Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us. Right
Speaker 1: down our toll free telephone number. We've got a lot
Speaker 1: of news today. It's eight hundred and ninety four to
Speaker 1: one Sean. If you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program, we will start with this news. The President
Speaker 1: has announced that he has asked Representative Congresswoman a Lease
Speaker 1: the Phonic to bow out of contention to be the
Speaker 1: US ambassador to the UN. He cited the GOP slim
Speaker 1: majority writing on Truth Social I have asked the Lease,
Speaker 1: one of my biggest allies, to remain in Congress to
Speaker 1: help me deliver historic tax cuts, great jobs, record economic growth,
Speaker 1: to secure border energy dominance, peace through strength, and much
Speaker 1: more so that we can make America great again with
Speaker 1: a tight majority. I don't want to take a chance
Speaker 1: on anyone else running for a Lease's seat. That people
Speaker 1: love Elise and with her we have nothing to worry
Speaker 1: about come election day. There are others that can do
Speaker 1: a good job at the United Nations. Republicans have been
Speaker 1: concerned that New York Governor Or Hoko could seek a
Speaker 1: to slow walk the election, leaving Stephanic seat open for
Speaker 1: as long as possible. This is just, you know, typical
Speaker 1: New York Albany corruption that is just standard fair and
Speaker 1: this has been discussed now for some time now. This
Speaker 1: news that I'm going to give you, I want you
Speaker 1: to pay very close attention to, and I've gone through
Speaker 1: this in great specificity, in detail even throughout this week.
Speaker 1: I'll try not to duplicate what I've said earlier, but
Speaker 1: if you look at the Treasury Department website, Reuters and
Speaker 1: other stories that are out there today, a detail that
Speaker 1: I doubt you're going to hear in the state run
Speaker 1: legacy media mob. They're still busy talking about the one
Speaker 1: off accidental inclusion of a reporter on the signal conversation.
Speaker 1: And by the way, you know, we go back to
Speaker 1: that too. Because I'm so sick and tired of what
Speaker 1: they're saying. It's such a phony controversy. These people didn't
Speaker 1: care about known terrorists, murderers, rapists, gang members, cartel members
Speaker 1: coming into our country.
Speaker 2: They didn't They just didn't care.
Speaker 1: They don't care, and it's such fake, phony, fraudulent outrage.
Speaker 1: I get so sick and tired of all of it.
Speaker 1: And as Pete Heeks has said, let me get this straight.
Speaker 1: The Atlantic released are so called war plans. The plans
Speaker 1: include no names, no targets, no locations, no units, no routes,
Speaker 1: no sources, no methods, no classified information. Those are really
Speaker 1: some I nan Adam Schiffe war plans, he continued. We
Speaker 1: will continue to do our job while the media does
Speaker 1: what it does best, pedal la hoax, and that's all
Speaker 1: they want to talk about. But they won't talk about
Speaker 1: any success. They're not going to talk about the fact
Speaker 1: that the border has been secured in such a short
Speaker 1: period of time and that the president is, in spite
Speaker 1: of the law fair is at least now detaining even
Speaker 1: though the three judge panel have ruled against them, so
Speaker 1: now it's off to the Supreme Court. I guess trying
Speaker 1: to get rid of Trende Ragua gang members. Could you
Speaker 1: imagine this is the party that champions men and women's sports,
Speaker 1: the rights of illegals, including trend A Ragua gang members,
Speaker 1: over the safety of Americans, and claims we have a
Speaker 1: constitutional crisis if we identify hundreds of billions of dollars
Speaker 1: in waste, broaden abuse. They're also the party that has
Speaker 1: no problem with domestic terrorism. I don't hear Democrats talking
Speaker 1: out and speaking out loudly against what has been done
Speaker 1: to Tesla. You know, you can't even talk about group thing.
Speaker 1: Everyone says, well, that's only a small part of the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, really, because I saw every member of the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party sit on their ass during the joint Session
Speaker 1: addressed by the President when two mothers that lost their
Speaker 1: children to Biden Harris unvetted illegals and they were being
Speaker 1: honored that night, I didn't see a single Democrats stand
Speaker 1: and applaud them and care about them. I haven't heard
Speaker 1: any Democrats speaking out about how you know, dozens of
Speaker 1: dozens of dead Americans because of Biden Harris illegals, all
Speaker 1: the dozens raped, the thousands of that are victims of
Speaker 1: violent crime, all the people that have died from fentanyl
Speaker 1: and opioid poisoning because of open borders. So anyway, here's
Speaker 1: the detail you won't hear about from the state run
Speaker 1: legacy media mob which I declared.
