WEBVTT - China Expands Travel Curbs to Top AI Talent

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.639
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 3>China tightens its grip on AI, this time targeting overseas

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 3>travel by top AI professionals.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Plus how big banks are looking to hire more AI

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 4>specialists and shrink traditional banking roles.

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 3>And we'll look at the tech IPO landscape as SpaceX

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 3>kicks off an IPO bonanza and.

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Quite the timing for any sort of IPO right now,

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 4>because a new record high once again ed it's risk

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 4>one and that means we're buying semiconductors, we're buying hardware.

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Then how's that one hundred and a new record high?

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 4>We're at one point on an in today basis, That is,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 4>we're looking at the Semiconductor index on fire up five

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 4>percent for the socks. Why dig into some of the

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 4>individual movers. We're seeing Micron and a new record high

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 4>as we see analysts or pile in an extraordinary uplift

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 4>from ubs in terms of a price target that more

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.560
<v Speaker 4>than doubles and where it's currently training. We're up seventeen

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 4>percent for Micron. But also you're shining a light what's

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 4>happening with Qualcom getting a real boost as well as

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 4>we start to see new buyers of its A six.

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 3>It's all about the hardware ed from Asia to the

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 3>US session. There's a massive rally in ship stocks. Also

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 3>because of a breakthrough in technology. China's Huawei says it

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 3>has a new technique, logic folding, that changes how a

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>signal passes through a transistor, so you can do away

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>with extreme miniaturization. You don't have to worry about the

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 3>limits of extreme ultraviolet lithography. It's a new design but

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 3>also method of chip manufacturing, and that has really sent

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of chip stocks or supply chain exposure stocks

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 3>sending much higher. Here's the catch, this is a technology

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 3>that's many years away. Let's get more with Bloomberg Senior

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Tech editor Mike Shephard. You know, so interesting because Huawei

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 3>is coming out saying, well, we've got something here technology wise,

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 3>but you're going to have to wait until the next

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 3>decade to see it. In a race with TESMC give

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 3>us more detail.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, they are promising something that people have been wondering about.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 5>What would be the next version of War's law, and

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 5>that is the idea that every two years you would

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 5>see a doubling of the number of transistors that you

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 5>could fit on a tiny chip. And in recent years

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 5>that has started to slow because the chips have just

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 5>gotten so small and so much harder to produce and

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:38.359
<v Speaker 5>really requiring such sophisticated machinery like the kind of EUV

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 5>machines produced by ASML, the Dutch company that really has

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 5>a stranglehold on that, and that has really been a bottleneck,

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 5>especially for China, which faces export controls on being able

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 5>to acquire that technology. So their solution innovate around the problem,

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 5>at least in the view of Huawei. They are promising

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 5>this new method and even a new law to define

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 5>how to pack all those transistors onto a chip, and

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 5>they are calling it Tao's law and really trying to

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 5>forge their own path. Now. The cautionary note, of course, ED,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 5>is that this is all theoretical. Right now, they say

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 5>that in the Cure inship, the new line coming up soon.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 5>We may see signs of it, but it may take years,

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 5>and ED can they produce it at a yield that

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 5>produces a profit for them?

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 4>But the focus clearly is on owning their own supply

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 4>chain controlling it, and they're also looking to control their

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 4>own talent chain. It feels as though as well might

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 4>more limitations on those building AI startups in the country.

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 5>Kara, We are seeing this competition between the US and

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 5>China for leadership and artificial intelligence and advanced technology, not

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 5>only in the chip and software arena, but in the

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 5>people arena and sphere as well. And what China is

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 5>doing is saying to its AI research is that look,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 5>if you want to go outside the country for leisure,

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 5>for business, you have to come to us first, come

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 5>to the authorities for permission. Now, for years they have

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 5>required this sort of okay ahead of any sort of

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 5>travel for college researchers, for nuclear scientists, and even executives

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 5>that state owned firms. But now they are extending this

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 5>reach into the private sector and specifically for companies that

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 5>deal with artificial intelligence, which just like the US, is

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 5>the clear for China it is a national strategic priority,

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 5>and that also includes the personnel who produce it, the researchers,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 5>the scientists, even the executives and founders. We don't know

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 5>how restrictive Caro this will be. Is it an automatic note?

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:37.799
<v Speaker 5>Does that mean you can never go to the US?

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Is it more pro former rubber stamp? We just want

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 5>to know where you are. But nonetheless it is a

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 5>signal that they want to keep those resources, those crown

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 5>jewels of knowledge there at.

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Home, particularly after we see the investigation into the MANUS

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 4>purchase by Meta as well bloembugs Mike Shepherd always across

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 4>all things geopolitics. We want to now get you all

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 4>across the markets more broadly, IPEC with US Swiss quote

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 4>see market analysts. Look, we are seeing once again a

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 4>furious rally, whether it be in hardware in China, whether

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 4>it be the US names as well.

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 6>Kind of continued, Well, that's a billion dollar question. I

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 6>guess we have seen this AI optimism take over again

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 6>since especially three months the RAN wars started, as investors

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 6>just try to forget about the AR problems they're funding

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 6>the financing of new debt on debt and the AR restrictions,

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 6>and then the competition and then supply chain problems, and

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 6>decided to just focus on the potential. And hardware is

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 6>at the very center of this huge potential for AI adoption.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 7>The demand is strong.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 6>We know that the results from the technology companies, especially

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 6>in the US, have come in better than expected. They

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 6>beat the Uestimus and it looks like, yes, this could continue.

