WEBVTT - COVID-19 Chapter 14: Virology, Take 2

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>My name is Patrick and I live in Orlando, Florida.

0:00:04.960 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>In June of twenty twenty, both of my parents were

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>hospitalized with COVID. It started with my mother. My mother

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>was seventy two, active and in good health. She ran

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>her own cosmetics franchise and practice yoga on a regular basis.

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Her only underlying condition was asthma, which was not severe.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>On June twenty fifth, she walked into the hospital complaining

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of shortness of breath, a persistent cough, and a fever.

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>She was admitted and began aggressive treatment with high low oxygen.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Due to COVID precautions, we were not allowed into the

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>hospital and had to communicate with her through the phone.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>As the days progressed, her condition worsened. When she would cough,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>she would gasp for air as if she was drowning.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>We kept our phone calls with her shorts so she

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>could conserve her oxygen. Eventually we told her only to

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>use text messages. The hospital gave her convalescent plasma, but

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the treatment course was limited and it didn't seem to help.

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>On July fourth, she was intubated with my mother on

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a ventilator. Any updates regarding her condition and prognosis were

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon the nurser doctor on the other end of

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the phone. The information regarding my mother's condition would change

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>based on the person observing it. We closely watched her

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>ventilator settings, and our hopes and emotions would rise and

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 1>fall with the daily reports. However, there was no true

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>guidepost with which to evaluate her progress. We were frequently

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>surprised by new conditions, such as her being septic, a

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>persistent pneumothorax, and the development of APHEB. On August sixth,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>after thirty two days on a ventilator, the hospital transitioned

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>her to compassionate care and removed her from the ventilator.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Thirty four minutes later, my mother died. Before she died,

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw the X rays of her lungs. Instead of

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the shadowy outline of two healthy lungs, it looked as

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>if a family of spiders created an impenetrable web that

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>showed as white lines criss crossed throughout the arc. My

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>father was admitted to the hospital two days after my mother.

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>My father has been disabled since two thousand and one

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>after suffering a stroke which permanently compromised his balance and

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>range of motion. He also suffers from heart disease and

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>has frequent bouts of APHEB. Despite his medical history, my

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>father's only COVID symptoms were a fever, diarrhea, and extreme exhaustion.

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>After five days in the hospital, he was discharged because

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he did not need oxygen. However, he was still testing

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>positive for COVID. The convergence of his mobility issues and

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>exhaustion meant that he could not even sit up in

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>bed and could not care for himself. We struggled to

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>take care of him while wearing PPE to avoid exposure

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to ourselves. The same day my mother was intubated, we

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>had to have my father readmitted to the hospital because

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the level of care he needed exceeded our capabilities. My

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.679
<v Speaker 1>father spent two more weeks in the hospital and survived.

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>January twenty twenty one would have marked my parents' fiftieth

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>way anniversary. Throughout this process, we struggled to obtain reliable

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and accurate information regarding my parents' conditions. Before my mother died,

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we were given the opportunity to come into the ICU

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and see her. The images from that day in the

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>ICU have stuck with me more than those of my

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>mother herself. The entire ICU was COVID patients. Each patient

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>was on a ventilator and confined to their room. Outside

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of the door to each room was the IV poll

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with no fewer than six IV bags and pumps. The

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere was eerily silent. The only sound we heard were

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a faint beeping in the distance and the stifled sniffling

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of nurses who took turns sitting at the nurses station,

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>quietly crying with their heads buried in their hands. It

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>was clear to us that the doctors and nurses were

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to care for all of their patients, but they

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>were continuously confronted by the dim, silent reality that most

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>every person in the ICU would not go home.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 2>My name's Rachel and from our toil in New Zealand

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and my husband's My are both working education in Auckland

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>and we have two young kits. I wanted to share

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 2>the experience that I have at the moment living in

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>a country which is essentially post COVID. We currently have

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 2>no community cases of COVID in only fifty five cases

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 2>in the country as of the eighth of December, which

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 2>are all quarantined at the border, and there is the

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>result of people coming back into the country. We went

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 2>into lockdown with the rest of the world in March

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>and the lockdown Level four lasted for five weeks and

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 2>during that time we have very strict conditions. Only hospitals, pharmacies,

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 2>petrol stations and supermarkets were open, and we were only

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>allowed out of our house for one local walker day

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 2>or for our designated shopper to go get groceries from

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the local supermarket. The idea was that we didn't put

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 2>ourselves at risk anything that we did that might increase

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 2>our chance of interacting with those outside our bubble. We

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 2>just didn't go and then we went to level three.

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>We are online. Shopping and takeaways were allowed for another

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>fe few weeks and then by May, schools were open,

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>businesses were pretty much back to normal. Our Prime Minister

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 2>took the scientific advice that she received really seriously and

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 2>we were rallied as a team of five million to

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>protect each other in the United against COVID nineteen. Ashley

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Bloomfield was a Director General of Health and he did

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 2>a press conference at one pm every day to update

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>everyone on new cases and which clusters had new cases.

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 2>And even though everyone not everyone agreed with lockdown. We

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 2>had very few cases of people breaking it. People received

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>government support and most people got paid at least eighty

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 2>percent of their wage over lockdown, and our borders are

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 2>still closed except for returning citizens in permanent residents and

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>they have to undergo two weeks isolation in a government

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 2>funded facility, which is a five star hotel until they

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 2>give return three negative tests. So after that first lockdown,

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 2>we had one hundred days with new cases, and to

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 2>be honest, it really felt like that was that. But

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 2>then we had one relapse where just an Auckland, the

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 2>Auckland region went back into lockdown for three weeks when

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>one family tested positive in the community and they were

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>able to find out that that was somebody from quarantine

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>who had delayed incubation period, so they came up positive

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>once they were back in the community. And so contact

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 2>tracing is a huge part of New Zealand's response and

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 2>they now trace all cases genomically to help link the clusters.

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>So COVID, is this a weird thing? Right now? We

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>know it's out there, we did the work to eliminate

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>it from the community, and there's this sort of peripheral

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 2>awareness of it. Because we wear masks on public transport in

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>case another case comes through quarantine, and we hear stories

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 2>from overseas and it's by no means completely rosy, like

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 2>it's hard for people with loved ones overseas and you

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 2>can't fly into the country unless you have a spacebook

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>to the managed isolation, so there are people that are

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>missing out on coming home for Christmas. But we also

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>go to concerts and have plans to travel with the

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 2>New Zealand over summer and have big family Christmas celebrations,

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 2>and we see what's going on, but we're not really

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 2>part of that global narrative of quarantine and the ever

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 2>present fear of in fiction or death for us here

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 2>in New Zealand and instead because of how swiftly the

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>government acts if there is a community case, we're sort

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>of on edge. But it's very easy to forget in

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the day to day that it's out there, because our

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>lives are back to normal so to speak. Okaids are

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 2>at school, where at work, and apart from not being

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 2>able to travel overseas, there's not a huge difference to

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 2>how we live now compared to in February, but we

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 2>do have that feeling of how lucky we are to

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 2>be in this situation. So basically all that to say,

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot at the end of the title. New

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Zealand is proof that testing, contact, tracing, quarantine, and science

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>and collective action can prevail, and hopefully we will and

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I've crossed the rest of the world as well.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so so much for sharing your stories with us,

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 3>and thank you also to everyone else who has written

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 3>in to share your first hand account of how COVID

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 3>nineteen has impacted you. We absolutely love hearing from you,

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>and we feel like telling your stories is such an

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 3>important reminder of how far reaching the effects of this

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 3>pandemic have been.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh and I'm Erin Alman Updike and

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 3>this is this podcast will kill you.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Welcome to our fourteenth I can't believe we've made

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 4>it this far.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 5>Oh my gosh.

