WEBVTT - Issuance Process for 100-Year Bonds Is Too Risky, Cloherty Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. The

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Department sent a survey to primary dealers asking very

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>detailed asking for very detailed responses to whether investors would

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>have an appetite for fifty or even one hundred year

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>US treasuries Now, how realistic is the potential for this

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.560
<v Speaker 1>ultra long dated bond issueist issuance by the US. I

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Michael Clardy. He's head of US

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>interest rate strategy at RBC Capital Markets in New York. Michael,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>can you give us a sense before we dig into

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what the Treasure Department is looking for and how feasible

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>this would be? Do you feel like this latest survey

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 1>signals that the Treasury Department is much more serious about

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>ultralong dated bond issuance now than they have been in

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the past. All Right, this is an issue that's been

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>out there for a while, but the specific nature of

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>these questions doesn't make it feel like we've moved a

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit closer um to the decision on this. So

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>greater odds uh that we do get an ultralong bond.

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what they were looking for. They

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>want to know the appetite by investors, but also the

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>primary dealers have to play a pretty big role in

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>whether this happens or not. Right right, So, I think

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest challenge with an ultra long is going to

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>be how do you issue it? Issue it? The problem

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>for the US is that we have a lot of

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>debt outstanding already, We've got fourteen training to debt outstanding.

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you look, there's lots of countries around the

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>world that issue ultralong bonds, but they all have much

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller amounts of debt outstanding. So what they can do

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is they can be tactical. They can they can wait

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>until they know there's demand for the bond, issue some

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>into those periods of strong demand, and then not issue

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>when there's weak demand. That works great if you only

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>have you know, a trillion dollars debt outstanding, when you've

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>got fourteen to be a relevant part of your overall

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>debt profile, you have to issue a lot of these

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>ultralong bonds, which means that you can't be tactical. You

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have to issue every quarter regardless of market conditions. That

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>makes the issue is process highly risks. How big with

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this ultra long portion of the market have to be

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to be relevant? I mean, I think if you're at

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>anything less than you eventually want to get it up

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to sort of five percent at least. Otherwise it's a

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of a waste of time. It's a lot of bonds,

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that is a lot of who is a lot of bonds?

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Is there an all, Michael? Is there an alternative way

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to achieve the same thing, which is to try to

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>lower or keep the cost of funding the government low? Well,

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>start with the with the ultra von, no without with

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what exists currently, right, So, I mean one of the

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:15.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the other questions with the ultra von is

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>if you issue a fifty year von, do you brand

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>brand new buyers are treasury debt or are you simply

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna cannibalize people who would have bought thirties and have

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>them buy fifties instead? Um, I think you know you

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.399
<v Speaker 1>would see a lot of cannibalizations. So the other alternative

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if if they want to extend the average charity is

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>just to issue more thirties, issue more thirties. Or is

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it possible to disconnect let's say the principal payment from

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the interest payment on treasuries. You could so you could

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>issue what that's called it a strip, so you've stripped

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>away the coupons from the principal payment that you Actually,

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I think see a lot of demand um for those

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>zero coupon long bonds. The one challenge of that is

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't raise a lot of money for the Treasury.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm selling today a principal strip, that's um,

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't get paid on for thirty years

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>or fifty years um. The value of that strip is

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>very low. Um. So I'm not by selling it today,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm not bringing in a lot of money. No, I

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was just gonna say, you know, I really was struck

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>by this survey. The reason being that Treasury Secretary Steve Minusan,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>who's just getting his feet wet at this point, he

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have all of the boots on the ground and

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Department that this is one of the the

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>initial moves is to really show that he's serious about

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>looking into this ultralong dated issuance. I mean, do you

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>think from an efficiency standpoint, from a financing standpoint, that

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it would actually help the United States lower their borrowing

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>costs over a longer period. No. Um. If you look,

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury has this Boring Advisor Committee. UM, it's a

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>group of different both sell side and buy side, the

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>investor based for their bonds. UM. They put out a

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>study in UH last back in February where they basically said,

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>if we look, if we if you look at the

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>last fifty years, at times when rates were rising, you

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>saved a tiny bit of money by issuing longer than normal.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But when rates are falling, issuing longer than normal costs

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you a ton of money. So it's a very a

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>submistan asymmetrical savings versus UH costs of the government. That's

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.679
<v Speaker 1>because normally there's a thing a risk premium matern premium.