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 6>But on well there are some problems and that risks

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 6>that are building today. One the Macray climbing set up,

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 6>the mac Ray climb backshop is not necessarily ideal. The

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 6>rising borrowing costs our at risk. The other riskers the

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 6>energy crisis, the supply chain problems and the competition.

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Epek our Markets team are writing that stocks arising because

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 3>of Iran piece hopes. But I'm looking at the S

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred information technology massively outperforming the Nazak

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 3>one hundred, pushing records. Semiconductors are going absolutely bonkers because.

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:28.239
<v Speaker 2>Of the Huawei report.

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 3>I think you just heard shep give the details of

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 3>Huawei's new chip manufacturing process. What's happening right now in

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 3>tech well.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 6>In tech well tech has become one major driver of

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 6>the global markets. It's not only the US, but we

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 6>also see it in the emerging markets, with Korean memoryship makers,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 6>for example, really carrying this rally almost alone on their

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 6>own shoulders to all time higher levels, whereas the rest

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 6>of the sectors are struggling. They're struggling with an unideal

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 6>macracline backdop rising those rising borrowing costs and supply chain risks.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 6>So what we see today is that the market bread

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 6>between the technology sector and the rest is increasing in

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 6>a way that when we look at the MSCI markets

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 6>while the rest of the market is if you just

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 6>stripped out s kah Nich, sums On or TSMC, for example,

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 6>while they have fallen to the levels that we have

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 6>last seen during the April death last year, past a

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 6>Liberation Day.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 4>This hardware focus and momentum has really made certain names

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 4>start to outshine here in the US.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm all eyes on Micron.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 4>We actually spoke with the CEO of Micron on Friday impact.

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 7>Just listen to what you said about the memory side

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 7>of the business.

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 8>Of course, the demand for memory has really searched, and

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 8>that is because of the importance and the value and

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 8>the capability of memory that is really essential for all

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 8>advanced systems. And yes there is a shortage, but Micron

0:07:56.200 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 8>is working hard to increase supply through these projects here

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 8>in americaa here in Manassa's Virginia, Boise and New York

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 8>and we see this shortage continuing beyond, well beyond twenty

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 8>twenty six time frame.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 4>In fact, this is an industry that we knew for

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 4>booms and busts, but the moment it's just on a

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 4>one way boom trajectory. Do you think that really is

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 4>the right way for the.

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 7>Market to be seeing it right now?

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 6>Well, obviously there is never just one way, especially when

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 6>we're looking at the market prices, they are parabolic, so

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 6>in terms of technical levels or in terms of what

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 6>happened in the past, we do expect a correction because

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 6>the valuations have done absolutely ballistic, and we know that

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 6>there are boom and bus circles in this industry. It

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 6>is just that AI and the demand for AI hardware

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 6>will probably make these cycles a little bit longer than

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 6>they have been before, but they're not going to just

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, make them an existent anymore. So I think

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 6>that there is a risk that all of those who

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 6>are predicting that there will be no bus cycles anymore

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 6>in the memories of industry are probably mistaken.

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 3>Eupe Oscar desh Gayer Swiss quote all across the news

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 3>and the markets.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much.

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 3>Now, coming up, we're going to hear a lot more

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 3>from Micron CEO on demand for memory and what they're

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 3>doing to adjust the supply constraint.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 2>That's next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Qual Com reached the deal with TikTok owner bike Dance

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 3>to supply chips for AI data centers. That's, according to sources,

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 3>marking a key win for a company trying to expand

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 3>from smartphone processes into AI infrastructure. Bloomberg's Chip reported Inking

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 3>just broke that story. The markets responding qual come up

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 3>seven percent, a fresh record high.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>You remember when Christiano was.

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 3>On the show a few weeks ago and he wouldn't

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 3>say who the customer was. He was saying, Oh, it's

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a hyperscaler, it's byte Dance.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 9>This is according to our reporting, Yes, and we believe

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 9>there's more to come, that this is kind of a

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 9>breakthrough for them in at least one area of this market.

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 9>And according to our reporting, we should expect more to

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 9>come on the customer list.

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 4>And it's millions of a six And so where and

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 4>why does a company like byte Dance come to Qualcom

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 4>at this moment?

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean Qualcom has a long history in the

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 9>chip industry. It's very skilled very It was a pioneer

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.199
<v Speaker 9>of something on the sc system on chips, which is

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 9>putting a lot of components together on one piece of silicon,

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 9>and it's done very well in very high volume market.

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 9>So obviously it has a lot of skills. Though it

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 9>would be useful if you are trying to get your

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 9>own solutions to market and volume quickly.

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 3>So this is what's interesting about the A six part right.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Qualcon is a fabulous chip maker, but essentially instead of

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 3>having its chip, it's doing it on behalf of a

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 3>customer kind of how broadcomes done for various people, for

0:10:57.720 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 3>example TPU.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 2>How does that work?

