Speaker 1: Right, happy, Uh, what is it? Cyber Monday eight hundred
Speaker 1: ninety four one, Sean, If you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program, if you're gonna buy online, please
Speaker 1: be careful, Please protect your identity and your information. These
Speaker 1: cyber criminals are all over the place. We've got a
Speaker 1: ton of great news I'm gonna get to in this
Speaker 1: hour that the mob and the media are going to
Speaker 1: of course ignore. We have the the Nomo Larkey Tour. Okay,
Speaker 1: my great grandfather's running for president on the Democratic Party side, Sean,
Speaker 1: can I jump in for one second, yes, ma'am, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I know. But two quick things about Cyber Monday. One is,
Speaker 1: Hannity has an awesome store. We partner with nine Line Apparel.
Speaker 1: We've got great t shirts just like celebrate freedom, give
Speaker 1: back to veterans. Save some money today on anything you
Speaker 1: buy in the Hannity store with nine Line. Also, for
Speaker 1: those of you who heard about the story over the
Speaker 1: weekend where the Starbucks person wrote pig on the police
Speaker 1: officers beverage on their cup, so Black Rifle Coffee Company
Speaker 1: is giving coffee away. They're doing great stuff to give
Speaker 1: back to our veterans and our police officers. Going to
Speaker 1: be our CC two. Okay, I'm doing rightful coffee. That's
Speaker 1: what you should talking about. All right, So I got
Speaker 1: all this good news. By the way, do you notice
Speaker 1: the Hong Kong protesters are carrying photos of President Trump
Speaker 1: waving signs that say and read Let's make Hong Kong
Speaker 1: great again? Oh yeah, that's out there. I want to
Speaker 1: start so you all know that I before I went
Speaker 1: to Fox Now, in my twenty fourth year, I was
Speaker 1: in Atlanta. I had four of the best years of
Speaker 1: my life. I got an education in Atlanta, Georgia that
Speaker 1: I could never repay, the great people there, memories like
Speaker 1: you wouldn't believe. I was the MC the night New
Speaker 1: king Ridge became the Speaker of the House, the first
Speaker 1: time Republicans controlled the House of Representatives. Imagine this in
Speaker 1: forty years. And it was the Contract with America, promises
Speaker 1: made and kept that made Republicans as a party relevant again.
Speaker 1: And I just I met I was the day I
Speaker 1: first got there. Maynard Jackson welcomed me to his city,
Speaker 1: got to know some of the great bravest civil rights leaders,
Speaker 1: everyone from Joe Lowry. He hated my politics, but we
Speaker 1: got along personally, really well, and you know later became
Speaker 1: Bill Campbell. We've had an up in that relationship, you know.
Speaker 1: But Josea Williams, God Rest his soul. Had more fun
Speaker 1: on the radio with Josea than I could ever imagine
Speaker 1: in my life. And you know, just amazing people. Andrew
Speaker 1: Young learned all about John Lewis, Cynthia McKinney at the time.
Speaker 1: I had some fascinating debates over the years and really
Speaker 1: learned a lot. And anyway, they're about to make the
Speaker 1: biggest mistake in Georgia. I've been writing at Georgia governor
Speaker 1: all day saying come on my radio show because Brian
Speaker 1: Kemp is the governor and everybody I know in Georgia,
Speaker 1: because my roots are pretty strong there. It's like, what
Speaker 1: the hell is this governor doing that He barely beats
Speaker 1: Stacy Abrams. I don't think he wins that governorship but
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump's help. I think there are people that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump helps do better, and then there are people
Speaker 1: that he outright helps win. I mean, you had a
Speaker 1: lot of people helping Stacy Abrams at the time. If
Speaker 1: I'm not mistaken, I think Oprah and Barack and Michelle
Speaker 1: Obama was strong for Stacy Abrams. You had a lot
Speaker 1: of strong support for her. Anyway, Brian Kemp needed help.
Speaker 1: I'm told he's a conservative, but I have no idea
Speaker 1: what he's doing, because it looks like he's on the
Speaker 1: verge of appointing for Johnny Isaacson, who's a great guy,
Speaker 1: and I hope he feels better. I've known him all
Speaker 1: these years that you know, the obvious choice to replace
Speaker 1: Johnny Isaacson his congressman, Doug Collins. He's a rock star,
Speaker 1: a total rock star. Now Johnny Isaacson is retiring because
Speaker 1: of some early health problems. And over the past few days,
Speaker 1: you know apparently a woman that I know, she's known
Speaker 1: in Lanna. She has no political experience whatsoever. And her
Speaker 1: name is Kathy Loffler. I don't have anything against her,
Speaker 1: but she is She apparently the co owner of the
Speaker 1: Atlanta Dream women's professional basketball team, while epe of this
Speaker 1: chairman of an intercontinental exchange that owns the New York
Speaker 1: Stock Exchange in part. But anyway, um, I'm watching this
Speaker 1: and I'm thinking, what the heck is going on here?
Speaker 1: Reading the Wall Street Journal that apparently Kemp's plan to
Speaker 1: pick Loffler is I am I am told. What are
Speaker 1: you telling me, Linda? I can't read and talk at
Speaker 1: the same time. Oh, I'm sorry. Kelly Loughner. Yeah, what
Speaker 1: did I say? Her name is Kelly Laffler, not k
Speaker 1: oh I'm sorry, not Kathy. I was thinking of someone else.
Speaker 1: Thank you anyway. Wall Street Journal reports suggests Kemp's plan
Speaker 1: to pick Laffler first named Kelly, who's also the CEO
Speaker 1: of a Bitcoin future exchange. I never understood bitcoin. I
Speaker 1: still don't understand bitcoin anyway. But you know, everyone's pointed out, well,
Speaker 1: she was a massive supporter of Bitt Romney, which is fine.
Speaker 1: I don't have a problem with that. But you know,
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney has done everything you can do to make
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's life miserable. And I don't know why, but
Speaker 1: everything that Romney and I supported him in twenty twelve,
Speaker 1: but everything Romney said he was going to do if
Speaker 1: he was ever elected President Trump is actually doing. I'm
Speaker 1: having a hard time understanding why. I mean, we're talking
Speaker 1: about major dollars here, and we're talking about somebody. This
Speaker 1: is an important seat. They're trying to impeach a president
Speaker 1: of the United States, and that might be sent over
Speaker 1: to the US Senate anyway, the a JC landed Journal
Speaker 1: Constitution saying Friday, the governor plans to top tap this
Speaker 1: woman as an interim senator. Well, that's going to throw
Speaker 1: a whole primary mess into everybody's face in Georgia. Not
Speaker 1: a good idea. And she donated seven hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: grand to Romney's presidential campaign and I'll ton to Speaker
Speaker 1: Paul Ryan's campaigns and his pack. So she's a kind
Speaker 1: of like a rhino from everything I can see Republican.
Speaker 1: I mean, you have conservative organizations all over the play
Speaker 1: and what the heck is going on down here? Congressman
Speaker 1: Matt Gates is apoplectic about it. He's tweeting out a
Speaker 1: force about all of this. We've got the greatest guy
Speaker 1: with the most courage that has emerged as a real star,
Speaker 1: and he's from the great state of Georgia and his
Speaker 1: name is Doug Collins. I have no idea what the
Speaker 1: heck is going on here. I've been trying to get
Speaker 1: a hold of the governor. He did finally return my
Speaker 1: text today, texted him earlier today, and we've been calling
Speaker 1: his office. What's going on here? Because if you want
Speaker 1: a constitutional conservative that would be Doug Collins. Is nothing
Speaker 1: that shows anybody I'm sure she's a nice woman, that
Speaker 1: she has any experience, or that she's a conservative, just
Speaker 1: the opposite. So I'd like to get an answer as
Speaker 1: sooner than later, because this is this matters, this, this
Speaker 1: pick matters big time. I'm not sure why kemp Is,
Speaker 1: you know, would would It's such an obvious choice. It's
Speaker 1: not even hard. I don't get it anyway, So conservatives
Speaker 1: Washington Examiner warn of a setback if a w NBA
Speaker 1: owner put in a Georgia's sentence seat. Again, it's not
Speaker 1: personal against this particular individual, but you've got the rock
Speaker 1: star right there. There's no question marks. You know, there's
Speaker 1: no inter party fractionalism here at all. But the amount
Speaker 1: of money we're talking about is massive. Tom McCluskey, president
Speaker 1: of March for Life, told others that she sits on
Speaker 1: a board of George's top one of Georgie's top abortion
Speaker 1: performing hospitals, donated thousands of dollars to liberal Democrats. What
Speaker 1: the heck is going on in Georgia. That is not
Speaker 1: a good sign for the great State of Georgia. All Right,
Speaker 1: I just said, I do have good news today. Look
Speaker 1: at this, Donald Trump's approval rating at an all time
Speaker 1: high with small business owners Epic time sixty is a
Speaker 1: CNBC poll, New heights pretty much everywhere. Now. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure why, because we had picked up on this statistic
Speaker 1: a while ago that the US now is a net
Speaker 1: exporter of petroleum. I guess, all right, I got it.
Speaker 1: We've been a net exporter of energy for a long time,
Speaker 1: but for the first month in seventy years, we are
Speaker 1: now a net petroleum export. Very specific, That's why I
Speaker 1: didn't understand it. One of the biggest issues that is
Speaker 1: emerging for twenty twenty, and we got to pay very
Speaker 1: very close attention to this. And there's real reasons why
Speaker 1: this is happening. There is a massive, huge, and it
Speaker 1: is real groundswell of support for the president and the
Speaker 1: African American community. And what's you got two thirds of
Speaker 1: data showing that Democratic voters that went for twenty eighteen
Speaker 1: Democrats are going back to Trump in twenty twenty. That's
Speaker 1: a good sign. But get this. So we've got new
Speaker 1: polling out there, and we got three polls in particular,
Speaker 1: and the first person to pick up on this was
Speaker 1: John Zogby. This is a while ago. I told you
Speaker 1: about it. Twenty percent approval rating plus in the black community.
Speaker 1: Now we're looking at if you look at the real
Speaker 1: clear politics op ed. They noted that Black Americans are
Speaker 1: beginning to say things like the Democrats just want our votes,
Speaker 1: not our babies. The Democrats don't care about our children
Speaker 1: getting a good education while they send their own kids
Speaker 1: to private school. That would be pocahuntas Elizabeth Warren. They
Speaker 1: talk about helping us climb the economic ladder of success.
Speaker 1: But it's Donald Trump that's begun to make it all happen.
Speaker 1: And during a recent Black Voices for Trump conference in Atlanta,
Speaker 1: he told the audience, we are going to campaign for
Speaker 1: every last African American vote in twenty twenty. We've done
Speaker 1: more for African Americans in three years than the broken
Speaker 1: Washington establishment is done in more than thirty years. Pastor
Speaker 1: Scott friend of this program. He's from Ohio. The most
Speaker 1: pro African American president we have ever had in our lifetime.
Speaker 1: Look at Emerson and Rassmussen. Rassmussen has the President's support
Speaker 1: with African Americans at thirty four and a half percent.
Speaker 1: Emerson thirty four percent. I mean the president only got
Speaker 1: eight percent of the African American vote in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: The lowest poll of the seven we've got is sixteen.
Speaker 1: That's double what he got in twenty sixteen. That is
Speaker 1: what's called a game changing moment in terms of elections.
Speaker 1: Now there's a reason for what is it? Okay? Well,
Speaker 1: why don't we get In the Obama Biden years, we
Speaker 1: had thirteen million more Americans on food stamps, eight million
Speaker 1: more in poverty, lowest labor participation rate since the seventy
Speaker 1: worst recovery since the forties, lowest home ownership rate in
Speaker 1: fifty years. Well, where are we now? Every month it's
Speaker 1: like a new record that we get with African Americans.
Speaker 1: Why because of the tax cuts, deregulation, the manufacturing jobs
Speaker 1: that Obama said were never coming back or back. Unemployment
Speaker 1: rate under Trump now is that the lowest ever in history,
Speaker 1: a new record five point four percent number of new
Speaker 1: African Americans employed, over a million two incomes for African
Speaker 1: American families have and poverty incomes are up. Poverty has
Speaker 1: now fallen to record low. Also, three hundred thousand people
Speaker 1: have been lifted out of poverty since twenty seventeen, median
Speaker 1: income has risen dramatically. The percentage of African American households
Speaker 1: earning over one hundred and fifty grand reach another record
Speaker 1: last year. And according to new polls, the president is
Speaker 1: seeing this support. So you got thirty four point five
Speaker 1: percent at that's the Emerson Pole, thirty four percent, Zogby Pole.
