WEBVTT - BrainStuff Classics: Why Are Stars and Planets Nearly Spherical?

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to brain Stuff production of I Heart Radio. Hey

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.479
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff, Lauren Bogle bomb here with another classic episode

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>from our archives. This one deals with one of the

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 1>most simple sounding yet cosmically impressive concepts that we humans

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>can contemplate. Why are stars and planets all nearly spherical? Hi,

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>brain Stuff, Lauren bog O bomb here. It's something we

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of take for granted. Roses are red and planets

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>are spherical. That's just the way things are, right, after all,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Building model solar systems would be way more challenging if

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 1>instead of using little foam balls we had to make

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of do decahedron shaped planet models. But have

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.279
<v Speaker 1>you ever wondered why planets look like this? Why are

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they basically spherical and not say, cylindrical or cube shaped?

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>We should kick off this discussion by calling a spade

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a spade. None of the planets in our solar system

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>are perfect spheres, nor, for that matter, is our Sun.

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>All those bodies could be more accurately described as oblate

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>spheroids objects with the shape bulge slightly around the middle.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>To borrow an analogy from the astronomer philled plate, they

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>look like a basketball that someone is sitting on put

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>More technically, in a celestial body with an oblate spheroid shape,

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the polar circumference will be smaller than the equatorial one.

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So here on Earth, if you were to travel from

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the north pole to the South pole and back, you'd

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>have walked a grand total of twenty four thousand, eight

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twelve miles that's thirty nine thousand, nine hundred

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and thirty one kilometers. On the other hand, a complete

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>trip around the equator would be a bit longer. That's

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>because the circumference of Earth's equator is twenty four thousand,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred miles or forty thousand and seventy kilometers. As such,

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>when you stand at sea level on the equator, you're

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>further away from the center of our planet than you

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>would be at either the north or South pole. On

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>some other planets. This bulge is even more pronounced. Just

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>look at Jupiter. Earth is only zero point three percent

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>wider at the equator than it is from poll to poll,

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but Jupiter's measurements showcase a much bigger disparity. Astronomers have

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>found that this plus sized planet is a full seven

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>percent wider at its equator than it is between the polls.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>The oblate spheroid shape is the result of two main factors,

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>gravity and rotation. Troy Carpenter, director of Washington State's Goldendale Observatory,

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>recently discussed the matter with us in an email exchange.

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>They explain, everything which has mass experiences gravity, and gravity

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.239
<v Speaker 1>attempts to crush an object inward in all directions. That's

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>because all objects experience self gravity, a force which pulls

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>their atoms toward a common center. As the mass of

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>an object increases, so too does its self gravitational pull.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>After it exceeds a certain mass, the pull gets overpowering

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to the point where the object collapses into itself and

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>becomes spherical. Little items, like say a banana or a

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>lug wrench, can resist this fate because their self gravity

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is relatively weak, allowing them to retain non spheroid shapes. However,

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in planets, suns, and other truly massive bodies, the force

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>is so strong that they can't avoid being distorted into

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>sphere roids. But Carpenter said gravity is not the whole story.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>While gravity conspires to render the planet's spherical, the speed

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of their rotation is simultaneously trying to flatten them. The

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>faster a celestial body spins, the more disproportionate it's equatorial

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>bulge gets. Carpenter tells us this is why there are

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>no perfect spheres in our Solar system, only oblate spheroids.

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>The Sun is almost a perfect sphere due to its

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>immense gravity and relatively slow rotation rate of twenty five days.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>A significant percentage of stars in the sky rotate much

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>faster and bulge noticeably at their equators. One such star

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is all Tear, located just sixteen point eight light years

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>away from our home planet. It's among the brightest objects

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in the night sky. All Tear is also notable for

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>spinning very very fast. It completes a full rotation on

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>its axis every ten point four Earth hours. Accordingly, astronomers

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>estimate that All Tears at least fourteen percent wider at

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the equator than it is from poll to poll. Rotational

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>speed also explains Jupiter's bulge. After all, a day on

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>this gas giant is a brisk nine point nine earth

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>hours long. Other forces act upon the stars and planets

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, altering their shapes. Although Earth is an oblate spheroid,

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it certainly isn't a perfect one. The gravitational pull of

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Sun and Moon both influence the planet's shaped to

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>a degree. For that matter, so do Earth's own plate

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>tik toonics. Consequently, the mass of our home world isn't

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>evenly distributed. In fact, it's sort of lumpy. Still, it

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.559
<v Speaker 1>looks a good deal rounder than Jupiter and Saturn. In turn,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the planets in our universe appear way more spherical than

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>some of their moons do. Mars, for instance, has two

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>small satellites, neither of which has a self gravity to

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be pulled into an oblate spheroid. Instead, their appearance is

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>often described as potato shaped. In conclusion, will say this

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>much for our home planet. It may not be flawless,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but at least the place is fairly well rounded. Today's

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 1>episode was originally produced by Tristan McNeil and is based

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>on the article why our planets almost sphere on how

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot Com, written by Mark Vancini. Brain Stuff

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>is production of iHeart Radio in partnership with how stuff

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com, and is produced by Tyler Clang. For

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts to my heart Radio, visit the i heart

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows,