WEBVTT - Markets, Cyberthreats, And Real Estate

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I want to bring

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in Cole Smead as a president in portfolio manager Smead

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management. Col thanks so much for joining us here.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to get your thoughts um from a value

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>investor perspective of this market right here. How are you

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>guys positioned here as we finished up the first quarter

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of well, thanks for having me, Paul, Uh. This is

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>just quite a fun world to be living in, to

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>be downright honest for investors like us. Where As you

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>pointed out, the dynamics of the oil market have people

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>really caught off guard and and on the wrong foot.

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, we have Warren Buffett out

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.639
<v Speaker 1>there being as aggressive as he ever is in an

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>open market common stock investment decision like he's doing with

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Oxidal Petroleum, and we feel great about that because we

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>have lower cost basis, and we agree with everything he's seeing.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the big difference though, is two years ago

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>investors had to look directly into the teeth of hell

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in that business and bet that things weren't going to

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be as bad, but you didn't have a lot of

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>information to know that. Versus today, Buffett's looking at um

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in effect, the return on equity, the business exploding, the

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>capital structure being far better towards the probability success is higher.

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Therefore he's willing to pay a lot higher prices, and

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the oddity is investors are not willing to follow him.

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>How are you thinking about sort of the value trade

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in the place in the face of rates moving higher,

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and is there sort of that correlation or causation factor.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question, Taylor. Um. Just so you know

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think about this is this is the opportunity of

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a lifetime. I'm thirty eight years old. Um. There's very

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>few people that are thirty eight that actually believe that

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>value investing works, or that you know, buying something cheap

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>enough because the economics are so good, or are of

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>any merit um. They all want to think about it

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>or talk about it, but they all want to go

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>do what the rest of the market participants want to do.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So to your point about higher rates, there's no question

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>whether higher rates will hurt stocks. The question is who

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>benefits from it, Okay, and it was the average stock

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>will get hurt by that. Multiples will contract. But I

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 1>would argue that the oddity of the last ten years

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>versus the next tent is that as the cost of

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>capital rises, capital intensive businesses will succeed because yes, their

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>cost the capital is rising, but fewer will enter those

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>types of businesses versus if you're in capital light industry

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or an asset light business, people can enter all the

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>while the cost cost the capital rises. So the question is,

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, to save margins, you want to lack a competition,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and we think there's just a huge price disparity between

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>what the opportunity is is in what people are paying

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the open market, and we own things like malls

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>home builders outside the energy are our biggest sector in

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>either of our international fund. Our US fund is energy

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>um at over both of those, so we're incredibly bullush

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>on energy. But like I said, cyclical assets that are

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>terribly miss priced are completely under the service of the

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>S and P or as you go abroad. All right,

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up energy because it has had

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a very good run here. And I guess the question

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of folks who maybe weren't there early,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is the room left in this trade? Yeah, so let's

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>go back to Occidental because and it's so timely with Buffett.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So I would argue to be your listeners that occidentals

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>producing about roughly fifty return on equity. Okay as we speak.

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Now if you think about I mean, that's crazy, that's

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>tech like r O E. Now, some of that's just

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the accounting Paul, just so you know, they wrote down

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the good will from Anna Darko Okay, which means the

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>book equity is lower than it really should be. Because

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>now that we know we've hunted all the oil, that

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>book equity that got written down you know probably shouldn't have.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>With that's done, it's made the return of equity go

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot higher. So if you go in out and said, hey,

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go look at companies that are producing fifty return

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and equity and trade at two times book, we just

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>won't find them, um, except in the energy business. Right, So,

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>like like Graham said, you know, Ben Ben Graham is

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>mentor said, prices what you pay values what you get.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Coca Cola was producing the same return in equity and

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight when Buffett stepped into it and did that

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for about ten years to follow that. And what ends

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>up happening is you can comp on book at that

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>level for five, seven, or even ten years. You make

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>so much book value per share you don't really care

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>what the book multiples in the end because the book

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>grows so much. And that's exactly what's going on. Oxy.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>If they can buy back shares, that just enhances they've

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>laid out most of their capital turns are gonna happen

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>by buy back that just enhances that book value per

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>share idea. Are your klins so asking you at all

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>about the bad word here, the R word recession and

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of how you think about some of these big

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>value performers in the face of that. Yeah, it's a

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question, Taylor. Um, so you got to

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>remember the said is augmenting the curve still right that

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you know that we have not stopped buying on the

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>long end. Um, so they're still subduing the long end.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So the question I would be asking is if the

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 1>FEDS not present in a year, what does the long

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>end look like versus they're completely controlling the short end,

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>And we know that that's got to go up, And

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the question is does it got to go up to

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>two and a half or is Larry Summer's right and

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to four and that's the only way to

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 1>quell this. And then the question is where does the

