WEBVTT - #361 Jason Flom with Audrey Edmunds

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>In the fall of nineteen ninety five, Audrey Edmunds was

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>running a small in home daycare center in Wannakee, Wisconsin.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the children she cared for was a seven

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>month old girl named Natalie Beard, who had a troubling

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 1>health history, both known and unknown, in addition to fussiness

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>when it came to feeding. On the morning of October sixteenth,

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety five, as per usual, Natalie was set up

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in a car seat in a quiet room with a

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>bottle to help her focus while feeding. According to Audrey,

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>she had soon found Natalie unresponsive as formula ran from

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>her nose and mouth, and Audrey some in paramedics who

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>noticed Natalie's pupils were fixed and dilated and she was

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>only taking short breaths. Tragically, Natalie died later on that

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>night at the hospital, and her autopsy revealed retinal and

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>brain hemorrhaging, as well as bruising on her scalp. Doctors

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>ruled these findings to be evidence of shit and baby syndrome.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>That trial. Medical experts testified with certainty that Natalie's death

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>was not the result of an accident, but rather recent

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>intentional forceful conduct and the most recent caregiver was Audrey Edmunds.

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>With the stresses of childcare, it's easy to believe that

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>something inside Audrey could have snapped. But this is wrongful conviction.

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Wrongful Conviction. Today, we're going to unpack

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the case of Audrey Edmunds, who was convicted of a

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>crime that simply never happened, and she was sentenced to

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>eighteen years in prison. Audrey, I'm so sorry for what

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>happened to you, but I'm super grateful that you're here

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>now to share your story with us.

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Good morning.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Likewise, you know, we've covered shaking baby syndrome or SPS,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>not only a this show, but also in depth on

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>wrongful conviction junk science. When our host Josh Dubin spoke

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>with Kate Judson, the executive director of the Center for

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Integrity and Forensic Sciences, and we've been asking her to

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>join us when we cover a case like yours. But

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>since the co founder of that organization, Keith Finley, was

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>your post conviction attorney, We're going to give Kate the

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>day off today. Keith, you also co founded the Wisconsin

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Innocence Project as well as the Innocence Network. I mean, wow, anyway, incredible.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>We're so honored to have you with us today.

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much, Jason, glad to be with you now.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I know you know a lot about this hypothesis, which

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>masquerades day in and day out as a decided science.

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Shake and baby syndrome is. As its founder, doctor Norman

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 3>guth Kelch referred to it repeatedly, It's a hypothesis, that's

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 3>all it is.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a hypothesis, right, And the hypothesis was that violently

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 1>shaking an infant could cause the brain to sort of

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>slosh around back and forth inside of the skull, which

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>would in turn cause the bridging veins of the brain

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and eyes to tear and bleed inside the coverings of

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the brain and retinas, in addition to brain swelling, ultimately

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>resulting in the triad of findings for which doctor gotth

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>Kelch was trying to figure out, try to solve, and

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this would then cause the child to lose consciousness or

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>potentially even their life.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 3>This hypothesis has never, as guth Kelch himself said late

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>in his life, has never been scientifically validated, and it's

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>for a very very good reason. It's nearly impossible to

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 3>do the kind of validation studies that would be required

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 3>to really test this scientifically, you need to do randomized

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 3>controlled studies, But for obvious ethical reasons, you can't shake

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 3>a certain group of infants and compare them to a

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 3>group of infants who are not shaken.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, if this hypothesis was to be believed, then you

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>not not only be submitting these infants to abuse, but

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>also what a proponent of SBS would believe is almost

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain death. However, there have been studies over time

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that have been able to disprove the hypothesis without shaking infants,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and those revelations come down to what other injuries would

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>also have to be present. In addition to the triad

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>of findings.

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 3>The thing that really informs this is biomechanical research. Biomechanics

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 3>is the study of the effects of force applied to

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 3>the body, and what the biomechanical research shows consistently is

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that the most vigorous shaking that a human being can

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 3>generate comes nowhere close to meeting the injury thresholds estimated

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 3>in these kinds of cases, and if sufficient forces could

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 3>be generated, that force would have to travel from the

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 3>chest through the neck to the brain. The weak link

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 3>there is the neck. The neck would almost certainly be

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 3>severely damaged by that much shaking, and yet these cases

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>almost never have any injuries of that sort.

