Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Joe podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. The Washington Post has become
Speaker 1: the latest corporate news outlet to verify that Hunter Biden's
Speaker 1: laptop is not only real, but that it contains documentary
Speaker 1: evidence of corruption. Post reporting comes more than a year
Speaker 1: after laptop first emerge and once again demonstrates the media
Speaker 1: actively ignored and work to cover up a bombshell story
Speaker 1: that would have damaged President Joe Biden right before the
Speaker 1: American people were going to vote of more on the
Speaker 1: Washington Post reporting in Tonight's hold On, Welcome to hold On.
Speaker 1: I'm Buck Sexton. They lie, do you. That's not a surprise,
Speaker 1: but let's just make sure we start with that the
Speaker 1: Democrat Alie corporate media lied to you repeatedly in the
Speaker 1: most bald faced fashion. They just didn't care how obvious
Speaker 1: the truth was. They lied to you anyway because they
Speaker 1: tried to and unfortunately were successful in steering the presidency
Speaker 1: toward Joe Biden or Joe Biden toward the presidency. This
Speaker 1: is how it all went down. They just pretended that
Speaker 1: the laptop was fake until people voted. Then they held
Speaker 1: that storyline for a while, that propaganda that oh, there
Speaker 1: you go, there's some of the photos from the laptop.
Speaker 1: By the way, whoa, and they just kept going with it. Well,
Speaker 1: guess what now, all of a sudden, the dam is
Speaker 1: breaking Washington Post story. Over the course of fourteen months,
Speaker 1: Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC China Energy and its executives paid
Speaker 1: four point eight million dollars two enterities controlled by Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden and his uncle, according to government records, corp documents
Speaker 1: and newly discovered bank statements, as well as emails contained
Speaker 1: on a copy of a laptop hard drive that purportedly
Speaker 1: once belonged to Hunter Biden. So let's just be clear here.
Speaker 1: Not only is the Washington Post telling you that the
Speaker 1: laptop information was at least a lot of it real accurate, true,
Speaker 1: which we've known a long time, but now they're having
Speaker 1: to admit what has been known. They're also telling that
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden got millions of dollars from Chinese cost a
Speaker 1: Communist Party back energy firm in China. That's a big deal,
Speaker 1: but it keeps going more from this post, worry Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden received an additional one million dollar retainer issued as
Speaker 1: part of an agreement to represent Patrick Hoe, a CEFC
Speaker 1: official who would later be charged in the United States
Speaker 1: in connection with a multimillion dollars scheme to bribe leaders
Speaker 1: from chat and Uganda. That retainer agreement, in a newly
Speaker 1: uncovered document, contains the signatures of both Hunter Biden and Hoe,
Speaker 1: who was later convicted at sentence to three years in prison.
Speaker 1: So this is interesting. Hunter Biden was signing stuff about
Speaker 1: how he was going to help out Chinese these officials
Speaker 1: in their business work. You know. The thing is, the
Speaker 1: commercial sector and the Communist Party in China are effectively
Speaker 1: one and the same. Right, So any major company, any
Speaker 1: major entity in China that's operating, is doing so at
Speaker 1: the behest of, or certainly at the forbearance of the
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist Party, and they're always advancing the interests of
Speaker 1: the government behind all this. Right, So this is interesting
Speaker 1: because you have Hunter Biden clearly tied into people who
Speaker 1: are guilty of corruption. And that's not a surprise because
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is in fact corrupt. Let's do a flashback
Speaker 1: for a second to October of twenty twenty. NBC News
Speaker 1: reported the FBI was investigating whether or not the emails.
Speaker 1: We're part of a foreign intelligence operations, and the emails
Speaker 1: were all real, But the news outlets were saying, Oh,
Speaker 1: but the FBI is investigating battle. Investigators are examining whether
Speaker 1: emails allegedly describing activities by Joe Biden, a son Hunter,
Speaker 1: and found on a laptop at a Delaware repair shop,
Speaker 1: are linked to a or an intelligence operation. According to
Speaker 1: people familiar with the matter, h isn't this so interesting?
Speaker 1: All the things that were said about this originally turning
Speaker 1: out to be well true in the media. Why do
Speaker 1: you about this? In fact, the media are not the
Speaker 1: only ones who lied about it. October of twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: the month before the presidential election, during a debate with
Speaker 1: President Trump, Joe Biden said Hunter never took money from China.
Speaker 1: Watch this one, Vice President Biden, there have been questions
Speaker 1: about the work your son has done in China and
Speaker 1: for a Ukrainian energy company when you were vice president.
Speaker 1: In retrospect, was anything about those relationships inappropriate or unethical?
Speaker 1: Nothing was unethical If my son has not made money.
Speaker 1: In terms of this thing about what are you talking
Speaker 1: about China? I have not had it. The only guy
Speaker 1: made money from China is this guy is the only one.
Speaker 1: Nobody else has made money from China. That's a lie.
Speaker 1: Let's just call it what it is. It's a lot.
Speaker 1: He lied. Joe Biden lied to you. He lied to
Speaker 1: the American people, and he did so so that he
Speaker 1: could fool them into enough of them into voting for him,
Speaker 1: at least the persuadables, the independence, the people that really
Speaker 1: care about what they're being told by presidents at the
Speaker 1: very last minute, back in October of twenty twenty. That
Speaker 1: certainly counts. But there was corruption. Hunter did make money
Speaker 1: from China. He did not register as a foreign agent,
Speaker 1: and there's a federal investigation in Delaware underway right now
Speaker 1: to that end. Hunter Biden has already paid after borrowing
Speaker 1: from a donor a million dollars of back taxes that
Speaker 1: were owed. Do you think you'd get away with just
Speaker 1: owing a million dollars? You just pay them after they
Speaker 1: started investigating you too. It's not like you come clean.