Speaker 2: Dead, gone and buried.
Speaker 1: They don't know it yet, they have no influence, and
Speaker 1: they have lost the trust of the American people. They've
Speaker 1: earned the loss of trust. Anyway, the cumulative dollar value
Speaker 1: of all foreign business investment that Donald Trump has secured
Speaker 1: since January twentieth for this country Tinzy became president, is
Speaker 1: now nearly equal to all the tax revenue collected by
Speaker 1: the IRS in twenty twenty four. Now, these news outlets,
Speaker 1: a couple of them, and credit to the ones that
Speaker 1: are reporting it that at the beginning of March, Donald
Speaker 1: trumpets secured commitments from foreign nations and from companies over
Speaker 1: three trillion dollars in new investment. Yesterday's Yesterday, Reuters and
Speaker 1: other news outlets reported that the United Arab Emirates had
Speaker 1: pledged to invest one point four trillion in business in
Speaker 1: the US. That's a total now four point four trillion dollars.
Speaker 1: If you look at the US Treasury website, all the
Speaker 1: tax revenue collected by the IRS over the entire year
Speaker 1: last year comes to four point nine trillion dollars. So
Speaker 1: that's just about five hundred billion dollars more than the
Speaker 1: cumulative foreign business investments that Donald Trump has brought to
Speaker 1: America in just twelve weeks.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: It is true that most foreign investment commitments have spread
Speaker 1: over a number of years. In the case of most
Speaker 1: of the investments, whether it be you know, from the
Speaker 1: pharmaceutical industry and all those companies, and they have. They're
Speaker 1: pledging hundreds of billions of dollars Apple, hundreds of billions
Speaker 1: of dollars Honda. I've gone through the whole list, Honda, Nissan,
Speaker 1: the Taiwanese chip company, and I can keep going and going,
Speaker 1: but I don't want to repeat myself, but this is
Speaker 1: a massive opportunity.
Speaker 2: Now. It was reported yesterday or the day before.
Speaker 1: India is now thinking about canceling what they had, all
Speaker 1: the tariffs they have put on before the April second
Speaker 1: deadline because they don't want reciprocal tariffs placed on them.
Speaker 1: And at some point the European Union in Canada and
Speaker 1: other countries they'll also come around. I mean, the fact
Speaker 1: that Rolls Royce, a car company in Great Britain, is
Speaker 1: coming up with contingency plans to build a factory here
Speaker 1: so they can build their engines here, and they do
Speaker 1: build some of the best engines in the world, is
Speaker 1: no doubt about it. Is just evidence that they don't
Speaker 1: want to deal with this. And the problem is is
Speaker 1: that all of these countries, even our so called allied countries,
Speaker 1: have been taking advantage of US for a long period
Speaker 1: of time. By the way, the Trump Treasury Department revealed
Speaker 1: that the leading Democratic Party fundraiser, Act Blue, has been
Speaker 1: the subject of a number of suspicious activity reports. House
Speaker 1: investigators now requesting access to those reports. Elon Musk is
Speaker 1: questioning whether Act Blue might be funding terrorist activities carried
Speaker 1: out by anti Tesla activists. Now, three Republicans in Congress,
Speaker 1: including the Chairman of the House Oversight and Administrative Panels,
Speaker 1: are urging Donald Trump's Treasury Department to share with lawmakers
Speaker 1: reports of suspicious financial transactions related to Act Blue. Other
Speaker 1: GOP lawmakers are demanding probes by the Treasury and the
Speaker 1: FBI into whether the fundraising platform has helped organizations that
Speaker 1: are engaging in domestic terrorism or violating federal campaign finance laws.
Speaker 1: Let's see what happens with that. By the way, a
Speaker 1: top MS thirteen gang leader was a rec in Virginia.
Speaker 1: Great job, Governor Younkin, Great job, Christy Nome, great job,
Speaker 1: Tom Homan, great job local law enforcement.
Speaker 2: Thank god.
