WEBVTT - Levy: Fed is struggling to boost aggregate demand

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day. That's Bloomberg

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, the Radio plus mobile. Last, and on your radio,

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a Bloomberg Business Flash and I'm Karen Moscow.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Futures are higher. Let's go to the First Word Breaking

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>news desk for today's morning call. Here's Bill Maloney. Good

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>morning Bill, Good morning Karen. U s Futures have added

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to their games since the last time we spoke down.

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Futures currently hired by a thirty six point scipes game

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>four and as a Futures rise by fifteen US ten

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>yield at one point eight three percent. Main up of

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>markets except Italy are trading higher. Germany gains one percent,

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>while in South America Brazil jumps three percent. On the

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>US Economic Friday thirty job numbers changing on from Peril's

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>estimate a hundred ninety five thousand and after develops night,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>HP Enterprise EPs beat Broadcom, Fuchre Remnview was in line,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and Smith and Wesson boost the ups and revenue views.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>In deal news, Sampson is buying too Mey for sv

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to share at AMC Theaters, to buy Carmikey Cinemas for

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty hours to share. Finally, semi Key Walsheet upgrades and

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>downgrades brought Informant cut the neutral over at Bank of America,

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Hewitt Packard Enterprise raised out perform at Bernstein h R,

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>cut to market perform at BMO. Barkley's cut the whole

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>versus by a Deutsche Bank. J Z Penny raised to

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>buy it, Evercore I s I Qualcom cut to perform

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>at Oppenheimer, and finally Godman Sachs, Excel Group cut to

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>neutral and monts Santo cut to sell. Live in the

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>first breaking news desk, go on, Bill Maloney care alright,

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks Villa to hear live breaking news over your Bloomberg

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>type squawk and go on your terminal. That's su you

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 1>a w k go, that's a Bloomberg business flash, Tom

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and Mike, Karen, and thanks so much. Since Job's Day,

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Surveillance bronch you by Investco, Investco believes it's time

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to bench the benchmarks and to consider active management and

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>factor based strategies. Find out more Investco dot com slash

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>high conviction. We moved to Job's Day. First of all,

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I do want to mention the series of headlines out

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of Brazil are simply stunning. We're not gonna dwell on

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>this a lot hereay, but markets explode higher. Petro bruss

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>rises eighteen percent. Is president Lula Mike? Is it unfair

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to say under house arrest? Uh, It's hard to know

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>his exact status. He has been detained by the police

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>for questioning. They took him to the airport for security reasons.

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So question it isn't exactly care what he is doing

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>or status. Brazilian real is stronger. We've had a wonderful

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>morning looking at our economic history, the broader themes Mickey,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>Levia Baringer capital markets with us. Mickey, let's fold into

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this immediate jobs report that we see in exactly ten minutes.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It's about productivity, capital, labor, and technological progress. Give us

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the y. We're flat on our back with productivity. I

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>think part of it is a missmeasurement problem. I see

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>everywhere anecdotal evidence of technological innovations, not only new products,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>but but but but improved production facilities and capabilities. I

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 1>see record breaking near record breaking corporate profits, and then

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the productivity data are so weak. I think there's a

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>mismeasurement problem that the US Department of Commerce will eventually

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>get to. But it's a very technical issue. Let me

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>just bring out an example, um, all of you who

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are looking at your iPhones now, UM, when you buy

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone because because it's because it's produced in China,

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it nets out to close to zero in GDP. Are

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you telling me that over the last seven eight years

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this has had zero impact? Mr mckeeney, the sainted one

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>needed a new iPhone yesterday. It did not. It directly

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>affected the GDP of American economy. I can assure you

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I did my patriotic duty and dropped a large amount

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of money on an iPhone, but it netted out to

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>close to zero in GDP and did not push the

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>productivity dial as measured. And I think there's a measurement problem.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just Apple, it's just almost in every industry.

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>You see technological advances and it's just we're just not

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>capturing it in the data. What do we uh, what

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>do you think February is going to show? You have

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to follow a day to day basis and with a

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with a disclaimer that of course one month is not

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>enough to uh, you know, really get a trend. But

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>what do we think? I think it's gonna be a

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>healthy number UM. In fact, it could be. I think

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a little over two hundred thousand. On jobs,

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I think actually job gains have been a little too

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>fast relative to g d P. But what I'm really

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at for in today's number is in January we

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 1>had a nice increase in wages. If there's an a

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>second month in a row of healthy wage gains UM

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on top of the recent nice news on consumer spending

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>in real terms and the increase in the core PCE

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>deflated to one point seven, I'm wondering if we get

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that that wage increase, it's not only very good for

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the economy, but it really puts the FED into a box.

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Are they really data dependent? We're on the front doorstep

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of them achieving their long run dual mandate. What will

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they do well? What will be the effect if they

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>do raise rights? Why the what? What is the I

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>S curve real economy effect? Not to get the restrictive,

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>not to get to accommodative, but to get off stand

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Fisher's ultra accommodative. Given the data, theoretically and historically, it

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>should have close to zero impact on economic performance. The

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>FEDS can sarn is um having gone through several queuei's

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>forward guidance. All of that was geared toward UH keeping

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>rates low, encouraging portfolio managers globally to take more risks.

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>And now one of the FED, one of the fed's

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>largest concerns is the reversal of that portfolio balance effect

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that they so touted for several years. Mickey Levis, thank

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>you so much, Dr Leavis with Barrenberg Capital Markets. As

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we get ready for h the jobs report will see

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that here in six minutes, so we should note a

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand jobs forecast, four point nine percent unemployment, and a

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>two tense gaining wages. Those are the headline numbers will

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>be watching. I will look at the revisions and he

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>grew always important, Robert Gordon said, he is, uh. He

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>is going to be looking at the labor force participation rate.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>He said, that's the key number for the economy going forward.

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>It's gotten better prospects for the economy. Of course, he's

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from the academic tower of Northwestern University.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>They where market economists are trying to figure out what

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the tenure yield will do to four digits UH at

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>eight thirty two. We will do that with Bill gross

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>one eight to eight six one on the tenure yield

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. Curve flattening over the last couple of days.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't want to make too much about it. It's been

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>range bound, as is a lot of other data. The

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar fractionally weaker after a few good days up its

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>warning and Michael McKee mentioned gold elevated here an hour ago,

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve sixty one the ounce right now, Michael McKee and

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane, please stay with us for this job's report

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in five minutes, the report on the American labor economy.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg's surveillance coming up. With all due respect.

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Highlight brought you by Landrover. If it's in your nature

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to cast off the every day and seek adventure, the

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Discovery Sport was built to help your search. Visit Landover

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>tri State dot com for special offers during the only

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Adventure Sales event Landover and bl