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>By issuing a very long bond, you're the buyer of

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that has a little more interest rate risk than if

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>they bought something short. UM. So normally you have to

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>pay that buyer for taking that risk over long horizons.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>This tends to be costly. Now issuing today, might you

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>know face a small today. It might save a little

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of money, but again the Treasury we have so

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 1>much dead outstanding UMU to really be important for the

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>financing cost, you'd have the issue a real lot today.

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I want to thank you very much for your thoughts.

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Michael Clardy is the head of US Interest rates Strategy

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at RBC Capital Market, speaking about Treasury Secretary Stephen Nuchan's

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>comments about Ultra long u S Treasury bonds. Right now

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to turn to UH. I p O is

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>different as class but equally important. I must admit I

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>want to bring in Sandy Miller, general partner at I

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>v P, the leader in tech I p O s.

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>He has done arguably more I p O s for

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>tech companies than anyone else. And Uh, Sandy, I want

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk to you a little bit about about your

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>projection that this year we're going to see a really

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>dramatic number of technology companies come to market with initial

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>public offerings. Can you explain why? How many you expect

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know what the demand is like for it? Sure,

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be a robust year. It's hard

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to know the exact number, but I think we could

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>see now. I'm thinking here primarily of tech i p

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>o s, which is my area of focus, but I

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to see, you know, in the range

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of thirty to fifty I p o s this year.

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>We're off to a good start in the year. It

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>reflects a lot of pent up demand because we've had

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a very very light I p o calendar again for

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>tech i p o s in the last three years,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that the stock market has been in

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a good place and there's so many great companies. So

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the buyers are there. Obviously, institutional buyers like I POS

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the source of alpha. Uh, the deals have been working.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Tech i p o s aout on average last year.

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>They're doing about the same so far this year. UM,

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and people want new names. You know, half the there's

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>only half as many listed companies as the word twenty

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago. So the wires are there, and then the

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>companies are there because there's more really strong tech companies

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 1>privately held still of scale called fifty million, hundred million,

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollars and growing than we've ever had before.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>In part because of course there haven't been very many

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I p o s to take them out. So I think, uh,

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the deals have been working well. The companies are ready

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of deals are on file already. Well. Fortunately

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the Jobs Act is allowed the silent filing, which has

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>been a terrific uh thing for the sector. And uh,

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's there's probably upwards of of you know,

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>more certainly more than five, maybe more than fifty, we

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know for sure. Uh, the companies that have file

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.599
<v Speaker 1>tech companies that have filed silently looking for I p

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>o s. It will come both this year and next year. Sandy,

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you talked a little bit about the dearth of i

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>p o s and how the number of public realistic

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>companies has declined pretty dramatically. This is the source of

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of hand ringing, and the tech industry

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>is a perfect example. People are saying that there are

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>these companies that have grown to be the size where

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>they would have otherwise had an I p O for

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a long time earlier, but they've been able to raise

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 1>so much money from venture capitalists and in the debt

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>markets that they haven't had to Can you explain why

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>these tech companies have waited so long? Well, I think

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>there as has been private financing available, if for tech companies,

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>primarily from equity rather than debt. Um and the companies

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>also have felt it was an easier road because they

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the public scrutiny and they could take the

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>hard decisions that sometimes you have to make about you know,

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>business shifts and so on, that are tougher to do

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in a public environment. But I think it was the

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>availability of the private capital that allowed them to really

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. The private capital is still there today, but

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the valuations today are better in the public market than

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>they are in the private market. And and so again,

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think ultimately companies recognize they're going to need

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>um need the liquidity of going public and also the

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>brand building awareness uh that that a public offering brings.

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So especially venture backed companies need to find an exit,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and the I p O has typically been the best exit,

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in part because it can it can fuel m and A.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>We saw that with one of our companies, have Dynamics,

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a really strong company that was poised to do a

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>really successful I p O and then at the last minute,

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Cisco came in and bought the company for a big premium.

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll see more of that as well. Because

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the i p O is actually catalyzed more m and

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a activity Sandy is snapped considered a success absolutely the

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the the company. I mean as whether something is a

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>long run success, and only we determine the long run.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think the I p O, if I assume

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.719
<v Speaker 1>that's your question, I think the I p O is

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>very much a success. The priced you know, range revised up,

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>price above the range, trading above the range. There's always

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>volatility in these names, especially with companies that are super

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>high profile UM still in at the sation where they're

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>not you know, profitable companies. Uh, there's there's just more

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>volatility around them, and I think we'll see a fair

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of volatility in the sector. But the overall a

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>very very strong year for I p O s and

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>also in the next year. Sandy. You noted that valuations

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>are better today in the public market than the private market.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Can you elaborate a little bit, Yeah, what I mean

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>by valuations, I mean multiples, because of course there's some

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>private you know that that are multiples reflecting the growth

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>rates of companies. But the uh, that's the normal environment.