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean the way it looks at the moment,

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 9>and we'll get more when Qualcomm does its analyst day

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 9>coming up this summer. They're pursuing two strategies. Their own chips,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 9>their own processors, so rivals to in videos products if

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 9>you like, but also the broadcrom strategy as well, which is, look,

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 9>you've got your ideas, you've got your designs, but you

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 9>don't really know quite how to get this done in

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 9>the kind of volumes that you need to do. Give

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 9>it to UDS, we'll get it across the line for you.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 9>That's kind of the role that they're looking at.

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 7>Here thinking on all things qual Com. We thank you

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 7>so much.

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 4>We've got plenty more on chips because shares a Micron

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 4>absolutely spiking today. It is now a one trillion dollar

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 4>company if it holds this almost seventeen percent game UBS

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 4>actually raised its price target on the memory chip, make

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 4>it to.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 7>A street high.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 4>I've get this and twenty five dollars from five hundred

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 4>and thirty five, and the new target implies the company's

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 4>valuation could reach one point eight trillion now. On Friday,

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Blue Moost Tyler Kendles sat down with Micron President and

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 4>CEO san Jamirotra about the company's expansion of chip production.

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 7>When here in the United States, take a listen.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 8>Memory today is absolutely key across all industries that have

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 8>electronic systems, and Micron is of course investing in Boise,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 8>Idaho building our leading ASH fab that's for leading ash

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:21.079
<v Speaker 8>memory that goes into smartphones, PC's servers, and that leading

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 8>edge memory in Boise, Idaho will bring first wafers out

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 8>middle of next year and then ramp up from there on.

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 8>We'll have a second fab in Boise, Idaho soon to

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 8>follow that start first wave first by end of twenty

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 8>twenty eight there and then we have production planned for Syracuse,

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 8>New York area, where we will build over time a

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 8>mega cluster or four fabs. And you can see two

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.479
<v Speaker 8>hundred billion dollars of investments that Micron is making here

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 8>in America to bring these long life cycle production that

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 8>will be managed here in Manassas, Virginia, along with production

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 8>in Boise, Idaho, and Syracuse, New York. And that will

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 8>bring Micron's total production over the course of about next

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 8>ten years as we ramp up all these multiple fabs

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 8>to about forty percent of our production. By comparison, it

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 8>is about ten percent today and all of that ten

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 8>percent comes from this site here in Manassas for Micron,

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 8>and this will totally our investments massive investments in long

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 8>life cycle technology nodes as well as leading as technology

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 8>nodes to serve these vast markets that are really surging

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 8>in demand driven by AI. Micron is going to be

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 8>bringing those investments that's semiconductive manufacturing and in the process

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 8>create ninety thousand new jobs here in the US as well.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 10>On this point of demand and how this investment is

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 10>seeking to help breach that growing demand. I'm wondering, how

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 10>long do you expect the shortage of memory chips to last?

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 10>When can we expect an easy.

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 8>Of course, the demand for memory has really searched, and

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 8>that is because of the importance and the value and

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 8>the capability of memory that is really essential for all

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 8>advanced systems. And yes, there is a shortage, but Micron

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 8>is working hard to increase supply through these projects here

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 8>in America, here in Manassa's Virginia, Boise and New York,

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 8>and we see this shortage continuing beyond, well beyond twenty

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 8>twenty six timeframe. But the important thing is that Micron

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 8>is working hard with our customers, working also on the

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 8>long term the supply agreements with our customers to really

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 8>ensure that they can have predictability for supply, and of

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 8>course Micron can have the confidence for the investments that

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 8>we are really committing to here for the long haul.

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 10>Historically, memory is a cyclical business, right periods of boom,

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 10>periods a bus I'm wondering if two hundred billion dollar

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 10>investment here in the US signals perhaps more of a

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 10>confidence that that demand, that high demand is going to

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 10>be permanent, or are their concerns here that the industry

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 10>could be overbuilding capacity.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 8>You know, of course, what we are doing is building

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 8>these fabs which are very long lead time items. As

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 8>you can see in terms of what we are doing

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 8>in Boise in New York, it really takes several years

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 8>just to build construct the shell. How we equip that

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 8>shell really very much depends on our latest assessments of

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 8>demand at a given time. So important thing is to

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 8>have that preparedness to meet the market demand, and memory

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 8>has become a key enabler. It is a strategic asset

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 8>for our customers today. It is a strategic asset for

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 8>AI across consumer as well as data center industries, because

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 8>without memory, you don't really have that intelligence that is

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 8>critically important for the future roadmaps the doward customers have.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 3>That was Micron President and CEO Sanjay Morota speaking with

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>our own Tyler Kendle. Now coming up, big banks are

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 3>looking to hire more AI specialists and shrink traditional banking roles.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 7>Wall Street.

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's getting caught up in aianks of course, and

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 4>looking to hire more AI specialists and actually shrink traditional

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 4>banking roles. Bloomberg has the latest on too highly sought

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 4>after trainers in finance teaching Wall Street bankers how to

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 4>use AI tools. Get this, They're chatting twenty five thousand

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 4>dollars a.

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 7>Day for the training.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Sally Bakwell is here with one particular evidence that

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 4>banks might be apologizing for calling certain people lower value

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 4>human capital, but on the other side of things, are

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 4>still really committing to the training side of things.