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 4>I installment of our Anatomy of a Pandemic series on

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 4>COVID nineteen. Today we are revisiting the virus itself, SARS

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 4>COVID two, which we visited first many many.

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Months ago, many many months.

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 4>So today we'll refresh you on what exactly this virus is,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 4>what new things we've learned about its transmission. We'll touch

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 4>on some of the new strains or rather variants that

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 4>you've probably been hearing about, and we'll talk about the

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 4>different tests for COVID nineteen and how those actually work,

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 4>and honestly, so much more.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 3>Again, there is a lot of great information in this episode,

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 3>so get excited. I'm excited, But first, are you also

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:09.559
<v Speaker 3>excited that it is Quarantin any time?

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm always excited for quarantine any time.

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? What are we drinking this week?

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 4>We're drinking quarantin y fourteen.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Oo. What a surprise.

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 4>And in Quarantini fourteen we have lime juice, Lemon juice, rum,

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 4>and Marischino liqueur. And we'll post the full version of

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 4>this Quarantini as well as our non alcoholic plus burrita

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 4>on our website. This Podcast will Kill You dot Com

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 4>and all of our social media channels, so make sure

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 4>you follow us there.

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. Okay, let's see, we've got a little bit more

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 3>business to cover, so we are still soliciting first hand

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 3>accounts for this COVID nineteen series, and if you would

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.319
<v Speaker 3>like to submit your first hand account, head to our website.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 3>This podcast will Kill You dot Com and click on

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the COVID nineteen first hand tab on the top of

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the page, and that'll send you over to a Google

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 3>forum where you can fill out some of the information

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 3>for your first hand account. And once again, thank you

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 3>so much to everyone who has submitted their first hand

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 3>account so far.

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we also are in the process of getting transcripts

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 4>made yay for all of our episodes. This is long overdue.

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 4>We're very excited. They will be available under the transcripts

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 4>tab on our website This Podcast will kill You dot Com,

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 4>So check back there or follow us on social media

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 4>to know when they're all being released.

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 3>And then there's just the usual business stuff. So we

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 3>have a good Reads list, we have a bookshop affiliate

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 3>account if you want to read more about any of

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 3>the subjects that we mention and that there happens to

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>be a book about.

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 4>And we also have.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Tons of incredible, amazing, beautiful, super cool TPWKY merch. Yeah

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 3>we do, and you can find links to all of

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 3>those things on our website This Podcast will kill You

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 3>dot Com.

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 4>How many times can we say the name of our

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 4>website in this episode?

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 3>My gosh, oh, my gosh.

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh. Anyways, let's get into today let's get into today.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so our guest today is someone that you are

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 3>likely familiar with because we talked with her all the

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 3>way back in March for our first virology episode. Also,

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 3>she's been like all over amazing, you know, up First

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 3>and other podcasts.

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 4>Super famous at this point.

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 3>She's famous, and we think she's great. We thought she

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 3>was great way back in the day. We still think

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 3>she's great. So we wanted to ask her once again

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.719
<v Speaker 3>all about the virus and what we've learned. Yeah, we

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 3>recorded this interview on December thirtieth, twenty twenty last year,

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 3>last year, and so here she is. We are so

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 3>thrilled to have back on virologist doctor Angie Rasmussen, affiliate

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 3>at the Georgetown Center for Global Health, Science and Security,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 3>and she is going to answer all of our questions

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 3>about SARS Kobe two, the virus that causes COVID nineteen.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 3>And we will let her introduce herself right after this break.

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 6>I'm Angela Rasmussen or Angie.

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.479
<v Speaker 5>I am an affiliate and a virologist at the Georgetown

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 5>Center for Global Health, Science and Security. Soon I will

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 5>be a research scientist at Veto Intervac, which is the

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 5>vaccine Research Institute at the University of Saskatchewan.

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 4>Excellent, Thank you so much for coming on again. We're

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 4>thrilled to speak with you. If you could kind of

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 4>just help refresh our knowledge and tell us a bit

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 4>about SARS CoV two, the virus that causes COVID nineteen,

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Like what kind of virus it is, maybe other viruses

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 4>it's related to, and what that tells us about the

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 4>virus and the disease it causes.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely so, SARS coronavirus two, as the name implies, is

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 5>a coronavirus. It is a beta coronavirus. So the Stars

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 5>or the coronavirus family is divided up into three major branches,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 5>the alpha coronaviruses, the beta coronaviruses, and the gamma coronaviruses.

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 5>SARS coronavirus two, like SARS classic, is a beta coronavirus,

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 5>and it's also what's called the sarbeco virus. The Stars

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 5>like beta coronaviruses, which is a subgroup of that particular genus,

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 5>So it's most similar to SARS coronavirus classic. It's also

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 5>related to MYRS coronavirus, which is another beta coronavirus, as

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 5>well as to two of the common cold coronaviruses, which

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 5>are also beta coronaviruses, and the other two common cold

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 5>coronaviruses that circulate in humans are alpha coronaviruses. So it's

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 5>part of this larger family called coronaviruses. And what all

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 5>coronaviruses have in common is they have a single stranded

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 5>RNA genome, so their genome, their genetic material, is encoded

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 5>on one single piece of RNA, a single strand, So

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 5>unlike our genomes, which are double stranded, DNA is just

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 5>one strand of RNA, and it's what we call positive sense,

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 5>meaning that if it gets into a cell, it can

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 5>be directly translated into protein by the ribosomes, which are

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 5>the organelles inside your cell that basically make proteins from RNA.

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 5>And that's their normal function. So that's what coronaviruses have

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 5>in common with each other. They all evolved at some

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 5>point from a common ancestor coronavirus back in you know,

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 5>ancient times, and now there's very diverse. They are very

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 5>diver family. We probably only know a handful of the

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 5>coronaviruses that are out there, and only a subset of

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:12.479
<v Speaker 5>those actually infect people, so people should keep in mind

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 5>not to scare anybody, but stars coronavirus two is a

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 5>sarbco virus, as I mentioned, and there are quite a

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 5>few of those that have been found circulating in wild

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 5>bat species, and not all of them can probably infect humans,

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 5>but some of them may be able to. So there

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 5>may be other coronaviruses out there floating around in the

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 5>wild that may be potentially human pathogens, but we really

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 5>don't know that much about that, and we I think

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 5>really need to know more about that to prevent future

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 5>pandemics from happening.

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Mm.

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So now let's talk what has been all over

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 3>the news lately, and that is strains. So in our

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 3>earlier episode back in I think March, where we talked

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 3>with you about the virology of SARS Kobe two, we

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 3>asked a bit about a couple of the different strains

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 3>that seem to have emerged at the time, calling the

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 3>L and S strain, and we talked about what that

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 3>might mean in terms of disease outcomes. And lately, a

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 3>we have a lot more information about just overall strains

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 3>of SARS Kobe two in general, and then in particular,

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>there's been a lot of coverage about the one UK

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 3>strain as it has been called in the news, that

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 3>seems to have now popped up in the US, for instance,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 3>and popped up all over different countries, and there's some

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 3>indication that it might be more contagious. Could you sort

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 3>of just walk us through what this UK variant is,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 3>whether this appears to be a new strain, how different

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 3>it is, and whether there are any you know, clinical

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 3>outcomes that we are seeing in regards to the strain.