Speaker 1: You've got the lowest of all the polls was the
Speaker 1: Economists you gov poll at sixteen. Gallup even had him
Speaker 1: at twenty one percent. NPR, PBS they had him at
Speaker 1: thirty three percent. This is a massive change. And if
Speaker 1: the president, let's say the lowest number, not the thirty
Speaker 1: four thirty four point five and thirty three percent number,
Speaker 1: when you've got seven poles now saying this, this is
Speaker 1: not an accident. And then add to that, of course,
Speaker 1: oh Alice Marie Johnson, add to that, the prison reform
Speaker 1: bill that every Democrat has talked about never got done
Speaker 1: because there is a differences in sentencing as it relates
Speaker 1: to African Americans and others. Well, the person that got
Speaker 1: that done is Donald Trump, and he worked hard with
Speaker 1: the African American community to get it done. Non violent
Speaker 1: drug offenses et cetera, like in the case of Alice Johnson.
Speaker 1: This is an amazing, amazing, you know trend that nobody
Speaker 1: in the media is paying attention to. Maybe it's why
Speaker 1: Axelrod and Obama are pushing so hard. But the val
Speaker 1: Patrick We're going to watch that over the next few
Speaker 1: weeks and months. Right as we roll along eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one, Sean, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, So you're saying, you just
Speaker 1: heard from the governor of George's office, Kemp's office. So
Speaker 1: we've offered him anytime, any part of any day today
Speaker 1: TV radio, and he's not available at all all day.
Speaker 1: There's not five minute window all day long. He's very busy.
Speaker 1: You know what. It's no, he's not busy. It sounds
Speaker 1: like they're ducking, That's what it sounds like. It sounds
Speaker 1: like they hear every conservative. And this pisses me off
Speaker 1: because this is what this is what Republicans don't like
Speaker 1: about rhino Republicans. Rather, this is what conservatives don't like
Speaker 1: about Rhino Republicans. Well, I think the problem that he's
Speaker 1: made up his mind right, he's probably promised her the seat.
Speaker 1: People are now discerning her record and is saying, this
Speaker 1: is not somebody that has any history of being a
Speaker 1: conservative and at best a liberal Republican, right, somebody that's
Speaker 1: going to be a strong conservative that we has already
Speaker 1: established the obvious choice, which would be Doug Collins. So
Speaker 1: now they don't now we duck hannityefull and we gave
Speaker 1: them any time that they want to have also offered tomorrow, um,
Speaker 1: you know, and just said, you know, we would really
Speaker 1: love to talk to him, you know, his constituents as well.
Speaker 1: I see people want to be people want to be
Speaker 1: heard before you make this decision. I wrote that to him.
Speaker 1: I think the unfortunate thing is it's just another Republican.
Speaker 1: When their feet are held to the fire, they really
Speaker 1: let the party down. No, it's well, this is why
Speaker 1: I'm not a Republican. This is everything. Look, I put
Speaker 1: it all on the line, and I told this audience
Speaker 1: because I am a concern the Donald Trump will govern conservatively.
Speaker 1: And I took more crap, more b s from conservatives
Speaker 1: that said I was sold out. Well, not on judges,
Speaker 1: not on tax cuts, not on deregulation, not on energy independence,
Speaker 1: not on building the wall, not on trade deals that
Speaker 1: are getting done left and right and not on pretty
Speaker 1: much every other promise he's made. Because the guy's kept
Speaker 1: his word. Well, I don't like his style. That has
Speaker 1: nothing to do with him keeping his word and governing conservatively.
Speaker 1: I told you he was a disruptor. I told you
Speaker 1: it was an iconoclass. He said, Oh, I'm gonna drain
Speaker 1: the swamp. This is what draining the swamp, as Rush said,
Speaker 1: We've aired it last week. Looks like it's ugly. They
Speaker 1: the swamp creatures don't want to be drained out. We'll
Speaker 1: continue all right, twenty five to the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine four one sean. If you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, all right, so
Speaker 1: you just so, I'm reading your email with Governor Kemp's office.
Speaker 1: You know what, It sounds like they're just being jackasses,
Speaker 1: really does. It sounds like they are mad and angry
Speaker 1: that they're getting called out for picking somebody that is
Speaker 1: a rhino. That's what they see. They're not mad. They're
Speaker 1: just mad that we are trying to get to the
Speaker 1: bottom of it before I think he makes a big mistake.
Speaker 1: This is what Republicans do. This is why Republicans as
Speaker 1: a party you want to know what this is exactly
Speaker 1: why Donald Trump was elected, because this is where the
Speaker 1: Republican Party as a whole has failed. And but for
Speaker 1: people like Doug Collins is Ian freed. He's a Freedom
Speaker 1: Caulker's member, isn't he? Oh yeah? Oh yeah? And Mark
Speaker 1: Meadows and the Jim Jordan's and the Devin Newnesses and
Speaker 1: the Ratcliffs and the Matt Gates is of the world,
Speaker 1: you know. But for that really strong group of conservatives
Speaker 1: in the Republican Party. How many times have I said
Speaker 1: over the last number of years, But for the Freedom
Speaker 1: Caucus and a few senators, that's it. These are the
Speaker 1: you know, you got fifteen people doing all the work.
Speaker 1: And to his credit, I'm listen all props to Kevin McCarthy.
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy stepped up, knew that Jordan was the best
Speaker 1: guy to move over to the Intel Committee for the
Speaker 1: Ukrainian coup attempt, and boy paid off big time. And
Speaker 1: so I give him credit. One of the guys called
Speaker 1: me said, why are you praising Because McCarthy did the
Speaker 1: right thing. That's why I'm praising what he did. And
Speaker 1: he's been standing strong and as have all the House
Speaker 1: Republicans against this madness and this insanity. So okay, you
Speaker 1: have a person with no experience. I have no idea
Speaker 1: except that I suspect, well, she can sell funds. There's
Speaker 1: my suspicions here. And I have some smart friends that
Speaker 1: I know in Georgia and they agree with this assessment
Speaker 1: of mine, and some of them have in their own
Speaker 1: ways passed it on to me. But there is as
Speaker 1: my assessment of all this is, yeah, this is about
Speaker 1: a lot more than anything but money for other Republican politicians,
Speaker 1: you know, And you know, this is very frustrating because
Speaker 1: I have a lot of roots in Georgia. I have
Speaker 1: a lot of friends in Atlanta, a lot of friends
Speaker 1: in Cobb County, Gwynette County, all over the perimeter, and
Speaker 1: that are in traffic on Georgia four hundred or seventy
Speaker 1: five eighty five right now. And you know, it's just
Speaker 1: kind of it's kind of sad that they don't even
Speaker 1: want to hear from a conservative or conservatives that without
Speaker 1: whose health Kemp doesn't become the governor. I guess I
Speaker 1: don't know if where the president is weighed in, but
Speaker 1: my sources have told me he's he's apoplectic about it,
Speaker 1: no experience. He's like, why are you bringing this person
Speaker 1: to meet me? One of my sources told me so
Speaker 1: now he won't. Now he's not going to come on
Speaker 1: a conservatives radio show, and they said no for tomorrow too.
Speaker 1: No time at all today, not a second of free
Speaker 1: time to even call in and explain why he's doing
Speaker 1: this before he does it. Doesn't want to hear from
Speaker 1: we the people. And I told him, I told him, listen,
Speaker 1: we'll take you from a cell phone. We'll take you
Speaker 1: for five minutes, we'll take you for ten minutes. His
Speaker 1: office is listening right now, could do anytime tonight. Oh
Speaker 1: his office is huddled or jackass. He is, No, you
Speaker 1: guys are being the jackasses, not me. I'm standing true
Speaker 1: to conservative principles. Explain the Romney connection. Explain some of
Speaker 1: these groups that they are so this woman is associated
Speaker 1: with that are liberal, that are odds with the conservative
Speaker 1: base in the Republican Party in Georgia. If we wanted
Speaker 1: somebody who supported planned parenthood, then we would have voted
Speaker 1: for Stacey Abrams. Now you are appointing somebody that's for
Speaker 1: abortion when that's not what the conservative people have driving
Speaker 1: camp doesn't win if Donald Trump didn't bat him out. Period.
Speaker 1: That's my take on it, and every smart person that
Speaker 1: I know is take on it. So you want, all right,
Speaker 1: so we're heading into an impeachment and what are we
Speaker 1: gonna do? We're gonna get a liberal Republican Wow? Okay
Speaker 1: for the Senate. Oh no, I promise. I've heard that before.
Speaker 1: I've heard a lot of promises before, or a lot
Speaker 1: of different people. Linda One's been to give out the
Speaker 1: number of the governors are well, he's not gonna talk
Speaker 1: to me. Well, maybe people show. All right, I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna do it all day. I'll give it out now,
Speaker 1: we'll give it a couple of times. We'll put it online.
Speaker 1: I tell people this, be respectful. Say why won't the
Speaker 1: governor go on Hannity's radio and TV show before he
Speaker 1: makes an appointment? Because I think that Doug Collins is
Speaker 1: the perfect fit to replace Johnny Isaacson and we're praying
Speaker 1: for Johnny Isaacson. Four h four six, seventeen seventy six.
Speaker 1: Easy to remember. We'll put it up on the website.
Speaker 1: Make it easy and be respectful. Why don't you explain
Speaker 1: before you make this decision? This is a very important
Speaker 1: decision at an important time in American history. Or oh, four, six, five, six,
Speaker 1: seventeen seventy six. All right, let's see, let's see what
Speaker 1: they if they'll respond to the people. They don't care
Speaker 1: about the talk show host. Fine, you don't care about Hannity,
Speaker 1: What do you care? I care because the country we're
Speaker 1: in it this is a critical tipping point moment for
Speaker 1: the country. That's why I care. I care because it's
Speaker 1: it's the you're not making the case, governor, why tell us?
Speaker 1: Why defend the record and lack of experience when you've
Speaker 1: got a guy like you know, hitting grand slams every day.
Speaker 1: By the way, back to these polls with African Americans,
Speaker 1: Kanye West, literally he's said fellow Americans, he advised to
Speaker 1: own your own power, you know. And by the way,
Speaker 1: if you haven't gotten his new CD, it's phenomenal. I
Speaker 1: everythink i'd ever support Kanye West. No a CD, no
Speaker 1: what he's done for criminal justice reform. Not only that,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you why I love this guy. Not only
Speaker 1: is he willing to say I believe in God, which
Speaker 1: I love, because you know, with that comes a lot
Speaker 1: of ridicule. I don't know why admitting that in God,
Speaker 1: we trust one nation under God, you know, endowed by
Speaker 1: our creator is so controversial in this date age. And
Speaker 1: you know, all that is admitting is you need help
Speaker 1: in life and want to be a better person. Okay, great, anyway,
Speaker 1: so he's willing to step out and do that. Then
Speaker 1: he's telling people, you know what, own your own power.
Speaker 1: Your power is not to just vote Democratic for the
Speaker 1: rest of your our lives. That's not power, he said,
Speaker 1: We're a great point. He added that such power is
Speaker 1: evidenced in his decision to move his production of Algae,
Speaker 1: a sneaker that he debuted to Cody Wyoming, and he
Speaker 1: said the goal is to bring manufacturing back to America,
Speaker 1: bringing its stateside present jobs for people here. He said
Speaker 1: that African Americans have been brainwashed by Democrats who are
Speaker 1: making you know. Then he goes on to a whole
Speaker 1: bunch of things. Look and then he got he's single
Speaker 1: handedly with Kim Kardashian. I could care less about the Kardashians,
Speaker 1: but they stood up for somebody that deserved to be championed.
Speaker 1: Alice Bury Johnson, Oh, we'd love I think that woman's amazing.
Speaker 1: One mistake one conviction, non violent drug offense. There was
Speaker 1: a life sentence for her twenty two years. She starts
Speaker 1: a ministry in prison, comes out after the President pardonser
Speaker 1: and says, thank you America, thank you for giving me
Speaker 1: a second chance. Thank you, President Trump. I'll never let
Speaker 1: you down. And then then they didn't stop there. Then
Speaker 1: they move on to, Okay, well, let's let's institutionalize this.
Speaker 1: Let's sketch criminal justice reform on my own offenders. Some
Speaker 1: of my conservative friends didn't like it, and maybe it's
Speaker 1: not perfect. But the idea that there's the spirit sensing, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's all been chronicled and proven to be true.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's a bad idea. By the way,
Speaker 1: can we play Joe three zero three three zero because
Speaker 1: Fox News it's from twenty seventeen. But this is really bizarre.