Speaker 1: You know they're after you. So there's the possibility here
Speaker 1: of federal tax evasion charges. There's the launder money laundering
Speaker 1: charges that would be thrown at Hunter Biden as well
Speaker 1: as the near certainty that he violated the Foreign Edges,
Speaker 1: Foreign Agents Registration Act or FARA. So there's a real
Speaker 1: possibility here of a criminal investigation of Hunter Biden that
Speaker 1: proves he did all these things. Will they still bring
Speaker 1: charges against him given that he's the president's son, That
Speaker 1: is a big open question. But even CNN now is
Speaker 1: finally reporting on the Hunter Biden Beresma scandal. Breisma is
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian energy company that was paying him fifty thousand,
Speaker 1: all the others say eighty thousand a month, and there's
Speaker 1: also a DJ investigation about all this here CNN having
Speaker 1: to admit reality for once, Ivan, just lay out your
Speaker 1: reporting here because this is very, very bad for the
Speaker 1: president's son. It is, and it's an investigation, as you
Speaker 1: pointed out, going back to twenty eighteen and right now,
Speaker 1: prosecutors in Delaware are focusing on a number of things,
Speaker 1: including whether Hunter Biden and some of his business associates
Speaker 1: violated laws, including attacks and money laundering laws and foreign
Speaker 1: lobbying laws. A lot of this has to do with
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's time working with this company called Barisma, an
Speaker 1: energy company in Ukraine. He was getting paid as much
Speaker 1: as fifty thousand dollars a month for that company during
Speaker 1: a time that the Joe Biden, his father was vice president,
Speaker 1: was in charge of handling Ukraine issues for the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: and that of course raised questions of a conflict. Oh
Speaker 1: the stuff that we on the right and me many
Speaker 1: others have been saying for what over a year now,
Speaker 1: Now they're finally coming clean because they have to, because
Speaker 1: I think there might be charges coming. Well. More on
Speaker 1: this were investigative journalists at the National Pulse Natalie Winters
Speaker 1: in just a moment. First, I want to talk about
Speaker 1: protecting your online data. A lot of companies promise your
Speaker 1: privacy is guaranteed. We know that's not true. That's why
Speaker 1: you need a new privacy and cybersecurity application tool called Secure.
Speaker 1: It is spelled SEK. You are. Security is using proprietary
Speaker 1: encryption and offering secure messaging, an email with secure all
Speaker 1: of your communications based on servers and data centers hosted
Speaker 1: in Switzerland without using any of the big tech platforms.
Speaker 1: Privacy is a big issue. Without real security, people can
Speaker 1: read your emails, messages, even your bank information. Secure will
Speaker 1: never mind your data and never ask for your phone number.
Speaker 1: You can send emails to your doctor, banker, lawyer, anybody
Speaker 1: with total confidence you're not being spied on by your
Speaker 1: internet provider or big tech. Secure is your solution to
Speaker 1: stop the constant theft of your digital identity. Cost only
Speaker 1: five dollars from the messenger, only ten dollars from the
Speaker 1: messenger and email combination package. Go to secure dot com
Speaker 1: and take back your privacy today. That's sekure dot com.
Speaker 1: Use promo code buck or twenty five percent off. We'll
Speaker 1: be right back with more. Hold the line. There's a
Speaker 1: battle going on right now, but maybe the most important
Speaker 1: fight our country's had since the Revolutionary War. Once again,
Speaker 1: it's about our freedom. People like you and me are
Speaker 1: being canceled, our speech increasingly censored by big tech and
Speaker 1: corporate media. Can't let that happen. Kind to fight back.
Speaker 1: Please stand with us and so the first teav be
Speaker 1: a part of our team dedicated to preserving the very
Speaker 1: essence of who we are free Americans. There's no evidence
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden has done anything wrong. There is no
Speaker 1: evidence of any wrongdoing between by Biden, by Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: or by Hunter Biden. There's no evidence that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: actually did anything wrong. Or did anything to sway things
Speaker 1: in Hunter Biden's favor. He's denied that his son ever
Speaker 1: lobbied him for anything. There is nothing, there is nothing
Speaker 1: wrong that Vice President Biden did. The President Trump has
Speaker 1: falsely accused your son of doing something wrong while serving
Speaker 1: on a company board in Ukraine. I want to point
Speaker 1: out there's no evidence of wrongdoing by either one of you.
Speaker 1: There is no evidence that anybody did anything illegal regarding
Speaker 1: the Bidens and Ukraine, and Joe Biden was carrying out
Speaker 1: US policy. President Trump wanted dirt on Joe and Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: Trump's claims about wrongdoing here are unsubstantiated. We have looked
Speaker 1: lots of outlets of look that was all lies. Of course,
Speaker 1: there was plenty of evidence. They knew there was evidence.
Speaker 1: They just pretended there wasn't They lied to you. Reminder
Speaker 1: of the lengths to which the media went to provide
Speaker 1: cover for Hunter Biden in the midst of the twenty
Speaker 1: twenty election. The Washington Post has become the second mainstream
Speaker 1: mallett after New York Times, to authenticate the contents of
Speaker 1: Hunter's laptop and report on evidence that the president's son
Speaker 1: received millions in payments from a Chinese energy firm, both
Speaker 1: that both the Post and The Times were late to
Speaker 1: the game, to say the least. Natalie Winters is an
Speaker 1: investigative reporter for The National Pulse. She began reporting on
Speaker 1: Hunter's connection to CEFC China Energy over a year ago.
Speaker 1: He joins me, now, Natalie, great to see it. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much for having me. All right, what do
Speaker 1: people need to know? I mean, just just give us
Speaker 1: the overview first, before we give the media coverage of this,
Speaker 1: the politics of it, all of that. What is the
Speaker 1: status right now of the relationship as we know it?