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 11>That is right. I think what we're seeing here is

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 11>Wall Street having a little bit of an AI reality check.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 11>It's recognizing that AI is not just a tool for

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 11>efficiency anymore. It is also a requirement for survival. And

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 11>so we have these two former soft bank fund managers

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 11>who have who are basically cashing in on that they've

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 11>set up this firm. It's called Wall Street Prompt and

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 11>it's essentially to teach elite bankers how to stop their

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 11>jobs from being automated. And indeed, the eyewatering numbers that

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 11>they can charge twenty five thousand dollars a day and

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 11>that they have a two month backlog. And what this

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 11>really speaks to is that the biggest hurdle to banks

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 11>now is not essentially accessing the AI software they can

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 11>get all of that, they can pay for that, and

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 11>they have invested millions and billions into doing that. But

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 11>the hurdle is ensuring that their senior professional professionals have

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 11>a kind of AI fluency that makes them productive and

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 11>that can keep the financial institution competitive.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Sally, what's wild about Wall Street prompt It's like less

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 3>than a year old and it has real customers Like

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 3>this is obviously one of the most read stories on

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 3>Bluebow Tunnel. You get why, but just explain to us,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 3>like what they've achieved and also why they want to

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 3>move to Singapore.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 12>Right.

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 11>So, Yeah, they were founded just last year and they

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 11>have clients including Bank of America, including City, including t

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 11>row Price. And what they're doing is they're going into

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 11>banks and they're having training sessions with twenty five to

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 11>thirty employees, and they're saying, you know, they're using Google,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 11>Gemini and alongside FBI style behavioral analysis in order to

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 11>spot red flags in founder pitch videos for example, they're

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 11>also teaching them how to use Chatchibt and Claude in

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 11>order to analyze earnings transcripts for the most market moving

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 11>information and build financial forecasting models on that. Now they

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 11>are potentially looking to expand in Singapore because that is

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 11>where they have put particular focus on it, suring that

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 11>anyone who wants to move into the financial sector is

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 11>very AI fluent. So there is a bit of a

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 11>competitive competitive edge in Asia and Singapore in particular, and

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 11>that's really shining spotlight on the need for US financial

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 11>firms to do that as well. I mean, we've heard

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 11>from so many of them that JP Morgan has rolled

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 11>out LM Suite, a generative AI tool. Goldman is working

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 11>with Anthropic. Bank of America says that it's made its

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 11>developers more productive with AI, and that mean Jamie Diamond

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 11>says he uses it every day. So the need is

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 11>clear that they need to upseeel their staff.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Sally bake Well absolutely top reporting, Thank you very much.

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 3>Pope Leo the fourteenth says AI should be quote disarmed

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 3>to protect humanity from its dangers, calling for making AI

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 3>more human friendly and freeing it from monopolistic control. The

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 3>comment comes as the Pope and Anthropic co founder Christopher

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Ola launched the Pontiff's first encyclical, a document called Magnifica

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 3>Humanitas Center of the Care of Human dignity in the

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 3>era of Ai Bloomberg. Slavia Ratandi joins us from Rome.

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Flavia fascinating. Let's please just start with the basics, the

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 3>basics of the document, what's in it, and I suppose

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 3>summarizing like the Pope and the attitude towards Ai.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 13>Absolutely, that was quite I say, the pretty powerful message

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 13>that came from the Pope. Just to give you an idea,

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 13>this is the first encyclical by the new pope elected

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 13>last year, and also the encyclical itself is the most

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 13>the most important, the most official actor from Ope, so

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 13>really includes some of the priorities of a new pope

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 13>and the fact that they chose artificial intelligence. And not

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 13>only that, but the waygual intelligence is changing our lives

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 13>that might change our lives, our lives in the future.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 13>I think it's really really says something as you said,

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 13>it actually uh used this world deserned and desermed. It

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 13>needs to be desermed. It doesn't mean that the artificial

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 13>intelligence must be somehow blocked, but must be regulated. That

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 13>was the main thing. And and also the fact that

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 13>it basically said that it must be used of course,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 13>uh for for you know, for for just for for

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 13>good intentions and and kind of indicated all the possible risks.

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 13>For example, indicated the factor that using computing, using artificial

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 13>intelligence in a warfare in the military and defense sector

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 13>is really dangerous, adding and a quote no algorithms can

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 13>make war morally acceptable.

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Seems to be a lot of things going on outside

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the Rome Bureau right now. Flavia Ratney of Bloomberg talking

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 4>about what is about magnificent humanity? That is, ultimately what

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 4>magnifica humanitus is all about.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 7>Ed well, so interesting.

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 4>It's about one hundred and thirty five years after the

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 4>original pop Leo talked about of new things the first

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Industrial Revolution, how to help humanity through that coming of

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 4>age of technology, and now they look at the age

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 4>of AI.

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and one point four billion dollar one point four

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>billion Catholics around the world. If you want to talk

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 3>to someone about AI, one message is a pope's address.

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 2>One way of doing.