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, So, before I get started, I'll say that, you know,

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 5>even the use of the word strain is somewhat confusing,

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 5>I think for people sometimes because it can be used.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 6>In a variety of different ways.

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 5>So I tend to call the variant of variants because

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 5>it's not really that different from all the other variants

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 5>of stars coronavirus two that are floating around out there.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 5>It has I think twenty three different nucleotide substitutions or deletions.

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 5>There are twenty three changes basically to the genome overall

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 5>that make up this new variance, and that basically means

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 5>that it's genetically different. But we expect all these variants

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 5>to be circulating around anyways, because the one thing about

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 5>RNA viruses that you can count on is that they

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.239
<v Speaker 5>mutate every time that they replicate. So this is a

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 5>normal and expected thing to have different variants with different

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 5>properties emerge. Whether there's strains or not is a matter

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 5>of debate, just because sometimes when people say strain they

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 5>mean something that's radically different, either genetically meaning that a

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 5>much larger part of its genome is substantially different from

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 5>the parent virus, or that it might be different immunologically

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 5>meaning that you know your immune system will mount fundamentally

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 5>different responses, make different antibodies to it. And we don't

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 5>have any evidence that that's happening for this. So the

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 5>L and S trains that we talked about, which feels

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 5>like a million years ago, didn't turn out to be

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 5>L and S. I think that the L and S

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 5>stod for I think low, low disease or lethal. I

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 5>can't remember what they stood for, but one was mild

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 5>and one was more severe, and that didn't turn out

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 5>to be true. That was probably just an artifact of

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 5>the population sizes that they sampled. But this variant in

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 5>the UK, which has the extremely catchy name of B

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 5>one one seven is does appear to be more transmissible,

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 5>and that's really based on a couple different lines of evidence.

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 5>One is that it became very prevalent, very very quickly

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 5>in the southeastern United Kingdom, and I should note that

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 5>it didn't really necessarily emerge in the UK, but that's

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 5>where it was first detected because their genomic surveillance program,

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 5>where they're actually sequencing about ten percent of the viruses

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 5>that they identify, and in terms of new cases, that

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 5>made it very easy for them to track the sort

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 5>of rapid takeover, if you will, of this particular variance,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 5>and it just became it out competed essentially all the

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 5>other variants that were circulating in that population in about

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 5>a couple of months, So that's really fast for a

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 5>single variant to take over. So there was that evidence.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 5>They also observed that people who were infected with this

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 5>particular variant had higher viral loads at the time of diagnosis,

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 5>and that's a little trickier because people aren't usually being

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 5>sampled every day and tested, and you know, during the

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 5>course of a viral infection, your viral load will change

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 5>as the viral replicating and then as it starts to

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 5>be cleared so it's hard to say if that's the

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 5>mechanism by which it's more transmissible, meaning that people who

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 5>are infected with that are sheddy more virus, But that's

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 5>what this preliminary data seems to suggest.

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 6>And then yesterday I saw that they.

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 5>Had released some data, some epidemiologic data about the secondary

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 5>attack rate, and that basically showed that people who were

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 5>infected with this were more likely to transmit the virus

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 5>to others in their households or in their workplaces. So

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 5>it does appear to be more transmissible. You know, we've

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 5>now found it in the US in Colorado, it's probably

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 5>elsewhere in the US. It's been found in I think

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 5>twenty five twenty six other countries so far. So this

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 5>variant has been emerging and has been spreading globally for

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 5>a while now. We just hadn't picked up on it

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 5>until the week before Christmas.

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 2>Gotcha.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 3>And so if the mechan is by which it is

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>more transmissible is a higher viral load or shedding more virus,

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 3>does that have any sort of clinical outcomes as well?

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Like do we see more severe disease in people infected

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 3>with this variant compared to other variants?

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 5>So that hasn't been observed yet, and it doesn't appear

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 5>that this variant results in increased pathogenicity or increased disease severity.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, we don't know the mechanism by which it's

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 5>more transmissible. That that viral load data is suggestive that

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 5>that might be the case, but other people have shown

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 5>that one of the mutations in the spike protein, which

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 5>is in the receptor binding domain, binds ACE two, the

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 5>receptor for the virus more tightly. It could have something

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 5>to do with that. It could have something to do

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 5>with increased fitness, which basically means that the virus is

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 5>able to replicate to higher tighters. We don't know, but

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 5>the good news is it doesn't appear to be associated,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 5>at least observationally with more severe clinical disease. And there

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 5>is a mutation that inserts stop code on and to

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 5>be ORF eight protein, and previously with both STARS coronavirus

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 5>two and STARS, classic deletions in ORF eight have been

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 5>associated with attenuation or making the virus less virulent. So

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 5>it may be that this stop codeon and ORF eight

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 5>has something to do with that might not, but people

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 5>are investigating this now.

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 6>But the good.

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 5>News in the bottom line is that it doesn't look

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 5>like this variant is more pathogenic.

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 4>That is good news. I guess you mentioned that there

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 4>are a lot of other variants kind of floating around,

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 4>and I know that that's something that a lot of

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 4>people have expressed questions or concerns about. Do we have

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 4>any evidence of any other variants that do seem to

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 4>cause more severe disease or even potentially affect different populations

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 4>differentially than more common variants.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 6>So not really.

0:23:55.560 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Initially this UK variance, it was said that that it's

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 5>infecting children more, and today some data came out that

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 5>in a preprint that showed that maybe not. So it's

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 5>really hard to say, but to my knowledge, there haven't

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 5>been any variants described that are more virulent than others

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 5>apart from that L and S paper way back when

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 5>that doesn't mean that they're not out there, but right now,

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 5>at least in the US and in most countries besides

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 5>the UK, we just aren't doing enough genomic surveillance overall.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 5>So it's really difficult to associate particular variants with particular

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 5>disease severities if you're not actually sequencing a big portion

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 5>of the variance that you're seeing. I mean, in the US,

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 5>if somebody goes in and gets a COVID test, you know,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 5>if they're very sick, they'll go to the hospital. But

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 5>that doesn't necessarily mean that somebody's going to be doing

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 5>the sequencing that's required to say, Okay, this person's infected

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 5>with this variant versus that one. So it's not to

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 5>say that there aren't variants out there that are ass

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 5>with more severe disease, but to my knowledge, we haven't

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 5>found any yet. There are other variants that have been

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 5>said to be more transmissible. There's one currently that was

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 5>reported right around the same time as the UK variant

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 5>in South Africa that also may be more transmissible. They've

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 5>said that it might also have some impact on virulence,

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 5>but right now there's not a lot of data about that,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 5>or at least I haven't seen any to indicate whether

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 5>or not that's the case. So the take home message

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 5>for me with this is we would maybe have more

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 5>information about this if we did more genomic surveillance, So

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 5>we should really think about finding ways to do that.

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and so you know, in a general sense, where

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 3>do all of these new variants come from.

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 5>They don't come out of thin air. They come from

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 5>the place where all viral variants come from, and that

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 5>is evolution. When RNA viruses, like coronaviruses replicate their genome,

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 5>they usually make mistakes, and that's because the enzyme that

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 5>replicates or copies their genomes essentially makes typos. It's called

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 5>the RNA dependent RNA polymerase or RDRP. Coronaviruses actually have

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 5>an advantage, probably not from an evolutionary standpoint, but it's

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 5>good for us. They have a lower mutation rate than

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 5>many other RNA viruses because even though they're rdrps are

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 5>still very error prone. They have another enzyme that is

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 5>an exonuclease that basically can do partial spell checking essentially,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 5>so it can correct some of the errors that the

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 5>RDRP makes.