Speaker 1: Based on evidence of Hunter's dealings in China and specifically
Speaker 1: with CEFC, Well, it's indisputable that Hunter Biden has given
Speaker 1: the chairman of CEFC China Energy his wiring information, his
Speaker 1: bank details, He's signed contracts, He's referred to himself in
Speaker 1: personal emails as quote the managing director of joint ventures
Speaker 1: between him and CEFC China Energy. So the links between
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden and CEFC China Energy are not Russian disinformation,
Speaker 1: are not conspiracy theory. They're rooted in cold hardback. They're
Speaker 1: rooted in evidence and CFC China Energy. It's worth noting
Speaker 1: that this isn't just a run of the middle energy
Speaker 1: company that's supplying power to people in China or even
Speaker 1: the United States. Now, this is a foreign influence group
Speaker 1: that's been flagged by the US State Department. Is working
Speaker 1: under what's known as the United Front Work Department, which
Speaker 1: is a Chinese state sponsored, multi billion dollar effort that
Speaker 1: seeks to find American elites, particularly those involved in politics
Speaker 1: or at least related to those involved in politics, to
Speaker 1: find them kind of like the Achilles Heel of America
Speaker 1: and target them with these business deals, with these lucrative contracts,
Speaker 1: ultimately to try to get them to really be at
Speaker 1: the hands and at the mercy of the Chinese Communist Party,
Speaker 1: weather with compromising material or just the fact that they're
Speaker 1: quite literally in bed with them, given that Hunter Biden's
Speaker 1: bank account benefits directly when China does well. So the
Speaker 1: CFC China Energy Connection is not fabricated. It's very very
Speaker 1: very real. Well here's the Washington Posts quote from them.
Speaker 1: The Post did not find evidence that Joe Biden personally
Speaker 1: benefited from or new details about the transactions with cef C,
Speaker 1: which took place after he had left the vice presidency
Speaker 1: and before he announced his intention to run for the
Speaker 1: White House in twenty twenty. Now they play this game
Speaker 1: of there's no evidence, there's no evidence. Is there no
Speaker 1: evidence that because I seem to recall something about ten
Speaker 1: percent for the Big Guy in some of the laptop emails,
Speaker 1: what do we know about whether there's even the possibility
Speaker 1: of money from Hunter's dealings abroad finding their way somehow
Speaker 1: through shell corporations or other ways to hide money to
Speaker 1: Big Joe Biden himself. Well, given Joe Biden's mental state,
Speaker 1: it's not hard to believe that he wouldn't know anything
Speaker 1: was going on. But all these deals were going back,
Speaker 1: you know, over a decade, is since Hunter Biden had
Speaker 1: been working on these business deals with these various foreign countries,
Speaker 1: particularly China, So there is evidence that Joe Biden did
Speaker 1: know what was going on. Of course, you're talking about
Speaker 1: the infamous saved ten percent for the Big Guy message,
Speaker 1: which again it's curious that the White House that no
Speaker 1: one has ever really come out and explicitly said that
Speaker 1: that's not Joe Biden. They just kind of rely on
Speaker 1: the fact that, well, there's no evidence that there is.
Speaker 1: Of course, the game that the mainstream media likes to play.
Speaker 1: But the intersection between Joe Biden and Hunter Biden's business
Speaker 1: dealings is bigger than just that one message alone. At
Speaker 1: the National Pulse, we uncovered a bunch of emails and
Speaker 1: techs that kind to paint a similar picture. Whether it's
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden telling one of his business partners this was
Speaker 1: a Mexican national, he was telling him that he would
Speaker 1: bring anyone that he requested any one of his clients
Speaker 1: for meetings at the White House. Now maybe they weren't
Speaker 1: meeting with Joe Biden, but nonetheless still leveraging his connections
Speaker 1: to the White House, which he only had through his father.
Speaker 1: And another email from the chairman of CEFC China Energy,
Speaker 1: who I'm pretty sure been kind of unpersoned by the
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist Party. Now no one really knows where he
Speaker 1: is well. In these emails he specifically requested meetings not
Speaker 1: just with Hunter, but quote with h and the family.
Speaker 1: So people can interpret what and the family means. But
Speaker 1: they probably weren't wanting to meet with Hunter Biden's you know,
Speaker 1: school aged children. So there really is evidence on there
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden was involved. And of course you can
Speaker 1: see this in text between them talking about the kind
Speaker 1: of exchange of cash and bank accounts, wiring information. So
Speaker 1: there's certainly enough evidence there that I think asking these
Speaker 1: questions are certainly valid. And when the mainstream media loves
Speaker 1: to use their phrase of quote no evidence, that should
Speaker 1: really be a telltale sign that there actually is a
Speaker 1: lot of evidence indicating otherwise. You know, they say there
Speaker 1: was no evidence, and they claim that it was beyond
Speaker 1: the media. The Democrat corporate media aligned with the Biden
Speaker 1: family here, of course, and all of this has said
Speaker 1: that they just couldn't get access to it. Noale I
Speaker 1: wanted you to respond to this. The Washington Post wrote
Speaker 1: that after New York Post began publishing reports and the
Speaker 1: contents of the laptop in October twenty twenty, the Washington
Speaker 1: Post repeatedly asked Juliani and Republican strategist Stephen K. Bennon
Speaker 1: for a copy of the data to review before the election,
Speaker 1: but the requests were rebuffed or ignored. I think there's
Speaker 1: some creative writing going on here. Can you tell us
Speaker 1: about it? That is most definitely creative writing. I know,
Speaker 1: at least from the national polls, including our editor in
Speaker 1: chief Raheem, because we had always always extended an open
Speaker 1: invitation to frankly, anyone who was part of the mainstream media,
Speaker 1: and Washington DC, The Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, MSNBC,
Speaker 1: you name it offered open invitations and only one person
Speaker 1: from Politico took us up on it. They came down and,
Speaker 1: believe me, at first they thought the hard drive wasn't real.
Speaker 1: They were kind of mocking us, saying, oh, you know,
Speaker 1: you're sure you want to let me look at it.
Speaker 1: And by the time he was done looking at it.