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Normally private companies are priced at some discount to publicly

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>public comparables growth adjusted, but we did go through a

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 1>period in particularly where that simply wasn't the case, and

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the the private company multiples are actually higher than public

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>company multiples. That's an anomaly, UM, and it was sure

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to correct and it has corrected. It's not a weak

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.079
<v Speaker 1>private market. We're still a robust private market. There's the

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>available for for good companies. There's good prices, but it's

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>more balanced, and that's making the public market UM look

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>more attractive to companies UM that we're kind of trying

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to choose between the private and the public market. Thank you.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Sandy Miller is the general partner of Institutional Venture Partners

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>based in San Francisco. Speaking about the potential torrent of

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>technology initial public offerings coming this year, we want to

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>take a moment to let you know about something new

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg. Starting right now, you can use our iOS

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>app or our new Google Chrome extension to scan any

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>news story on any website, instantly revealing relevant news and

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>market data from Bloomberg and other sources related to companies

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and people you're reading about. So no matter where you're

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>reading the news, you can bring the power of Bloomberg's

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>news and data with you it's pretty amazing. Download our

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>io s app or search for the Bloomberg extension on

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chrome Store to try it out. Learn more at

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash lens. The afternoon attack in Paris

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>yesterday killed a policeman and has further aggravated the situation

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in France as the country goes to the polls this weekend.

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us more, as Irene Finel Hannigman, Adjunct

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Professor of International Affairs at Columbia University. Irene, thank you

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>for being with us. Let's get your impressions first of

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what this means for the election in France. Well, I

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>think this clearly created an additional shock, as we now

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>know that the perpetrator was an Islamis terrorist again who

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>actually even known to the police uh and maybe affiliated

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>with what happened in Mark, say a few days ago.

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>The real concern is whether this will harden or even

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>increase Mathine Rapin, the extreme right wing candidate support she's

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>supposed to have about almost matched with the Centris McColl.

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Her support may increase, However, the question is whether at

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, this may not also actually

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>help the former Prime Minister of Francoisfidon, whose support was

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>eroding because of scandals, but who may look as if

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>he is a more sound and experienced type of politician,

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>able to basically take away some of Matine Rapine's support

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and still present a very strong pro security yet at

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the same time solid economic program. So right now, this

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>has made a volatile situation even more volatile and very concerning. Well,

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can we get any sense of how it

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is being received by voters by how this news is

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>being covered by the French media. Well, I think this

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>happened so quick ly, and the thing that was very

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>dramatic was it actually occurred during the last presidential debate,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>which was taking place last night when it occurred, and

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>so they were very very quickly responding. Our French of

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the campaign has been suspended today and in a way

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this may sort of perhaps calm things a little bit

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>down right now, the media seems to be responding in

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>France almost hour by hours. More information is coming in.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>The candidates are not making any statements, except for the

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>extreme left wing communist candidate Menancham, who said he will

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to give us speeches and rally his supporters, which

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>may actually work against him. And may be seen as

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly the wrong response. Uh so this is kind of

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>where we're at. The French press is again sort of

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit all over the place right now, difficult

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to know exactly how they said. Definitely this is good.

0:15:57.040 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately for Marie Lepine. We knew that she would make

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it through the first round. She may make it now

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>with support That actually increases The question is does Felon

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>or does the new young centrist candidate Emmanuel McColl who

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to have about which one of those two

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>really make it into the into the contention with mariein

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Rapin That is really going to be the big question.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Now we don't know at this point. I mean, does

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it matter who wins the election because the French parliamentary

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>system is such that perhaps the power of the president

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>would be limited to let's say, move forward with changes

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to the French participation in the European Union. Well, I

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think um in a way, in part portion fortunately and unfortunately, actually,

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the French presidency is quite a bit stronger than the

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>system which is much more faction based in other European countries.

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So the powers of the president are fairly large in France.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It's also the president who would clearly be picking his

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>cabinets prime minister if it was Matthin Lepan because of

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>her really dangerous and incoherent economic program. It would also

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>immediately create a huge shock on the markets and a

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>huge shock on what would be seen as the future

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of France, the future of the European Union at that point.