Speaker 1: Listen to Joe Biden. And by the way, you know,
Speaker 1: I sit on the stand and to get hot, I
Speaker 1: got a lot of I got hairy legs. That turned
Speaker 1: that that that that that that turned blonde in the sun.
Speaker 1: And the kids used to come up and reach in
Speaker 1: the pool and rub my leg down. So it was
Speaker 1: trained and that watch the hair come back up again
Speaker 1: and look at it. So I learned about roaches. I
Speaker 1: learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I've loved
Speaker 1: kids jumping on my lap. I'll give you time to
Speaker 1: decipher what that means. We'll do that in the next
Speaker 1: hour or Linda, there you go. Because kids petting his
Speaker 1: hairy legs learned what rats and roaches are. Okay, that
Speaker 1: is bizarre. I love kids jumping on my lapt What
Speaker 1: the hell is he even saying? AOC put out a
Speaker 1: warning to Buddha judge. This is a GOP talking point
Speaker 1: used to dismantle public systems. She's mad now that everyone
Speaker 1: says free stuff. Well, that's what she's offering, free stuff.
Speaker 1: That's what the New Green Deal is, free stuff. I'll
Speaker 1: say it every single day. Why was Biden biting his
Speaker 1: wife's finger this weekend when she was speaking? That was
Speaker 1: That was bizarre too. The New York Time Times actually
Speaker 1: got a resignation letter from a Kamala Harris staffer. It
Speaker 1: was brutal. Wow. Never seen an organization treat it's staff
Speaker 1: so poorly. I think I treat my staff well? Do
Speaker 1: I treat most of you? All? Absolutely? Everybody well? By
Speaker 1: the way you better say tomorrow's bonus Tuesday. Oh fantastic.
Speaker 1: You're the best boss and you're so You know, what
Speaker 1: do I always say when I give a bonus to
Speaker 1: everyone who works for me against a nice bonus every year?
Speaker 1: What do I always say? Money equals freedom? Save your money,
Speaker 1: Save your money. You know? It was an interesting point
Speaker 1: in Massachusetts GOP saying about Warren is running her entire
Speaker 1: presidential campaign based upon envy. Wow, clobho is pissed, he's angry.
Speaker 1: I don't buy his everyone else sucks argument for getting
Speaker 1: into the primary. Talking about in this particular case, Bloomberg
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, I'm not even going there. He's a mess.
Speaker 1: No current Democratic contender can beat Trump. That is from
Speaker 1: the Robert Johnson founder b ET first African American billionaire
Speaker 1: after he sold his company to Viacom in two thousand
Speaker 1: and one, lifelong Democrat, America's first black billionaire. Assess the
Speaker 1: Democratic contenders if you take a snapshot today, I don't
Speaker 1: think that group is capable of beating Donald Trump, what
Speaker 1: the polls say. I think the president has always been
Speaker 1: in a position where it's his to lose. Like I'd
Speaker 1: even say that he's the only one that can beat him.
Speaker 1: I'll say it loudly and I'll say it publicly. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Its Pelosi's now flying out with Democrats to the UN
Speaker 1: Climate Change meeting in Spain, and John Kerry is recruiting
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton and Leonardo DiCaprio. DiCaprio celebrated New Year's in Australia,
Speaker 1: gets on a private jet, celebrates it again in Vegas.
Speaker 1: We're gonna get lectures from him. He should put up
Speaker 1: the John Stossel video destroying some of the climate change myths.
Speaker 1: I thought that was done very, very well. I saw
Speaker 1: that today. Acazio Cortez whining about free stuff. Yeah, look,
Speaker 1: why am I not talking a lot about this? And
Speaker 1: Ukrainian and peachment coup attim. I will. We'll do a
Speaker 1: lot more later in a program at the top of
Speaker 1: the next hour. We got Jordan Seculo, Greg Jarrett. We
Speaker 1: have Sydney Powell on later. The Ukrainian president now again
Speaker 1: has pulled the rug out from the Democrats. This was
Speaker 1: in the Epic Times. Zelinski an I never talked to
Speaker 1: the president from any position of a quid pro quo.
Speaker 1: That's not my thing, says the Time magazine. Over the weekend,
Speaker 1: he says he has no clue. He doesn't understand at
Speaker 1: all these allegations made against Trump during this House Intel Well,
Speaker 1: they were all either opinion witnesses or hearsay witnesses, so
Speaker 1: none of their opinions matter. The only one that would
Speaker 1: ever be called in a trial, if we use the
Speaker 1: federal rules of evidence, would be what's his name? Sonit Slan, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that guy. They were all nuts. Then we've got, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, the letter of Sipoloni. Wow, was unbelievable. Let
Speaker 1: me tell you one thing knew. Gaingard said before that
Speaker 1: though this is real, they're that crazy, they're that nuts,
Speaker 1: they'll do this. There's not a reason for It's nothing
Speaker 1: impeachable here. There was no quid pro quo like Joe.
Speaker 1: So he only said it once today because there was
Speaker 1: You're not getting a billion unless you fire the prosecutor
Speaker 1: that I know is investigating my zero experienced son. He
Speaker 1: never asked. The President actually said in that call, you know,
Speaker 1: you're surrounding yourself with some of the same guys that
Speaker 1: the last corrupt guy did. I don't think it's smart
Speaker 1: for you to do that. So it's obvious the president's
Speaker 1: intent was he didn't like corruption in Ukraine, nor should
Speaker 1: he have they tried it? What four separate elections Trump
Speaker 1: Russia collusion unbelievable. Well, are we gonna put Adam Schiff
Speaker 1: under oath? Because that's the guy that needs to go
Speaker 1: under oath? And this is where you know, and Pat
Speaker 1: sippolone's the purposely scheduling the meetings. Why where the president's
Speaker 1: attending NATO leaders meetings in London? They rightly goes on
Speaker 1: to say that this inquiry has violated all past historical
Speaker 1: precedent of basic do rights, fundamental fairness. We can't fairly
Speaker 1: be expected to participate in the hearing while the witnesses
Speaker 1: have yet to have been named. Is not a single
Speaker 1: fact witness. They're gonna have a talk show on Wednesday
Speaker 1: in the House Judiciary Committee and bring in professors to
Speaker 1: give opinions about what they think high crimes misdemeanors are about. Okay,
Speaker 1: And then he said when the when the House Judiciary
Speaker 1: Committee is scheduled a similar meeting during the Clinton impeachment process,
Speaker 1: it allowed those questioning the witnesses two and a half
Speaker 1: weeks notice to prepare scheduled the hearing on a date
Speaker 1: suggested by the president's attorneys. Today, by contrast, you have
Speaker 1: afforded the president no scheduling input, no meaningful information, so
Speaker 1: little time to prepare. You have effectively denied the administration
Speaker 1: of any fair opportunity to participate. And by the way,
Speaker 1: if Shift chooses because he said any how, back then,
Speaker 1: House passed rules the president and his attorneys they have
Speaker 1: a right to cross examine witnesses, review evidence, call witnesses.
Speaker 1: Their first witness. Would it be Adam Schiff, the compromise
Speaker 1: corrupt congenital liar. And they said that if Shift refuses testified,
Speaker 1: then I would question the veracity and what he's putting
Speaker 1: in his report. Doug Collins said that Governor Kemp. Doug
Speaker 1: Collins said that the guy who's shown more courage than
Speaker 1: pretty much almost every Republican but for the Freedom Caucus. Guys,
Speaker 1: all right, what's the number again? You can give it
Speaker 1: out one more time or all four? Be nice? Yes,
Speaker 1: I'm very nice you. I'm saying to people that call, Yeah, everybody,
Speaker 1: be nice, but doing this seventeen seventy six or four?
Speaker 1: What is it? Six five, six, seventeen seventy six. By
Speaker 1: the way, Lisa Page, Yeah, we're gonna We're gonna break
Speaker 1: that down tonight on Hannity. You don't want to miss it.
Speaker 1: If the impeachment of the president is even worse, because
Speaker 1: again we're losing distinction of we're losing track of the
Speaker 1: distinction between sins and crimes. We're lowering the standard of impeachment.
Speaker 1: What the president has done is not a great and
Speaker 1: dangerous offense to the safety of the republic. In the
Speaker 1: words of George Mason, it is not an impeachable offense
Speaker 1: under the meeting the Constitution. And as you heard from
Speaker 1: mister Kanyers, the allegations are far far from proven. And
Speaker 1: the fact is we are not simply transmitting evidence to
Speaker 1: the transmitting a case with some evidence to the Senate,
Speaker 1: as evidenced by the fact that we already heard leaders
Speaker 1: this APay, he should resign. God forbid that he should resign.
Speaker 1: He should fight this and beat it. Benjamin Franklin called
Speaker 1: impeachment a substitute for assassination. It is, in fact, a
Speaker 1: peaceful procedure for protecting the nation from despots by providing
Speaker 1: a constitutional means for removing a president who would misuse
Speaker 1: his presidential power to make himself a tyrant or otherwise
Speaker 1: to undermine our constitutional form of government. To impeach a president,
Speaker 1: it must be that serious. It is grossly unfair because
Speaker 1: with respect to the twenty two hundred pages of evidence
Speaker 1: in the seventeen boxes of other evidence, the entire Judiciary
Speaker 1: Committee is going to see it to decide what must
Speaker 1: be kept confidential as protecting privacy of third parties. That
Speaker 1: means fifty people are going to see it. It's going
Speaker 1: to leak out, and those privacy rights are going to
Speaker 1: be violated, and that is ensured by this resolution. It
Speaker 1: is grossly unfair because during the ten or twenty days
Speaker 1: that that's going to be done, while the world will
Speaker 1: see salatious details, the president will not be allowed to
Speaker 1: look at those documents. There's no reason why he shouldn't.
Speaker 1: There's no delay entailed. But this resolution is doing everything
Speaker 1: they can to make the president's defense as difficult as possible.
Speaker 1: The effective impeachment is to overturn the popular will of
Speaker 1: the voters as expressed in a national election. We must
Speaker 1: not overturn an election and remove a president from office
Speaker 1: except to defend a very system of government or our
Speaker 1: constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not
Speaker 1: do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people
Speaker 1: and of their representatives in Congress of the absolute necessity.
Speaker 1: You gotta see and compare that tape, that audio, that
Speaker 1: is the Judiciary Committee chairman Gerald Nadler. Oh, we got
Speaker 1: a tape for him tonight nine Eastern Hannity on Fox News. Anyway,
Speaker 1: our two glad you're with us, Our toll free numbers
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety four one, Sean if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. This on the
Speaker 1: heels of a devastating beat down letter sent by White
Speaker 1: House Council Pat Sippoloni to Nadler and his committee, you know,
Speaker 1: first pointing out that, yeah, Nadler, really, you schedule the
Speaker 1: proceedings when you know that the president is attending meetings
Speaker 1: with NATO leaders in London. Huh, pretty pretty interesting timing
Speaker 1: on all of that, knowing that the president is out
Speaker 1: of the country. That's pretty dumb too. They then they
Speaker 1: say this in the letter, this baseless, highly partisan inquiry
Speaker 1: violates all past historical precedent, basic due process rights, fundamental fairness.
Speaker 1: He goes on and then says that Nadler provided only
Speaker 1: vague details about the hearing, and that unnamed academics, not
Speaker 1: fact witnesses. Academics. I guess they're going to hold a
Speaker 1: talk show in the Judiciary Committee. Maybe we'll have a
Speaker 1: big debate, and only they will be attending, No fact
Speaker 1: witnesses will be attending. And then, as the President's attorney
Speaker 1: White House Council Sipeloni says, we can't fairly be expected
Speaker 1: to participate in the hearing. While the witnesses are yet
Speaker 1: to be named, it remains unclear whether the Judiciary Committee
Speaker 1: will afford the president a fair process through additional hearings.
Speaker 1: More importantly, an invitation to an academic discussion with law
Speaker 1: professors does not begin to provide the president with any
Speaker 1: semblance of a fair process. Accordingly, under the circumstances, we
Speaker 1: do not intend to participate in this hearing. And when
Speaker 1: the Judiciary Committee scheduled a similar hearing during the Clinton
Speaker 1: impeachment process, it allowed those questioning the witnesses two and
Speaker 1: a half week's notice to prepare. It scheduled the hearing
Speaker 1: on a date suggested by the president's attorneys. Today, by contrast,
Speaker 1: you have afforded the president no scheduling input, no meaningful information,
Speaker 1: and so little time to prepare that you've effectively denied
Speaker 1: the administration a fair opportunity to participate. And it made
Speaker 1: clear in his response that they're demanding more information how
Speaker 1: they plan to conduct this witch hunt, demanding specifically if
Speaker 1: they can cross examine and call their own fact witnesses,
Speaker 1: including the House Intel Committee chair, the corrupt, compromised, coward,
Speaker 1: congenital liar Adam Schiff. House passed rules provide a president
Speaker 1: and his attorneys at the right to cross examine witnesses,
Speaker 1: review the evidence before the committee, but they have done nothing.