Speaker 1: I know Raheem has tweeted about this and told the story,
Speaker 1: but he knew it was real. He ended up actually
Speaker 1: writing a book on it. But it's really really bizarre
Speaker 1: that the mainstream media's kind of efforts to cover up
Speaker 1: the story say, oh, well, we weren't contacted by the
Speaker 1: people who had the hard drive. They wouldn't show us
Speaker 1: a coffee of it. Really, because I'm pretty sure this
Speaker 1: is the same mainstream media that would probably run I
Speaker 1: don't even know how many miles to every corner of
Speaker 1: the earth to chase down any single lead, no matter
Speaker 1: how small, about Donald Trump, even if the story was
Speaker 1: totally totally insignificant. Yet you have the first son the
Speaker 1: potential first son having business dealings with some of America's
Speaker 1: worst adversaries, whose sole purpose is to compromise the individuals
Speaker 1: involved in these business deals. And they can't even be bothered,
Speaker 1: let alone the FBI when the hard drive was given
Speaker 1: to them all the way back in twenty nineteen. Well,
Speaker 1: they don't even know where it is now, was revealed
Speaker 1: in recent congressional testimony from Congressman Matt Gates. So it's just,
Speaker 1: I think a perfect example of how when you're a
Speaker 1: member of America's ruling class, if your last name is Biden,
Speaker 1: if your last name is Clinton, there's no accountability. You
Speaker 1: can get away with it because the media will run
Speaker 1: cover for you, and any of these intelligence agencies they
Speaker 1: just can't be bothered to actually look into any of
Speaker 1: the alleged crimes. I wanted you to give us just
Speaker 1: a little bit of backstory context here for this originally
Speaker 1: published by the National Pulse in October twenty twenty. It's
Speaker 1: audio of Hunter Biden discussing his dealings in China. Watch
Speaker 1: this one. I get calls from my father to tell
Speaker 1: me that the New York Times is calling. But my
Speaker 1: old partner, Eric, who literally has done me harm for
Speaker 1: I don't know how long is the one taking the
Speaker 1: calls because my father will not stop sending the calls
Speaker 1: to Derek. I have another New at Times reporter calling
Speaker 1: about my representation of the literally doctor Patrick the spy
Speaker 1: chief of China. I am receiving calls from the soldiers
Speaker 1: commun yard from the US turning himself my best friend
Speaker 1: in business. Devin has named me as a witness without
Speaker 1: telling me in a criminal case and my father without
Speaker 1: telling me. That's kind of shading what's going on here.
Speaker 1: So Hunter Biden is referring to what he calls the
Speaker 1: spy chief of China, an individual named Patrick Coe, who
Speaker 1: was the chairman of CEFC China Energy. Believe it or not,
Speaker 1: he was actually later indicted for attempting to bribe officials.
Speaker 1: I believe it was in Africa to try to get
Speaker 1: leverage and certain business deals in exchange for payoffs. So
Speaker 1: it's certainly interesting that that same individual as the person
Speaker 1: who got into business with Hunter Biden to work on
Speaker 1: energy again Hunter Biden, who really had no experience in
Speaker 1: the field at all. But this is a private audio
Speaker 1: recording that we recovered from the voice memos section of
Speaker 1: the Hard Drive. So this is, you know, not a transcription,
Speaker 1: that's actually Hunter Biden speaking. So as much as the
Speaker 1: mainstream media likes to say that they were never given
Speaker 1: any information in any audio tapes or anything, we published
Speaker 1: all this, this was all publicly available to any of
Speaker 1: the outlets who cared to look into it. But what's
Speaker 1: also really interesting is that he reels that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: was actually named or potentially named as a witness in
Speaker 1: one of these hearings. It's sort of unclear what exactly
Speaker 1: he's saying and frankly rambling about, but again it speaks
Speaker 1: to I think the two biggest seams here, which is
Speaker 1: one Hunter Biden indisputably, indisputably was in business with the
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist Party and some of the most nefarious elements
Speaker 1: of it, that Joe Biden was involved, frankly on both ends,
Speaker 1: both receiving cash as a result of these deals, but
Speaker 1: also in as a kind of a middleman or at
Speaker 1: least involved in the process. Natalie, thanks so much be
Speaker 1: talking about this more. Thank you. If you want the
Speaker 1: full backstory, by the way of Hunter Biden's laptop, his
Speaker 1: dealings overseas, all of that, you should check out my
Speaker 1: new special on the First TV American scandal, Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: The special offers a deep dive into Hunter's perruption with
Speaker 1: investigative journalist John Solomon, who broke a lot of these
Speaker 1: stories years ago. An editor in chief of the National Pulse,
Speaker 1: Raheem Kassam, was also broken many of these stories. American
Speaker 1: Scandal Hunter Biden is only available to First TV subscribers.
Speaker 1: Go to the First TV dot com to subscribe and
Speaker 1: watch Today all Right. Earlier this month, Fox News correspondent
Speaker 1: Benjamin Hall and two of his colleagues were fired upon
Speaker 1: by Russian forces near Kiev. A cameraman and freelance journalists
Speaker 1: were killed in the attack, while Hall was left severely
Speaker 1: wounded in need of rescue. We come back, We'll speak
Speaker 1: the chat. Robushow, whose organizations Save Our Allies, was involved
Speaker 1: in the daring operation to get Benjamin Hall to safety.
Speaker 1: Stay with Us. According to the United Nations Refugee Agency,
Speaker 1: the number of people who have fled Ukraine since the
Speaker 1: start of the Russian invasion last month now stands at
Speaker 1: a little over four million, totally surpassed the UN's original
Speaker 1: worst case scenario estimates. In response to the crisis, the
Speaker 1: Biden administration has announced the US will accept one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand refugees from Ukraine and will provide an additional one
Speaker 1: billion dollars in humanitarian aid. Relief organizations from across the
Speaker 1: globe are now assisting refugees, including Save Our Allies, a
Speaker 1: group that not only helps with relief efforts, but has
Speaker 1: also been carrying out rescue operations inside Ukraine itself. You
Speaker 1: know what I mean now is the co founder of
Speaker 1: that group, Chad Robushow Chat. Thanks for being with us,
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me on your organization. Chat has been
Speaker 1: on the ground since early February in Ukraine. Can you
Speaker 1: just tell us what is that battlefield space? Like? What
Speaker 1: are you seeing? What's been going on? Well, I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, a major city is that are being attacked
Speaker 1: not just militarily but disaibilian the civilian populations as well. Uh.
