WEBVTT - Kevin O'Leary Talks Buying TikTok

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 2>The Supreme Court is hearing arguments about whether it will

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>uphold a law banning TikTok in the US if it's

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 2>not sold by its Chinese parent company by January nineteenth.

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I am Romaine Bostic.

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Scarlet Fou and we've been reading analyst notes

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>that indicate that the oral arguments suggest to some folks

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that the Supreme Court is likely to accept Congress's ban

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok, which would takeffect on January nineteenth, one day

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>before the inauguration.

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's kind of interesting. I mean, this hearing's

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 2>been going on for a while and we've gotten some

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 2>trips and drabs of information, but we're still waiting for

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of a formal announcement from the court about what

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 2>they will or won't do.

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And so far, the Supreme Court justices have signaled that

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they may uphold, of course, this upcoming ban or forced

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to divest the company by the Chinese owner. Byte Dance.

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Frank McCourt leads internet advocacy group Project Liberty, and he

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>sent a formal offer to China's Bike Dance in the

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>hopes of buying TikTok head of that new law taking effect.

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 4>Take a listen, were the right buyers because we have

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 4>put all the pieces together, We have the funding, we've

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 4>worked through all the legal issues.

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 3>We've put a formal offer, as.

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 4>You point out, right in front of Byte Dance, so

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 4>they have something now to react to, and most importantly,

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 4>we have the clean American tech stack. In order to sell,

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 4>they need to enter into an agreement, which is why

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 4>we put a formal offer in front of them in

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:26.919
<v Speaker 4>the last twenty four hours.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now for more on this effort is one

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of the names backing the project Liberty Bid for TikTok,

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a partner of Frank Lacourt. He is Kevin O'Leary, chairman

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of o'liary Adventures. Kevin, it's good to speak with you.

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>As you know, any sale of TikTok would require consent

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>from China's Byte Dance. What's the specific argument that your

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>group is making to them for why it's in their

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>best interest to a divest and b sell to you.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, I give up forty billion dollars worth of value.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Why is that good for anybody?

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 5>You've got to remember that within Byte Dance are some

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 5>of the world's largest financial institutions as shareholders, including many

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 5>billions worth of American dollars, and so one of the

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 5>options if this plays out the way I listen to

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 5>every word of the hearing, so I'm obviously an interested party,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 5>and the government made a very clear case that this

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 5>is not about free speech. It will be freer and

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.839
<v Speaker 5>there'll be lots of speaking after we buy it. This

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 5>has everything to do with the spyware aspect of byte Dance,

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 5>and they're not going to tolerate it anymore. Why this

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 5>bipartisan order is going to be upheld, I believe that

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 5>to be the case. When that occurs could be as

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 5>early as next week, could be today, We don't know.

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 5>The company will have a binary decision either to shut

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 5>it down, turn it off, or find a buyer. The

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 5>only syndicate is our offer last night. So we would

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 5>like to engage in a process obviously, and we're willing buyers.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 3>But the real issue for byte.

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 5>Dance and the Supreme Leader of China is what message

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 5>do you send to the world world's capital pools when

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 5>you're competing to become the largest economy on earth that

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 5>on a whim you would erase thirty forty fifty billion

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 5>dollars worth of value and just take your bicycle and

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 5>go home. I mean, that is a very bad look

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 5>if you're trying to raise capital at the lowest cost.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 5>So my thinking is that somebody's going to say, wait

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 5>a second, yeah, we should sell it and let it

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 5>go on. And that's what I'm hoping, and so is

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Frank So.

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Kevin, you've been vocal about wanting to buy TikTok for

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a while now, for almost a year, and you've floated

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this twenty billion dollar number without the algorithm purchasing TikTok.

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But without that algorithm, why or how is TikTok worth

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that amount if you don't get the famous for you

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>recommendation engine.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, I'm very familiar with this platform and have

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 5>been using it for years through the proxy of all

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 5>the companies I invest in. I have the data every

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Tuesday on cap on every single social media platform. So

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 5>because I don't have the data room yet, I'm just

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 5>going to give you some estimates. There's about seven million

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 5>small businesses products sort of between one and three million

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 5>in sales, five to five hundred employees, represent sixty two

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 5>percent of job creation in America. Most of them are

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 5>on TikTok and they're all my people.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>These are two generations of shark tankers.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to guess that ninety five percent of them

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 5>know me and I would like to bring them on

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 5>the journey with me. And I want to use equity

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 5>crowdfunding to do that so they can be my partner

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 5>going at the same deal I'm investing in, and we

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 5>go into this deal together. Now we're going to add

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 5>a lot of features that TikTok doesn't have. And we've

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 5>been talking about this together. And one of the reasons

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.119
<v Speaker 5>that my Cord and Olier got together in the first

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 5>place is we both have things the other doesn't have,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 5>so it makes sense to merge. But one of the

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 5>things I want to do, and so does Frank, is

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 5>to say, okay, these people are partners if they have

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 5>their personal data on it. Like take me, for example,

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 5>I'm a watch collector. I'm not interested in car ads.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 5>I don't collect cars. I collect watches. I only want

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 5>to see watch adds, right, and if you're going to

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 5>sell my data, I want a piece of the action.