Speaker 1: These people put their lives on the line for all
Speaker 1: of us. You know the insanity of this, and we'll
Speaker 1: get into this in the next hour with Joe Concha
Speaker 1: and Carol Roth, I mean Democrats, they still want to
Speaker 1: justify the spending abroad, which represents hundreds of billions of
Speaker 1: taxpayer dollars, knowing we have thirty seven trillion in debt,
Speaker 1: knowing the average America makes sixty six grand a year.
Speaker 1: You know, they had this hearing in Congress yesterday and Democrats,
Speaker 1: you know, with their bingo cards, fire Elon and save Elmo. Well,
Speaker 1: there's nothing to stop Democrats from saving Elmo. You want
Speaker 1: to invest in Elmo, go invest in Elmo. Good idea.
Speaker 1: I support you investing in Elmo. But the idea that
Speaker 1: Jasmine Crockett, now one of the leading spokespeople the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: is claiming, well, this is about free speech, and then
Speaker 1: you just can't have Fox News. Fox News doesn't get
Speaker 1: federal dollars to be on the air. We actually have
Speaker 1: real people that want to watch us because we put
Speaker 1: on news.
Speaker 2: You're not going to get an information.
Speaker 1: We give out information, news in an entertaining way that
Speaker 1: you're not going to get elsewhere. I mean the fact
Speaker 1: that I watched this committee hearing and we'll play it later,
Speaker 1: you know, and there's the fire Elon, save Elmo. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's insane. By the way, speaking of Tesla, I got
Speaker 1: my Tesla today. It is the greatest piece of machinery
Speaker 1: I've ever been in my life. The self driving mode
Speaker 1: is incredible, zero to sixty one point nine to nine seconds.
Speaker 1: This thing is a Remember, every other car has kind
Speaker 1: of made the same way, combustion engine all that, and
Speaker 1: I've always had them. I did have one hybrid Cadillac
Speaker 1: once Escalade, and it was a good car. There's good technology.
Speaker 1: Is nothing compared to this over a thousand horsepower. That's
Speaker 1: why I'm giving one away, and it's going to be
Speaker 1: the Tesla of your choice, and you can sign up.
Speaker 1: We're going to try and make it a little easier.
Speaker 1: The word of the day today, Tomorrow, Saturday, and Sunday
Speaker 1: is going to be one word. It's America. You go
Speaker 1: to Hannity dot com. We'll do this. You can do
Speaker 1: register once a day through April the eleventh, and if
Speaker 1: you once you go to the Tesla contest page, you
Speaker 1: just put in the word of the day. For the
Speaker 1: next four days, you can register once every day the
Speaker 1: words America. It's that simple. It's really easy. And then
Speaker 1: you get to pick the Tesla your choice. If you're
Speaker 1: the winner, we're very excited about it anyway. So then
Speaker 1: you have this head of MPR Katherine Mayer or mar
Speaker 1: I don't know how she pronounces it. I do want
Speaker 1: to acknowledge that we were mistaken and failing to cover
Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden laptop story more aggressively or sooner. Okay,
Speaker 1: this I couldn't understand, and this came up in the hearings.
Speaker 1: We'll play it later. The whole community. I don't even
Speaker 1: know what this means. Apparently it took place on MPR,
Speaker 1: according to the New York Post and the whole community
Speaker 1: of gender queer dinosaur enthusiasts. They came up with the
Speaker 1: hearing yesterday. I might need help interpreting that fear of
Speaker 1: fatness is more harmful than actual fat Who came up
Speaker 1: with that genius idea? Now, if if you want free speech,
Speaker 1: I'm all for it. If the woman that runs this
Speaker 1: thing that was in the hot seat yesterday had to
Speaker 1: explain away her tweets, do you believe that America is
Speaker 1: addicted to white supremacy?
Speaker 2: Yeah? I believe.
Speaker 1: I tweeted that, And as I said earlier, I believe
Speaker 1: my thinking has evolved over the last half decade.
Speaker 2: You mean the last five years you changed?
