WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Sonders, Ketterer, Jacobs

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:05.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week. Market shruggle, higher consumer prizes.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>The economy is in the process of rebounding. Will the

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>futteral reserve have its own digital currency? The financial stories

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.879
<v Speaker 1>that cheap hard work. Many people think the eels are

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just going to keep marching up. We have more spending

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>coming out of Congress. One of the big questions I

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>think on investor's minds inflation through the eyes of the

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>most influential voices. Larry Summer is the former Treasury Secretary

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bryan Whan, a backup America, Will Smart CEO Charlie Sharp,

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg wool Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>rethinking where we are on rates, on oil, on banker's pay,

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and on the Biden administration. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Weston. It was a week for taking stock

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>as President Biden tried to reset his agenda after a

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>year in the job. But I'm not going to give

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>up and accept things as they are now. I call

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it a job not yet finished. And it did it

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that he wasn't going to get all of that build

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>back better package, at least not all in one piece.

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we can break the package up, get as

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>much as we can now and come back and fight

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of lator. All markets took stock of

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>where they are to, sending the price of Brent crude

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>up over eighty nine dollars a barrel at one point,

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>with talk of it maybe going to one hundred dollars

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of barrel. Here's amrita send from energy aspects. I think

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that demand is so strong and refining margins

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in particular are still very, very robust despite the crewe

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>galley we've seen, is a very promising sign. But when

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to taking a fresh look, equities led the way,

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>suffering the worst week since the pandemic royal the market,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>with tech shares leading the way down, help by uneven

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>earnings and the anticipation of higher rates, with the SMP

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>down five points six percent for the week and the

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>NASDAC down another seven percent, putting the index into correction territory.

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>For all the talk about rate hikes, the ten year

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>bond yield actually went down to basis points to one

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>point seven six while the dollar climbed nearly four tenths

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of a percent. Help sort out a very vulnerable week.

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>We welcome now Sarah Ketder, she's CEO of Causeway Capital,

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and liz Ant Sanders, she's chief investment strategist at charl Schwab.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So as a strategist, we've got to turn to you first, Lisi,

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on what is going on here with the markets, is

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that the rates anticipation is that the earnings isn't something else.

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So there may be a little bit of a tie

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>into earnings just in terms of the companies that haven't

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>beaten expectations have gotten hit a little bit more. But

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there are bigger picture issues here. It's the

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>combination of the FED having moved from very loose policy

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>to tighter monetary policy, whether or not that what they

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>will start to do with rate hikes ending tapering and

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>then potentially moving to QT is the elixir for what

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>ails us in terms of the inflation problem, which in

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>turn is putting downward pressure on growth. And I just

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>think you have a rerating going on, and certainly a

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of a excuse the term puking of some of

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the higher spec lower quality segments of the market. So, Sarah,

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a puking a technical term I hadn't heard before. But

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>but but what are you saying as an investor, what

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing there? What are the opportunities? What are

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the real risks out there in the market place right now? Well,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the market is certainly rewarding certain areas such as energy

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and financials, banks, insurance stocks, but it's and value indices

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>are outperforming growth by wide margin. And this is just

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>three weeks into the year. But if you look beneath

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>that that as lizanner, that, they're definitely pain associated with

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:37.119
<v Speaker 1>the extremely high valuation stocks, but not all the very

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>low valuation stocks are doing well. Again, the market seem

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to rewarding those associated with rising commodities and the financials.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the value of dias are pulling up some of

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the financials. They have some I think serious headwinds, But

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the area that might have the greatest amount of upside

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>as the market begins to discern the winners and losers

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in is as we moved towards post pandemic will be

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>those who are most badly affected by COVID And there's

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole range of those stocks that have outperformed thus

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>far should continue to do so as the year progressed. Yeah,

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and David, I think what Sarah said is absolutely right

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>with regard to sort of the push and poll of

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>energy and financials, and then the relationship that that has

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>with the value indexes. But what's also interesting, it's a

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of times when people talk about growth versus value

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and value doing well, they're thinking about it at the

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>index level. But even in a sector like technology over

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the past few months, those stocks within tech that screen

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>well on value characteristics like free cash flow yield, dividend

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 1>yield are the ones that are outperforming, whereas the stocks

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>within tech that have negative earnings are the ones getting hammered.