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>And it has since been proven that there are a

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>multitude of other potential causes of the so called.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 3>Triad, everything ranging from choking to inherited conditions, coagulopathies, childhood stroke,

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 3>accidental falls, you name it. There's just so many of

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 3>them that there's simply no way that a physician can,

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 3>so to speak, diagnosis on the basis of the triad

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 3>or associated findings. And yet that's exactly what they did

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 3>in Audrey's case.

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Pers and so many others, because antithetical to the scientific method,

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>doctors at that time were trained in medical school to

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>just jump to this false conclusion each and every time

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>they saw that triad of findings. But before this happened

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to you, Audrey, let's go back. Tell us about what

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>your life was like.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 4>I grew up in Hudson, Wisconsin. I have three brothers.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 4>My dad was a teacher. My mom was a stay

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 4>at home mom. We had a very middle class life.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 4>We had a small home, we had one bathroom. We

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 4>worked when we were old enough too. I had done

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot of babysitting, dog sitting.

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>So you were predisposed of being a caregiver even as

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a teenager. And what did you do after high school?

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 4>I started a job in the Saint Paul area right

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 4>out of high school. And then I was married when

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 4>I was almost twenty eight years old, and within a

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 4>year we had moved to Ohio, and in Ohio is

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 4>where I had my first child, Carrie.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And then when Carrie was still a toddler, your family

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>moved to Wannakee, Wisconsin, where you went back to childcare.

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>How did that come about?

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 4>As much as I enjoyed working, I really enjoyed and

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 4>wanted to be a stay at home mom. And we

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 4>were in a young neighborhood with lots of small children.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 4>People started asking me from time to time if I

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 4>would watch their children, And that is how this all

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 4>started for me, having children come to my house to

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 4>take care of them.

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>And I loved it.

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it all sounds wonderful. And you had two

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>little ones of your own by that time, and you

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>were expecting your third, So how great is that to

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to be with them full time while also

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>providing this much needed service to your community and to

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>other parents in the area. So tell me a little

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>bit about your day care facility.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 4>We had a large ranch house, a kitchen in the

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 4>center of the house. I had the master bedroom to

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 4>the far left and two other bedrooms in a bathroom

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>on the right hand side. And I was not a

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 4>licensed daycare since I didn't have several children every day,

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 4>I took people as needed.

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>And one of the families you helped was the Beards

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and their seven month old daughter, Natalie, who tragically passed

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>away on October sixteenth, nineteen ninety five. Were there any

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>potential warning signs regarding her.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Health Natalie's parents, this was their first child. They'd had

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 4>a lot of problems with her fussiness and either taken

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 4>her to the doctor or called the doctor twenty five

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 4>times in her twenty seven weeks of life.

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Wow, twenty five doctor visits. That's a doctor visit a

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>week pretty much.

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 2>That's correct.

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 4>And then also, Natalie, unfortunately was not able to roll

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 4>over on her tummy. She couldn't prop herself up with

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 4>her arms as most children do at that age. She

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 4>couldn't hold her own bottle, and ever since I started

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 4>taking care of her, she had a real hard time sucking,

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 4>and I had asked her mom about that because most

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 4>babies at that age they will take down six to

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 4>seven ounces in five to seven minutes, and it took

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 4>Natalie at least twenty minutes. So I had accommodated her

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 4>over the six plus weeks that I had taken care

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 4>of her, to give her the time needed to hold her,

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 4>to help her eat, and keep her away from noisy people.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, most of our artis probably at some point

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>have been a baby, and as you may have experienced,

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>if the baby isn't feeling well or has some other

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on, it can be hard for them to

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>maintain focus while feeding. So anything else notable about the

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>lead up to that awful, faithful day.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, she had not been at my house since the

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 4>previous Wednesday, so I hadn't seen her for four days.

0:09:26.240 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 4>The previous Wednesday, after she'd been at my house, they

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 4>took her into the doctor the next morning because they

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 4>said she was fussy, and the doctor treated her with

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 4>an ear infection. To the best of my knowledge, the

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 4>coroner had noted that there was no ear infection in

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 4>the autopsy, but also on that note, the mother did

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 4>not tell me, But Natalie had projectile vomited that morning

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 4>in her car seat on the way to my house,

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 4>which is just around a half a block from their

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 4>house to my house, So what was really wrong with her?

