WEBVTT - Episode 109: Infield Preview

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to episode number one oh nine of the Marine

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Layer Podcast. We have our infield preview for the twenty

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 1>twenty four season, and we'll close out the show with

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>speak your Mind.

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Before we start the show, here's your reminder. If you're listening,

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 2>make sure to download our episodes, rate and review five stars.

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>You're doing us a huge favor if you do, leave

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 2>us a written review as well. If you're watching on YouTube,

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>you see that big red subscribe button. Just click it

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>takes a second to do, It's easy. Make sure to

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 2>like and comment on the video as well. If you're

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 2>watching and follow us on social media, We're on Instagram, TikTok, Twitter,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 2>and YouTube shorts at marine Layer Pod.

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get it rolling, and we welcome you to this

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Marine Layer Podcast, part of the Just

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Baseball Podcast network, recording here on Sunday, March third. By

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the time you hear this episode, Lal and I will

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>be twenty ten enough, at least i'll be ten. I

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know about Lyle. Maybe he'll just be sunburned, but

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll have to to find out. We'll be

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>right in the heart of our Arizona trip and as

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>our infield preview rolls along today. We'll start behind the

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>plate with cal Rawley. But let's see on this Mariner's infield.

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna make it our goal to talk to every

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>single one of these players while we're down there if

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>we can, and then recillcrow around with our preview once

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>we get back.

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean by recircle?

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Like, well, but they're like, hey, teach, I'm hitting forty

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>bombs this year. I was like, oh, okay, we'll reevaluate now.

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>I got you. Who's gonna be the one that say

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 2>they'd hit forty bombs. Honestly, if it was Tie, I

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 2>might perk my ears up.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>What a jump that would be. I mean yeah, I

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>probably we would probably have to just say, all right,

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we got to do version two of this, because if

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Ti Frans is hitting forty bombs this year, this roster's

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna look look a lot different, a lot different.

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I'd be, you know what, I'd be playing happy if

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>he hits twenty to twenty five and just gets his

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 2>WRC plus back up to like one twenty five, one thirty.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 2>But you know what, we can we can dive into

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 2>all of that.

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>That'll be great. Let's start behind the plate with cal

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Raley the Mariners projected starting catcher here in twenty twenty four,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>coming off a twenty twenty three season where he hit

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>two thirty two with a three zero six on base

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>percentage and a four to fifty six slugging percentage, good

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>for a one to eleven WRC plus four point seven

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>fangrafts wins above replacement. He walks nine and a half

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time and struck out twenty seven point

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of the time. What is your outlook on

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>cal Rawley's twenty twenty four season.

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't see why he shouldn't continue to repeat and

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 2>replicate what he's been doing the last couple of seasons.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 2>There's areas he can still get better. He could still

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>hit better from the right side of the plate, like

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 2>his WRC plus from that side seventy nine. It's obviously

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 2>much better from the left side, where all his power

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 2>comes from. He can the ball a little bit better,

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>like his blocks above average were down below average, And

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 2>like there's areas he can still clean it up, like

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 2>cal Rally may always be a strikeout guy. If you

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>want to look at his strikeout right and say maybe

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 2>he can bring it down a little bit. That's another area.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 2>But for the most part, you're talking about a catcher

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 2>who by F four was one of the three best

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>catchers in baseball. He let all catchers in home runs

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 2>last year. You know he's got pop, you know he's

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>got you know, he calls a good game, you know

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>he's got a good arm, and you know he's probably

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna put out a similar season next year. And I

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 2>think that's what people should expect. Average isn't gonna be crazy,

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>home runs will be high. Ops should jump up like

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and be carried by the home runs and ultimately service

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the better catchers in the league. I think

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 2>that's who cal Rally is at this point. I think

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>he's proven that how.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Many catchers in baseball can do what cal Rally does,

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like switch hit, I mean like switch hit plus power

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>plus framing plus arm like Adly get that it's just

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>might just be Adley. The switch hitting's kind of unfair

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>because there aren't very many switch hitting catchers. But even

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you just frame it as plus power plus framing

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>plus arm, great team leader like, you still might just

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>circle around to Adley and that's it.

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the team leader thing certainly makes it interesting. I mean,

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 2>maybe you throw Sean Murphy into there too, potentially, But

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 2>it's the point is the list is short, and I

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 2>honestly think people lowball cal Raley when they try to

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 2>rank them in these preseason rankings, like we've seen on

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>some of these catcher lists, They'll get put it seven,

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 2>sometimes six, sometimes eight. I think he should be higher

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 2>than that. I like, if they were up to me,

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 2>cal Like again, especially when you finish top three among

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>catchers in f WOAR, He's in the top five for sure.

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>For me, I'm wondering if there is is there any

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>more there for cal to unlock in his back I

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like a two point thirty average, the on base

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>percentage could probably be a little higher, but if he's

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not gonna hit for a high average, it's really difficult

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to get your on base percentage higher than say three

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty if you're gonna hit two thirty. So maybe not there.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>His slugging percentage you could go up a little, but

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he just finished the season with thirty bombs. So like,

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're like, we're sitting here nitpicking, is there really

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>another level for cal Raley to unlock In twenty twenty

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>four at the plate, he would, like you said, probably

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have to take a huge step from the right side

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>facing lefties. That like that would need to go up

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>significantly for him to have a chance at it. Otherwise,

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if it's only a one to eleven,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>let's say, let's go right in the middle between his

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three campaigns, which was

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>one twenty and one eleven WRC plus and you put

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>cal at like a one sixteen. I mean, that's for

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a catcher. That is all you can ask for at

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the plate. You can't ask for anything more for cal Raley,

0:05:55.000 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's all you need really to be honest, you

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>don't need cal Raley to be the best hitter on

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>your team because you've supplemented the lineup around him for

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that to be the case. Where if you just take

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a mix of his twenty two and twenty three seasons,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. You don't need anything else from cal Raley.

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>What you need from cal Raley is what Scott Service

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>needed from cal Rawley this offseason, where he's making his

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>list of six guys he's gonna go talk to this

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>offseason and like, hey, I need you guys to help

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>lead this clubhouse this season in the wake of on

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>financial uncertainty and who is his first call? Who do

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>he call first? Lyle in terms of what cal Rawley

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and the offseason, who Scott was going to talk to?

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Who was cal he called first? Oh, that's first on

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the bocket.

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Well in terms of who Scott talking, Yeah, Like, it's

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 2>funny cal Raley when he came up was pretty reserved,

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 2>wasn't loudly spoken. Now he's one of the team leaders.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>He's definitively one of the team leaders. And a lot

0:06:59.920 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 2>of catchers are, but some aren't. And Cal has very

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 2>very evidently stepped into that role and done so very well.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Might I add so? Yes, Like, along with everything he

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.559
<v Speaker 2>brings to the table at the plate and behind the plate,

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 2>he also brings it in the clubhouse.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And there could be, you know, as cal goes another

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>year into his big league career, a little bit of

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a I don't even know if it's like an emotional

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.679
<v Speaker 1>maturity thing. I mean, you don't want like a public

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>outbreak like there was last season. Cal Rawley, I think

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>had a valid reason for speaking the way he did

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>last season, But knowing how cal Rawly sort of retracted

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>his statement and how he's felt like he's sort of

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>grown in this offseason. I don't know if he would

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>do that again, right, I don't think he would. He

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>would do what he did in Game one sixty one

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>last year again. I would be curious to see what

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>happens if the Mariners have a situation like they did

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, where they start playing poorly, they're falling behind

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the Rangers and Astros, and things are sort of boiling

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>up and getting frustrated for some of the core guys

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on this roster who might still feel not feel like

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:07.559
<v Speaker 1>the roster is good enough.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if anybody would speak out again, and

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>you'd probably see it happen internally, maybe in house or sorry,

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't see it. Maybe it would happen internally. But

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I think in that scenario you'd see Cal either you know,

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>take matters into his own hands and either maybe there's

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>some players only meetings or maybe he has discussions internally

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 2>with management or front office people, whoever. But I think

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>more than anything, if they get behind early, you're probably

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna see I mean, you'd probably I mean, I don't

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>really know, to be honest, I'm trying to think of

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>even like, just think out loud here about what might happen.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what would happen if they fell behind again.

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure Cal would probably try to motivate the guys internally,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>but you're right in the sense of I don't think

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>anything would happen publicly again.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>No, and you know, maybe there might be comments off

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the record, but that's it, Like, I don't think you'd

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>do that again. I think the point as a leader

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>is you don't let that stuff get out. You don't

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>give yourself the opportunity to feel vulnerable. I mean the

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Mariners certainly, when that came out and you saw the

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>outcry from the fan base and everything else, you feel

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like the team is vulnerable at that point and not

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not as geled together because if you have someone willing

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to say that, whether it's intentional or not, you're demeaning

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>other parts of your roster. And you know, that's all

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>part of growing into the leadership role that Cal feels

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 1>like he has to occupy this season. Like Scott Service

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>leans on his players a lot to lead this team.