Speaker 1: If any of that took this point. If Shift chooses
Speaker 1: not to testify, then I really question the veracity and
Speaker 1: what he's putting in his reports at Doug Collins, who
Speaker 1: should be appointed by Governor Kemp and Georgia anyway. Jordan Seculo,
Speaker 1: executive director of the American Center for Law and Justice,
Speaker 1: is with us and by the way, the next red
Speaker 1: Wave how Conservatives can beat left disaggression, Rhino betrayal, and
Speaker 1: deep state subversion. Greg Jarrett, Fox News legal Analysts' latest
Speaker 1: book just out bestseller, witch Hunt, The Story of the
Speaker 1: Greatest mass delusion in American political history. I thought the
Speaker 1: letter was powerful, Greg, and I think it was dead
Speaker 1: on accurate, and I think that you know, what is
Speaker 1: the point of they hosting a talk show in the
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee on Wednesday or what? Oh, You're absolutely right
Speaker 1: and the letter was correct all the fact. Witnesses allegedly
Speaker 1: have already testified, and the President was deprived as an
Speaker 1: opportunity to have his counsel President to question those particular witnesses.
Speaker 1: And indeed, Republicans and the President were deprived of the
Speaker 1: long standing right in such matters to call their own witnesses.
Speaker 1: So what are we left with. We're left with a
Speaker 1: bunch of pinheaded professors who were going to weigh in
Speaker 1: on Federalist sixty five and the meaning of the impeachment clause,
Speaker 1: and it varies from constitutional scholar to legal expert. Frankly,
Speaker 1: if I were the Republicans, I just play the clip
Speaker 1: you just played, if Jerry Nadler, which is the best
Speaker 1: legal opinion for why this doesn't constitute an impeachment offense,
Speaker 1: and be done with it. But it's clear that Nadler
Speaker 1: is never going to be fair in much the same
Speaker 1: way that Adam Schiff was fundamentally unfair and deprived the
Speaker 1: president of due process, which the Supreme Court has said
Speaker 1: applies to congressional hearings Jordan's seculo. I do agree with
Speaker 1: new king Rich who says we better take this seriously.
Speaker 1: These people are nuts. This is real. Yet what is
Speaker 1: the impeachable issue? I mean, there wasn't a quit in
Speaker 1: a pro and a quo Like Joe the Ukrainian president
Speaker 1: said he felt zero pressure at any point, didn't know
Speaker 1: the military aid was even withheld temporarily. The one fact
Speaker 1: witness that showed up in the House Intel Shift Show
Speaker 1: Committee hearing said yeah, the president said I want nothing,
Speaker 1: no quid pro quo. Okay, the presidents in the past
Speaker 1: have all done this. The president is doing it even
Speaker 1: today as we speak with Lebanon. So at what point
Speaker 1: what are the impeachment issues here? Well? As we heard
Speaker 1: from these so called fact witnesses over these past few weeks,
Speaker 1: I say so called because none of them provided a
Speaker 1: lot of facts. They provided hearsay, they provided their opinion
Speaker 1: on the president's foreign policy. They provided what they presumed
Speaker 1: to be the case that was Ambassador Sonlon, But they
Speaker 1: there weren't a lot of specific facts that we already
Speaker 1: didn't know because we all got the transcript too so
Speaker 1: I mean, yes, they were fact witnesses, but you know,
Speaker 1: putting that aside, these these law professors, I mean, I
Speaker 1: think Pat Zippoloni, the White House Counsel, and of course
Speaker 1: I'm on the President's outside legal team, and we completely
Speaker 1: agree with what the White House Counsel has done here.
Speaker 1: Because one, even if these were other kind of witnesses,
Speaker 1: the fact that we're less than three days away and
Speaker 1: don't even know who they are, let's say they were
Speaker 1: fact witnesses, it would be absurd for the White House
Speaker 1: to go ahead and say, yeah, we'll be there and
Speaker 1: we're going to participate, and you get to determine all
Speaker 1: the rules. Jerry and Adler, you wouldn't do that. But
Speaker 1: it's even more absurd when all you found out is
Speaker 1: that they're some kind of I guess law professors and
Speaker 1: con law scholars, constitutional law scholars, which, by the way,
Speaker 1: are going to give, like Greg said, a bunch of
Speaker 1: different opinions on how they interpret a process which is
Speaker 1: pretty simply laid out in the Constitution an article one,
Speaker 1: an article two, and it has also failed consistently each
Speaker 1: time it has been used against a president of the
Speaker 1: United States. And so it failed when the House impeach Johnson.
Speaker 1: It failed when the House impeached President Clinton. So I mean,
Speaker 1: there hasn't been like a long record of successfully actually
Speaker 1: finding presidents guilty and throwing them out of office by
Speaker 1: using this process, which is exactly what the founders intended,
Speaker 1: it should be very difficult. I think that's it. That's
Speaker 1: all you need to discuss. Well, I don't want to
Speaker 1: hear from these professors, and I think that's what the
Speaker 1: White House is concerned. Why don't they bring in Mark Levin?
Speaker 1: Why don't they bring in you, Jordan? Why don't they
Speaker 1: bring in your father? Why don't they bring in Greg Jarrett?
Speaker 1: Why don't they bring to They don't want to hear
Speaker 1: from that. I mean I think that again, they don't
Speaker 1: want to hear anybody with a narrative that is different
Speaker 1: from exactly what they want. So I think what these
Speaker 1: con law professors are going to do, Sean, and I
Speaker 1: think they're Again, if you think those fact witnesses were bad,
Speaker 1: this will even be worse. If they're the liberal law
Speaker 1: professors that I'm assuming they will be. That they're going
Speaker 1: to try and convince the American public that, yes, what
Speaker 1: the president does did is some kind of an heat
Speaker 1: a bull offense based off their legal scholarship, and this
Speaker 1: is what they're relying on. Now, that's why the White
Speaker 1: House has is absolutely right and not participating in this charade.
Speaker 1: They're not going to cross examine law professors. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's absurd. And again in this letter we find out
Speaker 1: that Jerry Nadler's doing this again to the White House
Speaker 1: team and the President by saying you've got to respond
Speaker 1: by December, by the twenty ninth about so you've got
Speaker 1: to decide again about another hearing on the twenty sixth,
Speaker 1: I mean on December sixth, And still we don't have
Speaker 1: a witness list for that hearing. So how could the
Speaker 1: President's team possibly say yes, the President will be there
Speaker 1: or be represented there when they don't even know who
Speaker 1: the Democrats are calling, and we know whoever they want
Speaker 1: to call will get approved. And we also know that
Speaker 1: most likely any Republican attempts to call real fact witnesses
Speaker 1: like Adam Schiff, like we heard from Doug Collins, who's
Speaker 1: a fact witness because of his interaction or at least
Speaker 1: Staff's interaction with the Woods the blower, that if that's
Speaker 1: all going to get denied. You know what I say,
Speaker 1: as a member of the president's legal team, I dare
Speaker 1: the Democrats to move on with this. Go have your vote, ors,
Speaker 1: those thirty one Democrats that live in Trump majority districts,
Speaker 1: to go vote to impeach the president, and then let
Speaker 1: this go to the US Citate, because at this point
Speaker 1: it's a sham and I can't even imagine how difficult
Speaker 1: it will be to get people to tune into this
Speaker 1: on Wednesday. And Greg, what do you suggest, Well, I'd
Speaker 1: suggest Colleen Alan Dershowitz. He's an esteemed constitutional law professor.
Speaker 1: He's already made it clear that even if you view
Speaker 1: the president's actions in the light most unfavorable to him,
Speaker 1: at still does not come close to rising to the
Speaker 1: level of an impeachable offense. And Nadler knows this. He
Speaker 1: argued it as you played the clip during the Clinton
Speaker 1: impeachment case. So they were going to be fair, they
Speaker 1: would they would call somebody who is a Democrat, which
Speaker 1: Alan Dershowitz has been lifelong Democrat who is looking strictly
Speaker 1: at the impeachment clauses in the Constitution as well as
Speaker 1: Federalist sixty five, written by Alexander Hamilton, And as Hamilton writes,
Speaker 1: this is exactly what our founding fathers feared, that an
Speaker 1: opposition party in Congress would seek to remove a president
Speaker 1: on a basis that is purely political. Which is why
Speaker 1: the Framers, in their wisdom, instituted in the Constitution a
Speaker 1: procedural protection which is a two thirds supermajority in the
Speaker 1: United not getting it. That's the whole. This is why
Speaker 1: it's a show. This is why we know who these
Speaker 1: people are, all right. Jordan Seculo, American Center for Law Injustice,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett with Fox Right, final moments thoughts attorney's Jordan's Seculo,
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, Right, so we all agree, Jordan, this is
Speaker 1: a talk show that Nadler's putting on Wednesday. So where
Speaker 1: does this end? I mean it's law professor, illegal experts.
Speaker 1: I think it'd be great, as Greg said in the
Speaker 1: earlier segment, if someone like Alan Dershowitz was called, he
Speaker 1: was a Hillary Clinton supporter. He's been clear about the
Speaker 1: president not this not being an impeachable offense. A Harvard
Speaker 1: law professor, that would be wonderful. It still would be
Speaker 1: like inappropriate for the White House Counsel to be there
Speaker 1: to cross examine him, and yet we don't even know
Speaker 1: if he will be there, so the White House can't
Speaker 1: answer that question. And again, I just want to underscore
Speaker 1: how big of a sham this is. Nadler sent out
Speaker 1: another letter saying that the White House has got to
Speaker 1: respond by December six about another hearing where they have
Speaker 1: no witness list, they don't know what the procedures will be,
Speaker 1: and yet they're supposed to say whether or not the
Speaker 1: President's White House counsel and who the named president's attorney
Speaker 1: will be to a hearing where there's no information about
Speaker 1: I mean it is. This is the sham of all shams.
Speaker 1: It's what the Democrats have stooped to now at this point,
Speaker 1: last word, Greg Jarrett, how do you respond to a
Speaker 1: witness list that is empty? It's impossible. And that's exactly
Speaker 1: what Nadler wanted. He wanted to blindside the President, the
Speaker 1: White House, and Republicans. And in fact, they won't even
Speaker 1: release Adam Schiff's report based on the hearings until the
Speaker 1: night before were the morning of, allowing Republicans absolutely no
Speaker 1: opportunity to prepare. This is the antithesis of fundamental fairness
Speaker 1: in due process and Americans are smart. They realize it's rigged.
Speaker 1: All right, thank you both for being with us. Eight
Speaker 1: hundred nine one, Shawn. You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. All right, We'll take a quick break,
Speaker 1: we'll come back. We'll get to a lot of your call.
Speaker 1: Sidney Powell has an update on Michael Flynn, also her
Speaker 1: reaction to the White House and their response to the
Speaker 1: House Judiciary Committee chairman and the Ukrainian impeachment coup attempt
Speaker 1: Jerry Nadler. That more your call, straight ahead, eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one, Shawn. As we continue see Democrats, the
Speaker 1: radical left Democrats to do nothing. Democrat decided when I'm
Speaker 1: going to NATO. This was set up a year ago
Speaker 1: that when I'm going to NATO. That was the exact time.