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Many doctors who have studied these cases have said, when

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the parents continue to bring her in for medical attention

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 4>because they're crying, they need to start doing head scans

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 4>to see if something is wrong internally that can't be

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 4>detected with the little light that the doctor puts in

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 4>the eyes and ears and.

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Nose, And had head scans been a regular practice back then,

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>we might have known what was happening inside Natalie before

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it was too late for both her and for you.

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>As it turns out, as these findings manifested and took

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>her life while she was in your care.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 4>And it's proven these symptoms can take hours, if not days,

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 4>to manifest before there's an outward symptom, as it did

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 4>happen in my care.

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But at that time, the most recent caregiver was almost

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>always the one who was blamed. So let's talk about

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that morning. It was around seven thirty am on October sixteenth,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety five, when Cindy Beard dropped Natalie off.

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 4>That morning, the mother could not get her to take

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 4>her bottle, and babies should be hungry when they haven't

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 4>eaten for eight to ten hours. But I knew that

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 4>she was a very sensitive baby to noise, to any

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 4>little jolting, and that's why I decided to put her

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 4>away from the noise of the rest of the house.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Audrey tried to comb the child by propping her up

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 3>in a quiet bedroom in a car seat with a bottle,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>and she then went to ten to other children in

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 3>her care, and within less than an hour, when she

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 3>checked on Natalie, she found the child to be unresponsive,

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 3>turning blue.

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 4>I thought that she was choking, and I propped her

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 4>upright against my body. I'm patting her on the back.

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 4>She's not responding, and I run outside with her in

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 4>my arm, screaming for a neighbor lady who comes down,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 4>and I'm babbling telling her what's going on, and she's saying,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 4>you've got to call nine one one.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 3>The nine one one call itself is really revealing from

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the very get go. Audrey is telling the rescue people

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that there was all kinds of formula coming out of

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the infant's nose and mouth, and when paramedics arrived. They

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 3>said that they noted that there was formula coming out

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 3>of the child. They said they found a child who

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 3>had aspirated formula and it appeared by all accounts to

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 3>be a choking incident.

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So the paramedics also noted that Natalie's pupils were fixed

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and dilated and she was taking short breaths. She was

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>flown to University Hospital in Madison, where tragically she died

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that very night. A forensic pathologist named doctor Robert Huntington

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>performed the autopsy, which revealed extensive brain damage, dual retinal hemorrhaging,

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>bleeding in the coverings of the brain, and bruising on

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>her scalp. So the bleeds represent part of the triad,

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But what about the bruise.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 4>They couldn't say the timing of it. It was maybe fresh,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 4>but how fresh is for rush? Is it two hours?

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 4>Is it two days?

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Could that have happened in transit to the hospital or

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>while this little child was struggling to survive? What did

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Huntington make of that?

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Huntington said he thought it was too small to

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 3>be of any consequence, and therefore he concluded this had

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 3>to have been shaking right.

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Huntington ruled out accidental injury, saying that it was quote

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>intentional forceful conduct directed specifically at Natalie. But this murder

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>diagnosi is completely ignored not only her medical history that

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we've already discussed, but also what should have been a

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>big red flag at the autopsy.

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Their own brain scans showed that this child had a

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 3>chronic subdural hematoma, meaning previous episode of bleeding around the brain.

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 3>That's well established in the medical research. The chronic subdural

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 3>hematomas are very susceptible to rebleeding based on very little

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 3>additional trauma, or sometimes no trauma, just spontaneously like a

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 3>spontaneous nosebleed. And the prosecution and ultimately the court simply

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 3>ignored all of these indications that the child was not

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>a healthy baby, and that she was a previously brain

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 3>injured child.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>And these kinds of earlier bleeds are sometimes written off

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>as proof of previous abuse. But since they also believed

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that violence shaking caused an immediate demise in the SBS

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>proponent's mind, perhaps the alleged previous abuse wasn't forceful enough

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to kill. But now the alleged repeat offender, the most

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>recent caregiver had just finally been caught by way of

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the child's death, and that puts the onus on you, Audrey.

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Now did you get the sense that Natalie's parents believed

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>this as well?

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 4>So Cindy called me at noontime that day, and she

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 4>was very compassionate to me, asked me what happened. She

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 4>was very concerned. I went to the hospital that afternoon,

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 4>short after four, and we hugged and we both cried,

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 4>and I talked to her and I told her how

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 4>much I cared and how much I had tried to

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 4>help Natalie that morning. She was very kind to me,

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 4>and then once the prosecution went on the witch hunt

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 4>after me, they told her not to speak to me anymore.