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So even within call it growthier segments of the market,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of the value oriented stocks are the ones that are

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>doing better. Yeah, we even see this within semicon actors.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You can see an incredibly expensive semi vector stock like

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:10.239
<v Speaker 1>an Nvidio under form of maybe a less expensive stock

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 1>in memory. So the distinction is happening right before us,

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it's a reason to be grounded portfolio

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>wise in reasonably value, higher quality companies. Listen, as far

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>as there's uncertain of market right now, are we going

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to get some help from the Fed? Next week? We're

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna get another FMC ruling, So it'll be an interesting meeting.

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect anything um particularly formal in terms of

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>what they're going to do. They're not going to start

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to raise interest rates. Maybe in the statement they give

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more color about tapering, but there's no

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>question that during the press conference, I'm sure John Powell

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be peppered with questions about the span

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of time between papering and QT, whether or not they're

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have to act with a faster pace, or

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of chatter today. Might they have to do

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty basis points in the early stages versus only twenty five.

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't expect much of any of that to

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>be in the statement. But given that every f o

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>MC meeting has a press conference, those these days I

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>think are even more interesting than when we first here

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at two o'clock Eastern. And what we can't it's so

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting that the said, nor can the Bank of England

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>or the European Central Bank. They can't ignore what's right

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in front of their face, which is inexorable wage increases

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that every company we talked to and companies we don't

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to, we just read transcripts, they are facing wage inflation,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>and wage inflation that gets more so wage rises get

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>more wage rises, which is what makes inflation somewhat difficult

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to eradicate. So central banks may very well be behind

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the ball here. Thank you so very much to liz

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>An Sanders of Charles Schwab and Sarah Kettter of Causeway

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management. Coming up, Bank of America Chair and CEO

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>on the future of digital banking. That's next on Wall

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Street Week on gloom Work. This is Bloomberg Wall Street

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. The move into

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>digital was a big part of the earnings announcements of

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the big banks this season, with projections of large investments

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>dampening profit expectations in the near term. Bank of America

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Chair and CEO Brian moynihan has made digital priority for

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>years now and he's not backing off, seeing it as

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a major component of the bank's future and the broadest strokes.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>We are a high touch, high tech company, so digital

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is part of the strategy, but it has to be

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.239
<v Speaker 1>incorporated with our relationship manage of businesses think the private

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>bank or MARYL, or the commercial bank or UH, the

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>trading businesses. So and also our branches three or four

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>D thousand people coming to our branches, so it's a

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>combined strategy. But why digital is so important, it's from

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the customer interface. It's from the how employees can work together,

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and then how the customers can receive the uh, the

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>goods and services, how they by them, how they interact

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with So it makes us tremendously efficient and a great

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>client experience, which is a pretty good thing. There's a

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk right now, but particularly the big banks

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>investing in digital. I know you've been investing for some time.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think your numbers around three point five billion dollars

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a year is as steady as you go. Do you

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>expect that to continue into the future or ramp up? Well,

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it's always changing as to what we spend it on.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a gross amount of money, which is a pretty

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>good sized amount of money. So when people talk about

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>three and a half billion for us, that means literally

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>incremental new products and services and new capabilities. So it's

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to run the platforms another ten

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or twelve billion dollars. It just goes on every day.

