Me. He says, they quote tend to

1:00:50.000 --> 1:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be compacted and contain dark veins which might be mistaken

1:00:55.280 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for banding under unfavorable conditions of observation. So he says,

1:00:59.760 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're just coming up at this thing

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the day and you're trying to

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>peek in at it, you might mistake these these veins

1:01:07.880 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that we would often see in certain types of condrites

1:01:11.520 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>for the kind of banding you'd see in an agate.

1:01:14.240 --> 1:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's in defense of it being a meteorite. On

1:01:17.680 --> 1:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, against the condrite hypothesis, Accent says, Uh,

1:01:21.960 --> 1:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it's common for chondrites to have these metallic iron nickel

1:01:26.200 --> 1:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>pieces distributed evenly throughout, which should be obvious when you

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>look at this thing. Uh, this is something that people

1:01:33.200 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>would have observed about it. On the other hand, he

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>says that metal can disappear by way of oxidation i e.

1:01:40.000 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Rusting if exposed to your earth weather for long periods

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of time. So it maybe maybe it's just rusting. But

1:01:47.240 --> 1:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>if this were the case, you'd expect to see rust,

1:01:49.880 --> 1:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you'd expect to see like a reddish you. Now that

1:01:53.440 --> 1:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>being said, there are some accounts have said brownish or reddish, yeah,

1:01:57.600 --> 1:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and here we get back to the problem with like

1:01:59.560 --> 1:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>come by all these different accounts that seem to differ

1:02:02.160 --> 1:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>from one another. Uh, it's hard to know which one

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to go on if you're trying to draw the best conclusions.

1:02:08.000 --> 1:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I have seen that too. Some people say

1:02:10.040 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>reddish brown, others say black. So that's a little confusing. Um.

1:02:15.000 --> 1:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>But also he says, we would expect to see in

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a chondrite quote light colored con drools of silicate So

1:02:22.760 --> 1:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>what is that? Well, con drools are these visually striking,

1:02:27.160 --> 1:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>colorful spherical minerals that are found in some meteorites. You

1:02:31.800 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>should look this up. We could go Google search con drools.

1:02:35.880 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>They have a distinctive appearance and people would probably have

1:02:38.760 --> 1:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>noticed and reported them if they'd been present in the stone,

1:02:41.880 --> 1:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>because they're these like colored spheres. You would see them.

1:02:47.080 --> 1:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>So Accent says, okay, okay, what about a carbonaceous meteorite.

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>These are rare condrites that are low in density, they're

1:02:55.560 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>free of obvious medical medical metal particles, and sometimes they

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have these big cond rules that are really obvious.

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But these are rare meteorites. They're not a major candidate,

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and Accent thinks maybe we should just keep them in

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the back of the mind, you know. And we've had

1:03:12.800 --> 1:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a two different authors here discussed like rarity being an issue.

1:03:16.920 --> 1:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I keep thinking, though, we're talking about a rare stone,

1:03:20.920 --> 1:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>like you no, in no classification. It's not like black stone. Yeah,

1:03:26.400 --> 1:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like this is a singular stone. So can we really

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>count out the possibility of rare meteorites? Well, I mean

1:03:34.440 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it just it lowers the probability that anybody in history

1:03:38.520 --> 1:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>would have found things, but it maybe increases the probability

1:03:43.120 --> 1:03:44.959
<v Speaker 1>that if they had found it, they would have kept

1:03:44.960 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it and revered it. Um. So you're just sort of

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like adjusting the selection dials in two different ways. Um.

1:03:54.200 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>What about Thompson's hypothesis. He comes to that, you know

1:03:57.120 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's this fused silical glass. There's an impact event

1:04:00.800 --> 1:04:02.959
<v Speaker 1>in the sand and the desert, a bunch of sand

1:04:03.000 --> 1:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>gets melted along with some pieces of the meteorite into

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>these crazy wads of spinach and cottage cheese, uh turned

1:04:11.800 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>into stone. Well. Thompson obviously, as we said, likes this

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis because it means the stone could feasibly float, and

1:04:19.720 --> 1:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>there are those stories from the past of it floating

1:04:22.360 --> 1:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in brine or water or even concentrated brine, and this

1:04:26.680 --> 1:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>would this would also explain the white stone inside the

1:04:30.080 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>black stone. Um. But Accent says, it's hard to see

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>how a large peat piece of this impactite glass would

1:04:39.080 --> 1:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>form the smooth pebble shapes that are described by observers.

1:04:43.040 --> 1:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Again back to what people say. You see these smooth pebbles,

1:04:46.520 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, no bigger than a date in in the cement.