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 4>It, Sunny, Well, from the AI humanity question, it's a

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 4>bit of MNA for you.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 7>Has that as a plot shift delivery Hero up next

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 7>as a Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech, and let's take a look

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 4>at today's big number about eleven billion dollars. That's Delivery

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 4>here current market cap as it stands, and that is

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 4>after Uber has offered to take over the German delivery

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 4>company and a deal that would value it.

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 7>At about ten million euros.

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Now clearly the market thing, so it can be maybe

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 4>pushed a little bit higher and get dig into that

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 4>very thing now with the details from equities report to

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Jordan Fitzgerald. So an offer being made, is there more

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 4>being discussed on the table at the moment, Jordan, thank.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 14>You, yes.

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 15>So over the weekend, news broke that Uber made this

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 15>thirty three Europa share offer for German based food delivery

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 15>company Delivery Hero, and like you said, this value companied

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 15>about ten billion euros. But we don't have any guarantees yet.

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 15>Delivery Hero has been reviewing its strategic options. It's important

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 15>to note that Uber already has a master at twenty

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 15>percent stake in the company, but there's no guarantees here.

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 15>The Financial time to report that Uber had rebuffed the

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 15>Delivery Hero had rebuffed Uber's offer, but things are still up.

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 14>In the air.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 3>Delivery here just stopped trading in Europe and thirty eight

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 3>dollars twenty three cents a share. The market's kind of saying,

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, we see this going higher than thirty three

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 3>euros a share, But also, like a lot of analysts

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 3>and I think you've been writing about this right saying,

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 3>this makes a lot of sense to do this deal

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 3>from Uber's perspective.

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 15>From Uber's perspective, and from Delivery Heroes. Delivery Hero has

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 15>been reviewing it to options. Shares are up quite a

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 15>bit for the year as the company has been going

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 15>down the path of a strategic review, and for Uber,

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 15>analysts are really saying that this is a strategically sound

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 15>deal for them. Uber is in a space, the food

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 15>delivery space, where things are consolidating, and like I said,

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.479
<v Speaker 15>they've already a massive steake and Delivery Hero and Delivery

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 15>Hero in particular gives them exposure on the delivery side

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 15>to international markets, particularly in Asia and Europe, where they're

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 15>already offering ride shares, but they can expand it too

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 15>that delivery side and really grow their business.

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Doing both.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Jordan Fitzgerald, Top Reporting, Thank you very much. I want

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 3>to get back to check on Micron because what is

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 3>happening is nuts. It's up seventeen percent, in part because

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>UBS upgraded its pist target's one six hundred and twenty

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 3>five dollars a share, which as you can say see

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 3>looking at your screen, would be double basically what it's

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 3>currently trading at. But generally speaking, AI names absolutely ripping

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 3>this Tuesday Micron top of the heat. But as we

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 3>talked about earlier in the show, it is a global

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 3>story here to discuss the AI trade. Daniel Pilling, portfolio

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 3>manager at Sans Capital who counts in video and TSMC

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 3>among top holdings, it's just so interesting to work out

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 3>what's going on here.

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that you would.

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Say, similar to what I wrote about and the tech

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 3>in depth overnight and video's sold out. So whether your

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 3>goal in this market is to play this SPACEXIPO for

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 3>space based data center, orbital data center, or you're just

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 3>trying to build out day center on Earth, demand is

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 3>vastly outpacing supply.

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Does that sum it up?

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 14>Yes?

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 16>Indeed, I think so, And maybe to put some numbers

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 16>behind it, I think we think about AI, you can

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 16>break it down a three sort of bullet points right

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 16>like one, it's viral, right, so it's sort of like

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 16>zoom in during COVID. The growth is unparalleled and we

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 16>can see this in the anthropic numbers. Two though, it's

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 16>also highly underpenetrated. So you know, there's a billion office

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 16>workers in the world and a tiny, tiny fraction that

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.400
<v Speaker 16>I'm actually using these tools as of today. We try

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 16>to estimate it. It's maybe two or three percent, so

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 16>it's a very very small number.

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 14>And then three.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 16>You know, all this sort of virality and underpenetration is

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 16>hitting this market, the semiconductor market, where you have companies

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 16>that have long lead times, they're oligopolistic pricing powers. So

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 16>if you add all these things together, it's likely we're

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 16>going to be supply constrained for quite some time.

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 4>How broad therefore, should the holdings go. When I'm looking

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 4>at some of the funds you manage. Clearly you've got

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 4>with the program when it came to nvidio, but you're

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 4>also thinking about those that are offering not only chips

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 4>but also the entire vertical stack. When I think of

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 4>alphabet that you're in, there's Microsoft and Amazon, But why

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 4>not broad into other areas of the chip stack because

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 4>we've seen them just do so well.

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 14>Yes, we totally agree. So we actually also own memory

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:09.880
<v Speaker 14>companies such.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.480
<v Speaker 16>As Eskhaiinex and Samsung in Korea, memory is going to

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 16>be an increasingly significant bottleneck. We're heavily exposed to semi

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 16>kapnix companies business slides such as ASML and research to

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 16>provide the equipment to the foundries of the world. I

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 16>think one should also look at electricity companies, so anybody

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 16>that supplies electricity to data centers. One particular interesting business

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 16>there that we own is called Blume Energy. And then

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 16>last the CPUs. CPUs are back for US. That's particularly

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 16>interesting on arm but agentic AI needs a lot of CPUs, So.