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So when times are tough, instead of you know, going

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>and saying where like we need we need more, it's

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>instead going to be how do I get the most

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>out of this roster currently? We can all have our

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>opinions on the Mariners spending habits. You and I have

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>been very vocal about their spending habits on this podcast,

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and cal is welcome to have those as well. But

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for an organization that likes good pr you know, it's

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>part of cal Rally's game and I'm curious to see

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>how he handles it this year as we go on

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>into twenty twenty four, so exciting season for col We

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>look for the best offensively, defensively as well, and you know,

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>continuing to be the ultra reliable guy behind the plate, and.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>They should extend him. That's what I'll end with. Well,

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 2>they you know it was agent is. Yes, we know

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 2>that it might be unlikely, but the Mariner should do

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 2>whatever it takes to keep that guy around because clearly

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 2>he wants to win, clearly likes the organization.

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it sounds like he wants to be here too.

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>And last I checked, I think Scott's lack of a

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>little cash. He turned down of some huge paydays this

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>offseason for his clients and instead it's going to get

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>left with like thirty percent of what he was asking for.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you might need a long term extension to

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>sort of refill the coffers a little bit.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 2>That sounds great. You got to catcher in Seattle that

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>wants to be in his home, in his organization that

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 2>he came up with. So there's a match made in heaven.

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of a match made in heaven, the Mariners first

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 2>baseman seems to have found a match made in heaven

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>with his off season program over at drive Line This Winner.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 2>That's Ty France. He finished twenty twenty three with a

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 2>bit of a disappointing year. The number sat at two

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>fifty batting average with twelve home runs, fifty eight runs

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 2>batted in, seven oh three ops one four WRC plus

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 2>and just a half an f four zero point five.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>So Ty took matters into his own hands. He followed

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>his buddy JP Crawford to drive Line This Winner. The

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 2>results seem to be very very positive early on. He's

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>shown some of it in spring training, and what he

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>can do in twenty twenty four is kind of unknown.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>There's this balance of okay. The last year and a half,

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Ty France has had his major struggle. So the second

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 2>half of twenty two after the injury, and a lot

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty three. But there's also the side of, well,

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 2>we saw it work for JP, can this work for

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 2>ty France? Where he just pops off? And I certainly

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 2>think there's a world where he can. In fact, if

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I had to pick one side or the other, I

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>think he will bounce back. But we also know that

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 2>simply going to drive line doesn't just magically work for

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 2>every single player. It depends on the player, and it

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 2>depends on how they adjust everything they've learned to real

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.599
<v Speaker 2>games when the season starts. So there's a lot to

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 2>unpack with ty Franz. But I think the general consensus

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 2>is obviously Americers need him to be better than he

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:17.199
<v Speaker 2>was in twenty.

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Three, and there's a lot of spaces they need him

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to be better. I mean, you could say, yeah, he

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>needs to be flat out better, but I mean, first

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's keeping his physique throughout the season. There's

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>been some rave reports throughout camp of how in shape

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he is, how he feels a little bit faster, how

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he feels more athletic, and that he says he's open

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to playing bold first and third base, and that he

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>physically feels like he can do it opposed to last

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>season where he only played first base. So there's that,

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>there's the staying healthy, not getting hit by a pitch,

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>not having like a ball go off his wrists and

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have him affect an entire half season of his There's that,

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>and then there's just sort of the redefined offensive approach

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that he had at Is he gonna hit the ball

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in the air a little bit more? Is it going

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to have a little bit more true power to it

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>opposed to more of his softer hitting previous I'll say

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>almost like previous life in that aspect. In previous seasons

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in twenty three and twenty two and twenty one, more

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of a light hitter, singles, doubles, a few home runs

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>mixed in there. But this season, could he have true

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>first base power with a more redefined swinging, a calmer

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>batpath to the ball, a slimmer frame, more athletic, deeper

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in the box, farther off the plate. Does he feel

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like he can do that?

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are all the boxes I'm looking for ty france

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to check off. And we talked about the leadership with

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>cal Rawley. Ty Franz was on that list too, even

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>though ty Franz was worried if he was gonna even

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>get tender to contract this year, Scott Service made it

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like ty Frantz was one of the guys on

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>this infield who is a leader this year again and

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on him to keep his mentality and the rest of

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the enfield's mentality good as the season goes a long.

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 2>What is a realistic expectation for ty France this year?

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, as you turned your light on,

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>you're starting to get a little bit dark in there

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 2>for those.

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>A little bit now that beam behind us. But that's fine,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll make it work.

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you think a realistic expectation is for Tye?

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 2>I do think the power is gonna go up, and

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>they're talking about he's pulling the ball more.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But what do we think Probably not forty twenty five.

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see twenty five. Like just let's let's

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>do a marginal jump. Let's not let's not say ty

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>France is going to double his like double his home

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>run total. Now, if he does like a JP Crawford

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty points of WRC plus higher than his previous career high,

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>then maybe we could talk about forty because then we'd

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>be in the one sixty range. But I'm gonna say

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a marginal, a nice marginal improvement for ty France would

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>be back to his previous career high of a one

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine WRC plus and twenty five bombs.

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Is it odd at all that, first off, I think

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>that's about right, And now that he's pulling the ball

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 2>more and seemingly hitting it with a little more authority,

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>it does seem like a real possibility. Is it odd

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 2>at all that when you look at Tye's peripherals from

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 2>last year, when you pull up his Baseball Savant page,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 2>that his barrel rate and his hard hit rate were

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 2>actually higher than they were in twenty one and twenty

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 2>two when he was playing well, and he also with less.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that's interesting.

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's interesting. I do think the randomness

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of baseball probably plays a fact into that, And I

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>think ty could tell you that, you know, just because

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not always how hard you hit the ball, it's

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>also where you hit it. And Tye admitted his swing

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>last year felt kind of like just felt kind of

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>off because he wasn't hitting the balls in the right spots.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So even if he was technically, hitting the ball harder

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always mean it was better. So and then the

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>results spoke for itself. And just think of how many

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>hits ty Frantz left on the table because he wasn't

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>fast enough, didn't feel athletic enough last year. Certain there's

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly enough to make that the case. So definitely an

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting point, but I feel like it's very hard to

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>use past year's judgment to judge this year's ty France.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Ty Frants can be totally different. I

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just feel like this is his mentality has changed so

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>much to how he approaches the game of baseball and

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>how he approaches his hitting, his fielding, et cetera, all

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. It's no longer Ty France training with Ty

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>France in the off season. It's Ty France going and

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>getting outside help to help him move along this offseason

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>right and and become a better player and have a

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>different swing path and have and be and be in

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>better shape. And then and feeling like, you know, he

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>improved his diet, which I'm jealous of. I need to

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I need to do that too. Man, I've been so

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>lazy this year. Not not a good sign. But off

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the Ty France Tree of just doing that and like

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the little things of improving yourself, I think have a

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>chance to make a massive this year, And which is

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>why I think it's kind of hard to use past

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>years to judge this year's version of Tie.

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 2>And those third base rumors, man, those are interesting because

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what, not only if Ty's gonna if

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Ty's gonna be more athletic this year and he's hitting

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 2>and feels like he's comfortable to move over to third base,

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 2>not only does it give him more options, but Tyler Locklear,

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 2>that dude's coming like He's already mashed during spring training.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 2>He's hit at every level of the minor league. He

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 2>is on a fast track on his way through the minors.

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 2>And if the Mariners think that back can help mid season,

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 2>maybe defensively, it gets a little interesting. But if you

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 2>had the potential that Ty France a third, Locklear at

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 2>first and Mitch Garver dhing, whoo, yeah, that gets very

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 2>good group.

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's a pretty good group. How much third base

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>do we think Tye's playing this year?

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I think likely not much, And maybe they just end

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 2>up being rumors, But truthfully, a lot of it probably

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 2>depends on Locklear because of Locker hitting so well that

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 2>they say his bat has to be in the lineup. Well,

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 2>you can't move Mitch Garverer. He needs to be a

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>DH he catches. Not only does that take time from

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 2>cal but that is how Garver's gotten injured. A lot

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 2>of his career is catching. So I think it depends

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 2>on what happens with Lockler. I don't think you'll see

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 2>ty France play much third base early in the year.

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 2>You can see it later.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm just kind of I'd be kind of nervous with

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>him over there. He has played in twenty twenty one

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and twenty two. I've somehow forgotten the fact he played

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>nearly ten games worth of third base. He played eighty

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 1>six innings of third base in twenty twenty one and

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two. Managed to have four defensive run saved

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in those eighty six innings. That's not very good. Notice

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that a full season's worth of innings is what like

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>seventeen eighteen hundred innings, So multiply negative four by eighteen.

