WEBVTT - The Lefts Totalitarian Embrace

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:08.120
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with passionable intelligence.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Magnorma stake American. Bring you're a great American Again the

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show begins. Remember he's a great guy. No,

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the buck Sexton Show. This is Ben Weinegarten

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in four buck Sexton, appreciate you taking the time to

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>join me on this beautiful Thursday evening here in New

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 1>York and truly the last bashion of freedom because, as

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you may or may not know, the way that freedom

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is defined in New York today is you can commit

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a crime with impunity and you're let go the next day.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>You can commit another crime to let go the next day.

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>We are now in a no cash bail city, so

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>freedom to commit crimes. If you're a citizen, your freedoms

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>are infringed upon. This is truly the last bastion into

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Blasio's New York. As I mentioned, this is Ben Winegarden

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 1>in for Buck Sexton. I filled in several times in

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the past, but if it's your first time listening in

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>watching on the first welcome, I'm a fellow at the

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Claremine Institute, a senior contributor at The Federalist. You can

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>follow all my work at Benwegarten dot com, subscribe to

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>my newsletter at bit dot lee slash BHW News. Tell

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit later about my first book, which

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>comes out of the end of February. And this may

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>be an exclusive first I'll be talking about this in

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>any great depth. It's sure to be provocative, and I

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>know you're going to appreciate this one. All right. So

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>we're in the midst now of a whole bunch of

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>different major debates over national security and foreign policy, this

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>impeachment charade, which I don't even want to talk about,

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but I feel we do need to talk about it,

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>not because of the specifics, but because of the broader significance.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>There's some goings on in immigration that you're really not

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>hearing about anywhere else that we have to talk about.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And then, oh, yeah, yesterday the President just signed the

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Phase one China trade deal, and so today we're going

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to talk about these topics with what I think are

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the finest minds on these various issues. Coming

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>up just a bit later in this hour, Michael Doran

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on Iran policy and the Trump Middle East policy more broadway,

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk with the great Professor John Eastman about all

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>things immigration, insanity, and some sanity as well. And then

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>last but not LEAs, we'll also talk with Peter Navarro,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Peter Navarro of the Trump administration, one of the

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so called hawks on China, to talk about this deal,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>put it in its greater context, tell us a little

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>bit about some of the details. One of the things

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we should look for what's being missed in all the coverage, because,

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>as I've talked about in this program before, China is

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the greatest threat to our liberty. It is a communist

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>power by definition, and it is not a communist power

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that is content to just rule its own people with

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>an iron fist. It's hegemonic. It's hegemonic in its ambitions,

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and not just regionally but globally. And if it'stalitarian power

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 1>wants to be the dominant world power, necessarily that means

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it has to shrink our freedom and the freedom of

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the westmore broadway. So we will get to all that

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and much more today. I want to start with the

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Democrats standing with Russia and China and Iran and hear

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>me out on this and North Korea too. By the way,

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>if you remember when Trump was portrayed as the reckless cowboy,

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>before he was portrayed as the naive isolationist, before he

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>was again portrayed as the reckless cowboy when it comes

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to Iran, remember Kim Jong un was considered the rational

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>actor at the table at one point. Why is it,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that the Democrats stand with all of

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>these adversaries and point the finger at us and say

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we are traders. That really sticks in my craw and

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it should stick in your craw too, because for the

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>last hundred years, hundred years, Democrats have been the ones appeasing, bribing, coddling,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to find moderates in the world's worst regimes, those

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>regimes that are truly the most antisocial justice actually just

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>anti justice, no modifier needed regimes in the world. And

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but I'm sick and tired

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of Nancy Pelosi tweeting out things about Moscow, Mitch mcado,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and same thing with her friend. I believe one of

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment managers had Keem Jeffreys, Congressman from New York.

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Some congressmen have said that regardless of what happens with impeachment.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>They're going to continue pursuing Trump Russia ties and links.

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, the whole premise of the whole Trump Russia hoax,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>which was really about trying to take down his presidency

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>through this wedge issue, which, by the way, Hillary Clinton

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and his team and her team we're talking about within

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours after she lost, As has been documented

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and reported at length, it is all about saying, this

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>person's a traitor and therefore illegitimate, therefore dangerous, and therefore

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 1>that justifies us taking the most brazen acts possible to

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>undermine him, even if it means undermining everything else that

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the country is based on. I've said of this repeatedly

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>an articles on air. Who is violating the norms, values,

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>and principles and institutions that they tell us are so essential.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>It's them who is coddling our worst adversaries. It's them,

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And we have seen some of the most shameful examples

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of this in light of following the attack that took

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>out Caseem Solomani, who I always refer to and I

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>think you should refer to him too, as the world's

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>leading terrorists, of the world's leading terror force, of the

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>world's leading terrorist regime that funds, runs, orchestrates everything that

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is done by this world's leading sponsor of terror in

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Iran and its molocracy, and we should separate by the

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>way that regime from the people, some percentage of which

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>are actually out there literally risking their lives because they

0:05:56.000 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>actually do first for real, genuine freedom, not the freedom

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that we heard about in Egypt, which was freedom for

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the Muslim brotherhood to run roughshod over Christians and all

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>sorts of other ethic minorities and destroy a country. Not

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the kind of freedom we heard about in all the

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>other Arab spring places where the Arab spring turns to

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>the Arab winter very quickly. No, in Iran, there actually

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>is some percentage of the populace who, like in nineteen

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine pre Islamic revolutionary Iran, actually do yearn for

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>something approximating freedom and actually could be an ally and

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a partner with America and the Westmore Broadway, I want

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>to go to a couple of clips because some of

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the things that those on the left have been saying

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>post Solomani are just absolutely insane, And just like with

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi calling Mitch McConnell Moscow Mitch. And by the way,

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>his preferred name is Cocaine Mitch. He said this so

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>show some respect to the Majority leader, Madam Speaker. And

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>when they talk about the whole Russia collusion, hope you're

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a trader, even though it's been disproven, even though it's

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>been proven that this was really spygate, not Russia Gate.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Russia was the excuse to spy on an opposing campaign

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and to weaponize our national security and law enforcement apparatus

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>as part of a long running campaign from before the

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>man was inaugurated to try to take him down. And

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, before I get to I Ran, let

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>me just say it is the Democrats. It is those

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>who have propagated this Russia Gate, Russia collusion narrative, Russia

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>treasonous conspiracy narrative. They are doing far more damage to

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>our country than Vladimir Putin or anyone in Russia could

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>ever hope to do to America. And it's sort of

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with what we're seeing with what honestly

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sound like propagandist for the Iranian molocracy of moreaucracy that

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>has been at war with America since nineteen seventy nine.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to quip One. Here's John Kerry talking about Iran.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a sad day when the United States, so America,

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>has to rely on the decision of the regime that

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we neither liked nor trust, to have them be the

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>ones who behaved somehow in a way that saves Donald

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump from his own decision. They have the ones saving

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump from his own decision. This is a man

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>who literally admitted that Iran Deal the crown jewel of

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration in their second term, non treaty imposed

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>upon the American people, imposed upon the world, which we'll

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about at great length, and we'll talk about why

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>i Ran Deal isn't actually the proper name for the

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>deal because that doesn't describe at all what it did.

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't an Iran nuclear deal. It was fake arms control,

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.600
<v Speaker 1>actually about propping up the world's leading state sponsor of jihad.

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>John Kerry really has some nerve here because this is

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a man who himself has admitted back in twenty seventeen,

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the more than one hundred billion dollars that

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we release to Iran, and that is comprised of sanctioned

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.320
<v Speaker 1>relief and all that increased trade active video that Iran got,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and when we pulled off all of these sanctions from them,

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>he himself admitted that some of that money obviously would

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>end up going towards you guessed it, jihad. So John

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Kerry was totally fine with the US becoming the world's

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>leading state sponsor of the world's leading state sponsor of jihad.

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So who the hell is he to make this kind

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of comment? I ran saving him. No, Trump is cleaning

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>up the mess that preceded him in a resovute and

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a prudent way, in a way that I Ran never

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>expected because we've been bribing them, appeasing them, not calling

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a spade a spade for decades, and that's under Republicans

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats. By the way, all right, I want to

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>go to another clip. Let's go to EQUIP two. And

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a New York Times reporter. Her name is

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Rookmena Calamachi, applauding Iran. Let's go to EQUIP two. The

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>perception of America right now, I would say in the

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Middle East is that we act outside the law. I

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>hear this all the time from iraqis from Syrians who

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>do not see a legal process behind what we are doing,

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically because of the failure of the Iraq War and

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>the tainted intelligence that led to that point. One of

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the takeaways of the past week is that we actually saw,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, Iran act with perhaps more restraint than

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>our own government the rocket attacks, that the missiles that

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>landed on the basis where there were American troops did

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>not kill anyone. That seems like a wise decision that

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they made. Thankfully, our own government has now backed off

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 1>as well. Restraint. The Iranian regime is the prudent, sound wise, beneficent.

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>They didn't act out of restraint. They acted because they

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>knew that if they threatened the life and limb of

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>our soldiers or our assets threatened to destroy them, that

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>a city in Iran would be leveled. Okay, that has

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>not been clear to the Iranian regime. They never expected

0:10:56.880 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that from any administration, including this one. They thought they

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>could tap the Trump administration along continue to poke and pride.

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>All they've been doing is provocations towards the US, our

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>partners and our allies, testing probing, seeing how far could

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>they push before they got any sort of a reaction

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>from America. And what they got was an overwhelming reaction.

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>That destabilized and already wobbling regime. So why did the

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>malocracy respond the way that they did with their tail

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>between their legs. Because they knew that we pose an

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>existential threat to their existence for the first time in

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a long time, certainly since the start of the Obama presidency,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and frankly arguably since probably decades before that. And there's

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a case to be made that they are on weaker

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>ground today than they've been in at least a decade,

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and potentially far more. We'll talk a little bit about

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that as we proceed in this first hour, but I

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 1>want to point out why it is that the Left

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>sides with whoever is an enemy Trump and in this case,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>all of our adversaries. It's not just that they hate Trump,

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just that they have this naive worldview

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that all of our worst enemies can be appeased, or

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>at least that that's the better thing to do, that

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>actually confront reality as it is and deal with a

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>complicated world that's full of murderous thugs, that not everyone

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is by nature necessarily good, that there are people that

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>actually do want to infringe upon our daily life and

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>our freedoms as we've seen time and time again and

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>that you don't try to appease a bully because that

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>only emboldens that bully. What the Democrats have done is

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>they have an effect aided, a better than enabled, all

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of our worst adversaries. They are the ones who have

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>so discord in our politics to an unprecedented level. I mean,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly relative to the Obama years. They have corrupted our

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>system of checks and balances and separated powers and everything

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>from impeachment to the way that leftist judges have gone

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about blocking entire administration policies. One random federal judge we'll

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about this a little bit later, can stop clearly

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>lawful presidential policies across the entire country. Think about the

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>tyranny of that, that judicial supremacy. They have violated the

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>individual liberties of Americans in the way that they've gone

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>about the entire Russia Gate perpetration and then the cover up,

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>which has been in part impeachment in some ways, the

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>so called Mullar Special Council investigation and everything associated with it,

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the millions of subpoenas that they've issued. They've weaponized our

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.559
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement mechanism. They've sought to cover up the abuses

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the intelligence apparatus and law enforcement. And they've cheered

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>on an administrative state that's tried to sabotage the president,

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>who gives that administrative state its power. All of these

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>rogue officials and all of these agencies that come out

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and snipe at the president, they only have power because

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the presidents delegated it to them. Democrats cheer this on.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Imagine you can't even imagine. You can't conceive of a

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>scenario because there aren't enough conservatives in the administrative state

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and they would never act this inappropriately. Of course, in

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the first place, you can't conceive of a scenario where

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration did something and he was sabotaged by

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>rogue conservatives conspiring within the administrative states. It would never happen.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>It would be laughed out of the room, couldn't even

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>be conceived of. They are the ones who are trying

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to purge all dissenting views from public life. And we'll

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about that a little bit later. Anything that dares

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>challenge the progressive orthodoxy, unacceptable voices should be shut out.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And why why do they side where their adversaries and

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>why do they in affect Aida bet and enable them

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>with their actions while claiming that we're the traitors and

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we're the ones undermining institutions. They think that the America

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that we understand, that we believe in, that we understand

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the founders to have crafted for us, built for us.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>They think that America is inherently evil. It's the scores

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of the earth. And so if you hate that which

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is evil, you believe yourself good, then the only way

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to fix it is to turn it on its head,

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>repudiate all the principles, run rough shot over them, because

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the ends justify the means for them, and the ends

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately are power. It's power for them if they sometimes

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they say this outright. And some of these comments from

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>these reporters and Obama administration officials praising the Iranians, it

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>reminded me of a New York Times op ed writer

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Friedman. Sure you're familiar with his work, he wrote

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>back in September two thousand and nine. Something that sticks

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>with me, it should stick with you two and it

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>really represents where the left is, he said. One party

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>autocracy certainly has its drawbacks, but when it is led

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>by a reasonably enlightened group of people. As China is today,

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it can have great advantages. Beijing wants to make sure

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that it owns that in industries and is ordering policies

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Our one part, from the top down,

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>our one party democracy, quote unquote, is worse. They want

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>they want to rule everything because they don't want us

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a voice, because they disagree with this entire experiment,

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and they'll undermine it any and every which way they can,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>including siding with our worst adversaries. This has Ben Winegarden

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in for Buck Sexon on the Buck Sex and Show.

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back after this. You're in the Freedom Hunt.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sex and Show. This is Ben Weinegarten in

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>four Buck Sexton. We've been talking about the left, siding

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with our worst adversaries, and a little bit specifically about Iran.

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And in my next segment, I'm going to interview someone

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>who is, in my view, one of the finest experts

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>on national security and foreign policy generally in the Middle East,

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>specifically in Iran. I think he's written some of the

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>most prescient, deep probing, insightful pieces on not only what

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>the strike on Solomany means for American national security and

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy, but also what it means in context of

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>US Middle East policy more broadly, and where the Trump

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>administration stands on it, because a lot of people, frankly,

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>are hysterical when it comes to anything the Trump administration does,

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but in particular do not understand that there actually is

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>a coherent method to all that we've been doing from

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East to China, to Western and Eastern Europe

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and beyond Russia as well. And so we're going to

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>talk with Michael Durant of the Hudson Institute about a

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>number of these topics. He actually altees this a little bit,

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>has floated that the Obama administration, as I understand it,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>may have written love letters to Cosseem Solomany and I

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>talk in jest here, but actually did communicy directly potentially

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with Solomony, and not to deliver the kind of message

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration did, which is knock it off

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>or else. We'll talk about that right after this. Ben

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Wangarton in for Buck Sexton on The Buck Sexton Show.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to The bus Sexton Show podcasts. Remember

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe on Apple podcasts. The iHeartRadio app or wherever

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Wangarton in for Buck Sexton, and we

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>have on the line right now. As I just mentioned,

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>what I think is one of the finest scholars when

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>it comes to national security and foreign policy in the

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Middle Eastern general and Iran in particular, Mike Duran. He's

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. He formerly held

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>positions in both the Department of Defense and on the

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>National Security Council during the George W. Bush administration. Mike, thanks,

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for coming on the program. Thanks for

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>having me Ben, and thanks for that very generous introduction. Well,

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's well deserved and been a longtime fan of your work,

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and we've discussed many of these issues at length, and

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought bucks Audi deserves to hear from someone who

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>was in a policy making position, who has grappled with

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the adversaries that we're dealing with today, and in particular,

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to start with something that you sort of

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>teased out on Twitter and was later corroborated by Lee Smith,

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>another great writer on national security and foreign policy. We've

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>had on the program before, were you discussed the fact

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that a little birdie told you, essentially that the Obama

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>administration had drafted some letters to the world's weading terrorists,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>of the world's reading terror force, the cuts force, of

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the world's weading terror regime, of the Iranian molocracy. What

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>else can you tell us about that? Well, actually, I

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>don't know much more than that. It was absolutely a

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>little birdie. Somebody who I happen to know, and who

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>happened to know is in a position to know this

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>fact firsthand, said Hey, did you know that under the

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration we sent letters plural to cause some solo money?

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>And I said, no, I didn't know that, and it's

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>very interesting, and so I put I put that out

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, you know, so I pretended to be I

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>joked that I was an anonymous whistle blower, the joke

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>being that everyone in Washington, DC knows that Eric Jarmella

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is the anonymous whistleblower on the Zelinsky conversation that Trump

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is being impeached over. And you know, he's been walking

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 1>around town all since this thing began, and you're not

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed to supposedly, you know, you're not allowed to say

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>his name if you write his name on Twitter, you

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>get deep platformed and uh and so on. I thought, Wow,

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's really cool. I'd like to be an anonymous whistle

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>blower too. Uh. You know, people need to walk into

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>restaurants with people point at you and say, hey, there's

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the anonymous whistle blower. So I'm I'm anonymous here. I'm

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not when I talk to you about when I talk

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to you about the letters to Solo Money, I'm not

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike Duran at the Hudson Institute. I'm anonymous. Okay, I'll

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>neither confirm nor denied that I'm Mike Duran. As long

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>as we're talking about this, well, we'll make sure not

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to weak your name to the Washington Post and the Times.

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think it is significant though to the extent

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they did write letters to Solomony, and it's eminently believable

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because the administration took the Obama administration took sanctions off

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of Solomany as part of the so called I Ran

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Nuclear Deal in the first place. But it's quite an

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting contrast that they were probably writing letters hoping to

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>come to some sort of agreement or accord with Solomany,

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>whereas the Trump administration secretary Pompeo drafted a letter to

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Solomany which basically said, knock off the malign activities or else,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and the RLS actually happened exactly exactly. I mean, the

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the last point first. The letter that

0:21:53.800 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Pompeo sent to Solomony, actually he did so on the

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>instructions of Donald Trump. I noticed for a fact as well.

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Trump saw something in the intelligence early on in the

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>administration that worried him, and he said, I see that

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy Solimani is organizing to kill Americans. I want

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>to send him a letter, and I want to put

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>him on notice that if he harms the hair on

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a single American that there will be immediate and drastic consequences.

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know how the decision was made. I guess,

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe his advisor said, actually, mister President, I

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>don't think you should be the one talking to Solomoni.

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So it fell to Pompeo. And Pompeo's letter was very

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>short and very sweet, and it basically said I don't

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>know the exact wording, but it busically said just what

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I said, if you harm the hair on one American,

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that will be held a pain and that's the origin.

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the origin of the of the of the attack

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>on Solimani. I mean, he was he was warned, and

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.719
<v Speaker 1>he was warned time and again, and he ignored it

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and he paid a price for it. And that's the

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>way it should be. Solomoni is portrayed, and I think

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>accurately so, as sort of the architect of really in

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>some sense that the Shide Crescent and Iran's jihadest activities

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and also obviously has the blood of

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of Americans on his hands, and orchestrated the attack

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>on our embassy, which is an act of war, and

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>according to the Administration, was planning on orchestrating other ones

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>as well. How significant is the fact that Solomoni no

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>longer walks the face of the earth from the perspective

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of destabilizing the Iranian molocracy. Oh, it's enormously significant. This

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is the single most important thing the United States has

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>done in the Middle East since the invasion of Iraq,

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>There no doubt about it. First of all, let's just

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>start with him as an individual. You know, when the

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>CIA looks at whether to whether to eliminate an individual,

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the things they ask is can he be

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>easily replaced. So if we's going to be just whackamle

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we get rid of this guy, is another one going

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to pop up. And and in the case of Solomony,

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>he was absolutely unique, absolutely indispensable, you know the the

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>uh You can almost never say that about somebody, that

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>they are indispensable. But he's been in that job for years.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>He is. He was responsible for Iran's policy toward the

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>entire Arab world. He's the de facto head of Special Forces,

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>head of the CIA. I mean if he were if

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we were to map him onto onto the American system,

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he would be the head of Special Forces, the head

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of CIA, the head of USAID, and the head of

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the State Department with regard to all of the Arab

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>world and beyond Afghanistan as well. Um Java Zaief is

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>not the real or minister. He's the errand boy of costumes,

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sure the money. You know, he's lieutenant general. He's the

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>head of the Kods Force of the IRGC. So on

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the org chart, the head of the IRGC was his

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>commanding officer, but that was not the case. He was

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>an independent force. He had a direct line to the

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Leader. He had been He was the architect of

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>this policy of creating militias across the Arab world and

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>then distributing to those militias UH precision guided weaponry, completely

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 1>with the goal of undermining the US order in the

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>region by undermining America's allies. And he was also putting

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:44.479
<v Speaker 1>a noose around the neck of Israel. So getting rid

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of him was just in that respect, was fantastic. But

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>if I got to if I can have a second,

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll add a couple of other reasons why this was important.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead. So number two Trump has totally changed the

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>game up until now. For the last three presidents, when

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we have dealt with Iran, we have always played the

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>game on Iran's terms. That is that we know that

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Iran was building these militias, his Balah, the hoopies, the

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>five or six major militias that got in Iraq and

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>so on and that and that, and that those militias

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>are taking orders from Tehran. But when those militias would

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 1>behave and misbehave, we would always we would always respond

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>weekly against the militias, as if we didn't know that

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Taihran was actually pulling the strings. Trump has said, I'm

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>not playing that game anymore. I'm not going to play

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>this game on your terms. I know you're in charge,

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to hold you responsible for what you're doing.

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>That's a strategic shift by US policy. And it's amazing

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the effect that has had in a very short period

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of time, because now all of a sudden, Trump has

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>cut i Ran down to size. It. Ran is not

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.920
<v Speaker 1>as powerful as United States, and yet we've been treating

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it like an equal you know, John Kerry sat, he

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 1>sat in Vienna week after week after week, opposite of

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the Reef like they were like we were equal powers.

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>And Trump has shown no, Actually, you're a small week

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>power and we are a superpower. And if you bite

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>our ankles too hard, we're going to kick you in

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the in the teeth, which is exactly what he did.

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And everyone in the region sees that, and they're all

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>reacting to it. So we have reinvigoration of the of

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the of the protests in Iran, of the of the

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>anti Iranian protests in Iraq, and of the protests in Lebanon,

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>among other things. I mean, everyone, everyone in the region

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>immediately felt that the balance of power shifted towards the

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>United States. And if I could just make one last

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>point I'm making very briefly. We also took out in

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that attack on Slomanni a number of other individuals, but

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>one really particularly stands out, and that's Al Mohandas, who

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was Iran's number one guy in Iraq. Simply taking out

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Mohandas would have been a very big deal. We've of

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of been forgotten in the discussion of this

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>because Sulimani was so huge, But the effect of this

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:16.719
<v Speaker 1>for the US relations with Iraq are huge. So, you know,

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned one point that I want to kind of

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>hone in on, which is the why you said the

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>last three administrations have effectively looked the other way, been

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>willfully blind refused to poke the bear when it comes

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to Iran. And I think arguably and you probably agree,

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>really this dates back to both Carter and Reagan. Actually,

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.240
<v Speaker 1>how do you explain the fact that for all this

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>time we've been so engaged in the Middle East, in

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>all of these sectarian squabbles. How is it that Iran

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>has gotten off scott free the entire time? What is

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the explanation within our national security and foreign policy establishment

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for why we've pursued the path that we have, you know,

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I M the simple answer is America has a fantasy

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of returning with with the Islamic Republic, of returning to

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the relationship it had under the shaw Um, And it

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>has been telling itself since Reagan. I on hundred percent

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>correct about that, since Reagan has been telling itself that

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Iran is going to moderate, it's going to become a

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>normal country under the Islamic Republic is going to become

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a normal country just looking after its interests and we

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>can come to an accommodation with it. That was the

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>whole That was the whole thesis behind the Reagan's arms

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>for hostages that we were we were looking the arms.

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. Reagan famously went on the on primetime television

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and told the American people, you know, a couple of

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>months ago, I told you American people that I did

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>not trade arms for hostages. He said, my my, uh,

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>my intentions, um and my gut or I can't remember

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the exact words, but I I still tell them. I

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>still feel like I didn't do that. But I've looked

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at the facts and this is what happened. And at

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, I was a student and I heard Reagan

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>saying this, and I thought, how could you not know?

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>But actually he was. It was true, he didn't He

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that he had done that because the goal

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of sending the arms to the Iranians was during the

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Iran Iraq War, and their military was supplied by it

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>was all American equipment. They need spare parts. The goal

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>was not to give them spare parts. The goal was

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to use the delivery of the spare parts to find

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the moderates in Tehran with whom we could talk so

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>we can get back to the old relationship that we

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>used to have. So this is a bipartisan American dream.

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:47.840
<v Speaker 1>It is. It is. It's stronger today on the left

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>than it is on the right. But you can find

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>it in the Republican sphere as well. And it is

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the source of these letters that I believe. We won't

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>know until they're declassified, if they ever will be, but

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the source of the letters that I believe. I

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>presume that Obama sent the Obama administration sent to Solomany.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>The Obama administration believed that Solo that the US and

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Iran shared a couple of key vital interests. One was

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the stability of Iraq, and two was fighting isis. I

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>don't we don't need to go into details. I don't

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>agree with either of those presumptions, but they're very um

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they're very deep in the foreign policy establishment. That we

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>have overlapping interests with Iran, and if we just show

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the Iranians that we're not hostile to them, then we

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>can unlinlock the potential for cooperation that the shared interests represent.

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 1>This Ben Wangarnin for Buck Sexon. We're back with Mike Duran.

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Just after this, you're in the Freedom Line. This is

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sexton Show podcast. This Ben Wangarnin for Buck

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Sexon on the Buck Sexon Show, and we're back with

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Mike Duran talking about Iran Middle East policy more broadway.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>We only have a couple of minutes here, Mike, and

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about the sea change that has transpired,

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>not just with Iran but with the Middle East. Frankly,

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely heard by the North Koreans. I'm sure it's

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>heard in Beijing as well. A couple sort of fundamental questions. One,

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>how weak is the Iranian regime today and to the

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>extent it was to fall tomorrow? Do you believe the

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has devised contingency plans so that America's national

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>interest is best served should that happen, I don't know

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>how weak it is. The simple answer is, I don't know.

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm very reluctant to say that that a regime is

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>going to fall. You know, I watched the Syrian regime

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 1>very closely, and you know, everyone predicted it was going

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to fall weeks, months, whatever, and it never did. And

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of course the Russians stepped in to help it. You know,

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>if it looked like Tehran was really about to collapse completely,

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't surprise me. If we solve the Chinese and

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the Russians get involved, we may or we may not.

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Um uh so Uh, it's clearly. The one thing you

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>can say for sure is that it has a legitimacy

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>crisis of the likes of which it has never seen before.

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>The vast majority of Iranians do not regard it, you know,

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do not really support it. But it has, you know,

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this coercive apparatus that people, you know, it's willing to

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>shoot people who want to topple it. And uh and

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>some significant percentage of the population feels that their livelihood,

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought their lives are bound up in the continuation

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of them of the regime. So you know, I don't

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>know how long can it limp along like this? I'm

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>really not I'm really not sure. Does the US have

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>contingency plans? I would uh, you know, you never know,

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but I would doubt it, just because I don't think

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration was thinking. You know, it hasn't had

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the Its goal has not been to topple the regime.

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It's goal has been to weaken the regime in order

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to get a deal, particularly over the nuclear question. And

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>but by just a little bit of strategic application of

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>American force, Trump has shown the regime to be weaker

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>than I think most people thought it was. And so

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>now all of a sudden we have this question about, well,

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>what if it goes I doubt anyone's thought that through

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to those who say, lastly, to those who say that

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>China is the biggest threat of all, which I agree with,

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I ran as a threat China is

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the greatest nation state threat to American liberty. And they say, well,

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>what is really our interest in the Middle East? When

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you have this massive power that's looming, What is your

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>best argument to them that no, we actually do have

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>an interest in the Middle East in general, in an

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>i Ran situation, that is, in America's a national interest

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in particular, given the sort of greater challenges that loom

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>over the short, medium and long term. I think it's

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>all about China. Actually, what's gonna what's going to happen

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>if we're not ter, is that China is going to

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>come in and become the primary supporter, or maybe China

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and Russia together of the Iranian regime. The Iranian regime's

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>immediate goal is to drive the United States out of

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the Persian Gulf and to take over control, not necessarily

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>absolute ownership, but control of the vast oil resources of

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the Gulf. That's what it wants. The target of the

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Iranians is Saudi Arabia. They want to take over, They

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>want to control the oil resources of the Gulf, and

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>then the Iranians themselves see themselves as the leaders of

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:32.479
<v Speaker 1>the Islamic world. They want to take over the holy

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>sites in Saudi Arabia. Now, if if China and its

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>ally Iran, if they were to allie together or Russia,

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:45.279
<v Speaker 1>China and Iran as a block, then and control the

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>oil resources of the Gulf then they control the oil

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>resources of Europe and they'll start using that privileged position

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>as the main provider of oil to Europe to start

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>weakening the US European bond, and we would have one

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>dominant power on the Eurasian landmasks China, and that's where

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we want to avoid. We want to avoid China just

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>completely owning all of Eurasia. That's not good for democracy

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>in America. We've been speaking with Mike Duran, a senior

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.800
<v Speaker 1>follow at the Hudson Institute, and I think one of

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the finest minds when it comes to US national security

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and foreign policy. Mike, thanks so much for coming on

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the program. Thank you. Ben was a pleasure Pleasures Online.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is Ben Weingarten in buck Sexton on The

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show. We're back right after this. Thanks for

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>listening to The bus Sexton Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Welcome back to the buck Sexton Show.