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>market end up taking the tenure on the long end

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of the curve. So we we don't see it as

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a recession because if you look at prior instances of

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>like oil spiking back in oh a percentage of wallet

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that was going towards gas was way higher than at

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>those prices than we are now at the numbers we

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>looked at, I think this came from fund strat four

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent back then a percentage of wallet it's

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at three today. At these current prices, we'd have to

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 1>go to hundred fifty two dollar prices to really get

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>back to a crimp like that. And we're a moonshot

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>according to the Biden administration, you know, away from that

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>as they released reserves today. So um, so we don't

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>look at it like that. Also, if you look at

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>debt service ratios, they've never been lower since nineteen eight.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So the American household, with their savings rates coming off

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and their low debt service ratios, we've never

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>been so ready to spend our way directly in deflation inflation. Hey, Cole,

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Always appreciate getting your perspective.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Cole Smead, President, portfolio manager of SMED Capital Management. Looking

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>at the t l c O function on the Bloomberg

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>terminal gets all the global commodities. Looking at the medals

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in particular, I'm seeing year to day gains of ten

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>even before you look at Nickel up fifty six percent

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>year to day. Where do we go from here? Obviously

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>reflecting a lot of geopolitical tensions in Europe, Let's bring

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in Everett Millman, chief market analyst for Gainesville Coins. Everett,

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>which your big call here for medals? Here you highlighted

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the last time you're on that this was gonna be

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>an issue. We're gonna get some supply change, some supply

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>issues coming out of Russia. Where do we go from here? Absolutely,

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Paul Um and I believe the Biden administration invoking the

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Defense Production Act is not just a significant move with

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>respect to Russia. UM, it goes beyond that. Many of

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the sources for some of those EV medals, those battery

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>medals that we're talking about, like nickel and lithium and cobalt,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they are mined in uh not particularly well regulated jurisdictions

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>UM and also not particularly friendly trading partners for the

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>United States. So, for instance, about two thirds of global

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>cobalt is mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo. UM.

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>You have a major nickel operation in Indonesia, and the

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Indonesian government has been become increasingly protectionists with its nickel

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and copper exports. And then of course Beijing is on

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>both sides of dominating consumption and production of a lot

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of those key commodities. So really this is a move

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring those supply chains to the United States, to

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>North America a bit more secure. But of course I

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>believe this process is going to be fairly gradual and constrained. UM.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It takes many years for for these types of minds

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to become operational. That doesn't even mention the infrastructure needed

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for charging stations, and the d p A doesn't clear

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>away any potential regulations on the mining UM. So the

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration has been fairly careful to keep environmental concerns

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>at top of mind. Um, all of this means that

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>it will not be quite so easy to ramp up

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>production of That sort of brings me to my next question.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>When we think about domestic production of some of these

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>raw materials, is it clean? We've spoken a lot of

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>companies that say, look, we can do it cleaner, but

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there is maybe some concern around that, right,

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>A major concern um, not just for E s G reasons,

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>but from a feasibility standpoint. And that's one of the

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>main things that invoking the d p A does is

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it at least gets the ball rolling on some feasibility

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>studies to see what is the what kind of costs

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>can we expect, what kind of profitability can we expect? Because,

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, if environmental regulations are ignored, as they

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are in some jurisdictions, then um, you can mind these

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>metals much more cheaply. But that is obviously not going

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to fly in the United States. What are you telling

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>your clients about metals just broadly definders there are still

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>room to grow, or do we kind of it's had

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>its run up, it's a fascinating question because although I

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>think we do still have room to grow, the high

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>level of volatility we've seen across the metal space. You

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned nicol that's probably the biggest example, but even with gold,

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen quite a bit of intra day volatility going

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>back and forth UM that is leading to some liquidity issues.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>It's pushing some traders and participants out of the market.

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>And now we do have the fresh set of lockdowns

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and SHA high, so that could potentially curb some of

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the demand for copper and gold in these other medals,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just right now, it's a big, big pale of

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty that's hanging over this market. How does this sort

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of help relieve some of the volatility within this market,

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>if at all? It may not. I think that it's

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>going to take um many months for this to play out,

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>especially given the geopolitical conflicts that are continuing to rage.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think volatility and um some impaired liquidity is probably

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>what we should expect for the next at least the

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>next quarter across the commodity space. All right, ever, thank

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Really appreciate getting your

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>perspective on all things metals. All right, let's talk about

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll continue our discussion of energy, this time focusing on

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.679
<v Speaker 1>security of the energy grid. To do that, we welcome

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Daniel McGann, CEO of American Superconductor. Daniel, thanks much for

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. I know you guys at American semi

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Conductor provide wind turbine electronic controls and systems that gives

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>you a good sense of kind of how our system

