WEBVTT - The Edge

0:00:15.436 --> 0:00:21.556
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. I want to let you know that Rick has

0:00:21.556 --> 0:00:25.596
<v Speaker 1>a new podcast called Tetragrammaton. After about four to five

0:00:25.676 --> 0:00:28.556
<v Speaker 1>years of recording Broken Record, Rick decided he wanted to

0:00:28.596 --> 0:00:31.716
<v Speaker 1>talk to more than just musicians, so on his new podcast,

0:00:31.836 --> 0:00:37.636
<v Speaker 1>he'll be talking to actors, directors, wrestlers, business people, anyone

0:00:37.796 --> 0:00:40.876
<v Speaker 1>that Rick finds interesting. So make sure to subscribe to

0:00:40.876 --> 0:00:46.036
<v Speaker 1>Tetragrammaton wherever you listen to podcasts. You Two's The Edge

0:00:46.076 --> 0:00:49.156
<v Speaker 1>is one of only a handful of guitarists as famous

0:00:49.196 --> 0:00:52.876
<v Speaker 1>as his band's frontman. The Edge and Bono have been

0:00:52.876 --> 0:00:56.316
<v Speaker 1>together as You two since their early days as teenagers

0:00:56.316 --> 0:00:59.876
<v Speaker 1>in Dublin. They started the band in nineteen seventy six,

0:00:59.956 --> 0:01:02.236
<v Speaker 1>and in the years since they've become one of the

0:01:02.356 --> 0:01:05.596
<v Speaker 1>biggest rock bands in the world, releasing a consistent stream

0:01:05.636 --> 0:01:11.236
<v Speaker 1>of hit records decade after decade or decade. Nearing their

0:01:11.476 --> 0:01:14.756
<v Speaker 1>fifty year anniversary as a band, You two just released

0:01:14.836 --> 0:01:19.556
<v Speaker 1>another album, Songs of Surrender. It's a forty track collection

0:01:19.756 --> 0:01:23.556
<v Speaker 1>of reimagined and stripped down songs that span the entirety

0:01:23.596 --> 0:01:27.276
<v Speaker 1>of You Two's catalog. The band is also preparing for

0:01:27.316 --> 0:01:30.396
<v Speaker 1>the Las Vegas residency that starts this fall at the

0:01:30.476 --> 0:01:35.076
<v Speaker 1>Venetians MSG sphere. On today's episode, Rick Rubin talks to

0:01:35.116 --> 0:01:38.916
<v Speaker 1>the Edge about his theory behind the band's longevity. Plus

0:01:38.916 --> 0:01:41.956
<v Speaker 1>he shares stories about writing YouTube classics like New Year's

0:01:42.076 --> 0:01:45.156
<v Speaker 1>Day and Where the Streets Have No Name. The Edge

0:01:45.196 --> 0:01:47.916
<v Speaker 1>also explains why Bono singing at the top of his

0:01:48.076 --> 0:01:54.476
<v Speaker 1>range can be a bit much. This is broken record

0:01:54.836 --> 0:01:58.796
<v Speaker 1>liner notes for the digital Age. I'm justin Richmond. Here's

0:01:58.876 --> 0:02:03.396
<v Speaker 1>Rick Ruben's conversation with The Edge. So, how the hell

0:02:03.436 --> 0:02:07.036
<v Speaker 1>are you, Rick? I'm feeling pretty good. How about you? Yeah,

0:02:07.156 --> 0:02:12.236
<v Speaker 1>I must say, cannot complain congratulations on the new album,

0:02:12.436 --> 0:02:18.316
<v Speaker 1>Thank You. It's radical, it's radical. It struck us that

0:02:18.676 --> 0:02:21.796
<v Speaker 1>there's very few acts you could do this, which is

0:02:22.796 --> 0:02:28.076
<v Speaker 1>have a serious look back at recorded work from earlier years,

0:02:28.476 --> 0:02:32.036
<v Speaker 1>because most groups are not around. You know that the

0:02:32.316 --> 0:02:34.996
<v Speaker 1>full members are not with us. So it was a

0:02:35.036 --> 0:02:37.476
<v Speaker 1>thrill not only to get to do it, but also

0:02:37.876 --> 0:02:40.556
<v Speaker 1>feeling like we're doing something, as you say, radical, something

0:02:40.556 --> 0:02:45.556
<v Speaker 1>that's never been done. Yes, it's beautiful, and it struck

0:02:45.596 --> 0:02:50.356
<v Speaker 1>me as it had an honesty about it that really

0:02:50.516 --> 0:02:54.396
<v Speaker 1>was touching. Yeah, and it felt like it was true

0:02:55.156 --> 0:03:00.716
<v Speaker 1>to you and it felt really refreshing. Yeah. Well, because

0:03:00.796 --> 0:03:03.756
<v Speaker 1>we had to move so fast and because we were

0:03:03.836 --> 0:03:06.796
<v Speaker 1>allowing the music to lead us. I think it's got

0:03:06.796 --> 0:03:09.476
<v Speaker 1>a kind of ease about it, you know. The the

0:03:09.596 --> 0:03:14.716
<v Speaker 1>songs just are you know, and they're different versions for sure,

0:03:14.836 --> 0:03:17.876
<v Speaker 1>and we've taken quite a few liberties, but the songs shine,

0:03:18.076 --> 0:03:21.596
<v Speaker 1>and they shine because we've done a radical thing. We've

0:03:21.636 --> 0:03:25.636
<v Speaker 1>decided to really serve the voice and the lyrics and

0:03:26.076 --> 0:03:28.596
<v Speaker 1>get out of the way as much as possible, So

0:03:28.636 --> 0:03:33.236
<v Speaker 1>the arrangements are really sparse and very simple in most cases.

0:03:33.676 --> 0:03:36.796
<v Speaker 1>How did the idea come about to do this? It

0:03:36.876 --> 0:03:40.356
<v Speaker 1>was knocking around for a while because, as people who've

0:03:40.356 --> 0:03:43.596
<v Speaker 1>been to our shows will know, occasionally we would take

0:03:43.596 --> 0:03:45.556
<v Speaker 1>a song from an album that was a full band

0:03:45.596 --> 0:03:48.076
<v Speaker 1>arrangement that we'd strip it down and we'd play it.

0:03:48.916 --> 0:03:51.756
<v Speaker 1>Often it would just be binding myself and me on

0:03:51.836 --> 0:03:56.556
<v Speaker 1>acoustic guitar or possibly piano, and those versions sometimes became

0:03:56.636 --> 0:04:01.156
<v Speaker 1>the most iconic arrangements. I'm thinking of Staring at the

0:04:01.196 --> 0:04:07.316
<v Speaker 1>Sun or Ordinary Love or Every Breaking Way recently, so

0:04:07.396 --> 0:04:09.476
<v Speaker 1>there's always this thought, well, why don't we try that

0:04:09.516 --> 0:04:12.436
<v Speaker 1>with more of our songs to see where it leads us?

0:04:12.476 --> 0:04:17.236
<v Speaker 1>And then when the pandemic caused this lockdown. I'm one

0:04:17.236 --> 0:04:20.516
<v Speaker 1>of those people who works on music all the time,

0:04:20.916 --> 0:04:24.636
<v Speaker 1>but it seemed like the perfect moment to add into

0:04:24.956 --> 0:04:26.836
<v Speaker 1>what I would normally be doing, which is where coming

0:04:26.916 --> 0:04:30.636
<v Speaker 1>new stuff. To add in this other project is to

0:04:30.756 --> 0:04:35.596
<v Speaker 1>explore arrangement ideas for these songs. And so, with no pressure,

0:04:35.836 --> 0:04:39.436
<v Speaker 1>no expectation at sort of record company that there would

0:04:39.476 --> 0:04:42.836
<v Speaker 1>be a new YouTube record coming, we just started experimenting

0:04:42.876 --> 0:04:46.116
<v Speaker 1>and I would try a few arrangement ideas then bring

0:04:46.116 --> 0:04:49.796
<v Speaker 1>them to Bono and he would saying, see how it sounded,

0:04:50.596 --> 0:04:53.596
<v Speaker 1>and it just kind of grew, and the whole project

0:04:53.716 --> 0:04:58.156
<v Speaker 1>then developed its own momentum as we got deeper into

0:04:58.276 --> 0:05:01.596
<v Speaker 1>the material and the whole collection started to have its

0:05:01.636 --> 0:05:05.356
<v Speaker 1>own sort of personality. And the one thing that we

0:05:06.076 --> 0:05:08.876
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to try and do was bring an intimacy

0:05:08.956 --> 0:05:13.516
<v Speaker 1>to performances because as a young band particularly, we often

0:05:13.556 --> 0:05:16.876
<v Speaker 1>found ourselves with versions of our songs with Bono's singing

0:05:16.916 --> 0:05:19.676
<v Speaker 1>at the very top of his range, which is an

0:05:19.676 --> 0:05:22.396
<v Speaker 1>amazing sound. I mean, you know, the instrument of Bonnah

0:05:22.396 --> 0:05:26.676
<v Speaker 1>House is powerful, but it can be a little much,

0:05:26.956 --> 0:05:30.356
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're if you're at home and you

0:05:30.396 --> 0:05:33.516
<v Speaker 1>want to chill. You know, it's like you don't necessarily

0:05:33.556 --> 0:05:37.116
<v Speaker 1>go to those early YouTube records because they're just so intense.

0:05:37.396 --> 0:05:41.996
<v Speaker 1>So we were we thought, well, with this distance of

0:05:42.036 --> 0:05:45.596
<v Speaker 1>experience and time, you know, going back to those early

0:05:45.836 --> 0:05:49.036
<v Speaker 1>versions and rearranging them so Bono's singing within his range

0:05:49.036 --> 0:05:52.436
<v Speaker 1>and he's got the dynamic opportunity to kind of add

0:05:52.516 --> 0:05:55.156
<v Speaker 1>light and shade. We just thought would be interesting, and

0:05:55.196 --> 0:05:58.316
<v Speaker 1>it turned out to be the kind of secret weapon

0:05:58.756 --> 0:06:03.836
<v Speaker 1>was intimacy. It became our kind of new punk rock. Yeah. No,

0:06:03.996 --> 0:06:06.556
<v Speaker 1>it's it's beautiful, and it's a beautiful idea. And I

0:06:06.596 --> 0:06:11.036
<v Speaker 1>think in some ways the extremes are always what's interesting.

0:06:11.276 --> 0:06:15.596
<v Speaker 1>So very loud is interesting, and in the same way,

0:06:16.036 --> 0:06:20.036
<v Speaker 1>very quiet interesting. I can remember when I first discovered

0:06:20.116 --> 0:06:24.196
<v Speaker 1>Eric Satia, and I was still relatively punk rocker at

0:06:24.196 --> 0:06:27.036
<v Speaker 1>the time, but something about this music spoke to me

0:06:27.076 --> 0:06:29.036
<v Speaker 1>in a way that other things didn't. And then I

0:06:29.076 --> 0:06:34.076
<v Speaker 1>remember visiting Ian McKay in Washington, DC, and I got

0:06:34.076 --> 0:06:36.636
<v Speaker 1>to his house and there was an Eric Sati album

0:06:37.116 --> 0:06:40.636
<v Speaker 1>sitting there. It's like something's going on. Something, It's like

0:06:40.676 --> 0:06:44.236
<v Speaker 1>there's something and it's those it's the edges, it's what's

0:06:44.316 --> 0:06:48.476
<v Speaker 1>interesting around the edges, and now you're experimenting on the

0:06:48.476 --> 0:06:50.676
<v Speaker 1>other side. And I love it. I love it, and

0:06:50.756 --> 0:06:53.636
<v Speaker 1>it feels maybe when I was saying the honesty of

0:06:53.676 --> 0:06:58.276
<v Speaker 1>it is, this feels more like what I imagine you

0:06:58.276 --> 0:07:01.756
<v Speaker 1>would put on and actually listen to in real life.

0:07:02.356 --> 0:07:04.756
<v Speaker 1>Well a lot of the time, that's true. I mean,

0:07:04.836 --> 0:07:06.636
<v Speaker 1>you know, you got to remember when we were kids,

0:07:07.036 --> 0:07:10.676
<v Speaker 1>putting on a record was an occasion, you know, because

0:07:11.876 --> 0:07:15.156
<v Speaker 1>there weren't that many records around, or interesting records, and

0:07:15.276 --> 0:07:17.836
<v Speaker 1>those that had them, you know, we would get to

0:07:17.876 --> 0:07:19.596
<v Speaker 1>know them so we could go over to their place

0:07:19.596 --> 0:07:23.956
<v Speaker 1>and listen. So putting on an album, you wouldn't have

0:07:24.076 --> 0:07:28.796
<v Speaker 1>music much of the time. You'd only have it when

0:07:28.796 --> 0:07:30.796
<v Speaker 1>you decided you were going to go and have a

0:07:30.836 --> 0:07:34.916
<v Speaker 1>record listening session or on radio, I guess. But today,

0:07:35.316 --> 0:07:39.076
<v Speaker 1>of course, speak up access to music at all times,

0:07:39.356 --> 0:07:44.516
<v Speaker 1>so music becomes the soundtrack to every part of your day.

0:07:44.676 --> 0:07:47.036
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is you know, there's a need

0:07:47.076 --> 0:07:49.636
<v Speaker 1>at times to have this kind of music that is

0:07:49.716 --> 0:07:53.436
<v Speaker 1>just with you, but in a softer, more intimate way.