Speaker 1: This is one of the most important journeys that we
Speaker 1: make as president. And for them to be doing this
Speaker 1: and saying this and putting an impeachment on the table,
Speaker 1: which is a hope to start off with. If you notice,
Speaker 1: there was breaking news today the Ukrainian president came out
Speaker 1: and said very strongly the President Trump did absolutely nothing
Speaker 1: wrong that could be case over. But he just came
Speaker 1: out a little while ago and he said President Trump
Speaker 1: did absolutely nothing wrong and that could end everything, but
Speaker 1: it will never end it because they want to do
Speaker 1: what they want to do. They're getting killed in their
Speaker 1: own district. I think it's going to be a tremendous
Speaker 1: boon for the Republicans. Republicans have never ever been so
Speaker 1: committed as they are right now and so united. So
Speaker 1: it's really a great thing in some ways, but in
Speaker 1: other ways it's a distrait. It's just strade. You for
Speaker 1: a why don't just say it? What at your lawyer
Speaker 1: to represent your point of view before the house that
Speaker 1: you spit into it. Because the whole thing is a hope.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows this. All you have to do is look
Speaker 1: at the words of the graindiant presidents that he just issues,
Speaker 1: and you know it's a hope. It's an absolute distraight
Speaker 1: what they do to our country. I didn't even head
Speaker 1: of the president. And by the way, you know, I
Speaker 1: sit on the stand and to get hot, I got
Speaker 1: a lot of I got hairy legs. That turned that
Speaker 1: that that that that that turned uh blonde in the sun,
Speaker 1: and the kids used to come up and reach in
Speaker 1: the pool and rub my leg down. So it was
Speaker 1: trained and then watched the hair come back up again
Speaker 1: and look at it. So I learned about roaches. I
Speaker 1: learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I've loved
Speaker 1: kids jumping on my lap. Okay, what was that? By
Speaker 1: the way, the President was a thousand percent right and
Speaker 1: what he was saying, Yeah, we knew that this was
Speaker 1: scheduled with NATO. Go ahead, Yeah, while I'm away, then
Speaker 1: you do your impeachment coup attempt. Because they're in a
Speaker 1: Russian this is all a rush job. They want to
Speaker 1: get through this as fastly, as quickly as they possibly can.
Speaker 1: They want to race through this impeachment thing. And let's
Speaker 1: you know, they know it's not gonna work. So they're
Speaker 1: just like, all right, we're gonna do it. We'll do
Speaker 1: it as quickly and expeditiously as humanly possible, with no
Speaker 1: consideration how the American people feel about it. This next
Speaker 1: phase is going to happen really fast. Why because then
Speaker 1: we don't have to pay attention. You know, look at
Speaker 1: Byron York's column I referred to earlier. Byron York rightly
Speaker 1: points out they, oh, we're doing this. We were so reluctant, prayerfully,
Speaker 1: we believe that we shouldn't be doing this, but we
Speaker 1: have to do it for the sake of the republic.
Speaker 1: The previous impeachments in our lifetime we're followed by massive,
Speaker 1: long investigations. There's a reason they're doing this. They'd ever
Speaker 1: accepted the results in twenty sixteen, they never accepted the
Speaker 1: results four separate investigations into their conspiracy theory of Trump
Speaker 1: Russia collusion. There's no reason evidence to impeach the president
Speaker 1: at all. So rather than risk another three years and
Speaker 1: embarrassment not getting what they want, we'll just race through it.
Speaker 1: And if that means the president's on foreign soil, negotiating
Speaker 1: on our country's behalf, that's what we're gonna do. But
Speaker 1: we're gonna ignore quid pro quo. Joe. Now let's get
Speaker 1: to the second thing. Can you play that tape of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden again. This is from twenty seventeen. I saw
Speaker 1: Fox News. They found this. By the way, that this
Speaker 1: is right up there with Joe three h three three
Speaker 1: h Remember when he said that at the end of
Speaker 1: the debate, it meant nothing. It wasn't like called Joe
Speaker 1: or text Joe at Joe three h three. There was
Speaker 1: nothing to do. He just said, Joe three three three zero.
Speaker 1: Like everybody, United States of America, we've acted together. We
Speaker 1: have never, never, never been unable to overcome whatever the
Speaker 1: problem was. If you agree with me, go to Joe
Speaker 1: three oh three three oh and help me in this fight.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much. There is no Joe three O
Speaker 1: three three oh for Joe. There is a quid and
Speaker 1: a pro and a quote Joe, but there's no Joe
Speaker 1: three h three three oh Joe. But then there's Joe.
Speaker 1: See can you just play this again because I'm having
Speaker 1: a very hard time he said this in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1: Understanding what he's saying here, maybe you can, maybe you
Speaker 1: can decipher this for the audience, Linda. And by the way,
Speaker 1: you know, I sit on the stand and to get hot,
Speaker 1: I got a lot of I got hairy legs that
Speaker 1: turned that that that that that that turned blond in
Speaker 1: the sun. And the kids used to come up and
Speaker 1: reach in the pool and rub my leg down so
Speaker 1: it was trained, and then watch the hair come back
Speaker 1: up again. Then look at So I learned about roaches,
Speaker 1: I learned about kids jumping on my lap, and I've
Speaker 1: loved kids jumping on my lap. I love all right,
Speaker 1: I got to hear one more time if you just
Speaker 1: indulge me here, stop with the face. Stop with that face.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you a chance to respond. All right, Well,
Speaker 1: I have to understand this play together a way. You know.
Speaker 1: I sit on the stand and to get hot. I
Speaker 1: got a lot of I got hairy legs. That turned
Speaker 1: that that that that that that turned turned blonde. Son
Speaker 1: and the kids used to come up and reach in
Speaker 1: the pool and rub my leg down so it was trained,
Speaker 1: and then wash the hair, come back up again and
Speaker 1: look at it. So I learned about roaches. I learned
Speaker 1: about jumping on my lap, and I've loved kids jumping
Speaker 1: on my lap. Okay, that is scary what happened there?
Speaker 1: Can you explain that? Because I can't. I would rather
Speaker 1: talk about um world peace and how I think that
Speaker 1: that is better suited for me, and I would like
Speaker 1: to that then I got. I've been saying it all day,
Speaker 1: and that's the best you got. I'd like to talk
Speaker 1: about it's so weird, it's so creepy, bizarre, okay. And
Speaker 1: by the way, the roaches is weird, Like why are
Speaker 1: we talking about roaches? And then cocoa pops? What ye
Speaker 1: coco pup for my generation? Keep going go ahead? No,
Speaker 1: but in all seriousness, like the weirder thing we were
Speaker 1: just I just looked at Katie. I was like, I'd
Speaker 1: like when kids jump on my lap and then the
Speaker 1: kids like to I'd be at the bench and I'd
Speaker 1: be sitting there and in the summer, my hair and
Speaker 1: my legs. It's just like it's not blond Hillary okay,
Speaker 1: and the kids used to I mean, what is happen?
Speaker 1: First of all, where are the parents learned a lot
Speaker 1: about roaches? Like when you see her predator pulling your
Speaker 1: child away, don't let them massages legs, creepy get away
Speaker 1: from me. It's very uncomfortable, I have to say. I mean,
Speaker 1: as a mother of a four year old, I was
Speaker 1: not okay with this. It's let me tell you that
Speaker 1: that is actually outright scary. When you put it all together,
Speaker 1: all this crazy stuff. Now you understand the weird touching
Speaker 1: and then like the biting of his wife's finger this weekend. Yeah,
Speaker 1: what was the biting of the finger of the wife
Speaker 1: this weekend? I saw that. It's almost like it's almost
Speaker 1: like now it's a joke. It's like him and Jill
Speaker 1: get together and they go, all right, we're just really crazy,
Speaker 1: whacked out stuff. But what's the crazy bite my finger, babe?
Speaker 1: Oh okay, Like, what is happening? Do you not have
Speaker 1: a director, a campaign person, somebody, a friend? You have
Speaker 1: one friend to tell you, hey man, it's getting a
Speaker 1: little weird. I feel sorry, it's weird, and he's not
Speaker 1: gonna make it. Everybody knows. Then the Democratic Party they
Speaker 1: see it happening too. All right, let's get to our phones.
Speaker 1: Sidney Powell, Top of the hour, Conan Virginia, the Commonwealth. Sorry,
Speaker 1: welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. Happy Cyber Monday, Happy
Speaker 1: Cyber Monday. Do you sean quick question for you? In
Speaker 1: Nabler's complaint that been saga since the beginning that Trump
Speaker 1: had used his power to engage a foreign government to
Speaker 1: interfere in the US election. Now what election are we
Speaker 1: referring to? Because Biden is in a candidates he has
Speaker 1: to win the nomination. Well, their argument is I'm giving
Speaker 1: you their dumb argument because again you got to go back.
Speaker 1: The Ukrainian president has said over and over again, what
Speaker 1: did the presidents say? That? It was very key I
Speaker 1: needed to do me a favor. By the way, you're
Speaker 1: surrounding yourself with some of the bad people, and the
Speaker 1: other guy surrounded himself with you ought may not be
Speaker 1: doing that. So the President was referring to all the
Speaker 1: corruption that exists in Ukraine, very key phrase of the president.
Speaker 1: And yeah, what we do know about Alexander Chulupa. It's
Speaker 1: not a conspiracy theory. The NC contractor. Just read Politico
Speaker 1: January eleven, twenty seventeen. They chronicle it. We also have
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian court decision admitting they interfered in our elections
Speaker 1: on Hillary's behalf. So all of that is there, but
Speaker 1: she meets at the Ukrainian embassy. But the purpose of
Speaker 1: egging up dirt on Manaport, Trump and everybody in the campaign,
Speaker 1: and you know, for some reason, I don't know why
Speaker 1: Democrats have turned this into that's a conspiracy theory talking point. Well,
Speaker 1: take it up with Politico, and take it up with
Speaker 1: Ukrainian court. You know, just like, how do you ignore
Speaker 1: you're not getting the billion dollars unless you fire that
Speaker 1: guy that I know is investigating my zero experience son
Speaker 1: whose company has been paying the millions. I mean how's
Speaker 1: that not a quid pro quel. You have to bifurcate
Speaker 1: your brain in two and you have to live at
Speaker 1: a breath embrace breathtaking hypocrisy to be them. And that's
Speaker 1: what's at stake in three hundred and thirty seven days. Anyway,
Speaker 1: great point, Harry Washington. Next Sean Hannity Show, What's up, Harry?
Speaker 1: How are you hey? Sean Greeting's brother Just a great show.
Speaker 1: On Wednesday before Thanksgiving, Greg Jared brought up an interesting
Speaker 1: point during his conversation that there was a two week
Speaker 1: lapse between the time that Fusion GPS contracted uh Steele
Speaker 1: to produce the dossier at the time that the dossier
Speaker 1: was actually produced. That I've worked an intel in the
Speaker 1: in the military for a long time, um, and that's
Speaker 1: impossible unless you already have something written up or have
Speaker 1: the parts already put together, and and and can just
Speaker 1: uh put everything together, package it, you know, screen it,
Speaker 1: and then send it off. There's no way that that
Speaker 1: timeline can work out. That dossier was created before the fact.
Speaker 1: Steele was just a name and a reference to bring
Speaker 1: credence to that that report, to that dossier, but he
Speaker 1: didn't write it he might have contributed to I only
Speaker 1: can speak to what I know, and when he was
Speaker 1: under oath, under the threat of perjury in Great Britain
Speaker 1: and an interrogatory, he said he just he said he
Speaker 1: wrote it and admitted that he had no idea if
Speaker 1: any of it was true. We know for a fact
Speaker 1: Kathleen Cavlac and we know that Bruce or both admitted
Speaker 1: that they had worn the DJ the FBI top brass
Speaker 1: about the dirty dossier, steals agenda, Hillary paying for it,
Speaker 1: and it's unverified. Any use of it, any use of
Speaker 1: it would be premeditated fraud on a fis a court. Now.
Speaker 1: You know, we keep reading in the New York Times
Speaker 1: Washington Posts that maybe Michael Horowitz won't make conclusions. But
Speaker 1: then what I'm putting together is, you know, I guess
Speaker 1: the legal aspect, Remember, the Inspector General doesn't have the
Speaker 1: right to convene a grand jury. The Inspector General has
Speaker 1: a right to recommend, which he's done twice to You
Speaker 1: know that in the case of James Comey, he does
Speaker 1: have the right to recommend that you look into this.
Speaker 1: You know, Comey had a problem candor the same with
Speaker 1: McCabe lack of candor they discovered in those two earlier
Speaker 1: Horowitz reports, So you know there's a double standard at
Speaker 1: a high level. But the difference between the Inspector General
Speaker 1: and Prosecutor Durham is he can he can convene a
Speaker 1: grand jury, he can charge individuals with crimes. And that's
Speaker 1: where that aspect of it again more waiting, but at
Speaker 1: least we're getting something next Monday, a week from today. Finally,
Speaker 1: thank you. Amy is in New York. What's up, Amy?
Speaker 1: How are you? I'm fine, Sean, Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: I have an observational question. I wanted to get your
Speaker 1: take on. Been following for years the campaign to take
Speaker 1: down this president, most recently the quit pro quo tactics
Speaker 1: and then the tape of Biden saying that they wanted
Speaker 1: this prosecutor fired or they're not getting the money. Then
Speaker 1: they're back and forth, well you're not the president, um.
Speaker 1: And then what was his response, uh, will call Um?