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But what are we investing in greater capabilities? So Erica

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to our consumer clients, you know, is huge, but we

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>can keep increasing the functionality. So year every year, we

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>had a fourfold increase in the fourth quarter of twenty

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>one people using Erica, not because Erica it had a

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>growth in customers, but really came from people using it

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>more and more or Zel getting it more easily accessible

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>through a widget it's called. Those are the types of

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>things we're doing it in. On the institutional side, cash pro,

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>which is the way companies move money, more engagements by customers.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>They can see everything in a in a portal type

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>app as opposed to a bunch of different systems. These

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>are just core executions we drive through the platform. I

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>believe you passed a road mark this actually quarter in

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Zell actually having more transactions than you're checking accounts? Do

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe? I read that? If true, give us a

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>sense of overall in your business. Will that continue to progress?

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, at some point does digital eat the entire bank? Well,

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>so what happened with Zell is we keep track of

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the checks written by our customers. So, uh, you're sitting

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>down and writing a checkout and handing putting in the

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>mail to pay a bill or to hand it to

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's down of the last couple of years, and

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Zel has been growing fifty percent a year, so the

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers of transactions by zel is actually exceed the number

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>checks written by our consumer customers. That was a milestone

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>because it shows you what's really happening is that Zel

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is eating into those low balanced checks. And if you

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>look at a dollar amount of checks right, not the

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>number of transactions. Dollar amounts actually up a little bit,

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>so less checks of higher amounts to two thousand dollar

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>checks versus twy dollar checks, and those low checks are

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>being taken over by Zell, which is good because it's

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>easier for the clients to move money to each other.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's easy instead of giving your your son or daughter

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a check, David Ido, you just zelling the money. And

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and in the volume of Zell now exceeds Vemo overall

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in the industry, and I think we're basically equal to

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 1>Venmo in terms of transactions a quarterly basis, So we're

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.599
<v Speaker 1>driving that through. It's really convenient, but that is a

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>big milestone to think that what you and I grew

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>up with, David, is the way to get money out

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of the bank was to write a check and hand

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it to somebody and then they could negotiate that check

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>has now gone to where you can just say giving

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>your cell phone number and you pay them. That's pretty good.

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>It's extraordinary development, certainly for somebody at my age. That's right, Brian.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Give me a sense as you look at the digital

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>strategy going forward, how much of this is basically doing

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a form of the business you've been doing, for example

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>zel replacing checks as opposed to actually moving into new

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>businesses potentially with new stomers. Well, I think if you

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>if you look on the wealth management business, the financial

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>advisory team we have at MARYL and the private bankers

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we have their cord of what we do for clients.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you think about what happened during the pandemic,

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the ability for us to get information to clients and

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>blue our insights to clients through through Zoom and WebEx

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and other types of meetings allowed us to get out

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to clients in a very intimate setting, one to one,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but through the through the screen many more times. So

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you enabled your reach of those teammates. But behind the scenes,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>also just thinking the investment products like our our Life

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Events investment product has seven million users now who are

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>loading in a financial plan, a life event plan for

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>them and It keeps them on uh you know, on

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>parting and moving forward on task, showing them what's happening.

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>If they say this much, they want to say for

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this purpose, what are the priorities? You know, is that

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a new product not an advisor did that for years?

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>But is it enablement advisor to add more value to

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.559
<v Speaker 1>the insight knowledge they have as opposed to putting the

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff in a financial planning module or doing calculations is

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on spreadsheets? So you know, as you think about these, yes,

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>some are very new products. L is a new way

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to move money. Others are digital embodiments of old products.

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But light have reach and access and capabilities far different.

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's pretty fun and interesting. Are there customers that

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you will reach their digital that you would never have

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>reached their back of America or is it basically that

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>customer base that of course you're always trying to grow. Yeah, well,

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have basic things. We have more to do.