0:07:53.796 --> 0:07:56.636
<v Speaker 1>When you were growing up, was their music playing in

0:07:56.676 --> 0:08:00.876
<v Speaker 1>your household or not so much? There was we had

0:08:00.876 --> 0:08:05.076
<v Speaker 1>a record player. My dad's record collection was mostly kind

0:08:05.116 --> 0:08:09.516
<v Speaker 1>of the classic crooners of the fifties, Franks and and

0:08:10.156 --> 0:08:13.756
<v Speaker 1>there was her Valpert, those sorts of records, a couple

0:08:13.756 --> 0:08:17.076
<v Speaker 1>of jazz records. But he was just that little bit

0:08:17.116 --> 0:08:19.516
<v Speaker 1>too old to really get rock and roll, so he

0:08:19.556 --> 0:08:23.396
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any not even a Beatles record. So when

0:08:23.476 --> 0:08:26.156
<v Speaker 1>my brother and I were, you know, young, like eight

0:08:26.276 --> 0:08:30.116
<v Speaker 1>nine years old, I remember we got a gift of

0:08:30.596 --> 0:08:34.796
<v Speaker 1>a five pound note for Christmas from one of our grandparents,

0:08:35.716 --> 0:08:38.436
<v Speaker 1>so we said, let's buy an album together, so we

0:08:38.556 --> 0:08:41.716
<v Speaker 1>bought Sergeant Peppers. We decided that was going to be

0:08:41.716 --> 0:08:44.836
<v Speaker 1>our joint purchase, and that was kind of the first

0:08:45.556 --> 0:08:50.436
<v Speaker 1>rock and roll album in our household. And then subsequently,

0:08:50.476 --> 0:08:54.276
<v Speaker 1>obviously as we got a little older and got more

0:08:54.796 --> 0:08:58.636
<v Speaker 1>gifts from our grandparents, those that record collection grew slowly.

0:08:58.996 --> 0:09:01.996
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, think about that, it was that rare.

0:09:02.596 --> 0:09:06.316
<v Speaker 1>You know, you find your friends who had these records

0:09:06.356 --> 0:09:10.596
<v Speaker 1>like led Zeppelin record or Dylan record or a Jimmy

0:09:10.676 --> 0:09:14.196
<v Speaker 1>Hendricks record, and you'd borrow them if you possibly could.

0:09:14.396 --> 0:09:17.156
<v Speaker 1>And now it's everywhere, and I don't know there's good

0:09:17.156 --> 0:09:21.396
<v Speaker 1>and bad to that, but I certainly enjoy having access

0:09:21.396 --> 0:09:24.236
<v Speaker 1>to everything and eric side to somebody. I love it too,

0:09:24.236 --> 0:09:26.476
<v Speaker 1>by the way, and I think your streaming numbers are

0:09:26.636 --> 0:09:31.916
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly high. Interesting. Interesting would you say, did you fall

0:09:31.956 --> 0:09:33.956
<v Speaker 1>in love with music at that time when when it

0:09:34.076 --> 0:09:37.436
<v Speaker 1>was shared with your brother and what Sergeant Pepper? Was

0:09:37.476 --> 0:09:40.836
<v Speaker 1>that sort of the beginning of your connection to music?

0:09:41.316 --> 0:09:44.236
<v Speaker 1>It was, And you know, we were our family was

0:09:44.316 --> 0:09:49.436
<v Speaker 1>from Wales, moved to Ireland, so you know, growing up,

0:09:49.756 --> 0:09:53.356
<v Speaker 1>you know, we all kind of made inroads into the

0:09:53.476 --> 0:09:56.516
<v Speaker 1>local social scene as kids, but there's always that little

0:09:56.556 --> 0:09:58.796
<v Speaker 1>sense of being an outsider. And I think music was

0:09:58.836 --> 0:10:01.636
<v Speaker 1>a great place to kind of go and and just

0:10:01.756 --> 0:10:05.476
<v Speaker 1>spend time. So yeah, it was a refuge for me definitely.

0:10:05.516 --> 0:10:08.996
<v Speaker 1>And I would listen to records, particular records that I loved.

0:10:09.116 --> 0:10:13.436
<v Speaker 1>I'd listen hundreds of times because they were rare and

0:10:13.556 --> 0:10:17.036
<v Speaker 1>I got to know every single nuance of those records.

0:10:17.796 --> 0:10:21.076
<v Speaker 1>And this was before you started playing, Is this correct? Yeah?

0:10:21.196 --> 0:10:23.676
<v Speaker 1>The first instrument I ever tried to play would have

0:10:23.676 --> 0:10:26.156
<v Speaker 1>been piano one It is probably about ten. Didn't go

0:10:26.676 --> 0:10:30.076
<v Speaker 1>so great because I had a very good ear, but

0:10:30.516 --> 0:10:33.916
<v Speaker 1>a kind of music dyslexia, so there's no chance I

0:10:33.956 --> 0:10:37.476
<v Speaker 1>was ever going to be able to read music nearly

0:10:37.476 --> 0:10:41.676
<v Speaker 1>as easily as hear it and copy. So my ear

0:10:41.876 --> 0:10:45.636
<v Speaker 1>kind of has been someways my greatest asset, but definitely

0:10:45.636 --> 0:10:51.596
<v Speaker 1>early on stopped me from understanding notation or really finding

0:10:51.636 --> 0:10:54.996
<v Speaker 1>my way into that because I just didn't get us.

0:10:56.116 --> 0:11:00.316
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like it. I understood then, probably around thirteen,

0:11:01.076 --> 0:11:04.156
<v Speaker 1>my brother was given a cheap, little acoustic guitar and

0:11:04.196 --> 0:11:08.036
<v Speaker 1>the two of us learned basic chords just open chords

0:11:08.036 --> 0:11:10.956
<v Speaker 1>is just so we could sing and play. And that

0:11:11.076 --> 0:11:13.916
<v Speaker 1>was the beginning of when I got really interested in

0:11:14.236 --> 0:11:17.636
<v Speaker 1>learning an instrument. And then would you play along with records?

0:11:17.636 --> 0:11:21.956
<v Speaker 1>At that time? I would, and not just records. I

0:11:21.956 --> 0:11:23.676
<v Speaker 1>mean it got to the point where I would play

0:11:23.716 --> 0:11:28.516
<v Speaker 1>along to the TV show that whatever we were. This

0:11:28.556 --> 0:11:30.636
<v Speaker 1>is a small family house, so we're all, you know,

0:11:30.716 --> 0:11:35.196
<v Speaker 1>in the TV room, and I can't stop myself picking

0:11:35.236 --> 0:11:37.396
<v Speaker 1>up the guitar and I'm just playing along, and I

0:11:37.436 --> 0:11:42.596
<v Speaker 1>remember getting pillows thrown at me to shut up. I

0:11:42.676 --> 0:11:47.116
<v Speaker 1>was just doing everyone's head in with this incessant guitar line.

0:11:47.516 --> 0:11:53.076
<v Speaker 1>But again, it's the ADHD whatever. Once I got into

0:11:53.116 --> 0:11:55.116
<v Speaker 1>the guitar, I really sort of did a deep dive

0:11:55.156 --> 0:11:58.436
<v Speaker 1>and Luckily early on there was there's a couple of

0:11:58.716 --> 0:12:02.556
<v Speaker 1>guitar players that I fell in love with, Rory Gallaher

0:12:02.836 --> 0:12:07.076
<v Speaker 1>very early on, being Irish, being you know, a great

0:12:07.156 --> 0:12:10.396
<v Speaker 1>guitar player, so I would play along to his records.

0:12:11.276 --> 0:12:13.756
<v Speaker 1>And then that was when I was probably about fifteen.

0:12:13.796 --> 0:12:18.876
<v Speaker 1>And then suddenly punk rock happens, and suddenly it's like

0:12:18.916 --> 0:12:23.156
<v Speaker 1>the Clash, the Jam, all these amazing groups in the

0:12:23.276 --> 0:12:28.516
<v Speaker 1>UK and Patti Smith and then television. So suddenly, as

0:12:28.556 --> 0:12:32.556
<v Speaker 1>a young guitar player, I'm getting all this sort of

0:12:32.596 --> 0:12:38.236
<v Speaker 1>incoming exposure to radically different kinds of guitar approaches, and

0:12:38.276 --> 0:12:41.316
<v Speaker 1>I was like, whoa. And that was a big inspiration,

0:12:41.356 --> 0:12:43.356
<v Speaker 1>not just what they were doing, but the sense that

0:12:43.396 --> 0:12:46.356
<v Speaker 1>they could do something different. You know, I sensed it

0:12:46.436 --> 0:12:49.916
<v Speaker 1>was not the same set of ideas as the sort

0:12:49.916 --> 0:12:54.636
<v Speaker 1>of white rock, which you know I found early on.

0:12:54.996 --> 0:12:58.676
<v Speaker 1>I liked Lizzie, but certain point it just seemed like

0:12:59.396 --> 0:13:02.316
<v Speaker 1>it didn't have much imagination. But this work, you know,

0:13:02.396 --> 0:13:06.116
<v Speaker 1>Patti Smith and television particularly, they were like, wow, that

0:13:06.276 --> 0:13:10.396
<v Speaker 1>is that's different, That's coming from other place. It opened

0:13:10.396 --> 0:13:12.876
<v Speaker 1>the door to possibilities, whether whether you were going to

0:13:12.956 --> 0:13:17.396
<v Speaker 1>go down the same path as them or not. It

0:13:17.596 --> 0:13:20.716
<v Speaker 1>showed there's another way, and there could be many other

0:13:20.756 --> 0:13:23.396
<v Speaker 1>ways as it turns out. Yeah, I mean I was.

0:13:23.716 --> 0:13:26.636
<v Speaker 1>I was so fortunate so that you know, people like

0:13:26.756 --> 0:13:30.916
<v Speaker 1>John Miguel from Magazine and Susan the Banshees, and there

0:13:30.996 --> 0:13:35.676
<v Speaker 1>was some great guitar players, just so many at that

0:13:35.796 --> 0:13:41.356
<v Speaker 1>moment that we're doing new things, and I was just

0:13:41.436 --> 0:13:45.036
<v Speaker 1>lapping it all up at all times. About how old

0:13:45.036 --> 0:13:50.076
<v Speaker 1>were you at that time? Well, this was seventy seven,

0:13:50.316 --> 0:13:53.596
<v Speaker 1>so I would have been seventy seven. I would have

0:13:53.596 --> 0:13:59.316
<v Speaker 1>been sixteen. Yeah, punk rock happened kind of just as

0:13:59.316 --> 0:14:02.276
<v Speaker 1>I was turning fifteen. Do you remember what the very

0:14:02.276 --> 0:14:06.476
<v Speaker 1>first punk record you heard was. I think the first

0:14:06.516 --> 0:14:09.676
<v Speaker 1>punk song I heard was probably the Jazz on Top

0:14:09.716 --> 0:14:12.356
<v Speaker 1>of the Pumps. The Jam on Top of the Pops

0:14:12.436 --> 0:14:15.756
<v Speaker 1>was a moment because the sheer energy of it, you know,

0:14:15.836 --> 0:14:18.516
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that these guys were probably only about

0:14:18.556 --> 0:14:20.636
<v Speaker 1>three or four years older than us. It really felt

0:14:20.716 --> 0:14:25.916
<v Speaker 1>suddenly not only was it possible to write your own songs,

0:14:26.076 --> 0:14:29.636
<v Speaker 1>but actually get some notice. So that was a big

0:14:29.836 --> 0:14:31.836
<v Speaker 1>encouragement to us at that time because it was music

0:14:31.876 --> 0:14:34.316
<v Speaker 1>we could play. We love the Ramones for the same reason.

0:14:34.556 --> 0:14:38.556
<v Speaker 1>They were probably the first cover of something that was

0:14:39.196 --> 0:14:42.596
<v Speaker 1>from the punk kind of tradition, and we did a

0:14:42.596 --> 0:14:45.676
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Ramones songs. That was probably all we could

0:14:45.676 --> 0:14:49.276
<v Speaker 1>play at that point. I love the Ramones. That my

0:14:49.356 --> 0:14:51.556
<v Speaker 1>first experience of punk rock was the Ramans and it

0:14:51.876 --> 0:14:58.076
<v Speaker 1>changed my life. Yeah, they were real outliers. If you

0:14:58.196 --> 0:15:02.076
<v Speaker 1>think of how you connected to music, then how do

0:15:02.116 --> 0:15:07.076
<v Speaker 1>you say your relationship to music has changed since childhood? Well,

0:15:07.116 --> 0:15:10.076
<v Speaker 1>I think when you're a kid, you tend to sort

0:15:10.116 --> 0:15:13.876
<v Speaker 1>of have your real favorites and you you're not maybe

0:15:13.916 --> 0:15:18.076
<v Speaker 1>as curious about things outside of that genre of that form.

0:15:18.156 --> 0:15:21.596
<v Speaker 1>So we went through a whole phase where we absolutely

0:15:21.636 --> 0:15:25.116
<v Speaker 1>had no interest in the blues, no interest in really

0:15:25.116 --> 0:15:28.916
<v Speaker 1>an African American music, because that to us had been

0:15:29.356 --> 0:15:33.196
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of form, had been so strongly associated

0:15:33.196 --> 0:15:37.156
<v Speaker 1>with the music before punk rock. So we we would

0:15:37.196 --> 0:15:42.956
<v Speaker 1>have real prejudices against us copying any of those ideas

0:15:42.996 --> 0:15:46.916
<v Speaker 1>of forms. So certain guitar styles we just wouldn't we

0:15:46.916 --> 0:15:51.396
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't allow them in our music. Bending of notes, you know,

0:15:51.556 --> 0:15:53.676
<v Speaker 1>something as simple as that, we just weren't into it.