Speaker 1: You know, yet I'm not seeing it as much on
Speaker 1: the news as it should be consider what we're seeing
Speaker 1: on the ground. You know, residential areas in some cities
Speaker 1: are knocked out as as much as eighty percent of
Speaker 1: the cities. Uh. And and it's not doesn't appear to
Speaker 1: be indiscriminate. Fired appears to be actually direct attacks on
Speaker 1: civilians populations. Just recently, I was able to be part
Speaker 1: of the evacuation of forty seven disabled children that came
Speaker 1: from a group of about one hundred and fifty disabled
Speaker 1: children that was in a marked shelter of a mark
Speaker 1: shelter for for medical people, which was you know, these
Speaker 1: disabled children. A hundred of them were killed, forty seven
Speaker 1: survived and we were able to get them out. So
Speaker 1: we're seeing just terrific attacks by his world superpower on
Speaker 1: a first world nation of sober nation, and it's horrific.
Speaker 1: And uh, you know, the world is the world governments
Speaker 1: are not coming to help. But what we've seen as
Speaker 1: the incredible culmination of all these ngeos from all over
Speaker 1: the world come together to do the right thing and
Speaker 1: help the Ukrainian people by through evacuations, through pushing medical
Speaker 1: aid forward. We're also participating in getting communications infrastructure available
Speaker 1: as a cellular and electrical go down, so we can
Speaker 1: continue to communicate that sustaining evacuation and support efforts through
Speaker 1: organizations like ours to Save Our Allies. So Save Our
Speaker 1: Allies was involved in the rescue of Fox News corresponding
Speaker 1: Benjamin Hall after he his College were attacked by Russian
Speaker 1: forces over this month. Well, first of all, can you
Speaker 1: tell us what happened there in that in that attack
Speaker 1: and how were you able to get Benjamin Hall to safety? Yeah,
Speaker 1: well we were. We were actually all in our in
Speaker 1: our operations center and preparing for another operation when the
Speaker 1: call came in. And all we knew at the time
Speaker 1: was that five Fox employees were in pe Kiov in
Speaker 1: a acting battle of this particular day was the day
Speaker 1: was the day that the Russians were trying to take Kiov,
Speaker 1: and so we got the call in within twenty minutes,
Speaker 1: you know, we routed the door and two we had
Speaker 1: we broke up into two teams, and in each team
Speaker 1: we had you know, myself and a special operations vendoran UH,
Speaker 1: and then in another vehicle we had two spots special
Speaker 1: operations very skilled precision recovery experts and UH. And then
Speaker 1: both vehicles had surgeons with this trauma surgeon. So that
Speaker 1: was our team that went out with we had. As
Speaker 1: we were heading there, we learned that Benjamin Hall was
Speaker 1: still alive and probably had forty eight hours or so
Speaker 1: to live because there's some catastrophic injuries. Uh. Both Sasha
Speaker 1: and UH and Pierre were dead, their two drivers were dead,
Speaker 1: and UH and then the two other Fox employees were
Speaker 1: in hiding in safe and so we pressed the board
Speaker 1: and ended up getting there too, able and able to
Speaker 1: get Benjamin out, Benjamin Hall out. We chose to leave
Speaker 1: the other two Fox employees behind to go get them
Speaker 1: later because they were safe, and then come back for
Speaker 1: Pierre's body. But the most important thing was to get
Speaker 1: Benjamin Hall safe, get him, get him the medical care
Speaker 1: he needed, and we coordinated with the United States Military,
Speaker 1: Polish Special Operations, and Ukrainian Special Operations UH. Once we
Speaker 1: got him to the border of Poland, the Polish Special
Speaker 1: Operations were able to get us across and then UH
Speaker 1: and then to get him on US military aircraft because
Speaker 1: the US military couldn't come into Ukraine, so we got
Speaker 1: US military aircraft. The eighty second Airborne flew him to
Speaker 1: the airfield and US one thirty flew him the launch
Speaker 1: school Germany, where he underwent some massive surgeries, was stabilized
Speaker 1: and able to fly back to the United States where
Speaker 1: he's home now in the United States in Texas, getting
Speaker 1: the care, you know, the care that he needs. He
Speaker 1: needs to sitificant amount of care, but he is he
Speaker 1: is going to make it. And then uh two bas
Speaker 1: I want I was telling you this Chad. Were was
Speaker 1: that Fox News team? Were they hit with small arms
Speaker 1: fire from Mars and soldiers or was it indirect fire
Speaker 1: artillery round or a missile? It was indirect fire. Uh. Uh.
Speaker 1: The the Fox employee, Sasha, was in the vehicle with
Speaker 1: two drivers and that that uh, indirect fire hit that
Speaker 1: vehicle and destroyed the vehicle. And uh unfortunately everyone in
Speaker 1: the vehicle was killed. Benjamin Hall and Pierre were just
Speaker 1: away from the vehicle doing a shooting a report and
Speaker 1: uh and and that's where Pierre was killed and Benjamin
Speaker 1: was injured by the by that blast. And uh and
Speaker 1: uh we we actually went back two days after getting
Speaker 1: Benjamin Benjamin out, We went back two days later and
Speaker 1: uh and I actually personally drove the vehicle and escorted
Speaker 1: Pierre's body out. We wanted to get him a dignified uh,
Speaker 1: in a dignified way to get him out of the
Speaker 1: country and bring him to his wife. And we delivered
Speaker 1: him to his wife, Michelle in Poland. God bless what
Speaker 1: you guys are doing out there, such important work. You know,
Speaker 1: this war has been going on for over a month.
Speaker 1: The photos and videos coming out of Ukraine are grim
Speaker 1: when you are interacting with the refugees, So no, you're
Speaker 1: also involved in trying to help refugees who have managed
Speaker 1: to go to the country safely. Just how how are
Speaker 1: they doing? I mean, what are their sense, what's their
Speaker 1: sense of what's going on? I mean, just trying to
Speaker 1: give us a picture of what it's like dealing with
Speaker 1: these refugees and how are they handling all of this well,
Speaker 1: I mean, most of the refugees you're seeing are either
Speaker 1: women and children or elderly because the men have to
Speaker 1: stay there and fight. I've seen men gets it and
Speaker 1: ordering and they get turned around because they have to
Speaker 1: say in fight in anywhere from eighteen to sixty years old.
Speaker 1: So many of the women are fleeing with their children.