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 14>I think you're right.

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 16>One should look at the total stack, and there's many,

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 16>many winners across the entire stack.

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Daniel, Our top story in the show today was news

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 3>from Huawei on logic folding, basically a new method of

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 3>passing the signal through the transistor, taking you outside of

0:27:56.520 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Moore's law, you're not dependent on extreme miniaturization. The way

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 3>the market responded, first in Asia, then in Europe, and

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 3>then in the United States, everything was up irrespective of

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 3>their ties to Huawei.

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think that is.

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 14>Well?

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 16>I mean, I do think that in Asia, in particular

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 16>in China, there's a sense that they don't have access

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 16>to ASML nor leading edge chips from Taiwan Semi, so

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 16>any sort of announcement that they can make that might

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 16>provide them the opportunity to build their own leading edge

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 16>hips is much appreciated now. The counter to that, though,

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 16>is that this technology has been around for a while.

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 16>This idea of sort of stacking chips on top of

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 16>each other is also something that Taiwan Semis has been

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 16>pursuing for really a decade. The problem with it is

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 16>that is twofold one you have to stack them on

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 16>top of each other.

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 14>In two there's a heat.

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 16>Dissipation issue which is very very difficult to solve.

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 14>So time will tell.

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 16>But we're somewhat skeptical about the Huaii announcements as they

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:56.959
<v Speaker 16>are as of today.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 4>How skeptical are you or not of just China's prowess

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to AI and on its own supply

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 4>chain right now?

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 16>Yes, so I have to say we're very impressed what

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 16>China has been doing, but the core issue remains as

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 16>ever the same, I think. So China does not have

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 16>ASML and or litography manufacturing capabilities that would allow them

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 16>to build leading edged chips, So anything above sort of

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 16>five nanometers plus server, and as long as that doesn't change,

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 16>they will struggle to compete within videos of the world

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 16>with the sc high nexus.

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 14>And microns of the world. And in our opinion there

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 14>may be a decade away from that.

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 16>It took fifteen twenty years for Western nations to build

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 16>something like ASML, so as long as that's the case,

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 16>they will struggle to compete.

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Daniel, how's your math been going post in video earnings?

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 3>I think about the one trillion dollar figure, which is

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Blackwell rubin calendar twenty five's calendar twenty seven, and then

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 3>what in video said was they see hyperscale of capex

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 3>one trillion for the com twelve month period.

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 2>So you're trying to work.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 3>Out how much should they capture in sales and how

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 3>does that translate from video into free cash flow?

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Have you done that math?

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 14>Yeah?

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 16>So the math we have actually done, and I would

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 16>humbly argue is equally interesting. Maybe is so Jensen has

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 16>said something about three to four trillion capex for twenty

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 16>thirty for the entire industry.

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 14>So three to four trillion an enormously large number.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 16>Now in Vidia tends to have something like we believe

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 16>sixty percent market share across training and inference. Now that

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 16>number is true, which we actually find hard to dismiss.

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 16>That in video would generate something close to forty dollars

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 16>of earnings per share and close to one trillion dollars

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 16>of free cash flow by twenty thirty, and that would

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 16>indicate the stockets sort of five times earnings in that

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 16>time period. So that to us was sort of a

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 16>super interesting number. They've mentioned it before and it seems

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 16>very very large as of now.

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 14>So you'd have to have a lot of growth and

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 14>the anthropics of the.

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 16>World, but Jensen has shown over time, but it tends

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 16>to hit the numbers that you talk about.

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 14>We're very positive on that.

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Daniel Pilling from Sam's Capital good at Math, Thank you

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 3>very much. Care plenty of other news headlines out there.

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 7>It's time now for talking tech ed. Yeah.

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 4>First up, a Samsung union representing workers outside the ultra

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 4>profitable semiconductor division has asked a Korean court to block

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 4>voting on a tentative deal that were distributed about twenty

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 4>six point six billion dollars in bonuses looked a smaller union.

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 7>It's arguing that the.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Agreement disproportionately favors Samsung's chip business. The semiconductor staff set

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 4>to receive average bonuses about three hundred and forty thousand

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 4>dollars compared.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 7>With roughly four thousand dollars for.

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Workers in Samsung's Digital Experience division, plus shares of Ferrari

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 4>tumbling after the luxury automaker unveil its first fully electric

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 4>vehicle to a wave of negative.

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 7>Reviews over its design.

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Critics and social media users compared their six round and

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 4>forty thousand dollars Ferrari That's Luccee to mainstream evs, raising

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 4>questions about the company's push into electric vehicles.

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 7>In Johnny Ice.

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Design and Honeywell back to Quon is seeking to raise

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 4>as much as one point zero five billion dollars in

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 4>an IPO now. According to an SEC filing, the Quantum

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Computing Firm and as Yourself, twenty one million chairs close.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 7>Between forty five and fifty dollars each.

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 4>At the top end of the range, now, Quantumum would

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 4>be valued roughly twelve point seven billion dollars at okay.

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, SpaceX scores another successful launch, fueling fresh speculation

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 3>about the company's IPO prospects. And Elon Musk growing dominance

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 3>in the commercial space race.

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 2>We have more on that next. This is been Ktech.