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're so it was negative four defensive run saved.

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I think at first you said four.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, negative four, Sorry, that's what I meant negative four

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's out above average at first base has never

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>been above thirty fifth percentile in a full season. That

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>does not lead me to believe right now that ty

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>France his offense could outdo his defense at third to

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>be honest, but that's pretty better.

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 2>But what if ty France is mashing and Tyler Lockler's

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 2>mashing and Mitch Garver's mashing does.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>For having like fifth percentile defense over there at third

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>base and the effect it has on your pitcher, does

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that outweigh it? I don't think it does. I don't know.

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, seriously, think of how the Mariners infield is

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. You have questional defenders at shortstop and second base.

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>You have right now with Arius and Rojas, a question

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>market third when it comes to defense, and you would

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>downgrade that defense by putting ty France at third base.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>So then you would have, no matter how good your

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>first base defense is, your pitching staff would have to

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>deal with one of the worst defensive infields in baseball statistically.

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what it is. I would be a little nervous

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>with that.

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll just say it again, though. If everybody's hitting Locklear included,

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 2>there has to be some solution, and that seems like

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 2>the most likely one.

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Meridi's pictures would not be happy. They'd love to see

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the runs. Well, when a ball gets put in play

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 1>routinely on the infield, you expect it to being out.

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>And I guarantee you it's not Gino over there at

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>third anymore. There's no it's it would be less likely

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to be routine. I'm just seeing what the numbers say

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>would not be pretty lest they blew me away and

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>cheach everything overnight.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, if Tie's get a completely new

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 2>player at the play, maybe somehow he's cleaned up his

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 2>defense too over at third base, and not even cleaned up,

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 2>just gotten much better with it because he hasn't played

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 2>over there that much and he doesn't have to be great.

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 2>If he was even just league average. Remember how bad

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Gino's defense was when he came over here, and they said,

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 2>if he can just be league average, then that's win.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 2>What if they what if Perry Hill can help tybee

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 2>league average over there?

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Eventually would be a huge jump, a huge jump. But

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at least Gino was an infielder on the left side

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in the previous life. Ty France is not.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 2>That's true. Well, he he was a third baseman at

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 2>one point. He played other positions, but.

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Well there's a reason he didn't come over to the

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Mariners as a third baseman.

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 2>No, he did come over as a third baseman.

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>He was he was a first. I think he was

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a first, last, second baseman.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he was all three. But like he played

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 2>everything in the miners with the Padres, I think I

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>think primarily in the in the miners with the Padres,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Tye played third. But it would it would, yes, it

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>would be a jump for him to get back to that.

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 2>That being said, Tyler Lockler's not making the team out

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>of camp. It's gonna be a bit till he get

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 2>called up anyway. So for now, obviously ty France will

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 2>be playing for a base and more than anything, I

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 2>think we're pretty excited to see what he can look

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>like in twenty twenty fourth plate.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So I concur let's get to the next position on

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this Mariners infield. Let's go to second base. Jorge Polonco

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>acquired in a trade from the Minnesota Twins in twenty

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty three. He played nearly exactly half of the season,

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a two fifty five, three thirty five four fifty four

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>slash line one to eighteen WRC plus in eighty games

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>one and a half fangrafts wins above replacement, a walk

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>rate of ten and a half percent in a strikeout

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>rate of twenty five point seven percent. Is this the

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>best second baseman lyle the Mariners have had since Robinson Cano?

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>It feels like an easy yes.

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I'd say it's definitively yes. Orge Polonco in his last

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 2>four full seasons has put up a WRC plus of

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 2>one to eighteen or better. That's consistency. He didn't have

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>a great year in twenty twenty, but again I kind

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 2>of throw that year out the window for any good

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 2>players who had down years because it was such a

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 2>fluky year. Porge Polonko is absolutely the best offensive second

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>baseman this team has had since Robinson can Out. And

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>there's some things he does very well, Like you know,

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 2>he can hit for some power. He hits fastballs and

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 2>change ups particularly well when you look at the breakdown

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>pitch by pitch of what he mashes versus what he doesn't.

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 2>But the guy has to stay on the field. That

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>is the key. Played eighty games last year, we know

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 2>this is a we know this is a cloud hanging

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 2>over the head of the Mariners this year. Is this

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 2>seam going to be really good if guys stay healthy.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Polonco is one of the main factors when you're talking

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 2>about that topic. He has got to stay on the field.

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Eighty games last year is not enough. The Mariners need

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 2>him on the field for one hundred and thirty plus

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 2>games to do what they intend to do in twenty

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 2>twenty four. So if Jorge Polanco stays healthy, this is

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be one very, very exciting second basement to watch.

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Offensively, on our Wednesday mailbag show, I chose Jorge Polanco

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>as the Mariners' most valuable hitter after Julio Do you

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>want to know why that is? Lyele? I played a

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.360
<v Speaker 1>fun exercise when I was prepping for this. I went

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>back and I looked at the last five seasons of

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Mariner's second base production. Cover your ears. If there are

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>children around, I don't think they want to hear these numbers.

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Ops by year at second base twenty nineteen, six ninety seven,

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six oh four, twenty twenty one, six fifty three,

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, six oh seven, twenty twenty three, six

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>oh seven ops. I mean, my god, like Jorge Polanco

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>could have one of the worst hitting seasons of his career,

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>say a seven to seventy ops and nuke the Mariner's

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>pass production of second base out of the water. I

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>mean that is like, that's the level of upgrade we're

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about with Jorge polonkos someone who has the potential

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to have plus power. He has a thirty homer season

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in his career, He can walk over ten percent of

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the time, and at his peak, he doesn't strike out

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that much. I have a feeling his strikeout rate last

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>year was due to the fact he was never fully

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 1>healthy when he was playing. Last year. He dealt with

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>hamstring issues, he dealt with knee issues, and you know,

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>when you're in and out of the lineup, that can

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>mess with your timing and therefore lead you to strike

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>out more. Which is twenty five percent strikeout rate was

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the highest of his career last year. But at his peak,

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he's like an eighteen to nineteen percent strikeout rate guy.

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you can pair that with a ten percent

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>walk rate plus power, don't let's not talk about his

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>defense at second base. I mean, we're talking about the

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Mariners middle of the order, bat at second base, right

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>behind Julio or behind Garver or behind cow or wherever

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they decide to put Jorge Polanco. That's the kind of

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>guy you're putting there, and that's the kind of guy

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm excited to watch this guy this year. I

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>am through the moon to watch Horge Polanco.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 2>This is the guy who hit thirty plus home runs

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.159
<v Speaker 2>just a couple seasons ago. Like, this guy has real power,

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.920
<v Speaker 2>and he hit in Minnesota. Minnesota is not a hitter's tark.

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 2>So the guy can hit anywhere. And if he's just healthy,

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 2>You're talking about such a booze at second base for

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the Mariners, Like the two former twins. They acquired Mitch Garver,

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 2>who I guess was from the Rangers because he hit

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 2>free agency after playing for the Rangers, but he was

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 2>a twin. Mitch Garver, Jorge Polanko, those guys hit. Oh.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 2>This team looks way different than it did a season ago.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 2>And Polonko specifically, if he can stay healthy, if he

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 2>cuts the strikeouts back down, if he shows some of

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 2>the power that he very clearly has and can hit

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 2>gap to gap two, which we know he can. Oh,

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 2>like look out, like this offense gets that much more deadly.

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Like there's so many factors with this too. Everybody talks

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 2>about the health thing with the negatives. What if everything

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 2>goes right, What if Polanco's on the field all year?

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 2>What if ty France really makes all those drive line

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>improvements and looks similar to how JP did last year,

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 2>all those things, Like, there's a world this team can

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.119
<v Speaker 2>be really scary offensively.

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I will note defensively, he is a sub twentieth percentile

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>awaa guy in his prime, and that is not projected

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>to get any better as he ages in his career.

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna play some second base. I'm gonna guess it's

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>some point he'll play some third base this year for

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners. I hope it's gonna His offense is gonna

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be enough to outweigh his defense. I know JP Crawford

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>said that he was very excited to turn double plays

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>with Jorge Blanco, and he's excited for Jorgey on defense

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this season. I would like to see it with my

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>eyes that the numbers aren't as bad as they seem.

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I hope, because again, as we highlighted in Ties preview,

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a little nervous about this infield defense.

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Look, there's trade offs. When you need bats as badly

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 2>as the Mariners do, it's hard to find guys that

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 2>are that good on both sides of the ball. So

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 2>Polanco's a great hitter, but his defense is a little lackluster.

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Like he does not grade out well at second base.