Speaker 1: And then you know, oftentimes they get along lines there.
Speaker 1: Maybe they are in a day where the fuel's low
Speaker 1: and they run out of fuel, so thend up having
Speaker 1: a walk. And it's very cold right now, I mean, um,
Speaker 1: you know, right now it's probably you know, ten degrees
Speaker 1: outside and snowing. So you imagine being a wife or
Speaker 1: of your husband's going away fighting you don't know where
Speaker 1: he's at. And now you're moving your kids across a
Speaker 1: country in the snow, in the cold, through the middle
Speaker 1: of the night, walking to a border. Your cell phone
Speaker 1: battery probably dies. So they're very scared and they make it.
Speaker 1: They finally make it to the border. Those that do,
Speaker 1: they finally make it to the border, and then they're like,
Speaker 1: what's next. You know where I go? I know no one.
Speaker 1: I don't know where my husband's at. I don't have
Speaker 1: a phone, and they're just they're at the mercy of
Speaker 1: whoever's there to help them. Fortunately, there's some amazing people
Speaker 1: from around the world that have come there to help.
Speaker 1: People are driving them the refugee centers, people bringing jackets
Speaker 1: and clothes, warm food, and just people amazing human beings
Speaker 1: helping other human beings. That it's been just such a
Speaker 1: great thing to see that, But nonetheless it's still a
Speaker 1: major crisis. One as being just overwhelmed. There's so many
Speaker 1: people coming, and these refugee centers are are you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's very sad to go in. And we went
Speaker 1: in just the other day and brought good some goods
Speaker 1: and we've actually brought a bunch of flowers, but the
Speaker 1: ladies just to give them flowers and do something nice
Speaker 1: for them and uh, and they're just they're scared and
Speaker 1: they don't know what's next. And how can people how
Speaker 1: can people try to help from from stateside? Help your group? Well,
Speaker 1: I mean there's so many NGOs to help. Ours is
Speaker 1: one that's we're doing some critical rescues and and moving
Speaker 1: some medical supplies forward. So Save our Allies dot org
Speaker 1: is where you could donate. The most important thing that
Speaker 1: I think could be done for our organization right now
Speaker 1: is just keep us in, keep us in prayer and
Speaker 1: uh and and donate financially. This is very expensive operations.
Speaker 1: We're committed to do our part to be here on
Speaker 1: the ground and getting the work done. So if anybody
Speaker 1: wants to contribute, the best way to do us is
Speaker 1: make a donation at Save our Allies dot org. God
Speaker 1: bless chat. Thank you so much. Appreciate you, appreciate what
Speaker 1: your team is doing. Please give them our thoughts and
Speaker 1: prayers and U thank you so much. God, bless you,
Speaker 1: Thank you. Joe Biden is weighing into the debate over
Speaker 1: Florida's parental Rights and Education bill, and a video release
Speaker 1: today The President called the bill a hateful and called
Speaker 1: for transgender equality in the classroom and playing field. We'll
Speaker 1: have more on that with Collins David Marcus after the break. First,
Speaker 1: we're living chaotic times and foreign identity thieves love chaos.
Speaker 1: American homeowners have become a favorite target for these criminals.
Speaker 1: And it's not just your credit cards thereafter, it's your home.
Speaker 1: The hackers want your home. That's right, it's called home
Speaker 1: title theft. It's exploding in the US and no, you're
Speaker 1: not covered by homeowners Insurance or common ID theft services.
Speaker 1: Problem is your home's titles kept online, and identity thief
Speaker 1: knows his big paydays as easy as forging a signature
Speaker 1: stating you sold your home to him? Now who take
Speaker 1: out loan after loan against your home and you won't
Speaker 1: know until the collection calls start or you get an
Speaker 1: eviction notice. How do you protect your home from title theft?
Speaker 1: Go to your country or quarters office and check your
Speaker 1: home tittle every day, or reggish your address right now
Speaker 1: at home tetlelock dot com to see if you're already
Speaker 1: a victim. This is how we protect our most viable
Speaker 1: asset at a home titleock dot com again, that's home
Speaker 1: Titlelock dot Com author and commus David Marcus joins us
Speaker 1: when we come back. Kiln't miss American scandal Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: a new First TV exclusive special up hosted by Buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: available right now only on the First TV app. President
Speaker 1: Biden is all but ignoring the border crisis and record inflation,
Speaker 1: and has instead chosen to focus his attention on taking
Speaker 1: a stand with the transgender community. In a video address
Speaker 1: released today, Biden reveals he's making a priority to focus
Speaker 1: on equal and fair opportunities or trans individuals all of
Speaker 1: the country. Take a look the onslaught of anti transgender
Speaker 1: state laws attacking you and your families. Simply wrong. This
Speaker 1: administration is standing up for you against all these hateful bills,
Speaker 1: and we're committed to advancing trangender equality in the classroom,
Speaker 1: on the playing field, at work, in our military, and
Speaker 1: our housing and healthcare systems everywhere. Today we're announcing even
Speaker 1: more steps, but there's always more work to do. To
Speaker 1: end the epidemic of violence against transgender women of color
Speaker 1: and girls of color, to ensure transgender seniors can age
Speaker 1: with dignity dignity, and to finally pass a Bipartisan Equality
Speaker 1: Act to help transgender persons around the world live free
Speaker 1: from discrimination and violence. Do what I mean? How to
Speaker 1: break it all down? Columnists and author David Marcus David
Speaker 1: good to see him, hang on, Budd. Why is Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: whom I would argue didn't even know what transgender agenda
Speaker 1: mentor was a couple of years ago. Maybe he still
Speaker 1: doesn't even really know. I think he's probably just repeating
Speaker 1: whatever he's ald to say on this stuff. Why is
Speaker 1: the White House doubling down on this in this moment,
Speaker 1: going in even deeper al what feels to a lot
Speaker 1: of Americans like the effort to erase gender entirely because
Speaker 1: it's the official position of the Democratic Party. And they
Speaker 1: have a real problem now because for almost a decade now,
Speaker 1: they've been talking about this in very vague ways, it's
Speaker 1: a civil rights movement, trans dignity stuff like that. Now
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has waited specifically into this Florida law, which
Speaker 1: means Joe Biden now has to be asked, do you
Speaker 1: believe that six and seven year olds should be apps,
Speaker 1: should be told by their teachers in public school that
Speaker 1: they get to decide their own gender no matter what
Speaker 1: their parents say. And it's a problem because if Biden
Speaker 1: and the Democrats answer yes to that question, they sound
Speaker 1: like insane, crazy people to all but a very tiny
Speaker 1: minority of Americans. And if they say no, they're agreeing
Speaker 1: with Governor de Santis in the bill. So they're really
Speaker 1: in a bad situation here. And here is the Bid
Speaker 1: administration about to legally expand this issue as well, Washington
Speaker 1: Post writing the Biden administration is just weeks away from
Speaker 1: extending Title nine to trans students. In an article from
Speaker 1: Washington Post, it states new Title nine rules set to
Speaker 1: assert rights of transgender students. Discrimination against transgender students would
Speaker 1: be a violation of federal civil rights law underproposed regulations
Speaker 1: to the Education Department, and they're expecting to finalize this
Speaker 1: in the coming weeks. I hope people understand what this means, David,
Speaker 1: that this is now they're making this a federal civil
Speaker 1: rights issue, which which means whether you live in Texas, Wyoming,
Speaker 1: you met Florida, you name it. They're going to say
Speaker 1: now that if you have a problem with somebody who
Speaker 1: is a biological male also known as a male, swimming
Speaker 1: against women or any sport or whatever the case may be.