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Weinegarten in four Buck Sexton. And the

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>big news yesterday beyond the impeachment tarade, which you've already

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about, is that the Trump administration signed a monumental

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Phase one trade deal with China, And we're going to

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit later in the hour with one

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of those who was most influential in pushing this administration

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and representing this administration's tough line on the Chinese Communist

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Party regime, a tougher line than has ever been pushed

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>since we formally open relations with China, really beginning with

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Nixon back in seventy two, which has been, in my view,

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the most fundamental, most most important, long term, critical and

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>monumental change in US national security and foreign policy. To

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>recognize the nature of the China competition, the China threat,

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>China's adversarial nature, and actually begin to turn the ship

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of state around because we haven't aided about it, enabled

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>emboldened this malevolent Chinese Communist Party for decades. To put

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that deal in context, I think we need to talk

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what is the nature of the

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Communist Party regime, because the nature of the regime,

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, is what matters even

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>more sometimes than what the words are on a piece

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of paper. And you could say the same thing, for example,

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>with the quote unquote I ran nuclear deal which we

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 1>discussed in part already. You can't have a deal with

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.439
<v Speaker 1>the Mulas that they will abide by in any sense

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>unless they really feel that their livelihood is at stake

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and the alternative is utter destruction. And not saying it's

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>analogous with China, but what I am saying is that

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the regime matters above all else, whatever contingencies are, whatever

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 1>has been put in writing on paper, Honoring a deal

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>requires two honorable parties to it. And so you have

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to understand this deal in context of that nature of

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:50.360
<v Speaker 1>an expansionist, imperialist, frankly often malign, deceptive regime that is

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese Communist Party regime. And so let's talk a

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit about what their true core aims are. Their

0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>true core aim are expand their totalitarian rule so that

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the Chinese Communist Party can survive in perpetuity,

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and second that it can put forth its prerogatives and

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>impose them upon their own people, those in their near

0:39:11.960 --> 0:39:15.399
<v Speaker 1>abroad quote unquotes, and that includes Taiwan, that includes Hong Kong,

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that includes others as well, and ultimately expand their power

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>so that they're not just the regional hegemon but the

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>global hegemon and what would that mean. I mean that

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>China is not only rich, strong, and powerful, but that

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>every other nation effectively bends to China's rule. And the

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration has spoken quite openly and honestly about the

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>nature of this regime. The human rights violations that this

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>regime has engaged in are impactful. Not because human rights

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are necessarily the number one American interest when it comes

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to foreign powers and how we best deal with them.

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>We have to deal with the world as it is,

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>not as we wish it to be, but because it

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 1>tells you something about the way China, the Chinese Communist

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Party rules its own people, and how it will ultimately

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>treat others as its power expands and its ability to

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:10.359
<v Speaker 1>project that power expands globally through things like One Belt,

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>One Road and other initiatives that we've spoken about in

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>prior episodes. There are stories of mass forced oregan harvesting

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for prisoners. There's a one child policy, which if you

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know about, I've written a review of an amazing,

0:40:28.360 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 1>harrowing documentary on the China's one child policy that, to

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's credit, I believe is being distributed through Amazon, which

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 1>talks about the forced abortions, effectively the Chinese Communist Party

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>ripping children away from their parents and leaving them to

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>die on the roadsides unthinkable horrors. That's the Chinese Communist

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Party turning the guns on the protesters in Hong Kong

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and trying to force extradition so that China can effectively

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>take prisoner those who are supposed to be able to

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>live in the relatively free, although increasingly shrinking, relatively free

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. The China is supposed to respect Taiwan. China's

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 1>threatened invasion of Taiwan. That's why we supply Taiwan with

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated weaponry to deter China from seeking to quote unquote

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>reunify a part of China that's not theirs. Threatening foreign

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:39.280
<v Speaker 1>ambassadors and other officials, threatening dissidents in the Chinese diaspora

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:42.760
<v Speaker 1>around the world that they will potentially injure in prison

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>otherwise punish their families that are back on the mainland

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>should you speak out against the Chinese Communist Party abroad.

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the nature of the regime that we're dealing with.

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Two other recent stories caught my eye that really get

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to the core of what the Chinese Communist Party is about.

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's one headline I believe from life site News. Chinese

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>government demands Christians use religion to quote spread Communist Party principles.

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Everything serves the Party, including religion. And by the way, religion,

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, during the Cold War was considered by many

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>to be the antidote to the Soviet Union and its

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>expansionist ideology. So of course any competing worldview is going

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to be something that if you're the Chinese authorities, you

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 1>have to clamp down on, because you cannot tower it,

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>any sort of descent, any sort of cracks in the

0:42:38.600 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>veneer that they've built. And by some measures, Christianity is

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the fastest growing religion in China, with millions tens of millions,

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>if not hundreds of millions of members, and that's not

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>even necessarily including those who practice underground. So this is significant.

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And the article says new draconian rules for religious groups

0:42:57.719 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>are set to go into place in China, requiring that

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they spread Unist Party principles. China totalitarian government promulgated new

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 1>rules on December thirty that will place virtually all aspects

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of religious life under the control of the Communist Party.

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>The Administrative measures consist of six chapters and forty one

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:19.200
<v Speaker 1>articles governing the quote organization function, supervision and management of

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>religious groups, which would include religious doctrine, annual and daily activities,

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and rallies. The new rules going to force on February

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 1>one and come as part of a growing crackdown by

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Communists on religion, and many religious minorities have been persecuted.

0:43:37.760 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>We didn't talk about the biggest human rights violation of all,

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 1>which is the actual gulag twenty first century gulags that

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have been constructed in the Shenjiang province where millions in

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>total of weager Muslim ethnic minorities reside, of which at

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>least a million and probably more I would guess, are

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:04.880
<v Speaker 1>held in effectively modern day gulags because of their faith

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>under the guise of potentially posing a threat, a national

0:44:09.200 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>security threat, but in reality because they pose a threat

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:16.280
<v Speaker 1>because they might believe something that conflicts with Chinese Communist

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Party principles. But religion has to be bent to support

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the party because the party resides above all else, and

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 1>if not, it has to be crushed with an iron fist.

0:44:28.440 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>And when you infringe upon someone's faith and their conscience,

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that tells you a heck of a lot about the

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>nature of the authorities that you're dealing with now. In

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>some ways, I would argue it shows vigoity. If you

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 1>can't tolerate competing or dissenting views, then how strong can

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you really be. On the other hand, the fact that

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they can do this and then put on top of

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it a massive police state at apparatus in their social

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>credit scores where they govern how good of a citizen

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 1>you are based upon how closely you hue to Communist

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>party principles. It's scary that any government could have that power,

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and that there boarding that technology to many of the

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>other malevolent regimes that they do business way around the

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>world should scare us. And then of course that they're

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the ones that are the leaders in five G technology,

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>which is going to be the network that serves as

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the backbone of basically all information transfer and communications throughout

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the world, including among our allies. Can you trust a

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>regime that is a social credit score for its citizens,

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.480
<v Speaker 1>watches their every move and grades them based upon how

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:29.040
<v Speaker 1>well they're checking the party boxes. You want to put

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:34.280
<v Speaker 1>them in charge of all global telecommunications and information transfer.

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Chinese regime and then a much smaller example,

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>but that I think gets also to the nature of

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 1>not just this communist party, but the way that communist

0:45:47.280 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 1>parties have been really forever. This is from Ryan save

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Dry and the Daily Wire headline Communist China Private ownership

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of guns in US serious problem must change, Savedra says

0:46:06.239 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>communists China, which currently has millions of people walked away

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in concentration camps set in state controlled media this week,

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the second Amendment is a quote unquote serious problem that

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>there needs to be quote unquote change and had the

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:21.760
<v Speaker 1>American public views private ownership of guns. The Global Times,

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>which is Chinese state run media, published the op ed

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>after a good guy with a gun in Texas stopped

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a shooting in a church, trying to mock the United States,

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that quote shootings are shocking in a US allegedly

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.839
<v Speaker 1>governed by law. And he quotes a little bit from

0:46:34.840 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the article, and it's worth quoting in part also just

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to look at the parallels between their propaganda media and

0:46:40.320 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>our propaganda media. The article says private gun ownership is

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a tradition from the early days that the founding of

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the US in a modern society, the problems created by

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this tradition have already exceeded the benefits. It's problematic. American

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:56.480
<v Speaker 1>society has already seen serious problems caused by the private

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>ownership of guns, but their massive number has contributed to

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.520
<v Speaker 1>an enormous and nerves Many interest groups have benefited from it,

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and some ordinary people have truly gained a sense of safety.

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:09.399
<v Speaker 1>To change this habit, which has lasted hundreds of years,

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 1>tremendous political courage and a rearrangement of interest is required.

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike Bloomberg agrees facts have proved that the US system

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is unable to handle the intricacies of countless issues around guns,

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 1>including politics, economics, law and order in public psychology. The

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>country can either manage the safe storage and use of

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>so many guns owned by ordinary people, nor can it

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 1>establish a new national system that bans or strictly restricts guns.

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>It cannot even for it cannot even form an overwhelming

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>opinion regarding gun issues, and then Savedra to his credit.

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Rights here. China's attack on the Second amm And comes

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:43.600
<v Speaker 1>after Hong Kong protesters have requested to have their own

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment rights. J I wonder why so they can

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:49.839
<v Speaker 1>defend themselves from the oppressive Communist Chinese government. And this

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is also after The Wall Street Journal reported that, following

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:55.919
<v Speaker 1>in the footsteps of Mao Zedong during a two day

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>meeting that ended last month by mister she, the part

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is twenty five member poet Burrow Helas policies as visionary

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 1>and described him as the Renman wing Shoe or People's Leader,

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a designation that directly echoes and accolade most closely associated

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>with Communist China's founder Mao Zedong. And of course, like

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Mao Zedong, effectively she has absolute power. He is chairman

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the party for life. First, there's the use of

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:25.799
<v Speaker 1>the propaganda, and the Chinese Communist Party always says, we

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>want to treat every nation with mutual respect and admiration,

0:48:29.960 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>respect for sovereignty. We don't meadow and others foreign affairs. Okay, well,

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:36.360
<v Speaker 1>who are you to be commenting on our Second Amendment

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>in your propaganda rag that's in English so the entire

0:48:40.680 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>world can read it, and it's a propaganda coup for you.

0:48:45.800 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>More importantly is the fundamental issue of what are Second

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Amendment rights at core? Actually about at core the entire

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 1>tradition in Western civilization and particular in the anglosphere, is

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 1>about the right to self defense, self president servation an

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>essential right, and that self preservation both in nature and

0:49:05.640 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 1>its self preservation in your political sphere. China, of course,

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.439
<v Speaker 1>what they don't tell you, has some of the most

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>restrictive gun laws in the entire world. It's almost impossible

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:19.239
<v Speaker 1>to own firearms there as an individual. Why is that

0:49:19.280 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the case because the regime can't tolerate it, just like

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 1>they can't tolerate our First Amendment rights, freedom of speech,

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:31.440
<v Speaker 1>freedom of conscience, freedom to debate and argue in an

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>actual open marketplace of ideas. They can't tolerate you being

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>able to defend yourself against any tyranny, again, whether in

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:42.959
<v Speaker 1>nature or the tyranny of an oppressive government. China doesn't

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 1>want its people to have the right to defend their

0:49:44.840 --> 0:49:48.359
<v Speaker 1>lives and their liberties because they don't believe that life

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and liberty trump their tyrannical Iron Communist Party fist. This

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>article is important. This propaganda is important because it gets

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>to the core, which is that China doesn't believe in

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>any rights as we understand them in the West, not

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>for its people and not for those that it interacts with.

0:50:08.320 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Either and that's why in the past the Chinese Communist

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Party has lied, cheated, and stolen. This Ben Winegarden for

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Buck sex And on the Buck Sex and Show. We'll

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:21.439
<v Speaker 1>be back right after this. You're in the Freedom Hunt.

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:28.279
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to

0:50:28.280 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sex and Show. This is Ben Weinegarden in

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:34.640
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sexton, and we've been talking about the nature

0:50:34.800 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese Communist Party, which controls all of China,

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's businesses, it's people, their right to bear arms or not,

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:47.200
<v Speaker 1>as the case may be, their lack of any sorts

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of the civil liberties that we enjoy in America. And

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>what I've argued is that you have to keep this

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>context in mind when it comes to all of the

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:58.400
<v Speaker 1>United States's official dealings with Chinese Communist Party officials and

0:50:58.520 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>even with any of their private quote unquote private sector actors,

0:51:02.719 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>because in reality, there is no there is no distinction

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>between private and public there and so we need to

0:51:08.520 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 1>be very clear eyed about the nature of it. And

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a central context in terms of having a

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 1>healthy bit of caution and skepticism when it comes to

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>anything with China. And I believe the administration completely gets

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>this not only because of the way that the administration

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 1>has described the nature of the Chinese Communist Party and

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>its aims in the past, but by dint of its

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>entire policy towards the Chinese Communist Party speaking openly and

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>honestly about the way that they've abused and ripped off America.

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, even President Trump during the signing ceremony yesterday

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 1>alluded to some of those issues. He basically said, cover

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>your ears, Chinese representatives, while I talk about the truth.

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Here also bears noting in this deal that we're about

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to talk with Peter Navarro about tariffs still remain on China.

0:51:54.320 --> 0:51:57.759
<v Speaker 1>And it's important point, by the way, to note, you know,

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the entire world told us, and look, I'm a devotee

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of free enterprise economics, a long time defender of capitalism.

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Tariffs run in the face of capitalism to the extent

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.319
<v Speaker 1>that you have parties that are all really trading on

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 1>an open and honest playing field. You know where there's

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:19.799
<v Speaker 1>comparative advantage, and you're good at this, producing this, you're

0:52:19.800 --> 0:52:23.359
<v Speaker 1>good at producing this. We trade, everyone ends up better off.

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Let's not basically put a tax on products and then

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:28.799
<v Speaker 1>get into a war over it, and then you're taxing this,

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:33.760
<v Speaker 1>You're taxing televisions, and I'm taxing soybeans. The difference here,

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>The difference is that we have not been operating on

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:40.360
<v Speaker 1>anything remotely close to a level playing field, and in fact,

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we have built the entire world trade financial architecture, global

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 1>enterprise writ large is attributed to American institutions and largely

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>American companies, American technologies, American led policies. We invited China

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to operate in that system under the naive view, that

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is asked view that economic liberalization would ultimately lead to

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>political liberalization, or maybe for the more cynical people, because

0:53:06.080 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 1>they felt that China's a really big marketplace and we

0:53:08.360 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 1>better take advantage of it while the getting is good,

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 1>or someone else will consequences, potentially a US national interests

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:16.720
<v Speaker 1>be damned. And maybe look, maybe they didn't even conceive

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of the idea that China could end up as strong

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and as powerful and bellicos increasingly as it has become.