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 2>You just outlined it. Now, maybe Perry Hill can help

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 2>him out. Maybe they can shore some things up, and

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 2>he's at least a step better than he was last year.

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>But on the flips that he was much better at

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 2>least arm wise, and Colton Long was like Colton Long

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 2>didn't have much of an arm over at second base,

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>which I didn't think would really matter for playing the position,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 2>But then seeing when you really grate out that poorly

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>with your arm strength, they can play a factor. Planko's

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 2>not that now. He may not have great range, but

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 2>he can turn double plays that need to be turned.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 2>So that is a plus to start, It is a start.

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I Polo is gonna be He's gonna be fun. He's

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a blast to watch.

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.639
<v Speaker 2>I can't, I cannot wait before we get to our

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 2>next position, let's take a quick pause and talk to

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 2>you guys about our friends over at Pigatcha's Pub eighty

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 2>five over in Kirkland. The season coming up, string training

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 2>games going on, regular season just a few weeks away.

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 2>You need a spot to go watch the games. Head

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>over there. You can hang out with your friends, have

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>some great food, great drinks. There's pool tables and there's

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty two TVs in that place. So if there's other

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 2>games you want to watch too, March Madness is about

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 2>to start. What a great place to go watch some

0:28:56.360 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 2>games where you've got all the TVs you need. And

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 2>if you head over there during happy hour you can

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 2>get some great specials too. They're happy hours or Monday

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 2>through Friday two to six pm. It features three dollars

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 2>domestic beers, four dollar Manny Blue Moons toward dollar mac

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 2>and Jack's toward dollar Wells, and four dollar housewine. All that,

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 2>along with a great time with your friends, is over

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 2>at Pigatcha's Pub eighty five in Kirkland. Getting a short stop.

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>The longest tenured guy on the Mariners infield, JP Crawford

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>comes off a season. Yeah, he's been here since twenty nineteen.

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So that is wow.

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know what he's been here a long time now,

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 2>like he is nineteen twenty, twenty one, twenty two, it's

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 2>five years. He's entering his sixth season in Seattle. Like,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 2>we've gotten pretty used to seeing JP Crawford play, and

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 2>last year, man did he put it all together? Offensively?

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 2>It was his best season by fari hit two sixty

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>six nineteen home runs, He had an eight eighteen ops

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 2>that was a career high, a one thirty four WRC

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:58.479
<v Speaker 2>plus that was certainly a career high, and just a

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 2>hairshy of five wins above replacement. What a revelation JP

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Crawford was last year. And not only does he still

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 2>walk a lot, he doesn't strike out. He is everything

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 2>you could ask for in a leadoff hitter for a

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 2>competitive ball clet.

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Does he have any more in the tank offensively? Can he?

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Is there another level for JP Crawford to unlock? Like

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think because his home run to fly

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>ball rate was about twelve and a half percent last year,

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not terribly above league average, which is about ten percent.

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there a way he can get some more?

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there more home run power in that bat? Is

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>he going to hit for a higher average? He already,

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>He's probably not gonna walk more than fourteen percent of

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the time. Again, it's like, that's a really high number,

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a really high number for him. But are there other

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>areas that JP Crawford can unlock offensively? Because this dude

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 1>turned from a guy who the Mariners would tuck away

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of their lineup to give a good

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at bat in the end of the game too. He's

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>your second best hitter behind Julio. And you know, I

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a little unfair to expect JP to repeat

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>his which I would guess is about a ninety fifth

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>at least percentile offensive season for him in twenty twenty three.

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>But can he get back to about ninetieth? Can he

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>do that again? Can he repeat his success and stay

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>at the top of that lineup and be the catalyst? Like,

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>can we get the outlier season from JP Crawford again,

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>with the MVP season from Julio, with a healthy Mitch

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Garver's season, with a healthy Jorge Polanco season, with a

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>full cow Rawley season, with a turned around Ty France season?

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Can we please get that? Can we please? As a

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Mariner fan, I'm asking, can we please get that?

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 2>With a Dom canzone breakout with Luke Rayley continuing his

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 2>success from last year, like all of it, Like if

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 2>everybody clicks, there's no weak spots in the lineup, there

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 2>is a real world. There are no weak spots in

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 2>this lineup this year. And if you want to talk

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 2>about JP, look, even if he doesn WRC plus one

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty four again, there's no reason he can't be in

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 2>the world twenties. If he's got a one to twenty

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 2>WRC plus, has a ten or eleven percent walk rate

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 2>ops is still above eight hundred. That's your leadoff hitter.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 2>And if he hits fifteen home runs instead of closer

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>to twenty, that's still absolutely your leadoff hitter, and a

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 2>really good one at that. So I think this is

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 2>real what JP Crawford did last year. Even if he

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't take a step above the one thirty four mark

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 2>WRC plus wise that he had last year, this is real.

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 2>I fully believe that what JP Crawford did last year

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 2>is in some form or another here to stay at

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the plate. And that is such a difference for the Mariners.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 2>If JP had not done what he had done last year,

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 2>not only would the Mariners have a lot more questions

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 2>going into this season. They wouldn't have even been in

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the race to make the playoffs last season because they

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 2>really at points of last year did not have much

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.959
<v Speaker 2>consistent offensive production of anybody besides JP Crawford. He was

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the constant in that lineup. He was the consistent back

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think he's gonna do it again this year.

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, and we know Julio finished fourth in

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>MVP last year. JP was the most valuable hitter on

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the team last year period. So and there are some

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>numbers that Luke Arkins, who's a great follow on Mariners Twitter,

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>laid out why he thinks JP can continue his success

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty four. Luke pointed out like his barrel

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>rate and hard hit rate were way up. I mean,

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>those are numbers that are consistent with success, and barrels

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 1>means you're putting the ball in the air, and that's

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a good point. JP nearly doubled his average his average

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>launch angle last year, and hitting the ball in the

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>air more leads to more success. JP Crawford had a

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>problem with putting too many balls on the ground and

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>too much weak content. He started hitting the ball harder,

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>and he started hitting it in the air more while

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>especially utilizing his pole power. If those are all traits

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that trickle over to twenty twenty four, I mean we

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>can expect a better season, not a better season, a

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>good season, another season like the one he just had,

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and not one that is representative of the past seasons

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of JP Crawford. The question is there anything left in

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the tank defensive? Can he find a way to get

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>play some better defense than he did last season, which

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he ranked in the fifth yeah, fifth percentile ouse above average.

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 1>He had a lot of trouble going to his right

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in the hole at short. Is there a way JP

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:22.439
<v Speaker 1>ca can can get back up to league average?

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 2>If he does, we're talking about a guy who could

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 2>legitimately be an MVP candidate if he repeats what he

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.439
<v Speaker 2>did last year to play. If JP Crawford had done

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 2>what he did last year at the plate and he'd

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 2>even played league average defense, you're talking about him going

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 2>from a five war season to six plus. And if

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.280
<v Speaker 2>he'd played the defense he played a couple of years ago,

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 2>now you're talking like seven plus. So I don't know

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 2>if he's going to return to his gold glove form

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 2>or what he was in twenty twenty one also, But

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 2>even just getting back to the league average rains or

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 2>slightly above it makes such a difference. I mean, you've

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 2>talked to you're worried about this infield defense. If you're

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 2>going to pocket one spot of this infield defense, it's

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 2>the five to six hole. And we'll get to third

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 2>base here in a bit, but at least in certain situations,

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 2>it's the five to six hole. Because when JP Crawford

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 2>moved to his right last year, like you talked about,

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.359
<v Speaker 2>his season total for outs above average was negative five.

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 2>There are some areas he still is better, Like he's

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 2>good moving in on baseballs, when he moves to his

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 2>left on baseballs, he's better. It's that backhanded play going

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 2>toward third base. Negative eleven outs above average is where

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 2>he ranked going laterally towards third base last year. So

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 2>if you look at that five to six spot and

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Luis Arius, who will get to in a minute, are

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:43.439
<v Speaker 2>sharing time over there, like that could lead to some

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 2>C and I hits and maybe balls that were stopped

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 2>a year ago. I think JP Crawford finding a way

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 2>to shore it up a little bit next this upcoming year,

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 2>YEA makes such a big difference. He does not have

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.720
<v Speaker 2>to win a Gold Glove, but just a marginal improvement

0:35:57.760 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 2>could do a lot.