Speaker 1: Or is this like a politician's election year conversion and
Speaker 1: in your case, please don't cut my funding conversion, and
Speaker 1: I'll say whatever you want me to say, but I'll
Speaker 1: still keep MPR and PBS and all these publicly funded
Speaker 1: outlets as left wing as possible. One point admitting that
Speaker 1: every single employee that is registered that works for them
Speaker 1: is a registered Democrat. There wasn't one single Republican. And
Speaker 1: then also tweeting out, do you believe that America believes
Speaker 1: in black plunder and white democracy? And she responds, well,
Speaker 1: I don't believe that, sir. Well then got called out
Speaker 1: by Congressman Gill, saying you tweeted that in reference to
Speaker 1: a book you were reading at the time, apparently the
Speaker 1: Case for Reparations. She said, well, I don't think I've
Speaker 1: ever read that book. Well, Gill goes, well, you tweeted
Speaker 1: about it. You said you took a day off to
Speaker 1: fully read The Case of Reparation. She doesn't even remember
Speaker 1: what she put on Twitter back in twenty twenty. I mean,
Speaker 1: all this was about is can I get as much
Speaker 1: money as possible from US taxpayers?
Speaker 2: That's all that is about.
Speaker 1: By the way, the Republicans now urge the Department of
Speaker 1: Homeland Security to release data on the number of Biden
Speaker 1: illegals who were parolled into the US. Boy, I'd love
Speaker 1: to get that data. I'd like to know where these
Speaker 1: people are, especially the people will terroritize, unvetted, the gang members,
Speaker 1: cartel members, known murderers, rapists. And why would any judge
Speaker 1: you go against the Alien Enemies Act, which has been
Speaker 1: rendered constitutional in a Supreme Court decision in nineteen forty
Speaker 1: eight used by four prior presidents. And not only not
Speaker 1: only did the court hold that it was legal for
Speaker 1: the president to do so, but upon using the Alien
Speaker 1: Enemies Act, it was not subject to judicial review. That's
Speaker 1: how rock solid that decision was. Let's see what John
Speaker 1: Roberts and his court has to say about it, because
Speaker 1: it looks like that's where it's going next. Now, where
Speaker 1: does the time go? I don't even know, just flies
Speaker 1: on by doze uncovered another whopping four point seven billion
Speaker 1: dollars being wasted, your tax dollars that Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: his radical leftist you know, puppet masters were blowing on
Speaker 1: woke nonsense, the Department of Government Efficiency announcing that it
Speaker 1: terminated one hundred and thirteen contracts valued at four point
Speaker 1: seven billion dollars, including a Department of Agriculture consulting contract
Speaker 1: for Peru and their climate change activities. I'm sure that's
Speaker 1: a top priority for your children. DOGE has also announced
Speaker 1: the Department of Labor canceled five hundred and seventy seven
Speaker 1: million in America last grants, totaling two hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: seven million in savings. The funding that was canceled also
Speaker 1: included ten million dollars for gender equity in the Mexican workplace,
Speaker 1: twelve point two million for worker empowerment in South Africa,
Speaker 1: six point twenty five million for improving respect for worker
Speaker 1: rights and agricultural supply chains in the countries of Honduras, Guatemala,
Speaker 1: El Salvador, and eliminated five million dollars to elevate women's
Speaker 1: participation in the workplace in West Africa, four point three
Speaker 1: million to assist foreign migrant workers in Malaysia. And I
Speaker 1: can keep going if you want the total number. We
Speaker 1: are now at one hundred and thirty billion in savings.
Speaker 2: Breaking news straight from the source. It's pretty amazing, isn't it.
Speaker 1: The amount of money that the president is saving this country,
Speaker 1: you know, And what Elon Musk and DOZE is doing
Speaker 1: to help this country. They just uncovered four point seven
Speaker 1: billion dollars of your tax dollars that Biden and the
Speaker 1: radical leftists in this country. You know, we're blowing on
Speaker 1: their woke nonsense. I just went through all of that.
Speaker 1: So far, DOZE is up to one hundred and thirty
Speaker 1: billion dollars in discovering waste, fraud, abuse, corruption. That's nearly
Speaker 1: one thousand dollars a taxpayer. It's eight hundred and seven
Speaker 1: dollars and forty five cents per taxpayer. That's real money
Speaker 1: in your pocket. By the way, we could use that
Speaker 1: money to pay down the debt and stop stealing from
Speaker 1: our kids. We could shore up social Security and medicare.