Speaker 1: You're like the people that were blocking African Americans from
Speaker 1: going to school back before the Civil rights movement. Mean,
Speaker 1: this is what they're setting this up as. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: mean it's their only argument, and it's not flying, right.
Speaker 1: I Mean, everybody looks at that picture of Leah Thomas
Speaker 1: on the podium and they understand that this is not
Speaker 1: exactly a Rosa Parks moment here, right. It's their only argument.
Speaker 1: And again they won't answer the question about what do
Speaker 1: we do about the fact that this is deeply unfair
Speaker 1: to people who were born as women. They literally won't
Speaker 1: answer it. Bug. But the problem is that now they're
Speaker 1: going to have to. And they've used this political credit
Speaker 1: card for years and years and years, and the bill
Speaker 1: has come due, not just on these issues, on prisons,
Speaker 1: on shelters, I mean public policy intersects with the transgender agenda.
Speaker 1: It just does. And now is the time for Democrats
Speaker 1: to tell us what their answers are. Human Rights Campaign,
Speaker 1: by the Way, reports that quote the White House has
Speaker 1: announced major policy reforms to benefit transgender and non binary people,
Speaker 1: including issuing passports with an ex gender marker. So as
Speaker 1: of April, they just announced us today. I believe it's
Speaker 1: Transgender Visibility Day today, which I didn't know about, but
Speaker 1: the bidendministrations wanting everybody to know about. Of course, you'll
Speaker 1: be able to have a non binary gender marking of
Speaker 1: X on your official US government issued passport. Wow. Well yeah,
Speaker 1: And I mean what that is really meant to do
Speaker 1: is to enshrine the fact that you can have men
Speaker 1: playing women's sports, that you can have men in women's shelters,
Speaker 1: because at this point, how would you even check, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, if you're going to go back and change
Speaker 1: the birth certificate, if you're going to change the passport,
Speaker 1: you know, how do you know aside from the obvious
Speaker 1: visible markers, right? I mean, all of this is meant
Speaker 1: to complete the enshrine with our society the fiction that
Speaker 1: men can become women and women can become men. That's
Speaker 1: the bottom line issue. I mean, I think people who
Speaker 1: don't understand it, and I keep telling them this, it's
Speaker 1: not the ideology of the left, and I've really been
Speaker 1: diving into this recently. It's not that a man can
Speaker 1: become a trans woman. There're ideologies that a man can
Speaker 1: become a woman, indistinguishable for all intents and purposes from
Speaker 1: other women, a full switch. You are now a woman.
Speaker 1: You're not a trans woman, You're a woman. This is
Speaker 1: what they actually believe. This is like alchemy. Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I mean it's absolutely right. And look, we can have
Speaker 1: all kinds of compromises about things like education. We can
Speaker 1: even have compromises over things like sports. You know, there
Speaker 1: are compromises to be had about how the public policy
Speaker 1: moves forward. There's really no compromise to be had on
Speaker 1: the central question. Either you believe that biology is what
Speaker 1: determined gender or you don't. And I I really believe
Speaker 1: that the vast, vast majority of Americans still do believe
Speaker 1: that it does. David switching gears here for a second.
Speaker 1: You wrote a piece for Fox News that was critical
Speaker 1: to the least a president Biden's recent trip to Europe
Speaker 1: and the gaffs he made there. You wrote, for better
Speaker 1: or worse, the American people elected Joe Biden as president.
Speaker 1: They didn't elect this communications team or a secretary of state.
Speaker 1: They didn't elect whatever person or people it is who
Speaker 1: get angry at him if he takes too many questions. Well,
Speaker 1: this Debacolin Warsaw made painfully clear as that Biden is
Speaker 1: not in charge. That's not just a problem, it's a
Speaker 1: threat to our democracy. Tell me more here, David. Yeah, look,
Speaker 1: I was amazed, you know, right after watching Biden's speech
Speaker 1: in Poland. You know, when he made that statement here,
Speaker 1: for God's sake, this man cannot be in power, right.
Speaker 1: And whatever you think about whether that's a wise thing
Speaker 1: to say or an unwise thing to say, this was
Speaker 1: a historical moment for him, right. This was his JFK
Speaker 1: by an unberliner. This, you know, this was his reagans
Speaker 1: mister Gorbachev, tear down that wall, and he clearly meant it.
Speaker 1: And within minutes the White House had walked it back.
Speaker 1: And I said to myself, wait a minute, who did
Speaker 1: that on what authority? Right? Peter Doocey said on Fox
Speaker 1: that immediately upon him saying that he and others were
Speaker 1: texting the comms team at the White House, and the
Speaker 1: comms team say, no, no, no, no, he doesn't mean that.