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>We can do with every customer because we have the

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>best capabilities of anybody in the market. And if a

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>customer simply does has a product with us and does

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>something with somebody else, We're like, we're not serving them

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>well because we're the best, therefore they should do it

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>with us. That's our basic principle. But on the other hand,

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>we can gather customers. So if you think about it

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in the in the consumer side, especially as we've been

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>going into new markets at Pittsburgh or Columbus, are Cleveland, Cincinnati,

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Salt Lake, or Denver, Minneapolis that we've opened up in

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>with branches. When we go in there, we go in

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>digital first, and we'll have ten twenty thousand checking accounts

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>going before we ever opened the first branch. So those

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>stomers can do, you know, can work with this completely

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>digitally and it works and so but we we firmly

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 1>believe it's a high touch high tech. At some point

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>most customers on the consumer size come to the branch.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>All the relationship managing customers the core interfaces through a person,

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a financial advisor, a commercial banker, but enablement helps and

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so you have to think about this as a combined

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>strategy of high touch high tech. So, yes, we get

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>customers digitally only that happens all day long. But the

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>end of day, what makes us special. We have the

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>best digital capabilities, plus we have the physical capabilities with them. Brian,

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>as you say, you've invested a lot of money, continue

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to invest a lot. You've made a lot of progress.

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, do you envision possibly a major

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>acquisition in this area to really take you forward, because

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>you said the sky is unlimited and how far you

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>can go with digital? So we've done major acquisition would

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be off the table probably in a lot of ways

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's just the does a business model work creature.

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>But we have done an acquisition like an healthcare technology space.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>We did something to enable the payment side, surround payments.

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We bought back our joint venture on the merchant side

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago. That was a two billion

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar transaction and now we've put three hundred million dollars

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>into the new system to drive that. So we're always

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>going to make acquisitions which complement our behaviors and also

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>partner with companies or a couple of our capabilities and

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>partner with companies. But the reality is, you know, we

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>have two point seven billion digital interactions and our consumer business.

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Last quarter, we have a huge business. We have fifty

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>four million digital customers UH that are credited and forty

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>one million were active. You know, we we we we

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>need always be looking at what capabilities we need, and

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that's partnered with providers and ideas that come in.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is acquiring more customers is not what

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we're after right now. Right What we're after right now

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>is driving the usage in the capabilities and people understanding

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>what they can get from Bank of America's digital capabilities

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>across the whole platform. That was Brian Wynihan Chair and

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Bank of America coming up. How big is

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the semiconductor shortage problem? How long will it last? And

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>how can we fix it? We hear from the former

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>head of Qualcom, Paul Jacobs. That's next on Wall Street

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. Everybody's talking about it, the

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>shortage of microchips, whether you make cars. Like Mary Barra

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of GM, we saw significant impact with the semiconductor shortage

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>last year. I would say every quarter it gets a

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit better, but we're not through it yet. There

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>still is work to do. Or you make heating and

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>air conditioning equipment. Like Dave Gitland of Carrier, we actually

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>um don't have the kind of buying power with the

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>chip O e ms that maybe some of some other

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>folks in other industries do. But I can tell you

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that we have met directly with the CEOs of major

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>chip manufacturers. We've done unique arrangements with them that we've

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>never done in the past. And it's not just the

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>buyers of chips feeling the pressure. The producers like Kurt

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Sivers of n XP Semiconductors are feeling every bit as

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>much pressure. The entire semiconductor supply. Chaine is on the

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty heavy stress these days. Even FED Chair J. Powell's

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>job has gotten harder because of the chip shortage, which

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he says is partly what's leading to the inflation. We're

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing people want to buy cars. Car carmakers can't make

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>any more cars because there are no semi conductors. So

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's never happening. So what's the solution. Congress is

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>working on a Chips Act to get more investment in

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>onshore production, which Congressman Hayley Stevens of Michigan says is

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>critical for the auto industry in her district. Here in

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Automotive plan, one of the things that you cannot escape

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>from our is the chip shortage. We have got to

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>pass the Chips Act. But whatever the solution, just about

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone agrees that it's going to take time. Whether you're

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in the market to buy, we still think it's going

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to linger into the first half of this year and

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>we should be farther out it by the end of

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, or in the market to sell. This is

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>going to get better through next year, but I don't

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>think everything is going to be imbalanced from a supplied

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>amount perspective through the end of next year. And we

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>turned now to someone who really knows this chip industry well.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>He's Paul Jacobs. He's now the chairman CEO of x

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>CAM and he did for many years run qual Calm.