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Taking a look at some of what's going on in

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 3>the space sector. A lot of names are on the

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 3>move simply by association validation that the space sector is legit.

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 3>It is for real post SPACEXS S one last week,

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 3>but also after SpaceX's upgraded Starship successfully deployed mock satellites

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 3>and return to Earth mostly unscathed. That was on Friday night.

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Space correspondent Lauren Grash is with us for SpaceX success.

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Is the data right, so irrespective really what happens in

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the end. This was a completely new, re engineered, new

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 3>architecture V three Starship and they wanted to see how

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 3>it would work.

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 2>How did it work?

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 17>I would say that it was a largely successful debut

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 17>of the vehicle. As you mentioned, this was a completely

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 17>redesigned version of Starship. Mainly it had a lot of

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 17>new upgrades, new Raptor engines that were supposed to significantly

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 17>increase the thrust at liftoff. Also had a number of

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 17>upgrades to help with the reusability that they're after, and

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 17>so by and large it was a successful test. There

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 17>were some uncomfortable moments. For instance, that super heavy booster

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 17>which you can see climbing and sending Starship to space.

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 17>Once it separated, it was supposed to do a controlled

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 17>splashdown or landing in the Gulf, and that didn't quite

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 17>work as plan. It kind of spun out of control

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 17>at one point and then seemed to break apart. And

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 17>then also there was an engine out on Starship. So

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 17>just a few moments where it did not.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 11>Go to plan.

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 17>It was a little bit incomplete, but I think it

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 17>was by and large a really successful mission for the

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 17>debut of this upgraded version of the vehicle.

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 4>I leve all the quotes some employee Kate tyst we

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 4>were expecting the re entry to be super spicy, and

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 4>I guess that's what we got. But where does this

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 4>put us in the long term trajectory of the plans

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 4>for satellites, for the business model for malls and the like.

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I would say we're still marching forward. There are

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.359
<v Speaker 17>still some kings to work out. For instance, you know,

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 17>the big thing about Starship is that it's supposed to

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 17>be fully reusable. That's never been done before, and so

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 17>that problem that they had with the super heavy booster.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 17>Not doing that controlled landing complicated that on the path

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 17>to that full reusability. But as they demonstrated during this mission,

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 17>they weren't able to deploy satellites like they had planned.

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 17>They were dummy satellites, but they did demonstrate that could work.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 17>So it does seem, you know, it stands to reason

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 17>that that could potentially happen soon. I know they're aiming

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 17>at within the next year, but still there's definitely a

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 17>long road ahead in order to really fully unlock this

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 17>vehicle for what it's supposed to be.

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 4>And maybe vindicate evaluation. As we see some extraordinary footage

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 4>coming from the launch on Friday night, Long and Grush,

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much for breaking it all down for us.

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Let's get the latest on SpaceX's potential listing into the

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 4>market as well as the wider IPO landscape, because we've

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 4>got Ja Rittter with us. He's director of the IPO

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Initiative University of Florida, Mariatage professor.

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 7>They call you mister IPO.

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 4>So mister IPO, tell us as to how we see

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 4>a vindication in the market capitalization of SpaceX as it

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 4>goes public because, as Ed was writing in his news

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 4>letter today, an awful lot has to go right.

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.399
<v Speaker 12>I'm in complete agreement, an awful lot has to go right.

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 12>But this is a great company, as Lauren was indicating,

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 12>Starship is an incredible engineering feet. It's complicated, but this

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 12>is actually a competitive advantage. It's so difficult for a

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 12>competitor to come up with something similar that's going to

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 12>be able to lower launch costs as much as SpaceX can.

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 12>That it's going to allow SpaceX to have a big

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 12>technological lead over any potential competitor, and this will allow

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 12>it to put Starlink satellites into lower orbit and offer

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 12>startlink Internet access at much lower costs than competitors can.

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Jay, Professor, you are called mister IPO, if you don't

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 3>mind me saying, because you're probably the most influential, most

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>cited academic researcher in the field of IPOs of the

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 3>last forty years. What is different about this IPO and

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 3>what is the same as those that you have studied

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 3>deeply in your career.

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 12>Well, what's different is this is going to be the

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 12>largest private sector company ever to go public. Evaluation of

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 12>something like one point five trillion dollars, dramatically higher than

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 12>any other of the big companies that have gone public

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 12>in the past. They've generally been large state owned enterprises

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 12>with very large operations and profitability. This is a company

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 12>where the market and venture capitalists have been valuing it

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 12>based upon enormous potential future profitability. But as I was

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 12>mentioned previously, a lot of stuff has to go right

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 12>to justify this valuation.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 4>When you think about just the multiples that are going

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 4>to be digested, and I know you've looked a lot

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 4>into that, where does it sit in past and historical

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 4>terms compared to those that did list Because as we've

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 4>been talking about time and time again, across this entire network,

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 4>companies are staying much longer private and they're coming in

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 4>extraordinary valuations, And so you wonder how much money is

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 4>left on the table for a retail investor or a

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 4>different type of investor that hasn't been funding it from

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 4>day one.

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:38.200
<v Speaker 14>Right.