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 6>When it copies the genome.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 5>But nonetheless, mutation does occur, and some of those mutants,

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 5>which occur randomly, will be in a place that results

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 5>in some sort of competitive advantage to the virus. Either

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 5>it makes it replicate better, it allows it to enter

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 5>cells more easily, it allows it to evade the immunes

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 5>system more easily. There's a lot of different ways that

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 5>a mutation could have that sort of impact on a virus.

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 5>But if it does give the virus some sort of advantage,

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 5>it's said to be under positive selection. So these new

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 5>variants are the results of basically these mutations being acquired,

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 5>providing some kind of advantage to the virus, and then

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 5>getting passed on because they are under that positive evolutionary selection.

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 5>People ask me a lot, how do we stop the

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 5>virus from mutating? How do we prevent these variants from emerging.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 5>The best way to do that is to keep the

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 5>virus from replicating, and the best way to do that

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 5>is to keep it from finding new hosts to replicate in.

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 5>It all comes back basically to masks and social distancing

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 5>and staying home and washing your hands and avoiding getting

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 5>infected in the first place.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 3>I have a quick question about, going back to B

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 3>one one seven and about the mechanism of transmissibility. How

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 3>much do you think behavior could play a role in that. So,

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 3>for instance, if that variant is less virulent than the

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 3>other circulating more common variants, and that means that potentially

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 3>more people who are infected with it are still walking around,

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe shedding virus asymptomatically and don't know, so could that

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 3>be one of the major drivers of this apparently increased transmissibility.

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 5>It could, and I don't think we have enough data

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 5>to answer that directly, but I'm going to try to

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 5>speculate a little on how behavior might be involved.

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 6>It could be because people.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 5>Are more commonly asymptomatic and infecting people when they don't

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 5>know that they're sick, but that happens for normal variance

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 5>of Stars two as well. It could just be that

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 5>because it's more transmissible. The UK also relaxed some of

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 5>their restrictions in preparation for the holidays, which I think

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 5>is kind of a dumb idea, because if Christmas is

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 5>coming up, the virus doesn't care.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 6>It doesn't take the holidays off.

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 5>So if you relax your restrictions and people think that okay,

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 5>it's safe, like I can get together with my family,

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 5>I can go to work, I can go have dinner

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 5>in a restaurant or a bar or something like that,

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 5>you're in a situation that's going to be more conducive

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 5>to transmission anyways. And if you have a variant that's

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 5>more transmissible, then you're going to see transmission in those

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 5>riskier circumstances increase. And I think that that could explain

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 5>it just as well as anything else. We already know

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 5>that there's a lot of pre symptomatic transmission, and a

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 5>lot of the literature doesn't really distinguish asymptomatic from pre symptomatic.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 5>So there are people who are asymptomatic completely through the

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 5>entire course of their infection, and then there are people

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 5>who are diagnosed while they're asymptomatic, but they later become symptomatic.

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Those people already drive a fair amount of transmission. So

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 5>if people are in a situation where they're more relaxed,

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 5>they're not being as vigilant about these non pharmaceutical interventions

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 5>intended to reduce exposure risk, and you have a more

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 5>transmissible variant added into the equation, and whether they're more

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 5>asymptomatics or not is probably not as relevant as just

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 5>the fact that a situation in which you would have

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 5>maybe had five people get infected now is resulting in

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 5>ten people getting infected.

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that makes sense. So I think one of the

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 4>big questions that a lot of people are concerned about

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 4>with all this talk of new variants is what do

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 4>these new variants mean for the effectiveness of all these

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 4>new vaccines that have been developed, So could you kind

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 4>of explain whether these new vaccines will work against these

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 4>new variants and how.

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so that's really the million dollar question and the

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 5>short answer to that right now is that we don't know,

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 5>but those experiments are in progress, and it's actually fairly

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 5>easy to assess this. Basically, what you do is you

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 5>take plasm or serum, the liquid component of blood which

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 5>has antibodies in it, from somebody who was either vaccinated

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 5>or has recovered from being infected. We call that convalescent

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 5>plasma convalescent serum, and you take that and you incubate

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 5>it with the variants or with another virus that has

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 5>the spike protein from the variants on top of it.

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 6>That's called the pseudovirus.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 5>You take those antibodies and then you take the virus

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 5>and you incubate them together and see if the antibodies

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 5>can still neutralize that virus. So, this variant from the

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 5>UK has I believe seven nucleotide changes, specifically in two

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 5>deletions and the spike protein, and that that could change

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 5>the virus's ability to bind antibodies that were produced for

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 5>the vaccine.

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 6>It also might not.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 5>And one thing that's important I think for people to

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 5>get to keep in mind is that it's very unlikely

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 5>that just a couple of mutations are going to completely

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 5>evail the overall immune response, because with the vaccines are

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 5>made with are they direct antibody responses to the full

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 5>length prefusion spike protein, which is the protein that's on

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 5>the surface of the virus particle. That protein is obviously

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 5>pretty small to us, but it's pretty large to your

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 5>immune system, and different antibodies will bind all over the

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 5>surface of that spike protein. It's thought that the antibodies

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 5>that bind to the specific part of the spike protein

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 5>that binds the receptor, which is called the receptor binding domain,

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 5>are the most neutralizing, meaning that they will be best

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 5>able to render the virus non infectious. But not always virus.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Virus proteins can undergo conformational changes, changes in their shape

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 5>and structure that occur when an antibody binds to a

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 5>different part of the protein. So it's unlikely that you know,

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 5>unless the mutations themselves are inducing sort of radical structural

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 5>changes to the entire protein, that a few mutations are

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 5>going to completely avoid the entire broad repertoire of antibodies

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 5>that are going to be raised against it by your

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 5>immune system. However, ultimately we won't know until we do

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 5>the experiments to actually find out.

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 6>To a certain degree.

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 5>A lot of these mutations that distinguish different variants are

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 5>just kind of like a fingerprint.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 6>They're just mutations that were acquired.

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 5>They don't necessarily offer any type of advantage to the virus,

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 5>but because they're incorporated and they get replicated, they're preserved, so

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 5>you can use them sort of as genetic fingerprints to

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 5>see how a particular variance has evolved if you're doing

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 5>enough sequencing. But they're not always functionally important. The other

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 5>thing people should really keep in mind about this is

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 5>that even if the vaccines are less effective against these variants,

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 5>these vaccine are synthetic and they're easy to change. You

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 5>could make new mRNA vaccines very quickly, and I think

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 5>that it would be very easy to adjust these to

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 5>accommodate for new emergent variants. And over the long term,

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 5>people have asked me, are we going to have to

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 5>keep getting COVID shots over and over again because it's

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 5>like the flu Well, stars coronavirus two is not like influenza, fortunately,

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 5>and there are other reasons why we need to get

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 5>different flu shots every year. First and foremost, because there

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 5>are a lot of different influenza viruses, including strains and

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 5>multiple subtypes that are circulating and they can all reassort

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 5>with each other, which makes things even more complicated. But

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 5>we are aware that we need to make new flu

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 5>shots every year because of this exact issue. So if

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 5>we can do that annually with an inactivated influenza vaccine,

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 5>we can certainly do that, probably less than annually to

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 5>accommodate for evolving stars coronavirus two.