Speaker 1: You know, we could use it for the next generation
Speaker 1: of weaponry. We could use it to get rid of
Speaker 1: all of these partel members, gang members, terrorists, rapists, murderers
Speaker 1: that Biden and Harris allowed into the country. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's just a simple, basic, fundamental common sense, which unfortunately
Speaker 1: is not that common anymore.
Speaker 2: It's unbelievable.
Speaker 1: Trump warns that he may issue an executive order ending
Speaker 1: sanctuary cities.
Speaker 2: I think he should.
Speaker 1: Sanctuary cities are basically cities that are codifying law breaking.
Speaker 1: I mean the idea of helping I mean, I told
Speaker 1: the story the other day that they spent what ninety
Speaker 1: five billion dollars or whatever on healthcare for illegals in
Speaker 1: California medical and now they're having to borrow money because
Speaker 1: they're running a huge deficit. And Gavin Newsom will not
Speaker 1: give in on remaining a sanctuary state. In a sanctuary
Speaker 1: city of LA in San Francisco, they're guarding criminals, President
Speaker 1: Trump told reporters they're taking the rights away from the
Speaker 1: citizens of the state and the city. And we're going
Speaker 1: to be ending sanctuary cities if we find it necessary
Speaker 1: to do in certain major areas, and we may just
Speaker 1: end the entire thing all together, because it's just a
Speaker 1: way of protecting criminals and nobody else benefits by this.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: The Boston Mayor, Michelle Woo, has continued to battle the administration,
Speaker 1: asserting that Boston stands with immigrants and the comments prompted
Speaker 1: the borders are Tom Homan a focus on Boston where
Speaker 1: he did oversee three hundred and eighty US Immigration and
Speaker 1: Customs enforcement arrest last week, and what we're finding out
Speaker 1: about a lot a lot of the people that they're resting.
Speaker 1: Is there are a lot of bad people, and now
Speaker 1: we have to battle in the courts to have the
Speaker 1: president's policy of deporting these people, you know, get implemented.
Speaker 1: Pretty unbelievable, and that's what Alan Derschwitz I think rightly
Speaker 1: predicting that the US Supreme Court will ultimately rule in
Speaker 1: favor of President Trump and his right to deport members
Speaker 1: of the Venezuelan gang Trende Ragua. He said, the US
Speaker 1: Court of Appeals in DC has affirmed the lower court
Speaker 1: decision not to permit any more airplane flights or deportees
Speaker 1: to go to El Salvador. Ultimately, the case will be
Speaker 1: decided on the merits, and eventually I think it will
Speaker 1: probably go to the US Supreme Court, and I think
Speaker 1: the power of the president to order deportation with due
Speaker 1: process will be upheld. My prediction is a divided one. Substantively,
Speaker 1: the power of the president will be upheld procedurally, They'll
Speaker 1: have to get due process. And the remaining question is
Speaker 1: do federal courts have the power to enforce process against
Speaker 1: the wishes of the executive Is this purely an executive function?
Speaker 1: Based on Supreme Court precedents, the case of nineteen forty eight,
Speaker 1: that would be the president's decision. And in that decision
Speaker 1: they did adjudicate that there is no judicial remedy after
Speaker 1: the president invokes the Alien Enemies Act. Why let the
Speaker 1: law get in the way anyway, It's so it's so despicable.
Speaker 1: Now President Trump founded off on truth social early today
Speaker 1: because that same judge that stopped the deportations. This is
Speaker 1: the idiot judge that said, if they're flying in the air,
Speaker 1: now have the planes turn around and come back.
Speaker 2: What a dope.
Speaker 1: Anyway, he's with the US District Court for the District
Speaker 1: for DC, assigned now to preside over a lawsuit lodged
Speaker 1: against several Trump administration officials and the National Archives and
Speaker 1: Record Administration. The Obama nominated judge also presided over the
Speaker 1: lawsuit challenging the invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. I mean,
Speaker 1: how is it this guy gets picked every time. It's
Speaker 1: just a sheer accident, I know, just a mere coincidence.