0:15:54.476 --> 0:15:59.636
<v Speaker 1>The third, which is in musical terms, the note that

0:15:59.716 --> 0:16:02.276
<v Speaker 1>gives you a major chord or a minor chord. We

0:16:02.276 --> 0:16:05.036
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't play thirds. We just wanted our music to be

0:16:05.356 --> 0:16:08.716
<v Speaker 1>very open and hard to pin down, so I would

0:16:08.716 --> 0:16:11.196
<v Speaker 1>plays that were just made of the root and the fifth,

0:16:11.756 --> 0:16:16.116
<v Speaker 1>which means it has no sex. It's it's in terms

0:16:16.116 --> 0:16:19.636
<v Speaker 1>of the chord gender. If you want. Today, I'm much

0:16:19.676 --> 0:16:23.756
<v Speaker 1>more open, And I suppose where I'm at these days

0:16:24.036 --> 0:16:29.076
<v Speaker 1>is songs. You know, they seem to be an eternal thing.

0:16:29.076 --> 0:16:32.196
<v Speaker 1>If you hit on a song that is outside of

0:16:32.956 --> 0:16:36.436
<v Speaker 1>time in the sense of the moment in culture, you know,

0:16:36.476 --> 0:16:39.436
<v Speaker 1>if it's timeless, that's the highest goal. I think. So

0:16:40.116 --> 0:16:44.396
<v Speaker 1>therefore everybody from coal Porter and a bird backreck stuff.

0:16:44.396 --> 0:16:48.196
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have abba, you know, the bee jeans, I wouldn't.

0:16:48.196 --> 0:16:49.876
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have listened to any of that stuff when

0:16:49.876 --> 0:16:52.836
<v Speaker 1>I was sixteen. But now I feel like there's a

0:16:52.836 --> 0:16:56.316
<v Speaker 1>lot there for me to learn. It's beautiful. Having a

0:16:56.356 --> 0:17:00.796
<v Speaker 1>parochial view of style early on can be really helpful

0:17:00.876 --> 0:17:05.036
<v Speaker 1>in terms of defining your sound, so it can work

0:17:05.076 --> 0:17:09.396
<v Speaker 1>to your advantage to see, I'm only going to play this,

0:17:09.596 --> 0:17:12.876
<v Speaker 1>I'm only going to do this. This is our sound,

0:17:13.036 --> 0:17:15.436
<v Speaker 1>and you define your sound and then when you break

0:17:15.556 --> 0:17:21.356
<v Speaker 1>free of that. It allows incredible growth and change over time.

0:17:22.356 --> 0:17:25.596
<v Speaker 1>You're not starting with the palette of everything. You're starting

0:17:25.596 --> 0:17:28.076
<v Speaker 1>with a limited palette. But it was based on your taste.

0:17:28.156 --> 0:17:30.956
<v Speaker 1>It It was honest, you know, these are the things

0:17:30.956 --> 0:17:33.956
<v Speaker 1>I like. We're going to work within this framework, and

0:17:33.996 --> 0:17:37.796
<v Speaker 1>it's beautiful. And then finding ways now to say, okay,

0:17:37.836 --> 0:17:40.356
<v Speaker 1>now I like the things that I rejected, Then how

0:17:40.396 --> 0:17:44.876
<v Speaker 1>can these elements be integrated and still be true to

0:17:44.996 --> 0:17:48.516
<v Speaker 1>what it is that we do exactly? And limitations can

0:17:48.796 --> 0:17:55.236
<v Speaker 1>end up being really crucial defining characteristics. Sickly working with Brianino.

0:17:55.876 --> 0:18:00.556
<v Speaker 1>You know, Brian would have been a person who understood technology,

0:18:01.316 --> 0:18:05.116
<v Speaker 1>possibly more than he understood music, as in terms of

0:18:05.196 --> 0:18:09.756
<v Speaker 1>music theory. And we were working with Ryan and we

0:18:09.756 --> 0:18:12.276
<v Speaker 1>were at one point we were saying, you know, we're

0:18:12.316 --> 0:18:15.796
<v Speaker 1>not like virtuosos, you know, and he was going, well,

0:18:15.836 --> 0:18:18.516
<v Speaker 1>that's cool, you know, that's not important to think about

0:18:18.516 --> 0:18:21.556
<v Speaker 1>the velvet underground. I mean, these guys were they had

0:18:21.876 --> 0:18:26.796
<v Speaker 1>incredible intelligence and creativity. But you know, mo Tucker was,

0:18:27.316 --> 0:18:29.796
<v Speaker 1>you know, a drummer who played the songs, but she

0:18:29.596 --> 0:18:32.836
<v Speaker 1>was not one of the great drummers. And Lou was

0:18:32.876 --> 0:18:37.356
<v Speaker 1>a really decent guitar play. He's not Jimmy Hendrickson. We realized,

0:18:37.436 --> 0:18:41.676
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, you know, those limitations can turn into strengths,

0:18:41.796 --> 0:18:45.476
<v Speaker 1>and that was a big insight in some ways. That's

0:18:45.516 --> 0:18:48.236
<v Speaker 1>what the punk rock revolution was about. Was and the

0:18:48.316 --> 0:18:51.516
<v Speaker 1>hip hop revolution as well, was it was taking the

0:18:51.636 --> 0:18:54.876
<v Speaker 1>music out of the conservatory and back to the streets,

0:18:54.876 --> 0:18:57.996
<v Speaker 1>and it was for everybody. Everyone who had a conception

0:18:58.276 --> 0:19:03.556
<v Speaker 1>or something to say could participate. Yeah, it democratized in

0:19:03.596 --> 0:19:06.556
<v Speaker 1>a way. That's amazing, because that was the problem with

0:19:06.676 --> 0:19:08.756
<v Speaker 1>music prior to punk was that it seemed so at

0:19:08.836 --> 0:19:12.556
<v Speaker 1>least it seemed like, you know, if you weren't a

0:19:12.676 --> 0:19:16.436
<v Speaker 1>virtuoso musician, then you didn't didn't get a chance to

0:19:16.476 --> 0:19:19.796
<v Speaker 1>get into playing live and making records. And also there

0:19:19.876 --> 0:19:23.356
<v Speaker 1>was that sense of the tablets of Stone descending from

0:19:23.396 --> 0:19:26.796
<v Speaker 1>on High to us mere immortals, and you know, that

0:19:27.156 --> 0:19:31.396
<v Speaker 1>got very boring and extremely pretentious around that time. And

0:19:31.476 --> 0:19:34.556
<v Speaker 1>so we were into even then, we were into the

0:19:34.596 --> 0:19:38.556
<v Speaker 1>bands that could put it together on a single three

0:19:38.596 --> 0:19:42.156
<v Speaker 1>and a half minute, forty five vinyl record. So the

0:19:42.236 --> 0:19:46.156
<v Speaker 1>Ramones could do that, the Kinks could do that, Iggy Pop,

0:19:46.196 --> 0:19:50.836
<v Speaker 1>and the Stones obviously, the Beatles and they were our

0:19:50.916 --> 0:19:54.676
<v Speaker 1>heroes for that reason. We just loved those rock and

0:19:54.796 --> 0:19:58.396
<v Speaker 1>roll forty fives. Did you watch The Top of the

0:19:58.436 --> 0:20:02.876
<v Speaker 1>Pops every week? Yeah, pretty much religiously. And then there

0:20:02.916 --> 0:20:04.876
<v Speaker 1>was one other show called The Old Grow Whistle Test

0:20:04.956 --> 0:20:08.476
<v Speaker 1>and that was the same. We would watch it every week.

0:20:09.116 --> 0:20:12.956
<v Speaker 1>So told the Pops had pistols. On one occasion they

0:20:13.036 --> 0:20:15.996
<v Speaker 1>played pretty vacant and that was mind blowing. But the

0:20:16.036 --> 0:20:19.436
<v Speaker 1>Ogo whistle Test had all the touring acts, so the

0:20:19.556 --> 0:20:23.956
<v Speaker 1>Cramps were playing, you know, all that, so that was

0:20:24.556 --> 0:20:26.636
<v Speaker 1>a great one to catch and they would do in

0:20:26.676 --> 0:20:28.876
<v Speaker 1>that case, they do like two or three songs. They

0:20:28.876 --> 0:20:32.196
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't just do one. Great The Cramps was the first

0:20:32.316 --> 0:20:33.916
<v Speaker 1>punk rock show I got to see when I was

0:20:33.956 --> 0:20:37.556
<v Speaker 1>probably it was probably fifteen or sixteen, and it was

0:20:38.196 --> 0:20:43.356
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing. It changed my life forever. Amazing band. What

0:20:43.436 --> 0:20:45.036
<v Speaker 1>would have been the music that was playing on the

0:20:45.116 --> 0:20:48.916
<v Speaker 1>radio back when you're a kid, Well, I mean a

0:20:48.916 --> 0:20:51.236
<v Speaker 1>lot of it was was the pop music of the day,

0:20:51.236 --> 0:20:53.796
<v Speaker 1>and some of it was was actually really good, but

0:20:53.876 --> 0:20:55.916
<v Speaker 1>some of it was terrible. So when I was a

0:20:55.956 --> 0:20:58.796
<v Speaker 1>really young kid, there was a sort of glam explosion,

0:20:58.916 --> 0:21:03.116
<v Speaker 1>so it was everything from Bowie to Mark Bowland, Gary Glitter,

0:21:03.756 --> 0:21:08.036
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Stardust, all these artists from the UK who was

0:21:08.076 --> 0:21:12.116
<v Speaker 1>sort of right think the wave of this new Glam movement,

0:21:12.196 --> 0:21:16.596
<v Speaker 1>which I suppose was interesting because it brought androgyny into

0:21:16.756 --> 0:21:19.396
<v Speaker 1>rock and roll, you know, like I suppose Mick had

0:21:19.436 --> 0:21:22.756
<v Speaker 1>played around a bit with it, Mick Jagger, but Bowie

0:21:22.836 --> 0:21:25.116
<v Speaker 1>and Mark Bowland really kind of took it to the

0:21:25.156 --> 0:21:28.156
<v Speaker 1>next level. And you know, it was eyeliner, but it

0:21:28.236 --> 0:21:30.436
<v Speaker 1>was the music actually was a lot of it was

0:21:30.436 --> 0:21:34.276
<v Speaker 1>really good. And then Abbot, I guess would have been

0:21:34.476 --> 0:21:38.236
<v Speaker 1>huge at that time, but in terms of guitar music,

0:21:39.276 --> 0:21:41.196
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it didn't reach me, you know, and

0:21:41.236 --> 0:21:44.996
<v Speaker 1>I was such a Beatles fan. I really didn't like

0:21:45.596 --> 0:21:48.996
<v Speaker 1>the sort of progressive rock of that time. I quite

0:21:49.036 --> 0:21:51.076
<v Speaker 1>liked a band called Yes because I think that had

0:21:51.076 --> 0:21:53.676
<v Speaker 1>some good, good ideas, but a lot of it just

0:21:53.716 --> 0:21:57.116
<v Speaker 1>left me completely cold. So I was drawn to Alice

0:21:57.196 --> 0:22:03.036
<v Speaker 1>Cooper and Slade and these guitar bands that had tunes,

0:22:03.276 --> 0:22:06.076
<v Speaker 1>you know, that had some good songs. That was the

0:22:06.116 --> 0:22:09.756
<v Speaker 1>thing that was attracted me. Was you two your first band,

0:22:09.916 --> 0:22:13.276
<v Speaker 1>the first band you were in, Yeah, I mean we

0:22:13.276 --> 0:22:17.036
<v Speaker 1>were very early days. We called us Feedback and that

0:22:17.076 --> 0:22:19.116
<v Speaker 1>was when we were doing covers, and you know, we

0:22:19.116 --> 0:22:21.836
<v Speaker 1>were kids. And then when the punk thing happened, we

0:22:21.996 --> 0:22:23.836
<v Speaker 1>called ourselves the Hype for a while, and we were

0:22:23.876 --> 0:22:26.556
<v Speaker 1>starting to write our own songs, but still mostly doing covers.

0:22:26.996 --> 0:22:31.436
<v Speaker 1>And then you Two, when we really started to get

0:22:31.436 --> 0:22:34.636
<v Speaker 1>serious about our own songwriting, we called usselves you two

0:22:34.716 --> 0:22:37.156
<v Speaker 1>and that. Yeah, so, and how old were the members

0:22:37.156 --> 0:22:39.356
<v Speaker 1>of the band when you all met? We were all

0:22:39.396 --> 0:22:42.836
<v Speaker 1>in high school together, and so I would have been fifteen,

0:22:43.076 --> 0:22:47.196
<v Speaker 1>Larry would have been fifteen, Adam sixteen. And really when

0:22:47.356 --> 0:22:50.516
<v Speaker 1>when we got together, it was it was more about

0:22:50.676 --> 0:22:52.636
<v Speaker 1>just something fun to do on a Saturday, you know.

0:22:52.676 --> 0:22:57.636
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't knowing any idea of taking more seriously than that.

0:22:58.356 --> 0:23:03.476
<v Speaker 1>And we were kids, so the transcision from the hobby

0:23:03.876 --> 0:23:08.076
<v Speaker 1>to thinking, wow, we have something was a slow one,

0:23:08.156 --> 0:23:14.436
<v Speaker 1>but fun enough. The spark, that thing that you recognize

0:23:14.636 --> 0:23:18.356
<v Speaker 1>when you play with somebody else, that spark was there

0:23:18.436 --> 0:23:21.156
<v Speaker 1>quite early on, even as we were playing other people's material.

0:23:21.196 --> 0:23:25.116
<v Speaker 1>There was a chemistry there that we all recognized. And

0:23:25.276 --> 0:23:28.716
<v Speaker 1>the only band I think I've ever been in where

0:23:29.356 --> 0:23:32.316
<v Speaker 1>except for one, I got a gig with a country

0:23:32.316 --> 0:23:38.596
<v Speaker 1>band at age sixteen for one night and it was

0:23:38.756 --> 0:23:42.236
<v Speaker 1>a band called the Drifting Cowboys and we're basically doing

0:23:42.716 --> 0:23:47.076
<v Speaker 1>country songs and I got paid and that was that's

0:23:47.076 --> 0:23:51.516
<v Speaker 1>the first time I actually ever got paid to play guitar. Amazing.