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is kind of wired here in terms of our electrical

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>grid here, how secure or how insecure from your perspective

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is the electric grid in the United States. Thanks for

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>having me. Um. Yeah, at American super Conductor, we focused

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>not only on wind but on resiliency of the grid.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>And what we're seeing is this is a challenge that's

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.959
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to exacerbate over the coming years. The

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>types of things that we're going to rely upon the

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>grid for, um, from you know, powering different neighborhoods with

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with the change and how people are working and working

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>from home, to the electrification of transportation and specifically vehicles,

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and the grid is going to be asked to do

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things it's not designed to do. UM.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>So we've developed some solutions to help the system providers

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to in a cost advantageous way be able

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to provide more capacity and more resilience either the overall system.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about sort of that transition in the

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>way that renewables can play a part. A lot of people,

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of course want the transition to renewables, but they just

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>wanted in a reliable way. How are you thinking about

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the role that renewables can play in that? But we

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that renewables can be UM a

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>cross competitive UM. We work across the globe in wind

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and also in large scare solar UM. A lot of

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>what our most recent focus has been on is on

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>hardening the grid, allowing the grid to be able to

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>do more. Are we separate our business into a wind

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>segment and a grid segment. Our grid segment now is

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at record levels in the history of the company. We

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>actually grew the grid segment, but more against a year

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>ago quarter. So we see that, you know, the renewables

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>in many way and the electric vehicles are going to

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>drive dramatic changes to the grid to bring be able

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring this power to market, to to where it's

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>needed when it's needed. UM and one of the solutions

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that we recently made some news around US our resilient

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>electric grid solution. I actually Taylor did read a book

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that was a recommendation from Keith Grossman simply called The Grid,

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's a history of kind of electrification of the

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>United States and kind of where we are. So if

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to learn about the electric grid United States,

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and it is a fascinating development story, I recommend that. Um, Daniel,

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had a guest on from the petroleum

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>industry just earlier today and she's making a pretty strong argument,

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>not surprisingly given her from you know, the group. She

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>represents that there is still a need for oil and

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>gas in this country. Can't just all be renewables, and

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that now with the price of energy, given

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the geopolitical concerns. How do you think that

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>think about the future of you know, kind of just

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>energy development. Is nuclear does that have a role? Uh,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels, where do they fit in? And then of

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>course renewables, how do you think about that. I think

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a diverse need for energy sources and you can see, um,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the world changes can change pretty dramatically. Um.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, not too many years ago we were talking

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>about a move to natural gas um, you know, and

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>now Europe's waking up realizing that, you know, they have

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>their challenges with with supply from Russia given everything that's

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>going on over there. So I think as long as

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the world keeps moving towards cleaner sources and creating a

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>network that can allow you know, green power to move

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as easy as other types of power, that I think

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>net net, the consumer is at an advantage and and

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the planet and the climate are taking

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>better care of. How do you think with renewable some

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of the big question has been the storage of that.

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you thinking about how to better store renewables that

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>when we need it, we have it. I think that

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's that's certainly I'll say maybe a mid a longer

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>term problem where we've focused a lot on is is

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>there's need for kind of instantaneous manage of power within

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the grid because of these disparate sources, because we're asking

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the distribution grid to do more and more. So a

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of our solutions are really trying to deal at

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of the middlesecond microsecond management of voltage, current or

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>some combination thereof in different parts of the grid, be

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it trying to bring more rooftop solar onto a grid

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>using the existing system, be it trying to interconnect nodes

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on the network, these transmission distribution substations to allow the

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 1>grid to untrapped existing capacity that's already there. We looked

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at certain cities where we could double the quadruple the

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>level of resiliency in the urban core by turning the

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>distribution system into a true network where every point on

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the grid talks to every other point allow actrically. UH. Today,

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the distribution grid it's kind of like an aqueduct to

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>your home, you know that if you think of power

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>as water, everything rolls in that direction to you, and

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>once you get into the last mile or so, there's

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>no way really to be able to move power to

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the grid. So we've developed this thing

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>called Brazilian Electric Grid that we UH just lit up

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>our first installation with the City of Chicago in the summer,

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>which enables the interconnection of these existing assets in a

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>very new and unique way. Right, Hey, Dan, thanks so

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Really appreciate it. You know, we're

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about energy here today and that includes they the

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>security of our energy grid as well. Daniel McGann, CEO

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of American a super Conductor that's a NASTAC traded stock.