0:35:00.719 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, speaking of the spike protein, what additional things

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 3>have we learned about the structure or surface proteins of

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 3>SARS CoV two that maybe have given us some more

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 3>insight into how it causes disease or some of the

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 3>widespread effects that it has on the body.

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's a good question, and the short answer is

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 5>not that much. Is still a very active area of research.

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 5>But one thing I thought was interesting is that people

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 5>who have more severe disease have been seen to have

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 5>more antibodies to the end protein, which is also another

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 5>viral protein. It's not spike, but it might suggest that

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 5>maybe they're sort of developing different immune responses than people

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 5>who are able to successfully control the infection, in which case,

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 5>many of those antibodies are neutralizing antibodies that are specific

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.120
<v Speaker 5>for the spike protein. And it's not really clear why

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 5>that is. I mean, it could be for a variety

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 5>of reasons. Be because the antibodies targeting end just aren't

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 5>as effective at neutralizing the virus, and so people have

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:10.919
<v Speaker 5>more widespread infections, or it takes them longer to clear

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:15.839
<v Speaker 5>the infection. It could be because that's inducing immune responses

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 5>that are associated with more disease severity rather than with

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 5>virus clearance. So the T cells in your body can

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 5>be polarized. They call it to act in a few

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 5>different ways. Th one polarization is thought to be anti viral.

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 5>So that's basically your T cells saying all right, we're

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 5>going to start telling the B cells to crank out

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 5>a bunch of neutralizing antibodies. We're going to tell the

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 5>CD eight T cells to go out and start killing

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 5>infected cells. We're going to tell the CD four cells

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 5>to start thinking about anti viral immunological memory.

0:36:47.640 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 6>We're going to control inflammation.

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 5>There are other responses that are associated Typically they're supposed

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 5>to be for clearing your body of parasites like worms

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 5>and things like that THH two response that are very

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 5>heavy on antibodies and these other types of specialized immune

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 5>cells called granulocytes, including eosinophils and mass cells, and it's

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 5>thought that airway hyperreactivity can often be the result of

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 5>an inappropriate THH two response to a virus. And that's

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:25.600
<v Speaker 5>a very simplified way of putting a really complicated process.

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 5>But that's just one example of how sometimes the wrong

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 5>type of immune response can lead to more disease severity

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 5>rather than the immune system doing what it's supposed to

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 5>do and clear out the virus. So those anti n

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 5>antibodies have been a hot topic of discussion for that reason,

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 5>just because it's not clear if that's even important, but

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 5>it is an observation that's been made, and it maybe

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 5>explains why some people go on to develop ards or

0:37:54.360 --> 0:37:58.760
<v Speaker 5>acute respiratory distress syndrome that's associated with severe COVID nineteen,

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 5>and why some people have very mild infections that they

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 5>that they can control and clear and and don't have

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 5>any problems with. And then there's the whole issue which

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 5>we still really don't know very much about at all

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 5>of long covid, which is not due to a persistent

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:17.840
<v Speaker 5>infection most likely, but due to sort of a reprogramming

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 5>of inflammatory responses. We don't really know much about what

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 5>causes that, why some people get that and not some

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 5>people don't, why some people get that when they have

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 5>pretty mild disease. So there's a there's a lot that

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 5>we need to do here to look at, you know,

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 5>the types of immune responses. And I realized this doesn't

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 5>have a lot to do with your original question, which

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 5>was what do we know about antibodies to other viral proteins?

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 5>But it may be that responses to other viral proteins

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 5>by your immune system or interactions with the virus can

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 5>determine outcome.

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 4>M HM fascinating. So in terms of kind of transmission,

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:03.439
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a lot of discussion about transmission of

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 4>stars kov two at this point. Is there indication that

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 4>the virus is truly airborne? In terms of transmission, do

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 4>we have any evidence? I know early on there was

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 4>talk of like fecal oral transmission with the diarrhea. Do

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 4>any of these routes seem to be playing a role.

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 6>So by inhalation.

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 5>Definitely, short range transmission by droplets and aerosols is clearly

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 5>an important route of transmission that really drives transmission. This

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 5>has been an incredibly frustrating conversation to have in the

0:39:41.920 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 5>public domain because the term airborne itself, I think, could

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 5>be really confusing for people. In the strictest sense, means

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 5>that the virus is borne by the air and we

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 5>get it from breathing it.

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 6>To some people, that might mean that, oh God.

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 5>It's going to get into the a fac system and

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 5>people are going to be breathing it like from long

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 5>distances away, and you know, is it safe anywhere, because

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 5>we all need to breathe, And the reality is like, yes,

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 5>it's in shared air. So if you're in a room

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 5>with a bunch of people, like say, I don't know,

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:20.879
<v Speaker 5>you got together with your extended family for the holidays,

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 5>and you're all having dinner in your poorly ventilated dining room,

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 5>then yeah, that's going to be a huge risk of

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 5>transmission by inhalation. I don't like calling it airborne though,

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 5>just because a lot of people, I think hear that

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 5>and they think like that seen and outbreak, where Dustin

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 5>Hoffman is like it's gone airborne and like looks up

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 5>at the vents in the hospital and it's not transmitted

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:49.720
<v Speaker 5>that way. There have been a couple reports of people

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 5>in stacked apartment buildings that share plumbing lines having infections.

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 5>They can't rule out infection from congregating, for example, in

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 5>shared spaces in those buildings, but I think that if

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 5>that were happening all the time, we would have a

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 5>lot more people infected, especially in New York. Having lived

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 5>in New York in some terrible apartments, I can guarantee

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 5>that we would have seen COVID spreading like wildfire in

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 5>New York City. In apartment buildings that are sharing sewage

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 5>lines and I'm sure are not perfectly sealed, we would

0:41:32.360 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 5>have been seen a lot more of that. So I

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 5>think that this is opportunistic airborne in that in certain

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 5>circumstances it's very easy to transmit this by inhalation. And

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 5>that really is thinking about shared air. So anytime you're

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 5>in an enclosed space with people who are breathing and

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 5>putting out respiratory droplets and aerosols into the environment, and

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 5>you can breathe them, particularly cumulatively over a period of time,

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 5>that's going to really increase that risk. And that risk,

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 5>of course, can be mitigated by doing things like wearing

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 5>masks to prevent you as source control, to prevent you

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 5>from emitting particles yourself into the environment when you breathe

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 5>or speak.

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 6>It can be mitigated by increasing.

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Ventilation in those enclosed spaces, by avoiding them altogether. It

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 5>can be mitigated by taking it outside where there's obviously

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 5>no enclosures anymore. It cannot be mitigated by taking it

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 5>to like a temporary plastic tent that really closed, that's

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 5>not outside, but it's definitely transmitted by inhalation. I just

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 5>think that the term airborne is not really helping the discussion.

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 5>COVID is transmitted through shared air without a doubt, and

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 5>that's a major mode of transmission, much more than fomites

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:57.800
<v Speaker 5>or contaminated surfaces.

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, now shifting a bit to talk about testing

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 3>for SARS KOV two. Can you walk us through what

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 3>these various test experiences are like.

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.280
<v Speaker 5>The testing that we've had since the beginning of the pandemic.