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>So when did this witch hunt, as you so aptly

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>called it, begin, or when were you made aware of it?

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 4>I had no clue that anything was trying to be

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 4>held against me until January. I was just talking to

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 4>anybody that came to talk to me. The chief of

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 4>police who had come to my house earlier, mister Geezy,

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 4>he was very very kind. I just answered whatever questions,

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 4>showed them anything they wanted to see. They took photos,

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 4>and I thought this was just regular protocol.

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Typically, we see this diagnosis at the autopsy quickly turned

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>into an accusation, charges and arrest, but that didn't materialize

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>until five months later, on March nineteenth, nineteen ninety six.

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Now you were charged with first degree reckless homicide. As

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, you had two kids of your own

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and one more on the way. Perhaps they were waiting

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>for that baby to arrive before bringing you in. I

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean just thinking about you having to

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>leave behind your two young children and a newborn. It's

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>too much.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 4>It was horrible. My youngest was one month old. I

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 4>had no clue why this was even happening, why I

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 4>was charged, what they thought happened. I was so so scared,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 4>but yet I kept thinking, well, nothing happened, so everything

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 4>will be okay.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 2>And I was wrong.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>This episode is underwritten by global law firm Greenberg Trowig

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>through its pro bono program. Greenberg Trowig leverages its more

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>than twenty six hundred lawyers across forty four offices to

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>serve the greater good of our communities and provide equal

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 1>access to justice for all. In the field of criminal justice.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Greenberg Trowrig attorneys have exonerated and free demanded. Philadelphia represent

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>numerous individuals previously sentenced to life for crimes committed as

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>juveniles and resentencing hearings, and receive the American Bar Association's

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one Exceptional Service Award for Death Penalty Representation

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for their work.

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 3>On five death penalty cases.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 1>GT is reimagining what big law can be because of a

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>more just world. Only happens by design.

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 3>This is what we call a science dependent prosecution. The science,

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 3>the medicine, the expert testimony comprised the entire case. It's

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 3>almost unique in the law in that sense. There are

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 3>really three things the prosecution had to prove. One is

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>what's known as the actus reus, what happened. The medical

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 3>professionals would come in and say, we can tell you

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 3>exactly what happened. This child was violently shaken. The second

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>thing they have to prove is what's known in the

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 3>laws the mensraa, the mental state of the perpetrator. And

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.239
<v Speaker 3>in this case, the experts came in and testified, and

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 3>we can tell you what mental state the perpetrator had.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Because this would require such force the equivalent of a

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 3>second story fall or thirty mile an hour automobile accident,

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 3>that it couldn't be done accidentally. And the third thing

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 3>they have to prove is identity. The way the expert

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 3>would prove identity would be to say, a child so

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>injured would become immediately comatose, flaccid, unresponsive, and therefore the

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 3>last person with the child is the one who did it.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 3>That was Audrey. So that was the entirety of the

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 3>case against Audrey.

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So the trial began on November eighteenth, nineteen ninety six.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 1>The judge was Daniel Moser, and the prosecutor was to

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Da Dretchen Hayward. And the star witness for the prosecution

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>was doctor Robert Huntington, the forensic pathologists who had done

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the autopsy.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 3>He was joined in his testimony by a number of

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 3>other doctors, pediatricians, ophthalmologists, a range of others who were

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 3>uniform in their opinion that, as they said, nothing could

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 3>cause this triad of findings except violent shaking.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>So what did Audrey's defense attorney Steve Hurley present the

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>counter all of that combined so called medical expertise.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 3>The defense called their own expert witness, but reflecting how

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:41.719
<v Speaker 3>early this is in the life story of the shaking

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 3>baby Center hypothesis. At that point, there was virtually no

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 3>one who was challenging or disputing the hypothesis itself. So

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.439
<v Speaker 3>at the trial, all of the prosecution's witnesses were of

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 3>one voice, were unanimous this had to be shaking, and

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>nothing but shaking could cause it. The defense witness also

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 3>believed this had to be shaking, because that's just what

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 3>the unquestioned dogma of the day was, and so the

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 3>defense expert agreed it had to be shaking. The only

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 3>thing she introduced was but it could have happened before

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 3>the child was in Audrey's care.