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>So Paul, thanks so much for being with us. First

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, give us a sense of how big a

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>problem this is. Is can you put your arms around

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>how big a problem the shortage of semiconductors is right now.

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.479
<v Speaker 1>But as you know, everything is being digitized, and so

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>semi conductors are in almost every product we use, from

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>home appliances to cars and now even more so with

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles. They're in the cloud, they're in our smartphones,

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are in just so many things in our lives. And

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>what's happened is that we had some shocks in the system,

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>which became big because we had this notion of being

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>very efficient just in time manufacturing, lean manufacturing, so you

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't hold a lot of inventory on hand, and when

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>there were whips in the supply which happened because of COVID,

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>these things spiraled out of control and became very very

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>big issues in in the in the supply chain. And

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>so you're seeing for big companies, some of them are

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>able to get their components still, but for smaller companies, uh,

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>some of them are having a very hard time, long

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>lead times, some sometimes up as much as a year

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of waiting to get a part that you need, people

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>who have been raising prices. So all these things are

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>affecting sort of that innovation economy that the world depends on.

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about just in time, did we under

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>invest globally? Did we underinvest in the capacity to design

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and manufacturer chips. I think that there's a lot of

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>concentration in it, and there's only a few suppliers. Is

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of diversity in the the supply chain.

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think maybe to explain it a little bit simpler,

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>if we think about it something close to home, like

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>toilet paper. When you think about there was supply of

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.439
<v Speaker 1>toilet paper and a pretty constant demand of toilet paper,

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit more because people were working from home.

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 1>But you didn't buy a lot of toilet paper at

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>your house because I figured you could go down to

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the store and get it. Now what happened. People got

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>nervous whether they could actually go down to the store

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and get it, so they started putting more at home.

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>They started buying more, and the system wasn't set up

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>for that. So there was this surgeon demand and that

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>meant that there were shortages. And that is part of

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the chip business. The supply is there

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.159
<v Speaker 1>under normal constraints. But now with these things that have

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>happened because of COVID, and very interesting things happened because

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at first the demand dropped, everybody thought the whole economy

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was slowing down to demand drop. Then the demand surge

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>because all of this work from home and all the

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 1>other other things. So there was this ripple in the

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 1>demand side. The supply side was basically there, but it's

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like this toilet paper situation. Now people who

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>are have the ability are trying to hold more inventory

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>so that they don't get hit by these ups and

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>downs in the process. I would say though, that it

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is important to build more semiconductor uh fabs, and it's

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>important not just for the making of the chips, but

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>also the packaging of the chips, the testing of the chips,

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>but even beyond that, it's all the little components that

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>go around it aboards. I mean, we really, uh, you know,

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 1>we have an issue where there were very few suppliers.

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.439
<v Speaker 1>There was a broad range of products out there that

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that and components that that people needed, and all this

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>led to a lack of resiliency, you know, a lack

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of ability to adapt to these big shocks that might

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>happen in the system. Paul, this has been very helpful.

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so very much. As Paul Jacobs, he's the

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>chairman and CEO of x COOM. Coming up, we wrap

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>up the week with special contributor Larry Summers of Harvard.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. This

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>is Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. We're gonna wrap

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>up the week again this week with our very special

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>contributer Larry Summers of Harvard. Larry, welcome back. Good to

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>have you here. We've talked about the Fed. We've talked

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>about inflation. The FED has said they're going to tighten

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>because the inflation you've been warning about for some time.

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>We actually get a decision next week. What do you

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>expect the FED to do? I think they're going to

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be signaling the tightening in March. I hope they'll be

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>signaling as rapid as possible and end UH to qt UH.