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Just think of a guy like George Kirby, who's like,

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 1>at least as of right now, he could jump his

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rate up this year. But George pitches to contact

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. That's how he is so efficient

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>on the mound, and a fishing contact means a lot

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of balls on the ground. The more balls on the

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 1>ground against this Mariners defense that can get turned into outs,

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>the better the pitcher looks. But if every marginally tough

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>ball on the infield, especially to the poll side, for

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a right hand hitter, who are represent eight seventy percent

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of the hitters in Major League Baseball, if you know,

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>five percent of those start going for hits instead of

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>our outs, like, that's a problem. And especially for your

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>shortstop who is on a contract extension getting paid very

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>handsomely to be not only a good hitter, but a

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>good defender as well. And if he can't replicate that, though,

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly reason for concern at the hole at shortstop

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 1>this year. But I mean, offensively, you still expect JP

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to you know, he could beat a third best hitter

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this year behind Julio and Mitch Garver, or the fourth

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>best behind Julio and Julio, Mitch Garver and Jorge Polanco.

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>That would be great too. Some aspect of that would

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.479
<v Speaker 1>be great going into this twenty twenty four season. Now,

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>if we shift over to third base, lyle, this is

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>where the concerns start. I want to start with Josh

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Rojas at third base. Got traded to the Mariners at

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the trade deadline, coming off a season where he hit

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>two forty five three to ZHO three three thirty eight

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>one point one fangrafts wins above replacement, striking out twenty

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>three percent of the time and walking seven and a

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>half percent of the time. Can he get back to

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the nearly three win player he was in Arizona a

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>season prior in twenty twenty two.

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 2>That was I think he showed some flashes of it

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 2>once he got to Seattle. Because his his numbers as

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 2>a whole last year weren't great, his numbers when he

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 2>got to Seattle were a lot better. He hit two

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 2>seventy two with a seven to twenty one oh ps.

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 2>He also thrived in the month of August, where he

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 2>hit two eighty eight. He saw a little bit of

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 2>it last year. The change of scenery seemed to do

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 2>him some good. And the fact that along with Rojas

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:10.919
<v Speaker 2>being the three win player that he wasn't twenty two,

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 2>he's a good defender. Like so the earliest part of

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 2>it will get to in a minute, but the Josh

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.439
<v Speaker 2>Rojas part of this, Like, he put up six outs

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 2>above average last year, And I know he played a

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 2>lot of second base last year, but third base is

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 2>more his natural spot where he spent a little bit

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 2>more time. So if you have Rojas over at third base,

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I think you feel a little more secure about what

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 2>you're getting defensively from the hot corner. And Josh Rojas

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 2>is not going to hit thirty bombs. That's not what

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 2>he's here to do, frankly. But if he can play

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 2>some good defense, the on base is good. He's a

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 2>real lineup flipper out of the nine spot, where he

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:47.439
<v Speaker 2>proves to be a guy that can get on base

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot, drive in a few runs, and play good defense.

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he can be a three win player. Even

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 2>if it's not three exactly, he can be a two

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 2>win player, which is very valuable, especially in a platoon.

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So yes, I think Josh Rojas has the chance to

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 2>turn it around. I think you saw him start to

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 2>turn it around last year. You just have to see

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 2>it continue.

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm very curious how he's going to look in a

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>platoon because last year his platoon splits were dead even

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>like down the middle eighty three w orc plus each side.

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>He is slightly better against right hand throwers for his career,

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like Louis Sirius, who's actually a platoon

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:30.400
<v Speaker 1>bat who has done significantly better against lefties in his

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>career than he has against righty's. Rojas, there's not that

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>much of an advantage, and I'm hoping that there's still

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>enough there offensively for him to do well with even

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>when he's not like a true platoon bat in that case.

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's I'm not expecting an all world offensive season

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>from Josh Rojas. I think you and I just talked about.

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>The biggest thing we want to see from Josh Rojas

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 1>is to get on base at the bottom of the lineup.

0:39:58.000 --> 0:39:59.959
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't need to hit for a ton of power,

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 1>does need to hit for a high average, but can

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>he get back to his career walk rate of like

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>over ten percent? Can he do that because every season

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in his career prior to last he was over ten percent,

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and having that ten percent walk rate out of the

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>nine hole means you're gonna have a ten percent in

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the nine hole, and then you're gonna have wake up JA.

0:40:17.600 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's say ten percent for JP. We'll go nice middle

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>ground ten percent for JP. Then you got Julio Polanco,

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>cal Garver, those guys all right after them, and that

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>gives a lot of RBI and runs scoring opportunities. That's

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the most important part here for Josh Rojas. He's got

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to score some runs for the guys hitting behind him.

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 2>The walk rate's gonna be huge, and that played a

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.280
<v Speaker 2>major factor into his difference in offensive production between twenty

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 2>two and twenty three. Again, I don't think people should

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>just forget what he did here in Seattle last year

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 2>once he got traded over. I think that makes the difference.

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 2>He was a good player last year. Legitimately, he was

0:40:56.160 --> 0:40:57.959
<v Speaker 2>a good player that hit out of the ninth spot

0:40:57.960 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 2>and did his job. So if he's dead, even platoons

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 2>splits wise, I don't really think it matters which side

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:05.360
<v Speaker 2>of the plate he hits against. You're just trying to

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 2>help ry us out in that way. And again, if

0:41:07.640 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 2>he plays good defense and he gets on base, that's

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the key. But again, that walk rate jumping up for

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Rojas will be what to watch in twenty twenty four

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 2>because if he can get it back up, that's like,

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 2>that's a big difference. Again, you talk about a lineup flipper.

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 2>He was already kind of doing it last year once

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 2>he got to seattle out of the nine spot, But

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:28.439
<v Speaker 2>if he starts to walk a lot again, it makes

0:41:28.480 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 2>him that much more impactful.

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And let's just remind people what the best version of

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rojas was like. In twenty twenty two. He had

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a one to ten WRC plus of the plate, walked

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:42.120
<v Speaker 1>over ten percent of the trunk the time, struck out

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>under twenty percent of the time, he played about eighty

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>percent of his time at third base. That is the

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.280
<v Speaker 1>player the Mariners are looking for this year. Third baseman

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>not striking out a ton, walking a decent amount ten

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 1>percent better than league average at the plate. His defense

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 1>for his career third base is below average. It's negative

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive runs saved, but league average is what the Mariners

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>hope for, because if he was a league average DRS

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:09.320
<v Speaker 1>guy at third base, he'd be the best defender on

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this infield this year as of right now.

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 2>It is funny how how different this defense looks all

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, because that was one of the Mariner's

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>strengths for a while, and now that is one of

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 2>their question marks. And it may ultimately get resolved, and

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I hope it does, but it is something to watch. Now.

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 2>The other side of this platoon, you've got Luis Arius,

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.359
<v Speaker 2>who is in major need of a bounce back year.

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 2>The guy hit one ninety four last year, three home runs,

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 2>six thirty six ops, eighty three WRC plus negative zero

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 2>point one. Van grafts War I think I was a

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 2>little higher on the Luis Arius bounce back than I

0:42:46.760 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 2>will about two weeks ago than I am right now.

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 2>But the fact he can't throw the ball and reportedly

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 2>isn't in the greatest shape, it's a little worry. Some

0:42:57.040 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 2>we talked about that.

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So as of this week, he was lightly throwing the

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 1>ball across the endfield, which is a start. It's still

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a question if he's going to be on the opening

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>day roster, which again, if he can't even be on

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the opening day roster, then people are saying, like is

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>there a point of bringing him back at all. He

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 1>has hit okay in spring training in a small sample

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>size so far at DH, and he does have a

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 1>tiny bit more upside in the bat than Josh Rojas does.

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>He has a more clear platoon split than Josh Rojas does.

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>He's about over ten percent above league average against left

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>handed pitchers, which is good, But the question is he's

0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not a great defender. There have been now two teams

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that have let him go with options remaining as a

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>former top prospect, with the ability to keep him in

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>their organization, and they decided to get rid of him. Anyways,

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>how like, what are the Mariners going to find something

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:00.399
<v Speaker 1>this year? Is he going to show proof to them

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>he belongs in the big leagues and doesn't deserve to

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>get cut? Is he going to be able to not

0:44:07.280 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 1>just have a disastrous season at the plate again? And

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners can't have two third basement slugan or four

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:14.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred this year because that's what both of these guys

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>did last year. You can't have that again. Third basemen.

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 1>They need to pick up their weight when it comes

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to hitting. And if Louis Airius can't do that, and

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he's you and I think probably the first guy off

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this roster. If that's the case this season, probably the

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.120
<v Speaker 1>most replaceable guy, especially when you have a couple infielders

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:36.399
<v Speaker 1>down there. In our mail bag, we talked about Cole Young,

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Locklear could come up, Ryan Bliss could come up,

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Like all these guys have the opportunity to come up

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and get some time on the infield. If Louis Sirius

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 1>can't do what he did in twenty one and twenty

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>two at the plate. So there's a lot of question

0:44:53.600 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>marks surrounding this guy, and we're gonna have to see

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>as he gets healthy and as he gets more playing time.