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Audrey, what about Natalie's mother, Cindy Beard. You mentioned that

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 1>she didn't seem to blame you when Natalie was taken

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to the hospital. In fact, she expressed kindness and understanding.

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>As you recall. Did she testify at the trial.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, she did.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't recall a whole lot about it. She had

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 4>a hard time, of course, when Steve Hurley cross examined

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 4>her and talked to her about Natalie's pre existing conditions.

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 4>He was gentle around it, but he had some good,

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 4>strong topics.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 3>The prosecutors basically told them that Audrey murdered your child,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 3>and despite the absurdity of that claim, that's what they

0:20:55.840 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 3>led them to believe. And so I think that used

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.159
<v Speaker 3>an inevitable hostility. And who wouldn't be angry if you

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 3>were told that your baby was murdered by someone? Right?

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, these people suffered a terrible tragedy. The problem

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 3>is that I'm afraid that the prosecution kind of victimized

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 3>the parents again by making them believe this story of

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 3>murder rather than what It's still awful, but not as awful,

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 3>perhaps that the child died of natural causes.

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And other than the defenses expert Audrey, who else testified

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on your behalf.

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people thankfully came to my defense because

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 4>they had seen me with Natalie day after day when

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 4>I had her. I interacted with a lot of moms

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 4>and neighbors, and they would see when she would cry,

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 4>and I'd pick her up, and I'd pat her and

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 4>I'd comfort her, just little things like that.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 3>So, if I can just add Jason, the defense was

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 3>built a lot on the notion that this was just

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 3>absurd to think that Audrey, with this sterling track record,

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 3>would have snapped in less than an hour of caring

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 3>for Natalie. After not having cared for her for four

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 3>or five days, Stan snapped to the point of violently

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 3>shaking her to death.

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Nonetheless, with that bevy of tuber confident medical expert testimony,

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't appear that even a sterling track record made

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit of difference to the jury. On November twenty sixth,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety six.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 4>The courtroom was full. Both sides had a lot of supporters,

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 4>family friends, and the closing arguments were horrifying. When Gretchen

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Hayward still wants to talk like she was standing in

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 4>my kitchen that day telling how I had shaken this

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 4>child and bonked her head against a wall. And then

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 4>the jury had some questions about first degree reckless homicide

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 4>versus second degree and utter disregard.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>To human life.

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 4>My palms get sweaty just think thinking about sitting in

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 4>the hallway waiting, and then when we hear the jury

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 4>has come to a decision, and it's late at night,

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 4>and we go in and I heard that one awful,

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 4>ugly word and I thought I was going to die.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 4>The judge when he said eighteen years, I felt like

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 4>he was saying, you have taken a life so I

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 4>want your kids to be away from you until they're adults.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 4>To this day, I still can't wrap my head around

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 4>trying to prepare to be torn away from them. So

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 4>much is taken away from you. You're put into a

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 4>concrete cell with a tin toilet and a stranger, and

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 4>you're trying to do the best you can to adapt

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 4>and hold on to hope that this won't last long. Thankfully,

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 4>my children's dad and my parents and other family members

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 4>were wonderful for almost six years in bringing my children

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 4>almost every weekend to see me, and on top of that,

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 4>I had multiple phone calls to them throughout the week.

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 4>We wrote a lot of letters. My kids teachers throughout

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 4>the years were great to send me things, report cards, projects.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 4>So I am really really fortunate in that area because

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of moms had little of no contact with

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 4>their children. Then my kid's dad and I divorced about

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 4>six years after I was in and then I didn't

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 4>see them as much, but I saw them often and

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 4>we kept in very close touch throughout all the years.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm glad to hear that. And meanwhile, you were

0:24:56.160 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>doing literally everything you could possibly do to prove your innocence. Now,

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and two, your first appeal was denied,

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>and then in two thousand and three, Keith and the

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Wisconsin Innocence Project got involved. Now, from what I understand,

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Audrey's case was your introduction to the SBS hypothesis and

0:25:13.040 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>eventually inspired you to start the Center for Integrity and

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Forensic Science. But at that time, knowing very little about

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the science. What made you take her case.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 3>It was a high profile case here, so we all

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 3>knew about the case and knew that it was a

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 3>controversial conviction from the beginning. And her lawyer, Steve Hurley,

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 3>is a really outstanding lawyer, and her appellate lawyer was

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.679
<v Speaker 3>Dean Strang, who many of you may remember as one

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 3>of Steve and Avery's lawyers in the Netflix Docuseriies Making

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 3>a Murderer, who was a remarkable lawyer as well. And

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I knew them both well and knew that they were

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 3>really troubled by this conviction, believing firmly that she was innocent.