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>If you look at these things, Accent says, if the

1:04:52.000 --> 1:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>black stone fragments really are this fused silical glass from

1:04:55.760 --> 1:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>an impact, they shouldn't look like these smooth pebbles. They

1:04:58.800 --> 1:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>should uh, they should have different surface features, including things

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like bubbles and vesicles. Um. And so one last thought

1:05:08.600 --> 1:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>he offers is, you know, perhaps the original body was

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what he calls a concreteation of pebbles. And so this

1:05:15.480 --> 1:05:19.480
<v Speaker 1>originally this original stone, when when it fractured, what it

1:05:19.560 --> 1:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was was a bunch of pebbles stuck together and it

1:05:21.960 --> 1:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was just the pebbles coming off, if that makes any sense.

1:05:25.560 --> 1:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>So if you imagine the original stone was not like

1:05:28.160 --> 1:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a solid stone that broke into pieces and then the

1:05:30.800 --> 1:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>pieces got smoothed down, what if it was a solid

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>stone that was more like a cluster of grapes in shape,

1:05:38.960 --> 1:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and he cites one example of a piece of lunar

1:05:41.760 --> 1:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>material that had been hit by a shock media write

1:05:44.680 --> 1:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>bombardment that actually showed this type of this shape that

1:05:48.720 --> 1:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it looked sort of like a cluster of grapes. And

1:05:51.720 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so that's one possibility in his mind. But ultimately he concludes,

1:05:56.800 --> 1:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we don't know, and even though we've

1:05:59.720 --> 1:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>got better scientific knowledge to work with, we really need

1:06:03.080 --> 1:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>better access if we're going to make a conclusion, just

1:06:06.320 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>better access to the primary data. We'd have to be

1:06:08.640 --> 1:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>able to look at this thing closely and make some measurements. Yeah.

1:06:12.000 --> 1:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I really like that point that he made in the paper,

1:06:14.040 --> 1:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>saying that you know, even at the time it was

1:06:15.600 --> 1:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this ad two, that the material sciences had advanced so much, uh,

1:06:20.840 --> 1:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>even from some of the previous studies in the prior decades,

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and yet our information about the black Stone itself has

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>remained relatively the same. Uh, just you know, a few

1:06:34.280 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>more subjective observations of what it consists of. But but

1:06:38.880 --> 1:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately no new information, certainly no scientific, scientifically analytic information. Yeah.

1:06:45.440 --> 1:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>That that is a good point. And I think one

1:06:48.040 --> 1:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that I come away from this discussion with is Um.

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>This attempt to investigate the material or geological character of

1:06:57.040 --> 1:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the black Stone strikes me as kind of similar

1:07:00.240 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to our episode from a couple of years ago, or

1:07:03.160 --> 1:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess, let yeah, almost a couple of year and

1:07:05.280 --> 1:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a half ago, maybe on the Will of the Wisp

1:07:08.160 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>uh in the same way, it encapsulates some of the

1:07:11.040 --> 1:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>difficulties of doing what you might call second hand science.

1:07:15.400 --> 1:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>In both cases, you've got scientists trying to apply their

1:07:18.320 --> 1:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of natural phenomena to match this wide range of

1:07:23.080 --> 1:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>disparate subjective reports. Now, I think the reports of the

1:07:28.120 --> 1:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>black Stone of the Kabba are much more substantive than

1:07:31.880 --> 1:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>those of the Will of the Wisp. Obviously, in the

1:07:33.640 --> 1:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>case of the black Stone, it actually exists, and we

1:07:36.160 --> 1:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>know for a fact that it actually exists. It's not

1:07:39.200 --> 1:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>something that maybe people are just imagining. We know millions

1:07:43.480 --> 1:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of people see it all the time. It's not an

1:07:45.560 --> 1:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>ephemeral phenomenon. It's like a thing that's there. It's widely observed,

1:07:50.280 --> 1:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and we know that it's one unified phenomenon and not

1:07:53.440 --> 1:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like different phenomena being reported under the same name. So

1:07:58.200 --> 1:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>these are all not the case for the Will of

1:07:59.840 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the Isp. But like the will of the whisp, we

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>have to make judgments based on a host of variable

1:08:05.840 --> 1:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>descriptions and characteristics. What color is it? Different reports and

1:08:10.520 --> 1:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>different things. Are there flecks of other colors within it?

1:08:13.720 --> 1:08:16.599
<v Speaker 1>What color was it originally? Does it float in water?

1:08:17.000 --> 1:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>How reflective is it? Even in the cases where there's

1:08:19.720 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>only one major answer to these, sometimes we don't know

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>if we should trust that answer or just throw out

1:08:24.680 --> 1:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the question entirely. You know, does it float in water?

1:08:28.080 --> 1:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Are our evidence that the stone floats in water? Is

1:08:30.640 --> 1:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>some report from a thousand years ago? Yeah? Like, should

1:08:33.600 --> 1:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>we give it? Give that more weight than the question, Well,

1:08:36.479 --> 1:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>could it conceivably you know, spout a mouth and start talking?