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Tariffs though they told us you can't impose tariffs, We

0:53:28.880 --> 0:53:31.239
<v Speaker 1>can't win a trade war, and the Trump administration said, well,

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:34.320
<v Speaker 1>actually we can win trade wars. It's going to be easy.

0:53:34.440 --> 0:53:35.960
<v Speaker 1>And the fact of the matter is they have been

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>right pretty much every single time in terms of using

0:53:39.080 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>tariffs as a tool for leverage, not for tariffs in

0:53:42.680 --> 0:53:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and of themselves, not because the administration loves the idea

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of the protectionism, but because the administration understands it is

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a blunt tool that we, with the biggest economy in

0:53:52.239 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the world by a large measure of magnitude, can withstand

0:53:56.160 --> 0:53:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and which will bring parties to the table so that

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they will no longer rip us off and have unfair

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>trade and unfree trade and take advantage of us, because

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>we let the world take advantage of us in every

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:10.720
<v Speaker 1>single possible realm. And China, of course, is the biggest

0:54:10.760 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>actor of all in the way of those who have

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:15.960
<v Speaker 1>taken advantage of us, as I said before, lying, cheating,

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>stealing their way after being given entree into this amazing

0:54:20.640 --> 0:54:26.120
<v Speaker 1>global economy that America is the backbone of. They steal

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:29.160
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars in intellectual property from us.

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:34.400
<v Speaker 1>They counterfeit goods. They've flooded our soil with fentanyl in

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:37.200
<v Speaker 1>places that have been hollowed out and destroyed in no

0:54:37.360 --> 0:54:41.360
<v Speaker 1>small part because of the offshoring of jobs to China

0:54:41.440 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 1>because China is able to compete by paying people nothing.

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, it's forced technology transfer. You can't do

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:54.880
<v Speaker 1>business in China unless China basically gets the rights to

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:59.360
<v Speaker 1>all of the crown jewels of your company. It's unfair

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>go on on for so long, and it has enabled China

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to become a serious competitor to America, and again one

0:55:06.080 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that based on its nature, threatens our liberty. There's Ben

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Winegarden in for Buck Sexton back right after this. Thanks

0:55:13.160 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the bus Sexton Show podcasts. Remember to

0:55:16.480 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on Apple Podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:24.080
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show.

0:55:24.080 --> 0:55:27.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Ben Weingarten in for Buck Sexton, and we

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about the Democratic parties ends justify

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the means sort of perspective, and that has a way

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of permeating not just our political system, but also our culture,

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:47.920
<v Speaker 1>our society, our economic institutions, really every facet of our lives,

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because leftism demands control over every part of our lives,

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:54.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of like with the Chinese and the Chinese Communist Party.

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:58.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a similar sort of all encompassing totalitarian in the

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 1>sense of controlling everything ethos. And the scary thing is

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>when you see it seep into your culture such that

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we have a society that's completely divided in almost

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:14.759
<v Speaker 1>every single facet. And when you really think about it

0:56:14.800 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in America today, I mean, what does unite people who

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:20.879
<v Speaker 1>live on the coasts and people who live everywhere else?

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 1>When I walk around the streets in New York, ideologically,

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm completely different from everyone around me. Nine pcent of

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the time. We disagree on a whole host of subjects. Really,

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I've thought about this, Maybe the only uniting institution in

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 1>America today, beyond the fact that the military is still

0:56:39.080 --> 0:56:43.760
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly loved and revered and respected, the only institution certainly

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:47.480
<v Speaker 1>related to the government that's respected at this point is sports.

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you think of something else that unites

0:56:50.200 --> 0:56:53.239
<v Speaker 1>people from all walks of life, from every corner of

0:56:53.280 --> 0:56:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the country, Whether it's the smallest a grarian town or

0:56:57.040 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest urban center. That's pretty much it's sports. Can

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a country really survive long term when it is so torn?

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to, I don't want to sort

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:13.479
<v Speaker 1>of exaggerate the divide in America, because look, we fought

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a civil war. In the sixties, tensions were as high

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:19.000
<v Speaker 1>as they've been at probably at any time since the

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Civil War. There have been all sorts of periods of strife,

0:57:22.960 --> 0:57:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of partisanship, of animus, and tension within our culture, within

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:31.479
<v Speaker 1>our society, and we've been divided and at each other's

0:57:31.480 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>throats from the beginning. I mean when people talk about

0:57:33.600 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the viciousness of the press today, and the press is vicious,

0:57:35.920 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and the press does vie and cheat and effectively, as

0:57:39.560 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I usually argue, serves as the communications arm of the

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party in many respects. But the press, it used

0:57:47.680 --> 0:57:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to be that you had party newspapers. The newspapers were

0:57:50.000 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>known as party associated publications. I mean, in some ways

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it was better then because it was more transparent, but

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they would allege all sorts of asinine things within those publications,

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and we were remarkably torn as a country. But again

0:58:03.720 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the difference is that at core, there were certain things

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that did unite us, whether it was our understanding of

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the founding, our understanding of our history, our understanding of

0:58:12.080 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>our heritage, our understanding of the fundamental rights and responsibilities

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that we were built on, even just simple common virtue

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 1>views on morality, the importance of tradition to having a

0:58:26.440 --> 0:58:29.760
<v Speaker 1>functional society where we could disagree vigorously on any number

0:58:29.800 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of political issues, but separate the political issues from the

0:58:32.440 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>things that at core united US. The left can't tolerate

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that we, as conservatives, we debate them on any number

0:58:41.280 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of issues, and I would argue that the average conservative

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 1>knows a lot more about the left positions than the

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>left knows about our positions, because they believe that their

0:58:47.560 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>positions have to predominate by hook or by crook. Again, though,

0:58:54.520 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 1>what gets more insidious is when you have every element

0:58:58.640 --> 0:59:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of your society in aided by politics. And for the

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 1>latest example of this, there was a story out this

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:08.080
<v Speaker 1>week that was big in kind of the financial world,

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 1>dominated in the Wall Street Journal and elsewhere. Black Rock,

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the largest investment management company in the world

0:59:17.640 --> 0:59:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the amount of money that it manages,

0:59:20.400 --> 0:59:26.400
<v Speaker 1>about seven trillion dollars in assets that it helps invest

0:59:26.480 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on people's behalfs or that people invest through black Rock,

0:59:31.400 --> 0:59:34.800
<v Speaker 1>they weighed out a whole slew of initiatives under what's

0:59:34.800 --> 0:59:41.080
<v Speaker 1>called e SG. Now what is ESG Environmental, social and

0:59:41.280 --> 0:59:46.400
<v Speaker 1>governance focused initiatives that's become a huge thing in the

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 1>financial world. If you want to invest in basically green

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:52.760
<v Speaker 1>friendway companies, if you want to invest in companies that

0:59:52.840 --> 0:59:56.720
<v Speaker 1>value quote unquote diversity, not you know, in terms of

0:59:56.720 --> 0:59:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the way of thought, but in terms of skin pigmentation.

1:00:00.560 --> 1:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>If you want to support companies that are truly progressive

1:00:03.960 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>social justice warriors ESG are usually the kinds of vehicles

1:00:09.280 --> 1:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you can invest in. Some sort of fund that has

1:00:12.120 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>portfolio of companies that are all social justice warrior companies

1:00:15.800 --> 1:00:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and that has become a massive industry in financial services.

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Black Rock, the biggest asset manager in the world, is

1:00:25.640 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the leaders in ESG, and this week they

1:00:29.560 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>lay it out a slove of initiatives on stated environmentalist grounds,

1:00:32.880 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>So under sustainability and environmentalism in ESG slove initiatives where

1:00:40.080 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>not only will they be following these initiatives and basically

1:00:43.160 --> 1:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>imposing their progressive views on all of their employees, but

1:00:47.160 --> 1:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>also on all of the companies and other assets that

1:00:51.400 --> 1:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they invest in invest in. So in other words, they

1:00:55.280 --> 1:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>will push if through black Rock their investors own expert

1:01:00.040 --> 1:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>scent of a company. Let's say that company is an

1:01:02.280 --> 1:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>energy company, and that a company isn't a clean energy company,

1:01:05.600 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll push the board to get more clean and they

1:01:09.080 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>can do that because they effectively control the money, I mean,

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>follow the money in that company. So let's look at

1:01:19.360 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>what some of these initiatives are. Their CEO wrote to

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>other CEOs. We don't yet know which predictions about the

1:01:27.520 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>climate will be most accurate, nor what effects we have

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>failed to consider, but there's no denying the direction we

1:01:32.360 --> 1:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>are heading. Every government, company and shareholder must confront climate

1:01:35.720 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>change unquote. So the controller of more assets under management

1:01:39.560 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>than any investment manager in the world is saying climate change.

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>It's fact, world's gonna end in I guess eleven years.

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably they used to say twelve, but we're a year

1:01:48.720 --> 1:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future now. Investing decision should be made on

1:01:53.600 --> 1:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that basis. Basically, our entire society should be organized around that.

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's not a government talking. This is the private

1:01:59.000 --> 1:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>sector to a private sector company that effectively through all

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of the different assets that you can invest in, the stocks, bonds,

1:02:07.200 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and everything else that one either an individual or a

1:02:11.040 --> 1:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>big pension fund or an endowment, college endowment or your

1:02:15.280 --> 1:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>company can invest in through black Rock. You can invest

1:02:20.840 --> 1:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>in everything through black Rock. Basically, the entire global market

1:02:24.120 --> 1:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you can invest in through them. So when black Rock

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>says basically tow the party line and we're going to

1:02:30.680 --> 1:02:33.439
<v Speaker 1>nudge the companies that do any business with us, which

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is basically every company towards telling their environmentalist line, that's

1:02:38.880 --> 1:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of a scary state of play. He goes on

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>another letter to Black Rock clients to say, we believe

1:02:44.520 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that sustainabilities should be our new standard for investing. Okay, well, look,

1:02:49.280 --> 1:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as a private sector company, they are more than welcome

1:02:52.120 --> 1:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever they want. I mean, one of the

1:02:54.560 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>proposals is they're going to get out of investing in

1:02:57.840 --> 1:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>any businesses that generate meaningful amounts of revenue from thermal

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:04.080
<v Speaker 1>coal production. They're going to kick it out of their

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>portfolios that they offer to people. They're going to push

1:03:07.640 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>clients to adhere to the company's priorities such as un

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sustainable development goals such as gender equality and affordable and

1:03:14.680 --> 1:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>clean energy. They're going to substantially increase the number of

1:03:18.440 --> 1:03:23.800
<v Speaker 1>social justice friendwa investment offerings. Look, they're welcome to do

1:03:23.800 --> 1:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And they've also, by the way, joined the

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Climate Action one hundred plus, which engages with companies to

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:32.800
<v Speaker 1>improve climate disclosure and align business strategy with the goals

1:03:32.840 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Paris Agreement, is that what you think private

1:03:37.360 --> 1:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>sector companies should be in the business of. Look again,

1:03:41.240 --> 1:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't begrudge them. They can put forth whatever view

1:03:43.640 --> 1:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they want, and in a free marketplace, thank god, you

1:03:46.560 --> 1:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>can move elsewhere. If you don't like what the CEOs

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>stand for, if you don't like their company policies, take

1:03:53.440 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>your money out where, protest them, boycott them if you want,

1:03:58.120 --> 1:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, but recognize how much of the marketplace this

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>actually impacts. Because if we're talking about seven trillion dollars

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>worth of wealth invested across a whole swough of different companies,

1:04:11.120 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you can damn well be sure this is going to

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>impact any number of companies, and if you don't tow

1:04:15.560 --> 1:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the party line, your stock is going to creator. That's meaningful.

1:04:21.320 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So we see this on a micro level, this sort

1:04:23.280 --> 1:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of control with a cancel culture, where if you don't

1:04:26.640 --> 1:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>tow the progressive line, you're throwing out your ability to

1:04:30.200 --> 1:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>live work function in society is basically over. We've seen,

1:04:34.840 --> 1:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, that payment processing companies like PayPal and the

1:04:38.400 --> 1:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>like will kick people off of their services who are

1:04:41.520 --> 1:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>funded by people like you and me to be able

1:04:44.720 --> 1:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to produce content that a major corporation won't allow them

1:04:47.280 --> 1:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to produce again because it flats PC norms kicked off,

1:04:52.240 --> 1:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>can't make a living, can't use the payment processing company.

1:04:56.800 --> 1:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>This is far bigger. I mean, this is again seven

1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars almost in assets under management to the party line.

1:05:08.680 --> 1:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>This should really scare us, in my opinion, And it's

1:05:11.440 --> 1:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>not just about this particular move, and it's not just

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that, look, you know live and we live.

1:05:15.920 --> 1:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>If they want to be woke capital, they can be

1:05:17.760 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>woke capital. Okay, they can deal with the consequences of that.

1:05:21.200 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>But there are a couple broader points to be made.

1:05:23.160 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>One is the fact that this is representative of where

1:05:26.640 --> 1:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>corporate America is, where they have basically entire sections that

1:05:31.520 --> 1:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are dedicated to making sure that you don't run a

1:05:33.560 --> 1:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>foul of political correctness, and you don't run a foul

1:05:36.400 --> 1:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of the progressive sort of ethos that dominates in all

1:05:40.040 --> 1:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of our lead institutions, in our colleges, in our media,

1:05:44.920 --> 1:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in every facet of society that is responsible for imparting

1:05:49.680 --> 1:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>views to people and telling people how they should think.

1:05:55.120 --> 1:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So it should scare us from the perspective of this

1:05:57.000 --> 1:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is but one massive granted company. But what do you

1:06:00.680 --> 1:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>think the management teams look like a pretty much all

1:06:03.040 --> 1:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of the major corporations, And do you think they care

1:06:05.800 --> 1:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>more about the people that they have their cocktail parties with,

1:06:09.760 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>who run the schools that they send their kids to,

1:06:12.480 --> 1:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>their attorneys, all the senior management at these companies. Do

1:06:18.880 --> 1:06:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you think that they care more about you the deplorable

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or do you think they care more about the people

1:06:25.800 --> 1:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that they're friends with? And they think everyone else thinks

1:06:27.800 --> 1:06:29.919
<v Speaker 1>like because they think that their views, which are held

1:06:29.920 --> 1:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>by really like ten or twenty percent of the country,

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>are actually the mainstream views, and that the real mainstream

1:06:34.800 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>views in the country that the forgotten man in this

1:06:36.800 --> 1:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>country holds traditions they hold, dear, are fringe. I want

1:06:43.600 --> 1:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit more about woe capital, and

1:06:45.360 --> 1:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll do so right after this short break is Ben

1:06:47.560 --> 1:06:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Wangarten and for Buck Sexton. Back right after this. You're

1:06:52.880 --> 1:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.