0:23:53.156 --> 0:23:55.476
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back after a quick break with more from

0:23:55.556 --> 0:24:03.396
<v Speaker 1>Rick Rubin and The Edge. We're back with The Edge.

0:24:04.076 --> 0:24:08.556
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever feel connection to any traditional Irish music

0:24:08.716 --> 0:24:10.996
<v Speaker 1>just because such a big part of the Irish culture,

0:24:11.476 --> 0:24:14.916
<v Speaker 1>the folk songs and the traditional tunes. Was that in

0:24:14.956 --> 0:24:19.236
<v Speaker 1>your life at all? You know, I knew that it

0:24:19.316 --> 0:24:22.596
<v Speaker 1>was there, but you know, at that stage, I really

0:24:22.636 --> 0:24:26.076
<v Speaker 1>didn't find it interesting. I didn't find it engaging. I mean,

0:24:26.116 --> 0:24:30.076
<v Speaker 1>I suppose for us as kids in Dublin was in

0:24:30.116 --> 0:24:34.276
<v Speaker 1>those days and the sort of late seventies was quite

0:24:34.276 --> 0:24:39.476
<v Speaker 1>a gray place. There wasn't a huge amount going on.

0:24:39.676 --> 0:24:42.836
<v Speaker 1>So music was an escape, you know, it was it

0:24:42.916 --> 0:24:46.716
<v Speaker 1>was like a window to something else going on in

0:24:46.756 --> 0:24:49.356
<v Speaker 1>another part of the world. So the last thing we

0:24:49.396 --> 0:24:52.676
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do was listen to her, you know, traditional

0:24:52.676 --> 0:24:56.076
<v Speaker 1>Irish music, to be reminded of what we were very

0:24:56.116 --> 0:24:59.756
<v Speaker 1>well aware of every day, which was Ireland at that time.

0:25:00.156 --> 0:25:03.076
<v Speaker 1>Now I look back and it's it's beautiful music. There's

0:25:03.116 --> 0:25:07.316
<v Speaker 1>actually a huge revival of folk and traditional music happening

0:25:07.396 --> 0:25:13.596
<v Speaker 1>right now in Ireland, and some great new groups langcom Ye, Vagabonds,

0:25:14.756 --> 0:25:19.676
<v Speaker 1>Lisa O'Neil. These are really regarded new folk and traditional artists,

0:25:20.036 --> 0:25:23.436
<v Speaker 1>but back then not really understood. Please feel free to

0:25:23.476 --> 0:25:25.356
<v Speaker 1>share any of the new ones that you like, just

0:25:25.396 --> 0:25:27.596
<v Speaker 1>because I like all kinds of music and I don't

0:25:27.596 --> 0:25:31.476
<v Speaker 1>know about this movement, so that's exciting. How did you

0:25:31.716 --> 0:25:35.516
<v Speaker 1>first connect with Eno, Well, we made our first few

0:25:35.556 --> 0:25:38.476
<v Speaker 1>records with Steve Lillywhite, and he had this idea in

0:25:38.516 --> 0:25:41.156
<v Speaker 1>his head that he would only do one album per artist.

0:25:41.236 --> 0:25:44.636
<v Speaker 1>That was this thought, but in our case, he broke

0:25:44.676 --> 0:25:46.516
<v Speaker 1>his rule and he actually did the first three you

0:25:46.676 --> 0:25:49.356
<v Speaker 1>tube records. But then we're coming up to recond number

0:25:49.396 --> 0:25:52.116
<v Speaker 1>four and even we are at this point going, let's

0:25:52.196 --> 0:25:55.756
<v Speaker 1>think of working with somebody new and fresh, just to

0:25:56.596 --> 0:26:00.276
<v Speaker 1>keep it interesting. So we were swapping ideas and names,

0:26:00.276 --> 0:26:02.756
<v Speaker 1>and I particularly loved Before and After Science, which is

0:26:02.916 --> 0:26:07.156
<v Speaker 1>Brian's solo album, and we all liked Talking Heads, and

0:26:07.236 --> 0:26:10.556
<v Speaker 1>we loved the work he's done with Bowie, so he

0:26:10.636 --> 0:26:12.436
<v Speaker 1>kind of bubbled up to the top of our list

0:26:12.516 --> 0:26:14.956
<v Speaker 1>of like, well, this guy, we'd love to work with

0:26:14.956 --> 0:26:17.956
<v Speaker 1>Brian if we could persuade him. So we kind of

0:26:17.956 --> 0:26:20.876
<v Speaker 1>mounted a little bit of a campaign and through management

0:26:20.876 --> 0:26:22.316
<v Speaker 1>we got in touch with him and we had a

0:26:22.396 --> 0:26:25.676
<v Speaker 1>meeting with him in London. Actually it was Dublin. He

0:26:25.716 --> 0:26:29.076
<v Speaker 1>came to Dublin and he said he came pretty much

0:26:29.516 --> 0:26:32.436
<v Speaker 1>with the idea that he was going to turn down

0:26:32.476 --> 0:26:37.116
<v Speaker 1>the offer. But in the course of our conversations, I

0:26:37.156 --> 0:26:39.036
<v Speaker 1>think we realized how much we had in common in

0:26:39.116 --> 0:26:41.916
<v Speaker 1>terms of the music we liked, but also our ambitions

0:26:41.996 --> 0:26:47.356
<v Speaker 1>for sonics and experimenting with sound. So he found himself

0:26:47.476 --> 0:26:49.156
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the trip going, I think I

0:26:49.196 --> 0:26:53.356
<v Speaker 1>want to work with these guys, and so he's slightly

0:26:53.356 --> 0:26:55.996
<v Speaker 1>hedging his bets. He'd decided he would bring his friend

0:26:56.076 --> 0:26:59.556
<v Speaker 1>from Canada, fellow called Danny Lanois, who at that point

0:26:59.556 --> 0:27:03.036
<v Speaker 1>had been on dozens of records as a kind of

0:27:03.756 --> 0:27:09.596
<v Speaker 1>producer but local to Canada. And we had some songs

0:27:09.916 --> 0:27:13.836
<v Speaker 1>pretty much in good shape, maybe without lyrics. But I

0:27:13.876 --> 0:27:16.716
<v Speaker 1>remember a few days before, a week before Brian was

0:27:16.756 --> 0:27:18.996
<v Speaker 1>to arrive to start work, we had this sort of

0:27:19.756 --> 0:27:23.716
<v Speaker 1>crisis of confidence in material. So Steve Lilly might happen

0:27:23.756 --> 0:27:26.876
<v Speaker 1>to be in town, so we grabbed Steve and I said, look,

0:27:27.556 --> 0:27:30.956
<v Speaker 1>should we cancel the sessions. We're not sure we have anything.

0:27:31.276 --> 0:27:34.596
<v Speaker 1>He said, well, blame me what you got. So we

0:27:34.796 --> 0:27:37.436
<v Speaker 1>played him a version of Pride in the Name of

0:27:37.436 --> 0:27:43.756
<v Speaker 1>Love and a sort of homecoming and Unforgettable Fire and

0:27:43.796 --> 0:27:46.156
<v Speaker 1>he said, m I think you guys are going to

0:27:46.236 --> 0:27:48.036
<v Speaker 1>be fine. I don't think you need to worry about

0:27:48.076 --> 0:27:51.476
<v Speaker 1>the songs. You got some good things here. So we

0:27:51.516 --> 0:27:54.196
<v Speaker 1>started working with Brian and Danny and we decided for

0:27:54.316 --> 0:27:57.596
<v Speaker 1>that album, rather than being in a recording studio with

0:27:58.156 --> 0:28:02.676
<v Speaker 1>the sort of limited acoustic properties, we rented Slain Castle,

0:28:02.996 --> 0:28:08.876
<v Speaker 1>which is this sort of medieval castle north of Dublin City,

0:28:09.196 --> 0:28:13.316
<v Speaker 1>and what it had was these enormous rooms with the

0:28:13.356 --> 0:28:18.716
<v Speaker 1>possibility of recording, you know, in these spaces that would

0:28:18.836 --> 0:28:21.556
<v Speaker 1>add so much to the color and flavor of the music.

0:28:21.636 --> 0:28:26.036
<v Speaker 1>So we decamped to Slay Castle and had like, I

0:28:26.076 --> 0:28:29.156
<v Speaker 1>think it was six weeks, that's all we had. But

0:28:29.316 --> 0:28:32.596
<v Speaker 1>we had so much fun with Brian and Danny because

0:28:32.596 --> 0:28:36.716
<v Speaker 1>they both, I mean, as well as being incredible musicians,

0:28:37.076 --> 0:28:41.076
<v Speaker 1>they both shared so much of our kind of curiosity

0:28:41.156 --> 0:28:44.076
<v Speaker 1>about sound and it was just a pleasure to work

0:28:44.076 --> 0:28:46.476
<v Speaker 1>with them and I've obviously worked at them many times since.

0:28:47.196 --> 0:28:51.876
<v Speaker 1>That's fantastic. It's so nice when those those magic moments happen,

0:28:51.956 --> 0:28:54.316
<v Speaker 1>that you find a great collaborator and it just works

0:28:54.316 --> 0:28:55.756
<v Speaker 1>and you get to do it for a long period

0:28:55.796 --> 0:28:59.036
<v Speaker 1>of time. It's golden. Yeah. Yeah, And I mean I

0:28:59.076 --> 0:29:02.116
<v Speaker 1>would credit Brian and Danny with with, you know, really

0:29:02.116 --> 0:29:04.716
<v Speaker 1>bringing our music up at the level. You know, We'd

0:29:04.716 --> 0:29:08.316
<v Speaker 1>already had a bit of success on the War album,

0:29:08.396 --> 0:29:10.996
<v Speaker 1>so we were doing pretty well, but in terms of

0:29:11.036 --> 0:29:15.556
<v Speaker 1>the dimensionality and the kind of experimental qualities, they really

0:29:15.636 --> 0:29:18.996
<v Speaker 1>upped our game. This is a personal question. You could

0:29:19.036 --> 0:29:21.396
<v Speaker 1>answer it anyway you like, but tell me what you

0:29:21.436 --> 0:29:23.836
<v Speaker 1>think each band member. You can include yourself in this.

0:29:24.476 --> 0:29:29.116
<v Speaker 1>Each band member's biggest strengths and biggest weaknesses are and

0:29:29.156 --> 0:29:31.116
<v Speaker 1>this is only from your point of view. This is

0:29:31.116 --> 0:29:34.276
<v Speaker 1>not a broad view of how the world sees it,

0:29:34.396 --> 0:29:39.956
<v Speaker 1>just from your seat, right. Well, start with Adam Adams

0:29:39.996 --> 0:29:43.916
<v Speaker 1>probably are least conventional musician in the band, and that

0:29:44.516 --> 0:29:48.156
<v Speaker 1>his grasp of even the basic idea rules of music

0:29:48.276 --> 0:29:53.516
<v Speaker 1>is very tenuous. So Adam brings a kind of unorthodox

0:29:53.676 --> 0:29:57.756
<v Speaker 1>quality to our work, which is hugely important. So he

0:29:57.836 --> 0:30:01.956
<v Speaker 1>would often do something that no one else would ever

0:30:02.036 --> 0:30:05.396
<v Speaker 1>have thought of, and to him it's just as valid

0:30:05.396 --> 0:30:09.516
<v Speaker 1>as the things that most people would consider to be obvious.

0:30:09.516 --> 0:30:13.516
<v Speaker 1>To him, there's no difference. So that's a huge strength

0:30:13.796 --> 0:30:16.796
<v Speaker 1>to our band, and over the years there's a great

0:30:16.796 --> 0:30:19.476
<v Speaker 1>example of that with Bullet the Blue Sky. So that's

0:30:19.516 --> 0:30:22.636
<v Speaker 1>a that's a tune. We're in the studio demoing a

0:30:22.676 --> 0:30:24.676
<v Speaker 1>bunch of songs and I've been listening to this band

0:30:24.716 --> 0:30:27.796
<v Speaker 1>called The Fall, and I've been one of their songs

0:30:27.876 --> 0:30:31.796
<v Speaker 1>is this really jagged, cool sort of guitar part. So

0:30:31.876 --> 0:30:35.676
<v Speaker 1>I'm in I'm in the rehearsal space and I'm starting

0:30:35.716 --> 0:30:38.916
<v Speaker 1>to figure out this guitar part and I've got something

0:30:39.356 --> 0:30:42.756
<v Speaker 1>different but sort of in the same vein, and I'm

0:30:42.756 --> 0:30:45.876
<v Speaker 1>just playing this part and I see Adam and Larry

0:30:45.916 --> 0:30:47.796
<v Speaker 1>coming in because they've heard this, and I think this

0:30:47.876 --> 0:30:50.636
<v Speaker 1>is cool. So they join in, and I suddenly realized

0:30:50.676 --> 0:30:54.116
<v Speaker 1>they're playing it at in halftime, meaning I mean, here

0:30:54.196 --> 0:31:03.756
<v Speaker 1>is dadda and they so and I'm like looking at them,

0:31:03.756 --> 0:31:06.796
<v Speaker 1>going they just don't get it, you know, this is

0:31:07.356 --> 0:31:11.036
<v Speaker 1>what are they doing? So Adam comes up this incredible

0:31:11.036 --> 0:31:13.836
<v Speaker 1>bass part, but I'm I go back into the control

0:31:14.276 --> 0:31:16.836
<v Speaker 1>and Bona's in there, and I'm like, well that was

0:31:16.876 --> 0:31:20.556
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a mess, and Bonna's going, no, listen,

0:31:21.196 --> 0:31:24.036
<v Speaker 1>this is so cool. And I listened back, and sure enough,

0:31:24.796 --> 0:31:28.596
<v Speaker 1>the way they were hearing it, David a completely different twist,

0:31:29.236 --> 0:31:32.116
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we kept the bass part, we kept

0:31:32.116 --> 0:31:35.236
<v Speaker 1>the drum part, I changed some of the guitar and stuff.