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll do that.

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 5>We'll also make it interoperable. If you're posting. If you're

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 5>President Trump, you're posting on truth Social click here to

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 5>populate TikTok. We we'll open that for him. We'll open

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 5>that for any platform. So that adds a lot of

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 5>value and makes it, what I like to say, whimsically,

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 5>we'll make TikTok wonderful again.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>A shout out to of course your nickname. Frank McCourt

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>has said that the group plans to work with Donald

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Trump to close a deal. Have you talked recently with

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>presidentlect Trump specifically about TikTok? I asked, because it's not

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>totally clear where the President elect stands on this. I

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>mean he was for the band and now he's not

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>so much for the band.

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Yes, last weekend specifically on this topic, and I'm going

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 5>tomorrow again tomorrow logos specifically for this topic. We intend

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 5>to work on a bipartisan basis with both parties as

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 5>we have to currently. If the order gets turned back

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 5>to the executive that's Biden, he has the right to

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 5>extend it for ninety days and then of course at

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 5>twelve oh five on the January twentieth, we're working for Trump.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 5>So this, you know, entrepreneurship and TikTok is a bipartisan platform.

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 5>So we're working hard with both administrations right now, keeping

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 5>them in the loop, letting them know everything.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 3>We're doing, asking to work with them.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 5>Regardless of what the outcome is, you know, in terms

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 5>of timing of the decision. But we think it's going

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 5>to happen very shortly and probably next week, and we

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 5>will need to be working with the Trump with Trump

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 5>and I also think probably Mike, Mike Waltz, I mean,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 5>whoever is going to be the oversight on it.

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 3>We're going to work with them.

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 5>Whatever they need, We're going to give them.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Kevin remain bossic here. I am curious about the idea

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.840
<v Speaker 2>that for some reason they do get a reprieve from

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 2>the court and it does open up opportunity for you

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 2>and Frank to move forward with this here. Do you

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 2>worry at all about kind of the legal morass around this?

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, even if the Supreme Court kids it's clearance,

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>there's still sort of an international legal maras that is

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>going to hang over this, I would think, and I

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 2>do wonder about how you navigate that in a world

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 2>that is just going to be a lot different, let's

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>face it, over the next few years.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, one of the reasons Frank and I got together.

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 5>You may find this strange, is we both have six

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 5>one seven area codes on our cell phone. I know

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 5>that sounds nuts, but that's eighty percent of a deal

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 5>because you got you You're a Boston dude if you

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 5>have a six one seven, a real Boston dude, because

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 5>they don't give that number out anymore. So I knew

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 5>we'd know everybody in each other's teams, and in fact

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 5>we did.

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 3>We love hairball deals.

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 5>We love crazy complicated hairball deals because it's.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 3>A mote that's you know, I don't know who's going

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 3>to compete with us.

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 5>I really don't know who's got what we have together.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Bring it, if you got it, bring it.

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, then let's get to this idea of the

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>idea of what the social media space looks like, Kevin

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 2>and the competition in there. I mean, we're all making

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>our choices about where we want to be, how we

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>engage here. I've talked with Frank a lot, and I

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 2>know he has a very grand vision for what he

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>thinks social media should be. A way to make it

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 2>more informative, maybe even a little kinder, and certainly more

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 2>consistent here. I assume you kind of have the same ethos.

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I agree with everything in terms of his philosophy

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 5>of opening up and democratizing the data.

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>But I want to take it even a step further.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 5>To me, TikTok is the world's largest television network.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 3>As soon as Frank.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 5>And I get done here getting this set up, We're

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 5>going to India, Switzerland, France, Germany, England, Canada. We will

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 5>have this lit up everywhere people believe in democracy and

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 5>freedom of speech, and we will own and be part

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 5>of the largest television network on earth. That is the

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 5>vision that we both share. This is not about the money.

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.679
<v Speaker 5>This is a legacy deal for us. I mean, this

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 5>is a This deal is global, it's huge, it's complicated,

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 5>it's got a million hairballs on it, and.

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 3>It's just perfect for us.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Kevin, I'm gonna leave it there, Kevin O'Leary, Chairman of

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 2>O'Leary Ventures, as we will wait the Supreme Court's decision

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 2>here and whether to uphold that band on TikTok