1:07:00.040 --> 1:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. This is Ben

1:07:01.840 --> 1:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>weine Garden in for Buck Sexton. And before the break

1:07:05.040 --> 1:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we were talking a little bit about woke capital, and

1:07:07.560 --> 1:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>this is truly woke capital, because investment managers are a

1:07:11.160 --> 1:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>key part of sort of the capital markets and the

1:07:13.880 --> 1:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>financial industry and basically where funds get directed in our economy.

1:07:18.120 --> 1:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>That tells us what companies grow and succeed in which

1:07:20.400 --> 1:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>companies fail. And I was talking about the significance of

1:07:23.920 --> 1:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this particular company, black Rock, as the biggest asset manager

1:07:27.000 --> 1:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and they're also one of one hundred

1:07:28.840 --> 1:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and eighty one maybe plus employers who signed on to

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>an agreement which basically said that companies no longer their

1:07:37.120 --> 1:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>primary focus is no longer creating value for their owners

1:07:40.960 --> 1:07:44.479
<v Speaker 1>their shareholders, but to serving all stakeholders. They signed onto

1:07:44.520 --> 1:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this agreement changing what the principles of business are. The

1:07:48.600 --> 1:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>business should be about protecting the environment by embracing sustainable

1:07:52.040 --> 1:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>practices across our businesses. That is black Rock and basically

1:07:56.600 --> 1:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the biggest company is in a bunch of

1:07:58.440 --> 1:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>different sectors agreed. It's not about making money for your

1:08:02.080 --> 1:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>owners anymore and serving your owners, it's in part about

1:08:05.360 --> 1:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>serving environmental causes. But there's a hypocrisy in this, and

1:08:11.200 --> 1:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it actually winks back to what we've been discussing and

1:08:14.880 --> 1:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>will continue to be discussing over the next couple of days.

1:08:16.920 --> 1:08:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Actually China and US China policy. Here's the hook. Okay,

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that Blackrock and these other companies are

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>sustainability driven and their true believers and their principles, how

1:08:29.680 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>do they square that with the exposure that they and

1:08:32.439 --> 1:08:34.479
<v Speaker 1>many of these other companies have to the world's biggest

1:08:34.479 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>polluter in China. Let me explain this a little more.

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Black Rock, for example, has expanded its offerings of China

1:08:42.800 --> 1:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>specific investment vehicles. So you are, again, a big pension

1:08:46.320 --> 1:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>fund or an endowment can invest more and more money

1:08:50.600 --> 1:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in big Chinese companies, probably companies that are polluters, or

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>if not, at least their companies that prop up a

1:08:56.720 --> 1:09:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Communist Party regime that allows companies to and destroy

1:09:00.760 --> 1:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the environment there. But you haven't really heard of any

1:09:04.840 --> 1:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>any of these big companies saying we will no longer

1:09:07.000 --> 1:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do business with the China and the Chinese market due

1:09:09.760 --> 1:09:15.599
<v Speaker 1>to their lack of sustainable practices in their businesses. As

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, investors basically not only underwrite some percentage of

1:09:19.080 --> 1:09:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the companies the pollute, they effectively prop up this regime

1:09:24.280 --> 1:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>that enables that pollution. So can you really call yourself

1:09:27.600 --> 1:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>a proponent of environmental justice and claiming you care about

1:09:30.720 --> 1:09:33.479
<v Speaker 1>sustainability if with one hand you say we're going to

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>punish basically non Chinese companies that don't hute our environmental principles,

1:09:39.000 --> 1:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>but we're going to actually increase our investment holdings and

1:09:41.520 --> 1:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>offerings in Chinese companies. And it's not just the environmental

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>hypocrisy here, it's also investing in other non social justice

1:09:54.160 --> 1:09:59.599
<v Speaker 1>warrior friendly firms like, for example, Hick Vision. Hick Vision

1:09:59.720 --> 1:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is a China base and Hangsu business that produces the

1:10:03.880 --> 1:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>cameras that surveil the minority weager Muslim population that is

1:10:08.800 --> 1:10:12.360
<v Speaker 1>being held in modern day gulags in China Shinjiang Province.

1:10:13.479 --> 1:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Where's woe capital on that? You know? We saw this

1:10:16.120 --> 1:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>with Nike where God Forbid. A senior executive for the

1:10:19.720 --> 1:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Houston Rockets basketball team comes out and says something of

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>pro Hong Kong, and the backlash is swift. Because Nike

1:10:25.360 --> 1:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>has all their profits tied to doing business with China,

1:10:29.200 --> 1:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they get awfully quiet when it might impact their bottom

1:10:32.280 --> 1:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>line with their social justice warriordom. I want to see

1:10:36.600 --> 1:10:38.639
<v Speaker 1>all the financial services companies come out and say we're

1:10:38.640 --> 1:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>not going to do business with China because they flout

1:10:41.520 --> 1:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>progressive norms, values and principles. But you won't see it.

1:10:45.320 --> 1:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And why won't you see it? Because at the end

1:10:47.080 --> 1:10:50.799
<v Speaker 1>of the day, it is profits the matter. It's profit

1:10:50.840 --> 1:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that's matter. It's profits the matter. And oh, by the way,

1:10:53.280 --> 1:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it goes beyond that. Because these EESG products, the sustainability

1:10:57.400 --> 1:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>products that they offer, and this push for green company,

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet you find in a lot of ways it's

1:11:03.680 --> 1:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a racket. Because of those companies that fit this EESG environmentalism,

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>sustainable social governance and the like. What percentage of those

1:11:16.000 --> 1:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>companies receive chrony capitalists benefits It's not even woke capital

1:11:23.160 --> 1:11:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it's more like woke chrony capital How many of them

1:11:27.360 --> 1:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>receive huge subsidies from the government to basically keep afloat

1:11:31.080 --> 1:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>companies that otherwise wouldn't be able to exist on the

1:11:33.200 --> 1:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>free marketplace because they can't compete with the traditional industries

1:11:36.960 --> 1:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've had in this country. What percentage of them

1:11:38.960 --> 1:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>get tax breaks and write offs? What percentage of them

1:11:43.040 --> 1:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>have their business almost completely tied to government support in

1:11:47.200 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>one way or another? And then, oh, by the way,

1:11:49.200 --> 1:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>factor in that some of these pensions and other government

1:11:52.160 --> 1:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>associated investors including governments themselves and sovereign wealth funds invest

1:11:56.960 --> 1:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>through places like Black Rock. There's sort of playing both

1:11:59.400 --> 1:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sides because on the one hand, the government supports all

1:12:01.400 --> 1:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>these policies, and then on the other hand, the government

1:12:03.240 --> 1:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is investing those pension funds in the very companies that

1:12:06.920 --> 1:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>benefit from those government policies. So we should call a

1:12:11.240 --> 1:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>spade a spade when it comes to woke capital, whether

1:12:13.800 --> 1:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a big st manager or Nike or anyone else. Really,

1:12:17.920 --> 1:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, it's about profits. Let's

1:12:20.360 --> 1:12:23.599
<v Speaker 1>not call it woke capital. Let's call it woke crony capital.

1:12:24.080 --> 1:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>This Ben Wangaran in for Buck Saxon on The Buck

1:12:25.840 --> 1:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Sex and Show. We'll be right back. Thanks for listening

1:12:28.720 --> 1:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to The Bus Sex and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe

1:12:32.080 --> 1:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you

1:12:35.400 --> 1:12:39.519
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. Senator Sands, I do want to be

1:12:39.600 --> 1:12:43.519
<v Speaker 1>clear here. You're saying that you never told Senator Warren

1:12:43.680 --> 1:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that a woman could not win the election. The Senator Warren,

1:12:48.880 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>what did you think when Senator Sanders told you a

1:12:51.400 --> 1:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>woman could not win the election? I disagreed. Bernie is

1:12:57.520 --> 1:13:00.200
<v Speaker 1>my friend, and I'm not here to try to fight

1:13:00.320 --> 1:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with Bernie. But look, this question about whether or not

1:13:03.880 --> 1:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a woman can be president has been raised, and it's

1:13:07.040 --> 1:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>time for us to attack it head on um. And

1:13:10.840 --> 1:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the best way to talk about who can

1:13:12.880 --> 1:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>win is by looking at people's winning record. So can

1:13:17.040 --> 1:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a woman beat Donald Trump? Look at the men on

1:13:20.160 --> 1:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this stage collectively, they have lost ten elections. The only

1:13:24.920 --> 1:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>people on this stage who have won every single election

1:13:28.520 --> 1:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that they've been in are the women. Told me a

1:13:32.240 --> 1:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>liar on National TV. He's a little I think you

1:13:35.280 --> 1:13:38.439
<v Speaker 1>told me a liar on National MOVING. Let's not do

1:13:38.479 --> 1:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it right now. You want to have that discussion, we'll

1:13:40.160 --> 1:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have that discussion. You call meal and you told me.

1:13:43.160 --> 1:13:47.519
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say hydriden good. If you haven't

1:13:47.560 --> 1:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>seen it, you've got to see that last clip with

1:13:50.120 --> 1:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the Curb your Enthusiasm music dubbed over. It's and not

1:13:53.000 --> 1:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>only because the Larry David Bernie Sanders likeness, but it's

1:13:57.080 --> 1:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just too perfect for that whole episode. So you probably

1:14:00.160 --> 1:14:02.759
<v Speaker 1>been following this. It's almost getting annoying at this point.

1:14:03.240 --> 1:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>The mini confrontation what I would call sort of an

1:14:06.760 --> 1:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Iran Iraq war, which you really don't want to get

1:14:08.680 --> 1:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in the way of between Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren CNN.

1:14:13.200 --> 1:14:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it seems probably leaked from the Warren camp

1:14:16.680 --> 1:14:19.759
<v Speaker 1>or those close to the Warren camp, comments from Bernie

1:14:19.960 --> 1:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that a woman couldn't be president with respect to

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren, I believe, back in twenty eighteen. Then Bernie

1:14:26.280 --> 1:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>during the debate the other night, gets asked, you know,

1:14:29.720 --> 1:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>essentially a do you beat your wife's sort of question effectively,

1:14:33.200 --> 1:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>especially for the Democratic fields. He denies it, but then

1:14:37.240 --> 1:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of course they act in asking Warren about it as

1:14:39.920 --> 1:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if he didn't just deny it, and then after when

1:14:43.200 --> 1:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't have been recorded, there's a hot mic with

1:14:45.840 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>this whole exchange between Bernie and Warren, and I think

1:14:50.880 --> 1:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we have to stop and ask ourselves for a minute.

1:14:53.760 --> 1:14:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that the long knives, at least at

1:14:56.479 --> 1:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>CNN seemed to be out for Bernie Sanders. You know,

1:14:59.840 --> 1:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>he claimed that the twenty sixteen primary with Hillary Clinton

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was rigged in her favor, and I think that's absolutely

1:15:06.600 --> 1:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the case, and there's plenty of empirical evidence to show it.

1:15:10.360 --> 1:15:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Why now, you know, their ideas Bernie versus Warren's ideas

1:15:14.560 --> 1:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>are not all that different. She just polishes it with

1:15:17.080 --> 1:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a more sort of academic and serious kind of face

1:15:20.560 --> 1:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to it, more rigorous and substantive garbage. But why are

1:15:26.360 --> 1:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the long knives out for him? I would suggest the

1:15:29.680 --> 1:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>long knives are out for Bernie because they recognize that

1:15:32.360 --> 1:15:35.879
<v Speaker 1>he is a serious threat to win this thing. You know, Bernie.

1:15:36.320 --> 1:15:38.679
<v Speaker 1>It looks like Biden is going to sort of cruise

1:15:38.720 --> 1:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to the finish, even though he really has been incoherent,

1:15:41.439 --> 1:15:44.719
<v Speaker 1>largely for almost the entire set of debates. He's wrong.

1:15:45.000 --> 1:15:47.599
<v Speaker 1>He's been wrong on every single issue in public life

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that matters. He represented a terrible administration that preceded this one.

1:15:54.080 --> 1:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, and look at look at what is the

1:15:55.960 --> 1:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>substance of the democratic message. It's, you know, let's keep

1:16:00.120 --> 1:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>terrorists alive, solomni let's bribe and appease adversary regimes. I ran.

1:16:06.840 --> 1:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>China isn't a problem, says Joe Biden, and then he

1:16:09.439 --> 1:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>has the gaul to go out there and attack this

1:16:11.840 --> 1:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Phase one China trade deal that we'll be talking about

1:16:14.200 --> 1:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later this evening. Socialized medicine, open borders, infanticide.

1:16:22.160 --> 1:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Take an economy that's rip roaring from the perspective of

1:16:25.160 --> 1:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>job growth and wage growth and expansion in industries that

1:16:29.360 --> 1:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>had been hollowed out and destroyed in the past, repatriation

1:16:32.960 --> 1:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of something like a trillion dollars. I believe in wealth

1:16:35.640 --> 1:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>back to America, confronting our enemies, which is in our

1:16:39.439 --> 1:16:45.519
<v Speaker 1>economic and national security interest. That's their message. All. No

1:16:45.520 --> 1:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>matter who their nominee is, he's going to be pulled

1:16:47.439 --> 1:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in that direction at the very least to win the primary.

1:16:51.439 --> 1:16:53.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, Biden doesn't really have any beliefs as far

1:16:53.600 --> 1:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>as I can tell, So he's going to be a

1:16:55.880 --> 1:17:01.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of weak representative of the leftist mating factors that

1:17:01.520 --> 1:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are really what's driving this entire Democratic Party, which is

1:17:04.080 --> 1:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>why we're having impeachment right now in the first place,

1:17:06.240 --> 1:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which is why Nancy Pelosi has completely caved to the

1:17:08.880 --> 1:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>squad and almost every single issue imaginable. Why are the

1:17:14.439 --> 1:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>long knives out for Bernie because he actually believes in

1:17:16.760 --> 1:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. It represents where the energy in the party is,

1:17:21.080 --> 1:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and he has a real chance to win it. That's

1:17:23.920 --> 1:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the thing. He has a real chance to win it.