1:08:40.560 --> 1:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, uh, you know, at what point you just

1:08:42.880 --> 1:08:44.639
<v Speaker 1>cut off and say, all right, we're only gonna We're

1:08:44.680 --> 1:08:48.519
<v Speaker 1>only gonna look at these three qualities. What class of

1:08:48.560 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>meteorite most commonly sprouts a tongue? I can't, I can't

1:08:55.240 --> 1:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>think I think of one offhand. We'll have to what

1:08:58.000 --> 1:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to have to have to reach out to

1:08:59.800 --> 1:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>our audience on that one. Maybe the in meteorites. Yeah, well,

1:09:03.040 --> 1:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even if you do make a distinction between um,

1:09:06.080 --> 1:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, subjective religious beliefs and just subjective direct observational reports.

1:09:11.320 --> 1:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Even the direct observational reports, they're giving us all this

1:09:14.400 --> 1:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>conflicting info, and and none of it's very solid. Like

1:09:18.040 --> 1:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you you're you're not taking a measurement of it. You're

1:09:20.400 --> 1:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>just saying like, yeah, here's generally what I saw. But

1:09:23.280 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>then there's one other interesting parallel, at least it seemed

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:31.759
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me here in talking about a religious object,

1:09:32.680 --> 1:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is that I think it's kind of funny how the

1:09:34.840 --> 1:09:38.519
<v Speaker 1>practice of trying to do a geological or material science

1:09:38.560 --> 1:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>analysis on the black Stone based on these subjective descriptions

1:09:44.360 --> 1:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>almost reminds me of something that often happens in our

1:09:47.920 --> 1:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>faith traditions, which is the process of trying to draw

1:09:51.560 --> 1:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>clarity of theology from just what amounts to a large

1:09:55.720 --> 1:09:59.599
<v Speaker 1>collection of stories. You know. So when theologians of almost

1:09:59.680 --> 1:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>any religion try to come up with the systematic theology

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of that religion, the systematic theology being here are beliefs,

1:10:06.760 --> 1:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>here in the rules, here's what happens in the metaphysics

1:10:09.520 --> 1:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of our religion, essentially the science of the religion. Uh,

1:10:13.960 --> 1:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they often have to draw these conclusions based on sources

1:10:17.560 --> 1:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that are not originally written to be clear and systematic

1:10:20.400 --> 1:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>descriptions of rules and theological principles, but they're based on stories,

1:10:26.200 --> 1:10:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and so you have to sift through the stories to

1:10:28.880 --> 1:10:32.919
<v Speaker 1>try to pull out this clear, systematic understanding of it all. Anyway,

1:10:32.960 --> 1:10:35.639
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was kind of interesting. No, No, I think, yeah,

1:10:35.680 --> 1:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that's that's fair. It has a yeah, the idea

1:10:39.320 --> 1:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of of taking all of these either tales or these

1:10:42.360 --> 1:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>accounts and trying to build something concrete out of it,

1:10:46.240 --> 1:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>or just to say what does it mean? Yeah, yeah,

1:10:48.720 --> 1:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>what is the what is the shape of this? Or indeed,

1:10:50.960 --> 1:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>what is the meaning of this? Well? What am I

1:10:52.320 --> 1:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed to take home from this? Right? But it's but again,

1:10:56.800 --> 1:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's fascinating to to look at these different scientific

1:11:01.720 --> 1:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>hypotheses about the black Stone. It's also interesting just to

1:11:06.040 --> 1:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the history and in mythology surrounding it and

1:11:11.000 --> 1:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>try and figure out what that means as well. It's

1:11:13.479 --> 1:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really an enigma on several different levels. And I

1:11:16.920 --> 1:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>hope that we've been able to relate some of that

1:11:19.439 --> 1:11:22.759
<v Speaker 1>to you today. And on that note, hey, we're thinking

1:11:22.760 --> 1:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>about doing more episodes in this series looking at sacred

1:11:27.080 --> 1:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>places or objects, so we should throw out the question,

1:11:31.560 --> 1:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what sacred objects or places would you like us to

1:11:34.360 --> 1:11:36.080
<v Speaker 1>cover in the future. We already have a few ideas

1:11:36.120 --> 1:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>kicking around obviously, especially if there's some interesting scientific angle

1:11:40.120 --> 1:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it can be discussed about it. One of the things

1:11:42.479 --> 1:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that I might want to talk about in the future

1:11:44.280 --> 1:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is is the Ganges. Oh, yes, that's a good one. Uh.

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>More of an object than a place that comes to

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>my mind, as of course the Ark of the Covenant. Um,

1:11:54.720 --> 1:11:58.479
<v Speaker 1>it's like nothing we've gone after before. We should at

1:11:58.560 --> 1:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>least consider it u huh. But I'm sure there are

1:12:02.120 --> 1:12:04.479
<v Speaker 1>some other examples out there that our listeners can think of,

1:12:04.560 --> 1:12:06.639
<v Speaker 1>and certainly you can get in touch with us about those.