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think it does make an enormous difference, uh,

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>even before we start to look at the more complex

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>makeup of the of the parliamentary grouping. I mean, you

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>know you mentioned that the attack happened during a presidential debate.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Was that intentional? We don't know, you know. I I

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think the horrible thing is that at this point it

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>seems that a lot of these attacks may be very

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>much premeditated orchestrated. It seems that information is coming out

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, hard to know. May very well be the

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>case because the attack that was actually aborted in March

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>SI was the purpose of it was presumingly to dis

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>rupted the presidential election. Um, so this this may have

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>some link. I mean the election, the first round takes

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>place on Sunday, and then the second round is May seven.

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you know if the European Union has any plan

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>for response if Marine Lepan and the far left candidate

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Jean mcmlchan actually make it to that May seventh runoff.

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I am not sure at this point. I think actually

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone sort of is is just kind of holding their

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>breath uh and doesn't want in any way to step in.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that any comments or remarks or statements

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the European Union may in fact only

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>worsen uh the anti EU approach that Marine Leepan already has.

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It may just increased support uh, and she'll certainly play

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on that. So I think everyone will try to stay

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as far away as possible. That's why it was even

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit disturbing that Obama decided to call the

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Centers candidate mccon This was not necessary yesterday because one

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of the issues is McCall is often already accused of

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit babst pro American because Mopolitan this

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help. Well, thank you, we really we we. Unfortunately

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to leave it there. Thank you so much

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>for your comments. Professor Irene Finilla hanig Mans adject professor

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of International Affairs at Columbia University based in New York City,

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about the attack in Paris and the ripple effects

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>into the ongoing election. Well, let would be the first

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to wish you a happy earth Day. It's a little

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 1>bit premature, but tomorrow is earth Day is celebrated worldwide.

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It was first celebrated in nine seventy and one of

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the questions that comes up is why is the United

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>States so far behind when it comes to recycling materials.

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us in give us more information about

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Earth Day is Jim Fishy is the chief executive of

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Waste Management. Jim, thanks very much for for coming in.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I was looking up some statistics and it turns out

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that in the United States we've got low landfill fees,

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>plus we've got a fragmented waste management system, and that

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>just puts our rate at recycling at like that seems

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 1>very low. You know, I think it's I think you're right.

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it is lower than we'd like. And part

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of our objective is to try and get people to

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>truly recycle more. I mean, and and that sounds a

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>little cliche, but what I mean by that is put

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>every plastic bottle, put every piece of cardboard and mixed paper,

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>put every can in your recycle bin. Unfortunately, our model

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is one that encourages people to also put, in addition

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to recycling and recycle materials, put trash because it's a

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a you have a bin that basically collects everything,

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and and so there's an education process that's required of

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>us to let people know that that your garden hose

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and your Christmas Lie's and your garden rake, it is

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of seasonal, by the way, those things don't necessarily

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>go through a recycled plan. So how does your company

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>deal with those garbage items that get mixed up with

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the recycling, Well, it ends up coming up a big

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>conveyor belt and then it gets either hand or machine separated,

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and that that garden hose. Hopefully the garden hose doesn't

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>wrap around the wheel and shut down the entire plant,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>which does happen, but a lot of that materially, the

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>garden rake tends to get typically gets pulled off manually

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and goes into the trash. And so when we think

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about what's what's recycled, we've got to make sure that

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what's recycled truly becomes something else. That's the definition

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of recycling is that you take a plastic bottle and

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>turn it into another plastic battle or some other use.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So well, let's talk about that. So when you talk

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about recycling, when you talk about the rate that Pim

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>just cited, does that mean that sort of people effectively

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sort a cent of their garbage or does it meant

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of the garbage is taken and then we've we we

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 1>processed into something else that can be used. It's really

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the ladder. I mean, you know, people look at diversion

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and and diversion means that the first step away from

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the curb is someplace other than a landfill. So if

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I if I take a percent of my material at

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>my house and put it into my recycle bin, then

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>then I have diverted a percent of my material by

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that definition. Unfortunately, what happens is when it gets to

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the recycled plant half of it. If that's how much

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of my trash of are my recycled binness trash, half

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of it ends up ultimately going to a landfill anyway.