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 5>The sort of gold standard for diagnostic testing is PCR,

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 5>and this is basically a technique where you take you

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:26.959
<v Speaker 5>essentially are photocopying part of the virus biochemically to see

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 5>if you have it, and if you have it, then

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 5>you will amplify that through the PCR reaction. If you

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 5>have a lot of it to start out with, then

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:38.840
<v Speaker 5>you will develop a signal on that PCR test sooner

0:43:38.880 --> 0:43:41.760
<v Speaker 5>than later. And that's what if you've heard people talking

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 5>about the CT or the cycle threshold value, that's what

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 5>that refers to. So a lower CT, meaning the sooner

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 5>you got to identifying a positive signal with the PCR test,

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 5>the more.

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 6>Virus you had to start out with.

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 5>So that's the gold standard, and that's a very specific test,

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 5>so there's not a lot of false positives, contrary to

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 5>popular belief. Now, the problem with the PCR test is

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:10.880
<v Speaker 5>that it's quite sensitive, but it's not perfectly sensitive. So

0:44:11.040 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 5>if you don't have very much virus, if you just

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 5>were infected, you won't necessarily detect that it'll be a

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:22.680
<v Speaker 5>false negative. Essentially, if you just got over having COVID,

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 5>you might be shedding viral RNA, which is what the

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 5>PCR test detects for a long period of time, and

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 5>that I think is what some people have referred to

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.320
<v Speaker 5>as a false positive. It's not actually a false positive,

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:38.320
<v Speaker 5>because you are detecting a real signal from viral RNA.

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 5>It's just that the PCR test can't test for infectious virus.

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 5>And so it's really important in that regard to have

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 5>an understanding of when you were actually infected, because a

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:55.879
<v Speaker 5>positive test in somebody who's recovered doesn't mean that you're

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 5>actually still infectious over a long period of time, and

0:44:58.400 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 5>that's been shown by multiple streams of experimental evidence and

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:08.240
<v Speaker 5>epidemiological evidence. So that's the PCR test. There are PCR

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 5>tests that you get by the nasopharyngeal swab, which is

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 5>the big long Q tip. Some people are now doing

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 5>those tests with the anteriornaries, which are the nostrils basically only,

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 5>and some people have also developed PCR tests that use saliva,

0:45:25.280 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 5>which are actually more sensitive than the nasopharyngeal swabs, and

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 5>certainly I think probably a more pleasant experience to give us,

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 5>like an example, than to.

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:37.720
<v Speaker 6>Stick a giant key tip of your nose.

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 5>So those are all the PCR tests, the so called

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:47.399
<v Speaker 5>high complexity molecular diagnostics. Now you probably have also heard

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 5>about the rapid tests, or sometimes they're called antigen tests,

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 5>and these are tests that are looking for the viral

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 5>proteins what are called antigens, So the antigen test detect

0:45:59.239 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 5>the viral protein.

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:02.399
<v Speaker 6>There are a couple of different ways that they can

0:46:02.480 --> 0:46:02.839
<v Speaker 6>do that.

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.919
<v Speaker 5>There's some other rapid tests and development too, LAMP, which

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 5>is a rapid nucleic acid amplification method that looks at RNA,

0:46:13.000 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 5>it just doesn't go through the whole PCR cycling process.

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 6>Some people have developed a test.

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 5>That has not been authorized yet but that uses crisper

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:26.279
<v Speaker 5>technology to look for viral genetic material. But the main

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:29.799
<v Speaker 5>tests that are available now are the PCR test and

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 5>then these rapid tests that look for antigen in a

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:35.719
<v Speaker 5>very short period of time. The main disadvantages to the

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 5>rapid tests is that they are for diagnostics anyways, They're

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 5>less sensitive than the PCR tests, and they're also less specific.

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 6>They are more likely to give you a false positive.

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 5>There's been some controversy about this because some people have

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 5>proposed using rapid antigen testing daily so that people can

0:46:54.800 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 5>monitor their own status. And I think that there is

0:46:57.760 --> 0:46:59.759
<v Speaker 5>a place for that, and this is where we're getting

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:02.920
<v Speaker 5>into just my opinion, but I don't think it replaces

0:47:03.440 --> 0:47:07.440
<v Speaker 5>molecular diagnostics or PCR testing. I think people should have

0:47:07.520 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 5>the ability to test themselves, but they should also have

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 5>clear guidance for what to do, and that is they

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 5>should call their doctor, make sure that their case can

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 5>be reported, and then make sure that they have all

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 5>the information and support that they need to actually isolate

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 5>themselves and put contact traces in contact with people that

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 5>they have then and you know, in close physical proximity

0:47:26.840 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 5>with recently to make sure that those people can quarantine

0:47:29.840 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 5>and get access to testing as well.

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So our last question is is pretty general, and

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 3>that is, so, what do you think this pandemic has

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 3>taught us about virology, whether that's you know, virologists working together,

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 3>or communication about virology, or anything specific related to stars

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Kobe two, what do you think this pandemic has taught

0:47:52.960 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 3>us about the field of virology?

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:47:55.560 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 5>God, Well, it's taught me that there's a lot of

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 5>people who are not virilogists who think that they are.

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 5>It's also taught me that people, including very educated people,

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 5>including some of my colleagues.

0:48:13.320 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's really been telling Like it's brought out.

0:48:16.239 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 5>I think in some people the worst in people, and

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 5>it's brought out in others the best in people, and

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 5>It's really taught me that in general, scientists and our

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 5>society human beings keep making the same mistakes over and

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 5>over again. And I've seen that in so many ways,

0:48:33.120 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 5>like I keep having to explain the same concepts to people,

0:48:37.680 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 5>I keep having to debunk the same misinformation, and I

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:44.320
<v Speaker 5>think that's because to some degree, people don't actually want

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:48.799
<v Speaker 5>to learn. We live like in a world right now

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 5>where people they want facts, they want them immediately, and

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 5>if those facts aren't there, which in science is usually

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:58.520
<v Speaker 5>the case. You know, we are as scientists are trained

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:00.359
<v Speaker 5>to say this is very uncertain.

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 6>We don't know. It may be this, it may be

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 6>that in general.

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 5>People have very little patience for that now, and it

0:49:09.400 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 5>can be very very difficult to communicate that, you know,

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 5>we don't know this right now. Here's some of the possibilities.

0:49:15.920 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 5>We're looking into it. We'll let you know as soon

0:49:18.360 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 5>as we find out. But people want things now, and

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 5>it's been very surprising to me to see how that

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 5>vacuum has been filled for me. It's certainly taught me

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:32.799
<v Speaker 5>that the way that I was trained to do virology

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 5>through analyzing data, developing hypotheses and testing them and then

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 5>if they're wrong, revising my hypotheses and testing those new

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:46.040
<v Speaker 5>ones is still the correct way to do that. But

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 5>I've learned that I really have a long way to go,

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 5>as do most of my colleagues in communicating that uncertainty

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 5>to people. It's taken me a lot of experimentation, and

0:49:56.120 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 5>I still haven't got it right in terms of how

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 5>I communicate. You know, like we don't know if antibodies

0:50:02.280 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 5>are going to work against these new variants that are merging.

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 5>For example, I can tell you how we'll go about

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:10.560
<v Speaker 5>looking into that. I can tell you, I can teach

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:15.319
<v Speaker 5>you all about the spike protein and antibody binding and

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 5>how the immune system works. Although still the the immune

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 5>system is like the most complicated thing in the world.