1:12:08.200 --> 1:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And finally, you know, we've covered Islamic history, Islamic myth,

1:12:12.400 --> 1:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Islamic scientific contributions on the show before and will again,

1:12:16.960 --> 1:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's all part of our shared global culture.

1:12:19.439 --> 1:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, we recognize that discussions of

1:12:22.040 --> 1:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Islamic culture continue to resonate with particular potency in today's

1:12:25.320 --> 1:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>political climate. So we encourage everyone out there to expand

1:12:29.200 --> 1:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>their understanding of what it means to be a mussliment

1:12:31.520 --> 1:12:34.360
<v Speaker 1>today society. And as the starting point, we just wanted

1:12:34.360 --> 1:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>to highlight two organizations you might want to check out.

1:12:37.200 --> 1:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>First off, there's Muslims for Progressive Values at www dot

1:12:41.479 --> 1:12:44.479
<v Speaker 1>mp V USA dot org. This is a um a

1:12:44.520 --> 1:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>faith based, grassroots international human rights organization organization that embodies

1:12:48.760 --> 1:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and advocates for the traditional chronic values of social justice

1:12:52.960 --> 1:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and equality for all. In the twenty one century, so

1:12:55.400 --> 1:12:58.639
<v Speaker 1>they championed such values as separation of religious and state authorities,

1:12:58.680 --> 1:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech you versaal, human rights, and gender equality.

1:13:02.320 --> 1:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And another group is the Muslim Alliance for Sexual and

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Gender Diversity and that's at Muslim Alliance dot org. Uh So,

1:13:11.160 --> 1:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they work to support, empower and connect lgb t Q Muslims.

1:13:14.960 --> 1:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>They seek to challenge root causes of oppression, including misogyny

1:13:18.479 --> 1:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and xenophobia, and the aim to increase the acceptance of

1:13:21.240 --> 1:13:24.799
<v Speaker 1>gender and sexual diversity within Muslim communities and to promote

1:13:25.000 --> 1:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a progressive understanding of Islam that is centered on inclusion,

1:13:28.479 --> 1:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>justice and equality. Yeah. And one of the things that

1:13:31.080 --> 1:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope always comes through UM whenever we talk about

1:13:34.800 --> 1:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>religions on this podcast, as we do fairly often because

1:13:37.600 --> 1:13:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I think we all sort of find them very interesting, uh,

1:13:41.600 --> 1:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is it can be very easy to talk about religions,

1:13:44.080 --> 1:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>especially a religion that you don't personally hold in ways

1:13:47.560 --> 1:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of over generalized and overdetermined. Uh. And

1:13:52.200 --> 1:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>so one thing I hope you always take away from

1:13:54.400 --> 1:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>our discussions is is the incredible room for diversity of

1:13:58.680 --> 1:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>opinion the that exists within all these faith traditions around

1:14:02.360 --> 1:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. Uh. There are a lot of ways to

1:14:04.360 --> 1:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>be a Christian, a lot of ways to be a Muslim,

1:14:06.320 --> 1:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways to be a Hindu or Jew

1:14:08.400 --> 1:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>or anything. Indeed, and you know, I know we have

1:14:12.120 --> 1:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>some Muslim listeners out there, So I'd love to hear

1:14:13.960 --> 1:14:16.519
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on this. And certainly if you have gone

1:14:16.560 --> 1:14:19.479
<v Speaker 1>on the Hodge and you have seen the black Stone

1:14:19.520 --> 1:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with your own eyes or touched it with your with

1:14:22.040 --> 1:14:25.439
<v Speaker 1>your own body, Uh, we would love to hear your

1:14:25.479 --> 1:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>account of that. Yeah, what was it like? What? What

1:14:27.760 --> 1:14:30.479
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? And what color is it? Really? Yeah? Yeah,

1:14:30.520 --> 1:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts on that? You can find us

1:14:33.080 --> 1:14:35.679
<v Speaker 1>online as always it's stuff to blow your mind. Dot

1:14:35.720 --> 1:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>com that is the mothership. That's where we'll find all

1:14:37.800 --> 1:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast episodes, videos, blog posts, and links out to

1:14:41.000 --> 1:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>our various social media accounts, which is Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler,

1:14:44.360 --> 1:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Instagram it set, and if you want to get in

1:14:47.400 --> 1:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>touch with us directly, as always, you can email us

1:14:50.240 --> 1:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot com

1:15:02.920 --> 1:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics. Is

1:15:05.360 --> 1:15:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff works dot com The pay big believe

1:15:17.520 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I think by Man are doing