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And our goal is to make sure that people understand

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that the goal is not to divert a the goal

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is to recycle ad and that means turn that into

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>something of use on the back end, not just send

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it to a recycle plant so that they can pull

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>that garden rake out and ultimately send that garden rate

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to a landfill. Are the recycling plants that currently exist,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>are they at equated? No, they're not. The recycled plants

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that we have are are have new technology. We're refreshing

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that technology as we go. We're putting things like optical

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>sorters in that that read the types of plastic coming

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>up that that conveyor belt. But there is a lot

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of material that comes up the conveyor belt, and and

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it ranges from things like those garden hoses to bowling

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>balls and and and really everything out of the sun. So, uh,

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there is there are some some components of that process

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.479
<v Speaker 1>that haven't changed in twenty years, but it is. There

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of technology being brought to the reason.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>The reason I bring that up is because I know

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that major corporations such as Coca Cola and Walmart. I mean,

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>they have all pledged to add more recycled material to

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>their packaging, but the companies say that they struggle to

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>find the actual material and that supply is actually a problem.

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can't speak to whether supply is a

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>problem for those folks. Were not on that end. We

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>do provide. We're the biggest recycler in North America, so

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.959
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of supply coming out of our plants. Honestly,

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it goes to China. Almost almost of

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>our newsprint goes to China because they're the only buyer

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of that newsprint. Probably mixed paper goes to China, and

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>about of cardboard goes to China. And so hence the

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>volatility by the way in pricing, when when when one

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>customer controls that bigger percentage, if they decide not to buy,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>as they have recently with newsprint, the price really can

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>can can be volable. How much more expensive is it

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>for a municipality to recycle versus just directing its waste

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to a landfill. Well, in theory, the theory has always

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>been that you can provide recycling for a nominal a

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>nominal charge, and then the recycler makes money on the

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>back end. So when when that material goes through the plant,

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>we make money when we sell the plastics on the

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>back end or the cardboards on the back end. But

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be careful with that formula because if

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>prices are in are in a kind of an all

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>time lows, and we're sharing a piece of of of

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the back in sales, and yet our cost to process

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is higher than the commodity price. You can end up

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>in a in a position where the recycler is not

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>making any money. And so we we've changed the model

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit over the last twelve months so to the

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>municipality paying a little bit more, right exactly, I mean

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we want them to share on the upside when things

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>are good as they are right now, and on the

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>downside when when prices are low, then then we shouldn't

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>pay a rebate when the price is below our cost.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>What form is the plastic and the paper in when

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you sell it, well, it's bailed, I mean we we

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and we separate the plastics into different types of A

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>big tide bottle is a different type of plastic than

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>than a plastic the sawny water bottle, for example. So

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so we separate those plastics. Some are are lower value.

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>The high value plastics tend to be those two sawny

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>water bottles, and those are are fantastic for us. And

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and so we bail those and and send them onto

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to someone who's going to use them and recycle them.

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Are there other countries that are better at recycling and

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>what can we learn? Well, as it's a great question,

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>there are countries that are better at it. I would

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>tell you that that when you we've all been to Europe,

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>and when you go to Europe, they don't have what

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we use today is as single stream recycling. So single

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>stream means everything goes in one bin and then we

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>separate it. Typically in Europe there they we call them

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>dual stream, and they source separate everything. So so when

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you go to a house in Germany, they separate their

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>own glass from their plastics, from their from their aluminums

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and papers, and then it's picked up separately. So you

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>can imagine that that stream is much cleaner, you know

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>when you get today glass that benefit the United States,

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean if we were able to adopt it at

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a municipal level. You know, the theory was that we

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>would do that. Single stream would enable people to recycle

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>more and because now they don't have to separate it,

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to go through their own uh you know,

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>do their own work that will separate it for them.

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.239
<v Speaker 1>That was the theory behind single stream, and I think

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>to some extent that has helped, you know, increase the

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of recycled material, but it's also increasing amount of

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>trash that people put in. And I think the answer

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to that is a better education process, so people really

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>understand that this commodity, this, that this garden hose is

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.120
<v Speaker 1>not recyclable, whereas the plastic bottle is. Jim Fish, thank

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us to Fish is president

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of Waste Management, which is based in Houston, Texas, and

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>focuses on recycling materials such as plastic. Those two sawny

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>water bottles which are high quality plastic as well as

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>other things, but not your garden hose, So don't put

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>it in because it will clog up their systems. That

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the message. Uh. He joins us today

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on Earth Day, where we look for ways to make

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>sure that our earth stays beautiful. Thanks for listening to

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews that Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abramowits one before

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on Bluebirg

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Radio