0:31:35.236 --> 0:31:39.636
<v Speaker 1>But that was just an example where you really you

0:31:39.796 --> 0:31:44.716
<v Speaker 1>get great positives from differences of sensibility and how you

0:31:44.756 --> 0:31:47.396
<v Speaker 1>hear things. So that's Adam. I just have one quick

0:31:47.436 --> 0:31:51.756
<v Speaker 1>question about that, which is, from that moment, did it

0:31:51.876 --> 0:31:56.316
<v Speaker 1>then open your mind to possibilities in general? Like did

0:31:56.356 --> 0:32:01.876
<v Speaker 1>you become a different musician after that experience. Yes, I

0:32:01.916 --> 0:32:07.876
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that's all part of recognizing limitations as strengths,

0:32:08.276 --> 0:32:12.636
<v Speaker 1>and I think that whole album The Joshua Tree had

0:32:12.716 --> 0:32:16.156
<v Speaker 1>many examples of that. One of my favorite stories on

0:32:16.196 --> 0:32:19.196
<v Speaker 1>that front is another Adam's story. We were doing where

0:32:19.196 --> 0:32:22.556
<v Speaker 1>the Streets of No Name, and we played this take

0:32:23.236 --> 0:32:26.356
<v Speaker 1>and it had a great energy, really cool vibe. But

0:32:26.996 --> 0:32:30.036
<v Speaker 1>if you were to listen to the individual instruments, they

0:32:30.036 --> 0:32:34.116
<v Speaker 1>weren't particularly in time, you know, they'd be fairly substantial

0:32:34.476 --> 0:32:39.116
<v Speaker 1>sort of swings and periods where you know, there was

0:32:39.156 --> 0:32:42.996
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tension rather than everything being in the pocket,

0:32:42.996 --> 0:32:45.596
<v Speaker 1>you know, things were kind of struggling to stay in

0:32:45.636 --> 0:32:50.196
<v Speaker 1>the pocket. And I remember Adam actually got quite overwhelmed

0:32:50.236 --> 0:32:53.396
<v Speaker 1>at one point by the fact that we couldn't get

0:32:53.436 --> 0:32:56.956
<v Speaker 1>the perfect take. So we were working with this particular

0:32:57.036 --> 0:33:00.076
<v Speaker 1>version where the Streets of No Name, and eventually really

0:33:00.276 --> 0:33:03.276
<v Speaker 1>got something we were very happy with. But Steve Lillywhite

0:33:03.316 --> 0:33:05.156
<v Speaker 1>came in towards the end of the project to help

0:33:05.236 --> 0:33:08.156
<v Speaker 1>us mix the album to get these songs over the line,

0:33:08.636 --> 0:33:11.076
<v Speaker 1>and Dad and he sat him down. He said, look, Steve,

0:33:12.476 --> 0:33:16.556
<v Speaker 1>if you are mixing Streets, you should know that there's

0:33:16.636 --> 0:33:18.996
<v Speaker 1>one base part here, which was an overdub that we've

0:33:19.356 --> 0:33:22.876
<v Speaker 1>We've spent hours getting it perfectly in time. And then

0:33:22.916 --> 0:33:26.636
<v Speaker 1>there's the one that Adam played live, and every rough

0:33:26.756 --> 0:33:31.756
<v Speaker 1>mix that we've done with the overdub, we've all decided

0:33:31.796 --> 0:33:34.916
<v Speaker 1>it sounds terrible. The one with that tension in it

0:33:35.076 --> 0:33:37.956
<v Speaker 1>where it's out of time is the one to use.

0:33:38.116 --> 0:33:41.476
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Steve starts his mix and he puts up

0:33:42.156 --> 0:33:44.756
<v Speaker 1>the floor base as we call it. Now He's going,

0:33:45.316 --> 0:33:47.956
<v Speaker 1>this is wildly out of time, I'm not using that,

0:33:48.276 --> 0:33:50.116
<v Speaker 1>so we put up the other one. It's like sitting

0:33:50.516 --> 0:33:53.276
<v Speaker 1>as it should in the pocket with the drums, and

0:33:53.756 --> 0:33:57.196
<v Speaker 1>he does his rough mix and he's getting close to

0:33:57.276 --> 0:33:59.996
<v Speaker 1>finished and he calls us all in and we come in.

0:34:00.036 --> 0:34:03.476
<v Speaker 1>Apparently I don't remember this, but he Steve does. We

0:34:03.516 --> 0:34:06.916
<v Speaker 1>all came in and we're going, oh, sounds terrible. What

0:34:06.996 --> 0:34:09.636
<v Speaker 1>have he done. It's like, this is an awful mix.

0:34:09.716 --> 0:34:13.796
<v Speaker 1>It's terrible, Steve, whatever you're doing, it's just not working.

0:34:13.916 --> 0:34:17.596
<v Speaker 1>So it's like taken aback. So he says, well, he

0:34:17.756 --> 0:34:21.076
<v Speaker 1>remembers this conversation with Danny. He swaps out the basses.

0:34:21.116 --> 0:34:25.036
<v Speaker 1>Well does this help? And we all went there. It is.

0:34:25.636 --> 0:34:30.516
<v Speaker 1>That's the mix mate. That sounds great, and that's what's

0:34:30.516 --> 0:34:34.756
<v Speaker 1>on the albums, so incredible. Again, the idea of what's

0:34:35.116 --> 0:34:39.636
<v Speaker 1>right and correct is often not right and correct. So

0:34:39.676 --> 0:34:42.516
<v Speaker 1>with Larry, I'd say Larry's great strength again as a

0:34:42.636 --> 0:34:46.236
<v Speaker 1>musician is Larry plays to the to the vocal. Larry

0:34:46.236 --> 0:34:48.636
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play to the guitar, he doesn't play to the bass.

0:34:49.316 --> 0:34:52.636
<v Speaker 1>Larry plays drums to the to the singer. Which is

0:34:52.676 --> 0:34:56.036
<v Speaker 1>why he's such a great drummer because all his nuances

0:34:56.276 --> 0:35:00.996
<v Speaker 1>and his inflections and the groove he's picking up from

0:35:00.996 --> 0:35:05.036
<v Speaker 1>the vocal. So when it's funny, when you listen to

0:35:05.076 --> 0:35:09.116
<v Speaker 1>the monitor mixes of the band, you get this inside.

0:35:09.436 --> 0:35:13.636
<v Speaker 1>So my monitor mix is basically a full blend of

0:35:13.676 --> 0:35:18.116
<v Speaker 1>everyone's instruments with the guitar and my voice slightly elevates it.

0:35:18.236 --> 0:35:21.436
<v Speaker 1>Follows is kind of the same, but with his voice

0:35:21.516 --> 0:35:26.196
<v Speaker 1>elevates it. Adam has mostly kicked drum and a little

0:35:26.196 --> 0:35:28.196
<v Speaker 1>bit of a voice and a little bit of guitar,

0:35:28.596 --> 0:35:32.476
<v Speaker 1>but really it's base and basin kickdrum, and then Larry

0:35:32.956 --> 0:35:37.636
<v Speaker 1>is drums and the voice and a mighty bit of guitar.

0:35:39.436 --> 0:35:43.116
<v Speaker 1>So that quality I think for a musician, that drummer,

0:35:43.196 --> 0:35:46.156
<v Speaker 1>he's just there with the voice the whole time. I

0:35:46.156 --> 0:35:51.396
<v Speaker 1>think that's why he's so good, beautiful. And then myself,

0:35:51.516 --> 0:35:54.876
<v Speaker 1>I'm my strength, I suppose would be my ear, my

0:35:54.996 --> 0:35:59.676
<v Speaker 1>musical ear. So to me music I feel it very viscerally.

0:35:59.916 --> 0:36:03.356
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's not intellectual to me, it's just it's

0:36:03.396 --> 0:36:06.636
<v Speaker 1>like in my gut is where I receive music. So

0:36:07.516 --> 0:36:12.316
<v Speaker 1>writing and for four is very instinctive rather than technical.

0:36:12.756 --> 0:36:14.916
<v Speaker 1>So that's the strength. The weakness I suppose would be

0:36:15.356 --> 0:36:20.836
<v Speaker 1>the exact thing, not technical. So sometimes you know, not

0:36:20.956 --> 0:36:24.676
<v Speaker 1>knowing as much theory as as I ought to leaves

0:36:24.756 --> 0:36:28.716
<v Speaker 1>you slightly a hostage to inspiration. You know, you're not

0:36:28.876 --> 0:36:32.116
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have the way to get out of a problem

0:36:32.676 --> 0:36:38.076
<v Speaker 1>using just plain old theory. With Barow, he's also incredibly

0:36:38.116 --> 0:36:44.636
<v Speaker 1>instinctive and will will find amazing melodic ideas. And again

0:36:44.676 --> 0:36:46.436
<v Speaker 1>I think it's to do with growing up as we

0:36:46.476 --> 0:36:50.116
<v Speaker 1>did on stage. This sort of innate understanding of what

0:36:50.716 --> 0:36:53.636
<v Speaker 1>a great melody is and what is going to reach

0:36:53.676 --> 0:36:57.716
<v Speaker 1>an audience means that you know, when he hits on something,

0:36:58.156 --> 0:37:00.996
<v Speaker 1>it's going to ring like a bell. It's like you

0:37:00.996 --> 0:37:05.516
<v Speaker 1>know that melodic idea is going to travel. It's got potency.

0:37:06.156 --> 0:37:09.356
<v Speaker 1>So that's his great talent, I think. I think the

0:37:09.356 --> 0:37:13.276
<v Speaker 1>other strength we have as a band is this sense

0:37:13.356 --> 0:37:18.596
<v Speaker 1>of trust and us all having a common goal that

0:37:18.796 --> 0:37:21.756
<v Speaker 1>binds us together. So we're all looking out for each

0:37:21.756 --> 0:37:24.876
<v Speaker 1>other's backs at all times, you know, So when when

0:37:24.956 --> 0:37:27.636
<v Speaker 1>Larry sits behind the drum kit to figure out a part,

0:37:28.236 --> 0:37:31.716
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of there to add commons, help whatever, And

0:37:31.756 --> 0:37:34.356
<v Speaker 1>the same with me Bo or Adam. It's like there's

0:37:35.036 --> 0:37:38.716
<v Speaker 1>there's three guys have your back when you're coming up

0:37:38.716 --> 0:37:42.076
<v Speaker 1>with your ideas, which I think is a huge strength.

0:37:42.756 --> 0:37:47.436
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that music isn't intellectual to you, it's more instinctual,

0:37:48.076 --> 0:37:52.836
<v Speaker 1>and that plays well with the idea of the right

0:37:52.876 --> 0:37:57.676
<v Speaker 1>way would be the intellectual way. The instinctual way is

0:37:57.716 --> 0:37:59.556
<v Speaker 1>the one that just sounds good to you, you know,

0:37:59.596 --> 0:38:01.876
<v Speaker 1>the one that that feels good, doesn't have to follow

0:38:01.916 --> 0:38:04.076
<v Speaker 1>any rules. If it feels good to you, that's the

0:38:04.196 --> 0:38:09.076
<v Speaker 1>ultimate taste. Is I feel it, So it's good, doesn't

0:38:09.156 --> 0:38:10.996
<v Speaker 1>matter what the math of it is, and we don't

0:38:10.996 --> 0:38:13.556
<v Speaker 1>need to know the math of it. Yeah, And I

0:38:13.556 --> 0:38:16.236
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask if you feel like that there's a

0:38:16.276 --> 0:38:21.356
<v Speaker 1>spiritual dimension to that. Yes, I mean whether you however

0:38:21.396 --> 0:38:24.996
<v Speaker 1>you describe spiritual, and there's so many different versions of that.