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 2>So you sound kind of nervous about third base, and

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I heard a lot of defensive questions in there, but

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 2>you are also nervous about ty France playing third base defense.

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 2>So it sounds like to me, if we get to

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:13.720
<v Speaker 2>this point, Locklear gets up, you take the bat.

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, you got it? Yeah, I guess you gotta good.

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 1>You got a solid point there, I guess. I guess

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.400
<v Speaker 1>if we reach that point where it's just an ultimate

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>cult long level performance at third base, then pretty much

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:33.919
<v Speaker 1>anything else at third base would would suffice. So we'll

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:35.839
<v Speaker 1>cross that Bridge. When we get there, we'll see, we'll

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>see how the season shakes up.

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and again for the record, no matter what the

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 2>role Josh Rojas plays, whether it is strictly at third baseman,

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:45.839
<v Speaker 2>whether he starts being an infield platoon guy, I think

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 2>he's absolutely gonna have a role on the team. I

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:49.919
<v Speaker 2>think he is going to be valuable, and I think

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 2>he is going to stick around long term. It's just

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it's urious who I think the question marks revolve around.

0:45:56.200 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 2>So if it got to a scenario where Locklear got

0:45:58.640 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 2>up played first base ty France, when the rohas would

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 2>play some second base, he'd still play a couple times

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 2>a week. He'd fill in either defensively late in games,

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 2>or he'd you know, get a start here and there.

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:11.439
<v Speaker 2>But but yeah, it's I think Urrius is the question mark,

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 2>that's for sure.

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And Urius can save himself if he hits, because the

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Mariners needs are gonna need some offense at third base.

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>If he hits, we probably won't be having these discussions

0:46:20.600 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>because the worry will be out the door for the

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 1>most part. But if he can't hit, then we're really

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna start having an issue. There is a guy who

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.280
<v Speaker 1>could see some time at third base on the bench

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Mariners. That could help supplement their production throughout

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:36.799
<v Speaker 1>the season. But before we get to Dylan Moore, let's

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 1>hear a word from our friends at Simply Seattle. We

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:41.919
<v Speaker 1>love Simply Seattle because they're the best place to go

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for Pacific Northwest themed sports gear online. Go to simply

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Sattle dot com and you can use our code Marine

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen for fifteen percent off a check out. They have

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 1>all the best Huskies gear, Seahawks, gear, Sonics, cracking Mariners,

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 1>anything he could want in the Pacific north West. They

0:47:00.440 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>have you covered at simply Seattle dot com. Use our

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 1>code Marine fifteen for fifteen percent off your order. Well,

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Moore is going to get to occupy his true

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>role this year. He's going to be off the bench.

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be a true utility guy on the

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 1>infield and the outfield this season. He's coming off a

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a down season in twenty twenty three compared

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>to his his best season of his career in twenty

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. He hit two oh seven, three oh three

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>four twenty eight a one oh five WRC, plus only

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>had half a win above replacement by fangrafts. He struggled

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to stay on the field and he struck out a

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 1>career high thirty four percent of the time. What does

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>your guy have to do this year, Doug.

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, First off, he's healthy and in camp. That was

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 2>such a problem last year again, like go look at

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 2>the bats still and Moore had. When they sent him

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 2>out on a rehab assignment, it was sped up. Like

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 2>he went out, got a few at bats, he had

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 2>a setback, so he had to go through some more

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 2>rehab process again. Then once he got close to playing games,

0:47:59.640 --> 0:48:01.799
<v Speaker 2>that kind of set up as at bats again and

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 2>he didn't have a full spring. In fact, he had

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 2>no spring last year and he didn't have a whole

0:48:05.160 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of at bats to get acclimated. Now he's healthy,

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 2>he's getting at bats. I think that's the biggest key

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 2>point Here's he is fully healthy and taking part in

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 2>big league spring training. That's number one. But yes, he

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.799
<v Speaker 2>cannot strike out that much. He's got to find his

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:23.319
<v Speaker 2>power stroke again. We know he can hit lefties when

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:25.800
<v Speaker 2>he's at his best, But I think the health factor

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 2>is going to be such a key now. If Dylan

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Moore comes out and has struggles again in twenty twenty four,

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 2>despite being healthy. We might have some different things to

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 2>look at. But I genuinely think missing all a spring

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 2>last year made a big difference, and not a good way.

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure didn't. He probably was guessing more at the plate.

0:48:42.280 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I did have some concern though along those lines on

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:47.879
<v Speaker 1>see if he corrects himself a little bit this year.

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 1>He's chased eleven percent more pitches outside the zone last

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>year than he did the year before. And Demo's a

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>guy who's supposed to have a pretty good idea of

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the strike zone. He's supposed to like walk at a

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>decent clip and understand like his strike zone and his

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>power profile. But if he's not doing that again for

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a second consecutive season, then we're gonna have some trouble.

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Because he was chasing more, he was making less contact

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 1>on those pitches, and he overall because of that, was

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a less productive offensive player. And the Mariners like some

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of those signs, some of those chase signs and the

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 1>down contact numbers. Sometimes that relates to aging. If Dylan

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Moore is aging poorly him just into his thirties, like

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that's an issue, and the Mariners would then think about

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 1>someone after coming off the season and they struck out

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 1>too much. Can't have a guy on their bench striking

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:46.240
<v Speaker 1>out thirty five percent of the time without the really

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>top of the line power. So it's interesting. This season

0:49:50.520 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>is big for Dylan Moore and his future on the

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Mariners after this season, I think for sure.

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:00.440
<v Speaker 2>If you're not performing in your role as a utility player,

0:50:00.520 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 2>there are other utility players that you can find. However,

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 2>as the reason I am such a big Dylan more guy,

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 2>when he is at his best, he is a perfect

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.800
<v Speaker 2>utility player because he legitimately does everything. He draws, walks,

0:50:11.800 --> 0:50:15.879
<v Speaker 2>has power, steals, plays all these different positions. So let's

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:17.520
<v Speaker 2>see what the health does for him this year. I

0:50:17.560 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 2>agree that he cannot chase that many pitches. Again, I

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:22.439
<v Speaker 2>agree that he's got a yeah, he's got a zone

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:24.480
<v Speaker 2>in his played approach a little bit more like he

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 2>was doing in seasons prior. But you know, he can

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 2>play a real role on this team when he's at

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 2>his best. Now, his role is gonna look a little

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 2>different this year because I think we're gonna see him

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 2>play a lot more infield than outfield. At least that's

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 2>how it seems for now. Do we like that better.

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna be honest, I always liked him as an outfielder,

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 2>not that he can't play the infield, but I thought

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 2>he's said out there.

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:48.759
<v Speaker 1>He's better as an outfielder. Like numbers wise, it backs

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>it up. He is a better outfielder than he is

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:54.520
<v Speaker 1>an infielder. The problem is you now have, like we

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in our mail bag that you know he's probably

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the backup centerfielder to Hulle Rodriguez, but at this point

0:51:01.800 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in the corners, they're pretty set on corner outfielders. They

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>don't like. Demo's best spot is left field. I'll say,

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 1>like in the outfield, that's his best defensive spot. But

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the Mariners have multiple guys who can occupy left field

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:16.720
<v Speaker 1>this season, so they don't need Demo out there unless

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it's an emergency. They need him more on the infield,

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>which are his worst spots. He's a pretty bad defender

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 1>at short for his career. It's not much better at

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>second base, and certainly not much better at third base either,

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So it might not be his best spot defensively, but

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:34.680
<v Speaker 1>whereas bat fits in, it's probably what you're gonna have

0:51:34.719 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to end up with.

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 2>M hm. Yeah, So look Ultimately, I'm sure he'll still

0:51:39.280 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 2>play some outfield, but you'll probably see him more on

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the infield this year, and hopefully he gets back to

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the Dylan Moore he was in twenty twenty two, because

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty two he was a one twenty six

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 2>WRC plus guy. This is what I mean when Dylan

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 2>Moore is at his best. He's very good to have

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 2>that type of guy as a bench bat. Good stuff,

0:51:57.680 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 2>last guy. Very quickly, before we get to speak your mind,

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 2>I figured we should at least throw in a word

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 2>or two about about Sebbi Zavalla. I know we got

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 2>off from the catchers for a little bit, but as

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 2>we're looking at the bench players, obviously he's he's probably

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna see playing time once a week, maybe twice a week,

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.240
<v Speaker 2>because cal Raley takes such a load of the catching,

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:17.719
<v Speaker 2>but because he's a good defender. At least in the

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:20.520
<v Speaker 2>past he's put up some offensive production. If they can

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 2>get him back to even you know, an eighty five

0:52:22.760 --> 0:52:25.480
<v Speaker 2>ninety WRC plus guy, it might give cal the ability

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:27.360
<v Speaker 2>to get some more days off this year and stay

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 2>a little healthier and get less dinged up, especially because

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 2>again Zavala is a good defender, so if you need

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 2>him late in games, he can do that.