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>We got an economy that's looking like it's above the

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>speed limit and it's gonna have to slow down. And

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fed's got a very delicate operation now in UH

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>owing it down. The delicacy of that operation is underscored

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>by the turbulent and asset markets since the beginning of

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the year. It's underscored by the softness in some kinds

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of measures of consumer sentiment and UH consumer spending. But

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to have maximum employment and maximum growth

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>over time, UH, we're gonna have to control the pace

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of the growth of UH total incomes so that more

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of it can go into more employment and more output

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and less of it into inflation. Larry, as you look

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>at the various indicators do you can. Are you concerned

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>at all that maybe we're too complacent about the offensibility

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to do this. The market uses they have been turbulent,

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they're reacting at the same time you look at the

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>five year five years there's still like a two point

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>one two like that, And also the financial conditions have

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>not really tightened much. Is that because we're just so

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>confident that they can do this without really roiling people?

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we underestimating the size of the problem. I think

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the gravity of our situation is still understated. While the

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>term transitory has left the policy maker discourse, the idea

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of transitory inflation is still very fixed in their minds.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>There's still a belief that with very limited monetary actions

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>that have not taken full effect, we will see inflation

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>as slow to the two percent range by the end

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the year. That certainly could happen, but it wouldn't

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>be my bet. Given the tremendous tightness of labor markets,

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>given increasing signs to China is going to be a

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>source of bottlenecks for quite some time to come, given

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>increasing concerns about oil prices, given that there's a lot

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of housing inflation that's still has to feed through the system,

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and given how remarkably low real interest rates UH are,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it's the best bet that inflation

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>is going to be coming down to the two into

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the two percent range or the two's by the end

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of the year. And so I think complacency is UH

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>not appropriate. So Larry and President Biden had a quite long,

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>almost two year, two hour press conference this week, and

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>in the course of that he basically said it is

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the FEDS responsibility to do with inflation. He talked about

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the economy. What did you make of what Prisident Biden

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>had to say about his leadership of the economy. Look,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think President Biden is right to take pride in

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that more people are employed than anyone would

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>have expected on the day he took office, despite very

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:53.959
<v Speaker 1>substantial uh desease threats. Frankly, I can't understand, for the

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>life of me why the administration is so obsessed with

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>meat packing. Meat Packing is a entire higherly trivial and

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>unimportant issue with respect to uh inflation. It is inconceivable

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 1>that tossing a billion dollars as the Agriculture Department is

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>in the general direction of creating an extra meeting meatpacking

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 1>plant is a good use of taxpayers money or is

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. So I don't understand why the President

0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of the the United States keeps talking about that. I'm glad

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to see him recognize and emphasize the independence of the

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Central Bank. And as I said on your show last week, David,

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I very much hope that his new appointees to the Fed,

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>when they have their confirmation hearings, will take the opportunity

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to underscore their recognition that the most basic responsibility that

0:25:55.200 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Central Bank has is a stable currency and price

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>UH stability and the avoidance of inflation. That's not something

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that's been in any of their writings UH prior to

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>this point. That doesn't mean they don't fully share the conviction,

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think it will be very important for them

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to articulate that and articulate how important they perceive that

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to have been in the nominating process, because ultimately, credibility

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is about deeds as much as it's about words, and

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the most important deeds the president has with respect to

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>UH the Central Bank are what he are, what he

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>does UH in terms of staffing the Central Bank, Larry,

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.959
<v Speaker 1>we're talking at me packing, I naturally think about competition

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>policy and a trust law. You have something of a dispute,

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps going with Paul Krugman, your former classmate, your friend,

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>over the role that a trust and we've heard from

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>President Biden and others that really an trust enforcement is

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a key ingredient in fighting and inflation. How big a

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 1>difference do you really have on this subject. I'm not sure,

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not sure what they really think. Should we

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>have substantially enhanced anti trust in the United States? Yes,

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>we absolutely should. Is it harmless and normal politics to

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of concern about high prices to drive political

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>energy behind that competition policy? Yes. Does it make sense

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that antitrust policy canning any important way reduce

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>uh the inflation rate over the horizon of a couple

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>of years. No, that is not supported by economic science.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm also worried about the um and type trust doctrines

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that some of the Biden appointees have put forward. Lena

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Kahn expressed a concern that perhaps when two firms merge

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're able to produce more efficiently with fewer people,

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>that should not be counted as an efficiency. There's been

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk about introducing considerations other than lower

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>prices for consumers into antitrust protecting small business competitors. For example.