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 5>So I think we've all learned that even though we

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:26.840
<v Speaker 5>already knew it. But you know, it's really really hard

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:31.280
<v Speaker 5>for me to communicate to people that there's still probably

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:32.919
<v Speaker 5>going to be a lot of knowledge.

0:50:32.560 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 6>Gaps even after we do this one critical.

0:50:34.680 --> 0:50:37.759
<v Speaker 5>Experiment, even after this one paper comes out in this

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 5>big elite journal, there's still going to be a lot

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 5>of things that we don't know. And I think the

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 5>real challenge that all of us have faced from you

0:50:46.880 --> 0:50:50.279
<v Speaker 5>know an individual like me all the way to like

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:54.360
<v Speaker 5>the New England Journal of Medicine, is that sometimes getting

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:57.840
<v Speaker 5>an answer fast is not the same and it's not good.

0:50:58.200 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 5>That maybe we should figure out a way to communicate

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:03.680
<v Speaker 5>to people like we should slow down, we should take

0:51:03.680 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 5>our time with this because it's too important to get wrong.

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:09.000
<v Speaker 5>It kind of does matter if that answer is the

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 5>right one or if it's based in evidence. But for me, anyways,

0:51:14.120 --> 0:51:17.399
<v Speaker 5>the most important thing I've learned, I think, is that

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 5>we were not only unprepared, grossly unprepared to deal with

0:51:22.880 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 5>the generational pandemic even though we knew what was coming,

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 5>but we were also grossly unprepared to engage the public

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 5>in fighting it. And that's something that absolutely has to change,

0:51:35.640 --> 0:51:37.920
<v Speaker 5>and that's something that I'm probably going to be thinking

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 5>about for the entire rest of my career, if not

0:51:41.480 --> 0:52:15.239
<v Speaker 5>the rest of my life.

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so so much, Angie, doctor Rasmusen for coming

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 4>on and talking with us again. I learned so much

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:27.880
<v Speaker 4>from this episode, so as always in this series, we

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 4>want to go back and cover the top five things

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:31.240
<v Speaker 4>that we learned.

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Aaron, Yes, we'll start with number one. All viruses mutate

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 3>basically random mutations can happen every time a virus replicates,

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and those mutations are what can lead to new strains,

0:52:46.280 --> 0:52:49.719
<v Speaker 3>or rather new variants, and so it's completely normal and

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:53.319
<v Speaker 3>expected that a virus, and especially an RNA virus, will

0:52:53.320 --> 0:52:56.920
<v Speaker 3>have multiple variants. It's something that we were all expecting.

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:00.680
<v Speaker 3>And in the case of coronaviruses like SARS Kobe two,

0:53:00.800 --> 0:53:03.919
<v Speaker 3>the mutation rate actually isn't as high as we see

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 3>in some other RNA viruses like influenza, and that's a

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:09.480
<v Speaker 3>good thing. It means that it doesn't change as quickly

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 3>or as dramatically, and so while we have seen a

0:53:12.440 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 3>number of different variants pop up and spread across the globe,

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 3>these variants represent very small changes in the virus genome

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 3>and they aren't drastically different viruses. Many of these mutations,

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 3>in fact, mean nothing at all really biologically, and have

0:53:27.000 --> 0:53:31.319
<v Speaker 3>no biological implications. We have, however, seen that at least

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 3>one variant, the so called B one one seven, which

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 3>is the one currently making headlines, does seem to be

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 3>more transmissible than other variants, but we still don't know

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 3>the precise mechanism for this apparent increased transmissibility, and at

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 3>least some of its rise in prevalence could be due

0:53:48.040 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 3>to the lowering of restrictions on things like public gathering

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:53.400
<v Speaker 3>and indoor dining and so on that led to just

0:53:53.520 --> 0:53:57.840
<v Speaker 3>a whole lot more transmission in general. Unfortunately, this B

0:53:57.960 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 3>one one seven variant, and actually other variants so far

0:54:01.719 --> 0:54:05.320
<v Speaker 3>observed don't appear to be associated with more severe disease.

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 3>But the bottom line is that we also probably aren't

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:13.399
<v Speaker 3>doing enough surveillance overall to know for sure exactly how

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:16.320
<v Speaker 3>many variants there are, or whether some are more virulent

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 3>than others, meaning more likely to cause severe disease. So

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:23.760
<v Speaker 3>the big question is how do we stop this process

0:54:23.800 --> 0:54:27.000
<v Speaker 3>of mutation of new variants emerging? I mean, and we

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:30.120
<v Speaker 3>can't stop it, but we can slow it down. We

0:54:30.160 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 3>can slow it down by reducing transmission. Fewer new hosts

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:37.120
<v Speaker 3>for the virus means less replication and thus fewer opportunities

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:39.240
<v Speaker 3>for new variants to arise and spread.

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Exactly Number two. The question of will these new variants

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 4>affect how effective the vaccines that we have will be,

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 4>And the truth is we don't one hundred percent know. However,

0:54:56.640 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 4>it is highly unlikely that the small changes in the

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 4>these new variants will mean that the vaccines that we

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:06.320
<v Speaker 4>have are not effective. So we learned in our vaccines

0:55:06.360 --> 0:55:11.080
<v Speaker 4>episode that the mRNA based vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna,

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:14.880
<v Speaker 4>as well as the viral vector vaccine that's produced by Astrozenica,

0:55:15.400 --> 0:55:19.840
<v Speaker 4>all encode the entirety of that spike protein. That's the

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 4>protein that SARS CoV two uses to actually enter our cells.

0:55:24.280 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 4>So when you get vaccinated and your body starts producing

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:31.879
<v Speaker 4>this spike protein, you then start making antibodies against it,

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 4>a whole bunch of them, which target multiple parts of

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:38.440
<v Speaker 4>that protein. And the spike protein, it turns out, is

0:55:38.480 --> 0:55:41.680
<v Speaker 4>a pretty large protein. It's like over twelve hundred amino

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 4>acids long. And the changes that we're seeing in these

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:49.040
<v Speaker 4>viral variants are super small. In the case of B

0:55:49.160 --> 0:55:53.000
<v Speaker 4>one one seven, we're talking twenty three nucleic acids out

0:55:53.000 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 4>of their whole genome. Not all of those twenty three

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 4>changes are in that particular spike protein. So while it

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:05.399
<v Speaker 4>is possible that small changes can affect vaccine effectiveness, it

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 4>is overall unlikely. But that's probably not super reassuring to

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people. So we do have two other

0:56:13.520 --> 0:56:17.000
<v Speaker 4>better pieces of news that we learned. People are doing

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 4>the research to answer this exact question of vaccine effectiveness

0:56:21.800 --> 0:56:26.360
<v Speaker 4>as we speak. So that's awesome. And now that we

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 4>have this vaccine technology, it's not going to be difficult

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 4>in the future to make small changes as necessary to

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 4>these vaccines going forward to make them effective against new variants.

0:56:38.080 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 4>In fact, in the case of mRNA vaccines, is actually

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:44.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot easier to produce new proteins or new mRNA

0:56:44.800 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 4>than it would be to produce a new entire whole

0:56:47.719 --> 0:56:51.480
<v Speaker 4>killed viral vaccine like we already do every year for influenza,

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:52.160
<v Speaker 4>for example.

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's really important and pretty reassuring.

0:56:56.200 --> 0:56:58.319
<v Speaker 4>I feel very reassuring. Yeah.

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Number three, we learned that the term airborne gets confusing

0:57:02.680 --> 0:57:05.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's probably not the best term to use in general.