Speaker 1: And I find very little input or talk on Well
Speaker 1: who was he talking about, Callum? That's that would be
Speaker 1: President Obama. Um. So if Vice President Joe Biden was
Speaker 1: involved in this quid pro quo and he's announcing I
Speaker 1: think that that was a great point. I absolutely, you know,
Speaker 1: there's no focus on the radio programs on enough focus
Speaker 1: on the on the programs on TV and the news.
Speaker 1: UM will lie anyone I want to. I don't want
Speaker 1: to rush through this call. Amy, you brought up a
Speaker 1: great point because he does say what he's bragging about,
Speaker 1: the quid pro quo with Joe to save his zero
Speaker 1: experience Sonny doesn't. Yeah, you don't believe me? Call Obama.
Speaker 1: You're right, I know you know what. Nobody's focused on that.
Speaker 1: We'll come back, we'll get we'll pick it up at
Speaker 1: that point and as we continue. Amy is in New York.
Speaker 1: Amy brought up a great point. When Biden is bragging about,
Speaker 1: you know, you're not getting the billion unless you fire
Speaker 1: the prosecutor I know is investigating my son with zero
Speaker 1: experiences being paid millions. He says, you don't believe me,
Speaker 1: call Obama. Nobody's brought that point up, Amy, you get
Speaker 1: the gold start today. Yeah, Well, it's just an observational question,
Speaker 1: that's really all it is. And it's about time. You
Speaker 1: know what. I just got a call in. I says,
Speaker 1: if anybody's gonna gonna hear my question, I wanted to
Speaker 1: be sean. Thank you. I think it's a great point.
Speaker 1: I will I will advance this further because I think
Speaker 1: it's very smart, very bright. Well, we come back, Sydney Powell.
Speaker 1: We'll update you on General Flynn and her reaction to
Speaker 1: White House Council Cippoloni's letter. Don't forget on this Cyber Monday.
Speaker 1: We got the greatest gear that we put together with
Speaker 1: our friends at Nineline on Hannity dot com. The greatest
Speaker 1: gear available and if you want to take a look
Speaker 1: at it, we got some really cool stuff that we
Speaker 1: put up there, which discounts for Cyber Monday Hannity dot
Speaker 1: Com for all of it is featured at the top
Speaker 1: of our homepage. All right, quick break, right back, Sydney Powell. Next,
Speaker 1: stay right here for our final news round up and
Speaker 1: information overload. A lot of the initial messaging and all
Speaker 1: of this uproar involved the words quid pro quote. Do
Speaker 1: do Democrats congress women need to fine tune their language?
Speaker 1: Why does everyone keep saying quid pro quote? Yeah? Who
Speaker 1: the hell knows what that means? Right? People don't get
Speaker 1: quid pro quote, which one is hard to say very quickly.
Speaker 1: Quin pro quote might be too complicated, and two might
Speaker 1: get lost on some people. I mean, it's like an
Speaker 1: sat word quinn pro quote. People may not understand. How
Speaker 1: dangerous can these hearings be for Democrats if they can't
Speaker 1: get the public to understand what happened. Please stop saying
Speaker 1: quid pro quo enough of the Latin. What Trump did
Speaker 1: was bribery. It's not about a quid pro quote bribery.
Speaker 1: Stay away from the sort of legalistic Latin arguments we've heard.
Speaker 1: Don't use the Latin. Don't use the Latin. Just use
Speaker 1: the word bribery instead of qui pro quota, instead of
Speaker 1: the quid pro quote. The devis stating testimony corroborated evidence
Speaker 1: of bribery, quipro quo bribery. Bribery is for the republic
Speaker 1: at large, easier to understand than quid pro quo. This
Speaker 1: is the first time Speaker Pelosi has made the specific
Speaker 1: bribery case against Donald Trump, and several other key Democrats
Speaker 1: have also recently discussed bribery as the article of impeachment
Speaker 1: that they may lead with against Donald Trump. So this
Speaker 1: is all brand new this week. The first and foremost,
Speaker 1: the first person needs to testifies. Adam Schiff. Adam Schiff
Speaker 1: is the author of the support. Adam Schiff has been
Speaker 1: the author of many things, a lot of them found
Speaker 1: to be false over the past couple of years. But
Speaker 1: he's gonna be the author of this report. He's compared
Speaker 1: himself in the past to a special counsel. This is
Speaker 1: what he said he was doing well. If we go
Speaker 1: back to Clinton and leaving back to nixont In Clinton,
Speaker 1: ken Starr was a special counsel. He presented a report
Speaker 1: that we're going to get his judiciary. He actually came
Speaker 1: in set and testified under oath and took questions from
Speaker 1: all sides, including the White House. My first and foremost
Speaker 1: witnesses Adam Schiff. So you want to bring him in
Speaker 1: before the committee, not just to present a report, to
Speaker 1: take questions from Democrats and to be cross examined, if
Speaker 1: you will, by the Republicans. He needs to be. He's
Speaker 1: put himself into that position. If he chooses not to,
Speaker 1: then I really question his veracity and what he's putting
Speaker 1: in his report. I question is you know the motives
Speaker 1: of why he's doing it. It's easy to hide behind
Speaker 1: the report. It's easy to hide behind the gabble and
Speaker 1: Intelligence Committee behind closed door hearings. But it's going to
Speaker 1: be one another thing to actually get up and have
Speaker 1: to answer questions about what his staff knew, how he knew,
Speaker 1: what he dealt about the whistle blower report, his interactions
Speaker 1: as he's had with Ukraine, the other things that he's
Speaker 1: had over time in this process, and also why he
Speaker 1: is still not released documents to our committee and reports
Speaker 1: to our committee that we need to actually proceed in
Speaker 1: our Committee of Judicial Committee, which is the Committee of Impeachment.
Speaker 1: I have a question, why are they hiding this stuff
Speaker 1: from us? If they think they have such a case,
Speaker 1: give us all the materials and don't let Jerry Nadler
Speaker 1: write a crazy letter that SAIDs on the six, let
Speaker 1: us know you who your witnesses are. We don't even
Speaker 1: have the information from from the Intel Committee yet. This
Speaker 1: is why this is a problematic exercise, simply a made
Speaker 1: for TV event coming on Wednesday. All right. That was
Speaker 1: Congressman Doug Collins of the Great State of Georgia. I
Speaker 1: have no idea on this whole issue of what Kemp
Speaker 1: is doing. The governor down in Georgia by now, he
Speaker 1: is the obvious choice to replace Johnny Isaacson. I have
Speaker 1: many of my friends down in Georgia. They are ticked off.
Speaker 1: Apparently Brian Kemp is poised to select Kelly Wofner to
Speaker 1: replace Johnny Isaacson. And a lot of this comes down
Speaker 1: to well, Number one, President Trump helped Kemp get elected.
Speaker 1: Congressman Doug Collins has been one of one of the strongest,
Speaker 1: most outspoken leaders in the House now on all of
Speaker 1: the issues, from the Russia hoax to the Ukrainian hoax.
Speaker 1: Now she is apparently the chief executive of a subsidiary
Speaker 1: of some Atlanta based Intercontinental Exchange and owner of George's
Speaker 1: women's National Basketball Association team, the Atlanta Dream, which is great.
Speaker 1: She doesn't have any experience whatsoever as it relates to politics,
Speaker 1: and all right, so they have a lot of money,
Speaker 1: but the amount of money apparently in personal wealth. Maybe
Speaker 1: that benefits other politicians in Georgia, but it shouldn't be
Speaker 1: about that. It should be you know, about you know,
Speaker 1: seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars in donations to admit Romney,
Speaker 1: which I guess is nice, but nothing to Donald Trump
Speaker 1: until she apparently wants this position, all right, is a
Speaker 1: we're risking now in Georgia having somebody that is more
Speaker 1: like a Romney Republican. That's a problem anyway, eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one, Shawn, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, everything that you heard, though
Speaker 1: Doug Collins saying there shift needs to be the first
Speaker 1: and foremost witness media Democrats should use bribery instead of
Speaker 1: quid pro quo. By the way, that would only fit
Speaker 1: Joe and why a Democrats still hiding documents and a
Speaker 1: devastating letter from how White House counsel Pat Zippoloni to
Speaker 1: Jerry Nadler about this ridiculous, unfair quote hearing that begins
Speaker 1: with no fact witnesses. What are you having a big
Speaker 1: town hall from scholars that agree with them? Impeach Trump
Speaker 1: over anything? Anyway. Sidney Powell is here with us. She
Speaker 1: wrote the best selling book, Licensed to Lie. In that book,
Speaker 1: she chronicles prosecutorial abuse that we now know has happened
Speaker 1: on many levels. We'll see what happens a week from
Speaker 1: today with the Fiser report coming out. She also represents
Speaker 1: General Michael Flynn. A federal judge last Wednesday agreed to
Speaker 1: postpone next month sentencing for General Flynn. After the release
Speaker 1: of the FISA report from Michael Harrowitz Sydney Powell's with us.
Speaker 1: How are you hey, Let's I'm good, thank you. Let's
Speaker 1: start with General Flynn. First off, we know that that
Speaker 1: he was set up at this point. We know the
Speaker 1: FBIOD didn't think he was lying at this point. We
Speaker 1: know that that they said, well, you either agree that
Speaker 1: you lied even though we didn't think you lied, or
Speaker 1: we're gonna well, it was already bankrupt, lost his house,
Speaker 1: but or als, we'll go after your son who was
Speaker 1: in business with you. So what choice, I guess does
Speaker 1: a father have at that point. Yes, he was under
Speaker 1: tremendous pressure of every kind, financial, emotional, psychological, family everything
Speaker 1: to enter the plea of guilty when he did, and
Speaker 1: of course they did not disclose to him the scads
Speaker 1: of evidence they have that shows he's innocent and was
Speaker 1: completely framed. And have you ever gotten that Brady information
Speaker 1: yet that you've been requesting. No, I haven't. We're still
Speaker 1: waiting on an order from Judge Sullivan. Hopefully he will
Speaker 1: require them to produce everything that's they redacted, their heavy
Speaker 1: redactions and the few things they have produced, and then
Speaker 1: they gave only meager summaries of multiple other things that
Speaker 1: they admitted were exculpatory, So we need the full documents.
Speaker 1: We certainly can't trust their summaries, and a summary doesn't
Speaker 1: qualify as evidence anyway. They're supposed to produce the actual evidence.
Speaker 1: So I expect even after the World's or there a
Speaker 1: number of issues that Judge Sullivan will need to address.
Speaker 1: I mean, for one thing, we identified a memo of
Speaker 1: January thirty, twenty seventeen, while he was still in the
Speaker 1: White House that completely exonerates him of being any sort
Speaker 1: of agent of Russia, which was one of the previous
Speaker 1: that letter say sled. We don't know other than he's
Speaker 1: not an agent of Russia. He never was, and they
Speaker 1: knew that all along because he was working with the
Speaker 1: Defense Intelligence Agency. You know, I think for the American people,
Speaker 1: for the you know, for people that get, the people
Speaker 1: that do make America great. They get up every day
Speaker 1: and they take care of their jobs and families and responsibilities,
Speaker 1: and you know, they're shoveling coffee down their throat, making
Speaker 1: the kids lune, sending the kids off to school, work
Speaker 1: their fourteen hours, come home, help them study, feed them,
Speaker 1: and crawl into bed exhausted. It's been three years of
Speaker 1: never ending corruption being exposed. Now we're about to begin
Speaker 1: the process of untangling this mess. You read Pat Sippoloni's
Speaker 1: letter to Jerry Nadler. What do you think of that mess? Yes,
Speaker 1: it's just unspeakable at such an outrage. There's nothing constitutional
Speaker 1: about the process at all, and I'm very glad the
Speaker 1: White House decided that the President would not participate in it.
Speaker 1: It will not stand up under Supreme Court review or frankly,
Speaker 1: any legitimate court review. What do you make of these reports,
Speaker 1: these leaks New York Times, Washington Post. Oh no, no, Well,
Speaker 1: they're going to think the FBI did some things wrong.
Speaker 1: And yeah, maybe they didn't get it right with the
Speaker 1: FISA court, but we know that they will warned repeatedly
Speaker 1: not to use the dirty dossier, and they used it anyway.