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 3>But the thing that really got us going is that

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>a physician at the University of Wisconsin Hospital, doctor Javid,

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 3>approached us and said he thought there were or problems

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 3>with the scientific evidence with the medical evidence that was

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 3>used to convict her, and that we should look into it.

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 3>We started investigating, and we found that that forensic pathologist,

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 3>the medical examiner, you remember him, doctor Robert Huntington. He

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 3>had written a letter to the Journal of the National

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Association of Medical Examiners in which he basically said, you

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 3>know what, our beliefs about timing of these injuries may

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 3>have been wrong. I don't think he said, we can

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 3>actually time them to the last person with the child anymore.

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 3>And he based that on an experience he had autopsying

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 3>another child who died after being in the hospital for

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>about seventeen hours under expert supervision, and the child presented

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 3>with the full triad just like Natalie, but the child

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 3>had been in the hospital for seventeen hours where she

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.159
<v Speaker 3>was completely lucid. She was fussy and clingy, but she

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 3>was lucid, aware, alert, and therefore she had what in

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 3>the literature is known as an extended lucid interval. And

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 3>from this doctor Huntington wrote, what we used to believe

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 3>that the child would become unresponsive immediately, that's not always true.

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 3>We can't conclude that.

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And so the medical examiner actually admitted that he was wrong.

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>That's huge.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 3>He also said that having research this further, there was

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 3>now emerging, growing body of research that was challenging the

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 3>very hypothesis itself. And he therefore said he could no

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 3>longer be confident with his testimony that this child was

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 3>shaken at all. And so we reached out to doctor

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Huntington and said we were working with Audrey Edmonds. The

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 3>first thing he said, first thing out of his mouth,

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 3>was oh, Audrey Edmunds, what are we going to do

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 3>about Audrey Edmonds?

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So in two thousand and seven you got an evidentiary

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>hearing in which you presented, among several expert witnesses, doctor

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Huntington himself.

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Huntington was courageous and forthright, and he on the

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 3>witness stand, and he acknowledged that he was no longer

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with the testimony he had offered at Audrey's trial.

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 3>One he said he could no longer stand by his

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 3>testimony that the injury almost certainly happened within two hours

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 3>of the child's collapse. Elucid interval was possible, so he

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 3>couldn't time it to match Audrey's care. The second thing

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 3>he said, though, which was equally powerful, was that while

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 3>at trial he was certain this case had to involved

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 3>a violent shaking, he now said because the whole field

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 3>had become so much more controversial and more uncertain, he

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 3>could no longer say whether there was any shaking at all,

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 3>or whether this might have been an impact. He said

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 3>that original bruise that he saw at autopsy, that he

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 3>originally discounted as having been two minor to have been

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 3>of consequence, He said he now couldn't rule that out.

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 3>And the important thing about that is if that bruise,

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 3>if that impact of the head was the cause, it

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 3>could have been the product of prior abuse before the

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 3>child got to Audrey's care, or it could have been

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 3>an accident, because another thing that the biomechanical research shows

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 3>is that even minor falls, falls from just a few

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 3>feet generate fifty times more accelerations or more force than

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 3>the most violent shaking that a human being can produce,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 3>and that even those kinds of minor accidental type falls

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>do generate sufficient forces to exceed estimated injury thresholds. So

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 3>he basically said, I can't time it to Audrey, and

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I can't tell you if there was shaking or whether

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 3>this was intentional or accidental. The medicine doesn't answer those questions, pretty.

0:29:41.480 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Much refuting his own very damning testimony at the original trial,

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and to back him up, you had five other expert witnesses,

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>all prominent physicians and pediatric neurosurgeons.