Speaker 1: On federal judge denies the administration's effort to ban transgend
Speaker 1: transgender people from the military. Okay, it's just this is
Speaker 1: now what we have been calling it. This is now
Speaker 1: a new form of lawfare. This is judicial activism. This
Speaker 1: is court shopping, This is judge shopping. This is what
Speaker 1: Democrats can't get done electorally, what they can't get done legislatively,
Speaker 1: they go to activist jurists so that they will enact
Speaker 1: their radical agenda for them. Jim Jordan is going to
Speaker 1: as well as others next week, begin the process of
Speaker 1: taking away power from these low level judges so that
Speaker 1: they no longer have the ability to block the constitutionally
Speaker 1: authorized powers of the president. One thing that people don't
Speaker 1: understand is this terrif issue. And I'm the more and
Speaker 1: more I listen to people, more and more I realize
Speaker 1: how dumb some people are.
Speaker 2: They really are dumb.
Speaker 1: And what the President is doing is the President is
Speaker 1: trying to get countries who have free and fair trade.
Speaker 1: European Union countries have not been fair to the US.
Speaker 1: Canada has not been fair to the United States of America,
Speaker 1: and so the President announced the twenty five percent tariff,
Speaker 1: for example, on imported cars. Now, let me give you
Speaker 1: an example. Germany sells eight cars in America for every
Speaker 1: one car that we sell in Germany, American made car. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's not a fair ratio, is it? Well, why is that?
Speaker 1: Why do they do they not like American cars? No,
Speaker 1: there's such there's such a massive amount of money that
Speaker 1: is piled onto the cost of the car. It becomes
Speaker 1: unaffordable for people in Germany. So you start out with
Speaker 1: a ten percent teriff, flat out tariff, and then they
Speaker 1: have in Germany what's called a VAT tax or a
Speaker 1: value added tax, which is a sales tax, and based
Speaker 1: on the high cost of a car. That sales tax
Speaker 1: then makes it cost prohibitive for most people, so that
Speaker 1: then becomes another tax. Now India is considering reducing their
Speaker 1: tariffs on US products by wapping twenty three billion dollars. Well,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, Donald Trump is going to start a
Speaker 1: trade war. New Gingrich pointed out, Actually, America has fared
Speaker 1: very well when we have reciprocal tariffs put on other countries,
Speaker 1: or we put tariffs on other countries. But India's government
Speaker 1: told Reuters that New Delhi is now considering twenty three
Speaker 1: billion in teriff reductions on US imports to stave off
Speaker 1: President Trump's threatened reciprocal tariffs, which would effect at least
Speaker 1: sixty six billion in Indian exports if it takes effect
Speaker 1: next week. According to Reuter's sources, the Indian government ran
Speaker 1: the numbers concluded it will fare much better by lowering
Speaker 1: their tariffs, even though it will lose some income under
Speaker 1: the deal. And he is open to reducing tariffs on
Speaker 1: fifty five percent of US goods on its imports and
Speaker 1: are now subject to terroriffs ranging from five to thirty percent.
Speaker 2: Okay, that's progress.
Speaker 1: If they rescind those tariffs but don't rescind others, then
Speaker 1: the president can implement, you know, his agenda. Pretty amazing.
Speaker 1: You know, over nine million student loan borrowers are passed due.
Speaker 1: How do they get away with that? How do you
Speaker 1: get away with not paying your bill? I mean, it's
Speaker 1: not like a car loan where somebody, you know, the
Speaker 1: Repoman can come and take your car. What are you
Speaker 1: supposed to do? All these people they sign off on
Speaker 1: a loan, you don't pay it back. Now, maybe some
Speaker 1: people run into tough economic times, but if you do,
Speaker 1: you should get in contact with your lender and work
Speaker 1: out a payment plan. Tell them what your situation is,
Speaker 1: and I'm sure that they will work with you. It
Speaker 1: happens all the time. They prefer that rather than people
Speaker 1: running and hiding, which a lot of people also are
Speaker 1: capable of doing as well. On Well, you know, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of stories today that actually caught my attention
Speaker 1: that are driving me crazy. And I mentioned this whole
Speaker 1: issue involving MPR, you know, National Public Radio in this
Speaker 1: testimony that took place.
Speaker 2: We'll do more on this at the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: One craze transgender male allegedly attacking a female turning point
Speaker 1: US a leader while they were tabling at the University
Speaker 1: of Texas in Dallas on Tuesday. Anyway, Charlie Kirk posted
Speaker 1: the footage of the incident on x showing the male,
Speaker 1: dressed in women's clothes, allegedly swinging at the students with
Speaker 1: his bike clock before cycling away. I mean, what triggers
Speaker 1: people this way? Why are people shooting bullets into Tesla dealerships?