Speaker 1: Or Lisa Paide saying there is no fathomable way I
Speaker 1: have committed any crime at all. Okay, she's entitled to
Speaker 1: her defense. I believe in the principle of innocence and
Speaker 1: so be improving guilty. But the evidence is not in
Speaker 1: dispute as to her political motivations, is it. No, it
Speaker 1: would be hard to look at all those text messages
Speaker 1: and not see flagrant political bias, regardless of what the
Speaker 1: Inspector General said and his conclusions in the prior report,
Speaker 1: in which he frankly only meant that there wasn't a
Speaker 1: document that said, because we despised Donald Trump, we are
Speaker 1: doing X, Y and Z. You know, he's very literal
Speaker 1: in his approach, and he doesn't have the same subpoena
Speaker 1: power and ability to get a grand jury in things
Speaker 1: like that that John Durham has. So his report's going
Speaker 1: to be limited from the outset, but I expect it
Speaker 1: to be rich in factual information. Well, I agree, And
Speaker 1: again then we have on the heels of that, because
Speaker 1: an inspector General really really can't you know, he can't
Speaker 1: form a grand jury, he can't convene a grand jury.
Speaker 1: You can't issue indictments. But John Durham Ken Kenny, So
Speaker 1: where do you see a connection between the two investigations. Obviously,
Speaker 1: the Durham report will be the blockbuster where I would
Speaker 1: assume some people probably get indicted. I would expect criminal
Speaker 1: referrals even to come out of the Inspector General's report,
Speaker 1: but those have in the past and nobody's done anything
Speaker 1: about him. I would expect John Durham to start doing
Speaker 1: something about them. If he doesn't, then we clearly have
Speaker 1: a double standard in this country that completely destroys the
Speaker 1: rule of law. Attorney General Barr has said he is
Speaker 1: a big proponent of the rule of law, which is
Speaker 1: the very foundation of our justice system if we're going
Speaker 1: to have one at all, and it's got to be restored.
Speaker 1: If it isn't, the republic is history. You know, it
Speaker 1: does get down to that, Sydney. One of the things
Speaker 1: in License to Lie, you talked about prosecutorial abuse, and you,
Speaker 1: for example, you knew all about Andrew Weisman Muller's pit
Speaker 1: bull from the beginning, and you know here he is
Speaker 1: now all over television. I guess he's getting a contributorship
Speaker 1: what at the conspiracy channel MSDNC. And you know it's
Speaker 1: obvious his anti Trump bias. How do people with that
Speaker 1: big a bias have those powerful positions where it doesn't
Speaker 1: to them. It's like they forget all humanity, that there
Speaker 1: are humans, there are lives behind the people that they
Speaker 1: are charging. It's like, I'm convinced that people want Paul Maniford. Well,
Speaker 1: you know he's found guilty. Tax returns, loan applications. Okay,
Speaker 1: dumb things to do, but it seems they won't be
Speaker 1: happy unless the guy dies in jail. They want him
Speaker 1: dead in jail, life over. They wanted to be a
Speaker 1: death sentence. In other words, Yes, they truly despise certain
Speaker 1: people and deem themselves the ultimate authority of all issues.
Speaker 1: It's a very sick position from which to operate, but
Speaker 1: yet that's exactly where they come from. And it's got
Speaker 1: to stop. I mean, the reason I wrote License to
Speaker 1: Lie was to try to wake people up five years ago,
Speaker 1: and it's only gotten worse because nothing was done about
Speaker 1: mister Wiseman's misconduct and Katherine Roumler's misconduct and Matthew Friederich's
Speaker 1: misconduct to begin with, not to mention a number of others,
Speaker 1: like all the prosecutors in the Ted Stevens case that
Speaker 1: were identified. As it was a little late in his chase,
Speaker 1: wasn't he had already lost? They already succeeded in what
Speaker 1: they wanted. Let me ask you, what did you think
Speaker 1: of the Attorney General, Bill Barr's comments about what they've
Speaker 1: been doing to this president. I thought that was a
Speaker 1: very loud message coming from the Attorney General of the
Speaker 1: United States. It was and I was really glad he
Speaker 1: spoke up and said what he said. We've got to
Speaker 1: stop pussyfooting around this and deal with the actual issues,
Speaker 1: hold the people accountable who are responsible for this travesty
Speaker 1: of justice against General Flynn and the president and others,
Speaker 1: and make it stop now it cannot continue to go on. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I agreed, all right, Sidney Powell licensed to lie General
Speaker 1: Flynn's attorney. How I know people get in touch with
Speaker 1: you after all these interviews? How can people get a
Speaker 1: hold of you, Mike Flynn Defense Fund dot org And
Speaker 1: if y'all could put that on your website, it would
Speaker 1: be terrific. You've been a huge help in that regard,
Speaker 1: and so as Mark Levin and others. It's really meant
Speaker 1: a lot. We've gotten wadspread support from across the country,
Speaker 1: prayers and notes, cards, and yeah, this is how we
Speaker 1: treat thirty three year veterans war heroes, guys that served
Speaker 1: in duty you know, under fired. It's really sick to me.
Speaker 1: But right as we continue, we're going to take your calls.
Speaker 1: Final half hour of the program today eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one, Sean, if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. Stephen California, Stephen High, how are
Speaker 1: you glad you called at well over the show? Thank you, Sean.
Speaker 1: I've been a long time listener and a long time
Speaker 1: watch review in your programs, and I'm happy and glad
Speaker 1: you took my call. I've actually been trying to talk
Speaker 1: about this since the Mueller case was ended. Called before Yes,
Speaker 1: I had a question about where's the accountability in this
Speaker 1: administration of the whole government body here, because there seems
Speaker 1: to be nobody getting arrested for these lies they're telling
Speaker 1: in Congress. Not a single person is getting arrested and
Speaker 1: put away for Muller coming out Where Muller getting arrested
Speaker 1: if he was lying on the stand right there about
Speaker 1: the Russian pro You know the biggest problem with Muller's testimony,
Speaker 1: I mean the guy knew nothing. That I mean the
Speaker 1: big shock to me. How do you how does he
Speaker 1: not know what fusion GPS is? How did he not
Speaker 1: know that he hired Hillary Clinton's former attorney for the
Speaker 1: Clinton Foundation? How did he not you know, hold onto
Speaker 1: the phones of Page and Struck and he actually sends
Speaker 1: them out to get. You know, acid wash cleaned sends
Speaker 1: them right back to the manufacturer. I mean knowing that
Speaker 1: they had a bias, which supposedly is why they get
Speaker 1: rid of them. I don't know, I don't know the answer.
Speaker 1: I see corruption everywhere. UM. I have a view of
Speaker 1: my government that look, government's never been the answer. Government's
Speaker 1: always the problem. Reagan said that how many different ways
Speaker 1: and times when he was the President of the United States,
Speaker 1: and I used to love reagan quotes on government. You know, uh,
Speaker 1: you know when he would say, uh, yeah, government is
Speaker 1: the problem. Government's the problem. So anyway, UM, my hope
Speaker 1: is is that we can get to a point where
Speaker 1: we can get this straightened out. If we don't have
Speaker 1: the willingness to get us straightened out as a count tree,
Speaker 1: we are going to be in big, big trouble, and
Speaker 1: I mean unrecoverable. My philosophy of life is that if
Speaker 1: we make up our mind or we're gonna make our lives,
Speaker 1: then work hard towards that goal. We never lose. Somehow
Speaker 1: we will win out. Government is not the solution to
Speaker 1: our problems. Government is the problem. The nine most terrifying
Speaker 1: words in the English language. I'm from the government. I'm
Speaker 1: here to help. There's a slight problem with with with
Speaker 1: with the sweating, because I have a peculiar medical condition,
Speaker 1: which is that I don't sweat, or I didn't sweat
Speaker 1: at the time, and that was wishing. Yes, I didn't
Speaker 1: sweat at the time because I had suffered what I
Speaker 1: would describe as an overdose of adrenaline in the Falklands
Speaker 1: War when I was shot at, and I simply it
Speaker 1: was almost impossible for me to sweat. Do you remember
Speaker 1: dancing at Trump? No, that couldn't have happened because the
Speaker 1: date that's being suggested, I was at home with the children.
Speaker 1: You know that you were at home with the children?
Speaker 1: Was it a memorable night on that particular day that
Speaker 1: we now understand is the date, which is the tenth
Speaker 1: of March. I was at home, I was with the children.
Speaker 1: I'd taken Beatrice to a pizza Express in working for
Speaker 1: a party at a bus bose sort of four or
Speaker 1: five in the afternoon. Why would you remember that so specifically?
Speaker 1: Why would you remember a pizza express birthday and being
Speaker 1: at home? Because going to pizza Express in Woking is
Speaker 1: an unusual thing for me to do, a very unusual
Speaker 1: thing for me to do. I've never been I've only
Speaker 1: been through working a couple of times, and I remember
Speaker 1: it weirdly distinctly as soon as somebody reminded me of it.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, I remember that. That was the most first
Speaker 1: the what is its bollish behavior? It's like, no pedophilia?
Speaker 1: What part of that don't you get? Uh? There were
Speaker 1: at least six big debunk lies and Prince Andrew's telling
Speaker 1: in that disaster of an interview that he gave I've
Speaker 1: done at the time as a result of injuries from
Speaker 1: a law incident of the Falkland Land. The problem. We
Speaker 1: got pictures of you, yes, sweating at the exact same time.
Speaker 1: I've never been to this particular done spot place. Pictures
Speaker 1: all over the place. Uh. This guy's in trouble. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you this. This apparently one of the girlfriends, a
Speaker 1: lady by the name of Lady Hervey. I don't know
Speaker 1: who she is. Now she's been doing interviews discussing her
Speaker 1: brief flaying with Andrew, how it threw her, threw her
Speaker 1: into you know, the heart of this. Epstein and and
Speaker 1: Lolita Express or ge Island Nonsense says she was introduced
Speaker 1: to Epstein by the accused Madam. This woman just Lane Maxwell,
Speaker 1: who like a James Bond character and feels she only
Speaker 1: escaped Epstein's clutches because she was too old anyway. Hervey
Speaker 1: was twenty three and ninety nine, says Maxwell set her
Speaker 1: up for a date with the Royal Prince Andrew at
Speaker 1: ninety nine. Believe she was filmed by secret cameras when
Speaker 1: she stayed one of Epstein's Manhattan properties, and feels lucky
Speaker 1: not to have become one of his alleged victims. I
Speaker 1: am thinking this is not going to go well, and
Speaker 1: is not going well in any way, shape, matter of
Speaker 1: form for the Prince in this case. What do you
Speaker 1: think of that? London listen. I honestly I love the audio.
Speaker 1: I love when he says there's a problem with X.
Speaker 1: I have a special medical condition and I old sweat. Also,
Speaker 1: I remember a random night many years ago where I
Speaker 1: have pizza with my kids. I'm like, this guy's so
Speaker 1: full of it. I just can't. I think it's the
Speaker 1: most hysterical thing in the world that we're even entertaining
Speaker 1: that this guy could be potentially innocent in any way,
Speaker 1: shape or form. I think you should have to sit
Speaker 1: in front of this woman as she gives her testimony
Speaker 1: in this interview. I totally agree with you. I mean, now,
Speaker 1: the other thing is there's a TV interview with the
Speaker 1: accuser of Virginia Roberts. I don't know how to say
Speaker 1: her last name, Guphrey. I think set to air tonight
Speaker 1: that could spark ramifications. Anyway, there's a show on in
Speaker 1: New York called Panorama, and she's apparently going to talk
Speaker 1: about her really scary time as epstein sex slave. You
Speaker 1: can believe that, But that's there. See, the problem is
Speaker 1: those showing with this whole thing. Right, So Prince Andrew,
Speaker 1: there's so many pictures of him, right. So there's a
Speaker 1: lot of these accusers out there, and this has been
Speaker 1: the whole issue with the Me Too movement because there
Speaker 1: are people who are really suffering. You know, they've been attacked,
Speaker 1: they're victims, these horrible things have happened to them, and
Speaker 1: you know they either they didn't know at the time
Speaker 1: how to you know, make a record of it or
Speaker 1: how to file a report or whatever the case may be.
Speaker 1: And then there's people like this that were in these
Speaker 1: horrible like clubs or they were victims under Epstein's like
Speaker 1: sex trafficking. I mean, it's really it's terrible. But these
Speaker 1: guys have pictures, there's evidence. It's like, just be quiet
Speaker 1: it like you're done, it's done, you're guilty. Just say
Speaker 1: if you're not going to say I'm guilty, just be quiet,
Speaker 1: because yeah, saying, you know, sweat siding, I had never
Speaker 1: been where I've been saying, I don't ever take a
Speaker 1: picture like that, and there's pictures with you everywhere. Yeah, look,
Speaker 1: I don't I don't know what to think. I just
Speaker 1: know he was convicted of this. The deal that was
Speaker 1: struck down with I guess prosecutors down in Florida was
Speaker 1: a disaster. And I'd never heard of anybody, yeah, being
Speaker 1: convicted of this and getting a year quote in jail,
Speaker 1: but you get to go home and go to work
Speaker 1: every day and you get off on weekends. I've never
Speaker 1: heard of a deal like that, Right, And not to
Speaker 1: mention the fact that you know this is that whole
Speaker 1: conversation of you know, the equal party justice system, right,
Speaker 1: just like the Clintons is nobody, you know, have to
Speaker 1: be accountable for what they've done. If you look at
Speaker 1: the Clinton's like they're accountable for now never been held accountable.