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I really hated when over the

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years is when they would on a

0:52:40.120 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Cal's off day, they'd have to pull him off the

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 1>bench to hit. I really hope that the lineup depth

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>around Sebbi, Savala, and just around this roster overall is

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 1>enough that cal Rowly actually gets full days off. I'm like,

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>can't we can't keep pulling cal Rawly into the lineup

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>on his off days to have him hit in a

0:52:58.440 --> 0:53:01.759
<v Speaker 1>big spot, because you know what, the roster should be

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:05.160
<v Speaker 1>deep enough around cal Rawley where he does not have

0:53:05.239 --> 0:53:07.399
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Let's get this man some days off.

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Sebbi can play defense and the other eight guys in

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the lineup can match. Can we please just let that

0:53:12.600 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>be a thing. Let that be a constant for this

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:18.279
<v Speaker 1>lineup this season, because we're talking about like the health

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of cal Rawley's knees in the future, especially if you

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 1>want to extend him. Let's try not to run him

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>into the ground before he reaches his free agency, please

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and thank you.

0:53:28.920 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 2>And that was the problem last year. Tom Murphy was

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.399
<v Speaker 2>injured for a portion of the year. They had to

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:36.919
<v Speaker 2>bring up Luis Tonza one point to be the backup catcher.

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:38.960
<v Speaker 2>They didn't trust them behind the plate. So now you

0:53:39.000 --> 0:53:41.759
<v Speaker 2>have a real backup catcher with sevi'savalla. So that is

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:44.720
<v Speaker 2>good news. And hopefully he continues to play good defense

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 2>and even maybe hit a little bit too again, there

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:48.640
<v Speaker 2>have been years in the past where he's hit decently,

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.960
<v Speaker 2>just not last year. Maybe he'll bounce back. That'd be

0:53:51.960 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 2>great if he does. All right, let's get to speak

0:53:55.680 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 2>your mind. Speak your mind spot. That would be unwise.

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:09.319
<v Speaker 2>What is necessary is never unwise. Well, TJ, would you

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:12.360
<v Speaker 2>like to tell everybody what's on your mind this week?

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, as you might have noticed, I've been in two

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:19.919
<v Speaker 1>different locations for this episode. We've been having a lot

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of technical issues over the last couple of months, a

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 1>lot of it on my end, and I've officially made

0:54:26.880 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the decision that I need a new computer. Sucks. I

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>hate that's a lot of money to dish out, but

0:54:34.280 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually kind of excited to get a new laptop.

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I love my laptop. I've done a whole lot

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>on this laptop. This is my graduation present from college.

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It has served me well. But the hardware limitations have

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>finally caught up with us and has led to some

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 1>very long long episodes in length, not in actual length recorded,

0:54:55.600 --> 0:54:58.919
<v Speaker 1>but length sat here and actually tried to get through

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole recording self. It's been a been a pain

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of the ass. So I'm gonna we're we're gonna make

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 1>an upgrade and Laloni's time will all of a sudden

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:10.400
<v Speaker 1>become much more free because I imagine we're gonna have

0:55:10.400 --> 0:55:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot less issues with uh, with hardware limitations and

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:18.040
<v Speaker 1>lost recordings and and stuff like this. So I'm excited

0:55:18.200 --> 0:55:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to uh to have some new technology. It's gonna be

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be fun and yeah, but trying it to

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:26.879
<v Speaker 1>get too sentimental over this, uh, this quote unquote old

0:55:26.920 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that's only actually barely three years old.

0:55:31.280 --> 0:55:34.239
<v Speaker 2>I will say, uh for this episode. If you're watching

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube, for this episode, TJ is not in two

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 2>different locations, but we recorded a pair of episodes here

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday before the two of us took off for

0:55:43.040 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 2>spring training.

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So good point, exactly, the point of everything all blending

0:55:46.960 --> 0:55:48.720
<v Speaker 1>together and stuff like that.

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it is all blended together. So for what

0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:55.840
<v Speaker 2>it's worth, TJ knows this for I guess Transparency or

0:55:55.920 --> 0:55:58.400
<v Speaker 2>anybody that is curious. Probably none of you are. But

0:55:58.480 --> 0:55:59.799
<v Speaker 2>I got a new computer at one point in this

0:56:00.320 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 2>of doing the podcast too. For me, it was because

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:06.080
<v Speaker 2>trying to edit and upload things it was taking forever

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:08.880
<v Speaker 2>like upload shows to YouTube, is what I mean. And

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:11.439
<v Speaker 2>as a result, it just got to be too much

0:56:11.640 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 2>of pain, and I said, Okay, we've got to do

0:56:14.080 --> 0:56:16.880
<v Speaker 2>something else. Therefore, I got a new computer. So TJ,

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 2>you're not alone. And for the record, maybe it sucks

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 2>thinking about it right now, but once you have it,

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 2>you're like, man, this is this is a nice sigh

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:27.759
<v Speaker 2>of relief. Yah.

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. The problem is I really want a MacBook Pro.

0:56:30.680 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So I currently had the twenty twenty MacBook Air. It's

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a good computer, but again the hardware spect are just

0:56:36.480 --> 0:56:39.440
<v Speaker 1>not quite enough. I really really want the new MacBook Pro.

0:56:39.640 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Just like reading smer views of it, I'm like, man,

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I will never ever have a speed issue about anything

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on this computer. But that thing's like three thousand dollars

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to purchase. So I was like, that might be a

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit out of my budget. Hey maybe if I

0:56:53.120 --> 0:56:55.480
<v Speaker 1>went and worked in tech, like like I mentioned on

0:56:55.600 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 1>our Mailbag episode in a in a in a in

0:56:58.840 --> 0:57:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a episode earlier this week. In a different life, I

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 1>could be working in tech and three grand would be nothing.

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Throw that out and buy the brand new MacBook Pro

0:57:06.840 --> 0:57:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't ever have a have a smidge of

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:14.319
<v Speaker 1>doubt about processing power and computer speed ever again. But

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:16.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case, because you know, we work in sports,

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and people don't make that much money in sports. So

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it'll be a it'll be a different option, but uh,

0:57:21.280 --> 0:57:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it's be cool. I my my beef and

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I can maybe the real speak your mind. Part of

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:28.800
<v Speaker 1>why that like, I'm excited to get a new laptop,

0:57:29.000 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 1>but I need a new phone more than I need

0:57:30.760 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a new laptop, which really like my phone. I have

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the ten. It's like this thing is slower than my

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:41.000
<v Speaker 1>current laptop is. But I need the laptop because this

0:57:41.160 --> 0:57:43.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast is a big part of our lives now, so

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I need the I need the recording power. But I'm

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:50.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna need to find a way to find the money

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to also get a new phone as well, which stinks.

0:57:52.520 --> 0:57:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of money, a lot of cash that

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to spend going on a trip to Europe instead.

0:57:56.360 --> 0:58:00.800
<v Speaker 1>But as my grandma said today as I was coming

0:58:00.800 --> 0:58:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to record these two episodes and wishing wish me a

0:58:04.000 --> 0:58:08.240
<v Speaker 1>happy birthday today, that don't always get to spend the

0:58:08.280 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 1>money how you want, even if you plant it out it,

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 1>life never works out that way. And you know she's right,

0:58:15.320 --> 0:58:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Not everything works out that way, but in due time

0:58:18.080 --> 0:58:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everything will will be okay.

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:22.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess that's a pretty good way to think

0:58:22.920 --> 0:58:24.600
<v Speaker 2>about it. Maybe it's not the fun way to think

0:58:24.600 --> 0:58:26.960
<v Speaker 2>about it, but it is the truth. But hey, doing

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 2>this podcast is fun and obviously we care about doing

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:31.040
<v Speaker 2>a good job with it, which is why the two

0:58:31.040 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of us have now both gotten new computers in this process.

0:58:33.640 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 2>And hopefully one day everybody can cross your fingers for TJ.

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 2>He'll have a new phone at some point too. So

0:58:40.280 --> 0:58:42.560
<v Speaker 2>my speak your mind this week it's actually baseball related.

0:58:42.600 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 2>It's even a little bit Mariners related. So I hope

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't get too much flak for this, especially being

0:58:48.320 --> 0:58:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Mariners fans, but objectively as a baseball fan, somehow I

0:58:52.520 --> 0:58:55.320
<v Speaker 2>never really look too much into the two thousand and

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:57.800
<v Speaker 2>one MVP voting the year each row won it. I

0:58:57.800 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you've ever really dug into this, TJ,

0:58:59.760 --> 0:59:02.720
<v Speaker 2>but somehow I was either reading some articles or just

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:06.640
<v Speaker 2>digging through Fangrafts and Baseball Savant, but I stumbled across it,

0:59:07.280 --> 0:59:09.240
<v Speaker 2>and now it's kind of got me scratching my head.