Speaker 1: He means that you can't exert power over Ukraine. You know,
Speaker 1: whatever spin they're putting on it. And the fact of
Speaker 1: the matter is, when we elect the president of the
Speaker 1: United States, he's allowed to stand on a stage in Poland,
Speaker 1: and say what the position of his White House and
Speaker 1: his administration is. That's what we elect him to do.
Speaker 1: Nobody elected whoever it was who returned that text to
Speaker 1: Peter Doocey, And I'd like to know who's doing that
Speaker 1: and what that chain of command is. Isn't it fascinating
Speaker 1: when you think about David how many times the media
Speaker 1: just created news cycles based around the twenty fifth Amendment.
Speaker 1: For Donald Trump, we have to use the twenty fifth Amendment,
Speaker 1: they'd say he's not of sound mind just because they didn't.
Speaker 1: I mean, there was never Donald There's never a moment
Speaker 1: he said Donald Trump, he's senile. No one thought he
Speaker 1: was senile. They might have thought other things. Never do
Speaker 1: they talk about this with Joe Biden, who is clearly
Speaker 1: in the early stages at a minimum of real cognitive decline,
Speaker 1: which is what the twenty fifth Amendment that and you know,
Speaker 1: other physical health issues is all about. Yeah, look, I
Speaker 1: think that's right. I think that the White House has
Speaker 1: tried at times to make it clear their position that
Speaker 1: that Biden is completely of sound mind, and usually those
Speaker 1: things have have failed, Right, I mean, even that weird
Speaker 1: video of him getting his fourth or his second booster
Speaker 1: where he kind of like goes across the stage of
Speaker 1: like I don't know why I'm on stage, you know,
Speaker 1: like it just doesn't it doesn't look good the whole
Speaker 1: video of him with the troops, like eating pizza that
Speaker 1: was too spicy. Like they're really doing a bad job
Speaker 1: at convincing people that this idea is false. And so,
Speaker 1: uh yeah, maybe it's not always to see you man,
Speaker 1: Thanks David, Thank you buck. Congressman Madison Cawthorne claims sex
Speaker 1: and drugs are rampant in our nation's capital. We'll have
Speaker 1: the video for you. In tonight's Quick Hits, Stay with Us,
Speaker 1: Congressman Madison Cawthorne makes some wild accusations about people in Washington, DC,
Speaker 1: and Congresswoman Lauren Bobert has a message for transgender athletes
Speaker 1: those stories in tonight's Quick Hits, Let's get right to it. Look,
Speaker 1: DC is kind of a cesspool in a lot of
Speaker 1: ways that's been known. It's actually in a swamp. Of funny,
Speaker 1: it is a swamp washing DC. I lived there for
Speaker 1: a while, but it's also ethically a swamp that's been
Speaker 1: known and this though definitely raised some eyebrows. Congressman Madison
Speaker 1: Cawthorne is saying that he has been invited to orgies
Speaker 1: and seen members of Congress doing cocaine and Washington, DC
Speaker 1: watch the sexual perversion that goes on and washing out.
Speaker 1: I mean it being kind of a young guy in Washington,
Speaker 1: rob with the average age is probably six year seventy,
Speaker 1: and I look at all these people, a lot of
Speaker 1: them that I you know, I've looked up tooth in
Speaker 1: my life. I always paid attention to politics, guys that
Speaker 1: you know. Then all of a sudden you get invited
Speaker 1: to like, well, hey, we're gonna have kind of a
Speaker 1: sexual get together at one of our homes. You should come.
Speaker 1: They're like, what did you just ask when to come to? Yeah?
Speaker 1: And then you realize they're asking you to come to
Speaker 1: an orgy. Or the fact that you know, there's some
Speaker 1: of the people that are leading on the movement to
Speaker 1: try and remove you know, addiction in our country, and
Speaker 1: then you watch them doing you know, keybumble cocaine right
Speaker 1: in front of you, and it's this is this is wild?
Speaker 1: I mean, why would he make it up? I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: why would he make it up? I Mean that's the
Speaker 1: first thing that I think about here Representative Lauren Bobert
Speaker 1: is not shy about her opinions, and here she is
Speaker 1: talking about transgender athletes taking championships from biological women. Wow,
Speaker 1: the NCAA has gone woke and it's sailing. Our female
Speaker 1: athlete honor and recognition was stolen from Mma Wyant. So
Speaker 1: I am proud to leave twenty one of my colleague
Speaker 1: in a congressional resolution saying what most Americans already know
Speaker 1: to be true. Emma Wyant would be fastest female in
Speaker 1: the race, and she is the true champion. Hit. Oh wait, no,
Speaker 1: one more thing. To all you woke men who want
Speaker 1: to steal a championship from a woman, you've got some
Speaker 1: serious balls. Oh where's that? And then there's Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: out there, folks telling everybody, we can't let the fossil
Speaker 1: fuel industry use the need for more fossil fuel as
Speaker 1: an excuse to, you know, stop her and others from
Speaker 1: saving the planet. Watch this one. We cannot allow the
Speaker 1: fossil fuel industry to use this as an excuse to
Speaker 1: reverse everything we're doing to save the planet. One of
Speaker 1: the things I think that the President may say, I
Speaker 1: don't have this as a fact, is that we will
Speaker 1: use the Defense Production app to speed up diversification so
Speaker 1: that we're not so dependent on oil. Yes, Nancy Plosi's
Speaker 1: saving the planet. Sure, that's all for Tonight's hold the
Speaker 1: line the nose Spinos with Bill O'Reilly is up next,
Speaker 1: Shields High. There's a battle going on right now, but
Speaker 1: maybe the most important fight our country has had since
Speaker 1: the Revolutionary War. Once again, it's about our freedom. People
Speaker 1: like you and me are being canceled, our speech increasingly
Speaker 1: censored by big tech and corporate media. Can't let that happen.
Speaker 1: Un to fight back. Please stand with us and support
Speaker 1: the First Team. Be a part of our team, dedicated
Speaker 1: to preserving the very essence of who we are, free Americans.