1:17:26.920 --> 1:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So this party that talks about their concern for democracy, well,

1:17:29.880 --> 1:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if he is the candidate that prevails in their democratic

1:17:34.160 --> 1:17:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Democrat process, shouldn't they let him go? I think they

1:17:39.640 --> 1:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>recognize the powers that be, their political establishment recognizes that

1:17:43.360 --> 1:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Bernie could likely be suicide for them. But you know

1:17:45.920 --> 1:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>what separates Bernie from the other candidates is that he

1:17:47.960 --> 1:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>actually believes the communist sort of rhetoric. He's got communists

1:17:51.400 --> 1:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>working for his team. You've probably seen the Gulag video

1:17:54.280 --> 1:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that came out of one of his staffers recently. He's

1:17:56.760 --> 1:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>got a swam mess on his team, like Linda Sarsour

1:17:59.320 --> 1:18:03.519
<v Speaker 1>not to mention on Omar and the like the long

1:18:03.600 --> 1:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>knives around because they think he's serious. And then you notice,

1:18:08.920 --> 1:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and I believe Buck might have talked about this yesterday.

1:18:12.600 --> 1:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Well let's go to clip six. Let's go to clip six.

1:18:16.800 --> 1:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>And I want to say, that's a night for me

1:18:18.520 --> 1:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>was dispiriting. Democrats got to do better what we saw

1:18:21.320 --> 1:18:23.479
<v Speaker 1>at night. There was nothing I saw at Knight that

1:18:23.479 --> 1:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>would be able to take Donald Trump out. And I

1:18:25.200 --> 1:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>want to see a Democrat in the White House as

1:18:27.360 --> 1:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>soon as possible. There was nothing to night that if

1:18:29.880 --> 1:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at this thing, you say, any of these

1:18:32.400 --> 1:18:34.160
<v Speaker 1>people are prepared for what Donal Trump is gonna do

1:18:34.160 --> 1:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to us? That was Van Jones and I agree with

1:18:36.720 --> 1:18:39.679
<v Speaker 1>Van Jones on his political assessment here, and he's not alone,

1:18:39.720 --> 1:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way. Al Sharpton also came out on MSNBC

1:18:43.200 --> 1:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Famous Race. Bader visited the Obama's White House, however many

1:18:46.840 --> 1:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>dozens of times as treated as a legitimate figure in

1:18:49.640 --> 1:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>spite of the fact that he incited literal pigrums in

1:18:52.880 --> 1:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>New York. Becoming relevant again now sad way, you know,

1:18:56.000 --> 1:19:01.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years later, Sharpton two afraid none of these

1:19:01.600 --> 1:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>people can go toe to toe with Trump again. You know, frankly,

1:19:04.960 --> 1:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>I agree with their assessment. You have to ask why, though,

1:19:12.560 --> 1:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>why why is it that they don't believe any of

1:19:15.200 --> 1:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>them can compete with Trump? And why would they come

1:19:17.400 --> 1:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>out and say this. Could it be that they're trying

1:19:21.520 --> 1:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to create sort of a ground swell on the left

1:19:25.400 --> 1:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for a different candidate to emerge. Could it be maybe

1:19:29.320 --> 1:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Obama? And we've heard this rumor before, but the

1:19:32.840 --> 1:19:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Obama team has been awfully quiet, and there are reports

1:19:35.600 --> 1:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>out there saying that if Bernie were a seriously challenge

1:19:38.880 --> 1:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and potentially be in a position to become the nominee,

1:19:42.400 --> 1:19:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that Obama would speak out. Could it be that this

1:19:47.200 --> 1:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>is all sort of an elaborate employ given out week

1:19:49.479 --> 1:19:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Biden as ban and remember Barack Obama would not endorse

1:19:54.360 --> 1:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the odds on favorite in their field. Could it be

1:19:57.520 --> 1:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that this is all about a draft Michelle movement? She

1:20:00.360 --> 1:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to do it, but then the Democratic Party

1:20:03.240 --> 1:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>forced her and it was her patriotic duty to do

1:20:05.960 --> 1:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>so so that she could once again be proud of

1:20:07.760 --> 1:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>America again. And one of my colleagues at the Federalists

1:20:14.360 --> 1:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>today as an article, Tristan Justice, has an article about

1:20:17.680 --> 1:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>how could it be that the delay in the impeachment

1:20:20.640 --> 1:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is about rigging Iowa against Bernie Sanders? Again, rigging it

1:20:24.360 --> 1:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>against Bernie? Why would that be? Well, if Bernie and

1:20:28.200 --> 1:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>his fellow senaitors who are running are forced to be

1:20:31.160 --> 1:20:33.360
<v Speaker 1>sitting for the impeachment trial, and it looks like it's

1:20:33.360 --> 1:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>going to run right up against the start. Certainly at

1:20:36.000 --> 1:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>a minimum of the Democratic primary process, including I believe

1:20:40.000 --> 1:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the February third Iowa caucuses, he'll be off the campaign trail,

1:20:45.880 --> 1:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>taking him off the field. Now that that obviously supports Biden.

1:20:51.120 --> 1:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Could it go beyond Biden? Could it go to a

1:20:52.960 --> 1:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Obama. Incidentally, there's also a caucus change that happened

1:20:58.080 --> 1:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the rules for Iowa that you might not have

1:20:59.840 --> 1:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>heard about. This was in the Transom which Ben Dominic's

1:21:02.640 --> 1:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>great news letter Ben Dominech, publisher of The Federalist. He

1:21:06.080 --> 1:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>quotes an article which talks about how, for the first time,

1:21:09.200 --> 1:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>i quote in the history of Iowa's Democratic caucuses, the

1:21:11.880 --> 1:21:14.719
<v Speaker 1>party will report the raw vote count for each candidate,

1:21:14.960 --> 1:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and because of idiosyncrasies in the caucus process, the person

1:21:18.360 --> 1:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with the most votes at the beginning won't necessarily be

1:21:21.040 --> 1:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the one with the biggest delegate hall at the end.

1:21:23.720 --> 1:21:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Think of it as Iowa's version of the twenty sixteen

1:21:25.760 --> 1:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>electoral college issue. In Iowa, traditionally it's the delegates the matter,

1:21:30.000 --> 1:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and party leaders here are emphasized that shouldn't change. Ultimately,

1:21:33.479 --> 1:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the presidential primary contest comes down to who gets the

1:21:36.160 --> 1:21:39.200
<v Speaker 1>most delegates. But the disclosure of two vote tallies and

1:21:39.280 --> 1:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>one delegate counts on the night of the February third

1:21:41.439 --> 1:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>caucuses and move made to inject more transparency into the

1:21:44.200 --> 1:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>caucus process is threatening to muddle the narrative coming out

1:21:47.800 --> 1:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of Iowa. And here's the real takeaway. Depending on how

1:21:52.040 --> 1:21:54.439
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are interpreted, there's a scenario in which more

1:21:54.520 --> 1:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>than one candidate could claim a win quote unquote, do

1:21:57.840 --> 1:21:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you see they're starting to rig the process and all

1:22:00.040 --> 1:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sorts of ways. The question is is it for Bernie

1:22:02.320 --> 1:22:06.160
<v Speaker 1>or is it for someone else? And before we go

1:22:06.240 --> 1:22:09.759
<v Speaker 1>to break, I want to talk just briefly a little

1:22:09.760 --> 1:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>bit about impeachment. You know, it's sort of infringes upon

1:22:15.240 --> 1:22:18.479
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, their entire primary process. It puts a

1:22:18.479 --> 1:22:20.759
<v Speaker 1>cloud over it. It's obviously intended to put a cloud

1:22:20.760 --> 1:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>over the entire Trump presidency. I hate talking about impeachment

1:22:24.280 --> 1:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's an illegitimate process, both in terms

1:22:27.080 --> 1:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of the procedural way that it's been pushed onto us,

1:22:32.280 --> 1:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>imposed on Congress, and imposed upon the American people. When

1:22:36.160 --> 1:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>all of these Democrats, including Jerry Nader and others, you know,

1:22:39.439 --> 1:22:42.559
<v Speaker 1>during the Clinton impeachment trial, we're saying one thing now

1:22:42.600 --> 1:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and during these proceedings are saying another. It's not only

1:22:45.880 --> 1:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>rigged on the process, but I think it's totally illegitimate

1:22:48.360 --> 1:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on the merits as well. So I really don't like

1:22:50.200 --> 1:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about it, and I don't like focusing on it

1:22:52.479 --> 1:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think it is worthy of our focus

1:22:54.720 --> 1:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>and attention, because it's not worthy of our American political system,

1:22:58.720 --> 1:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>our constitutional republic. But you know, yesterday the House Democratic

1:23:03.760 --> 1:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Managers prayerfully and somberly signed the impeachment article as using

1:23:08.800 --> 1:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>approximately one seven hundred and seventy six pens, with Nancy

1:23:12.160 --> 1:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Plosa screaming out, you get a pen, and you get

1:23:14.000 --> 1:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>a pen, and you get a pen. But they were

1:23:16.720 --> 1:23:23.599
<v Speaker 1>very serious and somber, prayerful, thoughtful, and then they had

1:23:23.600 --> 1:23:27.360
<v Speaker 1>their procession, their little awake as they're in mourning, as

1:23:27.400 --> 1:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they went over to the Senate. And of course, you know,

1:23:31.400 --> 1:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>of these impeachment managers, six of them publicly supported impeaching

1:23:35.680 --> 1:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the president before the quote unquote whistle blower complaints regarding

1:23:39.840 --> 1:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the phone call with the president of Ukraine Zelinski. You

1:23:44.800 --> 1:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>know that this is a ruse. Well, what is impeachment

1:23:48.320 --> 1:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>actually about? What should we be how should we be

1:23:51.200 --> 1:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this given that it's a total charade. Obviously

1:23:55.680 --> 1:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they're the sort of immediate term considerations, the political attack

1:24:00.080 --> 1:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>considerations for the left. You know, this is about paralyzing

1:24:03.439 --> 1:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Trump agenda in an election year. It's about fundraising,

1:24:06.280 --> 1:24:10.599
<v Speaker 1>it's about appeasing the extremist progressive base which is currently

1:24:10.600 --> 1:24:13.439
<v Speaker 1>ascendant in the Democratic party, and I believe is taking

1:24:13.520 --> 1:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it over. If not, it may have already taken it

1:24:15.880 --> 1:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>over in some ways, potentially forcing the administration or Republicans

1:24:21.600 --> 1:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and both the House and the Senate into making tactical errors,

1:24:25.240 --> 1:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>forcing the administration to produce all sorts of documents that

1:24:27.920 --> 1:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they can that the Democrats can then portray in the

1:24:30.320 --> 1:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>worst possible way and attempt to smear the administration again

1:24:33.960 --> 1:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>going into an election year, maybe most important way from

1:24:37.200 --> 1:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a political perspective, forcing Republican senators into making tough votes,

1:24:41.439 --> 1:24:49.599
<v Speaker 1>potentially delegitimizing President Trump for a second term. What I

1:24:49.640 --> 1:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>think the importance of impeachment is is it's the same

1:24:53.760 --> 1:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>significance as Kavanaugh. You know, the Kavanaugh hearings were much

1:24:57.720 --> 1:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>bigger than Kavanaugh. It was about the nature of our

1:25:01.240 --> 1:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>political adversary and the way that they play the game

1:25:05.200 --> 1:25:07.559
<v Speaker 1>and the rules that they adhere to or don't adhere to.

1:25:08.840 --> 1:25:10.479
<v Speaker 1>And if it wasn't clear to you, then, frankly, if

1:25:10.479 --> 1:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't clear to you back in the days of

1:25:12.120 --> 1:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill, the Left play is to

1:25:15.160 --> 1:25:18.439
<v Speaker 1>win at all costs. They'll invoke the Constitution on the

1:25:18.439 --> 1:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>one end, and they'll shred up the Constitution on the

1:25:20.880 --> 1:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>other when it suits them, they claim that impeachment is

1:25:23.400 --> 1:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a purely political process when their party controls it in

1:25:26.360 --> 1:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the House, and a purely strictly legal process when it

1:25:29.479 --> 1:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately hits the Senate. We're up against the political adversary

1:25:35.320 --> 1:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that wants to destroy us to retain its own power

1:25:38.920 --> 1:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and privilege and grow it. There's no level to which

1:25:42.240 --> 1:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>they won't sink, There's no amount of shame to which

1:25:47.439 --> 1:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they won't reach, There's no level hypocrisy doesn't matter for them. Remember,

1:25:55.280 --> 1:25:58.759
<v Speaker 1>since before the start of the Trump presidency, it was resist, resist, resist,

1:25:58.920 --> 1:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and our side doesn't fight the same way. With few exceptions,

1:26:03.120 --> 1:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's movement conservatives and a fraction of a

1:26:06.000 --> 1:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>fraction of those in Congress and elsewhere. Trump has shown

1:26:10.479 --> 1:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the way tactically and strategically how to fight the left,

1:26:13.479 --> 1:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to fight fire with fire. Yes, sort of like Solomoni.

1:26:17.479 --> 1:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Solomoni was a game changer because the other side never

1:26:19.800 --> 1:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>expected it. Our side needs to act like that on

1:26:22.880 --> 1:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>more issues, core issues that are about defending and protecting

1:26:27.680 --> 1:26:32.679
<v Speaker 1>this constitutional republic that we love. The left will never, ever, ever,

1:26:32.880 --> 1:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ever stop fighting till the day Donald Trump is out

1:26:36.080 --> 1:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of office, and then probably after he's out of office,

1:26:38.400 --> 1:26:40.519
<v Speaker 1>they'll pursue him, and then they'll go after the next

1:26:40.520 --> 1:26:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Republican and the next one and the next one. Because

1:26:42.760 --> 1:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>for them politics it's not even religion. It goes beyond religion.

1:26:46.960 --> 1:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>For them, it's their entire being. They're wholly consumed by it.

1:26:51.560 --> 1:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>For them, in their view, it's about good versus evil,

1:26:53.920 --> 1:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>and they need to destroy us because we're either evil

1:26:56.520 --> 1:27:01.559
<v Speaker 1>or stupid. We're seeing this view manifest itself even in

1:27:01.600 --> 1:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the private sector, which is controlled by progressives. And we'll

1:27:03.960 --> 1:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about that a little bit later, but for now,

1:27:06.240 --> 1:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to leave you with a message that impeachment,

1:27:08.360 --> 1:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>what it should represent for us is this, this is

1:27:11.240 --> 1:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the left. We need to fight with

1:27:14.000 --> 1:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the same intensity, with the same rigor, with the same

1:27:16.360 --> 1:27:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seriousness that they bring to the table, because they fight

1:27:19.040 --> 1:27:21.479
<v Speaker 1>us every single day of every single year. And it's

1:27:21.520 --> 1:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about time we woke up to it. This president has

1:27:24.320 --> 1:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the entire Republican Party must This has been war in

1:27:28.000 --> 1:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sexon on The Buck Sexton Show. We'll be

1:27:29.840 --> 1:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>back reddet you're in. This is the Buck Sexton Show Podcast.