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I want to preface this by saying, for the record,

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I think each Erro is absolutely a first ballot Hall

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:17.000
<v Speaker 2>of Famer. I think he has a real chance to

0:59:17.000 --> 0:59:19.280
<v Speaker 2>be unanimous. He is one of the greatest mariners ever.

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 2>He's one of the greatest players ever, which is why

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:22.960
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be a first ballot Hall of Famer.

0:59:23.640 --> 0:59:26.480
<v Speaker 2>But strictly looking at that two thousand and one season,

0:59:27.320 --> 0:59:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you've ever paired up his numbers

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:34.640
<v Speaker 2>with Jason Giambi, who finished in second. And let me

0:59:34.720 --> 0:59:37.720
<v Speaker 2>put it like this, if these two seasons happened in

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:40.920
<v Speaker 2>today's day and age at the same time, I don't

0:59:41.040 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 2>think each Zuro has an MVP to his name. So

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:47.640
<v Speaker 2>here's what I mean. Each Hero in two thousand and

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 2>one obviously had over two hundred hits. He hit three

0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 2>point fifty amazing and a six f wour. Jason Giambi

0:59:55.880 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and one hit three point thirty two.

0:59:58.720 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 2>He had an eleven thirty ops eleven thirty seven, thirty

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:06.880
<v Speaker 2>eight bombs, nineteen point two percent walk rate, twelve point

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:10.040
<v Speaker 2>four percent k rate nine point two four, which was

1:00:10.080 --> 1:00:12.200
<v Speaker 2>much higher than each heroes. And this is the kicker.

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:18.080
<v Speaker 2>A one ninety three WRC plus e Zerros was not

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:21.440
<v Speaker 2>that So I hope I'm not gonna get black for this,

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>but I just start looking at these numbers, I'm like, Wow,

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>times have changed in baseball a little bit, because if

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:30.320
<v Speaker 2>this was today, I don't think Eachziro's win that MVP

1:00:30.440 --> 1:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>over Jason Giambi.

1:00:32.360 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>The more I read some of these steroid erastats, the

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>more I'm convinced the pitchers in that era were just

1:00:37.600 --> 1:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>not very good. I mean, are you could eat a

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen point two percent walk rate? Yeah, you're telling me

1:00:43.800 --> 1:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>these guys couldn't strike these guys out more than twelve

1:00:46.400 --> 1:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time barely more? Are you kidding me?

1:00:49.880 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know what the most hilarious part of all

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this is, Lyle, is that the man who makes Jason

1:00:55.400 --> 1:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Giambi look like that season look like absolutely nothing is

1:01:00.160 --> 1:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Hall of Fame from that year. Correct.

1:01:02.960 --> 1:01:04.680
<v Speaker 2>And by that, for those who maybe don't get the

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>reference Ry Barry Bonds, Yes, that is crazy. Like again, like,

1:01:10.040 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>this is no knock on each roo he was. He

1:01:12.400 --> 1:01:14.760
<v Speaker 2>obviously deserved Rookie of the Year. He obviously deserved to

1:01:14.760 --> 1:01:16.120
<v Speaker 2>be one of the eight Mariners in the All Star

1:01:16.160 --> 1:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Game that year. He was the second best player in

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the American League that year, like like, which is really good.

1:01:22.920 --> 1:01:26.520
<v Speaker 2>But I hear one ninety three WRC plus for a

1:01:26.600 --> 1:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>hitter and I'm like, that guy lost the MVP and

1:01:30.080 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 2>he put up a nine win season, like wow, Like

1:01:34.280 --> 1:01:37.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, each lay better defense, Like he played

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:40.840
<v Speaker 2>better defense better pure contact. Hitter stole way more bases,

1:01:40.840 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>by the way, like way more obviously, but you know,

1:01:45.960 --> 1:01:48.480
<v Speaker 2>the the home run heavy numbers like WRC plus and

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:50.800
<v Speaker 2>ops kind of favored nowadays.

1:01:51.120 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>There's some pretty wonky voting back then. You look at

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>some of these MVP races, especially when a Ron was

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Mariners in his you know, first handful of seasons.

1:02:00.880 --> 1:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>The fact he didn't win an MVP as a Mariner

1:02:03.760 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is pretty bonkers. Like this man is a twenty year

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>old had a ten win season.

1:02:11.280 --> 1:02:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Crazy, Yeah, that's wild, and he didn't win it, Like

1:02:14.400 --> 1:02:15.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that ever, he.

1:02:15.600 --> 1:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Didn't even finish first on his own team.

1:02:18.560 --> 1:02:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that's crazy. Oh that's the other crazy thing

1:02:21.840 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>about two thousand and one two Brett Boone finished third

1:02:25.040 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that year and he had a monster year in oh one,

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>like monster year, one of the best seasons at least

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 2>power wise for a second baseman ever. So yeah, it's

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 2>pretty crazy that that was a really good MVP class.

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>And I was just looking at that and it made

1:02:38.360 --> 1:02:41.280
<v Speaker 2>me kind of realize, oh, wow, like there there there

1:02:41.320 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 2>might have been a snub going on here. As much

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 2>as I love each ye ro, I love each hero,

1:02:45.840 --> 1:02:48.480
<v Speaker 2>but just as an objective baseball fan looking at more

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:50.640
<v Speaker 2>in that lens, in this sense, I was like, wow,

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 2>that's that is interesting. That's how I'll put that. So,

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know something. I was kind of digging around

1:02:56.320 --> 1:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>and looking through and I said, this is this is

1:02:58.800 --> 1:03:00.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of on my mind. I'm gonna bring it up,

1:03:00.160 --> 1:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>see what you think, and we'll see what all of

1:03:02.480 --> 1:03:05.040
<v Speaker 2>our listeners think about it too. So I'm sure there'll

1:03:05.080 --> 1:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>be some comments about it. I'm sure there'll be some

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:10.520
<v Speaker 2>people saying like, how dare you slander your own your

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:12.960
<v Speaker 2>own team, which I'm not slandering, it's just it's just

1:03:13.040 --> 1:03:14.560
<v Speaker 2>each each Again, I think each year is a first

1:03:14.600 --> 1:03:16.400
<v Speaker 2>ballid Hall of Famer. It's just maybe that year he

1:03:16.440 --> 1:03:18.280
<v Speaker 2>should have finished second, not first. That's all.

1:03:18.960 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So you bring up some good points, hey listen. Yeah,

1:03:22.320 --> 1:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it was, like I'm just gonna say in summary, like

1:03:24.520 --> 1:03:26.439
<v Speaker 1>reading some of the box scores and the slash lines

1:03:26.480 --> 1:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>from the steroid or era are insane. It's it's crazy

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to think those things happened in like modern baseball.

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah it is. It is wild. They need a PD

1:03:36.960 --> 1:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>wing in the Hall of Fame. That is my final statement.

1:03:38.960 --> 1:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>You cannot just act like all these guys didn't exist period, Like.

1:03:42.000 --> 1:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, hitters today don't do that, and they

1:03:44.240 --> 1:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>can't because the pitching's too.

1:03:45.320 --> 1:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Good right now. Hitters would never have ten straight years

1:03:49.520 --> 1:03:51.480
<v Speaker 2>of two hundred plus hits either in today's day and

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:54.960
<v Speaker 2>age like each EIO did. But same concept, pitching's way

1:03:54.960 --> 1:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>too good to ever do that. That's why hits are

1:03:56.600 --> 1:04:00.640
<v Speaker 2>way down in baseball now. So yeah, games changed and

1:04:01.280 --> 1:04:02.880
<v Speaker 2>it is fun to look back on some of those years,

1:04:02.920 --> 1:04:05.919
<v Speaker 2>that's for sure. All Right. I think that just about

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>wraps up this edition of the Marine Layer podcast. You

1:04:08.760 --> 1:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>guys know the drill. If you want to listen to

1:04:10.240 --> 1:04:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the full form podcast. You can do so. Wherever you

1:04:12.360 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>get your audio pod to make sure to download. Leave

1:04:14.400 --> 1:04:16.760
<v Speaker 2>us a five star review, leave a written review. If

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:19.000
<v Speaker 2>you're watching it on YouTube, make sure a light comment

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:23.320
<v Speaker 2>and subscribe. Follow us on social media too. We're on Instagram, TikTok,

1:04:23.480 --> 1:04:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Twitter and YouTube shorts at Marine Layer Pod. That's TJ.

1:04:27.440 --> 1:04:29.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Lyle. As always, we thank you guys for tuning in.

1:04:30.360 --> 1:05:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Talk to you soon. The stiest