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>A m SC is the symbol for that one. I'm

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>want to get to our next guest right now, Kevin

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Good Irish name Kevin Kelly, CEO and founder of

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Kelly E. T F joins us. Kelly, thanks so much

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time here because I just wonder a

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>story about mortgage rates really starting to tick up um

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering if this is kind of the first,

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, break maybe and what's been a very strong

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>commercial and residential real estate market, particularly the residential side

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of years. What's your view of

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the residential real estate market. Well, I'm glad we're talking

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>about mortgage rates and its impact on, uh, the the

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>overall housing market because the problem we're having now is

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's very limited inventory, so that led the prices

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>going up, and with mortgage rates going up, it's going

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to lead to less inventory because people that have purchased

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>homes or refinanced homes last year are going to stay

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>in their homes for longer because they won't want to

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>give that interest rate up, and so it's going to

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>further exacerbate the housing inventory shortage we already have. So

0:17:56.600 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to really reverberate through markets, and I especially

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about inflation, is on top of everybody's mind.

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>This leads to higher structural inflation, and the set is

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>very conscientious about it. I mean, you've seen the San

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Fed even talk about how these persistent increases in

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>asking rents because of the low housing inventory is actually

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>feeding into uh, the rent component in the consumer price indexes.

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about when you think about inflation

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>and some of the impacts on the equity markets, the

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>power of dividend growers where at least you're getting some

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation protection via dividend. Yeah. I think that's a great

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>point to bring up, because you want to be positioned

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>with companies that have pricing power, and so when I

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>look at that, they have to have unique business models

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that will be impervious to the inflationary shocks that are

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing bouts and fits that that are happening across the board,

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>especially with oil. And so a lot of dividend companies

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and in income companies have proven their the sustainability of

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>their models over time, and so That's why investors can

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>get really comfortable even in some residential publicly traded reads

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that are out there because of the structural inflation that

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, and rents are only for a year, so

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>then they can reset higher. So just take for example apartments, right,

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Apartment has had a really tough time in one especially

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in the coastal markets, and we've now seen them completely

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>rebound and so they've seen about rent increases from their

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>levels which were impacted from the pandemic. And so when

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about income and trying to generate it, you

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>want to go to those companies that are uh that

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the key part of their business model and objective is

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to generate income. All right, let's stick with the residential

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>rule state. I gotta admit I don't get it. Housing

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>prices are just ripping through the roof. And I was

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>a recent seller, so I benefited from that. People are

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>telling me that rents are going crazy, and they certainly

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>are here in New York City where if if if

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>those markets are up, what markets are down, there's there

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't more people that need to be housed in the

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>United States. So where is the other side of that trade? Yeah,

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the other side of that trade, uh started to happen

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in where we decided to build less. And you've had

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>real estate is very locals, as you know, you just sold, right,

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and so you're focused on your local market. Well, what

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>happens is is you have a lot of state and

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>local municipalities that have zoning restrictions and it's the ultimate nimby, right,

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>not in my backyard. I don't want this big residential

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>development going here. I don't want you know, I don't

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>want zoning to be this and that. So since we've

0:20:53.800 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>actually seen fewer total housing units being produced in household formation,

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So what is the driver behind that? Millennials? Right, Millennials

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>got in the last bust and so they were living

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>with their parents, they were trying to save money. It

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>was a tough economy. Now they're coming out and forming

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot more households, and we have you were almost

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a third fewer housing units available. So it's just simple

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand, you know. So I am so sick

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of millennials getting blamed for everything, Kevin. I was getting

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:31.360
<v Speaker 1>blamed because I wasn't forming households. I was the one

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>not doing it. Now we're all doing it, and that's

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for the cause of all the supply jacking issues. It's unbelievable.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>When can we blame gen Z for something? Yes, so, Taylor,

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you're right, I mean, I'm I'm I'm in an older

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>millennial myself, right, and so I bought my first house

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>at the age of thirty six, and so you're blamed. Yeah, yeah,

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's totally my fault. Right, Um, we can blame gen

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Z for the for the last mortgage or sorry, we

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>can blame the we can blame the older generations for

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the last mortgage crisis. So that's how we differ and

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>deflect as millennials because we had to go into the

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>job market and it was a tough time for us

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>when we were trying to do our household formations because

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>look at all the costs that went up. Think about

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>what people have to spend money on every day. Education.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Education has gone through the room, right, So we're paying

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>more in education costs, we're paying more in energy costs,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.239
<v Speaker 1>we're paying more in housing costs. What generations are are

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to blame for that? I'll leave that up to you guys.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, I think I know where this is coming

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>coming back. Yeah, you may, you may. Yeah, I'm in

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the tail tale and literally the last year or two

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of the baby boomers. But Kevin, he gets points for

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>explaining to me this housing cost issue. I hadn't. I

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't gotten that. So we had supply over the last

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>ten twelve years going down, and then you had some

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>demand spike heres the millennials get out of the basement.

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So Kevin Kelly, good job there, CEO and founder of

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Kelly E. T S talking about the rental market, the

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>real estate market way way hot, even during the whole pandemic.

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.