1:27:40.560 --> 1:27:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to The Buck Sexton Show. This is Ben

1:27:42.720 --> 1:27:45.599
<v Speaker 1>Weingarten in for Buck Sexton. We only have a couple

1:27:45.640 --> 1:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of minutes before my next guest, who I'm very pleased

1:27:48.280 --> 1:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to have on, Johnny Eastman, comes on and joins the program,

1:27:51.640 --> 1:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and before we get to that conversation, I need to

1:27:54.120 --> 1:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>provide a little bit of framing for it. Eastman is

1:27:57.120 --> 1:27:59.479
<v Speaker 1>one of the premier scholars in my view when it

1:27:59.479 --> 1:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to constitutional matters, in particular dealing with immigration and

1:28:04.320 --> 1:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>national sovereignty. And in our prior segment we were talking

1:28:08.200 --> 1:28:12.439
<v Speaker 1>about impeachment and the nature of the Democrats march and

1:28:12.680 --> 1:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that they'll fight dirty, they'll fight any which way to

1:28:15.080 --> 1:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>win on any grounds they possibly can. And one of

1:28:17.840 --> 1:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>the most nefarious ways that they do it is through

1:28:21.720 --> 1:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not even amnesty, but the very fact that non citizens

1:28:26.160 --> 1:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and in in particular disproportionately illegal aliens are able to come here,

1:28:29.720 --> 1:28:33.479
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats promote it because it actually impacts the political

1:28:33.479 --> 1:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>process even before they potentially all get amnestied at some

1:28:37.160 --> 1:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>future point. And I've talked about this before and it's

1:28:40.000 --> 1:28:43.560
<v Speaker 1>relatively arcane, but bear with me because it's really significant.

1:28:44.160 --> 1:28:47.839
<v Speaker 1>We talked about the census and what the census means

1:28:47.960 --> 1:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>for political power for your vote and the votes of

1:28:50.800 --> 1:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>every American. The census tells us how many people and

1:28:56.200 --> 1:29:00.559
<v Speaker 1>that includes citizens and non citizens, including millions of illegal aliens,

1:29:00.920 --> 1:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>reside in the US. And those total population numbers, not

1:29:05.200 --> 1:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>just the number of citizens, not just the number of

1:29:07.160 --> 1:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>eligible voters and the like. Those numbers are what is

1:29:11.760 --> 1:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>used actually to determine entire legislative districts, so apportionment of

1:29:17.760 --> 1:29:23.439
<v Speaker 1>congressional seats. We today count again millions of millions of

1:29:23.479 --> 1:29:27.639
<v Speaker 1>non citizens in these numbers, and what does that do well.

1:29:27.760 --> 1:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Report came out from the Center for Immigration Studies, which

1:29:31.160 --> 1:29:35.559
<v Speaker 1>believes in restricting immigration numbers, and it showed this. The

1:29:35.680 --> 1:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty census will show that the presence of all

1:29:38.360 --> 1:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>illegal of all immigrants, which is naturalized citizens, legal residents,

1:29:42.240 --> 1:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and illegal aliens and their US born minor children, is

1:29:45.720 --> 1:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>responsible for a shift of twenty six House seats. Twenty

1:29:51.240 --> 1:29:55.599
<v Speaker 1>six house seats of the twenty six seats that will

1:29:55.640 --> 1:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>be lost due to redistricting due to these total population

1:29:58.880 --> 1:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers that come from the insis that includes millions of

1:30:01.960 --> 1:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>non citizens including illegal aliens. Twenty four are from states

1:30:06.200 --> 1:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that voted for Donald Trump in twenty sixteen. Of states

1:30:09.280 --> 1:30:12.439
<v Speaker 1>that will gain House seats because of immigration. Nineteen will

1:30:12.479 --> 1:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>go to the Soldiway Democrat states of California and New York,

1:30:14.720 --> 1:30:17.519
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Massachusetts in Illinois, Texas is the only solid

1:30:17.600 --> 1:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>or solidy Republican state that will gain, while Florida is

1:30:20.640 --> 1:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a swing state. So what I want to talk about

1:30:22.920 --> 1:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>with John Eastman is how did we get to such

1:30:25.720 --> 1:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a place where non citizens could so gravely impact the

1:30:29.920 --> 1:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>power of your vote, the weight of your vote, and

1:30:31.760 --> 1:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>disenfranchise you without even a mass amnesty. This is Ben

1:30:35.400 --> 1:30:37.799
<v Speaker 1>Wegarden in for Buck Sexton. We'll be up with Professor

1:30:37.880 --> 1:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>John Eastman right after this. Thanks for listening to The

1:30:41.360 --> 1:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>bus S Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,

1:30:45.680 --> 1:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.

1:30:50.520 --> 1:30:52.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. This is Ben

1:30:52.600 --> 1:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Weingarten in for Buck Sexton, and before the break I

1:30:57.240 --> 1:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about the impact of non citizens

1:31:01.520 --> 1:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in our census count and how that drastically has swung

1:31:04.960 --> 1:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>political power. Based upon some one study that has come

1:31:08.040 --> 1:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>out regarding what non citizens will do to twenty twenty

1:31:12.080 --> 1:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>population numbers in the census count, and those population numbers

1:31:14.880 --> 1:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>translate that into how the electoral map is drawn and

1:31:19.000 --> 1:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>basically give Democrats substantial power because mass illegal alien populations,

1:31:23.800 --> 1:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>even if they're never amnesty, it'll ultimately swing power to

1:31:27.000 --> 1:31:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you guessed it generally democratic districts. And I have on

1:31:30.479 --> 1:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the line with me an expert in not only constitutional

1:31:33.760 --> 1:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>law generally, but in particular immigration and has written and

1:31:37.240 --> 1:31:40.439
<v Speaker 1>spoken at length about these and other relevant issues. And

1:31:40.479 --> 1:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that's doctor John Eastman, who's the founding director of the

1:31:42.800 --> 1:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence and a senior Fellow

1:31:46.080 --> 1:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Claremont Institute. And he also serves as the

1:31:48.200 --> 1:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Henry Salvatory Professor of Law and Community Service at Chapman

1:31:51.320 --> 1:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>University's Daily four School of Law. Doctor Eastman, thanks so

1:31:55.479 --> 1:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Well, thanks very much. I'm sorry

1:31:58.160 --> 1:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that the introduction is such a mouthful. Not a problem

1:32:02.000 --> 1:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>at all, and it's a testament to your scholarship and

1:32:04.800 --> 1:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>your great work. And I want to start in a

1:32:07.600 --> 1:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of a fundamental question that I think most Americans

1:32:10.640 --> 1:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>would find curious if they were aware of it, and

1:32:13.120 --> 1:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that is, why are non citizens, including millions of legal aliens,

1:32:17.120 --> 1:32:19.839
<v Speaker 1>counted in our census? And why does that number dictate.

1:32:19.960 --> 1:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Then how the districts are drawn for house seats across

1:32:23.240 --> 1:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the country. Well, it's it's kind of grown up over

1:32:27.040 --> 1:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>time with a kind of false understanding of the constitution.

1:32:30.840 --> 1:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>The Constitution says, for our senses, every ten years, we

1:32:33.760 --> 1:32:37.519
<v Speaker 1>have to count all persons. And then you know, treated

1:32:37.840 --> 1:32:40.719
<v Speaker 1>slaves as three fifths of a person. That was largely

1:32:40.760 --> 1:32:45.479
<v Speaker 1>designed to minimize the electoral weight of the Southern states.

1:32:46.439 --> 1:32:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And then and then excluding Indians not taxed. And the

1:32:50.920 --> 1:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>point of that last clause is a recognition that there

1:32:53.720 --> 1:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>are some people here on our shores, within our borders,

1:32:57.479 --> 1:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>who are not part of our political community, and we're

1:33:00.320 --> 1:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to count them in the census, because, as

1:33:03.080 --> 1:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the Declaration of Independence sets out, government is based on

1:33:06.280 --> 1:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the consent of the government. That means the people who

1:33:09.160 --> 1:33:11.880
<v Speaker 1>form part of the political community are the only ones

1:33:12.160 --> 1:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that are entitled to representation in that political community. Excluding

1:33:16.400 --> 1:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Indians not taxed was the example of people within our

1:33:20.160 --> 1:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>borders at the time who were not part of our

1:33:23.360 --> 1:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>political community. And therefore we're not going to be counted

1:33:26.080 --> 1:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>because that would skew the representation of those who were

1:33:29.720 --> 1:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>entitled to be represented in our halls of governments. That

1:33:34.520 --> 1:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the excluding Indians not tax clause or a

1:33:37.360 --> 1:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more limited understanding of person, that meant persons who are

1:33:40.360 --> 1:33:43.519
<v Speaker 1>here and part of our political community, not anybody who

1:33:43.560 --> 1:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>happens to be here temporarily visiting, would be counted. And

1:33:46.800 --> 1:33:49.519
<v Speaker 1>that's the only theory that's consistent with the doctrine of

1:33:49.600 --> 1:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>consent outlined in the Declaration of Independence. So do we not,

1:33:54.160 --> 1:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in effect today have foreign interference in our elections? Writ

1:33:59.080 --> 1:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>large by dinner of the fact that millions of illegal

1:34:01.920 --> 1:34:05.519
<v Speaker 1>aliens dictate how much the relative vote of one person

1:34:05.560 --> 1:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>living in California is versus another person living in Alabama.

1:34:09.200 --> 1:34:12.519
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, well, that's absolutely true, and let me know,

1:34:12.560 --> 1:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of push the example here, the hypothetical. Let's suppose

1:34:16.720 --> 1:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got a district that has one legal voter and

1:34:20.360 --> 1:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>half a million illegal immigrants or even temporary visitors who

1:34:24.960 --> 1:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>are on student visas who are not eligible to vote.

1:34:27.800 --> 1:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>That one voter gets to choose a member of Congress,

1:34:31.000 --> 1:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the next distric over that have a half

1:34:33.360 --> 1:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>million citizens, each one of them gets one one five

1:34:37.160 --> 1:34:39.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousandth of the weight of that vote for that

1:34:40.000 --> 1:34:43.879
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress. That vote dilution that occurs by counting

1:34:44.400 --> 1:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>illegal immigrants, legal immigrants who are not citizens, people who

1:34:48.040 --> 1:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>are on temporary visitors, what have you, that really skews

1:34:52.080 --> 1:34:55.599
<v Speaker 1>and dilutes the vote of those citizens in other districts.

1:34:56.040 --> 1:34:58.240
<v Speaker 1>One other example on this, and I think it's important,

1:34:58.680 --> 1:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>let's suppose the nineteen eighty four Olympics in Los Angeles

1:35:02.200 --> 1:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>was actually held four years earlier in nineteen eighty when

1:35:05.640 --> 1:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the census was going on. That brought several million people

1:35:09.080 --> 1:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>from around the world to Los Angeles, and if we

1:35:11.840 --> 1:35:14.559
<v Speaker 1>had counted them just because they were persons who were

1:35:14.560 --> 1:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>physically present at the time the census was being conducted,

1:35:17.800 --> 1:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we would have handed Los Angeles County and therefore California

1:35:22.520 --> 1:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>half a dozen new congressional seats as a result of

1:35:25.080 --> 1:35:28.439
<v Speaker 1>people who were just temporary visitors here. The absurdity of

1:35:28.479 --> 1:35:31.479
<v Speaker 1>that should explain what's wrong with the way we're doing

1:35:31.479 --> 1:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the census now. And of course, amazingly, during the Trump term,

1:35:36.840 --> 1:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this huge debate and I sort of noticed

1:35:40.280 --> 1:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that it was going to become an emerging issue when

1:35:42.680 --> 1:35:46.479
<v Speaker 1>former Attorney General Eric Holder started to write and speak

1:35:46.479 --> 1:35:51.599
<v Speaker 1>publicly about it. In terms of the census citizenship question,

1:35:51.720 --> 1:35:55.240
<v Speaker 1>which as our listeners might recall, the Trump administration wanted

1:35:55.280 --> 1:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to simply ask are you a citizen or not? To

1:35:57.920 --> 1:36:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the head of households responding to the census, something where

1:36:00.840 --> 1:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a long history of asking different derivations of this question,

1:36:04.439 --> 1:36:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and even on the non main census, the Obama administration

1:36:08.560 --> 1:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>asked a similar question, not asking someone to incriminate themselves,

1:36:12.040 --> 1:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and we can debate whether they should or not be

1:36:14.080 --> 1:36:16.320
<v Speaker 1>asked really the more important question, which is are you

1:36:16.360 --> 1:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>here legally or not? But rather are you a citizen

1:36:19.080 --> 1:36:21.280
<v Speaker 1>or not? And the Democrats fought this tooth and nail,

1:36:21.600 --> 1:36:24.559
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately one in the courts on what I would

1:36:24.640 --> 1:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>argue your ass and on grounds and I'm sure you

1:36:26.400 --> 1:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>probably have a similar view on that that the question

1:36:29.000 --> 1:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>should be kicked out, basically because the courts didn't approve

1:36:32.160 --> 1:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of the way that the Trump administration went about incorporating

1:36:34.920 --> 1:36:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the question. But recently a study came out and part

1:36:38.479 --> 1:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of the reason the Democrats argued against the inclusion of

1:36:41.040 --> 1:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this question was that they said, well, look, non citizens

1:36:44.960 --> 1:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and presumably illegal aliens will be afraid to contribute to

1:36:47.880 --> 1:36:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the census if this question is asked, because they'll be

1:36:50.840 --> 1:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in some way, shape or form, incriminating themselves. But the

1:36:53.920 --> 1:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Census did a test on this, and it recently came

1:36:56.360 --> 1:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>out that actually there would not be a statistically significant

1:36:59.240 --> 1:37:02.599
<v Speaker 1>or meaningful drop off in responses to this question about

1:37:02.640 --> 1:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>census citizenship. So I just want to get your general

1:37:05.320 --> 1:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>take on what do you make of that study and

1:37:07.280 --> 1:37:11.519
<v Speaker 1>the census citizenship debate more broadly. Well, you know, we'd

1:37:11.560 --> 1:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>asked about citizenship, not surprisingly on every census that had

1:37:15.240 --> 1:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>been done up until nineteen fifty, safer one or two

1:37:17.960 --> 1:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the early eighteen hundreds, and then since nineteen

1:37:22.160 --> 1:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty it was asked on every census on the long form,

1:37:24.800 --> 1:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>which went to a statistically significant but not entirely every

1:37:30.160 --> 1:37:34.479
<v Speaker 1>household on the long form census. It was only in

1:37:34.520 --> 1:37:37.519
<v Speaker 1>the twenty ten Census that it was drawn from either