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 12>This is a company where last year it had eighteen

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 12>point seven billion dollars in sales, bigger than just about

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:53.719
<v Speaker 12>any tech startup or private company that hadn't already been

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 12>public has in terms of revenue at the time of

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 12>going public, but it's also got the really huge valuation,

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:16.319
<v Speaker 12>and to justify a one point five trillion valuation, very

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 12>big future profits have to be there. There have only

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 12>been about eighteen companies that have gone public in the

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 12>US with inflation adjustice revenue of at least one hundred

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.440
<v Speaker 12>million dollars per year and a price to sales racial

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 12>of more than forty at a one point five trillion valuation.

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 14>SpaceX is going to be going.

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 12>Public at a price to sales racial of about eighty.

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 12>So there haven't been all that many companies that have

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 12>done this before, but of those that have, on average,

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 12>the stock has been disappointment to investors. Lots of things

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 12>have to go right.

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Lots things have to go right, Jay repeats throughout the

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 3>s One is a warning that they will be constrained

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 3>by compute now in the future, and starship has to

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 3>work very quickly. Is that just boiler plate or they

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 3>have to say that.

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:20.280
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's technologically true that the profitability of sending

0:40:20.320 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 12>people to mys is very questionable, but the ability to

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 12>get things going in the foreseeable future with startling can

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 12>be an enormous source of profits.

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Jay Rider, the IPO initiative the University of Florida.

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 2>They call him mister ip O. Thank you very much.

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Now coming up, Google comes out with the fit Bit Air,

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 3>trying to catch up to Whoop in the AI powered

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 3>wellness space.

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Can have a look. This is Blombog tech.

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 7>Tech companies.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.800
<v Speaker 4>They are racing into an era of personalized health and

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Google is out with its latest product in the space,

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 4>the Fitbit Air.

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 7>So new one hundred dollars screen is wearable, which.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 4>Represents a major evolution in what consumers can expect from

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 4>fitness trackers. More, let's speak to Bluma's consumer tech editor

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 4>in a Woman. Now, you have a Whoop, which might

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 4>be a direct comparison here. But what's so interesting is

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 4>Google having more of an sort of open way in

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 4>which they're going to be allowing us to use our data.

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 18>Yes, so I think the business model is going to

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 18>be quite more appealing for a wider swath of consumers.

0:41:36.480 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 18>So you pay upfront for Google's hardware and then if

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 18>you like, you can just use Google Health for free

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 18>as a free app. They do have a premium tier

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 18>that offers a lot more interesting features, and that's where

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 18>you might be paying locked into a subscription model, but

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 18>Whoop is entirely subscription based. It Technically you aren't even

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 18>paying for the hardware itself. You're paying for these annual

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 18>subscriptions and if you ever cancel, your device is pretty

0:41:59.280 --> 0:41:59.720
<v Speaker 18>much bricked.

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 3>The business models are so different between the two, right,

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, like just last week we were talking about

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 3>different form factor but or arraying and IPO. You're the

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.320
<v Speaker 3>editor on the Consumer Tech team. We do reviews, like

0:42:12.400 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 3>we get into the tech, how it works. What was

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 3>the team's kind of like impression.

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 18>So we think competition is good. Sorry to sound so

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 18>buttoned up there, but competition is good I think for consumers, and.

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 7>We like both.

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 18>Is really sort of the long and the short of it.

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 18>Whoop is still probably a better choice for more advanced users.

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 18>It has a more data focused approach, so it pulls

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 18>more data. It presents it in a very clean, but

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 18>sort of geeky way. I think if you are looking

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 18>to interact with a device like this, really leaning into

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 18>the AI, having a conversation with a coach that is proactive.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.840
<v Speaker 18>Google's AI is more advanced than Whoops. I found it

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 18>more natural, more conversational. It was easier, for instance, to explain, hey,

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 18>if I wake up in the middle of the night,

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 18>it's because my toddler woke me up. Briefly, it's not

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 18>because I have I've chosen to wake up at two AM.

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 18>So having conversations like that is a lot easier with

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 18>Google's device. You will get more data still with Whoop,

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 18>and you will, in my opinion, see it presented in

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 18>a way that makes a little more sense and is

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 18>a little more aesthetically pleasing.

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is the way in which, briefly we're going

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 4>to be using them with so much more than sleep

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 4>or heart rate and the like, oh, I'm sorry when

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 4>we go using them more for like you're using for

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.359
<v Speaker 4>meal plans, for example, how you can fold it in more.

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely so.

0:43:28.760 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 18>I used it for a combination of I tried to

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 18>use it really like any consumer would. I used it

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:35.879
<v Speaker 18>for a combination of sleep tracking overnight analyzing my sleep

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 18>and my readiness for the coming day. And I really

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:41.240
<v Speaker 18>played around a lot with the food tracking.

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 18>I took pictures of my meals. I said, how many

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:49.760
<v Speaker 18>calories is this? And actually the estimate seemed pretty accurate

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 18>as far as I could tell.

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 4>Right, Dana great getting up aspective woman.

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 12>And it to you.

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, check out the four review on Bloomberg dot com. Unfortunately,

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 3>that does it. First edition of Bloomberg Tech.

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 7>Don't forget to check out this podcast.

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 4>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:05.400
<v Speaker 4>online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart This is Blueberg.