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 3>In response, the state called four experts, most of whom

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 3>had testified at the trial originally. And what we showed

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 3>through the course of this was that there indeed can

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 3>be elucid interval, that a child so injured can experience

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 3>a period where they are alert and responsive for hours,

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 3>if not days. That although the medical science had been

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 3>undisputed at the time of Audrey's trial except for the

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 3>question of timing, since then enormous research had emerged that

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:30.719
<v Speaker 3>suggested that shaking is an unlikely if impossible cause of

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 3>these findings, that it's simply myth, there's no science behind it.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 3>And we established that there are multiple possible causes for

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 3>these findings, and that's particularly important in a case like

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.719
<v Speaker 3>this where the child was previously ill, the child had

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 3>a pre existing subdural hematoma, and was sick, and was

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 3>fussy and clingy, and the research now shows that those

0:30:55.800 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 3>are all potential indications that the child is neurologically compromised

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 3>and heading towards collapse.

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And yet after you had established all of this updated

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:10.959
<v Speaker 1>scientific evidence, the original trial judge, Daniel Moser, was not persuaded.

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 3>He denied the motion and basically said, I believe the

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 3>state's experts more.

0:31:15.840 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sounds like you gave that a lot of thought.

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But of course you appealed, which brings us up to

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>January thirty first, two thousand and eight.

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 3>In a unanimous decision, the Court of Appeals reversed the

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 3>trial court judge and said that Audrey had indeed presented

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 3>newly discovered evidence in the form of new medical research

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 3>that created a probability that at a retrial she would

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 3>be acquitted. And they said the trial judge had legally

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 3>aired by applying the wrong standard by substituting his own

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 3>judgment about the guilty innocence for that of the jury,

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 3>and therefore Audrey was entitled to a new trial. Conviction vacated.

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Hey man, that was a great day.

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 3>That was a great day.

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe it. Audrey. Can you tell me about those

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>first moments on February sixth, two thousand and eight, when

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you found out you were finally going.

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 3>To be released.

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 2>It was awesome. It was a snowy day.

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm working on this auto part scrapping line and my

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 4>supervisor's supervisor comes to me and says, Audrey, I have

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 4>gotten a call and you can legally come to my

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 4>office to take a telephone call.

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 2>And at first I was like, oh no, I can't

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 2>do that. I was scared to death. You don't touch

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a telephone.

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 4>You don't even think about touching a telephone because that's

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 4>a form of escape. I'm this close to getting out,

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to do anything. And she said everything

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 4>is okay. So I went to her office and we

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 4>had a call with some people at Keith's office and

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 4>they said the judge has a big trial next week,

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 4>but he will put you in for you release hearing

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 4>on Wednesday at noon. That Wednesday was a terrible snowstorm day.

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Medisine got two feet of snow and at quarter to

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 4>three that day, in a massive snowstorm, I walked out.

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 4>I didn't care where I slept that night, as long

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 4>as I was on the other side of the fence.

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 3>By the way, there's this iconic, beautiful photograph of Audrey.

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 3>I believe in the parking lot meeting with meeting with

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 3>her friends, being reunited with them, with the snowstorm swirling

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 3>around them and the wind blowing, and they're all reaching

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 3>out to hug each other. It's just such pure joys.

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 3>It makes it all amazing.

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 4>And I have to say on one thing, the prosecutor

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 4>did say that they had contacted the parents and neither

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 4>one objected to my release, because had they objected, I

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 4>could have been having to go back to County jail

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 4>until the July hearing.

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 2>So that was a big plus.

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, So although you were out, you were still in

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>legal limbo until that hearing.

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 3>Once Audrey's conviction was overturned and the prosecution was thinking

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 3>about whether to retry them, and then ultimately when they

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 3>dismissed the charges, the prosecution continued to insist publicly and

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 3>to tell the parents that Audrey had murdered their child,

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 3>even though they no longer had any proof, no evidence,

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 3>And to me, that was just morally indefensible. It was

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 3>such a harmful thing to do to everyone, as a prosecutor,

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 3>as a public servant, as a minister of justice. In theory,

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.760
<v Speaker 3>you either prove your case in court by the requisite

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 3>legal standard, or you accept the presumption of innocence, and

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 3>they refuse to give Audrey that they refused to give

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 3>Natalie Beard's family that.

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was. It was atrocious.

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 4>I've never expected and I'm sorry for them, but I

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 4>wish they would be big enough to say the truth

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 4>that the medical evidence does not support the charge.

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>But they did dismiss the case on July eleventh, two

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, and you were finally exonerated of these completely ludicrous,

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>false and unjust charges and able to return to your

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:13.319
<v Speaker 1>family at last. And I have to ask, I'm sure

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone's wondering, how are you doing now? And how are

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 1>your kids because they were, in a sense in prison

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>with you during your entire ordeal, doing their own sort

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>of time because of this horrible persecution.