1:37:37.560 --> 1:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the regular census or the long form census form during

1:37:40.880 --> 1:37:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the Obama administration. Now, to be fair, that dropping of

1:37:45.240 --> 1:37:48.639
<v Speaker 1>it occurred earlier during the Bush administration, but they had

1:37:48.680 --> 1:37:52.519
<v Speaker 1>moved it to the annual Community Survey. But the fact

1:37:52.560 --> 1:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're not asking that on the decenial census that

1:37:55.240 --> 1:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution mandates every ten years means that people have

1:37:58.760 --> 1:38:02.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten this completely crazy notion that our representation ought to

1:38:02.960 --> 1:38:05.519
<v Speaker 1>be based on non citizens as well as citizen and

1:38:05.600 --> 1:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>it completely destroys the notion of consent as the basis

1:38:08.720 --> 1:38:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of our government. Anybody who happens to be here gets

1:38:11.640 --> 1:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a share in the weight of representation, even if they

1:38:14.960 --> 1:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>can't vote for that representative. That's absurd, and no other

1:38:18.439 --> 1:38:21.720
<v Speaker 1>country in the world does that. And in fact, the

1:38:21.800 --> 1:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>United Nations some years ago recommended to all member or

1:38:26.200 --> 1:38:31.280
<v Speaker 1>nations that they ask about citizenship on their senses. And

1:38:31.320 --> 1:38:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought that the left believed in the UN as

1:38:33.280 --> 1:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the highest body in the globe. So it's quite a

1:38:36.960 --> 1:38:41.400
<v Speaker 1>rod I don't right. And and in the next segment

1:38:41.400 --> 1:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about a similar policy to that,

1:38:43.400 --> 1:38:45.479
<v Speaker 1>which is the remain in Mexico policy, which we'll get

1:38:45.479 --> 1:38:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to in a minute, and what international law would say

1:38:47.880 --> 1:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>about that. But I do think it also is worth

1:38:50.479 --> 1:38:54.200
<v Speaker 1>noting that it is not only your voting power in effect,

1:38:54.280 --> 1:38:58.479
<v Speaker 1>they can get deluded or artificially bumped as a result

1:38:58.479 --> 1:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of counting non citizens, but it's also how hundreds of

1:39:01.640 --> 1:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars in federal funds are allocated. In a

1:39:05.160 --> 1:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of respects. It is really about you getting less

1:39:08.160 --> 1:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>representation in some ways than non citizens getting representation. Well,

1:39:13.960 --> 1:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And look, I've been a leading proponent of

1:39:17.200 --> 1:39:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the view that all of these grants and aid programs

1:39:20.720 --> 1:39:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to the states that serve particular constituencies or particular regions

1:39:25.960 --> 1:39:30.439
<v Speaker 1>rather than furthering the general or national welfare, are unconstitutional.

1:39:30.960 --> 1:39:33.839
<v Speaker 1>The Article one, section eight clause that allows for spending

1:39:33.840 --> 1:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>says spending for the common defense, not the local police

1:39:37.400 --> 1:39:40.439
<v Speaker 1>force and the general welfare. That doesn't mean I get

1:39:40.439 --> 1:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to widen, you know, the road in my community. Maybe

1:39:44.120 --> 1:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I can participate an interstate highway system, but I don't

1:39:47.960 --> 1:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>get to put palm trees on the center median of

1:39:50.160 --> 1:39:53.000
<v Speaker 1>my main street because that's not the general welfare, that's

1:39:53.040 --> 1:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the local welfare. And so, you know, we have for

1:39:56.160 --> 1:40:00.240
<v Speaker 1>about eighty years now ignored that fundamental limitation on the

1:40:00.280 --> 1:40:05.840
<v Speaker 1>power of Congress and completely distorted funding mechanisms where we

1:40:05.920 --> 1:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>now have complete disconnect between the taxes raised and the

1:40:10.439 --> 1:40:12.920
<v Speaker 1>benefits being provided. Used to be if I was going

1:40:12.960 --> 1:40:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to provide a benefit, I would tax the people that

1:40:15.040 --> 1:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>were going to benefit from it, and they could make

1:40:17.160 --> 1:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>them a judgment or whether it was worth the taxes

1:40:20.080 --> 1:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to pay for the benefit or not. Now we've got

1:40:22.320 --> 1:40:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this crazy situation where people are in Rhode Island are

1:40:25.280 --> 1:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>paying to widen my road in Long Beach and vice versa,

1:40:27.960 --> 1:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's complete disconnect and it's an unconstitutional one and

1:40:31.479 --> 1:40:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's exacerbated when they're sending money to provide welfare programs

1:40:36.840 --> 1:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that inevitably end up in the hands of people who

1:40:39.680 --> 1:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>are not even here legally. And somebody will tell me, well,

1:40:44.280 --> 1:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the statutes all prohibit illegal immigrants from having access to

1:40:47.680 --> 1:40:50.559
<v Speaker 1>these programs. And then you do a follow up question

1:40:50.600 --> 1:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and you ask any single welfare office do you check

1:40:54.640 --> 1:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>on whether somebody applying for the benefits is here legally

1:40:58.000 --> 1:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>or not? And they say, no, we're not allowed to

1:40:59.840 --> 1:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>do so. Of course, there's a massive amount of fraud

1:41:03.040 --> 1:41:05.760
<v Speaker 1>on those welfare programs and that because of money is

1:41:05.800 --> 1:41:10.120
<v Speaker 1>flown and they're creating a constituency for one political party

1:41:10.120 --> 1:41:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in this country rather than another, which is another dangerous

1:41:12.800 --> 1:41:15.479
<v Speaker 1>aspect of all of this. This has Ben Wangarton in

1:41:15.520 --> 1:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sexton more with doctor John Eastman. Just after

1:41:18.040 --> 1:41:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this quick break, you're in the Freedom Hud. This is

1:41:23.400 --> 1:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck

1:41:29.840 --> 1:41:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Show. This is Ben Wangarton in four buck Sexton,

1:41:32.680 --> 1:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and we've been talking with doctor John Eastman about all

1:41:35.000 --> 1:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>things immigration, in particular on the sense of citizenship question

1:41:38.200 --> 1:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and what that means for the power of your vote

1:41:40.960 --> 1:41:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and really the broad disproportionate foreign interference that we see

1:41:45.800 --> 1:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that the Left doesn't seem to care about because of course,

1:41:48.120 --> 1:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>in this case it works for them. I mentioned before

1:41:52.240 --> 1:41:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the break the remain in Mexico policy, and apparently Democrats

1:41:56.880 --> 1:42:00.519
<v Speaker 1>are planning in the House, are planning on probing this policy. Doctors,

1:42:00.720 --> 1:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can you tell us a little bit about what that

1:42:02.479 --> 1:42:06.559
<v Speaker 1>policy entails regarding asylum claims and then speak to the

1:42:06.640 --> 1:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>legitimacy of it. Well, there's international treaties on this that

1:42:13.000 --> 1:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>deal with refugees, and the rule is you're supposed to

1:42:19.240 --> 1:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>claim refugee status or seek asylum as a refugee or

1:42:24.120 --> 1:42:27.439
<v Speaker 1>somebody who would be politically prosecuted or persecuted in your

1:42:27.479 --> 1:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>home country in the first safe country that you arrive in.

1:42:31.800 --> 1:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not what's happening with a massive amount of immigration

1:42:35.640 --> 1:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>from Central America and South America through Mexico into the

1:42:40.520 --> 1:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>United States. They are just bypassing Mexico or the other

1:42:45.880 --> 1:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>countries on their route in order to get to the

1:42:48.040 --> 1:42:50.559
<v Speaker 1>United States, which is a pretty good indication this is

1:42:50.600 --> 1:42:53.240
<v Speaker 1>not true asylum effort. They're just trying to get to

1:42:53.360 --> 1:42:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a better economy, and I don't blame them from trying.

1:42:57.640 --> 1:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>The question is whether we were legally obligated to the

1:43:00.600 --> 1:43:03.479
<v Speaker 1>President Trump saying no, you're gonna have to ask for

1:43:03.520 --> 1:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>asylum in the first country of origin or we're not

1:43:06.040 --> 1:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>going to accept you. Now, that means people that we're

1:43:08.360 --> 1:43:13.519
<v Speaker 1>pleaing religious or political persecution in Mexico would have a

1:43:13.600 --> 1:43:16.519
<v Speaker 1>claim for seeking asylum in the United States. But people

1:43:16.520 --> 1:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>coming up from Guatemala and Venezuela or Honduras or Nicaragua

1:43:21.400 --> 1:43:24.639
<v Speaker 1>through Mexico, where they could seek asylum there, and then

1:43:24.760 --> 1:43:27.599
<v Speaker 1>bypassing that and seeking it in the United States are

1:43:27.680 --> 1:43:30.679
<v Speaker 1>leap frogging this rule. Now. I've not done a deep

1:43:30.760 --> 1:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>dive on the application of the rule. There's some indication

1:43:33.720 --> 1:43:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that maybe you have to have a bilateral agreement in

1:43:36.880 --> 1:43:39.439
<v Speaker 1>place with the particular country, like we would have to

1:43:39.479 --> 1:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have one with Mexico before that can be triggered. I

1:43:42.040 --> 1:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer to that, but it's certainly something

1:43:44.960 --> 1:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that the United States ought to be pursuing vigorously is

1:43:48.080 --> 1:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to enforce this international norm that asylum seekers need to

1:43:51.600 --> 1:43:53.479
<v Speaker 1>ask for asylum when they get to the first safe

1:43:53.479 --> 1:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>place to do it. Lastly, in about a minute and

1:43:57.720 --> 1:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a half or so, there was a ruling from I believe,

1:44:01.360 --> 1:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a federal judge in Manhattan putting a temporary halt sorry

1:44:06.080 --> 1:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in Maryland rather putting Freudian slip there, putting a temporary

1:44:10.200 --> 1:44:14.439
<v Speaker 1>halt on the ability for states, and I believe even

1:44:14.600 --> 1:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>smaller jurisdictions than just states, to reject refugees being resettled

1:44:20.720 --> 1:44:24.480
<v Speaker 1>within their borders by a result of the Trump administration

1:44:24.680 --> 1:44:27.720
<v Speaker 1>executive action on the matter, which makes intuitive sense. If

1:44:27.760 --> 1:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't believe that refugees should be resettled in your state,

1:44:30.120 --> 1:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>why should you be forced to accept them? But now

1:44:32.200 --> 1:44:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a judge just said no, an individual governor, for example,

1:44:35.200 --> 1:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>what Governor Abbott in Texas cannot reject refugees being resettled

1:44:39.280 --> 1:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>in their states? What do you make of the ruling

1:44:41.920 --> 1:44:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in general? And then the problem of nationwide injunctions more broadly, well,

1:44:45.960 --> 1:44:48.240
<v Speaker 1>so the ruling in general, the judge starts off, he's

1:44:48.280 --> 1:44:51.360
<v Speaker 1>wringing his hand as melogrammatic. He says, this violates every

1:44:51.400 --> 1:44:53.879
<v Speaker 1>norm and it violates this clear text of the statue

1:44:53.880 --> 1:44:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and whatever. Well, you know, he doesn't ever actually cite

1:44:56.520 --> 1:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this text of the statue, And the text of the

1:44:58.200 --> 1:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>statue specifically says that in our resettlement programs, we're supposed

1:45:02.960 --> 1:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to consult with the state and local government officials, and

1:45:06.000 --> 1:45:08.479
<v Speaker 1>if they don't want the refugees, we need not place

1:45:08.560 --> 1:45:12.240
<v Speaker 1>them there. The Trump order doesn't doesn't give the state

1:45:12.280 --> 1:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and local government officials an absolute veto, as the judge claimed.

1:45:16.360 --> 1:45:18.759
<v Speaker 1>It just says, if we don't want them, the United

1:45:18.800 --> 1:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>States is not going to force the refugees on them

1:45:21.240 --> 1:45:25.240
<v Speaker 1>unless the United States determines that it's absolutely necessary. So

1:45:25.320 --> 1:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>on both counts, that the statute doesn't involve the state

1:45:29.200 --> 1:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and local governments, the judge is wrong. And that it

1:45:31.680 --> 1:45:34.040
<v Speaker 1>gives the state and local governments an absolute veto, the

1:45:34.120 --> 1:45:36.360
<v Speaker 1>judge is wrong. So I have no doubt that that

1:45:36.479 --> 1:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>decision will ultimately be overturned. Whether in the Fourth Circuit

1:45:40.000 --> 1:45:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Court of Appeals that supervises the Maryland courts or ultimately

1:45:44.479 --> 1:45:46.559
<v Speaker 1>in the Supreme Court, remains to be seen, but it

1:45:46.600 --> 1:45:51.639
<v Speaker 1>will eventually be overturned. So flatley contrary to the statute. Now,

1:45:52.840 --> 1:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the other issue about nationwide at junctions. As you ask,

1:45:57.080 --> 1:46:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court is already strongly indicated that there is

1:46:01.200 --> 1:46:05.519
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem with a single federal trial judge sitting

1:46:05.560 --> 1:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in Baltimore, Maryland, or in Hawaii or in San Francisco,

1:46:09.560 --> 1:46:13.519
<v Speaker 1>basically altering the political policy judgments of the elected branch

1:46:13.520 --> 1:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of government, the elected president by issuing a nationwide injunction.

1:46:19.439 --> 1:46:22.880
<v Speaker 1>The leftists on the courts who are smart, understand the

1:46:22.960 --> 1:46:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court is about to shoot that whole thing down,

1:46:25.960 --> 1:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and so they are modifying their own district court nationwide

1:46:29.400 --> 1:46:33.320
<v Speaker 1>injunctions to apply only to the particular parties in the case.

1:46:33.920 --> 1:46:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But you still get these outlier judges who just think

1:46:36.960 --> 1:46:39.599
<v Speaker 1>they can buy a stroke of a pen, become president

1:46:39.600 --> 1:46:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and set our immigration policy. It's

1:46:42.760 --> 1:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely outrageous, and I look forward to the Trump administration

1:46:45.960 --> 1:46:49.599
<v Speaker 1>hopefully fighting this vigorously at the Supreme Court and prevailing.

1:46:49.600 --> 1:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, doctor Usman, We're going to leave it right there.

1:46:51.520 --> 1:46:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for taking the time to come on today.

1:46:54.120 --> 1:46:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Ben, Take care and this has been

1:46:56.760 --> 1:46:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Ben Wangarten in four Bucks exton. I want to thank

1:46:59.479 --> 1:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you for the time and sharing this time with me today.

1:47:02.040 --> 1:47:03.439
<v Speaker 1>I hope you have a great evening, and we'll be

1:47:03.439 --> 1:47:04.280
<v Speaker 1>back tomorrow.