Speaker 1: Here's going to be accountable. Whatever started investigating Weinstein, Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: That was it for her. And then he actually said
Speaker 1: something to the that I was shocked at that. You know,
Speaker 1: this one Aida brodder A case needs to be revisited.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't know what to do. These these
Speaker 1: issues become very very difficult though. You know, we saw
Speaker 1: what people can do in the Kavanaugh case. I mean
Speaker 1: Julie Sweatnick in that particular, it was almost every other
Speaker 1: weekend they line up in the hall, they drug these
Speaker 1: girls with punch, and you know, they take turns every
Speaker 1: other weekend. No witnesses, no one remembers the people they
Speaker 1: say were there weren't there. He's got a you know,
Speaker 1: a critical accounting of his entire life for that entire year,
Speaker 1: right down to the actual calendar that he actually had
Speaker 1: when he was in high school, when he was in college.
Speaker 1: I mean everything he has, he has tangible records. So
Speaker 1: this woman has nothing. You know, she's more concerned about
Speaker 1: putting creamin or coffee during the hearing than she is
Speaker 1: about what's happening. That hearing was disgusting and the fact
Speaker 1: that they kept oh and what's time I'm saying, is
Speaker 1: but why I always, for example, I always stay and
Speaker 1: I've done this, and it's been I've done it successfully.
Speaker 1: I go back to the Richard Jewel case, and we
Speaker 1: go back to the Nicholas Samman case, and we go
Speaker 1: back to Ferguson in Baltimore and Cambridge Police, and in
Speaker 1: so many other cases or vetting Obama, we always stay
Speaker 1: and we stand back and wait. I don't know, I
Speaker 1: can't say for certain what happened, but I do and
Speaker 1: I do believe in due process, presumption of innocence, all
Speaker 1: of that. There's so much smoke here. It's despicable and
Speaker 1: pretty disgusting. And that interview, frankly, is like exhibit A
Speaker 1: against him, agreed one. I mean, he's caught lying five
Speaker 1: different ways in that interview. And not only That's what
Speaker 1: I'm like every case that you just mentioned, the reason
Speaker 1: why the people that were accused were exonerated was because
Speaker 1: the evidence either wasn't there or the evidence that was
Speaker 1: there actually worked in the person being accused of favor.
Speaker 1: So if we look at the Ferguson case and we
Speaker 1: look at Mike Brown, and we look at the officer,
Speaker 1: and we take a look at what actually happened. The
Speaker 1: eyewitnesses that were afraid to come forward because they didn't
Speaker 1: want to be, you know, completely excommunicated from from their community,
Speaker 1: you know, because they were going to say, listen, saw him.
Speaker 1: He just strong armed a clerk in a store, and
Speaker 1: you know he had his guns, he has his hands
Speaker 1: at the car. He I mean, there's all sorts of
Speaker 1: eyewitness testimony as well as pictures and video and cameras
Speaker 1: inside the police vehicle. So these things come out. It's
Speaker 1: completely different, right. But then it's like, you know, you
Speaker 1: have cavanall there's zero evidence, no people that they said
Speaker 1: were there and were like, I was never there. I
Speaker 1: was in that the party. I didn't know. Everything fell apart,
Speaker 1: Everything fell apart, and everybody to me and where all
Speaker 1: the eye believers. I watched Gail King, I don't. I
Speaker 1: met Gail once at some event that I had to
Speaker 1: go to because Fox made me, and I don't remember
Speaker 1: what it was for anyway. And I thought the interviews
Speaker 1: that she gave with the two women that accused the
Speaker 1: Lieutenant governor were extraordinarily powerful interviews. Now do I know
Speaker 1: the truth of it, Nope, But there's a what I
Speaker 1: felt were credible allegations. One was rape and the other
Speaker 1: was violent sexual assault. Both had corroborating witnesses at the time,
Speaker 1: and it just goes nowhere. There's no eye believers there,
Speaker 1: which shows that unfortunately, these issues get politicized in so
Speaker 1: many different ways and then they becomes Then you get
Speaker 1: into other nuances here, you know, consensual relations that people
Speaker 1: have and then one person decides later that you know what,
Speaker 1: well that that text, that email, blah blah blah that
Speaker 1: you sent me, Yeah, I want you to pay me
Speaker 1: for that. That happens too. There's a whole, you know,
Speaker 1: industrial complex that is built out of this. So getting
Speaker 1: to truth, which should be everybody's motivation here, because we
Speaker 1: don't want anybody abused, we don't want anybody mistreated. But
Speaker 1: to get to truth, you have to get the evidence.
Speaker 1: That's the only way it works. And that's why, you know,
Speaker 1: that's the beauty in our system of the presumption of
Speaker 1: innocence and what we all believe in, or say we
Speaker 1: believe in, which is due process. But even look at
Speaker 1: the hearings we had just last week. Here's President Trump,
Speaker 1: it's trying to run the country. Nobody's saying you need
Speaker 1: to like them. Nobody saying you got to have dinner
Speaker 1: with them. Nobody's saying you have to go out to
Speaker 1: parties with him. You're not on each other's Christmas card list.
Speaker 1: That's fine, But at the end of the day, is
Speaker 1: your four on one k better? Is Hispanic Black and
Speaker 1: women unemployment? You know, the lowest it's ever been. Do
Speaker 1: we have people back in the workforce. Do we have
Speaker 1: people able to get their kids, you know, health insurance
Speaker 1: with their concierge care options that some congress people are
Speaker 1: trying to take away from us. This is a guy
Speaker 1: who went to Afghanistan on Thanksgiving, He went to a
Speaker 1: rack class Christmas. What's your problem? Do you want to
Speaker 1: impeach him because somebody in some rooms that they heard
Speaker 1: him on the telephone. Newsweek kind to end up firing
Speaker 1: Oh my god, that's editor. They didn't fire, they end
Speaker 1: up they fired the reporter. They demoted an editor who
Speaker 1: claimed Trump was golfing on Thanksgiving logo. Unbelievable. I'm like, wow,
Speaker 1: do you fact check anything he's tweeting and golfing. Well,
Speaker 1: he's actually in the Middle East visiting American troops. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there you go. I mean, it's unreal. And that's the
Speaker 1: problem is that the American people they see this. And then,
Speaker 1: by the way, that story, the story broke about Trump
Speaker 1: going to Afghanistan at one fifty six pm Eastern Time. Yeah,
Speaker 1: at the bottom of newsweek story. And but Newsweek is
Speaker 1: just a dead magazine that you know, is trying desperately
Speaker 1: to get online as a leftist magazine. They attacked me
Speaker 1: all the time. And anyway, they say the story was
Speaker 1: substantially updated at six seventeen oh, okay, to reflect the
Speaker 1: president's surprise trip to Afghanistan. Yeah, they said in a
Speaker 1: statement to The Washington Examiner, the story has been corrected.
Speaker 1: Asked about the bogus report, Trump said, I thought Newsweek
Speaker 1: was out of business, So did I classic. Well, all right,
Speaker 1: let's get to our phones. Um, let's say hi to
Speaker 1: Joe and Ella j Georgia. We've known Joe for wow,
Speaker 1: what twenty four or five? Six, seven years now? Joe,
Speaker 1: how are you? My friend? Sean? I am doing great,
Speaker 1: and I'll tell you what you and your great radio
Speaker 1: show is gonna lead Donald John Trump to the biggest
Speaker 1: land slot in the history of America. You have been
Speaker 1: his number one supporter, and we down here in Laja Georgia.
Speaker 1: Love you. We love your television show, we love your
Speaker 1: radio show. And all I can say to you is
Speaker 1: keep up the great work for the American tax prayers.
Speaker 1: They're great and one and only. Sean Hannity Joe from
Speaker 1: Ella J Georgia. Ladies and gentlemen, we love Jay. Let's
Speaker 1: go to MJ Florida. MJ. How are you glad you called? Hey?
Speaker 1: How are you? Simperfidallas? Sean Hannity five, always faithful marine?
Speaker 1: How are you? I'm doing great? How are you? I'm good?
Speaker 1: So I was at the Sunrise rally last week. How
Speaker 1: to blast? Yeah, apparently everybody, you know, everyone goes to
Speaker 1: these Trump rallies. They're like tailgating. They're having you know,
Speaker 1: they're cooking the barbecue when they're sharing their beer, their wine.
Speaker 1: It's a big party. I have a warning. I have
Speaker 1: a warning to the Democrats. They've done. Broward County, Florida
Speaker 1: is going to flip red. I'm telling you right now,
Speaker 1: most of the people I spoke to you a Democrats
Speaker 1: who are there at all voting for Trump. That place
Speaker 1: seats twenty thousand people. I spoke to a guy that
Speaker 1: was working there in the Panthers Arena BBNT. They had
Speaker 1: to open up the top two and three thousand up
Speaker 1: the nosebleeds at place was packed to the gills. You
Speaker 1: see the crowd outside, crowd outside, I mean it was
Speaker 1: it was. It was insane, and I was very upset
Speaker 1: that you didn't have your man on the street out there.
Speaker 1: I was looking for him. Yeah, by the way, everyone's
Speaker 1: looking for Lawrence. I mean, Lawrence is a rock star.
Speaker 1: He's our twenty twenty uh uh, you know, correspondent, special
Speaker 1: correspondent for the election. Lawrence is a great Lawrence is
Speaker 1: a rock star. He's so good of him. He's such
Speaker 1: a good guy. And uh, I've locked him down. He's
Speaker 1: locked on. He's mammy. He's married to the Hannity Show
Speaker 1: now through twenty the end of twenty twenty, and he's
Speaker 1: going to be the breakout star this year. I can
Speaker 1: tell you that. All right, thank you, m J. Big
Speaker 1: Time AJ, Houston, Texas. What's going on? Baby KTRH? How
Speaker 1: are you? Big time? What is this? Santa Claus? Is
Speaker 1: this Santa Claus? Big Time AJ? That's big that's big
Speaker 1: time Santa Claus, Baby, big time Santa Claus. Hey, I
Speaker 1: want to wish you all a happy Thanksgiving and God
Speaker 1: don't be here. We go, Oh merry Christmas is coming
Speaker 1: to everybody. You're certainly better than the leven version of
Speaker 1: how all right? What do you want anyway for Christmas? Kid?
Speaker 1: Hurry out? Hey, I agree with Linda that Joe Biden deal.
Speaker 1: I heard that cliff Man, and I'm just saying, parents,
Speaker 1: keep your kids away because that is not good. And
Speaker 1: wait real quick, I want everybody to understand all this
Speaker 1: happened under the Obama administration, and the fake news will
Speaker 1: not tell nobody that only you rush Joe Packs and
Speaker 1: everybody else, but the fake news won't tell everybody that
Speaker 1: started under the Obama administration. But hey, when the report
Speaker 1: come out, I hope they don't cheese us baby, because
Speaker 1: we've been waiting to shine. There's no other conclusion except look,
Speaker 1: I do think the Remember, the Inspector General doesn't have
Speaker 1: the power to convenient grand jury or charge people. Can
Speaker 1: only make recommendation. So we'll see. Let's see what Durham
Speaker 1: does because he actually can convene a grand jury, he
Speaker 1: can charge people. This is gonna be your process, and
Speaker 1: I'm gonna tell you and then we're gonna get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of this Ukrainian impeachment coup nonsense, another hoax,
Speaker 1: another conspiracy theory, more lies in this case led by
Speaker 1: the compromise, corrupt, coward, congenital liar Adam Schiff and now
Speaker 1: Jerry Nandler. All Right, that's gonna wrap things up at today,
Speaker 1: full comprehensive news information you're not going to get from
Speaker 1: the mob. Lindsey Graham, Ari Fleischer, Greg and Matt Gates,
Speaker 1: Jordan's Seculo, and Charlie Hurt Hannity the news the Mob
Speaker 1: won't give you nine Eastern Fox News Channel. We'll see
Speaker 1: tonight and we'll be back here tomorrow. As always, thank
Speaker 1: you for being with us.