Speaker 1: Why are they setting charging stations ablaze? Where's the Democratic Party?
Speaker 1: The peaceful party? All we're saying is give piece a chance.
Speaker 1: Whatever happened to that party? This is a sad story.
Speaker 1: Lawsuit filed against Walt Disney Parks and Resorts you in
Speaker 1: relation to a twenty twenty three investigation into an ex
Speaker 1: Florida employee accused of filming up the skirts of teenage
Speaker 1: girls Box thirty five reporting the lawsuit. I mean, isn't
Speaker 1: it kind of the most bizarre feeling to know that
Speaker 1: such creepy people are in the world. It drives me
Speaker 1: crazy as a parent, and my kids think I'm nuts
Speaker 1: and like trust nobody. Don't trust anybody. I don't even
Speaker 1: trust Linda anymore. Can't trust Linda. She has a hate list.
Speaker 1: No saying La approved. Now, this is why all you
Speaker 1: people that believe in government, I want you to pay
Speaker 1: attention to this. So we watched the Pacific Palisades fire.
Speaker 1: You saw fire hydrants that didn't have water in them.
Speaker 1: We saw an empty reservoir. We learned that a lot
Speaker 1: of money that could have been a lot of water
Speaker 1: rather that could have flowed from northern California to southern
Speaker 1: California was not. We saw more mistakes than you'd ever
Speaker 1: dream of. They weren't prepared for this, even though they
Speaker 1: knew Santa ana wins were predictable than wildfires were predictable.
Speaker 1: They didn't practice the basic science of forestry. Okay, so
Speaker 1: people lose their homes. Now people would like to some
Speaker 1: of them rebuild their homes. Some of them are getting
Speaker 1: the hell out of dodge. But the city of Los
Speaker 1: Angeles get this. Since the wildfires, which seems like an
Speaker 1: eternity ago, they have approved only four building permits to
Speaker 1: owners to rebuild their homes following the Pacific Palisades fires.
Speaker 2: This goes two and a half months ago.
Speaker 1: Los Angeles, LA City council Member Tracy Park expressed disappointment
Speaker 1: with the slow progress when I hear in the community
Speaker 1: meetings like we had today that only four permits have
Speaker 1: been issued and we're on day seven seventy five post fire.
Speaker 2: That is concerning to me. It should be.
Speaker 1: Concerning to you, those of you that believe the government
Speaker 1: will be there to help you in your life, get
Speaker 1: rid of that ridiculous notion, and that means that everything
Speaker 1: that they have ever touched usually goes to ruin. How's
Speaker 1: the government done in terms of securing our borders prior
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump? How's the government done with their lock
Speaker 1: box for Social Security and Medicaid and Medicare? Oh, that's right,
Speaker 1: they rated it. How's the promise of Obamacare working out?
Speaker 1: Keep your doctor plan and save on average twenty five
Speaker 1: hundred dollars per family. Why do people put their trust
Speaker 1: and their hope and their belief that the government that
Speaker 1: has failed spectacularly, why do they want to give them
Speaker 1: more power and control? How is your school system working
Speaker 1: out for your kids in most cities and small towns?
Speaker 2: Not that great?
Speaker 1: How's law and order and safety and security in your
Speaker 1: small town? Are big city but most Americans not that
Speaker 1: great anyway? Eight hundred and nine four one, Shawn is
Speaker 1: a number. You want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: All right, let's save elm shall we the comments? We're
Speaker 1: going to play him in full at the top of
Speaker 1: the hour. And this hearing yesterday about saving MPR MPBS,
Speaker 1: I promise it might have been one of the most
Speaker 1: entertaining moments and a congressional hearing that I've heard in many,
Speaker 1: many years.
Speaker 2: We'll get to that.
Speaker 1: Also, there is a very very very important Supreme Court
Speaker 1: race that will take place next Tuesday in Wisconsin. Brad Schimmel.
Speaker 1: He will tip the balance of power if he wins
Speaker 1: to the Conservatives. It's very important, just like Mike Waltz's
Speaker 1: seat will be. That vote is on Tuesday as well.