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 4>And they're good. They all have very good jobs. Two

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 4>of them are married. I just found out that my

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 4>baby is pregnant, so I will have two grand babies.

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, congratulations.

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 2>I just saw my middle one over the weekend.

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 4>She lives in Iowa and she will be taking her

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 4>boards to be a licensed practical nurse. And I'm just

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 4>super thankful that they are doing well. I'm sure they

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 4>have a scar from this. They don't hardly talk about it.

0:35:55.000 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's just too hard for them. But they

0:35:58.160 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 4>know that there are things still going on in my

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 4>life that I speak out like I am today, and

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm grateful that there's just more and more awareness of

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 4>these wrongful convictions.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And you've also written a memoir called It Happened to Audrey,

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>A terrifying journey from loving mom to accuse baby killer.

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 1>We're going to put a link to that at our bio.

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to order a copy, I hope everybody does.

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And Keith, you've also co authored a book along with

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a number of leading experts in this field, which is

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>coming out very soon. I've already ordered this one, by

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, the book is called Shaken Baby Syndrome, Investigating

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the Abusive Head Trauma Controversy. I highly recommend it for

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>anyone who has even a passing interest in learning more

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>about this terrible, faulty hypothesis that has destroyed thousands of

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>people's lives. Will have a link to that in the

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>bio too. And now we've come to one of my favorite,

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>well my favorite part of the show really, which we

0:36:56.480 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>call closing arguments, and this is the part where, first

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>of all, I'm going to thank you you Audrey for

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>your courage and your strength and your grace and for

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>being here to tell your incredible story. And Keith, as always,

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being an inspiration to all of us

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the movement. And now I'm just going to turn

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>my mic off, kick back in my chair with my

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>headphones on, close my eyes, and just listen to anything

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>else you want to say. Keith, let's start with you.

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Then you can just pass the mic off to Audrey

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and she can take us off into the sunset.

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Audrey's case. In the end, the whole topic of

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 3>shaking baby syndrome represents what is all too common and

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 3>wrongful convictions, and that is a rush to judgment, an

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 3>unquestioning acceptance of expertise and authorities even when they are flawed,

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 3>and a real vindictiveness and sort of the punitive nature

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 3>of the culture we live in that you know, when

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 3>a baby dies, somebody's got to pay for it, and

0:37:54.800 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 3>that's really really tragic. The struggle continues. But the bright

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 3>side of this, that the bright note here is that

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 3>there is a growing body of physicians, by mechanical engineers

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 3>and other scientists who are re examining shaking baby syndrome,

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 3>the entire hypothesis who are publishing in response to it.

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 3>There will be more pushback, there will be efforts to

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:23.280
<v Speaker 3>silence or discredit critics, but eventually scientific truth will prevail.

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm confident. I just hope not too many more innocent

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 3>people suffer the faith that Audrey suffered.

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 4>In the meantime, just please be aware if you're around

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 4>a jury, really listen to truth and facts, no matter

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 4>how many witnesses one side has versus the other, use

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 4>some common sense, know the facts, know the truth, know

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 4>the validity of any witness. Really be open minded. Just

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 4>because somebody is charged doesn't mean they have done the

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 4>appropriate investigation and know all the facts of the case.

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 4>And especially in cases like mine, please please look at

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 4>the medical scientific facts, not opinion. Opinion doesn't matter anymore

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 4>and can be so well discredited as there are more

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 4>and more people who are experts who are researching these

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 4>who came to my attention, who came to Keith's attention,

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 4>and don't look at these people that are not upgrading

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 4>and updating their medical knowledge.

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to wrongful conviction. I want to

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 1>thank our production team, Connor Hall, any Chelsea Lyla Robinson,

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Clyburn, and Kevin Warris. The music in this production

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>was supplied by three time OSCAR nominated composer Jay Ralph.

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to follow us on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction,

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook at Wrongful Conviction podcast, and on Twitter at

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 1>wrong Conviction, as well as at Lava for Good. On

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.399
<v Speaker 1>all three platforms, you can also follow me on both

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and Instagram at It's Jason vlahm. Ravel Conviction is

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a production of Lava for Good Podcasts and association with

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Signal Company Number one