0:57:05.880 --> 0:57:08.319
<v Speaker 3>But what we do know is that for sars KOV two,

0:57:08.560 --> 0:57:13.040
<v Speaker 3>inhalation of viral particles is still the driving factor behind transmission,

0:57:13.880 --> 0:57:16.240
<v Speaker 3>and that means that any place where you are sharing

0:57:16.280 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 3>air with other people, like in a restaurant or a bar,

0:57:19.520 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 3>on a plane, or at your Aunt Judy's house, you

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:26.439
<v Speaker 3>have a risk of transmission and ways to mitigate this risk.

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, we've covered them over and over again, but

0:57:30.600 --> 0:57:34.560
<v Speaker 3>just to reiterate. That includes wearing a mask, increasing ventilation,

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:38.880
<v Speaker 3>being outside being further apart. But if you are in

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 3>shared air, whether inside a building or inside a plastic

0:57:41.960 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 3>tent outside at a restaurant, distance alone does not cut

0:57:46.800 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 3>it because you are still sharing air. Overall, other forms

0:57:50.880 --> 0:57:54.400
<v Speaker 3>of transmission, like from surfaces or fomites or fecal oral

0:57:54.440 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 3>transmission don't seem to be big drivers of virus transmission,

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:01.840
<v Speaker 3>which is great news. But that doesn't mean that if

0:58:01.880 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 3>you rub your nose and then shake someone else's hand

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 3>and then they touch their nose, that they can't get

0:58:06.320 --> 0:58:09.360
<v Speaker 3>infected through that root. So that's why we still have

0:58:09.440 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 3>to wash our hands and not touch our faces when

0:58:11.760 --> 0:58:14.440
<v Speaker 3>we can help it. It's the Swiss cheese approach all

0:58:14.480 --> 0:58:17.600
<v Speaker 3>over again. The more layers of protection you have, both

0:58:17.640 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 3>literally and figuratively, the lower the risk of transmission.

0:58:21.480 --> 0:58:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Also, does anyone shake hands anymore? I feel like

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:26.080
<v Speaker 4>that's we're never going to shake hands again.

0:58:26.320 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 3>I yeah, I'm okay with that.

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:29.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm okay with it.

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:58:29.960 --> 0:58:31.880
<v Speaker 4>I have a fan of the elbow bump. I don't know.

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like just the wave.

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Number four, So we learned a lot about the

0:58:38.440 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 4>difference between PCR based tests which are looking for viral RNA,

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:46.160
<v Speaker 4>and then the rapid tests, which are detecting antigen and

0:58:46.320 --> 0:58:50.440
<v Speaker 4>are overall less sensitive and specific than the PCR based tests.

0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:53.440
<v Speaker 4>We also learned that these at home tests that have

0:58:53.520 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 4>recently been approved are these antigen based tests, and while

0:58:57.720 --> 0:59:00.320
<v Speaker 4>they are excellent in a number of ways, we do

0:59:00.400 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 4>need to make sure that there's really good communication and

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 4>guidance around what to do with the information that these

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:11.240
<v Speaker 4>tests provide. Right now, that guidance is severely lacking, and

0:59:11.360 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 4>without it, wide implementation of at home testing with rapid

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:19.560
<v Speaker 4>tests could really backfire. False negatives and false positives are

0:59:19.600 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 4>possible with any test, but a positive test really needs

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 4>to be followed up in some way, and we need

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 4>to have guidance or some sort of protocol as to

0:59:28.840 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 4>exactly how to follow up if we're going to be

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:31.919
<v Speaker 4>using these tests at home.

0:59:32.280 --> 0:59:32.680
<v Speaker 6>M hmm.

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And number five are last point, and this point

0:59:38.120 --> 0:59:41.880
<v Speaker 3>seems to be a highly recurring theme in these COVID

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:43.160
<v Speaker 3>nineteen episodes.

0:59:43.520 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 4>The number one theme of these episodes yep.

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's been in every episode so far, but

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 3>that just underlines how important this particular theme is and

0:59:53.200 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 3>that is communication. Communication during a pandemic is hard, but

0:59:58.720 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 3>it's also essential in this country, especially in the US,

1:00:03.280 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 3>but truly around the globe. We need to be able

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:11.120
<v Speaker 3>to communicate truthfully and directly among scientists, public health professionals,

1:00:11.160 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 3>healthcare workers, and communities. And one of the biggest challenges

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:18.560
<v Speaker 3>we've faced in this pandemic is how we communicate uncertainty.

1:00:19.320 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 3>So much of this last year has been uncertain and

1:00:23.280 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 3>the scientific process works to wade through uncertainty to find answers,

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:30.000
<v Speaker 3>but it takes time, and this pandemic is one of

1:00:30.040 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 3>the first times that a lot of people have gotten

1:00:32.240 --> 1:00:35.959
<v Speaker 3>a front row seat as to how slowly and incrementally

1:00:36.200 --> 1:00:39.720
<v Speaker 3>knowledge can grow and how rarely things in science seem

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:43.040
<v Speaker 3>black and white. We don't know all of the answers

1:00:43.040 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 3>when we start the process, and jumping to conclusions either

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>discarding or disseminating information early without evidence just makes everything

1:00:51.360 --> 1:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>more confusing in the long run. It's hopefully something we

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>can learn from moving forward, how to better communicate this

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>process and the uncertainty surrounding it to the wider public.

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, big time. Yeah, we're learning as we go.

1:01:05.800 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh yes, thank you again so much, Doctor Rasmussen. Angie like,

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:13.680
<v Speaker 3>we're we're all friends and I right, we're best friends.

1:01:13.840 --> 1:01:18.240
<v Speaker 4>We're gonna go to a Zoom happy hour eventually.

1:01:18.440 --> 1:01:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yes, thanks again for taking time out of your

1:01:22.880 --> 1:01:26.720
<v Speaker 3>busy schedule. We love chatting with you, and your explanations

1:01:26.760 --> 1:01:30.760
<v Speaker 3>are so great and like easily understandable. It's fantastic.

1:01:31.280 --> 1:01:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Also, if you want even more detail about the

1:01:35.160 --> 1:01:38.080
<v Speaker 4>variants of sars Kov two that have been all over

1:01:38.120 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 4>the news, Angie wrote a really awesome article in The

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Guardian that we will link to in our show notes

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:47.040
<v Speaker 4>and on the website that explains these variants in a

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of detail, and also talks about why things like

1:01:49.880 --> 1:01:53.480
<v Speaker 4>travel bands aren't effective in stopping the spread of new variants.

1:01:53.680 --> 1:01:54.680
<v Speaker 4>It's definitely worth a read.

1:01:55.120 --> 1:01:55.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:01:55.400 --> 1:01:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, thank you to Bloodmobile for providing the music for

1:01:59.840 --> 1:02:02.600
<v Speaker 3>this episode and all of our episodes.

1:02:02.480 --> 1:02:05.160
<v Speaker 4>And thank you to Exactly Right Network, of whom we

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 4>are proud to be a member.

1:02:07.280 --> 1:02:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and thank you to you listeners for listening. We

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 3>appreciate it. Send us your COVID questions whatever we can

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:16.439
<v Speaker 3>these things going.

1:02:16.920 --> 1:02:19.960
<v Speaker 4>We really have a lot more in the works and mine.

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:25.040
<v Speaker 3>We do all right. Well, until next time, wash your

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>hands

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:26.960
<v Speaker 4>You filthy animals,