0:38:25.076 --> 0:38:28.156
<v Speaker 1>I do really believe that. I've been reading a great

0:38:28.156 --> 0:38:33.196
<v Speaker 1>book recently called Notes on Complexity. It's it's actually a

0:38:33.276 --> 0:38:38.436
<v Speaker 1>science book that explains the limitations of science. And what

0:38:38.556 --> 0:38:44.756
<v Speaker 1>it introduces is the idea that our insights as creators,

0:38:44.796 --> 0:38:51.036
<v Speaker 1>as inventors, as scientists often are outside of any kind

0:38:51.036 --> 0:38:55.916
<v Speaker 1>of explanation, any logic. They are the kind of leaps

0:38:56.036 --> 0:38:59.636
<v Speaker 1>of insights. And I think of songwriting that way, it's

0:38:59.676 --> 0:39:03.516
<v Speaker 1>like you get this vision in your mind's ear, you

0:39:03.636 --> 0:39:08.316
<v Speaker 1>hear like a complete song sometimes or when we're playing together,

0:39:08.756 --> 0:39:11.956
<v Speaker 1>you know, you just find you're reaching for notes, so

0:39:11.956 --> 0:39:15.516
<v Speaker 1>you don't necessarily know what the note is or why

0:39:15.556 --> 0:39:20.476
<v Speaker 1>you're going there, but it emotionally makes sense. So to me,

0:39:20.516 --> 0:39:24.036
<v Speaker 1>there's a sort of this consciousness in the small sea sense,

0:39:24.596 --> 0:39:28.396
<v Speaker 1>which is the individual consciousness, but there's also a kind

0:39:28.436 --> 0:39:34.556
<v Speaker 1>of collective consciousness, big sea consciousness, which we can access,

0:39:35.236 --> 0:39:38.636
<v Speaker 1>and it's when you access that that you're really kind

0:39:38.636 --> 0:39:42.116
<v Speaker 1>of you're not just being inspired. I think there's a

0:39:42.196 --> 0:39:46.236
<v Speaker 1>kind of a higher level again, where you can kind

0:39:46.276 --> 0:39:49.916
<v Speaker 1>of access things that you couldn't you couldn't normally do,

0:39:50.036 --> 0:39:52.556
<v Speaker 1>and you couldn't possibly explain how you got there, but

0:39:52.956 --> 0:39:56.836
<v Speaker 1>suddenly you've arrived. Some are very unique, and I think

0:39:56.836 --> 0:39:59.476
<v Speaker 1>that's true for some of the great breakthroughs in science

0:39:59.476 --> 0:40:03.396
<v Speaker 1>as well, like Einstein and his theory of relativity. He

0:40:03.436 --> 0:40:06.316
<v Speaker 1>didn't sit down with a slide rule and go, well,

0:40:06.556 --> 0:40:09.396
<v Speaker 1>that must mean such and such. He saw it does

0:40:09.436 --> 0:40:13.476
<v Speaker 1>a vision and then figured out the mathematics to make

0:40:13.556 --> 0:40:17.196
<v Speaker 1>sense of it afterwards. So I feel I think that's

0:40:17.316 --> 0:40:20.516
<v Speaker 1>the spiritual dimension and of course, I mean I do

0:40:20.596 --> 0:40:25.036
<v Speaker 1>have a faith, so I'm not saying that that's not

0:40:25.436 --> 0:40:29.156
<v Speaker 1>true for me, you know, the more specific faith in

0:40:29.276 --> 0:40:32.476
<v Speaker 1>existence of God. But I suppose I can see it

0:40:33.156 --> 0:40:36.156
<v Speaker 1>being true if you have no belief in God, if

0:40:36.196 --> 0:40:41.156
<v Speaker 1>you just see it as being open to to these

0:40:41.316 --> 0:40:47.036
<v Speaker 1>other levels of consciousness. Yes, and whatever creative energy brings

0:40:47.076 --> 0:40:49.756
<v Speaker 1>forth everything in on the planet. You know, there's some

0:40:50.236 --> 0:40:53.476
<v Speaker 1>there's something productive going on, because the trees are growing,

0:40:53.516 --> 0:40:57.556
<v Speaker 1>there's something happening, there's some energy. Well, I mean my

0:40:57.796 --> 0:41:00.236
<v Speaker 1>definition of God is the creative force of the energy,

0:41:00.316 --> 0:41:03.316
<v Speaker 1>you know, and of the universe, the creative energy of

0:41:03.316 --> 0:41:06.196
<v Speaker 1>the universe, because I mean, if you start looking at

0:41:06.236 --> 0:41:09.876
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang and all the theories about this universe existing,

0:41:09.996 --> 0:41:15.276
<v Speaker 1>you realize it's a miraculous thing. There's no explanation for it.

0:41:15.316 --> 0:41:17.956
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it shouldn't exist. And the only way that

0:41:18.716 --> 0:41:23.556
<v Speaker 1>the cosmologists of today can sort of rationalize the mathematics

0:41:23.596 --> 0:41:28.316
<v Speaker 1>of the improbability of it is through the multiverse that

0:41:28.436 --> 0:41:31.756
<v Speaker 1>there are in fact an infinite number of universes. And

0:41:31.836 --> 0:41:36.916
<v Speaker 1>somebody was explaining how improbable it is that our planet

0:41:36.956 --> 0:41:40.276
<v Speaker 1>exists with life and sentient life. Instead, it'd be like

0:41:40.916 --> 0:41:44.836
<v Speaker 1>flying a plane at like ten thousand feet throwing random

0:41:44.916 --> 0:41:49.596
<v Speaker 1>letters out the window, and that a Shakespeare play is

0:41:49.636 --> 0:41:55.196
<v Speaker 1>formed on the ground. It's like beyond much too much.

0:41:55.676 --> 0:41:58.916
<v Speaker 1>So I'm I'm much more with the program of some

0:41:59.036 --> 0:42:03.076
<v Speaker 1>creative and energy whatever, whatever that is, whatever that is.

0:42:03.756 --> 0:42:07.316
<v Speaker 1>I just heard a story about Einstein's theory of relativity,

0:42:07.636 --> 0:42:10.876
<v Speaker 1>which was from the time that he presented it to

0:42:10.916 --> 0:42:15.156
<v Speaker 1>the people of the powers that be in the science community,

0:42:15.796 --> 0:42:19.596
<v Speaker 1>he was basically called a quack for twenty one years.

0:42:19.676 --> 0:42:25.076
<v Speaker 1>Took twenty one years until they finally recognized the theory

0:42:25.076 --> 0:42:27.356
<v Speaker 1>of relative For twenty one years, he was crazy and

0:42:27.396 --> 0:42:31.636
<v Speaker 1>it was impossible by the powers that be. Yeah, that

0:42:31.636 --> 0:42:35.476
<v Speaker 1>doesn't surprise me. It's such a radical idea, and yeah,

0:42:35.476 --> 0:42:38.556
<v Speaker 1>it turned everything on its head, but it turns out

0:42:38.596 --> 0:42:42.396
<v Speaker 1>to be absolutely on the money. Yeah, and then there's

0:42:42.396 --> 0:42:44.716
<v Speaker 1>a whole other this is interesting, you might like, there's

0:42:44.716 --> 0:42:50.556
<v Speaker 1>a whole group of other researchers called the Thunderbolt maybe

0:42:50.556 --> 0:42:55.036
<v Speaker 1>it's called the Thunderbolt Project who actually believe that Einstein

0:42:55.156 --> 0:42:58.796
<v Speaker 1>was wrong and that everything that has been built on

0:42:59.436 --> 0:43:03.916
<v Speaker 1>Einstein's philosophy, everything we think in physics is not true.

0:43:04.076 --> 0:43:07.596
<v Speaker 1>Based on that everything since then has been wrong, which

0:43:07.596 --> 0:43:10.476
<v Speaker 1>is again interesting. Again. I don't I don't have a

0:43:11.396 --> 0:43:13.596
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a horse in the race. But I

0:43:13.676 --> 0:43:16.236
<v Speaker 1>love that there are people thinking about it. It's like

0:43:16.916 --> 0:43:19.476
<v Speaker 1>maybe the thing that we thought was impossible as possible,

0:43:19.796 --> 0:43:21.636
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the thing that we're sure of is not the

0:43:21.716 --> 0:43:24.636
<v Speaker 1>way it is. It seems like a healthy outlook to

0:43:26.236 --> 0:43:31.516
<v Speaker 1>continue this creative unfolding. Well, I mean, every every scientific

0:43:31.556 --> 0:43:36.116
<v Speaker 1>idea is called a theory, yeah, because at any time

0:43:36.196 --> 0:43:39.636
<v Speaker 1>they could end up being proved to be incomplete or

0:43:39.756 --> 0:43:43.716
<v Speaker 1>inaccurate in some way. Newtonian physics was it for so

0:43:43.756 --> 0:43:48.796
<v Speaker 1>many centuries, and when relativity was first brought to the

0:43:48.836 --> 0:43:52.996
<v Speaker 1>public attention, it turned Newton's ideas on its head. So

0:43:53.476 --> 0:43:57.716
<v Speaker 1>it quite likely could happen again to Einstein's ideas. But

0:43:57.756 --> 0:44:01.476
<v Speaker 1>I think the scientific method is what's important that we

0:44:01.796 --> 0:44:04.836
<v Speaker 1>use for something as as important as science, that we

0:44:04.996 --> 0:44:09.356
<v Speaker 1>use that method. And I think you can't mix science

0:44:09.116 --> 0:44:15.676
<v Speaker 1>and faith. You can use inspiration from metaphysics if you

0:44:15.716 --> 0:44:19.236
<v Speaker 1>want to arrive at a new theory, but the actual

0:44:19.636 --> 0:44:22.356
<v Speaker 1>the proving out of that theory has to be methodical

0:44:22.436 --> 0:44:26.236
<v Speaker 1>and scientific, absolutely, and I think most scientists would probably

0:44:26.236 --> 0:44:29.356
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. I think so many scientists are are

0:44:29.476 --> 0:44:33.916
<v Speaker 1>spiritual beings and that's how they find their way into

0:44:33.956 --> 0:44:38.036
<v Speaker 1>the new ideas. It's not not at all uncommon. Yeah.

0:44:38.276 --> 0:44:41.756
<v Speaker 1>One of one of my friends is a particle physicist

0:44:41.836 --> 0:44:46.556
<v Speaker 1>and I guess cosmologist Brian Coxesnim. He works at certain

0:44:47.036 --> 0:44:51.956
<v Speaker 1>particle accelerator and he's also a great communicator on science.

0:44:51.956 --> 0:44:54.556
<v Speaker 1>So he does a lot of TV shows and actually

0:44:54.596 --> 0:44:58.956
<v Speaker 1>does live concerts, which is quite interesting to go and

0:44:58.996 --> 0:45:02.996
<v Speaker 1>see somebody lecturing about black hole theory to you know,

0:45:03.396 --> 0:45:08.596
<v Speaker 1>two thousand people. It's really I would recommend going to

0:45:08.596 --> 0:45:11.996
<v Speaker 1>one of the show. He is not an atheist, he's

0:45:11.996 --> 0:45:15.796
<v Speaker 1>an agnostic. But one of his friends is a bishop,

0:45:16.196 --> 0:45:22.676
<v Speaker 1>and they've sat on many occasions going over the differences

0:45:22.716 --> 0:45:27.196
<v Speaker 1>between the sort of belief systems. One is purely scientific

0:45:27.236 --> 0:45:31.876
<v Speaker 1>and one is theological, and they've decided this very little difference.

0:45:32.076 --> 0:45:36.516
<v Speaker 1>The only real difference is that the bishop believes that

0:45:37.476 --> 0:45:42.716
<v Speaker 1>the existence of God is eternal, omnipotent, and therefore truth

0:45:43.116 --> 0:45:48.916
<v Speaker 1>and you know, insight and understanding is both universal and omnipotent.

0:45:49.396 --> 0:45:52.956
<v Speaker 1>And what Brier would say is no, I think that

0:45:53.076 --> 0:45:57.596
<v Speaker 1>sort of insight and understanding is about human beings. Here

0:45:57.636 --> 0:46:01.356
<v Speaker 1>and now on planet Earth. So it didn't exist before us,

0:46:01.476 --> 0:46:04.876
<v Speaker 1>it won't exist after us unless some other life form

0:46:04.916 --> 0:46:09.196
<v Speaker 1>has developed this level of intexual development. But that's the

0:46:09.196 --> 0:46:12.356
<v Speaker 1>only difference. And I think that if you just approach

0:46:12.516 --> 0:46:16.836
<v Speaker 1>spirituality as like they're all truth seeking, that's what it is. Yes,

0:46:16.956 --> 0:46:19.676
<v Speaker 1>and we're all have a slightly different version of but

0:46:20.556 --> 0:46:23.356
<v Speaker 1>it's the same set of questions that we're all trying

0:46:23.396 --> 0:46:26.036
<v Speaker 1>to answer. Yeah, and they seem to get us to

0:46:26.076 --> 0:46:28.716
<v Speaker 1>the same place. Same true with all of the faiths,

0:46:28.836 --> 0:46:32.236
<v Speaker 1>or so many of the faiths seem to be many

0:46:32.316 --> 0:46:35.716
<v Speaker 1>streams leading to the same river, you know, the eternal

0:46:35.756 --> 0:46:39.316
<v Speaker 1>truths seem to be in all of them. Yeah, And

0:46:39.876 --> 0:46:44.036
<v Speaker 1>it's a different approach with science, it's it's much more methodical.

0:46:44.436 --> 0:46:48.396
<v Speaker 1>But I think it was Carl Sagan who said that

0:46:48.476 --> 0:46:52.916
<v Speaker 1>he put forward the idea that humanity is the means

0:46:52.916 --> 0:47:00.116
<v Speaker 1>by which the universe understands itself. Without humanity, it's there. Yes,

0:47:00.716 --> 0:47:03.676
<v Speaker 1>there is no understanding of it, or appreciation of it

0:47:03.756 --> 0:47:06.556
<v Speaker 1>or celebration of it. Yes. Well, there's a great gift

0:47:07.196 --> 0:47:11.236
<v Speaker 1>that we have and a certain responsibility. We're going to

0:47:11.276 --> 0:47:13.196
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break and then we'll be back with

0:47:13.236 --> 0:47:20.716
<v Speaker 1>the Rest of Rix Conversation with the Edge. We're back

0:47:20.716 --> 0:47:24.196
<v Speaker 1>with the Rest of Rix Conversation with the Edge. How

0:47:24.236 --> 0:47:26.676
<v Speaker 1>do you think your band has managed to stay together

0:47:27.236 --> 0:47:30.036
<v Speaker 1>all of these years when it seems like practically none

0:47:30.036 --> 0:47:33.556
<v Speaker 1>of your contemporaries have been able to do that. You know,

0:47:33.596 --> 0:47:36.556
<v Speaker 1>we do it because we love it, and we do

0:47:36.596 --> 0:47:40.476
<v Speaker 1>it because we love working with each other. And you know,

0:47:40.556 --> 0:47:43.236
<v Speaker 1>there's been times where we haven't loved the idea of

0:47:43.236 --> 0:47:45.636
<v Speaker 1>working with each other and being together, and you know,

0:47:45.676 --> 0:47:47.836
<v Speaker 1>so we have to give each other time, you know,

0:47:48.116 --> 0:47:52.556
<v Speaker 1>time off, time to be away. But bottom line, I

0:47:52.556 --> 0:47:55.596
<v Speaker 1>think it's because we all know instinctively that we shine

0:47:56.356 --> 0:47:59.516
<v Speaker 1>individually the brightest when we're in this collective. So the

0:47:59.596 --> 0:48:02.756
<v Speaker 1>collective works for us beautiful, and it works for all

0:48:02.796 --> 0:48:05.156
<v Speaker 1>of us because we're not really in competition if you

0:48:05.236 --> 0:48:07.396
<v Speaker 1>think about it, you know, it's like think about say

0:48:07.436 --> 0:48:12.036
<v Speaker 1>the Beatles. You know, you've got three lead singers and

0:48:12.236 --> 0:48:16.596
<v Speaker 1>three great songwriters who are trying to get their song

0:48:16.676 --> 0:48:19.356
<v Speaker 1>on the album. You know, the case of George, he

0:48:19.476 --> 0:48:22.556
<v Speaker 1>had a harder time than Paul and John, but they're

0:48:22.556 --> 0:48:25.556
<v Speaker 1>amazing talents, all of them. And you could make the

0:48:25.676 --> 0:48:29.836
<v Speaker 1>argument probably for any one of their songs, Well maybe

0:48:29.876 --> 0:48:31.516
<v Speaker 1>one of the other guys should have sung the lead

0:48:31.516 --> 0:48:33.836
<v Speaker 1>on this. So in our band, it's not like that

0:48:33.916 --> 0:48:36.716
<v Speaker 1>we each have our own area of expertise, you know.