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>That kind of stuff is frankly promoting of higher prices

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and works in the wrong direction with respect to inflation.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>The most important things thing we can do with respect

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to competition policy is accept lower priced goods from abroad,

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and resistance to protection is UM active trade policy. Those

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't things we hear about from the administration. So yes,

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I am all for UH competition policy. Yes, I think

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>ant i trust in our country has lagged, but it

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>needs to be based on lower consumer prices. Larry Lewis

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>sneak in one more if I could hear please. A

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, we had an outrage of the

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>week from you about the patterns of investment from our

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>public officials, whether at the Federal Reserve Board or up

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in at on on Capitol Hill. We now have perhaps

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a development where the Speak of the House, Nancy Pelosi,

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>apparently has backed off of her resistance to a broadband

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on that. What do you think should happen? I was

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>glad to see it. I think we need to scale

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>scale any suggestion of impropriety by public officials. UM out

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of our system. That means not trading in individual stocks.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>That also means uh, not here in something and calling

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>your broker to do anything, even selling mutual funds and

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the like. People should be able to adjust their financial positions,

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>but only well in advance, so that there's a reassurance

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:20.479
<v Speaker 1>that insider information is not coming into it. And there

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>should be rigorous rules in both the executive branch, the

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve and uh the Congress. And I think it's

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>an area where it's appropriate for a confidence uh to

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>look at things so an outrage of the week that

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit less outrageous going forward, we hope.

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much to Larry Summers, Will Harvard, our

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 1>very special contributor on Wall Street Week. Thanks a lot. Finally,

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>one more thought. Lions and tigers and bears and even hamsters.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh my, every one of us is dealing with COVID

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in one way or another, whether it's worrying about our

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>hospitals or whether our kids can go to school, or

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.920
<v Speaker 1>figuring out when we should go back into the office.

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>But that's all about us. What about the other creatures

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that share the planet with us? What about the tigers

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and pumas, and minx, and yes, even the hamsters. Well,

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that a lot of them can get

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>this virus too, and they don't even have the option

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of getting the vaccine, much less the booster. A year ago,

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a crisis over mink farming in Denmark which

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>brought the Danish Prime Minister to tears when she ordered

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>millions of the little furry creatures destroyed. Now we learned

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that lions and pumas in a South African zoo have

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>contracted COVID, apparently from the people who work there. Fortunately

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.479
<v Speaker 1>they were treated and they recovered, which is more than

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we can say for the poor hamsters. Over in Hong Kong,

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>China is pursuing a vigorous, some might say ruthless policy

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of zero tolerance of COVID. So when a local pet

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>shop worker, a customer, and eleven hamsters tested positive for

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the Delta variant, the Hong Kong government ordered all hamsters

0:31:56.400 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 1>imported since December euthanized. Despite the lack of really clear

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>proof that humans can get COVID from hamsters, but there

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>may be another way. Since the eighteenth century, in a

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>small village west of Madrid, on the eve of San

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Anton's day, they purify animals from disease. Well, how do

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they do it. They take a group of horses and

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>ride them through bonfires, which may or may not date

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>back to the days of the plague. And if it

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>seems a bit medieval, then again doesn't a lot of

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>our response to this pandemic. It sure does for those

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>poor hamsters. That does it For this episode of Wall

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Street Week, I'm David Weston. This is Bloomberg. See you

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>next week.