0:48:36.796 --> 0:48:40.836
<v Speaker 1>With me, it's sort of compositional responsibilities. That's what I do.

0:48:40.876 --> 0:48:46.956
<v Speaker 1>I'm the lead composer. Bono's melodically responsible and lyrically responsible.

0:48:46.996 --> 0:48:50.556
<v Speaker 1>Adam and Larry are there as part of making our

0:48:50.676 --> 0:48:55.956
<v Speaker 1>music unique and different. And Larry's a better drummer because

0:48:55.996 --> 0:48:58.956
<v Speaker 1>he's playing with me and Adam. And I'm a better

0:48:58.956 --> 0:49:02.916
<v Speaker 1>guitar player because I'm playing with Larry and Adam and Adams.

0:49:03.036 --> 0:49:05.556
<v Speaker 1>You know, the bass player is because Larry and me

0:49:05.716 --> 0:49:10.316
<v Speaker 1>and Bono. So I think in that way it's a reliance,

0:49:10.396 --> 0:49:13.196
<v Speaker 1>but it's a trust as well that works. There's a

0:49:13.396 --> 0:49:18.316
<v Speaker 1>great another book, please, Robert Axelrod. I think it's called

0:49:18.356 --> 0:49:22.716
<v Speaker 1>Evolution of Cooperation, and it's a great analysis of how

0:49:22.756 --> 0:49:26.996
<v Speaker 1>cooperation works in nature and how it's not exclusive to humans,

0:49:27.436 --> 0:49:30.316
<v Speaker 1>and that the basis of it is that if you're

0:49:30.316 --> 0:49:34.116
<v Speaker 1>in a cooperative relationship, that means you're better off than

0:49:34.196 --> 0:49:37.836
<v Speaker 1>being on your own. Yes, the minute it stops being that.

0:49:37.996 --> 0:49:41.956
<v Speaker 1>In other words, for anyone's being exploited, then it's going

0:49:41.996 --> 0:49:44.316
<v Speaker 1>to fall apart, but it just so happens. Over the years,

0:49:44.956 --> 0:49:49.756
<v Speaker 1>we understand one thing, which is human nature. Everybody is

0:49:49.796 --> 0:49:53.116
<v Speaker 1>going to always overestimate their own importance and value in

0:49:53.156 --> 0:49:57.956
<v Speaker 1>a given relationship, as they also underestimate everyone else's. And

0:49:58.116 --> 0:50:01.596
<v Speaker 1>if you can keep that in your mind, yes, you know,

0:50:01.796 --> 0:50:04.716
<v Speaker 1>it sort of tempers your ego and you just go, oh, well,

0:50:05.156 --> 0:50:07.436
<v Speaker 1>that was something I did that was great, but it

0:50:07.436 --> 0:50:10.596
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for these guys. Absolutely,

0:50:11.316 --> 0:50:15.956
<v Speaker 1>let's talk more about composition. Is there a particular way

0:50:16.076 --> 0:50:18.916
<v Speaker 1>that it happens for you or does it happen in

0:50:18.956 --> 0:50:23.716
<v Speaker 1>different ways. I think that the most important tool to

0:50:24.316 --> 0:50:28.356
<v Speaker 1>good composition is recognition that you've got something really good.

0:50:28.476 --> 0:50:32.796
<v Speaker 1>And the enemy of getting to something really good is

0:50:32.836 --> 0:50:38.356
<v Speaker 1>not something bad, but something that's just good, yes, and

0:50:38.516 --> 0:50:43.596
<v Speaker 1>something that's kind of almost it. Yes, I can really

0:50:44.236 --> 0:50:46.396
<v Speaker 1>fool you and waste a lot of your time and

0:50:46.436 --> 0:50:49.916
<v Speaker 1>a lot of anguish. And so I think there's been

0:50:49.956 --> 0:50:53.436
<v Speaker 1>times where we're as a band are more attuned and

0:50:53.996 --> 0:50:58.076
<v Speaker 1>less attuned, and so records can take longer if you're

0:50:58.116 --> 0:51:01.676
<v Speaker 1>not as a tune, not because you're not writing good stuff,

0:51:01.676 --> 0:51:05.116
<v Speaker 1>but the stuff you're you believe is it. You know,

0:51:05.196 --> 0:51:07.436
<v Speaker 1>it turns out not to be as good as you think,

0:51:07.716 --> 0:51:11.836
<v Speaker 1>So that's I would say that the most important quality

0:51:12.276 --> 0:51:16.436
<v Speaker 1>is almost what you reject, and knowing to keep rejecting

0:51:16.636 --> 0:51:20.916
<v Speaker 1>until you start to get to something really great. It's confounding,

0:51:20.996 --> 0:51:23.716
<v Speaker 1>you know. It's because you can be waiting around. You know,

0:51:23.796 --> 0:51:25.956
<v Speaker 1>you might have something that you know there's an element

0:51:25.996 --> 0:51:30.276
<v Speaker 1>there that's really special, but getting to the finished song

0:51:30.476 --> 0:51:33.436
<v Speaker 1>can take a long time. Do you always write with

0:51:33.476 --> 0:51:35.716
<v Speaker 1>a project in mind or do you just write on

0:51:35.756 --> 0:51:39.596
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis. I just write. I just write on

0:51:39.676 --> 0:51:43.556
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis. And you know, early early days, I'd

0:51:43.636 --> 0:51:46.356
<v Speaker 1>work with four track set machines and I'd like have

0:51:46.516 --> 0:51:50.196
<v Speaker 1>drum machines and keyboards and bass guitars and guitars and

0:51:51.076 --> 0:51:54.356
<v Speaker 1>try and build up tracks that way. These days it's

0:51:54.396 --> 0:51:58.676
<v Speaker 1>all on the laptop. And was garage band. Now it's logic.

0:51:58.876 --> 0:52:03.636
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's basically the same, searching for a collision

0:52:03.636 --> 0:52:08.756
<v Speaker 1>of melody and chords that tells you there's something special

0:52:08.756 --> 0:52:12.516
<v Speaker 1>going on here. And often I'm hearing it, you know,

0:52:12.596 --> 0:52:15.396
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing some chords that I'm using and I'm hearing

0:52:15.396 --> 0:52:19.916
<v Speaker 1>something Bona's doing and something that's it something great here, Now,

0:52:20.196 --> 0:52:22.676
<v Speaker 1>where's this leading us? And so you're trying in a

0:52:22.716 --> 0:52:27.076
<v Speaker 1>way to take that little moment of inspiration and follow

0:52:27.116 --> 0:52:32.436
<v Speaker 1>it through to where it naturally wants to go. And

0:52:32.516 --> 0:52:36.716
<v Speaker 1>the frustrating thing is sometimes you just can't find that way,

0:52:36.796 --> 0:52:40.236
<v Speaker 1>and it can you have many full stones occasion, and

0:52:40.236 --> 0:52:44.556
<v Speaker 1>then sometimes the song is there from the beginning, almost instantaneously.

0:52:45.236 --> 0:52:47.156
<v Speaker 1>Would you say that in the early days it was

0:52:47.276 --> 0:52:49.476
<v Speaker 1>more of a being in the room with the band

0:52:49.556 --> 0:52:52.396
<v Speaker 1>playing off of each other to find it, and now

0:52:52.436 --> 0:52:55.636
<v Speaker 1>it's more finding it yourself and then bringing it to

0:52:55.676 --> 0:52:58.236
<v Speaker 1>the band just by the nature of everybody living in

0:52:58.236 --> 0:53:02.676
<v Speaker 1>different places. Yeah, that's definitely true. But I think what

0:53:03.636 --> 0:53:07.516
<v Speaker 1>happened in that earlier process of kind of being in

0:53:07.516 --> 0:53:10.116
<v Speaker 1>the rehearsal room and trying to figure something out, it

0:53:10.276 --> 0:53:15.516
<v Speaker 1>sort of gives you a much smaller palette of possibilities

0:53:16.316 --> 0:53:19.876
<v Speaker 1>because you're kind of you can only move when you're

0:53:19.916 --> 0:53:23.316
<v Speaker 1>moving as a group, and sometimes that's magical. I mean,

0:53:23.356 --> 0:53:28.836
<v Speaker 1>I remember with Adam, the two of us just improvising together,

0:53:29.276 --> 0:53:35.116
<v Speaker 1>and this whole song Into the Heart came together, which

0:53:35.196 --> 0:53:38.036
<v Speaker 1>is on our first album. It was basically the two

0:53:38.076 --> 0:53:40.756
<v Speaker 1>of us in rehearsal and just just really like in

0:53:40.836 --> 0:53:44.876
<v Speaker 1>a kind of duet and me responding to things that

0:53:44.916 --> 0:53:47.316
<v Speaker 1>Adam is doing on the bass and him doing the

0:53:47.316 --> 0:53:49.196
<v Speaker 1>same as I would play something on the guitar you

0:53:49.236 --> 0:53:53.556
<v Speaker 1>would change, and that when it works is magical. But

0:53:53.676 --> 0:53:59.076
<v Speaker 1>it's it's extremely rare, and what actually happens most is,

0:53:59.636 --> 0:54:03.476
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'll get some simple idea. You know that

0:54:03.476 --> 0:54:06.516
<v Speaker 1>that idea will not go anywhere until somebody sits down

0:54:06.516 --> 0:54:11.036
<v Speaker 1>and starts to work on a new new section. Tell

0:54:11.076 --> 0:54:13.476
<v Speaker 1>me about playing with Adam, because that's a that's a

0:54:13.556 --> 0:54:19.956
<v Speaker 1>real thing. Yeah, he's such a unique musician and for

0:54:20.156 --> 0:54:25.036
<v Speaker 1>all of the lack of theory, he has a feel

0:54:25.356 --> 0:54:30.036
<v Speaker 1>that's incredible. When he plays it always feels good. Even

0:54:30.036 --> 0:54:33.476
<v Speaker 1>if the note's wrong, that's something that can be repaired

0:54:33.556 --> 0:54:37.396
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but the feeling of it, the groove of

0:54:37.436 --> 0:54:42.756
<v Speaker 1>it is always cool. Yeah, always, yeah. I mean a

0:54:42.796 --> 0:54:45.276
<v Speaker 1>good example of being New Year'sday. So you know, we're

0:54:45.316 --> 0:54:48.236
<v Speaker 1>in rehearsal or maybe in the sound check and it

0:54:48.316 --> 0:54:51.756
<v Speaker 1>suddenly starts doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo

0:54:51.756 --> 0:54:54.316
<v Speaker 1>doo doo doo doo doom doo doo doo doo doo

0:54:54.356 --> 0:54:58.676
<v Speaker 1>doo doo. We're like, whoa, dude, that's amazing. So we

0:54:58.796 --> 0:55:01.996
<v Speaker 1>kick that around for But that's it. That's all we have,

0:55:02.196 --> 0:55:06.396
<v Speaker 1>you know, is his first part. So the next stage

0:55:06.396 --> 0:55:11.516
<v Speaker 1>of that was me sitting with the piano and going, Okay,

0:55:11.676 --> 0:55:15.756
<v Speaker 1>where's this taking us and figuring out the next part

0:55:15.836 --> 0:55:19.756
<v Speaker 1>of the music. And I didn't really have melodic ideas

0:55:19.836 --> 0:55:22.596
<v Speaker 1>per se, but I knew, I just knew instinctively has

0:55:22.676 --> 0:55:27.356
<v Speaker 1>to go here. So that's an example of that song

0:55:27.356 --> 0:55:30.676
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't exist without Adam, but it wouldn't have been a

0:55:30.716 --> 0:55:35.156
<v Speaker 1>song without the compositional work that had to happen after

0:55:35.196 --> 0:55:39.156
<v Speaker 1>the fact. So that's why it really works for us

0:55:39.196 --> 0:55:43.796
<v Speaker 1>being a group and with Adam. As I say, with

0:55:44.316 --> 0:55:48.556
<v Speaker 1>where the streets of her name, what's technically correct, it's

0:55:48.596 --> 0:55:53.316
<v Speaker 1>not really here nor there? Really, Yeah, let's talk about

0:55:53.356 --> 0:55:56.716
<v Speaker 1>walk On and tell me what you remember about the

0:55:56.756 --> 0:55:59.476
<v Speaker 1>origination of walk On and the writing of it. In

0:55:59.476 --> 0:56:01.956
<v Speaker 1>the development of that song, it's one of my very favorites.

0:56:02.716 --> 0:56:06.796
<v Speaker 1>I think what started was a set of chords in

0:56:06.876 --> 0:56:10.596
<v Speaker 1>an idea that I had worked up at home and

0:56:11.156 --> 0:56:14.596
<v Speaker 1>brought it to the sessions and everyone thought it was

0:56:14.796 --> 0:56:17.276
<v Speaker 1>really promising, so we started working on it as a band,

0:56:17.956 --> 0:56:21.716
<v Speaker 1>did a couple of versions, and then we like this

0:56:21.876 --> 0:56:25.476
<v Speaker 1>particular take, so we started working on it and Bono

0:56:25.596 --> 0:56:30.676
<v Speaker 1>was working on melodic ideas and we kicked around for

0:56:30.716 --> 0:56:33.356
<v Speaker 1>a while, but it didn't seem to come good. It

0:56:33.516 --> 0:56:38.556
<v Speaker 1>just was something was not working. So I think at

0:56:38.556 --> 0:56:42.836
<v Speaker 1>one point Brian said, where did these chords come from?

0:56:42.956 --> 0:56:45.796
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, I worked on them at home, and

0:56:46.316 --> 0:56:50.676
<v Speaker 1>he said, I think that's the problem. So I took

0:56:50.716 --> 0:56:52.756
<v Speaker 1>that and I went, now, I could I could have

0:56:52.756 --> 0:56:56.036
<v Speaker 1>been insulted, but in fact I just want I think

0:56:56.036 --> 0:56:59.796
<v Speaker 1>he's absolutely right. I think there's a flaw in this

0:56:59.956 --> 0:57:03.676
<v Speaker 1>course sequence. So I went away and worked and came

0:57:03.716 --> 0:57:06.636
<v Speaker 1>back said, okay, let's try this, and it was not

0:57:06.756 --> 0:57:11.116
<v Speaker 1>radically different, but it was actually a different chord progression,

0:57:11.596 --> 0:57:14.956
<v Speaker 1>and the song just almost wrote itself after that, and

0:57:15.436 --> 0:57:19.196
<v Speaker 1>we all got involved in sort of throwing ideas for

0:57:20.156 --> 0:57:25.196
<v Speaker 1>different sections melodically. But again, once you got the log

0:57:25.276 --> 0:57:29.236
<v Speaker 1>jam out of the way, it's just the thing really

0:57:29.276 --> 0:57:33.236
<v Speaker 1>sort of almost wrote itself. So so lyrically, walk On,

0:57:33.956 --> 0:57:38.556
<v Speaker 1>Walk On, that was a big breakthrough. That came as

0:57:38.556 --> 0:57:41.436
<v Speaker 1>a result of this change of the chords, and we

0:57:41.436 --> 0:57:44.676
<v Speaker 1>were at that time very inspired by the leader of

0:57:44.716 --> 0:57:48.396
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic movement in mymar who had been under house

0:57:48.476 --> 0:57:50.716
<v Speaker 1>arrest for a number of years, and we had just

0:57:50.756 --> 0:57:55.236
<v Speaker 1>received the freedom of Dublin City, a great honor, and

0:57:55.436 --> 0:57:59.716
<v Speaker 1>she had been honored at the same ceremony. Her son

0:57:59.756 --> 0:58:01.876
<v Speaker 1>came along to accept on her behalf because she was

0:58:01.876 --> 0:58:05.236
<v Speaker 1>in jail. So that was the first time we really

0:58:05.276 --> 0:58:09.036
<v Speaker 1>became aware of her story. So that's just a great

0:58:09.196 --> 0:58:15.036
<v Speaker 1>example of something that's almost good, that's almost being your enemy.

0:58:15.436 --> 0:58:18.476
<v Speaker 1>And we did waste we probably wasted in hours trying

0:58:18.516 --> 0:58:21.716
<v Speaker 1>to make this first version work. The other thing about

0:58:21.756 --> 0:58:23.956
<v Speaker 1>it that has so much power, and I think it's

0:58:23.996 --> 0:58:27.676
<v Speaker 1>different than other YouTube songs, is that it continues to unfold.

0:58:27.716 --> 0:58:31.036
<v Speaker 1>It's got the home section kind of late late in

0:58:31.076 --> 0:58:33.556
<v Speaker 1>the song, when it feels like the song would be ending,

0:58:34.236 --> 0:58:38.356
<v Speaker 1>we have this beautiful bridge and then there's the all

0:58:38.516 --> 0:58:40.636
<v Speaker 1>the all that you repeat, all that You is at

0:58:40.636 --> 0:58:44.516
<v Speaker 1>the end. It really takes us on a journey. Yeah

0:58:44.756 --> 0:58:47.236
<v Speaker 1>that most songs, don't, you know. Most songs are three

0:58:47.236 --> 0:58:49.116
<v Speaker 1>and a half minutes or four minutes, But this one

0:58:49.236 --> 0:58:53.756
<v Speaker 1>feels like it goes the extra two extra levels of

0:58:54.436 --> 0:58:59.396
<v Speaker 1>taking us on this adventure. Yeah, and I think those

0:58:59.436 --> 0:59:03.716
<v Speaker 1>different sections we're all attempts to solve the songwriting problem.

0:59:03.756 --> 0:59:07.436
<v Speaker 1>And then we had this collection of great moments, so

0:59:07.476 --> 0:59:10.076
<v Speaker 1>the real challenge is trying to sew it all together

0:59:10.116 --> 0:59:13.436
<v Speaker 1>in this sort of coherent way. It was arranging and

0:59:13.476 --> 0:59:16.796
<v Speaker 1>it was it was sort of a dynamic journey that

0:59:16.836 --> 0:59:19.916
<v Speaker 1>we had to establish. And then the most recent version,

0:59:19.916 --> 0:59:23.276
<v Speaker 1>which is on the Songs of Surrender collection, Bonno and

0:59:23.356 --> 0:59:25.956
<v Speaker 1>I had done a very stripped down version of the

0:59:25.996 --> 0:59:29.796
<v Speaker 1>song on an Irish TV show. We thought, well, let's

0:59:29.836 --> 0:59:34.516
<v Speaker 1>try let's try walk on at this particular show. What's

0:59:34.556 --> 0:59:36.716
<v Speaker 1>the minimum version we can do. It's like it came

0:59:36.796 --> 0:59:40.676
<v Speaker 1>up with this acoustic part which only hints at the chords,

0:59:40.956 --> 0:59:44.516
<v Speaker 1>but just enough so the melody makes sense. So then

0:59:44.556 --> 0:59:48.036
<v Speaker 1>we took that and we were recording it for the

0:59:48.076 --> 0:59:53.276
<v Speaker 1>Songs of Surrender project. And almost that day or a

0:59:53.276 --> 0:59:56.476
<v Speaker 1>few days before, we first heard about the Russian invasion

0:59:56.516 --> 1:00:01.476
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine. And Bonno had actually met President Zelenski at

1:00:01.756 --> 1:00:04.276
<v Speaker 1>at an event like a couple of years before, so

1:00:04.356 --> 1:00:06.316
<v Speaker 1>he had actually had a chance to get to know

1:00:06.356 --> 1:00:09.956
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit, and he knew that he was

1:00:10.516 --> 1:00:13.516
<v Speaker 1>before becoming a politician, had been an actor and a

1:00:13.916 --> 1:00:16.916
<v Speaker 1>stand up comic. In fact, he did apparently he did

1:00:17.036 --> 1:00:22.276
<v Speaker 1>a open mic session in Drahada in the late nineties,

1:00:22.436 --> 1:00:26.596
<v Speaker 1>you know. So it's like we were so struck by

1:00:26.636 --> 1:00:30.716
<v Speaker 1>the sense that the person standing up to this bully,

1:00:31.236 --> 1:00:35.956
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin and and kind of protecting the idea of

1:00:35.996 --> 1:00:41.516
<v Speaker 1>democracy against the threat of a totalitarian ideology was a

1:00:41.556 --> 1:00:45.596
<v Speaker 1>stand up comic, a guy who is the least likely person.

1:00:46.116 --> 1:00:49.236
<v Speaker 1>So that became the basis of a new set of

1:00:49.316 --> 1:00:52.076
<v Speaker 1>lyrics for a Walk On which we've put on this

1:00:52.156 --> 1:00:56.916
<v Speaker 1>new collection Beautiful. I think to end, I'm going to

1:00:57.076 --> 1:01:01.476
<v Speaker 1>play the new version of Every Breaking Wave, because it's

1:01:01.476 --> 1:01:04.156
<v Speaker 1>a song. It's a song I've loved. I loved the

1:01:04.196 --> 1:01:07.676
<v Speaker 1>original version, I love this version, and something about hearing

1:01:07.716 --> 1:01:11.796
<v Speaker 1>it in its intimate form really allows it to shine.

1:01:12.196 --> 1:01:14.796
<v Speaker 1>So I will play that. Thank you for that, and

1:01:14.836 --> 1:01:17.596
<v Speaker 1>we will listen and thank you for doing this today.

1:01:18.636 --> 1:01:21.436
<v Speaker 1>It's been an absolute pleasure, Rick, and we'll definitely we

1:01:21.556 --> 1:01:45.996
<v Speaker 1>have to do this again. We will Every Breaking Way

1:01:46.996 --> 1:01:52.716
<v Speaker 1>on the Shore tails the next one. There'll be one more,

1:01:53.476 --> 1:02:00.596
<v Speaker 1>and every Gambler knows that's a loose is what you're

1:02:00.636 --> 1:02:09.396
<v Speaker 1>really Therefore, summer hours far listeness now I speak, came

1:02:09.636 --> 1:02:16.316
<v Speaker 1>to an answer phone like every father, all the breeze,

1:02:18.076 --> 1:02:28.716
<v Speaker 1>winter would leave it alone. If you go, if you

1:02:29.116 --> 1:02:38.196
<v Speaker 1>go your way? And I gom a wiser, always so

1:02:38.876 --> 1:02:46.676
<v Speaker 1>helpless against the time. Maybe every time of the boostream

1:02:46.956 --> 1:02:51.636
<v Speaker 1>knows that we're in love with the food. Are we

1:02:51.836 --> 1:02:58.396
<v Speaker 1>ready at you beswift off our feet and stop chasing

1:03:00.156 --> 1:03:14.196
<v Speaker 1>and breaking away? And every sale knows at the scene

1:03:16.156 --> 1:03:22.876
<v Speaker 1>is a friend made enemy, and every shipwreck so knows

1:03:22.996 --> 1:03:29.476
<v Speaker 1>what it is to live without into sea. I thought

1:03:29.556 --> 1:03:35.076
<v Speaker 1>I had the captain's voice, but it's hard to listen

1:03:36.236 --> 1:03:44.396
<v Speaker 1>while you preach, like every broken on the shore. This

1:03:44.756 --> 1:03:51.076
<v Speaker 1>is as far as I could read. If you go,

1:03:54.516 --> 1:04:04.356
<v Speaker 1>if you go in a coma, Are we soul always

1:04:04.396 --> 1:04:10.676
<v Speaker 1>so help us against the tide? Baby ever t on

1:04:11.196 --> 1:04:16.596
<v Speaker 1>the street and knows that we're in love with truth?

1:04:17.556 --> 1:04:23.156
<v Speaker 1>Are we ready to the swifts off our feet and

1:04:23.436 --> 1:04:41.756
<v Speaker 1>stop chasing breaking the sea knows other rocks trying his nosing.

1:04:42.596 --> 1:04:47.276
<v Speaker 1>You know the hottest see place yours has been. We

1:04:47.556 --> 1:04:51.756
<v Speaker 1>know that the fitter we sorely and before we pick it,

1:04:52.756 --> 1:05:04.756
<v Speaker 1>before we begin if you go, if you got, are

1:05:04.836 --> 1:05:14.596
<v Speaker 1>we soon? Are we shook handless against her time? Even

1:05:14.596 --> 1:05:22.916
<v Speaker 1>every dog on the street knows they're wearing life? Are

1:05:23.036 --> 1:05:29.236
<v Speaker 1>we read it to be? Swift? Feet can't stop you

1:05:29.516 --> 1:06:11.036
<v Speaker 1>saying breaking a breaking way, re breaking? We were breaking breaking.

1:06:35.636 --> 1:06:38.316
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to the Edge for catching up with Rick YouTube's

1:06:38.356 --> 1:06:41.916
<v Speaker 1>new album, Songs of Surrender is out now. We can

1:06:41.996 --> 1:06:44.316
<v Speaker 1>hear all of our favorite YouTube songs on our playlist

1:06:44.316 --> 1:06:47.876
<v Speaker 1>at broken Record podcast dot com. Can subscribe to our

1:06:47.876 --> 1:06:51.476
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Broken Record Podcast,

1:06:51.596 --> 1:06:54.756
<v Speaker 1>where you can find all of our new episodes. You

1:06:54.796 --> 1:06:58.516
<v Speaker 1>can follow us on Twitter at broken Record. Broken Record

1:06:58.596 --> 1:07:02.396
<v Speaker 1>is produced with Helpful Lea Rose, Jason Gambrel, Naladay, and

1:07:02.676 --> 1:07:06.956
<v Speaker 1>Eric Samer. Our editor is Sophie Crane. Broken Record is

1:07:06.956 --> 1:07:09.756
<v Speaker 1>a production of Pushkin Industries. If you love this show

1:07:09.796 --> 1:07:13.836
<v Speaker 1>and others from Pushkin, consider subscribing to Pushkin Plus. Pushkin

1:07:13.876 --> 1:07:17.236
<v Speaker 1>Plus is a podcast subscription that offers bonus content an

1:07:17.276 --> 1:07:20.396
<v Speaker 1>uninterrupted ad free listening for four ninety nine a month.

1:07:20.796 --> 1:07:24.236
<v Speaker 1>Look for Pushkin Plus on Apple podcast subscriptions, and if

1:07:24.236 --> 1:07:26.436
<v Speaker 1>you like the show, please remember to share, rate and

1:07:26.476 --> 1:07:29.556
<v Speaker 1>review us on your podcast app. Our theme musics by

1:07:29.596 --> 1:07:31.676
<v Speaker 1>Kenny Beats. I'm Justin Rischman,